Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Where, = summation of return () of all individual period
= number of observations for which return has been measured
Volatility/Risk
Risk is the potential that a chosen action or activity (including the choice of inaction) will lead to a loss
(an undesirable outcome). The notion implies that a choice having an influence on the outcome exists
(or existed). Potential losses themselves may also be called "risks".
In finance, risk is the probability that an investment's actual return will be different than expected. This
includes the possibility of losing some or all of the original investment. In a view advocated by
Damodaran, risk includes not only "downside risk" but also "upside risk" (returns that exceed
Page | 4
expectations). Some regard a calculation of the standard deviation of the historical returns or average
returns of a specific investment.
Risk or volatility can be measured through standard deviation or co-efficient of variance. When
observations are in absolute term standard deviation is not much useful, than co-efficient of variance
should be used. In this research observation is daily return percentage hence standard deviation is used
to measure risk or volatility of return. Formula for standard deviation is
Literature Review
Schwert (1988) has also used standard deviation to measure risk. He had shown that the
standard deviation of both stock returns and industrial production growth are higher during
recessions than during expansions.
Schwert William G. (1990) has used daily return for his study. He had focused on the effect of
the 20 percent drop in stock prices on the volatility of stock market return. He had analysed the
behavior of daily returns before and after the 1987 crash was unusual relative to the experience
of over 100 years of daily data. While the 1987 crash was the largest one day percentage
change in prices in over 29000 observations, it was unusual in that stock market volatility
returned to low pre-crash levels quickly.
Ahmed Gauher and Syed Abdul Malik (2009), he had stated in his study that according to the
Indian establishments, India is not going to be much touched by the crisis if growth rate of
some 8 to 9 percent is going to hold good. But according to the first or preliminary symptoms,
the Indian Economy is also going to be hit by the crisis, as already there is a crisis of liquidity in
the economy and the estimates of the growth rates are also being lowered.
Page | 5
Kawai (2008), Sub-prime story: Bubble burst in 2008, collaps of the financial system of US,
affected global level.
Ravishankar B. and Mahesh Rajgopal (2009), has descibed several stages of financial crises in
US in following way:
1. Initial subprime crisis (June/July 2007)
2. Spillovers into other credit markets (July/August 2007)
3. Liquidity squeeze and forced reinter-mediation (August 2007)
4. Broad-based financial sector strain (Sept/Nov 2007)
5. Growth fears and dysfunctional markets (Jan/Feb 2008)
6. Continued deleveraging and deteriorating credit cycle (March-Sep. 2008)
7. Collapse of Investments Banks such as Merril Lynch etc.
The BSE Sensex has continued to bleed more out of panic and psychological reasons than for
others. In last few weeks (3-4) his study period BSE Sensex fell by almost 15%. It is also due to
shortage and dries up of capital from FII and FDI. I have also selected same period for my study.
Sandeep Kumar and Sweta Bakshi (2009), 1.3% industrial growth is the lowest IIP (Index of
Industrial Production) data ever registered since last ten years. April-august growth is 4.9%
which also lowest for the first five months of the financial year in 14 year period except 1998
and 2001. The Industrial growth in August of 2008 plummeted to mere 1.3% compared to
same month in 2007. This industrial slow down affected transport service too. Global recession
will also lead to less tourists coming to India. That will negatively affect tours and travels
industry. The global recession affected IT, automobile industry and export oriented firms
adversely.
Louis K.C.Chan, Jason Karceski and Josef Lakonishok (2000), Operating performance of large cap
growth stocks in last few years can not have been trigger for their huge stock returns. Over the
Page | 6
period 1996-98 period, large-cap growth stock earned a return of 34% a year, but their
operating performance for this period was not outstanding when compared with the past. The
growth rate (in terms of sales) for the three years was 6% a year but he average for these
companies was 10.3% for the entire sample period. It is not easy to continuously perform at
higher rate or increasing rate. The same thing happens with large-cap companies. They also
observed that Small-cap stocks have historically outperformed large-cap stocks and value
stocks have had higher return than growth stocks. For the selected period they have found that
small-cap stocks did well and small-cap value stocks did particularly well.
Poshakwale, S., & Theobald, M. (2004, May 8), The lead/lag relationship between portfolios
comprising large and small cap firms is analytically derived in terms of their speeds of
adjustment and degrees of thin trading. Using a number of Indian equity index series that differ
in their market capitalization characteristics, large cap indices are found to lead small cap
indices and to have higher speeds of adjustment towards intrinsic values.
