4200-223; SS OP 2.1; 4222-25; 35!5-014 "nowled#e $or%boo% Learner name: Learner signature: Date completed: Assessor name: Recommended GLHS: 3 &'e (ur(ose of t'is unit is to (ro)ide t'e learner wit' introductory %nowled#e about t'e medical and social models of disability. In t'is assi#nment* you will demonstrate your understandin# of t'e social and medical models of disability. +ou will loo% at 'ow t'ese models 'a)e de)elo(ed o)er time and are reflected in ser)ice deli)ery. +ou will also consider 'ow your own (ractice s'ould (romote inclusion. &'ere are two tas%s to t'is assi#nment set by ,-./ 0/ 1odels of disability 2/ 3eflecti)e account Pa#e ! of "# &'is (a#e is blan% Pa#e " of "# $andidate Assessment Record %nter &nit 'um(er according to )ualification taking: &nit *itle: +ntroductor, a-areness of models of disa(ilit, Date .ork(ook su(mitted: !st 4444444444.. "nd 4444444444.. 0ssessment ,riteria 0ssessor 5eedbac% 1st Submission Outcome Pass63efer 2nd Submission Outcome Pass63efer 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 2.2 a b c d 2.3 Pa#e 3 of "# 0ssessor comments to 7earner &ar#et date and action (lan for resubmission 8if a((licable9 Outcome of second submission I confirm t'at t'is assessment 'as been com(leted to t'e re:uired standard and meets t'e re:uirements for )alidity* currency* aut'enticity and sufficiency 0ssessor Si#nature/ ;ate/ I confirm t'at t'e assi#nment wor% to w'ic' t'is result relates* is all my own wor% 7earner Si#nature/ ;ate/ Internal <erifiers Si#nature/ ;ate/ Pa#e / of "# &'e ,are =uality ,ommission 8,=,9 www.c:c.or#.u% is t'e inde(endent re#ulator of 'ealt' and social care in >n#land. &'e ;e(artment for >ducation www.education.#o).u% is res(onsible for education and c'ildren?s ser)ices. &'e ;e(artment of @ealt' www.d'.#o).u% is res(onsible for leadin# on 'ealt' and social care. 1y 'ome life aims to celebrate eAistin# best (ractice in care 'omes and (romote care 'omes as a (ositi)e o(tion for older (eo(le. www.my'omelife.or#.u% Bational ,entre for Inde(endent 7i)in# www.ncil.or#.u% is a resource on direct (ayments* inde(endent li)in# and indi)idual bud#ets Bational Institute for @ealt' and ,linical >Acellence 8BI,>9 www.nice.or#.u% is t'e inde(endent or#anisation res(onsible for (ro)idin# national #uidance on t'e (romotion of #ood 'ealt' and t'e (re)ention and treatment of ill 'ealt'. S%ills for ,are www.s%illsforcare.or#.u% is t'e em(loyer-led aut'ority on t'e trainin# standards and de)elo(ment needs of social care staff in >n#land. Social ,are Institute for >Acellence 8S,I>9 www.scie.or#.u% was establis'ed to identify and (romote t'e dissemination of %nowled#e about w'at wor%s in social care* and t'e de)elo(ment of best (ractice #uidelines. Pa#e of "# 0ssessment ,riteria 1.1/ t'e medical model of disability 0ssessment ,riteria 1.2/ t'e social model of disability 0ssessment ,riteria 1.3/ 'ow eac' of t'e models 'as de)elo(ed and e)ol)ed o)er time *he 0edical 0odel 1 Cnder t'e 1edical 1odel* disabled (eo(le are defined by t'eir illness or medical condition. &'e 1edical 1odel re#ards disability as an indi)idual (roblem. It (romotes t'e )iew of a disabled (erson as de(endent and needin# to be cured or cared for* and Dustifies t'e way in w'ic' disabled (eo(le 'a)e been systematically eAcluded from society. &'e disabled (erson is t'e (roblem* not society. ,ontrol resides firmly wit' (rofessionals; c'oices for t'e indi)idual are limited to t'e o(tions (ro)ided and a((ro)ed by t'e E'el(in#E eA(ert. &'e 1edical 1odel is best summarised by referrin# to t'e International ,lassification of Im(airments* ;isabilities and @andica(s de)elo(ed by t'e $orld @ealt' Or#anisation in 1F0. &'e classification ma%es t'e followin# distinctions/ Im(airment is Gany loss or abnormality of (syc'olo#ical* ('ysiolo#ical or anatomical structure or function?. ;isability is Gany restriction or lac% 