Sie sind auf Seite 1von 24

# Chapter 3

## Finite Element Formulation

For solving the equations describing the diaphragm deformation we will use the nite element
method. In this chapter we will present the formulation of the method for geometrically
nonlinear, three-dimensional continuum elements. We will focus on the particular aspect
of rubber-like materials. The basic ideea of the nonlinear nite element formulation is to
linearize the weak form of the equations of the problem and to solve these equations for the
nite elements discretized domain. This leads to an incremental approach, the solution at
each step being obtained from the solution at the previous step. By step it is understood
a load increment in static analysis, and, a time step in transient analysis . In solid
mechanics the weak form form is usualy derived from the principle of virtual work. In
our presentation for the weak and linearized form we follow the formulation given by Simo
and Taylor . For the nite element implementation we use a similar approach as used by
Schweizerhof  and Bathe . The time integration scheme and the numerical algorithms
are described according to  and -.
33
34
3.1 Weak formulation
Following Simo and Taylor  let
T
C
=
_
: R
3
| |
u
= 0
_
,
be the linear space of all admissible variations in the present conguration. In the classical
notation stands for u. The principle of virtual work written in the present conguration
states that for an arbitrary admissible variation T
C
D

L =
_

:
s
d
_

t d +
_

U d = 0, (3.1)
where D

## [ ] represents the Gateaux derivative at in the direction ,

s
is dened in
(2.31) and t = n represents the tractions. Using (2.14) and the formulae from section
3.6, the equation (3.1) can be written consecutively
_

R
1
J
FSF
T
:
1
2
_
F
T
_
1
_
D

C
_
F
1
d
R
=
_

t d
_

U d,
_

R
1
2
S :
_
D

C
_
d
R
=
_

t d
_

U d. (3.2)
For hyperelastic materials there is a stored energy function W (X, C()) such that the
second Piola-Kirchho stress tensor can be determined from W through the equation (2.11).
Using (2.17) in (3.2) yields
_

R
W
C
: D

C d
R
=
_

t d
_

U d,
D

__

R
W d
R
_

_

t d
_

U d = 0. (3.3)
The equation (3.3) represents the principle of virtual work in the case when there is a stored
energy function W. The equation (3.3) also allows the denition of the following functional
L() =
_

R
W d
R

td +
_

Ud. (3.4)
35
The functional (3.4) can be used to derive the weak form and further the nite element
equations of the problem for compressible materials. The diculty arises when the material
tends to be incompressible, as in the case of plasticity problems or in the problems involving
rubber or rubber-like materials. In this case, in the nite element modeling, it is known that
the displacement and the pressure P (=
kk
= tr ) are decoupled and therefore separate
modeling is needed for each. This formulation is known as displacement/pressure formulation
. A situation which might occur in this case is the locking phenomenon caused by
the dependency of displacements and pressure determination of the bulk modulus. The fact
that an element will lock or not is determined by the Babuska-Brezzi condition . The
evaluation of this condition is not very easy, and therefore, in practice, this verication is
avoided. It is used instead a constrain counts indicator .
The incompressibility condition acts like an internal constraint and in the numerical calculus
cannot be imposed unless it is introduced explicitly. In the nite element formulation, this
can be achieved through the Lagrange multiplier method, penalty method, or the augmented
Lagrangian method . This leads to an additional variable in the functional (3.4).
Using the Lagrange multiplier method and the constraint condition J = det[C] = 1, the
functional (3.4) needs to be modied as follows
L() =
_

R
W d
R
+
_

R
P(J 1) d
R

td +
_

Ud. (3.5)
The functional (3.4) denes the balance of energy. To maintain the same physical meaning of
(3.5), the term P(J1) must have an energy dimension. J1 denes in fact the change in the
volume or the relative volume of an innitesimal material element and therefore a volumetric
deformation. It follows that P, the Lagrange multiplier, must have the dimension of a stress.
The condition P(J 1) = 0 states in fact that the mechanical work done by the P over
the volumetric deformation is null. The weak form of this condition is the integral form.
Dierent other formulations can be followed in  and . The condition J = 1 is the
particular case of J = with > 0, 1. Using the deformation decomposition (2.34),
36
it can be written
F = J
1/3

