Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
162
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
paolone ET AL
163
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
CLINICAL RESEARCH
164
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
paolone ET AL
shade guides
The majority of the shade guides by com-
Prefabricated shade guides posite manufacturers are made of plas-
tic. Few are made of composite. Some
All the concerns exposed concerning systems provide a ceramic shade guide.
the naming of composite masses may Other systems are “paper” shade guides.
be eased using a composite system in Analyzing the shank of the specimens,
which a fine and understandable shade there was metal, plastic and shankless
guide is provided. (for the stick-shaped and paper speci-
For example, if the ‘A2’ dentin of a mens).
composite system does not match at all As for the thickness and the shape of
with the Vita shade guide but the com- the specimens, there was also a vast va-
pany provides a reliable shade guide, riety. Many had the color “painted” on a
color selection should not be an issue. plastic stand (Figs 3 and 4), and this re-
How reliable are shade guides pro- sults in the lack of thickness of the speci-
vided by the companies for their com- men; others have the shape of a com-
posite systems? Unfortunately, they plete crown of a central incisor, although
often are not.23-25 If the shade guides they are exclusively dentin shades.
that exist today on the market are ana- One shade guide had the upper cen-
lyzed, an enormous variety is revealed tral incisor shape and every specimen
(Fig 2). (Fig 5) was the result of a hypothetical
All the shade guides that were ana- stratification of a body, a dentin and an
lyzed were dissimilar from the others. enamel mass, but no information was
165
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
CLINICAL RESEARCH
Fig 5 This shade guide is a result of a theoretical Fig 6 Plastic specimens with different thickness-
stratification, but there are no indications on thick- es.
ness for each layer.
166
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
paolone ET AL
Fig 7 Dentin specimens made in ceramic. Fig 8 Enamel and opalescent specimens of the
same shade guide as Fig 7.
Fig 9 This shade guide is in composite and allows Fig 10 Tapered composite tabs both for dentin
the snap-on of enamels on dentins. and enamel.
Fig 11 In this shade guide dentin specimens Fig 12 Enamel and opalescent specimens for the
have variable thickness. same composite system as Fig 11 have the same
dentin thickness.
167
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
CLINICAL RESEARCH
168
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
paolone ET AL
169
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
CLINICAL RESEARCH
3.5 mm
Fig 19 The micrometer is opened once again and Fig 20 The thimble is twisted once again in order
the enamel composite is placed on one of the sides to close the micrometer until the value of 3.5 mm is
of the dentin disc. In this example an opaque high read.
value mass has been chosen for didactic purposes.
Fig 21 After enamel curing, the micrometer is Fig 22 The specimen is ready, it can be polished
opened in order to remove the specimen. and glued on a stand (eg, on a Microbrush, Micro-
brush International).
170
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
paolone ET AL
Fig 24 Enamel composite is placed and spread Fig 25 The positive portion is then coupled apply-
on the negative portion. ing a gentle constant pressure in order to make the
enamel excesses flow away through the four vents
created on the negative impression.
Fig 26 Once the two portions are coupled, we Fig 27 The enamel “shell.”
must check that the flask remains closed by itself,
therefore assuring that the material is correctly dis-
tributed. Light curing is then performed through the
transparent portion.
shape of the dentinal body and is made Specimens can be obtained using
of transparent and soft silicon. Making a enamel and dentin masses from the
specimen is quite simple, as described same composite systems or mixing
in Figs 24 to 27. masses from various composite brands.
The enamel layer has different enamel In this way, it is possible to understand
thicknesses: the producer indicates an the response of different materials. More
0.2 mm thickness in the cervical third, an elaborated inverse layering techniques
0.5 mm thickness in the middle and an can be performed, adding a variety of
0.7 mm thickness in the incisal portion colors for special cases.
(Fig 28).
171
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
CLINICAL RESEARCH
Fig 29 Initial situation. Fig 30 Shade selection with a shade guide made
of the same composite in which the restoration will
be made. Natural gray background may help color
matching.
172
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
paolone ET AL
Fig 31 Checking the silicone index. Fig 32 Layering interproximal walls.
Fig 33 Final result right after dental dam removal. Fig 34 Final result after rehydration.
Fig 35 Color matching with polarization. Fig 36 Color matching with flash light.
