0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
50 Ansichten125 Seiten
This document is a dissertation that compares the strategies adopted by Walmart and Carrefour in China using a resource-based perspective. It begins with acknowledgements and an abstract. The dissertation then reviews literature on entry modes, operating strategies, positioning strategies, and human resource management strategies. It describes the research methodology of using a qualitative case study approach to analyze Walmart and Carrefour's development in China. It then provides an industry analysis of China's retail market before examining each company's background, entry into China, expansion, positioning, adaptation, sourcing, and human resource strategies. Finally, it analyzes the two companies' strategies using resource-based theory and provides conclusions and recommendations.
This document is a dissertation that compares the strategies adopted by Walmart and Carrefour in China using a resource-based perspective. It begins with acknowledgements and an abstract. The dissertation then reviews literature on entry modes, operating strategies, positioning strategies, and human resource management strategies. It describes the research methodology of using a qualitative case study approach to analyze Walmart and Carrefour's development in China. It then provides an industry analysis of China's retail market before examining each company's background, entry into China, expansion, positioning, adaptation, sourcing, and human resource strategies. Finally, it analyzes the two companies' strategies using resource-based theory and provides conclusions and recommendations.
This document is a dissertation that compares the strategies adopted by Walmart and Carrefour in China using a resource-based perspective. It begins with acknowledgements and an abstract. The dissertation then reviews literature on entry modes, operating strategies, positioning strategies, and human resource management strategies. It describes the research methodology of using a qualitative case study approach to analyze Walmart and Carrefour's development in China. It then provides an industry analysis of China's retail market before examining each company's background, entry into China, expansion, positioning, adaptation, sourcing, and human resource strategies. Finally, it analyzes the two companies' strategies using resource-based theory and provides conclusions and recommendations.
I appreciate my dissertation supervisor Dr Wang, Ior his continuous patience, support, guidance and constructive comment throughout the period oI my dissertation. I would like to thank the proIessors and lectures Irom whom I learned a lot throughout my master year. I also would like to show my gratitude to Nottingham University Business School that provided this value chance Ior my postgraduate studies as well as the chance to conduct this research.
I wish to acknowledge all those who helped me with the inIormation and data, and those who showed their support and care during this period. Last, but by no means least, thanks to all members oI my Iamily.
Abstract
This research aims to provide an overview oI links between a Iirm`s strategies and the Iirm possessed resources and capabilities. Two casesWal-Mart and CarreIour in China are chosen. By using resources-based theory, their development strategies in China are compared and analyzed. This research adopted documentary research method, particularly Iirms` historical documentary review and analysis, Ior this qualitative research to study each case.
In China`s retail market, the competition is intensive and market conditions are evolving. To capture greater market share in this market, Wal-Mart and CarreIour adapted their strategies to cater local customers as well as economic and political conditions. Although Wal-Mart and CarreIour in the same market environment, there are still diIIerences between the strategies adopted by each giant retailer. ThereIore, it is probably saIe to argue that the diIIerences between strategies adopted by the two retailers, to certain extent, are due to their distinct Iirm-speciIic resources and capabilities.
Contents Page No.
Chapter 1 Introduction (5)
1.1 Background (5) 1.2 Research Questions (6) 1.3 Aims and Objectives (7) 1.4 Structure oI the Research (8)
Chapter 2 Literature Reviews (11)
2.1 Entry Modes (11) 2.1.1 The Timing and Scale oI Entry (11) 2.1.2 Entry Modes (14) 2.2 Operating Strategies (17) 2.3 Positioning Strategies (18) 2.3.1 Cost Leadership (19) 2.3.2 DiIIerentiation (20) 2.3.3 Focus Strategy (23) 2.4 Human Resource Management (24) 2.4.1 HRM Adaptation to Local Context (26) 2.5 Resource-Based Theory and Management Strategies (31) 2.5.1 The Resource-Based Theory (31) 2.5.2 Entry Modes Selection and Resource-Based Theory (33) 2.5.3 Positioning Strategies and Resource-Based Theory (35) 2.5.4 Human Resource Management and Resource-Based Theory (36)
Chapter 3 Research Methodology (39)
3.1 Research Design (39) 3.2 Research Methods (41) 3.3 Case Design (42) 3.4 Data Collection (43) 3.5 Summary (46)
Chapter 4 Industry Analysis of Chinese Retail Market (47)
4.1 Industry Facts (47) 4.2 Market DeIinition (49) 4.3 Internal Rivalry (49) 4.4 Entry (51) 4.5 Substitutes and Complements (53) 4.6 Supplier Power (55) 4.7 Buyer Power (57)
Chapter 5 Foreign Retailers in China-Wal-Mart and Carrefour (59)
5.1 Wal-Mart (59) 5.1.1 About Wal-Mart (59) 5.1.2 Wal-Mart`s Entry into China (61) 5.1.3 Wal-Mart`s Development in China (62) 5.1.4 Wal-Mart`s Positioning in China (64) 5.1.5 Wal-Mart`s Local Adaptation in China (65) 5.1.6 Wal-Mart`s Sourcing in China (67) 5.1.7 Human Resource Management and Public Relations (69) 5.2 CarreIour (70) 5.2.1 About CarreIour (70) 5.2.2 CarreIour`s Entry into China (71) 5.2.3 CarreIour`s Development into China (73)
5.2.4 CarreIour`s Positioning in China (75) 5.2.5 CarreIour`s Local Adaptation in China (77) 5.2.6 CarreIour`s Sourcing in China (79) 5.2.7 Human Resource Management and Public Relations (80)
Chapter 6 Analysis of Wal-Mart and Carrefour`s Strategies (82)
6.1 Assessment oI Two Giants` Strategies (82) 6.1.1 Entry Strategies (82) 6.1.2 Expansion Strategies (84) 6.1.3 Positioning Strategies (86) 6.1.4 Local Adaptation (88) 6.1.5 Sourcing Strategies (90) 6.1.6 Human Resource Management and Public Relations (91) 6.2 Resource-Based Theory and Their Strategies (92) 6.2.1 Entry Strategies (93) 6.2.2 Expansion Strategies (94) 6.2.3 Positioning Strategies (95) 6.2.4 Local Adaptation (96) 6.2.5 Sourcing Strategies (97) 6.3 Summary (98)
Chapter 7 Conclusions and Recommendations (100)
7.1 Findings oI the Research (100) 7.2 Conclusions (102) 7.3 Recommendations Ior Wal-Mart and CarreIour (103) 7.3.1 Recommendations Ior Wal-Mart China (103) 7.3.2 Recommendations Ior CarreIour China (105) 7.4 Limitations oI the Research (106)
References (108)
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Background
China has been developing rapidly in the last two decades, especially aIter market-oriented economic reIormation and entry into World Trade Organization (WTO). Coupled with the trend oI business globalization, many multinational Iirms view China as a Iavored market with great potential oI opportunities.
The development oI Chinese retail market started since the 1980s when China started to move Irom a planned to a market-oriented economy. This transition oI economy system has stimulated the development oI Chinese tertiary industry, as evidenced by the proIound revolution in the retail industry since 1990s. In 1992, Ioreign capital was allowed to enter Chinese retail sector. Although there were still strict regulations in place to restrict the operation oI Ioreign retailers at that time, the implementation oI these regulations was rather Ilexible and local authorities bypassed many oI these restrictions to support these Ioreign retailers (Levy, 1996). A large number oI Iamous international supermarket retailers such as CarreIour, Wal-Mart, Makro, Ito-Yokado appeared in China. Wal-Mart and CarreIour are the world number one and two retailers in terms oI turnover and employment (Colla and Dupuis, 2002), and they entered into China in 1996 and in 1995, respectively. Wal-Mart has so Iar opened 68 stores in China and CarreIour 98.
However, the two giants in China exhibited diIIerent perIormances in terms oI market shares. It is reported that Wal-Mart ranked as the largest retailer in the world, and CarreIour as the second largest (asia.proquestreIerence.inIo). While in China, CarreIour perIorms as the market leader compared with Wal-Mart in terms market share (euromonitor.com). What interested most is that although both Wal-Mart and CarreIour are in the same industry and the same Chinese retail market, their entry and expansion strategies are quite diIIerent. It is possible that the diIIerent perIormances oI the Ioreign retailers can be partly explained by their diIIerent entry and expansion strategies.
1.2 Research Questions
Wal-Mart and CarreIour pursue diIIerent strategies when entering and operating in China. This is possibly because both Wal-Mart and CarreIour have their own distinctive resources and capabilities which enable them to Iollow distinctive sets oI strategies even when they are in the same environmental settingChinese retail market.
However, it may not be reasonable to say which particular strategy is better than the other, because the strategies adopted are related and interact with the Iirm-speciIic resources, and with the speciIic market conditions. The resource-based theory views
Iirms are heterogeneous and possess heterogeneity resources. According to WernerIelt (1984), the resource-based approach views the Iirm as a historically determined collection oI assets or resources which are tied semipermanently to the Iirm`s management. Lockett and Thompson (2001) state that 'resource-based view emphasizes Iirm heterogeneity and path dependency, as each Iirm`s resource bundle is unique, and the consequence oI its past managerial decisions and subsequent experiences, it Iollows that so is each Iirm`s opportunity set. In short, the resource-based view provides a Iramework Ior management strategy development. So could it explain why diIIerent Iirms adopted diIIerent strategies even in the same environmental context.
There have been many studies on strategies oI Wal-Mart and CarreIour (Colla and Dupuis, 2002), and development oI supermarkets in China (Lo et al, 2001). This study, however, applies the resource-based theory to compare the two giants` strategies in China. Thus, the Iirst research question is that how the strategies oI Wal-Mart and CarreIour are diIIerent Irom each other; and the second research question is that why they diIIer in the perspective oI resource-based theory.
1.3 Aims and Objectives
More speciIically, the research objectives oI this study are as Iollows: (1). To provide a comprehensive overview oI the Chinese retail market, in terms oI
Porter`s Five Forces. (2). To analyze the strategies oI Wal-Mart and how these strategies interact with Chinese government policies and local market conditions (3). To analyze the strategies oI CarreIour and how these strategies interact with Chinese government policies and local market conditions (4). To implement a comparative study oI the strategies oI the two retailing giants. (5). To make recommendations oI strategies Ior the two retailers in the context oI Chinese entry into the WTO and Iurther opening oI the retail sector.
The possible diIIerences oI strategies oI the two retailers are mainly analyzed in terms oI entry strategies, positioning strategies, and expansion strategies, sourcing strategies, local adaptation strategies, human resource management and social relationship. The Iinal objective is to link the resource-based view to these resources and present how the resource-based theory could explain these resources.
ThereIore, the overall aim oI this research is, by using the resource-based theory as the basic principle and using the two casesWal-Mart and CarreIour, to provide an overview oI the relationship between the Iirm strategies and its possessed resources and capabilities.
1.4 Structure of the Research
Following this introduction, Chapter 2 reviewed the literatures concerning with the strategies oI a Iirm in a Ioreign market as well as the resource-based theory. The strategies reviewed in this chapter include the entering strategies, operating and competing strategies, and human resource management strategies. The resource-based theory is reviewed and also linked with the previous part in Chapter2, providing an analysis oI why a Iirm preIers one strategy to another. The third chapter introduces the methodology oI doing this research. It includes the analysis oI why the case study research approach and documentary method are selected, why Wal-Mart and CarreIour are chosen as the cases to study, and how the inIormation and data collected.
Chapter 4 provides a detailed analysis oI Chinese retail market by applying Porter`s Iramework oI Iive Iorcesinternal rivalry, entry, substitute and complementary products, supplier power, and buyer power. It will not only identiIy the Iactors aIIecting Iirms` perIormances in terms oI both vertical trading and horizontal competitive relationships, but also identiIy the opportunities and threats in this industry (Besanko et al, 2003).
Chapter 5 provides the studies oI the strategies adopted by the two retailing giantsWal-Mart and CarreIour, including entry, positioning, expansion strategies, local adaptation strategies, and human resource management and public relations. Chapter 6 compares and contrasts the similarities and diIIerences between strategies
adopted by Wal-Mart and CarreIour in terms oI the above six aspects. Then is the analysis oI the comparisons using the resource-based theory and explanations why there are similarities and diIIerences.
Finally, Chapter 7 includes the Iindings and conclusions oI this research, and recommendations will be provided to both Wal-Mart and CarreIour Ior their Iuture development. This chapter also contains a brieI analysis oI the limitations oI this research.
Chapter 2 Literature Reviews
Each country has diIIerent economic, political and legal systems. When a Iirm has made decision to enter a particular market, these diIIerent systems determine the opportunity costs oI how to enter and develop in that country. This chapter reviews the entry, expansion and development strategies available Ior Ioreign investors.
2.1 Entry Modes
When Iirms have decided to enter a Ioreign market, how to enter becomes another important issue. Generally, at this stage, companies need to consider the timing, scale, and mode oI entry.
2.1.1 Timing and Scale oI Entry
Ghemawat (1991) argue that when thinking oI the entry timing and entry scale, Iirm should consider market uncertainty and the potential irreversibility oI investment. Any investment, especially investment to a Ioreign country, involves great opportunity costs and commitment. Indeed, no matter whether large scale entry or small scale entry, and no matter early or late entry, there must advantages and disadvantages oI each option.
Timing of Entry. Usually, it is an early entry when an international business enters a Ioreign market beIore other competitors, and a late entry when aIter them. Liberman and Montgomery (1988) suggest that there are Iirst-mover advantages iI a Iirm pursues an early entry. The idea oI Iirst-mover advantage is that 'the initial occupant oI a strategic position or niche gains access to resources and capabilities that a Iollower cannot match (Grant, 2005, p236). According to Hill (2004), there are several Iirst-mover advantages Ior an international business. The Iirst is that the Iirst mover could preempt rivals and capture demand by establishing strong brand reputation with suppliers and customers. The second advantage is concerned with cost advantages, which reIers that, by enter the market earlier, the Iirm could produce at lower cost by moving down the learning curve Iaster through building a larger producing volume than competitors. A third advantage is that early entrants could create switching costs so that customers are unlikely to switch to the products or services provided by Iollowers. However, there are still Iirst-mover disadvantages (Shaver, Witchell and Yeung, 1997). The most common one is known as pioneering costs, which are costs that early entrants bear and later entrants could avoid (Hill, 2004). There are many causes oI such pioneering costs as argued by Hill (2004). They may arise in the Iorm oI time and eIIort spent on learning the rule oI business systems in a Ioreign country. Mistakes that are made as a result oI that the early entrant Iails to understand the country he enters also brings pioneering costs. Pioneering costs also include the costs oI promoting a new product to customers in a Ioreign market incurred to early entrants, such as educating customers. A special condition when
regulations change in a way that diminishes the value oI an early entrant`s investment would put the early entrant at a server disadvantageous position. In the conditions mentioned above, the Iollowers could learn Irom the early entrants` experiences, avoid the mistakes and costs, and ride on their investments. Shave, Mitchell and Yeung (1997) have Iound that iI international business could enter a Ioreign market aIter several competitors, the probability oI survival is greater than otherwise.
Scale of Entry. When an international business enters a Ioreign market, the size oI entry is another important issue. Hill (2004) argues that large scale entry requires commitment oI signiIicant resources and implies rapid entry. The resulted strategic commitment has great as well as long-term impact on Iollowing development oI the Iirm and diIIicult to reverse (Ghemawat, 1991). Ghemawat (1991) continues to argue that such strategic commitment in the Iorm oI large-scale entry will inIluence the nature oI competition in the market in terms oI attracting customers and distributors in the long run and deterring entry oI potential competitors, but also in terms oI restricting its own resources to Iurther expansion. Indeed, on one hand, the large entry size is a signal to customer and distributors that this Ioreign Iirm make signiIicant strategic commitment to its investment and thus gains customers and distributors trust and loyalty, and makes the potential entrants to reconsider their entry decision; on the other hand, as the Iirm have made signiIicant commitment to its investment, most its resources are inevitably been sunk into this Ioreign market, which may limit the Iurther expansion into new market in another industry or country. ThereIore, a Iirm
should balance the risks and beneIits oI signiIicant strategic commitment. Nevertheless, a small entry scale also brings beneIits as well as risks to a Iirm when entering a Ioreign market (Hill, 2004). A small size with little strategic commitment would allow the Iirm to learn about the Ioreign market with limited risk. By achieving this, the Iirm could Iirst collect inIormation oI the Ioreign market and then deciding whether to expand, maintain or quit. However, this small scale entry may have diIIiculties in capturing market share, achieving scale economies, and creating switching costs.
2.1.2 Entry Modes
A Iirm`s entry mode is how to enter the Ioreign market, and how to make its goods or services available to Ioreign customers (Bishop, 2006). Generally, there are six diIIerent modes Ior an international Iirm to choose: exporting, turnkey projects, licensing, Iranchising, joint ventures, wholly owned subsidiary (Hill, 2004). Each entry mode has its distinct characteristics (see, e.g., Hill, 2004; Hill, et al, 1990; Hill and Kim, 1988; Anderson and Gatignon, 1986; Madhok, 1997; Brouthers and Brouthers, 2000; Bishop, 2006). They are summarized in Table 2.1.
Choosing an appropriate entry mode is a diIIicult decision Ior Iirms interested in entering a Ioreign market (Agarwal and Ramaswami, 1992). Sometimes, an international Iirm may use more than one entry modes simultaneously (Bishop, 2006).
According to Wei et al (2005) there are many Iactors aIIecting the entry modes, such as host country Iactors, resource commitment and cultural distance.
Table 2.1 Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Entry Mode
Entry Mode Advantages Disadvantages Exporting Ability to realize location and experience curve economies High transaction costs Trade barriers Problems with local marketing agents Turkey Contracts Ability to earn returns Irom process technology skills in countries where FDI is restricted Creating eIIicient competitors Lack oI long-term market presence Licensing Low development costs and risks Lack oI control over technology Inability to realize location and experience curve economies Inability to engage in global strategic coordination Franchising Low development costs and risks Lack oI control over quality Inability to engage in global strategic coordination Joint Ventures Access to local partner`s knowledge Sharing development costs and risks Political acceptable Lack oI control over technology Inability to engage in global strategic coordination Inability to realize location and experience economies Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Protection oI technology Ability to engage in global strategic coordination Ability to realize location and experience economies High costs and risks Source: Hill (2004), p409.