8resultin# from an im(airment9 of ability to (erform an acti)ity in t'e manner or wit'in t'e ran#e considered normal for a 'uman bein#? &'e 1edical 1odel focuses on w'at a (erson can?t do/ Im(airment ;isability 0 w'eelc'air user cannot climb t'e stairs or wal% to t'e s'o(s 0 (artially si#'ted (erson cannot read information in Gstandard? siHe (rint 0 (erson wit' an ac:uired brain inDury cannot s(ea% as :uic%ly as ot'er (eo(le Peo(le wit' disabilities 'a)e #enerally reDected t'is model. &'ey say it 'as led to t'eir low self-esteem* unde)elo(ed life s%ills* (oor education and conse:uent 'i#' unem(loyment le)els. 0bo)e all* t'ey 'a)e reco#nised t'at t'e 1edical 1odel re:uires t'e brea%in# of natural relations'i(s wit' t'eir families* communities and society as a w'ole. ;urin# t'e 1!0?s and 1I0?s newly formed #rou(s of disabled (eo(le started to c'allen#e t'e way in w'ic' t'ey were treated and re#arded wit'in society. 1 'tt(/66u%.ettad.eu6Cnderstandin#J20;isabilityJ20-J20#uideJ20toJ20#oodJ20(ractice.(df Pa#e 1 of "# &'e medical model is based on t'e (at'olo#y of t'e indi)idual. It em('asises on 'ow t'e body?s functions are im(aired by disability and 'ow medical6sur#ical inter)ention can reduce or correct t'e im(airment. &'e focus is t'erefore on in)estin# in 'ealt' care and related resources to researc'* identify* dia#nose* cure* mana#e* alter and control illness. It does not account for social and en)ironmental influences w'ic' contribute to an indi)idualEs le)el of EdisabilityE. Bow* medical (ractitioners reco#nise t'e need to include indi)iduals in decision ma%in#. 0lternati)e definitions of im(airment and disability were de)elo(ed and formed t'e basis of w'at is %nown as t'e Social 0odel. Im(airment is t'e functional limitation wit'in t'e indi)idual caused by ('ysical* mental or sensory im(airment. ;isability is t'e loss or limitation of o((ortunities to ta%e (art in t'e normal life of t'e community on an e:ual le)el wit' ot'ers due to ('ysical and social barriers. 82arnes* 14/29 ;isability is no lon#er seen as an indi)idual (roblem but as a social issue caused by (olicies* (ractices* attitudes and6or t'e en)ironment. 5or eAam(le* a w'eelc'air user may 'a)e a ('ysical im(airment but it is t'e absence of a ram( t'at (re)ents t'em from accessin# a buildin#. In ot'er words* t'e disablin# factor is t'e inaccessible en)ironment. &'e disabled (eo(leEs mo)ement belie)es t'e EcureE to t'e (roblem of disability lies in t'e restructurin# of society. Cnli%e medically based EcuresE* t'at focus on indi)iduals and t'eir im(airment* t'is is an ac'ie)able #oal and to t'e benefit of e)eryone. &'is a((roac' su##ests t'at disabled (eo(leEs indi)idual and collecti)e disad)anta#e is due to a com(leA form of institutional discrimination as fundamental to our society as seAism* racism or 'omo('obia. &'e social model focuses on riddin# society of barriers* rat'er t'an relyin# on Gcurin#? (eo(le w'o 'a)e im(airments. &'e social model is based on t'e )iew t'at t'e en)ironment and attitude of ot'ers limits t'e indi)idual?s (artici(ation in society. 0lt'ou#' it c'allen#es t'e medical model* many (eo(le now mer#e t'e two w'ere (ossible* ta%in# t'e best from eac'. Pa#e 2 of "# 0edical 0odel Social 0odel ;isability is a G(ersonal tra#edy? ;isability is t'e eA(erience of social o((ression ;isability is a (ersonal (roblem ;isability is a social (roblem 1edicalisation is t'e Gcure? Self-'el( #rou(s and systems benefit disabled (eo(le enormously Professional dominance Indi)idual and collecti)e res(onsibility >A(ertise is 'eld by t'e 8:ualified9 (rofessionals >A(ertise is t'e eA(erience of disabled (eo(le &'e disabled (erson must adDust &'e disabled (erson s'ould recei)e affirmation G&'e ;isabled? 