BY EGISTEREDA.D.

No.F.Vig/2-753/2006(141)
ALLINDIAINSTITUTE OFMEDICALSCIENCE
(VIGILANCECELL)
ewOelhi-110029
AUG 2014
To
SubhashChandraAggarwal,

Dariba.ChandniChowk,
Delhi110 006.
Subject:- Informatation underthe RTI Act.,2005.
_*'It*****
Sir.
I am to refer to CVC's leHer NO.CVC/RTIIAPP/CIC/14/010/25011 dated 16.06.2014
received from Sh. Mahesh KumarSharma. Administrative Officer.RTI ell. vide letterdated
25.6.2014. The information on point no.-2 ofthe above leHer. as avail ble in the Vigilance
Cell,AIIMS is enclosed herewith alongwith certified copies ofthe com unications including
inquiryreportssentbyCVCatAIIMS fortheperiodfrom 01.06.2012to2 .5.2G13( the date of
request). Further.thedetailon actiontaken byCVCmaybetakenfromlPIO.CVC.
Shri Sanjiv Chaturvedi, Dy. Secretary and Chief Vigilance Officer, Room No.14.
Director Offi.ce Wing,AIIMS. Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110 029 s the Appellate
Authority(Vigiiance)underRighttoInformationAct. 2005.
Yoursfaithfully
Copyto:- 1..Sh. RajivMathur,ChiefInformationcommissionerRoomNo.306,2 nd Floor,B-Wing,
AugustKrantiBhawan, BhikajiCama Palace, NewDelhi-110066.w..to letterFile
No.CIC/SM/ A/2013/1265/RMdated02.06.2014.
2. Sh. ArunKumar, Director&CPIO,CentralVigilanceCommission,Sa arkta
Bhavan, Block-A,GPOComplex,INA, NewDelhi- w.r.t.letter
No.CVC/RTI/APP/CIC/14/010/250177dated16.6.2014.
3. ShriMaheshKumarSharma,Admn.Officer,RTI Cell,AIIMS,NewDehl-ll00029.
)
"
)

;,
Detail of all the communications including inquiry reports sent by eve at AIIMS from 01.06.2012 to 27.5.2013 (the date of request)
against different officials at AIIMS.
********
S.No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8..
Ref. from eve
NO.F.011/HFW/037/175394 dt. 21.5.2012
NO.F.0121HFW/014/179067
Cont. No.l3052111/177081 dated26.4.2012
No. 010/HFW/022l177216dated6.6.2012
NO.F.0121HFW/010-179406dt.29.06.2012
NO.0121HFW/0101209449dt. 12.4.2013
NO.0121HFW/0141189616dt. 3.10.2012

Subject
Disciplinary proceeding
against S/Sh. S.S.
Bhaduria, Stores
Officer,CNC
Complaint- procurement of
Washer Disinfector
instrumentbeingpurchased
atAilMS.
Complaint under 'Public
Interet Disclosure
Resolution
Reg. Disciplinary
proceedingagainstDr. R.S.
Tyagi,Ex. DD(CF)
Gross Violation of the
Terms and conditions
preserved by CVC
alongwith complaint dt
12.4.2012 of Sh. Kamaljit
Singh,Director,MIsPrehari
ProtectionSystemPvt ltd.
Grossviolationoftheterms
and conditions prscribved
byCVC
Procurement of Washer Sameaspoint-2above
Disinfector in AIIMS -
Clarification
"",";:cus
Remarks
Thematterisunderinvestigation
Detailed investigation report/comments sent to CVC vide letter dated
22.8.2012and CVCvide letterNo0121HFW/014-206332 dt15.3.2013 has
advisedclosureofthecase.
On receipt ofcomplaintrelating with allegations ofhaving disproportionate
assets by Shri Suresh Bhasker, Executive Engineer(Civil), the matterwas
examinedafterobtaininginformationfrom Sh. Bhaskerandreport hasbeen
sent to cve vide letter 15.4.2014 for opinion and further course of
action.
DisciplinaryproceedingsunderRule14oftheCCS(CCA)Rules, 1965were
initiated against Dr. R.S. Tyagi, Ex. Dy. Director(Computer Facility),AIIMS
and penaltyofwithholding 10% ofhispenSion and gratuity fora period of
two yearshadbeenimposedvideorderdated20.6.2013
As perdirection oftheCVC,thematterhasbeenexamined inconsultation
with the procurement section ofthe Institute and report sent to CVC vide
letterofevennumberdated8.11.2013
t,;ase related toAUMS Bhopal andthe samehadbeen forwarded to JS &
)
)
of All MS. CVO, Ministry of H. & FW, Nirman Shawan, New Delhi, vide letter dated
05.12.2013
9.
10.
No.01-02-J-21-NH-R/195317 dt. 29.11.2012
NO.014VGC-511243065 dt. 31.3.2013
Related to Engineering
WoJ1<s
Vigilance clearance in
respect of Shri D.R.Sarin.
GM(HR)National Seeds
Corporation Ltd. for
selection to the post of
CMD. Articicial Limbs Mfg.
Coil). of India
The infonnation pertains to AIIMS and MIs HSCC partly. So far as AIIMS is
concemed, the details obtained from Engg. Services Deptt., had been sent
to CVC in prescribed performa and reference had also made to CVO,
HSCC. with the request to provide the desired information to CVC.
vide
letter dated 15.1.2013
Viglnace Clearance in respect of Sh. D.R.Sarin in (in the prescribed
performa) had been forwarded to CVC vide letter dated 03.04.2014
11 ..
12.
01-01-J-21-NH-R/210592 dt. 30.4.2013
NO.F.013JHFW/023-212825 dt. 16.5.2013
Intensive examination of
works by
Oraanization.
CTE
Irregularities in Sterilizer at
higher prices
The CVC had been intimated vide letter dated 5.7.2013 that the CSI has
taken up the said case and is being verified by the CSI.
File under submission. Copy of CVC reference will be provided after the file
is received back ..
********
.\
1\\/
/
"'...."
,..' '.'

'" '

. . '.
"
Co fidential
No. 011IHFW/037
GovernmentofIndia
CentralVigilanceCommission
*******
SatarktaBhavan,GPOCo plex,
Block-A,I.N.A.,NewDelh,
Dated21.5.2012
OFFICEMEMORANDUM
Sub: Disciplinary proceedings against Shri S.S. Bhadauria Store
Officer.
AIIMS may refer to their unsigned letter No. F.l7INVC/2 '11(57)
dated7.5.2012ontheabovesubject.
2. CVO, AIIMS may refer to Commission's OM dated
24.11.2011(copyenclosed)videwhichcertaindocuments/clarificati n had
beensought for detailedexamination. It is seenthat the saiddetai shave
stillnotbeenfurnishedbyAIIMS.
\ , 3. TheCVO,AIIMS mayfurnish the same to the Commission
1
.. DIl"
.'\ anyfurtherdelay.
tLJr
(MamtaUpadhy 'y al)
Di ector
AllIndiaInstituteofMedicalSciences,
(ShriVineetChaudhry,Dy.Dir.& CVO),
AnsariNagar,
NewDelhi-29.'\
(frf:v..t.
.......
0"",\1. t\ .: (,'.e
.,... .. '1';>" ".
"'1;" \.1"'"
" ,,,(;\ \\.":';'
. 1"'\'\' , ....,
""'I. r ;("
",,\C, \N v


honfidential
No. 69-
CentralVigilanceCommission
*******
SatarktaBhavan,GPOComplex,
Block-A,LN.A.,New elhi,
Dated22.6.2012
OFFICEMEMORANDUM
Sub: Procurementofwaterdisinfectorbeingmadein AIIMS.
Acopyofcomplaintdated 30.3.2012 received in the Comm' sionon the
, (\ above subject is enclosed. On scrutiny ofthe complaint, it is s en that the
allegations mentioned in the complaint have a vigilance angle an , therefore,
needtobeverified.
,.
2. In view ofthe above, the Central Vigilance Commission in exercise of
powersconferredon itunderSection8(1) (d) andSection8(1) (h)ofthe CVC
Act 2003, hereby directs that an investigationbe conducted into th complaint.
The detailed investigation report along with the departmen's specific
comments/recommendationsoneachofthe allegations may besub ittedtothe
Commissionwithin 12 weeksof receiptofthisorder.
3. Thereceiptof this ordermaybeacknowledged.
J
(MamtaUpahyaytal)
Director
pAll IndiaInstituteofMedicalSciences,
'. (ShriVineetChawdhary,CVO),
d".>.,:0 RoomNo.150A,
,'tr' NirmanBhawan,

\
Encl:
- '\
'<J\ ;}-r J ,

, /' ".jJ-
:\;\\ 'l\,e,Sll: Gfi,U"
'?' i \ ..-.'llF"'I'I' J 'I H:., ',j'.I" .
i
, .'. ! ,

,. ,
, Technomed Services' \ 7<)/'
8,3,Aditya trade.Tower,PlotNo.4, LocalShoppingCentre,0& P Garden, (Ind'
Mob,Je:09968555603,Tel/Fax. 91;1122594534,Email.seyQlome@yahoo.co.m
URGENTFORIMMEOIA'I'EATTENTIONOF ALLCONCERNED '
.To, Ref: TMS/CVC/CNC .IMS/3003
TheCentralVigilancecommissioner
dt: 30.03.2012
SatarkataBhawan '
GPOComplex,INA
NewDelhi
Sub:RequestingInvestigationandImmediateActionagainst of
WasherDisinfectorbeingmadein atDOUBLEthepriceas in
MinistryofHealthandFamilyWelfare .
DearSir,
1. AIIMS is purchasing WasherDisinfectorModelPG8536 from a particular c mpany in
varioustendersintheinstituteatSUBSTANTIALLYINFLATEDPRICE.
2. 'Thismodel heen approved by Ministry ofHeaith and Family Welfare for Dr RML
Hospital vide their tender number Y-11016/15'8/201 OPC-ECC Due on 5.07.2010
ScheduleNo28 WasherDisinfectorwith Seven yearswarranty ( two years arranty
and additionalfive, years free CMC) . This equipment pricewas EurQ 1 200 elF
New Delhiwith morethan t\"Vice theaccessories than askedin tbis tender,This fad
maybeverifiedbyMoHFW.
3. ,The same model is,being procured by AIIMS with halfthe accessories at ore than
DOUBLEt'he price(Euro27800withFIVEyearswarrantyand'halftheace ssories.)
. 4.
In spiteofourreportingthematterandsubmittingdocwnentaryevidencethe Model
PG8536 isbeingpurchasedagainbyAIIMSunderTenderNo-71/CNC/CTVS A-12011-
2012/STforBuro27800withFIVEyearswarrantyandhalftheaccessories.
5. The established and leading companies ineluding Franke Finland andGettinge as been
rejected to favour one particular company. Gettinge is the world leader in Washer
Disinfector and Franke is also leading supplierofwasher disinfectors andNBS UK has
FrankesystemsbeingusedinSUBSTANTIALnumbers.
6. We would nowrequest you to kindly advise immediate cancellation ofthe pro ilrement
processand investigatewhy the is beingpurchasedatdoublethepricein SPir'of the
submissionofdocwnentaryevidences, '
Encl: 1.RTIreplyfrom AlIMSindicatingthecostof theUnitbeingpurchased. '
.. 2. RTIReplyfromMinistryofHealthindicatingthecostofapprovedu; ,

CC:1.Hol1'blePrimeMinisterofIndia
2.Hon'bleMinistet'ofHealthandFamilyWelfare
3.DirectorAIIMS
4.HOD.CTVS

.
--,.--..
..'
rXfJ.. ..ra..l.. VUllo')
GOVERNMENT OF INOlA
- MINISTRY Of HEAl.TH "FAMIl.Y WELFARE
'OIRECTORATe OF HEAt.TH
. .' 'ROCUREMENT ca.t.) . . .
'R-OOM NO ':' 549, WING, IHAVAN.'NEW OELHI-.nOOl1
-
I ....
GRAM. HOSPITALINOlA
TelefClx: 91011-23061950.
No. PCllL'I"l/h\AR/20ii
. bated:29.03.2012 ..
._- .-
To
;r. ,- _--
B-:3,AdifyG No,4,
Local ShoPPing _
Ollstil3d Garden. .'
t>.lhl-ll0095
Sublect:. S'ceklng Information uncier R,1J: Ac-t agaInst Tender Erqulri No. Y-ll016tl!)8/2010.Pcfj!Cc.delted
.:.. 'Item No. 28 for Olslnfcc;!o!;, lor AM!=.. Hospttcll floo.ted by '?< Hs
- . New DeJh,l, - - --
Withrefereneeto in connfion.i1 ;sinfor-med1hatthec!etc1l1scsrequired.ereoSgivenbelo;:--
- - . . ... -,.. . . ..- ... - ...
51,No .lI\formotion/Commeilu '. Illform::ationClSked. ..-'
1. W,.Teehnome:dServiceS,()elhi.
-
1. werethequalified
Mlsl'1. Mi,romed Pvt. L.td.
,2
Nameofall the!tIodelsof"thequalified MIs, TecnnomedServices-
bidders. Model DEKO032EK.
.
MlslC.L.. f.\ic:romed-
i
I Offer- I:ModelPG 6536CO
I
Offer- II:Model 91882CO
3 IPrices,ofellthequalified!tIodel' including MIs,Tecnnol1lec! Services
I
1:1.1'0 Z3.528/ul'litCIP bcsis
M/$IC.L..
theaiterl'Otilleof{ers.
OfferlMiele,PS8!i36CD
-euro13.200/unitCIPt>elhl basis
!
Otte,.nM,de e7SeZCO-
Euro7900/unltC[P()elhibasis
i
Yes 4 Isquotingofo/1ernClt;ve modelsallowed.

(Sauro... n"'I'ma)
Dy.Dlrecto (proe)
For OlrectcrGenera' ofHealfh Services

w/'<:l<i!I ,i'
.
.
,
J
,
'-,.,-. - -.- '-\
. . .' E'" " 7J.... . :,;...:., .
.,stoREsSECTION t'io k
. (AIIMS) I D'.arj No 4J D V
. .. /Dlwyo.:; ....:3-:-
.Sub: Infonnation RTIAct.2005.regardingTenderNo.7I1eNel f- ...
2012181;' WasQerandpisinfeCtor..;.reg;.
.' . -.".'. .' .
. .
. .
Ref:LetterNo.TMSIRUlCNC/AIIMS12902, dt.29.02.2012t'eceivedfrom s.Technomed
: . Services;Delhi. ;.. ..;.- : ..
'
.
.
-.
.. - With reference to the Letter from'Mls,Technomed SerVice , Delhi.seeking
infermation RTI on the aforementioned'Tender.floated-by CNC'for Insln1.IDent .Washer
and.OisiIllector,thepoint-wise.repliesI iDfonnationareprovidedasunder:- - .-
. .... - . -".-...
... < - -
--4 - .... ... _.. ....
- 1. Th. theapphcru:t Mls.Technomed been Ify.the..technical:...
-comrruttee-anthefolloWInggrounds ", ..\ _ .' ,
"Their".JlllOted ModeI-' deviations as they are not meetrig the tender .
in'respeCt.ofSLNO.1,f,3,4,.6;7,8,9andlot. - - .
2. Thepriceofthemodel("Miele t>G8536") approvedfor'thistenderis Eur 27300
+Freight& Euro'300= (CIF).perurut.
'. 3.- -The of'budget fOf this-rtem was Rs:20 akhs'perwtit
approximately. However, the fm!U, approved'cost comesJo .
- approx., which js well.withinthe budgeted estimate and;hence, there is
ex:ceedingthe'estllnatedbudgetarise. ' --.- .
- . _.. -
4. The'Ll fumhas- beengiventherequisitefall clauseundertakingasperC'ause-50of1ne'-,
tender. However,;hedocumentary evidenceand otherrelevantc!etails as in this ,-
paramaypleasebe'providedby'theapplicantforfurthernes::essaryactionit ourend.
5. The price ofthe model ("Miele PG8536") approved of Ll bidder fo this is
Euro 27800(elF)per unit, which comes to Lakhs per unitappr x. However,
the dpcumentaryevidenceandotherrelevant detailsthe purchasesmadeb MOHFWas
claimed inthisparamay pleasebe providedbytheapplicantfor erestofthe I
infonnation. - \
Moreover. the same equipment was tendered by the IRCH Ttnder No.IR-
04IBRAIRCH/IO-II and placed order for the same model ofthe approved,firm ("Miele.
Model PG8536") at a cost ofRs.18.85,2,75/- vi4e S.O.No.99II 'IRCHlSSKh0--11, dated
11.. I
Forwardedforn.ecessaryinformationandfurthernecessary please.
.To
Sh. R.K.Shruma,
Asst.'Admn.Officer
C.N.C.,AIIMS
(b1$'v.x- .
{) , Copyto.:
VigilanceCell.AIIMS.- for infonnationplease.
t:-L\'t,

Technomed Services
BYSPEEDPOST/URGENTFORIMMEDIATE ATTENTIONOFALLCON ERNED
TOt
Ref: TMS/CVCI IIMSIlI04
TheCentralVigilancecommissioner
dt: 11.04.2012
SatarkataBhawan
GPOComplex,INA
NewDelhi
Sub:RequestingInvestigationandImmediateActionagainstproc rementof
WasherDisinfectorbeingmadeinAIIMSatDOUBLEthepricea approved
inMinistryofHealthandFamilyWelfare.
DearSir,.
1. AIIMS ispurchasingWasher ModelP08536 fromaparticu]
invarioustendersin theinstituteatdoublethe PRICE.
2. Thismodel beenapprovedbyMinistryof HealthandFamily Welfarefor
HospitalvidetheirtendernumberYlI0161I58/2010PC-ECCDueon 15. 7.2010
ScheduleNo28 WasherDisinfectorwithSevenyearswarranty(twoyearswarranty
andadditionaffive yearsfreeCMC) .ThisequipmentpricewasEuro 132 0CIF
NewDelhiwithmorethantwicetheaccessoriesthanaskedinthistender.
3. Thesamemodel isbeingprocuredbyAlIMSwithhalftheaccessoriesatm rethan
DOUBLEtheprice(Euro27800inCNCAIIMS andEuro28600inJPNA CAIIMS
and INR 18.85.275inBRAIRCHAHMS with FIVEyearswarrantyandhe!fthe
accessories.).
. 4. ModusOperandiofTheInflated Thefollowingmethodhasb en
adoptedforthe.process:
a) DonotdiscJosetheMinistryApprovedpricetoAIIMS.
b) MakeaSpecificationwith insignificancepointthatwillkeepaUthelea 'ing
playersout.Eventhe worldLeaderMIS Gettingeisout.
c) QuotewithForgeddocumentswithFakecompany{GlobalMedica] Syst ms)and
Withaproductwhichisnotknownorhaveitspresencein India.
d) DonotdisclosetheVATRegistration,EMD.PANCardorProprietor'sn eand
exactaddressto theotherbiddersforverification fortheFakecompany.
e) InonecaseCNCenterTender 71ICNC/CTVSINAl2011-20121STev nthe
EMD wasreducedfrom (theminimumrequirementasperGFR) 1.20'OItoa
mere40,000thusfacilitatingtheforgery.
f) ThusonlyMainCompanyandtheFakesupportingcompanyqualifies.K.epthe
fake companypricealwayshigh.
g) Be.comeLM1and CollecttheorderinDOUBLEtheprice.
rRML
Technomed Services
Reference is made to investigate the following tenders in which either pure p,ases have
been made or are under the process at DOUBLE the prices;
a) CNCenter Tender No- 71/CNC/CTVSINAl20 11-2012/ST
b) JPNA Trauma Center Tender No: TCw 716/0rtho/11-121FSC
l
c) BRA IRCH Tender No: IR04IBRAIRCH/IOtl
d) XX-264/0rtho.1201112/FSC-I due on 02-112011
We would now request you to kindly advise immediate INVESTIGATION .of all the
procurement process and investigate why the unit is being purchased or has lbeen
purchased at double the price in spite of the submission of documentary evi ences
and also initiate recovery proceedings.
Encl: 1. RTI reply froIl) AIIMS indicating the cost ofthe unit being pure ased.
('\
2. RTI Reply from Ministry of Health indicating the cost of appro ed unit
cc:1.Hon'ble Prime of India
2.Hon'ble Minister of Health nnd Family Welfare
3.Director AIIMS
4.HOD, CTVS & Neuroanaesthesia- ref Tender- 71/CNC/CTVSINN20 lIST
5. Dr G.K:Rath .Chief. BRA lRCH.-refTender lR04/BRAIRCH/1 0-11
6. Or M.C.Mishra Chief JPNA Trauma Center- ref Tender Te716/0rthol 1-
12IFSC
7.Dr P.P.Kotwal, Pro &HOD, Orthopedics- refTenderXX-264/0rtho!20 1-
12/FSC-I
8. Vigilance Cell, AIIMS
Requesting all to initiate investigations and also initiate recovery of th.
difference amount an'd also punitive actions therein.
-.- - - - - - - ... ..
QGOOl
.'
- -
.
ROOM NO
GRAM: HOSPtTALINOlA
No.PC/RTI/MA"RI2012 '.
To
TeChtlolllCdSwellS,
B.l.AdltyQTraer.Tower.Plot No.4.
Loco! Cellt"',Oap Block,
t>lIshad &orden.
Delhl:-llOO95
GOVERNMENT OF INOlA
MINISTRY OF HEALTH Ie FAIIilLV WaFARE
OIRECTORATe GENERAl. OF HEALTH SERVJCES
(EPW. PROcUReMENT'CELL)
- "A" WING. NIAMAN BHAVAN. NewOELHI-lIOOU
Telefax:91-011-230619 I
Doted: 29.03.2012
Subject:
Seeklllg lnfoMnGtlon under Ac;-t Tender Ctlqllfry No. V-11016/158/2010-PC/ECC dated
10.06.2010, 'Item No. Z8 for Washer bl'llItector for Hospital fl04te<i by )(;H.$ NII't1IGn
Bhcwon, New OcIhl.
'.
Reference: YOIJl' lenet'No. trns/rtllrml/wd/lOdateJ 13.3.2012
, ..
WitnreferencetoClbove, inthis connection,itislnfol"medthatthedetailsQSrequired.Clt'ea.givenblow:
5i.No Informationasked Infortn4tion/Cotntner\ts
1 !WhoWere1heqUCllifiedbidders. .1. MIs.Tc.clmomedScrvi<;e$,DeIhl.
2. M/sl C.L.MlcrotlledI'Y-t,
Z
Mis. TechllOl'Hd ServlC:e$-
bidders.
ofall themodelsof thequalified
.. MoIIl.II)1(0.D3ZEK.
MI.IC.L.Mlcromed
Offer I:ModelP& 8536cti
Offer II: CO
3 MIs. TcchnomedServices
.'thealter(lCltll/e.offerS.'
PrIcesofali.theQualified\'1\Qdelsincluding
ELI'o 23,528/unitCIPOelhiballi.l
M/sl C.L! Micromed
Offer-IMielePS61336CD
.ellro13.Z00JunitCIPDeIhlbasis .
.Offer-II CD-
\
EIJI'O7900/unltCIP't>elhlbasis
4 'Yes, ., \ IsquotingofalierllCliive11\00.1$allowed.
---...,.,....-
I
i
- - - -_. , , ...U-..../
Sub: lnfonnationsoughtunderRTIAct2005 regardingTenderNo.711CNC CYVS' 011-
2012/ST forInstrumentWasherandJ,)isinfector- reg.
..
Ref:LetterNo.TMSIRTIICNClAIlMSI2902,dt.29.02.2012receivedfrom s.Technomed
Services,Dellii.
, With reference to the Letter received from Mls.Technomed Service, Delhi s'eeking
inf:ormation under Rl1 on the aforementioned Tender floated by CNC for In trument \Vasper
.andDisinfector,thepoint-wisereplies1informationareprovidedasunder:-
1. The bid ofthe applicant Mls.Technomcd Services has been rejected. the..tecbnical"".
conunitteeonthefollowing grounds:- \
"Their quoted Model has major deviations as they are not meet'ng the tender
specificationsinrespectofSl.No.1,2,3.4, 6, 7, 8, 9and 10"
2. Thepriceofth'emodel ("Miele1>G853,6") approvedfor thistenderis Em 27300 (FOB)
+Freight& Insurance,Euro300= Euro27800(CIF)perunit.
3. The initial projectjon of budget estimate for this item was Rs.20 L ' s per unit
approximately. However, the final approved cost comes to Rs.18.22 akhs per unit
which is well within the budgeted es.timate and. hence, there is 0 questionQt
exceedingtheestimatedbl\dgetarise.
4. TheL-l fIrm has given therequisitefall c1auseundertakingasperCl use-SO ofthe
tender. However, thedocumentary andotb.errelevantdetailsascaimedInthis
paramayplease,beprovidedby theappliclltltforfurthernecessaryactionat UT end. \
5, The price ofthe model ("Miele PG&536") approved ofthe L1 bidder tor tender is
Euro 27800 (CIF) perunit, which comes to Rs.l8.22Lakhsperunit appro. However,
the documentary evi,denceand otherrelevant detailsthe purchases madeby OHFWas
claimedin lhisparamay please beprovided by theapplicant torprovidingtlerestofthe
information.
Moreover, the same equipment was tendered by the IRCH against Ten er No.tR-
04IBRAIRCW10-ll and placed order for the same model ofthe flpproved tiF ("Miele,
Model PG8S36") at a cost ofRs.l8,85,275/. vide S.O.No.991/'IRCHlSSKfl -11, dated
29103/2011. '
Forwarded for necessaryinformationandfhrthernecessaryaction .
.'
,.'
-.,1
.1,-
To
Sh.R.K.Shanua,
Asst. Admn. Officer
C.N.C.AIIMS
I'.,'
\\\1 '1'"
under"PublicInterestDisclosureResolution"issentherewithfornec ssaryaction.
2. Itis further statedthat the complaint is not an anonymous 0 eand has been
madeunder"PublicInterestDisclosureResolution". The identityof he complainant
has,therefore,beenkeptsecret.Itmay,therefore,beensllfedthatift eidentityofthe
tty I ,

