Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
"We are now increasingly receiving from Pakistan unacceptable news of [terrorism and
extremism] which we cannot regard as political practice and, with the international
community,aredeterminedtofightveryfirmly."
BernardKouchner,ForgienMinisterofFrance
Throughout the last 60 years, France and Pakistan have had a dynamic relationship.
This historic partnership has spanned diplomacy, defense cooperation, education, medicine,
biodiversity, and economics (FrancePakistan). Furthermore, this association can now
move forward thanks to recent changes in the Pakistani government. The recent general
electioninPakistanisapositivesign;Franceisoptimisticandhopestoworkwithalegitimate
and fullfunctioning government (Declaration). Following the elections France stated,
[these elections] constituted a crucial step in strengthening democracy and calming the
internalsituationthisgreatcountryisavitalpartnerintheregionsstabilityandinresolving
theconflictsthatbesetit,[namely]theriseofterrorism(Legislative).Franceiscommitted
tooperatingwithintheneedsandcapacitiesofPresidentZardarisnewadministration.
Despite these many advancements, France, as a nation and as the host nation of the
PresidencyoftheEuropeanUnion,stillhasmanyseriousconcernsregardingtheviolenceand
terrorism that remains prevalent throughout Pakistan, especially along the northwest border.
TheUnitedNationshasrecognizedthatatleast15%ofindividualsassociatedwiththeTaliban
areintheborderregionofWaziristan(List).ItisvitaltothesecurityofFrance,Europeand
allcountriestocombatthegrowingthreatofterrorismfromwithinthePakistaniregion.The
French people understand the severity of the threat firsthand. According to the 2008 EU
Terrorism Situation and Trend Report, 91, or about 25%, of French terrorist arrestsdealt with
radicalIslamicterroristplots(Ratzel).Thereportnoted,overthelastfiveyears,muchofthe
command, control and inspiration for planning attacks came from alQaedas remaining core
leadershipinthetribalareasofPakistan(Ratzel).
Bearing this in mind, France implores the international community to support the
ongoing Pakistani policy adjustment that will restrict the autonomy of the Waziristan region.
WhileFrancerecognizesthepreviousproductivityofthispoliticalautonomy,thearrivalofthe
Taliban and other extremists in the area has forced the hand of former President Musharraf,
currentPresidentZardariandtheinternationalcommunityatlargetotakeaction(Khan).One
ofthegoalsthatFrancehassetintheSecurityCouncilistodefinewhenautonomyinaregionis
no longer acceptable and what course of action the country, as well as the UN, can pursue to
combat this problem. France respects Pakistans stance on the situation in Waziristan and
believesthatPakistanhasthemostauthorityontheneedsandrealitiesofthearea.
France is firmly dedicated to the ideal of national sovereignty and therefore firmly
supportstheactionsofthegovernmentofPakistan.Ayearago,thegovernmentbegantaking
newactionsintheWaziristanArea,movingPakistanitroopsin andaroundtheregion(Khan).
MilitaryeffortmaybenecessarytobringthiscrisistoafirmresolutionandPakistanshouldbe
theprimarycoordinatorofsuchforce.InBajaur,aFederallyAdministeredTribalArea(FATA,)
to the north of Waziristan, one thousand militants were killed through Pakistani efforts in
August(AP).ItisFranceshopethatsuchresultscouldbereplicatedwithinWaziristan.
Ifinternationalmilitaryforcedoesbecomenecessary,theSecurityCouncilandPakistan
must ensure that clear stipulations are in place regarding the use of force. Any military
engagementtakenmustbeaclear,multilateralactionthatfullyrespectsthewishesofPakistan.
Without clear direction from the Security Council, actions within Pakistan by NATO forces
would be a violation of the NATOs current efforts in Afghanistan. Rather, the International
Security Assistance Force (ISAF), under the leadership of NATO, should focus on the
counterinsurgency efforts in Afghanistan (Reuters). The defense ministers of NATO have
agreedthatISAFtroopsmustbegincombatingthedangerousopiumtradewithinAfghanistan.
Engaging in a new war in Pakistan will only compromise the success of current operations in
Afghanistan(NATOjoins).
Regrettably,militaryactionaloneignoresmanyaspectsoftheproblem.WhilePakistan
has taken many steps forward in combating Talibanization, additional support from other
countries is still needed. There are many diverse issues that Pakistan must confront when
lookingatthesituationintheFATAs.FrancehasplayedanimportantroleinhelpingPakistan
fight these dangerous problems through the provision of higher education. Nearly 500
Pakistani students are enrolled in advanced degree programs in Paris and the French
government funds several schools for higher education within Pakistan. Pakistani health
servicesreceivemajorsupportandguidancefromFrance.In1991FrancefoundedthePakistan
FranceBusinessAlliancetopromoteeconomictradeandassociationbetweenthetwonations
(FrancePakistan).
These efforts at bringing stability and safety to Pakistan must be supported by both
individual countries and the United Nations as a whole. Despite the international financial
crisis, France has weathered the economic downturn steadily, thus maintaining the ability to
help fund important programs involving agriculture, medicine and education in Pakistan
(Foroohar). It is along these lines that the battle for the hearts of the people will be fought.
Promoting peace will inevitably come at a cost to both the international community and
Pakistan. By emphasizing humanitarian and education needs, that price will be paid with
moneyinsteadofwithlives.
France recognizes that any solution must be flexible enough to change depending on
shifting circumstances. Internal military policies must be combined with international
economic support. Intelligence sharing will be critical as a means to combat many forms of
terrorism, including suicide bombers. If Pakistan is unwilling or unable to contain the
dangerous extremists located within Waziristan, the international community must recognize
thepossibilityofenteringPakistantoprotecttheglobalcommunityfromterrorism.Thismust
occur only under circumstances of multilateral commitment and direction from the Security
Council.
Inconclusion,Francerecognizesthatthisissuecannotbeeasilysolved,butthestability
of this region is an integral component of international security. French President Sarkozy,
Foreign Minister Kouchner and former Defense Minister Michele AlliotMarie have all
commented on the need to resolve this situation before it spreads beyond Afghanistan and
Pakistan. With these dire consequences in mind, France resolves to collaborate with Pakistan
and the international community to confront the rising threat of terrorism in Waziristan and
abroad.
WorksCited
Associated Press (AP). "U.S. praises Pakistan action against militants." MSNBC.com. 20 Oct.
2008.20Oct.2008.<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27287098>.
"DeclarationbythePresidencyontheconductofthegeneralelectioninPakistan."Embassyof
France in Pakistan. 22 Feb. 2008. Presidency of the European Union. 10 Oct. 2008.
<http://www.ambafrapk.org/article.php3?id_article=1326>.
Foroohar, Rana. "A New Age of Global Capitalism Starts Now." 4 Oct. 2008. 11 Oct. 2008.
<http://www.newsweek.com/id/162299>.
"FrancePakistan:60yearsoffriendship."14July2007.TheEmbassyofFranceinPakistan.10
Oct.2008.
<http://www.ambafrapk.org/article.php3?id_article=1212>.
"Legislative Elections in Pakistan." French Ministry of European and Foreign Affairs. 20 Feb.
2008.FranceDiplomatie.20Oct.2008.
<http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/countryfiles_156/pakistan_504/franceand
pakistan_5709/politicalrelations_5981.html>.
