0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
23 Ansichten7 Seiten
Validation of an ELISA method for the serological diagnosis of canine brucellosis due to Brucella canis. Two different antigenic extracts, obtained by heat or ultrasonic homogenization of microbial antigens, were compared by ELISA and Western blot.
Validation of an ELISA method for the serological diagnosis of canine brucellosis due to Brucella canis. Two different antigenic extracts, obtained by heat or ultrasonic homogenization of microbial antigens, were compared by ELISA and Western blot.
Validation of an ELISA method for the serological diagnosis of canine brucellosis due to Brucella canis. Two different antigenic extracts, obtained by heat or ultrasonic homogenization of microbial antigens, were compared by ELISA and Western blot.
Validation of an ELISA method for the serological diagnosis of canine brucellosis
due to Brucella canis
Maria Zoraida Daltro de Oliveira a , Vera Vale c , Lara Keid d , Songeli Menezes Freire c , Roberto Meyer c , Ricardo Wagner Portela c , Stella Maria Barrouin-Melo a,b, * a Laboratrio de Infectologia Veterinria, Escola de Medicina Veterinria, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Av. Ademar de Barros 500, 40170-000 Salvador, Brazil b Departamento de Patologia e Clnicas, Escola de Medicina Veterinria, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Av. Ademar de Barros 500, 40170-000 Salvador, Brazil c Laboratrio de Imunologia e Biologia Molecular, Instituto de Cincias e Sade, e e Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vale do Canela S/N, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil d Departamento de Medicina Veterinria Preventiva e Sade Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinria e Zootecnia da Universidade de So Paulo, SP, Brazil a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 23 October 2008 Accepted 10 July 2010 Keywords: Brucella canis Canine Brucellosis ELISA Validation Serology Diagnosis a b s t r a c t In the present study, the validation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for serodiagnosis of canine brucellosis is described. Two different antigenic extracts, obtained by heat or ultrasonic homog- enization of microbial antigens from a wild isolate of Brucella canis bacteria, were compared by ELISA and Western blot (WB). A total of 145 canine sera were used to dene sensitivity, specicity and accuracy of the ELISA as follows: (1) sera from 34 animals with natural B. canis infection, conrmed by blood culture and PCR, as well as 51 sera samples from healthy dogs with negative results by the agargel immunodif- fusion (AGID) test for canine brucellosis, were used as the control panel for B. canis infection; and (2) to scrutinize the possibility of cross reactions with other common dog infections in the same geographical area in Brazil, 60 sera samples from dogs harboring known infections by Leptospira sp., Ehrlichia canis, canine distemper virus (CDV), Neospora caninum, Babesia canis and Leishmania chagasi (10 in each group) were included in the study. The ELISA using heat soluble bacterial extract (HE-antigen) as antigen showed the best values of sensitivity (91.18%), specicity (100%) and accuracy (96.47%). In the WB analyses, the HE-antigen showed no cross-reactivity with sera from dogs with different infections, while the B. canis sonicate had various protein bands identied by those sera. The performance of the ELISA standardized with the heat soluble B. canis antigen indicates that this assay can be used as a reliable and practical method to conrm infection by this microorganism, as well as a tool for seroepidemiological studies. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Brucellosis comprises a spectrum of infectious diseases that af- fects livestock, companion animals and humans as well as is widely distributed in many countries (World Health Organization, 2008). The infection is transmitted to people by direct or indirect contact with infected animals or their products, and most Brucella species are pathogenic for humans (Delpino et al., 2004). In dogs, the severity of brucellosis caused by Brucella canis ranges from clinical normality to the occurrence of miscarriages, poor reproductive performance in males and females or non- specic signs such as lymphadenopathy and diskospondylitis (Carmichael and Joubert, 1987; Kerwin et al., 1992). Infected dogs can transmit the infection to other dogs or people even after the bacteremia has ceased and without presenting clinical symptoms of the disease (Carmichael and Shin, 1996; Lucero et al., 2005). As clinical diagnosis in dogs must be conrmed by laboratory tests, many serological methods have been developed. Such tests include the tube agglutination test (TAT), the rapid slide agglutination test (RSAT) or agargel immunodiffusion (AGID); however, all of these assays present variable levels of false positivity (Johnson and Walker, 1992; Mateu-de-Antonio et al., 1993; Baldi et al., 1994; Carmichael and Shin, 1996). False negativity in laboratory tests has also been reported (Keid et al., 2009). Therefore, bacterial cul- tures from blood or other biological specimens are still necessary to conrm a questionable serological diagnosis (Carmichael and Shin, 1996; Baldi et al., 1997; Wanke, 2004). Various ELISA-based approaches for serodiagnosis of the