Host country Iactors are important in aIIecting the entry mode choice. Khanna and
Palepu (1997) argue that in some countries, there are extensive government intervention, lack oI reliable inIormation, and lack oI eIIective enIorcement oI contract law. These would inevitably create signiIicant risks Ior Ioreign investors and make business operations less eIIicient (Isobe et al, 2000). According to Tse et al (1997), nonequity-based entry modes, such as joint ventures, would like to be adopted by Ioreign investors rather than equity-based modes.
Cespedes (1988) argues that the resource availability and control determine the entry mode choice Ior Ioreign investors. As any business decision is made based on trade-oIIs between expected beneIits and risks, when Iirms have made signiIicant investments into a Ioreign market, they should choose an entry mode with a high degree oI control such as wholly owned enterprises rather than one with high risks and shared investment commitment such as joint ventures. ThereIore, Larimo (1993) and Hennart and Larimo (1998) argue that the larger the resource commitment to a Ioreign market, the less likely that a Iirm will share the equity in a Ioreign market.
Hennart and Larimo (1998) argue that national culture is also widely believed to aIIect the entry modes decisions. Countries vary in terms oI psychological characteristics (HoIstede, 1980), and an international Iirm`s decision on the entry modes will reIlect characteristics oI the home countries (Shetty, 1979). As what Taylor et al. (2000) have Iound, although resource commitment is widely considered true, Japanese multinational Iirms are more likely to adopt an entry mode with a lower
control even when resource commitment is high. Erramilli (1996) concludes that Iirms Irom countries that are characterized as high power distance and low uncertainty avoidance may preIer an entry mode with Iull ownership control in a Ioreign market.
The entry strategies are very important Ior a Iirm when they have decided to enter a Ioreign market. The entry strategies include the timing, scale and modes oI entry. It is obvious that an early entry may gain several advantages, but they must be balanced against the pioneering costs and risks. Large scale entry into a Ioreign market implies great strategic commitment that limit the Ilexibility oI the Iirm, while potential huge beneIits are also associated with such a strategy. Concerned with the entry modes, there are six modes Ior a Iirm to enter a Ioreign market, and each oI them has its own distinct advantages and disadvantages. Wei et al (2005) has concluded several important Iactors that aIIecting the choice oI modes. Firms that are going to enter a Ioreign market need to balance the beneIits, costs and risks associated with each option, and choose the most appropriated entry strategy.
2.2 Operating Strategies
AIter the entry into a Ioreign market, how to organize and operate the business in the Ioreign market is also signiIicantly important. According to Grant (2005), every Iirm has three sets oI key characteristicsgoals and values, resources and capabilities, and organizational structure and system. In addition, he argues that strategy is viewed as
Iorming a link between the Iirm that embodied by the three characteristics and its external environment, and is mainly concerned with planning how to achieve its goals.
There are Iour basic strategies Ior international Iirms to compete in a global environment: an international strategy, a Multidomestic strategy, a global strategy and a transnational strategy (Bartlett and Ghoshal, 1989). Firms pursuing an international strategy try to transIer valuable skills and products that competitors do not possess to Ioreign markets, but undertake limited local customization. Firms that pursue a multidomestic strategy try to customize their product oIIering, marketing and all other business strategies to adapt the Ioreign national conditions to achieve maximum local responsiveness. Firms pursuing a global strategy Iocus on increasing proIitability through experience curve eIIects and location economies to achieve a low cost strategy. Firms that pursue a transnational strategy plan to exploit experience curve eIIects and local economies, transIer core competencies and Iocus on local responsiveness, which may enable Iirms simultaneously achieve both cost and diIIerentiation advantages. Each oI the Iour strategies has both advantages and disadvantages, and Hill (2004) argues that international Iirms should choose the appropriate strategy based the pressures Ior cost reduction and Ior local responsiveness.
2.3 Positioning Strategies
When an international company has been settled in a Ioreign market, it has to decide how to compete in the particular industry. Besanko et al (2003) argue that a Iirm`s position in the market is one oI the most important Iactors in determining a Iirm`s success, and a Iirm`s generic strategy describes how it positions itselI to compete in the market. There are three generic strategies that establish basic models Ior strategic management: cost leadership, diIIerentiation, and a Iocus or niche strategy (Porter, 1980).
2.3.1 Cost Leadership
Cost Leadership is the strategy that a Iirm succeed by achieving the lower cost per unit oI products than competitors` without sacriIicing a quality (Holt and Wigginton, 2002). By achieving cost leadership, the Iirm could gain signiIicant market share. Cullen and Parboteeah (2005) argues that the eIIiciency achieved by cost savings could occur anywhere Irom the very beginning oI the production, such as the design or research oI a product or raw material purchases, to the end oI product Iinal sale. Grant (2005) suggests that every business can be viewed as a chain oI activities that creates value, and each activity along the value chain has diIIerent cost structure. ThereIore, to build cost advantages, a Iirm needs to analyze costs structure and cost drivers oI each activity along the value chain. Grant (2005) has concluded the principal stages oI value chain costs analysis as Iollows.
First, the Iirm needs to disaggregate its entire business into separate activities, which requires Iull understanding oI the processes Irom inputs to customer delivery. Usually, the Iirm`s divisional structure is a useIul guide, but Iirm should also consider the importance oI an activity, the dissimilarity oI activities and how the competitors perIorm a particular activity. Then the Iirm should establish the relative importance oI the activities that are the major source oI cost in the total cost oI the product. AIter that, the Iirm should compare the costs oI identiIied activities with those oI competitors, and hence could Iind out which activities the Iirm perIorms more eIIiciently and which not. IdentiIying the cost drivers oI each activity is very important. Cost drives are the Iactors that determine the level oI cost Ior each activity, such as wages rates and deIects rates are important cost drivers Ior labour intensive activities. However, some business activities are interrelated, and hence the cost oI one activity may be determined by other activities. ThereIore, it is crucial to identiIy this kind oI linkages in order to identiIy the right cost drivers. Through the stages above, the Iirm thereIore could identiIy the opportunities to reduce costs oI each possible activity along value chain. There are several ways Ior Iirms to achieve cost advantages, and Figure 3 has summarized these drivers oI cost advantage (Grant, 2005, p254).
2.3.2 DiIIerentiation
DiIIerentiation advantage is the strategy that Iirms provide superior value within the industry to customers (Cullen and Parboteeah, 2005). Porter (1980) argues that the perceived superior value as compared to industry competitors is the key Ior the Iirm to diIIerentiate itselI against competitors. The basic reason is that, through diIIerentiation, Iirms could charge premium prices on the superior value oI the product and thus enjoy more proIits than competitors in the industry. Usually, Iirms could provide the superior value to customers through many ways such as unique product Ieatures, higher quality, or all-round complementary services, etc.every aspect oI the way that the Iirm relates to its customers (Grant, 2005).
Grant (2005) argues that, to achieve diIIerentiation advantages successIully, Iirms should match customers` demand Ior diIIerentiation with the Iirm`s capacity to supply diIIerentiation. ThereIore, a successIul diIIerentiation depends on both the demand side and supple side oI a product.
As the demand side is concerned, the key is to Iully understand customers in terms oI their requirement and preIerence oI product Ieatures, and their willingness to pay Ior superior value. ThereIore, Grand (2005) has concluded several useIul techniques that can guide the Iirm`s positioning and pricing oI their product, including multidimensional scaling that analyzes customer`s perception oI diIIerent attributes oI competing products (SchiIIman, et al., 1981), conjoint analysis that analyzes the customers` preIerence among diIIerent attributes (Cattin and Wittink, 1982), hedonic
price analysis that calculates the market price Ior each valuable attribute (Gondal, 1994), and value curve analysis that identiIies innovative combinations oI product characteristics that can create new market space Ior a Iirm (Kim and Mauborgne, 1999). However, Grant (2005) argues that the above statistical market research techniques would not lead to an eIIective diIIerentiation. He continues to argue that what really matters is an understanding oI customers on what and how they behave, because most customers choose a product that reIlects their social goals and values to realize community with others or one`s own identity. These social and psychological Iactors may not be captured by the statistical techniques.
On the other side, the Iirm`s ability to oIIer diIIerentiation is also important to achieve diIIerentiation advantage. Many well-diIIerentiated Iirms usually spend more on Irom product research and development, technology, hiring higher skilled people, to marketing, distribution, and customer services ((Holt and wigginton, 2002). Grant (2005) concludes several principal stages that use the value chain to identiIy opportunities Ior diIIerentiation advantages Ior Iirm. The Iirst stage is that the Iirm should construct a value chain Ior the Iirm as well as customers. Then along the value chain, the Iirm can identiIy the drivers oI uniqueness in each activity in order to assess the Iirm`s potential Ior diIIerentiating its product. Among the drives oI uniqueness identiIied, Iirms should select the most promising diIIerentiation variables Ior the Iirm. Firm then locate linkages between the value chain oI the Iirm and that oI the customers so that a Iirm can identiIy the means by which it can create value Ior
customers and can evaluate the potential proIitability oI diIIerentiation.
2.3.3 Focus Strategy
Focus strategy, compared with the above two basic generic strategies, can also be used to achieve competitive advantages by Iocusing on one segment oI a market or concentrating on one good or services (Holt and Wigginton, 2002). The key issue is competitive scope, which represents how broadly a Iirm targets its products or services (Cullen and Parboteeach, 2005). Cullen and Parboteeach (2005) argue that Iocus strategy oIIers several strategic advantages Ior Iirms relative to broad-based competitors. It enables the Iirm to react more quickly and behave more Ilexible than rivals to customer needs, and also helps a Iirm to attract and retain customers. There are three common Iocus strategies: customer specialization, product specialization, and geographic specialization (Besanko, et al, 2003). Customer specialization means that the Iirm oIIers their products to cater the needs oI particular class oI customers, and the example oI customer specialization is that clothes oI Top Shop are designed Ior young and Iashion people while those oI Burberry are designed Ior classic and rich people. As a result, the Iirm would not underserve or overserve customers who especially value certain attributes oI a product or who do not. Product specialization means that the Iirm produces a limited set oI products Ior a wide set oI customers so that the Iirm could serve these group oI customers especially well. The Iocus on a limited set oI products enables the Iirm to enjoy beneIits oI economies oI scale and
learning economies. The geographic specialization means that the Iirm oIIers their products within a narrowly deIined geographic market, which would enable the Iirm to enjoy economies oI scale such as in local marketing, and to better serve local markets. In addition, Besanko, et al (2003) conclude that these three basic Iocus strategies, compared with broad-based strategies, insulate the Iirm Irom competition, as limited customer demand in some segment oI market could more beneIit the only one Iocusing Iirm in this market in terms oI little competition and substantial returns.
Cost leadership, diIIerentiation, and Iocus are three generic strategies Ior Iirms to create their competitive advantages in order to compete in the market they are serving. Each oI them can help a Iirm to realize success in the market with keen competition. ThereIore, Iirms need to recognize their internal strengths and weakness as well as external environment, and hence Iormulate a suitable strategy and then implement it
2.4 Human Resource Management
Human resource management is gradually Irom being viewed as a support Iunction oI strategy implementation to one oI strategic importance (Pucik, 1992; Scullion and Starkey, 2000). Indeed, people are the most valuable assets in a Iirm. Without people, the Iirm would not exist; plans, decisions and strategies would not be carried out; and the competitive advantages would not be achieved. Human resource management is the activities a Iirm carries out to use its human resources eIIectively, and the basic
Iunctions include staIIing, training, motivation and labour relations (Hill, 2004). When human resource management is applied to the international setting, it becomes international human resource management (Cullen and Parboteeah, 2005). Bartlett and Ghoshal (1989) argue that an eIIective human resource management is vital Ior the successIul implementation oI international strategies Ior multinational Iirms. International human resource management concerns with meeting the needs oI multinational conIigurations with little similarity to traditional organizations (Holt and Wigginton, 2002). ThereIore, when a Iirm enters into a Ioreign market and hence an international context, this Iirm Iaces more complexity in human resource management.
Researches on international human resource management can be categorized into three broad strands (Keating and Thompson, 2004). The Iirst concerns human resource management in multinational Iirms, which Iocuses on the management oI human resource in international Iirms to eIIectively achieve its strategic objectives (Schuler et al, 1993; Sparrow et al, 1994; Scullion, 1995; Taylor et al, 1996; De Cieri and Dowling, 1999). These studies particularly argue that the nature oI both home-country and host-country aIIect the extent to which multinational Iirms implement their human resource management in the local subsidiaries (Ferner, 1997), and Adler and Ghadar (1990) indicate that international human resource management should be linked to external environment as well as internal business strategies. The second strand mainly Iocuses on culture diIIerences relating to human resource
management, which suggests that culture will inIluence the development and operation oI human resource management policies (HoIstede, 1980; Laurent, 1986; Schneider and Barsoux, 1997; Adler, 2003). They argue that cultures, values and norms aIIect employees` behaviours and attitudes as well as management practices, and thereIore, there is no universal model oI management and management theories and practices are not transIerable Irom one culture to another. The third is comparative human resource management, which compare the human resource management systems and practices across diIIerent nations (Pieper, 1990; Brewster et al, 2000; Clark, 1996). They describe and explain diIIerences oI human resource management systems between diIIerent countries, and argue that these diIIerences are attributed to diIIerent national cultural, legal, economic, and social environments. The three strands oI international human resource management studies have the similar objectivesunderstanding and explaining human resource management, and the diIIerence is that each oI them has its distinct Iocusing explained point.
2.4.1 HRM Adaptation to Local Context
Staffing. Schein (1985) reIers staIIing policy as the selection oI employees Ior particular jobs and it does not only involve selecting individuals who have the required skills, but also a tool Ior developing and promoting corporate culture. Geringer et al (2002) also Iound that technical skills as well as a person`s potential to do to good job are important selection criteria Ior managers in 13 countries. ThereIore,
the main objective Ior selection is to enable the Iirm to achieve and attain higher perIormance. According to Hill (2004), there are three types oI staIIing policy: the ethnocentric approachall key positions in management are Iilled by home-country nationals, the polycentric approachhost-country nationals are recruited to manage subsidiaries and home-country nationals occupy key position at headquarters, and the geocentric approachthe best people regardless oI nationality are recruited Ior key jobs. Each oI the three approaches has advantages and disadvantages. By hiring home-country nationals, the Iirm can easily maintain uniIied corporate culture, transIer core competencies to Ioreign subsidiaries; On the other hand, this will limit advancement opportunities that lead to resentment, lower productivity and higher turnover rate, and will Iail to understand host-country cultures that lead to 'cultural myopia (Hill, 2004). Recruiting host-country nationals will enable the Iirm to avoid the problems oI 'cultural myopia and enjoy the beneIits that the local managers bring to the Iirm such as political, social and business connections; however, it also has disadvantages such as gap between host-country and home-country managers due to languages, cultures and other diIIerences, and lack oI integration between headquarters and Ioreign subsidiaries (Holt and Wigginton, 2002; Hill, 2004). The geocentric staIIing policy enables the Iirm to build and make the best use oI a cadre oI international executives, but the oIten time-consuming and expensive creation oI a cadre oI makes this policy diIIicult to implement (Hill, 2004).
Training. No matter whether the home-country nationals or host-country nationals
are recruited, they should be trained when they enter into a new international environment in order to perIorm better. It is Iound and estimated that there are high Iailure rate and costs oI expatriation all over the world (Harvey, 1983; Black and Gregersen, 1999; Caudron, 1991). ThereIore, Dowling and Schuler (1990) Iound that cultural training, language training and practical training are useIul ways to reduce expatriate Iailure Ior international Iirms. Culture training is to prompt the home-country managers to understand the host-country culture, so as to eIIectively deal with host-country subordinates and business aIIairs. Although English is prevalent all over the world, communications in the language oI the host-country will build rapport with host-country subordinates and improve the management eIIectiveness. Practical training reIers to that Iirms oIten devote considerable eIIort to build expatriate community alike with good sources oI support and inIormation, and thereIore the expatriate manager and the Iamily will be more easy and smooth to adapt to a Ioreign liIe and culture. Unlike expatriate managers, managers Irom host-country lack training at parent company as well as cross-cultural exposure, and only learn through their own experience (Cannon, 1995), and hence although they have the potential to do a good job, they lack international knowledge and experiences. Holt and Wigginton (2002) have identiIied several opportunities Ior local managers to gain knowledge and experiences. First, there have been many distance learning as well as education alliances Iormed between local and western schools that create new and more learning opportunities Ior people all over the world. In addition, many international Iirms send local promising managers back to school and hence many
leading American universities take this opportunity to oIIer resident, exchange as well as modular development courses to attract them. Some employers also make substantial investment in training potential management such as mentoring programs adopted by Ford to match candidates to work alongside Ioreign managers on joint projects, and the creation oI Motorola University in China to provide long-term education to aspiring young managers. In a word, management training is an important but also expensive investment Ior international Iirms, because they oIten hire people with management potential, and then help them to develop and give Iull play to their potential.
Motivating Employees. Even iI an international Iirm has the best strategy and human resources, it will not be successIul iI the management does not well motivate and lead employees in the host-country. Mitchell (1997) deIined motivation as the process that account Ior an individual`s intensity, direction, and persistence oI eIIort toward attaining a goal; thus, motivation is the stimulus that drives behaviors. However, in the context with diversiIied cultures, motivation becomes more complicated as the cultural characteristics are not universal. HoIstede (1980) argues that human values and needs such as perceived importance oI monetary rewards and achievement vary among cultures, so it is dangerous to motivate people Irom diIIerent cultures in the same way by the same phenomena. HoIstede (1983) Iound that even within the same culture in one country, people`s perceptions may also vary among diIIerent social classes and occupational groups. Inglehart (2000) conducted a study oI people`s
attitudes toward work in 50 countries, and their work the World Values Surveys and European Values Surveys suggest that people Irom diIIerent nations place diIIerent magnitude oI importance to their work Iunctions. Indeed, people Irom some countries may place selI-achievement at a higher priority while others may place monetary income at a higher priority. ThereIore, management oI the international Iirm should understand the working reasons oI Ioreign employees. In addition, work centrality is also an important dimension oI employees` values to work. England (1986) reIers work centrality as the degree oI general importance oI work relative to other interests Ior an individual. Parboteeah and Cullen (2003) examined work centrality diIIerences in 26 countries and Iound that national cultures do have signiIicant impact on people`s work centrality. They Iound that uncertainty avoidance and masculinity negatively aIIect work centrality, and individualism positively aIIects work centrality. Usually, people with greater work centrality usually work more and are dedicated, and hence lead to more eIIective organization (Collen and Parboteeah, 2005). Moreover, the value oI rewards may diIIer among diIIerent nations and cultures. Holt and Wigginton (2002) argue that motivation is inextricably linked with employees` perceived value oI rewards that reIlects the meaning oI their eIIorts. They continue to argue that perceptions oI rewards vary according to values oI diIIerent cultures, such as people in a high individualism nation valuing more on individual achievement or personal recognition than those in collective nation, and people in masculinity culture more valuing motivation in terms oI job toughness and competition.
