Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
(
.
5
,hippingL
@eceiving
Inspection
6inished-Foods ,torage
7etail of 64,
cell on ne't
page.
6le'ible
4anufacturing
,ystem (64,)
+ell
4aintenance
9nd
+ustodial
*uality
+ontrol
Angineering
7esign
+omputer
+enter
9ccounting
2lant 4anager and ,taff
,ales and
4ar!eting
2urchasing
and
Inventory
+ontrol
2roduction
,cheduling
2ersonnel
9utomated 4aterial-
/andling ,ystem
@
a
"
4
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
2
a
r
t
s
,
t
o
r
a
g
e
2
a
c
!
a
g
i
n
g
0
o
r
!
+
e
n
t
e
r
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
T
e
s
t
i
n
g
,
a
l
t
<
a
t
h
(
/
e
a
t
T
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
)
B
i
l
6
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
y
s
t
e
m
1
(
.
5
1
(
.
5
2@B<MA4 6-.1 (+B8TI8CA7)
(b) 9ndromeda +orporation# 64, cell.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- #&
1.
.
(.
..
5.
+utting
/eading
,lotting
Thread-
ing
0ashing
2@B<MA4 6-. ((? 4I8CTA,)
4emorandum
7ate# Today
To# 2resident- 9ndromeda +orporation
6rom# I.4. ,tudent
,ubject# 8on-value-added costs
I have identified several activities in the company;s production process that may be non-
value-added activities- that is- activities that are not essential and do not add value to the
product. 9s a result- I believe the firm is incurring substantial non-value-added costs.
,everal of these costs are listed belo".
1. ,torage time
(a) @a" materials are ordered too far in advance of their use. They remain stored in
inventory.
(b) 6inished goods often are produced before they are needed for sale. They remain
stored in inventory.
. 0aiting time
2artially completed bolts are produced before the ne't production operation is ready
for them. The "or! in process sits "aiting in various holding areas.
(. 4ove time
Too much time is spent moving ra" material- "or! in process- and finished goods
from process to process.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-#' Solutions Manual
2@B<MA4 6-. (+B8TI8CA7)
.. Mabor force
Bur "or! force is larger than it needs to be. If "e purchased a fle'ible manufacturing
system- more of the "or! could be done by automated e&uipment. Aach production
employee "ould be able to handle several operations in an 64, cell.
I believe the firm can eliminate most of the non-value-added costs by installing
a fle'ible manufacturing system and an automated material-handling system. In
conjunction "ith these changes in manufacturing technology- the company should
adopt a just-in-time production and inventory management system. This system
"ould reduce inventories of all types and save the non-value-added costs of
unnecessary investment in ra" materials- "or! in process- and finished goods.
2@B<MA4 6-.( ((? 4I8CTA,)
1. If Ielifo Alectric Dehicle +ompany (IAD+B) implements a )demand pull) production
philosophy- both its planning and operating processes could e'perience the follo"ing
effects.
#lanning
2roduction planning "ill change from a centrali%ed batch function process to a
more decentrali%ed activity. In some cases- production teams "ill be responsible
for the entire production process of a product.
The method and timing of ho" the company prepares its production schedule
(including capacity re&uirements) "ill change to parallel the )demand pull)
approach as opposed to the )production push) approach.
The 2urchasing 7epartment "ill need to plan to have high-&uality- reliable- and
fle'ible suppliers "ho can &uic!ly deliver orders of varying si%es as needed.
Operations
+hange-over time (set-up time) "ill reduce lead times significantly.
9 !anban-li!e system "ill have to be implemented. 9 triggering device such as a
!anban card is necessary so that the department or cell !no"s "hen to begin
production.
Freater employee participation "ill result from cell production team arrangements.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- #(
2@B<MA4 6-.( (+B8TI8CA7)
. 6ive benefits to IAD+B in changing to a )demand pull) production operating
philosophy are as follo"s#
Mess re"or! and fe"er defective units because of cell-level accountability and
control and product problem solving at the cell level.
9 lo"er cash investment in inventory and plant space. /andling- storage-
insurance- brea!age- and obsolescence all "ill be lo"er.
4ore satisfied customers should result because of shorter lead times and higher
&uality.
Improved labor productivity as a result of rearranging the production process and
the creation of manufacturing cell teams.
9 reduction of the number of suppliers- leading to improved relationships and
communication.
(. ,ome of the behavioral effects of the proposed change at IAD+B on team
participation in planning and production include the follo"ing#
/igher team morale and motivation- since each cell team is responsible for all cell
production and "ill- therefore- have more control over their "or! and an increased
sense of o"nership.
/igher individual satisfaction- development- and motivation- as management "ill
encourage participation- training- and input on ho" to improve the product and
production process.
9 possible resistance to change by those employees "ho may feel insecure or
threatened by the change.
9 sense of partnership "ith management in achieving the goals and objectives of
the organi%ation.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-#) Solutions Manual
2@B<MA4 6-.. (5 4I8CTA,)
1. 9nnual financial impact#
@eturn on released funds
S(Q(-6??-??? - Q6??-???) ' 1OTNNNNNNNN Q(6?-???
,avings in insurance and property ta'esNNNNN :-???
Mease revenue ((?-??? s&uare feet ' :5O ' Q)NN. .5-???
7epreciation on remodeled facilities
(Q6??-??? 1? years)NNNNNNNNNNNN.. (6?-???)
,avings in "arranty and repair costsNNNNNN... 5-???
,alary savingsKNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN... (?-???
9dded stoc!out costsNNNNNNNNNNNNN... (:?-???)
,avings from JIT systemNNNNNNNNNN... Q(5:-???
K 8ote# The cost of the t"o transferred employees is e'cluded
because 9lliance "ill continue to have these individuals on
the payroll.
. 0ith a just-in-time purchasing system- companies avoid costly build-ups of ra"-
material inventories because materials and parts are ordered only "hen needed. The
suppliers under such a system are highly reliable and deliver &uality goods on time.
