0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
28 Ansichten34 Seiten
This document provides an overview and comparison of qualitative and quantitative research paradigms. It discusses key aspects of each paradigm including underlying philosophy, research questions, literature review process, data collection and analysis methods, strengths and limitations. The document is intended to teach nursing students about both qualitative and quantitative designs and how to evaluate each step of the research process for both approaches.
This document provides an overview and comparison of qualitative and quantitative research paradigms. It discusses key aspects of each paradigm including underlying philosophy, research questions, literature review process, data collection and analysis methods, strengths and limitations. The document is intended to teach nursing students about both qualitative and quantitative designs and how to evaluate each step of the research process for both approaches.
This document provides an overview and comparison of qualitative and quantitative research paradigms. It discusses key aspects of each paradigm including underlying philosophy, research questions, literature review process, data collection and analysis methods, strengths and limitations. The document is intended to teach nursing students about both qualitative and quantitative designs and how to evaluate each step of the research process for both approaches.
2013/14 Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Post Diploma Degree Program, Ryerson University Loiselle et al. (20 ) All Chapters to date Prepared by Dr Elaine Sta. Mina
Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Paradigms
Some researchers are purely qualitative and others are purely quantitative,
neither believing in, nor accepting, the others paradigm as a valid path to understanding 2 Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Paradigms
However, as demonstrated in last weeks class on multi-method designs there is a growing body of research embracing both designs within one study.
3 Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Paradigms There are also differing views on the best practice for teaching the two research paradigms: some educators insist they should be taught separately and others believe they should be taught in an integrated fashion.
The Loiselle et al (2007) text 2nd ed. was written from an integrated framework.
4 4 Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Paradigms
This course has taught you about research by separating the paradigms.
It has built upon what may be most familiar, the narrative, inherent in qualitative research.
Then it has developed your understanding of the quantitative approach to lead to statistical analysis. 5 5 Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Paradigms However
it is important that as nurses and as consumers of researcher (and possibly as future researchers) you understand both paradigms, and can compare and contrast their methodologies in order to inform your practice. 6 6 Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Paradigms
So this weeks class will bring both paradigms together to compare and contrast each step of the research process, according to each philosophy. 7 7 Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Paradigms
So this weeks review will bring both paradigms together to compare and contrast each step of the research process, according to each philosophy. 8 8 1) Underlying Philosophy Qualitative
a holistic approach to understanding reality consists of multiple truths
inductive reasoning
Quantitative
reductionistic approach
truth as objective reality
deductive reasoning
9 9 1) Underlying Philosophy Qualitative
subjective experience is valued
the researcher is integral to the research process
Quantitative
subjectivity set aside
objective reality valued the researcher is separate from the research process
10 10 2) The Research Question
Qualitative
broadly articulated
phenomenon are explored, described
Quantitative
tightly defined
cause and effect relationship among independent & dependent variables
11 11 3) Literature Review Qualitative
broad focus on phenomena and philosophy phenomena are searched may be part of analysis
Quantitative
extensive review of each variable
review of theory reviews previous research
12 12 3) Literature Review Qualitative
identification of gaps in research, methodology, population, conditions Quantitative
identification of gaps in research, methodology, population, conditions
13 13 4) Conceptual Framework or Theory Qualitative
little, if any, conceptualization of the phenomena the ory or conceptual model research develops theory rather than tests theory
Quantitative
usually well articulated theory 14 14 5) The Research Problem, Question (s); Hypothesis (es) Qualitative
problem is broadly described
no hypotheses
Quantitative
problem is clearly identified from the literature review question flows from problem statement hypothesis (es) are stated from the research question
15 15
6) Design Type Qualitative
retrospective prospective longitudinal cross-sectional emergent designs ethics are critical
Quantitative
retrospective prospective longitudinal cross-sectional articulated designs ethics are critical
16 16 6) Design Type Qualitative
phenomenological ethnographic historicism participant action critical social
Quantitative
randomized control trial: the gold standard experimental quasi experimental non-experimental
17 17
7) The Target Population and The Sample Qualitative
small sample size sample size determined by saturation non-probability sampling Quantitative
large sample size sample size calculation non-probability sampling probability sampling
18 18 8) Methods Qualitative
ethics approval informed consent evolve during process emergent design
Quantitative
ethics approval informed consent tightly articulated step by step
19 19 8) Methods Qualitative
collection and analysis occur simultaneously may include member checking
Quantitative
data collection and analysis occur separately findings not validated with participants, they may request a copy of the findings 20 20 9) Data Collection
Qualitative
high obtrusiveness flexible methods
the unstructured and structured Observation
Quantitative
highly structured low obtrusiveness
levels of measurement nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio 21 21 9) Data Collection Qualitative
logs, journals, diaries tape recordings, audio and video
Quantitative
structured interview logs, journals, diaries
23 23 10) Data Analysis Qualitative
iterative not standardized unit of measure is narrative goal to synthesize, interpret, communicate
Quantitative
Linear highly standardized unit of measure is numeric goal to establish results not by chance alone
24 24 10) Data Analysis Qualitative
template categories ,editing
immersion / crystallization
Quantitative
statistical analysis to test the hypothesis hypotheses are supported or refuted based upon statistical significance
25 25 10) Data Analysis Qualitative
data quality trustworthiness credibility confirmability dependability transferability of findings Quantitative
data quality:
reliability validity generalizability of findings 26 26 11) The Research Report
Qualitative
includes thick narrative
transferability
Quantitative
includes statistical results
generalizability 27 27 11) The Research Report
Qualitative
includes thick narrative
transferability
Quantitative
includes statistical results
generalizability 28 28 12) Dissemination of the Research Findings Qualitative
journals, conferences books
Quantitative
journals, conferences books 29 29 13) Strengths of the Paradigm Qualitative
subjective realities are valued in-depth meanings articulated
Quantitative
subjectivity is controlled cause and effect more clearly established
30 30 13) Strengths of the Paradigm Qualitative
develops theory develops knowledge about little known phenomena
Quantitative
supports of refutes theory supports or refutes hypotheses generalizable reproducible 31 31 14) Limitations of the Paradigm Qualitative
subjectivity lend itself to competing hypotheses
Quantitative
tight control of extraneous variables diminishes generalizability
32 32 14) Limitations of the Paradigm Qualitative
not generalizable small sample sizes
Quantitative
feasibility of getting large samples 33 33 References Burns, N., Grove, S. K. (2001). The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique, & Utilization 4 th Edition. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders. Loiselle, C.G., Profetto-McGrath, J., Polit, D., F. & Beck, C. T. (2007). Canadian Essentials of Nursing Research 2 nd Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Polit, D., F. & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods 7 th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 34