0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
15 Ansichten3 Seiten
Car-centric planning has been directly responsible for the degeneration of urban mobility in most Asian cities. Urban mobility decreases as the travel time increases substantially with higher traffic. The failure of public transport system to attract the passengers in terms of travel time and cost is largely responsible for the road becomming a sure choice for the commuters.
Car-centric planning has been directly responsible for the degeneration of urban mobility in most Asian cities. Urban mobility decreases as the travel time increases substantially with higher traffic. The failure of public transport system to attract the passengers in terms of travel time and cost is largely responsible for the road becomming a sure choice for the commuters.
Car-centric planning has been directly responsible for the degeneration of urban mobility in most Asian cities. Urban mobility decreases as the travel time increases substantially with higher traffic. The failure of public transport system to attract the passengers in terms of travel time and cost is largely responsible for the road becomming a sure choice for the commuters.
2) Car-centric planning has been directly responsible for the degeneration of
urban mobility in most Asian cities. Examine. In the Urban cities-the dream of middle class is -A car-a status symbol.The theory of interest articulation shows that the common interests are reflected in the policy making body- of the city ,-of the state and -of the nation at large.Roads are expanded which incentivises more cars and in turn more roads. This circle goes on until the space is crunched and there is no more room for further expansion of the roads.Urban mobility decreases as the travel time increases substantially with higher traffic.Asia has the highest rates of urban migration which is not an abnormal condition when we look at the countries which were at a similar development stage.But the failure of public transport system to attract the passengers in terms of travel time and cost is largely responsible for the road becomming a sure choice for the commuters.Cases in point:Mumbai ,kolkata,Delhi -the severe mobility crunch forced the policy makers to move towards the rapid transit system rather than car centric planning. Interlinked network of rapid transit system with underground stations as the nodes and the roads for the travel between the node and a sub node(here your house) is the required criteria for the urban mobility to go up.This is the only way travel time and cost can be reduced and should be reflected in the city plans.
2 nd Answer Urban degeneration is one of the major problem confronting the process of urbanisation. Unplanned transport infrstructure especially roads are a major contributing factor to this degeneration. Often the roads are expanded to decongest them for cars. Termed as car-centric planning, the move mostly attracts more cars and increases congestion. Road are constructed over surface. Long gestation periods cause great deal of congestion, traffic diversion and jams, obviating the whole purpose of decongestation. Poor planning and foresight makes these projects redundant on completetion as the demands already exceed the space created. Also the increased load of slow moving cars and traffic jams create a major pollution problem. Land acquisition, demolitation etc create long litigation and implementation delays. Further the ability to expand is limited especially in densely populated areas. Asian countries with whooping population suffers a great deal with mobility related problems. Solutions like elevated expressway constructed in Manila to ease congestation has further aggravated it. The solution lies in realising the fact that the purpose of mass transit system should be to move people not cars . Underground transit systems like those in Japan, Singapore and Metros in India provides a solution. But, these mass transit can only be successful to attract commuters if they are supported by artery network like buses, autos and cylce depots. 3 rd Answer Many Asian countries were de jure or de facto colonies. The whites and the rich brownies had car, the poor had the public-transport. With freedom and economic progress, the urban middle-class emerged from the poor and for them a car signaled having arrived in life. The govt. took this as natural, and widened the roads, paved the unpaved and built new ones for the cars. With a burgeoning middle class and price-wars in the market, the growth of the car-population outstrips the current as well as predicted growth in road infrastructure. The central idea of this discourse is that the 1000cc 3mX1.5m car hauls a single person, where a 8000cc12mX3m bus will haul at least a 50. A diesel locomotive will haul even more kg per unit power. So it is not the car that is the problem, but the driver-only cars and car centric planning. More road space will attract more cars. And driver only cars mean 4.5 m^2 space for a 6 foot man. That is a sure shot way to degenerated urban mobility. What is to be done is declare moratorium on urban roads, and build a subway.But what is needed most is an attitudinal change from seeing cars as an expression of vertical social mobility, to seein them as a mere means of horizontal physical mobility
4 th answer Long queues of cars stuck in traffic jam are a very common feature in Asian cities. City administration builds flyovers, underpasses and widens roads to increase city mobility but only to fall short due to increased traffic pressure. Ensuring faster mass mobility in cities is an integral part of city planning which must adapt to the specific needs of the city and its population instead of copying mindlessly the idea of planning from the developed nations. Though Asian cities require more emphasis on rapid mass transit system, the city administrators appear to find solution only in building flyovers, underpasses and widening roads to decongest traffic system. More importantly, even these roads often exclude its use by cycles and discourage two-wheelers. Despite these efforts the challenge continues which exposes the lack of wisdom in transport management. There may be pressure from car industry or belief of our policymakers that car sales are essential to keep economic growth. But what is overlooked is economic cost of time loss, difficulties of majority commuters and not ignorable environmental cost. A well planned and integrated public transport is the only solution to decongest our roads and also to reduce agony of the commuters. Delhi Metros success is an example to this.