Thus- despite the absence of inventories that firms can rely on if needed- the
li!elihood of e'cessive stoc!outs is fairly lo".
(. Mong-term contracts under a JIT purchasing system set tight standards "ith respect
to the &uality of materials purchased. The &uality is high- "hich reduces the need
for incoming inspections.
.. Cnder a traditional purchasing system- goods are purchased (fre&uently in large
lots) and then placed in inventory until used. In contrast- "ith JIT- costly inventories
are avoided by having the materials arrive 1just-in-time3 to be issued to production.
4aterials are therefore purchased only "hen needed- "hich often translates into
numerous small ac&uisitions throughout the period.
2@B<MA4 6-.5 ((? 4I8CTA,)
1. 9ctivity-based management refers to the use of activity-based costing to improve
operations and eliminate non-value-added costs. These costs arise from non-value-
added activitiesUoperations that are either (a) unnecessary and dispensable or (b)
necessary but inefficient and improvable. 2ut simply- such activities can be
eliminated "ithout harming overall &uality- performance- or perceived value.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- #-
2@B<MA4 6-.5 (+B8TI8CA7)
. +ost of non-value-added activities#
Incoming receipts# Q(??-??? -??? purchase orders P Q15? per purchase
order
0arehousing# Q(6?-??? >-??? inventory moves P Q.? per move
Butgoing shipments# Q5-??? 15-??? shipments P Q15 per shipment
0arehousing# 55? moves ' Q.?NNNNNNN. Q-???
Butgoing shipments# 5? shipments ' Q15NN (-:5?
TotalNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Q5-:5?
(. A'tra inventory moves in the "arehouse may be caused by boo!s being shelved (i.e.-
stoc!ed) incorrectly- poor planning for the arrival and subse&uent
placementLstoc!ing of ne" titles- and other similar situations. A'tra shipments
"ould li!ely be the result of errors in order entry and order filling- goods lost in
transit- or damaged merchandise being sent to customers.
.. 9s the follo"ing figures sho"- the elimination of non-value-added activities allo"s
<oo!8et.+om to achieve the target-cost percentage for soft"are only.
9ctivity
+ost-7river
*uantity
O
<oo!s
O
,oft"are
+ost-7river
*uantity#
<oo!s
+ost-7river
*uantity#
,oft"are
Incoming
receiptsNN. -??? :?O (?O 1-.?? 6??
0arehousingN. >-??? =?O ?O 6-65?K 1-=??
Butgoing
shipmentsN 15-??? 5O :5O (-:5? 11-???KK
K (>-??? moves ' =?O) R 55?
KK (15-??? shipments ' :5O) R 5?
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-$. Solutions Manual
2@B<MA4 6-.5 (+B8TI8CA7)
<oo!s ,oft"are
Incoming receipts#
1-.?? purchase orders ' Q15?NNN.. Q1?-???
6?? purchase orders ' Q15?NNNN. Q >?-???
0arehousing#
6-65? moves ' Q.?NNNNNNNN... 66-???
1-=?? moves ' Q.?NNNNNNNN... :-???
Butgoing shipments#
(-:5? shipments ' Q15NNNNNNN 56-5?
11-??? shipments ' Q15NNNNNN. 165-???
Total costNNNNNNNNNNNNNN. Q5(-5? Q(:-???
+ost as a percentage of sales#
Q5(-5? Q(->??-???NNNNNNN 1(.65O
Q(:-??? Q-6??-???NNNNNNN 1.5=O
5. 9dditional cost cutting of Q5-5? is needed for boo!s to achieve the 1(O target of
Q5?:-??? (Q(->??-??? ' 1(O). Tools that the company might use include customer-
profitability analysis- target costing- value engineering- !ai%en costing-
benchmar!ing- and reengineering.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- $"
2@B<MA4 6-.6 (5? 4I8CTA,- 2MC, TI4A ,2A8T 9T F@B+A@E ,TB@A 987 <98I)
This is a chance to thin! carefully about ho" detailed and precise an activity analysis can
be. It;s also an opportunity to invo!e your sense of humor and air your pet peeves about a
couple of errands "e all have to do routinely.
There is clearly no single correct ans"er. @easonable ans"ers "ill vary "idely.
1. 9ctivity se&uences and lin!ages#
Frocery ,tore <an!
(1) ,trategically choose time of day-
!eeping in mind (a) ho" urgent need
is- (b) li!ely cro"ding- and (c) ho"
"ell stoc!ed the shelves "ill be
(1) ,trategically choose time of day
and branch location
() 7rive or "al! to store () +hoose among inside teller
"indo"- drive-up lane- or 9T4
(() 2ar! car (() 2ar! car
(.) 0al! to front door (.) 0al! to front door
(5) Fet cart$ search par!ing lot if
necessary
(5) 2repare ban!ing documents
(6) 0al! aisles to find items (6) 0ait in line
(:) @ead product labels (:) A'plain ban!ing needs to teller
(or operate 9T4)
(=) +ompare prices (=) 0ait "hile transaction is
completed
(>) ,elect items (>) +hec! teller;s (or 9T4;s) "or!
(1?) ,trategically choose chec!out line
(A'press lineG +ash onlyG 0hich one
is shortestG 0hich one is fastestG
0hich cler! is fastestG etc.)
(1?) Meave ban!
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-$# Solutions Manual
2@B<MA4 6-.6 (+B8TI8CA7)
(11) 0ait in line$ joc!ey for position if ne"
chec!out lane opens
(11) Meave par!ing lot
(1) Cnpac! cart
(1() Items are chec!ed out
(1.) Items are bagged (paper or plasticG)
(15) +arry out bags (or have bags carried
out)
(16) Moad car
(1:) Meave par!ing lot
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- $$
2@B<MA4 6-.6 (+B8TI8CA7)
. ,pecifying "hether an activity is value-added or non-value added often depends on
ho" "ell the business is organi%ed for the activity. 6or e'ample- some grocery stores
ma!e it easier to par! close to the entrance than do others. Thus- getting from your
car to the front door could be value-added or non-value-added- depending on ho"
convenient the store;s par!ing lot is. The designations of D9 or 8D9 "ill vary "idely-
depending on individual e'periences.