'a)e an indi)idual identity ;isabled (eo(le 'a)e a collecti)e identity ;isabled (eo(le need care ;isabled (eo(le need ri#'ts Professionals are in control ;isabled (eo(le s'ould ma%e t'eir own c'oices ;isability is a (olicy issue ;isability is a (olitical issue Indi)idual ada(tations Social c'an#e 3s,cho4Social 0odel of Disa(ilit, >ri% >ri%son used t'e ('rase K(syc'o-socialL to describe sta#es of 'uman de)elo(ment. It combines t'e de)elo(ment of t'e mind wit' t'e social circumstances or relations'i(s of an indi)idual. It is sometimes referred to as a bio-(syc'o-social model addin# biolo#ical as(ects. .eor#e >n#el considered t'at t'e idea of mind* body and circumstances to be fundamental to 'ow (eo(le reacted to ill 'ealt' and disability. &'e model 'as been used in mental 'ealt' for se)eral years. It deals wit' all as(ects of t'e (erson* in (articular t'eir ability to adDust to ac:uired im(airment. It considers 'ow for eAam(le* culture and (o)erty* can interact wit' (ersonality and beliefs to affect t'e way a (erson eA(eriences or mana#es t'eir illness or im(airment. &'e model reco#nises t'at (eo(le will react differently to t'eir situation and condition and concentrates on ado(tin# an indi)idualised a((roac' to identifyin# and meetin# t'e needs of (eo(le 8for eAam(le a (erson wit' dementia9. &'ere is a need to be fleAible and (erson-centred. @ow indi)iduals are described can cause offence e.#. Kt'ey are dementedL or Kare ;own?s syndromeL. It is im(ortant to consider t'e indi)idual and 'ow t'ey mi#'t be Pa#e 5 of "# affected if t'ose around t'em ado(t a (articular a((roac' based on t'e different models of care. Social care (olicy and (ractice 'as mo)ed from institutionalisation to inde(endent li)in# o)er t'e (ast century. Personalisation 'as e)ol)ed o)er many years and 'as been stron#ly influenced by (eo(le w'o use ser)ices. Personalisation was officially introduced in #o)ernment (olicy in ;ecember 200I w'en t'e Puttin# Peo(le 5irst concordat 8official a#reement9 was (ublis'ed. &'is outlined t'e reforms for social care. Personalisation is about #i)in# (eo(le more c'oice and control o)er t'eir li)es in all social care settin#s. Personalisation means startin# wit' t'e indi)idual as a (erson wit' stren#t's and (references. It is about startin# wit' t'e (erson not t'e ser)ice. It is wider t'an sim(ly #i)in# (ersonal bud#ets to (eo(le eli#ible for council fundin# and a((lies to (eo(le w'o (ay in full for t'eir care needs to be met. &'e 'istorical timeline #i)es a clear (icture of 'ow society is mo)in# slowly towards acce(tin# disabled (eo(le* (eo(le wit' learnin# disabilities* (eo(le wit' mental 'ealt' (roblems and older (eo(le as e:ual citiHens and im(ortant members of t'e community. $'ere (eo(le were once 'eld in 'os(itals and institutions* t'ey are now bein# su((orted to li)e inde(endent li)es in t'e community. &'e idea of t'e Esocial modelE of disability was a crucial (art of t'is c'an#e. 0ssessment ,riteria 1.4/ eAam(les of w'ere eac' model of disability may be used in ser)ice deli)ery. 0ssessment ,riteria 2.1/ 'ow t'e (rinci(les of eac' model are reflected in ser)ice deli)ery &'in#s to consider are/ @ow mi#'t t'e indi)iduals see t'emsel)es if t'e carers and ot'ers ado(t a w'olly medical model* social model or (syc'o-social modelM Practical day to day factors/ @ow mi#'t t'eir li)es be affected in e)eryday matters suc' as self-care* eatin# and drin%in#* wor%in#* trans(ort* educationM ,ontrol and self-determination/ &o w'at de#ree may t'e indi)idual be in control o)er t'eir own lifeM Self-esteem and confidence/ @ow mi#'t t'e different a((roac'es affect t'e confidence of t'e indi)idual and t'e way t'ey see t'emsel)es in relation to ot'ersM &'e 1edical 1odel of ,are/ Pa#e 6 of "# ,an lead to a lac% of (artners'i( wor%in# as t'e (rofessional is seen as t'e eA(ert ,an lead to treatment w'ic' see%s to KnormaliseL an indi)idual 8e.