F =
1/3

1/3
J
1/3

F.
This suggests the consideration of a modied deformation gradient F instead of F
F(, ) =
1/3

F() =
1/3
J()
1/3
F, C = F
T
F, J() = det F, (3.6)
where C is the associated right Cauchy-Green tensor with the modied deformation gradient.
It is clear that if we impose now the condition J() = , it follows that F = F. This moves
the incompressibility condition 1 to be imposed on W. Hence the functional (3.5) can
be modied by replacing F with F and 1 with . This leads to the following functional
depending on three elds (, P, )
L(, , P) =
_

R
_
W
_
X, C(, )
_
+ P(J() )
_
d
R

td +
_

Ud. (3.7)
It can be seen that (3.7) does not impose any restriction yet on W regarding the incompress-
ibility condition. This condition can be added later by a proper choice of the stored energy
function. So far the functional (3.7) holds for both types of materials: compressible as well
as incompressible. The extended virtual work principle (3.3) in the case of (3.7) is
D

L + D

L + D
P
L q = 0, (3.8)
where and q are admissible variations of respectively P. The equation (3.8) yields to
the following three equations
_

R
_
D

W + PD

J()
_
d
R
=
_

t d
_

U d, (3.9)
_

R
(D

W P) d
R
= 0, (3.10)
_

R
q (J() ) d
R
= 0. (3.11)
37
Using the results from the section 3.6, we obtain
_

_
dev
_
2
J
F
W
C
CF
T
_
: dev [] + P div
_
d =
_

t d
_

U d, (3.12)
_

_
J
3
tr
_
2
J
F
W
C
F
T
_
P
_
1
J
d = 0, (3.13)
_

q (J() )
1
J
d = 0, (3.14)
or in a dierent form
_

## {dev : dev [] + P div } d =

_

t d
_

U d, (3.15)
_

_
J
3
tr P
_
1
J
d = 0, (3.16)
_

q (J )
1
J
d = 0. (3.17)
The equations (3.12)-(3.17) are the weak form of the equations (2.23) or (2.24) and are valid
for any expression of the stored energy function W. Using the decomposition (2.35) the
stored energy function can be written
W
_
X, C(, )
_
= U() +

W
_
X,

C
_
, (3.18)
in which the rst part U() is the energy stored as a volumetric deformation and

W
_
X,

C
_
the energy stored as a deviatoric deformation. From the equation (3.17) it follows that
= J. Introducing this result in (3.16) yields
P =
1
3
tr =
1
3

kk
= U

(J). (3.19)
From the equation (3.19) it can be seen that the Lagrange multiplier P is like a pressure,
but it is not the pressure as in uid mechanics, for example. Using (3.19), the second Piola-
Kirchho stress tensor becomes
S = 2
W
C
= 2
U
J
J
C
+ 2

W
C
= U

JC
1
+ 2

W
C
.
38
Using the derivations formulae from section 3.6 we obtain
S = PJC
1
+ 2J
2/3
DEV
_

