Revision Date: Project No: DISC: Activity:

6/4/2013
Revision: Start Date: Finish Date: Duration: Responsibility:
Resource (labour) Man-Hours Rate Cost(AUD$) Resource (non-labour) Cost(AUD$)
Senior Engineer 56
Principal Engineer 21
Total Labour 77 $0 Total Non-Labour $0
Total Activity Cost $0
Project Manager Approval: Date: Client Approval: Date:
Report Date: 26/02/2007 9:29:32 AM
16
Limitations:
1) No contigency is provided in this estimate. It is essential that the Project allocates appropriate contigency to project estimates,
(typically ranging between 0-20%).
Confidentiality
This document has been prepared for the sole purpose of documenting our proposal for consultancy services associated with this CTR.
It is expected that this document and its contents, including work scope, methodology and commercial terms will be treated in strict confidence by the Cutomer and
that the contents will be used by the Customer only for the purpose of selecting a consultant for the project.
1) Engineering Supervision & Coordination
a) Deliverable controls - start-up/close-out files, documents, registers, transmittals, progress reporting
b) Carry-out desktop risk assesment & site-based JSA
c) Site Visit
d) Evaluate & prepare survey information, existing drawings, documentation.
4
Deliverables:
1) Structural Survey / Condition Assessment Report (1 off)
2) Report
a) Compile, back-engineer & issue report
b) Quality Control - Independant checking, back checking and approval
Tasks & Deliverables: State hours per deliverable (Eng & Des) Engg Hrs
21
4
1
8
4
56
40
Exclusions:
1) Team Meetings
2) Inductions
3) Accomodation, Meal & Travel Expenses - Allowances to be made by Project.
4) Development of Risk Matrix
5) Attending Site Inductions
6) Obtaining necessary permits
7) Provision of special PPE.
8) Report issued once only.
9) Drafting
10) Provision of equipment (i.e. EWP, Ladder etc)
11) Isolation of services
12) Core drilling or material testing
13) Condition Assessment of adjoining plant/building/structures
14) Roof or underground cavity inspections.
15) No allowance for more than one return trip.
401010-00011 - 3Z0002B Structural Engineering 2S1001A
B TBA TBA 15 Business Days Sam Akritidis
Title: Cracker Cooling Fin Fan Support Structure - Condition Assessment
The Customer Location Refinery is evaluating the cost of carrying out a Condition Assessment of the Cracker Cooling Fin
Fan support steelwork. The support structure is 4 stories high, and has a plan area of approximately 35m x 15m (525m2 per
level).
Scope:
This CTR sheet is for the Structural Engineering services to carry-out the following:
a) The survey will comprise of a non-destructive walkthrough visual survey of the building and suroundings, readily
accesible on foot.
b) Compile Structural Survey report, documenting the damage, defect & deterioration identified during the survey, a Risk
Assessment carried-out on each defect, and a recommended Risk Response.
Important Note:
Following on from the Walk-through visual survey, will be recommendations or Immediate Actions, depending on the nature of the
observation.
Typical recommendations include ultrasonic testing of welds to confirm integrity, thickness testing of corroded plates and sections,
comments on whether to restrict access in an area, recommendations on whether to carry-out physical rectification work etc.
Applicable References: (International/National Regulations, Standards, Codes of Practice, Guidelines etc)
1) Customer Location Refinery Specifications
2) NCC 2012 (formerly BCA)
3) AS 1170 (Parts 0, 1, 2 & 4)
4) AS 4100 - Steel Structures
5) AS ISO 13822 - Assessment of Existing Structures
Inputs:
1) All existing documents & detail drawings of the Cracker Cooler Fin Fan support structure, existing services and any plant
located within the area.
2) Existing 3D Model (in Autocad or PDMS format) of the structure, if available.
3) Risk Assessment Matrix and Risk Categories for Customer Location Refinery
Assumptions:
1) The Survey will take one day.
2) The customer will provide any required site supervision.
3) NO working from heights required.
4) All necessary permits will be arranged by the Customer (Camera use necessary).