Frocery ,tore <an!
9ctivity D9 or 8D9 9ctivity D9 or 8D9
(1)
D9 (1)
D9
()
D9 ()
D9
(()
a
D9- 8D9 (()
a
D9- 8D9
(.)
a
D9- 8D9 (.)
a
D9- 8D9
(5)
b
D9- 8D9 (5)
i
D9- 8D9
(6)
c
D9- 8D9 (6)
j
8D9
(:)
d
D9- 8D9 (:)
!
D9- 8D9
(=)
d
D9- 8D9 (=)
l
8D9
(>)
D9 (>)
m
8D9
(1?)
e
8D9 (1?)
D9
(11)
e
8D9 (11)
h
D9- 8D9
(1)
D9
(1()
D9
(1.)
f
8D9
(15)
g
8D9
(16)
g
8D9
(1:)
h
D9- 8D9
a
7epends on the configuration of the par!ing lot in relation to the design of the
building and the location of the front door.
b
Fetting a cart in the store or by the front door- D9$ searching the par!ing lot- 8D9.
c
7epends on the store layout. The author is inclined to say 8D9- since it "ould be an
improvement if grocery stores "ould adopt a standard layout (e.g.- the soda al"ays in
aisle .- or the dairy-case pi%%a al"ays in aisle 6 on the end near the registers).
d
7epends on ho" convenient the store ma!es these tas!s. Interestingly- this is one
area "here the la" has helped the consumer. ,tores no" must display unit pricing
information- and food companies must include nutritional information on the labels of
many items.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-$% Solutions Manual
2@B<MA4 6-.6 (+B8TI8CA7)
e
This part of grocery shopping drives the author up the "all. 0hy not have all non-
e'press-lane customers "ait in one line and then feed into the ne't available chec!out
laneG This configuration is typical of ban!s- but the author has seen it done in only
one grocery store.
f
<agging can be simultaneous "ith chec!ing out- especially if bar code scanners are
in use.
g
The store could adopt the technology of an automated material-handling system
(94/,) here. <ags of groceries "ould be placed in bins "ith the customer;s number
indicated. Then the bins "ould be transported by conveyor to a location by the front
door. 0hen the customer drove up- a store employee "ould load the groceries into
the car. The author has seen this system in operation- but rarely.
h
7epends on the configuration of the par!ing lot.
i
7epends on ho" user-friendly the documents are.
j
8D9- but a lot better than in a typical grocery store. ,ee note (e) above.
!
7epends on the ban!;s operating procedures and level of teller training.
l
Alectronic operating systems process transactions much faster than do manual
systems.
m
8D9- because "e "ouldn;t have to chec! if errors "ere e'tremely rare or
none'istent.
(. T"o stri!ing e'amples of successful reengineering are the "idespread introduction of
bar code scanners by grocery stores (and other retailers) and 9T4s (automatic teller
machines) by ban!s. The introduction of electronic ban!ing (from the home) is
another emerging e'ample of reengineering in the ban!ing industry. ,imilarly- the
introduction of shopping services and telephone ordering by grocery stores
continues the re-engineering process in this industry. 9lso- many retail companies
are dramatically reengineering their sales and billing procedures due to the ever-
increasing use of buying via the internet.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- $&
2@B<MA4 6-.: ((? 4I8CTA,)
1. +ontribution margin of lost sales (?-???) units#
@evenue.................................................................................. Q1.??K
Dariable costs#
+osts of goods sold..................................................... Q ..5?K
,elling and administrative........................................... 1.??K
Total variable costs...................................................... Q 5.5?
Cnit contribution margin....................................................... Q 6.5?
Dolume of lost sales.............................................................. ?-???
Total contribution margin of lost sales...................... Q(1(?-???)
Bvertime premiums............................................................... (.?-???)
V
@ental savings....................................................................... 6?-???
@ental income from o"ned "arehouse
(1-??? s&. ft. .:5 Q1.5?)............................................ 1(-5??
Alimination of insurance....................................................... 1.-???
Bpportunity cost of funds released from inventory
investment#
Investment in inventory............................................... Q6??-???
Interest before ta'es.................................................... .? 1?-???
Astimated before-ta' dollar savings.................................... Q (:-5??
KTotal amount on the income statement >??-??? units
V
The cost of overtime premiums- Q.?-???- is less than the additional forgone contribution
margin if the overtime is not used (15-??? units Q6.5? P Q>:-5??). Therefore- the overtime
should be used.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-$' Solutions Manual
2@B<MA4 6-.: (+B8TI8CA7)
. +onditions that should e'ist in order for a company to install just-in-time inventory
methods successfully include the follo"ing#
Top management must be committed and provide the necessary leadership
support in order to ensure a company"ide coordinated effort.
9 detailed system for integrating the se&uential operations of the manufacturing
process needs to be developed and implemented. @a" materials must arrive "hen
needed for each subassembly so that the production process functions smoothly.
9ccurate sales forecasts are needed for effective finished-goods planning and
production scheduling.
2roducts should be designed to use standardi%ed parts to reduce manufacturing
time and decrease costs.
@eliable vendors "ho can deliver &uality ra" materials on time "ith minimum lead
time must be identified.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- $(
2@B<MA4 6-.= (.5 4I8CTA,)
1. T"o dimensional 9<+#
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-$) Solutions Manual
Cost Assignment "iew
@A,BC@+A +B,T,
9ssignment of resource costs
to activity cost pools
associated "ith
significant activities
#rocess "iew
9ctivity analysis
9ctivity evaluation
2A@6B@498+A
4A9,C@A,
(see re&. (.) for e'amples) @BBT
+9C,A,
(see re&. (() for
e'amples)
9+TIDITE
T@IFFA@,
(see re&. () for e'amples)
9ssignment of activity
costs to cost objects
using second-stage
cost drivers
+B,T B<JA+T,
(2roduct lines# coo!ing
utensils- table"are-
flat"are)
1 ( . 5 6
: = > 1?
