Elisha Huggins, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH O ur favorite demonstration for sound waves is to set up a compressional pulse on a hor- izontally stretched Slinky. One can easily watch the pulse move back and forth at a speed of the order of one meter per second. Watching this demonstration, it occurred to us that the same thing might happen in a steel pipe if you hit the end of the pipe with a hammer. The main difference is that the speed of sound in steel is close to 5000 meters per second. If you hit the end of a 10-ft (3.05-m) pipe, the pulse should take about 1.2 ms to go down and back, a time conveniently measured by an oscil- loscope. We found out that The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics have several articles de- scribing clever ways to measure the speed of sound in steel rods, pipes, and wires. 1 _ 4 Here we wish to describe an experiment that uses readily available equipment, is inexpensive, and is easy to perform. For equipment we used the apparatus shown in Fig. 1 of the TPT article on Fourier Analysis in Introduc- tory Physics. 5 This apparatus uses an $8 Wal-Mart microphone and a $40 Griffin 6 iMic plugged into a computer running the shareware oscilloscope program MacScope II. 7 The program runs on any computer with a USB port. If the computer has a microphone input, the iMic is not needed. As shown in Fig. 1, we taped the tip of the micro- phone to the end of a 10-ft piece of electrical conduit pipe, which we purchased at Home Depot. Running the MacScope II program in trigger mode and hitting the end of the pipe with a hammer, we got the results shown in Fig. 2. Here we see a regular series of pulses representing the compressional pulse bouncing back and forth. Selecting the front edge of seven pulses, the curve A window tells us that the seven bounces took 8.38 ms for an average time of 1.20 ms for the 6.10-m trip. This corresponds to a speed of 5080 m/s. To set up the trigger mode, we watched the ambi- ent voltage and saw that it did not rise to 20 mv if we did not touch the pipe. Thus we set the trigger level to 20 mv, clicked the Trigger A button, and selected Stop on Trigger as seen in Fig. 2. When we hit the pipe, we immediately got the curve shown. We sus- pect that the small pulses between the seven regular Fig. 1. Microphone taped to steel pipe. Fig. 2. By selecting seven pulses (heavy line), we get an elapsed time of 8.38 ms for the seven bounces of the sound pulse. Thus the pulse traveled down and back (6.10 m) in 1.20 ms for an average speed of 5080 m/s. THE PHYSICS TEACHER Vol. 46, January 2008 DOI: 10.1119/1.2823993 13 14 THE PHYSICS TEACHER Vol. 46, January 2008 pulses result from the hammer bouncing when it hit the pipe. Measuring the Delay To be sure that we were observing a pulse moving down the pipe, we decided to measure the delay as the sound pulse moved for the first time down the pipe. To do this, we attached microphones to both ends of the pipe, plugged them into the left and right sides of the stereo input, triggered both curve A and curve B, and got the results shown in Fig. 3. Here we see the 0.60-ms delay in curve B, which is the time the pulse took to travel down the pipe. There was a complication involved in measuring this 0.60-ms delay. Typical computer microphones are powered by the computer (or the iMic). We found that any connections that powered both microphones also mixed the signals and we could not see the delay. To handle this problem, we purchased two $25 bat- tery-powered mono lapel microphones from Radio Shack. We also had to purchase two $4 connectors to go from the 1/8-in mini plug of the microphone to the RCA input of the Y connector supplied with the Griffin iMic. This wiring setup is shown in Fig. 4. The net result was that it cost us an additional $58 in order to see the delay. References 1. Gerald P. Hart, Measurement of the speed of sound in metal rods using the microcomputer, Phys. Teach. 24, 89 (Feb. 1986). 2. Tony Key, Robert Smidrovskis, and Milton From, Measuring the speed of sound in a solid, Phys. Teach. 38, 7677 (Feb. 2000). A signal generator and a trans- ducer were used to create a series of square wave pulses in an acrylic rod. 3. David Potter, The speed of sound in an iron rod, Phys. Teach. 40, 5657 (Jan. 2002). A pickup coil used to detect the enhanced magnetization of the compres- sional pulse. 4. Karl C. Mamola, Measurement of sound velocities in metal wires, Am. J. Phys. 42, 1117118 (Dec. 1974). A loud compressional wave is created by dragging a wet sponge along a stretched wire. 5. Elisha Huggins, Fourier analysis in introductory phys- ics, Phys. Teach. 45, 2629 (Jan. 2007). Introduces the use of MacScope. 6. The iMic is discussed at: http://www.griffintechnology. com/products/imic. 7. The shareware program MacScope II, which turns any USB Mac or Windows computer into an audio oscilloscope, can be freely downloaded from: http:// www.physics2000.com. PACS codes: 01.40.d, 01.50.My, 01.50.Pa Elisha Huggins is professor emeritus at Dartmouth College. This paper uses his second version of MacScope. The first version had a $2000 hardware inter- face box, which could be eliminated using the computers sound input capability. 29 Moose Mt. Lodge Road, Etna, NH 03750; lish.huggins@dartmouth.edu Fig. 3. Curve A shows the signal from the microphone at the hammer end of the pipe. The microphone at the other end, whose output is seen in curve B, shows no response for 0.60 ms. Fig. 4. The signals from the two microphones enter the Y connector supplied by Griffin. We had to convert from mono 1/8-in microphone plugs to RCA inputs on the Y connector.