5) As site services will not be isolated, a risk assessment will be performed and plan established for how to execute the survey safely
6) The proposed surveys will be non-destructive with observations based on walkthrough. No specific access equipment
(ladders,EWP's etc) are envisaged. Any special PEP (Gas masks, chemical suits etc) will be provided by the customer.
Project Title: Cracking Cooler Fin Fan
Project No: 401004-00011
Cost, Time, Resource Sheet
Revision Date: Project No: DISC: Activity:
6/4/2013
Revision: Start Date: Finish Date: Duration: Responsibility:
Engg Hrs Draft Hrs
Coordination & Supervision (All stages) 10 6
10 6
2 2
4 4
2
2
STAGE 1 - Quantitative Structural Assessment 40 2
40 2
4 2
6
1
16
4
1
8
STAGE 2 - Concept Design & Development - Strengthening & Modifications 32 48
28 16
16 16
12
4 32
2 16
2 16
STAGE 3 - Detail Design & Development - Strengthening & Modifications 84 76
70
8
8
20
14
4
16
14 76
4 16
2 24
8 20
16
TOTALS 166 132
Resource (labour) Man-Hours Rate Cost(AUD$) Resource (non-labour) Cost(AUD$)
Senior Engineer 136
Principal Engineer 30
Senior Designer 110
Lead Designer 22
Total Labour 298 $0 Total Non-Labour $0
Total Activity Cost $0
Project Manager Approval: Date: Client Approval: Date:
Report Date: 26/02/2007 9:29:32 AM
Limitations:
1) No contigency is provided in this estimate. It is essential that the Project allocates appropriate contigency to project
estimates, (typically ranging between 0-20%).
1) Calculation - Quantitative assessment of grating and secondary support structure
a) Obtain & review existing documents & drawings, & identify load paths and critical checks.
b) Assess load configurations and define load combinations
c) Assess grating reliability
d) Assess secondary structure members and connections
e) Compile calculation & back engineer
f) Compile and Issue Email outlining the findings of the Stage 1 assessment
g) Quality Control - Independant checking & approval of calculation and email.
Confidentiality
This document has been prepared for the sole purpose of documenting our proposal for consultancy services associated with this CTR.
It is expected that this document and its contents, including work scope, methodology and commercial terms will be treated in strict confidence by the
Cutomer and that the contents will be used by the Customer only for the purpose of selecting a consultant for the project.
Project Title: Cracking Cooler Fin Fan
Project No: 401004-00011
Cost, Time, Resource Sheet
Title: Cracker Cooling Fans - Structure Assessment and Strengthening - Option 1 (Existing Maintenance Method)
The Customer Location Refinery is evaluating the cost of improving the reliability of existing structure, and the
safety of the maintenance process when servicing the Cracker Cooling Fin Fan motors. Specifically, for the Motor
removal procedure remaining unchanged, carry-out a quantitative structural assessment of the existing grating &
secondary members, specify grating and design new members or strengthening requirements that are predicted.
(Refer to email dated 28/05/2013 from Peter Llewellyn to Barry Collins)
Scope:
This CTR sheet is a Select Phase (+\- 35%) man-hour estimate for the Detail Design services of engineering & design of
Option 1 (for the existing maintenance strategy), to carry-out the following:
a) Assess the reliability of the existing grating
b) Assess the reliability of the secondary support structure, & primary support structure (as necessary).
c) Specify grating of satisfactory reliability.
d) Design existing member strengthening (including new members and connections, as required).
Important Note:
It is recommended that a staged approach is adopted, where the Customer and Site Project representatives are engaged at
the conclusion of the initial assessments, to discuss findings and evaluate strengthening options, prior to proceeding into the
Detail Design of strengthening & modifications.
Tasks & Deliverables: State hours per deliverable (Eng &Des)
Inputs:
1) All relevant existing documents & drawings of existing structures, services and plant located within the area, to
allow for accurate set-out & design.
2) Relevant Customer Location Refinery Specifications
3) Structural survey data verifying RL's and geometry of existing infrastructure.
4) Existing 3D Model (in Autocad or PDMS format) of the structure, if available.
