Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
AbstractThe use of active damping to reduce the total harmonic distortion (THD) of the line current for medium-voltage
(2.37.2 kV) high-power pulsewidth-modulation (PWM) currentsource rectifiers is investigated. The rectifier requires an LC filter
connected at its input terminals, which constitutes an LC resonant
mode. The lightly damped LC filter is prone to series and parallel resonances when tuned to a system harmonic either from the
utility or from the PWM rectifier. These issues are traditionally
addressed at the design stage by properly choosing the filter resonant frequency. This approach may result in a limited performance
since the LC resonant frequency is a function of the power system
impedance, which usually varies with power system operating conditions.
In this paper, an active damping control method is proposed for
the reduction in line current THD of high-power current-source
rectifiers operating at a switching frequency of only 540 Hz. Two
types of LC resonances are investigated: the parallel resonance excited by harmonic currents drawn by the rectifier and the series
resonance caused by harmonic pollution in the source voltage. It
is demonstrated through simulation and experiments that the proposed active damping control can effectively reduce the line-current THD caused by both parallel and series resonances.
Index TermsActive damping, active front-end (AFE) converter, current-source rectifier, pulsewidth-modulation (PWM)
rectifier, space-vector modulation (SVM).
I. INTRODUCTION
applications, utilizing switching frequencies of several kilohertz to damp out transient oscillations [4], [5]. High-power
medium-voltage current-source rectifiers conventionally use
symmetric gate-turn-off thyristors (GTOs) or gate-controlled
thyristors (GCTs) which have a usable switching frequency
in the hundreds of hertz. An active damping technique was
proposed for high-power low-switching-frequency applications
[6]. However, the technique was used on the inverter side to
achieve multimotor operation instead of total harmonic distortion (THD) reduction. In this paper, the effectiveness of active
damping at reducing the THD of the line current in both seriesand parallel-resonant modes is investigated.
Manuscript received December 31, 2003; revised March 10, 2004. Abstract
published on the Internet March 14, 2005. An earlier version of this paper was
presented at the 2004 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Aachen,
Germany, June 2026.
J. Wiseman is with Rockwell Automation Canada, Cambridge, ON N1R 5X1,
Canada (e-mail: jwiseman@ra.rockwell.com).
B. Wu is with Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada (e-mail:
bwu@ee.ryerson.ca).
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TIE.2005.843939
(1)
WISEMAN AND WU: ACTIVE DAMPING CONTROL OF A HIGH-POWER PWM CURRENT-SOURCE RECTIFIER
a resistor in parallel with the filter capacitor. In this configuration, the rectifier draws a damping current proportional to the
capacitor voltage
(2)
It should be noted that active damping is a much different
control scheme than active filtering. Active filtering is a much
more complicated process utilizing harmonic injection to eliminate or minimize harmonic distortion in the line current. By
contrast, active damping is used to improve the dynamics of the
lightly damped LC filter, thereby indirectly improving the THD
of the line current.
A. Frequency-Selective Active Damping
Previous work on current-source systems [4][6] has used active damping methods that provide damping for all frequencies
including the fundamental. The more practical implementation
of active damping for the current-source rectifier is to emulate
a resistor which damps all frequencies except the fundamental
[8]. This is mainly due to: 1) the fundamental component of the
damping current will result in an active power flowing into the
rectifier which will interfere with the control of the dc current;
2) the lowest LC resonant frequency is around 3.65 pu, which
will not excite resonances at the fundamental frequency; and
3) damping of fundamental quantities requires a large amount
of control effort which may saturate the modulation index. For
these reasons, damping of the fundamental component should
not be implemented.
B. Proposed Active Damping System
The proposed active damping control for pulsewidth-modulation (PWM) current-source rectifiers is shown in Fig. 2. Due
to the selection of the cutoff frequency of the input LC filter of
the rectifier, the dominant low-order harmonic in the line current
is the fifth. Therefore, the active damping loop will be injecting
primarily fifth harmonic current in steady state, along with current at the filter resonant frequency during transients. The frequency selectivity of the active damping is realized by transforming the three-phase capacitor voltage feedback from the stationary reference frame into the synchronous reference frame.
In this reference frame the capacitor voltage is represented as
a vector having and axes aligned with the reference frame.
The fundamental component of the capacitor voltage vector in
Fig. 3.
