Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A Meta-Analysis
Peter P. Vitaliano
University of Washington
J ianping Zhang
IndianaUniversityPurdueUniversity, Indianapolis
J ames M. Scanlan
University of Washington
Caringfor afamily member withdementiaisgenerally regardedasachronically stressful process, with
potentiallynegativephysical healthconsequences. However, noquantitativeanalysishasbeenconducted
on this literature. The authors combined the results of 23 studies to compare the physical health of
caregivers with demographically similar noncaregivers. When examined across 11 health categories,
caregiversexhibitedaslightlygreater risk for healthproblemsthandidnoncaregivers. However, sexand
the health category assessed moderated this relationship. Stronger relationships occurred with stress
hormones, antibodies, and global reported health. Theauthors arguethat atheoretical model is needed
that relates caregiver stressors to illness andproffers moderatingroles for vulnerabilities andresources
and mediating roles for psychosocial distress and health behaviors.
For thepast 30yearsresearchershaveassumedwithout contro-
versy that providingcarefor anill family member ishazardousto
ones health. Although this research has been well meaning, no
quantitative procedures have summarized this literature to assess
the consistency of findings across studies. The fact is, it is still
unknowntowhat extent caregivingishazardoustooneshealth. In
this meta-analysis weexamineand critiquetheliteratureon self-
reported health and physiological functioning in caregivers of
persons with dementia. Because meta-analyses are usually re-
stricted to studies with comparison groups (Shadish, Matt, Na-
varro, & Phillips, 2000), wefocus hereonresearchthat compares
caregivers with demographically similar noncaregivers. To pro-
vide a rationale for this review, we first discuss why caregiver
health is important. We then argue that stressors, psychosocial
distress, andrisky healthhabits influencephysiological responses
incaregivers, whichincreasetheir risksfor healthproblems. Next,
wediscusshowillnessesandphysiological functioninghavebeen
measuredincaregivers, as well as therationales for thechoiceof
measures. We then argue that inferences about relationships of
caregiving with health problems should consider the types of
healthmeasures used. Finally, wenotethat researchoncaregiver
health has been largely atheoretical and has not profited from
extensivemindbody research. Weconcludeby recommendinga
model that uses constructs previously shown to be predictive of
illnesses in persons under chronic stress.
Who AreInformal Caregivers and Why AreThey
Important?
Informal caregiversarecaregiverswhoarenot financially com-
pensated for their services. They are usually relatives or friends
whoprovideassistancetopersonswhoarehavingdifficultieswith
daily activities because of physical, cognitive, or emotional im-
pairments. Without suchhelp, carerecipients, suchaspersonswith
Alzheimers disease (AD), would not be able to sustain them-
selves. Althoughcaregivingis dependent onthespecific needs of
eachperson, it usually involveshelpingwithmaintenancesuchas
bathing or higher level activities such as reading. In general,
caregiving is
basedonareverencefor lifeandthebelief thathumanbeingshavethe
innateright to function to their highest level of mental and physical
capacity. Themajor missionof caregivingistopromoteindependence
by maintaining thepersons most functional statephysically, intel-
lectually, emotionally, and spiritually. (Bridges, 1995, p. 13)
Sinceprehistoric times, informal caregiving has been thestan-
dard way to protect people in poor health (Lebel et al., 2001).
Althoughcaregivers havealways beenof socioeconomic valueto
society, inthefuturetheywill beevenmoreimportant. Inthenext
20 years, the portion of the U.S. population that will exceed 65
years of agewill increasefrom12%to 17%(U.S. Bureau of the
Census, 1996). Theprevalenceof ADwill alsoincrease. Estimates
of AD in theUnitedStates vary from2.7%to 11.2%for persons
65 years of age or older (Ernst & Hay, 1997). This translates to
1.56.1 million persons. Note that although 75% of all persons
withdementiawhoare65yearsof ageor older haveAD(Ganguli,
Dodge, Chen, Belle, & DeKosky, 2000), stroke and Parkinsons
Peter P. VitalianoandJ amesM. Scanlan, Department of Psychiatryand
Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington; J ianping Zhang, Depart-
ment of Psychology, IndianaUniversityPurdueUniversity, Indianapolis.
This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health
Grant R01MH57663, National Institute of Aging Grant R01 AG10760,
Clinical Nutrition Research Unit Grant DK38516, and National Institutes
of Health Clinical Research Center Grant M01-RR00037. Thetitleof the
article arose from a 1999 editorial in Psychosomatic Medicine by Igor
Grant. We thank William Shadish for his insights and generosity and
Roslyn Siegel for clerical support.
Correspondenceconcerningthis articleshouldbeaddressedto Peter P.
Vitaliano, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University
of Washington, Box 356560, Seattle, Washington 98195. E-mail:
pvital@u.washington.edu
Psychological Bulletin Copyright 2003 by theAmerican Psychological Association, Inc.
2003, Vol. 129, No. 6, 946972 0033-2909/03/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.946
946
T
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
a
l
l
i
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
s
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
u
s
e
r
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
b
r
o
a
d
l
y
.
disease also create cognitive and behavioral problems (Hooker,
Manoogian-ODell, Monahan, Frazier, & Shifren, 2000; Vetter et
al., 1999). Thus, theprevalenceof all dementias, andtheresulting
costs, aresignificantly greater thanthosefor AD alone. For 1991
thetotal U.S. costsof ADalonewere$20billion(J ohnson, Davis,
& Bosanquet, 2000), and families bore most of these expenses
(Leon, Cheng, & Neumann, 1988). Unfortunately, the costs of
caregiving may also bepsychosocial and physical.
Why AreCaregivers Expected To Beat Higher Risk for
Health Problems Than Noncaregivers?
Given thecritical functions that caregivers perform, both gov-
ernment agenciesandresearchershavebeenconcernedwithmain-
taining caregiver health. Oneassumption underlying this concern
is that negative responses to caregiving may interfere with a
caregiversabilitytoprovidecare. However, researchershavealso
been concerned with caregiver health in its own rightand con-
cerned that caregivers may not care for or be able to care for
themselves. Thesebeliefshavegeneratedextensiveresearch. Since
Grad and Sainsbury (1963), the first researchers to examine per-
ceptionsof stressorsamongcaregivers, aplethoraof observational
studieshavebeenperformed. Most of thesestudiesdidnot include
comparison groups. In those that did, matching was not always
usedto control confounders. Instudies that matchedonvariables,
such as sex and age, thedirection of relationships between care-
giving and health indicators could not be determined because of
theretrospectivedesigns. Despitetheseproblems, researchershave
persistedinstudyingcaregiver healthbecauseof itsimportanceto
society andtheassumptionthat caregiversareat risk for illnesses.
Wenowdiscusstwoliteraturestosupportthebelief thatcaregivers
areat risk for health problems. First weconsider caregiver expe-
riences, suchas chronic stressors, psychosocial distress, andrisky
health habits, and then we review relationships known to exist
amongchronicstress, distress, healthhabits, healthindicators, and
potential physiological mechanisms.
Stressors, Distress, and Health Habits in Caregivers
To understand the stressors encountered by caregivers of vic-
tims of dementia and related disorders, one needs to understand
these diseases. Dementia is caused by degenerative brain (AD),
cerebrovascular (multi-infarct dementia), and neurological (Par-
kinsons) diseases. ADandvascular dementiaarediagnosedusing
established criteria(Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders, 4th ed.; DSMIV; American Psychiatric Association,
1994; McKhann et al., 1984). AD involves impairments in mem-
ory, attention and cognition, and gradual progressive intellectual
andfunctional deterioration. Parkinsonsdiseaseinvolvesprogres-
sivedegenerationof motor function, tremors, andstiffness (Stern,
1988). Most caregivers of persons withdementiaface315years
of exposure to physical and psychosocial demands. They absorb
household chores and are exposed to symptoms of depression,
anger, agitation, and paranoia in their care recipients (Teri et al,
1992). Theseaffectsandbehaviorsintrudeontheir lives(Mendel-
sohn, Dakof, & Skaff, 1995; Vernon & Stern, 1988). As AD
progresses, caregivers must continually monitor their carerecipi-
entsandwitnesstheir cognitivedeterioration(Stephens, Kinney, &
Ogrocki, 1991). This exposure to chronic stressors can lead to
psychosocial distress and risky health behaviors.
Onepsychosocial responsetocaregivingisperceivedburden. It
results fromthe physical, psychological, emotional, social and
financial problems experienced by families caring for impaired
older adults (George& Gwyther, 1986, p. 253). Burdenincludes
embarrassment, overload, feelings of entrapment, resentment, iso-
lationfromsociety(Zarit, Reever, & Bach-Peterson, 1980), lossof
control, poor communication, (Morris, Morris, & Britton, 1988),
andwork pressures(Stephenset al., 1991). Giventheseresponses,
it is not surprising that caregivers report more distress and risky
health behaviors than do noncaregivers. As an example, Blazer
(2003) reviewed three population-based studies of community-
residing older adults and reported a median rate of major and
minor depression of 11%. In contrast, in a review of caregiver
morbidities, the median rate of clinical depression (e.g., using
versions of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSMIV) was
22%(Schulz, OBrien, Bookwala, & Fleissner, 1995). Whenself-
report measureswereused, however, themedianrateof depressed
moodwas30%. Theseresultsareconsistentwithreviewsthathave
argued that rates of clinical depression in caregivers are signifi-
cantly higher than in the general population but that only a mi-
nority of caregivers will meet with clinical depression if they are
notactivelyseekingpsychological intervention(Neundorfer, 1991;
Wright, Clipp, & George, 1993). These results also support the
belief that structured interviews yield lower estimates of depres-
sion than self-report inventories. In addition to depression, other
reactions may increase the risks of caregiver illnesses. These
include sleep problems, poor diets, and sedentary behaviors
(Fuller-J onap& Haley, 1995; Gallant & Connell, 1997; Vitaliano
et al., 2002).
Relationships of Chronic Stressors With Health Indicators
Chronic stressors are associated with illnesses (S. Cohen,
Kessler, & Underwood-Gordon, 1997; Greenwood, Muir, Pack-
ham, & Madeley, 1996) and with disease progression in persons
who arealready ill (Everson et al., 1997). Caregivers may expe-
rience prolonged anticipatory bereavement over lost aspects of
their relationships with their care recipients, and bereavement is
positively associatedwith physical illnesses (Kaprio, Koskenvuo,
& Rita, 1987), health care utilization (Prigerson et al., 1997; W.
Stroebe& Stroebe, 1987), andmortality (Goldman, Korenman, &
Weinstein, 1995). Chronic stressors and bereavement are also
associatedwithelevatedphysiological risks(Kawakami, Haratani,
& Araki, 1998; B. S. McCann et al., 1999; OConnor, Allen, &
Kaszniak, 2002; Pickering et al., 1996). Such responses may
provide mechanisms for why chronic stressors are related to
illness.