infec- tion have been proposed, each one showing variable results depending on the properties of the antigen used in the assay (Johnson and Walker, 1992; Mateu-de-Antonio et al., 1993; Baldi et al., 1994, 1997; Letesson et al., 1997). Recently, other methods have been proposed to detect the infection in dogs, including an immunochromatographic assay (Kim et al., 2007) and a polymer- ase chain reaction method (Keid et al., 2007). Furthermore, new 0034-5288/$ - see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.07.004 * Corresponding author at: Laboratrio de Infectologia Veterinria, Escola de Medicina Veterinria, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Av. Ademar de Barros 500, 40170-000 Salvador, Brazil. Tel.: +55 71 3283 6754; fax: +55 71 3283 6728. E-mail address: barrouin@ufba.br (S.M. Barrouin-Melo). Research in Veterinary Science 90 (2011) 425431 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Research in Veterinary Science j our nal homepage: www. el sevi er . com/ l ocat e/ r vsc methodological improvements in agglutination (Watarai et al., 2007) and complement xation tests (Adone et al., 2008), employ- ing more efcient antigens, represent reliable tools for both veter- inarian practitioners and public health purposes. Antigens used in the immunodiagnosis of Brucella infections consist of various somatic proteins and surface components, but antigenic similarities occur between species within the same gen- era, such as B. canis, B. ovis, B. suis or B. abortus (Myers et al., 1972; Baldi et al., 1994, 1997; Goldbaum et al., 1999; Ebani et al., 2003; Nielsen et al., 2004). Common epitopes have been described between Brucella species and other bacteria, such as alpha- proteobacteria from soil and plants, including Agrobacterium, Sino- rhizobium and Ochrobactrum genera (Delpino et al., 2004). False positivity due to cross-reactivity between Brucella and other path- ogenic bacteria in the serological diagnosis includes Salmonella (Nielsen et al., 2007), Yersinia enterocolitica and E. coli (Mateu- de-Antonio et al., 1993; Bounaadja et al., 2009). Since clinical signs of canine brucellosis are not pathognomonic, the serotest for routine diagnosis must be able to differentiate the animals antibody response to B. canis infection from the humoral response elicited by other canine infectious agents that occur in a same geographical area. This property is closely inherent to the quality of the antigen used in the serotest. In Brazil, leptospirosis, ehrlichiosis, babesiosis or leishmaniosis are examples of current canine infectious diseases, among others such as canine distemper and neosporosis. The AGID test is used as the ofcial test for canine brucellosis in Brazil. We have recently developed an indirect ELISA using an antigen obtained by heating a wild isolate of B. canis, which is easy to pre- pare, has low associated costs and demonstrates good sensitivity and specicity (Barrouin-Melo et al., 2007). In the present study, we have compared this antigen with a bacterial sonicate, which is also easy to obtain and does not require special or expensive equipment, to enrich the antigen preparation with cytosolic pro- teins specic for the genus Brucella (Carmichael and Joubert, 1987) and augment the specicity of the ELISA test. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Dog sera selection A total of 145 sera from dogs were employed in this study. Among the samples, sera from 34 dogs examined and sampled at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of University of So Paulo, Bra- zil, with canine brucellosis conrmed by PCR and bacterial culture, were used as positive controls. All of these positive control dogs presented clinical signs of disease and were seropositive for canine brucellosis by the agargel immunodiffusion test (AGID). The neg- ative controls consisted of 51 samples obtained from healthy dogs and bitches of different breeds and ages (from 6 months to 8 years old), from controlled kennels with no history of brucellosis or other infectious diseases, with negative test results in the AGID assay. All of the 51 negative control sera samples were used for cut-off calcu- lation by ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) curve, while 20 of these samples were used for cut-off calculation by the mathe- matical formula as described by Frey et al. (1998), selected from dogs less than 1 year old and therefore sampled before entering reproductive activity. Sera samples from 60 dogs with dened diagnosis, either by clinical or laboratory methods, of different canine infectious dis- eases, were used for comparative ELISA and WB tests using both B. canis-derived antigens. These sera, in groups of ten samples, were positive for Leishmania chagasi, Ehrlichia canis, Babesia canis, Leptospira species, Neospora canis and canine distemper virus (CDV) infection, and were tested and kindly provided by the Labo- ratories of Zoonosis and Parasitology of UFBA (Salvador, Brazil) and the Laboratory of Virology at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil. All these samples presented nega- tive results in the AGID assay for B. canis-specic antibodies. All sera were stored at 20 C before being tested by ELISA and Wes- tern blot. 2.2. Bacteria cultures and antigen preparation A strain isolate of B. canis was kindly provided by the Desidrio Finamor