Conf.l3052/11- I'):;e:>('7
CentralVigilanceCommission
*******
SatarktaBhavan,
Block-A,I.N.A.,
Dated26.4.2012
OFFICEMEMORANDUM
Sub: Complaintunder"PublicInterestDisclosureResolution".
Acopy ofsource information dated 08.9.2010 received in t
complainantgetsrevealedatanytime,thesamemaybekeptsecret.
3. However, in case, it is gotrevealed, it may be ellsured that n
causedtothecomplainantinanymanner .
.'"
)x..
l'
y ,
(/
,/
All InstituteofMedicalSciences,
(Shri Chawdhary,Dy.Dir(Admn.)/CVO),
AnsarI
NewDelhi- 29
Encl:AsAbove.
POComplex,
ewDelhi,
e Commission
harassment is
.lY
.. padhyaybl)
Director



GovernmentofIndia
DirectorateGeneral
(Vigilance Unit)
CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
NirmanBhawan,New
Sub: ComplaintagainstShriSureshBhaskar, EE,CPWD
CVC may kindly refer to their O.M. No. Conf./30S2/11 160797 dated
4.1.2002 vide which a copy of source information dated 8 11.2010 (copy
enclosed for ready reference) has been forwarded for necessry action. In
this regard it is intimated that Shri Suresh Bhaskar, EE, named in the
cO:ql.plaint, is not a CPWD official. It has been gathered th t Shri Suresh
Bhaskar who is working as EE (Civil) in the All India Insti te of Medical
Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi belongs to AIIMS cadre.
Since the matter neither pertains to CPWD nor involve CPWD officer,
the same is returned herewith for further action at your end pI ase.
Encl: As above
Executive gineer (V) VI
Shri Arvittd Kumar, Section Officer, Central Vigilance Commiss'o
Satarkta Bhawan GPO Com lex Block-A. INA New Delhi - 110023
0/0 JS & CVO, CPWD U.O.No. 10/V-6/(A-20)/2012-VSI Dated: March 2012
r
!

flffcfH=U (;'
CENTRALVIGILANCECOMMiSSION tft1c6dl .
0023
.P.O; Complex:.
Delhi 110023
.01.2012
.. ...............................
'1ft.tft
.;. \3rr{.tff.q-.,
. Sa,ta,rkta.Bhawan,
.", ,.., it. BlockA.INA,Ne
. <,
'."ax :
.':':,.' ..
.L(,.',' '\ ,i!!f J'. ):'Da.'ted
. '.
.
OFFICEMEMORANDUM

,':
: I;'
, " ,I # i ' .t. I
ComplaintagainstSh.SureshBhaskar,Exe. CPWD.:
******"'******* ::'., )!
\
. , :..,
, .... :.
. .
.0," A copy of the source information dated OB.ll.2010 received in the L.Ol1runlSSl()o is
enclosedfornecessaryaction. . .,j . "
'I' \'j.
'.2. . TheidentityofthecomplainanthasbeenkeptsecretIn case,theidentityofco
.'gets revealed at any time, the same may please be kept secret and It is to be
'if!"-"-\!!i:i:antis notharassedinanymannerformakingacomplaint.
ofthisOM maybeacknowledged.
- / ,I>!
- .",'


] '. .

CPWD,
.r'\(Shri.Nilthileshfha,CVO)
, NirmanBhawan
NewDelhi
finel: Asabove
i
!
1
I
,
!
. ,
: i
, .
;i
i i
! !
, .
i I
,:
'I
j
I
I
i
i
< ,
, I
!.
, i
;I
.
NQ: 94.
I juJu."J C
.ufllpfniflfs n O ~
CUfiUSpo"d
""""
-::--t---_.__...
\
I
\
\
\
\
i
j.
,
::

CONF
No.OlOIHFW/022 J111.9.
1
6
Government of India
Central Vigilance Commission
*******
Satarkta Bhavan, GPO Complex,
Block-A, LN.A., New Del i,
Dated 06.6.2012
OFFICEMEMORANDUM
Sub: Disciplinary proceedings against Dr. R.S. Tyagi,
(ComputerFacility),AIIMS.
. AIIMS may refer to their letter No. F.VIG/2-762/2007 dat d 25.5.2012
on the above subject.
2. The case has been referred to the Commission without the specific
comments of the Disciplinary Authority regarding the penalty to be imposed
on the CO. Besides, it is noticed that this case for second has
not been furnished in the format as prescribed in Circular No. 32P2/08 dated
01.12.2008 is available on the CVC website (wWw.cvc.nic.in). I .
3., The CVO is advised to furnish the impugned reference_in +e laid down
format, which should be adhered to in' future references also, wit, in 15 days .
I
Director
.r-... '\
7. Institute ofMedical Sciences, . .
[ShriVineetChawdhary,Dyr.i>irector(Admn.) & CVO],
AnsariNagar,
NewDelhi-ll0029.
l

0,
.
, .
. :'f:)
..
.!t'
OY. DIRECTOR
.;?- J 0 5{,7
I{fJl :;0", r !..; ..... :;./ ............
fi:pi;1../bA,T Er).......... ..7.jf?o-
.No. 012/1-1FW/OJ 0- 1?r'7c"tJG
Central VigilanceCommission
**********
Satarkta Bhavnl1, GPO Complex,
Block-A, I.N.A., New lelhi,
Dated29.6.2012
OFFICEMEMORANDUM
Sub: - G.ossviolation ofthe termJand conditionsprescribed by
******
A copy ofcomplaintdated 12.4.2012 received in the COll11l1i
abovesubjectis sentherewith.
ve.
sion on the
2. ,The CVO, AIlMS may furnish a factualreporl on the complaint at the
earliest.
\"Y
bys-yLal)
Director
All IndiaInstituteofMediJalSciences,
(ShriVineetChawdhary,ny.Dir(Admn.)/CVO),.
AnsariNagar,
NewDelhi-110029
Encl: asabove.
'I
SUB:
\
No.012/HFW /010!,$OotltL!9 !
CentralVigilance Commission
..
*****
Satarkta Bh van, Block-A
GPO Complex, INA, NewDelhi
Datedl, 12.04.2013
\
OFFICE MEMORANDUM \
\
I
GrossviolationofthetermsandconditionsprescribedbycJc.
. *********** \
All India Institutes of Medical Sciences may refer to letter No.
f'. . . F.17/NVC/2012(164)dated05.01.2013ontheabovecitedsubject. .
2. It has beenobserved that the complainant, M/s. PREHtRI besides'
referring the matter to the Commission, also sought relief froml Delhi High
Court. The Delhi High Court has dispqsed off the petition filled by the
complainant(WP CNo. 1697/2012).
3. Even thoughthecourthas dismissedthepetition,CVO maye, aminethe
followingissue indetail:
liThe bid .of M/s. PREHARI Protection Systems apparently has not been
considered for award due totheir poor performance in previous contract. If
thiswereSOl whythecontracton M/s.PREHARI whichwas validupto
December, 2009was extended numberoftimes. Further,ifM/s. had
failed in the previous contract, whether any notice was sent to\them .and
whetheranypenal actiontakenintermsofthecontract." 1
.,.
4. ReceiptofthisOM maybeacknowledged.
All IndiaInstituteofMedicalSciences
(ShriSanjivChaturvedi,Dy. Secy. &CVO)
I
I
I
I
tI I(.

(Lilajhandran)
Deput y\Secretary
4J{, I')
Jl?
Ansari Nagar,
NewDelhi- 110029.

"1 ' '"t';I l
,
C I nfidential \
rdJ '<
No. 012IHFW/014 ('\9'161 b
1
1
Government of India Chitf Vi
g
nen7:l!le0.
3
'1.
.. Central Vigilance Commission :;f'l'lo';'/
******* , :jDated .. Q",. ,
Satarkta Bhavan, GPO
Block-A, I.N.A., New
Dated 3.10.2012 :

I , ,
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Sub: Procurement of washer disinfector in AIIMS.
AIIMS may refer to their letter no. F. 17INVC/20i2(1 5) dated
22.8.2012 on the above subject. .
..
After examining the report ,furnished by AIIMS, it is ob)rVed that
while the said report mentions that four firms had participated ib the said ,
tender and two firms had been technically shortlisted for openin$ of price
bids, the enclosed note of Store Purchase Selection Committee Iindicates
that six firms had submitted their offer against the AIIMS's aldvertised
tender, of which five bidders had been rejected. Moreover, t e model
numbers in the report of AIIMS for the purpose of price comp ison are
different from the model mentioned in the complaint.
3. In view of above, CVO, AIllv:S is advised to cl.arify t e above
mentioned discrepancies. Further, CVO is also advised to ,offe specific
comments on the allegation pertaining to framing of biased spec fications
by AIIMS in the aforesaid- procurement, which led to rejection 01 most of
the bids. .I
ULD
(Mamta Upadhr.a
y
Lal) _

I
All India Institute of Medical Science, I
[Shri Sanjiv Chaturvedi, CVO],
Ansari Nagar,
New Delhi-ll0029.
Confidential
No.0121HFW/033-
CentralVigilanceCommission I
*******
SatarktaBhavan,
I
Complex,
Block-A,LN.A.,NewDelhi,
Dated27.11.2012
OFFICEMEMORANDUM
Sub.: Complaintagainstthe'officialsofAIIMS.
A copy ofcomplaintdated nilreceivedinthe the above
subject is enclosed. Onscrutmy ofthe complaint', itis seenthatTeallegations
.
,.
.
mentioned in the complaint have a vigilance angle and, thereforr' need to be
. \ t
N'4 \ verified.
/.; \- \ \
.'-'; ill
\ '
2. In view ofthe above, the Central Vigilance Commission exercise of
powersconferred itunderSec:ion8.(1).(d)andSection8 (;ofthecyc
,', t
U
aj'Act2003, hereby dIrects thatan InvestigatIOnbe, conductedInto t .e, complaInt.
W: The detailed investigation report along with the departme t's specific
i icomments/recommendationsoneachofthe allegations may besu,mittedtothe
, within12weeksofreceiptofthisorder.
3. Thereceiptof thisordermaybeacknpwledged.
\
\ '
MJhP
,
(MamtsUnsdliyayLal).
\ Director
AllIndiaInstituteofMedicalSciences,
(ShriSanjivChaturvedi,CVO),
AnsariNagar,
.NewDelhi- 110029
Encl:asabove
I A
DearSir,
I amDr. Ashok Sharma,. working as a PostdoctoralResearchFellowatVanderbiltMedi alCenterUSA. I amvery
keen to come back and serve my country. So, I applied for facu1ty position in Bi chemistry, Physiology &
Microbiology (ApplicationNo.: FNAIIMSOI2011"()02994) inNew AIIMS open by ''M 'stry ofhealth"& Family
Welfare"undertheschemeofPMSSY.Duetoonlineapplications.oftwareproblemmysu 'ectorderwaschangedi.e,
Physiology, Biochemistry& Microbiology. MyCVshortlistedfor Physiology(thatis myspec;:ialization) instead
ofBiochemistry(my specialization) and received interview c.allfor Physiology, As I kniW, I immediatelysent.e
requestandnotifiedtheauthorityaboutthat:buttheynot" givesatisfactoryreply,
. .
. .
Secondly,I also faced lotofprobleminpayingmyappljcationfee throughNEFTtransfer,becauseaccountnumber
"(4460110005393) given inadvertise (FacultyNewAIIMS.No.1 120111 dated 28thDec was notcorrect and
denied by my bank (SBl). After lot of struggle, I about another account N0I (446010110005393) and
. successfully submitted my fee. So, there were lots ofstudent ofoverseas left to submit application fee due to
wr.on
g
account.number published inthe above advertisement present onthe home page "Mil;riStry.OfHealth&
FamilyWelfare'.http://mohfvv.nic.inlindexl.php?lang=l&level=0&linkid=37&lid=46 . .
. .
Sir, Finally, I asked about to fixed the time, date and about mode ofinterview like elephonic/ SkypeNideo
conferencing/ absentia/personally). many times via email
directorrk.prnssy@gmail.com. ramamurthyjv@gmail.com . I
,rkumar92@hotmail.com)andtelephone(+91-9968120034;011 - 23062434)butInotrecdivedanyreplyaboutthat.
(1 asked a.bout these facilities because overseas applicants were eligible to avail this facmf,'as per interview letter.)
Finally, I visited India and meet to Director PMSSY (Dr. Rakesh Kumar) and Directo AIIMS (Bhopal) in the
'NirmanBhawan"NewDelhi,I faint, whenIknewthatinterviews alreadydoneandfacul es alsoappointed. I
asked about my interview and application status, instead ofproviding any information a out Director AIIMS
(Bhopal)badly"insultedandhumiliatedmeandgaveuselessexcuses,Idon'tknowwhy?Wh twasmymistake?After'.
thatI theRTIapplicationto gettheinformationaboutmyinterviewas wellas :tug ofapplication.ButI
amsorrytoinformthatstillafter43daytheynotsendanyinformationregardingmyRTI. etothisbehavior,Iface
ecoriomicallossandfrustrations becauseI wasalready 10 days latetojoinmyworkinUS .So,I appliedfor 'First
Appellate' after that they uploaded some information on Patna AIlMS website and also ent some .ofrny
questionsnotall(SeeAttachment).Ananswerof myquestionclearlyindicatesthatthere9somethinggoingwrong
during AIIMS. Faculty selection. I was also surprised when I saw the "Faculty advertise ent" with correct Bank'
account No. on Patna Login site (http://aiimspatna.nic.inO (See Attachment). Previo I)', there was no such
. advertisementonthatsite . ..
(h :lIaii atna.nic: inde. h ?d =can &act= onfi &ema'=as oks arma 02 rna'Leo (See Attachment).
TheymodifiedthesiteaftermyRTIapplication.ThiswasnothappenedwithmeonlybutIh veconfactedsomeother
candidatesthat alsovictimized. . \
All these circumstance clearly indicates that the ..(asSistant professors) selection prpcedure for all six r:ew
AIlMS was not fare, transparentand lot ofconfhct ofmterest was' there. I also feel that;Seal'ch-cum-selectlOn
committeehasmisused hisdiscretion powertoselecttheirowncandidates. i
Now,I am frustratedandtiredandhaveno hopetogetmyright concerndept.So,hnally,I amwritingto
you forjusticeandto protectmyright.Myhumblerequestyoutopleasetakethestrongne4essaryactiontoprotect
our countryfrom corruptionandhelpsallothercandidateslikeme. Pleasefmdthe ofnecessarydocument
andall conversation(emails)donebymewithdepartment. \.
!
Thankyouverymuchforyourconsiderationandlookingforwardtohearingbackfromyou. I
I
:::mgaxds, ,, .." Of1'1F:
_...u.\ .. .. . '.. .....
I'. .
\fth"'ttrn : :', \ I \\;1
&1 ZRJ.1\. ('ol. ,\, ._. . .
c, O('l\\\
\'!fa u1..i(j,'1
GOVCilrnmentofIndia
MinistryofHealth& FamilyWelfare
NirmanBhavan,NewDelhi110011
, .
Website:www.mohfw.nic.in 'Fax :011-
E-mail:directorrk.pmssY@gmail.com
Advertisement:FacultyNewAIIMSNo.1120111 dated28
th
Dec2011
ADVERTISEMENT FOR FACULTY POSITIONS IN THE SIX 1ALLINDIA'
INSTITUTES OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (AIIMS) BElNG EST LISBED' AT
RISBIKESH, BHOPAL,JODBPUR, PATNA, RAIPUR AND 'B ANESBWAR
.UNDERPRADBAN.MANTRISWASTHYASURAKSBAYOJANA' .
1.' Institutions ofNational Importance: The Ministry of Health & F ily Welfare,
Government ofIndia is setting up these six Autonomous Institutions ofNationlU Importance.
For Faculty Positions! Senior Residency applications are invited from Indian" ationals and
'PersonsofIndianOrigin,holdingOCIStatus.Regular,Deputation,contractualapointmentsare
open:
n. Lastdatefor receipt ofonline application is 31st Jan 2012 which will .econsidered
evenifthehardcopyisnotreceivedbythisdate.However copyis amust.
m. Application Process: Advertisement and Application form is hosted at
www.mohfw.nic.in and http://aiimspatna.nic.in.Application form can be from
htt.p:llaiimspatna.nic:inlAIIMSApplicationForm vl.doc and filled online from sites. The .
hardcopyoftheduJy filled applicationalong attestedcopyofallrelevantce ificatesisto
besenttoDr.RakeshKumarDirector RoomNo.208-D Wing,Nirman havan,New.
Delhi, 110011 superscribingontheenvelope"Applicationforthe FacultyPostiniNewATIMS
Institutions"..Applicants are encouraged to submit applications on lineto avoi4 typing/data'
entryerrors. In case only a hard copyis sent andreceived intime, at a clearly cqmmunicated
requestoftheapplicanttherecruitmentsecretariatwillsubmititonlineaprinted ofwhich
will have to be validatedby signing it at the time ofinterview. Follow in creating
passwords accurately(atleast 10 digits, 1number, 1uppercase, 1symbol) andre$ember/note
theloginandpasswordsseparatelyforfutureuse. . I,
IV. ' Application fee: For all Institutes application fees ofRs. 500/- for SC/ST
candidates) bymeans ofa DemandDraftdrawn in favor ofDirector AIIMS Patnlf, payable at
Patnaor paymentcan be made on line. Other Instruments of be us'4d, Account
details: Bank ofIndia Account. '. .. , . Thts fee once
remittedwillnotberefunded. ,I
V. From OtherInstitution: Those who are working in Central/State Goverr$entISemi
Government Autonomous body orthose who want tojoin on deputation may to submit
''NoObjectionCertificate"fromtheirrespectiveorganizationalongwiththeir atthe
timeofinterviewallowingjoiningwithinfortyfivedaysofissueofappointmentletter.
VI. Period ofdeputation: shall not normally exceed 3 years at a time. The p,ay ofThe
DeputedFacultyMemberswillbeprotectedasperGovernmentofIndiaRules. \
VII. Annexures: Attested photocopies ofDegrees, Certificates, Mark sheets, i\ge proof,
Caste certificates etc. may be annexed to the hard copy ofthe application to bePI1
l
duced in
original along with photocopy for verification atthe time ofinterview. Some sugg stions on
whattoannexare availableintheonlineapplicationform.
r
VIII. Age limit: Age limit not exceeding 50 years for Assistant Professor and r\,ssociate
Professor and 58 years 'for Additional Professor and Professor, relaxable for G9Yemment
servants, SC, ST and OBC.up to 5 years and in otherwise exceptionally ving
cases. However, for cantr,actual appointments on any position (Assistant/Associate/Ald i iOn
f
,!1"
Professor and Professor) 'maximum age limit will be further relaxable as per Goyle 1 .. '.
Instituterules/regulations. I. I):
i
(
I