Two pathways may berelevant to relationships of illness with
chronic stressors and bereavement. Onepathway appears to flow
fromchronic stressors to psychosocial distress and then to stress
hormones. This primarily occurs viathehypothalamicpituitary
adrenal axis, fromwhichcorticotropinreleasinghormone-ACTH-
cortisol are secreted, and the sympathetic adrenomedullary axis,
fromwhichnorepinephrineandepinephrinearesecreted(Lovallo,
1997; Steptoe, Cropley, Griffith, & Kirschbaum, 2000). These
hormonesstimulateperipheral activity, whichcanleadtoallostatic
load, or wear-and-tear fromrepeated arousal and inefficient con-
trol of physiological responses(Chrousos& Gold, 1992; McEwen,
2000). Such compensation may lead to pathophysiology (Niaura,
Stoney, & Herbert, 1992; Schneiderman, 1983). Inasecondpath-
947
CAREGIVER HEALTH
T
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
a
l
l
i
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
s
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
u
s
e
r
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
b
r
o
a
d
l
y
.
way, distressmaytrigger riskyhealthbehaviors, suchaspoor diet,
sedentary behavior, and substanceabuse.
Thesetwo possiblepathways, amongothers, may contributeto
illness by increasing cardiovascular (Kannel & Vokonas, 1986),
metabolic(Keys, Fidanza, Karvonen, Kimura, & Taylor, 1972), or
immunologic(OLeary, 1990) dysregulation. Assuch, theyshould
help to explain why depression, sleep problems, and risky be-
haviors are associated with illnesses in the general population
(Arntzenius et al., 1985; Epstein & Perkins, 1988; Erikssen,
Forfang, &J ervell, 1981; Fischer &Raschke, 1997; Leigh&Fries,
1992; Musselman, Evans, & Nemeroff, 1998) andwhy caregivers
areexpected to beat greater risk for illnesses.
Current KnowledgeAbout Physical Health Indicators in
Caregivers
In onereview(Schulz, Visintainer, & Williamson, 1990), only
11 of 34 caregiver studies examined physical health, and only 1
study included physiological measures. In studies that used self-
reports, themeasuresincludedglobal self-reportedhealth, asingle
itemthat assessed health frompoor to excellent (Davies &
Ware, 1981); number and intensity of symptoms (Pennebaker,
1982); number of chronicillnesses(Rosencranz&Pihlblad, 1970);
number of medications (Harrison, 1997); and health care utiliza-
tion (Ritter et al., 2001). Caregivers were similar to matched
noncaregivers in some studies (George & Gwyther, 1986), but
poorer inhealthinother studies (Haley, Levine, Brown, Berry, &
Hughes, 1987). Inareviewof 40additional studies (Schulz et al.,
1995), some researchers found that caregivers were higher than
noncaregiversinchronicillnessesandmedications(Baumgartenet
al., 1992; Kiecolt-Glaser, Dura, Speicher, Trask, & Glaser, 1991),
whereas others did not observe differences (George & Gwyther,
1986; Haley et al., 1987). Sincethesereviews, morestudies have
usedphysiological measures. Such measures may helpto explain
observed associations between caregiving and illness. Indeed,
physiological measures may showassociations withcaregiver ex-
periences much earlier than do chronic illnesses.
Physiological Indicators
Table1contains alist of thecategories andmeasures that have
been used to study physiological functioning in caregivers since
this research began 15 years ago. The categories include stress
hormones and neurotransmitters and, immunologic, cardiovascu-
lar, and metabolic functioning. For each measure, weprovideits
description and the references that support its relationships with
stress and illness. We do not consider the caregiver studies that
haveexaminedthesemeasures becausethey arediscussedbelow.
Wenowarguethat thetypeof healthmeasureusedmay influence
its relationship with caregiving.
Health Indicators as Moderators
Becausecaregiver healthproblemshavebeenassessedinmany
differentways, itisimportanttoexaminewhether certainmeasures
aremorerelatedtocaregivingthanothers. If somehealthproblems
are more associated with caregiving than others, this could have
boththeoretical andclinical implications. Hence, oneobjectiveof
this articlewas toconsider four contrasts, eachof whichis driven
by previous work. First, self-report measures may have inherent
advantages over physiological measures becauseof their relation-
ships with distress. That is, strong positive relationships exist
betweencaregivingandpsychological distress(Schulzetal., 1995)
andbetweendistress andreportedhealthproblems (Costa& Mc-
Crae, 1980; Watson & Clark, 1984). Thus, one needs to assess
whether caregiving is more related to reported health than to
physiological measures. Second, because relationships are espe-
cially high for global self-reported health with distress (r .70;
Hooker & Siegler, 1992), it would be useful to assess whether
relationships of caregiving with global health are greater than
relationshipsof caregivingwithreportsof medications, utilization,
and illnesses. Third, researchers in psychophysiology would ex-
pect measures that areimmediately responsiveto central nervous
systemarousal, suchas stress hormonelevels, to bemorerelated
to caregiving than more peripheral cardiovascular and metabolic
responses (Lovallo & Thomas, 2000). Fourth, variations in the
associationof caregivingwithimmunityarerelevant toresearchin
psychoneuroimmunology. For example, meta-analysesof immune
measureswithdepressionandstresshavereportedthatmeaneffect
sizesfor antibodiestovirusesarelarger thanmeaneffect sizesfor
T-cell counts and natural killer cell activity (NKA; Herbert &
Cohen, 1993a, 1993b). Inadditionto healthindicators, individual
differencesmay bemoderatorsof relationshipsof caregivingwith
health problems. However, prior to presenting some candidates,
we consider a model that supports the importance of individual
differences for predicting health problems in caregivers.
A Theoretical Model of Caregiver Experiences, Individual
Differences, and Health Problems
Althoughresearchoncaregiver healthhas steadily increasedin
thepast decade, relatively fewattempts havebeen madeto usea
theoretical model tounify thiswork. Figure1isonesuchattempt.
It illustratesthebasicpathwaysthat interrelatecaregiver stressors,
psychosocial distress, riskyhealthhabits, physiological mediators,
andsubsequent healthproblems. Themodel overlapsandparallels
previous attempts to relate psychosocial factors to illness
(Clark, Anderson, Clark, & Williams, 1999; J orgensen, J ohnson,
Kolodziej, & Schreer, 1996; Taylor & Repetti, 1997). It includes
individual differences, such as vulnerabilities and resources, that
moderate relationships of stressors with distress (Lazarus &
Folkman, 1984). Vulnerabilities and resources tend to be nega-
tively related. As such, some researchers have viewed themas
mirror images or oppositeends of thesamecontinuum. However,
there is some tradition in sociology, psychology, epidemiology,
and psychiatry to distinguish these constructs according to their
stability and temporal place among pathways from stressors to
illness. For example, thetermvulnerability has beenusedtorefer
to hard-wired characteristics (Mechanic, 1967) such as age, sex,
disposition(Lazarus & Folkman, 1984), race(Robins, 1978), and
family history and heredity (Zubin & Spring, 1977). In contrast,
resources are more mutable and affected by interactions of the
person with the environment. These include process coping
(Folkman & Lazarus, 1980) and social supports (S. Cohen &
Wills, 1985). For these reasons, vulnerabilities typically occur
early indevelopment andarenot theresult of caregiving, whereas
resources may be both predictors and outcomes of caregiving.
Using this framework, traitlike characteristics, such as disposi-
tions, may have positive (e.g., hostility) or negative (e.g., opti-
mism) relationships with illness, depending on their content, but
948
VITALIANO, ZHANG, AND SCANLAN
T
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
a
l
l
i
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
s
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
u
s
e
r
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
b
r
o
a
d
l
y
.
they are both categorized in the vulnerability domain. Hence,
personshighinoptimismwouldbelowinvulnerability. Likewise,
dependingontheir quality, social supportsmayprovideeither high
or lowresources.
Given the model, one would expect the main effects of expo-
sures(E; here, caregiving), vulnerabilities(V), andresources(R) to
bedirectly associated with psychosocial distress and risky health
habits. In addition, interactions among the constructs indicators
areexpectedto influenceillness over andabovethemaineffects.
Thisbelief isconsistent withthestressdiathesismodel (Mechan-
ic, 1967). For example, two-way interactions of exposures, vul-
nerabilities, andresources (e.g., E V; E/R; V/R) predict distress
andpoorer healthhabitsbeyondthemaineffectsof E, V, and1/R,
andthey also magnify their effects (Vitaliano, Maiuro, Bolton, &
Armsden, 1987). Indeed, in one study caregivers with high vul-
nerability and low resources (V/R) had greater burden 1518
months later than did those with either low vulnerability or high
vulnerability and high resources, even after controlling baseline
burden (Vitaliano, Russo, Young, Teri, & Maiuro, 1991). One
wouldexpectsuchdistresstoresultingreater illnessrisksfor these
caregivers.
Individual Differences as Moderators
Consistent withFigure1, another objectiveof thisarticlewasto
assess whether relationships of caregiving with health problems
are moderated by individual differences. Examples of some can-
didates for moderation include psychiatric history, personality,
ethnicity, comorbidities, social supports, socioeconomic status
(SES), and coping. In support of the stressdiathesis model,
Russo, Vitaliano, Brewer, Katon, and Becker (1995) found that
73%of caregiverswithahistoryof depressionhadarecurrenceof
depression while they were caregivers, but only 30% of non-
caregivers had a recurrence during a similar time frame. This is
important because depression has been found to be positively
related to health problems in caregivers (Schulz et al., 1995).
Caregiversalsohaveelevatedlevelsof anger (Gallagher, Wrabetz,
Lovett, Del Maestro, &Rose, 1989), andVitaliano, Becker, Russo,
Magana-Amato, and Maiuro (1989) found that caregivers who
were critical of their spouses in a structured interview reported
moretrait anger thanthosewhowerenot critical of their spouses.
These results are relevant to caregiver health because in non-
caregivers, anger is a risk factor for elevated blood pressure
(J amner, Shapiro, Goldstein, & Hug, 1991), greater body mass
index (Scherwitz, Perkins, Chesney, & Hughes, 1991), fat and
caloric intake (Scherwitz et al., 1991), and glucose and insulin
levels(Raikkonen, Keltikangas, & Hautanen, 1994). Indeed, care-
givers highinanger havehigher levels of fastingglucosethando
noncaregivers who are high in anger, but no differences exist in
caregivers and noncaregivers who are low in anger (Vitaliano,
Scanlan, Krenz, &Fujimoto, 1996). Ethnicitymayalsoberelevant
to caregiver health because it is related to health disparities
(Kaplan, 1992), andethnic groups responddifferently to caregiv-
ing (Hinrichsen & Ramirez, 1992). Also, Black caregivers may
have fewer economic resources than White caregivers, but they
may havemorespiritual resources (Dilworth-Anderson& Ander-
son, 1994). Finally, comorbidities, suchas coronary heart disease
(CHD) andcancer maymoderaterelationshipsbetweencaregiving
and physiological measures that are manifestations of these dis-
eases (Vitaliano, Scanlan, Ochs, et al., 1998; Vitaliano, Scanlan,
Siegler, et al., 1998).
