0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
30 Ansichten4 Seiten
For social entrepreneurs, launching a new initiative can be just as challenging. Government can create an Enabling Environment by removing barriers, lending credibility, and supporting collaboration. For New Leaders for new schools, local governments helped convene internal leaders and community stakeholders to support the initiative when it enters a new city.
For social entrepreneurs, launching a new initiative can be just as challenging. Government can create an Enabling Environment by removing barriers, lending credibility, and supporting collaboration. For New Leaders for new schools, local governments helped convene internal leaders and community stakeholders to support the initiative when it enters a new city.
For social entrepreneurs, launching a new initiative can be just as challenging. Government can create an Enabling Environment by removing barriers, lending credibility, and supporting collaboration. For New Leaders for new schools, local governments helped convene internal leaders and community stakeholders to support the initiative when it enters a new city.
Role of government for growth of social entrepreneurship in country
Encouraging Social Innovation
Creating an enabling environment for social entrepreneurial initiatives; Rewarding initiatives for their performance; Scaling initiatives success; and Producing knowledge that enhances social entrepreneurs efforts. Miscellaneous: Encouraging Social Innovation For any entrepreneur, the start-up period of an organization is critical. In the private sector, one-third of new employer establishments do not survive the first two years, and more than half fail in the first four years. For social entrepreneurs, launching a new initiative can be just as challenging. To help social entrepreneurs endure the trials of the start-up phase, several foundations, most prominently Echoing Green and Ashoka, provide support specifically for early organizational development. In addition, various academic programs sponsor competitions and awards to encourage social innovation and the founding of new initiatives. According to Surdna Foundation Director Edward Skloot, government, too, has an important role to play in what he calls acting as a seedbed for innovation government encouraged social innovation by providing seed funds to support social-entrepreneurial initiatives in their start-up phases. For ex.in india
Creating an Enabling Environment
government can create an enabling environment for social entrepreneurs in a variety of waysmost prominently by removing barriers, lending credibility, and supporting collaboration. The examples discussed below show how government has succeeded in supporting social entrepreneurs through these practices. At times, existing practices and systems present barriers to addressing a social problem with an innovative and entrepreneurial approach In some cases, existing laws can constitute barriers to implementing new ideas .For several successful social entrepreneurs, government officials have helped them create an enabling environment simply by drawing attention and ultimately lending credibility to their causes. For New Leaders for New Schools, local governments have created an enabling environment by helping to convene internal leaders and community stakeholders to support the initiative when it enters a new city. Both to ensure public, private, and community support and because the New Leaders financial model requires ongoing private sector funding, interested municipalities must convene external community leaders for fundraising and other types of community support.
Rewarding Performance Another powerful way government can support the work of social entrepreneurs is by rewarding their performance through government financial support. As Howard Husock, director of the Manhattan Institutes Social Entrepreneurship Initiative, points out, Social entrepreneurs want access to reliable sources of financing that recognize performance.108 Four of the organizations in the interview pool have received government support in the form of performance-based rewards, through funding and purchasing. These rewards, in turn, have further enabled these organizations to leverage public and private resources and develop solutions. When social entrepreneurs innovations begin to catch on, government can recognize their positive results and reward their performance by institutionalizing funding. When social entrepreneurs produce and sell socially beneficial goods or services, another way government rewards performance is through purchasing their products.
Scaling Success
Often, the best reward for successful performance in social entrepreneurship is having the chance to scale success. Expanding the reach of a proven solution in a situation of market failure is often critical if the solution is to be truly transformative. While for-profit companies can use an initial public offering (IPO) to secure the funds for the huge initial investment that scaling requires, there is no equivalent available to social entrepreneurswho, even if they have developed a low-profit model, rarely operate within traditional profit margins to scale, let alone go public. As a result, in interviews, government often came up as the equivalent of an IPO that could help social entrepreneurs scale their approaches.
Producing Knowledge
Innovation most often requires making use of reliable information that can help to answer such questions as: What is the target social problem? How many people are affected? Are current or past activities effective in making changes? For this reason, successful social entrepreneurship is often closely associated with what Gregory Dees calls market-like feedback mechanisms.113 Government often plays a critical role as a resource and partner for producing knowledge that helps identify the problems, document the solutions, and compare various interventions against standards for success. Government specifically provides research data, establishes critical standards, and produces or funds evaluations that provide critical information for those working toward solving social problems. Government data are important not only for problem identification but also for setting standards and gauging success. New Leaders uses government data as a central measure of program success.
