THE NEW FEDERALIST

March 29, 1999

Pages 6 -7

American Almanac
It's the British Oligarchy That's the Enemy

'The Shape of Things to Come'

by Nancy Spannaus

Library of Congress

H.G. Wells

Library of Congress

Lord Bertrand Russell

The men of the New Republic will hold that a certain portion of the
population exists only on sufferance . . . and on the understanding that
they do not propagate; and I do not foresee any reason to suppose that
they will hesitate to kill when that sufferance is abused.
H.G. Wells, Anticipations
If a Black Death could spread throughout the world once in every
generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world
too full. . . . The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but
what of it? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness,
especially other people's.
Bertrand Russell, Impact of Science on Society

In 1945, the Satanic evil of Adolf Hitler's Germany was decisively defeated.
In 1989-91, the Soviet empire collapsed without a shot being fired. Yet,
despite the elimination of these evil forces, responsible for the slaughter of
millions, the world today is hurtling toward a condition of immiseration,
wars, and chaos that can only be described as a New Dark Age.
How that is possible, and how to stop it: This is the theme of this article.
But this question cannot be approached with a regurgitation of objective
facts. We have to concentrate on what has happened inside the minds of
populations and leaders, that allow the great promise of these victories over
tyranny to be squandered, up to this moment.
Start by thinking about how certain attitudes of the American population
including yours have changed. Up until the beginning of the 20th
Century, the British were the historic enemy of the United States; today they
are allegedly our best, and often only, ally. Up through the mid-1960s,
Americans were known for their technology-proud, can-do attitude, in which
every challenge was welcomed as an opportunity for improving man's
condition, and was appropriate to be shared with the rest of mankind; today,
we have abandoned the most advanced frontiers of technology, and are
threatening wars against other nations who wish to obtain such technologies
for their own benefit. Throughout this century, Americans have created lifesaving medical technologies that have revolutionized life-expectancy and
quality; yet, today most people are concerned about cutting costs for
"useless eaters" and ending their lives. Through most of this century,
Americans saw war as a last resort, and recoiled from the horrors of mass
destruction, especially aggressive war; today, our political leaders are
openly discussing punitive bombing raids, including the possible use of
nuclear weapons, against nations which pose no threat to the United States.
How did these radical reversals come about?
Unconsciously, that's for sureat least within the U.S. population.
But the truth is that some agency did conceive of bringing about these
fundamental changes in belief. That agency, working through individuals
and institutions, has shaped the mass media, educational institutions and
content, and the culture of politics which have engineered this reversal.
I can almost hear the far, far right yahoos shrieking now: You're right, it's
the communiststhe Russians and the Chinese!

What fools! The agency which has shaped this change is actually responsible for creating the hideous forms of communism which dominated China
under the Cultural Revolution, and the Soviet Union under Stalin. And a
war of "capitalists" versus "communists" only serves their purposes of
reducing the condition and numbers of mankind.
The agency of which I speak is the Satanic core of the British financial
oligarchy, the heirs of Venice, the Roman Empire, and the Babylonians
before them. This grouping of aristocratic families and hangers-on has
dominated the planet economically and culturally over the past century, and
with increasing power since the early 1960s. It is this oligarchy, of whom
Queen Elizabeth's consort, Prince Philip, is the most prominent example,
which has propagated and developed the ideologies of geopolitics, Malthusianism, eugenics, the sexual revolution, and the nuclear balance of terror,
which future historians will say have characterized our century. It is this
oligarchy which must be understood as the enemy of all mankind in every
nation of this planetand from which mankind must be freed.
Introducing H.G. Wells
It is a lackey of this oligarchy, however, on whom we will concentrate: one
Herbert George Wells (1866-1946). Wells, unlike his evil soul-mate Lord
Bertrand Russell, was not part of the British aristocratic set. But this
middle-class novelist's representations of the evil of man were so effective,
that he came to the attention of the British ruling set during the last decade
of the 19th Century. After having written The Time Machine, The Island of
Dr. Moreau, and The War of the Worlds in the 1890s, Wells decided to state
his theoretical foundations in Anticipations of the Reaction of Mechanical
and Scientific Progress Upon Human Life and Thought, a book published in
1901. This led to him being brought into the Fabian Society, and the grouping which was directly responsible for British geopolitical maneuvers over
the decades to come.
In Anticipations, Wells presents a theory of one-world government, called
the "New Republic," which was based on totally anti-republican ideas. We
give a taste of that here:
And the ethical system which will dominate the world-state will be
shaped primarily to favour the procreation of what is fine and efficient
and beautiful in humanitybeautiful and strong bodies, clear and
powerful minds, and a growing body of knowledgeand to check the

