0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
152 Ansichten37 Seiten
100G in the Metro: When and Where It Will Be Economical An Infonetics Research Webinar Co-produced with jdsu, mrv, and Transmode. Transition to metro 100G expected in 2016. 100G is not in a bubble; it is unseating the technology workhorse of the past decade.
100G in the Metro: When and Where It Will Be Economical An Infonetics Research Webinar Co-produced with jdsu, mrv, and Transmode. Transition to metro 100G expected in 2016. 100G is not in a bubble; it is unseating the technology workhorse of the past decade.
100G in the Metro: When and Where It Will Be Economical An Infonetics Research Webinar Co-produced with jdsu, mrv, and Transmode. Transition to metro 100G expected in 2016. 100G is not in a bubble; it is unseating the technology workhorse of the past decade.
An Infonetics Research Webinar Co-produced with JDSU, MRV, and Transmode The Webinar Will Begin Shortly #100GMetro 100G in the Metro: When and Where It Will Be Economical An Infonetics Research Webinar Co-produced with JDSU, MRV, and Transmode #100GMetro Todays Speakers 3 Andrew Schmitt Principal Analyst, Optical Infonetics Research JoAnne Emery Event Director Infonetics Research (Moderator) Scott Wilkinson Senior Director of Technical Marketing MRV Sten Nordell Chief Technology Officer Transmode Guylain Barlow Senior Product Manager JDSU #100GMetro Agenda 4 Service Provider Deployment Plans 3 4 Why Metro 100G Is Different Metro Pluggable Technology Overview Deploying 100G in the Metro Sponsor Approaches Conclusions Audience Q&A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4 #100GMetro Deployed Optical WAN Capacity Deployed bandwidth grew 25% to 30% in past 3 years 100G is not in a bubble; it is unseating the technology workhorse of the past decade Forecast: 100G costs will drop Only makes sense for long spans today, used mostly for 10G traffic Metro applications limited to either 100G clients or fiber exhaust scenarios Transition to metro 100G expected in 2016 Infonetics Research, 10G/40G/100G Optical Transceivers Market Size and Forecasts, 2 nd Edition, October 2013 5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 CY11 CY12 CY13 CY14 CY15 CY16 CY17 T r a n s m i s s i o n
C a p a c i t y
( P e t a b i t s / s e c )
10G 40G 100G Growth rate What Service Providers Are Saying 100G crowding out other speeds within two years 10G still plays a major role in the metro until 2015 10% 5% 54% 26% 14% 7% 22% 62% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2013 2016 A v e r a g e
P e r c e n t
New Long Reach WDM Installs <10G 10G 40G 100G Infonetics Research, 40G/100G and ROADM Deployment Strategies: Global Service Provider Survey, November 2013 6 Metro 100G Poised to Jump Service providers indicate metro 100G roughly triples between 2013 and 2015 Core 100G penetration peaks by 2016 Metro becomes the source of most market growth starting in 2015
Infonetics Research, 40G/100G and ROADM Deployment Strategies: Global Service Provider Survey, November 2012 & November 2013 Question: What percentage of new installs are coherent in your metro and core networks? 25% 46% 68% 79% 8% 10% 29% 37% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 2012 2013 2015 2016 S h a r e
o f
N e w
C o h e r e n t
W a v e l e n g t h s
Core Metro 7 Metro 100G Technology Preferences Technology not a differentiator in the metro Unless it lowers costs! Pluggable CFP2 perceived as potentially valuable technology Service providers want more of what they already have Except cheaper 8 Infonetics Research, 40G/100G and ROADM Deployment Strategies: Global Service Provider Survey, November 2013 Scale: 1 =not important; 7 =critical 7% 14% 18% 18% 21% 36% 71% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Raman amplification Pluggable CFP based 100G direct-detect non-coherent module Advanced modulation formats such as 16-QAM for higher spectral efficiency Pluggable CFP based 100G coherent module Flexible coherent (software selectable modulation) for reduced sparing Pluggable CFP2 based 100G coherent module Lower cost 100G hardware identical to form factor used in long haul % of Respondents Rating 6 or 7 Desired Technologies for Metro Deployments (Metro Regional Spans of 80km600km) Agenda 9 Service Provider Deployment Plans 3 4 Why Metro 100G Is Different Metro Pluggable