11 1
1( 1. 15
16
9+TIDITIA,
2@B<MA4 6-.= (+B8TI8CA7)
. Triggers for selected activities#
9ctivity
8umber Trigger
() @eali%ation by purchasing personnel that they do not fully understand the
part specifications
(>) @eali%ation by purchasing personnel that the ordered part "ill be (or may
be) late in arriving
(11) @eceipt of order
(1) 7iscovery during inspection that parts do not meet specifications
(1() 7iscovery that parts do not satisfy intended purpose
(. 2ossible root causes#
9ctivity
8umber 2ossible @oot +ausesK
() Cnclear specifications
Incomplete specifications
+lear- but apparently "rong- specifications
Cndertrained purchasing personnel
(>) Dendor delay
7elay in placing order
6ailure by purchasing personnel to ma!e deadline clear
(11) Cse of vendor that has not been fully certified as a reliable supplier
+ritical importance of parts
(1) 4isspecification of parts
Arror by purchasing personnel in placing order
Dendor error
Inspector error
(1() 4isspecification of parts
Incomplete specifications
2oor product design
Arror by purchasing personnel in placing order
Dendor error
KThis list is not necessarily complete. Bther root causes may e'ist.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- $-
2@B<MA4 6-.= (+B8TI8CA7)
.. ,uggested performance measures#
9ctivity
8umber 2erformance 4easures
(5) 9verage price paid
(6) 8umber of vendors
8umber of vendors that are precertified as dependable
(1?) 2ercentage of orders received on time
9verage delay for delin&uent orders
(1) 8umber of orders returned
2ercentage of orders returned
(16) 9verage dollar value tied up in parts inventory
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-%. Solutions Manual
2@B<MA4 6-.> (.? 4I8CTA,)
1. The net cash savings reali%ed by 9gri+oHs ,ervice 7ivision as a result of the just-in-
time inventory program is Q.(-???- computed as follo"s#
+ash
,avings
(loss)
6unds released from inventory investment....................... Q.??-???
Interest.................................................................................. .15 Q6?-???
Insurance savings (Q=?-??? .6?)..................................... .=-???
0arehouse rental revenue
S(=-??? s&. ft. .:5) Q.5? per s&. ft.T........................... 15-???
0arehouse rental cost# no effect........................................ U
Transferred employees# no effect....................................... U
+ontribution of lost sales ((-=?? units at Q1?.??)K............. ((=-???)
Bvertime premium (:-5?? units at Q5.6?)
V
........................... (.-???)
8et cash savings.................................................................. Q.(-???
K+alculation of unit contribution margin#
@evenue (Q6-16?-??? =?-??? units)............................... Q.??
Mess variable costs#
+ost of goods sold (Q-66?-??? =?-??? units)..................... Q>.5?
,elling and administrative e'penses (Q:??-??? =?-??? units) .5? 1.??
+ontribution margin........................................................................ Q1?.??
V
The incremental cost of Q5.6? per unit for overtime is less than the additional Q1?.??
per unit contribution for the :-5?? units that "ould have been lost sales. Therefore- the
overtime hours should be used.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- %"
2@B<MA4 6-.> +B8TI8CA7)
. 6actors- other than financial- that should be considered before a company implements
a JIT inventory program include#
+ustomer dissatisfaction# ,toc!outs of finished goods or spare parts could result
in customers; do"ntime- "hich may be costly.
7istributor relations# ,toc!outs of spare parts or finished goods can impair the
manufacturer;s image "ith its distributors- "ho represent the direct contacts "ith
the ultimate customers.
,upplier dissatisfactions# 2lacement of smaller and more fre&uent orders can
result in higher material and delivery costs from suppliers. 9dditionally- "ith
changes in their production and procurement processes- suppliers may choose to
discontinue supplying to a just-in-time customer.
+ompetition# The mar!etplace "ill determine the impact of service degradation
due to stoc!outs. <rand loyalty can deteriorate "hen service standards are
lo"ered. Therefore- it is crucial that before adopting JIT- management thin!
through all the implications. It is important to maintain the company;s prior service
standards and if possible to improve on them.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-%# Solutions Manual
2@B<MA4 6-5? (5? 4I8CTA,)
1. 2redetermined overhead rate P
hours labor - direct budgeted
overhead ing manufactur budgeted
P
hr ?-???
Q1-.>6-???
P Q:..=? per hr.
. There is no single correct response to this re&uirement. Bne reasonable response is
sho"n in the follo"ing table. Bverhead costs are categori%ed into nine cost pools
designated (a) through (i). +ost drivers are identified as follo"s#
(a) 2roduction (in units)
(b) @a"-material cost
(c) 6actory space
(d) 4achine hours
(e) 2roduction runs
(f) ,hipments of finished goods
(g) ,hipments of ra" materials
(h) 8umber of different ra" materials and parts used in a product
(i) Angineering specifications and change orders
(. ,ee the follo"ing table.
