Psychologi

cal Test
Report
Rosellnica L. Balasoto
II-9 BS Psychology
Professor Adonis David
February !" #$!
I. Demographic Information
%a&e '
Age ' $( years old
)ender ' Fe&ale
*thnicity+Race ' Fili,ino
-arital Status ' Single
)rade ' Second .ear /ollege
Date of 0esting ' 1anuary to February #$!
*2a&iner '
II. Reason for Referral/Purpose of Testing
0he ,ur,ose of giving battery of tests is to &easure the co&,etencies
and characteristics that are needed for assu&ing a guidance counselor
,osition. 0his 3as done to s,eci4cally assess the follo3ing di&ensions'
cognitive s5ills" 3or5 values" and ,ersonality.
III. Assessment Procedures
0ests Ad&inistered'
0ests' Dates 0a5en'
$. Structural Reliability
Assess&ent 6SRA7 8erbal For&
1anuary $!" #$!
. /ulture Fair Intelligence 0est
6/FI07 Scale 9
1anuary $!" #$!
9. Standardi:ed A,titude 0est for
0eachers 6SA007
1anuary 9" #$!
!. ;ASIS 9 1anuary (" #$!
<. Fili,ino =or5 8alues Scale
6F8=S7
1anuary (" #$!
>. %*;-Personality Inventory
Revised 6%*;-PI R7
February !" #$!
?. *&otions Pro4le Inde2 6*PI7 February ?" #$!
(. $> Personality Factor
@uestionnaire 6$> PF7
February ?" #$!
9. Social AdAust&ent Scale-Self
Re,ort
6SAS-SR7
February $#" #$!
Test Results:
Structural Reliability Assess&ent 6SRA7 8erbal For&
Raw Score Percentile Rank Rating
8ocabulary
6linguistics7
9 !# Above Average
Arith&etic
6Bualitative7
$> <# Average
Total ! "# A$erage
/ulture Fair Intelligence 0est 6/FI07 Scale 9
Total Raw Score Percentile Rank I% &'ui$alent Rating
! >! $#> A$erage
Standardi:ed A,titude 0est for 0eachers 6SA007
Intellecti$e
(unctioning
Score Percentile Rank
$. 8erbal Ability 9 ?(
a. Analogy ?
b. )ra&&atical
Csage
?
c. 8ocabulary 9
. %u&erical Ability $! >?
9. 1udg&ent in 0eaching
Situation
$? ((
!. Reading
/o&,rehension
! 9!
<. Abstract Reasoning $$ >#
Total )! )*
;ASIS 9
Raw Score Percentile Rank
Artistic
$> 99
Scienti4c
9 $#
%ature
$ 9
Protective
$ 99
-echanical
# <
Industrial
$ <
Business Detail
? $#
Selling
# $
Acco&&odating
? $#
Du&anitarian
$9 <#
Leading-InEuence
$# <
Physical Perfor&ing
! $#
Fili,ino =or5 8alues Scale 6F8=S7
Raw Score Percentile Rank
Rating
*nviron&ental !< 9<
8ery Strong
Fa&ilial < 9
8ery Strong
Intellectual-
Achieve&ent
;riented
?# (>
8ery Strong
Inter,ersonal !< 9
8ery =ea5
-anagerial << 9<
8ery Strong
-aterial 99 ?9
Strong
;ccu,ational 9 $
8ery =ea5
;rgani:ational 9< (!
8ery Strong
Religious !# 9>
8ery Strong
8ariety $< $
8ery =ea5
%*;-Personality Inventory Revised 6%*;-PI R7
Rating
%euroticis&
Lo3
*2traversion
Lo3
;,enness
Average
An2iety
Lo3
/onscientiousness
Average
*&otions Pro4le Inde2 6*PI7
Raw Score Percentile Rank
0rustful 9 ?9
Dyscontrolled < <
0i&id $9 (
De,ressed ? >(
Distrustful 9 !!
/ontrolled 9 ?<
Aggressive $ $#
)regarious $? (>
Bias 9? >#
Social AdAust&ent Scale-Self Re,ort 6SAS-SR7
(actor Total Percentile Rank
=or5 Role $.( <?
Social and Leisure .< >9
*2tended Fa&ily .# >9
$> Personality Factor @uestionnaire 6$> PF7
Rating
+lo,al (actors
*2traversion Lo3
An2iety Lo3
0ough -indedness Average
Inde,endence Average
Self-control Lo3
I-. Analysis of Test Results
A. .ogniti$e /e$el
0he test data reveals an average general cognitive ability. -ore
s,eci4cally" average level 3as obtained in intelligence tests and a ,ercentile
ran5 of ($ resulted in a,titude test. In intelligence tests" it sho3ed that the
client has enough ca,acity to deter&ine the relationshi, bet3een obAects" to
5no3 the &eaning of so&e vocabulary 3ords" and to ,erfor& Bualitative
activities. 0hese ratings convey that the individual can understand
conversations and is eBui,,ed 3ith necessary arith&etic s5ills. ;n the other
hand" it 3as sho3ed in a,titude test that the client also has suFcient
reading co&,rehension ade,tness and has good Audg&ent on diGerent
situations.
0. 1ork -alues
Based on the test results" the client ,refers Aobs that oGer an
o,,ortunity to aid ,eo,le in need. 0his ,erson highly values tas5s that
coordinate 3ith hu&an resources. She has an interest in hel,ing ,eo,le 3ith
,roble&s of a ,hysical" social" e&otional" or religious nature. 0his is a good
indication since she is assu&ing for a guidance counselor ,osition.