Objectives
Primary Objectives
To know the risk and return of different capitalisation Stocks during different phases of
Indian stock market in India.
Secondary Objectives:
To study the movement of different indices of different capitalisation for the selected
period.
To know risk and return related to different stocks of different capitalisation during
different phases of stock market
To analyze volatility of different capitalisation stocks during different phases of stock
market in India
To identify most risky capitalisation stock with its return relationship
Page | 7
Research Methodology
Type of Research:
For my study I have applied Descriptive Research design, which helped me describing the fact
on the basis of my analysis of secondary data. I have collected daily price data of different
Indices of different Capitalisation of BSE i.e. Sensex, Mid-Cap Index and Small-Cap Index.
Analysis have been done on the basis of daily return, which is calculated on the basis of daily
price data.
Population:
For this study my population includes all different stocks of different capitalisations and value
of their daily prices which determines risk and return related to them from the date of their
listing in Stock Exchanges in India.
Sampling and Sample Frame:
For this study I have applied Judgmental Sampling. For study of different Capitalisation stock I
have selected different indices of Bombay Stock Exchange i.e. Sensex, Mid-Cap Index and Small-
Cap Index which may properly represents them. I have observed the period from 1
st
January
2007 to 31
st
December 2009 i.e. two year daily value of selected indices. This period represents
different phases of Stock Market viz. Bearish Trend, Consolidation Period and Bullish Trend.
Sample:
After determining two years period and careful study of chart of daily values of different indices
i.e. Small-Cap, Mid-Cap and Sensex, I had selected a particular period from 10
th
Sept 2008 to
19
th
May 2009, from the observed the period (1
st
January 2007 to 30 November 2009) for detail
analysis on the basis of certain concepts of technical analysis.
Data Collection
Secondary data of daily prices of different capitalisation stocks are collected from internet,
website www.bseindia.com.
Data Analysis
First of all I have used Technical analysis for the selection of data out of the Sample Frame. In
which support line and resistant line has been drawn on the basis of subjective analysis of trend
lines of selected Indices of different Capitalisation Stocks.
For the calculation of Return I have used Arithmetical Mean which represents expected return
and Risk is calculated on the basis of deviation from mean. Here standard deviation has been
used for calculation of risk.
Page | 8
For study of significant difference in Return and Risk ANOVA has been used with the use of
statistical computer package SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science).
Interpretation and Analysis of Data
For my study of performance of different Indices of different Capitalisation during different
phases of Stock Exchange, I have observed two years data of sensex, Mid-Cap and Small Cap
index of BSE. For two years time period I have selected time period from 1
st
January 2007 to 30
November 2009. I have collected daily value of selected indices representing different stocks of
different capitalisation. Than after I have calculated daily return percentage for all indices for
every day, as it is very difficult to work with absolute data. Following chart represents all those
values.
Figure: 1
7000
12000
17000
22000
27000
32000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
2
J
a
n
2
0
0
7
7
F
e
b
2
0
0
7
1
4
M
a
r
2
0
0
7
1
9
A
p
r
2
0
0
7
2
5
M
a
y
2
0
0
7
2
8
J
u
n
2
0
0
7
1
A
u
g
2
0
0
7
5
S
e
p
2
0
0
7
1
0
O
c
t
2
0
0
7
1
3
N
o
v
2
0
0
7
1
7
D
e
c
2
0
0
7
2
2
J
a
n
2
0
0
8
2
5
F
e
b
2
0
0
8
2
A
p
r
2
0
0
8
9
M
a
y
2
0
0
8
1
3
J
u
n
2
0
0
8
1
7
J
u
l
2
0
0
8
2
1
A
u
g
2
0
0
8
2
5
S
e
p
2
0
0
8
3
N
o
v
2
0
0
8
1
0
D
e
c
2
0
0
8
1
5
J
a
n
2
0
0
9
1
9
F
e
b
2
0
0
9
3
0
M
a
r
2
0
0
9
1
1
M
a
y
2
0
0
9
1
2
J
u
n
2
0
0
9
1
6
J
u
l
2
0
0
9
1
9
A
u
g
2
0
0
9
2
3
S
e
p
2
0
0
9
3
0
O
c
t
2
0
0
9
MidCap Sensex SmalCap
A B C
C
V
D
1
2
3
Page | 9
Out of selected period it has been observed that on 10
th
Sept 2008 (Line A in the Figure)
onward Bearish Trend has been started. We can observe that resistant line (Line 1,2 and 3 for
Mid Cap, Small Cap and Sensex respectively, in the Figure) has been cross in each capitalisation
and Bearish Trend continued up to 3
rd
Dec 2008 (Line B in Figure), after which we can observe
that again trend has established new support (not marked in the figure) below which it had
hardly move and remain less fluctuated up to certain period of time i.e. 12
th
March 2009 (Line C
in Figure). After this Consolidation Period again all Indices have cross previous resistant line
which became Support Line (Line 1,2 and 3) from which Bullish Trend Started and market trend
moved up continuously with new support levels till 19
th
May 2009 (Line D in Figure).