.. ,ee the follo"ing table.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- %$
2@B<MA4 6-5? (+B8TI8CA7)
@e&. () @e&. (() @e&. (.) @e&. (6)
Bverhead Item
+ost 2ool
and
+ost 7river
2roduction
9ctivity
+andidate
for
Alimination
7irect
+osts of an
64, +ell
,upervision.................................................. h process
4achine maintenanceUlabor..................... d process J
4achine maintenanceUmaterials.............. d process J
Alectrical po"er........................................... d process J
8atural gas (for heating)............................. c process
6actory supplies.......................................... a process J
,etup labor.................................................. e process J
Mubricants.................................................... d process J
2roperty ta'es............................................. c process
Insurance..................................................... c process
7epreciation on manufacturing
e&uipment................................................ d process J
7epreciation on truc!s and for!lifts.......... b move J J
7epreciation on material conveyors.......... b move J
<uilding depreciation.................................. c process
Frinding "heels.......................................... a process J
7rill bits........................................................ a process J
2urchasing................................................... b process J
0aste collection.......................................... a process J J
+ustodial labor............................................ c process
Telephone service....................................... h process J
Angineering design..................................... i process J
Inspection of ra" materials........................ g inspection J
@eceiving..................................................... g process J
Inspection of finished goods...................... a inspection J
2ac!aging.................................................... a process J
,hipping....................................................... f move J
0ages of parts cler!s (find parts for
production departments)....................... h storage J J
0ages of material handlers........................ b move J J
6uel for truc!s and for!lifts........................ b move J J
7epreciation on ra"-material
"arehouse............................................... b storage J
7epreciation on finished-goods
"arehouse............................................... a storage J
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-%% Solutions Manual
2@B<MA4 6-5? (+B8TI8CA7)
5. 9ctivity accounting identifies the costs and other performance measures that pertain
to significant activities in the firm. Identification of activities and their costs helps
management to identify and e'amine non-value-added costs. 6or e'ample-
management may be able to eliminate (or significantly reduce) the cost of fuel and
depreciation for the truc!s and for!lifts and the "ages of material handlers by
installing an automated material-handling system. ,imilarly- adoption of a JIT
approach to production could enable management to eliminate or reduce the "ages of
parts cler!s and the depreciation on the t"o "arehouses.
6. ,ee the preceding table (right-hand column).
:. 9lmost all of the costs that are not traceable to an 64, cell are general facility costs-
such as factory depreciation- property ta'es- and insurance. These costs could be
allocated to departments and 64, cells on the basis of factory space usage. Then the
costs "ould be reallocated from these "or! centers to products in a t"o-stage
allocation process.
=. +omputation of pool rate#
@eceiving...................................................................................................... Q?-???
Inspection of ra" material........................................................................... ?-???
Total............................................................................................................... Q.?-???
2ool rate P
driver cost of level budgeted
cost budgeted
P
.??
Q.?-???
P Q1?? per shipment
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- %&
2@B<MA4 6-51 (.? 4I8CTA,)
1. +ustomer-profitability analysis#
Trace
Telecom
+alte'
+omputer
,ales revenue...................................................................... Q1>?-??? Q1(-=??
+ost of goods sold.............................................................. =?-??? 6-???
Fross margin....................................................................... Q11?-??? Q 61-=??
,elling and administrative costs#
Feneral selling costs.................................................... Q .-??? Q 1=-???
Feneral administrative costs....................................... 1>-??? 16-???
+ustomer-related costs#
,ales activity........................................................... =-??? 6-???
Brder ta!ing............................................................. (-??? .-???
,pecial handling...................................................... .?-??? (?-???
,pecial shipping...................................................... >-??? 1?-???
Total selling and administrative costs............................... Q1?(-??? Q =.-???
Bperating income................................................................ Q :-??? Q (-?? )
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-%' Solutions Manual
2@B<MA4 6-51 (+B8TI8CA7)
. +ustomer-profitability graph#
+ustomer Bperating Income (in dollars)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- %(
-5-???
-?-???
-15-???
-1?-???
-5-???
?
5-???
1?-???
15-???
?-???
5-???
Q:-???
Q(-??)
+ustomer
Trace
Telecom
+alte'
+omputer
2@B<MA4 6-5 (.5 4I8CTA,)
1. +ustomer-profitability profile (supporting details in the table follo"ing the profile)#
+umulative Bperating Income as a
2ercentage of Total Bperating Income
K+ustomers ran!ed by operating income.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-%) Solutions Manual
?O
1?O
?O
(?O
.?O
5?O
6?O
:?O
=?O
>?O
1??O
11?O
1?O
1 ( . 5 6 : =
+ustomersK
2@B<MA4 6-5 (+B8TI8CA7)
,upporting details for customer-profitability profile#
+ustomer
8umber
a
+ustomer
Bperating
2rofit
+umulative
Bperating
2rofit
+umulative
Bperating
2rofit as a
2ercentage of
Bperating
Income
(1) 8et"or!-9ll- Inc. Q>(-??? Q >(-??? ((O
() Folden Fate ,ervice 9ssociates :1-??? 16.-??? 5>O
(() Fraydon +omputer +ompany 6?-??? .-??? =?O
(.) 4id-,tate +omputing +ompany .-??? 66-??? >5O
(5) Trace Telecom
b
:-??? :(-??? >=O
(6) The +alifornia Froup 6-??? :>-??? 1??O
(:) Tele-Install- Inc. (1=-???) 61-??? >.O
(=) +alte' +omputer
c
(-??) (=-=?? =6O
a
+ustomer numbers are ran!ed by operating income.
b
6rom solution to preceding problem.
c
6rom solution to preceding problem.
. 4emorandum
7ate# Today
To# I. ,ellit- Dice 2resident for 4ar!eting
6rom# I. 4. ,tudent
,ubject# +ustomer-profitability profile
The attached customer-profitability profile sho"s that t"o of our customer relationships are
unprofitable (Tele-Install- Inc. and +alte' +omputer). 9s the profile sho"s- over half of our
operating income is generated by our t"o most profitable customer relationships- and >5
percent of our operating profit is generated by just half of our customers.
9n activity-based costing analysis of customer-related costs provided the data for the
customer-profitability analysis portrayed in the profile.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- %-
2@B<MA4 6-5( (.? 4I8CTA,)
1. @eferring to the specific ethical standards for management accountants of
competence- confidentiality- integrity- and objectivity- 4arie 0aters violated the
follo"ing standards of ethical conduct "hen she as!ed 9ndre" 6ulton to suppress
pertinent information.
Competence. 4arie 0aters- controller- has a responsibility to#
2repare complete and clear reports and recommendations after appropriate
analyses of relevant and reliable information.