procreation of base and servile types, of fear-driven and cowardly

souls, of all that is mean and ugly and bestial in the souls, bodies, and
habits of men, the method that has only one alternative, the method
that must in some cases still be called in to the help of man, is death.
For a multitude of contemptible and silly creatures, fear-driven and
helpless and useless, unhappy or hatefully happy in the midst of
squalid dishonour, feeble, ugly, inefficient, born of unrestrained lusts,
and increasing and multiplying through sheer incontinence and
stupidity, the men of the New Republic will have little pity and less
benevolence.
In other words, Wells was a racist eugenicist, whose concept of a world
government and mass-murder goes way beyond Hitler in its scope. Elsewhere in the same book, he was even more explicit in elaborating the above
idea:
The men of the New Republic will not be squeamish either in facing
or inflicting death. . . .
They will have ideals that will make killing worthwhile. . . . They
will hold that a certain portion of the population exists only on sufferance out of pity and patience, and on the understanding that they do
not propagate; and I do not foresee any reason to suppose that they
will hesitate to kill when that sufferance is abused.
It is clear that Wells totally believed what he wrote in his story The
Croquette Player of 1937: "Man is still what he was. Invincibly bestial,
envious, malicious, greedy. Man, Sir, unmasked and disillusioned, is the
same fearing, snarling, fighting beast he was a hundred thousand years ago."
Certainly, that is an honest description of the British oligarchy. But that
oligarchy was determined to remake all mankind in that image.

EIRNS/Stuart Lewis

EIRNS/Stuart Lewis

His Royal Consort Prince Philip

Albert Gore, Jr.

The more people there are, the more resources they'll consume, the
more pollution they'll create, the more fighting they will do.
We have no option. If it isn't controlled voluntarily, it will be
controlled involuntarily by an increase in disease, starvation and war.'
HRH Prince Philip People, Dec. 21, 1981
No goal is more crucial to healing the global environment than
stabilizing human population. . . . The speed with which the change
has occurred [population growth] has itself been a major cause of
ecological disruption.
Albert Gore, Jr. Earth in the Balance

The Open Conspiracy

In 1928, Wells published a prospectus for a political movement called the
Open Conspiracy. Here we find programmatic basis for the one-world
government which Wells' cothinkers have sought to put into effect ever
since. The program had the following six points:

1. The complete assertion, practical as well as theoretical, of the

provisional nature of existing governments and of our acquiescence in
them;
2. The resolve to minimise by all available means the conflicts of
these governments, their militant use of individuals and property and
their interferences with the establishment of a world economic
system;
3. The determination to replace private local or national ownership of
at least credit, transport, and staple production by a responsible world
directorate serving the common ends of the race;
4. The practical recognition of the necessity for world biological
controls, for example, of population and disease;
5. The support of a minimum standard of individual freedom and
welfare in the world;
6. The supreme duty of subordinating the personal life to the creation
of a world directorate capable of these tasks and to the general advancement of human knowledge, capacity, and power.
This is precisely the kind of genocidal program for elimination of national
sovereignty, culling of the "unfit," and dictatorship that we find being
promoted today by the likes of Malthusians Prince Philip and Al Gore. It
cuts across the "right" and the "left." That was demonstrated immediately
by avowed pacifist Bertrand Russell, who wrote to Wells after he read the
Open Conspiracy, saying, "I do not know of anything with which I agree
more entirely."
Wells described the actual organization of the Open Conspiracy as follows:
[It] will appear first, I believe, as a conscious organization of intelligent and quite possibly in some cases wealthy men, as a movement
having distinct social and political aims, confessedly ignoring most of
the existing apparatus of political control, or using it only as an incidental implement in the attainment of these aims. It will be very
loosely organized in its earlier stages, a mere movement of a number
of people in a certain direction, who will presently discover with a
sort of surprise the common object toward which they are all moving. . . .