#. coc'lea im(lants to Kcure Kdeafness* (rost'etic limbs w'ic' are desi#ned to loo% KnormalL rat'er t'an to function effecti)ely and efficiently &as% centred rat'er t'an (erson centred 'ome care 8w'ere ('ysical needs are more im(ortant t'an 'olistic needs9 ,are 'omes desi#ned to meet stereoty(ical and #rou( needs rat'er t'an indi)idualised care 0utomatic care (roceedin#s w'en a c'ild is born to (arents wit' a learnin# disability. &'e Social 1odel of ,are/ See%s to c'an#e attitudes and encoura#es inte#ration In)ol)es (eo(le wit' disabilities in de)isin# and de)elo(in# le#islation and (olicy Increased use of assisti)e tec'nolo#y ;isability ;iscrimination 0ct 8in terms of re:uirements not for t'e definition it uses9 Influenced t'e <aluin# Peo(le 8<aluin# Peo(le Bow9 0lterations to en)ironments suc' as re(lacin# ste(s wit' ram(s ,losure of s(ecialist 'os(itals w'ic' mo)ed (eo(le wit' disabilities away from society Inte#ration of c'ildren wit' disabilities into main stream sc'ools Influenced Our @ealt' Our ,are Our Say Cse of direct (ayments and indi)idualised bud#ets for care (ro)ision Promoted 7earnin# ;isability Partners'i( 2oards &'e Psyc'o-social 1odel of ,are/ 7eads to indi)idualised care. 7oo%s at t'e w'ole (erson and all t'e factors t'at im(act on t'eir eA(erience of im(airment. ,'an#es to en)ironments in treatment centre suc' as 'os(itals to include suc' t'in#s as #ardens* 'airdressin# etc. Inter)entions aimed at t'e wider social conteAt of t'e indi)idual* suc' as wor%* education* family ;ementia ,are w'ic' offers a (erson centred a((roac' 1ental 'ealt' care w'ic' offers a combination of t'era(ies $@O International ,lassification of 5unctionin# and ;isability 8I,59 ;ementia Strate#y Suitable s'ort brea% (ro)ision Pa#e !# of "# 0ssessment ,riteria 2.2/ 'ow eac' of t'e models of disability im(acts on t'e a9 inclusion b9 ri#'ts c9 autonomy d9 needs of indi)iduals &'e followin# statements are eAtracts from t'e e-learnin# resource t'at you can access on t'e followin# website lin%/ 'tt(/66www.scie.or#.u%6(ublications6elearnin#6(erson6(erson016resource6indeA.'tml Disa(ilit, is a personal traged, ;isability6illness is often described as a tra#edy. Oli)er 8109 su##ests t'at if disability is re(resented as a tra#edy* disabled (eo(le will be (ercei)ed as )ictims of some tra#ic 'a((enin#6circumstance and social (olicies are t'en de)elo(ed to com(ensate for t'is. If we see disability as a result of social o((ression t'en disabled (eo(le will be )iewed as collecti)e )ictims of an uncarin#* i#norant society. Social (olicies would be more li%ely aimed at rectifyin# and redressin# social inDustices. Disa(ilit, is the experience of social oppression Social o((ression is seen as t'e (rimary factor leadin# to t'e eAclusion of disabled (eo(le. ,am(ai#nin# for e:ual ri#'ts 'as t'erefore been central to disability (olitics. Disa(ilit, is a personal pro(lem Illness or disability is t'e result of a ('ysical condition* is intrinsic to t'e indi)idual 8it is (art of t'at indi)idualEs own body9. Disa(ilit, is a social pro(lem 0 %ey conce(t of t'e social model is t'at society disables (eo(le. @ow we or#anise t'in#s in our culture often limits w'at some of its members can do. In t'is sense disability is )iewed as a social construct. +t is al-a,s important to diagnose all illness and disa(ilit, &'e medical model )iews dia#nosis as a startin# (oint to dealin# wit' illness and disability. &'e im(ortance of understandin# t'e cause of someoneEs illness or disability (ro)ides t'e %ey to wor% towards a cure* control or mana#ement. Pa#e !! of "# %xpertise is held (, the )ualified professionals >A(ertise is assumed t'rou#' :ualification* (rofessional eA(erience and researc'. It is usually e)idence based and t'erefore robust. %xpertise is the experience of disa(led people &'e social model insists t'at t'e (erson wit' t'e #reatest eA(ertise is t'e (erson eA(eriencin# t'e issue. It is u( to (rofessionals to listen and res(ond to t'eir eA(erience not to dominate it *he disa(led person must ad7ust &'e medical modelEs focus is towards cure w'ere)er (ossible. $'ere t'is is not (ossible resources are tar#eted at mana#in# and controllin# t'e illness and disability to allow t'e (erson to adDust. 