2erform professional duties in accordance "ith relevant la"s- regulations- and
technical standards.
In this instance- 0aters; re&uest to 6ulton- the assistant controller- to suppress
information about the component failures is unethical. This action !eeps both 0aters
and 6ulton from performing their duties in accordance "ith technical standards and
has a favorable impact on earnings as re&uested by Jac! 4arch- vice president of
manufacturing. The reported financial information- "ith the omission- lac!s relevance
and reliability for decision ma!ing. 4anagement does not have a clear solution to
overcome the component failure problem.
Confidentiality. 7oes not apply.
+ntegrity2 0aters has a responsibility to#
@efrain from either actively or passively subverting the attainment of the
organi%ation;s legitimate and ethical objectives.
+ommunicate unfavorable as "ell as favorable information and professional
judgments or opinions.
0aters; re&uest is unethical since she has responsibilities to report all information of
use to decision ma!ers in the company. ,he should protect the overall interests and
goal attainment of @esolute Alectronics +orporation by encouraging further study of
the problem by her staff- informing her superiors of this matter- and "or!ing "ith
others to find solutions.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-&. Solutions Manual
2@B<MA4 6-5( (+B8TI8CA7)
Ob3ectivity. 0aters has a responsibility to#
7isclose fully all relevant information that could reasonably be e'pected to
influence intended users; understanding of the reports- comments- and
recommendations presented.
0aters; re&uest is unethical because it "ould suppress information that could
influence an understanding of the results of operations. 0aters is also not
communicating information objectively by "ithholding information about the
contingent liability.
. The steps that 9ndre" 6ulton- assistant controller- could follo" to resolve this
situation are as follo"s#
6ollo" the established policy on ethical conduct at @A+- if a policy e'ists.
6ulton has discussed the matter "ith 0aters. If a satisfactory solution is not found
and losses continue to mount- 6ulton should discuss it again "ith 0aters and may
"rite a report detailing the probable economic effects of the situation and
mentioning 0aters; re&uest to suppress the component failures.
6ulton should advise 0aters that he intends to ta!e the matter further and discuss
the issue "ith her superior. If the matter is not resolved satisfactorily- 6ulton
should continue up through higher levels in the organi%ation (eventually to the
board of directors) until the matter is resolved.
6ulton should clarify the relevant concepts "ith a confidential and objective
advisor to obtain an understanding of possible courses of action.
If- after e'hausting all internal revie" levels- the ethical conflict still e'ists- 6ulton
may have no recourse but to resign and "rite an informative memorandum to the
appropriate organi%ational representative.
A'cept "here legally prescribed- communication of such problems to authorities
or individuals not employed or engaged by the organi%ation is not considered
appropriate.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- &"
2@B<MA4 6-5. (.5 4I8CTA,)
1. ,ee the graph on the follo"ing page.
. ,ee the graph on the follo"ing page.
(. ,ee the graph on the follo"ing page.
.. ,ee the graph on the follo"ing page.
5. ,ee the graph on the follo"ing page.
6. Iai%en costing see!s to lo"er costs during the manufacturing phase through
continuous improvement in the production process. +osts are lo"ered through
constant small betterment activities- "hich every employee in the company is trying
to achieve.
<y lo"ering its costs and improving &uality through continuous improvement
efforts- the company "ill be in a better position to compete in the global mar!et on
both price and &uality.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-&# Solutions Manual
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- &$
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-&% Solutions Manual
2roblem 6-55 (6? minutes)
1. 2ic!"ic! 2aper +ompany# +urrent production process.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- &&
+onveyor
,hipping
Moading 7oc!
Mabeling
<uilding
Mabeled
rolls
stored
Mabeling
6or!lifts
0inding
machines
+alenders
(polishing)
@efining
area
(treatment
of
fibers)
2aper
machines
2allets
(rolls stored)
2lant
<uilding
7igester
6ibers
stored
7epressuri%ed
blo" tan!
2allets
(separated fibers
stored)
6or!lifts
/arvested trees
@ail
6lume
0oodyard
(logs stored)
2lant
<uilding 1
,mall truc!s
7ebar!er
+hipping
machines
<ins
(chips stored)
2@B<MA4 6-55 (+B8TI8CA7)
. +andidates for non-value-added costs#
(a) ,torage time. Mogs in the "oodyard and finished rolls of paperboard in the
labeling building are stored for a long time.
(b) 4ove time# 9 lot of effort and employee time is devoted to moving "or! in
process. Mogs are unloaded from the railroad cars and subse&uently reloaded
into the flume. ,mall truc!s are used to transport chips to the digester in plant
building . 6or!lifts are used to transport separated fibers to the refining area.
6inally- for!lifts are used to transport rolls of paperboard to the labeling
building.
(c) 0ait time# 0or!-in-process inventory "aits at several points in the production
process until the ne't operation is ready to receive it. 6irst- logs are stored in
the "oodyard. ,econd- chips are stored in bins near the chipping machines.
Third- fibers are stored near the digester. 6ourth- separated fibers are stored on
pallets near the depressuri%ed blo" tan!. 6ifth- unlabeled rolls of paperboard
are stored on pallets near the "inding machines. 9s the problem states- the
partially processed product sometimes "aits for t"o to three days bet"een
production operations.
(d) Mabor force# The labor force is probably larger than necessary. 4uch of this
e'cess labor is involved in material-handling operations.
(. 2lan for revised production process#
The plan for a ne" production process involves the follo"ing !ey changes#
(a) 7irect transfer of harvested trees from railroad cars to the flume.
(b) Installation of an automated material-handling system (94/,) to move all "or!
in process after it enters plant building 1.
(c) 8o storage of "or! in process bet"een production stages. Implementation of a
pull method for production scheduling.
(d) 8e" construction to house the 94/, bet"een buildings.
(e) 4ovement of the labeling machines to the other end of the labeling building-
closer to the "inding machines.
