This course has a rigorous schedule. Please do not request deviation from course assignments or course due date.

Kate Schroeder EDUC 683 Practicum Rubric Student 1:

Areas: 50 Points 25 Points 10 Points or 0 Points

Directions:

All directions were followed including
parental permission, practicum plan,
evaluations and parental report with
graduate level grammar, punctuation,
spelling and sentence structure.
One piece of information was missing.
There were a few written mistakes.
More than one piece of information
was missing and/or practicum was not
written at an acceptable level of
grammar, punctuation, spelling and
sentence structure.
Background Information on Student
1: 50/50

The following details were submitted:
Students first name
Date of birth
Grade in school
Reason for referral
Case history
School history
Student attitude

5 of the following details were
submitted:
Students first name
Date of birth
Grade in school
Reason for referral
Case history
School history
Student attitude
Less than 5 of the following details
were submitted:
Students first name
Date of birth
Grade in school
Reason for referral
Case history
School history
Student attitude
Assessment of Student 1:
50/50:
Solid assessment. Charts and
anecdotal explanations were easy to
understand for professionals and
parents.
The following information was
included in pre and post tests:
Dates administered
Test results
Performance levels
Attitude/behavior during
testing
Thorough discussion of
reading diagnosis
Specific plan and goals for
the student based on
assessment results
Assessment was written
with graduate level
grammar, punctuation,
spelling and sentence
structure.
The following information lacked one
or two of the listed ideas.
Dates administered
Test results
Performance levels
Attitude/behavior during
testing
Thorough discussion of
reading diagnosis
Specific plan and goals for
the student based on
assessment results
Assessment was written
with a few graduate level
grammar, punctuation,
spelling and sentence
structure errors.

An incomplete assessment of student
was submitted.
Daily Lesson Plans Student 1:
50/50:
Your plans were well written and
focused on key targeted areas. Nice
work!
Lesson plans were:
Well-prepared
Focused on word study,
fluency and comprehension
Professionally developed
Dated with the time of each
session
Included instructional
activities
Followed a consistent format
Utilized running records
(Submit at least 2)
Used a balance of narrative
and expository terms
Lesson plans missed one or two pieces
of the following information:
Focused on 3 main ideas
Professionally developed
Dated with the time of each
session
Included instructional
activities
Followed a consistent format
Utilized running records
(Submit at least 2)
Used a balance of narrative
and expository terms
Incomplete lesson plans were
submitted.
Case Study Student 1:
50/50
This case study was thorough,
complete and easy to follow. It
clearly outlined areas of concern and
progress made.






The following pieces of information
were included:
Cover page
Background information on
student
Reason for referral
Case history
Family history
School history
Student attitude
Summary of assessment results
Areas of reading difficulty
Diagnostic teaching plan
Attendance/session summary
Narrative and expository text
Parent component
Results
Reflections
One or two pieces of information were
missing.
More than two pieces of information
were missing.
Quality of Case Study:
50/50:
An excellent knowledge base was
reflected in your case study.
A through case study was written with
clear tables and/or graphs.
Graduate level grammar, punctuation
spelling and sentence structure were
used.
Case study was well written with one
or two confusing parts. Clear tables
and/or graphs were presented.
Graduate level writing contained a few
errors.
Case study was not well written at a
graduate level.







Total Points: 300
This course has a rigorous schedule. Please do not request deviation from course assignments or course due date.

Rubric Student 2:
Areas: 50 Points 25 Points 10 Points or 0 Points

Directions:
50/50
All directions were followed
including parental permission,
practicum plan, evaluations and
parental report with graduate level
grammar, punctuation, spelling and
sentence structure.
One piece of information was
missing. There were a few written
mistakes.
More than one piece of information
was missing and/or practicum was
not written at an acceptable level
of grammar, punctuation, spelling
and sentence structure.
Background Information on
Student 2:
50/50

The following details were
submitted:
Students first name
Date of birth
Grade in school
Reason for referral
Case history
School history
Student attitude

5 of the following details were
submitted:
Students first name
Date of birth
Grade in school
Reason for referral
Case history
School history
Student attitude
Less than 5 of the following details
were submitted:
Students first name
Date of birth
Grade in school
Reason for referral
Case history
School history
Student attitude
Assessment of Student 2:
50/50:
This student made impressive
progress in a short amount of
time. Nice work!


The following information was
included in pre and post tests:
Dates administered
Test results
Performance levels
Attitude/behavior during
testing
Thorough discussion of
reading diagnosis
Specific plan and goals for
the student based on
assessment results.
Assessment was written
with graduate level
grammar, punctuation,
spelling and sentence
structure.
The following information lacked
one or two of the listed ideas.
Dates administered
Test results
Performance levels
Attitude/behavior during
testing
Thorough discussion of
reading diagnosis
Specific plan and goals for
the student based on
assessment results.
Assessment was written
with a few graduate level
grammar, punctuation,
spelling and sentence
structure errors.

An incomplete assessment of
student was submitted.
Daily Lesson Plans Student 2:
50/50:
It is clear that you are very
proficient at digging deeper and
implementing the three part
intervention plan, adjusting and
reflecting. This was a well
outlined set of intervention
lessons.

Lesson plans were:
Well-prepared
Focused on word study,
fluency and comprehension
Professionally developed
Dated with the time of each
session
Included instructional
activities
Followed a consistent format
Utilized running records
(Submit at least 2)
Used a balance of narrative
and expository terms
Lesson plans missed one or two
pieces of the following information:
Focused on 3 main ideas
Professionally developed
Dated with the time of each
session
Included instructional
activities
Followed a consistent format
Utilized running records
(Submit at least 2)
Used a balance of narrative
and expository terms
Incomplete lesson plans were
submitted.
Conference/Parent Report Student
2:
50/50: This was easy to
understand at a professional level
as well as for parents. Nicely
targeted discussion! You had
strong anecdotal information.
With that amount of information, I
would recommend moving it from
the chart and writing in paragraph
form.
A thorough parent report was
prepared with the following
information:
Student Name
Age
School
Author of Report
Supervisor
Date of parent conference
Background of student
Test results
Analysis
Recommendations
Graduate level writing. (See
above.)

A report was prepared with 1-2
missing pieces of information.
Writing contained a few errors.
A thorough report was not prepared.
Graduate level writing was not
exhibited.
Total points: 250


This course has a rigorous schedule. Please do not request deviation from course assignments or course due date.

Summary/Reflection: This is a separate assignment. Please include this document aligned to INTASC standards and it will be complete for your
portfolio submission.
Area: 50 Points 25 Points 10 Points or 0 Points

Directions:

50/50
Very strong reflection!





A reflection of the practicum
experience was written including
the following ideas:
Professional growth
Growth of students
Teaching plans and their
effectiveness
Adjusting plans in the future
Application to your current job
Graduate level writing
One piece of information was
missing. One or two written errors
were made.
More than one piece of information
was missing. Graduate level writing
was not exhibited.
Total points: 50
Kate,
Your coursework was solid, reflecting your strength at digging deeper and focusing on literacy needs. I am impressed with your organization and
implementation of skills. I hope you are moving forward to gaining your 317 Reading Specialist licensure!
Best wishes,
Course Grade: A
Theresa Stanley, MAED
Theresa Stanley, MAED
Reading Specialist
Viterbo University