5or eAam(le a deaf (erson may be offered t'e latest and most tec'nolo#ically ad)anced 'earin# aid so t'ey can adDust to a E'earin# worldE. +ndividual Adaptations &'e medical model assumes t'at indi)iduals s'ould be (ro)ided wit' ada(tations w'ere)er (ossible to enable t'em to reac' t'eir (otential in society. Social $hange &'e social model doesnEt always see indi)idual (olicies* ada(tations and cure as t'e (rimary focus. It reco#nises disability as a (olitical issue w'ic' 'as to be addressed by t'e w'ole of society not Dust disabled (eo(le. 0ssessment ,riteria 2.3/ 'ow own (ractice (romotes t'e (rinci(le of inclusion 2 Or#anisations must 'a)e a strate#y and a clear (olicy to in)ol)e (eo(le w'o use ser)ices and carers in ways w'ic' are meanin#ful and acce(table. &'is (ro)ides a way of s'owin# accountability and met'ods of usin# t'e eA(ertise of (eo(le w'o use ser)ices to de)elo( #ood (ractice. &'e im(ortance of in)ol)ement at all le)els* and in a ran#e of different functions and acti)ities* needs to be reco#nised. 5eedbac% about an indi)idual?s own care and6or feedbac% about a ser)ice s'ould influence or#anisational (lannin# and im(ro)ements and contribute to t'e de)elo(ment and learnin# for em(loyees. 3 8arriers to inclusion 2 'tt(/66www.scie.or#.u%6(ublications6#uides6#uide3F6files6#uide3F.(df 3 'tt(/66www.scie.or#.u%6(ublications6#uides6#uide356files6#uide35.(df Pa#e !" of "# N Po)erty* disability* mobility* sensory and communication (roblems* (oor ('ysical and mental 'ealt'* unsuitable accommodation and lac% of trans(ort can all contribute to t'e eAclusion of older (eo(le. N 0#eist attitudes and assum(tions* low eA(ectations and limited as(irations may be s'ared by (rofessionals* families and some older (eo(le t'emsel)es. N &'e )oices and )iews of disabled older (eo(le* includin# t'ose wit' multi(le and com(leA needs* are often un'eard* discounted or outwei#'ed by ot'ers. N .rou(s w'ere a#e is combined wit' ot'er discriminatory factors* includin# disability* et'nicity* #ender and6or seAuality* (articularly ris% eAclusion. N &ranslator* si#nin# and ot'er communication ser)ices may be restricted. Negative language is a factor. Older people are conscious of talk about the problem of old age, the plague of an ageing population. They are referred to as a burden for the young to carry. There is also a widespread fear of old age fear of l!heimer"s disease, fear of becoming helpless and dependent, fear of isolation and the loss of mobility, fear of having to go into a home, fear of dwindling resources ... Transport is a fundamental problem in rural areas# unless you are rich you can"t get about if you"re a person who doesn"t drive. Older (eo(le ta%in# (art in a consultation. $n residential homes, a variety of issues around access to information can lead to e%clusion. One home had various policies printed in miniscule font and pinned high up on the wall in the home"s reception area. &any homes offer no access for residents to daily newspapers, maga!ines, 'ournals or phone calls. newly admitted resident was an%ious and tearful because her daughter was undergoing surgery for an aggressive cancer, and wanted to phone the hospital to find out how the operation had gone. (he was denied access to a phone, and told a member of staff would ring the hospital later in the day. Obser)ations from )isits to 'omes Overcoming (arriers to older people9s inclusion Positi)e ste(s s'ould be ta%en to desi#n and de)elo( inclusi)e forms of su((ort and care for older (eo(le ;isabled and older (eo(le s'ould 'a)e a wide ran#e of access (oints and o((ortunities to influence and s'a(e t'eir su((ort ser)ices. 1easures to alle)iate a#e-related (o)erty and increase (eo(le?s access to t'e widest ran#e of resources s'ould recei)e 'i#'er (riority. &'e ;i#nity and 3es(ect (ro#rammes s'ould be stron#ly (romoted as measures to encoura#e older (eo(le?s social inclusion and em(owerment. 