Research Institute (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) and kept in Brucella broth (BBL Microbiological Systems, Cockeysville, USA) un- til antigen preparation. The bacteria were isolated from the pla- centa and fetuses of a bitch (positive by AGID test for B. canis, which aborted between 42nd and 45th days of gestation), classi- ed by microscopic and biochemical methods as B. canis (White and Wilson, 1951; Vargas et al., 1996; Alton, 1998) and compared with the RM6/66 B. canis reference strain (ATCC 23365 donated by the Laboratoire de Brucellose Agence Franaise de Securit Sanitaire des Aliments, Maison Alfort, France). For antigen preparation, a heat soluble bacterial extract (HE- antigen) was obtained following the method described by Myers et al. (1972), with minor modications. Briey, the culture was transferred to 5 mL of Brucella broth (BBL Microbiological Systems, Cockeysville, USA), cultured for 48 h at 37 C and expanded in Roux asks containing 100 mL of Brucella agar (Difco Laboratories, De- troit, USA) in the presence of oxygen for 48 h at 37 C, as described by Carmichael and Bruner (1968). Bacterial cells were harvested with 50 mL of sterile PBS (phosphate buffered saline; 150 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.5 mM KH 2 PO 4 , 9 mM Na 2 HPO 4 , pH 7.4) and inactivated by heat (1 h, 56 C). The suspension was ltered through sterile gauze and washed three times by centrifugation (3500g, 10 min) in PBS. The pellet was then re-suspended in 10 mL of PBS and autoclaved at 120 C under 1.5 atmospheres for 20 min. For the sonicate antigen preparation (US-antigen), the PBS- ltered suspension of inactivated bacteria was subjected to ultra- sonic cell disruption by three 60 s cycles of ultra-sound at 40 Hz (Branson Sonier
450), in an ice bath, with 1 min intervals be-
tween cycles. After heat or ultrasonic treatment, the cells were centrifuged at 12,000g for 20 min, at 4 C. The supernatants were identied as HE-antigen (obtained by heat) and US-antigen (ob- tained by sonication) and stored in 200 lL aliquots at 20 C, until their use in ELISA and SDSPAGE/Western blotting techniques. The protein concentration of both antigens was determined by the Lowry method (Lowry et al., 1951). 2.3. Indirect ELISA technique The indirect ELISA was standardized and performed as already described (Mateu-de-Antonio et al., 1993; Carpenter, 1997), with modications for optimization as previously described (Barrouin- Melo et al., 2007). The working dilution of the peroxidase- conjugated anti-dog immunoglobulin, the optimum protein con- centration of both antigen preparations and the serum sample dilutions were determined by previous checkboard titrations, to achieve suitable differentiation between positive and negative sera samples. Sera dilutions were tested at 1:250; 1:500; 1:1000; 1:2000 and 1:5000. The same B. canis-positive and negative control sera samples were used as standards throughout all assays to en- sure reliability and reproducibility for the results. All incubations were performed in a humidied chamber. Flat-bottomed polysty- rene 96-well microtiter plates (Corning Inc., New York, USA) were sensitized overnight at 4 C with 0.75 lg/well of HE-antigen or 0.5 lg/well of US-antigen, diluted in 0.05 M sodium carbonate bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6. After being washed ve times with 426 de Oliveira M.Z.D. et al. / Research in Veterinary Science 90 (2011) 425431 PBS, pH 7.4, containing 0.05% (v/v) of Tween-20 (PBS-T), each well of the antigen-coated plates was blocked with 200 lL of 5% skimmed milk in PBS-T and incubated at 37 C for 1 h. After ve more washes, 100 lL of sera samples, diluted at 1:1000 in PBS-T containing 1% (v/v) of skim milk, was added to each well in dupli- cate. Plates were sealed and incubated at 37 C for 1 h. After ve washing cycles with PBS-T, 100 lL of anti-dog IgG conjugated with peroxidase (Sigma, St Louis, USA), diluted at 1: 5000 in PBS-T, was added to each well and the plates incubated at 37 C for 1 h. After ve washings as described above, the color reaction was developed by adding 50 lL/well of a solution containing 1.0 mg/mL of o- phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (OPD; Sigma, St Louis, USA) in 0.05 M citrate buffer (pH 4.0) with 0.04% (v/v) H 2 O 2 . Plates were incubated in the dark for 1015 min at room temperature. The enzymatic reaction was stopped by the addition of 25 lL/well of 4 N H 2 SO 4 . Absorbance measurements were made at 492 nm, using an automatic ELISA plate reader (550, Bio-Rad, Life Sciences, Her- cules, USA). 