Thus, it is serious error Ior international managers to generalize human values and motives across cultures. Alder (1997) argues that most motivation theories, such as Maslow`s hierarchy oI needs, ERG, expectancy theory, etc., were developed in the context oI American. As cultures are not universal, neither are these theories. However, the logic oI these theories is important, such as Maslow`s hierarchy oI needs in which the hierarchy can be adapted according to Ioreign national cultures. ThereIore, managers should understand the host-country`s value about work, jobs and rewards, and make suitable motivation strategies in order to motivate employees eIIectively.
2.5 Resource-Based Theory and Management Strategies
2.5.1 The ResourceBased Theory
Every Iirm plans and implements various strategies in order to create competitive advantages so that they could outperIorm their competitors and earn a higher rate oI proIits in their industry. To achieve superior competitive advantage, Besanko et al (2003) argue that a Iirm must create more values, which depends on its stock oI resources and distinctive capabilities oI using those resources. For long-term proIitability, a Iirm must ensure its successIul strategies and the created competitive strategies are sustainable (Cullen and Parboteeah, 2005). Sustainable is critical and it means that strategies are not easily neutralized or attacked by competitors (Aaker,
1989), and its competitive advantage persists despite eIIorts by competitors or potential entrants to duplicate or neutralize (Barney, 1991).
ThereIore, during 1990s, the resource-based theory oI Iirm was developed, and it argues that any Iirm is essentially a pool oI resources and capabilities which determine the strategy and perIormance oI the Iirm; and iI all Iirms in the market have the same pool oI resources and capabilities, all Iirms will create the same value and thus no competitive advantage is available in the industry (Barney, 1991; PeteraI, 1993; Dierickx and Cool, 1989; Grant, 1991; WernerIelt, 1984; Mahoney and Pandian, 1992). Lockett and Thompson (2001) state that 'resource-based view emphasizes Iirm heterogeneity and path dependency, as each Iirm`s resource bundle is unique, and the consequence oI its past managerial decisions and subsequent experiences, it Iollows that so is each Iirm`s opportunity set. Resource-based theory also argues that, to sustain competitive, a Iirm should possess resources and capabilities that are imperIectly mobile, valuable, nonsubstitutable and diIIicult to imitate. These Iour characteristics can lead to the asymmetries in the resources and capabilities oI Iirms in the industry and serve as the basis oI sustainability. Besanko et al (2003) suggest that these Iour characteristics can be induced or reinIorced through isolating mechanisms that are deIined by Rumelt (1984) as the Iorces that limit the extent to which a competitive advantage can be duplicated or neutralized through the resource-creation activities oI other Iirms. There are two groups oI isolating mechanisms: impediments to imitation that impede existing Iirms and potential entrants Irom duplicating
resources and capabilities, such as legal restrictions, superior access to inputs or customers, scale-based barriers and intangible barriers (e.g. causal ambiguity, dependence on historical circumstances and social complexity; and earlv-mover advantages that increase the economic power oI a competitive advantage over time, such as learning curve, reputation and buyer uncertainty, buyer switching costs and network eIIects.
The resource-based theory has been diIIused and accepted widely. Peng (2001) suggested several reasons Ior this. The Iirst is that resource-based theory has greater perceived advantage due to its Iocus on Iirm-level determinants oI company strategy and perIormance. Second, resource-based view is compatible with both behavioral and economic schools oI thought in strategy (Mahoney and Pandian, 1992). The third reason is that the logic oI resource-based theory is simple and easy to understand. In addition, the resource-based theory has a high level oI trailability'the degree to which an innovation may be experimented with on a limited basis (Rogers, 1983, p15). The Iinal reason is that various high visibility Iorums and events have supported the resource-based theory, and thus the role oI credible is instrumental. With the above attributes above, the resource-based theory is adopted by most Iirms all over the world.
2.5.2 Entry Mode Selection and Resource-Based Theory
It has been suggested that there are several entry modes available Ior Iirms to consider aIter they have made an entry decision to a Ioreign country, and each oI these entry modes can bring both advantages and disadvantages to these Iirms. ThereIore, the selection oI the most appropriate entry mode involves signiIicant tradeoIIs and it is very important Ior the Iirm`s Iuture development. Hill et al (1990) argue that a particular entry decision is closely related to the overall strategic resources and capabilities owned by the Iirm.
Hill (2004) has made some generalization Ior international Iirms about how to select an entry mode based on the resources they owned. He suggests a distinction between Iirm`s resources and capabilities oI the international Iirm in deploying its technological know-how and in management know-how. II a Iirm can create competitive advantages by deploying its technological know-how, licensing and joint venture arrangements should be avoided, and a wholly owned subsidiary is preIerred. Based on resource-based theory, technological know-how is one oI the resources those are easy and rapid Ior competitors to imitate iI not protected well, so a wholly owned subsidiary is the most rationale entry mode to protect technological know-how. However, licensing and joint-venture are oIten selected when the Iirm owning the technological know-how would like to reduce the risk oI the technology being expropriated or when the Iirm expects imitation by competitors to avoid transitory. On the other hand, some Iirms create competitive advantages by deploying management how-how, and they possess value brand name and reputation. Usually, brand names
are protected by laws and regulations, as a result many Iirms would choose a combination oI Iranchising and subsidiaries to control the Iranchises in a Ioreign country, and the subsidiaries may be in Iorms oI wholly owned or joint ventures.
2.5.3 Positioning Strategies and Resource-Based Theory
Whether to purse a cost leadership or diIIerentiation strategy also depends on the resources and capabilities that both the parent Iirm and subsidiary own. In the early part oI this research, several drivers oI cost advantages have been identiIied, such as economies oI scale, economies oI learning, production techniques, etc. These costs advantages can be achieved iI the Iirms have superior advantages oI purchasing, advertising and research and development. Usually larger and more reputed Iirms may enjoy beneIits oI bulk purchases at a lower unit price, large coverage oI advertisement at a lower advertising cost per consumer, and R&D spillovers when ideas developed in one project are oI help in another project (Besanko et al, 2003). ThereIore, Ior Iirms with resources and capabilities that enable the drivers oI cost advantages, a cost leadership strategy is Iavored to create competitive advantages. As diIIerentiation strategy is concerned, Grant (2005) argues that Iirms need to consider their internal strengths in terms oI resources and capabilities to determine whether they have potential and advantages Ior diIIerentiation compared with their competitors. Usually, diIIerentiation requires high levels oI technologies and services, which, in turn, requires signiIicant superior inIormation system supporting Iast response capabilities,
training to support customer service excellence, and Iast new product development. In addition, each activity along the value chain is also very important, such as quality oI components and materials, wide variety oI product, Iast delivery, eIIicient order processing, strong brand reputation, and customer aIter-sale services (Grant, 2005). These resources and capabilities provide Iavorable conditions Ior Iirms to pursue a diIIerentiation strategy. For international Iirms, Peng and Wang (2000) argue that it is not necessary that the resources and capabilities needed are a one-way process originating Iorm headquarters, but rather, subsidiaries can develop their own. As Birkinshaw (1996) reported, some subsidiary growth is driven by its own distinctive capabilities developed through eIIorts by subsidiary management rather than parent management. ThereIore, the choice oI strategies does not depend on the resources and capabilities owned by parent Iirm, but also local subsidiaries.
2.5.4 Human Resource Management and Resource-Based Theory
In this paper, it has been argued that human resources are critical Ior the success oI an international Iirm. Human resources oIIer skills, knowledge, and reasoning and decision-making abilities (Grant, 2005). Grant (2005) also suggests a Iew kinds oI resources and capabilities that human resources bring to the Iirm. The Iirst is that the education, training and experiences oI employees determine the skills available to the Iirm. In addition, the adaptability oI employees contributes to the strategic Ilexibility oI the Iirm. Moreover, the social and collaborative skills oI employees bring the
capacity oI the Iirm to transIorm human resources into organizational capabilities. Finally, the commitment and loyalty oI employees determine the capacity oI the Iirm to attain and maintain competitive advantages. ThereIore, these characteristics oI human resources play signiIicant role on the perIormance oI the Iirm. II these characteristics are inimitable and immobile, then resource-based theory suggests that the Iirm is able to create and maintain its competitive advantages compared with its competitors.
Taylor et al (1996) have studied three levels oI human resourcesthe parent Iirm, the subsidiary and the employees. They suggest that top managers at the parent Iirm level present some oI the most valuable, unique, and hard to imitate resources. Top managers oI an international Iirm have signiIicant international experience and speciIic tacit knowledge, and thus Carpenter et al (2001) argue that this kind oI experience and knowledge are diIIicult to access and imitate Ior other international Iirms those do not possess. At the subsidiary level, staIIing subsidiaries with entrepreneurial managers (Birkinshaw et al, 1998), providing suIIicient incentive to subsidiary (Gupta & Govindarajan, 2000), and seeking a Iit between its human resources practices and local culture (Schuler & Rogovsky, 1998), are all suggested to be able to Iacilitate subsidiary capability development and knowledge sharing. Finally, at the employee level, Bae & Lawler (2000) and Lee & Miller (1999) Iound that it is more likely to attain higher perIormance iI Iirms value people as a source oI competitive advantages.
Human resources possess complex social relationships, and Barney (1991) argues that social relationships may be one oI the most diIIicult to imitate resources. ThereIore, Irom the resource-based view oI point, human resources are vital to propel the Iurther progress in creating and sustaining competitive advantages in the industry.
Chapter 3 Research Methodology
The previous chapter has reviewed the strategies Ior international Iirms to enter, expand and develop in a Ioreign country, and how the resource-based theory contributes to the selection oI an appropriate strategy. This chapter will introduce the research methods used in this research.
A methodology is 'the analysis oI, and rational Ior, the particular method or methods used in a given study, and in that type oI study in general (Jankowicz, 1994). ThereIore, it is generally a research approach Ior studied topics. Blaikie (2000) suggests that it also includes a critical evaluation oI alternative research methods.
3.1 Research Design
This dissertation will Iind out the extent to which the strategies oI Wal-Mart and CarreIour in China are diIIerent Irom each other and the reasons why they are diIIerent in a resource-based perspective. There are two broad categories oI researches: quantitative and qualitative research. Qualitative research has always been in an important place in the studies oI international business (Marschan-Piekkari and Welch, 2004). This dissertation will apply the qualitative method to conduct the comparative study oI the two retailing giants` strategies. According to Van Maanen (1983, p9), qualitative methods is deIined as procedures Ior 'coming to terms with the meaning
not the Irequency oI a phenomenon by studying it in its social context.
Cresswell (1998) listed Iive research approaches that each has a distinguished history in one oI the social science disciplines and then explores their application in research design. The Iive research approaches include:
1. Biographical research, concerned with an individual and their experiences, and maybe in the Iorm oI a selI-report or autobiography or a biography prepared by another person based on oral reports and or written materials. 2. Phenomenological, concerned with experiences oI more than one person in relation to a concept or phenomenon. 3. Grounded theory, concerned with generating or 'grounding theory in their observations rather than applying or using an extant theory. 4. Ethnography, concerned with a variety oI diIIerent schools oI thought (e.g. structural Iunctionalism, Ieminism, critical theory, etc.), that emphasizing the Iirst-hand collection oI data based on the observation oI people. 5. Case studies, concerned with a detailed and in-depth description and analysis oI a 'case or 'bounded system using multiple sources oI inIormation.
Considering the research questions, I choose the case studv to conduct this research. According to Hartley(2004, pp.323), 'case study research consists oI a detailed investigation, oIten with data collected over a period oI time, oI phenomena, within
their context, and the aim is to provide an analysis oI the context and processes which illuminate the theoretical issues being studied. Hartley also argues that case study is particularly suited to research questions which require detailed understanding oI social or organizational processes. In addition, Yin (1994) suggests that case studies are preIerred when 'how and 'why questions are to be answered, and when the researcher has little control over events and when the Iocus is on a current phenomenon in a real-liIe context.
As this research is concerned, it is an investigation oI strategies adopted by Wal-Mart and CarreIour in the Chinese retail industry, and an analysis oI the diIIerences between the two in a resource-based theory perspective. ThereIore, designing this paper in the Iorm oI case studies is the most appropriate.
3.2 Research Methods
AIter designing the research, the research methods that are going to be used are also important. Fisher et al (2004) suggest several commonly used research methods: interviews, such as an open interview, pre-coded interview, and semi-structured interview; panels, that gather a group oI people to have a Iree Ilowing, but Iocused, discussion on a particular topic; questionnaires, including both pre-coded and open questionnaires; observational research, either open or pre-coding observation; and documentary research by using documentary materials to take either an open or
pre-coded Iorm. The use oI methods mainly depends on the nature and scope oI data collected.
In this research, documentary research method, particularly Iirms` historical documentary review and analysis is adopted Ior this speciIic case study. History is regarded as a repository oI Iacts and can be used to illuminate the present and Iuture especially in the resource-based view. De Geer et al (2004) argue that historical documents can be used in two diIIerent capacities. The Iirst is that they are remnants oI earlier processes in the organization and thus bear witness to activities in the past. They tell the activities and events happened at that period oI time, but researchers need to identiIy and veriIy the authentic document required. On the other than, these sources may tell numerous inIormation about some hidden situations, processes and attitudes within the organization. These requires critical scrutiny because they involve complicated relationship that researchers cannot easily assess.
3.3 Case Design
Two casesWal-Mart and CarreIour are selected to be studied in this research. This design oI case studies is decided Ior several reasons.
First, due to the aim oI this researchto provide an overview oI the relationship between the Iirm strategies and its possessed resources and capabilities, a comparative
studies oI more than one Iirm in the same market context would be more convincing than one case studies. By contrasting the diIIerent strategies adopted by diIIerent Iirms in the same context, the determinant Iactorsresources and capabilities are stressed as the main points. However, the number oI cases chosen cannot be too much. Studying a great number oI cases would result in verbose and repeated data interpretation and analysis. It is also a work burden. Two or three cases should be the better choice Ior a comparative study. Due to time and words limitation oI this research, two cases are preIerred in this research.
In addition, Wal-Mart and CarreIour are chosen as representatives depending on several Iactors. First, Wal-Mart and CarreIour are the largest two retailers worldwide. They have similar business scales and strength, and hence they are comparable in terms oI their resources and capabilities. In addition, Wal-Mart and CarreIour entered China in the same period oI time, and then expand and develop together experiencing diIIerent periods oI policy changing. This enables a successive analysis oI the two retailers` strategies Irom their entry until today. Furthermore, although Wal-Mart ranked head CarreIour in the world, but it becomes Iollowing CarreIour in Chinese retail market. These three Iactors all enable a comprehensively comparative study oI their strategies.
3.4 Data Collection
Orbell (1987) suggests that most suIIicient inIormation Ior historical documentary method can oIten be collected, without having to contact companies, in public sources available to most oI people. The main sources oI these historical inIormation that could be used are through companies` websites, annual reports, documents or websites published by government, trade associations, and research organizations and proIessional bodies, newspapers and magazines, textbooks, academic journals, or online database and so on. The available sources oI inIormation are listed in Table 3.1, and the ticked ones are the sources available to use Ior this research.
Table 3.1 Sources of Information
Data generated by individuals and organizations Government bodies; \ Trade associations; \ Private companies; Local employer networks; Trade unions; Patent oIIices; Research organizations and proIessional bodies; \ Consumer organizations
Data recorded in primary sources
Monographs (books on a single topic); Academic journal articles; \ ConIerence papers; Unpublished research reports (available Irom author); Newspapers and magazines (some Ieatures and news items) \ Company annual reports; \ Company price lists; Company internal house magazines`; \
Data organized, collated and indexed in secondary sources Books oI readings 9collations oI journal articles);
Those are summarized and signposted in tertiary sources Subject guides; Library catalogues and indexes; \ On-line databases; \ InIormation services; \ Librarians; Your tutor; \
Source. Howard and Sharp (1983).
As this research is concerned, the websites oI parent companies are good sources oI the overview oI Wal-Mart and CarreIour, as well as their possessed resources and capabilities. The websites oI local companies provides their activities and strategies in China. Both provide the inIormation year by year, which provides convenience and reliability Ior researchers. Some important Iigures and policy documents can be obtained through governments` oIIicial websites, such as Central People`s Government P.R.C, and Ministry oI Commerce China, which enable the collected inIormation`s reality and reliability. Online public published newspapers, magazines, academic journals, textbooks and etc., especially with great reputation, will provides reliable and just inIormation and analysis oI the activities and strategies oI Wal-Mart and CarreIour.
3.5 Summary
According to the research aims and objectives, this research chooses Wal-Mart and CarreIour as two cases to conduct a qualitative cases study. Through documentary research method, both Wal-Mart and CarreIour`s historical documentary are reviewed and analyzed. All the inIormation and data about Wal-Mart and CarreIour will be gained through companies` websites, governments` oIIicial websites as well as other public published newspapers, magazines, academic journal articles, textbooks and etc. Due to the strict approval, edition and reputation, these sources oI inIormation and data are believed to be just and reliable.
Chapter 4 Industry Analysis of Chinese Retail Market
Industry analysis provides a Iramework Ior assessment oI industry and Iirm perIormance, identiIication oI key Iactors aIIecting perIormance, determination oI how changes in the business environment may aIIect perIormance and identiIication oI opportunities and threats in a particular business context (Besanko, et al 2003). This chapter conducts an industry analysis by applying Porter`s Five Forces Irameworkinternal rivalry, entry, substitutes and complementary products, supplier power and buyer power.
4.1 Industry Facts
It is probably saIe to argue that, since the Chinese economy reIormation occurred in 1979, retail sector is one oI the sectors with the most rapid changes, the most Iundamental transIormation and most intensive competition. Since 1979 the Iree market retailing became legal again, and Chinese retail sector grew exponentially (Davies, 1994). Davies (1994) Iound that aIter Iree market retailing was permitted, the number oI retailing stores in China grew explosively Irom 1 million in 1979 to 10 million in 1992. By the end oI 2001, the number oI retail businesses reached around 20 million units (euromonitor.com, 2003). Meanwhile, the retail sector is growing more mature and complete. Every retailer, Irom domestic to Ioreign ones, is diIIerentiating itselI to realize its distinct position in this industry, and adopting
advanced management models and technologies.