"List of individuals belonging to or associated with the Taliban." 17 Oct. 2007. United Nations
SecurityCouncil.10Oct.2008
<http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1267/consoltablelist.shtml>.
Khan,Ismail."PlanreadytocurbmilitancyinFata,settledareas."Dawn:TheInternetEdition.
26June2007.DawnMediaGroup.10Oct.2008
<http://www.dawn.com/2007/06/26/top4.htm>.
"NATOjoins'waronAfghandrugtest'"Dawn:TheInternetEdition.11Oct.2008.DawnMedia
Group.11Oct.2008<http://www.dawn.com/2008/10/11/top8.htm>.
Ratzel, MaxPeter, Director of Europol. EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report. Rep.No. 3.
Europol. 2008th ed. The Hague, Netherlands: European Police Office, 2008. 20+.
<http://www.europol.europa.eu/publications/EU_Terrorism_Situation_and_Trend_Rep
ort_TESAT/TESAT2008.pdf>
Reuters, comp. "France Will Bolster NATO Troops in Afghanistan." The New York Times. 19
Dec.2005.NYTimes.com.11Oct.2008
<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/19/international/asia/19france.html>.
Building Skills
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 5.1
Building Skills
Delegates must acquire the skills necessary to participate successfully in a Model UN
committee. These skills allow the delegates to translate national policy and desired goals
into concrete measures and actions. Participation skills include:
Ability to role play
Using the Rules of Procedure correctly
Effective Communication & Public speaking;
Negotiating and consensus building
Making use of formal and informal debate
Diplomacy between delegates from blocs and throughout the committee.
Formulating written documents
Defining Effectiveness in Committee
The objective of every delegate is to be effective in committee. Being effective means
forwarding the goals and interests of ones country to arrive at a realistic response or
solution to the committees topic of debate. To do this, a delegate must be knowledgeable
about his or her own country, the topic areas, and the proceedings of the United Nations.
In addition, a delegate must also be able to work well with others. Delegates cannot be
effective in committee if they alienate other participants by mistaking assertiveness for
condescending behavior and/or rude treatment of fellow delegates. The experienced
delegate chooses to further his or her aims through perceptive and tactful diplomacy. This
ability to communicate effectively and diplomatically with others to resolve difficulties is a
key skill and one that can be taught, practiced and developed to make your committee
experience even more rewarding.
Working well with others often means cutting through the national policies to finding
creative solutions to problems that meet the interests of all nations. Herein is the root of
true negotiation finding consensus policy solutions that do not alienate the national
interests of any members of the committee. Delegates should always keep in mind their
countrys best alternative to a negotiated agreement. In the context of a Model UN
committee session, a delegate should consider whether the proposed resolutions address
the situation in a way that is better than the UN not addressing the issue at all.
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 5.2
Role Playing
Delegates are expected to effectively act as representatives of their assigned countries
throughout the duration of the conference. This must be demonstrated both in the
delegates conduct as UN officials and by the delegates aptitude in representing the
interests of their countries. Delegates will frequently be challenged to think on their feet
and should therefore be well-versed in their national positions and in the reasons behind
those positions.
Delegates must also be able to distinguish between their national policies and their
fundamental national interests. A national policy is the stance a country takes on an issue
and the positions a delegate presents when negotiating with other delegates. A national
interest is what a country deems vital to its existence. To illustrate this difference one need
only consider the United States relationship with the Philippines. The US supported both
the Marcos regime and its usurper, the Aquino government. This course of action by the US
was largely due to the fact that the US benefits strategically by having a military base on
Philippine soil. Thus, the policy of the United States changed from supporting Marcos to
Aquino but its strategic interests remained the same.
A national position can be compromised for the sake of a greater good, especially if it
achieves long-range interests or if it can be translated into direct benefits for the nation. A
national interest cannot be compromised. Delegates should not blindly or uncritically
follow the stated positions of their country. Rather, they should identify the reasons
behind those positions and extrapolate on the national interest of their country. To learn
more about negotiating generally, and the difference between policies and interests,
delegates may review a classic text in the field of negotiation called Getting to Yes:
Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In by Roger Fisher and William Ury.
By recognizing the difference between a national position and a national interest, delegates
will be freer to actively participate in the negotiating process while accurately representing
their country. Delegates can be creative in their approaches to problem-solving and can
thus get more out of their Model UN experience.
Rules of Procedure
The committees at each Model UN conference work within the rules of procedure
formulated by the conference staff. Effective use of the rules is essential to a smooth-
running, effective and functional committee. IMUNA conference Rules and Procedures are
covered in Chapter 6, and these tend to be similar in most conferences or at least have a
great deal of overlap with standard Parliamentary Rules of Procedure. (Also see Appendix
?? for a full list of these Rules).
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 5.3
Effective Communication & Public Speaking
Verbal communication is fundamental for the delegate. The delegate must be able to
verbalize ideas and support arguments clearly and concisely to a single person as well as to
large groups. Delegates should learn to speak from prepared notes as well as
extemporaneously.
The two keys to a successful speech are brevity and relevance. All speeches, whether
stating national polices or extemporaneously reacting to new ideas proposed to the
committee, should be clear and concise. They should address the issue at hand, whether it
is substantive or procedural, and remain germane to the point throughout the entire
speech. Written speeches will help to ensure that delegates do not leave important points
out and it is particularly helpful, and effective, to refer specifically to main points raised by
other delegates that are germane. This demonstrates that you are able to utilize another
very important skill in conflict resolution listening well to others issues and
incorporating them into to your discussion.
WRITING SPEECHES
Although most of the speeches that a delegate gives will be delivered extemporaneously,
there are occasions when formal speeches can be given. These usually occur during general
debate on a specific issue or during opening policy statements. Formal speeches should be
well-written and well-practiced so that their delivery will be as effective as possible. Even
these prepared statements, however, may need to be altered in the course of the general
debate in order to respond to points made by other delegates.
KINDS OF SPEECHES
Policy Speeches: General debate speeches outline the countrys policy on a wide range of
issues. The first speech on a given topic should state national policy on that issue. Such a
speech should include:
Broad introduction to the countrys goals on the specific issue;
Specific positions on various aspects of the issue at hand;
Supporting arguments;
A conclusion summarizing your case.
Extemporaneous Speeches: These spur-of-the-moment speeches are the primary vehicle for
a delegate to communicate his or her ideas about a specific topic. A few minutes of
planning will make the speech much more effective, as a rambling delegate will quickly lose
the attention of the committee. The following tips on different extemporaneous speeches
are helpful:
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 5.4
Substantive Speeches
These speeches deal with issues related to the
topics, and should incorporate the following
suggestions: Make notes on opposing viewpoints
while they are being given and then answer each
point directly; Keep notes on allies speeches,
bringing out points which have been omitted and re-
emphasizing concepts which may still be unclear;
Highlight important sections of the resolutions and
state why they are important; Keep notes so that
you do not omit important points.
DELIVERING SPEECHES
Good speaking skills are necessary in Model UN because both formal and informal meetings
require that the delegates message reach a large audience. Because many delegates have
had practice speaking to small groups, this section focuses on large group speaking skills.
The points made, however, can easily be applied to a small group situation. The following
tips are helpful:
Procedural Speeches
These are speeches regarding the pros and cons of a
motion before the committee, and should include
the following suggestions: Speak only to the
procedural matter at hand; Explain your viewpoint
as to what should or should not happen; Be concise
and complete.
