0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
3K Ansichten3 Seiten
The Judicial Campaign Ethics Subcommittee has been delegated authority to provide candidates for judicial office with prompt responses to campaign-related ethics questions. Candidates are advised that all campaign statements are accurate and do not misrepresent factual information or present it in a misleading manner.
The Judicial Campaign Ethics Subcommittee has been delegated authority to provide candidates for judicial office with prompt responses to campaign-related ethics questions. Candidates are advised that all campaign statements are accurate and do not misrepresent factual information or present it in a misleading manner.
The Judicial Campaign Ethics Subcommittee has been delegated authority to provide candidates for judicial office with prompt responses to campaign-related ethics questions. Candidates are advised that all campaign statements are accurate and do not misrepresent factual information or present it in a misleading manner.
Judicial Campaign Ethics Center 25 Beaver Street New York, New York 10004 1-888-600-JCEC (5232) jcec@nycourts.gov Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics Hon. George D. Marlow Chair Hon. Betty Ellerin Hon. Jerome Gorski Vice Chairs Hon. Arnold F. Ciaccio Subcommittee Chair Hon. Debra Givens Hon. James Lack Hon. Judith McMahon Hon. Denise Molia Subcommittee Members Hon. Edward P. Borrelli Special Counsel Judicial Campaign Ethics Center Laura L. Smith, Esq. Eugene Colon, Esq. John Sullivan, Esq. Staff Counsel August 18, 2014 Hon. Richard Sherwood 501 Legion Drive Schenectady, NY 12303 Re: SC2014-075 Dear Judge Sherwood: Thank you for your attached inquiry, dated August 6, 2014, to the Judicial Campaign Ethics Center (JCEC). The Judicial Campaign Ethics Subcommittee (the Subcommittee) has been delegated authority by the full Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics (the Committee) to provide candidates for judicial office with prompt responses to campaign-related ethics questions. The Subcommittee believes that your inquiry involves campaign-related activity, and therefore has determined that it may provide a response in this matter. You have stated that you are currently a Town Judge in the Town of Guilderland and are now running for Albany County Surrogate's Court Judge. 1. Can I refer to myself as Judge Sherwood in my literature and on my signs? For example, Judge Sherwood for Surrogate Judge or Elect Judge Sherwood Albany County Surrogate Court Judge. Yes. In general, you are advised that you must ensure that all of your campaign statements are accurate and do not misrepresent factual information or present it in a misleading manner. See Opinions 12-129(A)-(G); 09-162; 04-16; 22 NYCRR 100.5(A)(4)(a), 100.5(A)(4)(d)(iii), 100.5(A)(4)(e); see also Opinion 12-114 at n.1. You are further advised that a sitting judge who is a judicial candidate may make truthful statements about his/her qualifications, including his/her current judicial status, and may therefore appear in judicial robes, and identify him/herself as a judge in campaign materials. See 22 NYCRR 100.5(A)(4)(d)(iii); Opinions 07-139; 07-137; 03-90; 94-50; cf. Opinion 04-16. Thus, although you must not create the impression that you are currently a Surrogate Court Judge, you may refer to yourself as Judge because you are currently a sitting judge. Under the facts presented, the specific statements you propose to make during your campaign appear to be truthful and not misleading, and are therefore permissible. 2. Can I be photographed in my robe and use it in my literature? I know that I cannot be photographed on the bench. Yes. As a sitting judge in your window period, you may use a photograph of yourself in your robes in your campaign literature. See id. The Subcommittee concurs that you must not use a photograph of yourself on the bench, because a judge must avoid a public perception of entanglement of the judiciary itself in the political process. Opinion 05-101; see also 22 NYCRR 100.5(A)(4)(a). Indeed, the full Committee has advised that a judge may not use photographs in a campaign that might convey the impression that the courthouse is being used for political purposes and, in particular, to facilitate the candidacy of a sitting judge. Opinion 05-101. 3. Can I be photographed in front of a Courthouse to use in my literature? Yes. The full Committee has advised that there is no ethical barrier to the taking of pictures in locations to which the general public has access for the taking of photographs, such as in front of the courthouse. Opinion 05-101. Reliance on this Opinion. Please be advised that provided that your conduct comports with the advice contained herein, such conduct will be presumed proper for purposes of any subsequent investigation by the Commission on Judicial Conduct. You are further advised that this response provided by the Subcommittee, and the resulting presumption of propriety, applies only to you for conduct undertaken during your current window period. The presumption is expressly conditioned on the correctness and completeness of the facts supplied in your attached inquiry. Mandatory Training Requirement. Please note that all judicial candidates (except those seeking Town or Village Justice positions) must complete a campaign ethics training program any time after the candidate makes a public announcement of candidacy or authorizes solicitation or acceptance of contributions for a known judicial vacancy, but no later than 30 days after receiving the nomination for judicial office. 22 NYCRR 100.5(A)(4)(f). Please contact us at 1-888-600-JCEC (5232) to register for the training, or visit our website for further details. Mandatory Financial Disclosure Requirement. All judicial candidates (except those seeking Town or Village Justice positions) must file a financial disclosure form for the preceding calendar year pursuant to either Part 40 or 22 NYCRR 100.5(A)(4)(g). Please visit our Financial Disclosures information page for general information on Rule 100.5(A)(4)(g), including a list of persons who are exempt from the rule. If you are not exempt, please contact the Ethics Commission as soon as possible to make sure you are in compliance. For Further Assistance. The amended rules and a copy of the Judicial Campaign Ethics Handbook are also available on our web site. For further assistance on this or any other campaign-related ethics matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, Hon. Arnold Ciaccio Subcommittee Chair Att.
Olaf Peter Juda v. Dennis Michael Nerney, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Northern District of California Stephen R. Kotz, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Albuquerque, New Mexico John J. Kelly, U.S. Attorney, Albuquerque, New Mexico Michael Yamaguchi, U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, California Robert L. Holler, District Director, U.S. Customs Service, El Paso, Texas Leonard S. Walton, Acting Assistant Commissioner, U.S. Customs Service, Washington, D.C. Bonnie L. Gay, Foia Unit, Attorney-In-Charge, Washington, D.C. John and Jane Does 1-25 United States of America, Olaf Peter Juda v. United States Customs Service, Robert L. Holler, Joy M. Hughan, Daniel Luar, Rita Alfaro, Dolores Payan, Gina E. Fuentes, Internal Revenue Service, George Terpack, Carolyn Leonard, Timothy A. Towns, John Does, Jane Does, 149 F.3d 1190, 10th Cir. (1998)