Innoncaregivers, resources suchas emotional andinstrumental
supports (House, 1981) arerelatedto better healthhabits (Peirce,
Frone, Russell, Cooper, & Mudar, 2000), lessdistress(Raikkonen
et al., 1994), and lower CHD prevalence (Niaura et al., 1992;
Williams et al., 1992). In caregivers, high levels of perceived
support also predict better reported health (Monahan & Hooker,
1995) and lower metabolic and cardiovascular risk (Vitaliano et
al., 2002). In noncaregivers, high SES is associated with better
physical health (Adler & Ostrove, 1999) and lower CHD preva-
lence(Niauraet al., 1992), andlowSESisrelatedtopoorer health
incaregivers(Morrissey, Becker, & Rupert, 1990). Activecoping,
such as problem solving, is inversely associated with elevated
distress(Folkman& Lazarus, 1980), poor healthhabits(Epstein&
Perkins, 1988), and physiological risk (Niaura et al., 1992) in
noncaregivers. Incaregivers, problem-focusedcopingisassociated
withlesspsychological distress(Vitaliano, Russo, Carr, Maiuro, &
Becker, 1985).
Demographic variables, such as acaregivers age, relationship
tothecarerecipient, andsexmaybeparticularlyrelevant tohisor
her riskof illness. Intwoof threestudiesreviewedbySchulz et al.
(1995), womenreportedgreater healthproblemsthandidmen, and
in two of two studies of caregiver age, no relationships were
observed with health (Schulz et al., 1995). However, these were
relationships for health problems with individual differences and
not relationshipsof effect sizeswithindividual differences. Toour
knowledge, no studies haveexaminedthelatter. It is important to
notethat thedirectionof moderationwas, andstill is, not obvious
for sex, age, andonesrelationshiptothecarerecipient. Although
older personshavelessresistancetoillness(Rowe& Kahn, 1998),
caregiving may be more developmentally on time for older than
for younger caregivers (Neugarten, 1969). Also, spouses may be
frailer, more isolated, and more distressed than other caregivers
(C. A. Cohenet al., 1993), but caringfor aspousemight beviewed
as amarriagecommitment. In contrast, caring for aparent might
pose conflicts of equity when one must choose between parents
versus spouses and children (George, 1982). Sex may be an
important moderator of caregiver health because women report
moredistress(Kessler et al., 1994) andhealthproblems(Rahman,
Strauss, Gertler, Ashley, & Fox, 1994; Ross & Bird, 1994), and
they utilize more health care (Nathanson, 1990) than do men.
Alternatively, menexposedtolaboratorystressorsshowlarger and
more consistent increases in stress hormones, neurotransmitter
metabolites, andbloodpressurethandowomen(Earle, Linden, &
Weinberg, 1999; Kirschbaum, Kudielka, Gaab, Schommer, &
Hellhammer, 1999). This may befurther exacerbatedwhenfaced
with a stressor such as caregiving, which is inconsistent with
mens traditional gender roles (Kramer, 1997). Finally, widowers
appear to havemoreillnesses in responseto theloss of aspouse
than do widows (Chen et al., 1999). Hence, one might expect
associations of caregiving and health indicators to differ for men
and women.
Study Objectives
Giventhecontributions that caregivers maketo society andthe
potential for improving understanding of relationships of chronic
stressors with illness, one goal of this article is to quantify rela-
tionships of caregiving with health problems. For practical and
949
CAREGIVER HEALTH
T
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
a
l
l
i
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
s
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
u
s
e
r
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
b
r
o
a
d
l
y
.
Table1
Measures of Stress and Physiological Functioning in Caregiver Research
Measure Description Stress related Illness related
Stress hormones and neurotransmitters
ACTH (Adrenocorticotropic hormone) Peptidehormonesecreted by pituitary
signal cortisol release.
Chrousos & Gold (1992),
Lovallo (1997), Lovallo
& Thomas (2000)
Cortisol Steroid glucocorticoid secreted by theadrenal gland. Affects cardiac
and metabolic function.
Chrousos & Gold (1992),
Lovallo (1997), Lovallo
& Thomas (2000)
Chrousos & Gold (1992),
Lovallo (1997),
Lovallo & Thomas
(2000), Sapolsky
(2000)
Epinephrine Secreted rapidly by adrenal medulla. Affects cardiac function and
blood pressure(BP).
Lovallo (1997), Lovallo &
Thomas (2000)
Norepinephrine Present in CNS, peripheral sympathetic nerves, and theadrenal
medulla. Secretion affected by muscular exertion and effort.
Affects cardiac function, BP, and immunity.
Lovallo (1997), Lovallo &
Thomas (2000)
Kohm& Sanders (2001)
Prolactin Peptidehormonesecreted by anterior pituitary. Can increasewith
high physical and/or psychological stress exposure. Has an
immunestimulating effect.
Irwin et al. (1997) McMurray (2001)
Forskolin stimulation Stimulates post-betareceptor adenylatecyclaseactivation. May be
used to test changes in cyclic AMPA independent of beta-2
receptors.
Mills et al. (1997)
Growth hormone Growth hormonemRNA expression fromB and T cells facilitates
immunity. Lowlevels of growth hormonemRNA expression
suggest reduced growth hormoneproduction.
Wu et al. (1999) Lovallo (1997), Lovallo
& Thomas (2000),
McCallumet al.
(2002)
GABA Theneurotransmitter GABA is known to counter certain stress
responses in animals.
Pomaraet al. (1989),
Sanacoraet al. (2000)
Neurotransmitters found in cerebrospinal fluids (CSF) reflect CNS
activity. LowCSF GABA has been found in peoplewith
depression.
NeuropeptideY Neurotransmitter in both CNS and peripheral sympathetic nerves,
which increases catecholamineactivities and influences feeding
behaviors.
Irwin et al. (1991),
Zukowska-Grojec
(1995)
Irwin et al. (1991),
Zukowska-Grojec
(1995)
Betareceptors Beta-adrenergic receptors mediaterelationships among
catecholamines, cardiac function, and BP.
Naga-Prasad et al. (2001) Haeusler (1990), Herd
(1991), Naga-Prasad et
al. (2001)
Immunologic
Cellular
Enumerative Cell counts, percentages, and CD4:CD8 ratios. High levels of some
immunecells aregenerally associated with health, others with
infectious illness; for example, high whiteblood cell count is
generally associated with activeinfections; CD3 refers to total T
lymphocytecell count; CD4 cells aregenerally considered to be
positively related to thecapacity to defend against many illnesses.
LowCD4 can becaused by severedisease, such as HIV infection,
and reflects diseasevulnerability. High CD8 (cytotoxic T cells)
counts may reflect an overactiveimmunesystemor acurrent
illness theimmunesystemhas difficulty controlling. CD4:CD8
ratio is used as an immunological index, with higher ratios
presumed healthier. Higher NK (CD56) and B-cell counts are
generally thought to reflect better immunereserves.
Cohen & Herbert (1996),
Herbert & Cohen
(1993a, 1993b), Lovallo
(1997), Lovallo &
Thomas (2000)
Cohen & Herbert (1996),
Herbert & Cohen
(1993a, 1993b),
Lovallo (1997),
Lovallo & Thomas
(2000)
Functional Lymphocyteproliferation in responseto mitogen challenge. Index of
theability of T and B cells to proliferatein responseto mitogens
such as phytohemagglutinin, concanvillan A, and pokeweed. Low
levels may suggest illness susceptibility.
Cohen & Herbert (1996),
Herbert & Cohen
(1993a, 1993b), Irwin
(1999), Lovallo (1997),
Lovallo & Thomas
(2000)
Horiuchi et al. (1995),
Irwin (1999)
Natural killer cell activity (NKA) and lymphokineactivated killing
areearly immunological defenses against tumor cells and viral
infections independent of prior exposure. Common measures of
NKA includeunstimulated killing responseto tumor cells and
responseto tumor cells after cytokinestimulation (such as IL-2 or
interferon gamma), which may better reflect in vivo NKA.
Moderateto high NKA is consistent with good health; chronically
lowNKA may reflect diseasesusceptibility.
Cohen & Herbert (1996),
Herbert & Cohen
(1993a, 1993b), Lovallo
(1997), Lovallo &
Thomas (2000)
Lovallo (1997), Lovallo
& Thomas (2000)
950
VITALIANO, ZHANG, AND SCANLAN
T
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
a
l
l
i
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
s
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
u
s
e
r
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
b
r
o
a
d
l
y
.
Table1 (continued)
Measure Description Stress related Illness related
Immunologic (continued)
Cellular
Functional
(continued)
Delayed typehypersensitivity responseis skins capacity to respond
to multipleantigens (J . J . McCann, 1991, used tuberculin, tetanus,
streptococcus, diptheria, candida, trichophyton, and proteus),
usually 48 hr after exposure. Two typical responsemeasures are
thenumber of positiveantigen reactions (antigen score) and the
size(diameter) of theantigenic skin response(induration).
Dhabhar (2000) Dannenberg (1991)
Healing speed of astandardized skin puncturewound is used as a
general health index, and is dependent on interactions of
immunological, hormonal, and nutritional factors.
Kiecolt-Glaser et al.
(1995)
Kiecolt-Glaser et al.
(1995)
Tumor necrosis factor is an inflammatory cytokine. High levels are
thought to promoteloss of muscletissue, aging, and poor general
health. Cytokinesecretion has complex effects on immunological
responses and can affect cellular immuneresponses (such as
activating macrophages) and humoral immunity through beta-cell
activation.
Dantzer et al. (1999),
Lovallo (1997), Lovallo
& Thomas (2000)
Dantzer et al. (1999),
Lovallo (1997),
Lovallo & Thomas
(2000)
Antibodies
Vaccinations Immunoglobulin G (IgG) vaccination response(influenzaand
otherwise). High antibody responses reflect health. A four-fold
memory responsepostvaccination implies avigorous immune
response.
Cohen & Herbert (1996),
Herbert & Cohen
(1993a, 1993b), Lovallo
(1997), Lovallo &
Thomas (2000)
Cohen & Herbert (1996),
Herbert & Cohen
(1993a, 1993b),
Lovallo (1997),
Lovallo & Thomas
(2000)
Epstein Barr virus
(EBV)
EBV virus capsid antigen IgG titers. High levels of EBV antibodies,
in theabsenceof vaccination or antigenic challenge, may reflect
latent EBV viruses that thecellular immunesystemis having
difficulty suppressing.
