Names: Aaron John Balana, Jannelle Casanova, Merranizza Musa Section: SAD Group No: 7 Instructor: Ms. Sarah May Sibug Rating______
I. Experimentally Measured Physical Properties
1. Molecular Weight:109.4 g/mol (9%) 2. Density at 31 o C: 0.940898 g/mL (2%) 3. Viscosity at 31 o C: 35.6 centipoises (40%) 4. Surface Tension at 31 o C: 0.03515 N/m (6%) 5. Molar Heat of Vaporization: 38.545 kJ/mol (40%)
II. Examination of Literature
SOURCES: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 85 th Edition Langes Handbook of Chemistry, 16 th Edition http://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/chris/CHN.pdf Merck Millipore International
Possible Liquids Density (g/mL) 20 o C 25 o C 30 o C 40 o C 50 o C Cyclohexanol 0.9624 0.948 0.9406 0.9321 0.9257 Pentanoic acid
Possible Liquids Viscosity (centipoises) 15 o C 20 o C 25 o C 30 o C 50 o C Cyclohexanol - - 57.5 41.38 12.3 Pentanoic acid 2.359 - - 1.774 - 3-methylbutanoic acid 2.731 2.411 - - - Hexanoic acid 3.525 - - 2.511 -
Possible Liquids Surface Tension (N/m) 0 o C 20 o C 25 o C Cyclohexanol - - 0.03533 Pentanoic acid - - 0.0289 3-methylbutanoic acid - - 0.02728 Hexanoic acid - 0.02805 0.02755
III. Tabulation of Data from Literature
Possible Liquids MW (g.mol) Density (g/mL) Viscosity (centipoises) Surface Tension (N/m) H vap (kJ/mol) Cyclohexanol 100.158 0.9406 (30 O C) 36.180(31 O C) 0.0353 (25 O C) 62.01 (25 O C) Pentanoic acid 102.132 0.9339(25 O C) 1.774 (30 O C) 0.0289 (25 O C) 67.5 (25 O C)* 3-methylbutanoic acid 102.132 0.931 (25 O C) 2.411 (20 O C) 0.0273 (20 O C) 51.6 (25 O C)* Hexanoic acid 116.153 0.9212 (25 O C) 2.511 (30 O C) 0.0276 (25 O C) 71.9 (25 O C)* * These enthalpy of vaporization values were calculated from standard enthalpies of formation at liquid and gaseous phases and were not reported directly in the CRC Manual.
IV. Identity of Unknown: Cyclohexanol
The dictionary of organic compounds (doc.chemnetbase.com) allows for the search of 308,935 compounds (linked to the CRC database) using some chemical or physical properties as search constraints. After inputting the range of values for the density, molecular weight and assumed boiling point (recorded during the Dumas experiment), a list of 30 matches was obtained. The top four compounds that were most common (and hence, available in most laboratories) and with most documented physical properties in the CRC and Langes handbooks were selected from the search results.
The literature values for the four compounds were determined and were tabulated above. Cyclohexanols literature values corresponded well with most of the experimental results. Furthermore, cyclohexanol was the only compound (of the top four) whose theoretical viscosity value was within the experimental discrepancy range. However, the enthalpy of vaporization of cyclohexanol was beyond the 40% experimental discrepancy. As explained in the Experiment 9 laboratory report, the theoretical enthalpy of vaporization value used is only valid for 25 O C. Since enthalpy is temperature-dependent and that the experimental enthalpy of vaporization was valid at the boiling point at which it was measured, the experimental result should be compared to a theoretical value measured at the same, boiling temperature.
It must be noted that physical properties were not used in the determination since there were no distinct, observable traits (odor, color, etc.) that allow for more convenient determination of its identity.