2.4. SDSPAGE and Western blotting analyses The heat soluble bacterial extract (HE-antigen) and the soni- cate antigen preparation (US-antigen) were electrophoresed as follows: 50 lg of each antigen was solubilized in sample buffer and subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel elec- trophoresis (SDSPAGE) using a 12% polyacrylamide gel and ana- lyzed with Coomassie blue (2.5% brilliant blue in 50% methanol, 10% acetic acid) staining. For Western blotting, the electrophore- sed antigen was transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, in a hu- mid procedure, employing 100 V for 1 h. Unbound sites on the membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in PBS-T and incu- bated overnight at 4 C. The membranes were cut into 0.5 cm wide strips after being washed ve times with PBS-T. Each one of 10 positive sera for canine brucellosis, 60 positive sera for dif- ferent canine infections and 10 negative control sera, diluted 1:100 in PBS-T with 1% skim milk, were added to individual strips, which were then incubated at 37 C for 1 h. Subsequently, the strips were washed ve times with PBS-T and blots developed with horseradish peroxidase labeled anti-dog IgG (Sigma, St Louis, USA), diluted 1:500 in PBS-T for 1 h at 37 C. After ve washing steps, the strips were immersed in a substrate solution made of a 1:5 dilution of a 0.3% 4-Clnaphtol in methanol and Tris-saline buffer (0.05 M TrisHCl, 0.2 M NaCl, pH 7.2), with 0.04% (v/v) H 2 O 2 , and the reaction was developed in the dark at room tem- perature for 15 min. A nal washing step was performed once with distilled water. 2.5. Statistical analysis In the present study, sera from blood-culture- and AGID- positive dogs were used as a reference for ELISA validation. The AGID serotest was used as a reference because it is employed as the ofcial assay for canine brucellosis in Brazil. The cut-off value was determined by a mathematical formula for a statistically valid value, which denes the upper prediction limit based on the upper tail of the t-distribution of 20 negative control OD readings, at a condence level of 99.5%. For this calcu- lation, were utilized 20 sera from dogs with ages below 1 year old. The cut-off was calculated as follows: cut-off = (X) + SD * t[1+(1/n)] (Frey et al., 1998; Barrouin-Melo et al. 2007). Specicity and sensitivity of the assay were calculated as follows: S TP TP FN 100 E TN TNFP 100 where TP Number of truly positive samples TN Number of truly negative samples FP Number of false positive samples FN Number of false negative samples. The accuracy was determined by the number of discordant re- sults divided by the number of total samples tested. The sensitivity and specicity of the ELISA made with US-anti- gen and HE-antigen were also calculated employing a cut-off value obtained by the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) curve that presented the best specicity and sensitivity together. This curve was obtained using EPIINFO Software, with values obtained from all 34 positive control sera and 51 negative control sera ob- tained from dogs showing no clinical signs of the disease. Sixty sera samples from dogs with diseases other than brucellosis were in- cluded as negative for Brucella infection in the negative control group for the ROC curve calculation. Condence intervals for sensitivity, specicity and test accuracy were determined by Wilsons Score (Open EPI 1.1, Epi Info). Nor- mality of the results distribution was tested using the Pearsons chi-square test. Comparisons of mean absorbance values for ELISA readings of the groups of sera positive for different diseases, sera positive for brucellosis and sera from healthy dogs were performed by analysis of variance followed by Anova and Tukeys Test (SPSS v. 13.0). 3. Results The results of 51 sera samples from healthy dogs, all seronega- tive by the AGID test for canine brucellosis, and 34 sera samples from dogs positive for canine brucellosis by blood culture, PCR and the AGID test were used as reference for the determination of sensitivity and specicity of the ELISA. Table 1 shows these re- sults, assayed with both HE-ELISA and US-ELISA. The cut-off absor- bance value for the HE-ELISA was 0.235 and for the US-ELISA was 0.323, as determined by the Frey method. As shown in Table 2, the HE-ELISA of dog sera presented a sen- sitivity of 91.18%, identifying 31 of 34 sera from dogs positive for canine brucellosis while the US-ELISA presented a sensitivity of 100% (34/34). The HE-ELISA results conrmed the AGID results in all 51 sera, showing a specicity of 100%, while the US-ELISA Table 1 Distribution of positive and negative reactions for canine brucellosis by HE-ELISA and US-ELISA using samples previously tested by the AGID reference serotest. n HE-ELISA US-ELISA Positive Negative Positive Negative Negative control sera 51 0 51 8 43 Positive control sera for brucellosis (AGID) * 34 31 3 34 0 Total 85 31 54 42 43 * Dogs positive by blood culture and/or PCR for canine brucellosis. Table 2 Sensitivity, specicity and accuracy of HE-ELISA and US-ELISA serotests using 34 positive * and 51 negative sera samples tested by the AGID reference test. Reference: AGID HE-ELISA (%) US-ELISA (%) Sensitivity 91.18 100.00 Specicity 100.00 84.31 Accuracy 96.47 90.59 * Dogs positive for canine brucellosis by blood culture or PCR. Maria Zoraida Daltro de Oliveira et al. / Research in Veterinary Science 90 (2011) 425431 427 demonstrated a specicity of 84.31% (co-negativity in 43 out of 51 sera). The accuracy index was 96.47% for the HE-ELISA and 90.59% for the US-ELISA. To investigate the specicity of the ELISA with each of the anti- gens, sera from dogs with infectious diseases common in our geo- graphic area underwent comparative HE-ELISA and US-ELISA testing. Mean absorbance values for the HE-ELISA demonstrate a clear discrimination between sera from dogs culture-positive for canine brucellosis and sera from dogs negative for brucellosis or positive for other diseases (Table 3). The US-ELISA showed higher mean absorbance values and standard deviations for several sera sam- ples among each group of diseases, despite