173
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
CLINICAL RESEARCH
174
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
paolone ET AL
ENAMEL plus
GDF GmbH GE1 0.32 0.04 0.28 0.35
HFO
Filtek Supreme
3M ESPE A2 ENAMEL 0.30 0.03 0.28 0.33
XTE
Coltène
Miris 2 NT 0.38 0.02 0.35 0.39*
Whaledent
ENAMEL plus
GDF GmbH UE1 0.32 0.02 0.31 0.34
HRi
Kerr
Herculite Ultra XL 0.29 0.03 0.26 0.32
Corporation
Heraeus Kulzer
Venus Diamond CL 0.30 0.05 0.25 0.35
GmbH
Tokuyama
Estelite Σ Quick BW 0.30 0.01 0.29 0.31
Dental Corp.
* t-test P = 0.034
enamel shells that represent the speci- After 30 min, a small amount of ma-
men of this study. terial was taken from the heated syringe
A standardized protocol has been and spread on to the white part of the
used to produce every specimen. Every mold with a rounded obturator in order
composite was placed in a composite to provide a uniform material thickness.
heater conditioner (Fig 38) (CHC, Com- The two parts of the mold were coupled
posite Heating Conditioner, Micerium). and a little pressure was applied for 3 s
175
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
CLINICAL RESEARCH
Fig 40 A stable and reliable template was used to measure every specimen in the same point.
in the middle of the transparent portion template was made in composite (M7
following the manufacturer’s instruc- CeramX, Dentsply) layered and cured
tions, while the mold was placed on a on the “buccal” portion of a specimen
laboratory dental vibrator (Vibrax 230V, isolated with Vaseline.
Renfert) running at a low frequency.
The mold was checked to see if the
two parts had been joined perfectly. Results
The procedure was repeated until cou-
pling was considered satisfactory, mak- Table 1 shows the mean changes (plus
ing sure that every side of the mold was standard deviations and minimum and
“closed.” maximum) in cervical measurements,
A curing light was then applied in the showing that no significant differences
middle of the transparent portion of the were observed (all P > 0.05), except
mold for 80 s in order to cure the com- for one composite (Miris 2, P = 0.034).
posite. After this, the mold was opened Table 2 shows no significant differenc-
and the shell was cured for another 40 s. es across the measurements taken at
The enamel shells were carefully re- the middle area. Table 3 shows that no
moved from the white portion of the mold. significant differences were observed
In order to measure the specimens’ when the measurements were taken at
thickness, a point micrometer was used the incisal area (all P > 0.05), except for
(SMPC25, Alpa). Every specimen was two composites (Enamel plus HRi, P =
produced by a single operator, who pro- 0.019; Renamel Microfill, P = 0.020).
duced three specimens (enamel shells)
for every composite.
Every specimen was measured Discussion
(Fig 39) in the cervical, middle and in-
cisal areas in order to evaluate their Both the null hypothesis were accepted,
thickness. As a means to measure every while all the specimens demonstrated
specimen in the same point, a stable and comparable enamel shell measure-
reliable template was used (Fig 40). This ments in all the examined areas.
176
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
paolone ET AL
ENAMEL plus HFO GDF GmbH GE1 0.52 0.06 0.47 0.58
ENAMEL plus HRi GDF GmbH UE1 0.51 0.02 0.49 0.52
IPS Empress Direct Ivoclar Vivadent Enamel D3 0.48 0.05 0.44 0.54
Heraeus Kulzer
Venus Diamond CL 0.55 0.06 0.47 0.59
GmbH
Tokuyama Dental
Estelite Σ Quick BW 0.52 0.02 0.5 0.53
Corp.
White
SYNERGY D6 Coltène Whaledent 0.52 0.06 0.46 0.57
Opalescent
Renamel Microfill DeltaMed GmbH Incisal Medium 0.51 0.02 0.49 0.53
177
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
CLINICAL RESEARCH
ENAMEL plus HFO GDF GmbH GE1 0.69 0.04 0.65 0.73
ENAMEL plus HRi GDF GmbH UE1 0.76 0.02 0.75 0.78*
IPS Empress Direct Ivoclar Vivadent Enamel D3 0.66 0.02 0.65 0.69
Heraeus Kulzer
Venus Diamond CL 0.72 0.03 0.69 0.75
GmbH
Tokuyama Dental
Estelite Σ Quick BW 0.72 0.05 0.69 0.78
Corp.
White
SYNERGY D6 Coltène Whaledent 0.74 0.05 0.68 0.78
Opalescent
Incisal
Renamel Microfill DeltaMed GmbH 0.74 0.01 0.73 0.75**
Medium
178
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
paolone ET AL
179
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014
CLINICAL RESEARCH
180
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 2 • SUMMER 2014