A confluent system of Trust-owned business organizations and of Universities and reorganized military and naval services may presently
discover an essential unity of purpose, presently begin thinking a
literature, and behaving like a State . . . a sort of outspoken Secret
Society . . . an informal and open freemasonry. In all sorts of ways
they will be influencing and controlling the apparatus of the ostensible
governments.
In 1936 Wells further elaborated the means by which this Secret Society
could exert control, in a speech before the Royal Institute of International
Affairs:
1 want to suggest that something, a new social organization, a new
institutionwhich for a time I shall call World Encyclopaedia. . . .
This World Encyclopaedia would be the mental background of every
intelligent man in the world. . . . Such an Encyclopaedia would play
the role of an undogmatic Bible to World culture. It would do just
what our scattered and disoriented intellectual organizations of today
fall short of doing. It would hold the world together mentally. . . . It
would compel men to come to terms with one another. . . . It is a super
university I am thinking of, a World Brain; no less. . . . Ultimately, if
our dream is realized, it must exert a very great influence upon everyone who controls administrations, makes wars, directs mass behavior,
feeds, moves, starves and kills population.
In other words, national dictatorscommunist, fascist, or otherhave
nothing on Wells and his cohorts. Wells is elaborating a global oligarchical
scheme of social and mind control, in which the nation-state and intellectual
freedom no longer exist. The only kind of freedom and love which Wells
(and Russell, and their colleagues) ever promoted, was that of sexual lust-as
long as it was combined with birth control, of course.
A New Feudalism
While Wells' vision, as we have elaborated it so far, may appear immoral, so
far it has masqueraded as a high-technology, "scientific" civilization. This,
too, is fraudulent, as the works of his soul-mate Bertie Russell make clear.
Let us quote a number of descriptions by Russell of the society which he and
Wells were seeking to build on behalf of the British oligarchy.
In Prospects of Industrial Civilization, a report on his two trips to China in
the early 1920s, Russell wrote:

Socialism, especially international socialism, is only possible as a

stable system if the population is stationary or nearly so. A slow increase might be coped with by improvements in agricultural methods,
but a rapid increase must in the end reduce the whole population to
penury. . . . The white population of the world will soon cease to
increase. The Asiatic races will be longer, and the negroes still longer,
before their birth rate falls sufficiently to make their numbers stable
without help of war and pestilence. . . . Until that happens, the benefits aimed at by socialism can only be partially realized, and the less
prolific races will have to defend themselves against the more prolific
by methods which are disgusting even if they are necessary.
Indeed, Russell looks forward to the reduction of the world population. He
complains in his book Impact of Science on Society that:
At present the population of the world is increasing at about 58,000
per diem. War, so far, has had no very great effect on this increase,
which continued throughout each of the world wars. . . . War . . . has
hitherto been disappointing in this respect . . . but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could spread
throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could
procreate freely without making the world too full. . . . The state of
affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really highminded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people's.
Russell cites the ideal of his aristocratic friend John Ruskin, under which
"the present urban and industrial centers will have become derelict, and their
inhabitants, if still alive, will have reverted to the peasant hardships of their
medieval ancestors."
The regular reader will be immediately reminded by Russell's sentiments, of
the pronouncements of the likes of Prince Philip and his environmental
lunatic cohorts in groups such as Earth First! in terms of using bacteriological means of reducing population. Philip said he wanted to be reincarnated
as a "deadly virus" to "help" solve the overpopulation problem; Earth First!
praises the AIDS virus for reducing population in Africa, although they
complain it is not working fast enough.
Indeed, they won't have long to wait, given the rate at which the life expectancies and absolute populations of regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa

are declining. There are major regions there already, which can only be
compared to the devastation of the medieval Black Death.

The action starts at Christmastime 1940.

Passworthy: War doesn't stop progress. It stimulates progress. . . . After
all, aren't we exaggerating the horrors of war?
Cabal: If we don't end war, war will end us.