C
_
, DEV[] = []
1
3
([] : C) C
1
, (3.20)
= P1 +
2
J
dev
_

F
T
_
. (3.21)
3.1.1 Incompressibility condition
With the previous weak formulation, the incompressibility condition = 1 can be introduced
by a proper choice of the function U(). However the function U() must satisfy two
conditions.
U() 0 and convex. This condition is imposed by the fact that the energy must be
positive or zero and must remain a convex function.
U() = 0 = 1. This condition is required by the incompressibility condition.
Analyzing the expression (2.32), it is suggested to consider for the volumetric part of W
U() = Kf(), K =
2G(1 + )
3(1 2)
,
where K represents the bulk modulus, and the condition for U() is now transferred to
f(). As long as the above requirements are satised, any function f() can be chosen. In
the case of rubber material 0.5 K and K acts like a penalty parameter for a
constraint condition f() = 0 which, is equivalent to 1. So, in fact, by choosing f()
satisfying the above requirements and choosing 0.5, we impose the constraint condition
= 1. For example in 
f() =
1
2
_
(x
2
1) ln
_
,
is used for rubber-like materials analysis. In 
f() = K [ln ]
2
, (3.22)
39
is used in the elasto-plastic analysis. The nite element program NIKE3D uses the function
(3.22) for a Mooney-Rivlin model, see also section 2.5. The penalty method exposed here
can be further improved by using the augmented Lagrangian method .
3.2 Linearization. Static case
The equations (2.23),(2.24), the strong form, or (3.12)-(3.17), the weak form, are nonlinear
equations. The usual procedure for solving those equations is an iterative method, which
requires a linearization of those equations. In Chapter 2, the linearized equations of the
strong form was presented. In this section the liniarization of the weak form is presented,
an essential step for solving the problem using the Finite Element Method. To proceed, rst
we write the equations (3.12)-(3.14) in the reference conguration. Introducing (2.14) and
the results from section 3.6, we obtain
_

R
R
=
_

t d, (3.23)
_

_
U

() P
_
d
R
= 0, (3.24)
_

R
q(J ) d
R
= 0. (3.25)
Following the denition of the linearization process, we consider small increments (u, , p)
of (U, , P). The Gateaux derivative in the direction (u, , p) of the equation (3.23) yields
D
u
__

R
R
_
u + D
p
__

R
R
_
p =
=
_

t d
_

: d (3.26)
40
The left hand side of the equation (3.26) can be expanded as follows
D
u
__

R
R
_
u + D
p
__

R
R
_
p =
=
_

R
__
D
u
F u
_
S +F
_
D
u
S u
__
R
+ D
p
__

R
R
_
p.
(3.27)
Using the formulae from section 3.6 in (3.27) yields
_

R
R
+
+
_

R
_
F
_
JF
1
[P (1 1 2I)]
_
F
T
_
1
+F

CF
T
_
:
s
u + p1
_
R
.
in the reference conguration. In the present conguration (3.27) becomes
_

: {(u) + [P (1 1 2I) +

c] : u + p1} d
where

C and

c are the deviatoric material tensors expressed in reference and present con-
guration .
(1 1)
ijkl
=
ij

kl
, (I)
ijkl
=
ik

jl
Following the denition (2.20) and the decoupled form (2.35) of stored energy function we
obtain
C = 4
W
CC
= 2
S
C
= 2

C
_
PJC
1
+ 2J
2/3
_

W
C

1
3
_

W
C
: C
_
C
1
__
.
A complete derivation of C and c can be found in . Hence the linearized form of the
weak form (3.23) in the present conguration is
_

s
: {(
s
u) + [P (1 1 2I) +

c] :
s
u + p1} d =
=
_

t d
_

: d. (3.28)
41
Similarly the linearized form of (3.24) is
_

_
U

() p
_
d =
_

_
U

() P
_
d, (3.29)
and for the third equation (3.25)
_

q(div u
1
J
) d =
_

q(J ) d. (3.30)
For the nite element formulation it is convenient that (3.28), (3.29) and (3.30) be written
in matrix form. Similar with , we introduce the following notations
B
L
=
_

x
1
0 0
0

x
2
0
0 0

x
3

x
1

x
2
0

x
1
0

x
3
0

x
2

x
3
_

_
, B
NL
=
_

x
1
0 0
0

x
1
0
0 0

x
1

x
2
0 0
0

x
2
0
0 0

x
2

x
3
0 0
0

x
3
0
0 0

x
3
_

_
, D =
_

x
1

x
2

x
3
_

_
,
S =
_

11

12

13

21

22

23

31

32

33
_

_
,
ij
=
_

ij
0 0
0
ij
0
0 0
ij
_

_
,

T
=
_

11

22

33

12

13

23
_
, u =
_

_
u
1
u
2
u
3
_

_
, =
_

3
_

_
.
The components of the second order symmetric gradient tensor
s
u can be arranged in a
vector
e
T
=
_
e
11
e
22
e
33
2e
12
2e
13
2e
23
_
, e
ij
=
1
2
(u
i,j
+ u
j,i
) , e = B
L
u,
42
and the components of the forth order material tensor C in a 6 6 matrix
C =
_