,
Sl. Name of Department. Prof AddlProf Associate . Asst Prof
No. Prof
1 '. Anatomy 1 1 1 , 5
Physiology i
1.
_.-
1 1 4 2
3 Biochemistry 1 1 1
'3
I
4 PathologylLab Medicine . 1 1 1 , 2
5 Microbiology 1 r 1 2
6 Pharmacology 1
-
.1
1,
'7 Forensic Med and ToxicoloD 1
- -
1
8
.. Community Med/Family med 1 1 1 2
9 GenMed 1
- -
1
10 'Dermatology 1
- - -
11 Psychiatry 1
-
- 1
12 Pediatrics 1
- -
1
13 Pediatric Surgery 1 1
-
..
14 Gen Surgery 1 '" 1 ' 1
-
15 Trauma & 1
- -
12
16 Orthopedics 1
-
1 1
17 Ophthalmoloror 1
- -
,I
18 Obst&Gyne 1. - -
1
19 .
E.N.T. 1 - - 1
20,
Radio Diagnosis 1
- -
11
21 Anesthesiology r
- -
1
22 Dentistry 1
- -
1
23 Transfusion Med & Blood bank 1
- -
1
24 -Radio Therapy
1
- -
1
25- Pulmonary Med 1
-
- 11
26 Physical Medicine and 1
- - !1
Rehabilitation
I
i
27 Nursing 1
- -
11
Total 27 7 9 48
Reservation for aBC 27% 7 2 2 !12
Reservation for SC 15%
4-
1 1 8
Reservation for ST 7.5% 2 1 1 '4
Grand Total 91
The number of vacancies is subject to increase/decrease. Reservati will be as pe r
Government of India policy. '
. -. \ . -
IX. Short. Listing: Based on bio-data, the Search cum Selection may short-list
candidates fqr interview. Candidates called for interview will have to pro,duce. all relevant
original documents in proof of details furitished in their application at the tnnet'Of interview
X. Sit.e of Int.erview: At New Delhi and or at the respective Institute locati n. No TWA at
l?elhi or at respective Institute location, to be intimated will be paid fo appearing iri the
llltervlevv. . . -
XI. Det.ails of Posts: For each of the Six Institutes, applications are invited, or the following.
posts.
I
i
.xn Qualifica.tions: QualificationsmayberelaXed for experienced, or
candidatesatthediscretionofthesearchcumselectioncommittee.However,theygenerallyare:
. . 1. PGdegree recognized by the MCIorEquivalent inthe APGdegree
LabMedicinewillbeconsideredforappli9ationtoPostsinPathology. ,\
2. PhD or Equivalent in the' Anatomy, Physiology, Biochemistry, I pharmacology"
.,Microbiology,PathologyrecognizedinIndiafornonMedicalCandidates.I ' .
'J; Nursing:AsperrecommendationsoftheNursingCouncilofIndia. !
xm:Experience: '. ' 1"
1. Professor: 13 years ofTeachinglResearchExperienceafterQualifyingd greeor4years
asAdditionalProfessor. ' , i . .
2. Professor: 9yearsof Experience after degree
or3yearsasAsso,ciateProfessor.' . J'
3. AssociateProfessor: 6years ofTeachinglResearchExperience after Qualifying degree
or3yearsasAssistantProfessor. , \'.
4. AssistantProfessor:3yearsof TeachinglResearchExperienceafterQualifyingdegreeor
3yearsas SeniorResidentorEquivaleijt" ', ' 't
S. SeniorResidents: Candidateswithlessthan3yearsteachingexperience fterqualifying
degreewillbeconsidered. .
6. For 3 years pre IyIChlDM degree residency will counted as
teachmgexpenence. ' \ '
, I
I
1. Professor: PayBand-4: Rs.37400":67000 with Academic Grade Pay of1.10S00 (Plus
NPAfor medically qualified candidates only) withthe minimum payOf S16001- and
AGP ofRs.10S00/-. Up to 40% ofposts ofProfessors will get Higher dministrative
(HAG)scalesubjecttoclearanceoftheprescribedprocess. '
2. Additional Professor: Pay Band-4: Rs.37400-67000 with Academic ade Pay of
Rs.9S00 (plus NPA for medically qualified candidates only) with miflimiun Pay being
Rs.460001- andAGPofRs.9S001- I
r
3. Associate Professor: Pay Band-4: Rs.37400-67000 with Academic'Grade Pay of
Rs.9000 (plusNP A for medicallyqualified candidatesonly). )withminim4mPay being
Rs.428001- andAGPofRs.90001- '
4. AssistantProfessor: PayBand-3: Rs.lS600-39100 with Grade Pay ofR4.8QOO with a
minimum. ofRs..30, 0001- +NPA. (NPA for medically qualified only) With
provision to move to PB-4 after three years (Rs.37400-6700) with Qrade Pay of
Rs.8700/- I.
5. SeniorResidents:AsadmissibleatAIIMSDelhi. i
S. ContractualAppointments: Salaries are usually negotiated butbased Last Pay Drawn
especiallyfor GovernmentInstitutionEmployees or givenfor!similarposts
bytheministry. I
UsualAllowa,ncesadmissibletoequivalentpostsin Governme,ntOf.I.ndia.
.'jl .N ru:t:lGf,1t
. ,1". \.JT"1
\ffif'lll'Ii& .... , ." "" Ii"I l
I' '-. J\. ' _ -' 4>
':il/', .\.;'...... :...
'
, ,
XV. Promotions: A Teacher gaitUng (equisite experience for the higher post Ican be granted
promotion subject to the Rules, and Regulations applicable from time to timel in the Central
Government Institutions! AIIMS.
:' XVI., 'Disputes:Alldisputesaresubject thejurisdictionoftheStateofDelhi.
"XVII. Reservation:ReservationswillbeasperGovernmentofIndiapOliCY"i :,',
': XVIII.Clearances: Appointments are subject to clearances as for equiv lent posts in
GovernmentofIndia , , .K.
, . oint Secretary
\'
'iWMiJ
' "ill,
l'
j
'.) / ',', .,' ;ti.U,
r ." :.:
,
No.01-02-J-21-NH-R/195317'
Governmentof India
CentralVigilanceCommission
I
SatarktaBhawan,:Block'A',
I
GPOComplex,INA,
, I
NewDelhi- 110123
To
19 2012
TheChiefVigilanceOfficer,
AllIndiaInstituteof MedicalScience,
\
(VigilanceCell),AnsariNagar,
NewDelhi-110029.
Sub:- Request made for ./ Intensive examination of works by CTE
Organization.
" Ref:- YourofficeletterNo.F.1-90/Engineering(Ptfile) dated26
th
lOctober,
ctl L 2012. . \
("01 Vide above-cited lettera requestwasmadeto'tmunit ofcvk:to carry
...... Intensive Examination ofthe following works apart from pclTeaching
.; '/ k D1
;: f ,: ioIOC:-
"K' .'. "
Jr.,.;:: .:. I
,-,:" 1.
ConstructiondoneinRajKumariAmritKaur,OPDbuildingin
1, f'tf rl 2
1": ('
Renovationworkin 1
st
, 2
nd
& 3
rd
Floorof PulmonaryWard was
inauguratedinJuly,2012);and , \
3. Constructionof BoundaryWall,CRHS,Ballabhgarh. I
Before taking a final viewregardingthe matterofc'arrying outlintensive
examination of above works ornot,"'it is requested to furnish details
pertaining to contracts of above mentioned works along in QPR formatI as
already sendto you ,alongwithpaymentdetails and status ofwork(qompleted
orunderprogress). \
I
,_ fl, \,'thfUII
Y
,
._.G.....I. I A
/' 1Q0"'''\
rv
'(S,K.
G/\'l..P:..,.,.... TechnicalE1xaminer

! t\ :':"j[ Off'lCff(
....
';4
.! (J

: .
H ..... ;IARKTA:NewDelhl
1/
::E-Mail Address

cenvigil@nic.in , .
4 cf){11 31llJ ,A I \lCR. ;fr:tiT.alt.

www.cvc.nic.in CENTRALVIGILANCECOMMISSION '1f
EPABX
24600200
SatarktaBha an,UP.O. Complex,
BlockA,INA NewDelhi110023
IFax:24651186 .......... ..
/ ..
To,
ShriVinodKumarGaur,
Chairmancum ManagingDirector,
NationalSeedsCorporationLtd,
Beej Bhavan,PusaComplex,
NewDelhi-l10012.
Sub: - VigilanceclearanceinrespectofShriDRSarin,GM(HR),NationalSeeds CorporationLd.forselection
tothepostof CMD,ArtificialLimbsManufacturingCorporationofIndia. I
Sk, I
PESB has recommendedShri ShriDRSarin, GM(HR), NationalSeeds CorporationLtU, forselection
tothepdstof CMD,ArtificialLimbsManufacturingCorporationof India.. Bio-dataofthe asreceived
from PESBis enclosed. .\
4. It is, therefore, requested to furnish the requisite information in respect ofSbri D Sarin (in the
enclosedproforma)attheearliest.
Yoursfait fully,
\

(Raj Kuttiar) -
SectionOtficer
Tele-246?1084
Encl:- Asabove. i
(i) The Chief Vigilance Officer, National School of Drama, Bhawalpur House, Das
Road, New Delhi. Complete information in respect of Shri D R Sarin, the th6n Registrar,
National School of Drama during his tenure in National School of Drama may\ please be
furnished to theCommissionintheprescribedformat (copyenclosed)attheearliest. I.
I
(ii) Shri R K Kama, CVO, National Capital Region Planning Board, IS! floor, core-IV B, Habitat
Centre, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. Complete information in respect ofShri D R Sarin, ifhe then Jt.
Director(Finance) during his tenure in National Capital Region Planning Board mar please be
furnishedtotheCommissionintheprescribedformat(copyenclosed)attheearliest. i
.:. {'" ""'."",':,,.::2, CVO, All India Institute ofMedical Sciences, Room No 1, Port Cabin, 3
rd
floor, Administrative Block, AnsariNagar, New Delhi .Complete information in respect f Sbrii)R
Sarin , the then Adminstrative Officer, AIIMS may please be furnished to the Commi sion in the
prescribedformat(copyenclosed)attheearliest.
!
OF THE OFFICERS FOR WHOM VIGILANCE I CLEARANCE I:
G SOUGHT \
I
[To be furnished and signed bythe evoorHOD1 \
I
Name ofthe Officer(ln full)
FathersName
Date of Birth 3
4 Date ofRetirement
5 Date ofEntry Into Service
6 Service to which the officer belongs
including batchI yearcadre - etc..
\
wherever applicable
\
7 Positions held
I
tdurlng the ten precedingyears)
I
orgaoizalie0; Des 8.." FininisIraIi veIncd.1MinistrY IDepl!.-
To S.No. (Name in Placeof . ncerned(in case ofofficers ofPSUs II From
full) I posting tc. ) \
. .----- ..- --- ---- -- _._--... _. ---.. - -- --+-----1
__ __ .. _______.. __________- __... ___ _.__L.___--'
8 Whether the officerhasbeenplacedon
the Agreed LISt" or"ListofOfficersof
Doubtful Integrity"
[Ifyes details )0 be given)
1
9 Whether any allegalion ofmisconduct
\
involving \lIgilance angle was examined
\
against the officer during the last 10years \
and If so with what result (*)
\
I
10Whether any punishmentwas awarded to
the officerdUring the last 10years ar)d ifso.
the dale ofImposition and details ofthe
{'"
penaltyn
11 Is any disciplinary /criminal proceedings
or charge sheet pending against theofficer.
as on date [Ifso. details to befurnished -
lnc1udlng ref,erence no.if any. of the
Commlsslonj
I,--Isany action contemplated against the
officeras on date (Ifso. detailsto be
furnished j(.)
I
\
I
I
1
DATE:
\
(NAMEANDSIGNATURE)
n If vigilance clearancehadbeen obtained'fro
be:provlded for the period thereafter
6,
. I' df fill") f.\ L1fVl( :' :
Name 0fth
epostappIe or----------'"...
1- C '
Nameofthe applicantin __________
L..fr S . =<.) ( C '.I
I
Father'sname h.LLJ-L.:b...
ae0 I 0 eappIcan _......... ____...____L_____:L____.:;:;.l..w_-l.____ I
I
fb
'rth fth I' t (')0- au... \0 I
D t
' J J'f" r'{\ r .--lu:\j"-\r,E'(,d Ar1.: m/
l
\
ucatlona quaI Icatlons ___... ... !Q..1,;,r....._..1___________ '
Ed
! I
Presentpostheld& scaleofpay... Ie
7,
Positionsheldduringtheprecedingtenyears:) J )(, q '00< .6.
I
...._--,---,--/-._-,
From
,To, ' Designation Organisation& placeofposting
.- , -1------.--......,

Jecf! \\ .
GMlHK)
I
R(J!.'yy""L

D-\-4.'06!
:!
3)...
'
; I
Sam"
t
Jo04 I
NC.R Ph""'1-
I
Dl"(M1)'I
I
I
i
i
I
i
I
I
I
I
! I
i I ,
-----t----..---.._.
!
8. Whether any punishment awarded to the applicant the
last 10, and also any action or is going
onagainsthimasfarashiS knowledgegoes : ..... N.c.J! ..

... .....
Date2-:
1
tQ.
2
t
L
':1 (Signatureoftheapplicant)
To
Secretary. PESB,
BlockNo, 14, CGOComplex,
Lodhi Road, NewDelhi...110003
,vi.;;,
'J'"
<... 1'
. ..\",..I\:' \ ..
\
I.
I
I
01-02-J-21-NH-RI210592
\
GovernmentofIndia
\
CentralVigilancecommission
SatarktaBhatwan,Block'A',
I
GPO\Complex,INA,
NewDelhi-ll0023.
!
0APR 2013
AeChiefVigilanceOffieer,
, AUIndia InstituteofMedicalScience,
(VigilanceCell),AnsaJi Nagar,
NewDelhi-ll0029. \
.. IntensiveexaminationofworksbyCTEOrganization. . \
Ref:- ThisofficeletterNo.01-02-J-21-NH-R/195317dated29
th
201i.
I
I '
i
{\ Vide above-cited lette.r it was requested" to furnish to the: Commission
i
necessary documentspertainingto followingcontracts: - \
I
i
1. ConstructiondoneinRaj KumariAmritKaur, OPDbuildingin
)
2
nd
3
rd
2. Renovation work in 1S\ & Floor of Pulmonary War& (which was
(I) ;0
inauguratedin 2012);and \
l'1-
f:, .
ConstructionofBoundaryWall, CRHS,Ballabhgarh. ' !
...:
.5-121 works at S.No. 1 & 2, HSCC vide hisII letter No.
d ciH$CCIAIIMSIl14/20131 475 dated 01.04.201.3, has intimated that bonp the worl<$
.'u ;;: : i I
been executed in one agreement and were finally completed on\16.11.2012.
i fi for workat S.No.3, 9VO,AIlMS vide hisJette.!:No. F. pt.
ff- dated 18
th
Feb., 2013 bas intimated that the'work had since been c$mpleted on
<.9 C!O f1') ')011 '.
. _.- "
I
/ i
I
3. all thethreeworks'had beencompleted, Commissionis viewthat
no useful purpose shall be served by carrying out a CTE inspection ati this stage.
!
However,you may conducta CTEtype inspectionatyourownlevel and\revert back
totheCommissionifanyvigilanceangle is found Olltduringsuch
Yours\faithfuBy,
(
i

Technical\Examiner
Ph: 011-\24651679
2P.04.2013
i
1"
TelegraphicAddress:
"SATARKTA: NewDelhi
E-Mail Address

cenvigil@nic.in
Website
fH1cfidi 3'1141 1
www.cvc.nic.in '
CENTRALVIGILANCECOMMISSION ea,.<fi{tI \lCR. ..
. l{..
EPABX
Satarkta . GP.O. Complex,
24600200
BlockA, NewDelhi 110023
IFax:24651186
............
CVCjRTlj CICj14jOlO
/
To,
ShriSubhashChandraAgarwal,
1775,KuchaLattushah,
Dariba, ChandniChowk,
Delhi-110006.
Sub: InformationsoughtunderRTI Act, 2005-
Sir,
Please refer to CIC's order given in file No.CICjSMjAj2013j00126.5jRM dated
02.06.2014 (receivedintheCommissionon06.06.2014) onthesubject above.
2. A copy of CPIO's letter No.CVCjRTljAPPj13/131-221326 dated 30.07.:":)13
alongwithitsenclosureissentherewith.
Yoursfaithfully'

(p-. I
(R.N.Nayak)I.
OSD/CPIO
Encl:-Asabove.
(PrabhatKumar) ~
f\ Enclosure:As above.
director&CPIO ")
."'-'1")
,.
To
Shri SubhashChandraAgarwal
1775,Kucha Lattushah
DaribaChandni Chowk
Delhi-110006
SUbject:-
Information UnderRTIAct 2005.
authority.
This is with reference to your appeal dated 28106/2013 filed before t
2. CopiesofthefOllowingdocumentsareenclosed:-
(i) Copies of file noting/correspondence relating to the appoint
AJIMS since01.06.20]2till date.
(j)
RTIMATTER
VCIRTI/APPII13/131
~ < ; ; l 1 3 ~ "
30.07.2013
e first appellate
ent ofCVO in
,R, ~
, r I fV -
,
('LLt- t"h 1v ;hLI/l'L.0 frt
- ch'('YI. r'-- -/c.;A.. (!<-1
r]) {' A f'l.t. c:'--f,A:


,v
\
\"':'
\ \ h
{.., \,,' "

PfL
t
l
,-",,-,,-, .
j1/V\./1
'J::! " 0 , ' "
(:R-
k

Vtf

2-) . D G'I
71(lJ-P.131jc :-+:

-""'-L""'-..... /((/I1 !r
I
1h-1-/

(t' ,0 )
[;1
1V
FAa...ll'rv-<l..:, /II?.' )ff2-J Lg
,"({<i' It,, ct") < 1 ('vo _ II J[ f'?f "',1 Cl ?,. '-- '"I
h,,t "'> - q l.. ;:D t-+< .;.." tftl R-
j {,,,, h' ''>- (' ,,-- '"" h ".-{' ""I:-f
",,,.. (",., CLL'iT -rfl" c... ,A.", :;ru....r-vfl
HOA .fA. ..\<1"')1'''1 c
a1 <.A.lt (.'-J t:J
/
The FR placed at p.132/C may be seen. Ithas been informed that Sh. Sanjeev
r'\haturvedi, IFS (HR:2002) has joined as Dy. Secretary at AIIMS and has also been
5
1ven
the charge ofCVO, AllMS. Firstly, no concurrence ofCommission has been
taken in this regard. Secondly, Commission vide its earlier communications dt.

28.12.2010 (p.123/C), 8.2.2011 (p.l25/C) and 26.4.2011 (p.127/C) on
postingof31 full-timeCVO in AIIMS.
In the light ofthe above, while the present intimation may be noted, Ministry
may be toldagaintoappoint afull-timeevoatAIIMS attheearliest.
J. cp4-
(PrabhatKumar)
Director(Coord)

S.e
c
'Ye+4 . 6. pLd 01
-to tt'\ a.,.,
(,vo
I

I
/
"vt
\ \y
,'tt
I
I
\;}
-501N-
OV-CVO-87
MatterdiscussedwithSecretary. NotesonP.491N may alsobeseen.
The decision for full-time CVO for AIIMS was discussed during the
meeting ofthe Commission with Secretary, Health held on 10.9.09 (the minutes
may be seen at 'X' on P.IOS/C). Para 2 ofthe Mlo HFW's letter dt. 8.9.2010
(P.120/C) has also mentionedabout the same. The issuewas alsofollowed up by
the Commission vide letters dt. 2S.12.2010 (P.l22/C), OS.2.2011(P.125/C) and
26.4.2011 (P.127/C).
Now, vide FR(P.132/C),ithasbeeninformedthatSh. SanjeevChaturvedi,
IFS (HR):2002 has joined as Dy. Secretary at AIIMS and has also been given
chargeofCVO onapart-timebasis. Nopriorconcurrenceofthe Commissionhas
beentaken inthisregard.
Submittedfor informationand directions, ifany.
I
Secrytary
(PrabhatKumar)
Director(Coord)
Dt. 24.08.2012

).... L.t _16 - ,L-
-\W
f"t II MS.
I ~ f
I
I
f\ .
())
-f;j-'/L
t:. fl. (rlIV'
i ~
- 5".).. I N-
<IN, :-
. ----
pR, f""" <V'<
!eL.<..}.t' '
.
.
l
\
i
I
I
I
1
I

I
("'..
!
I
I
I
I.
I
i
I
I
I
-------
-53/N-
ov-cva-87
FR-I to FR-IV may kindly be seen.
2. FR-I (p.135/C) is a letter from Sh. Sanjiv Chaturvedi, AIIMS which had been
addressed to Dr. R.S. Shukla, JS & cva,M/o Health & Family Welfare (HFW) and only a
copy has been endorsed to the Commission. Since, the Commission has sought some
clarifications from M/o HFW vide letter of even no. dated 03.09.12 (p.134/C), we may wait
till a formal reply in this regard is received from the Ministry.
3. FR-lII (p.161/C) is a letter from Sh. Sanjiv Chaturvedi to Dr. R.S. Shukla. In view
of para I above, we may wait for formal reply from the Mlo HFW.
4. FR-IV (p.162/C) is a communication from Sh. Sanjiv Chaturvedi to the
Commission regarding correction of address of cva,AIIMS. As the issue of appointment
of cvahas not been finalized the matter regarding correction of address is a secondary
issue to be dealt with at the moment.
5. FR-II (p.159/C) is a letter from Sh. Vineet Choudhary, Dy. Dir. (Admn.), AIIMS
n addressed to the Commission. He has informed that directions received from CVC were
placed before Director, AIIMS and he has taken a view that since the communication of the
CVC is addressed to M/o HFW, no action is required to be taken by AIIMS till any
instructions are given by the Ministry. He has further mentioned that Government of
Haryana is contemplating disciplinary proceedings against Sh. Chaturvedi and also a
criminal case is being registered against him at Jhajjar Police Station. Accordingly, we
may write to Environment anQ Forest for getting detailed information from
the State government in this regard.
(prabhat Kumar)
Director (Coord)
Dt. 15.10.2012 I
I
...., -ftfl: I
i
l
)-1 f) .-1-GVL--+.. h_
.
I
I
I
I
r\
..
I
I , ," l.. f
-54/N-
S.No. 78(R}-P-163-164/c
FR is the letter of Shri Sandeep Kumar Nayak, Joint Secretary, Ministry f Health
& Family Welfare (MoHFW) regarding the appointment of Chief Vigilance fncer in
AIl MS. New Delhi.
2, Regarding Commission's query made vide its letter on p-134/c . .IS, Mol FW has
stated that DD(Admn) has always been functioning as CVO at AlIMS from he very
inception. On the suggestion of the Commission to have an independent CVO it AllMS
and to delink him from procurement and administration work, a proposal for cr ation of
full-lime evo at the level of DS/Director was considered by AflMS, ith the
upgradation of the post of DO (Admn) from DSlDirector level to .IS level andtcreation
of an additional post of DS/Director, it \Va; felt to assign the work or 'VO to
DS/Director and in this process. 8hri Sanjeev C'haturvedi was appointed a' evo,
AIfM8. It has also been mentioned that AIIM8 is not in the list of institution' which
require mandatory approval of evc prior to appointment of CVO. As far as
appropriateness of level of DSlDirector for appointment of CVO in AIIMS is
concerned, it has been mentioned that as per evc m1nual (Clause 1 ,JA(t)) a ofl:h:er
drawing grade pay of Rs. 8700 can be assigned the charge of CVO in auto OOlOUS
bodies.
3. In response to the Commission's desire to send a panel of officers, (l
oplions/designations has been be considered for appointment as VO in
AIIMS, which are as under: - -
(i) DO (Adl11n'i. ArIMS. New Delhi
eii) .Ioint Secretan' & CVO, MOHFW
(iii) One orlh", n.::gular Director and OS in MOHFW 1\
(iv) C1ntinu(?' Sanieev C'haturvedL DS. MOHFW. as eva in AIIMS I
4. It is per
l
,:r1cnt 10 ll1t!nlioll that as per para 2.2 of V:giIanee Manual (New), thf Chief
Vigilance Officer in all dt!partments/organizations are appointed after prior eons4itation
with the Central Vigilance Commission and no person whose appointment In that
capacity is objected to by the Commission may be so appointed. Henee tht' ar ument
given b:. :.\ 10IlF\\' in abo\'e para is not sustainable. I
I
5. Ft.rther per para 2.6.1 of the Vigilance Mallual, irrcsp(!ctive of the fact ",\hether
the pOSI of" CV0 in an autonomous organization is on full-ti:ne basis or 011 pa1t-tilllc
basis, such organizations would forward, through their
Ministries/Departments a panel of names of three officers of sufficiently higher! level,
who can direct to the chief execlHivc in vigilance relaled matter. arranltlcd in
0rdcr of preference. along with their bi\l-datn and completc ACR dossiers J?r tili:
consideration. The officer. thus. appro' cd by the Commission wo}lId be
JS ('VO in that organization, There1brc. the panel sent above is not inlterms
of provisions of para 2,6.1 of the vigilance manila!. I
6, The Commission may like to consider whcther to call for a proper panel in Iterrns
of para 2.6.1 of the vigilance manual or the Commission will consider the as
given in para:; aboye.
Submitted please.