Know what to say before saying it; even extemporaneous speakers should have an
idea of the point they want to get across.
Speak loudly and clearly
; take advantage of the microphones that are available in
most committee rooms.
Speak slowly
Practice delivering your policy points in an active and engaging manner. Other
delegates will not pay attention to a speech delivered in a monotone manner;
; allow the words to sink in. Do not, however, fill the spaces between
words with monosyllables like um and like.
A delegate should also add some illuminating facts about his or her country in the
speech. This will make it more interesting and delegates will likely pay closer
attention.
Negotiation and Consensus-Building
Delegates must develop negotiating skills so that they may attain their countrys aims,
whatever they may be. This includes adopting a strategy and using the proper tactics to
accomplish the desired goal. To be an effective negotiator, delegates must be tactically as
well as substantively prepared before the conference begins. In researching their country,
committee and issues, they should -- for each agenda item -- formulate an objective,
strategy, and tactics. Students objectives should address such questions as: does my
country have a specific position on this issue; does it wish to see concrete action taken?
Once a delegate has thought through the objectives of his or her country in the debate, he
or she should prepare a strategy and tactics for reaching that objective. Examples range
from delaying debate through procedural means to utilizing speeches in order to persuade
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 5.5
fellow delegates. Obviously, a delegate should develop a strategy that achieves as many of
his or her countrys objectives as possible without losing sight of the overall goal in
negotiating any one point.
A last note: To negotiate is to practice diplomacy. It is a careful balancing of the ideological
against the practical, of the necessity of compromise against the policy and priorities of the
nation one represents. This is not always easy, but in many ways it is one of the most
rewarding aspects of the conference.
TACTICS
The following is a list of negotiating tactics and the merits and possible drawbacks of each:
Anger: Anger, real or feigned, draws attention to a
point and signals the seriousness of a negotiators
position, while raising doubts about the validity of
an opponents position. This tactic could,
however, stimulate an equally angry response,
creating unneeded problems.
Aggression: Delegates may aggressively emphasize
errors and flaws in an opponents argument to
weaken confidence in his or her position.
Unfortunately, an aggressive stance might cause a
fellow delegate to react in such a way that he or
she becomes more stubborn on the issue and can
eventually lead to a breakdown in diplomacy
within the committee.
Assuming a Reasonable Stance: This strategy is the
most common and effective tactic. In other words,
induce and adhere to a spirit of compromise and
consensus. Compromise is usually the key to a
successful negotiating session. Thus learning to
negotiate in good faith is often the most
successful, as others usually respond to it with a
reciprocal sense of trying to forge resolution and
compromise. This style depends on your
countrys actual policies and national interests, as
it may not be the best tactic for that countrys
actual goals.
Demanding More in a First Offer: Demanding more
than one is ultimately hoping to get is an excellent
strategy for beginning negotiations. On the other
hand, the demand could be viewed as so
outrageous that its proponent might be seen as
not really interested in negotiating. Use this tactic
cautiously in committee, but do not ignore its
effectiveness.
False Demand: This is another good negotiating
tactic. By posing a demand and then yielding on it,
a delegate convinces others that his or her country
is reasonable and sincere in its negotiations. This
action also sets an example for others to follow
and reciprocate. It may however mislead an
opponent into thinking that the negotiators
position is weak. A related tactic is to convince an
opponent that a pending offer is ones bottom line.
Playing One Against Another: This action is
sometimes useful. By comparing different
interests between two opponents, the delegate
will sometimes gain the upper hand against a
stronger opponent by letting him or her direct his
or her energies in the wrong direction. In some
cases, an opponent will not take the bait and the
delegate may find him or herself in a weaker
rather than a stronger position.
Surrendering: This can sometimes limit potential
damage and enable a delegate to appeal to their
opponents sense of ethics and fairness. However,
an opponent may not take pity if this tactic is used
too late in the negotiating process, opting instead
to go for the kill.
Negotiating With Authority: Using this tactic, a
delegate attempts to convince others that he or
she is most knowledgeable on a particular subject.
The opinion of a delegate who negotiates from a
position of strength will be given a greater weight
in the formulation of resolutions. The delegate
who appears to be the leader will attract followers
and gain support for his or her actions. Of course,
having established such a position, being proven
wrong can be disastrous.
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 5.6
Making Use of Debates
Understanding the three basic types of debate is a must for any delegate on any committee.
Formal Debate
This is traditional debate, carried out entirely within the Rules of Procedure. On
substantive matters, it consists of speakers who speak in an order determined by the
Speakers List. Delegates may or may not choose to answer questions on the substance of
their speech. The Chairperson moderates this debate, and all motions concerning the
debate must pass through him or her. Formal debate is the framework within which all
voting and submission of formal resolutions must take place.
Informal Debate
Informal debate, sometimes called a moderated caucus, is a suspension of the rules
which may be allowed by the Chairperson to facilitate discussion. A formal Speakers List is
not drawn up; instead, delegates are recognized to speak by the Chairperson at the
conclusion of each speech. Generally, this kind of debate takes the form of a roundtable
discussion. It allows a greater measure of give and take between delegates and enables
more clarification when formal rules may be too cumbersome. Informal debate can be an
effective tool, especially in smaller committees, but will only be utilized at the discretion of
the Chairperson.
Diplomacy
During the course of the conference, delegates may find themselves working in different
blocs groups of nations which vote and/or caucus together due to a set of similar
interests and common views. The reasons for this unity can be historical, political,
ideological, military, geographic, or economic in nature.
Caucusing
Caucusing, like informal debate, is a temporary recess or suspension of the rules in the
committee meeting. During an unmoderated caucus proposals are drawn up and
consensus-building, negotiation and compromise take place. Caucusing provides the
opportunity for words to be put to the concepts and thoughts voiced in more formal
debate. Caucusing is the primary working mode of the committee. Blocs use this
opportunity to consolidate and discuss their positions, and to communicate with other
blocs. Working papers and resolutions, discussed in Chapter Six, are usually drafted during
these unmoderated caucuses.
These blocs unite on issues of importance, polling their combined strength to press for
opposition or support of resolutions, amendments or concessions primary to their national
interests. Nations acting together in blocs can accomplish things that they might be unable
to achieve as individual nations. During caucus periods, blocs interact with one another and
negotiate to further their goals agreeing, for instance, to eliminate an unfavorable clause
Strength Through Unity
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 5.7
to gain support for their resolution, or promising to vote in favor of another blocs position
if t that bloc agrees to defeat the proposal of another, opposing bloc.
Examples of Blocs
Examples of regional blocs are the African or Latin American blocs; ideological blocs
include the non-aligned and the Eastern blocs; a bloc formed for military (and political and
strategic) reasons is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). There are also broader
classifications of blocs such as East, West, and underdeveloped nations; even more
simplified is the North/South (Developed/Developing) division. The breakdown of blocs
will vary from committee to committee and from issue to issue depending on the nature of
the topic under discussion and the blocs the delegates find most useful. The more
politically oriented committees tend to split along regional lines (i.e., Western, African,
Middle Eastern, Eastern, Asian, Latin American); however, this is not universal the non-
aligned bloc tends to draw many underdeveloped and developing nations away from their
geographical bloc. One must note that regional or ideological interests are not always
paramount. Israel, for example, while a Middle Eastern state, traditionally votes with the
Western bloc. States that were formerly part of the British Commonwealth often form blocs
with one another.