The following inputs will be required during the design period:
5) Review Email and authorise conceptual work (Stage 1)
6) Approval of concept design (at the end of Stage 2)
7) Client Review of Drawings with comments & approvals (prior to construction issue in Stage 3)
Assumptions:
1) The materials will be painted/coated in accordance with customer's specifications, and that customer's specifications
provide for sufficient durability.
2) Structure Condition Assessment will be carried-out as part of a different CTR sheet, prior to this work's proceeding.
3) Trolley mass (with motor) is 800kg, as defined in email dated 28/05/2013 from Peter Llewellyn.
4) Cooler motor weight is 600kg.
5) Assessment criteria to be develop and approved by WP & the customer prior to commencement of Stage 1 works.
6) Stage 2 work involves the development of a single concept that is submitted to the customer for approval.
Applicable References: (International/National Regulations, Standards, Codes of Practice, Guidelines etc)
1) Customer Location Refinery Specifications
2) NCC 2012 (formerly BCA)
3) AS 1170 (Parts 0, 1, 2 & 4)
4) AS 4100 - Steel Structures
Exclusions:
1) Team Meetings
2) Inductions
3) Site Visits & Travel
4) Calculations (as deliverables)
5) Development of specifications and/or specifications reviews
6) Procurement support (i.e. tender bid evaluations)
7) Material Take-Offs
8) TIC estimate support
9) Commissioning structural surveys or carrying-out dimensional surveys
10) Concept development of more than one concept in Stage 2.
5) Detail Drawings (Issued for Construction)
a) General arrangement & design notes (1 off)
b) Grating plan (1 off)
b) Details (2 off)
c) Independent drafting checking & approval
3) Concept Drawings (Issue for Client Review & Approval of concept prior to Stage 3)
a) General Arrangement
b) Preliminary Details Drawing (1 off)
4) Calculation - Analysis and Member Design
a) Finalise loads and loading combinations
b) Finalise strengthening arrangements and connection details
c) Carry-out detail analysis & design of secondary element strengthening - hand calculations
d) Connection analysis & design - hand calculations
e) Compile calculation package and complete cover sheet.
f) Quality Control - Independant calculation checking and approval
30 Business Days
2) Calculation - Preliminary Design
a) Concept development (includes allowance for discussions & liasing)
b) Preliminary analysis & member sizing
1) Coordination & Supervision (all stages)
a) Project Admin - Start-up/close-out file, Doc/Dwg register, transmittals
b) Supervision & Project Control - Progress management & monitoring
c) Establish & confirm Basis of Design & Design Criteria.(incl. allowance for discussions)
d) Complete Safety-In-Design/Risk Assessment worksheet
B
1) Email - Outcomes & recommendations of the quantitative assessment (Stage 1)
2) Drawings (4 off total) - General arrangement & notes, Grating plan, Structural Details (allow for 2 off)
Deliverables:
Structural Engineering 401010-00011 - 3Z0002B 3S1001A
SamAkritidis TBA TBA
Revision Date: Project No: DISC: Activity:
6/4/2013
Revision: Start Date: Finish Date: Duration: Responsibility:
Engg Hrs Draft Hrs
Coordination & Supervision (All stages) 24 14
24 14
4 4
10 10
4
6
STAGE 1 - Concept Design & Development - Strengthening & Modifications 68 60
56 24
8 4
20 20
16
4
8
12 36
6 20
6 16
STAGE 2 - Detail Design & Development - Strengthening & Modifications 110 86
86
8
8
16
16
16
6
16
24 86
4 16
2 24
18 30
16
TOTALS 202 160
Resource (labour) Man-Hours Rate Cost(AUD$) Resource (non-labour) Cost(AUD$)
Senior Engineer 148
Principal Engineer 54
Senior Designer 130
Lead Designer 30
Total Labour 362 $0 Total Non-Labour $0
Total Activity Cost $0
Project Manager Approval: Date: Client Approval: Date:
Report Date: 26/02/2007 9:29:32 AM
3) Concept Drawings (Issue for Client Review & Approval of concept prior to Stage 3)
a) General Arrangement
b) Preliminary Details Drawing (1 off)
4) Calculation - Analysis and Member Design
a) Finalise loads and loading combinations
b) Finalise rail, new member & strengthening arrangements (incl. connection details)
c) Carry-out detail analysis & design of rail and new members
d) Carry-out detail existing structure analysis and design member strengthening
e) Connection analysis & design - hand calculations
f) Compile calculation package and complete cover sheet.