Hence we can select this particular period from 10
th
Sept 2008 to 19
th
May 2009, from the
observed the period (1
st
January 2007 to 30 November 2009) for detail analysis, which also
properly represents different phases of Stock Market. With use of the technical analysis we can
divide selected period in basically three parts i.e. three different Phases: Bearish Trend,
Consolidation Period and Bullish Trend. As my objective is to study Stocks of Different
Capitalisation Stocks during different phases of Stock Market; collected data of different Indices
like Sensex, Mid-Cap Index and Small Cap index of Bombay Stock Exchange would be useful for
my study.
For analysis of collected data following Statistical Analysis has been done with the help of SPSS
software.
Univariate Analysis of Variance
Table: 1 Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label Number of Observations
Indices
1
Sensex Return 162
2
Mid-Cap Return 162
3
Small-Cap Return 162
Time Period 1
Bearish Trend 168
Page | 10
2
Consolidation Period 192
3
Bullish Trend 126
From above table we can observe that total number of data for each Index for the selected
period is 162 working days return. For different phases like Bearish Trend, Consolidation Period
and Bearish Trend number of observations were 168, 192 and 126 respectively.
Descriptive Statistics
Table: 2 Dependent Variable: Return
Indices Time Period Mean Std. Deviation N
Sensex Return
Bearish Trend -.8017 4.88829 56
Consolidation Period -.0721 2.57563 64
Bullish Trend 1.4420 3.41796 42
Total .0683 3.80753 162
Mid-Cap Return
Bearish Trend -1.1671 5.07494 56
Consolidation Period -.1265 1.80217 64
Bullish Trend 1.2346 2.15057 42
Total -.1333 3.47949 162
Small-Cap Return
Bearish Trend -1.3152 2.78056 56
Consolidation Period -.1793 1.80399 64
Bullish Trend 1.2462 2.38170 42
Total -.2024 2.51745 162
Total
Bearish Trend -1.0947 4.35259 168
Consolidation Period -.1260 2.08201 192
Bullish Trend 1.3076 2.68673 126
Total -.0892 3.30885 486
Page | 11
For the selected period mean return and standard deviation for different indices during
different period and their total is calculated in above table. In the same manner during the
particular period what was descriptive statistics is given at last part of the table.
From above statistics we can say that Bearish period is most risky period as the standard
deviation of it is maximum i.e. 4.35 compare to all other period i.e. 2.08 and 2.68 for
Consolidation Period and Bullish Trend respectively.
In similar manner we can also observe that the risk in Large Cap Indices (Sensex) is highest in all
different phases than Mid Cap and Small Cap Indices, but at the same time return is also highest
in Sensex compare to other indices during all the phases of Stock Market.
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Table: 3 Dependent Variable: Return
Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 425.259(a) 8 53.157 5.191 .000
Intercept .396 1 .396 .039 .844
Indices 6.378 2 3.189 .311 .733
Time Period 415.925 2 207.963 20.308 .000
Indices * Time Period 2.926 4 .731 .071 .991
Error 4884.750 477 10.241
Total 5313.872 486
Corrected Total 5310.009 485
a R Squared = .080 (Adjusted R Squared = .065)
Above table represents two-way ANOVA table. The F-ratio for Indices 0.311 and p-value is 0.733
which is not less than 0.05. The F-ratio for Time Period is 20.308 and p-value less than 0.5.
Therefore it can be said that the effect of Indices is not significant whereas effect of Time
Period is significant. The F-ratio of Indices by Time Period interaction is 0.071 and associated p-
Page | 12
value is very high i.e. 0.991 which is not less than 0.05. Thus, the Indices by Time Period
interaction effect (Indices * Time Period) is also not statistically significant.
Above table is very important for analysing the variation in return of different indices due to
type of the stock or due to time period or due to combine effect. F statistics and significant
value assist in determining the significant effect on variation in return. Out of above table we
can derive conclusion that there is no significant difference due to Indices or combine effect of
Indices and Time Period, but of course there is significant effect of time period as separate
variable. There is significant difference in different time period return divided in three parts. For
the detail analysis post hoc analysis is very useful to identify detailed significant difference in
return of different indices and during different time period.