Written Documents
The products of UN committees, like other deliberative bodies, are written documents:
treaties, resolutions, declarations, etc. Delegates must understand the process by which
such documents develop and acquire the skills to participate in this process.
DRAFTING
Creating a written statement of aims, goals and a means of effective action is the ultimate
goal of debate on any topic. The process that generates such a document is termed drafting.
Drafting as a process is the written result of compromise and consensus built in debate and
caucus. Drafting is a continual process of revision, and delegates should never view any
draft as the finished product that the entire committee should accept.
Drafting involves building agreement through accommodating other delegates concerns.
This accommodation takes place by changing the document. These changes are sometimes
as extensive as altering the content, or sometimes as minute as substituting an alternate
word choice. As said above, a draft goes through many revisions as it gains support. While
certain countries may play the key roles in writing a resolution, many nations will want to
have input. A bloc, for example, may designate certain countries to be part of the drafting
group, but all countries expect to review the document before it comes up for a vote. Many
will try to make changes at that time. In the end, all the actions of the United Nations
appear in written form. If a delegate cannot write well, he or she is forced to rely on the
ability of others to promote his or her ideas. But writing skills, like all skills, improve with
practice and especially by learning what seems to work well in other delegates writing, so
it is in the delegates best interests to develop this skill.
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 5.8
WORDING
Negotiations over revisions usually take the form of disputes over wording. At times, an
argument over semantics will be one that is essential to the meaning of the document.
Consider, for example, the difference between calling a group a terrorist organization and
a collection of freedom fighters in your resolution. The tone of the document would be
very different. Thus, delegates need to be aware of the implication of using certain crucial
words and what wording would generate the most desired support.
Precision of Meaning: Most seasoned diplomats argue for more precision and clarity. They
reason that a hard-fought agreement deserves to be written so that it means just what the
parties have verbally accepted. In this way, misunderstandings and false interpretations
can be avoided. Once an issue is settled verbally, it should not be reopened in a dispute
over language.
Intentional Ambiguity: The ideal of clarity cannot always be achieved. On occasion,
particularly controversial or petty points are written in ways that leave room for several
interpretations. Usually this occurs to allow progress on the more important aspects of the
issue. A classic case of this constructive ambiguity is found in Security Council Resolution
242 that established a framework for peace after the 1967 Arab-Israeli War. It called for
withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict. The
text leaves unclear whether Israel should withdraw from some or all territories (and if not
all, then which?). The principal sponsors maintained that the ambiguity was unavoidable
and necessary in order to pass a resolution acceptable to everyone that would help to
reduce tensions in the Middle East.
Unavoidable Ambiguity: Another reason resolutions are often vague is that details of
implementation cannot always be spelled out. Later specific detail work almost always
remains to be done, subject to further negotiations. It is important when leaving language
vague to make the intent of a resolution clear; questions over the implementation of a
resolution are better than ones over the main purpose or goal.
STYLE
To be understood, the draft document must be free of grammatical errors and utilize
proper punctuation. To prepare for the drafting process, delegates should carefully read
the resolutions, reports and other texts relevant to their topics. This preparation method
will help develop a feel for the style to be used. Reading summary records and speeches,
comparing draft resolutions with final ones and examining the portions of resolutions
voted on separately are all good ways to focus on language. Best of all, a delegate can use
this opportunity to learn from other delegates either more skilled or more familiar with
resolution writing to develop their own resolution writing skills.
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 5.9
TYPES OF WRITTEN DOCUMENTS
Working Papers
Before composing a formal resolution to deal with the topic problems, delegates may wish
to transfer their general ideas into a working paper, or rough draft. Working papers are
usually formed by a group of nations from the same geographic bloc or of similar
ideological persuasion. Working papers need not be written in formal resolution format
and may be simply a few major points jotted down on paper. The purpose of a working
paper is to have something in writing to serve as a starting reference point during caucus
and formal debate. Though not formally introduced to the committee, working papers may
be copied and distributed in committee depending on the rules of the particular Model
UN conference and generally only with the committee Directors approval. Working papers
serve to help delegates identify the different views of the countries in the committee and
facilitate the negotiation process. Resolutions are usually formed by combining several
working papers.
Resolutions
Resolutions are the desired end-product of debate on a topic area. They represent a course
of action or policy endorsed by the international community in response to the issue at
hand. The formatting of resolutions is thoroughly discussed in the following section of this
chapter.
Pre-Written Resolutions
Resolutions that are written before the conference, sometimes referred to as pre-writes
are not allowed at many U.S. conferences, including IMUNA conferences. Conferences that
prohibit pre-written resolutions stress that pre-writes go against basic Model UN
philosophy. From this perspective, debate should consist of a committee-wide dialogue
about ways in which the varied countries policies can be incorporated into a solution.
Debate should not be the presentation of a one-sided solution upon which policies are to be
based. Delegates should recognize that the effectiveness and importance of the United
Nations lies in its capacity for international discussion. Long-term solutions are mainly
derived by altering world opinion, which is possible only through the process of thought,
discussion, and debate.
Note: While pre-written resolutions are unacceptable at IMUNA conferences, delegates may
bring notes on some major points that address the problem areas of the topics to serve as a
reference during the conference. Like speech notes, it is always okay to prepare notes for a
conference, but these should be notes and should not be read verbatim or used exactly as
written.
RESOLUTION FORMATTING
A resolution is one (very long) sentence. It begins with the committee or subject (The
World Health Organization for example), which is indented by five spaces, underlined, and
followed by a comma. A Sample resolution is appended to the end of this chapter.
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 5.10
Affirming
Alarmed by
Approving
Aware of
Believing
Bearing in mind
Confident
Considering also
Contemplating
Convinced
Declaring
Deeply concerned
Deeply conscious
Deeply convinced
Deeply disturbed
Deeply regretting
Desiring
Emphasizing
The Preambulatory Clauses
After the subject, come the preambulatory clauses. The preambulatory clauses comprise the preamble of the
resolution. While they set the tone of the resolution and often give some of the history regarding the issue,
for operational purposes the perambulatory clauses hold little weight. Formally, these are participle or
adjectival phrases modifying the subject. Informally, they describe the committees intent, motivation, and
frame-of-mind in writing the resolution. Preambulatory clauses are followed by a comma and begin with an
underlined participle or adjective which is capitalized. Examples of these first words include:
Expecting
Expressing its satisfaction
Expressing its wish
Fulfilling
Fully aware
Fully alarmed
Fully believing
Further deploring
Further recalling
Guided by
Gravely concerned
Having adopted
Having considered
Having considered further
Having devoted attention
Having examined
Having studied
Having heard
Having received
Keeping in mind
Noting further
Noting with approval
Noting with deep concern
Noting with regret
Noting with satisfaction
Noting with zest
Observing
Reaffirming
Recalling
Recognizing
Referring
Reiterating
Seeking
Taking into account
Taking into consideration
Taking note
Viewing with appreciation
Welcoming
Accepts
Affirms
Appeals
Approves
Authorizes
Calls
Calls upon
Commends
Condemns
Congratulates
Confirms
Considers
Decides
Declares accordingly
Demands*
Deplores
Designates
Draws the attention
Emphasizes
The Operative Paragraphs
The operative paragraphs, which follow the perambulatory clauses, formally make the predicate of the
sentence. More informatively, they contain the action of the resolution, or the operations that the committee
hopes occur once the resolution is adopted and implemented. Each operative clause begins with a capitalized
present tense verb in the third person singular. Each paragraph formed by a new operative verb is indented
five spaces, numbered, indented to the tenth space, and finally ended with a semicolon. The last paragraph ends
with a period. The following are representatives of operative verbs:
Encourages
Endorses
Expresses its appreciation
Expresses its hope
Further endorses
Further invites
Further proclaims
Further reminds
Further recommends
Further resolves
Further requests
Has resolved
Notes
Offers
Proclaims
Reaffirms
Recommends
Reminds
Renews
Requests
Solemnly affirms
Strongly condemns
Supports
Trusts
Takes note of
Transmits
Urges
* Only the Security Council
may demand
Rules of Parliamentary Procedure
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 6.1
Rules of Parliamentary Procedure
Understanding of the flow of committee procedure is critical to effective participation in
the simulation. This chapter outlines the flow of debate in a "typical committee, as well as
tips on a mock committee session.