Technology Overview Deploying 100G in the Metro Sponsor Approaches Conclusions Audience Q&A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 #100GMetro Why 100G in the Metro/Regional Network? Continuous growth of high capacity video traffic HD and 3D TV drives bandwidth in metro/regional network Data center interconnect Internet Content Providers (ICPs) Super data centers; Netflix, Facebook, YouTube, iTunes Increase in mobile broadband through Smartphones and dongles 10 Source: Bell Labs, Metro Traffic Growth, December 2013 10 Extra Challenges in the Metro Its not just a capacity/cost question Space and power consumption are critical challenges to fix Metro 100G isnt just a challenge for Layer 1 Many networks now metro edge / metro regional P-OTS 10G Ethernet services/backhaul require aggregation to 100G - e.g. CCAP (new combined CMTS and edge QAM in cable networks) 10G becomes the new 1G client port rate, requiring aggregation to 100G in the network and 100G client ports also grow rapidly 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 CY05 CY07 CY09 CY11 CY13 CY15 CY17 N u m b e r
o f
p o r t s
Sub 10G (10M-2.5G) 10G 40G 100G Infonetics: Optical Network Hardware Market Share and Forecasts, Nov. 2013 11 100G Solutions Need to Work with the Existing Infrastructure Over existing amplifiers, filters, ROADMs, etc. Coexistence with 10G and 40G wavelengths and others such as 16G Fibre Channel 100G solution Metro edge / metro regional P-OTS Existing amplifiers, filters, ROADMs Coexist with 10G, 40G, 16G FC, etc. 12 The Need for Economic 100G Solutions in the Metro Current 100G solutions (e.g., coherent) are too expensive for metro applications Long haul economics (many customers, higher revenue) do not translate to metro networks
Data center and non-traditional carrier networks do not require expensive telecomm-grade 100G solutions Standardization of 100G optics has the promise of reducing costs on a 10G rather than a 40G curve 800Gbps+ 13 40km The industry needs a commodity 100G solution like pluggable optics to bring prices in line as they did with 10G Demand on Client-Side Drives Line Side DWDM Network (Line) Client Network Long to Ultra-Long Reach New: Metropolitan area networks Long-haul terrestrial networks Ultra-long submarine networks
Short to Medium Reach Intra-office Data centers Enterprise networks Routers and switches ROADM 100 GE/OTU 4 Client Client Transponder Transponder Client Metro is pushing the requirements for lower costs and higher port density across both Clients and Lines 14 100 Gbps Classic Tests: Client & Line This example shows elements based on right to left traffic direction Client Side Line Side C l i e n t
S i d e
Client/Network Testing: Ensure service quality Ethernet throughput, latency, packet jitter, bursting OTN requirements emerging Infrastructure Tests Connector inspection and cleaning OTDR (length, loss, impairments) NOTE: Dispersion measurements are not needed on the client side Basic Infrastructure Testing/Documentation Connector inspection and cleaning OTDR (length, loss, impairments) Advanced Testing OSNR: Higher sensitivity at 100 G RAMAN amp link testing (IL/ORL/OTDR) Chromatic dispersion (CD) Polarization mode dispersion (PMD) 100 GE OA OA D e m u x
M u x
Pluggable optics Pluggable optics Pluggable optics Fixed or pluggable optics Most common 100 GE Client interface is: 100GBase-LR4 1310 nm range (nm) 1295.56 1300.05 1304.58 1309.14 4.5 nm 4 x 25 G 1 signal Use of DWDM/modulated signals 15 New challenge: 100 G pluggable optics are more complex than at lower rates. New requirement for optics module testing Agenda 16 Service Provider Deployment Plans 3 4 Why Metro 100G Is Different Metro Pluggable Technology Overview Deploying 100G in the Metro Sponsor Approaches Conclusions Audience Q&A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 16 #100GMetro Current Status of Pluggable 100G Optics 17 Gray optics Dedicated fiber Single fiber pair connection Singlemode or Multimode Cannot DWDM Metro optics Four DWDM wavelengths Multi-fiber connection External mux/demux Fixed or tunable Coherent optics One wavelength DWDM Tunable Extended distance capability Gray Optics Cannot be used with WDM Require a dedicated fiber per direction (fiber pair) Singlemode and multimode versions available Multiple wavelengths with internal mux/demux 10x10Gbps (SR10) and 4x25Gbps (LR4/ER4) versions Metro Optics Can be used with WDM, including amps and DCM External WDM mux/demux required Can share fiber pair with other services Four wavelengths (4x25Gbps) Fixed and tunable versions Coherent Optics Single wavelength Can be used in DWDM, networks with amps Distance up to 1000km Tunable wavelengths Enables the longest distance and/or highest bandwidth Advanced optical technology reduces or removes need for dispersion management Available now from several vendors in several versions. Versions available now. New versions appearing with costs rapidly declining. Initial versions should appear in 2014. 