g) Quality Control - Independant calculation checking and approval
5) Detail Drawings (Issued for Construction)
a) General arrangement & design notes (1 off)
b) Grating/Floor Plate plan (1 off)
c) Details (3 off)
d) Independent drafting checking & approval
Limitations:
1) No contigency is provided in this estimate. It is essential that the Project Manager allocates appropriate contigency to
project estimates, (typically ranging between 0-20%).
Confidentiality
This document has been prepared for the sole purpose of documenting our proposal for consultancy services associated with this CTR.
It is expected that this document and its contents, including work scope, methodology and commercial terms will be treated in strict confidence by the
Cutomer and that the contents will be used by the Customer only for the purpose of selecting a consultant for the project.
Deliverables:
1) Email - Outcomes & recommendations of the quantitative assessment (Stage 1)
2) Drawings (5 off total) - General arrangement & notes, Grating plan, Structural Details (allow for 3 off)
Tasks & Deliverables: State hours per deliverable (Eng &Des)
1) Coordination & Supervision (all stages)
a) Project Admin - Start-up/close-out file, Doc/Dwg register, transmittals
b) Supervision & Project Control - Progress management & monitoring
c) Establish & confirm Basis of Design & Design Criteria.(incl. allowance for discussions)
d) Complete Safety-In-Design/Risk Assessment worksheet
2) Calculation - Preliminary Design
a) Obtain & review existing documents & drawings to identify load paths and critical checks.
b) Concept General Arrangement development (includes allowance for discussions & liasing)
c) Determine loads, assess load configurations and define load combinations
d) Preliminary sizing of rail members & new members
e) Preliminary quantitative assessment of existing secondary structure members
Exclusions:
1) Team Meetings
2) Inductions
3) Site Visits & Travel
4) Calculations (as deliverables)
5) Development of specifications and/or specifications reviews
6) Procurement support (i.e. tender bid evaluations)
7) Material Take-Offs
8) TIC estimate support
9) Commissioning structural surveys or carrying-out dimensional surveys
10) No allowance for the development of more than one concept in Stage 2.
11) Condition assessment of the existing structure
401010-00011 - 3Z0002B Structural Engineering 3S1001B
B TBA TBA 35 Business Days SamAkritidis
Title: Cracker Cooling Fans - Structure Assessment and Strengthening - Option 2 (Modified trolley maintenance
system)
The Customer Location Refinery is evaluating the cost of improving the reliability of existing structure, and the
safety of the maintenance process when servicing the Cracker Cooling Fin Fan motors. Specifically, this option is
looking at carrying-out a quantitative structural assessment of the existing secondary structural members
followed by the design of new tracks (rails), new secondary members and existing structure modifications or
strengthening requirements that are predicted.
(Refer to email dated 28/05/2013 from Peter Llewellyn to Barry Collins)
Scope:
This CTR sheet is a Select Phase (+\- 35%) man-hour estimate for the Detail Design services of engineering & design of
Option 2 (install new trolley rails), to carry-out the following:
a) Assess the reliability of the existing secondary support structure, & primary support structure (as necessary).
c) Design new rails, new members (incl. connections) and existing structure modifications/strengthening
Important Note:
It is recommended that a staged approach is adopted, where the Customer and Site Project representatives are engaged
at the conclusion of the initial assessments, to discuss findings and evaluate strengthening options, prior to proceeding
into the Detail Design of strengthening & modifications.
Applicable References: (International/National Regulations, Standards, Codes of Practice, Guidelines etc)
1) Customer Location Refinery Specifications
2) NCC 2012 (formerly BCA)
3) AS 1170 (Parts 0, 1, 2 & 4)
4) AS 4100 - Steel Structures
Inputs:
1) All relevant existing documents & drawings of existing structures, services and plant located within the area, to
allow for accurate set-out & design.
