Scale

5000 0 5000
Meters
Class_Names
Unclassified
Trees
Marsh water
Dry grass 4
Water hole
Water with high sediment content
Water mainstream
Streets, Houses, and Waterways with Glint
Class_Names
Soils and Grass
Dead grass
Water silty
Water Algae
Red_dead_grass
Water Brown
marsh bright green vegetation 1
marsh bright green vegetation 2
Class_Names
Waterside Vegetation
Soils
Dry grass 1
Dry grass 2
Dry grass 3
Misc light green vegetation
Misc marsh vegetation
Misc Green Vegetation
Class_Names
Misc light green vegetation 2
Bushes
Green grass bunches
A
B1
The black outline is the approxamite outline of the seasonal wetland, which is very similar to the
fgures provided. There are several areas of interest on this map area. Areas A, B and C.
Area A is an area that appears dry during most seasons, if you look at the Google Earth imagery,
there is a small soil area here in the classifcation and appears dry in most aerial photography.
Area B1 has a good amount of soil and vegetation, but it appears to have a higher elevation than
the rest of the area, so I did not include it in my outline of the seasonal wetland. Area B2, is similar
to B1 due to it being on the margin, but in a number of the GE images, it has denser vegetation
during dry times, this might be due to it being north-facing.
It might be worth noting that Area C is slightly diferent from the wetland fgures provided to me.
as you can see in Figure 1, The site map.
C
Fig 1: Site Map
C
A
C
B2
Google Earth Image: August 8th, 2006
Party Vote Ratios by Precinct
Obama 2012
Legend
Republicans:Democrats 2012
1.0 - 1.1
1.1 - 1.5
1.5 - 1.75
1.75 & up
Democrats:Republicans 2012
1.1 - 1.5
1.5 - 1.75
1.75 - 2.0
2.0 - 3.0
3.0 - 10
10 - 30
30 & up
~Equal
Google Streets 8





Notes: This map was produced for a political race in Kansas. It reflects
the ratios of support different precincts experienced. This map (among 20
+ others) was intended for use by campaign managers to understand the
dynamics of the political environment across several election years.
Dasymetric Allocation within Alameda County
Legend
Population Density
(persons/sqkm)
0
1 - 3000
3001 - 5000
5001 - 9000
>9000
Alameda County
0 9 18 4.5 Miles
NOTES: This graphic was produced in my grad school coursework
The assignment involved dasymetric allocation, meaning certain non-
urban landcover types were excluded and population densities were
increased to reflect "truer" densities than those that a simple census
tract density would calculate.
Benjamin H. Wheeler North American Bat Ranges and Climate Change Spring 2012

8



Figure 1: Species richness and changes for the future a) Species Richness for the present b) Species richness for
A2A c) Species richness for B2A d)Total species change for A2A e) Total species change for B2A f) Percentage change
in species richness for A2A g) Percentage change in species richness for B2A. (Equal Area projection)