Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
- , transceiver, gy-
I. INTRODUCTION
Fig. 1.
GUTHRIE et al.: CMOS GYRATOR LOW-IF FILTER FOR A DUAL-MODE BLUETOOTH/ZIGBEE TRANSCEIVER
1873
Fig. 3.
input
by
, an output
(1)
where is the integrator time constant.
and
and two
The complex integrator has two inputs
and
. The cross-branch transconductors
outputs
and
produce feedback currents which are proportional to
the outputs and which sum with the input currents. It is readily
shown that the transfer characteristic is described by
(2)
where the frequency shift
is given by
(3)
is
simulates the nodal equations of the prototype using state-variables , , , , and . The specific real current integrators
are shown boxed. It can be seen that the forward and backward
connection of the integrators have formed a series of
transconductor loops which are in fact gyrators.
Translating this low-pass design into its complex bandpass
counterpart involves providing two paths, each containing the
low-pass filter, and then replacing the real integrator pairs with
complex integrators. This results in the architecture shown in
transconFig. 4(c). It can be seen that, as well as the
ductor loops, the cross-branch transconductor loops form a further set of gyrators.
The design values for a fifth-order 0.5-dB equiripple ChebyMHz,
chev dual-mode filter with Bluetooth (
MHz) and ZigBee (
MHz,
MHz) responses are given in Table I. The design uses a common set of
transconductors, and the dual response is implemented simply
by switching the values of the capacitors.
III. PRACTICAL FILTER DESIGN
The practical implementation of this filter uses balanced
CMOS transconductors and floating antiparallel pairs of
Nwell-polysilicon capacitor arrays with the extra capacitors for
1874
TABLE I
SINGLE-ENDED DESIGN VALUES FOR THE DUAL-MODE CHANNEL FILTER
TABLE II
CHANNEL FILTER REQUIREMENTS
A. Balanced Transconductor
One promising approach which uses the PMOS/NMOS transistor pair proposed by Nauta [6] for mainly high-frequency
filters and employed recently by Andreani [7] at lower frequencies is shown in Fig. 6(a). If the pMOS and nMOS
have identical parameters (this is an untransistors and
necessary constraint but one which simplifies the description),
and the overall transconductance of
then
where
. Biasing the
this single-ended cell is
produces equal drain
input at the midrail voltage
and
and the output current is zero.
currents in both
When the input voltage changes by
, the drain currents of
and
are unbalanced as given by
(4)
(5)
and a linearly related current,
, flows at
the output. Thus, the transconductor is inherently linear despite
the square law relationships determining the individual currents.
Furthermore, the transconductor is exceptionally efficient because it operates in class AB for peak output currents as high as
.
GUTHRIE et al.: CMOS GYRATOR LOW-IF FILTER FOR A DUAL-MODE BLUETOOTH/ZIGBEE TRANSCEIVER
1875
, then
is modu-
(7)
connected to each output. Voltage disturbances at the transconbut the capacitive curductor input produce feedforward via
rent is routed harmlessly via the source follower to
, and
the transconductor experiences no extra feedforward. However,
voltage disturbances at the transconductor outputs do produce
. Clearly,
creates only capacitive feedback
feedback via
while the internal transconductors produce only feedforward. If
, then
we make
the fully differential transconductor has reciprocal feedthrough
capacitance. Now, when the transconductors are connected as
gyrators, the feedforward cancels the feedback and feedthrough
and
for the
is eliminated. In practice, the values of
transconductor are readily obtained from the transistors opercan be
ating point information and the resulting design of
trimmed to optimize the filters amplitude response.
B. Post- and Pre-Amplifier
A CMOS voltage gain stage can be made simply from a
pair of single-ended transconductors driving a load made from
1876
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
GUTHRIE et al.: CMOS GYRATOR LOW-IF FILTER FOR A DUAL-MODE BLUETOOTH/ZIGBEE TRANSCEIVER
1877
Fig. 12.
Measurement setup.
Fig. 15.
voltages. They also serve the purpose of transmitting any subrail. With near equal interferstrate interference onto the
and
rails, very little signal is coupled into
ence on both
the filter.
IV. MEASUREMENT RESULTS
Fig. 13.
which are integrated and amplified and then used to control the
charge pump [10]. With the switched capacitor set to the value
, the loop stabilizes when the integrated currents sum to
zero and
is at the value required to achieve the desired
time constant. When the transconductor or capacitor have nonadjusts to change the transconductance
typical values,
value to restore the time constant to its nominal value.
Necessarily, the loop regulates with a sawtooth ripple on
and so the supply voltage
used by the filter is
and
. With the source follower
low-pass filtered by
and
scaled to produce the same
regulating transistors
, the value of
tracks closely the mean value of
,
and the filters transconductors will closely track the control
loops reference transconductor. The signal handled by the
supply,
filter produces almost no ripple current in the
but the mean level of the supply current increases with signal
and some
amplitude, and this causes a mismatch with
detuning of the filter.
,
,
, and
were all
The decoupling capacitors
nMOS gate-oxide capacitors connected to minimize their gate
1878
V. CONCLUSION
Fig. 16.
Fig. 17.
TABLE III
MEASURED PERFORMANCE OF A TYPICAL CHANNEL FILTER
GUTHRIE et al.: CMOS GYRATOR LOW-IF FILTER FOR A DUAL-MODE BLUETOOTH/ZIGBEE TRANSCEIVER
1879