Cohen & Herbert (1996),
Herbert & Cohen
(1993a, 1993b), Lovallo
(1997), Lovallo &
Thomas (2000)
Murray & Young (2002)
Immunoglobulins A GAM profileincludes measures of multipleplasma
immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM). Although different diseases can
result in either increases or decreases in immunoglobulins, in the
absenceof specific disease, it is assumed that lower levels are
associated with poorer immunity. Thesearerelatively general
measures as opposed to specific immunological memory responses,
such as antibody responses to influenzavaccination.
Valdimarsdottir & Stone
(1997)
Pyne& Gleeson (1998)
Cardiovascular
Systolic BP (SBP) Thepoint of highest recorded BP, usually measured at rest. SBP
140 suggests hypertension, which is associated with coronary heart
disease(CHD) and mortality.
Herd (1991), Lovallo
(1997), Lovallo &
Thomas (2000)
Herd (1991), Lovallo
(1997), Lovallo &
Thomas (2000)
Diastolic BP (DBP) Thepoint of lowest recorded BP, usually measured at rest. DBP
90 suggests hypertension.
Herd (1991), Lovallo
(1997), Lovallo &
Thomas (2000)
Herd (1991), Lovallo
(1997), Lovallo &
Thomas (2000)
Heart rate Measured in heart beat/min. Higher rates may beassociated with
reduced heart function.
Herd (1991), Lovallo
(1997), Lovallo &
Thomas (2000)
Herd (1991), Lovallo
(1997), Lovallo &
Thomas (2000)
Metabolic
Insulin, glucose
obesity
Insulin anabolic hormonecauses glucosestorage; hyperinsulinemia
reflects difficulty controlling glucose.
Schneiderman & Skyler
(1996)
Schneiderman & Skyler
(1996)
Glucoseis necessary for muscular activity and proper brain function,
but high fasting glucose(126) suggests glucoseintoleranceand
possiblediabetes, conditions associated with CHD.
Schneiderman & Skyler
(1996)
Schneiderman & Skyler
(1996)
Body mass index is theratio of weight/height squared. High numbers
reflect obesity.
Schneiderman & Skyler
(1996)
Schneiderman & Skyler
(1996)
Transferin Transferin is an index of stored iron in thebody. Lowiron levels
may beassociated with anemia.
Bostian et al. (1976)
Plasmalipids Low-density cholesterol and triglycerides areassociated with obesity
and CHD. High-density cholesterol is associated with physical
fitness and reduced CHD.
Schneiderman & Skyler
(1996)
Schneiderman & Skyler
(1996)
Note. CNScentral nervoussystem; AMPA alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionicacid; GABA gamma-aminobutyricacid; CD
cluster designation; NK natural killer; IL-2 interleukin 2; GAM profilefor immunoglobulins G, A (IgA), and M (IgM).
951
CAREGIVER HEALTH
T
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
a
l
l
i
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
s
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
u
s
e
r
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
b
r
o
a
d
l
y
.
theoretical reasons, however, we also examine whether certain
health indicators are more related to caregiving than others and
whether somesubgroupsof caregiversareat greater riskfor health
problems. A final objective is to critique the state of research in
this areaand providerecommendations for futurework.
Method
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Used to Search the
Caregiver Physical Health Literature
Welocatedreports usingelectronic andmanual searches andtherefer-
encelists of identifiedarticles. WesampledCurrent Contents since1996,
MEDLINE since1983, PsycINFOsince1967, Sociofilesince1974, Social
Work Abstractssince1977, andNursingandAlliedHealthsince1982. To
beincluded, areport hadto examinecaregivers of persons withdementia
andphysical healthproblems or illnesses or physiology. Ineachdatabase
weincludedthefollowingkey wordsor wordstemsusinganasterisk as
wildcard, hereindicatingthat thesearchcontainedbut was not limited
to that word or word stem: dementia, Alzheimers disease, cognitive
disorders, health, physical and health, physiolog*
1
, illness*, hormones,
cholesterol, cardiovascular diseases, blood pressure, obesity, diabetes,
immun*, mortality, death, and caregiv*
2
. Articles were searched only in
English, with an inclusion end date of April 1, 2001. Medical subject
headings (MeSH, theNational Library of Medicinevocabulary) werealso
used for MEDLINE articles. We also hand searched the Journals of
Gerontology, The Gerontologist, the Journal of the American Geriatrics
Society, Psychology and Aging, Psychosomatic Medicine, Health Psychol-
ogy, theJournal of Behavioral Medicine, theAnnals of Behavioral Med-
icine, theJournal of the American Medical Association, andtheJournal of
Aging and Health. Bibliographies fromreviews werealso used(Schulz et
al., 1990, 1995; Vitaliano, 1997). We excluded articles that (a) were
non-data based, (b) examined caregivers of care recipients who did not
havedementia(e.g., cancer patients), (c) did not includehealth or physi-
ological data, and(d) lackedanoncaregiver comparisongroup. Becausewe
could not guarantee that all studies were uncovered, we examined the
robustness of our findings fromall possiblereports of datacensoring. To
do this, weused thetrimand fill procedure(Sutton, Song, Gilbody, &
Abrams, 2000), which is described below.
Results of searches. For parsimony we provide only the results for
MEDLINE, as it yielded the vast majority of articles. After crossing the
key words dementia (Alzheimers) by caregiv* by physical health (or
immunity, physiology, cardiovascular diseases, endocrinology), we ob-
tained 81 articles. When these terms were crossed by control, non-
caregiver, or comparison, 35articlesresulted. Theother databasesyielded
7additional articles. Hence, 42(357) of 88articles, or 48%, metcriteria.
Using similar key words in the ProQuest Digital Dissertations database
(UMI from1984), weobtained10entries; however, only 3wereretained
(Atkinson, 1995; Giefer, 1994; J . J . McCann, 1991) becausetheothershad
beenpublishedandincludedaboveor they didnot includephysical health
dataor noncaregivers. This resulted in 45 reports.
Independence of samples. Toclarifywhether multiplereportsfromone
research group camefromindependent samples, wecompared thedemo-
graphic dataanddescriptions of participants. Threelabs producedreports
with partial to substantial participant overlap. These authors were con-
tacted, and it was determined that the Ohio State University (OSU) and
University of California, San Diego (UCSD) labs used three and two
independent samples, respectively, and the University of Washington
(UW), University of Alabama, andMedical Collegeof Georgiaeachused
onesample. Of thethreedissertations, twousedindependent samples, and
thethirdwasbasedondatafromthesecondOSU samplethat hadnot been
published (Atkinson, 1995). Overall, the 42 articles and one dissertation
weregenerated from21 independent samples, and two dissertations were
generatedfrom2independent samples. Thisyieldedatotal of 23samples.
Eighteen samples each produced 1 report, and 5 samples produced 27
reports. Of thelatter, 10articles werefromtheOSU laboratory, 8articles
werefromtheUW laboratory, 5articles werefromtheUCSD laboratory,
and2articles eachwerefromtheUniversity of AlabamaandtheMedical
Collegeof Georgia.
Health Categories Assessed
Table 2 summarizes the 45 reports according to the 23 samples that
generated them. For each report thereareeight main columns containing
the(a) identifyingnumber of thesample; (b) reports authors andyear of
publication; (c) meanagesof thecaregiversandnoncaregivers; (d) typesof
disordersof thecarerecipients; (e) caregiver samplesize, stratifiedonsex;
(f) noncaregiver (control) sample size, stratified on sex; (g) types of
reportedhealthmeasures; and(h) typesof physiological measures. Eleven
samples used only reported health measures, six used only physiological
measures, andsix usedboth. Therewerefiveself-reportedhealthcatego-
ries and six physiological categories.
Five reported health categories. Table2includesthereport references
for each category, so they arenot repeated here.
1. Global self-reported health was examined in 10 samples (n
717 caregivers; n 879 noncaregivers). Five samples used a
single self-rated item, How would you rate your current
health? ona4-point or 5-point scalefrompoor toexcellent. As
notedbelow, thesescoreswerereversedintheanalysissothat a
1
This subsumes terms such as physiology and physiological.
2
This subsumes terms such as caregiver, caregivers, and caregiving.
Figure 1. Theoretical model of stress and health/illness.
952
VITALIANO, ZHANG, AND SCANLAN
T
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
a
l
l
i
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
s
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
u
s
e
r
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
b
r
o
a
d
l
y
.
T
a
b
l
e
2
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
t
h
e
4
5
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
M
e
t
a
-
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
S
a
m
p
l
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
M
e
a
n
a
g
e
C
a
r
e
r
e
c
i
p
i
e
n
t
s
C
G
C
O
S
e
l
f
-
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
P
h
y
s
i
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
M
W
M
W
1
K
i
e
c
o
l
t
-
G
l
a
s
e
r
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
8
7
)
C
G
:
5
9
.
3
;
C
O
:
6
0
.
3
A
D
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
3
G
l
o
b
a
l
s
e
l
f
-
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
i
a
n
v
i
s
i
t
s
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
d
a
y
s
i
l
l
N
K
c
e
l
l
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
,
C
D
#
,
C
D
4
,
C
D
4
:
C
D
8
r
a
t
i
o
s
,
E
B
V
a
n
t
i
b
o
d
y
;
E
B
V
V
C
A
I
g
G
t
i
t
e
r
s
,
a
l
b
u
m
i
n
,
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
2
C
a
c
i
o
p
p
o
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
8
)
C
G
a
n
d
C
O
:
6
7
.
2
A
D
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
d
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
0
2
7
0
3
7
P
r
o
l
i
f
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
C
o
n
A
,
P
H
A
)
,
N
K
A
,
N
K
c
e
l
l
c
o
u
n
t
,
C
D
3
,
C
D
4
,
C
D
8
,
C
D
4
/
C
D
8
E
s
t
e
r
l
i
n
g
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
4
)
C
G
:
7
0
.
4
;
C
O
:
7
0
.
9
A
D
1
0
2
1
9
2
2
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
h
r
o
n
i
c
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
i
a
n
v
i
s
i
t
s
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
d
a
y
s
i
l
l
N
K
A
,
N
K
c
e
l
l
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
,
N
K
A
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
r
I
F
N
o
r
r
I
L
-
2
,
m
e
a
n
c
e
l
l
f
l
u
o
r
e
s
c
e
n
c
e
E
s
t
e
r
l
i
n
g
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
6
)
C
G
:
6
5
.
7
;
C
O
:
6
8
.