N
r-..
t>v1



It
s,-Q. (l\.A
.
A Ov"\ pQ..9.9. k;

he


FC\..l5X S',

'tu"
i
. .;-,
{ ....-i..... ',e.
, -
'''''/':
/
cv

I
[7
ovJc",'C
~ . i f I ()7ciw 0t/u -fide . -
.---------------
)dt,.'7f f ~ e te
%-'-
FNO.C-31011/01/2011-Vig
GovernmentofIndia
M/o Health & Family Welfare
(DepartmentofHealth & FW)
HI E12
Nirman Bhawan, Ne Delhi
Dated Jun , 2012
OFFICE ORDER
Dr. R,S. Shukla, lAS (WB :86), JOint Secretary & CVO, Min stry of
Health & Family Welfare, will look after the work of eva, A.I.!.I'.S, in
addition to his normal duties, with immediate effect and until Wurther
orders.
,r'\ 2. The official address ofDr. R.S. Shukla is as under:-
RoomNo -150A
Nirman Bhawan,
Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi
Telefax-23061706
3. This issues with the approval ofSecretary (H&FW).
,

, R
(Ram Prasad
Director(Vig.)
I
Copyto:-
1. PS tOIHFM/MoS (HFW)
2. Director(A.I.I.M.S), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi
I
3. PPSs to Secretary (HFW)/Secretary (AC)/Se;cretary
(AYUSH)/Secretary (HR)
4. Shri VineetChawdhry, Dy Director(Admn), A.I.I.M.S.
5. DrR.S. Shukla, JS & CVO, % Health & FW
6. Joint Secretary (HR.)
Central Vigilance Commission (Shri P. M. Pillai,
w.r.t,
letterOV/CVO/87 dated 28
th
Decembers, 2010
8. All Sections/Desks/Divisions/Attached offices under Depart1ent of
Health & Family Welfare
9. All MinistrieS/DepartmentsundertheGovt. ofIndia
10. Director(NIC) foruploading on Ministry'sWebsite.
I
ONFIDENTIAL
No.F.1-90/CVC/MR/2003-Vig
ALLINDIAINSTITUTE OFMEDICALSIlENCES
(VIGILANCECELl)
Ansari Nag r, NewDelhi-29. \
Datedthe:-
1
0JUL 2012 .
To
P.M. Pillai,
OfficerOn SpecialDuty,
CentralVigilanceCommission
SatarktaBhawan
Block-A, I.N.A. Colony
NewDelhi-110023.
Subject:- AppointmentofChiefVigilanceOfficerinA.IIMS, NewDelhi.
*******
Sir,
IamtoinformthatShriSanjivChaturvedi,IFS(HR:2
1
02)hasjoinedto \
New Delhi w.e.f. 29.06.2012(forenoon) and actas ChiefVgilance OfficerofI
the AIIMS. The particulars of Shri Sanjiv Chaturvedi, Deuty Secretary &
ChiefVigilanceOfficer,AIIMSisenclosedherewith.
I
,D' CR,-.I,-t
.-..v'- 0) /
Ji )J __/ (VI T
, DY. DIRECTjOR(ADMN.)
-
__ \
G--, . v"'>\"<r Enc\.: Asstatedabove I
V\1r\)1) Copy to:- Sh. Ram Prasad Meena, Director(Vig.) Ministry qfHealth & F.W.,
) '0 \ NirmanBhawan, NewDelhi. I
I
i
I
\
.- -
~
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
~ 22.
~ :QNFIDENTIAL
PARTICULARS OF C.V.O.
Name of the Organization (Please indicate
All INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL
the Administrative Ministry/Deptt. in case
SCIENCES, NEW DElHI.
of Public Sector/Autonomous Bodies
(MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY
WELFARE)
Name of the evo
SHRI SANJIV CHATURVEDI
Telephone numbers
Office 26594443
Residence
-
Fax No.
011-26588663
Date of Birth
21.12.1974
Date of Superannuation of C.V.O.
21.12.2034
Designation of the evo within the Dy. Secretary/Chief Vigilan( e Officer
Organization
Service to which he belongs and his Cadre IFS (HR:2002)
Pay Scale of the incumbent
Basic Pay-24,450/- GP-7600 -
Whether the post of C.V.O. is full time or
Part time
part-time?
Whether the functions of C.V.O. have been
There is no post of C.V O. The Dy.
assigned to him in addition to his own
Secretary has joined at the nstitute and
duties as has been the practice in the past. act as CVO of AIIMS.
Date of approval of the appointment of the
-
C.V.O. by the Commission.
Whether on deputation or from within the On deputation
organization
Date on which he took over the charge of 07.07.2012
the post of C.V.O.
Date on which his tenure ends
Whether attended any training courses for No
CVOs organized by the CVC? If so, the
dates
Whether worked as CVO earlier, if so, the No
name of the organization (with period)
I
If the post of evo is vacant or not filled -
!
with the approval of the Commission, since
I
when and why?
I
Date of relinquishing charge by incumbent -
I
predecessor
If office located out of Delhi. Please NA
indicate name (s) and other particulars
including residence/office telephone Nos.
of Delhi-based officer(s) of your
organization who can contacted in
emergent situation to pass on message to
you.
Fax No. if any (Delhi) 011-26588663 I
Any other remarks -
Confidential
To
Shri R.S. Shukla,
1S & evo,
M/o Health & Family Welfare,
0, 'A' Wing,
Nirman Bhawan,
New Delhi - JI.
OV-CVO-07!lP '413 /lS....
03/0S/20l2
Yours faithfully

Kumar)
I Director
to-ordinadon-Il
I
Copy to: - Shri Vineet Choudhary, Deputy Director (Admn.), AIIMS, Ansari Nagar, New
Delhi - 29. \
Jf.
..
>
C
Ansari Nagar,
Datedthe:
To
Dr. R..S. Shukla, lAS
JointSecretary(PH)&
ChiefVigilnaceOfficer, /
NFlDENTIAL
fJ-
"::l-tl <3)')-O
l
?-
New
2012
7 :)1<>'
M.inistryofHealth&FamilyWelfare, ___
NlrmanBhawan, "'..-- '\ \1 __"
NewDelhi. . ( ""'7t/ t t..._-. ..----
Subject: Informationregarding appointmentofChiefVigilanceOfficera AIIMS.
Ref.: Telephoniccommunication regar.ding appointmentofCVOatthe IIMS
*********
Sir,
TheinformationregardingappointmentofChiefVigilanceOffice (CVO)atthe
AIIMS is as

A proposal for creation of one post of ChiefVigilance Officer lO be filled on

deputation basisfrom Central StaffingScheme atthe AIIMS ha been placed
beforethe Standing Finance Committeeofthe Institute in its metingheld on
20.7.2010. After considering the proposal, the Standing Finan eCommittee
decidedasunder:- I
"The Committeewas ofthe viewthata full time CVO wasInotneeded.
Instead, withthe upgradatioQ ofthe postofDD(A) to JS and with
the increase ofadministrative workload on accountof
ofthe Moily Committee recommendations and the secon" campus at
Jhajjar, an additional post at Dy. Secretary/Director leve) should be
created. TheworkofCVO could be assignedtosuchan o,ficer. Itwas
also suggested that the post of DD(A) should be as Add\.
Director in view of the fact that the post was now JS equivalent. It was
agreed to examine whether such re-designation would need in the
Actor Rules" (Annexure-I). !

After approval ofthe competent authority, the undersigned in

AIIMS, NewDelhiand subsequentlyjoinedon29.6.2012. \

The Director,AIIMSInaccordancewiththeabovementioneddecisionof
the SFC, issued Memorandum No.F.9-40/2010-Estt.(RCT) dated 7.7.2012
(Annexure-II) vide which the undersigned was to act a$ the Chief
Vigilance Officer of the Institute, In addition to his duties and
responsibilities as CVO, the work ofcertain branches were alsO; allocated to
him..Itis clarified that as perpastpractice,the Director, AIIMS has been
allocating the work of CVO and thereafter information to effect is
being given to the CVC (Annexure-III). There has been any
objectionfromCVC orMinistryoverthis. Itisalsoclarified that,as
perVol. IofVigilance Manual, name ofAIIMS does not intothe
list of organizations, for which approval of CVC is In
appointingCVO(AnnexureIV). l

The information regarding appointmentofChiefVigilanceOfficerpttheAIIMS

was communicated to the CVC on 20.7.2012 a copy to
theMinistryalso. Sincethen,usualtransactionofworkisgqingonwith
CVC&CSI invigilancematters. !
\
I
I
______________IO'i: ..
,.
2-

The eve has already approved the name ofthe underlslgned as evo,
AIIMS as isevidentfromthedisplayofthenameoftheIUnderslgnedon
theevewebsite,asevo,AIIMS,onwww.cvc.nic.in

In accordancewith Section2.9ofVigilanceManual (Vol. I), appointment
as evo, the undersigned issued Office Memorandu
1
NO.F.17/NVC/
2012(142) dated 26.7.2012, to keep himself away from all the
tender/procurement processes (Annexure-VII). It is also to be mention here
that in pasttwo months, aftertaking overas CVO, action been initiated
into a number of cases, related to financial irregularities irlto procurement,
construction works, recruitment and irregularities committedhi'y medical shop
openedintheinstitute.
Theaboveissubmittedforkind information.
Yoursfaithfully,
I
(SANJIVCH,4,TURVEol), IFS
CHIEFVIGILANCE AIIMS
Copyto;-
:
I
1. /'ShriK.o.Tripathi,
V Secretary,
CentralVigilanceCommission,
Satkarta Bhawan,
Block-A, LN.A. Colony,
Newoelhi-110023.
2. Or. VishwasMehta,JS, MESection, MOH&FW

I
Wl"1i .!):
lVHNUTES OF TH.:r.: 19S
TH
IVfEETIl\TG OP TH.E
STANDING . COlVlMITTEE OFT "ALL
INiDL\' INSTITUTEOli'MEDICALSCIENCES,NEvV
DELI-II", fIELD .ON .20.07.2010 AT . V.
RI\MALINGASWAMI BOARD ROOM A'f TIlE
A.l.I.M.S,NEWDELI-II.
Thel95
1h
meeting oftheStandingFinanceCommitteeofAIOvi:S was on20.07.2t}1O,
The followings we.re present:-
i) Ms. K. SujathaRao,
Secretary to the Govt. cfIndia,
I ,r'\,
i
.Ministry ofHealth &FamilyWelfare,
NirmanBhawan.,
i I
N,=w Del):; - 10 I)! I

Dr.R.KSrivasta.va,
DirectorGener.al ofHeaithServi:::es,
Govel11ment ofInc!ia.,
N'irman Bhavv'an,
.New Delhi.- 110 011
J) Shri NavedMasood, r
Addl Secretary &FinanciA: Adviiler,
GovernmentofIndia, .
[V!.inistry cifI-Iealth & FamilyWelfare,
NirmanBhawan,
i
NewDelhi- J10011
Member
I'
4) Dr: R.C. Deb\,
Director, !
A.II.M.S.,
New'Delhi- 110 029
IVIe\nber-Secretary
5) Shri DebasishPanda,
JointSecretary
Government ofIndiA.,
Ministry ofHeaJth&FamilyWelfare,
NirmanBbawan,
i
NewDelhi - 110011
Invitee
6) Dr. D.K Shaima,
M.edical Superilltendent,
A.LUvLS.:
NewDelhi- 110029
. Invitee
I .
I
I
I .
i
I'
i
i
I
DirectorGeneral ofneallt-o Servicesthat has been setupU\llde.r CS(MA.) Rule.s
Itern l'io.Fe/l2
Hem No.FCi13
Item No.I1'Cl14
Hcm No.FC/16
for consideration ofrequests fl)r treal:ment abroad !
i
To consider the proposnl for purchase of new Tomdthe,'apy Unit with
latest. for .Dr.. B.R. Ambedltflr Cancer
Hospital,AIIMS, New DeIhl. i.
------------------------_.._------------ -------------..---------------.+-----------.::<-:.--------
I
I
It was decided that the item No.Fen, FC/8 and Fd12 should be fIrst
I
considered by the Hospital Affairs Committee. Accordingly,
I
I
. considerationuftheseitemswasdeferred.
I
.
I
i
I
To start some new investigations in the Depar:tment;of.Obstetrics llnd
Gynaecology on paymentbasis. I
--------------------------------------------------___________________-1______________.:..;,. _____
I .
,
i
To considel' the proposai for charges to beievied newly illtroduced
& Therapeutic P:occdux'es' in the Depat'\'tment of Nuclea'r
tvlechcme atAD1VIS. NewDelhi. ... .
----..
I
!t was decided thaI: the hemNO.Fell3 andFell 4 should be first considered
by the Hospital Affairs Committee. Accordingly, the ofthese
items,.vere defelTed. .. i
i
To considcl' the Pl'oppsal for creation of one post Chief Vigilfll\Ce
OJficcr atthe. Alll'v.f.S. NewDeIhL I

I
, .
The Committee W,lS of the view that a ntH time CVp was not peeded.
fnstead, with the upgradation ofthe post ofDD(A) to J$ kvel und withthe
1 .
increase of administrative.workload on account of of the
Moily Committee recommendations and the secona at Jhajjer, an
additional post at Dy.SecretarylDirectorlevel should be cteated Theworkof
,
cvacould be assignedto such an officer. Itwas also su*gestedthatthe post
ofDD(A) should be re-designated as Add!. Director in of-the fact that
,
the post was now JS equivalent. It was agreed to whether such re- .
designationwould need r.:hanges the Act orRules.
I
To consider the proposal fOI' enhancement of emolugmenf);for Ph.n.
students and enhl'lllCemelltofPh.D.Institute AITIVtS.
. ,

Approved.

,
. 1.-""
-----.
ALLINDIAINSTITUTEOFMEDICALSCIENCESi
ANSARINAGAR,NEWDELHI110608 1
!
,II. ...., ..
F.No.9-40/2010-Estt.(RCI) Da4d:O
'" '... " i.,.': " !..'
I
MEMORANDUM
I
!
I
The Director has been pleased to order that Shri Sanjiv Chaiturvedi, Deputy
Secretary who has recently joined shall act as the Chief Officer of the
Institute. Further,inaccordancewithRegulation11 oftheAIIMSReg\ulations,1999(as
has work.of br1nches himin
addltion tohis dutiesandresponslblhties as CVO with unmedlate lfect,tillfurther
orders:- .
I
1. GeneralSection
i
2. EstateSection
I
H
A -vv-:ll .l.h!!> ,....,. "'
3. .1..... .1 ;:, t: t..l i \tv\..&. J. cu.\...... v .... ..-0. ... .LV.&. '-' .... .L..... ..........to.Jl \,.,,1
A
'. Heisalsoauthorizedtosigntllepensionpapersofthe
\
The Administrative Officers/AAOs/OS of the concerned shall
I
,
submitfilesdirectlytohim.
,
i .
.. I
:
(ViI'ieetChawdhry)
DeputyJ>irector(Admn.)
ShriSanjivChaturvedi
:
DeputySecretary,AlIMS
('. Distribution:-
01.TheChairman,HospitalManagementBoard.
02. Dean(Academic) / Dean(Research) ,
03. ChiefsofalltheCentres/MedicalSuperintendent(HospitalfDlr.RPCentre)
04. Sr.FinancialAdvisor
05.ChiefAdministrativeOfficer
06. FinancialAdvisor
07. SuperintendingEngineer
08. AllSr. AdministrativeOfficer/AdministrativeOfficers/AAOs;
09. AllF&CAOs/AccountsOfficers
10.PPStoDirector,AIIMS
11.VigilanceCell
12.Personalfile oftheofficerconcerned
13.GuardFile
CONFIDENTIAL
ALLINDIAINSTITUTEOF MEO;Cl\l SCIENCES
(VIGILANCEC.ELtll
Ansari Nagar, Delhi-29
No.F.90/CVC/MR/2003-Vig(PUile)
Datedthe: 08.'11.2007
\
To
Shri Sallai
Director,
CentralVigilance Commission,
Satarkte1 Shawan, Block-A,
4th Floor, GPOComplex, INA,
NewOelhi-110023,
SUbject:- ApP'o'irntmentofChiefVOIQilance Officer J\UMS, New
II
,
Sir,
Iam dirncted toforward herewith apmposal forappointment ofDr. Randeep
Guleria, Professor, Deptt. ofMedicineasChiofVigilanceOfficerofthis 11stitute.
2. It is, thElrefore, requestedthat Dr. Ran.fl'3ep Guleriamaybe appoihtedas Chis'f
VigilanceOfficE}roftheAIIMS. TheparticularsofDr. RandeepGuleriais: enclosed.
ThisissueswithtileapprovaloftheDirflctor,AIIMS.
Yoursfaithfully,
(
'1
/
(SANJAY

t DMNOFFICER(V:IG.)
Enc!.;- Asstatncl above.
PA !R 1'1CU1..1\ RS 0 rC,V.O.
, 't <, h ,"' .
1M

;.




r'\
II
.;
;1
I
(\
I
l;
1. Name of the Organization (Please
indicatr3 the Administrative
Ministry/Deptt. in case of Public
Sector/Autonomousbodier,)
2.
3.
Name,)ftheCVO
Telephonenumbers(s):-
Office
Residence
4.
5.
FaxNt,.
Date birthofeYa.
6.
7.
8.
DateofSuperannuatingofeyo.
Designation ofthe Cya. within the
Organisation
Servicfl to which he belongs and his

9. Payscaleoftheincumbent
10. Wheth''3r the post of C.v.O.
timeorpart-time?
11. Wheth(3r the functions of
is full
I
ALL INDIA INSTITUTEiOF MEDICAL
SCIENCES, NEWDELHI
(MIf'HSTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY
WEI.FI!\RE) I
I
DR. HANDEEP
I
!
265D3G76

265B:313S3
'1959
30.04.2021
PROFESSOR
AIiMS Slilrvil,;t:;:
'
RS,1H400-500-22500+NPA
Parttime .
:
CYO.:Them is no post of C.VjO. as suell.
have been assigned to him in the Professor, has benn
additiontohis normal dutiesorhe'is
workin!Jonfull time.as eyo.only
12. Date ofapproval ofthe appointment
oftheeyo. bythe Commission.
13. Whether on deputation or from
withinthe organization.
14. Date on which he took over the
chargeofthepostofCYO.
15. Dateonwhichhistenureends.
16. Whether attended any training
courses for evos organized by the
CVC?Ifso, thedates.
17. Wheth!;)r worked as evo earlier, If
so, name of the organization
(withperiod)
18. If the post of CVO is vacant or not
filled with the approvEll of the
Commission, sincewhenandwhy?
19. Date of relinquishing cllarge by
incumbentpredecessor.
20. Ifofficelocated outofDelhi. Please
indicate name(s) and other
particulars including residl:J;nce/office
teleohone Nos. of
assigned to work as Chief Vigilance
Officer in addition to his own duties i?1S
hasbeenthe practicein past.
I
WithintheOrganization
07.11.2007 (Copy
OrdHr No.F. 35-9/2002-E
07.1'i.2007 enclosed)
I
atU
r
of AflMS
datHd
Shri Debasish Panda, DD(A) & cva
was relieved from the Ini:;titute with
effect.from 02.04.2007 on promotion to
the of Joint Secretary in the
MinistryofHealth& FamilyWelfare.

