0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
18 Ansichten2 Seiten
Nixon was both treasonous and duplicitous because he thought that he was the edification of a larger than life power complex to implement a grandiose vision for the Free World. His Napoleonic visions came to a grinding halt when Watergate backfired. In this brief essay article, I try to go into depth about this vision with the backdrop of the Vietnam War in mind.
Originaltitel
Cold War Axioms Relating to the Duality of Richard Nixon
Nixon was both treasonous and duplicitous because he thought that he was the edification of a larger than life power complex to implement a grandiose vision for the Free World. His Napoleonic visions came to a grinding halt when Watergate backfired. In this brief essay article, I try to go into depth about this vision with the backdrop of the Vietnam War in mind.
Nixon was both treasonous and duplicitous because he thought that he was the edification of a larger than life power complex to implement a grandiose vision for the Free World. His Napoleonic visions came to a grinding halt when Watergate backfired. In this brief essay article, I try to go into depth about this vision with the backdrop of the Vietnam War in mind.
Cold War Axioms Relating to the Duality of Richard Nixon
Omar Alansari-Kreger
As the Cold War approached a peaking period the last thing any power wanted was to capitulate to a peace agreement at the hands of a fourth rate power. American meddling in Vietnam began immediately after the French reasserted their colonial power over their possessions in Indochina. From there the world was broken into geo-political fragments where both superpowers analyzed their comparative strengths and weaknesses. The designs of the Cold War were one of attrition in the sense that one wanted to dominate the other. Nixon did not want to go down as the first president that agreed to a peace agreement with the communist bloc because that gesture alone would undermine the hegemonic legitimacy of the United States. History shows that this happened before the Soviet Union was confronted with a similar international situation which later arrived in the form of Afghanistan. The facts still stand; the Vietnam War was unwinnable from its earliest onset, tens of thousands of American servicemen died for absolutely nothing, and everything the United States tried to protect fell entirely through the cracks. The aftereffect caused even greater humiliation to the United States as a direct result of its military first diplomacy later mindset; however, Nixon was allowed to walk away without answering for his sabotage of the peace agreement arranged under the Johnson Administration. That was treasonous because Nixon did not have the right to intervene in official channels in order to exclusively manipulate it; the act of the latter is a blatant act of a manipulative crony bent on the proliferation of their own power complex. Unfortunately, Nixon saw himself as the edification of the United States and felt justified in following through with what he saw was best for the nation; wait a second, isnt that what a benevolent dictator does? It seems that Nixon desired to use Vietnam as a template to combat the domino effect all over the world; beneath those circumstances the United States would establish a militarized presence at the request of an embattled pro-American government fighting an internal war against its own communist insurgency. The CIA did just that, but if the North Vietnamese were pummeled into submission American military intervention worldwide would have been more out in the open in the aftermath; after the Nixon era the same tactics continued, but were carefully swept under the rug under a pseudo culture serving the so called greater good. In this regard, open exposure specifically refers to the manner in which an international situation is conveyed to the American public. The hurrah culture of American military muscle gradually faded after 2
World War Two nostalgia started to dwindle from the American psyche; that was largely due to the generational paradigm shift that arrived in the form of the Baby Boomers. Secrecy would have continued, but perhaps that would have jump started the vision foreseen by the New American Century decades later? Nixon failed because he thought he had extraordinary powers that went above and beyond any element of constitutional law; he was reprimanded not as a power hungry thug, but as a defeated visionary that caught an oppositional bullet at the wrong place at the wrong time.