_
C
1111
C
1122
C
1133
C
1112
C
1113
C
1123
C
2211
C
2222
C
2233
C
2212
C
2213
C
2223
C
3311
C
3322
C
3333
C
3312
C
3313
C
3323
C
1211
C
1222
C
1233
C
1212
C
1213
C
1223
C
1311
C
1322
C
1333
C
1312
C
1313
C
1323
C
2311
C
2322
C
2333
C
2312
C
2313
C
2323
_

_
.
The equation (3.28) can be written
_

T
B
T
L
CB
L
ud +
_

T
B
T
NL
SB
NL
d +
_

pD
T
d =
=
_

T
t d
_

T
B
T
L
d. (3.31)
The second equation (3.29) remains the same
_

_
U

() p
_
d =
_

_
U

() P
_
d, (3.32)
and the third equation
_

q(D
T
u
1
J
) d =
_

q(J ) d. (3.33)
3.3 Finite element equation. Static case
Let =
e
be a discretization of the domain in the present conguration. On each ele-
ment
e
we introduce a continuum approximation of the displacement u using the standard
shape functions and nodal values .
u =
T
u, u
T
= [u
1
u
2
. . . u
n
] , (3.34)
and a discontinuous approximation of the relative volume and the pressure p using standard
shape functions, but internal values.
=
T
, p =
T
p. (3.35)
43
Similarly the variables (, , q) will be replaced by

T
,
T
= [
1

2
. . .
n
] ,
T
, q
T
q.
Introducing the matrices
B
L
= B
L
, B
NL
= B
NL
, D = D,
the linearized equation (3.28) becomes

T
_
e
B
T
L
CB
L
d u +
T
_
e
B
T
NL
SB
NL
d u +q
T
_
e
D
T
d p =
=
T
_

T
t d
T
_
e
B
T
L
d,
The second equation

T
_
e
U

()
T
d
T
_
e

T
dp =
T
_
e

_
U

() p
_
d,
and the third equation
q
T
_
e
D
T
du q
T
_
e
1
J

T
d = q
T
_
e
(J ) d.
Since the variations , , q are arbitrary, it follows that
_

_
K
uu
0 K
up
0 K

K
p
K
pu
K
p
0
_

_
_

_
u

p
_

_
=
_

_
F
u
F

F
p
_

_
. (3.36)
The equation (3.36) represents the nite element equation. The matrices in (3.36) are dened
as follows
K
uu
=
_
e
B
T
L
CB
L
d +
_
e
B
T
NL
SB
NL
d, (3.37)
K
up
=
_
e
D
T
d, K
p
=
_
e

T
d,
44
K

=
_
e
U

()
T
d, K
pu
=
_
e
D
T
d,
K
p
=
_
e
1
J

T
d.
The matrix K
uu
is the displacement tangent stiness matrix of the element e. The rst
term in (3.37) represents the material stiness matrix, and the second term the geometric or
initial stress stiness matrix. The vectors on the right side of the equation (3.36) are dened
below
F
u
=
_

T
t d
_

B
T
L
d = F
ext
F
int
(U), (3.38)
F

=
_
e

_
U

() p
_
d,
F
p
=
_
e
(J .) d
The rst term in (3.38) represents the force due to the external loads and the second term
the internal force. The equation (3.36) can be assembled in full size, keeping all variables.
But due to the structure of the equation (3.36)the variables and p can be condensed at
the element level. We present below two methods.
3.3.1 Static condensation-I
From the second equation of (3.36)
= K
1