9
A
D
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
d
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
1
0
1
8
7
2
2
N
K
A
,
N
K
c
e
l
l
s
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
r
I
F
N
o
r
r
I
L
-
2
,
B
M
I
G
l
a
s
e
r
&
K
i
e
c
o
l
t
-
G
l
a
s
e
r
(
1
9
9
7
)
C
G
:
6
0
.
6
;
C
O
:
6
2
.
4
A
D
,
P
a
r
k
i
n
s
o
n
s
d
i
s
e
a
s
e
,
H
u
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
P
i
c
k
s
d
i
s
e
a
s
e
1
3
5
8
1
3
4
5
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
w
i
t
h
c
o
l
d
s
o
r
e
h
i
s
t
o
r
y
H
e
r
p
e
s
a
n
t
i
b
o
d
y
t
i
t
e
r
s
,
H
S
V
-
1
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
T
-
c
e
l
l
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
K
i
e
c
o
l
t
-
G
l
a
s
e
r
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
1
)
C
G
:
6
7
.
3
;
C
O
:
6
7
.
8
A
D
,
m
u
l
t
i
-
i
n
f
a
r
c
t
d
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
,
P
a
r
k
i
n
s
o
n
s
d
i
s
e
a
s
e
,
H
u
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
P
i
c
k
s
d
i
s
e
a
s
e
,
u
n
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
d
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
2
0
4
9
2
0
4
9
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
h
r
o
n
i
c
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
i
a
n
v
i
s
i
t
s
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
d
a
y
s
i
l
l
C
o
n
A
,
P
H
A
,
N
K
c
e
l
l
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
,
C
D
3
,
C
D
4
,
C
D
8
,
B
c
e
l
l
,
E
B
V
V
C
A
I
g
G
t
i
t
e
r
s
K
i
e
c
o
l
t
-
G
l
a
s
e
r
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
6
)
C
G
:
7
3
.
1
;
C
O
:
7
3
.
3
A
D
1
4
1
8
1
4
1
8
C
D
3
,
C
D
4
,
C
D
8
,
m
o
n
o
c
y
t
e
s
,
I
g
G
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
v
a
c
c
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
(
E
L
I
S
A
)
,
I
g
G
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
v
a
c
c
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
(
H
A
I
)
,
c
y
t
o
k
i
n
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
:
I
L
-
1
b
,
c
y
t
o
k
i
n
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
:
I
L
-
6
,
c
y
t
o
k
i
n
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
:
I
L
-
2
U
c
h
i
n
o
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
2
)
C
G
a
n
d
C
O
:
6
3
.
5
(
M
d
n
)
A
D
1
3
2
3
6
2
8
S
B
P
,
D
B
P
,
H
R
W
u
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
9
)
C
G
:
6
4
.
0
;
C
O
:
6
8
.
0
A
D
0
9
0
9
G
r
o
w
t
h
h
o
r
m
o
n
e
m
R
N
A
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
B
c
e
l
l
s
a
n
d
T
c
e
l
l
s
G
l
a
s
e
r
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
8
)
C
G
:
7
3
.
0
;
C
O
:
7
1
.
5
A
D
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
d
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
1
5
3
9
2
0
4
9
F
o
u
r
-
f
o
l
d
a
n
t
i
b
o
d
y
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
f
l
u
v
a
c
c
i
n
e
;
b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e
a
n
t
i
b
o
d
y
l
e
v
e
l
s
A
t
k
i
n
s
o
n
(
1
9
9
5
)
C
G
:
6
7
.
2
;
C
O
:
6
8
.
1
A
D
2
3
5
2
2
3
5
7
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
u
s
e
W
e
i
g
h
t
c
h
a
n
g
e
3
K
i
e
c
o
l
t
-
G
l
a
s
e
r
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
5
)
C
G
:
6
2
.
3
;
C
O
:
6
0
.
4
D
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
0
1
3
0
1
3
I
L
-
1
b
m
R
N
A
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
i
n
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
l
i
p
o
p
o
l
y
s
a
c
c
h
a
r
i
d
e
,
I
L
-
1
b
m
R
N
A
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
i
n
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
T
N
F
,
I
L
-
1
b
m
R
N
A
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
i
n
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
G
M
-
C
S
F
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
d
a
y
s
o
f
w
o
u
n
d
h
e
a
l
i
n
g
a
4
I
r
w
i
n
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
1
)
C
G
a
n
d
C
O
:
7
1
.
3
A
D
1
8
3
0
6
1
1
E
P
I
,
N
E
P
I
,
n
e
u
r
o
p
e
p
t
i
d
e
Y
,
N
K
A
5
I
r
w
i
n
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
7
)
C
G
:
7
1
.
0
;
C
O
:
6
9
.
6
A
D
4
3
5
7
1
4
1
9
A
C
T
H
,
b
e
t
a
-
e
n
d
o
r
p
h
i
n
,
c
o
r
t
i
s
o
l
,
p
r
o
l
a
c
t
i
n
,
E
P
I
,
N
E
P
I
,
n
e
u
r
o
p
e
p
t
i
d
e
Y
,
N
K
A
M
i
l
l
s
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
7
)
C
G
:
7
3
.
5
;
C
O
:
7
4
.
0
A
D
6
2
1
8
2
C
D
4
,
C
D
8
,
C
D
1
6
,
c
o
r
t
i
s
o
l
,
E
P
I
,
N
E
P
I
,
b
e
t
a
-
r
e
c
e
p
t
o
r
s
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
,
b
e
t
a
-
r
e
c
e
p
t
o
r
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,
f
o
r
s
k
o
l
i
n
s
t
i
m
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
,
S
B
P
,
D
B
P
,
w
e
i
g
h
t
P
a
t
t
e
r
s
o
n
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
8
)
C
G
:
6
3
.
7
;
C
O
:
6
1
.
2
A
D
6
8
1
0
6
7
1
6
9
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
s
y
m
p
t
o
m
s
S
h
a
w
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
7
)
C
G
:
7
0
.
6
;
C
O
:
6
9
.
7
A
D
5
3
9
7
2
2
2
4
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
u
s
e
,
h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
,
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
h
e
a
l
t
h
r
a
t
e
d
b
y
n
u
r
s
e
S
h
a
w
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
9
)
C
G
:
7
0
.
5
;
C
O
:
7
0
.
2
A
D
5
1
9
3
2
4
2
3
A
n
t
i
h
y
p
e
r
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
m
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
u
s
e
S
B
P
,
D
B
P
,
B
M
I
(
t
a
b
l
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s
)
953
CAREGIVER HEALTH
T
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
a
l
l
i
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
s
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
u
s
e
r
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
b
r
o
a
d
l
y
.
T
a
b
l
e
2
(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
S
a
m
p
l
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
M
e
a
n
a
g
e
C
a
r
e
r
e
c
i
p
i
e
n
t
s
C
G
C
O
S
e
l
f
-
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
P
h
y
s
i
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
M
W
M
W
6
P
i
c
o
t
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
7
)
C
G
:
6
0
.
8
;
C
O
:
5
5
.
5
A
D
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
c
h
r
o
n
i
c
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
0
1
8
0
2
4
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
h
r
o
n
i
c
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
n
t
i
h
y
p
e
r
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
m
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
u
s
e
S
B
P
,
D
B
P
,
H
R
7
P
o
m
a
r
a
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
8
9
)
C
G
:
6
3
.
6
;
C
O
:
6
4
.
5
A
D
0
5
2
2
C
S
F
,
G
A
B
A
8
R
e
e
s
e
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
4
)
C
G
:
5
6
.
3
;
C
O
:
6
0
.
9
A
D
,
s
t
r
o
k
e
1
6
3
4
8
1
7
N
K
c
e
l
l
,
l
y
m
p
h
o
c
y
t
e
,
C
D
3
,
C
D
4
,
C
D
8
,
C
D
4
/
C
D
8
9
V
e
d
h
a
r
a
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
9
)
C
G
:
7
3
.
0
(
M
d
n
)
;
C
O
:
6
8
.
0
(
M
d
n
)
A
D
,
d
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
,
P
a
r
k
i
n
s
o
n
s
d
i
s
e
a
s
e
2
4
2
6
3
1
3
6
S
a
l
i
v
a
r
y
c
o
r
t
i
s
o
l
,
I
g
G
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
t
o
v
a
c
c
i
n
e
s
1
0
S
c
a
n
l
a
n
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
8
)
C
G
:
6
9
.
8
;
C
O
:
6
9
.
1
A
D
2
9
5
2
2
5
5
7
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
h
r
o
n
i
c
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
C
D
4
,
C
D
8
,
C
D
4
:
C
D
8
r
a
t
i
o
,
B
M
I
V
i
t
a
l
i
a
n
o
,
R
u
s
s
o
,
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
3
)
C
G
:
6
9
.
4
;
C
O
:
6
8
.
5
A
D
3
0
5
2
3
0
4
8
A
n
t
i
h
y
p
e
r
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
m
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
u
s
e
S
B
P
,
D
B
P
,
H
R
V
i
t
a
l
i
a
n
o
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
5
)
C
G
:
6
9
.
8
;
C
O
:
6
9
.
1
A
D
3
6
6
0
2
9
6
2
T
o
t
a
l
c
h
o
l
e
s
t
e
r
o
l
,
L
D
L
C
,
H
D
L
C
,
t
r
i
g
l
y
c
e
r
i
d
e
s
,
B
M
I
V
i
t
a
l
i
a
n
o
,
S
c
a
n
l
a
n
,
K
r
e
n
z
,
&
F
u
j
i
m
o
t
o
(
1
9
9
6
)
C
G
:
6
9
.
8
;
C
O
:
6
9
.
1
A
D
2
5
4
8
2
0
4
9
I
n
s
u
l
i
n
,
g
l
u
c
o
s
e
,
l
i
p
i
d
s
,
B
M
I
V
i
t
a
l
i
a
n
o
,
S
c
a
n
l
a
n
,
K
r
e
n
z
,
S
c
h
w
a
r
t
z
,
&
M
a
r
c
o
v
i
n
a
(
1
9
9
6
)
C
G
:
6
9
.
8
;
C
O
:
6
9
.
1
A
D
2
9
5
2
2
6
6
0
A
n
t
i
h
y
p
e
r
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
m
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
u
s
e
B
M
I
,
l
i
p
i
d
s
V
i
t
a
l
i
a
n
o
,
S
c
a
n
l
a
n
,
O
c
h
s
,
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
8
)
C
G
:
6
9
.
8
;
C
O
:
6
9
.
1
A
D
2
7
5
3
2
6
5
9
N
K
A
V
i
t
a
l
i
a
n
o
,
S
c
a
n
l
a
n
,
S
i
e
g
l
e
r
,
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
8
)
C
G
:
6
9
.
8
;
C
O
:
6
9
.