The most important event in Chinese retail industry is the market openness policies Ior Ioreign investment started in 1992. This openness policy brings both opportunities and challenges to Chinese retail industry. On one hand, it leads to industry revolution, and on the other hand, it brings intensive competition to domestic retailers. China opened its retail market gradually to Ioreign retailers. In July, 1992, the central government oI China issued Commercial Retail Areas on the Issue of the Use of Foreign Investment Approvals, which started to allow one or two Ioreign retailers to open business as pilots in Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Guangzhou, Dalian and Qingdao, and Iive Special Economic Zones. However, there are Iour conditions Ior these Ioreign investments: (1) the Chinese partner must have a stake more than 51, (2) they must Iorm joint ventures or cooperation to enter the market, (3) they cannot operate wholesale businesses, (4) the proportion oI imported goods, shall not exceed 30 (Marketing BrieIs). In June 1996, the central government oI China expanded the number oI experimental cities to all provincial capital cities and several separated planned cities, and also allowed Ioreign retailers to operate wholesale businesses. This is believed to indicate that China, especially the retail industry, took an important step in the opening policy. At the end oI 2004, China removed all limits on business location, amount and shares structure. Accompanied with the large market with great proIit potential, the Ioreign investments greatly accelerate the pace oI entering China.
4.2 Market Definition
According to Besanko et al (2003), market deIinition requires identiIication oI both product market and geographic market. Retail can be deIined as the Iunction and activities involved in the selling oI commodities directly to consumers (www.theIreedictionary.com). ThereIore, the product market can be considered as providing brick-and-mortar stores with a large range oI commodities and services Ior consumer shopping. Others, such as Chinese traditional wet markets and street market, as well as online retailing and television retailing, are considered as substitutes in this analysis. Consumers tend to shop locally, and consumers oI a metropolitan area tend to visit retailing stores in the same vicinity. It might be thought that each metropolitan is a distinct geographic market. However, considering the aims oI this research, we will deIine the geographic market to be studies as the entire Chinese retail market.
Market deIinition is a cornerstone oI industry analysis (Besanko, et al, 2003). Porter`s Iive Iorces Iramework (illustrated in Figure *) will be perIormed to analyze the retail industry in China.
4.3 Internal Rivalry
According to Besanko et al (2003), internal rivalry reIers to the jockey Ior shares by Iirms within a market. Due to the economy reIormation in China, the number oI
competitors in Chinese retail industry is increasing rapidly. Especially aIter China oIIicially became a member oI WTO, the Ioreign retailers enter China market as well as expand in China in a signiIicant rapid pace. In addition, each competitor may have diIIerent cost. There is also substantial excess capacity Ior each retailer. Furthermore, in this retail market, customers oIten have low switching costs. According to Besanko et al (2003), these characteristics oI retail market tend to heat up price competition. ThereIore, the Chinese retail market meets the criteria Ior Iierce internal rivalry.
According to China Internet InIormation Center News (2002), China has planned to create its own large domestic retailers. There are a Iew domestic retailers engage in a Iast and large development. With a Iew number oI international retail giants, the competition in China retail industry is inevitably intensive and sharp. Table 4.1 shows the a Iew top retailers in China consisting both domestic and Ioreign ones.
Table 4.1 The Rank of Retailers in China Rank Retailer Name Sales in 2006 (Billion RMB) Number of Outlets 1 Gome Electric Appliance, China 86.93 820 2 Bailian Group, China 77.09 6280 3 Suning Appliance Chain Store, China 60.95 520 4 China Resources Vanguard, China 37.85 2250 5 Dashang Group, China 36.14 182
6 CarreIour, France 24.80 95 14 Wal-Mart, USA 15.03 71 17 Lotus, Thailand 13.50 75 23 Metro, Germany 9.37 33 24 Tesco, UK 9.30 47 Source: Each company`s website
From the table, it is easy to Iind that domestic retailers occupy the top Iive retailers in terms oI sales in 2006, and they own a signiIicant market share in Chinese retail market. CarreIour, the best perIorming Ioreign retailer took the sixth position and Wal-Mart took the Iourteenth. However, in recent years, the openness policies become more relax and Ilexible, more and more Ioreign retailers landed China. Most oI them have completed their strategic layout oI their stores over China perIectly. ThereIore, although some oI the domestic retailers have occupied the leading position, they are still Iace severe challenges. It is estimated that in the next Iew years, 60 oI Chinese retail market will be owned by 3-5 world-class retail giants, and 30 will be owned by Chinese national retail giants, and the rest oI 10 will be owned by regional retail giants.
4.4 Entry
In an industry, argued by Besanko et al (2003), new entrants will erode current
players` proIit in two ways: (1) entrants will divide the market demand among more sellers, and (2) entrants will decrease the market concentration which will in turn heat up internal rivalry. Usually, there are many kinds oI entry barriers in an industry.
In the early years aIter economy reIormation, there was no Ioreign retailers allowed to enter China, and Chinese central government encouraged and supported the development oI new retailers. ThereIore, operating retail stores was considered as a good way to make proIit due to the small entry barriers. It does not entail signiIicant economies oI scale or experience curve, because small retail stores still make proIits with lower cost. Retailers` reputations are not signiIicantly important, as the goods they sell to customers are less diIIerent. Retailers can access to buyers easily and there are no network externalities. As a result, the number oI retailers increased rapidly.
Recently, China central government has introduced policies to regulate and promote the development oI retailing, which encourages competitive Iirms to realize scale expansion, and to reorganize assets that are cross-sector, trans-region and cross-ownership. This, meanwhile, leads these enterprises to become larger and stronger. Especially when China central government completely removed the limitations oI Ioreign retailers to enter and develop in China, the barriers Ior both domestic and Ioreign retailers to enter Chinese retail market became smaller. More and more powerIul domestic and Ioreign potential entrants will enter this market.
However, small entry barriers, on the other hand, discourage potential entry to this industry. A report Irom A.T. Kearney Iound that the attractiveness oI Chinese retail market in 2006 showed a downward trend (www.chinabgao.com). As Besanko et al (2003) suggested expectations about post entry competition are also important. As more and more enter this market, the competition is inevitably considered as intensive, and market is gradually saturated. However, Irom Chinese retail market`s overall growth trend, many experts conclude that there is still huge potential Ior Iurther development and opportunities Ior investment. According to China State InIormation Center, the retail market in China will maintain an annual growth rate oI 8 to 10.
In addition, the value oI RenMinBi (RMB) will also inIluence the potential entrant to the retail market. First, iI there is RMB revaluation, the consumers` real purchasing power will increase and hence the retailers will beneIit Irom this, which will encourage more entries. Second, the RMB revaluation indicates the real prices oI imported goods decrease, which will beneIit the retailers and encourage potential entrants.
4.5 Substitutes and Complements
Substitutes and complements are two important Iactors inIluencing market demand.
Substitutes would divide the proIits and intensiIy the competition in this market, while complements would boost the demand and hence enhancing proIit opportunities in this market.
Chinese traditional marketswet markets and street marketsare considered to be substitutes oI retailing stores in Chinese retail market. Wet markets are large and enclosed, and space is divided among counter-service departments. Street markets, on the other hand, sell Iresh Iood in the open by private sellers with tiny stalls. The environments oI both are dirty, crowded and noisy. The competitive advantages oI wet markets and street markets lie in cheaper prices and Iresher Iood. In the early days, these wet markets and street markets are strong substitutes oI retailing stores. With the improvement oI people`s living standers, a comIortable shopping environment, wide variety oI goods, and outstanding services provided by retailing stores attract more and more customers.
In addition, nowadays, sales on Internet and television become more and more popular. Advanced technology enables the online and television shopping transactions to be gradually Iast and saIe. Furthermore, online and television shopping are considered to be time and cost suIIicient. Combined with the increasingly Iast paced liIestyle oI society, the demand oI online and television shopping is increasing. In 2001, the Internet retail sales had hit RMB 1200 billion that is more than one third oI
the traditional retailing Iormat with sales oI RMB3230.6 billion (euromonitor.com). There is no doubt that online and television retailing brings great challenges and threat to traditional brick-and-mortar retailing stores.
Both Chinese traditional market and modern online and television retailing reap the market demand in this retail industry. However, online shopping will complement and can boost the demand Ior brick-and-mortar retailing stores. The presence online will increase the exposure oI the retailer, and give the potential customers a Iull introduction oI this retailer. In addition, other industries such as tourism, restaurants and hotels, will also boost the sales oI retail industry in one city.
4.6 Supplier Power
Besanko et al (2003) argue that the supplier power is the ability where industry`s upstream input suppliers to negotiate prices that extract industry proIits. Besides, they also suggest that suppliers may have two kinds oI power over a downstream industry. II suppliers are in a competitive market, then they have 'indirect power. Suppliers with indirect power charge the downstream industry according to the supply and demand in the upstream industry, and also can sell their goods and services to the highest bidder. Supplier have 'direct power iI the industries oI suppliers are concentrate, or there is relationship-speciIic investments between suppliers and buyers.
Suppliers with direct power can raise prices oI the goods and services they provide without destroying that market. Both direct and indirect power will erode the proIit oI downstream industry.
In China, especially aIter China`s entry to the WTO, relationships between retailers and suppliers have become increasingly important (www1.chinadaily.com.cn). It is possible that the retailing stores have become the most important distribution channels with great development potential. Retailers are the most important customers Ior the manuIacturers. Especially in China, there are a lot oI medium and small suppliers and the intensive competition oIten makes the Iittest to survive. ThereIore, the suppliers have weak power over retailers. On the other hand, with the Iurther and Iast development oI retail industry, many retailers are becoming larger in terms oI their operating scales and hence their purchasing scales. This will lead the retailers to a position with strong bargaining power.
In addition, the revaluation oI RMB leads to the decreased competitive advantages on exporting prices. BeIore that, Chinese manuIacturers have tremendous competitive advantages in exporting. However, recently, manuIacturers in such a diIIicult situation have to seek domestic retailing channels to distribute their goods and services. As a result, retailers would beneIit in terms oI their bargaining power as well as the prices and quantities these suppliers provide.
ThereIore, it is probably saIe to argue that the suppliers oI Chinese retail industry have low bargaining power, and they impose little threat to the proIit oI retail industry.
4.7 Buyer Power
Buyer power reIers to the ability oI individual customers to negotiate purchase prices that can extract proIits Irom sellers, and analogous to supplier power, and buyers also have direct and indirect power over retailers (Besanko, et al, 2003).
Due to the sustained growth oI GDP in China, citizen`s personal incomes are rising, and thereIore this Iurther stimulates citizen`s consumption level. With Iast economic growth, the Chinese consumption level is expected to grow continuously (Luo, 1998). This enables Chinese retail industry to enter a good stage oI development. In 2005, China central government issued Central Governments proposal on the Fifteenth Five Year Plan Profect of National Economv and Social Development. This policy was mainly issued to Iurther increase the income oI residents, enhance consumers` conIidence, promote potential consumption, and hence to support the retail industry to develop more healthy and continuously (www.gmw.cn). It is estimated that during the period oI the IiIteenth Five Year Plan (2006-2010), the growth rate oI consumption sales will reach between 13 and 15.
In retail market, buyers` liIestyle and psychology play very important role. With the increase oI citizen`s income levels, more and more people are seeking a better liIestyle. The increase oI car ownership and improved transportation links enable people to travel to and shop in Iarther retailing stores. In addition, it is reported that, due to the lower import duties and tariIIs aIter China`s accession to WTO, sales oI high quality consumption goods have started enlarging in small market because more and more middle-class income residents are able to aIIord the spending on those high quality goods (China Country Report, 2002).
Table 4.2 summarizes the Iive Iorces in the recent Chinese retail market. Generally, each retailer Iaces intensive competition and challenges as well as great opportunities in this market. The proIitability oI this industry depends on many Iactors, oI which government policies play a more important role in China than in other countries.
Table 4.2 Five Forces Analysis of Chinese Retail Market Forces Threat to Profits Internal Rivalry High Entry Medium to High Substitutes/Complements Medium Supplier Power Low to Medium Buyer Power Medium
Chapter 5 Foreign Retailers in China -Wal-Mart and Carrefour
In this chapter, Wal-Mart and CarreIour are chosen as two representatives oI Ioreign retailers in China. They are two oI the largest Ioreign retailers in China and enter China in an early time. ThereIore, it is more convincing iI these two Ioreign retailers are used to provide an overview oI how Ioreign retailers enter and develop their business models in Chinese retail market. The objective oI this chapter is to analyze the two giants` entry and development strategies, and especially how their strategies interact with Chinese government policies and local market conditions.
5.1 Wal-Mart
5.1.1 About Wal-Mart
Wal-Mart was established by Mr. Sam Walton, who is believed to be the legend oI the retail industry worldwide, in 1962 in Arkansas, US. AIter 40 years oI development, Wal-Mart has become the largest chain retailer in the world. In 2005, Wal-Mart has reached the sales oI $312.4 billion. Currently, Wal-Mart has opened nearly 6,800 shopping stores globally, and employs more than 190 million peoples, located in 14 countries. It is estimated that there are about 176 million visits per week (www.wal-martchina.com). With the same slogan 'Low Prices Everyday and
Table 5.1 Wal-Mart Histories
Source: www. Wal-martchina.com
'SatisIactory Services all over the world, Wal-Mart has won a large number oI customers. There is no doubt that Wal-Mart is always the industry leader in terms oI 1962 Company Iounded with opening oI Iirst Wal-Mart store in Rogers, Arkansas. 1969 Company incorporated as Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. on Oct. 31. 1972 Wal-Mart approved and listed on the New York Stock Exchange. 1983 First SAM'S CLUB opened in April in MidWest City, Oklahoma. 1987 Wal-Mart Satellite Network (largest private satellite communication system in the U.S.) was completed. 1988 First Supercenter opened in Washington, Missouri. 1990 Wal-Mart became nation's No. 1 retailer. 1991 International market entered Ior the Iirst time with the opening oI a unit in Mexico city. 1992 President George Bush presented Sam Walton with the Medal oI Freedom. 1996 Wal-Mart entered China through a joint-venture agreement with Shenzhen International Fiduciary Investment Co. Ltd. 1997 Wal-Mart replaced Woolworth on the Dow Jones Industrial Average. 1998 Wal-Mart introduces the Neighbourhood Market concept with three stores in Arkansas. 1999 Wal-Mart had 1,140,000 employees, making the company the largest private employer in the world. 1999 Wal-Mart acquired the ASDA Group plc. in the United Kingdom (229 stores). 2000 H. Lee Scott named president and CEO oI Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 2001 Wal-Mart named by FORTUNE Magazine as the 3rd most admired company in America. 2002 Wal-Mart signed JVs with Zhongxin Company Ior Iuture stores in Shanghai and nearby. 2002 Wal-Mart topped Fortune`s Global 500 and ranked Iirst among the 'Most Admired Companies in America. 2002 China becomes Wal-Mart`s most important purchasing centre in the world. 2003 Wal-Mart opened its Iirst outlet in Beijing in July. AIter then Wal-Mart has opened 27 outlets in China by August. 2004 Wal-Mart held its shareholder meeting on March 4 in Shenzhen, China. 2006 Wal-Mart makes its Iirst Ioray into Central American retailing by buying a stake in the region`s top retailer Irom Dutch retailer Royal Ahold, which has stores in Costa Rica, Guatemala, EI Salvator, Hoduras, and Nicaragua.
Ioreign market expansion as well as management models. Table 5.1 highlights some oI the important events during the 40 years` development.
5.1.2 Wal-Mart`s Entry into China
Wal-Mart entered China in 1996, which is Iour years aIter the allowance by Chinese central government. It is also the time when China central government increased the number oI experimental cities, where Ioreign retailers are allowed to operate their businesses. Wal-Mart did not enter until the Iurther openness policy in China, which illustrates that Wal-Mart considered this as mature and great opportunities Ior its entry into Chinese retail market.
As stated in the previous chapter, in 1996, Ioreign retailers must Iollow the regulations Irom Chinese central government to start their businesses, and one oI regulations was that their businesses must be in Iorm oI joint ventures or cooperation with one Chinese partner and the Chinese partner must own a stake more than 51. ThereIore, beIore its Iormally entry, Wal-Mart and Shenzhen International Trust & Investment Co., Ltd, China, signed Agreement on Joint Ventures, and established 'Shenzhen Wal-Mart & Pearl River Department Stores Ltd in August 1995 (www.szitic.com). In the Iollowing year 1996, Wal-Mart opened its Iirst super center and Sam`s club store in Shenzhen (www.wal-martchina.com).
5.1.3 Wal-Mart`s Development in China
Stores Formats. AIter entering in Chinese retail market, Wal-Mart tried with diIIerent store Iormats. Supercenter is always the principal Iormat Ior Wal-Mart retailing since its Iirst supercenter opened in March 1988 in Washington. Today, Wal-Mart has over 1,000 supercenters all over the world and China has 81 supercenters. Wal-Mart`s supercenters have become the customers` Iavorite store Iormats, and they lead to the positive development oI Wal-Mart. Another Iormat is Sam`s Clubs, which act as procurement agents Ior their members, and provide the branded merchandises at preIerential prices to companies and individuals. The products in Sam`s Club are packed in large packages, and the shopping environment is like warehouses. Hence, these lead to lower margin costs and thus, enable members to experience lower prices. Wal-Mart also began to test smaller neighborhood supermarkets in communities. Although there are now two neighborhood supermarkets, they seem to Iit better with consumers` buying behaviors in China.
Store Locations. At a news conIerence in Beijing, Joe HatIield, CEO oI Wal-Mart Asia, said, Wal-Mart evolved by starting in smaller cities and moving into the larger cities (Meredith, 2004). Indeed, when Wal-Mart took Shenzhen as their Iirst step oI entering China, the store distribution network implied its 'second tier cities expansion direction. This can be easily prooIed when Wal-Mart limited its store locations in South oI China such as Shenzhen, Dongwan, Xiamen and etc. between
1996 and 2001. Until 2001, Wal-Mart gradually moved to bigger cities, such as Guiyang, Changchun and Nanjing. In the two largest citiesBeijing and Shanghai, Wal-Mart only opened three stores in each city in a late stage. In addition, most oI the stores are located in communities and the junction oI urban and rural areas that are Iar Irom the prosperous areas.
