0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
43 Ansichten6 Seiten
Separation of conducted EM1 noise into different modes, common mode (CM) and differential mode (DM), is important to the appropriate application of emission reduction techniques. This paper identify different noise modes for different front-diode conducting patterns. The impact on EM1 filter components by these noise modes is summarized. A time-domain based method is proposed to separate and acquire CM and DM noise components for the diode-front three-phase systems.
Originalbeschreibung:
Originaltitel
Definition and Acquisition of CM and DM EM1 Noise for General-Purpose
Separation of conducted EM1 noise into different modes, common mode (CM) and differential mode (DM), is important to the appropriate application of emission reduction techniques. This paper identify different noise modes for different front-diode conducting patterns. The impact on EM1 filter components by these noise modes is summarized. A time-domain based method is proposed to separate and acquire CM and DM noise components for the diode-front three-phase systems.
Separation of conducted EM1 noise into different modes, common mode (CM) and differential mode (DM), is important to the appropriate application of emission reduction techniques. This paper identify different noise modes for different front-diode conducting patterns. The impact on EM1 filter components by these noise modes is summarized. A time-domain based method is proposed to separate and acquire CM and DM noise components for the diode-front three-phase systems.
2004 3Sth Annual IEEE Power El ectroni cs Specialisrs Conference
Anclten, Germany, 2004
Definition and Acquisition of CM and DM EM1 Noise for General-Purpose Adjustable Speed Motor Drives W. Shen, F. Wang, D. Boroyevich, and Y. Liu Center for Power Electronics Systems The Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer EnFineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA weshen@,vt.edu Abstract- Separating conducted EM1 noise into different modes, common mode ( CM) and differential mode (DM), is important to the appropriate application of emission reduction techniques. While the CM/ DM separation is well defined and understood for the single-phase or DC system, the same cannot be said for three-phase converter systems, common for general-purpose adjustable speed drives (ASD). Based on the study of CM and DM propagation characteristics of a three- phase diode-front converter, this paper identify different noise modes for different front-diode conducting patterns. The impact on EM1 filter components by these noise modes is summarized. Finally, a time-domain based method is proposed to separate and acquire CM and DM noisecomponents for the diodefront three-phase systems. Simulation and experimental verifications are presented. I. INTRODUCTION The separation of common-mode (CM) and differential- mode (DM) noise components from total conducted EM1 noise is important to the EM1 filter design and conducted emission modeling. For DC or single-phase AC systems, the definitions of CM and DM conducted EM1 noises are clear and well understood [I]. Hardware based on signal transformers or combiner/splitter has been introduced successfully to acquire them [1]-[4]. + h v,, =- 2 V,, =V, - V, ( V, , Vh : noise voltages on two lines) However, when the CM noise is not evenly distributed between two lines, the unbalanced part of CM noise would become DM noise according to the above definition. The discontinuous conduction of the front diode bridge does cause this CM uneven distribution, the so-called non- intrinsic differential-mode noise that has been reported in [5] for diode front-end single-phase power converters. This affects EM1 filter design and emission modeling, since the CM and DM noise equivalent circuits cannot be separated clearly. Specifically, line-to-line capacitors would be chosen both considering for balancing the unevenly distributed CM and attenuating DM noises. For three-phase systems, there is no corresponding CM and DM definition. However, westill can define the CM This work was supported primarily by the ERC Program of the National Science Foundation under Award Number EEC-973 1677. noise for three-phase system as ground loop noise, and DM noise as line-to-line. Once we characterize the CM and DM in this way, we have already assumed that the three-phase converters can be decoupled into two orthogonal equivalent modes. CM noise is generated by CM noise source and propagated along ground-included-loop, and DM noise is from DM noise source and through line-to-line loop. If the three-phase syr:tem is symmetrical, linear and time- invariant, CM and DM components can be decoupled and obtained through (y, ti, 0) transformation [6] or some other orthogonal transformations. Accordingly, several CM/DM separation methods [7]-[8] are proposed based on this symmetrical assumption. However, for three-phase systems widely used in ac converters (such as motor drives with diode-front), the circuit is inherently unsymmetrical and time-variant. Similar to the single-phase c3se [SI, the unevenly distributed CM noise would appear. Furthermore, the possible diode commutation would make the three-phase case more complicated. Under this circumstance, separation of CM and DM noises meaningfully at the three input lines is a challenge. In [9], a mapping relationship, scaling the spectrum by two thirds (3.5dB). is built between DM noise currents at inputs of liont-end rectifiers and at point of DC links, where CMIDM separation can be straightforward. This convolution reflection is valid under the assumption that the rectifier input current shape is quasi-square-wave of certain amplitude with a given conduction pattern (each diode conducts 240). Following the analysis approach for single-phase converters [5], this paper tries to clarify the existence of unevenly distributed CM noise among three phases. Based on the study of CM and DM propagation characteristics of a diode-front converter, this paper identifies different noise modes for different front-end diode rectifier conducting patterns. The impact on EM1 filter components by these noise modes is analyzed. Finally, a time-domain based method is proposed to separate and acquire CM and DM noise components for the diode-front three-phase systems. 