Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
20
. - . . :
0
0
75 90
15 30 45 60
Slope angle ( 0 )
Fig. 2 Slope height slope angle data for the
Kawakawa Bay slopes .
envelopes, Fig. 1. The Hoek and Bray ch~rts
are based on the assumption of a tenSIOn
crack exists behind the crest of the slope. It
could be argued that it would be more
consistent with the philosophy spelt out above
if tension cracks were ignored, as ~he
mobilised strength required without te~SlOn
cracks is less than with them. Compansons
given by Baikie show that tension cracks have
little effect on the results for low angle slopes
but there is a significant difference in the tWO
resistance envelopes for steep slopes.
3.3 The mobilised strength curve
As an example of the application of Baikie's
resistance envelopes the observed height-angle
data for slopes in greywacke at Kawakaw
a
Bay near Auckland, have been analysed. The
, .. . ple
height-angle data, obtained USIn~ sirn d
surveying techniques by Free (1987), ISploU
e
in Fig. 2. The resistance envelopes for four
slope angles, 30
0
, 45
0
, 60
0
and 75
0
, have .b.e:~
replotted from Fig. 1 and the mobilis
outer
strength curve has been drawn as an
envelope to the four resistance envelopes. (FO~
the calculations the unit weight of the roc
mass was assumed to be 25kN/m
3
).
At this stage a small point of terminology
866
0. 4
75
60'
45'
30'
o
1.00
Un (MPa) 0. 4
mobilised strength
0.5 1.0 1.5
o, (MPa)
Fig. 3 Mobilised strength curve for the
Kawakawa Bay slopes.
deserves clarification. As originally formulated
by Casagrande the resistance envelope refers
to one particular slope geometry and gives us
the stress combinations in the slope that are
required to satisfy equilibrium. The advantage
of working with different slope geometries is
apparent in Fig. 3 as the steep slopes give
greater mobilised shear stresses at low normal
stresses whilst the resistance envelopes from
the flatter slopes extend the mobilised strength
data over a wider range of normal stresses. As
each resistance envelope lies beneath the
failure envelope, the envelope of the separate
r~sistance envelopes, such as that drawn in
FIg. 3, gives a better bound on the failure
envelope for the material in the rock slopes.
Herein the term resistance envelope is
cOnfined to information derived from a single
Slope geometry and the term mobilised
strength curve is used when information is
g~ined from the back analysis of slopes with
dIfferent geometries. Extrapolating from the
separate resistance envelopes to the mobilised
strength curve involves the assumption that the
rack mass conditions for each slope are similar
and that no special geological condition is the
explanation for a particular slope geometry.
The resistance envelopes plotted by Baikie
are particularly convenient. It is also possible
to work directly from the Hoek and Bray, or
any other stability charts, to achieve an
equivalent back analysis.
4 EXAMPLES
The process outlined above has been applied
to slopes in jointed greywacke at several
locations in the North Island of NZ. The
extremes of the resulting mobilised strength
curves are plotted in Fig. 4. More details are
given by Pender (1990).
Greywacke is the basement rock for much of
the North Island of New Zealand. In the
unweathered state the intact rock would be
classified, following Hoek et al (1992), as
strong. The close jointing is a consequence of
a complex history of faulting as part of the
boundary between the Pacific and Australia-
India plates passes through the country.
From Figs. 3 and 4 it is apparent that the
mobilised strength curves are not linear c,
relations. This could in part be a consequence
of the back analysis process but it also thought
that the existence of a curved failure envelope
is characteristic of a closely jointed rock mass.
5 CURVED FAILURE ENVELOPE FOR A
CLOSELY J OINTED ROCK MASS
A consensus has gradually emerged among the
rock mechanics community that the failure
envelope for a closely jointed rock mass is
curved rather than linear.
At low normal stresses the apparent friction
angle is large and the apparent cohesion is
small. At high normal stresses the apparent
friction angle is smaller and the apparent
cohesion larger. The above back analyses of
greywacke slopes lend support to this idea
although the mobilised strength curves do not
necessarily have the same form as the failure
envelope for the material. The idea of a
nonlinear failure envelope is further justified
after reviewing strength tests on rough joint
surfaces, Barton (1973); on materials such as
granulated marble, Rosengren and J aeger
(1969) and Gerogiannopoulos and Brown
(1978), that are thought to model closely
867
1. 0
0.5 1.0
an (MPa)
Fig. 4 Range of the mobilised strength curves
for the greywacke slopes analysed.
jointed media; and on assemblages of carefully
fitted blocks, Brown (1970).