Things to Come
By now, the Satanic evil of Wells, and Russell, should be transparent. The
reader should also have a rather eerie feeling about how much today's
dominant culture reflects the cynical evil of these two oligarchical lackeys.
But there is more, much more. For from the twisted minds of Wells and
Russell came literal scenarios for the kind of nuclear confrontation and
destruction of civilization which looms before us today, as a result of the
Satanic commitment of the British oligarchy and its agents, like the Goreconnected Principals Committee of the United States.
Note that no later than 1913 Wells wrote a book called The World Set Free,
which projected the obliteration of modern life through the use of atomic
bombs in warfare. After describing the terrifying scenes of devastation,

famine, plague, and other miseries resulting from atomic warfare, Wells
concludes:
The catastrophe of the atomic bombs which shook men out of cities
and businesses and economic relations shook them also out of their
old established habits of thought, and out of the lightly held beliefs
and prejudices that came down to them from the past. To borrow a
word from the old-fashioned chemists, men were made nascent; they
were released from old ties; for good or evil they were ready for new
associations.
In effect, a global form of shock treatment.
But Wells also produced a dramatic version of the destruction of civilization
through warfare which anticipated the horrors which we are headed for
todayif this faction of the British oligarchy is not stopped. Out of a long,
unsuccessful book called The Shape of Things to Come, Wells crafted a
movie version called Things to Come, which provides a scenario for not only
the Second World Warwhich he was clearly anticipatingbut also for the
miseries he saw coming for all mankind.
Things to Come was produced in 1936, but it depicts a scene that begins in
1940, in a place called "Everytown." Let's recount the story of this 98minute film.
The action starts at Christmastime 1940, showing the interaction between
two male characters, John Cabal and Piper Passworthy. Cabal is the pessimist, expecting war; Passworthy is happy-go-lucky, insisting that nothing
bad is about to happen. Very soon the war begins, with no apparent purpose,
and the bombing of "Everytown" with poison gas that does its work swiftly
and surely.
From there, the film depicts the war going on, and on, and on. Tanks,
planes, and more poison gassings are shown, with Wagnerian music accompanying the holocaust. We are shown a brief interlude in Everytown
dominated by building ruins, and devastated by lack of medicine and
virtually every other modern amenity where a new pandemic disease has
broken out. It's called "wandering sickness," and there is no cure. Eventually, the population turns to simply shooting and killing those with the disease, in order to prevent it from spreading. The disease is eliminated, after
having wiped out more than half the world's population.

A man with 'wandering sickness'

staggers out into the street.

Rudolf the Victorious (the 'Boss')

announces the end of the 'pestilence,'
after shooting all Wanderers.

Boss: Why don't you shoot them. . . . It's their lives or ours. . . .
Dr. Harding: That's how they dealt with pestilence in the Dark Ages.

We are now in the early 1970s, back in Everytown. The city of ruins is now
ruled by a "Boss," a warlord with a great physical similarity to Benito
Mussolinior is it one of Wells' colleagues in the Coefficients' Club? It
doesn't matter. This "boss" is depicted as adamantly committed to "national
sovereignty," and getting back an air force that can defeat his enemy, the
"hill people." He is trying to force scientists who oppose his regime to get
his last remaining airplane to work, despite the shortage of spare parts and
fuel.
Suddenly, a modern airplane appears in the sky, bearing a white-haired John
Cabal (who had disappeared 30 years before to fight the war overseas),
dressed like a Black Knight. Cabal is promptly arrested by the "Boss,"
despite Cabal's warning that he is simply the harbinger of a force based in
Basra (Iraq) called "Wings of the World," which is determined to wipe out
backward little fiefdoms like that dominated by the Boss. In the ensuing
dialogue, Cabal declares that he represents a "freemasonry" of Science and a
superior international force that will no longer permit the anachronism of

He is arrested, and then confronts the 'Boss.'

John Cabal lands his plane in

Everytown.

Cabal stands over the body of

Rudolf, the Chief (the Boss).

The old engineers and mechanics have pledged ourselves to save the world . . .
the Brotherhood of efficiency, the free masonry of Science. We're the last
trustees of civilization when everything else has failed. . . .
Boss: This is an independent sovereign state. . . .
Cabal: We don't approve of independent sovereign states. . . .
Cabal: Dead and his world dead with him. A new world beginning.