(F

p) , (3.39)
and from the third equation of (3.36) p can be expressed
p = Gu +h, (3.40)
45
where
G =
_
K
p
K
1

K
p
_
1
K
pu
, h =
_
K
p
K
1

K
p
_
1
_
K
p
K
1

F
p
_
.
Substituting (3.40) in the rst equation of (3.36) yields
K
e
T
(U
e
) u
e
= F
e
(U
e
) , (3.41)
where e indicates that the equation (3.41) refers to the element e and
K
e
T
= K
e
uu
+K
e
up
G
e
, F
e
= F
e
u
+K
e
up
h
e
.
Assembling all equations (3.41) for all elements yields
K
T
(U) u = F(U) , (3.42)
where K
T
(u) represents the tangent matrix of the nite element model, u the vector of
the increment displacements, which needs to be determined, and F(u) the force vector. The
equation (3.42) is a nonlinear equation and can be solved iteratively by dierent methods .
One of these methods is described in section 3.5.1. After solving (3.42) for displacements,
then and p are calculated using (3.39), (3.40) and (3.34) respectively. The values of
displacement, relative volume and pressure are updated using
U U+u, + , P P + p.
3.3.2 Static condensation-II
In section 3.3 we have solved the problem using a nite element approximation (3.35) for the
increments of pressure p and relative volume . In the end, the pressure and the relative
volume were statically condensed at the element level resulting nally in a nonlinear equation
only in u. This suggests that the way in which the pressure and the relative volume are
calculated at the element level does not aect the nal equation, which will be only a function
of u.
46
Using this idea Simo and Taylor proposed a dierent approach in  for calculating the
total pressure P and the total relative volume . In this approach the total pressure and
total relative volume are approximated at the element level using again shape functions and
internal values of the total pressure and total relative volume.
=
T
, P =
T
P, (3.43)
where this time the vector P and contains the values of total relative volume and total
pressure on an element. Replacing (3.43) in the equation (3.16) and (3.17), we obtain

T
_

R
Jd
R
=
T
_

T
d
R
,
and further
= K
1

, K

=
_

T
d
R
, F

=
_

R
Jd
R
. (3.44)
Introducing (3.44) in the equation (3.17) yields
P
T
_

R
U

()d
R
= P
T
_

T
d
R
P,
and
P = K
1
pp
F
p
, K
pp
=
_

T
d
R
, F
p
=
_

R
U

()d
R
. (3.45)
The increment p in the linearized equation (3.36) is now calculated from (3.45) and intro-
duced in the rst equation of (3.36). The nite element program NIKE3D uses this approach.
3.4 Finite element equation. Dynamic case
In the dynamic case the linearization follows the time domain discretization. The usual
procedure expreses the displacements at the present time t + t as a function of the dis-
placements U, velocities

U and accelerations

U at the time t, leading to a Newmark- time
integration schemes . Following  for example,
t+t
U =
t
U + t
t

U +
_
1
2

_
t
2 t

U + t
2 t+t

U, (3.46)
47
t+t

U =
t

U + (1 )
t
t

U + t
t+t

U, (3.47)
where and are numbers between (0, 1). Introducing (3.46) in (3.47) and linearizing the
equations (3.15)-(3.17) at the time t + t yields
M
t+t

U+K
T
(
t
U)u =
t+t
F
ext
F
int
(
t
U). (3.48)
The displacement increment u can be determined iteratively. At the iteration k + 1
K

(
t
U
k
) u
k+1
=
t+t
F
ext
F

(
t+t
U
k
), (3.49)
where
K

(
t
U) = K
T
(
t
U
k
) +
1
t
2
M, (3.50)
F

(
t+t
U
k
) = F
int
(
t
U
k
) +M
t+t

U
k+1
. (3.51)
K

= K
T
(
t
U) +
1
t
2
M, (3.52)
with K
T
(
t
U) calculated from the last iteration of the previous time step and
F