11. CM AND DFdPROPAGATION CHARACTERISTICS For motor drives with diode-front rectifiers, the DC link can be treated as three-wire DC system, where the CM and DM definition and separation are explicit as discussed above. However, the three-phase EM1 filter at AC input, not 0-7803-8399-0/04/$20.W 02004 IEEE. I028 2004 35rh Annual IEEE Power Elecrronics Specialists Conferace Aachen, Germany, 2004 DC EM1 filter, is usually chosen for the system. Therefore, wecan find out the mapping relationship between the A: , inputs and DC link, to help us to understand and define ihe noise mode. To conduct the %apping analysis, we can assume that front-end diodes do not contribute to EM1 noises emission, as shown by other previous work. DM noise current circulates between two-conducted phases under normal operation. There also could be no DM noise flow under discontinuous-conducted-mode (DCM), or DM noise current on all three lines under continuous-conducted- mode (CCM) because of diode commutations. Meanwhile, these different diode-conducting conditions also affect the propagation paths of CM noise currents, which is actually the mechanism of mixed mode noises [SI. A simple but representative switching converter is built and analyzed to understand the mechanism of the mapping CM and DM noises from DC link to the input of the three- phase rectifier. The system is shown in the Fig. I , which consists of three-phase rectifier, DC link capacitor, and MOSFETllGBT switches. The system represents the conducted EM1 emission of typical switching power converter, and the analyzed results can be applied to other three-phase converter systems such as motor drives. Fig. I. The three-phase diode-front switching converter system (blue components representing major parasitics considered during analysis) A. DM Noise Propagation For converters with DC link capacitors, DM noise propagation mechanism can be described as follows. High current slew results from each switching instant, and the AC source and DC link capacitors would provide the fast dUdt together. The portion from AC source is what we concern for EM1 noise reduction and standard limits regulate, which is determined by the equivalent source impedances of the source and capacitor. The presence of LISN would cause the DM current provided by LlSN capacitors, if we think the LlSN ideally isolate the AC source for high frequency range. Since the front-end rectifier is nonlinear and time- variant, we need to examine noise propagation path specifically for different diode conduction patterns. The diode conduction is determined by the relationship between line-to-line voltages and the DC link voltage. If we only focus on the AC inputs, during input line current conduction period, DM noise currents will flow between the two conducting phases, as shown in Fig. 2. DM noise current can still flow to certain extent, when there is no line-frequency current conducted (DCM), since the ESL of DC link capacitors will lower the DC voltage. Therefore, the conduction angle of DM noise current is larger than that of low frequency phase current for each phase. Under this condition, the three-phase converter is equivalent to three single-phase converters operating alternatively within one line cycle. Therefore, we can apply the DM definition by standard to the circuit. During the duration of no phase current conducting, there is no DM noise presenting at the AC input, while the DC link capacitor would provide the switching current slew, as illustrated in Fig. 2. During the short period of diode commutation, there are all three lines representing low impedance, and the DM noise current could flow through three LISNs. Although the noise of one phase is always equal to the sumof noise on the other two phases, the detailed distribution still depends on the instantaneous circuit parameters. DM is not appropriate description for the noise mode under this transition duration, so wenote this mode as commutation mode. - - - - - 1029 2004 35lh Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialisls Conference Aachen, Germany, 2004 Fig. 2. DM noise propagation path illustration during the period ofno- phase, huo-phase, and three-phaseconducting ( bm top to bottom) E. CM Noise Propagation CM noise current flow is determined by phase voltages and diode conduction status, which play similar role as transistor DC voltage and current biasing to small signals. CM will basically flow through low loop impedance paths, which are affected by diode conduction and component high-frequency impedance. Under two-diode conducting conduction, CM noise current will be evenly distributed on the two conducted phases, as in Fig. 3. Since the DC link impedance is much smaller than the source LlSN impedances, we can treat the positive and negative DC buses as equal potential points. For