Hoek et al (1992) propose a modification to
the Hoek-Brown failure criterion that gives a
curved failure envelope and caters for closely
jointed rock masses by requiring a zero
cohesion intercept. This new criterion has the
form:
where: a
c
is the unconfined compressive
strength of the intact rock, a and mb are
parameters describing the intensity of the
jointing and the condition of the rock mass.
Following the classification given by Hoek et al
(1992) the surface condition of the. of the
joints in the greywacke mass would typically be
in good category, and the structure would be
blocky/seamy. Taking an unconfined
compressive strength of 50 MPa, a =0.5 a~d
mb =1.2 gives the failur.e envelope plott~? in
Fig. 5. To match approximately the mobilised
strength envelope values of the three
parameters which are quite unrealistic have to
be used. Thus we conclude that the closely
jointed rock masses, for which the mobilised
strength curves are given in Fig. 4, have a
reasonable factor of safety, assuming, of
course, the applicability of the modified Hoek-
Brown failure criterion to the closely jointed
greywacke rock masses in New Zealand.
1. 5
1.0
" 2
p...
;g
l-'
0.5
1.5
modified Hoek
and Brown:
0', = 50 MPa,
a =0.5, m, =1.2
mobilised strength curve
for Wellington greywacke
o
o 0.5 1.0
an (MPa)
1. 5
Fig. 5 Comparison between the mobilised
strength curve for the closely jointed
greywacke rock masses in Wellington and ~he
failure envelope derived with the modified
Hoek-Brown criterion.
6 EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS
An additional effect that could have been
considered in the above analysis of the
Wellington slopes is the affect of earthquake.s.
All the slopes for which data are plotted rn
Fig. 4 will have been subjected to nu~erous
earthquakes. The inclusion of a honzontal
acceleration to represent an earthquake would
improve the apparent strength 'para~eter~
derived, in the same way as the mclu~J On 0d
water improves the strength. The analysis use
above is easily adapted to handle this case.
Instead of finding the strength parameters t~at
give the required slope height-angle relatlo~
under static conditions, i.e. zero honzon
ta
acceleration, the strength parameters ar~
estimated for some non zero value of th,
horizontal acceleration. The omission of thIS
consideration is further confirmation that the
mobilised strength curves in Fig. 4 are lower
bounds on the actual failure envelopes.
The requirement for satisfactory earthquake
behaviour is another reason for prefe~r~ng ~
curved failure envelope for a closely J omte
rock mass. This is a consequence of the stress
. an
changes that occur in a slope during
earthquake. The application of a honzonwl
868
t
curved failure envelope for a
closely jointed rock mass
c, cl> extrapolation of the ~
cu~,ure enve,:/
~---'l
./' stress path during an earthquake
initial average stress on a
failure surface
Fig. 6 Earthquake loading and the effect of
a curved failure envelope.
acceleration to a slope reduces the normal
stress on potential failure surfaces. A c,
envelope, which models the curved failure
envelope at high normal stresses, will tend to
overestimate the strength available during an
earthquake. This is illustrated in Fig. 6. In a
different context, Hoek (1983) makes a similar
point about the need to be aware of the
Consequences of failure envelope curvature.
A further aspect of earthquake behaviour
relates to allowable deformations in such an
event. Newmark (1965) and Sarma (1975 &
1979) have treated the earthquake response of
earth dams and slopes on the basis that failure
for a short period, during which limited
deformation occurs, is acceptable. In the case
of a closely jointed rock mass this is not so
clear. Any deformation during a failure
excursion will lead to loosening of the rock
mass with a consequent loss in the available
~trength, much of which is derived from the
Interlocking of the closely jointed blocks of
rock. This concept is illustrated in Fig. 7.
7 CONCLUSIONS
The difficulty of estimating the shear strength
of a closely jointed rock mass has be~n
explained. A procedure for the back analysis
of existing slopes is put forward as a means of
estimating the mobilised strength required to
failure envelope for a
closely jointed tightly
t interlocked rock mass
failure envelope for a
loosened rock mass
.-
an
Fig. 7 Change in the failure envelope for a
closely jointed rock mass during loosening.
explain existing states of stability. If the slopes
are assumed to be dry and prior earthquake
performance is not considered, then the back
analysis will yield a lower bound to the actual
failure envelope.