the fact that the mean OD value for the negative samples from healthy dogs remained low (Table 3). Analysis of the mean absorbance values by the Mann Whitney test (unpaired t test) for the HE-ELISA data, as presented in Fig. 1, shows that the reactivity of sera from dogs positive for ca- nine brucellosis was signicantly higher than sera from other groups (P < 0.001). There were no signicant differences between the mean absorbance values of sera from dogs with other diseases in the HE-ELISA (Fig. 1). The same sera from dogs with serological and clinical diagnoses of different infections, healthy animals and animals positive for ca- nine brucellosis were tested by US-ELISA. Their comparative reac- tivities are shown in Fig. 2. In this plot, there is a difference between positive and negative sera readings (P < 0.05). Sera from dogs with other infections showed lower mean absorbance values than the Brucella-positive group. Nevertheless, many samples from the group with other infections had high OD readings, suggesting cross-reactivity between antibodies in those sera and the Brucella antigens present in the US preparation. Sera from dogs with other infections were tested by Western blot to determine the proteins responsible for the cross-reactivity, which occurred mostly with the Brucella antigen obtained by ultra- sound. Western blotting with ultrasound-extracted antigen re- vealed that many proteins with molecular weights above 98 kDa were recognized by sera from dogs with different infections (Fig. 3). In the same antigen preparation, two bands of approxi- mately 62 and 85 kDa, despite being recognized predominantly by positive sera for canine brucellosis, were also recognized by ser- um from a dog positive for babesiosis. The Western blots of sera with higher OD values in the HE-ELI- SA revealed that only one sample from a dog with leptospirosis re- acted weakly with a band of approximately 20 kDa (Fig. 4). Bands of approximately 18, 39 and 78 kDa were specically recognized only by sera from animals positive for canine brucellosis in both antigen preparations (Figs. 3 and 4). The calculations of the cut-off points, sensitivities and specic- ities of the US-ELISA and the HE-ELISA were then performed by ROC analysis, including the OD readings of the sera from the 60 dogs with other infectious diseases in the group of brucellosis-neg- ative samples. With the cut-off point for OD readings at 0.278, assuming the grey zone of 10% with the condence interval of 0.2500.306, as determined by the ROC curve, the sensitivity was kept at 91% and the specicity at 95.7%, for the HE-ELISA (Fig. 5a). Results for the US-ELISA showed a sensitivity of 77.3% and a specicity of 75.5%, considering a cut-off point for OD read- ing at 0.443 (Fig. 5b). Table 3 Distribution of optical density (OD) readings in HE-ELISA and US-ELISA assays of sera samples positive and negative for canine brucellosis and sera samples positive for other viral, bacterial and protozoan infections. Canine sera n HE-ELISA US-ELISA Mean OD value SD Above cut-off n = 0.235 Mean OD value SD Above cut-off n = 0.323 Positive for brucellosis * 10 1.481 0.208 10 1.187 0.386 10 Positive for leptospirosis 10 0.283 0.133 1 0.596 0.388 8 Positive for ehrlichiosis 10 0.121 0.021 0 0.471 0.545 3 Positive for babesiosis 10 0.276 0.112 2 0.749 0.588 7 Positive for leishmaniosis 10 0.111 0.029 0 0.248 0.105 3 Positive for neosporosis 10 0.189 0.258 0 0.430 0.433 3 Positive for distemper 10 0.107 0.044 0 0.299 0.176 1 Negative 10 0.138 0.018 0 0.149 0.046 0 * Positive for canine brucellosis by the AGID test. brucell leptosp ehrlich babes leish neosp distemp negat 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Sera from dogs with different infections A b s o r b a n c e 4 9 2
n m Fig. 1. ELISA reactivities of sera from dogs with brucellosis, leptospirosis, ehrlich- iosis, babesiosis, distemper, leishmaniosis and negative controls against B. canis- antigens extracted by heat (HE-ELISA). bru lep ehr bab lei neo dis neg 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Sera from dogs with different infections A b s o r b a n c e
4 9 2
n m Fig. 2. Results US-ELISA of sera samples from dogs with brucellosis, leptospirosis, ehrlichiosis, babesiosis, distemper, leishmaniosis, and negative controls. 428 de Oliveira M.Z.D. et al. / Research in Veterinary Science 90 (2011) 425431 4. Discussion There is a need for sensitive, specic and automated serological tests for the identication of B. canis-specic antibodies, as the infection of dogs by this microorganism has become more wide- spread and affected humans, particularly in large cities where the disease has been reported in commercial breeding kennels (Vargas et al. 1996; Poester et al., 2002). In terms of sensitivity, ELISAs have been proven to be superior to agglutination-based techniques for the serodiagnosis of canine brucellosis (Wanke et al., 2002). Previous reports have described efforts to obtain and apply suitable antigens in serological diagnos- tic tests for canine brucellosis based on the ELISA technique with variable results in terms of sensitivity, specicity and reproducibil- ity (Johnson and Walker, 1992; Mateu-De-Antonio et al., 1993; Wanke et al., 2002; Wanke, 2004). The different techniques used to extract antigens from B. canis may interfere with their protein composition or alter the