Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
. A
detailed illustration of the simulation and design of
HIDiCs can be found elsewhere (Gadalla et al., 2004).
Then, the obtained liquid and vapour stream temperatures
and enthalpy changes are extracted and imported to
ASPEN pinch to plot the process composite curves.
These curves include the information on temperatures,
ow rates and specic heats of all process streams, such
as condenser, reboiler and stage vapour and liquid streams.
One may notice that the HIDiC design of Figure 4 is an
ideal one since the reboiler duty is equal to zero. This can
be seen on the right side of this gure when the two curves
start on the same vertical enthalpy line. As shown, the con-
denser duty is equivalent to 413 kW and the amount of heat
recovery, which is indicated by the overlap between the
two curves, is 2866 kW. The pinch point can be represented
by a vertical line in the composite curve diagram. This line
cuts the composite curves at the minimum temperature
difference (separation distance). The temperatures of the
pinch are those at which the composite curves are cut by
the pinch line. The pinch divides the design of the process
into two stages, and hence classies the streams into two
groups, streams above the pinch and streams below the
pinch. The main principles of the design using pinch analy-
sis are: no cooling is allowed above the pinch and similarly
no heating below the pinch. In addition, no heat is trans-
ferred across the pinch. Satisfying these guidelines will
reduce the energy consumption of the distillation processes
(Smith, 1995).
To incorporate more information of the distillation
process to the composite curves, the heat transfer processes
across the column stages can be superimposed. As shown in
Figure 4, this can be done by representing the heat transfer
on each stage by a straight line connecting the temperature
of a rectifying stage with its corresponding stripping stage.
Each line represents the process of heat transfer from one
stage in the rectifying column into the corresponding stage
in the stripping column. These lines are equivalent to
exchanger units or heat panels placed on the column
stages. Each line starts on the hot composite curve at the
temperature of the hot vapour and ends on the cold compo-
site curve at the temperature of the cold liquid.
The height of a line is equivalent to the temperature driv-
ing force across the stage through which heat is transferred;
however, the width does not necessary indicate the duty of
this heat transfer. As shown, some lines cross over the
pinch; this means that these lines transfer heat from
above the pinch to below the pinch, which is a violation
of the principles of pinch analysis. This across-pinch heat
transfer is conducted on the stages 4, 5 and 6. This may
incur more energy consumption, i.e., the reboiler duty or
condenser duty is not at the minimum value. As the reboiler
duty is already zero for this ideal HIDiC design, the con-
denser duty (413 kW) must be at higher value than the
minimum one. Consequently, the amount of heat recovery
is higher than what is necessary to accomplish an ideal
HIDiC. In other words, it may be expected to reach the
same HIDiC design with smaller heat transfer areas and
less utility consumption. Thus, to improve the performance
of the original design, the circumstances that violate the
pinch technology rules should be avoided. As a result,
heat transfer across these three stages should not be per-
formed. This calculation is performed using ASPEN
in
a way that the heat transfer across these pinched stages is
not considered. This will lead to a new heat integration
scheme with an opportunity for better energy savings.
The modied heat integration scheme will then have heat
transfer throughout all column stages except stages 4, 5, 6
(Figure 5). The modied design in practice will have heat
transfer panels only on the integrated stages, whereas
Figure 4. HIDiC composite curves for benzenetoluene separation
(100 kmol/h equimolar feed; 20 stages; pressure ratio (bar): 2.5:1.0;
stage duty: 287 kW; 99.5% benzene in distillate and 0.5% in bottoms,
including stages with heat transfer operation.
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2005, 83(A8): 987993
PINCH ANALYSIS-BASED APPROACH TO DESIGN OF HIDiCs 989
stages 46 will operate without panels. And since the
location of the pinch point is only sensitive to the tempera-
ture proles which in turn are governed by the pressure
ratio, the location of the pinched stages is then stable.
In Table 1, the results of the modied design are com-
pared with the original design. These results as mentioned
previously were obtained from ASPEN
simulation tool.
The total annual cost reported in the table includes the
investment costs of column, condenser, compressor and
heat transfer mediums (devices). Reboiler cost is not
contained since HIDiC is ideal and reboiler is not needed.