A nonlinear mobilised strength curve was
found to give better modelling of the observed
relation between the slope height and angle
than a linear c, envelope. However the
modified Hoek-Brown failure criterion, when
used with what seem appropriate parameters
from the classification in Hoek et al (1992),
gives strengths greater than those from the
mobilised strength curves.
The mobilised shear strength envelope
derived for closely jointed greywacke confirms
that the material has a high apparent friction
angle at low normal stresses. If used for design
of different slope configurations this envelope
provides a means of arriving at man-made
slopes which have factors of safety as good, or
as poor, as those of the natural slopes. The
major limitation of the method is the unknown
conservatism incorporated as the back analysis
process provides no information about the
actual failure envelope for the rock mass
under consideration.
8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The assistance, with field work costs, of the
Structures Committee of the of the Road
Research Unit of the former New Zealand
National Roads Board is gratefully
acknowledged.
869
9 REFERENCES
Baikie, L. D. (1988) Casagrande resistane
envelopes for rock and rockfiII slopes havinj
circular slipsurfaces. Canadian Geotechnica
J ournal, Vol. 25, pp. 42-49.
Barton, N (1973) Review of a new shea:
strength criterion for rock joints
Engineering Geology Vol. 7, pp. 287-332.
Bandis, S., Lumsden, x. c. & Barton, N. (1981:
Experimental studies of scale effects on the
shear behaviour of rock joints. Int. J ill. Rock
Mech. & Min. Sci., Vol. 18, pp. 1-21.
Bieniawski, Z.T. and Van Heerden, W.L.
(1975) The significance of in-situ tests on
large rock specimens. Int. J ill. Rock Mech.
& Min. ScL, Vol. 12, pp. 101-113.
Brown, E.T. (1970) Strength of models of rock
withintermittent joints. Proc. ASCE, J ill. Soil
Mech. & Found. Div., Vol. 96, pp.
1935-1949.
Casagrande, A (1950) Notes on the design of
earth dams. J our. Boston Society of Civil
Engineers. Vol. 37, pp. 405-429.
Free, M. W. (1987) Back analysis of closely
fractured greywacke sandstone and argillite
rock slopes, MSc thesis, Geology
Department University of Auckland.
Gerogiannopoulos, N.G. and Brown, E.T.
(1978) The critical state concept applied to
rock. Int. J ill. Rock Mech. and Min. Sci.,
Vol. 15, pp. 1-10.
Hoek, E and Bray, J .W. (1981) Rock slope
engineering, 3rd. edition, Inst. Min. and
Metallurgy, London.
Hoek, E., Wood, D. and Shah, S. (1992) A
modified Hoek-Brown criterion for jointed
rock masses, Proc. Eurock'92, Thomas
Telford, pp. 209-213.
Hoek, E (1983) Strength of jointed rock
masses. Geotechnique, Vol. 33, pp. 187-223.
J anbu, N. (1977) Slopes and excavations in
normally and lightly overconsolidated clays.
State-of-the-Art Report, Proc. 9th. ICSMFE,
Tokyo, Vol. 2, pp. 549-566.
Newmark, N.M. (1965) Effects of earthquakes
on dams and embankments. Geotechnique,
Vol. 15, pp. 139-160.
Pender, M. J . (1990) Stability of slopes in
closely jointed rock masses. NZ Road
Research Unit Bridge Design and Research
Seminar, RRU Bulletin 84.
Pratt, H.R., Black, AD. & Brace, W.F. (1974)
Friction and deformation of jointed quartz
diorite. Proc. 3rd. Congress ISRM, Denver,
Vol. IIA, pp. 306-310.
Rosengren, KJ . and J aeger, J .e. (1968) The
mechanical properties of an interlocked low
porosity aggregate. Geotechnique, Vol. 18,
pp. 317-326.
Salt, G. (1986) Application of the resistance
envelope procedure to the determination of
field mobilised shear strength. Proc-
Australian Geomechanics Society Specialty
Geomechanics Symposium, Adelaide, pp.
134-138.
Sarma, S.K (1975) Seismic stability of earth
dams and embankments. Geotechnique, Vol.
25, pp. 743-761.
Sarma, S.K (1979) Stability analysis of
embankments and slopes. Proc. ASCE J ill.
Geotech. Eng. Div., Vol. 105, pp. 1511-1524.
870