2) Relevant Customer Location Refinery Specifications
3) Structural survey data verifying RL's and geometry of existing infrastructure.
4) Existing 3D Model (in Autocad or PDMS format) of the structure, if available.
The following inputs will be required during the design period:
5) Approval of concept design (at the end of Stage 2)
6) Client Review of Drawings with comments & approvals (prior to construction issue in Stage 3)
Assumptions:
1) The materials will be painted/coated in accordance with customer's specifications, and that customer's specifications
provide for sufficient durability.
2) Structure Condition Assessment will be carried-out as part of a different CTR sheet, prior to this work's proceeding.
3) A trolley (with cooler motor) weighs approx. 1000kg.
4) Cooler motor weight is 600kg.
5) Assessment criteria to be develop and approved by WP & the customer prior to commencement of Stage 1 works.
6) Stage 2 work involves the development of a single concept that is submitted to the customer for approval.
Project Title: Cracking Cooler Fin Fan
Project No: 401004-00011
Cost, Time, Resource Sheet
Revision Date: Project No: DISC: Activity:
6/4/2013
Revision: Start Date: Finish Date: Duration: Responsibility:
Engg Hrs Draft Hrs
Coordination & Supervision (All stages) 28 16
28 16
4 4
12 12
4
8
STAGE 1 - Concept Design & Development - Strengthening & Modifications 120 80
104 28
12 8
20 20
16
16
16
8
16
16 52
8 20
8 32
STAGE 2 - Detail Design & Development - Strengthening & Modifications 144 125
120
8
8
24
24
16
16
8
16
24 125
4 16
2 24
18 45
40
TOTALS 292 221
Resource (labour) Man-Hours Rate Cost(AUD$) Resource (non-labour) Cost(AUD$)
Senior Engineer 228
Principal Engineer 64
Senior Designer 165
Lead Designer 56
Total Labour 513 $0 Total Non-Labour $0
Total Activity Cost $0
Project Manager Approval: Date: Client Approval: Date:
Report Date: 26/02/2007 9:29:32 AM
4) Calculation - Analysis and Member Design
a) Finalise monorail, new member & strengthening arrangements (incl. connection details)
b) Finalise SapaceGass model, including boundary conditions and member restraints
c) Input final loads, loading combinations & member design parameters
d) Complete detail analysis & design of monorail, new members
e) Carry-out detail existing structure analysis and design member strengthening
e) Complete Connection analysis & design - hand calculations
e) Compile calculation package and complete cover sheet.
f) Quality Control - Independant calculation checking and approval
5) Detail Drawings (Issued for Construction)
a) General arrangement & design notes (1 off)
b) Grating/Floor Plate plan (1 off)
c) Details (3 off)
d) Independent drafting checking & approval
Limitations:
1) No contigency is provided in this estimate. It is essential that the Project Manager allocates appropriate contigency to
project estimates, (typically ranging between 0-20%).
Confidentiality
This document has been prepared for the sole purpose of documenting our proposal for consultancy services associated with this CTR.
It is expected that this document and its contents, including work scope, methodology and commercial terms will be treated in strict confidence by the
Cutomer and that the contents will be used by the Customer only for the purpose of selecting a consultant for the project.
Deliverables:
1) Email - Outcomes & recommendations of the quantitative assessment (Stage 1)
2) Drawings (5 off total) - General arrangement & notes, Grating plan, Structural Details (allow for 3 off)
Tasks & Deliverables: State hours per deliverable (Eng &Des)
1) Coordination & Supervision (all stages)
a) Project Admin - Start-up/close-out file, Doc/Dwg register, transmittals
b) Supervision & Project Control - Progress management & monitoring
c) Establish & confirm Basis of Design & Design Criteria.(incl. allowance for discussions)
d) Complete Safety-In-Design/Risk Assessment worksheet
2) Calculation - Preliminary Design
a) Obtain & review existing documents & drawings to identify existing structure load paths
and critical checks.