Committee Session: Activities
SETTING THE AGENDA
The first matter to be considered in committee following the roll call of countries (and an
orientation speech by the committee staff) will be the setting of the agenda. The agenda is
the order in which the committee will consider the topics before it. Each committee has a
provisional agenda prior to the session. The provisional agenda consists of the topics
presented in the Background Guide. The committee must choose the order in which to
address these topics. Traditionally, the time allotted for debate at most conferences,
including IMUNA conferences, provides committees with enough time to thoroughly
address only one topic.
A Speakers List will be established for the purpose of debate on the order of the agenda.
Delegates may begin making motions proposing an agenda only after the Chairperson has
deemed that sufficient debate has taken place. The motion must include all topics on the
provisional agenda (ex. a motion to address Topic B first and Topic A second, or vice versa).
If the Chairperson accepts the motion, it will be put to an immediate vote. If a proposed
order passes, debate on the agenda is over, and debate on the first topic begins. If the
motion fails, debate on the agenda continues until another motion is made and passed.
GENERAL DEBATE
Once a topic area has been opened, a new Speakers List will be taken, and formal debate on
the topic area will begin. Normally, debate will begin in a very general way, with delegates
making policy statements and suggesting broad solutions. After the main issues have been
outlined, (which delegates should be aware of before the session is opened) and individual
country positions established, someone will call for a caucus. The formal session will
recess and delegates will informally begin to discuss the issues and draft proposals. In
most conferences it takes the first two committee sessions to get the issues on the table and
delegates adjusted to the committee format.
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 6.2
An understanding of the three basic types of debate is a must for a delegate on any
committee:
This is traditional debate, carried out entirely within the Parliamentary Rules of Procedure.
(Full listing in Appendix ??) On substantive matters, it consists of speakers who speak in an
order determined by the Speakers List. Delegates may or may not choose to answer
questions on the substance of their speech. The Chairperson moderates this debate, and all
motions concerning the debate must pass through him or her. Formal debate is the
framework within which all voting and submission of formal resolutions must take place.
Formal Debate
Informal Debate
Informal debate, sometimes called a moderated caucus, is a suspension of the rules
which may be allowed by the Chairperson to facilitate discussion. A formal Speakers List is
not drawn up; instead, delegates are recognized to speak by the Chairperson at the
conclusion of each speech. Generally, this kind of debate takes the form of a roundtable
discussion. It allows a greater measure of give and take between delegates and enables
more clarification when formal rules may be too cumbersome. Informal debate can be an
effective tool, especially in smaller committees, but will only be utilized at the discretion of
the Chairperson.
Caucusing
Caucusing, like informal debate, is a temporary recess or suspension of the rules in the
committee meeting. During an unmoderated caucus proposals are drawn up and
consensus-building, negotiation and compromise take place. Caucusing provides the
opportunity for words to be put to the concepts and thoughts voiced in more formal
debate. Caucusing is the primary working mode of the committee. Blocs use this
opportunity to consolidate and discuss their positions, and to communicate with other
blocs. Working papers and resolutions, discussed in Chapter Six, are usually drafted during
these unmoderated caucuses.
WRITTEN PRODUCTS
Resolutions are the final product of a Model UN committee. To create this product,
delegates usually go through the following process.
Before composing a formal resolution to deal with the topic problems, delegates may wish
to transfer their general ideas into a working paper or rough draft. Groups of nations from
the same geographic bloc or of similar ideological persuasion usually draft working papers
together. Working papers need not be written in formal resolution format; they can be as
simple as few major points neatly jotted down on paper. The purpose of a working paper is
to have something in writing to serve as a starting reference point during caucus and
formal debate. Though not formally introduced to the committee, working papers may be
copied (by the conferences administrative staff) and distributed in committee, with the
Directors approval. Working papers serve to help delegates identify the different views of
Working Papers
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 6.3
the countries in the committee and facilitate the negotiation process. Resolutions are
usually formed by combining the content of several working papers.
The Director authorizes the copying and distribution of resolutions or working papers. To
introduce a resolution to the full committee, a minimum number of signatures are needed
as evidence that a broad enough interest exists to justify bringing it before the committee.
Delegates should remember that signing a resolution does not constitute endorsing it. By
signing a resolution the delegate only indicates his or her belief that the resolution
deserves debate before the full committee. The writers of a resolution (who do endorse the
content of the document) are the sponsors and delegates who only sign the resolution are
signatories.
Resolutions
At some point in the debate, usually well into the second session, a group of delegates who
have been working on a proposal (perhaps in working paper form, described below) will
find they have enough support to formally bring their resolution before the committee.
Essentially, this means the resolution is assigned a number, (e.g. 1.1 for the first resolution
on Topic 1), duplicated and distributed to the committee.
Amendments
After a resolution is debated in committee, it is common for changes both small and large to
be made to the document. These changes most often come in the form of amendments to
the resolution. Time and resource constraints often do not allow delegates to submit new
resolutions late in committee debate, so when possible, clauses and sub-clauses in existing
resolutions are added, subtracted or re-worded according to the committees preferences.
Amendments are giving consistent numbering; for example, Amendment 1.2.1 is the first
amendment to Resolution 1.2 and Amendment 1.2.2 is the second amendment to
Resolution 1.2. There is no limit to the amount of changes an amendment can make to a
resolution. Amendments are often used to combine multiple resolutions into one cohesive
document.
VOTING
Generally, it becomes apparent that debate on a topic has reached some sort of conclusion,
consensus, or final stage beyond which the arguments only repeat themselves. At this time
the Chairperson may allow a motion that debate be closed on the topic area. Should the
committee pass such a motion, debate on the topic area closes and all resolutions before
the committee are brought to an immediate vote. Such a step is not to be taken lightly, for
it generally means that no further discussion on the topic is possible and that the
committee moves on to the next agenda item--another type of debate entirely. Debate may
also be tabled. This means leaving the topic without voting on resolutions. The
committee may then vote at some future point to take the debate up again. Tabling is
useful when the debate becomes deadlocked, but is generally discouraged due to limited
conference time.