Miscellaneous:
A comprehensive government approach to entrepreneurship and SMEs would provide for a full coordination of activities of numerous Governmental institutions (chambers of commerce, employment bureaus, etc.) and NGOs dealing with entrepreneurship and SMEs. With no pretension of defining the role of government in supporting entrepreneurship and SMEs, we believe that apart from designing a comprehensive entrepreneurship and SMEs strategy, the development of national SME support institutions and networks is one of key condition for success. There are no doubts that governments should create different types of support institutions: (a) To provide information on regulations, standards, taxation, customs duties, marketing issues; (b) To advise on business planning, marketing and accountancy, quality control and assurance; (c) To create incubator units providing the space and infrastructure for business beginners and innovative companies, and helping them to solve technological problems, and to search for know-how and promote innovation; and (d) To help in looking for partners, in order to stimulate entrepreneurship and improve the business environment for small enterprise. (a) Training : Basic training differs from product to product but will necessary involve sharpening of entrepreneurial skills. Need based technical training is provided by the Govt. & State Govt. technical Institutions. There are a number of Government organizations as well as NGOs who conduct EDPs and MDPs. These EDPs and MDPs and are conducted by MSME's, NIESBUD, NSIC, IIE, NISIET, Entrepreneurship Development Institutes and other state government developmental agencies. (b) Marketing Assistance: There are Governmental and non-governmental Specialized agencies which provide marketing assistance. Besides promotion of MSME products through exhibitions, NSIC directly market the MSME produce in the domestic and overseas market. NSIC also manages a single point registration scheme for manufacturers for Govt. purchase. Units registered under this scheme get the benefits of free tender documents and exemption from earnest money deposit and performance guarantee. (c) Promotional Schemes : Government accords the highest preference to development of MSME by framing and implementing suitable policies and promotional schemes. Besides providing developed land and sheds to the entrepreneurs on actual cost basis with appropriate infrastructure, special schemes have been designed for specific purposes like quality up gradation, common facilities, entrepreneurship development and consultancy services at nominal charges.
For ex.Government of India has been executing the incentive scheme for providing reimbursement of charges for acquiring ISO 9000 certification to the extent of 75% of the cost subject to a maximum of Rs. 75,000/- in each case. ISO 9000 is a mechanism to facilitate adoption of consistent management practices and production technique as decided by the entrepreneur himself.
(d) Concession on Excise Duty : MSME units with a turnover of Rs. 1 crore or less per year have been exempted from payment of Excise Duty. Moreover there is a general scheme of excise exemption for MSME brought out by the Ministry of Finance which covers most of the items. Under this, units having turnover of less than Rs. 3 crore are eligible for concessional rate of Excise Duty. Moreover, there is an exemption from Excise Duty for MSME units producing branded goods in rural areas (e) Credit Facility to MSME : Credit to micro, small and medium scale sector has been covered under priority sector lending by banks. Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) has been established as the apex institution for financing the MSME. Specific schemes have been designed for implementation through SIDBI, SFCs, Scheduled Banks, SIDCs and NSIC etc. Loans upto Rs. 5 lakhs are made available by the banks without insisting on collaterals. Further Credit Guarantee Fund for micro, small and medium enterprises has been set up to provide guarantee for loans to MSME up to Rs. 25 lakhs extended by Commercial Banks and some Regional Rural Bank. (f) Policies and Schemes for Promotion of MSME Implemented by State Governments All the State Governments provide technical and other support services to small units through their Directorates of Industries, and District Industries Centers. Although the details of the scheme vary from state to state, the following are the common areas of support. (i) Development and management of industrial estates (ii) Suspension/deferment of Sales Tax (iii) Power subsidies (iv) Capital investment subsidies for new units set up in a particular district (v) Seed Capital/Margin Money Assistance Scheme (vi) Priority in allotment of power connection, water connection. (vii) Consultancy and technical support Government of India runs a scheme for giving National Awards to micro, small and medium scale entrepreneurs providing quality products in 11 selected industry groups of consumer interest. The winners are given trophy, certificate and a cash price of Rs. 25000/- each. urial Initiatives