"national sovereignty." (While there are no German accents, the implication

that these are supposed to be the Germans cannot be missed.)
The "Boss" and his way of life are soon wiped out by the appearance of an
air-fleet of Cabal's friends, who drop a "gas of peace" to conquer Everytown.
Wells then takes us to the year 2036, and the grandchildren of our protagonists. Everytown is now a super-modernistic metropolis, looking every bit
like today, with outside elevators, everything aseptic and blinding white,
where huge buildings and machines overpower the citizens. We find the
modern Mr. Cabal as the leader, planning to launch two youth from a spacecannon to the Moon (including his own daughter), and a revolt in process,
led by the "artist" Theotocopulos1. Theotocopulos rails against the relentless
drive of progress and science, and riles up a mob to attempt to dismantle the
space-cannon. He ultimately fails, and the movie ends with Cabal watching
the space-ship hurtling out into space, and asserting that man's drive for
power through science must continue forever, no matter what it means for
individual human life.
Looked at in the light of what Wells himself actually represents, "Things to
Come" is chilling indeed.
It is clear that Wells, like Russell, believes there will have to be a new,
devastating Thirty Years War in order to reduce the world's population, and
create the basis for "pacification" of what they consider "upstart" little
nations. And, as Wells said in The Open Conspiracy, it is the "world directorate," a literal freemasonry, represented in the film by Cabal, which is
destined to control the advanced technologies upon which the progress of
mankind will depend. Wells agrees with Cabal: "national sovereignty" is
going to be wiped off the map.
But, wait a minute: Just what does Wells mean by "progress?"
It's certainly not what the republican current in the history of science, which
proceeds from the standpoint of man having been made in the image of the
Creator, means. Just as Wells' "New Republic" represents a dictatorship, so
Wells' idea of "progress" means just the assertion of power through technological means.

The Great Air Dictator presiding over the World Council at Basra.

The Space Gun.

Theotocopulos, the rebellious artist.

Cabal and Passworthy peer
through the telescope at the
spaceship they have launched.
Theotocopulos: What is the good
of all this Progress? Onward and
onward. We demand a halt. . . .
We will not have human life
sacrificed to experiment. . . .
Make an end to this progress. . .

Passworthy: I feel that what we've done is monstrous.

Cabal: What they've done is magnificent. . . . Is it this or that? All the
universe, or nothingness? Which shall it be?

The Message Delivered

Thus, through this filmas in his other writingsWells is bending the
minds of his audience by redefining the way they think. He wants them to
associate national sovereignty with petty dictators, rather than with the
necessary function of representative government and lifting-up of mankind
through the sovereign nation-state. Since the Second World War, in fact,
Wells' view has been accepted broadly through the industrialized world,
although not by the underdeveloped sector. This is perverse, and evilas
the denial of development to over half of the world's population demonstrates.
Equally evil is Wells' portrayal of science as the inhuman lust for power, and
technology as an oppression of the human spirit. Although Wells does not
show any such use of technology for hurting people in the film, the image of
Theotocopulos mobilizing the masses against the space-shot has the most
eerie similarity to the stirring up of the anti-science mobs which have
stormed nuclear plants and other targets today. True science, of course, is
combined with agap, the love of mankind, both now and in the future, and
has no coherence at all with Wells' bowdlerized presentation.
On to Nuclear War
But, if we want to really understand the mind of the oligarchy which is
currently out to destroy any threat to its power, we have to look at more of
the Wells-Russell story. Because, as indicated by the fact that Wells was
writing in 1913 about the possibility of nuclear war, both Wells and Russell
went to even greater extremes in order to brainwash people against a love of
science and their fellow-man. They went so far as to float the idea of using
limited nuclear war.
Russell was the most brash. He was constantly lying that the pursuit of
scientific and technological progress would lead to disaster for mankind. He
anticipated inevitable world food shortages, an increasing gap between rich
and poor, and then concluded: "Such a situation can hardly fail to lead to
world war. . . . War may become so destructive that, at any rate for a time,
there is no danger of overpopulation; or the scientific nations may be
defeated and anarchy may destroy scientific technique."