,-- 5jtJ
./
\ CONFIDENTIAl.
ALL INDIAINSTITUTEOFMEDICAL$CIENCES
A.\:SA.RI NAGAR NEvV DELI-II-11008
9
.
6-6-1/2003-EsttI
DeltedIthe "1:1 JUL
To
i
i
n. u:!ntrdlYigilanceCommissioner
'.
CENTRALVIGILANCE
House. I st Floor
llELHI-: 110001.
I
SUbjt\:t- Appointment of Chief Vigilallre Officer at the -1\11 India Institute of
MedicalSciences,NewDe'JhL
Sir,
I have the honour to say thM Shri N. Baijendra (lAS, MP-'1985) v;ho
was a ppointed as ChiefVigilance Onicer a t the AIIIvlS has sine been on
07.02.2004 and 5hri Ivfdycmk (IDAS-1989), Senior Advisor on
deputation at this Instihlte is lookinf; after the duties of the ChiefVigilance Officer
w.eJ. 07.02.200-l. \.
i
l
It is. ti1erefore. requested that Shri Mayank Sht1r1l1c1 '(IDAS-1989) may br::'
appoinb=d as Chief Vigilc1nce Officer of the AIIMS. The ofShri
Sharmais enclosed.
.Anearlyreply inthematteri:;
Yoursfaithfully,
\
(ATTAR: .
CHIEFA
Encl.: Asabo\'e.
'f O/l".. \1- V\O
. \',\
------------


./
"
/ .
!
J
PARTIC1I L.b. R S_0 F CoYO.
of t.he Organization (Please I-ALLIf-JDIAINSTITUTEOFMEDICAL
indicate th'2 _-\dministrative t-.linistry/
Deptt. in("ase of Sector/
\ AutonomnousbodIes).
" :"-''<nne ofthepresentc.y.O. -
re ofbirthl)te.\'.o.
Dateofsuperannuationofex.o.
Designation of the C.V.O. within thE:
Or
o
.... anizalion
_
Senice i;e, which he belonv,s and his
,,,
cadre
NEW DELHI !
(MfNISTRYOFHEALTH &tAoMILYWALF. .tl,RE)
.:
SHPJ. MAYANK .
-----------------+--------
29.10.1965 i
I
-------
31.10.2025
-+1----
I
.. ----
- i
SENIORFINANCIALAIpVISOR
I
_ .________________+-_____________
IDA5-1989
;
Payscaleofthe H300-400-1R300j-
i
\\'hether the PC\st of cx.a. is full titHe
. ")
l)[ pa!t-hm5'. _
\\'hether th02 functions of C.V.O. h,.lVe
t('1 him in addition totlis
.. .....
11I..)nnai duties l)r he is working on full
X.C'. only
it) Whether (In deputation or from \'\-'ithin
I
Pdrl-time
I
f
i
i . ________._.
Tlwre is no post of C.V.O. as such. ILowe\'(
I .
theSeniorFinancialAdvisoris lookirw I
-
\-igilancE' Work in to hiD ownclut-it,':i
--------_. .......-..- .....-
Ondeputation
theorganization __-+______________-1-.-_______...____
11 . Date ofappro\"a! of the appointmentof
theC.V.a. by theCommission
12 IDate on which he took over the charge 07.02.2004
ofthe postofC.V.O. ___________._. _.._______._..___
13 'Dateonwhichhis tenureends 30.06.2006
1-1 \,'hether attended any training course
for C,Os organized by the CVe?Ifso,
thedates.
15 Whether w('1rked a::: evoearlier, Ifso,
tht? nanw of the organization (''''ith
period)
lb . Ifthe postofevois Vac.lntornot
. \\'ith the approval of tlll' Commission,
since\,henand "'hy"!
1:- An\'otherremarks
No..But he has attended a course on JUI
Procedures at Institute of Judicial Traini
Lucknow. , __....____
Yes. He worked as Dy. C.V.c
CGDA(Admn.) in the Controller Gene
DefenceAccounts, l'..Jew Delhi. :He has hI
charge of Dv. C<;;DA (Admn,) wht
hdnd:ed all kin<..1:s of Court (as "
disciplinary cases and handled iilquiries
& P.O. both. i
As perremad<.s in 9
------..------/---_._----_.............._... ..
Nil
, '\'V.
j2
,
:l;jl
..'.... ,
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MlEDICAL SCIENES
Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-29
.
-Esn.I
Dated:
23 AUC 2005
i
MEMORAND"JM
Sub:- Distribution of work between Deputy Director (Administration) and. tilt:
Financial Advisor at the AIIMS, New Dflihi. I
...... '" '" '" '" '" " '"
I
In supersession of this office memorandum of even number dated the :1
51
Ma.rch. 2005 and 23rd July, 2005 on the subject eited above, the followirg
distribution of work is ordered with immediate (lffect:-
I S.No. Director{Admn) SI'. Fin
I
I I
ancial Advisor
11.
I Ge ral Ad.mi.l . . '
: 'He Finance Accounts
! 2.
I Establishment
---
3. I Security
.
--
4. DiscipUnary & Departmental
"-
Inquiry cases
5.
I Vigilance
as Chief Vigilance
Officer
6. 1 Engineering Services Department
,7. Stores
I 8.
I Court Cases
'--"
'--'
9. Vishrarn Sadans
10. Parliament Questions
'---:-- --
Ill.
I Member-Secretary to the
I I' C' fj
I Se e<:tlOO omrruttees or
Irecruitment to at! Group 'A' ,md
! 'B'
,- :-::-1-----
12. Coord inator fur meetings of all
the Statutory Bodies
13. I Cbainnan, AIlMS Cafeteria


, ..,
. ,
__
"!'"
\ '
J L I Committee -
i
! 14.
I Recreation -
&
I
)AmenItiesCommittee
i
I1-
).
I ofPermanent
I Machinery.
I
16.
i AssociationslUnionst activities
!
-
17.
I Constirution
of various
r C .
! ! ommlttees
to look into
:
I f functioningofthe fnstirute
'". ..__ . _ ...__._.._
.-,
--,--- !
-_....-." ..... ,'-+--"'''''-1
,
I
18.
i \\ ork relatmg to Parliamentary
!
)
;Committees.
- !
l19. i posts. ,_______. i-J
l20. :GrievancesofSCs/S.:r
s
--t ----.-+-==i
r21.
: Car/Scooteretc.
ut
24.
IDelegatianofPowers
. Facultymatters
Distribution:-
I. TheChairman- Hospit:ll ManagementBoard
2. TheDean(Acad.lExam.)
3. Thetvfedical Superintendent,AITh1S
4. All ChiefsofCentreslHeadofDeparlments/Sections/Units
5. Sh.DebasishPalJda,Dr.Director(Admn.)
6. Shr.MayankShanna,Sr.FinancialAdvisor
7. TheFinancialAdvisor
8. TbeSuperintendingEngineer
9. All Sr.Admn.Ofi1cers/p.dmn.Oflkers/Asutt.Admn.Officers
\0. All ACCOunts Officers
11. ThePersonal Fileoftht personconcemed
! ResourceDevelopment
122.;All advances viz. HBA, Festival,
: Hindi __4'''-+__________---+-'_---l
--
I PubJic lnformatiollOftice'r
!
j
f
(P. VENUQOPAL)
DIRECTOR

f:f
.ECtAt ;ENGf'R
AllINDIAINSTBTUTEOf SCIENCES
(ViGilANCE.CELk)
No.F.1-90/CVC/MR/2003-Vig
To
ShriSamirSahai,
Director,
Govt. ofIndia,
CentralVigilanceCommission,
Satarkt;9 Shewen,
G.p.a.Complex,
BlockA, INA,
NewDolhi-110023.
Subject: - App:ointmentofChiefVigilanceOfficerinAllIndiaInstituteofMedical
Sciefflices, NewDelhi. .
}
Sir,
I ern to reFer to cve's IEltter dated Nil on U-Je abow,
subjectandto informthatShri Sh1:lilesh Kurnlr Yac:av, Oy. Director(Adrnn.) hasnow
beenappointedasChiefVigilanceOfficerofihisIn;;titute videOrderNo.F.3p9/200;(
Estt.1 dated 2:>.11<1 December, 2007(copy encl:)SI3d), Tl'le particulars ofShri Shailesi'l
KumarYedav i!.i enclosed,
Yoursfaithfully,
.
, V
I'DMN. FFICER(\I/G.)

Encl ..- As above.
/ '
\LLINDIA OFMEDICAl.,SCIJLNC
AnsariNagalr, New D:elhi-29
..,.
***-7.:,"******
3'r1
Estt.I
l)ated:22
o
<l Dec.:ember, :
Subject:- Allocationofworkat A.I.tM.S.,New DeIhl.
**************
In supersession ofall prGvious orders on the su'bject cited above, the undersign,
of powers conferred Wld'!r Section 11 ofthe Regulations, 1999 (as amer
- herebyallOcatestheworksas indicated beloweach
SJ.No.
1.
2.
3.
It

General Administratic Finance& AccoU!
..
Establisn.rnent
Security
Disciplinary&Depa!
-l---.-----
--_._----.........-
tmental Inquirycases
.;;
,.
I _. VlgtianceasChiefV.,gilance
I 6. EngineerService ____.___..--____-\--_________
!7.: ..__---------r------ I--
i 8. CourtCases
f 9..:,.__-+...,V,:...::is:;,:hram::.; Sadans--.--.--------..;.------I!------
1O. Parliament.. __._-:;:--:---:-_-::::---........,.-___;;--+__
11. Member-Secretary LO all Selection for
12.
13.
14.
15_
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
I
Alladvancesvi.z. \,Festival, etc. HBr
23.
24.
25.
26.
Chairman,AIIMS
Chairman. Recreati
Member-Secretru>,Permanent egQtla tog. ac mer) __
AssociationslUnirr ctivities
Constitution of "
15 A
ario
nst
us committees
functioningofthe I itute.
to look
Workrelatingto Par!ia
Recruitmentto fac
GrievancesofSCsI
.osts
S

ST
HumanResource' eJopment
:
.
into
HindiTraining/Ret :5
-
the
Dev
urn
ers ! DelegationofPuw
FacuI!}: affairs
PublicMedia
recruitment to A_'_' _&::-'..,.B:,-'-:-'... po-:s'-'ts _____
Coordinatorfur mt' ofall the Statutory;Bodies
Cafeteda
. ...
on &AmenitiesCommiV.tees
-,-------
N' t' kif h'

(T.D.DOGRA
J)lRECTOR
DISTRIBUTION:-
1. TheChairmzn,Hospital ManagementBoard.
') The Dean (AcademiclExamination)
1 The Medical Superintendent(MainHospitallDr. RP, Centre)
- ----/1..:J""rls of
; " J"'i"'" ,
I
"
l
/
,J; I'
/:
.CONFIOEf'llTIAL
PARTICUL,U::tS 0 F C.V.O.
1.
2.
3.
4.
S.
o.
,.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
I .
16.
17.
18.
J
F
S
19.
20.
Name of the Organization (Plgas
indicate the AdministrativE
Ministry/Deptt. in case of Public
Sector/Autonomousbodies)
NameoftheCVO
Telephonenumbers(5
Office
Residence
Fax No.
DateofbirthofC.V.a.
DateofSuperannuatingofC.V.O.
Designation of the CVO. within the
Organisation
Service to which he belongs an( hi:
cadre
Pay sc:;tleofthe incumbent
VVhether the post of CVO. is full time
orpart-time?
VVhether the functions of C.V.O...ilavE
been assigned to him in addition to
norm<'ll duties or he is working on fuli
time as. CVO.only
Date of approval of the appointmeqt or
theC.V.O. bytheCommission. .
Whetller on deputation or from ""ithie
theorganization.
Date on which he took overthe chargE'
ofthepostofcva.
Dateonwhichhistenureends.
Whether attended any training
for C\/Os organized by the CVC? If so,
thedates.
Whether worl<ed as CVO earlier, I';' so.
the name of the (with
penod)
Ifthe postofCVO is vacant or notiille<i
with the approval of the Commis:sion,
sincewhenandwhy?
Date of relinquishing charge b)1
incumbentpredecessor.
If office located out of Delhi.
indicate name(s) and other particulam
including residence/office telephono
Nos. of Delhi-based officer(s) of YOlle
organization who can contacted ill
emergentsituation to pass on mes!>agn
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE!: OF MEDICt\L
SCII:NCES, NEWDELHi
(MIf'.IISTRY OF HEAl.TH & FAMILY
WELFARE)
ShriShaileshKumar Ya:dav
2651l8Tf7
0120-2502898
265B86G3
13.08:1965
31.08.2025
Dy. Director(Admn.)
Indian Police Service, Tamil Nadu Cadre
(1983)
Rs.16400-4S0-20000
Parttime
There is no post of q.V.O. as SUGh.
However, the Dy. Director (Admn.) tlelS
been assigned to work as Chief
Offir.erin addition tohis own dutiesas
been practiceinthepast.
On deputation
22.12.2007 (Copy iof AIIMS
No.F.35-9/2002-EstU elated 22.12.2007
enclosed)
Shri Debasish Panda. DD\A) & CVO was
reliENed from the Institute)Nith effect from
02.04.2007 on promotion to the rank f.)f
JointSecretary in the Mini$try of t-i'aalth S.
FamilyWelfare.
_"n NO..,". <f))
qrn:
Confidential '
""'.". i(TA"New Delhi
I
".IfRO 'ff\!CPR. c.f,y'
,I?
tml
c6.,nl1 aTiP11 Cl
cnvigil@nic.in
GOVERNMENT OF IN]f)IA
CENTRAL VIGILANCI! COMMISSION i

www.cvc.nic.in
t 1ft. \!.<ft.IfCffi.


To,

..
The Director
AlIMS
New Delhi.
, 'fIOC1krJ 'f1<Ff. \itttft.<H1I.
..
Satarkta Bhawan, G.P.O. Complex,
BlockA, INA, New Delhi 110023
Date: 25.01.2008
./",..0
.' J>.Y Sub: Appointmentof evo inAIIMS.
Sir,
Please refer to the Institute's letter l'To. F Vigilance
CommissionlMRJ2003-Vig. Dated 29,12,07 on the subject,
2. The contents of the above reference (reg. appointment of Shri S,K.
Yadav, Dy. Director (Admn.) as CVOof the .institute] have been noted by
the Commission,
Yours faithfully,
(P.
Officer onSpecia
Tel:246
/'
- NtZ,..Q*
&
1'11'
-I')
ALLINDIAINSTITUTEOF SCIENCES
(VIGILANCECELL)
,
/
NoF1-90/CVC/MR/2003-Vig
Dated the:
To
Shri P.M. Pillai,
Officeron Special Duty,
CentralVigilanceCommission,
SatarktaBhawan,
G.P.O. Complex,
Block-A,I.NA,
NewDelhi.
Subject:- AppointmentofChiefVigilanc,eOfficerinAIIMS. Newpel hi.
Sir,
Iam directed to inform that Dr. Sharat(;naunan. IJii'octCii i;-; Of
!nd!::, MinistryofHealth &FamilyWelfarehastaken overthe charge to the postof
,
Deputy Director(Administration) atthe Allln,pia InstituteofMedical New
Delhi w.e.f. 18.12.2009 (evening) in addition to his duties as Director in the Gov!.
of India, Ministry of Health and FarQilY Welfare vide Memorandum NO.F.6
16/2009Esttl dated 21.12.2009 (copy enclosed). There is no s$parate post of
ChiefVigilance Officer at the AItMS and as has been the practice in the past; he
has also been assigned to work as Chief Vigilance Officer of the Institute in
addition to his own duties. The particulars of Dr. Sharat Chauhqn, Dy. Director
.(Admn.) &ChiefVigilanceOfficer, AIIMSisenclosed herewith.
Ansari Nagar, NewDelhi"2'9

Encl.:- As stated above.
'(OiJiS faithfully.
PARTICULARS OF.C.V.O.
CONFIDENTIAL
( 1. NameoftheOrganization (Please
IndicatetheAdministrativeMinistry/
Deptt.incase ofPublicSector/Autonomous
Bodies)
2. NameoftheCVO
3. Telephone numbers
Office
Residence
4. Fax No.
5. DateofbirthofC.V.O.
6. DateofSuperannuationofC.V.D.
7. DesignationoftheC.V.O. withinthe
Organization
8. Servicetowhichhe belongsand his
Cadre
9. Payscaleoftheincumbent
10. Whetherthe postofC.V.D. is fulltime
orpart-time?
11. WhetherthefunctionsofC.V.O. have
beenassignedtohiminadditiontohis
normaldutiesorhe isworkingonfull
timeas C.V.O. only
12. Dateofapprovaloftheappointmentof
theC.V.O. bytheCommission
13. Whetherondeputationorfromwithin
theorganization
14. Dateonwhich hetookoverthecharge
ofthepostofC.V.D.
15. Dateonwhich histenureends.
16. Whetherattendedanytrainingcourses
forCVOsorganized bythecvcr Ifso,
theJates.
17. WhetherworkedasCVO earlier, ifso,
thenameoftheorganization(withperiod)
18. IfthepostofCVO isvacantornotfilled
withtheapprovaloftheCommission,
sincewhenand why?
19. Dateofrelinquishingchargeby
incumbentpredecessor.
20. IfofficelocatedoutofDelhi. Please
indicatename(s) andotherparticulars
includingresidence/officetelephoneNos.
ofDelhi-basedofficer(s)pfyour
organizationwhocan contacted in
emergentsituationtopass onmessage
toyou.
?1. Fax NO. ifany(Delhi)
ALL I I ~ D I IN:jTITUTE OF MEDICALSCIENCES,
NEWDElHI.
(MINI:;TRYOF HEALTH &FAMilYWELFARE)
DR. !;IIARATCHAUHAN
265U:777
012(1-250289:3
265811663
17.11.1968
30.11.2028
Dy. Director(Admn.)
INDI/INADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE
AGMUT
PB-'I"Rs.374C'O-67000+Rs.8700GradePay
Part-time
ThEt!e is no postofc.v.o.as such. However,
the Dy. Diredor(Admn.) hasbeenassigned to
workas ChiefVigilanceOfficerlinadditiontohis
owndutiesas has been thepr<lcticeinthepast.
On deputation
18.J.2.2009
No
No
18.12.2009
26588663

('IV
LIST OF SELECT ORGANISATIONS FORWRICH \ ,)
SPECIFIC APPRO V AL OF THE COMMISSION FOR AN OFFICER TO BE
APPOINTED AS CVO IS REQUIRED
(\
S.No. NameoftheOrganisation
1. ContainerCorporationofIndia Ltd.
2. IRCON International
3. RITES Ltd.
4. AkQ..orts AuthorityofIndia
5. AirIndia
6. IndianAirlines
7. Indian IndustriesLtd.
8. ITDC
9. BharatSancharNigamLtd.
10, MTNL
11. NationalHighwaysAuthorityofIndia
12. ChennaiPortTrust
13. EnnorePortLtd,
14, GoaShipyardLtd.
i5. HindustanShiPyardLtd.
16. lawaharlalNehruPortTrust
17, KandlaPortTrust
18. Kochi ShipyardLtd.
19, KolkataPortTrust
.
20. MazagonDockLtd.
Mumbai PortTrust .j 21.
22. ParadipPortTrust
23. ShippingCorporationofIndiaLtd.
24. TuticorinPortTrust
25. Visakh!!p_atnamPortTrust
26. BankofMaharashtra
27. EximBank
28, LD,B.I.
29. !.LB.!.
30. IndianBank
31. IndianOverseasBank
32. N.A,B.A.R.D.
33. NationalHousiI!S.Bank
34. ReserveBankofIndia
35. SIDBr
36. StateBankofIndia
37, StateBankofBikaner&
38. StateBankofH5derabad
39. StateBankofSaurashtra
40. StateBankofIndore
41. StateBankofMysore
42. StateBankofPatiala
43. StateBankofTravancore
23
44. UCOBank
45. Union Bank ofIndia
46. Allahabad Bank
47. Andhra Bank
4S. Bank of Baroda
49. Bank of India
50. CanaraBank
51. Central Bank of India
52. Corporation Bank
53. Dena Bank
54. Oriental Bank of Commerce
55. Punjab & Sind Bank
56. Pul!iab National Bank
57. Syndicate Bank
5S. United Bank of India
59. Bank
60. LIC of India Ltd.
61. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
62. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

v,). Orientallnsurauce Co. Ltd.
64. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
65. Bharat Cokinl! Coal Ltd.
66. Bharat Heavy' Electricals Ltd.
67. Bharat Petroleum Co. Ltd .
Central Coalfields Ltd. \68.
69. Coal India Ltd.
"
70. Eastern Coalfields Ltd.
Gas Authority of India Ltd. 71.
72. H.P.C.L.
73. 1.0.C. Ltd.
74. I.R.E.D.A.
75. M.M.T.C. Ltd.
76. National Aluminium Ltd.
77. National Thermal Power Corp. Ltd.
78. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd.
79. Northern Coalfields Ltd.
80. O.N.G.C.
St. Oil India Ltd.
82. Power Grid of India Ltd.
83. Rashtriya Ni&am Ltd.
84. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd.
85. STC of India Ltd.
86. Steel Authority ofIndia Ltd.
87. Employees Provident Fund Organisation
88. Employees State Insurance Corporation
89. Food Corporation of India
90. D.D.A.
D.T.C. 91.
24
92. M.C.D.
93. N.D.M.C.
94. BharatDynamicsLtd.
95. BharatElectronicsLtd.
96. HindustanAeronauticsLtd.
97. KudremukhIron& OreCo. Ltd.
98. MishraDhatuNigamLtd.
99. N.H.P.C.
100. SatluiJalVidvutNigamLtd.
25
No.F .1-90/CVC/MR/20b3-Vig
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
(VIGILANCE CELb)
Ansari Nagar, NewDelhi-29. \
To
, Datedthe:- 2. 0 JUl 2012
<"P.M. Pillai,
OfficerOnSpecialDuty,
CentralVigilanceCommission
Satarkta Bhawan
Block-A, I.N.A. Colony
New Oelhi-110023.
Subject:- AppointmentofChiefVigilanceOfficerinA,IIMS, NewDelhi.
**it**.. *
Sir,
Iam to informthatShri Sanjiv hasjoinedto
the post of Deputy Secretary atthe All India ofMedicalSciences,
New Delhi w.e.f. 29.06.2012(forenoon) and actas,ChiefVigilance Officerof
the AIIMS. The particulars Shri Sanjiv Chaturvedi, Deputy Secretary &
ChiefVigilanceOfficer.AIIM!isenclosed herewith. .
,Yours