The cost also accounts for the electricity and water
consumption. Cost correlations for equipments including
column shell and trays, compressor, condensers, reboilers
and heat transfer devices and operating costs of electricity
and cooling water are those proposed by Douglas (1998).
To account for the complexity of HIDiC compared to
normal distillation columns, the installed column cost is
multiplied by 1.5. One may notice that the comparison of
Table 1 does not include any control or startup issues
since the study is devoted to conceptual design only.
Since here only two ideal options are considered, the
exclusions of reboiler and condenser, required to startup,
is not essential, because the costs related to these units
are the same for both cases. As shown in Table 1, the
modied design requires less heat to achieve an ideal
HIDiC. The condenser duty and the water consumption
are both reduced and the total heat transfer area required
is 36% less than that needed for the original design. The
compressor load saving is about 4% and hence its electri-
city consumption will also reduce. The modied design
has a lower total cost with saving of 4% with respect to
the original design cost.
From Figure 6, it can be seen that thanks to a substantial
reduction in the total heat transfer area the area required per
stage will remain relatively small. Such an impressive gain
on the total heat transfer area side has arisen from the fact
that in case of modied design the temperature driving
force increased substantially (see Figure 7), due to avoiding
the heat transfer mismatches. The application of these new
ideas may lead to considerable savings in cases where the
condenser duties are larger than reboiler duties. In these
cases, additional savings in hot utility consumptions
could be attained.
A MODIFIED HIDiC DESIGN FOR PP-SPLITTER
In practice the applications amenable for the implemen-
tation of this heat integration concept are those where a
heat pump is already established as a technology, i.e., in
energy intensive separations of close boiling mixtures
such as propylenepropane and the like separations.
Due to different product purity requirements, a propylene
propane separation column (so called PP-splitter) contains
usually much more stages in the rectifying than in the strip-
ping section of the column. It was observed by a separate
study done on HIDiCs by Sun et al. (2003) that a top
design is much more efcient than a bottom alternative
for a propylenepropane splitter. In the top design, the
stripping stages are integrated with the equivalent number
of the top stages of the rectifying section, while the lower
(non-integrated) part of the rectifying section operates as
a normal column. The opposite is the case with the
bottom design.
The relative performance of the two cases is illustrated in
Table 2, which includes a schematic illustration of the top
Table 1. Results of a modied HIDiC design for benzenetoluene
separation.
Parameter Original design Modied design
Reboiler duty (kW) 0 0
Stage heat duty (kW) 287 391
Compressor load (kW) 446 427
Heat recovery (kW) 2866 2737
Condenser duty (kW) 413 389
Water utility (t/y) 79.040 74.448
Total heat transfer area (m
2
) 363 233
Total annul cost (k$/y) 523 503
Figure 6. Heat transfer areas of the modied HIDiC and original designs.
Figure 5. A new heat integration scheme for an optimum HIDiC design.
Figure 7. Temperature driving forces of the modied HIDiC and original
designs.
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2005, 83(A8): 987993
990 GADALLA et al.
and bottom designs. The corresponding operating
conditions, for the base case HIDiC-type PP-splitter, are
given in Table 3.
Obviously, all the duties and the corresponding heat
transfer areas are much larger in the case of bottom
design. Here, the upper, normally operating part of recti-
cation section does not perform adequately, which means
that practically all separation work is concentrated in a
rather short integrated part, where an immense reux/boil
up is required to perform accordingly with a relatively
small number of theoretical plates. Namely, the reux
ratio in the upper (normal part) is well below the minimum
for normal operation (this part of the section is far from the
feed tray and thus it can be operated at such a theoretically
unsound condition). Although this conguration is not
worth of further elaboration, it is evaluated here together
with the most benecial one by using the stage temperature
proles and composite curves, because this provides useful
insights into the conguration imposed nature of the heat
transfer process.
Figure 8 shows the temperature of the column stages for
each design before transferring heat from the rectifying
column to the stripping column as well as after the heat
is being transferred between the two columns. Strikingly,
in the case of the bottom design, the rst 17 stripping
stages are cooled down after transferring heat from the
rectifying column. This means that the cold liquid streams
on these stages are losing heat and becoming colder. This
indicates that these streams consume cold utilities as hot
streams rather than receiving heat from other hot streams.
