0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
223 Ansichten3 Seiten
In June of 2014, the House Ethics Committee closed a years-long investigation of Rep. Don Young (R-AK) for violating federal law and House rules by using campaign funds for personal use,accepting gifts, and filing inaccurate personal financial disclosure forms.
The result of the investigation was essentially a slap on the wrist: the Ethics Committee issued a letter of reproval to Rep. Young, ordered him to re-pay his campaign committee and the entities that provided him with gifts,
and to edit his financial disclosure statements.
At the same time, the Committee commended him for his more
recent efforts to not violate the law.
In June of 2014, the House Ethics Committee closed a years-long investigation of Rep. Don Young (R-AK) for violating federal law and House rules by using campaign funds for personal use,accepting gifts, and filing inaccurate personal financial disclosure forms.
The result of the investigation was essentially a slap on the wrist: the Ethics Committee issued a letter of reproval to Rep. Young, ordered him to re-pay his campaign committee and the entities that provided him with gifts,
and to edit his financial disclosure statements.
At the same time, the Committee commended him for his more
recent efforts to not violate the law.
In June of 2014, the House Ethics Committee closed a years-long investigation of Rep. Don Young (R-AK) for violating federal law and House rules by using campaign funds for personal use,accepting gifts, and filing inaccurate personal financial disclosure forms.
The result of the investigation was essentially a slap on the wrist: the Ethics Committee issued a letter of reproval to Rep. Young, ordered him to re-pay his campaign committee and the entities that provided him with gifts,
and to edit his financial disclosure statements.
At the same time, the Committee commended him for his more
recent efforts to not violate the law.
In June, the House Ethics Committee closed a years-long investigation of Rep. Don Young (R- AK) for violating federal law and House rules by using campaign funds for personal use, accepting gifts, and filing inaccurate personal financial disclosure forms. The result of the investigation was essentially a slap on the wrist: the Ethics Committee issued a letter of reproval to Rep. Young, ordered him to re-pay his campaign committee and the entities that provided him with gifts, and to edit his financial disclosure statements. At the same time, the Committee commended him for his more recent efforts to not violate the law.
The Committees investigation into Rep. Youngs illegal behavior began, ostensibly, at the instigation of Rep. Young himself who was facing a criminal investigation by the Department of Justice Public Integrity Section and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Rep. Young threw himself on the mercy of the Committee by self-reporting several potential violations instances where he 1) spent campaign funds for personal use or 2) accepted gifts, either impermissibly or without reporting them as required by House Rules and by federal law. 1
In August of 2010, DOJ declined to prosecute Rep. Young, citing the lack of evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to ultimately convict [him], 2 and referred the case for further action to the Ethics Committee. CREW made a Freedom of Information Act request to DOJ and the FBI for documents related to the investigation, to determine why Rep. Young was not charged. Over two years later, after CREW successfully litigated the release of hundreds of documents and made them available to the public, the Ethics Committee finally took action by forming an investigative subcommittee to look into the allegations against the Congressman in March of last year.