1
A
D
2
4
4
7
2
1
4
9
M
e
t
a
b
o
l
i
c
s
y
n
d
r
o
m
e
,
S
B
P
,
D
B
P
,
i
n
s
u
l
i
n
,
g
l
u
c
o
s
e
,
B
M
I
,
H
D
L
C
,
t
r
i
g
l
y
c
e
r
i
d
e
s
V
i
t
a
l
i
a
n
o
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
9
)
C
G
a
n
d
C
O
:
6
9
.
5
A
D
2
9
5
1
2
5
6
0
N
K
A
1
1
A
l
m
b
e
r
g
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
8
)
C
G
:
6
6
.
6
;
C
O
:
6
8
.
8
D
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
1
5
3
7
2
3
4
3
H
e
a
l
t
h
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
i
n
a
b
u
r
d
e
n
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
,
c
o
d
e
d
a
s
y
e
s
/
n
o
1
2
B
a
u
m
g
a
r
t
e
n
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
2
)
C
G
:
6
6
.
7
;
C
O
:
6
0
.
4
D
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
4
0
6
3
4
6
6
9
G
l
o
b
a
l
s
e
l
f
-
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
,
m
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
u
s
e
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
s
y
m
p
t
o
m
s
B
a
u
m
g
a
r
t
e
n
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
7
)
C
G
:
6
3
.
2
%
a
b
o
v
e
6
5
;
C
O
:
4
4
.
2
%
a
b
o
v
e
6
5
D
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
3
3
6
2
4
1
6
3
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
h
r
o
n
i
c
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
;
m
e
d
i
c
a
l
r
e
c
o
r
d
o
f
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
i
a
n
v
i
s
i
t
s
1
3
G
r
a
f
s
t
r
o
m
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
2
)
D
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
3
5
7
5
7
3
1
5
9
M
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
u
s
e
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
i
a
n
v
i
s
i
t
s
,
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
h
a
v
i
n
g
h
e
a
l
t
h
w
o
r
s
e
t
h
a
n
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
1
4
H
a
l
e
y
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
8
7
)
C
G
:
5
7
.
8
;
C
O
:
5
3
.
4
D
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
1
2
3
2
1
2
3
2
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
s
y
m
p
t
o
m
s
(
P
I
L
L
)
,
g
l
o
b
a
l
s
e
l
f
-
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
i
a
n
v
i
s
i
t
s
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
p
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
m
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
h
r
o
n
i
c
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
,
h
e
a
l
t
h
s
t
a
t
u
s
954
VITALIANO, ZHANG, AND SCANLAN
T
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
a
l
l
i
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
s
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
u
s
e
r
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
b
r
o
a
d
l
y
.
T
a
b
l
e
2
(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
S
a
m
p
l
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
M
e
a
n
a
g
e
C
a
r
e
r
e
c
i
p
i
e
n
t
s
C
G
C
O
S
e
l
f
-
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
P
h
y
s
i
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
M
W
M
W
1
5
H
a
l
e
y
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
5
)
C
G
:
5
8
.
7
;
C
O
:
5
6
.
4
D
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
6
0
1
1
5
5
8
1
1
7
C
a
r
d
i
o
v
a
s
c
u
l
a
r
a
n
d
r
e
s
p
i
r
a
t
o
r
y
s
y
m
p
t
o
m
s
(
C
o
r
n
e
l
l
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
)
;
g
l
o
b
a
l
s
e
l
f
-
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
;
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
i
a
n
v
i
s
i
t
s
,
h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
;
m
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
u
s
e
1
6
L
o
r
e
n
s
i
n
i
&
B
a
t
e
s
(
1
9
9
7
)
C
G
:
3
1
.
2
%
u
n
d
e
r
5
0
;
C
O
:
4
2
.
5
%
u
n
d
e
r
5
0
D
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
2
1
6
4
6
4
1
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
d
a
y
s
i
n
b
e
d
o
r
h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
i
n
p
a
s
t
1
2
m
o
n
t
h
s
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
i
a
n
v
i
s
i
t
s
i
n
p
a
s
t
1
2
m
o
n
t
h
s
1
7
M
c
N
a
u
g
h
t
o
n
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
5
)
C
G
:
7
1
.
1
;
C
O
:
7
0
.
4
A
D
N
8
9
b
N
3
1
b
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
s
y
m
p
t
o
m
s
(
I
n
t
e
r
i
m
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
S
u
r
v
e
y
)
;
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
h
e
a
l
t
h
(
r
a
t
i
n
g
s
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
i
a
n
v
i
s
i
t
s
,
m
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
u
s
e
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
s
y
m
p
t
o
m
s
,
h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
)
1
8
O
R
e
i
l
l
y
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
6
)
C
G
:
5
6
.
5
;
C
O
:
5
6
.
4
P
a
r
k
i
n
s
o
n
s
d
i
s
e
a
s
e
5
5
9
9
4
7
7
7
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
h
r
o
n
i
c
i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s
;
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
i
a
n
v
i
s
i
t
s
,
h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
;
m
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
u
s
e
1
9
R
o
s
e
-
R
e
g
o
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
8
)
C
G
:
7
0
.
4
;
C
O
:
7
2
.
5
A
D
3
8
6
1
3
9
7
4
G
l
o
b
a
l
s
e
l
f
-
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
2
0
W
r
i
g
h
t
(
1
9
9
4
)
C
G
:
6
9
.
0
;
C
O
:
6
8
.
6
A
D
6
2
4
4
1
2
M
u
l
t
i
l
e
v
e
l
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
(
M
A
I
;
s
e
l
f
-
r
a
t
e
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
;
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
i
a
n
v
i
s
i
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
p
a
s
t
y
e
a
r
,
d
a
y
s
o
f
h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
p
a
s
t
y
e
a
r
,
m
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
a
k
e
n
p
e
r
d
a
y
;
a
n
d
r
a
t
i
n
g
s
o
f
h
e
a
r
t
a
n
d
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
m
a
k
e
u
p
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
s
c
o
r
e
;
a
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
o
f
2
7
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
p
e
r
f
e
c
t
h
e
a
l
t
h
)
W
r
i
g
h
t
e
t
a
l
.
(
1
9
9
9
)
C
G
:
6
7
.
2
;
C
O
:
6
3
.
9
A
D
,
s
t
r
o
k
e
1
7
1
1
9
5
G
l
o
b
a
l
s
e
l
f
-
r
a
t
e
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
;
M
A
I
2
1
F
u
l
l
e
r
-
J
o
n
a
p
&
H
a
l
e
y
(
1
9
9
5
)
C
G
:
7
4
.
5
;
C
O
:
7
4
.
1
A
D
5
2
0
5
3
0
G
l
o
b
a
l
s
e
l
f
-
r
a
t
e
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
,
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
i
a
n
v
i
s
i
t
s
;
c
a
r
d
i
o
v
a
s
c
u
l
a
r
a
n
d
r
e
s
p
i
r
a
t
o
r
y
s
y
m
p
t
o
m
s
(
C
o
r
n
e
l
l
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
)
2
2
J
.
J
.
M
c
C
a
n
n
(
1
9
9
1
)
C
G
:
6
7
.
5
;
C
O
:
6
7
.
2
A
D
,
M
u
l
t
i
-
i
n
f
a
r
c
t
,
a
n
d
u
n
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
d
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
0
3
4
0
3
3
G
l
o
b
a
l
s
e
l
f
-
r
a
t
e
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
;
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
h
y
s
i
c
i
a
n
v
i
s
i
t
s
,
d
a
y
s
o
f
i
l
l
n
e
s
s
,
c
h
r
o
n
i
c
i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s
,
m
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
N
u
m
b
e
r
a
n
d
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
t
o
t
a
l
l
y
m
p
h
o
c
y
t
e
,
C
D
3
,
C
D
4
,
C
D
8
,
C
D
5
6
,
a
n
d
B
c
e
l
l
s
;
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
s
k
i
n
h
y
p
e
r
s
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
2
3
G
i
e
f
e
r
(
1
9
9
4
)
C
G
a
n
d
C
O
:
7
5
.
0
(
M
d
n
)
D
e
m
e
n
t
i
a
a
n
d
f
r
a
i
l
o
l
d
e
r
a
d
u
l
t
s
1
4
2
6
1
4
2
4
I
g
G
p
r
o
f
i
l
e
(
I
g
G
,
I
g
M
,
I
g
A
)
N
o
t
e
.
A
d
a
s
h
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
d
a
t
a
c
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
b
e
c
o
m
p
u
t
e
d
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
s
a
m
e
o
r
a
l
l
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
w
a
s
u
n
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
.
C
G
c
a
r
e
g
i
v
e
r
;
M
m
e
n
;
W
w
o
m
e
n
;
C
O
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
(
n
o
n
c
a
r
e
g
i
v
e
r
)
;
A
D
A
l
z
h
e
i
m
e
r
s
d
i
s
e
a
s
e
;
N
K
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
k
i
l
l
e
r
;
C
D
c
l
u
s
t
e
r
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
;
E
B
V
E
p
s
t
e
i
n
B
a
r
r
v
i
r
u
s
;
V
C
A
v
i
r
u
s
c
a
p
s
i
d
a
n
t
i
g
e
n
;
I
g
G
i
m
m
u
n
o
g
l
o
b
u
l
i
n
G
;
C
o
n
A
c
o
n
c
a
n
v
i
l
l
a
n
A
;
P
H
A
p
h
y
t
o
h
e
m
a
g
g
l
u
t
i
n
i
n
;
N
K
A
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
k
i
l
l
e
r
c
e
l
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
;
r
I
F
N
i
n
t
e
r
f
e
r
o
n
r
e
c
e
p
t
o
r
;
r
I
L
-
2
i
n
t
e
r
l
e
u
k
i
n
2
r
e
c
e
p
t
o
r
;
B
M
I
b
o
d
y
m
a
s
s
i
n
d
e
x
;
H
S
V
-
1
h
e
r
p
e
s
s
i
m
p
l
e
x
v
i
r
u
s
T
y
p
e
1
;
E
L
I
S
A
e
n
z
y
m
e
l
i
n
k
e
d
i
m
m
u
n
o
s
o
r
b
e
n
t
a
s
s
a
y
;
H
A
I
h
e
m
a
g
l
u
t
i
n
i
n
i
n
h
i
b
i
t
i
o
n
a
s
s
a
y
;
I
L
-
1
b
i
n
t
e
r
l
e
u
k
i
n
-
1
b
;
I
L
-
6
i
n
t
e
r
l
e
u
k
i
n
6
;
I
L
-
2
i
n
t
e
r
l
e
u
k
i
n
2
;
S
B
P
s
y
s
t
o
l
i
c
b
l
o
o
d
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
;
D
B
P
d
i
a
s
t
o
l
i
c
b
l
o
o
d
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
;
H
R
h
e
a
r
t
r
a
t
e
;
T
N
F
t
u
m
o
r
n
e
c
r
o
s
i
s
f
a
c
t
o
r
;
G
M
-
C
S
F
g
r
a
n
u
l
o
c
y
t
e
-
m
a
c
r
o
p
h
a
g
e
c
o
l
o
n
y
s
t
i
m
u
l
a
t
i
n
g
f
a
c
t
o
r
;
E
P
I
e
p
i
n
e
p
h
r
i
n
e
;
N
E
P
I
n
o
r
e
p
i
n
e
p
h
r
i
n
e
;
C
S
F
c
e
r
e
b
r
o
s
p
i
n
a
l
f
l
u
i
d
;
G
A
B
A
g
a
m
m
a
-
a
m
i
n
o
b
u
t
y
r
i
c
a
c
i
d
;
L
D
L
C
l
o
w
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
c
h
o
l
e
s
t
e
r
o
l
;
H
D
L
C
h
i
g
h
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
c
h
o
l
e
s
t
e
r
o
l
;
P
I
L
L
P
e
n
n
e
b
a
k
e
r
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
o
f
L
i
n
g
u
i
d
L
a
n
g
u
i
d
n
e
s
s
;
I
g
M
i
m
m
u
n
o
g
l
o
b
u
l
i
n
M
;
I
g
A
i
m
m
u
n
o
g
l
o
b
u
l
i
n
A
.
