Assignment Title Evaluation of the key Cross Cultural Management influences at Barclays PLC Assignment Type Individual Assignment Word Limit 4000 (+/-10% allowed) Weighting 100% (Pass marks: 50%) Issue Date 4 th August Submission Date 8 th September Issued by (Assessor) B Botes Internal Verifier Nabil Ahmed Plagiarism When submitting work for assessment, students should be aware of the LSBF guidance and regulations in concerning plagiarism. All submissions should be your own, original work.
You must submit an electronic copy of your work. Your submission will be electronically checked.
Harvard Referencing The Harvard Referencing System must be used. The Wikipedia website must not be referenced in your work.
Learning Outcomes On successful completion of the module, students should be able to: 1. Discuss critically the concept of culture and approaches to the study of culture, explaining its usefulness and relevance to a range of issues of management and organisation. 2. Provide a critical account of the main theoretical approaches to cross-cultural management. 3. Use these theories to analyse problems and issues of organisation and management in a context of increasing cultural diversity, and to recommend how they may be addressed. 4. Evaluate the implications of culture and/or language for business communication. 5. Identify the effect of global communications on disparate cultures. 6. Appraise the problems of managing across cultures and propose considered solutions. PLEASE READ THE FOLLWING SECNARIO & GUIDELINES SECTION VERY CAREFULLY Scenario
You are an aide to the management team tasked with integrating the Barclays and Lehman Brothers cultures post the acquisition of Lehman Brothers.
Based on the case study of Barclays and Lehman Brothers, supported by your own research you are asked to do the following.
1
Your Task
Referring to the 6 levels of cultures normally found in a business context and considering the main theoretical influences and models in the field of cross cultural management, write a report where you discuss the challenges faced by Barclays PLC after the acquisition of Lehman Brothers. As part of the report you are also asked to provide recommendations on how the management of the newly formed organisation can effectively move forward without losing key management staff, intellectual property and knowledge created at Lehman Brothers while they were still operational.
The report will include the following:
1- Background of the businesses involved, highlighting some of the key cultural influences and challenges that management may be facing. (LO1, LO2) 2- Critically evaluate prominent theories and models on the topic and linking this to the business in question with the view of making effective recommendations to the team. (LO2, LO4, LO5, LO6) 3- With justification, identify the key management actions that can be taken to address the issues highlighted in 2 above, which will ensure the business is able to leverage the acquisition effectively in order to gain competitive advantages for the business. (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4)
Guideline
Please ensure that you reference material which you take from text books, published documents, internet, etc. in the main body of your report, as well as listing the publications in an appendix. Also, try to evaluate and critique this material and the experience you get from applying and using it.
This is an individual assignment. The assignment is based on the supplied case study and should be supported by your own research onto both the business involved as well as the main theoretical models referring to the topic. You can choose any general academic report structure but there needs to be clear evidence that the theoretical subject matter is understood and is integrated with the practical elements of the task.
Key issues that will be taken into consideration are: Presentation and Style Evidence of Reading / Application of Theory Discussion of Topic
2
Use of Applied Examples in Context Recommendations and Conclusion
In addition your submissions will be expected to demonstrate the following qualities:
1. Answering the central focus of the assignment topics. 2. A critical appreciation and application of relevant literature and theories to support argument substantiate model(s) and other aspects of the assignment. 3. Taking ownership of the content, being prepared to debate and argue a personal position, evidences evaluative skills. A submission made up of extracts from published sources which is descriptive and just theoretical, is not acceptable. 4. Your submission must have interpretation and consideration of the challenges and issues of taking theory into practice (using cases and/or personal experience). 5. Ability to analyse relevant theoretical concepts in a critical manner, evaluation of material. 6. Logical flow of ideas and treatment; imaginative approaches; appropriate selection of real world factors related to the model(s) or specific assignment topic. 7. Evidence of additional personal research and the ability to analyse material from a variety of appropriate relevant perspectives. 8. A clear listing of references using the Harvard referencing method. 9. Presentation, structure, appropriateness of methodology, breaking into section headings/subheadings, tidiness. 10. A strong conclusion. Please ensure that you reference material which you take from text books, published documents, internet, etc, in the main body of your report, at the place you use it, as well as listing the publications in an appendix. Also, try to evaluate and critique this material and the experience you get from applying and using it. The assignment should be written from a third-person perspective.
Note The assignment should be in the format of a professional Business Report ( one that you would be expected to submit to the Senior Management Team of an organization were you to be in a real-life business situation)
3
GRADING CRITERIA
Criteria Weighting 100% 70%+100 60-69% 50-59% 0 -49% Fail Generic skills: communication and presentation.
Comprehensive and correctly structured assessment. Style of writing is very fluent and develops a coherent and logical argument. Excellent referencing. Well-structured report which follows appropriate format but some aspects of layout and referencing could be improved. Style of writing is fairly fluent. Good referencing. Good report in most aspects but suffers from variations in quality and the layout contains some inadequacies. Style of writing is satisfactory. Referencing needs improving. Very poor report which is incorrectly structured and contains major errors and omissions. Style of writing lacks coherence and fluency. Poor referencing.
Knowledge & Understanding
Demonstrates excellent knowledge of theory and provides critical theoretical underpinning. Very good interpretations and summarising of main themes.
Wide range of knowledge demonstrated and evidence of good understanding of the topic.
Ability to interpret and summarise succinctly. Good range of knowledge demonstrated but weaknesses in key areas. Some understanding displayed of the topic.
Summary and interpretation are satisfactory. Very poor range of knowledge demonstrated and there are major weaknesses evident in interpretation and understanding.
No clear interpretation of main themes. Analysis
Excellent use of theoretical and conceptual models to guide analysis linked with a critical discussion of main themes. Deconstructs the major themes used in the argument. Very good use of the theoretical and conceptual models with good critical discussion and application.
Good evidence of deconstruction. Use of theory and concepts limited but relevant. Application could be improved and there is a tendency towards description.
Must provide more evidence of deconstruction. Very poor use of theory and very little application of concepts.
Very little description with not much evidence of analysis.
Synthesis/ Creativity/ Application
Logical presentation of themes with appropriate examples being demonstrated. Very good demonstration of synthesis. Models have been clearly applied to the argument. Very good account of main themes with sound application. Good attempt at applying models to the argument. .Fairly good attempt at synthesising the salient points. Good account of main themes with some attempt at application. Limited evidence of synthesis. Very poor account of main themes with little or no application. No links between models and argument. Evaluation
Shows clear evidence of in-depth critical reflection and evaluation of the argument by providing a robust defence of the opinions presented in the assessment. Shows evidence of critical reflection and evaluation and a fairly cohesive defence of the argument Shows some evidence of critical reflection but could have been developed. Shows little or no evidence of critical reflection and needs to be much more developed. There is no defence of the opinions presented.