primary structure of the epitopes, affect- ing their function. In fact, some authors have shown that cytosolic antigens can provide more sensitive and specic serotests than outer membrane antigenic preparations from B. canis (Carmichael and Joubert, 1987), while others have argued that there are no rel- evant differences in ELISAs using either type of antigen (Wanke et al., 2002). Recently, we have reported the standardization of an ELISA using an easily obtained antigen extracted by heat from B. canis, which presents good sensitivity and specicity (Barrouin-Melo et al., 2007). In an attempt to improve the diagnostic accuracy of Fig. 3. Western blot analysis of B. canis-antigens extracted by ultrasound (US- antigen) after electrophoresis in a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate and transfer to nitrocellulose sheets. Numbers in the left side indicate the molecular weights of various bands recognized by sera from dogs with brucellosis (lanes 3 and 4) that are also recognized by sera from dogs with leptospirosis (lanes 69), babesiosis (lanes 1014), ehrlichiosis (lane 15), distemper (lane 18) and leishmaniosis (lanes 19 and 20), but not by negative controls (lanes 1 and 2). Fig. 4. Western blot analysis of B. canis-antigens extracted by heat (HE-antigen) after electrophoresis in a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate and transfer to nitrocellulose sheets. Numbers in the left side indicate the molecular weights of bands recognized only by sera from dogs with brucellosis (lanes 3 and 4) and not by sera from dogs with leptospirosis (lanes 69), babesiosis (lanes 1014), ehrlichiosis (lane 15), distemper (lane 18) and leishman- iosis (lanes 19 and 20) or by negative controls (lanes 1 and 2). Fig. 5. Diagram of the ROC curves for determination of the HE-ELISA (a) and US- ELISA (b) cut-off points, sensitivities and specicities. Maria Zoraida Daltro de Oliveira et al. / Research in Veterinary Science 90 (2011) 425431 429 the ELISA by enriching a B. canis antigen preparation with cytoplas- mic antigens, we developed an antigen extracted from the bacteria by ultrasound. In the present study, we compared the heat- and ultrasound-extracted antigens to evaluate their diagnostic performance in ELISA. Furthermore, the cross-reactivity due to rec- ognition of B. canis proteins sera from dogs with other known infections was assessed by Western blot. The results presented herein, using 145 dog sera samples, show that both ELISAs were highly sensitive for canine brucellosis; how- ever, the antigen extracted by heat conferred better specicity than the antigen extracted by ultrasound. Accordingly, the performance of the US-ELISA, standardized with the antigen extracted by ultra- sound, was considered limited, as 25 positive results from this test were deemed false. This difference between ELISAs was displayed by the ROC curve (Fig. 5). As a diagnostic serological method, the ELISA has important advantages over other serological tests commonly used for the diagnosis of canine brucellosis, such as providing readily measur- able results and being easy to perform and standardize. Although the AGID test has reduced overall sensitivity and specicity (Zwir- ner, 1996), this method, which uses B. ovis as a source of antigen due to its similarity to B. canis, is currently the ofcial test for sero- logical diagnosis of canine brucellosis in Brazil, where the produc- tion of test antigens is restricted to ofcial state-level laboratories (Poester et al., 2002). This is the reason why the AGID test was se- lected for comparison with the indirect ELISAs evaluated and vali- dated in the present study. Using sera from dogs positive and negative by AGID as the ref- erence serotest, the ELISAs with either antigen, extracted by heat or ultrasound, showed a sensitivity of 91.1% and 100%, respec- tively, which can be considered satisfactory. Nevertheless, the higher specicity (100%) for the ELISA with antigen extracted by heat versus the specicity (84.3%) for the ELISA with antigen ex- tracted by ultrasound demonstrates the superior diagnostic accu- racy provided by the heat-extracted antigen. The use of heat to obtain antigen from B. canis may have favorably inuenced the specicity by disrupting epitopes that bind to antibodies directed against other infectious agents. Considering that the diagnosis of canine brucellosis commonly condemns the animal to be with- drawn from reproduction, neutered or even sacriced, false posi- tivity represents a signicant disadvantage despite good sensitivity. In fact, although ultrasound-extracted antigen con- ferred 100% sensitivity to the ELISA, it also had several protein bands recognized by sera from dogs with clinical and laboratorial diagnosis of other infections by Western blot. Given that diseases caused by other bacteria, such as Leptospira sp. and Ehrlichia canis; protozoa, such as Leishmania chagasi, Babesia canis and Neospora sp.; or even a virus, such as the canine distemper virus (CDV), are common in our geographic area, the specicity of the diagnos- tic method is critical. In the present study, the assessment of cross- reactivity between antibodies specic for antigens from other infectious agents common in dogs and those of B. canis revealed that high-molecular-weight proteins, above 90 kDa, were more commonly involved in such reactions than