no line current conduction, CM will flow uni- directinnally through either the most positive phase, when rear-end switch turns-on (dv/dt>O), or the most negative phase, when the switch turns-off (dv/dt<O), as in Fig. 3. This is what is defined in [5] as mixed-mode or non-intrinsic DM noise phenomenon. Here, wewant to note this noise as unevenly distributed CM , which represents its inherent mechanism - flowing through ground. There is no DM current under this condition, so any separation hardware cannot discriminate all these different modes for different time duration. Therefore, we need understand their behave and measure correspondingly under certain diode conducting condition. However, since DM noise current and input line parasitic inductance will cause line voltage distortion, there could be two phases conducting CM current at the same time. This means CM current will gradually commutate from one phase to another, not exactly abrupt commutation from one phase two another as discussed above. For the three-diode conducting situation, CM noise could be distributed into all three lines. However, the later discussion shows the existence of filter X cap will make CM noise current always evenly distributed on all three lines. Therefore, the impact on filter design is same for all diode- conducting conditions. L Fig. 3. CM noise proptigation path illustration during the period ofno- phase, two-phase, and three-phase conducting (from topto bottom) 111. SMULATION AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS The analysis of CM and DM noise propagation characteristics is verified through simulation and experimental results, for the converter shown in Fig. 1. The simulation is based on the vendor-provided MOSFET model (Infineon@ SPW 1 1N80C3) and high-frequency parasitic measurement of components and interconnections. The MOSFET is switched at 100kHz, and the load is adjusted to make sure the cnnverter operating in DCM. Since the purpose of this work is not to predict the exact emission of certain converter, the simulated and measured noises are not perfectly same. Fig. 4 presents the result for two-diode 1030 2004 35th A n n u l IEEE Power Electronics Speciolisrs Conference Aachen, Germany, 2004 conducting situation. The DM noise is between the two conducting phases, while the CM, due to both MOSFET turn-on and tun-off, also evenly appears on these two phases. For no-diode conducting duration, Fig. 5 shows the unidirectional CM noise on each phase, and there is no DM noise. i "l .l ".l l l l ."l l "."."." ... " . ~. . . . . . . . . ... .........I s, simulation (uppa) and expenmental (lower) IV. SEPARATION OF CM AND DM Since our purpose is to find out the profile of the noise spectrum, which will be used as bare noises for EM1 filter design, we can use the spectrum result of the diode- conducted period as worst-case. The effect of noise for whole line cycle time duration would be the same as this worst period, fiom filter design point of view. After understanding the propagation mechanism of CM and DM noises under all three possible rectifier diode- conducting patterns, it is apparent that CM noise can be obtained at anytime by measuring all three phases together. For the DM noise, nom1 two-phase conducting would have bigger noise contribution, for the line current amplitude is bigger than commutation intervals. Therefore, we can measure two conducting phase currents during the period of pair diodes conduction. Accordingly, CM noise can be obtained by sum two-phase currents at this period, and DM noise of the phase would be the result of subtracting half of the CM noise amplitude from each phase current. The corresponding spectrum of CM and DM noise then can be obtained through doing Fourier Transform. 50 2 VCu =FFT[(i, +i , ) *- ] vor instance, phase A and E conducted) ( 2) i - i 2 VDU =F F T [ ( e ) * 2 * 5 0 ] vor instance, phase A and B conducted) (3) To verify the method, we first perform the proposed method to obtain CM and DM noise components at the diode rectifier input side. Then we connect LISN's to positive and negative DC outputs of the rectifier, and directly measure CM and DM spectrum using Common- mode rejecter (CMR)/Differential-mode rejecter (DMR) and AgilentB E7402A spectrum analyzer. The comparison is shown in Fig. 6, and they match well below several mega- hertz. The high-frequency discrepancy is because of the coupling of noise from the function generator, which is used to get MOSFET gate signal. 3 UL j i am *:m P.*.W. I_j* B m e i66' xi% ". .." ..,.,.. ... , .. I simulation (upper) and experimental (lower) Fig. 5. lhree input line current waveform during no-diode conducting, 103 1 2004 35Ih Annual I EEE Power Electronics Specialists ConferencE dBuV Fig. 6. CM noise (upper) and DM noise (lower) from the proposed method (solid) and Agilat@ E7402A spectrum analyzer (dotted) v. IMPACT ON FILTER DESIGN Fromthe analysis abovementioned, it is clear that CM and DM noise propagation characteristics are different for different rectifier diode conduction patterns, and EM1 filter design needs to consider all of them on time domain basis. For a given filter topology, filter equivalent circuits can be derived under different periods within one line cycle in time domain. To guarantee the filter design meeting attenuation requirements in frequency domain, we need to take Laplace transform of the noises, multiply the corresponding transfer function of the equivalent filter circuit, sum all s components, and finally apply Laplace-Fourier transform to obtain spectrum [IO]. In practice, since there