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 6.4
The committee takes two types of votes: procedural and substantive. Procedural votes
pertain to logistical issues, for example the length of speaking time. During procedural
votes all members of the committee must vote and there are no abstentions. Substantive
votes pertain to all content-driven matters before the committee, like passing an
amendment or resolution. During substantive votes, abstentions are counted. During
substantive voting procedure, the chamber, or committee room, is sealed and no one is
permitted to leave or enter the room. Most voting procedures use a simple majority vote,
meaning the item must pass by a majority of half the committee body plus one. Certain
items must pass by a two-thirds majority, including reconsideration (Rule 49), important
question status (Rule 48), and closer of debate (Rule 36).
This section repeats the previous one, except that the flow is described in terms of the rules
of procedure and the actions the Chairperson must perform to move debate along as
described. The rules referred to are those of all IMUNA conferences (see Appendix I).
Plenary Session
In the United Nations, a resolution that passes in a committee is still not official until it
passes in a plenary session. For this reason, some conferences run a full (plenary) session
to vote upon the proposals passed in committees over the course of the conference. The
Security Council and International Court of Justice along with other specialized agencies
may also meet at this time to conclude their closing sessions.
Committee Session: Parliamentary Rules of Procedure
Step 1: Agenda Discussion
Entertain a motion to open debate on the
Agenda (Rule 17)
Note: Delegates may call for a caucus at
any time hereafter for the purpose of
discussing the agenda. (Ask how long the
caucus shall be for and recommend
lengthening or shortening it if necessary.)
Entertain a motion to open a Speakers List
on the topic of the agenda (Rule 20)
A member of the dais will take down all
countries wishing to speak by show of
hands. If delegates wish to be added to the
Speakers List after the initial show of
hands, they should submit a request to be
added back to the Speakers List in writing
to the dais where the Chairperson, often
also called Committee Director and
Assistant Director sit.
If the delegates do not make a motion to
set a time limit, the Chairperson may wish
to suggest one -for example, one or two
minutes -to prevent overly long speeches.
If a time limit is imposed, the Chairperson
will try not to cut off the delegate. Usually,
the Chairperson will tap the gavel when 15
seconds are left.
Because these are procedural speeches, no
yielding or questioning may take place
(Rules 23 and 24).
Adoption of Agenda (Rule 17)
After a few speakers, a delegate may wish
to propose an agenda.
If the Chairperson feels that sufficient
discussion has taken place, an immediate
vote (simple majority) will be taken.
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 6.5
If passed, debate on the agenda is closed,
the Speakers List is discarded and debate
on the first topic will begin.
If the proposed motion fails, debate
continues with the original Speakers List
until a new agenda is proposed and passed.
Step 2: Topic Debate
Create a Speakers List for debating the first
topic (Rule 20)
The Chairperson will ask for a show of
hands and create a new Speakers List for
substantive debate on the first item of the
set agenda. Again, later additions to the
Speakers List can be made by submitting a
written request to the dais.
Substantive Debate
After a delegate makes a speech, they may
answer questions or yield remaining time
to another delegate. The delegate may also
yield their remaining time to the
Chairperson. under rules 23 & 24.
Delegates continue speaking until a caucus
is called (see drafting process, below)
Resolution Drafting
Caucuses should be held for the purpose of
discussing and drafting a resolution.
Several cycles of moderated and
unmoderated caucuses and speeches may
occur as the draft(s) takes shape. The
Chairperson may wish to suggest a move
into informal debate (a moderated caucus)
to facilitate discussion of the draft.
Delegates may use working papers to aid
the debate (described in Chapter Five).
Moving a resolution to the Floor
The Chairperson should accept, when
appropriate, a resolution for the
committees consideration when the
Director determines that sufficient debate
and drafting activity has taken place. (Note
the signature requirements for
resolutions.)
It is common to suspend the rules after a
draft resolution is formally introduced to
the committee and allow the sponsors of
the resolution to field questions. First, the
committee will have the opportunity to
address non-substantive points (i.e.
grammatical corrections, typos, and other
errors in the document.) After the non-
substantive issues are corrected, the
committee may ask substantive questions
of the sponsors. These questions should be
used to clarify terms in the resolution; this
is not the time for debate. Substantive
debate on the resolution will resume after
the question and answer session.
Amendments (Rules 28 & 46)
During committee session, delegates may
formulate amendments to the resolutions
on the floor.
Only operational clauses can be amended.
Therefore delegates should be especially
fastidious when drafting perambulatory
clauses, as they cannot be changed in
anyway.
Some conferences make the distinction
between friendly amendments (made
when the resolution sponsors
unanimously agree and thus are
automatically incorporated in the
resolution) and unfriendly ones (which
require a vote to incorporate the
amendment in the resolution.) Under the
rules used at IMUNA conferences, all
amendments are "unfriendly and must be
voted on by the entire committee.
To formally introduce an amendment to
the committee, a certain amount of
signatories must sign-on. The IMUNA rules
of procedure require at least 1/10 of the
committee (but no less than three
delegations).
Closing Debate
After sufficient debate on the resolution(s),
a motion to close debate on the topic at
hand and move to an immediate vote (Rule
36) is in order.
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 6.6
At IMUNA conferences closure of debate
requires a 2/3 vote with two speakers
against the motion. As soon as the motion
passes, an immediate vote on the
resolutions and amendments of the topic
will take place. This is the time when
motions to divide the resolution or
amendments are in order. If the Speakers
List expires (the last speaker on the list
speaks), debate is automatically closed and
the committee moves to a vote (Rule 25).
Voting Procedure (Rules 43-47)
Amendments are voted on first from most
to least destructive. For example if
Amendment B strikes operative clause 1
and Amendment A changes the wording in
clause 1, Amendment B will be voting of
first. If it passes, Amendment A is
irrelevant and will no longer be voted on.
Amendments that pass are incorporated
into the final resolution.
Again, only operative clauses can be
amended. If delegates wish to change
preambulatory clauses, they must
withdraw the resolution and resubmit it
with the desired changes. The resolution
will be renumbered accordingly.
Other variations can occur in voting
procedure, notably a motion can be made
to divide the resolution (that is, to vote on
different parts of the resolution
separately.) In this case the following
procedures occur:
1) Take a first vote on whether the
resolution will be divided at all. This is
a procedural vote.
2) Vote on each of the divided parts
separately. This is a substantive vote.
All the parts that pass form the final
resolution.
3) Vote on the final resolution.
Step 3: Move to Second Topic
Repeat Step, as time allows. The Director
will generally inform delegates of time
restraints and make a recommendation.
While most Model UN conferences operate using similar Rules of Parliamentary Procedure,
there are always nuances in interpretation of the rules. Most conferences hold rules
briefing sessions before the first committee session. All delegates should attend these
informational sessions, especially first-time delegates.
Training Exercise: Mock Committee Session
Holding a mock committee session is very helpful, especially for organizations with
inexperienced delegates. This activity gives the students an opportunity to practice
committee simulation and will make them feel more comfortable when they participate in
the conference. A mock session also provides an excellent way to acquaint the delegation
with the rules and familiarize them with other countries positions on the topics that have
been selected. Its objective is to allow students to apply the rules of procedure in a context
uncluttered with complex substantive issues.