a
T
h
i
s
e
f
f
e
c
t
s
i
z
e
w
a
s
n
o
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
s
o
m
e
o
f
t
h
e
m
e
t
a
-
a
n
a
l
y
s
e
s
.
b
B
o
t
h
m
e
n
a
n
d
w
o
m
e
n
a
r
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
n
u
m
b
e
r
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
t
u
d
y
d
i
d
n
o
t
s
t
r
a
t
i
f
y
t
h
e
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
y
b
y
s
e
x
.
955
CAREGIVER HEALTH
T
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
a
l
l
i
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
s
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
u
s
e
r
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
b
r
o
a
d
l
y
.
higher score corresponded to poorer health. Other reports used
itemssuchasincreaseinhealthproblems andpercentagewho
hadworsehealththanexpected or compositehealthscoresfrom
theMultilevel Assessment Inventory (Lawton, Moss, Fulcomer,
& Kleban, 1982) and theDukeUniversity Center for theStudy
of Aging and Human Development (1978).
2. Number of chronic conditions was assessed in seven samples
(n 476caregivers, n 461noncaregivers). Chronic illnesses
weremeasured by checklists. Oneexampleis theHealth Status
Questionnaire(Belloc, Breslow, & Hochstim, 1971).
3. Number of physical symptoms was assessed in eight samples
(n 742caregivers, n 649noncaregivers). Measuresincluded
thePennebaker Inventory of LinguidLanguidness (Pennebaker,
1982), the Cornell Medical Index, and the Interim Medical
Survey.
4. Medicationusewas examinedin10samples (n 941caregiv-
ers, n 960noncaregivers). This includedthenumber of med-
icationsor percentageof peopletakingamedication. Asthisisa
reviewof physical health, wefocused on somatic medications.
5. Healthserviceutilizationwasassessedin11samples(n 1,002
caregivers, n 961 noncaregivers). This included number of
clinicvisitsinthepast3or 6months, daysinhospital, percentage
of peoplewho visitedaphysicianmorethanonce, andpercent-
ageof peoplehospitalized.
Six physiological health categories. Hereweonly present information
on themeasures used in each category and not therationales, as they are
provided in Table1.
1. Antibodies wereassessed in four samples (n 175 caregivers,
n 187 noncaregivers), namely, immunoglobulin G (IgG) re-
sponseto herpes simplex virus (HSV) Type1 and vaccination,
Epstein Barr virus (EBV) virus capsid antigen IgG titers, and
immunoglobulins.
2. Other functional immune measures were examined in six sam-
ples (n 308 caregivers, n 216 noncaregivers). The OSUs
second and third samples examined T-cell proliferation re-
sponses to mitogens (concanvillan A, phytohemagglutinin), re-
sponses tocytokinestimulation(NKA inresponsetointerferon-
receptor, lymphokineactivatedkillinginresponseto interleukin
2 receptor), cytokine responses (interleukin-1b [IL-1b], etc.),
IL-1b mRNA in responseto lipopolysaccharide, tumor necrosis
factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and
delayedskinhypersensitivityfromantigenandindurationscores.
3. Enumerative immunity was examined in six samples (n 266
caregivers, n 226noncaregivers), namely, lymphocytecounts
and percentages of different subsets (e.g., cluster designation
[CD]4, CD8).
4. Stress hormones and neurotransmitters were examined in five
samples(n 176caregivers, n 119noncaregivers). Measures
includedACTH, epinephrine, norepinephrine, cortisol, prolactin,
neuropeptide Y, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), beta-
receptor sensitivity and density, forskolin stimulation, and
growth hormonefromB and T cells.
5. Cardiovascular measures were examined in four samples (n
217caregivers, n 161noncaregivers). Theseincludedsystolic
and diastolic blood pressureand heart rate.
6. Metabolic measures were examined in five samples (n 309
caregivers, n 256noncaregivers). Theseincludedbody mass,
weight, cholesterol, insulin, glucose, and transferin.
Thespeedof healinginresponsetoastandardizedskinwoundhasbeen
usedtoassess acaregivers ability toheal damagedtissue. It is dependent
on interactions of immune, hormonal, and nutritional factors. Because it
was only examined in one sample (Kiecolt-Glaser, Marucha, Malarkey,
Mercado, & Glaser, 1995), it couldnot beincludedinacategory by itself,
but it was used to calculateglobal relationships.
Coding Procedures and Rater Reliability
J ianping Zhang and J ames M. Scanlan examined the 45 reports for
codeable data, such as means, t tests, and so on. Data were included if
information was available to transform a contrast to the point-biserial
correlation (r
pb
). We used the point-biserial correlation as the effect size
becauseit reflects theobservational natureof caregiver research and it is
easy to understandandinterpret. Ineachcomputation, wecodednoncare-
givers as 0andcaregivers as 1. As such, larger point-biserial correlations
suggested greater health risks for caregivers. A total of 172 computable
point-biserial correlations wereobtained. Rater reliability was .92for two
raters across fivereports withself-reportedmeasures andsix reports with
physiological measures.
Analyses Used to Calculate Within-Sample Point-Biserial
Correlations
Lipsey and Wilson (2001) provided the main source for the point-
biserial correlationcalculations. Belowwediscuss thedecisionrules used
for their derision.
1. If themean, standard deviation, samplesize, or percentagewas
included for each measurein each group but thearticledid not
report astatistical test for thedifferencebetweencaregivers and
noncaregivers, wecomputed at test or chi-squaretest for inde-
pendent samples using the pooled variance. The r
pb
was trans-
formed fromt according to standard formulae.
2. If thetests anddegrees of freedomwereincluded, point-biserial
correlations were computed using the above transformation re-
gardless of whether the means and standard deviations were
reported. This was done because in cases of missing data or
outliers, thesampleusedtocalculatethestatistical test might not
havebeenthesameastheonereportedinthedescriptiveresults.
3. If aprobability valuewas reported without atest valueand the
samplesizeswereknown, weestimatedthevalueusingareverse
distribution function and obtained thepoint-biserial correlation.
4. If an article reported that a difference between groups was not
significant, but it didnot provideatest value, probability value,
or meansandstandarddeviations, werecordedthecomparisonas
nsnd (nonsignificant, no data). In such cases, wecalculated the
average point-biserial correlations twice for that sample and
category, namely, without the nsnd and by setting the nsnd
values to zero. This allowed us to observe how nonsignificant
findings influenced theaveragepoint-biserial correlations.
5. Inonearticle(Millset al., 1997), twogroupsof caregiverswere
available. In this case, we first averaged the groups and then
computed thepoint-biserial correlations.
6. Somearticlesincluded, not onlygroupsof caregiverswhosecare
recipientswerelivingat home, but alsoother typesof caregivers.
The latter included former caregivers (Glaser, Kiecolt-Glaser,
Malarkey, & Sheridan, 1998), bereavedcaregivers (Cacioppo et
956
VITALIANO, ZHANG, AND SCANLAN
T
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
a
l
l
i
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
s
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
u
s
e
r
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
b
r
o
a
d
l
y
.
al., 1998; Esterling, Kiecolt-Glaser, Bodnar, & Glaser, 1994;
Esterling, Kiecolt-Glaser, & Glaser, 1996; Lorensini & Bates,
1997; Wright, Hickey, Buckwalter, Hendrix, & Kelechi, 1999),
caregivers of care recipients in nursing homes (Wright et al.,
1999), and caregivers using adult day care(Lorensini & Bates,
1997). When the data were stratified, we used only current
caregivers, caregiverscaringfor carerecipientsintheir homes, or
caregivers that werenot using adult day care.
7. Inthefewsampleswithrepeatedmeasuresdata, weusedthefirst
timepoint tocomputepoint-biserial correlationsbecausethiswas
commensuratewithdatafromthevast majorityof other samples.
8. If the same measure was used across overlapping reports, the
point-biserial correlations were averaged and represented only
oncefor that sample. Themeanof theresultingmeans was then
obtained. For example, NKA was used in four samples with
sevenreports. Assuch, it wasfirst averagedacrossthereportsin
each sample and then the resulting four sample means were
averaged.
9. For each physiological measurewehad to determinethedirec-
tionof itsmost commonrelationshipwithillness. Indoingsowe
recognized that although indicators such as obesity and high
glucose are usually associated with negative health outcomes,
very low body weight and glucose might also result fromstar-
vation. Moreover, high NKA and CD4 are usually associated
withbetter health, but therearerarediseases inwhichthey may
be elevated. In almost all cases, the most common association
was for higher values with greater health risk, but for some
immune markers and high-density lipoproteins, lower values
indicated more risk. In these cases, we reversed the coding so
that higher values represented morerisk.
Analyses Used to Assess Central Tendencies, Variability,
Significance, and Moderators
Random-effects and fixed-effects models. Inferencesabout central ten-
denciesrelativetoseveral sourcesof variationcanbemadeusingrandom-
effects or fixed-effects models. Therandom-effects model is usually used
when thegoal of ameta-analysis is to generalizethefindings beyondthe
collection of observed or identical studies. Greater generalizability is
achievedby incorporatingbetween-studies variability intoerror estimates,
variance, and statistical tests (Hedges & Vevea, 1998; Lipsey & Wilson,
2001). Thefixed-effects model is often used when ones goal is to make
inferences to the observed or identical studies, except for randomerror
sampling of participants into each study. Although the random-effects
model ismoregeneralizable, thecostsof applyingit aregenerally broader
confidence intervals and less powerful test results when making condi-
tional inferences (Hedges & Vevea, 1998). Alternatively, when heteroge-
neous effect sizes exist, generalizing the results of fixed error models
beyond the studies used is problematic because systematic variability is
unexplained. Here, the point-biserial correlations were assumed to be
heterogeneous across samples when the Q statistic exceeded the critical
valueof thechi-square, withk 1degrees of freedom. Insuchcases, we
examined potential outliers (Shadish & Haddock, 1994). Because the
fixed-effects model also allows important inferences, we used both ap-
proaches. However, we only report fixed error results when they are
significant and therandomerror results arenot.
