IAIA Application Template

Synthesis
Inquiry
Argument
Inference
Analysis
IDA developed a ten-year Master plan (iN2015) to grow Singapores
infocomm sector.
Purpose of this Master plan is to use infocomm technologies to enhance the
competitiveness of key economic sectors and build a well-connected society.
The 10
th
mark is approaching and the main aim is to have the global city
powered by infocomm.
Find out about iN2015
How are they doing so far
What in2015 is doing all along this year?
Find out their achievement
What to enhance so we can meet their vision?
How can we use infocomm technologies?
Is the master plan achievable? Is it productive?
Why is there a need to grow the economic sector?
What are the benefits of IT to economic and society?

The purpose of analysis is to understanding exactly what event we
are looking to determine the frequency of.
The major question is how to use infocomm technologies to improve
it and the sub question is what are the skills use to improve the
competitiveness of key economic sectors and how to apply the skills
accurately.
The relevant factors to consider is how much infocomm technology
has enhance the competitiveness of key economic sectors.
We should use holistic analyse in order to respond to the Driving
Question.
What are the proposed artefacts?
What are the skills used to improve the competitiveness sectors?

IDA is trying to develop a ten-year Masterplan to grow Singapores
infocomm sector.
They are trying to develop this Masterplan to enhance the
competitiveness of key economic sectors and build a well-connected
society.
They wants to navigate Singapores exhilaration transition into An
Intelligent Nation, A Global City, powered by infocomm
The implications that we made is that we seem to be quite close to the
vision because we are already working on it.


Combining the different responses together and apply the correct concept
Applying the considerations and criteria for the sound or cogent argument.
Is it an inductive or deductive argument?
What are fallacies made in the arguments?
Support? Why? We support the decision for IDAs technology as
technologies would be faster and more accessible. It also means that with
those new ideas, new inventions can be invented. Thus the quality of lives
in Singapore will be even better.

Dont support? Why? We dont support the decision because as it may also
cause misunderstanding and competitors may be hostile against one
another. The cost of living may also increase causing people to not be able
to afford technologies.

Key Questions to consider when filling up the IAIA Application Template
Inquiry
What is some prior knowledge that we can tap on to respond to the Driving Question?
What are the considerations when responding to the Driving Question?
What are the assumptions we need to make in order to propose a feasible approach in responding to the
Driving Question?
What are the resources needed to respond to this Driving Question?
Where can we find reliable and credible resources?
How do our resources enhance and develop our responses to the Driving Question?
What possible artefacts can best represent our responses to the Driving Question?
Analysis
What is the purpose of our analysis?
What are the major question and sub-questions for our analysis?
What are the relevant factors to consider when responding to the Driving Question?
What are the linkages/relationships between our considerations and resources?
Which approach to analysis (atomistic or holistic) should we adopt in order to respond to the Driving
Question?
How do the chosen artefacts represent our responses to the Driving Question?
Inference
What information can we infer from the resources we have on hand?
What conclusion can we draw based on the analysis done on the resources?
What possible inferences can be drawn from the chosen artefacts?
What are the implications of our responses to the Driving Question?
Argument
What are the different responses shared within the team?
How can we relate the different responses of the team members to form a coherent E-portfolio?
How well do our chosen response/artefacts answer the Driving Question?
How can we build sound and/or cogent arguments for our response to the Driving Question?
Have we made any fallacies in our arguments?