Expansion. Although Wal-Mart ranks No.1 in the worldwide, its growth in China is not aggressive. Table 5.2 shows the expansion list oI Wal-Mart in China. It can be Iound that, in the early years oI Wal-Mart`s entry, the speed oI expansion was slow. Wal-Mart started to accelerate its expansion in 2004 when the central government oI China announced the removal oI restrictions. to Ioreign retailers. In addition, beIore Table 5.2 Wal-Mart China Histories
Source: Shanghai Business Daily, (www.shbiz.com.cn) 2006, the expansion oI Wal-Mart in China took the Iorm oI opening new stores. 1996 Wal-Mart opened the Iirst supercenter and Sam`s Club in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province. 1997 The second Wal-Mart supercener was opened in Dongwan, Guangdong Province. 1999 Wal-Mart stepped out oI Guangdong and opened its IiIth supercenter in Kunming, Yunnan Province. 2000 Wal-Mart opened it Iirst supercenter in Dalian, Liaoning Province, which is the Iirst supercenter in the North oI China. 2001 Wal-Mart entered Fujian Province; opend 7 stores totally this year in China. 2002 The Iirst neighborhood market opened in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province; opened 7 stores totally this year in China. 2003 Wal-Mart opened Sam`s Club in Beijing, and opened 8 stores totally this year in China. 2004 Wal-Mart opened 11 stores totally in China, which is the year that opens the most stores. 2005 Wal-Mart entered Shanghai Ior the Iirst time, and opened the Iirst supercenter in Shanghai 2006 Wal-Mart opened its Shanghai`s second store. 2007 Wal-Mart bought 35 oI shares oI Trust-Mart.
However, in 2007, Wal-Mart spent $1 billion acquiring Trust-Mart, which is also one oI the leading retailers in Chinese market. The main attraction oI Trust-Mart to Wal-Mart until Wal-Mart willing to invest such large amount oI capital is that Trust-Mart has large number oI stores and its leading position in China. Undoubtedly, this acquisition enables Wal-Mart to capture much more competitive advantages in China.
5.1.4 Wal-Mart`s Positioning in China
'Everyday Low Price is Wal-Mart`s promise to consumers. This is attractive to Chinese consumers, since the average income oI Chinese population remains low. ThereIore, Wal-Mart must enable its costs to be low enough so that its low price competitive advantages can be realized. ThereIore, Wal-Mart in 2002 announced that they would not charge suppliers` administration Iees Ior the products entered their store. The aim oI this announcement is believed to lower the cost oI suppliers and hence enable the suppliers to lower the prices oIIered to Wal-Mart. This not only helps Wal-Mart to achieve its lower costs position, but also promote the good relationship with suppliers.
In addition, Wal-Mart`s modern inIormation system enables the lower stock-holding costs. Wal-Mart requests suppliers to adopt electronic data interchange system, which can transIer inIormation swiItly and can save stock-holding costs. Each store sends
inIormation and orders to its suppliers via the Internet and has products replenished in on-average two days versus Iive days oI their rivals (Huey and Walton, 1992). Its complete storage management system enables Wal-Mart to replenish goods twice a week (once bi-weekly to their rivals) and reduce storage space and delivery time. Consequently, Wal-Mart is able to reduce stock-carrying and transportation costs and thereIore increase proIitability by 2.5 compared with their competitors (Stern and Stalk, 1998).
However, in Iact, Wal-Mart Iaces the embarrassment that their prices are not low enough compared with the prices oI CarreIour (Qin, 2004, www.gemag.com.cn). ThereIore, on the meanwhile oI controlling costs, Wal-Mart makes eIIorts on assuring the products quality. Wal-Mart has a strict control over the goods they are purchasing. Usually, Wal-Mart orders and replenishes the stock oI goods directly Irom the manuIacturers. They even purchase Irom overseas iI suppliers provides a lower prices. In addition, Wal-Mart appealed some purchasers who accepted bribes in court. Thus, the goods purchased have a good quality and price assurance in Wal-Mart.
5.1.5 Wal-Mart`s Local Adaptation in China
Wal-Mart, as the No.1 international retailer, started to learn to do things the Chinese way. They need change in order to adapt the special environment oI retail market in
China.
Satisfying Customers` Needs. The buying behaviors oI Chinese consumers are diIIerent Irom those oI Americans, due to the diIIerences in culture, income, and many other Iactors. Taking the Iood purchase Ior example, Chinese shoppers preIer to select their own Iresh vegetables, Iruits, live Iish and seaIood (Trunick, 2006), and they insist on requesting Ioods to be Ireshly harvested, or even killed in Iront oI them. In the early days oI Wal-Mart, Chinese shoppers were not satisIied because Wal-Mart was trying to sell them dead Iish as well as meat packaged in StyroIoam and Cellophane (Naughton, 2006). As Wal-Mart discovered that Iood products are critically important to create and maintain a strong customer base (Trunick, 2006), it began to adapt to customers needs in the way oI displaying uncovered meat, live Iishes and killing in Iront oI costumers. In addition, Wal-Mart in China has put in demonstration stations Ior cosmetics where customers can be shown how to apply various cosmetics products (Trunick, 2006). According to Govindarajan and Gupta (1999), Wal-Mart also accepted that most Chinese buy small quantities oI goods, and will tailored their marketing approaches according to language and culture diIIerences.
Relationships with Local Suppliers. In 2002, when Wal-Mart announced that it would not charge suppliers any administration Iee Ior the goods entering in its
supercenters, it won acclaim Irom its suppliers. This makes its competitors surprised and embarrassed. This decision oI Wal-Mart allows suppliers to yield more proIits in the market, and enables the continuous and good cooperation relationship. In 2003 and 2006, Ministry oI Commerce China and China Chain Store & Franchise Association, both awarded Wal-Mart as Chinese Retail Industry`s Top Employer.
Relationships with Governments. Wal-Mart is always keeping a good relationship with both Chinese central and local governments. This is a good strategy Ior Wal-Mart`s development in China. As Wal-Mart has a large scale oI purchasing in China, and in 1996 the purchasing reached $2 billion. Chinese government Iavored this exporting scale, and Ior return, Wal-Mart gets the permit to opening its Iirst store. In addition, Wal-Mart is known as non-union policies in the US. However, China Iorces Ioreign companies to allow trade unions under a proposed legal amendment (Fong, 2006). Naughton (2006) suggests that aIter eight years` hard line in China, Wal-Mart soIten and agreed to accept unions in 2004. Partly because Wal-Mart realized organized labor as a cultural and political imperative in China; Iurthermore, this is also good chance to maintain good relationship between Chinese governments.
5.1.6 Wal-Mart`s Sourcing in China
Wal-Mart always purchase merchandises Irom manuIacturers and suppliers directly. Thus Wal-Mart China has three options Ior its sourcing. The Iirst is that products are
purchased Irom global suppliers and the products are not manuIactured in China; the second option is that Wal-Mart can purchase products Irom global suppliers and the products are manuIactured in China; and Wal-Mart can purchase goods Irom local suppliers. According to Govindarajan and Gupta (1999), Wal-Mart China chooses to purchase 85 percent oI its merchandise Irom China, which is a combination oI option two and three. This does not only meet the needs oI Chinese consumers Ior high standards imported products, but also reduce the pressures Irom local government to purchase domestic goods.
Wal-Mart establishes international procurement headquarters that provides sourcing inIormation oI local retailers and centralized sourcing practices and then directly distributes goods to each distribution centre (Lin and Liang, 2001). Wal-Mart established three distribution centers supplying its supercenters in China, but it does not sound like much oI a logistics network to support its operations. It is widely believed that the global success oI Wal-Mart is mostly attributed to the excellent logistics management that combines advanced inIormation system and traditional transportation. However, Chinese certain special conditions pose challenges Ior Wal-Mart and its suppliers. HuIIman (2003) argues that Chinese provincial autonomy and selI-suIIiciency hinder interprovincial trade and pose diIIiculties Ior road transportation, private and commercial trucking, and Customs clearance Ior imports. In addition, due to the small number oI stores, Wal-Mart is unable to establish distribution and operation centers in large scales. ThereIore, Wal-Mart in China oIten
establishes distribution centers Iirst and then opens stores in cities nearby. This inevitably limits the speed oI expansion by opening new stores as well as increases the costs oI expansion.
5.1.7 Human Resource Management and Public relations.
'The undeniable cornerstone oI Wal-Mart`s success can be traced back to our strong belieI in the dignity oI each individual we view our associates as much more than a pair oI hands to do a job, but also as a wonderIul source oI new ideas. Our people really do make a diIIerence!Don Soderquist, Senior Vice Chairman oI Wal-Mart Store, Inc. (www.wal-martchina.com). Wal-Mart pays particular attention on employees` training programs. Joe HatIield, president and CEO oI Wal-Mart Asia points out that training takes place every day in every store (Trunick, 2006). Wal-Mart sends employees with good skills and potentials to US to attend Walton Institute, whereas those who do not speak English Iluently are provided with other trainings such as computers and management programs. In addition, according to Trunick (2006), Wal-Mart China has a 16 employee turnover rate which is the lowest among any operation worldwide, especially in an area where skills are in short supply and job poaching is common. In November 2005, as the Iirst program in celebration oI the tenth anniversary oI its entry into China, Wal-Mart invited more than 120 employees whose tenure was 10 years and their Iamilies to come to Shenzhen headquarters to attend 'Wal-Mart 10 th anniversary celebration Ior staII, and share Wal-Mart`s ten
years oI glorious achievements.
'We should not ask Ior beneIits Irom liIe, but contribute to the community we live and disseminate good things.Helen Walton (Sam Walton`s wiIe) (www.wal-martchina.com). Wal-Mart China has donated Iunds and support worth more than $3.4 million, to local charity and welIare organizations over the past ten years. Wal-Mart China associates have also denoted more than 130,000 man hours to these activities. Wal-Mart`s corporate social responsibility programs Iocus on Iive areas: environmental protection, education, child welIare, community involvement and disaster relieI. Recently it was awarded as Most Generous MNC Donors in China by Forbes China (www.wal-martchina.com).
5.2 Carrefour
5.2.1 About CarreIour
The CarreIour Company was created by the Fournier and DeIIorey Iamilies in 1959 in France, with the meaning oI its name 'crossroads expressing convenience. CarreIour opened its Iirst supermarket in 1960 and then invested and opened its Iirst hypermarket in 1963. In 1969, CarreIour entered Belgium and opened its Iirst store outside France by Iorming alliance with local partners. CarreIour stepped outside
Europe in 1975 by opening a hypermarket in Brazil. Over the past 40 years, the CarreIour group has become the world`s second largest retailer and the largest in Europe. Today, CarreIour has reached 30 countries in Europe, Latin American and Asia. Currently, CarreIour has opened over 12,500 stores all over the world, with sales in 2006 oI $114.9 billion and 456,000 employees. (www.carreIour.com). Table 5.3 listed the some important events during its development.
5.2.2 CarreIour`s Entry into China
CarreIour entered China in 1995, and large scale oI operation was the main objective since its Iirst entry. It was still the period oI tight control over Ioreign retailers by Chinese central government. At that time, Ioreign retailers were only allowed to operate in several particular cities, and only allowed to own less than 49 oI shares in their joint ventures or cooperative enterprises. CarreIour did Iorm a joint venture with a Chinese company called Zhongchuang Commercial Company, but exploit a loophole oI this regulation. CarreIour signed a joint venture agreement with Zhongchuang Commercial Company, and established Jiachuang Commercial Management Company. Then Zhongchuang registered another company called Chuang Yijia Commercial City and Jiachuang took over the businesses and management oI Chuang Yijia. AIter Chuang Yijia opening the chain store at Beijing International Exhibition, CarreIour as the main shareholder oI Jiachuang controlled
the chain store and named it CarreIour in public. ThereIore, CarreIour had absolute control over the interests oI its chain store and started to expand in China through similar way (hn.rednet.com.cn). Table 5.3 Carrefour Histories
Source: www.carreIour.com
BeIore coming to Mainland China, CarreIour entered in Taiwan and opened the Iirst 1959 CarreIour Company was created by the Fournier and DeIIorey Iamilies. 1960 CarreIour opened its Iirst supermarket in Annecy, Haute-Savoie. 1963 CarreIour invested a new store concept hypermarket. The Iirst hypermarkets were Iound in France. 1969 CarreIour opened its Iirst hypermarket outside France in Belgium. 1970 CarreIour shares listed on the Paris stock exchange. 1975 CarreIour opened its Iirst hypermarket in Brazil. 1979 Development oI hard discount: CarreIour created Ed chain in France and Dia banner in Spain. 1985 CarreIour brand-name products were introduced. 1989 The Iirst CarreIour hypermarket opens in Asia, in Taiwan. 1995 CarreIour opened its Iirst store in China by a JV with Zhongchuang Company. 1996 CarreIour continues to grow in Asia, adding Thailand, Korea and Hong Kong to its list. 1999 CarreIour and Promodes merged to create the largest European Iood retailing group and second largest worldwide. 2000 AIter the two groups merge, all Continent hypermarkets become CarreIour stores and supermarkets adopted the Champion name in France. CarreIour launched on- line supermarket Ooshop and opened its Iirst hypermarket in Japan. 2001 CarreIour inaugurated 17 CarreIour service stations on France`s motorway networks and became the largest Iood retailer in Argentina. 2002 CarreIour sold its 35 shares oI 27 stores in China to Chinese companies due to disobeying the government regulations. 2003 CarreIour was under Iire Ior imposing unIair charges on Iood suppliers in June. 2003 CarreIour operates 39 hypermarkets in China and set up GoWest` plan. 2004 CarreIour announces the sales oI its share in Modelo and its purchase oI 13 hypermarkets in Poland Irom Ahold. 2005 CarreIour acquired 6 hypermarkets in Taiwan and 2 other projects currently Irom Tesco.
CarreIour hypermarket in Asia in 1989. Lean-Luc Chereau, the head oI CarreIour China, in an interview by Child (2006) stated that entering Taiwan brought a Iantastic advantage when entering China in terms oI learning how to adapt and deal business with Chinese. It is obvious that, although the economic systems are diIIerent between Taiwan and Mainland China, both the liIe and business cultures are Iairly similar. ThereIore, experiences in Taiwan are more valuable Ior international business than experiences in Europe or the United States.
5.2.3 CarreIour`s Development in China
Store Formats. CarreIour operates three store Iormats in China: CarreIour hypermarkets, Champion supermarkets, and Dia discounted convenience stores (www.carreIour.com.cn). Since CarreIour entered China in 1995, hypermarkets were the principal Iormat Ior CarreIour expansion. Yan (2003) argues that this hypermarket Iormat Iits the countries like China who is developing Iast due to low prices oI products. He also suggests that this hypermarket Iormat poses challenges to both large department stores by lower prices, and small chain stores by comprehensive goods. In 2004, CarreIour opened its Iirst Champion supermarket in Beijing as asked by Beijing government to do something to modernize the small retail business (Child, 2006). However, Chereau Iound that Beijing consumers oIten use a hypermarket as a supermarket and hence he saw a very diIIicult Iuture Ior supermarkets (Child, 2006).
CarreIour opened 150 Dia discounted convenience stores in Shanghai and 100 in Beijing in 2003 (www.carreIour.com.cn), but Iaces Iierce competition Irom 7-Eleven stores Irom Taiwan. CarreIour would more likely to learn Irom and Iollow 7-Eleven in the convenience store niche (Child, 2006).
Store Location. China is still a country with a relative low income level and hence the mainstream power oI consumption remains in large and prosperous cities and city centers. ThereIore, CarreIour establishes their stores in Iirst tier cities and also in more prosperous and business areas (Li, 2004). Yan (2003) argues that CarreIour`s strategy oI store location enables its leading position among Ioreign retailers. He continued to argue that the decision oI selecting Shanghai as the headquarter location enabled CarreIour`s rapid strategic expansion in China, due to a better sourcing environment, transportation conditions and marketing expansion capabilities in Shanghai compared to Shenzhen where Wal-Mart`s headquarter located. Today, CarreIour has almost Iinished its strategic networking establishment in coastal cities and prosperous cities.
Expansion. CarreIour, at the end oI 2006, was ranked the 6 th in Chinese retail market in terms oI sales with 95 stores. Table 5.4 shows the development histories oI CarreIour in China. The development oI CarreIour is rapid, and this can be prooIed by the report Irom Ministry oI Commerce, China that until June 2004, CarreIour was
ranked the Iirst with sales oI $0.97 billion and 50 stores among Ioreign retailers in China (Li, 2004). However, in 1999 CarreIour was warned Ior its expansion by China central government as the shares that CarreIour held was more than regulated in its retail joint venture (Yan, 2003). In 2001, CarreIour stopped expansion and development operations Ior 18 months due to the Iailure oI getting approval Irom central government but only local government (Child, 2006). AIter that, in the year 2001, CarreIour continued its Iast expansion. From Table 5.4, it is clear that the expansion Iorm oI CarreIour is only to open new stores. However, Chereau announced that CarreIour may acquire at least ten Chinese retailers as part oI its expansion strategy (Wall Street Journal Asia, 2006). Table 5.4 Carrefour China Histories
Source: www.carreIour.com.cn
5.2.4 CarreIour`s Positioning in China
The slogan oI CarreIour China is 'Happy Shopping in CarreIour and the mission is 1995 Carrefour opened first hypermarket in Beijing. 1996 Carrefour entered Shanghai and Shenzhen. 1997 Carrefour opened stores in Tianjin. 1998 Carrefour entered Chongqing, Zhuhai, Wuhan, and Dongwan. 2000 Carrefour opened 5 hypermarkets to speed up its expansion. 2002 Carrefour opened 35 hypermarkets in 20 cities. 2003 Carrefour opened store in Hangzhou, and Dia Discounted convenience store entered Shanghai and Beijing 2004 The first Champion supermarkets opened in Beijing 2005 Carrefour opened its 60 th store in Chongqing.
to IulIill customers` needs with Iull eIIort and provide the best prices to customers in every country, in every retailing Iormat, and in the range oI the best goods (www.carreIour.com.cn). ThereIore, CarreIour positions itselI as providing both good shopping environment and low prices. In terms oI low prices, Li (2004) suggests that the prices oI goods in CarreIour are lower than those in Wal-Mart, especially the prices oI living necessities such as rice, Iood, oil and so on. This lower prices strategy provides CarreIour a competitive advantage in the retail market competition and leads more and more competitors to imitate. The lower prices come Irom lower costs oI purchasing goods. It is suggested that CarreIour adopted various and rather Ilexible sourcing methods, such as local stores can purchase their own goods as long as the prices oI purchased are low, and this leads to Iamous Iake white wine aIIairs in CarreIour China (Qin, 2004).