100G Metro Pluggable Optics An economical solution for network operators needing to move from 800Gbps to ~2Tbps per fiber Currently much less expensive than coherent and available for purchase Fixed (non-tunable) versions approaching 5-6x 10G pricing 18 Up to 2Tbps 80 channels x 10Gbps = 800Gbps 20 channels x 100Gbps = 2Tbps 1 wavelength = 1 service 4 wavelengths = 1 service 10G DWDM 100G Metro DWDM 100G Pluggables Evolution over Time Client optics CFP so far, evolving to CFP2 (and later CFP4, QSFP28) CFP2 client optics are a metro enabler: lower cost and higher density 25G I/O is a very challenging technology though
Line Optics (modulated) Started with fixed optics, moving to pluggable form factors
25G I/O
10G I/O CFP 10 physical electrical lanes LR4 to 4 CFP2 4 physical electrical lanes LR4 to 4 19 CFP CFP4 QSFP28 CFP2 Fixed 168-pin MSA CFP CFP2 (with External DSP) 100G Optics Development in Size, Cost and Power Consumption Time PM-QPSK Coherent Trx 5x7 OIF module 75W PM-QPSK Coherent Trx CFP module 30W Photonic integration and ASIC for metro spec. 2014 2015 2013 OIF=Optical Internetworking Forum Size Cost Power consumption 20 Fully Integrated 100G Pluggable Technology Clearer demarcation between optical and digital domain with DSP + ADC integrated in CFPx Decreased complexity with no external analogue high speed interfaces Less complex design, more futureproof and faster Time To Market for new line formats No need to redesign boards for different pluggable interfaces with various coherent transmit/receive optics More flexibility with support for various CFPs for long haul coherent, metro coherent and client optics in any port Why fully integrated CFPx over loosely coupled? 21 Complex high speed analogue interface DSP needs to interoperate with multiple CFP vendors CFPx DSP Loosely coupled CFPx Integrated CFPx DSP CFPx Traffic unit Common digital interface Traffic unit Agenda 22 Service Provider Deployment Plans 3 4 Why Metro 100G Is Different Metro Pluggable Technology Overview Deploying 100G in the Metro Sponsor Approaches Conclusions Audience Q&A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 22 #100GMetro Datacenter vs. Service Provider Requirements 23 Service Provider Revenue from transport Reliability and SLAs drive network design Five 9s transport network requirements Port density is paramount Central office is filled with ports Drive to 100G native ports and 100G transponders Usually own the fiber infrastructure Multiple service types on same fibers Revenue from applications and content Cost and capacity drive network design Best effort network with retransmit at Layer 3 Cost per port is paramount Datacenter is filled with storage and processing Drive to keep 10G ports and use 100G muxponders Usually lease fiber or capacity from others Limited service types on the same fibers Datacenter Divergence in service requirements is creating a divergence in 100G requirements 100Gbps Interconnect 24 800Gbps Current bandwidth per fiber maxed at 800Gbps (80 wavelengths x 10Gbps) Metro 100G optics allow an upgrade to 2Tbps (20 channels of 100G) immediately and cost-effectively The ultimate goal is cost-effective coherent optics, allowing up to 8Tbps (80 x 100G) per fiber 2Tbps 8Tbps Additional fibers provisioned or jump to a coherent solution for compatibility and long-term growth Datacenter Service Provider Network Examples Layer 1 and Layer 2 10G (OTU2e) 10G (OTU2e) N x 1 G b E
N x 1 G b E
100G (OTU4) 100G (OTU4) 100GbE 100GbE M X P M X P TP TP TP TP 100G (OTU4) 100G (OTU4) 100G (OTU4) 100G (OTU4) 100GbE 100GbE N x 1 0 G b E
N x 1 0 G b E
Layer 2 and Layer 1 combined Layer 1 TP TP 25 100 G introduced many innovations, including multilane pluggable optics Metro deployments will increase volumes 100 G interfaces are often (but not limited to) LR4 involving multiwavelength client interfaces