DY.DIRECTOR(ADMN.)
Encl.: Asstatedabove
Copy to:- <Sh. Ram Prasad Meena, Director(Vig,)Ministry of Health & FW.,
Nirman Bhawan, NewDelhi. '
CONFIDENTIAL
PARTiCULARSOF C.V.O.
t
1.
6.
7.
2. NameoftheCVO SHRI SANJIV
3. Telephonenumbers
Office 26594443
Residence -
4. FaxNo. 011-26588663
5. DateofBirth 21.12.1974
8.
9.
1
10
.
i
I 11.
\
I
Name ofthe Organization (Please indicate
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL
the Administrative Ministry/Deptt. in case SCIENCES, NEWDELHI.
ofPublicSector/AutonomousBodies (MINISTRY OF :HEALTH AND FAMILY
WELFARE)
DateofSuperannuationofC.V.O. 21.12.2034
Designation of the CVO within the Dy. Secretary/ChiefVigilanceOfficer
Organization
ServicetowhichhebelongsandhisCadre IFS (HR:2002)
PayScale oftheincumbent Basic Pay-24,45QtGP-7600/-
Wheth!!r the post of C.V.O. is full time or Parttime
part-time7
"- .. ,._ '1.. ...
-'
assigned to him in addition to his own i Secretaryhas joined atthe Instituteand
dutiesas hasbeen thepracticeInthe--E.ast. I actasCVO of
I Whether ofC.
\
I.C...,,.,, u"ell \ Inere IS no post ot C.V.O. The Dy. \
\ 12.
0.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Dateofapprovalofthe appointmentofthe; -
C.V.O. bytheCommission.
J.
Whetheron deputation orfrom within the IOn deputation
organization S J.
Date on which he took over the chall::e of \ 07.07.2012
.
thepostofC.V.O.
\
.
Dateon which histenureends
Whether attended any trainingcourses for
CVOs organized by the evC? If so, the
dates
Whether worked as CVO earlier, ifso, the
nameoftheorganization(withperiod)
If the post of CVO is vacant or not filled
withtheapproval oftheCommission, since
whenand why?
Date of relinquishing charge by incumbent
predecessor
If office lo<;ated out of Delhi. Please
indicate name (s) and other particulars
including residence/office telephone Nos.
of Delhi-based officer(s) of your
organization who can contacted In
emergent situation to pass on message to
you.
FaxNo.ifanyJDelhi)
Any otherremarks
No
No
:
-
NA
,
\
I
011-26588663
J
-
\
-
Central\ ligilance
CoNniission
Query Result
Organisation
Phone/Fax/!:-maii Category
AGRICULTURAL& PROCESED FOOD PRODUCTS
evo:
Phone:,
Address:ANSALCHAMBERS
Fax: AUTONOMOUS
BHLKAJlCAMA PLACE
E-mail :-
R.K. PURAM
NEW DELHI-I10066
ALI YAVARJUNG NATIONAL lJ"lSTlTUTE FOR HEARING
evo: SHRl RAJEEVJALVI
Phone:022-2640I529,Q9969986006
AddresS:BANDRARECLA1vlATION,
Fax:022-26404170 AUTONOMOUS
BA\URA(WEST),
E-mail :- rjalvi@gmailicom

II
I
1\
AUGARH :-.n:SU:Vl L':"fVERSITY
evo: I'
ILone:,
AddresS:ALlGARH,202001
!AUTONOMOUS
CTTAR PARDESH
Email :.
I
,

ALL INDIA COUNCTL FORTECHNICAL EDUCATION
evo: DR.BHlRUDSUNIL GANGADHAR
Phone:2372415157,
Address:7thFLOOR,CHANDERLOKBU1.LDlNG,
Fax: 23724183 AUTONOMOUS
JANPATH,NEW DELHIIIOOO!
E-mail :- knasa2k7@aicte.erneLin
ALL INDIA INSTITUTEOF MEDICALSCIENCES
evo: SH.SANJIVCHA..'TuRVEDI
Phone:OII-26588777,Qll.26588266
AddresS:ROOMNO. -"15OA
Fax.: 011-26588663 AUTONOMOUS
NIRMAN BHAWAN',
E-mail :-
MAULANA AZAD ROAD,
NEW DELHI. \
ALL INDIA INSTITUTEOF SPEECH&HEARING
evo: Dr. K. C. SI-lYAMALA
Phone:0821-2514449, .
Address:MANASAGANGOTHRI
AUTONOMOUS Fax: 08212510515
MYSORE-570006
E-mail :- savithri486@gmail.com
..
.
ALLAHABAD MUSEUM
evo: \
Phone:,
AddresS:ALLAHABAD
AUTONOMOUS Fax:
E-mail :-
ANGLING&AQUATIC CONSN. SOCY.OF INDIA
I \
http://www,cvc,nic.in/cvo/cvcsearch1 ,asp 29-Aug-12
I -
,
,
ALLINDIAINSTITUTEOF MEDICALSCIENCES
'. VIGILANCECELL .
No.F.17/NVC/2012(142) Dated the 26
th
July, 2012
Subject: Submission of files relating to purcha!Ses/financial involvement -
Instructions thereof.
*******
The undersigned has been acting as the Chief Vigilance Officer at the
Institute and in addition the work of General Sec.tionfEstate Section has been
ntiusted to me. As per generai principie, tne CVO wno nas been given aOOltional
charge, should not invohi in dealing with the matters of purchases, financial
, .'
involvement etc. Therefore, the Administrative Officer, Estate Section & General
Section shall submit their files relating to purcnases etc. in which financial
commitment involved to the competent authority through the Chief Procurement
Officer, AIIMS.

(SANJIV CHATURVEDI)
DEPUTY SECRETARY &
CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER
DISTRIBUTION:-
1. The Administrative Officer, Estate Section
2. The Administrative Officer, General Section
Copy for information to:- 1. The Chief Procurement officer
(c/)
\G
. t.\. 3fI!lf(l$1I'1

-.:tTR; qqoo=?f. (1fmf)
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
ANSARI NAGAR, DELHI110029(INDIA)
Dated : ...................................
VINEETCHAWDHRY, lAS
DEPUTY DIRECTOR (ADMN.)
D.O. No.9-40/2010(RCT) 1thSeptember,2012
Confidential
DearShri
Attention is invited to letter No.OV-CVO-87/186415 dated 03/09/2012 from Shri
Prabhat Kumar, Director (Co-ordination-I!), Central Vigilance Cpmmission regarding
appointmentofChiefVigilance Officerin AIIMS, NewDelhiaddressedtoShri R.S. Shukla,JS
&CVO, MinistryofHealthand FamilyWelfare,acopyofwhichhasalso beenendorsedme.
," l ,Thedirections received from the CVC were placed before the Director, AIIMS. He
/ _ l) V taken the view that since the communication ofthe CVC is addressed to Ministry of
:'. J) Healthand FamilyWelfare,noactionis requiredtobe takenbyAIIMStillsomeinstructions
\\ arereceivedfromtheMinistry.
CA'v'\ yJ
Further, find enclosed herewith a copy of the Memo No;3239-Ft-2-2012/7806
dated 20/6/2012 forwarded by the Government of Haryana, intimating that the State
Governmentis contemplatingdisciplinary proceedings againstShriSanjeevChaturvedi and

that a criminal case is also registered against the officer at Police Station, Jhajjar. This
communication has also been forwarded to Ministry ofHealth and Family Welfare, since
theselectionand appointlnentofShri ChaturveditoAIIMS wasdecided bytheGovernment
ofIndiaandnotbythisInstitute.

Thisis forthekind informationoftheCVC please.
Withregards,
Yourssincerely,
(VINEETCHAWDHRY)
Shri K.D. Tripathi,
Secretary,
CentralVigilanceCommission,
SatarktaBhawan,G.P.OComplex,
BlockA, INA, NewDelhi-l10023.
Ene!: a/a
11653() P. vv"( ,G
v
. "'u. : ,:(045938
n.19
21Jun. ?014'16:19P 1
..
.. /
,
r-rom
AdditionaiChiefSecretaryto ofHaryana,
ForestsandWildLifeqapartment. .
To
ThePrincipalChief ConservatorofForests.
Haryafls, . . .
MemoNO.3239-Ft..2-20121 0'
Chandigarh,datedthe
..
Subject: SelectionforappointmentondepuiatiOnto.the.postof
.
DeputySecretary,AIIMS;NewDelhi. ' .
--""
;..
M
Please refer to your letter letter NO.e-1/pf 7112500; dated. '
24.,2.2011 onthesupjec:tmentionedabove. ' ' .
The matterhas been considered bythestateGovemmen(
tn conection, it is intimated lthat proceedings ,are
Shri Sanjeev IFS,for dereliction. of
duties during the\failure of plantatIon 111 JhajJar, District. Further.. a
Crlmh'lal Case is also registered against the offiCer at Police
Jhajjar. Keeping in. view this positio.r(' the Government have
decidtldnottorelievethesaid'officer.,

Under
"forAdditional .SeCretarytoGovemmentor ,
Haryana,ForestsandWildLife
,

(0
j.
.
TeleglphicAddress:
"SATARKTA: NewDelhi
,
E-Mail Address

, ,tl
cenvigiJ@nic.in

"tP""
Website
fb,;{ltI fH"I ctf.f I ail
www.cvc.nic.in
CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSJON EH'I$<'11 ;:;fi.tft:..
EPABX

24651001 - 07 SatarktalBhawan.G.P.O.
BlockA, INA.New Delhi 110023
IFax: 24616286
. , OV-CVO-87
tI'./No......,.....................................................
. ,
/ Dated..................................
To
ShriRS.Shukla,
" JS&CVO,
Mlo Health& FamilyWelfare,
'A'Wing,
NirmanBhawan,
NewDelhi- 1 L
Sub: AppointmentofChiefVigilanceOfficerinAIIMS. NewDelhi.
Sir,
Please refer to AIIM's letter No.1-90jCVCjMRj2003-Vig dated 20
th
July, 2012
(copyenclosed)onthesubjectcitedabove.
2. From the above letteritis seen thatShri Sanjiv Chaturveli, DeputySecretary,
MHFW has been appointed as CVO in AIIMS without the approval;ofthe Commission
which is required to be obtained before such appointment as laid down in Vigilance
Manual. In this connection, it may be clarified whether Deputy Secretary is the
appropriate forappointmentasCVO inAIIMS. TheCommissionhasdesiredtoknow
the past practice for appOintmentofCVO in AIIMS and whyapproved was not taken for
suchappOintment. ' .
3. Further,theCommissionthrough itsearlierlettershasbeeninsistingon havinga
full-time CVO in AIIMS. But Ministry has not responded to this requirement of the
Commission.Therefore,a panelofofficersofappropriatelyseniorlevelmaybeforwarded,
totheCommissionforappointmentofCVO inAIIMS.
4. Anurgentreplyissolicited.
YOI'w
/
(PrabhatKumar)
Director
Co-ordination-I1
Copy to: - Shri Vineet Choudhary, Deputy Director (Admn.), AIIMS, Ansari Nagar, New
Delhi- 29.
I'I<l .
,?. \(.i \,./'

,..,-
CONFIDENTIAL/.:\1
No.F.1-90/CVC/MR/2003(Pt.file)(2)
( \fC')
ALL INDIAINSTITUTEOFMEDICALSCIENCES , '-'
VIGILANCE CELL
AnsariNagar,NewDelhi-29.
Dated the:
To
24SEF 2012
Dr. R.S. Shukla, lAS
JointSecretary(PH) &
ChiefVigilanceOfficer,
MinistryofHealth&FamilyWelfare,
NirmanBhawan,
NewDelhi.
Subject: InformationregardingappointmentofChiefVigilanceOfficerattheAIIMS.
Sir,
IncontinuationofthisInstitute'sletterofevennumberdatedih September,2012 onthe
subject,theadditionalinformationinthesubjectmatterisas follows:-
Afterdue deliberationoverthe issue ofthe CVO in the Institute,in theSFC, thedecision regarding
parttimecvoofDy.Secretary/Directorrankwas approvedbytheMinistryand consequently,aftera
very cumbersome exercise involving DoPT, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Ministry of
Environment& Forest, and GovernmentofHaryana, in which the undersigned was selected from a
panel ofthreeofficerssentby DOPTtotheMinistry.The nameoftheundersigned was approved by
Hon'bleHealth& FamilyWelfareMinisterhimselffromapanelofthreeofficers,forthesaid position.
Therefore, it is clear that the said exercise, ofthe selection ofthe officerfor assigning the job of
Vigilance mattersin the Institutewas already completed undertheapprovalofthe Ministry,froma
panelofthreeappropriatelyseniorlevelofficers.
Moreover, as per Chapter II ofthe Vigilance Manual, CVO can be an Officer ofsufficier)tly higher
level,inwhichrankofDeputySecretaryisverymuchincludedbytheVigilanceManualitself.
Finally,as persection8(1)(h)ofCVCAct,2003,whichreadsasunder:-
"exercise superintendence over the vigilance administration oj the various Ministries oj the Central
Government or corporations established by or under any Central Act, Government companies, societIes and
local authorities ov.,ned or controlled by that Government:
ProvIded that nothing contaIned In this clause shall be deemed to authorise the to exercIse
superintendence over the VIgilance administration In amanner not consistent with the directions :relatlng to
vigilance matters Issued by the Government and to conJer power upon the Commission toIssue: directions
relating to any policy matters",
Thus, the Institute does notcome under any ofthe above mentioned categories, as itis neithera
Ministrynoracorporation/company/society. As perthe preambleand Section 13 & 14oftheAIIMS
Act,1956, it is basically a research and educational institution, and that is why SFC and Central
Government took a considered decision to have a part time CVO only, of the Deputy
Secretary/Director rank and therefore, as per the second partofSection 8 (l)(h)ofevcAct, 2003,
the evc was not authorised at all to issue such imposing directions as was issued in the
communicationdated3.9.2012.
In viewofthe facts mentioned above, therefore, now no issue remains unaddressed regarding the
allocationofworksofCVOtotheunderSigned. Thisisforyourkindinformation.
Yoursfaithfully,
fv 'f' 'j)
'5....
\J ,'\- - 'i.1)Il-/"-
l.:td. ;.. \
{SANJIVCHATURVEDlj, IFS
C(0''' ..,.J
CHIEFVIGILANCE OFFICtR,AIIMS
.--Copyto:- ... '\j- \...
. 1. )ifuiK,D. Tripathi,
/'Secretary,
CentralVigilanceCommission,
SatkartaBhawan,
Block-A,I.N.A. Colony,
NewDelhi-llOO23.
2. Dr. VishwasMehta,JS, MESection, MOH&FW.
Y
CONFIDENTIAL
'7
No.F.1-90/CvC/MR/2003(Pt.file)(2) /ISU
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
VIGILANCE CELL
AnsariNagar,NewDelhi-29.
Dated'he: 2IS SEP 1()'1
To
l'-'50
_ MamtaUpadhyayLal,
Director,
CentralVigilanceCommission,
SatkartaBhawan,
I.N.A.,
NEWDELHI.
Subject:RegardingincorrectaddressofChiefVigilanceOfficer,AIIMS, NewDelhionCVCwebsite.
t'l /' i /'lJ! ******'
r;r-),
Madam,
Iam toinform that on CVC website, the official address ofthe CVO, AIIMS has been posted
, \ \ ) Itis, therefore, requested tokindlycorrect/updatethe official addressoftheCVO, AIIMS
\ ontheCVCwebsiteas under:-
.-CJ.'JaW ShriSanjivChaturvedi,
).;Y \'. \;\ PortCabin,3
rd
Floor,
. cit AdministrativeBlock,
U
_ Q.K CY' V'c..'-lO InstituteofMedicalSciences,
r\ A Ansari Nagar,
-" .... (,\.,\\v NewDelhi-ll0029.
Yoursfaithfully,
J:;i)
,
(SANJIVCHATURVEDI), IFS
CHIEFVIGILANcr:'OFFICER,AIIMS
Y""".-_...-t

:/ J
r'\ 7'; _
'2-:-::....',\
1\ L-
A'\.v'"\-- .
("{\....:::'-'" -/
.
.'


File o. V.16020/36/2009-ME-I
GovernmentofIndia .
MinistryofHealth& FamilyWelfare
ME-I Section
.NirmanBhawan,
NewDelhi
Dated 24th December, 2012
To
TheSecretary
CentralVigilanceCommission,
SatarkataBhawan,
Block-A, LN.A. Colony,
NewDelhi-l10023
Subject: AppointmentofChiefVigilanceOfficerinAIIMS, New
Y.
Y
\I,
Sir,
}I'
I am directed to refer to CVC's reference No. OV-CVO-
87/186415 dated 3.9.2012 on the subject mentioned above seeking
clarification on the appointment of Shri Sanjiv Chaturvedi, Deputy
Secretary as CVO, AIIMS without approval ofCVC; the pastpractice
for appointment of CVO in AIIMS; whether the Deputy Secretary is
appropriatelevel for appointmentasCVO inAIIMS. Further, theCVC
hasalsosoughtresponsetotheirearlierlettersinsistingopa full-time
CVO in AIIMS along with a panel of officers of appropriately senior
level.
DD(Admn) has always been functioning as CVO at.AIIMS from
the very inception. In a meeting held in February, 20Q9, the CVC
suggested to have an independent CVO in AIIMS and to.dr,;link him
from procurement and administration works. Keeping in view this
suggestion, a proposal for creation of a full time CVO atthe level of
DS/Director was considered by AIIMS. However, it was felt that
considering the actual work load, a full time CV 0 would not be
necessary atAIIMS. To cope with the increased administrative work
load on account of Moily Committee report and second campus at
Jhajjar, it was decided to upgrade the post of DD(Admn) from
DS/Director level to JS level and creation of an additional post of
DS/Director. Itwas felt thatthe workofCVO canbeassigned to the
officeratDS/Directorlevel. .
Accordingly, onemorepostofDS/Directorwas to assist
the DD(Admn). Thereafter, ShriSanjeevChaturvediwasappointedas
DS in AIIMS under the Central Staffing Scheme. When he joined
AIIMS on29.06.2012,hewasassignedtheworkofCVO sin,ce decision
was earlier taken to entrust the charge of CVO to the DS/Director
whensomeonejoinsthepost.

I
Inthepast, past, priorconcurrenceofCVC wasnotobtainedby
theDirector, AIIMS for appointmentofanofficer asCVO intheAIIMS.
Further, AIIMS is not in the list of institutions which require
mandatoryapproval ofCVC priortoappointmentofevo. As regards
the appropriatenessoflevel ofDSjDirectorfor appointmentofCVO in
AIIMS, the CVC manual ( Clause 1.3.4 (f) ) prescribed thatan officer
drawingGrade PayofRs. 8700andabove canbeassignedthe charge
of CVO in autonomous bodies. In fact the post of DD (Admn) was
earlieratthelevel ofDirectorandtheDD(Admn) waslookingafterthe
Vigilancework.
It may be pointed out that in other institutions of national
importance like JIPMER, PGIMER, NIMHANS etc. there are no full
time CVO and one of the regular officers is assigned the additional
chargeofCVO.
Since the evc has asked a panel of officers of appropriately
senior level, the following panel is sent to the Commission for being
considered to be appointed as evo in AIIMS, New Delhi in the
followingorderofpreference:
1. DD(Admn),AIIMS, New Delhi
2. JointSecretary& evo, MOHFW
3. OneoftheregularDirectorandDSinMOHFW
4. Continue Shri Sanjeev Chaturvedi, DS, MOHFW, as CVO in
AIIMS
CVC maykindlyconsideraccordingly.
ThishastheapprovalofHFM.
Yoursfaithfully,

Sundeep -
JointSecretarytotheGovernmentofIndia
Tel: 23061773 tWit.-
, \
f"'-.,
,
Confidential
OV-CVO-S7!2. 01. 06 r2
13/02/2013
To
Shri Sundeep Kumar Nayak,
JointSecretary,
Mlo Health & Family Welfare,
ME-l Section,
Nirman Shaw81l,
New Delhi.
Sub:- Appointment of Chief VigilanceOfficer in All MS. New Delhi.
Sir,
Please referto your letter No. V.16020/36/2009-ME-I dated 24th December, 2012 on the
subjectcitedabove,
2. The matterhas been examined in the Commission. It is pertinenttomention thatas per
para 2.2 of Vigilance Manual (Copy enclosed), the Chief Vigilance Officer in all
Dapartments/organization are appointed after prior consultation with the Central Vigilance
Commission and no person whoseappointmentin thatCapacityisobjected to by the Commission
maybesoappointed.
3. Furtherasperpara2.6.1 of theVigilance Manual (copye!lc1osed), in'espectiveofthe fact
whether the post ofa CVO in an autonomous organization is on full-time basis oron part-time
basis, such organizations would forward, through theiradministrative Ministries/Departments a
panel of names ofthree officers ofsufficiently higher level, who can report'direct to the Chief
Executive in vigilancerelatedmatter,arrangedinorderofpreference,alongwiththeirbio-dataand
complete ACR dossiers for the Commission's consideration. Til'? officer, thus, approved by the
CommissionwouldbeappointedasCVO in thatorganizatioll.
4. In viewoftheabove,the panelsentby the MinistryofHealth& Familywelfareis notin
accordancewiththeprovisionof thevigilancemanualasitdoesnotcontainthenameandvigilance
profile ofthe off:cers concerned, who are recommended for appointment ofCVO in AIIMS. The
MinistryofHealth& FamilyWelfaremayaccordinglysenda panelwithvigilance p:"ofileandother
detailsasprescribedin para2.6.1 of theVigilanceManualforconsiderationoftheCommission.
Yoursfaithfully,
jrpl
(PrabhatKumar)
Director
Co-ordination-I1
Telephone:- 24651638
End:- As above.
., ~ ...
CENTRALINFORMATIONCOMMISSION
Room No.-306, 2ndFloor, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan
BhikajiCamaPlace, NewDelhi-110066:
Website:cic.gov.in
File No.CIC/SM/Al2013/001265/RM
Appellant:
Shri SubhashChandra
Delhi
PublicAuthority:
Central VigilanceCommissIon,
NewDelhi J
DateofHearing:
02.06.2014
DateofDecision:
02.06.2014
Heardtoday, dated02.06.2014.
Appellantis present. i.