= F(
t
U) M
_
1
t
t

U+
1

_
1
2

_
t

U
_
.
Solving (3.49) the accelerations, velocities and displacements are updated by
t+t

U =
1
t
2
u
1
t
t

U
1

_
1
2

_
t

U,
t+t

U =
t

U+ (1 )t
t

U+
t+t

U,
t+t
U =
t
U+u.
Then the equilibrium iterations are performed with K

## updated with (3.50) and F

updated
by (3.51). The time integration algorithm is unconditionally stable for 2 1/2. For
48
other combinations the algorithm may be conditionally stable or unconditionally unstable.
The combination = 1/4, = 1/2, known as trapezoidal rule, leads to a second order
accuracy in time unconditionally stable and to a maximum dissipation of the higher energy
modes, usually creations of the discretization process . We will use this combination in
chapter 5.
3.5 Numerical procedures
The nite element method is accompanied by a large number of numerical procedures such
as: numerical integration, numerical algorithms for solving nonlinear problems, methods
for solving a linear system and procedures for solving eigenvalue problems as in vibrations
analysis. In this section we mention briey some of these methods which play an important
role in the analysis of the diaphragm problem. Since we will use the program NIKE3D , we
limit our presentation to numerical methods related to this code. The program is described
briey in section 5.2. In NIKE3D the following shape functions are used for displacement
eld modeling

i
=
1
8
(1
i
)(1
i
)(1
i
), , , [1, 1], (3.53)
where
i
,
i
,
i
are the local coordinates of the node i as is shown in Figure 3.1. For the
relative volume and internal pressure P a constant discontinuous functions are used for
both variables.
=
_

_
0 0
0 0
0 0
_

_
, = 1.
The matrices from sections 3.3 and 3.4 are evaluated numerically. The procedure is a 222
Gauss-type integration. Here we distinguish two types of integrals: volume integrals and
surface integrals. A volume integral on the element e is calculated as follows
_
e
f(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
) d =
_
+1
1
_
+1
1
_
+1
1
f(, , )J
e
ddd =
2

i=1
2

j=1
2

k=1
f(
i
,
j
,
k
)Jw
i
w
j
w
k
,
49
Figure 3.1: Three dimensional and two dimensional nite elements.
where
i
,
j
,
k
are the Gauss point coordinates and w
i
w
j
w
k
the Gauss weights and J is the
jacobian 
J =

x
1

x
1

x
1

x
2

x
2

x
2

x
3

x
3

x
3

.
The restriction of (3.53) to one of the faces of the solid element from Figure 3.1 b), for
example = 1, is

i
=
1
4
(1
i
)(1
i
), , , [1, 1], i = 1, 4,
where
i
,
i
are the local coordinates of the node i as shown in Figure 3.1 b). An integral
over the surface
e
of an element e becomes
_
e
f(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
) d =
_
+1
1
_
+1
1
f(, )J
e
dd =
2

i=1
2

j=1
f(
i
,
j
)Jw
i
w
j
, (3.54)
50
where
i
,
j
are the Gauss point coordinates and w
i
w
j
the Gauss weights . The surface
jacobian J is dened 
J =

EGF
2
, (3.55)
in which
E =
x

, F =
x

, G =
x

.
The unit normal to the surface of the element e is
n =
1
J
_
x

_
.
3.5.1 Nonlinear iterative algorithm
Solving equation (3.49) implies calculation of the tangent stiness matrix K
T
at every it-
eration, method called full Newton-Raphson. This is very expensive in the nite element
analysis and therefore a modied procedure is usually used. One way is to use the tangent
matrix from the rst time step. This method is called the initial stress method and it usually
leads to more iterations as the solution advances in time. The program NIKE3D uses a
combination between these two methods called modied Newton-Raphson or quasi Newton.
In this case the tangent stiness matrix is formed at the beginning of the time step and it
is kept constant during the equilibrium iterations . In NIKE3D the iterative algorithm
involves two steps
Line searches.
Stiness update.
In the line search algorithm initially the displacements are updated with
t+t
U =
t
U+ s
k
u
k
,
where s
k
is a parameter between 0 and 1 that is determined iteratively by a line search
procedure . Equilibrium iterations are performed by solving (3.49) for u
k
. Convergence is
51
checked by using a displacement and the energy norm .
||u
k
||
u
max