low-molecular-weight proteins. On the other hand, the low-molecular-weight protein fractions of Brucella seem to predominate in the reactions between Brucella-specic antibodies and the HE-antigen, as could be seen in the WB tests. In fact, outer membrane proteins are thought to con- fer good sensitivity in serological tests for diagnosis of B. canis infection (Cloeckaert et al., 1990; Wanke et al., 2002; Lopez et al., 2005). The ELISA using heat-extracted antigen distinguished ca- nine brucellosis, and this method could be used to differentiate sera of dogs with canine brucellosis from sera of dogs with lepto- spirosis, ehrlichiosis, babesiosis, leishmaniosis, neosporosis, dis- temper and non-infected healthy animals. Despite the high specicity of the HE-ELISA, as shown by the differences between the mean absorbance values for canine brucellosis sera and sera of all other diseases tested, as well as sera from non-infected healthy animals, two sera from dogs with babesiosis and one lep- tospirosis-positive sample presented discrete OD values. These re- sults could be explained by the high incidence of infectious diseases among stray dogs, which could have concomitant infec- tions. When those sera from dogs with other known diseases were included in the determination of a new cut-off for brucellosis-neg- ative sera by ROC curve, the specicity dropped from 100% to 95.7%, which is still a very good index for a serotest. Given that the AGID test has poor sensitivity (Zwirner, 1996), some of the neg- ative sera with higher absorbance values in the HE-ELISA could come from B. canis-infected animals that gave a false negative re- sult by AGID. In conclusion, the heat-extracted antigen presented better ELI- SA results than the ultrasound-extracted antigen. Moreover, the production of heat-extracted antigen does not require expensive equipment or highly trained technicians, making it feasible for application in ELISAs for eld studies or population surveys. The results presented here demonstrate that the antigen extracted by heat from B. canis is highly suitable for use in the diagnosis of ca- nine brucellosis by ELISA, creating a reliable and secure serological assay. Acknowledgments We thank Lgia Paraguass Batista from the Laboratory of Microbiology; Universidade Catlica de Salvador for technical assistance; Zlia Ins Portela Lobato from the Laboratory of Veter- inary Virology, UFMG; and Luis Fernando Pita Gondim from the Laboratory of Veterinary Clinical Pathology, UFBA; for sera sam- ples. This work was supported by the Fundao para o Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (FAPESB) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientco e Tecnolgico (CNPq). References Adone, R., Francia, M., Ciuchini, F., 2008. Brucella melitensis B115-based complement xation test to detect antibodies induced by Brucella rough strains. Journal of Applied Microbiology 105, 567574. Alton, G.G., Jones, L.M., Angus, R.D., Verger, J.M., 1998. Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory. INRA, Paris, p. 190. Baldi, P.C., Wanke, M.M., Loza, M.E., Fossati, C.A., 1994. Brucella abortus cytoplasmic proteins used as antigens in an ELISA potentially useful for the diagnosis of canine brucellosis. Veterinary Microbiology 41, 127134. Baldi, P.C., Wanke, M.M., Loza, M.E., Monachesi, N., Fossati, C.A., 1997. Diagnosis of canine brucellosis by detection of IgG antibodies against an 18 kDa cytoplasmic protein of Brucella spp. Veterinary Microbiology 51, 273281. Barrouin-Melo, S.M., Poester, F.P., Ribeiro, M.B., Alcntara, A.C., Aguiar, P.H.P., Nascimento, R.M., Freire, S.M., 2007. Diagnosis of canine brucellosis by ELISA using an antigen obtained from wild Brucella canis. Research in Veterinary Science 83, 340346. Bounaadja, L., Albert, D., Chnais, B., Hnault, S., Zygmunt, M.S., Poliak, S., Garin- Bastuji, B., 2009. Real-time PCR for identication of Brucella spp.: a comparative study of IS711, bcsp31 and per target genes. Veterinary Microbiology 137, 156 164. Carmichael, L.E., Bruner, D.W., 1968. Characterization of a newly recognized species of Brucella responsible for infectious canine abortions. Cornell Veterinarian 58, 579592. Carmichael, L.E., Joubert, J.C., 1987. A rapid slide agglutination test for the serodiagnosis of Brucella canis infection that employs a variant (M) organism as antigen. Cornell Veterinarian 77, 312. Carmichael, L.E., Shin, S.J., 1996. Canine brucellosis: a diagnosticians dilemma. Seminars in Veterinary Medical and Surgery (Small Animals) 1, 161165. Carpenter, A.B., 1997. Enzyme-linked immunoassays. In: ROSE, N.R. (Ed.), Manual of Clinical Laboratory Immunology, 5th ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp. 2029. Cloeckaert, A., De-Wergifosse, P., Dubray, G., Limet, J.N., 1990. Identication of seven surface-exposed Brucella outer membrane proteins by use of monoclonal antibodies: immunogold labeling for electron microscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Infection and Immunity 58, 39803987. Delpino, M.V., Fossati, C.A., Baldi, P.C., 2004. Occurrence and potential diagnostic applications of serological cross-reactivities between Brucella and other alpha- proteobacteria. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 11, 868873. Ebani, V.V., Cerri, D., Fratini, F., Bey, R.F., Andreani, E., 2003. Serological diagnosis of brucellosis caused by Brucella canis. New Microbiology 26, 6573. 