When running a rules session, a fictional committee is simulated. Topics are chosen so that
no research is necessary and all students are able to participate. For example, you could
simulate the Committee on Global Entertainment with the topics: 1) High School Movies, 2)
Pop Stars, and 3) The Importance of the Internet. Alternatively, you could choose to use
the 3 Global Entertainment topics for which pre-written resolutions are given at the end of
this chapter. Topics such as these ensure that the simulation is enjoyable and they allow
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 6.7
students to focus on the procedural rules of committee rather than the content of debate or
country positions. The chairperson should be experienced in the rules of procedure and
feel comfortable leading a committee session. Resolutions can be prepared ahead of time
or the delegates can draft them. Either way, make sure that they are not distributed until
the proper motions are made.
The proper format for a Resolution is outlined in Appendix I. Use this guideline to create
several resolutions and amendments on fictional topics for a fictional committee or use the
examples at the end of this chapter. While the substance of the resolution is irrelevant, it is
important that delegates get an opportunity to familiarize themselves with proper
resolution format and voting procedure. Delegates should practice introducing, combining,
withdrawing and voting on resolutions and amendments. Later, delegates can practice
more advanced voting procedures, like Dividing the Question (Rule 44) and unanimous or
weighted voting (featured on specialized agencies like the Security Council and the World
Bank.)
IMUNA staff runs mock rules sessions to train our Assistant Directors and Directors.
Several high schools have chosen to run similar sessions and have also found them to be
effective in training students about the rules of procedure.
Another effective learning tool is to write up different motions and statements and
distribute them to the students. The students then have to determine when a motion is
appropriate. If a motion is in order or is critical to continue proper debate, the chairman
should prompt the delegates for it. If they make mistakes, the chairperson should make
corrections and explain the proper course of action. To aid in this activity, a list of motions,
points and statements are featured in appendix ??. This list can be photocopied, cut into
separate items, and distributed to students. These statements and motions only serve as an
outline for the running of the committee. Students should feel free to make motion and rise
to points as they see necessary. When a new topic is started, these motions and statements
can be re-circulated.
Classroom Simulation
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 7.1
Classroom Simulation
This simulation will introduce your students to the world of Model United Nations.
Through participation in a Model UN simulation, your students will learn to understand the
actual consequences of international politics, to solve real problems, to compromise and to
see the world from a different perspective.
UNIT OBJECTIVES
Students Will:
Appreciate the difficulties in developing a solution that benefits all nations
Analyze and evaluate background information on the country they are representing
and the issue selected for debate
Develop a point of view based on the foreign policy of the country they have
researched and are representing
Synthesize the data to develop creative solutions that will benefit all nations
Begin to understand the complexities of issues facing the international community
Develop speeches, working papers or resolutions to be used in the debate
Negotiate with other participants to develop a consensus
UNIT COMPONENTS
The Simulation will consist of several activities. A suggested timetable to complete the
entire simulation is one to two weeks depending on the complexity of the research phase
and the length of the debate. Activities include:
Organization: Research in depth both the country and topics to be synthesized and
presented during the debate
Pre-simulation Preparation: Knowledge of the Rules of Procedure and development
of policy speeches and a working paper or resolution
Committee Debate: Participation in the committees discussion of the topic(s).
Debriefing: Evaluation of the process and the product
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 7.2
Selecting Topics
When preparing for a committee simulation, students should select two topics that will be
debated in their upcoming conference. The topics should be currently discussed by the
global community, but remain unresolved. The following activity will allow the students to
research and debate a given topic of international importance, Global Literacy, on the Social
and Humanitarian Committee of the United Nations. In addition, twenty-seven country
profiles are provided so students can begin debate without a great deal of further research.
After completing either one or both of the topics, students will be ready to research and
develop their own position. To provide order and accuracy for the simulation, a set of rules
have also been included (see appendix #) . If you are familiar with other rules, you may opt
to use those.
Phase 1: Preparation and Research
No more than one week prior to the beginning of the simulation, students should be
assigned or allowed to select one of the twenty-seven countries provided to you in this
guide. Background summaries are provided for the Afghanistan, Argentina, Brazil, Chile,
China, Cuba, Egypt, France, Germany, Haiti, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kenya, Malaysia,
Poland, Russia, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Spain, Sudan, Syria, Thailand, United Kingdom,
United States, Vietnam and Zimbabwe.
This is also an excellent time to watch the IMUNA instructional DVD; it provides students
with both a substantive and procedural introduction to Model UN through a mock
committee session. Preparation can also include a discussion of the history and goals of the
United Nations. Some students will need help in understanding that the purpose of a UN
committee is to reach consensus by its final session. Model UN encourages students to use
the concept of principled negotiation to develop a resolution to the conflict that all nations
can support.
If the students have limited experience in simulations, it is recommended that each
delegation consist of two representatives. The recommended class size would be one to
two representatives for each of the twenty-seven countries and two to three students who
would be the committee staff. The committee staff would consist of the committee
Director, who will also be acting as Chairperson and one to two Assistant Directors. The
Assistant Directors are usually in charge of writing the Speakers List , addressing the non-
substantive notes to the Chairperson, counting the votes and copying the working paper or
resolution. If there is not a student with experience in parliamentary procedure, it would
be best if the Faculty Advisor chaired at least the first session.
Once the students have received their country assignments, they should receive the
Committee and Issue Background Paper and the appropriate Country Profile. The
Background Paper describes the committee to be simulated and the background of the
topic to be debated. The Country Profile gives them a brief overview of the nation they are
representing. At this point, the Faculty Advisor will have to determine the length of the
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 7.3
simulation activity. It can be introduced during a class period and followed by a
preparation day for research on the topic and country. The research activities can be
extended to include several days of additional preparation. (See Chapter Two for more on
how the additional research time can be used.) During this time, students would seek
additional materials on the issue and their nation. Either way, the students will need one
day devoted to the development of an opening policy speech (no longer than two minutes.)
Students will also need to develop ideas for working paper and resolutions.
The Rules of Procedures should be thoroughly reviewed. The IMUNA instructional video is
an excellent way to start. If time permits, practice using the rules of procedure with a mock
rules session; this will help the students to internalize the rules (Chapter Six.)
The committee staff (Director and Assistant Directors) should also be hard at work
analyzing the committee topic(s) and reviewing the rules of procedures. They should
prepare a list of the countries represented and placards to use for roll call, debate and
voting procedures. The committee staff may do additional research on the topic to be
discussed and presented to the committee. This information could be in the form of an
update on the topic, presented at the beginning or middle of the committee session. If the
simulation is more advanced, the Assistant Directors and Director may even prepare a
crisis scenario for the committee to address. These ideas for expanding the activity are not
necessary- especially during the first simulation.
Most importantly, confirm students have developed their countrys position on the issue
before going from the preparation phase to the committee session. This step is crucial if the
students are going to have specific solutions to the issue.
ADDITIONAL RESEARCH
If time permits, the research period can be expanded to include additional basic facts about
your county related in its participation at the United Nations. This information could easily
be obtained from an encyclopedia or a similar source (see Chapter 4 for sources).
Economics: natural resources, exports and imports, per capita income, technology
used in agriculture and industry, economic outlook.
Politics: present political system, history, neighbors, allies, regional organizations.
Social Structures: organization of the social system, what is its attitude to social
concerns (women's rights and health care for example)?
Culture: educational level of the people, cultural background
National Priorities: development, military strength, industrialization, welfare of
the people, foreign trade, education and others that might be a priority.
International Priorities: regional cooperation, development, peace and security,
human rights, international trade. Does your nation give or receive assistance?