b) Concept General Arrangement development (includes allowance for discussions&liasing)
c) Determine loads, assess prelim. load configurations and load combinations
d) Establish SpaceGass model, including boundary conditions and member restraints
e) Input preliminary loads, load combinations & member design parameters
f) Preliminary size of monorail members & new members
g) Preliminary quantitative assessment of existing secondary structure members
3) Concept Drawings (Issue for Client Review & Approval of concept prior to Stage 3)
a) General Arrangement
b) Preliminary Details Drawing (2 off)
Exclusions:
1) Team Meetings
2) Inductions
3) Site Visits & Travel
4) Calculations (as deliverables)
5) Development of specifications and/or specifications reviews
6) Procurement support (i.e. tender bid evaluations)
7) Material Take-Offs
8) TIC estimate support
9) Commissioning structural surveys or carrying-out dimensional surveys
10) No allowance for the development of more than one concept in Stage 2.
11) Condition assessment of the existing structure
401010-00011 - 3Z0002B Structural Engineering 3S1001C
B TBA TBA 40 Business Days SamAkritidis
Title: Cracker Cooling Fans - Structure Assessment and Strengthening - Option 3 (Monorail Maintenance System)
The Customer Location Refinery is evaluating the cost of improving the safety of the maintenance operations when
servicing the Cracker Cooling Fin Fan motors. Specifically, this option is looking at carrying-out a quantitative
structural assessment of the existing secondary structural members followed by the design of a new monorail,
connected to new overhead secondary member framing, together with existing structure modifications or
strengthening requirements that are predicted.
(Refer to email dated 28/05/2013 from Peter Llewellyn to Barry Collins)
Scope:
This CTR sheet is a Select Phase (+\- 35%) man-hour estimate for the Detail Design services of engineering & design of
Option 3 (install new monorail & steelwork), to carry-out the following:
a) Assess the reliability of the existing secondary support structure, & primary support structure (as necessary).
c) Design new monorail, new secondary steelwork & framing (incl. connections) and existing structure
modifications/strengthening.
Important Note:
It is recommended that a staged approach is adopted, where the Customer and Site Project representatives are engaged at
the conclusion of the initial assessments, to discuss findings and evaluate strengthening options, prior to proceeding into the
Detail Design of strengthening & modifications.
Applicable References: (International/National Regulations, Standards, Codes of Practice, Guidelines etc)
1) Customer Location Refinery Specifications
2) NCC 2012 (formerly BCA)
3) AS 1170 (Parts 0, 1, 2 & 4)
4) AS 4100 - Steel Structures
Inputs:
1) All relevant existing documents & drawings of existing structures, services and plant located within the area, to
allow for accurate set-out & design.
2) Relevant Customer Location Refinery Specifications
3) Structural survey data verifying RL's and geometry of existing infrastructure.
4) Existing 3D Model (in Autocad or PDMS format) of the structure, if available.
The following inputs will be required during the design period:
5) Approval of concept design (at the end of Stage 2)
6) Client Review of Drawings with comments & approvals (prior to construction issue in Stage 3)
Assumptions:
1) The materials will be painted/coated in accordance with customer's specifications, and that customer's specifications
provide for sufficient durability.
2) Structure Condition Assessment will be carried-out as part of a different CTR sheet, prior to this work's proceeding.
3) An overhead gantry rated at 1 tonne is sufficient, as defined in email dated 28/05/2013 from Peter Llewellyn.
4) Cooler motor weight is 600kg.
5) The floor above that is proposed to support the new gantry steelwork, is able to reliably support the new loads.
6) Down-rating the allowable live load on the floor above is authorised by the customer, if it is necessary, to ensure the
structure reliability after the installation of the new gantry system.
7) Assessment criteria to be develop and approved by WP & the customer prior to commencement of Stage 1 works.
8) Stage 2 work involves the development of a single concept that is submitted to the customer for approval.
Project Title: Cracking Cooler Fin Fan
Project No: 401004-00011
Cost, Time, Resource Sheet