From this standpoint, Russell was ecstatic about the dropping of the atomic
bombs by the United States on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He hoped that this
would force the creation of a world government which would maintain a
monopoly over the control of nuclear weapons, because they were so
devastating.
In the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists in October 1946, Russell said: "An
international government, if it is to be able to preserve peace, must have the
only atomic bombs, the only plant for producing them, the only air force, the
only battleships, and its infantry regiments must each severally be composed
of men of many different nations; there must be no possibility of the development of national feeling in any unit larger than a company."
The alternative to such an international governmentRussell was explicit
was a nuclear monopoly by the United States. This was not because he
loved the United States, but because he wanted to destroy the potential for
this technology to be used for the benefit of mankind. Russell called in 1946
for the United States to demand that Russia give up its national sovereignty,
or face a preventive nuclear war. Yes, Russell, in fact, reiterated numerous
times that he thought the U.S. should be prepared to bomb the Russians to
smithereens in the immediate postwar period, so that an "arms race" would
never develop. And what if the Russians did not capitulate? "Of course you
can't threaten unless you're prepared to have your bluff called," Russell told
the BBC in 1959.
The U.S., which Russell considered to be not sufficiently imperialist, did not
take Russell's advice. And by 1954, both the United States and the Soviet
Union had developed the hydrogen bomb. In 1955, Russell established the
Association of Parliamentarians for World Government, and then the series
of Pugwash Conferences, as a way for scientists to meet and discuss these
technological questions.
It was in the context of the Pugwash conferences that the idea of "limited
nuclear war" surfaced. This came from Dr. Leo Szilard, the person on whom
the movie character Dr. Strangelove was based, and a veritable lunatic, who
had been designated personally by Wells as his heir apparent on these
matters. Szilard outlined the nuclear scenario at a Pugwash conference in
the spring of 1958.
Szilard proceeded from the standpoint that "a limited war need not deteriorate into an all-out war." Instead, he proposed a set of agreements between

the two nations for city-for-city nuclear exchanges, including each side
giving the other four weeks to evacuate the targetted city, before it was
struck by nuclear weapons. This was the ultimate "war game," allegedly
contained by treaty contracts, but of course, guaranteed to destroy increasing
amounts of civilization, as it is carried forth.
This outlook of "limited nuclear war" is precisely that which is being carried
forward today in the war scenarios of the heirs of Wells and Russell. Only
this time, the oligarchy's forces believeas in the immediate post-World
War II periodthat they don't have to negotiate with the other side. Instead,
they can simply enforce whatever they want against nations they decide are
enemieslike Iraq, North Korea, China, etc.assuming that the stillnuclear capable Russia will not respond.
Such a scenario is clearly insane.
Technological Apartheid
There is no question but that the British oligarchy hopes to control the
United States, in order to enforce a Wells-like world order. These forces
want to have a monopoly over advanced technologies in the way that Wells'
Open Conspiracy manifesto expressed it: giving them power over who lives
and who dies.
It's not surprising that the oligarchy would have this idea. It goes way back
in the history of empires, and characterized the rule of the British Empire
against the American colonies as well, when the Parliament passed laws
explicitly outlawing the export of manufactures, manufacturing technologies, and even skilled workmen to the American colonies. The idea is to
prevent dependent peoples from increasing in education and numbers, both
of which processes are seen as a direct threat to the continued rule by the
oligarchy.
If you as an American have now turned against the spread of technology for
the benefit of mankind, you have turned directly against your nation's core
beliefs, as well as morality.
With the Wells-Russell cultural assault, this ideology was gradually
inculcated into the population itself. First, the idea was for people to fear
advanced technology, on the basis of their belief that it would be used in a
bestial fashion. This then was followed by the determination to prevent
other peoples from having access to advanced technology, with the