430 de Oliveira M.Z.D. et al. / Research in Veterinary Science 90 (2011) 425431 Frey, A., Canzio, J.D., Zurakowski, D., 1998. A statistically dened endpoint titer determination method for immunoassays. Journal of Immunology Methods 221, 3541. Goldbaum, F.A., Velikovsky, C.A., Baldi, P.C., MoRt, S., Bacher, A., Fossati, C.A., 1999. The 18 kDa cytoplasmic protein of Brucella spp., an antigen useful for diagnosis, is a lumazine synthase. Journal of Medical Microbiology 48, 833839. Johnson, C.A., Walker, R.D., 1992. Clinical signs and diagnosis of Brucella canis infection. Compendium on Continuing Education 14, 763772. Keid, L.B., Soares, R.M., Vasconcellos, A.S., Chiebao, D.P., Megid, J., Salgado, V.R., Richtzenhain, L.J., 2007. A polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Brucella canis in semen of naturally infected dogs. Theriogenology 67, 1203 1210. Keid, L.B., Soares, R.M., Vasconcellos, S.A., Megid, J., Salgado, V.R., Richtzenhain, L.J., 2009. Comparison of agargel immunodiffusion test, rapid slide agglutination test, microbiological culture and PCR for the diagnosis of canine brucellosis. Research in Veterinary Science 86, 2226. Kerwin, S.C., Lewis, D.D., Hriberkik, T., Partington, B., Hosgood, G., Eilts, B.E., 1992. Diskoespondylitis associated with B. canis infection in dogs: 14 cases. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 201, 12531257. Kim, J.W., Lee, Y.J., Han, M.Y., Bae, D.H., Jung, S.C., Oh, J.S., Ha, G.W., Cho, B.K., 2007. Evaluation of immunochromatographic assay for serodiagnosis of Brucella canis. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 69, 11031107. Letesson, J.J., Tibor, A., Eneide, V., Wansard, V., Weynants, P.D., Saman, V., 1997. Humoral immune responses of Brucella-infected cattle, sheep, and goats to eight puried recombinant Brucella proteins in an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 4, 556564. Lopez, G., Ayala, S.M., Escobar, G.I., Lucero, N.E., 2005. Use of Brucella canis antigen for detection of ovine serum antibodies against B. ovis. Veterinary Microbiology 105, 181187. Lowry, O.H., Rosembrogh, N.J., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J., 1951. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biology and Chemistry 193, 265275. Lucero, N.E., Escobar, G.I., Ayala, S.M., Jacob, N., 2005. Diagnosis of human brucellosis caused by Brucella canis. Journal of Medical Microbiology 54, 457 461. Mateu-De-Antonio, E.M., Martin, M., Soler, M., 1993. Use of indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with hot saline solution extracts of a variant (M) strain of Brucella canis for diagnosis of brucellosis in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 54, 10431046. Myers, D.M., Jones, L.M., Varela-Diaz, V.M., 1972. Studies of antigens for complement xation and gel diffusion tests in the diagnosis of infections caused by Brucella ovis and other Brucellae. Journal of Applied Microbiology 23, 894902. Nielsen, K., Smith, P., Conde, S., Draghi de Benitez, G., Gall, D., Halbert, G., Kenny, K., Massengill, C., Muenks, Q., Rojas, X., Perez, B., Samartino, L., Silva, P., Tollersrud, T., Jolley, M., 2004. Rough lipopolysaccharide of Brucella abortus RB51 as a common antigen for serological detection of B. ovis, B. canis, and B. abortus RB51 exposure using indirect enzyme immunoassay and uorescence polarization assay. Journal of Immunoassay & Immunochemistry 25, 171182. Nielsen, K., Smith, P., Yu, W.L., Halbert, G., 2007. Salmonella enterica serotype urbana interference with brucellosis serology. Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry 28, 289296. Poester, F.P., Gonalves, V.S., Lage, A.P., 2002. Brucellosis in Brazil. Veterinary Microbiology 90, 5562. Vargas, A.C., Lazzari, A., Dutra, V., Poester, F.P., 1996. Brucelose canina: Relato de caso. Cincia Veterinria 26, 305308. Wanke, M.M., 2004. Canine brucellosis. Animal Reproduction Science 8283, 195 207. Wanke, M.M., Delpino, M.V., Baldi, P.C., 2002. Comparative performance of tests using cytosolic or outer membrane antigens of Brucella for the serodiagnosis of canine brucellosis. Veterinary Microbiology 88, 367375. Watarai, M., Kim, S., Yamamoto, J., Miyahara, K., Kazama, M., Matsuoka, S., Chimura, S., Suzuki, H., 2007. A rapid agglutination assay for canine brucellosis using antigen coated beads. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 69, 477480. White, P.G., Wilson, J.B., 1951. Differentiation of smooth and nonsmooth colonies of brucellae. Journal of Bacteriology 61, 239240. World Health Organization, 2008. WHO Recommended Standards And Strategies For Surveillance, Prevention And Control Of Communicable Diseases. Available from: <http://www.who.int/zoonoses/diseases/brucellosis/en/>. Zwirner, N.W., 1996. ELISA. In: Margni, R.A. (Ed.), Imunologa e Imunoqumica, 5th ed. Editorial Mdica Panamericana, Buenos Aires, pp. 798820. Maria Zoraida Daltro de Oliveira et al. / Research in Veterinary Science 90 (2011) 425431 431
Performance and Feasibility of Using Both Stool Culture and Nested PCR For Improved Detection of Typhoid Fever in Buea Health District, South West Cameroon
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Procedural Checklist NCM 112 RLE Preparing A Sterile Field Opening A Sterile Pack Adding Items To A Sterile Field Adding Liquids To A Sterile Field Skin Preparation