0cti)e media and (ublic education strate#ies s'ould illustrate wide-ran#in# and inno)ati)e o((ortunities for includin# disabled and older (eo(le. Inter-#enerational (roDects 'a)e demonstrated creati)e ways in w'ic' youn# and older (eo(le can benefit from in)ol)ement wit' eac' ot'er. Pa#e !3 of "# &'ere are many ways of (romotin# and (ro)idin# an enablin# en)ironment. 7istenin# to t'e indi)idual Pro)idin# information in accessible format 1a%in# sure you use lan#ua#e and words t'ey understand Positi)e re(resentation of (eo(le wit' disabilities 3aisin# awareness and education ,'allen#in# attitudes ,'allen#in# discriminatory actions or (ractice wit'in or outside t'e ser)ice Pa#e !/ of "# *ask A 0odels of disa(ilit, ,om(lete t'e table in relation to t'e medical and social models of disability. 8minimum 50 words for eac' (art9 80ssessment ,riteria 1.1; 1.29 O)er)iew of t'e medical model of disability O)er)iew of t'e social model of disability From the medicals model point of view, disabled person are the problem. This model primarily justifes the disability. It sees disability purely as a problem of the individual, without any discrimination between the impairment faced and the disability itself. The medical model of disability focuses on the lack of physical, sensory or mental functioning, and uses a clinical way of describing an individuals disability. From the socials model point of view disabled people want the same chances and opportunities in their life as nondisabled people! education, employment, relationships, decisions about the issues that a"ect their lives. The social model helps disabled people to understand the situation. They are challenging people to give up the idea that disability is a medical problem re#uiring $treatment, but to understand instead that disability is a problem of e%clusion from ordinary life. &'e main features of t'is model &'e main features of t'is model &isabled people are by defnition then dependent on others to help them and decide on care'treatment for their disability. &isability is a tragedy, and focuses on what a person cannot do. These results in segregation of disability, giving anyone perceived as di"erent a label due to the f%ation of (normality) by society *referring to people by their disability+ (hes a &owns baby,) (shes the dwarf),, lack of individual respect and the ignorance of cultural, social and institutional barriers that disabled people face in trying to lead their own independent lives. The understanding and acceptance of the social model of disability by nondisabled people builds a community of allies that speeds the progress of attitudinal change. This in turn will have a positive impact on creating a barrierfree society that will gain the full beneft of the talents and contributions of all its citi-ens, and in which disabled people will take their rightful place in education, the workforce and all aspects of community life. .emoving barriers for disabled people usually benefts everyone+
Pa#e ! of "# ;escribe 'ow eac' of t'e models 'as de)elo(ed o)er time 8minimum 50 words9 80ssessment ,riteria 1.39 If you 'a)e internet access clic% on t'is lin% to find out more about t'e timeline of c'an#e O select Section &wo 'tt(/66www.scie.or#.u%6(ublications6elearnin#6(erson6(erson016resource6indeA.'tml 1edical model The medical model is defned by the international classifcation of impairments, disabilities and handicaps developed in /012 by the 3orld 4ealth 5rgani-ation. &uring the /062s and /072s were formed new groups of persons with disabilities and they started to challenge the way in which they were treated and regarded within society. The medical model is based on the pathology of the individual and how any medical intervention can reduce or correct the impairment. 