d
,
(u
k
)
T
t+t
Q
k
(u
0
)
T
t+t
Q
0

e
,
t+t
Q =
t+t
F
ext
F
int
(
t
U),
where
d
and
e
are the tolerance for the displacement and energy norm respectively. Diver-
gence is determined by a comparison of residual norms

t+t
Q
0
<
t+t
Q
k
.
If convergence is not attained and the solution is not divergent, the displacements are updated
by
t+t
U
k
+ 1 =
t+t
U
k
+ s
k
u
k
,
and the iterations continue. When the solution diverges or convergence is not achieved after a
number of iterations, the tangent stiness matrix K
T
is reformed using the current estimated
geometry and the equilibrium iterations continue. The value of s
k
is found by iteration such
that 
(U
k
)
T t+t
Q
k
0, U
k
=
t+t
U
k

t+t
U
k1
.
To update the stiness matrix in NIKE3D four methods are implemented:
Broydens rst method
Davidon
Davidon-Fletcher-Powell
Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shano (BFGS).
According to  these methods involving a line search are slightly more expensive in the
computation but lead to a more stable program. Details of these methods can be followed in
. For our purpose we have used the BFGS method. In the NIKE3D program, the BFGS
method follows the implementation proposed by Matthies and Strang . Based on their
algorithm, the inverse tangent stiness matrix is updated by
(K
k
T
)
1
=
_
I +w
k
(v
k
)
T
_
(K
k1
T
)
1
_
I +v
k
(w
k
)
T
_
,
52
where v
k
and w
k
are vectors dened as follows

k
= U
k1
,
k
=
t+t
Q
k1

t+t
Q
k
,
v
k
=
t+t
Q
k

t+t
Q
k1
_
_
1 +
_
(U
k
)
T

k
(
k
)
T t+t
Q
k1
_
1/2
_
_
, w
k
=
1
(
k
)
T

k
.
One of the advantages of using this algorithm is that the determinant of K
T
and therefore the
change in the condition number of K
T
can be easily computed in order to control the updates,
especially in the situations when K
T
becomes nearly singular and the condition number
very large . All the methods mentioned before for solving the nonlinear equations are
in fact algorithms for minimization for convex problems . In our situation the potential
deformation energy is the function which needs to be minimized in order to nd the solution.
As long as the potential deformation energy remains strictly convex, i.e. a positive denite
function, all those methods will converge. The methods will fail when the energy is no
longer a convex function. In this case, a dierent approach is needed and the problem is
still open -. For example, a particular case is the situation when the energy becomes
semipositive denite, that is the buckling situation. However, for this particular case there
are some algorithms that permit us to pass over this limit point, but only for some structures
that can exibit either a snap-through or a snap-back phenomenon.
3.5.2 Arc-length method
When the load applied to a structure reaches a limit value, i.e. the point in the load/displacement
space is in the neighbor of a limit or bifurcation point , as in Figure 3.2, the previous
procedures fail to converge. In this case a special algorithm needs to be used in order to pass
through that point. The theoretical basis for such algorithms was given by Riks in . The
approach described by Riks is theoretical rather than a practical one, and therefore, several
authors have proposed practical algorithms based on Riks approach, for the nite element
equations in the vicinity of a limit point: Chrieseld , Ramm , Schweizerhof ,
Riks-Wepmner . These algorithms are known as constant arc length algorithms. The
53
Figure 3.2: Limit point a). Bifurcation point b).
program NIKE3D uses the algorithm proposed by Riks-Wepmner . Following ,
the incremental equilibrium equations (3.49) can be written as
K
T
u = F
ext
F
int
,
where is called the load factor parameter which has to be determined. This is done by
u
T
u +
2
= s
2
= const,
which represents the length of the arc in the load-displacement space. The load level is then
split into three parts
=
m
+
i
+ ,
where
m
i
represents the
load level in the iteration i and
i
the change in the load level in iteration i, which is
determined through an iterative process. The increment in displacement is calculated
u =
i
u
I
+u
II
, u
I
= K
1
T
F
ext
, u
II
= K
1
T
_
(
m