-oreover" the test results sho3ed that the client highly considers her
fa&ily" religion and environ&ent in &a5ing decisions. Der fa&ilial &atters
3ill &ost li5ely interfere 3ith her 3or5. She also tends to be easily aGected
by the environ&ental conditions around her. Scoring high on in intellectual-
achieve&ent orientation" she ,refers to do things that reBuire inde,endent
3or5. Do3ever" she scored lo3 in accounting inter,ersonal relationshi,s. She
considers least the i&,ortance of e&otional closeness" 4delity" hos,itality"
and H,a5i5isa&aI. Daving a lo3 score on occu,ational" she also doesnJt ,ay
&uch attention on fairness" co&,etence and ,ublic service. 0he client is into
routine 3or5. 0his is due to her lo3 score in variety.
.. Personality
Based on her results that 3ere derived fro& the %*;-PI R" the client is
generally rela2ed" reserved" good natured" and 3ell organi:ed. She has clear
goals in life and is eager to coo,erate 3ith others. -oreover" the results also
sho3 that she is ,ractical and 3illing to consider ne3 3ays of doing things.
0his can be a good attribute to her 3or5 ,erfor&ance.
She earned high scores in her e2tended fa&ily ad social and leisure
roles based on her results in SAS-SR 8erbal For&. Der inEated scores indicate
that she 3ithdra3s herself to3ards her signi4cant others for the ,ast t3o
3ee5s since the testing date. Lesser nu&ber of friends contacted and
a&ount of social activity is evident. For& of freBuent argu&ents &ay also be
,resent. 0he client is currently e2,eriencing tur&oil in her relationshi,s.
Do3ever" she re&ained to do 3ell in her studies. Acco&,lishing the reBuired
tas5s in school is 3hat she focuses.
Su,,orting the ,revious tests results" the corollary fro& the *&otional
Pro4le Inde2 sho3s that the client is gregarious" trustful" controlled" and
ti&id. *vident characteristics are being sociable" friendly" and aGectionate.
Being trustful" the client tends to be obedient. Der high control &a5es her
3ant to 5no3 &ore about the environ&ent and on ho3 to deal 3ith it.
/o&bination of being controlled and ti&id conveys that she is a res,onsible
and cautious ,erson 3ho has strong needs for social a,,roval. 0he client also
has a strong li5elihood of having an obsessive co&,ulsive behavior.
-oreover" the outco&e of her test in $>PF correlates 3ith the three
,revious ones. 0he client tends to be acco&&odating yet reserved as
concerned to others. She got a high sten score on being ,rivate. Do3ever"
she still &anages to be lively and s,ontaneous 3hen co&&unicating. She is
coo,erative and acce,ting. Further&ore" she is conscious in avoiding
conEicts by being rule conscious and deferential to3ards the ,eo,le around
her. In general" she is e&otionally stable and &ature enough.
-. Summary
0he client is on average level in ter&s of intellectual ca,acity. She has
good nu&erical and verbal ability" reading co&,rehension and Audg&ent.
Further&ore" the results also sho3ed that she has a 4ne co&,etency in
organi:ing and arranging things.
She ,refers Aobs that hel, ,eo,le. Do3ever" in her 3or5 values" it
sho3s that she doesnJt value inter,ersonal relationshi,s" fairness and variety
that &uch. She is greatly inEuenced by her fa&ily" religion" and environ&ent.
0hese &ay interfere 3ith her 3or5.
/oncerning the clientJs ,ersonality" it sho3s that she is controlled"
,ractical" good natured" and organi:ed. In relation to these" she tends to
coo,erate 3ith others because she doesnJt 3ant to have any conEicts.
Do3ever" the results revealed that she is currently e2,eriencing so&e
,roble&s 3ith her signi4cant others. She beco&e distant and 3ithdra3s
herself to the&. But generally" she is e&otionally stable.
-I. Recommendations
0he client is eBui,,ed 3ith necessary cognitive abilities es,ecially in
language co&,rehension. 0he results also sho3ed that she has good
Audg&ent ability. She can use this in her 3or5 4eld.
In ter&s of her 3or5 values" she tends to be ,rofessional enough. 0he
client 5no3s ho3 to not involve herself too &uch 3ith others. Do3ever" she
scored high in considering her fa&ily" religion" and environ&ent 3hile
3or5ing. 0his &ay aGect her ,erfor&ance.
=hen it co&es to her ,ersonality" she is an ideal i&age of a guidance
counselor. She is controlled" reserved" and good natured. Being 3ell
organi:ed" the client &ay also &a5e ,eo,le feel co&fortable 3hen
co&&unicating 3ith her. She is also al3ays conscious of the rules and the
things that she does. But the client has an o,en &ind in considering
changes.
Based on all of the tests that have been conducted" the client is
Buali4ed enough for being a guidance counselor. She has the basic
intellectual and e&otional characteristics that are needed for the ,rofession.
Do3ever" so&e hesitations are ,laced in her due to her strong tendency to
be inEuenced by fa&ily" religion" and environ&ent and her lo3 regard for
inter,ersonal relationshi,s" fairness" and variety in the 3or5,lace.
Rosellnica L. Balasoto

nd
.ear Psychology student in ,ractice