CHECK LIST TO EVALUATE BRAINSTORMING ACTIVITY

Auto-evaluation
Students name: __________________________________ Level: ___________ Date: ________________________

Criteria YES NO
I participate actively during the brainstorming
activity.

I present ideas related to the lesson with
coherence.

I respect other partners opinions.
I listen carefully to all the significant contributions
from my partners.

I increase my knowledge about the numbers
lesson.


Observations:

RATING SCALE TO EVALUATE THE VIDEO DISCUSSION
Auto-evaluation
Students name: __________________________________ Level: ___________ Date: ________________________

Criteria


I express relevant ideas and points of view related to
the video.

I answer to questions related to the video.
I respect other partners opinions.
I show interest when watching the video.
I demonstrate good behavior during the activity.

Observations:


MINISTRY OF EDUCATION
AGUSTIN PEREZ COLMENAREZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CHECK LIST TO EVALUATE THE CIRCLE RACE ACTIVITY

Auto-evaluation
Students name: __________________________________ Level: ___________ Date: ________________________

Criteria Yes No
I participate actively in the activity.

I accomplish all the activity.

I answer correctly to my partners questions.

I demonstrate listening and speaking skills, and content
domain.

I work collaborating and demonstrating my effort,
responsibility, and organization.


Observations:
..
CHECK LIST TO EVALUATE THE COMPETITION ACTIVITY
Co-evaluation
Students names: Level: ___________ Date: _______________________
a) __________________________________
b) __________________________________
c) __________________________________
d) __________________________________
e) __________________________________

Criteria Yes No
The group participates actively in the activity.
The group accomplishes all the activity developing the
assigned roles.

The group answers correctly to all the Math problems.
The group demonstrates listening and speaking skills, and
content domain.

The group works collaborating and demonstrates effort,
responsibility, and organization.


Observations:
...

RATING SCALE TO EVALUATE THE CROSSWORD

Hetero-evaluation
Students names: Level: ___________ Date: _______________________
a. __________________________________
b. __________________________________
c. __________________________________




Criteria Score
The students recognize and use correctly spelling skills
in order to fill out the crossword.

The students demonstrate appropriate behavior during
the class.

The students use correctly the class time.

All the members of the team work in group
satisfactorily.

The workshop is saved correctly in the USB device.


Observations:
..

RUBRIC TO EVALUATE THE CREATING A SONG ACTIVITY

Hetero-evaluation

Students names: Level: ___________ Date: _______________________
a) __________________________________
b) __________________________________
c) __________________________________
d) __________________________________
e) __________________________________

Category 4 3 2 1
Use of keywords
The group uses all
the keywords
given by the
teacher.
The group uses
almost all the
keywords given by
the teacher.
The group uses
some keywords
given by the
teacher.
The group does
not use any
keyword given by
the teacher.
Lyrics
The song lyrics are
outstanding.
The song lyrics are
good.
The song lyrics
have somewhat
coherent.
The song lyrics are
not
understandable.
Follow
instructions
The group puts
into practice all
the followed
instructions, and
they use
exceptionally the
class time.
The group puts
into practice
almost all the
followed
instructions, and
they use the class
time correctly.
The group puts
into practice some
instructions and
takes into account
just a little bit of
the class time.
The group does
not develop any
instruction, and
they do not take
full advantage of
the time.
Creativity
The group
composes an
original song with
the topic
assigned.
The song
composed is
original, but there
are some
elements that are
not excellent.
The song
composed is not
very original, and
there are some
elements that are
not good.
The composed
song is not very
original, and the
message is not
conveyed.
Collaborative
work
Everybody works
together,
demonstrates
good behavior,
and present the
song at the end of
the class.
The group works
together in almost
all the
development of
the activity. They
demonstrates a
regular behavior
The group has
some problems to
work together,
they demonstrate
different point of
view, and they
present the song
incomplete.
The group does
not how to work
together, and they
do not present
the song.


Observations:
..


RUBRIC TO EVALUATE THE POEM DRAMATIZATION
Hetero-evaluation

Students names: Level: ___________ Date: _______________________
a. __________________________________
b. __________________________________
c. __________________________________

Category 4 3 2 1
VOICE
Voice is loud and
clear; words are
easily understood.
Student speaks
clearly but it is
difficult to
understand some
of the script;
couldve been
louder.
Voice and
language are not
very clear;
couldve been
much louder.
Could not
understand what
was being said
due to unclear
and low speech.
SPELLING
All the words are
pronounced
correctly.
Most of the words
are pronounced
correctly.
Few words are
pronounced
correctly.
Unintelligible
pronunciation.
PERFORMANCE
Sustain
engagement
throughout the
dramatized poem
and encourage
the involvement
of others.
Sustain
engagement
throughout the
drama.
Sustain
engagement for a
portion of the
dramatized poem.
Rarely sustain
engagement in
the dramatized
poem.
FACIAL
EXPRESSION/
BODY
LANGUAGE
Great use of
gestures, facial
expressions and
body movement!
Contained some
facial expressions,
gestures & body
movement.
Need more facial
expressions
gestures &
movement.
Contain little to
no facial
expression,
gesture or
movement.
AUDIENCE

Audience feels
like part of the
show.
It is aware and
well-connected to
the audience.
Need more
audience
awareness and
connection.
No audience
awareness or
connection at all.

Observations:
...

RUBRIC TO EVALUATE THE POWEPOINT ORAL PRESENTATION

Hetero-evaluation
Students names: Level: ___________ Date: _______________________
a. __________________________________
b. __________________________________
c. __________________________________
Category 5 4 3 2 1
Content Content is
accurate and all
required
information is
presented in a
logical order.

Content is
accurate but
some required
information is
missing and/or
not presented in
a logical order,
but is still
generally easy to
follow.
Content is
accurate but
some required
information is
missing and/or
not presented in
a logical order,
making it difficult
to follow.
Content is
questionable.
Information is
not presented in
a logical order,
making it
difficult to
follow.
Content is
inaccurate.
Information is
not presented
in a logical
order, making
it difficult to
follow.
Slide
Creation
Presentation
flows well and
logically.
Presentation
reflects extensive
use of tools in a
creative way.
Each members
information is
represented in
slides and
identified with
their name.
Presentation
flows well. Tools
are used correctly
Each members
information is
represented in
slides and
identified with
their name.
Overall
presentation is
interesting.
Presentation
flows well. Some
tools are used to
show acceptable
understanding.
Each members
information is
represented in
slides and
identified with
their name.
Presentation is
unorganized.
Tools are not
used in a
relevant
manner. Lacking
some of the
members
information.
Presentation
has no flow. No
tools used.
Insufficient
information
and lacking
some of the
members
information.
Pictures,
Clip Art
Backgroun
d
Images are
appropriate.
Layout is
pleasing to the
eye.
Images are
appropriate.
Layout is
cluttered.
Most images are
appropriate.
Images are
inappropriate.
No images
Mechanics No spelling
errors. No
grammar errors.
Few spelling
errors. Few
grammar errors.
Some about
spelling errors.
Some grammar
errors.
Some about
spelling errors.
Some grammar
errors.
Many spelling
errors.
Technolog
y
Connectio
n
Comprehensive
use of
technology is
apparent.
General
understanding of
technology.
Acceptable
understanding of
technology.
Little
understanding
of technology.
No
understanding
of technology.