Issued almost four years after DOJ and the FBI referred the case to the House Ethics Committee, last months report confirmed years of reporting by CREW on Rep. Youngs unethical behavior. 3
1 In the Matter of Allegations Relating to Representative Don Young, Report of the Investigative Subcommittee, 113th House of Congress, U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Ethics, 1-59, at 1, April 29, 2014. 2 Available at http://www.scribd.com/collections/2980138/CREW-Regarding-Rep-Don-Young-Investigations (hereinafter Young FBI Documents), Federal Bureau of Investigation, Case ID # 58C-TP-70141, Corruption of Federal Public Officials, Donald Edwin Young, et al., Memorandum Re: To close case, August 30, 2010 )Young FBI Documents, at 173). 3 See Beyond DeLay: The 22 Most Corrupt Members of Congress (and two to watch), available at http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org/most corrupt/ entry/most-corrupt -report-2007, CREWs Most Corrupt Members of Congress: The 20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress (and four to watch), available at http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org/most corrupt/ entry/most-corrupt -2008, CREWs Most Corrupt 2009: The 15 Most The Committee found that Rep. Young, his wife, and his staff and took fifteen trips to hunting resorts and lodges for which Rep. Young either improperly used campaign funds to cover personal expenses, or where he impermissibly accepted or failed to report gifts. 4 The Committee also identified several non-trip related gifts Rep. Young accepted that were either impermissible or that he failed to report on his financial disclosure statements. 5
Unfortunately, these findings fall far short of the extensive evidence of corruption released by DOJ and the FBI as a result of CREWs FOIA request. Most significantly, the Committee appears to have made no effort to investigate an incident known as the Coconut Road earmark, a surreptitious edit to the transportation bill in 2005 that awarded $10 million dollars to a highway project in Florida. 6 The original language in the bill created an earmark for the widening of and improvements to I-75 in south Florida, but after the bill was passed, yet before the president signed it, that language was deleted and the phrase Coconut Rd. interchange I- 75/Lee County was inserted. 7 The incident sparked the FBIs investigation into Rep. Young as early as 2007, and in 2008 Congress demanded an investigation as well. Facing increased public scrutiny, Rep. Young admitted he had sponsored the earmark, and that his staff had changed the language in the bill. 8
Local officials denied asking for the Coconut Road earmark, and even twice declined to accept it given the suspicious circumstances around its appearance in the bill. 9 But hundreds of pages of evidence, released to CREW by the FBI and the DOJ, point to the real beneficiaries of the earmark land developer Daniel Aronoff, who hosted a fundraiser for Rep. Young in Florida that raised $40,000, mere months before the earmark was awarded. 10 In addition, the documents show that an unidentified individual paid all of the expenses for the fundraiser, the individual was not paid back until after the scandal broke, and the sum that was paid was far below the actual costs of the event. 11 Despite the vast amounts of evidence 12 amassed by the FBI, DOJ declined to press charges and handed over any further action to the House Ethics Committee, which failed to even touch on these allegations in its investigation and final report on Rep. Youngs ethics violations.
Corrupt Members of Congress 2009, available at http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org/mostcorrupt/entry/most -corrupt- 2009, CREWs Most Corrupt 2012, available at http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org/mostcorrupt/ent ry/most-corrupt- members-of-congress -report-2012, and CREWs Most Corrupt 2013, available at http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org/most corrupt/ entry/most-corrupt -members-of-congress-report -2013. 4 In the Matter of Allegations Relating to Representative Don Young, 113th House of Congress, U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Ethics, 1-9 at 3, June 26, 2014. 5 Id. 6 Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, CREWs Most Corrupt Members of Congress 2013, 100. 7 Id. 8 Id. at 101. 9 Julio Ochoa, MPO votes to move forward on Coconut Road, naplesnews.com, June 15, 2007. 10 CREWs Most Corrupt Members of Congress 2013, at 100. 11 Id. at 101. 12 Federal Bureau of Investigation, Case ID # 58C-TP-70141, Corruption of Federal Public Officials, Donald Edwin Young, et al., December 1, 2008 Email Re: Young Status Conference Call (Young FBI Documents, at 337); Letter from Jack Smith, Chief, Public Integrity Section to Blake Chisam, Chief Counsel, House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, August 17, 2010 (Young FBI Documents, at 166-67). Finally, outside of the improper campaign fund expenditures and gift violations detailed above, the Ethics Committee investigation failed to look into any of the additional improper appropriations of campaign funds by Rep. Young. CREWs investigation found evidence that cash advances were provided to Rep. Young and his wife by the campaign for use as per diems, as well as evidence of use of campaign funds for personal expenses such as laundry, dry cleaning, personal travel such as plane flights home, and personal mileage reimbursements. 13
None of these expenditures were mentioned in the committee report. Similarly, the committee report failed to address evidence cited by CREW of improper gifts, such as jewelry, that were given to Rep. Youngs wife. 14
Ultimately the House Ethics Committee expended little effort to investigate Rep. Youngs activities outside of the small subset of violations he reported himself, and made no detailed review of the mountains of evidence gathered in the course of the investigations by the FBI and DOJ. Those instances where the Committee found Rep. Young violated the law earned him a mere slap on the wrist, followed quickly by a pat on the back as a reassurance that his recent effort to play by the rules had not gone unnoticed.
13 CREWs Most Corrupt Members of Congress 2013, at 102-103. 14 Id. at 104.