However, according to Qin (2004), the actual shopping environment contradicts with its 'Happy Shopping in CarreIour. In Shanghai, there are many complaints on the diIIerence between the prices on shelI and actually paid. In addition, although there is poster saying, 'You Iound the cheaper prices elsewhere, you get twice the prices diIIerences payback, there are various restrictions when customers request. Furthermore, as most oI CarreIour hypermarkets are in city centers, the limited car parking spaces bring inconvenience to customers.
5.2.5 CarreIour`s Local Adaptation in China
It is probably saIe to argue that the leading position among Ioreign retailers is attributed to its local adaptation to some extent, and its experiences in Taiwan play an important role.
Satisfying Customers` Needs. Gaining valuable experiences in Taiwan has made CarreIour understand the buying behavior and habits oI customers in Mainland China. ThereIore, since their Iirst entry in Chinese market, CarreIour decided to adopt Iresh-market style Ior vegetables, Iishes and other seaIood, and to display the above products at lower prices in a better and cleaner environment (Child, 2006). This undoubtedly provides a Iresh market image that Chinese customers are accustomed to. In addition, CarreIour also believes that customers group Ior each store are diIIerent and unique, so CarreIour organize each store diIIerently to adapt the needs oI their local customer group in terms oI products varieties, and their places and orders on shelves, and most oI these adaptation decisions are made by local store management Ilexibly (Qin, 2004). In addition, Chereau indicated that CarreIour is trying to be a quarter-hour ahead oI the customers, which means that the products will not be too advances or too late (Child, 2006). For some new but not too advanced products, CarreIour brings in and explains them to customers.
Relationships with Local Suppliers. The relationships between CarreIour and its suppliers are believed to be strained (Li 2004; Yan, 2003). Li (2004) argues that CarreIour oIten reaps proIits by charging suppliers` administration Iees and asking suppliers Ior Iinancial support in Iestivals. Charging suppliers administration Iees is created by CarreIour in Chinese retail market, and iI a supplier would like his products enters CarreIour hypermarket, the supplier needs to pay six diIIerent kinds oI Iees that may reach 36 oI expected sales oI his products (Li, 2004). In 2003, Shanghai Seed and Nut Roasters Association proposed to stop supplying to CarreIour in order to protect the beneIits oI more than 5000 members in the association due to high administration Iees (www.gzii.gov.cn). In addition, according to Yan (2003), some oI CarreIour stores transIer the loss oI discounting, product wear and tear as well as negative balance oI proposed sales to suppliers. This inevitably leads to more costs to suppliers.
Relationships with Government. CarreIour always has a good relationship with local governments. CarreIour`s remarkable volume oI goods purchase win Iavor and support Irom local government, as it generates a large export proIit margin Ior local government (www.people.com.cn). However, CarreIour has a strained relationship with Chinese central government. The main reason is believed to be that, in order to realize its rapid strategic expansion, CarreIour disregards the regulations on Ioreign retailers Irom central government, and exploit the loophole oI the regulation diIIerences between local governments and central government (Yan, 2003). Chinese
central government was annoyed by this, and hence put CarreIour in the blacklist and commanded CarreIour to stop to reorganize its share proportion and expansion strategies in China. This was not resolved until CarreIour sold its illegal shares in its joint ventures and announced the decision to establish 10 sourcing bases in China Ior CarreIour`s global purchasing (Li, 2004).
5.2.6 CarreIour`s Sourcing in China
Similar to Wal-Mart, CarreIour also purchases most oI its goods within China. However, each store oI CarreIour has around 85 oI its stock procured locally and has them distributed directly to each store. CarreIour believes that this Ilexibility oI purchasing strategy does not only cater the needs oI local customers, but also can lower the purchasing costs (www.supplychainer.com). CarreIour was reported already established 11 sourcing bases in big cities in China since 1995 and plans its 12 th
sourcing base in Yiwu, Zhejiang Province (yiwu.ipr.gov.cn). In addition, the empowerment also reIlects CarreIour`s Ilexibility in management. CarreIour headquarters empowered purchasing rights to Iour local sourcing centers: Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Wuhan; each store is also empowered purchasing rights Ior its own stock (Cai and Zhang, 2003).
However, this lack oI centralized sourcing and distribution systems is considered to be
problematic. Cui (2003) argues that this imperIect physical distribution systems and delay oI inIormation system development in China brings higher costs and diIIiculties to large retailers as most suppliers are still at the stage oI workshop that are unable to provide accurate and complete services on delivering. However, as the special conditions oI Chinese provincial autonomy and selI-suIIiciency, a centralized procurement system is diIIicult and costly to operate. ThereIore, by relying on the distribution systems oI suppliers, CarreIour`s Ilexible sourcing and logistic strategies enable CarreIour to save costs on distribution as well as catering the diIIerent needs oI stores in each location.
5.2.7 Human Resource Management and Public Relations
CarreIour established its Iirst CarreIour China Institute in Asia, and it aims to train Chinese staII to take positions with more responsibility. Training covers staIIs, supervisors, department managers and mandarins, and provides both general and specialized knowledge Ior their career development (www.carreIour.com.cn). In addition, to retain trained and talent people, CarreIour needs them to sign a three- or Iive-year contract: any staII who go to work with a competitor have to pay back the money CarreIour spent on training, and that is a huge amount oI money; but iI staII stay Ior Iive years and more, they are given a super bonus that is several times oI salary (Child, 2006). This signiIicantly reduces employees` turnover rate in CarreIour
China.
CarreIour China makes eIIort on being an enterprise citizen with Iull responsibilities on society all over the world, such as actively sponsoring Ior public welIare events and community building. In 2004, CarreIour China was awarded as Top Ten Foreign Enterprises with Outstanding Contribution in China. In addition, CarreIour established CarreIour (China) Food SaIety Fund Foundation, whose aim is to promote the Iood saIety.
Chapter 6 Analysis of Wal-Mart and Carrefour`s Strategies
The previous chapter provides analysis oI strategies adopted by Wal-Mart and CarreIour respectively. These strategies, as analyzed, are planed and implemented highly interacting with Chinese government policies and market conditions. Some oI these strategies lead a competitive position Ior Wal-Mart or CarreIour, while some need to be adjusted Ior Iurther and better development. This chapter will Iirstly compare and contrast the similarities and diIIerences between strategies adopted by Wal-Mart and CarreIour. The second part oI this section will explain the link between the resources and capabilities that they possess and the strategies they adopted by using resource-based view as basic principle.
6.1 Assessment of Two Giants` Strategies
Both Wal-Mart and CarreIour entered China in the mid-1990s, and there are both similarities and diIIerences oI the strategies adopted by the two giants according to the previous chapter. This section will provide an assessment oI the two giants` strategies in terms oI entry strategies, expansion strategies, positioning strategies, local adaptation, and human resource management and public relations.
6.1.1 Entry strategies
Wal-Mart and CarreIour both entered Chinese retail market in Iorm oI joint ventures with local companies. BeIore 2004, when Chinese central government cancelled limitations on Ioreign retailers` entry mode, joint ventures were the only mode that Ioreign retailers can choose. Although the entry modes are chosen according to the government regulations, both Wal-Mart and CarreIour expressed that they would still enter in Iorm oI joint ventures iI there were no such regulations. As listed in Table 2.1, Ioreign retailers can beneIit Iorm local partners` knowledge oI the host country on cultures, languages, relationship networks, political systems and market conditions. ThereIore, it is probably saIe to argue that joint ventures are the optimal entry modes Ior the two retailing giants to enter China.
Although the entry modes that two giants adopted were the same, there are diIIerences in details. First, Wal-Mart Iormed a joint venture with Shenzhen International Trust & Investment Co., Ltd, China, and Iollowed government regulations strictly. However, CarreIour exploited the loophole oI regulation, and Iormed a nominal joint venture with Zhongchuang Commercial Company, China, but controlled most oI shares and management in their business. This is consistent with CarreIour`s objective to build large a large scale in a short period in China (Li, 2004). By controlling more shares and business management, CarreIour is able to engage in its expansion strategies more Ilexibly and without loss oI knowledge Irom local partners.
In addition, Wal-Mart entered China in 1996, and CarreIour entered in 1995. Although
there is only one-year diIIerence, the government policies on Ioreign retailers changed signiIicantly. As mentioned in the previous chapter, beIore 1996, Ioreign retailers were only allowed to enter 11 cities throughout China. However, in 1996, Chinese central government allowed Ioreign retailers to enter all provincial cities and some other cities. This early entry also provides CarreIour Iirst-mover advantages by earlier establishing strong brand reputation and stable customer groups. Wal-Mart`s later entry also provides competitive advantages in terms oI more Ilexible choices oI location Ior its entry.
Indeed, beIore its entry into China, Wal-Mart had prepared Ior Iour years and made great eIIorts. In 1992, Wal-Mart received a charter in Chinese retail industry, and set up its agency in Hong Kong to conduct researches on Chinese retail market. The researches mainly concerned on economic policies, government supports, city economy, GDP, national income, and consumers` habits (sying.com). This undoubtedly helped Wal-Mart to select a better strategy to enter according to its researches. CarreIour, on the other hand, entered Taiwan Iirstly where the cultures as well as customers preIerences and buying habits are closely similar with those oI Mainland China. AIter learning and gaining successIul experiences in Taiwan, their entry was easier and more conIident, especially Ior Iuture expansion.
6.1.2 Expansion Strategies
The speed oI expansion Ior both Wal-Mart and CarreIour were not rapid enough. Obviously, Wal-Mart and CarreIour are the largest two retailers in the world, and they have strengths and powers to expand aggressively to become the market leader in Chinese retail industry. However, during more than 10 years development in China, at the end oI 2006, CarreIour and Wal-Mart ranked only the 6 th and 14 th respectively, with sales no more than one third oI the market leader.
BeIore end oI 2006, both two giants expanded through opening new stores. At the end oI 2006, CarreIour ranked the 6 th by opening 95 new stores and Wal-Mart the 14 th by opening 71. This market structure changed when Wal-Mart acquired Trust-Mart which have101 stores. This is the Iirst acquisition Ior Wal-Mart in China, and did push Wal-Mart`s position in the rank Iorward signiIicantly. CarreIour is still keeping expanding by opening new stores. However, according to Chereau, CarreIour is considering to do an acquisition as well (Child, 2006), and it is believed that Wal-Mart`s acquisition encouraged CarreIour to seek acquisition Ior Iuture expansion. According to Hill (2004) there are advantages and disadvantages Ior both opening new stores and acquisitions. By establishing a new store, on one hand, Ioreign Iirms could have a greater control over the Iorms oI its subsidiary stores such as cultures, operating routines and so on; on the other hand, it is slow and risky to establish new stores. Acquisitions are quick to execute, preempt competitors and less risky, but they also Iail because oI clashes between cultures in two Iirms, diIIiculties in integrating resources oI two Iirms, and inadequate preacquision screening. On the early stages oI
Wal-Mart and CarreIour`s entry in mid-1990s, the competition in Chinese retail industry, especially in the supermarket niche, was not intensive, and hence it allows Wal-Mart and CarreIour to spend time on expanding by opening new stores. This provides advantages Ior two retailing giants to build its brand image and reputation in Chinese retail market. Today, as the retail market in China opening Iurther, the competition is more and more intensive. Expanding by opening new stores is considered to cost time and money, so acquisition becomes a competitive option Ior Wal-Mart and CarreIour to expand Iurther in China.
Store locations are important Ior retailers. Wal-Mart and CarreIour adopted diIIerent strategies Ior locations. Wal-Mart preIers to locate stores in second tier cities, and their strategy is to start in smaller cities and then move to larger ones. CarreIour, however, particular emphasizes its stores to be located in big cities and city centers or prosperous areas. China is still a developing country with a relative low level oI people`s income. ThereIore, more developed cities and city centers are still the mainstream oI higher consumption levels that lead to higher sales Ior retailers.
6.1.3 Positioning Strategies
As Besanko et al (2003) argued a Iirm`s positioning strategy is one oI the most important criteria in determining a Iirm`s success. Wal-Mart and CarreIour adopted diIIerent positioning strategies, which can be seen Irom their marketing slogans
respectively. Wal-Mart emphasizes 'Low Prices Everyday. It conveys to customers that it is always the right choice to shop at Wal-Mart since the prices are cheap everyday. CarreIour, on the other hand, with 'Happy Shopping in CarreIour, aims to emphasizing its good shopping environment. The Chinese name oI CarreIour is Jia Le Fu, in which Jia means Iamily, Le means joy, and Fu means happiness. It expresses the shopping environment in CarreIour will bring joy and happiness to Iamilies shop there. However, the Iacts contradict with positioning strategies Ior both oI Wal-Mart and CarreIour.
As prices are concerned, both retailing giants understand that prices are vital Ior Chinese consumers. In the retail industry, the main sources oI costs are procurement and stock management. Wal-Mart takes its advantages oI its advanced inIormation system that can reduce the costs oI sending and receiving inIormation and orders with suppliers, as well as the costs oI stocking. Wal-Mart also stops charging products administration Iees to suppliers so that pay less when purchasing Irom suppliers as these suppliers bear less cost. CarreIour, however, lower the prices oI people`s necessities to attract customers. Flexible sourcing methods also enable CarreIour`s competitive advantages, as local stores purchase products individually as long as the prices are low. Although Wal-Mart emphasizes its low prices in its slogan, it is Iound that prices in Wal-Mart are not lower enough or even higher than those Irom CarreIour, and it is also widely agreed by customers (Qin, 2004). The slightly lower prices oI products enable CarreIour to gain more market shares than Wal-Mart.
For shopping environment, Wal-Mart wins CarreIour slightly. This is the diIIerentiation strategy that Iirms provide superior value within the industry to customers (Cullen and Parboteeah, 2005). Wal-Mart always has tight control over the products they sell. All products are purchased directly Irom suppliers, even some oI them Irom another country. Wal-Mart prohibits close and abnormal relationships between purchasers and suppliers to avoid corruption that lead to unsatisIied product qualities. However, there have been many scandals concern with CarreIour`s products qualities. The main reason is that CarreIour pursues Ilexibility and low costs purchase and not all products are purchased Irom suppliers, and hence the quality oI products cannot be assured Ior customers. In addition, as most oI stores are located in city centers, there are also complaints on the car parking problems. The unmatched actual treatment to customers with promised by CarreIour also reduces the reliability oI CarreIour. This diIIerentiation allows Iirms to charge premium prices on the superior quality oI products and comIortable shopping environment, so by keeping prices low everyday, Wal-Mart is in a competitive position in its diIIerentiation advantages.
6.1.4 Local Adaptation
Having a good relationship with customers, suppliers and, especially with government oI China is important Ior Ioreign enterprises in China. They are all determinant Iactors Ior a Ioreign Iirm to develop, expand, and even survive.
Catering the needs and preIerences oI local customers is critically vital Ior Ioreign retailers. ThereIore, both Wal-Mart and CarreIour adjust their selling models especially Ior Ioods, to cater the buying habits oI Chinese customers. On its Iirst day oI entry, CarreIour adopted Iresh-market style Ior vegetables, Iishes and seaIood. However, Wal-Mart took a tortuous way in understanding Chinese customers` buying habits, as at the early stage oI development Wal-Mart still relied on the same Iorm oI selling Iood in America or Europe, and sold vegetables, dead Iish and seaIood in StyroIoam and Cellophane. Today, both Wal-Mart and CarreIour adopted the Chinese traditional wet market selling models but provides a better shopping environment Ior customers.
Wal-Mart and CarreIour adopted totally diIIerent strategies in dealing with suppliers. Wal-Mart sets store by the relationship with suppliers. It stopped charging administration Iees to suppliers, and allows suppliers to yield more beneIits. CarreIour, however, is widely considered to reap proIits Irom suppliers. Products administration Iees were created and promoted by CarreIour in Chinese retail industry and become the main source oI retailer`s proIits in China. In addition, CarreIour also charges many other various kinds oI Iees to suppliers, which leads to lots oI complaints Irom suppliers. It is obvious that Wal-Mart establishes a good relationship with suppliers, while CarreIour does not. It is believed that harmony relationships with suppliers would promote a healthy and continuous Iuture development and expansion oI
retailers.
As relationship with government is concerned, both have good relationships with both local and central governments. As both are two retailing giants in the world, and hence they make great contribution to local and national economy and receive great Iavors Irom governments. The only diIIerence lies in the attitudes towards government regulations on Ioreign retailers` development. Wal-Mart is always Iollowing regulations Irom its Iirst entry until its expansion and development, whereas CarreIour oIten exploits the loopholes oI these regulations to reap its beneIits. In 2001 CarreIour was warned Ior its disregard oI regulations and was Iorced to stop Iurther expansion. China is a highly central controlled country, and governments intervene Ior both political and economic reasons. ThereIore, when entering and developing in China, Ioreign Iirms need to understand, respect and Iollow the government regulations.
6.1.5 Sourcing Strategies
Sourcing and logistics are important Ior retailers. HuIIman (2003) suggests that the eIIective management oI sourcing and logistics is always high on many retailers` lists oI goals. Wal-Mart and CarreIour adopted totally diIIerent strategies Ior their sourcing and logistics. Both oI the two giant retailers have more than 80 percent oI their products purchased Irom within China. However, Wal-Mart emphasizes central
sourcing and distribution Ior all stores within China. It provides sourcing inIormation to local retailers and centralizes sourcing practices through the procurement headquarters, and goods are then distributed to each distribution center. Wal-Mart has three distribution centers in China Ior all oI its stores. CarreIour, however, established 12 sourcing bases in China, and each oI them is empowered with purchasing rights. CarreIour emphasizes Ilexibility oI sourcing and distribution, and thereIore each store have their own rights and decisions on their goods purchasing and stocking.
There are both advantages and disadvantages Ior the two strategies. Centralized sourcing and distribution would be better in terms oI products quality and delivery control. However, China`s special conditionsprovincial autonomy and selI-suIIiciency, pose challenges Ior centralized strategies. Especially, the amount oI stores that Wal-Mart has in China is still small, and the costs oI such strategies would be more. For the empowered sourcing strategies adopted by CarreIour, it is argued that the products quality and delivery cannot be assured. However, it is more suitable to Chinese inter-provincial conditions, and the Ilexibility oI these strategies enables CarreIour to save a lot oI costs and time in purchasing and delivery.