759
760
WISEMAN AND WU: ACTIVE DAMPING CONTROL OF A HIGH-POWER PWM CURRENT-SOURCE RECTIFIER
and resonant
761
the switching ripple. However, high resonant frequencies combined with a low active damping resistance reduce the stability
of the active damping loop. For this reason, active damping resistances below 1 pu are not shown because the small decrease
in THD is not significant compared to the reduction of system
stability. The effect of active damping resistance on system stability will be discussed in Section V.
Fig. 10. Simulated THD versus series resistance R and resonant frequency
f for series resonance without active damping.
762
and resonant
is used as shown in Fig. 11, especially when a low value of active damping resistance is employed.
V. SELECTION OF ACTIVE DAMPING RESISTANCE
As discussed earlier, a small value of the active damping reis preferred for minimizing the line current THD.
sistance
is too small, the active
However, if the damping resistance
damping loop gain becomes too high, and the active damping
is
system may become unstable. In addition, the choice of
also constrained by the limitations of the modulation index. This
is a function of the rectifier operating point and the harmonic
pollution levels in the system. When the dc current is small, a
will result in saturation of the modulation
small value for
index due to the normalization of the damping current with the
dc current. As the dc current approaches zero, the required active damping current will no longer be realizable due to extreme
saturation of the modulation index. This problem can be solved
by imposing a lower limit on the value of dc current used to normalize the active damping current reference.
Saturation of the modulation index may also occur when the
rectifier is producing a maximum dc output voltage. Under these
conditions, the active damping resistance should be increased.
Otherwise, the active damping compensation will actually degrade the line current waveform due to the distorted damping
current. An example of saturation of the modulation index can
is a constant
be seen in Fig. 3. In steady-state operation,
value in the axis. When there is significant fifth harmonic polwill be a vector that rotates at six times
lution in the system,
and
results in
the line frequency. The vector addition of
vector whose magnitude exceeds the maximum realizable value
of unity. This will significantly distort the active damping current that is produced by the rectifier. This saturation will also
cause undesirable interaction with the dc current control by reducing the effective dc output voltage. This phenomenon occurs
due to saturation. Nordue to the asymmetry imposed on
follows a circular trajectory and does
mally, due to the HPF,
not have any average value in the d or q axis. However, as shown
(3)
The small-signal model of the active damping loop can be
approximated with the assumption that the effect of the dc current ripple is negligible. The open-loop active damping system
can be modeled using the parallel filter impedance, the
, the total damping current delay
damping current gain
, and the dynamics of the HPF in Fig. 2. From this model, the
minimum damping resistance for stability of the approximated
system can be determined based on the gain and phase margins
of the open-loop gain equation
(4)
As an example, an idealized system with a clean source voltage
and a smooth dc current is considered. A filter resonant frepu,
pu), a sequency of 6 pu (
ries resistance of 0.5%, and a switching frequency of 540 Hz
are used. The total calculation time is 25 s, and the HPF cutoff
is 20 Hz. The gain and phase margins of the active damping
loop are plotted in Fig. 12 as a function of the active damping
resistance . Fig. 12 should not be confused with a frequency
response. Rather, it is the approximate gain and phase margin
of the active damping loop obtained from a set of frequency responses at different active damping resistances. It can be observed that the idealized system goes unstable with an active
damping resistance of around 0.55 or less. In general, the system
is easier to stabilize at lower resonant frequencies. The same
system with a resonant frequency of 4.5 pu instead of 6 pu becomes unstable with an active damping resistance of 0.32 pu.
In the practical system, the effects of saturation of the modulation index require a much larger active damping resistance than
the minimum required for stability. To allow for reasonable gain
and phase margin, and to prevent saturation of the modulation
index, the recommended minimum value for the active damping
resistor for this system is 1.0.
WISEMAN AND WU: ACTIVE DAMPING CONTROL OF A HIGH-POWER PWM CURRENT-SOURCE RECTIFIER
763
Fig. 12. Gain and phase margin versus active damping resistance R for
idealized rectifier system. (a) Gain margin. (b) Phase margin.
Fig. 14. Measured waveforms of the low-power PWM rectifier at 50% I and
40% V . (a) Without active damping. (b) With active damping.
764
Jason C. Wiseman (M03) received the B.Eng. degree in electrical engineering with honors from Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada, in 1997, and
the M.E.Sc. degree from the University of Western
Ontario, London, ON, Canada, in 2001.
In 2000, he joined Rockwell Automation
Canada, Cambridge, ON, Canada, as a Development Engineer. Currently, he is involved in
medium-voltage drive control and power electronics.
His research interests include pulsewidth modulation, control and signal processing techniques for
high-power/medium-voltage drives, and power conditioning equipment.