Estimated Marginal Means
Table: 4 Grand Mean
Dependent Variable: Return
Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
0.028991 0.14741 -0.26066 0.318644
Table: 5 Indices
Dependent Variable: Return
Indices Mean
Std.
Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Sensex Return 0.18942 0.255321 -0.31227 0.691112
Mid Cap Return -0.01965 0.255321 -0.52135 0.482039
Small Cap Return -0.08279 0.255321 -0.58448 0.418901
Page | 13
Page | 14
Table: 6 Time Period
Dependent Variable: Return
Recession
Mean
Std.
Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
Before Recession -1.095 .247 -1.580 -.610
During Recession -.126 .231 -.580 .328
After Recession 1.308 .285 .747 1.868
Table: 7 Indices * Time Period
Dependent Variable: Return
Indices
Recession
Mean
Std.
Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Sensex Return
Before Recession -.802 .428 -1.642 .039
During Recession -.072 .400 -.858 .714
After Recession 1.442 .494 .472 2.412
Mid Cap Return
Before Recession -1.167 .428 -2.007 -.327
During Recession -.126 .400 -.912 .660
After Recession 1.235 .494 .264 2.205
Small Cap Return
Before Recession -1.315 .428 -2.155 -.475
During Recession -.179 .400 -.965 .607
After Recession 1.246 .494 .276 2.216
Post Hoc Tests
The table Multiple comparisons show the difference in Mean and associated significance level
between each pair of groups.
Page | 15
Indices: Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Return
Table: 8 Scheffe
(I) Indices
(J) Indices
Mean
Differenc
e (I-J)
Std.
Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Upper
Bound
Lower
Bound
Sensex Return
Mid Cap Return .2016 .35557 .852 -.6715 1.0747
Small Cap Return .2707 .35557 .749 -.6024 1.1437
Mid Cap Return
Sensex Return -.2016 .35557 .852 -1.0747 .6715
Small Cap Return .0691 .35557 .981 -.8040 .9422
Small Cap Return
Sensex Return -.2707 .35557 .749 -1.1437 .6024
Mid Cap Return -.0691 .35557 .981 -.9422 .8040
Based on observed means.
Homogeneous Subsets
Return
Table: 9 Scheffe
Indices N Subset
Small Cap Return 162 -.2024
Mid Cap Return 162 -.1333
Sensex Return 162 .0683
Sig. .749
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on Type III Sum of Squares
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 10.241.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 162.000.
b Alpha = .05.
It can be seen from above table of Indices (two rows) that the difference in mean return of
Sensex and Mid-Cap is 0.20158 with associated significance level 0.85159 which is greater than
0.05, which means that difference of 0.20158 return is not statistically significant. The second
Page | 16
row shows the mean return difference between Sensex and Small Cap indices which 0.270667
with associated significance level 0.7485 which also greater than 0.05, which means that
difference of 0.270667 return is not statistically significant.
In third row, Mid-Cap return is compared with Sensex return and therefore the difference and
significant level will be same as that of first row. In forth row, Mid-Cap and Small Cap return is
compared. The difference in mean return is 0.069086 and associated significance level is
0.981301, which means that the difference in return in Indices does not differ significantly.
Each comparison appears twice, as each of the indices is compared with the remaining two
indices. The magnitude of difference and significance level remains the same, only sign changes
with change in the reference group. The reference group is denoted by I and the other
categories are denoted by J.
The Homogeneous Subsets table created using Scheffes test show that Sensex, Mid-Cap and
Small Cap all indices are homogenous set. Here, N represents the sample size for each group.
Time Period
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Return
Table: 10 Scheffe
(I) Recession
(J) Recession
Mean
Difference
(I-J)
Std.
Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Upper
Bound
Lower
Bound
Before Recession
During Recession -.9687(*) .33807 .017 -1.7988 -.1386
After Recession -2.4022(*) .37713 .000 -3.3283 -1.4762
During Recession
Before Recession .9687(*) .33807 .017 .1386 1.7988
After Recession -1.4335(*) .36689 .001 -2.3344 -.5327
After Recession
Before Recession 2.4022(*) .37713 .000 1.4762 3.3283
During Recession 1.4335(*) .36689 .001 .5327 2.3344
Page | 17
Based on observed means.