Public Authority is represented by Shri RN Nayak, OSD/CPIO and Shri Raj Kumar,
SO. '.
FACTS
Vide RTI dt 27.5.13, appellant had sought information on 8 pOints. relating to
appointmentofCentral VigilanceOfficersatAIIMS.
2. CPIOvide letterdt24.6.13, provided apointwise response.
3. An appeal was filed on 28.6.13.
4. M vide orderdt 1.8.13, upheld the decision ofCPIO on all pointsexcept for
sought at query nO.5 for which the CPIO was directed to transfer the
sametotheconcerned publicauthority. '
5. Submissions mape by the appellant and public authority were heard.
Appellant submitted that in respect of query no.1, he is not in receipt of the CVC
letterdt30.7.13as referred to in theM'sorderof1.8.13.Appellantfurthersubmitted
thatheshould be provide informationin respectofqueryno.2and 3. CPIOsubmitted .,
that information is maintained by the CVC on the basis of name$ and not
organization and as such they would not be in aposition to provide information in
respect ofqueryno.2. However, as queryno.3relatesto aspecificname, theywould
be in a position to provide a copy of their advice. Appellant further submitted that
queryno.2 maybe transferredtoAIIMS.
DECISION
6. The Commission directs CPIO to provide acopy'oftheir letterdt30.7.13 and
also aresponse toquery no.2within ten daysfrom dateofreceipt ofthe orderand to
transferquery no.2 to the CPIOAIIMS for providing aresponse to the appellant The
information soughtbe providedfreeofcost.
The appeal is disposed of.
Sd/- !
(RajivMathur)
ChiefInformationCommissioner
1
-2--
..
truecopy:

DeputyRegistrar
Copy to:
1. TheUnderSecretary &C.P.1.0.,
CentralVigilanceCommission
SatarktaBhawan,
G.p.a.Complex,
LN.A., NewDelhi- 110023.
2. The Add/. Secretary&FAA,
CentralVigilanceCommission
SatarktaBhawan,
G.P.C.Complex,
I.N.A., NewDelhi-110023.
Y.Mr. SubhashChandraAgrawal.
/ 1775,KuchaLattushah,
Dariba,ChandniChowk,
Delhi- 110006.
No. CIC/SM/Al2P13/001265/RM
SENIORCITIZEN:PRIORITYHEARINGREQUESTED
BEFOREHONOURABLECENTRALINFORMATIONCOMMISSION
APPEALUNDERSECTION19(3)OFRIGHTTO INFORMATIONACT
Petitioner
SubhashChandraAgrawal
1775KuchaLattushah,Dariba
ChandniChowk,Delhi-l10006
Respondents
ShriRajivVerma
UnderSecretary& CPIO
CentralVigilanceCommission(CVC)
SatarktaBhawan,CGO Complex
Block-A,INA,NewDelhi-ll0023
&
ShriAlokBhatnagar
AdditionalSecretary& AppellateAuthority
CentralVigilanceCommission(CVC)
SatarktaBhawan,CGOComplex
Block-A,INA,NewDelhi-l10023
BriefFacts&Prayer
Ividemy RTI petitiondated27.05.2013 soughtcompleteinformationtogetherwithrelatedfile-
notings/documents/correspondenceonunder-mentionedpointsrelatingto appointmentof Central
VigilanceOfficers(CVOs)atAllIndiaInstituteofMedicalSciences(AIIMS):
1. Complete information together with related documents/communication$/file-noting etc

onappointmentof CentralVigilanceOfficersinAIIMS from01.06.2012tilldate

2. Certified copies ofall the communications including inquiry reports ~ n t by Central
Vigilance Officers at AIIMS from 01.06.2012 till date against different officials at
AIIMS mentioningalso actiontakenby CVC onthesecommunicationsrevealingnames
ofofficialsatAIIMSfoundgUilty
3. Complete information on CVC receiving any complaint against Shri Viheet Chaudhary
lAS together with information on action taken together with related file-
notings/documents/correspondence etc on such communication on communication sent
byCentralVigilanceOfficeratAIIMSinthisregard
4. Complete information on CVC ever objecting on appointment of Central Vigilance
OfficeratAIIMS
5. Complete information on appointment ofMr. Vineet Chawdhary, Mr. Shailesh Yadav,
Mr. SharatChauhan,Dr. RandeepGuleriaatAIIMS
6. Complete information together with list of autonomous organizations where Central
Vigilance Officers are appointed as per vigilance manualwith prior approval ofCVC
from a panel sent by concerned Ministry including the autonomous organizations of
UnionHealthMinistry
7. Anyotherrelatedinformation
8. File-notingsonmovementofthisRTIpetition
'Nodal' CPIO on basis ofinputs provided by various CPIO's at CVC summarised to decline
information on all the points vide a consolidated response No. CVC/RTII13/410/217091 dated
24.06.2013 under various excuses some ofwhich indeed reflect allergy to basic spirit towards
transparency-ActofconcernedonesatCVC.
Learned CPIO declinedinformationto query(1) that processofappointing CVI atAIIMS is in
progress, and assuchinformationcannot be providedas exemptedundersection8(1)(h) ofRTI
Act. Unfortunately an anti-transparency spiritofCPIO has made him quote the saidexemption
which applies to impeding process of investigation and not process of appointment. Even
exemptionundersection8(l)(h)canbe appliedonly ifinformationis likelyto impededprocess
ofinvestigation. Otherwisealso Ihave sought informationonall appointmentsmadefrom from
the period 01.06.2012 and not only the present appointment-process. Information sought under
query-numbers(2), (3) and(7) areofquitedifferentbutspecificinnature, andclpbbingtheseto
decline informationonflimsy grounds claimingexemptionunder section7(9) ofRTI Actagain
quotingCIC-verdictirrelevanttoqueriesofmyRTI furtherrevealstheusualtendencyat
CVC to decline information. Learned CPIO has again clubbed query-numbers (4) and (6) to
declineinformationonqueriesofveryspecificnature.
Ifiled myfirst appealdated28.06.2013 whichwasdisposedof videanorder ~ t e 01.08.2013. I
appeal CVC may kindly be directed to pr.ovide a point-wise responseto each'ofthe queries of
RTI petition with sought and related documents nowto be provided free-of-c.ost under section
7(6)ofRTIAct. It isprayedaccordingly.
Humblysubmitted
SUBHASHCHANDRAAGRAWAL
09.09.2013
Verification
I, Subhash Chandra Agrawal slo late Shri Om Prakashand resident of1775, Kucha Lattushah,
Dariba,Delhi-II0006verifythatthe facts mentionedinmythisappealarecorrectto bestofmy
knowledge.
SUBHASHCHANDRAAGRA f AL
1775KuchaLattushah i
DaribaDELHI 110006(India)
Mobile9810033711 Fax 23254036
E-mailsubhashmadhu@sify.com
09.09.2013
Copiesenclosed:
RTIpetitiondated27.05.2013
CPIO'sresponseCVC/RTII13/410/217091 dated24.06.2013
FirstAppealdated28.06.2013
Appeal-orderdated01.08.2013
Passport-copyforproofof beingseniorcitizen

REGISTERED A.D.
No.F.V1g/2.753/200S(141)
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
(VIGILANCE CELL!
Ansari New Delhl-11 0 029
Dated the:- U AUG 2013
To
Shrl SubhashChandra Agrawal.
1775 Kucha Lattushah
Dariba, Chandni Chowk
Delhl110 OOS.
Subject:- Seeking information/documents under Right to Information Act, 2005 .
Sir,
This has reference to his letter dated 27.05.2013 received through Shri R.N.Nayak,
OSD/CPIO, CVC on 16.8.2013 on the above subject. The following information from Vigilance Cell is
provided in connection with his request for information under RTI ACT, 2005:-
Sr. Information asked for
IReply thereon
No.
1. Complete information together with related
documents/communications/file noting etc on
appointment of Central Vigilance Officers in AIMS
from 01.06.2012 till date
2. Cetified copies of all the communications
including inquiry reports sent by Central Vigilance
Officers at AIMS from 01.06.2012 till dated
against difference officials at AIMS mentioning
also action taken by CVC on these
communications revealing names of officials at
AIMS found..9uilty.
3. Complete information on CVC receiving any
complaint against Shri Vineet Chaudhary lAS
together with information on action taken together
with related file-notings
Idocuments/correspondence etc on such
communication on communication sent by
Central Vigilance Officer at AIMS in this reQard
4. Complete information on CVC ever objecting on
apPOintment of Central Vigilance Officer at
AIIMS.
5. Complete information on appointment of Mr.
Vineet Chawdhary, Mr. Shailesh Yadav, Mr.
Shart Chauhan Dr. Randeeo Guleria at AIMS.
6. Complete information together with list of
autbnomous organisation where Central
Vigilance Officers are apPOinted as per vigilance
manual with prior approval of CVC from a penel
sent by concerned dMinistry including the
authnomous organizations of Union Health
-
"""" Ministry. "" "
The information pertains to CVC.
As per information available, the CVC
has raised only on the
apPOintment of present CVO, AIIMS,
Sh. Sanjiv Chaturvedi.
The information pertains to CVC.
- "
7. Any other related information
I
8. File notings on movement of this RTI petition
Shri Sanjiv Chaturvedi, Dy. Secretary and Chief Vigilance Officer, Room No.14, Director Office
Wing,AIIMS, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi110 029 is the
Information Act, 2005.
Appellate Authority(Vigilance) under Right to
YO'y
CPIO, VIGfANCE CELL

OutToday
Te'legraphicAddress:
"SATARKTA: NewDelhi
.
E-MailAddress


ccnvigil@nic.in

Website
4;;s{l '(=t<1cfi <11 3f141 :'1 .
www.cvc.nic.in
CENTRALVIGILANCECOMMISSION 'qCff, "iffl':tit.an.
EPABX
CifflCfi'--q:.
24600200
Satarkta.Bhawan,UP.O.Complex,
BlockA,INA,NewDelhi 110023
IFax: 24651186
No.. 3.<-
I ..... ...."
Appellant: Shri SubhashChandraAgrawal, 1775 KuchaLattushah,Dariba,ChandniChowk,
("\ Delhi-I10006.
Respondent: Shri Rajiv Verma, Under Secretary & 'Nodal' CPIO, Central Vigilance
Commission.
i
The RTIApplicant, vide his RTI dated 27.05.2013 .(received in the ,I
Commissionon29.05.2013)hadsoughtcertaininformationfrom thisCOplmission, whichbeing
toolengthyis'notbeingreproducedhere,butisenclosedasAnnexure-'A'totheseorders.

2. Astheinformationpertainedto differel]tSectionsoftheCommission,the 'Nodal'CPIO,

afterobtaining the information from the SeGtions concernedofthis Commission; vide his letter
No. CVCIRTII13/410/217091 dated24.06.2013hadinformedtheApplicantthat"
"Para1
The CPIO concerned, that is, 8hri Prabhat Kumar, Director, has stated that the
, ,
selectionprocessfor appointmentofCV0 inAIIMS is underactive considerationofthe
Commissionatthemomlmt,afinal viewinthematterhasnotbeentakenandfinal order
has not been issued. You may 'note' that the cases where the authority concemedhave
'not takenatinal view inthematterandhave not yet issued final orders, that is, the
cases have still not reached their logical conclusion, are to be considered as 'under
investigation' asupheldbytheCentral Information Commission (CIC) inthecaseof Shri
Shankar Sharma and other Vs Income Tax Department in case No.'
CIC/A. TIAl200710000711 011 1 whereCIC statedthat "investigation would mean all action
of law enforcement, disciplinary proceedings, enquiries, adjudications and so on.
Logically, no could be said to be complete unless it has reached a point
where the final decision on the basis of that investigation is taken ". Hence, the
information has been defined bythe CPIO concerned under Section 8(1)(h) ofthe RTI
Act,2005..
Paras2,3&7
The CPIO concerned, that is, 8mt. Lila Chandran, Deputy Secretary, has stated
that no such information as sought by you in these paras is being maintained in the

format in which it has been sought from this Commission. However, information as
askedformaybeavailableintheindividualfilesoftheCommissionandcullingand
.
'.
-2-
..
compiling information from individual files as requested by you involves deployment of
'additional manpower and would disproportionately divert the resources of this Public
Authority. Hence, the information cannot be provided to you, keeping in view the
provisions contained under Section 7(9) of the RTI Act. This view has been upheld by
the Central Information CommissJon (CIC) in its decision. in case No.
CICIS,MlAI2011100207(J in respect of Shri Natra} Saha Vs Central Vigilance Commission
in which the CIC held "The CVC cannot be compelled to produce information in a
certain format if they do' not maintain it in that manner. It would be like creating new
information. While a citizen has every.right to get the available information, he cannot
get any information which does not exist and has to be created"
Paras 4 & 6
The CPIO concerned, that is, Shri Prabhat Kumar, Director, has stated that no
such information as sought by you in these paras is being maintained. in the format in
which it has been sought from this However, information as asked for may
be available in the individual files of the Commission and culling and compiling
information from individual files as requested by you involves deployment of additional
-manpower and would disproportionately divert the resources of this Public Authority, as
already pointed out in reply to para (2), (3) & (7) above. However, you may approach the
organization concerned for obtaining the information required relating to para (6) of the
Application. ,
ParaS
The CPIO concerned, that is, Shri Prabhat Kumar, Director, has stated that you
may approach the organization concerned for obtaining the information relating
to para (5) of the Application.
Para 8
The file noting of this RTI application consists of 02 pages for which the fees as
prescribed in Para (3) below may be deposited with this Public Authority. .

3. A fee of Rs.2/- for each page (in A-4 or A-3 size paper) qas been prescribedJor
.providing the information under the Right to Information (Regulation of Fee and Cost)
Rules, 2005. Since the documents required by you, would require photocopy of 02 pages,
an amount of Rs. 04/- (Rs. Four Only) may please be deposited in cash against proper
receipt; or by demand draft or cheque or Indian postal payable to the
Section Officer, Centtal Vigilance Commission at New Delhi, for the supply of
documents. "
3. The Appellant has now preferred an Ap,peal before this Appellate Authority, which being
tpo lengthy is not being reproduced here, butis enclosed as Annexure-'B' to these orders.
4. After receipt of Appeal from the Appellant, the CPIO concerned, vide his letter No.
CVCIRTIIAPPIl3/1311221326 dated 30.07.2013 had informed the Applicant that "Copies offile
noting/correspondence relating to the appointment ofCVO in AIIMS since 01.06.2012 till date."
, .

'.
-3-

0

Decision
5. As regards para (1) of th.e Application, I have gone through the relevant records and find
that the CPIO concerned, that is, Shri Prabhat Kumar, Director has, vide his letter No.
dated 30.07.2013 has already providea copies of relevant
documents to the Appellant and hence, the Appellant's request has already been accepted by the
CPIO concerned. No further action is required in the matter .
6. As regards para (2) of !he Application; I find that the Commission maintains its data as
per the names and designation of the officials concerned, against Whom cases have been
received, belong and not in the. format in which it has been sought by him. Hence, in the
absence of the name, designation of the officials, it is not possible to provide any information as
requested for by the Appellant, as no such infdrmation, as defined under Section,2(f) of the RTI
Act, is available with this Commission. Under the provisions contained in S@ction 2m of the
RTI Act, the Public Authority concerned can only be asked to provide the infotmation 'held by
it'. However, information as asked for by him may be available in the individual files of the
Commission and culling and compiling of information from all the case files from 01.06.2012
onwards, as requested by him, would involves deployment of additional manpower and would
disproportionately divert the limited human resource available with this Public Authority.
Hence, the information cannot be provided keeping in view the provi.sionscontained under
Section 7(9) of RTI Act. This view has been upheld by the Central Information Commission
(CIC) in its decision in case No. CIC/SMlAl2011/002070 in respect of Shri Natra; Saha Vs
Central Vigilance Commission in which the CIC held "The CVC cannot be compelled to produce
information in a certain format if they do npt maintain it in that manner . ..1t would be like -
creating new information. While a citizen has every right to get the aV(Jilable information, he
cannot get dny information which does not exist and has to be created II Moreover, the
information sought by the Appellant pertains to vigilance/disciplinary cases against third parties,
which is exempt from disclosure under the contained in Section 8(1)0) of the RTI
Act. This view has been upheld by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi, in its decision in
L.P.A. No. 6180(2012 in the case of Union Public Service Commission Vs. Sari R.K. Jain. in
which the Court has stated that "The disciplinary orders and the documents in the course of
disciplinary proceedings are personal information within the meaning ofSection 8(1)0) and the
disclosure of which normally has no relationship to any public activities or public interest and
disclosure ofwhich would cause unwarranted invasion ofthe privacy ofan individual. " Hence,
the Appellant's request is not acceptable.
7. 'As regards para (3) of the Application, I find that the Appellant has sOl!lght information
against third party, which is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)0) of the RTI Act, as
upheld by CIC in its decision in case No. CIC/SMlAl2013/000058 in respect of Shri Mano; Ana
Vs. Cabinet Secretariat, in which CIC held that "The entire information sought by the Appel/ant'
revolves aroijnd the complainls made against an officer of the government and any possible
action the authorities might havlf taken on those complaints. The Appellate Authority was very
right in deciding that this entire class of information was qualified as personal information
within the meaning ofthe provisions ofSection 8 (i) 0) ofthe RTI Act. In this connection, it is
very pertinent to cite the decision of the Supreme Court of India in the SLP(C) No. 27734 of
2012 (Girish R Deshpande vs CIC and others) in which it has held that "the performance ofan
employee/Officer in an organisation is primarily a matter between the employee and the
employer and normally those aspects are governed by the service rules whichfall under the
...4- ..

expression personal information, the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public
activity or public interest. On the other hand, the disclosure of which could cause unwarranted
invasion of the privacy of that individual." The Supreme Court further held that such
information could be disclosed only if it woulq serve a larger public interest. The information
sought by the Appellant in this case is about some complaints made against a government
official and any possible action the authorities might have taken on those' complaints. It is, thus,
clearly the kind ofinformation which is envisaged in the above Supreme Court order. Therefore,
the information is completely exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act."
Hence,theAppellant'srequestis notacceptable. .

8. As regards para (4) of the Application, '1 find that the information sought by the
Appellantis inthe form ageneralquerywithoutprovidinganyspecificnameetc. and hence, in
theabsenceof specificinformationlikethenameof theofficialsetc.,itisnotpossibletoprovide
anyinformationasrequestedforbyhim,asno'Suchinformation,asdefinedunderSection2(f)of
the RTI Act, is available with this Commission. Under the provisions contained'in Section2m
ofthe RTI Act. the Public Authority concerned can only be asked to provide the information
'held by it'.However, informationas asked for by himmaybeavailablein the individualfiles
ofthe Commission and culling and compiling ofinformation from individuals files, would
involves deployment ofadditional manpower and would disproportionately divert the limited
.. humanresourceavailablewiththisPublicAuthority. Hence,theinformationcannotbeprovided
keepinginviewtheprovisionscontainedunderSection7(9)ofRTI Act, asalreadypointedout
inpara.( 6)above.
9. As regards para (5) ofthe Application, 1find thatthe information pertained to another
PublicAuthority, thatis,AIIMS, and hence,I directShriR.N. Nayak,CPIO,to transferthis.
parato thePublicAuthority.concerned,thatis, AIIMS, underSection6(3)foftheRTIAct,
within5daysofthereceiptoftheseorders. .
iO. As regards para (6) of the Application, 1 find that the information sought by the
Appellantpertainedto differentPublicAuthoritiesandnosuchinformationismaintainedbythis
CommissionintheformatinwhichithasbeensoughtbytheAppellant. Hence,itisnotpossible
to provide any information as requested for by him, as no such information, as defmed under
Section2(f) ofthe RTI Act, is available withthis Commission. Underthe provisions contained
in Section2m ofthe RTI Act, the PublicAuthorityconcernedcanonly be askedto providethe
information 'held by it'. However, information as asked for by him may be available in the
individual files ofthe Commission and culling and compiling ofinformation from individuals
files, would involves deployment ofadditional manpower and would disproportionately divert
the limited humanresourceavailable withthis PublicAuthority. Hence, theinformationcannot
beprovidedkeepinginviewtheprovisionscontainedunderSection7(9)ofRTIAct, as already
pointedoutinpara(6)above.
11. As regardspara(7)of theApplication,1findthatno specificinformationhasbeensought
bytheAppellantandhence,no ftptllercommentsarerequired.

-5-
12. As regards para (8) ofthe Applicant, find that the Appellant's RTI Application was
received in the Commission on 29.05.2013 and a reply was provided to him, vide letter No.
CVCIRTII13/410/217091 dated 24.06.2013, that is, on the 26
th
day 'of the receipt ofthe
Application.. Hence, the demand offees was within the time frame as prescribed under Section
7(1)oftheRTIAct. TheinformationsoughtbytheAppellantpertainedto variousissues, which
..
are beingdealtwithby differentsectionsoftheCommissionandtheinformationsoughtby him
had to be collected from different sections aIld CPIOs ofthis Commission. The collection of
information from different sections takes time. the reply waS sent to the Appellant
withinthe30days' timelimit,a& prescribedunderSection7(1)oftheRTIAct. Asaresponsible
citizenitwasalso the dutyofthe Appellantto depositthefees. whichwas demandedas perthe
provisions ofRTI Act. The Appellant couldhave sent the fees alongwith his Appeal, showing
respect for the rules, instead offinding ways not to deposit the small amount ofRs. 4/-.
However, as amatter ofconvenience and keeping inview the spirit ofthe RTI Act, copies of
two pages ofnotings relating to para (8) ofthe Application are enclosed, alongwith these
orders.
13. Theissues raised by theAppellantin his Appealdated28.06.2013, have thus been
addressed,appropriately.
14. However, ifAppellantis notsatisfiedwiththeabovedecision, he maymakeanAppeal
with the Central Information Commission, B-Wing, 2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji

CamaPlace,NewDelhi-II0066. ".