This is a consequence of the fact that due to insufcient
separation in the rectication section the top stages of
stripping section contain relatively much more propylene
and consequently have a lower temperature at the same
pressure. The only remedy would be increasing the com-
pression ratio accordingly, which however is detrimental
for compression duty. On the other hand, the lowest
feasible compression ratio for HIDiC is that that ensures
that the lowest temperature in the rectication section is
higher than the highest temperature in the stripping section.
Certainly, minimum temperature difference implies maxi-
mum heat transfer area and this is a typical trade off con-
sideration during design of installations for heat transfer.
Returning to the above discussed ill-situation, in overall,
the amount of heat recovered from the rectifying stages is
less than what is available and on the contrary, excess cool-
ing utilities are consumed. As a result, more heat needs to
be transferred between the two columns in order to reduce
the reboiler duty further. On the other hand, all the strip-
ping stages in of heat recovery available for this case is
completely exploited in heating the cold streams of the
top design are heated by recovering heat from the rectifying
stages. In addition, the amount the stripping stages and
hence similar situations are avoided.
Figures 9 and 10 show the grand composite curves for
the top and bottom designs respectively. Grand composite
curves are another form of the temperatureenthalpy
representation of a given process (Smith, 1995). In such
case, a line with a negative slope represents a hot stream
or a group of streams, while cold streams are represented
by a line with a positive slope. A hot stream can be used
to heat a cold stream if there is a viable temperature driving
force. The gap area between the two hot and cold lines is
equivalent to the amount of heat recovery. Additionally,
the pinch point can be detected from the grand composite
curve; it is located where the curve touches the zero-
Table 2. Results of HIDiC top and bottom designs for propylenepropane
splitter.
Top
design
Bottom
design
Stage duty (kW) 1817 4686
Condenser duty (kW) 5782 18 880
Reboiler duty (kW) 0 0
Compressor duty (kW) 7489 18 820
Total transfer area (m
2
) 25 364 37 360
Table 3. Problem data and HIDiC design specications.
Column specication
Feed propylenepropane
Composition propylene mole% 50
Flow rate t/h 111.6
Pressure bar 12.2
Temperature 8C 31.7
Rectifying pressure bar 19.2
Stripping pressure bar 12.2
Rectifying stages 154
Stripping stages 57
Top product purity propylene mole% 99.6
Bottom product purity propylene mole% 1.1
Figure 8. Stage temperature proles for top and bottom HIDiC designs.
Figure 9. A grand composite curve of the top HIDiC design.
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2005, 83(A8): 987993
PINCH ANALYSIS-BASED APPROACH TO DESIGN OF HIDiCs 991
enthalpy axis. The grand composite curve of the top
design shows that all the rectifying section hot streams
can provide heat to the stripping section cold streams.
Therefore, all heats available in the rectifying section are
transferred into the stripping section. The cooling duty
required, as shown in the Figure 9, represents only the
necessary cooling duty of the condenser. Conversely, the
grand composite curve of the bottom design reveals that
a part of stripping stage streams behaves as hot streams;
these streams were supposed to be integrated with the
rectifying hot streams. Alternatively, they are cooled,
consuming additional cooling duties and reducing the
actual amount of heat recovery from the rectifying stages.
Moreover, the amount of heat recovered is shown to be
less than which is available on the rectifying stages. In
conclusion, the HIDiC bottom design requires more
heat transfer in order to compensate the shortcoming of
the design performance, and consequently, poor energy
efciency is obtained.
According to Figures 8 and 9, the pinch point situation
occurs on the bottom stages of the HIDiC top design.
This indicates that it could be possible to improve the
design by changing the heat integration scheme. An attempt
for improving the energy performance of the top design
delivered two possible congurations, i.e., two modi-
cations of the original design shown schematically in
Figure 11. The rst improvement is a change in the heat
transfer rate across the rst few top and the last few
bottom stages of the column. In this design modication
(top-new), the heat duty is increased on these stages.
The design transfers a 2600 kW of heat across the stages
14 and 5457 and all others exchange a constant heat
duty of 1600 kW. These heat duty values are obtained by
using ASPEN