6.1.6 Human Resource Management and Public Relations
Both Wal-Mart and CarreIour attach great importance on its employees training and
retaining. As argued by Cannon (1995), although managers Irom host countries may have good management knowledge, skills and potential, they lack cross-cultural exposure and they only learn through their own experience. ThereIore, both Wal-Mart and CarreIour send good and potential management employees to their head oIIices in parent countries to learn Ior their Iuture career development. Employee motivation is also important Ior Iirms` human resource management. This would reduce the rate oI employees` turnover and help talent retaining. Wal-Mart, Ior example, awarded employees who worked Ior 10 years on its 10 th anniversary celebration. CarreIour, use competitive remuneration contracts to avoid trained employees to leave Ior competitors and to retain the talent staying Ior longer time.
Corporate social responsibility is closely related to business ethics, and it reIers to the idea that businesses have a responsibility to society beyond making proIits (Cullen and Parboteeah, 2005). Both Wal-Mart and CarreIour devote much time, money and eIIort to Chinese social welIare aIIairs. They exert themselves to promote environment protection, sponsor education, and join community activities as well as other public activities. These do not only lead to better environment and society in China, but they are also ways to marketing themselves and build brand image in the society.
6.2 Resource-Based Theory and Their Strategies
Firms plan and implement strategies in order to create competitive advantages to outperIorm competitors. As each Iirm has a distinctive bundle oI resources and capabilities, the opportunity set Ior each Iirm is distinct Irom others. ThereIore, the strategies are planned depending on resources and capabilities a Iirm possesses. In the last section oI this chapter, strategies adopted by Wal-Mart and CarreIour are compared and contrasted in terms oI six aspects. This section will use resource-based theory as basic principle to explain the relationship between resources and capabilities possessed by Wal-Mart and CarreIour and the strategies they adopt.
6.2.1 Entry Strategies
Hill (2004) argues that the choice oI entry modes depends on the type oI know-how that a Iirm possesses, whether technological know-how or management know-how. Wal-Mart and CarreIour both adopted joint ventures as their entry modes and also will continue with this method during their Iurther development. Wal-Mart and CarreIour both are successIul and ranked the Iirst two large retailers in the world. Their successes depend largely on their management know-how on every aspect relating to retailing businesses. As management know-how is accumulated through business development process and gained by experience, it is path dependency resources and diIIicult to imitate. On the other hand, by Iorming a joint venture with local partners, the two retailing giants are able gain valuable knowledge on Chinese market, economic and political conditions. ThereIore, joint ventures are good options Ior their
entry. Through joint ventures, not only their valuable resourcesmanagement know-how is applied while protected in Chinese market, but they also gained valuable knowledge on Chinese conditions.
6.2.2 Expansion Strategies
During the expansion oI Wal-Mart and CarreIour, they adopted diIIerent store location strategies, and the speed oI expansion oI CarreIour is slightly more rapid than that oI Wal-Mart. These diIIerences are generally due to diIIerent experiences in internationalizations oI the two retailing giants. CarreIour had more experiences in internationalization as well as developing new market overseas. CarreIour opened its Iirst store outside France in Belgium in 1969, and now CarreIour has presented in 30 countries globally. Wal-Mart entered Mexico and opened its Iirst oversea store in 1991, and now there are only 15 countries that Wal-Mart has entered. In addition, the experiences gained Irom operation in Taiwan by CarreIour also provide great competitive advantages Ior its development in China. ThereIore, CarreIour understands more on consumers` needs, preIerences, buying habits as well as the location oI mainstream oI high-level consumptions. These experiences resources provide CarreIour great capabilities in exploiting new market as well as developing in China.
As the choice oI stores location is concerned, Wal-Mart would more likely to choose
smaller and second tier cities in China, whereas CarreIour would more likely to expand to larger and more developed cities. For Wal-Mart`s choice, this is also due to the past experiences during its development processes. Wal-Mart started in a small city in Arkansas, US and continues to develop new stores in smaller cities more than in big cities to avoid intensive competitions. As Lin and Liang (2001) suggest, Wal-Mart always adopted a 'circumvent big cities strategies to steadily cultivate talents and accumulates experiences. This has been traditions Ior Wal-Mart to develop internationally, and hence provides experiences to Wal-Mart Ior the same development strategies.
6.2.3 Positioning Strategies
Both Wal-Mart and CarreIour adopt cost leadership strategy and oIIer low prices in order to capture more market shares. As argued in previous chapters, cost advantages can be achieved iI Iirms have superior advantages in purchasing, advertising, and research and development. Wal-Mart and CarreIour are both large retailers in China. As most oI their products sold worldwide are purchased in China, their buying powers are relative high than other retailers. ThereIore, this enables the two retailing giants to purchase at lower prices. In addition, they also enjoy the beneIits Irom advertising, because their larger coverage oI their advertisement enables lowers advertising costs per consumers. Wal-Mart also possesses advanced inIormation system that enables its lower costs on stocking and inIormation communicating.
Both Wal-Mart and CarreIour also aim to achieve diIIerentiation strategies. However, Wal-Mart outperIorms CarreIour in terms oI this aspect. According to Grant (2005), diIIerentiation requires high levels oI technologies and services. As retail industry is concerned, customer services are the key to achieve competitive advantages. CarreIour and Wal-Mart both emphasize the creation oI a Iriendly atmosphere at every store where employees wander around to replenish goods and see iI any assistance is required (Lin and Liang, 2001). Wal-Mart also especially regulates its staII to keep 'ten-Ioot attitudes and 'eight-tooth smiles Ior customers. Wal-Mart insists on ordering and purchasing goods Irom suppliers directly to assure their qualities. It also pays more attention on customers` complaints and requests. With gradually accumulated customers` satisIaction, the company`s image will also gradually built as good shopping environment, which are valuable resources to achieve diIIerentiation advantages.
6.2.4 Local Adaptation
During the development oI Wal-Mart and CarreIour, both retailing giants make great eIIorts on its local adaptation. CarreIour adapted on the Iirst day oI its entry, such as Iood selling as well as exploiting the loophole oI government regulations. These are its distinct strategies Ior its expansion and development in China. Regardless oI whether CarreIour`s strategies are good or not, compared with Wal-Mart, CarreIour is
more adapted to Chinese market environment and hence expands and develops Iaster. This may be attributed to CarreIour`s experiences in Taiwan. Through six years` operation in Taiwan, CarreIour undoubtedly gained great knowledge on customers` needs, preIerences, and buying habits as well as Chinese social cultures, communication cultures and business cultures. These experiences provide great advantages Ior CarreIour`s local adaptation strategies. Although Wal-Mart took Iour years in researching Chinese market, economic and political condition, these research results are not unique, and they can be obtained or imitated by any competitors. ThereIore, CarreIour does possess competitive advantages in local adaptation strategies.
6.2.5 Sourcing Strategies
The sourcing strategies adopted by Wal-Mart and CarreIour are totally diIIerent. This is also due to the diIIerence resources that each oI the two retailing giants possesses. Wal-Mart is Iamous Ior its logistics system and it is widely considered as one oI the most important Iactors that lead to global success oI Wal-Mart. Take Wal-Mart in US Ior example, a distribution center with satellite system is capable to distribute Ior 120 stores, and Wal-Mart use its own lorries to distribute goods to stores that are no Iar than 24 hours` driving distances. This advanced distribution system is argued to depend heavily on locations and destinies oI stores. ThereIore, technologies and management oI centralized distribution system are valuable resources Ior Wal-Mart.
Although the distribution systems in China now are not as suIIicient as those in the US, it is believed that with the increase oI the number oI stores, Wal-Mart`s centralized distribution systems in China will provides signiIicant competitive advantages (Li, 2004). CarreIour, however, adopted decentralized and empowered sourcing strategies, and hence the distribution oI goods relies on local sourcing base and suppliers. This is due to CarreIour`s lack oI technologies and management know-how and also the lower costs oI such a strategy. ThereIore, although Wal-Mart costs more money and time on its distribution system, it may beneIit more than CarreIour in the long-run.
6.3 Summary
This chapter conducts a comparative study oI strategies adopted by Wal-Mart and CarreIour respectively. There are both similarities and diIIerences. Generally, the strategy that Wal-Mart adopted is more smooth and steady, enIorcing long-term development and sustainability, while CarreIour`s strategy is more aggressive and Iocusing on rapid short-term development.
These strategies adopted by each Iirm depend on various Iactors, such as government regulations, market conditions and so on. However, they are mostly aIIected by the resources and capabilities that each Iirm possesses. Since each Iirm has its unique
bundle oI resources and capabilities that determine opportunity set Ior each Iirm, strategies adopted by Iirms may diIIerent. ThereIore, it is reasonable to Iind that although Wal-Mart and CarreIour are in the same industry with the same context, the strategies adopted are diIIerent and it is determined by the resources and capabilities they possess respectively.
Chapter 7 Conclusions and Recommendations
The previous chapters have analyzed and compared the strategies adopted by Wal-Mart and CarreIour, and provided the explanations oI links between the strategies adopted and resources and capabilities possessed. ConIronted with intensive competition in Chinese retail market especially aIter China`s entry into WTO, Ioreign retailers need to plan and implement their strategies tightly according to market conditions and their Iirm-speciIic resources. This chapter will Iirst conclude the Iindings oI aims and objectives oI this research. A conclusion will be drawn in the Iollowing part. There are also recommendations to both Wal-Mart and CarreIour Ior their Iuture development in China. At the end oI this research is the limitations oI this research.
7.1 Findings of the Research
This research aims to provide a comparative study oI strategies adopted by Wal-Mart and CarreIour in a resource-based view, and the purpose is to provide an overview oI the relationship between Iirms` strategies and its possessed resources. Through the analysis oI Chinese retail industry, studies oI Wal-Mart and CarreIour`s strategies in China, comparing and contrasting the similarities and diIIerences oI these strategies adopted, and combining the resource-based theory with the comparative studies, Iindings oI objectives are as Iollows.
Since the transition oI Chinese economy system occurred, the government policies on retail market gradually become open to Ioreign retailers, especially aIter Chinese entry into WTO. ThereIore, the retail market in China also evolves with these changes. Based on Porter`s Five Forces Iramework, in Chinese retail market today, the internal rivalry is highly intensive, potential entry level is medium to high, the inIluence oI substitutes and complements are medium, suppliers oI retailers have low to medium level oI power, and the power oI customers are medium. ThereIore, it can be concluded that competition in Chinese retail market is Iairly intensive.
Wal-Mart always adopts steady development strategies Iocusing on long-term and adapts its strategies to the local market conditions and government policies. CarreIour also adapts its strategies according to Chinese market condition. However, CarreIour pursues aggressive development strategies and sometimes disregards and exploits the loophole oI government regulations.
Through a comparative study oI the two retailing giants` strategies, it is Iound that there are both similarities and diIIerences between their strategies. The choices oI their strategies are selected largely based on the resources and capabilities they possess, such as management know-how, experiences, technology and etc.
7.2 Conclusions
In conclusion, China is always an attractive market Ior Ioreign investment especially aIter China`s entry into the WTO. This research employs case studies research method and uses Wal-Mart and CarreIour and Chinese retail industry as representatives to illustrate Ioreign Iirms` entry and development in China. It can be Iound that although the retail market in China is oI great potential, the competition is very Iierce. In addition, government policies play important role in Ioreign retailers` strategies. Although the importance oI regulations decreases with gradually Iurther openness oI Chinese market to Ioreign investment, establishing good relationships with government and paying attention on government regulations are very important Ior Ioreign investors. ThereIore, Ioreign Iirms need to plan its entry and development strategies based on economic, market and political conditions. However, the resources and capabilities are the critical Iactors in determining strategies, as they provide unique opportunity sets Ior each Iirm. Through the analysis oI strategies oI Wal-Mart and CarreIour, it is Iound that both giant retailers plan strategies according to local market, economy and government conditions and achieve great competitive advantages on their local adaptations. In addition, their successes also rely on the strategies exploited based on their resources and capabilities. However, there is also space Ior Iurther improvement oI both Wal-Mart and CarreIour`s strategies.
Undoubtedly, aIter China`s entry into the WTO and policies are more open to Ioreign
investors, more and more Ioreign investment come into China, and they bring advanced technologies and management knowledge, and some oI these Ioreign entrants are successIul worldwide. However, business models and experiences proved to be successIul in other countries would not be successIul in China. Internal resources and external environment are both critically important Ior Ioreign investors.
7.3 Recommendation for Wal-Mart and Carrefour
From the previous analysis, there are both similarities and diIIerences between the strategies adopted by Wal-Mart and CarreIour. Some oI the strategies may lead to competitive advantages, while others are not. II the strategies that do not lead to beneIits, the Iirm needs to consider how to adjust it Ior its Iuture positive development. II it is the unique resources and capabilities that lead to competitors` success, the Iirm needs to consider how to create a substitute oI or imitate the competitors` distinct resources. ThereIore, as Wal-Mart and CarreIour`s strategies in China are concerned, some recommendations are made Ior their Iurther development in the context oI China`s entry into the WTO and Iurther opening oI the retail sectors.
7.3.1 Recommendations Ior Wal-Mart China
Wal-Mart`s strategies are considered to Iocus on long-term development and they are based on regulations oI every level oI governments in China. They pursue harmony
relationships with customers, suppliers, governments and the whole society. However, there are still some strategies to be adjusted or paid more attention to Ior its better development in Iuture.
First, to be more Ilexible. Wal-Mart keeps developing very steadily, and it can be proved by its expansion and distribution strategies. Wal-Mart still Iocuses more on opening new stores in second tier cities, and the number oI stores in developed and large cities is still low. However, although 'circumvent big cities strategies are used to accumulate experiences, the mainstream oI consumption power still lies in developed cities and prosperous areas. In addition, it has been more than 10 years since it entered China, it is time Ior Wal-Mart to invest more in large and prosperous cities and areas. Distribution systems oI Wal-Mart also need to be more Ilexible. Due to the small number oI stores in China, it is still diIIicult Ior Wal-Mart to realize economies oI scale in centralized distribution system. In addition, China`s provincial autonomy and selI-suIIiciency pose diIIiculties in interprovincial transportation. These inevitably increase the delivery time and costs. ThereIore, Wal-Mart should consider a more Ilexible logistic system to lower the costs oI distribution currently.
In addition, Wal-Mart acquired Trust-Mart at the end oI 2006, and thus Wal-Mart needs to make eIIort on integrating resources oI the two Iirms to achieve greater competitive advantages. It may be a great opportunity Ior Wal-Mart to gain more market shares as well as proIits, but it still may be great challenges Ior Wal-Mart.
Learned Irom Wal-Mart`s acquisition experiences worldwide, iI Wal-Mart acquired a proIitable Iirm, then the acquired Iirm will stay proIitable, such as acquisitions in Canada, Mexico and UK; iI Wal-Mart acquired a Iailed Iirm, then the acquired Iirm will continue to make loss. Trust-Mart that Wal-Mart acquired is a Iirm with signiIicant loss. ThereIore, whether it is a good acquisition or not largely depends on the integration oI the resources and capabilities. Resources integration is important Ior Iirms involved in acquisition, and thereIore, Wal-Mart needs to contribute more on integrating resources and avoid culture clashes.
7.3.2 Recommendations Ior CarreIour
CarreIour`s strategies are more aggressive since its Iirst entry into China, and hence the expansion and development oI CarreIour are more rapid and Iluent than those oI Wal-Mart. However, its rapid and aggressive expansion makes CarreIour neglect some important issues.
The most important issue is that CarreIour needs to attach importance on the relationship with customers and suppliers. Compared with Wal-Mart, CarreIour received more complaints Irom customers and suppliers, and warning Irom government. Although the prices oI products in CarreIour are widely considered to be cheaper than Wal-Mart, the customer services are also vital Ior survive oI a retailer. In addition, CarreIour always reaps great proIits Irom suppliers, and hence suppliers can
obtain a small proIit margin. ThereIore, it is dangerous Ior CarreIour iI these suppliers leave and stop supplying in the Iuture especially when Wal-Mart have a stronger buying power.
In addition, CarreIour needs to Iocus on its long-term development and plan strategies to create values resources in order to achieve competitive advantages. For example, having an integrated supplier network Ior its sourcing and distribution centers should be more important than opening more and more new stores. Empowered purchasing and distribution rights and management hinder the delivery quality oI goods, which is critically important Ior retailers. In addition, CarreIour should develop advanced inIormation systems on communicating with suppliers and stocking, which will save signiIicant costs and beneIit CarreIour`s stock management in the long-term,
7.4 Limitations oI the Research
This research aims to provide an overview oI the relationship between the Iirm strategies and its possessed resources and capabilities. It uses Wal-Mart and CarreIour as two cases representatives and studies their activities and strategies in Chinese retail market. The research relies on qualitative research methods by collecting data and inIormation Irom government websites, company websites, textbooks, journal articles, company reports and etc. These public published sources oI inIormation improve the quality and reliabilities oI data.
However, there are still limitations oI this research. II a longer period is given, more data and inIormation would be collected and two cases would be studied better and more completed. In addition, this research only chooses two cases to study their strategies and possessed resources and capabilities, so iI there were more cases such as Tesco and Makro, the research would be more convincing. Furthermore, interviews and surveys are important methods in case studies, and iI there were interviews or surveys conducted the research would be more inductive. Moreover, the data and inIormation may not be the latest, and some oI the latest reports does now allow to access. As a result, the analysis and recommendations are based on the strategies and activities accessible, and thereIore they may be preliminary and more detailed and in-depth ones need to be developed. Further research should Iocus on a comparative study on the resources possessed by domestic retailers and Ioreign respectively and how theirs strategies diIIer Iorm each other, and their Iuture development responding to the other`s evolution.
References
Aaker, D.A. (1989) 'Managing Assets and Skills: The Key to Sustainable Competitive Advantage, California Management Review, vol. 31, p91-106.
Alder, N.J. (1997) International Dimensions of Organi:ational Behavior, 3 rd ed., Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern.
Adler, N. (2003), International Dimensions of Organisational Behavior, 4th ed., Kent Publishing Co., Boston, MA.
Adler, N.J. and Ghadar, F. (1990) "Strategic Human Resource Management: A Global Perspective", in Piper, R. (Eds),Human Resource Management. An International Comparison, de Guyter, New York, NY, p.236-60.