8fter years in /006 of direct action by disabled people, the government allowed direct payments. 9entres for independent living are established for disabled people and people who may need to use social care like older people and people with mental health problems. Social model The origins of the :ocial model of disability can be traced to the /062s. The approach behind the model is traced to the civil rights'human rights movements of the /062s. In /07;, the <= organi-ation <nion of the >hysically Impaired 8gainst :egregation *<>I8:, claimed that the disabled people are unnecessarily isolated and e%cluded from full participation in society.? In /01@, the disabled academic Aike 5liver coined the phrase ?social model of disability?. 4e focused on the idea of an individual model versus a social model, derived from the distinction originally made between impairment and disability by the <>I8:. The ?social model? was e%tended and developed by academics and activists in the <=, <: and other countries, and e%tended to include all disabled people, including those who have learning diBculties ' learning disabilities ' or who are mentally handicapped, or people with emotional, mental health or behavioural problems. 5or eac' of t'e models #i)e one eAam(le to s'ow 'ow t'e a((roac' mi#'t affect eac' of t'e followin# as(ects of an indi)idual?s life. 80ssessment ,riteria 1.49 1edical model .i)e one eAam(le to s'ow 'ow eac' a((roac' mi#'t affect eac' of t'e followin# as(ects Social model Pa#e !1 of "# The medical model of disability views disability as a $problem that belongs to the disabled individual. It is not seen as an issue to concern anyone other than the individual a"ected. Inclusion of t'e indi)idual bein# su((orted in society The social model of disability views disability as a society issue that concern everybody. The social model is more inclusive in approach C how disabled people can participate in activities on an e#ual footing with nondisabled people. This medical model approach is based on a belief that the diBculties associated with the disability should be should be the responsibility of the disabled person, and that the disabled person should make e%tra e"ort *perhaps in time and'or money, to ensure that they do not inconvenience anyone else. &'e reco#nition and (romotion of t'eir ri#'ts >osition that represents the social model is #uite the opposite C society can do to reduce, and remove, some of these disabling barriers, and that this task is the responsibility of society, rather than the disabled person. 8ccording to the medical model people with disabilities are not able to fully take control over their lives. For e%ample, If a wheelchair using student is unable to get into a building because of some steps, the medical model would suggest that this is because of the wheelch air, rather than the steps. >nablin# t'em to ta%e or resume control o)er t'eir li)es; t'is may re:uire informed consent and s'ared decision ma%in# 80utonomy9 The social model enables persons with disabilities to have greater control over their lives. The social model of disability would see the steps as the disabling barrier. This model draws on the idea that it is society that disables people, through designing everything to meet the needs of the majority of people who are not disabled. Pa#e !2 of "# Aedical model is not committed to meeting the needs of individuals. For e%ample, the visually impaired student cannot participate in the class discussion because a course leader will refused to produce a handout in a larger font. 3eco#nisin# and meetin# t'e needs of indi)iduals The social model is more inclusive in approach. 