is only one filter for all three different time durations within one line cycle, one practical approach is to identify one duration as the worst case and design the filter accordingly. The designed filter would automatically satisfy the frequency domain attenuation requirements. We can assume the noise amplitude does not change for different diode conduction conditions. For DCM applications, we can design CM and DM parts of EM1 filters according to the equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 7, respectively, since X capacitors (usually several pF) make filter CM equivalent circuit almost the same for different conditions. For CCM applications, we need to consider both two and three diode conducting situations. The filter CM equivalent circuit can still use the one shown in Fig. 7. After checking DM equivalent circuits, we can conclude that the two-diode conducting situation is the worst case. Therefore, we still can usethe equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 7. AAer X capacitors of the filter are added, the path of CM and DM noise currents will be different on LISN reference resistors (SOQ) from input terminals of the rectifier. Since the value of Cx is usually in the range of 0.5-3pF, which would short three phases together for the frequency range of the interest. Therefore, CM noise current would follow through three LISNs evenly, to certain degree. In this sense, the Cx also attenuate CM noise, similar to the reported mixed-mode phenomena in [SI. Another important point is that the design ~ 1032 Aachen. Gennany, 2W4 of CM choke would consider one third of total CM noise current for each winding. Zcm 50R 50R Fig. 1. CM filter equivalent circuit (upper) and DM filter equivalent circuit (lower) From above discussion, we can conclude that the three- phase EM1 filter is actually designed as three single-phase filters, which will be effective alternatively along the phase sequence. The combination of these three identical filters results in the one three-phase filter for the system. Furthermore, this conclusion implies that the EM1 filter put at the DC link could be more optimal from both part count and size standpoints. Another advantage of the DC link EM1 filter is that the Cy leakage current limitation is not applicable any more. It is true that front-end diode bridge would generate very limit CM and DM noises, and not putting of the EM1 filter at the input edge of the system would degrade the eflectiveness of the filter. However, the careful shield and ground design could still make the DC link filter work well. VI. CONCLUSIONS One CM noise and one DM noise are not enough to characterize the EM1 noise of diode-front type of three phase converter systems. Other diode conducting conditions due to current discontinuous or diode commutation influences would cause other modes of noise. However, the two-diode conducting situation is identified as the worst case. Therefore, sepaiating CM and DM components from total noise of each phase can be obtained during two-diode conducting period, through clearly defined algebraic calculation and Fourier Transform. This analysis is useful to the three-phase EM1 filter design, and also provides insights to the further efforts on EM1 modeling. Both bare noise spectrum acquisition method and filter design equivalent circuits are given. 2004 351h Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference Aachen, Germany, 2004 ACKNOWLEDGMENl This work made use of ERC Shared Facilities supported3 by the National Science Foundation under Award Number EEC-973 1677. REFERENCES [ I ] CISPR 16-1, Radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus, 1999. [Z] C. R. Paul and K. B. Hardin, Diagnosis and reduction of conducted noise emissions, IEEE Transactions an Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 30, No. 4. Nov. 1988, pp. 853-560. 131T. Guo, D. Y. Chen, F. C. Lee, Separation of the common-mode- and diffmtial-mode-conducted EM1 noise, Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. I I, May 1996, pp. 480488. [4] M. J. Nave, A novel differential mode rejection network for conducted emissions diagnostics, Electromagnetic Compatibility. LEEE 1989 National Symposiumon, 1989, pp. 223 -227. [SI S. Qu and D. Chen, Mixed-mode EM1 noise and its implications to filter design in amine switching power supplies, Power Electronics, EEE Transactions on, Val. 17, J uly 2002, pp. 802 -507. 161A. Cansoli. G. Oriti,A. Testa, and A. L. J ulian, Induction motor modeling for common mode and differential mode emission evaluation, IAS 96.. Conference Record, Vol. I , pp. 895 -899. [7] A. De Bonitatibus, C. De Capua. and C. Landi, Automatic test equipment for the measurement of symmetrical and asymmetrical RF interference based on hybrid junctions, lnsrmmentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 49,2000, pp. 1337 -1343. [SI L. Ran, J. Clare, K. 1. Bradley, and C. Christopoulos, Measurement of conducted electromagnetic emissions in PWM motor drive systems without the need far an LI SN, Electromagnetic Compatibility, IEEE Transactions on, Val. 41, Feb. 1999, pp. 80 -55. [9] L. Ran, S . Gokani, I. Clare, K. J . Bradley, and C. Christopoulos, Conducted electromagnetic emissions in induction motor drive systems. 1. Time domain analysis and identification of dominant modes, Power Electronics, lEEE Transactions on, Vol. 13, J uly 1998, pp. 751 -767. [ IOIJ. C. Crebier, L. J ourdan. R. Papescu, I. P. Ferrieux. Common mode disturbance reduction of PFC full bridge rectified, PESCW. 2000 IEEE 3151 Annual, J une 2000, pp. 922 - 927. 1033