(f) @eduction of finished-goods inventory.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-&' Solutions Manual
2@B<MA4 6-55 (+B8TI8CA7)
9 diagram of the ne" process is sho"n on the ne't page. The steps in the ne"
process are as follo"s#
(1) /arvested trees arrive as needed for production by rail in the "oodyard and are
transferred to the flume.
() Mogs are moved by a flume into the plant "here they pass through a debar!er
and are cut up into chips.
(() The chips are transported by the 94/, to the digester.
(.) The chips then are placed in a digester- a large pressure coo!er "here heat-
steam- and chemicals convert the chips into moist fibers.
(5) The fibers are loaded onto the 94/,- "hich carries the fibers to a depressuri%ed
blo" tan!. This operation separates the fibers.
(6) The 94/, is used to carry the separated fibers to the refining area- "here the
fibers are "ashed- refined- and treated "ith chemicals and caustic substances
until they become pulp.
(:) The "ood pulp then enters the paper machines through a headbo'- "hich
distributes pulp evenly across a porous belt of forming fabric.
(=) 0ater is removed from the pulp by passing the pulp over a "ire screen.
(>) 9dditional "ater is removed from the pulp in a series of presses.
(1?) 7riers then remove any remaining "ater from the pulp.
(11) The 94/, carries the sheets of pulp to the calenders. The thin- dry sheets of
pulp are then smoothed and polished by the calendars.
(1) The paperboard is "ound into large rolls and placed on the 94/,.
(1() The rolls are labeled and stored for shipment in the labeling building. Inventory
is minimi%ed.
(1.) The rolls of paperboard are shipped to customers from the ne" loading doc! in
the labeling building.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- &(
2@B<MA4 6-55 (+B8TI8CA7)
2ic!"ic! 2aper +ompany# 8e" production process.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-&) Solutions Manual
,mall &uantities of
labeled rolls
stored
Mogs transferred from
railroad car to flume
/arvested trees
@ail
6lume
,hipping
8e" Moading 7oc! Moading 7oc!
Mabeling
machines
(ne" location)
+hipping
machines
9utomated
4aterial
/andling
,ystem
(94/,)
2lant
<uilding 1
2lant
<uilding 7igester
7epressuri%ed
blo" tan!
8e" construction to
connect buildings
+alenders
(polishing)
@efining
area
(treatment
of
fibers)
2aper
machines
8e"
construction
to connect
buildings
7ebar!er
0inding
machines
Mabeling
<uilding
SO*!TIONS TO ,ASES
+9,A 6-56 (.5 4I8CTA,)
1. 9 proliferation of part numbers means that the company may be ordering and stoc!ing
many more types of uni&ue parts than it needs to. Bverordering and overstoc!ing
entail more costs in purchasing- receiving- inspecting- storing- and material handling
than might other"ise be necessary.
. Mong production cycles may indicate that the production process is inefficient.
Inefficiencies- in turn- imply non-value-added costs.
(. 9n 9<+ system can be used to help reduce costs by focusing attention on the
problem of part number proliferation.
a. The division;s strategy is to be a product differentiator. It used to be a price
leader- but no" it must meet the mar!et price- since ne" competitors have
entered the mar!et.
b. 2rices are currently being set by the mar!et.
c. 4anagement;s primary need is cost reduction so that the division can meet the
mar!et-driven price. 4ore accurate product costs- "hile al"ays desirable- are
not the primary need here. The division "ill not be able to use cost-based
pricing any"ay.
d. +ost reduction is the current goal of management.
e. 2art number proliferation is (at least partially) to blame for high production
costs.
f. The design engineers- "ho strive for )engineering elegance) in their product
designs are largely to blame for part number proliferation. <y designing
products )from scratch-) engineers often specify ne" partsthat is- parts that
the division does not already use in its other products.
g. 9n 9<+ system can help solve the problem of part number proliferation by
focusing attention on it. Bne method of directing attention to this problem is to
choose a cost driver that ma!es the design engineers a"are of the implicit costs
from specifying ne" uni&ue parts in a product design.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- &-
+9,A 6-56 (+B8TI8CA7)
.. The objective is to find a cost driver that charges to a product the costs associated
"ith purchasing- receiving- inspecting- storing- and handling the parts used in the
product. 2ossible candidates for such a driver include (1) direct-material cost- ()
number of parts- and (() number of part numbers.
7river number (()- the number of part numbers (i.e.- the number of different
parts in a product)- "ould probably "or! the best. It focuses most directly on the
problem at hand# part number proliferation. <y charging a product for all the myriad
support costs that go along "ith using many different types of parts- the design
engineers "ill see more clearly the adverse cost effect of using ne" parts in a product
design. They "ill be encouraged- "hen it is possible- to use parts that the division
already stoc!s. The hope is that the design engineers "ill begin to ma!e cost-effective
trade-offs bet"een engineering elegance and product cost.
5. The ans"er to this &uestion is similar in spirit to the ans"er to re&uirement (.). The
9<+ system could use cycle time as a cost driver in assigning production-line costs
to products. Thus- the longer a product;s cycle time- the longer its assigned product
cost. In this manner- the costing system focuses attention on a problem that
management feels is unnecessarily inflating production costs.
6. In the 9erotech e'ample used in +hapters 5 and 6- the fundamental role of the 9<+
system "as to achieve more accurate product costs by eliminating (or minimi%ing) the
problem of cost distortion that is so common in traditional- volume-based product-
costing systems. The role of the 9<+ system here is fundamentally different. The
objective of the 9<+ system is to modify be)avior2 <y choosing cost drivers that
focus attention on the implicit costs of part number proliferation and long production
cycles- the system encourages employees to change the "ay they do their "or!. The
design engineers- for e'ample- are encouraged to use common parts in product
designs "henever possible rather than al"ays designing from scratch to achieve
engineering elegance.
+9,A 6-5: ((? 4I8CTA,)
1. 9fter the target price is established- in accordance "ith the ne" vehicle models;
performance characteristics- the target profit for the vehicle model must be set.