justification that any technology could be used as a weapon against someone

else.
What this ideology has done is to justify cutoffs of life-saving high technologies to developing sector nations, even when it is obvious that they will die
without it.
In 1990, in an interview with Sir Jimmy Goldsmith's French newspaper
L'Express, a top-level French government official, operating under the
pseudonym "Jean Villars" gave this policy a modern name: "technological
apartheid." On Sept. 7, 1990in the buildup to the Gulf War against Iraq
this official declared that while the policy may be "brutal," it should apply
not only to military goods, but to all high-technology goods. In effect, the
underdeveloped sector of the world would be blockaded from getting the
technologies they need.
Such a policy is right in line with the racism of Wells and Russell, who were
determined to prevent too much "proliferation" of the non-white races
something that was more likely to happen if they could have the technology
for clean water, decent hospital care, locally produced pharmaceuticals, and
reliable energy supplies. It also happens to be the documented policy of the
Bush administration, which adopted an Enhanced Proliferation Control list,
and of Vice President Al Gorewhose hatred of technology and population
puts him right in sync with the Wells and Russell policy.
The Best-Laid Plans . . .
The hideous scenarios put forward by the Wells-Russell crowd have, through
the medium of culture itself, been etched into the brains of millions of
Americans. The terror of nuclear technology, the fear of "overpopulation,"
the demand for control of technologies, the countercultural insistence on
personal pleasureall these ideologies deeply infect our leading institutions,
and many of our citizens.
It is to be hoped that many who have absorbed these evil ideas will step back
in shock, and abandon them, once they realize how they've been brainwashed by these evil propagandists for the oligarchy.
But there is another point to be kept in mind, at this juncture, one that should
scare any sane person into rethinking his or her assumptions. The fact is that
a New World Order, or one world government dictatorship, as envisioned by
Wells cannot and will not exist. If the whole economic and financial system

of the British oligarchy is not replaced with an alternate system, along the
lines of the principles of the New Bretton Woods put forward by Lyndon
LaRouche, the world is headed toward chaos.
The oligarchy has declared war on the majority of the human race; how is it
supposed to maintain control? In truth, it cannot, and to a large extent, the
oligarchy today has abandoned the effort to do so.
Take the example of the IMF and the United Nations. Clearly the UN,
which is full of Russellite programs for population control, low-technology
regimes, and other supranational functionsjust as Wells outlinedwas
targetted to be the instrument of the oligarchy in maintaining their control.
But there was a problem with that plan: A number of the largest nations in
the world were unwilling to go along with the plan! For years and years, it
looked as though Third World nations would go along with cutting their own
throats, but as of the fall of 1998, this changed. Russia and China, vetowielding members of the UN Security Council, began to resist the program.
There was little question about what the financial oligarchy would do under
such circumstances, and they are doing it. They are simply out to destroy
any possible alternative to their rule. And they are using their power in the
United States-through brainwashed Republicans and the Gore-led Principals
Committeeto carry out the wars and provocations that will lead to that
destruction.
How ironic, that those bulletheads who scream the loudest about a United
Nations "one-world government," are now perfectly content to carry out the
Russellite program if it's the U.S. that functions as the "one world government." But, an evil idea is an evil idea, no matter who implements it.
Where we are headed is demonstrated by Africa, the most devastated victim
of the British imperial oligarchy, from the period of Wells and Russell, to the
present day. Technology has been withheld, credit has been withheld,
looters have been sent in, and thus countries are collapsing into chaos and
war. In fact, the future will look more like the endless warfare of Wells' 30years war, than the antiseptic metropolis of the scientific elite.
If the heirs of Wellsin Britain, the Commonwealth, and the United States
are not stopped, the world's future will be that of Africa. These maniacs
do have the power to bomb and destroy, as long as the population permits
them to do so. And destruction is what they aspire to achieve.

We have a process of nearly 100 years of brainwashing to overturn in the

United States and Western Europea process that has given us a generation
of inept Baby Boomer leaders obsessed with pursuit of immediate pleasure,
and a disintegrating economic base. We have gone from a situation where a
Wells provides our popular entertainment, to one in which an Al Gore and
his Principals Committee, who determine the Clinton administration's
military and foreign policy, are effectively implementing Wellsian policies in
the U.S. capital. This is the situation that must be stoppedand only the
American population, mobilized politically, can stop it. It is an aroused
American citizenry that must determine the shape of things to come.
Notes
1. Theotocopulos is described as a descendant of the Greek painter
Domemicos Theotocopoulos, known as El Greco (1541-1614), whose
paintings were strongly influenced by Byzantine and Venetian art.
This article was drawn heavily from the work of EIR researchers Scott
Thompson and Michael Minnicino, which was printed in EIR magazine, vol.
24, no. 51; and The New Dark Ages Conspiracy, a book by Carol White,
published in 1980 by New Benjamin Franklin House.