* The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
Homogeneous Subsets
Return
Table: 11 Scheffe
Recession N Subset
1 2 3
Before Recession 168 -1.0947
During Recession 192 -.1260
After Recession 126 1.3076
Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on Type III Sum of Squares
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 10.241.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 157.091.
b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error
levels are not guaranteed.
c Alpha = .05.
It can be seen from above table of Time Period (two rows) that the difference in mean return of
Bearish Trend and Consolidation Period is -0.9687 with associated significance level 0.017074
which is less than 0.05, which means that difference of -0.9687 return is statistically significant.
The second row shows the mean return difference between Bearish Trend and Bullish Trend
Time Period which -2.40224 with associated significance level 0.000 which also less than 0.05,
which means that difference of -2.40224 return is statistically significant.
In third row, Consolidation Period return is compared with Bearish Trend return and therefore
the difference and significant level will be same as that of first row. In forth row, Consolidation
Period and Bullish Trend return is compared. The difference in mean return is -1.4335 and
Page | 18
associated significance level is 0.001, which means that the difference in return in Time Period
differs significantly.
Each comparison appears twice, as each of the Time Period is compared with the remaining
two Time Period. The magnitude of difference and significance level remains the same, only
sign changes with change in the reference group. The reference group is denoted by I and the
other categories are denoted by J.
The Homogeneous Subsets table created using Scheffes test show that Bearish Trend,
Consolidation Period and Bullish Trend all Time Period are different set. Here, N represents the
sample size for each group.
Figure: 2
After Recession Consolidation Period Bearish Trend
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
M
a
r
g
i
n
a
l
M
e
a
n
s
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
-0.50
-1.00
-1.50
Smlcap Return
Midcap Return
Sensex Return
Indices
Estimated Marginal Means of Return
Page | 19
Conclusion
From above study I can conclude that when risk will be more chances of making return will be
more. Here if we observe performance of different Capitalisation Indices; they do not perform
very differently in any of the phase of stock market, but even the same Indices performs
differently in different phases of stock market. Thus, I can say that types of capitalisation do not
make much difference in Risk and Return involve with investment but the timing plays very
important role in investment decision.
Bibliography
Avadhani, V. A. (2009). Securities Analysis and Portfolio Management. In V.A.Avadhani, Securities
Analysis and Portfolio Management (Ninth Revised Edition ed., p. 584). Mumbai, Maharastra, India:
Himalaya Publishing House.
bsemidsmcap. (2005, April 11). Retrieved April 12, 2009, from www.bseindia.com:
http://www.bseindia.com/about/abindices/bsemidsmcap.asp
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance ,
Volume 47 (Issue 2), 427-465.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VGT-4CBDGBM-
1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1137805088
&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=ff60e92c704
00f40f3. (n.d.).
Importance of Stock Exchange in India. (n.d.). Retrieved August 18, 2011, from
www.indiastudychannel.com: http://www.indiastudychannel.com/resources/138411-Stock-exchanges-
India-their-importance.aspx
Market Capitalisation. (n.d.). Retrieved from www.investopedia.com:
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketcapitalization.asp
Market Capitalisation. (n.d.). Retrieved from www.wikipedia.org:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_capitalization
Market Capitalisation. (2009, December 4). Retrieved June 15, 2011, from www.finance.yahoo.com:
http://finance.yahoo.com/personal-finance/glossary?gloss_ind=m
Page | 20
Poshakwale, S., & Theobald, M. (2004, May 8). Market capitalisation, cross-correlations, the lead/lag
structure and microstructure effects in the Indian stock market.
Schwert, G. W. (1990, May-June). Stock Market Volatility. Financial Analysts Journal , 23-34.
Schwert, G. W. (1990). Stock Volatility and the Crash of '87. The Review of Financial Studies , Voume 3
(Number 1), 77-102.
Schwert, G. W. (1989). Why Does Stock Market Volatility Changes Over Time? The Journal of Finance ,
Volume 44 (Number 5), 1115-1153.
Shreenivasa, R. H., & Yathishchandra, M. S. (2009). "Economic Turbulence: Short or Long-term
Strategies" Contemporary Issue in Finance. (P. S. Prof. Jagdeesha, Ed.) Excel Books.
Singh, S. (2010). Global Financial Crisis and Indian Economy: Impact Assessment, Policy Responses and
Recovery.
V.K.Bhalla. (2011). Investmetn Management Security Analysis and Portfolio Management (Seventeenth
Edition ed.). New Delhi: S.Chand & Company Ltd.
http://www.sharetipsinfo.com/bse-nse-categories.html