The next logical step: Simple method to validate the pluggable optics Electrical pins 10 (or 4) Tx/Rx lanes LR4 optical 4 CFP/CFP2 My 100 G network shows traffic errors at deployment. Whats the next step? Deployment Scenario: Problem Statement 26 Testing 100G Pluggable Optics: Use Cases Operator Use Cases Troubleshooting: On network test errors, initiate troubleshooting by first testing pluggable optics Prescreening: Testing pluggable optics in advance can avoid future issues
Manufacturer Use Cases Compliance Testing: Ensure that designs meet the criteria outlined in the standards, such as IEEE 27 Testing Pluggable Optics: Anatomy of Requirements R&D and qualification require compliance testing Network deployments require performance testing Compliance Detail Error Rate Performance per lane Check pattern sensitivity and crosstalk Stress skew parameters including dynamic skew and nominal jitter Verify receiver sensitivity Functionally verify communications with optics module (MDIO) Performance Focus on Error Rate performance Test within clock tolerances Verify operation within specified optical power range CFP CFP2 28 Clearly define acceptable error rate performance Agenda 29 Service Provider Deployment Plans 3 4 Why Metro 100G Is Different Metro Pluggable Technology Overview Deploying 100G in the Metro Sponsor Approaches Conclusions Audience Q&A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 29 #100GMetro Covering the industry ecosystem
JDSU 100G Test Solutions Early adopters requiring depth Field Deployment & Troubleshooting T-BERD/MTS R&D Labs ONT 30 Production Scale & efficiency Services Protocols Client I/f Optical testing Infrastructure Portability & Reliability OTN 100GE Fiber Characterization (Loss/ORL/OTDR/Dispersion) Spectral analysis (Power//OSNR) Connector Inspection / cleaning Photonic testing Optics Compliance & Performance OptiDriver: Designed for the Future of 100G 31 100G Muxponder with 100G CFP Pluggable Optics Slot & 10x10G SFP+ and 2x40G QSFP+ Pluggable Optics Slots 100G Transponder with SR-10 and ER-4 Gray Optics CFP Pluggable Optics A family of chassis optimized for mature 10G and emerging pluggable 100G solutions New All pluggable Metro 100G solution Interfaces: 1x100G + 12x10G Coherent CFP line ~800km Supports LAN-mode (10 G LAN/100 GbE) and Transponder- mode (OTU2e/OTU4) on all ports 220G total switching capacity for full wire-speed switching at all packet sizes 32 First all pluggable, coherent optics based 100G metro solution supporting Layer 1 and Layer 2 100G Transponder 220G Ethernet Muxponder 100G Muxponder Interfaces: 2x100G Coherent CFP line ~800km LR-4/LR-10/SR-10 client CFPs 100GbE & OTU4 support Interfaces: 1x100G + 10x10G Coherent CFP line ~800km STM-64/OC-192, 10GbE, 8GFC, OTU2/OTU2e support 100GbE & OTU4 support Agenda 33 Service Provider Deployment Plans 3 4 Why Metro 100G Is Different Metro Pluggable Technology Overview Deploying 100G in the Metro Sponsor Approaches Conclusions Audience Q&A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 33 #100GMetro Conclusions Metro 100G does not have the luxury of greenfield deployments and has a much higher economic bar to clear to beat 10G Requirements of datacenters are different from those of traditional service providers, and they provide the near term metro 100G market growth Vendors believe pluggable 100G WDM optics offer the economics and flexibility to address customer requirements 34 Agenda 35 Service Provider Deployment Plans 3 4 Why Metro 100G Is Different Metro Pluggable Technology Overview Deploying 100G in the Metro Sponsor Approaches Conclusions Audience Q&A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 35 #100GMetro Audience Q&A 36 Andrew Schmitt Principal Analyst, Optical andrew@infonetics.com Infonetics Research JoAnne Emery Event Director joanne@infonetics.com Infonetics Research (Moderator) Scott Wilkinson Senior Director of Technical Marketing SWilkinson@mrv.com MRV Sten Nordell Chief Technology Officer sten.nordell@transmode.com Transmode Guylain Barlow Senior Product Manager Guylain.Barlow@jdsu.com JDSU #100GMetro Thank You This webcast will be available on-demand for 90 days
For additional Infonetics events, visit https://www.infonetics.com/infonetics-events/