Mean point-biserial correlations. Two types of tests were con-
ductedthose in which mean point-biserial correlations were compared
withzero andtests of contrasts, inwhichmeanpoint-biserial correlations
werecomparedwitheachother. To calculateameanpoint-biserial corre-
lation, all r
pb
swerefirst transformedtoFishersZ
r
. Eachsamplewasthen
weightedby its appropriatemeanweights (Shadish& Haddock, 1994). If
asamplegeneratedonereport, thefunctionof thesamplesizewasusedto
weight the point-biserial correlation in the composite of point-biserial
correlations from that category. If a sample generated multiple reports
usingthesamemeasure, thesamplesizesinthereportswerefirst averaged
to weight thepoint-biserial correlation for that measure. To calculatethe
grandmeanpoint-biserial correlationof the23samples, wecomputedthe
unweighted mean point-biserial correlation within each sample. The 23
meanpoint-biserial correlations weretheneachweightedby afunctionof
their samplesize(meann wasusedfor theOSU, UW, andUCSDsamples)
and used to computethegrand mean. When computing thepoint-biserial
correlations for thefivereportedhealthcategories or thesix physiological
categories, wefirst averagedacross point-biserial correlations withineach
samplein that grouping (i.e., k 17 and 12, respectively). Thesevalues
werethenweightedbytheir samplesizefunctions, andtheir averageswere
obtained across thesamples. This was also donefor themeans of the11
healthcategories. Inall cases, themeans of thepoint-biserial correlations
werecomputedfromLipseyandWilsons(2001) formulaeusingtheSPSS
macroprocedure. For therandomerror model, atest wasusedthat assumes
this model (Bryk, Raudenbush, & Congdon, 1996; Shadish & Haddock,
1994). Contrast tests were done for reported health versus physiological
measures; global self-reported health versus utilization, medications, and
chronic illnesses; stress hormones versus cardiovascular and metabolic
measures; antibodies versus enumerativemeasures; and antibodies versus
other functional immunemeasures.
Analyses Used to Examine Data Censoring and Data
Interpretation
Weexamineddatacensoringintwoways. First, wecomparedthemean
point-biserial correlations of published and unpublished studies. Second,
we used the trim and fill procedure. This method is useful when the
primary goal of ameta-analysis is to establishtheexistenceof arelation-
ship between two variables. In such cases it is important to examine the
robustnessof findingsrelativetoall possiblesourcesof datacensoring. The
trimandfill method(Duval & Tweedie, 2000) first developsafunnel plot
of studies, definedby theeffect sizesonthex axisandthestandarderrors
or sample sizes on the y axis. Once the plot is created, studies fromthe
asymmetric outlying part of the funnel are trimmed. The symmetric re-
maining studies provide a more accurate effect size estimate. Correct
calculation of the variance for the pooled estimate requires that the
trimmedstudiesbereplacedandtheir apparent missingcounterpartsonthe
funnel plot befilled by inputting values. This is based on theassumption
that the sides of the funnel plot should be a mirror image of each other
(Sutton, Song, et al., 2000). The fill step allows for adjusted overall
confidence intervals to be calculated. Funnel plots may be asymmetric
from factors other than publication bias. These include study quality,
different outcomemeasures, andsoforth. Therefore, changedresultsbased
on inputted values should be interpreted with caution (Sutton, Duval,
Tweedie, Abrams, &J ones, 2000). Whenameaneffectsizewithstandsthis
procedure it has enhanced credibility. Here we used the STATA macro
procedure, METATRIM (Steichen, 2001), whichemploys themethods of
Duval andTweedie(2000). Finally, toexaminethemeaningandinterpret-
ability of the grand means of the point-biserial correlations, we assessed
study-level effect sizes. This was done by correlating the point-biserial
correlationsfor different categoriesof healthmeasuresacrossthosestudies
that assessed morethan onehealth indicator.
Results
Acrossthe23samples(n 3,072), 18werefromNorthAmer-
ica, 4 were fromEurope, and 1 was fromAustralia. The grand
meanfor agewas 65.0years, andtherangeof theagemeans was
55to75years. Themedianpercentageof womenwas65.1, andthe
rangewas 0%to100%. Themediannumber of non-Whitepartic-
ipants was 7.4%, with the sample percentages varying from0 to
100. Overall, therewere1,594caregiversand1,478noncaregivers
957
CAREGIVER HEALTH
T
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
a
l
l
i
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
s
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
u
s
e
r
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
b
r
o
a
d
l
y
.
that were group matched on age and sex in the 23 observational
studies. Themeanageswere65.6years(SD 5.9) for caregivers
and64.6years(SD 6.4) for noncaregivers. Themedianpercent-
ageof womenwas65.0for caregiversand65.2for noncaregivers.
Point-Biserial Correlations of Caregiving With Indicators
of Physical Health
Grand means for all studies, self-reported studies, and physio-
logical studies. There were 172 point-biserial correlations that
couldbecalculatedacrossthe45reports(13fromdissertationsand
159 from articles). Forty-one nonsignificant comparisons were
also reported(or 19%of 213comparisons), withinsufficient data
to calculate point-biserial correlations. For the 23 samples, the
overall grandmeanwassignificant whenthenonsignificant values
wereset to zero (r
pb
.10, p .01), and it was also significant
when these values were ignored (r
pb
.12, p .01). The 17
samples that examined the five self-reported health categories
generated7to14contrastsineachcategory. A total of 57contrasts
were reported, of which 53 point-biserial correlations could be
calculated. For the self-reported health categories the mean was
also significant (r
pb
.10, p .01), both with and without
nonsignificant values set to zero. Caregivers reportedmorehealth
problems than did noncaregivers. The 12 samples that examined
the six physiological categories contained 14 to 56 contrasts. Of
the 155 contrasts (154 1 contrast for wound healing), 118
point-biserial correlations could be calculated. The mean was
significant (r
pb
.11, p .05) when nonsignificant values were
set tozero, aswell aswhentheywereignored(r
pb
.15, p .01).
Theseresults suggest that caregivers had greater potential illness
risks than did noncaregivers.
Mean point-biserial correlations and variability within subcat-
egories. For each sample (row) of Table 3, we provide point-
biserial correlationsfor thefiveself-reportedhealthcategoriesthat
wereexamined. Thelastthreerowsincludethemeanpoint-biserial
correlations using the randomerror model, without and with the
nsnd results set to zero, and thenumber of point-biserial correla-
tions usedto calculatethemeans and, inparentheses, thenumber
of nsndresultsineachhealthcategory. Table4issimilar toTable
3, but it contains thephysiological results.
Table 5 provides a summary of 14 groups of point-biserial
correlations. Theseincludetheset of all point-biserial correlations
calculated, the point-biserial correlations for all self-reported
healthmeasures, thepoint-biserial correlations for all physiologi-
cal measures, andthepoint-biserial correlationsfor the11subcat-
egories. For eachgroup, thetableincludescolumnscontaining(a)
categoryname; (b) number of independent samples(k); (c) sample
sizes for caregivers andnoncaregivers (controls); (d) meanpoint-
biserial correlation for the random-effects model ignoring nsnd,
withsignificancelevels, 95%confidenceintervals, andQ statistic;
(e) mean point-biserial correlations for therandom-effects model
withnsndresults set to zero, withsignificancelevels, 95%confi-
denceintervals, andQ statistic; and(f) trimandfill estimatesof the
mean point-biserial correlation with nsnd values set to zero.
Fromthe table, one can see that in eight categories there was
either no difference or a minor difference between the mean
point-biserial correlationsfor thecalculationsinwhichnsndswere
ignoredversus thecalculations inwhichthey wereset to zero. In
other categories, the drop in the mean point-biserial correlation
wasmoresubstantial whenzerosweresubstitutedfor nsnds. These
includedglobal self-reportedhealth(16%drop), functional cellular
immunity(23%drop), all physiological samples(27%drop), stress
hormones (28% drop), and enumerative immunity (42% drop).
This last differenceis not surprising because25 of the56 point-
biserial correlations in this category were nsnd. To be conserva-
Table3
Point-Biserial Correlation Coefficients for Self-Reported Health Measures
Sample Report
Global self-
reported health
Chronic
illnesses
Physical
symptoms
Medication
use
Health service
utilization
1 Almberg et al. (1998) .28
2 Baumgarten et al. (1992, 1997) .28 .04 .25 .38 .02
3 Grafstromet al. (1992) .13 .05 .07
4 Haley et al. (1987) .18 .25 .11 .22 .19
5 Haley et al. (1995) .09 .02 .03 .03
6 Lorensini & Bates (1997) .09
7 McNaughton et al. (1995) .07
8 OReilly et al. (1996) .08 .11 .01
9 Rose-Rego et al. (1998) .22
10 Wright (1994), Wright et al. (1999) .09
11 Fuller-J onap & Haley (1995) .12
12 Kiecolt-Glaser et al. (1987)
13 OSU second sample .12 .11 .04 .29
14 UCSD second sample .05 .06 .08
15 Picot et al. (1997) .11 .04
16 UW group .24 .01
17 J . J . McCann (1991) .25 .12 .18 .36 .21
Mean r
pb
Random-effects model
without nsnd
.18 .11 .10 .12 .06
Random-effects model
with nsnd at 0
.16 .11 .10 .12 .05
Number of r
pb
s (nsnd) 10(2) 7(0) 13(0) 11(0) 12(2)
Note. Point-biserial correlations(r
pb
s) areunweighted. A dashindicatesthat thevaluecouldnot becomputedbecauseit wasrecordedasnonsignificant,
with no data(nsnd). OSU Ohio StateUniversity. UCSD University of California, San Diego. UW University of Washington.
958
VITALIANO, ZHANG, AND SCANLAN
T
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
a
l
l
i
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
s
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
u
s
e
r
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
b
r
o
a
d
l
y
.
tive, wefocus hereonresults withnsndcodedas zero(seeM and
Q columns for weighted r
pb
with nsnd, Table5).
Acrosscategories, thelargestpoint-biserial correlationswerefor
stress hormones (k 5; r
pb
.23, p .05), global self-reported
health(k 10; r
pb
.16, p .01), andantibodies (k 4; r
pb