i
)F
ext
F
int
_
, (3.56)
54
where u
I
represents the displacement due to the constraining condition and u
II
represents
the usual displacement increment. The linearization of the constraint equation yields
f(u, ) = u
T
u +
2
s
2
= 0,
f
u
u +
f

+ f(u, ) = 0,

T
u + + f = 0, =
f
u
, =
f

,
and substituting (3.56) the following is obtained
=
f +
T
u
II
+
T
u
I
.
Details of the calculations can be followed in .
3.6 Gateaux derivatives
The concept of Gateaux derivative used in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 was used in conjunction
to the idea that the deformation of a body can be regarded as a map between the reference
(undeformed) and present (deformed) conguration of the body. Hence the denition of
deformation gradient in section 2.1 requires the use of derivative of a map. This concept,
which is the extension of the derivative of a function at a point, is dened by the Frechet
derivative of a map. Hence if f is a map
f : X Y
where X and Y are Banach spaces then f is dierentiable or Frechet derivable at a point x
0
if there is a bounded linear map Df(x
0
) such that for each > 0 there is a > 0 such that
u
X
< implies 
f(x + x
0
) f(x
0
) Df(x
0
) u
Y
u
X
(3.57)
55
where
X
,
Y
denes a norm on X, Y respectively. The equation (3.57) determines
uniquely Df(x
0
). If f and g are two maps then the derivative Frechet of the composite g f
is dened by the chain rule 
D[(g f)(x)] = Dg[f(x)] (Df(x) u) (3.58)
The directional derivative of a map f in the direction u is dened as 
Df(x) u = D
u
f(x) u =
d
d
[f(x + u)]
=0
(3.59)
If (3.59) exists for all directions u then f is called Gateaux dierentiable at x . The
linearization of f at x
0
is given by relation
L
x
0
f(x) = f(x
0
) + Df(x) (x x
0
)
To calculate the Gateaux derivatives used in this thesis we have used the formula (3.59) and
the relation (3.58). For example to calculate D

F we proceed as below
D

F =
d
d
F( + )

=0
=
d
d
_
( + )
X
_
=0
=
= D( ) = [ ] F, ()
ij
=

i
x
j
.
For simplicity of notation we have omitted the composition with or in some cases with the
inverse transformation
1
. We present below some Gateaux derivatives used in this thesis.
1.
D

F = F.
2.
D

J = J div , div =

i
x
i
56
3.
D

F =
1/3
_

1
3
_
J
1/3
1
J
D

J +
1/3
J
1/3
D

F =
= dev ()F, dev () =
1
3
div 1
4.
D

C = D

F
T
F +F
T
D

F =
= F
T
dev
_
()
T
_
F +F
T
dev [] F = 2F
T

s
F
5.
D

W =
W
C
D

C = 2F
T
W
C
F
s

6.
7.
D
u
J u = Jdiv u
8.
D
u
C
1
u =
C
1
C
D
u
C u = C
1
C
1
2F
T

s
F = F
1
2I
_
F
T
_
1
:
s

9.
D
u
S u = P (D
u
J u) C
1
+ PJ
_
D
u
C
1
u
_
+ 2

2

W
CC
_
D
u
C u
_
=
= JF
1
P (1 1)
_
F
T
_
1
:
s
F
1
2I
_
F
T
_
1
:
s
+F
T
CF :
s
=
= JF
1
[P (1 1 2I)]
_
F
T
_
1
:
s
+F
T
CF :
s