. The issues to be considered in setting a ne" vehicle modelHs target profit "ould
include the follo"ing#
The target retail price and projected sales volume.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-'. Solutions Manual
+9,A 6-5: (+B8TI8CA7)
The profit achieved on the current vehicle model being redesigned.
The profit achieved on other comparable vehicle models.
The level of investment in the vehicle model.
(. 9fter the target retail price and target profit have been set- the target cost is computed
as the target price minus the target profit.
.. Dalue engineering accomplishes the really hard "or! of target costing# bringing the
ultimate production cost of the ne" vehicle model into line "ith the target cost. Dalue
engineering is a cost-reduction and process-improvement techni&ue in "hich
information is collected about a product;s design and production process- and
attributes of the design and process are then e'amined to identify candidates for
improvement.
The concept of value engineering can be related to all or most of the steps
depicted in the diagram given in the problem. 6or e'ample- the styling "ould be
e'amined for "ays to trim cost "ithout diminishing the vehicle;s attractiveness. The
test model dra"ings "ould be carefully scrutini%ed for "ays to cut costs- such as
using common parts instead of uni&ue parts. 6or e'ample- an automobile
manufacturer that has 5? different headlight housings "ill incur more cost overall
than a manufacturer that uses 1? different housings. The facility and e&uipment used
in the vehicle;s production "ould be e'amined for potential improvements. The test
model (prototype) "ould be carefully scrutini%ed for potential improvements and
opportunities for cost savings. In short- every aspect of the ne" vehicle model;s
design and production process "ould be analy%ed through value engineering for
improvements and potential cost savings.
5. If the value-engineering team is unable to trim cost do"n to the target cost- the result
"ill be one of the follo"ing#
The target price "ill be reconsidered (and possibly raised).
The target profit "ill be reduced.
The basic development proposal for the ne" vehicle model "ill be revised.
9nother attempt to trim the cost using value engineering "ill be made.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- '"
,!RRENT ISS!ES IN MANA0ERIA* A,,O!NTIN0
I,,CA 6-5=
)4AJI+B 0A9DA, 4B@A TIA,--8B. 1 I8 F9@4A8T,- IT 4IF/T ,BB8 <A TB2 TAJTIMA
,BC@+A-) %4( 5A66 7%*((% 8O9*:A6- 9CFC,T 1- ???- JBAM 4IMM498.
1. 9 just-in-time inventory system !eeps minimum inventory on site. Inventory
arrives from vendors just in time to fill orders and ma!e sales.
. 9 just-in-time inventory system allo"s greater managerial control and &uic!
turnaround on changes in orders.
I,,CA 6-5>
)9, T/A TAMA+B4, A4A@FA 987 +CT +B,T,- ,A@DI+A I, B6TA8 9 +9,C9MTE-) %4(
5A66 7%*((% 8O9*:A6- J98C9@E 1>- ???- @A<A++9 <MC4A8,TAI8 987
,TA2/98IA 8. 4A/T9.
1. 4erging companies are cutting fat- automating functions that humans used to
provide- and abandoning "hite glove services in order to please an increasingly
fic!le 0all ,treet. +ommunication problems often result. ,ometimes personnel do
not communicate "ith each other- and often their technology is not compatible.
<lending company cultures- procedures and policies sometimes presents problems.
. The cost-reduction methods discussed in the chapter are designed to cut costs
"ithout any loss in customer service or perceived value. /o"ever- implementing
cost reduction programs is a challenge- and in many cases- unintended reductions
in service or value do occur.
I,,CA 6-6?
)<CIMT 6B@ T/A MB8F /9CM-) B97+:(77 5((&- JCME (- ???- 4I+/9AM 9@87T.
2accar shuns many capital costs and !eeps asset costs lo". 0hen orders slac!en-
2accar can cut costs by furloughing employees at its union and nonunion plants- rather
than idling e'pensive e&uipment. <y using labor-intensive assembly plants- it holds
do"n capital investments- and this lets 2accar cut costs "ith layoffs "hen orders
slac!en. The company does no si%e up for pea!s- but ta!es care of pea!s "ith e'tra
shifts and some selective contracting. 2accar stays lean by purchasing :5 percent of
every 2eterbilt and Ien"orth truc! from outside vendors.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
6-'# Solutions Manual
I,,CA 6-61
)9MIA89TI8F +C,TB4A@, I,8;T 9M09E, 9 <97 I7A9- 498E 6I@4, 7I,+BDA@-) %4(
5A66 7%*((% 8O9*:A6- J98C9@E :- 1>>>- @I+I <@BBI,.
6irst Cnion profiles its customers according to a formula- "hich determines a
customer;s profitability to the ban!. 7ata for the formula is gathered from a myriad of
computer systems "ith profitable customers flagged as green- unprofitable customers
flagged as red- and in bet"een customers as yello". Freen customers are given
preferred treatment- "hile red customers incur additional charges for services provided
free to green customers. ,ome customers are told they no longer are eligible for
personal treatment. 9lthough denied by management- these measures often encourage
non-profitable customers to ta!e their business else"here. 0hen this happens- profits
increase since the bottom ? percent of customers account for a drain on profits by as
much as 5? percent- "hile the top one fifth of the customer base account for a large
share of the ban!Hs profitability.
I,,CA 6-6
)T/A FMB<9M ,IJ-) B97+:(77 5((&- J98C9@E 5- 1>>>- IAIT/ 89CF/TB8 987 I9@A8
MB0@E 4IMMA@.
1. 7esigning auto models "ith computers instead of traditional drafting methods is
called computer-aided design.
. +omputer-aided design allo"s auto manufacturers to develop vastly different
models from one basic chassis. This ne" technology has cut time to mar!et by one
third. It no" ta!es about 1. 1L months to bring a ne" design to mar!et as opposed
to the previous time of about 1 months.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Managerial Accounting, 5/e 6- '$