9ertain adjustments are made and this involves time or money, to ensure that disabled people are not e%cluded. For e%ample, a course leader who meets with a visually impaired member of the group before the beginning of a course to fnd out how handouts can be adapted so that the student can read them. Pa#e !5 of "# *ask 8 3eflecti)e account ,'oose a ser)ice t'at is (ro)ided for (eo(le wit' a disability. &'is may be t'e ser)ice you wor% for or any ot'er local ser)ice t'at you 'a)e %nowled#e of. 80ssessment ,riteria 2.1; 2.29 1. Outline t'e ser)ice (ro)ided by t'e or#anisation. $'o recei)es su((ort and for w'at disabilitiesM There are lot of services and supports for people with disabilities that Dale 4ouse specifcally provide to enable people who have disabilities to fully participate in society and community life. :ome such services and supports are mandated or re#uired by law, some are assisted by technologies that have made it easier to provide the service or support, and others are commercially available not only to persons with disabilities, but to everyone who might make use of them, such as! self care, comprehension and language, learning, mobility, capacity for independent living, therapeutic activities. 2. Pro)ide eAam(les of t'is ser)ice deli)ery t'at demonstrates t'e social model of disability. Dale 4ouses approach leads to individualised care. There are many ways of promoting and providing an enabling environment. 3e also provide information in accessible format and our sta" use simple language and words they understand. 3hen I start working with people with disability I realised how diBcult it can be to ensure information is accessible to all. :ome disabilities are relatively easy to provide accessible information for, but it felt unconscionable to be campaigning for all people with disabilities without providing information that could be understood by people with learning disabilities as well. Dale 4ouse o"er access for residents to daily newspapers, maga-ines, journals or phone calls. 3e o"er therapeutic activities suitable for people with severe dementia need to be encouraged. The focus tends to be on people with dementia with mild or moderate impairment and there is a need to develop and use a wider range of approaches and interventions, including forms of stimulation such as music, aromatherapy and massage. 3. Pro)ide eAam(les of t'is ser)ice deli)ery t'at demonstrates t'e medical model of disability. Pa#e !6 of "# 4. Pro)ide at least 5 eAam(les of 'ow your own (ractice (romotes inclusion. 80ssessment ,riteria 2.39 >eople with impairments are disabled because they are e%cluded from participation within the mainstream of society as a result of physical, organisational and attitudinal barriers. These barriers prevent them from gaining e#ual access to information, education, employment, public transport, housing and social or recreational opportunities. 4owever, recent developments promote inclusion. Dale 4ouse in many ways promote completely inclusion of persons with disabilities. They are taking part in a whole range of social activities C access to information through newspapers, television and maga-inesE a Flife story bookF or Fmemory bo%F of photos from the personFs past may be a useful way to help the person interact and reminisceE rela%ation techni#ues such as massage and aromatherapy can be e"ective and enjoyableE with familiar music someone with dementia may be able to sing or hum a favourite tune even after they have lost the ability to speakE facilities that support people with high support needs and a servicecentred approach which focuses on assessing needs and providing care as a series of tasks as a positive living environment! security, access, privacy and choice+ Once com(lete (lease ma%e sure t'at your details are on t'e front of t'e wor%boo% and t'en return it to your assessor/ OAfords'ire S%ills and 7earnin# Ser)ice Cni(art @ouse .arsin#ton 3oad ,owley OP4 2.= Pa#e "# of "#