Agarwal, S. and Ramaswami, S. (1992) 'Choice oI Foreign Entry Mode: Impact oI Ownership, Location and Internalisation Factors, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 23(1), p1-16.
Anderson, E. and Gatignon, H. (1986) 'Modes oI Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 17, p1-26.
Bae, J. and Lawler, J. (2000) "Organizational and HRM Strategies in Korea: Impact on Firm PerIormance in an Emerging Economy", Academv of Management Journal, Vol. 43(3), pp.502-17.
Barney, J. (1991) 'Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, vol. 17, p99-120.
Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1989) Managing Across Borders, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Besanko, D., Dranove, D., Shanley, M. and SchaeIer, S. (2003), Economics of strategv, 3 rd edition, International edition, Wiley.
Birkinshaw, J. (1996) 'How Multinational Subsidiary Mandates Are Gained and Lost, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 27 (3), p467-495.
Bishop, J. (2006) 'Entry Strategies, Supplv Management, vol. 11(3), p37.
Black, J.S. and Gregersen, H. (1999) 'The Right Way to Manage Expatriates, Harvard Business Review, March-April, p52-63.
Blaikie, N.W.H. (2000) Designing Social Research. The Logic of Anticipation, Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press: Blackwell.
Brewster, C., MayrhoIer, W. and Morley, M. (Eds) (2000) New Challenges for European Human Resource Management, Macmillan, Basingstoke,
Brouthers, K.D. and Brouthers, L.B. (2000) 'Acquisition or GreenIield Start-up?, Strategic Management Journal, col. 21(1), p89-97.
Cai, Y. C. & Zhang. Q. Z (2003), 'CarreIour China Strategies, Hebei Daily, 11/02/03.
Cannon, F. (1995) 'Business-Driven Management Development: Developing Competencies Which Drive Business PerIormance, Journal of European
Industrial Training, vol. 19(2), p26-31.
Cattin, P. and Wittink, D.R. (1982) 'Commercial Use oI Conjoint Analysis: A Survey, Journal of Marketing, Summer, p44-53.
Cespedes, F.V. (1988) 'Control vs. Resources in Channel Design: Distribution DiIIerences in One Industry, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 17(2), p15-27.
Child, P. (2006) 'Lessons Irom a Global Retailer: An Interview with the President oI CarreIour China, McKinsev Quarterlv, 2006 Special Edition, p70-81.
China Country Report (2002) Irom PricewaterhouseCoopers, China (mainland) Country Report, Retail & Consumer Irom New Delli to New Zealand, http://www.pwcglobal.com/Ir/pwcpdI/pwcchina.pdI, October 2002. Accessed on 18/08/2007.
Toh, M., (2002), China Aiming Ior Own Retail Giant, China Internet InIormation Centre News, http://asia.proquestreIerence.inIo/pqrasia, accessed on 18/08/2007.
Clark, T. (1996) "HRM: A UniIied Understanding or a Multiplicity oI Meanings?", in Clark, T. (Eds),European Human Resource Management. An Introduction to Comparative Theorv and Practice, Blackwell, OxIord, pp.244-62.
Colla, E. and Dupuis, M. (2002) 'Research and Managerial Issues on Global Retail Competition: CarreIour / Wal-Mart, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, vol. 30(2), p103-111.
Cresswell, J. W. (1998) Qualitative Inquirv and Research Design. Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Cui, J. H. (2003), 'Full eIIorts Ior expansion brought hidden trouble; CarreIour suIIers Chinese style problems, http://hn.rednet.com.cn/Articles/2003/07/441656.HTM on 18/07/03. Accessed on 21/08/2007.
Cullen, J.B. and Parboteeah, K.P. (2005) Multinational Management. A Strategic Approach, 3 rd edition, Thomson: South-Western.
Davies, K. (1994) 'Foreign Investment in the Retail Sector oI the People`s Republic oI China, The Columbia Journal of World Business, Fall, p.56-69.
De Cieri, H. and Dowling, P. (1999) "Strategic Human Resource Management in Multinational Enterprises: Theoretical and Empirical Developments", in Wright, P., Dyer, L., Boudreau, J., Milkovich, G. (Eds),Strategic Human Resource Management. An Agenda for the 21st Centurv, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, .
De Geer, H. Borglund, T. and Frostenson, M. (2004) 'Interpreting the International Firm: Going Beyond Interviews in Marschan-Piekkari, R. and Welch, C. (2004) (edited) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK; Nirtgampton, MA, USA.
Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. (1989) 'Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability oI Competitive Advantage, Management Science, vol. 35, p1504-1511.
Dowling, P.J. and Schuler, R.S. (1990) International Dimensions of Human Resource Management, Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing.
England, G.W. (1986) 'National Work Meanings and Patterns: Constraints on Management Action, European Management Journal, vol. 4(3), p176-184.
Erramilli, M.K. (1996) 'Nationality and Subsidiary Ownership Patterns in multinational Corporations, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 27(2), p225-248.
euromonitor.com (2003) CarreIour SA: Retailing, http://www.euromonitor.com/cliIe/deIault.asp February 2003. Accessed on 04/08/2007.
Ferner, A. (1997) "Country oI Origin EIIects and HRM in Multinational Companies", Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 7(1), p19-37.
Fisher, C., Buglear, J., Lowry, D., Mutch, A. and Tansley, C. (2004) Researching and Writing a Dissertation for Business Students, Prentice Hall: Financial Times.
Fong, M. (2006) 'China May Force Foreign Firms to Allow Unions, Wall Street Jouornal (Eastern Edition), New York, N.Y., 08/07/2006, page A2.
Geringer, J.M., Frayne, A.C. and Milliman, J.F. (2002) 'In Search oI Best Practices` in Internaitonal Human Resource Management: Research Design and Methodology, Human Resource Mangement, vol. 41(1), p5-30.
Ghemawat, P. (1991) Commitment. The Dvnamics of Strategv, New York: Free Press.
Gondal, N. (1994) Hedonic Price Indexes Ior Spreadsheets and an Empirical Test Ior Network Externalities, Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 25, p160-170.
Grant, R.M. (1991) 'The Resource-Based Theory oI Competitive Advantage: Implications Ior Strategy Formulation, California Management Review, Spring, p.119-145.
Govindarajan, V. and Gupta, A.K. (1999) 'Taking Wal-Mart Global: Lessons From Retailing`s Giant, Strategv Business, Fourth Quarter, Harvard Busienss School Executive Education
Gupta, A.K. and Govindarajan, V. (2000) 'Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21(4), p473-496.
Hartley, J. (2004) 'Case Study Research, in Cassell, C. and Symon, G. (2004) (edited) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organi:ational Research, SAGE Publications: London; Thousand Oaks; New Delhi.
Harvey, M.G. (1983) 'The Multinational Corporation`s Expatriate Problem: An Application oI Murphy`s Law, Business Hori:ons, vol. 26, p71-78.
Hennart, J.F. and Larimo, J. (1998) 'The Impact oI Culture on the Strategy oI Multinational Enterprises: Does National Origin AIIect Ownership Decisions? Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 29(3), p515-538.
Hill, C.W.L. (2004) Global Business Todav, International Edition, McGraw Hill: Irwin.
Hill, C.W.L., Hwang, P. and Kim, W.C. (1990) 'An Eclectic Theory oI the Choice oI International Entry Mode, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 11, p117-128.
Hill, C.W.L. and Kim, W.C. (1988) 'Searching Ior a Dynamic Theory oI the Multinational Enterprise: A Transaction Cost Model, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 9 (Special Issue on Strategy Content), p93-104.
hn.rednet.com.cn., 'CarreIour suIIers Chinese style problems, http://hn.rednet.com.cn/Articles/2003/07/441656.HTM , 18/07/03, Access on 02/08/2007
HoIstede, G. (1980) Cultures Consequences. International Differences in Work-Related Jalues, Newbury Park, CaliI.: Sage Publishing.
HoIstede, G. (1983) 'National Cultures in Four Dimensions: A Resource-Based Theory oI Cultural DiIIerences among Nations, International Studies of Management & Organi:ation, vol. 13(1), p46-74.
HoIstede, G. (1991) Cultures and Organi:ations, London: McGraw-Hill.
Holt, D.H. and Wigginton, K.W. (2002) International Management, 2 nd edition, Thomson: South-Western.
Howard K. and Sharp J. A. The Management of a Student Research Profect.
Huey, J. & Walton, S. (1992), Made in America, N.Y. Doubleday.
HuIIman, T.P. (2003) 'Wal-Mart in China: Challenges Facing a Foreign Retailer`s Supply Chain, The China Business Review, September-October, p18-22.
Inglehart, R. (2000), 'World values surveys and European values surveys, 1981-1984, 1990-1993, and 1995-1997 ICPSR version, Ann Arbor, MI: Institute Ior Social
Research. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium Ior Political and Social Research |distribution|. Ljubljana: Arhiv druzboslovnih podatkov.
Isobe, T, Makino, S. and Montgomery, D.B (2000) 'Resource Commitment, Entry Timing, and Market PerIormance oI Foreign Direct Investment in Emerging Economies: Case oI Japanese International Joint Ventures in China, Academv of Management Journal, vol. 43(3), p468-484.
Keating, M. and Thompson, K. (2004) 'International Human Resource Management: Overcoming Disciplinary Sectarianism, International Human Resource Management, vol. 26(6), p595-612.
Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. (1997) 'The Right Way to Restructure Conglomerates in Merging Markets, Harvard Business Jiew, July-August, vol. 77(4), p125.
Kim, C. and Mauborgne, R. (1999) 'Creating New Market Space, Harvard Business Review, January-February, p83-93.
Larimo, J. (1993) 'Foreign Direct Investment and PerIormance: An Analysis oI Finnish Direct ManuIacturing Investment in OECD Countries, Acta Wasansia, 32.
Laurent, A. (1986) "The Cross-Cultural Puzzle oI International Human Resource Management", Human Resource Management, Vol. 25(1), p91-102.
Lee, J. and Miller, D. (1999) 'People Matter: Commitment to Employees, Strategy and PerIormance in Korean Firms, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 20(6), p579-593.
Levy, R.G. (1996) Consumer Marketing in China. Chasing Billions, Catching
Millions, 2 nd ed., Hong Kong: The Economist Intelligence Unit.
Liberman, M. and Montgomery, D. (1988) 'First-Mover Advantages, Strategic Management Journal, 9 (Summer Special Issue, 1988), p41-58.
Li, W. (2004) 'Who Wins in Chinese Market: Wal-Mart or CarreIour (translated), published at www.people.com.cn on 24/08/2004. Accessed on 06/09/2007.
Lin, M.Q. & Liang, W.K (2001), 'A Comparative Study oI Asia Strategy: Wal-Mart versus CarreIour, http://blake.montclair.edu/~cibconI/conIerence/DATA/Theme5/China.pdI Accessed on 12/07/07.
Lo, T.W., Lau, H. and Lin, G. (2001) 'Problems and Prospects oI Supermarket Development in China, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, vol. 29(2), p66-75.
Lockett, A. and Thompson, S. (2001) "The Resource-Based View and Economics", Journal of Management, Vol. 27(6), p723-54.
Lu, T.H. and Qiu, B. (2002) 'Retail king in the world - the case oI the biggest retailer in the world, China Business, http://www.sying.com/applynews/syingclub.asp?newsid1131 on 03/06/02. Accessed on 08/08/2007.
Luo, Y. (1998) 'Timing oI Investment and Internaional Expansion PerIormance in China, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 29(2), p391-407.
Madhok, A. (1997) 'Cost, Value and Foreign Market Entry: The Transaction and the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 18, p39-61.
Mahoney, J. and Pandian, J.R. (1992) 'The Resource-Based View within the Conversation oI Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, p179-192.
Marketing BrieIs (1996) in Marketing Management, Summer, vol. 5(2), p8.
Marschan-Piekkari, R. and Welch, C. (2004) 'Qualitative Research Methods in International Business: The State oI the Art, in Marschan-Piekkari, R. and Welch, C. (2004) (edited) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK; Nirtgampton, MA, USA.
Meredith, D. (2004) 'Wal-Mart`s China Growth Under Way, Womens Wear Dailv, vol.188 (95), p2-2.
Mitchell. T.R. (1997) 'Matching Motivational Strategies with Organizational Contexts, in Cummings, L.L. and Staw, B.M. (eds) Research in Organi:ational Behavior, vol.19, Grrenwich, CT: JAI Press, p60-62.
Naughton, K. (2006) 'The Great Wal-Mart oI China; To Move into China, America`s Biggest and Most SuccessIul Retailer Had to Learn its Business All Over Again (U.S. Edition), Newsweek, New York, Vol.148 (16), pp50-50.
Orbell, J. (1987) A Guide to Tracing the Historv of Business, Aldershot: Gower.
Parboteeah, K.P. and Cullen, J.B. (2003) 'Social Institutions and Work Centrality: Explorations beyond National Culture, Organi:ation Science, vol. 14, p137-148.
Peng, M.W, (2001) 'The Resource-Based View and International Business, Journal of Management, vol. 27, p803-829.
Peng, M. W. and Wang, D. (2000) 'Innovation Capability and Foreign Direct Investment: Toward a Learning Option Perspective, Management International Review, vol. 40 (1st Special Issue), p7993.
PeteraI, M.A. (1993) 'The cornerstones oI Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, p179-191.
Pieper, R. (1990) "Introduction: Human Resource Management: An International Comparison", in Pieper, R. (Eds), Human Resource Management. An International Comparison, de Gruyter, Berlin, p1-26.
Porter, M.E. (1980) The Competitive Advantage on Nations, New York: Free Press.
Pucik, V. (1992) "Globalization and Human Resource Management", in Barnett, C.K. (Eds),Globali:ing Management. Creating and Leading the Competitive Organi:ation, Wiley, New York, NY, p61-81.
Qin, F. (2004) 'Wal-Mart vs. CarreIour: Comparison between Strategies in Chinese Retail Market (translated title) at http://Iinance.sina.com.cn on 21/06/2004. Accessed on 16/08/2007.
Rogers, E. (1983) Diffusion of innovations,3 rd ed. New York: Free Press.
Rumelt, R.P. (1984) 'Towards a Strategic Theory oI the Firm, in Lamb, R. (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management, Englewood CliIIs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, p556-570.
Schein, E.H. (1985) Organi:ational Culture and Leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
SchiIIman, S., Reynolds, M., and Young, F. (1981) Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling. Theorv, Methods, and Applications, Cambridge, MA Academic Press.
Schneider, S. and Barsoux, J. (1997) Managing across Cultures, Prentice-Hall, Hemel Hempstead.
Schuler, R., Dowling, P. and De Cieri, H. (1993) "An Integrative Framework oI Strategic International Human Resource Management", International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 4(4), p717-64.
Schuler, R. and Rogovsky, N. (1998) 'Understanding Compensation Practice Variations Across Firms: The Impact oI National Culture, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 29(1), p150-177.
Scullion, H. (1995) "International Human Resource Management", in Storey, J. (Eds),Human Resource Management. A Critical Text, Routledge, London, p352-82.
Scullion, H. and Starkey, K. (2000), "In Search oI the Changing Role oI the Corporate Human Resource Function in the International Firm", International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 11(6), p1061-81.
Shaver, J.M., Witchell, W. and Yeung, B. (1997) 'The EIIect oI Own Firm and Other Firm Experience on Foreign Direct Investment Survival in the United States, 1987-92, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, p811-24.
Shetty, Y.K. (1979) 'Managing the multinational corporation: European and American styles, Management International Review, vol. 19, p39-48.
Sparrow, P., Schuler, R. and Jackson, S. (1994) "Convergence or Divergence? Human Resource Practices and Policies Ior Competitive Advantage World-wide", International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 5(2), p267-99.
Stern, C. W. & Stalk, G. Jr. (1998) (eds.), Perspectives on Strategv, M.A.: The Boston Consulting Group.
Taylor, S., Beechler, S. and Napier, N. (1996) "Toward an Integrative Model oI Strategic International Human Resource Management", Academv of Management Review, Vol. 21(4), p959-85.
Taylor, S., Beechler, S. and Napier, N. (1996) 'Toward an Integrative Model oI Strategic International Human Resource Management, The Academv of Management Review, vol. 21(4), p959-985.
Tse D, Pan YG, and Au K. (1997) 'How MNEs Choose Entry Modes and Form Appliances: The China Experience, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 28(4), p779-805.
Van Maanen, J. (1983) 'Reclaiming Qualitative Methods Ior Organizational Research: A PreIace, in Van Maanen, J. (ed.) Qualitative Methodologv, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, p9-18.
Wall Street Journal Asia (2006), 'CarreIour SA: Expansion Plan to Include Buying Retail Firms in China, published on May 16, 2006.
Wei, Y., Liu, B, and Liu, X. (2005) 'Entry Modes oI Foreign Direct Investment in China: A Multinomial Logit Approach, Journal of Business Research, vol. 58, p1495-1505.
WernerIelt, B., (1984) 'A Resource-Based View oI the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, p171-180.
www.carreIour.com, OIIicial website oI CarreIour. Accessed on 05/08/2007
www.carreIour.com.cn, OIIicial website oI CarreIour China. Accessed on 05/08/2007.
www.chinabgao.com, China Government Reports House. Accessed on 07/08/2007.
www.theIreedictionary.com, Accessed on 20/08/2007.
www.gmw.cn, Website oI Guangming Daily China, Accessed on 07/08/2007.
www.gzii.gov.cn, Guangzhou Economy and Trade Website, Accessed on 07/08/2007.
www.people.com.cn, 'CarreIour No. 1 in China in Terms oI Number oI Stores on http://english.people.com.cn/200301/13/eng20030113110000.shtml. Accessed on 08/08/2007.
www.supplychainer.com, 'Wal-Mart and CarreIour: Whose Strategy Is Better? http://www.supplychainer.com/50226711/walmartandcarreIourinchinawhose strategyisbetter.php. Accessed on 08/08/2007
www.szitic.com, OIIicial Website oI Shenzhen International Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. Accessed on 08/08/2007.
www.wal-martchina.com, OIIicial website oI Wal-Mart China. Accessed on 05/08/2007.
www1.chinadaily.com.cn, China Daily Website, Accessed on 07/08/2007.
Yan, R. (2003) 'Sheep and WolICase oI Competition between Wal-Mart and CarreIour in China, China Business on 04/08/2003. Accessed at http://www.emkt.com.cn/article/115/11584.html on 18/08/2007.
Yin, R. (1994) Case Studv Research. Design and Methods, 2 nd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.