15. TheA"ppeal isaccordinglydisposed.

CA,lok
AdditionalSecretary&AppellateAuthority
Encl.:Asabove.
Copyto:-
/ ShriSubhashChandraAgrawal,
1775KuchaLattashah, .
Dariba,ChandniChowk,
Delhi-I10006.
(2)
ShriR.N. Nayak,

OSD&CPIO,
.
CentralVigilanceCommission.
(3)
ShriRajivVerma:
UnderSecretary& 'Nodal'CPIO,
CentralVigilanceCommission.
(4) Guardfile
UNDERRIGHTTOINFORMATIONACT
CentralPublicInformationOfficer
Centr.' Vigilance Commlon
Da'k;Undet RTI ACT .
CentralVigilanceCommission(CVC)
Oy; No.
SatarktaBhawan,CGOComplex

Fee Received VideRT. NoI.Ji.?if
Block-A,INA,NewDelhi-l10023
.. ..... ..................
,,-'
;;;.
If '<I<
\. I '
Sir
. !
J I
Please provide complete informatioo- with
.' .
notingsidocumentsicorrespondence on under-mentioned points relating to appointment of
CentralVigilanceOfficers(CVOs)atAll IndiaInstituteofMedical Sciences(AIIIy1S):
1. Complete information together with related documents/communications/file-noting
\ \
etconappointmentofCentralVigilanceOfficersinAIIMS from 01.06.2012tilldate
,
"
2. Certified copies ofall the communications including inquiry reports sent by Central
Vigilance Officers at AIIMS from 01.06.2012 till date against different officials at
"
AIIMS mentioning also action taken by CVC on these communications revealing
namesofofficialsatAIIMSfound guilty
3. Complete infOlmation on CVC receiving any complaint against Shri Vineet
Chaudhary lAS together with information on action taken together with related file-
notings/documents/correspondence etc on such communication on communication
sentbyCentralVigilanceOfficeratAIIMS inthisregard
4. Complete information on CVC ever objecting on appointment ofCentral Vigilance
f\\
OfficeratAIIMS
,
5. Complete information on appointment of Mr. Vineet Chawdhary, Mr. Shailesh
\' Yadav,Mr. SharatChauhan,Dr. RandeepGuleriaatAIIMS
6. Complete information together with list ofautonomous organizations where Central
VigilanceOfficersareappointedas pervigilancemanualwithpriorapproval ofeve
.,,;
('"
, !
.. from apanel sent by concerned Ministry includingthe autonomous organizations of
r
UnionHealthMinistry
7. Any other related information
8. on movement of this RTI petition
h"i,.nt.)..J
l' !rR""t;JnU )itO
In case queries;Le1ate..t;Q,sQme othetqJafiic-authority, please transfer this RTI petition to CPIO
there number 08F-743050 for rupees ten is enclosed
towards as per DoPT circular-number No.F.1 0/9/2008-
IR dated 05.12,.20,08.
tqt90-"n)
Regards

SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL
(GlIil1ness Record Holder & RTf Activist)
1775 Kucha Lattushah
Dariba, Chandni Chowk
DELHI 110006 (India)
Mobile9810033711 Fax 23254036
E-mail subhashmadhu@sify.com
Web www.subhashmadhu.com
27.05.2013
iP/ Y tu--O t c(4 - 13
,P" '\'J -::==+7;)r

.\'7\ FIRSTAPPEALUNDERSECTION 190)OFRIGHTTOINFORMATION ACT . 5h JJJ
q \\ \hriAlok Bhatnagar
Additional Secretary& AppellateAuthority
Central VigilanceCommission(CVC)
SatarktaBhawan,CGOComplex
INA, New II0023
Sir
( vide my RTf petition dated 27.05.2013 sought complete information together with related file-
notings/documents!correspondence on points relating to appointment of Central
VigilanceOfficers(CVOs)atAllIndialnstituteof MedicalSciences(AUMS):
I. Complete information together with related documents/communicationslfile-noting etc on
appointmentof Centl'alVigilanceOfficersin AIIMSfrom 01.06.2012tilldate
2. Certified copies.ofall the communications including inquiry reports sent by Central Vigilance
Officersat AIIMS from 01.06.2012 till date againstdifferentofficialsat AIIMS mentioningalso
action taken by evc on these communications revealing names ofofficials at AllMS found
guilty
3. Complete information on CVC receiving any complaint against Shri Vineet Chaudhary lAS
together with infi)rmation on action taken together with related file-
notings/documents/correspondence etc on such communication on communication sent by
Central VigilanceOfficeratAIIMS in thisregard
4. Complete information on CVC ever objecting on appointment ofCentral Vigilance Officer at
A.HMS
5. CompleteinformationonappointmentofMr. VineetChawdhary,Mr. ShaileshYadav, Mr. Sharat
Chauhan,Dr. Rar!deep GuleriaatAHMS
6. Complete informati()11 together with list ofautonomous organizations where Central Vigilance
Officersare appuinted as pervigilance manual with prior approval ofevcfrom a panel sentby
concernedMinistryincludingtheautonomousorganizationsofUnion HealthMinistry
7. Anyotherrelated infc)rmation
8. FiJe-l1otingson movementof thisRTIpetition
'Nodal' CPJO on basis of inputs provided by variolls CPIO's at CVC summaris.ed to decline information
on all the points vide a consolidated response No. CVC/RTII13/410/217091 dated 24.06.2013 under
various excuses some, of indeed reflect allergy to basic spirit towards transparency-Act of
(;ol1cerned ones at eve.
learned ePIO declined information to query (1) that process of appointing CVI at AIIMS is in progress,
and as such information cannot be provided as exempted under section 8( 1)(h) of RTI Act. Unfortunately
.m spirit of CPIO has made him quote the said exemption which applies to impeding
rn.. "':;;'SS (It il1\ estigation an9 not process of appointment. Even exemption under section 8( I )(h) can be
applied only if information is likely to impeded process of investigation. Otherwise also I have sought
information on all appointments made from from the period 01.06.2012 and not only the present
appointment-process. I appeal learned CPIO may kindly be directed to provide information query (l) with
sought and related documents now to be provided free-of-cost under section 7(6) of RTI Act.
Information sought under query-numbers (2), (3) and (7) are of quite different but specific in nature, and
clubbing these to decline information on flimsy grounds claiming exemption under section 7(9) of RTI
Act again quoting CIC-verdict in'elevant to queries of my RTI petition further reveals the usual tendency
at eve to dec.line information. I appeal learned CPIO may kindly be directed to !fe-visit queries for a
separate point-wise information on query-numbers (2) and (3) with sought and related documents now to
be provided free-of-cost under section 7(6) ofRTI Act.
Learned CPIO has again clubbed query-numbers (4) and (6) to decline information on queries of very
specifIc nature. I appeal that learned CPIO may kindly be directed to re-\'isit quel)'-numbers (4) and (6)
for a :;eparate point-v.ise information with sought and related documents no'.,\' to be provided free-of-cost
tinder 7(6) ofRTI Act.
Learned CPIO has also advised me to appl'oach concerned public authority AIlMS for response to que!')
numbers (4) and (5). It again reflects total lack of knowledge of RTI Act on part of those concerned at
CVe. Section 6(3) of RTI Act mandates a public-authority to transfer RTI petition to concerned ones
related, to queries. 1 appeal learned CPIO may kindly be directed to transfer my RTI petition to AIIMS
under section 6(3) of RTr Act for queries related to that public-authority.
CPIO has wrongly demanded copying charges of rupees four also because DoPT circular
F,]\;0. 3; 20! 3 .. IR dated 1 J ,02.2013 which on basis of a eIC-verdict has asked public-authorities to
send deinandietter at S0me early date so that information-seeker may have sufficient time to
deposit cOP: ing-charges so as to received copied documents within 30 days of receipt of petition by
26.06.2013' for
-CPIO, which evidently could not be possible when a demand-letter dated 24.06.2013 was mailed on
an RTf petition dated 27.05.2013. I appeal that enquiry may kindly be o,rdered how'
concerned CPIO did not take cognizance of the referred DoPT circular, and necessary directions may
kindly be given to all concerned at CVC to raise demand for copying-charges at some reasonably early
date in view of enclosed DoPT circular F.No.12f3112013-IR dated 11.02.2013.
Also a recent ClC-verdict dated 30.05.2013 in appeal-number CIC/SMIAl2013/000781 requires CPfOs to
apply presence of mind for not demanding such petty copying charges which may cost much more
heavily in terms of postal-charges and man-hours in re-handling of RTf petition. 1 appeal CP[O may
kind Iy be directed to provide copy of file-notings as demanded under query (12) of RTI petition also free-
of-cost. It is prayed accordingly .
. Many public-authorities have conducted workshops for their officers for educating them to handle Rl1
petitions. J appeal and request that some such similar RTf workshop may be organised for officers at
eve to make this public-authority restore to its earlier glory for being m o n g s ~ best-rated public-
authorities,
Humbly submitted
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL
((iuinness Record !-Io/der & RTf Actiyis/)
1775 Klicha Lattushah
Dariba, Chandni Chowk
DELHI 110006 (India)
Mobile 9810033711 Fax. 23254036
E-mail subhashmadhu@sify.com
Web www.subhashmadhu.com
28.06.2013
I I M CAft/ fL:I7.j , '5 Jl/ ,v
.,.--------
A'I
fl"O'NO.i - ,.pp..'u.r
M
(ZJr rrJ)
11 .(-c< tJ{ 1:.. I 0 1r""') /AP-J Ir""' "LLf"'W-k--"
r-
u-/> , "x. 1.-'-'-JL M) fv-"""'" ,"'"
pOfrOl. ' ,
d_
r.>
((v'lA r Y
r":
r--b
'J)t"fJ pI
b
'2/
q
. (){, I 'J,
W' fI "I, V
V/'1/'> .)
,,2111' ') J ",(VI'
lO' 1\ C'" ])
, I
1
"''''''''' v(Vv1.h0
\
\
\"
\
j,_r-c..t-. ';'J cu - -
\
Ul .-(fLcA/ 15" ,.... P- f7L
1f{l.'I'- ') b!<..
vt"/Ar &) ')1(.
I
J)f--4- (YL

.'
,
4,t
"r .
\
FIRSTA)?PEAL UNDERSECTION 19(1)OFRIGHTTOINFORMATION ACT
ShriAlokBhatnagar
Additional Secretary& AppellateAuthority
Central VigilanceCommission(CVC)
SatarktaBhawan,CGOComplex
Block-A, INA,NewDelhi-1I0023
Sir
I vide my RTI petition dated 27.05.2013 sought complete information together with related file-
nOlings/document:s!conesponc;ence on under-mentioned p,)ints relating to appointment of Central
VigilanceOfficers(CVOs)at All IndiaInstituteofMedicalSciences(AlIMS):
I. Complete intormation together with related documents/communicationslfile-noting etc on
appointmentof CentralVigilanceOfficersin AIIMS from 01.06.2012till date
2. Certified copies ofall the communications including inquiry reports sent by Central Vigilance
Officers at AlIMSfrom 01.06.2012 tilt date againstdifferent officialsatAIIMS mentioningalso
action taken by CVC on these communications revealing names ofofficials at AIIMS found
guilty
3. Complete information on CVC receiving any complaint against Shri Vineet Chaudhary lAS
together with information on action taken together with related file-
notings/doclIlllents/correspondence etc on such communication on communication sent by
CentralVigilanceOfficeratAlIMS in thisregard
4. Complete information on CVC ever objecting on appointment ofCentral Vigilance Officer at
AIiMS
5. CompleteinformationonappointmentofM..VineetChawdhary,Mr. ShailesbYadav, Mr. Shamt
Chauhan,Dr. RandeepGuleriaatAIIMS
6. Complete informati;m together with list ofautonomous organizations where Central Vigilance
Officers are appointed as pervigilance manual with prior approval ofCVC from a panel sentby
concernedMinistry includingtheautonomousorganizationsofUnion HealthMinistry,
7. Anyotherrelated information
8. FiJe-notingson movementofthisRTI petition
'Nodal' ePlo on basis of inputs provided by various ePIO's at eve summarised to decline information
on all the points vide a consolidated response No. eVC/RTI113/410/217091 dated 24.06.20 \3 under
various excuses some of which indeed reflect allergy to basic spirit towards tran:sparency-Act of
concerned ones at CVe.
Learned CPIO declined information to query (1) that process of appointing CVI at AIIMS is in progress,
and as such information cannot be provided as exempted under section 8(1)(h) ofRTI ACt. Unfortunately
an anti-transparency spirit of CPIO has made him quote the said exemption which applies to impeding
process of investigation and not process of appointment. Even exemption under section 8(1 )(h) can be
applied only if information is likely to impeded process of investigation. Otherwise also I have sought
information on all appointments made from from the period 01.06.2012 and not only the present
appointment-process. I appeal learned CPIO may kindly be directed to provide information query (1) with
sought and related documents now to be provided free-of-cost under section 7(6) of RTI Act.
Information sought under query-numbers (2), (3) and (7) are of quite different but specific in nature, and
clubbing these to decline information on flimsy grounds claiming exemption under seotion 7(9) of RTI
Act again quoting CIC-verdict irrelevant to queries of my RTI petition further reveals the usual tendency
at CVC to decline information. I appeal learned CPIO may kindly be directed to re-visit queries for a
separate point-wise information on query-numbers (2) and (3) with sought and related dpcuments now to
be provided free-of-cost under section 7(6) of RTI Act.
Learned CPIO has again clubbed query-numbers (4) and (6) to decline information on queries of very
specific nature. I appeal that learned CPIO may kindly be directed to re-visit query-numbers, (4) and (6)
for a separate point-wise information with sought and related documents now to be provided free-of-cost
under section 7(6) of RTI Act.
Learned CPIO has also advised me to approach concerned public authority AIIMS for response to query
numbers (4) and (5). It again reflects total lack of knowledge of RTI Act on part of those concerned at
CVe. Section 6(3) of RTI Act mandates a public-authority to transfer RTI petition to concerned ones
related to queries. I appeal leamed CPIO may kindly be directed to transfer my RTI petition to AIIMS
under section 6(3) ofRTI Act for queries related to that public-authority.
CPIO has wrongly demanded copying charges of rupees four also because DoPT circular
F.No.12/3 1120 13-IR dated 11.02.2013 which on basis of a CIC-verdict has asked public-authorities to
send demand-letter at some reasonably early date so that information-seeker may have sufficient time to
deposit copying-charges so as to received copied documents within 30 days of receipt of petition by
CPIO, which evidently could not be possible when a demand-letter dated 24.06.2013 was mailed on
26.06.2013 for an RTl petition dated 27.05.2013. I appeal that enquiry may kindly be ordered how
concerned CPIO did not take cognizance ofthe referred DoPT circular, and necessary directions may
kindly be given to all concerned atCVC to raise demand for copying-charges at some reasonably early
datein viewofenclosed DoPTcircularF.No.12/3112013-IR dated 11.02.2013.
AlsoarecentCIC-verdictdated30.05.2013 in appeal-numberCIC/SM/A!2013/000781 requiresCPIOsto
apply presence ofmind for not demanding such petty copying charges which may cost much more
heavily in terms ofpostal-charges and man-hours in re-handling ofRTl petition. I appeal CPIO may
kindly be directedtoprovidecopyoffile-notingsasdemandedunderquery(12)ofRTlpetitionalsofree-
of-cost. It is prayedaccordingly.
.t""""\ Manypublic-authorities have conductedworkshopsfor their officersfor educating them to handle RTf
petitions. f appeal andrequest that some such similar RTf workshop may be organisedfor officers at
eve to make this public-authority restore to its earlier glory for being amongst best-ratedpublic-
authorities.
Humblysubmitted
SUBHASHCHANDRAAGRAWAL
(Ouinness RecordlIoldel'&RTfActivist)
1775 KuchaLattushah
Dariba,ChandniChowk
DELHI 110006(India)
Mobile 9810033711 Fax 23254036
E-mail subhashmadhu@sifY.com
Web www.subhashmadhu.com
28.06.2013

1) '?J Yl<;) P-Oo <il
ilanceCommission
5" ' Sub CI-a",tA""'rtJr><It
I?-?-S"; K\J.cW>.. C.

GA-ci'rt.rtrL4

-


, ,*:cft.alt. A. 3JIf:1'(=f.'1{., '"
twan,GPOComplex,Block A, tN.A.,NewDeIhi..Z3
,4. I
....,
14002325.06.2013
POSTI\GE
324B 49923
N2013b
-
A,
,
"'"
<'.:)
"" '
TelegraphicAddress:
"SATARKTA: NewDelhi
E-MailAddress
cenvigil@nic.in
Website
www.cvc.nic.in
EPABX
24600200
IFax:24651186
To,
ShriSubhashChandraAgrawal,
1775KuchaLattushah,
Dariba,ChandniChowk,
Delhi- 110006.
Subject: Requestfor information undertheRighttoInformationAct,2005.
Sir,
Please refer to your letters dated27.05.2013 [received in the <Commission on '
29.05.2013]ontheabovecitedsubject.
2. Theparawisereply isas'under:-
Para 1
The CPIO concerned, that is, Shri Prabhat Kumar, Director, has statedthat the
selectionprocess forappointmentofCVOinAIIMS isunderactiveconsiderationofthe
Commissionatthemoment, afinal viewin thematterhasnotbeentakenandfinal order
hasnotbeen issued. You may 'note'thatthecaseswheretheauthorityconcerned have
notyettaken afinal view in the matterand have not yet issuedfinal orders, that is, the
cases have still not reached their logical conclusion, are to be considered as 'under
investigation' as upheld by the Central InfOrmation Commission (CIC) in the case of
Shri Shankar Sharma and other Vs Income Tax Department in case No.
CICIATIAI2007100007110111 where CIC stated that "investigation would mean all
actionoflawenforcement, disciplinaryproceedings, enquiries, adjudicationsandsoon.
Logically, no investigation couldbe saidto be complete unless it has_reachedapoint
where the final decision on the basis ofthat investigation is taken". Hence, the
information has beendefined by the CPIO concernedunderSection 8(1)(h) ofthe RTI
Act,2005. .
Paras2,3& 7
TheCPIO concerned, that is, Smt. LilaChandran, Deputy Seaetary, has stated
that no such information as sought by you in these paras is being maintained in the
format in which it has been sought from this Commission. However, information as
asked for may be available in the individual files ofthe Commission and culling and
compilinginformationfrom individualfilesasrequestedbyyou involvesdeploymentof
additional manpower and would disproportionately divert the resources ofthis Public
Authority. Hence, the information cannot be provided to you,.keeping in view the
provisionscontained underSection 7(9) oftheRTI Act. Thisview has been upheld by
--
C1Cli:iMlAllUlllUUlUIU In respect ot ()hri Natra; ()aha Vs - Central Vigilance
Commission in which the CIC held "The CVC cannot be compeiled to produce
information in a certain format if they do not maintain it in that manner. It would be
like creating new info1'mation. While a citizen has every right to get the available
information, he cannot get any information which does not exist and has to be created. "
Paras4& 6
The CPIO concerned, that is, Shri Prabhat Kumar, Director, has stated that no
such information as sought by you in these paras is being maintained in the format in
which it has been sought from this Commission. However, information as asked for
may be available in the individual files ofthe Commission and culling and compiling
informationfrom individualfilesasrequestedbyyou involvesdeploymentofadditional
manpowerandwoulddisproportionatelydiverttheresourcesofthisPublicAuthority, as
already pointed out in reply to para (2), (3) & (7) above. you may approach
the'organizationconcernedfor obtainingthe informationrequired relatingto para (6) of
..
theApplication. .
ParaS
The CPIOconcerned, thatis, Shri PrabhatKumar, Director, has statedthat you
may approach the organization concerned for obtaining the information required
relatingtopara(5)of theApplication.
Para8
Thefile notingof thisRTIapplicationconsistsof02 pagesfor whichthefees as
prescribedin Para(3)belowmaybedepositedwiththisPublicAuthority.
3. A fee ofRs.2/- for each page (in A-4 or A-3 size paper) has been prescribed for
providingthe information theRightto Information (RegulationofFee and Cost) Rules,
2005. Sincethedocumentsrequired byyou, would require photocopyof02 pages, anamoOnt
ofRs. 04/- (Rs. Four Only) may please be deposited in cash against'proper receipt; or by
demand draftorbanker'schequeorIndianpostalorderpayableto the Section Officer, Central
VigilanceCommissionatNewDelhi,forthesupplyofdocuments.
4. Ifyou are not satisfied with the abo\re reply, you may file an to Shri Alok
Bhatnagal',Additional SecretaryandAppellateAuthority, Central VigilanceCommission,New
Delhiontheaboveaddress,within30daysof receiptof thisletter.

Yoursfaithfully

UNDERRIGHTTO INFORMATIONACT
CentralPublicInformationOfficer
CentralVigilanceCommission(CVC)
SatarktaBhawan,CGOComplex
Block-A,INA,NewDelhi-ll0023
Sir
Please provide complete information together with related file-
notings/documents/correspondence on under-mentioned points relating to appointment of
7', CentralVigilance Officers(CVOs)atAllIndiaInstituteofMedicalSciences(AIIMS):
I. Complete information together with related documents/comrriunications/file-noting
etconappointmentofCentralVigilance OfficersinAIIMS from 01.06.2012tilldate
2. Certified copies ofall the communications including inquiry reports sentby Central
Vigilance Officers at AIIMS from 01.06.2012 till date against different officials at
AIIMS mentioning also action taken by CVC on these communications revealing
namesof officialsatAIIMSfoundguilty
3. Complete information on CVC receiving any complaint against Shri Vineet
Chaudhary lAS together with informationonactiontakentogetherwith related file-
notings/documents/correspondence etc on such communication on communication
sentbyCentralVigilanceOfficeratAIIMSinthisregard
4. Complete information onCVC ever objecting onappointment ofCentral Vigilance
OfficeratAIIMS
5. Complete information on appointment of Mr. Vineet Chawdhary, Mr. Shailesh
Yadav,Mr. SharatChauhan,Dr. RandeepGuleriaatAIIMS
6. Complete information together with list ofautonomous organizations where Central
VigilanceOfficersare appointedas pervigilancemanualwithpriorapprovalofCVC
from apanel sent by concernedMinistry includingthe autonomous organizations of
UnionHealthMinistry
7. Any other related information
8. File-notings on movement of this RTI petition
In case queries relate to some other public-authority, please transfer this RTI petition to CPIO
there under section 6(3) ofRTI Act. Postal-order number 08F-743050 for rupees ten is enclosed
towards RTI fees in name of "Accounts Officer" as per DoPT circular-number No.F. 1 0/9/2008-
IR dated 05.12.2008.
Regards
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL
(Guil1/1ess Record Holder & RTf Activist)
1775 Kucha Lattushah
Dariba, Chandni Chowk
DELHI 11 0006 (India)
Mobile9810033711 Fax 23254036
E-mail subhashmadhu@sify.com
Web www.subhashmadhu.com
27.05.2013