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 7.4
REVIEW OF STEPS
1) Assign students to represent each of the 27 countries.
2) Have students read the Committee and Issue Summaries as well as the country
profile paper.
3) If time is available, students can research additional information on the committee
issue and their nation.
4) Have students review and practice the rules of procedure.
5) Have students develop an opening policy speech and ideas for a working paper or
resolution.
6) Have the committee staff prepare the placards and the list for the roll call.
SUGGESTED TIMELINE
Either of the following two timelines could be used during the preparation phase. In each
case, a day represents one class period.
Timeline One
DAY 1 - Introduction of the simulation and the
issue to be discussed, assignment of the countries,
and background on the United Nations if time
permits. (Handouts: Committee and Issue
Summary, Country profile and Rules of
Procedure.)
DAY 2 - Country and issue research.
DAY 3 - Development of opening policy speeches
and ideas for resolution, review of the rules of
procedure.
Timeline Two
DAY 1 - Introduction of the simulation and the
issue to be discussed, assignment of the countries,
and background on the United Nations if time
permits. (Handouts: Committee and Issue
Summary, Country profile and Rules of
Procedure.)
DAY 2 & 3 - Research on the country and issue.
DAY 4 - Development of opening policy speeches,
ideas for a working paper or resolution and
review of the rules of procedure.
DAY 5 - Mock rules session (see Chapter Seven.)
When the class has completed these activities, the committee sessions may begin.
Phase 2: The Committee Session
The room should be arranged with a table or teachers desk at the front for the dais
(Chairperson and Assistant Directors.) If a podium is available, place it to the left or right of
the dais. Delegates should use the podium when they give policy statements or impromptu
speeches. The delegations can be seated at desks or in chairs. Depending on space
availability, the seating can be arranged in aisles facing the dais or in a semi-circle so all
delegates can see one another and the dais. Each delegation will need a simple placard with
the name of their country clearly written and visible from a distance. One of the Assistant
Directors should be designated to maintain the Speakers List.
The following outline how debate should move in a two to four day (class period) debate.
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 7.5
DAY 1
This meeting marks the beginning of the simulation and sets the tone for future
negotiations. The committees work begins with the calling of the roll by a staff member.
Because the committee will be debating only one topic, the setting of the agenda may be
bypassed and a substantive Speakers List should be created. If the simulation did have two
topics to consider, simply follow the rules for the selection of the agenda (discussed in
Chapter Six.) Each country should be required to present an opening policy speech at a
maximum two minutes speaking time. After speaking, delegates may answer questions
and/or yield time to another delegation under Rules 23 and 24. Total time for the delegate
to speak including their speech and answers to the question (including the question itself)
should not exceed two to three minutes.
Questions: Students will want to listen closely to the speeches to ask appropriate questions.
These questions can be used to clarify the issue or to question a countrys position.
Students will learn the importance of speaking carefully and listening critically. Remember
there are three forms of debate: formal debate, informal debate (a moderated caucus) and
unmoderated caucus (see Chapter 5&6 for a more detailed explanation.)
Unmoderated Caucus: Students will most likely move for an unmoderated caucus after the
presentation of all or most of the policy speeches. All suspensions of the rules are made at
the Chairpersons discretion; it is common to wait for a caucus until all opening speeches
are completed. Be sure the students know how to correctly move for the caucus. A five to
ten minute unmoderated caucus is appropriate after opening statements are made. Such
an unformatted bloc of time will allow students to express their ideas for developing a
working paper or resolution. During caucus, nations will generally divide themselves into
blocs (see Chapter Five for more on blocs.)
Working Paper: If time is limited, it may be best to prepare a working paper prior to debate
or at least start one for the committee. The working paper can be presented in almost any
form. A list of operative clauses (see section on resolutions, Chapter 5) is an effective form
for a working paper. It can serve to focus the committees attention to one particular area
of the topic. There can be more than one working paper on the floor (being debated by the
committee) at the same time. It is very important that the committees ideas stay as a
working paper as long as possible because it is easier to amend in this form.
Writing Resolutions: The final step in this process is the writing of the resolution. A
resolution is a formalized outline of solutions to the problem encompassing the ideas in the
working paper, The most important aspect for students to remember in this process is that
a resolution is a by-product, and not the goal, of good debate. During unmoderated
caucuses the delegates should cull their working papers into one or more resolutions. An
Assistant Director can collect the finished draft resolution(s) and prepare (i.e. format and
type) them for distribution at the next committee session. It may also be appropriate for
the students to work on a resolution overnight and present it to the committee on the
second day of debate.
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 7.6
DAY 2
Open with debate on resolution. The second day should definitely begin with debate on a
working paper/resolution whether the students have developed one or you have given
them one. Try to make copies of the resolution or resolutions for all delegations. These
resolutions do not need to be perfect. It will add to the committees debate if the students
can amend the resolution. All amendments to the resolution are technically unfriendly.
Amendments must get the support of 1/10 of the committee members but no less than
three to support the amendment.
Students will continue to add their names to the Speakers List. If a delegation wishes to be
added to the speakers list, they should send a note to the committee chair. Students can
motion for a caucus at time which is the least structured form of debate. If, however, you
feel that this is dilatory, then as the Chairperson you can overrule the motion. In caucus, the
delegates discuss the issue with no restrictions except for a time limit. The committee can
also decide to go into an informal session or moderated caucus. The Chairperson will
regulate this form of debate but the speakers time is more flexible and some response to
speaker is permitted. During informal debate and caucus, you will be able to observe the
critical thinking process in action.
Voting: Debate on the topic can be completed on the second day or if time permits, a third
day can be used for committee debate. When a closed speakers list has expired (Rule 25)
or when someone moves for closure of debate follow the rules of procedure (Rule 36). In
addition, you will want to follow Rules 43 -47 for voting procedure. You may need to go
over this procedure with the students before voting on the resolution.
DAYS 3 & 4:
The committee session can easily continue during into a third or fourth day if time permits.
With extra time students will be able to draft working papers, resolutions and amendments
with ample time for substantive debate.
General Tips:
If students have experienced a mock rules session, then encourage them to apply
that knowledge to the committees debate.
Be sure to refer to the Committee Session Outline with Rules of Procedure (Chapter
Six.) This will provide an outline of how committee debate should proceed.
The delegates should strive for consensus and remember that a resolution
expresses the will of the international community. The Security Council is the only
United Nations body having enforcement powers. The airing of different views in
the process of debate is even more important than the passing of a resolution. While
consensus is important, students must remember that they are representing the
essential needs and values of their nation and these must be preserved in any
compromise.
I n t e r n a t i o n a l Mo d e l U n i t e d N a t i o n s A s s o c i a t i o n | 7.7
REVIEW OF STEPS
1) Call to Order followed by a Roll Call
2) Creation of a Speakers List on Topic A
3) Opening Policy Speeches
4) Moderated and Unmoderated Caucus (at several points in the debate)
5) Development and revision of working papers
6) Drafting of a Resolution (amendments if needed)
7) Closure of Substantive Debate
8) Voting Procedure
Phase 3: Debriefing
Debriefing is a critical aspect in this educational experience. This activity gives the students
the opportunity to articulate what they believe they learned during the simulation. There
are two ways to approach this assignment: Students may orally evaluate the simulation or
submit a written evaluation. It may be appropriate to do both.