Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Paragraph 2: Explain what the WHO and the CDC have done, presenting inaccurate data and
Paragraph 3: Connect the media and the public health organizations to the pharmaceutical
The recent outbreak of the swine influenza (H1N1) has caused much alarm amongst the
media, the public and health agencies. Swine flu is a subtype of the influenza A virus; the 2009
strain is a virus of swine origin. The 2009 outbreak of the swine flu has been exaggerated by the
media and the World Health Organization (WHO) which in-turn is leading to large profits by the
throughout. The first outbreak started in Mexico City where schools, bars and restaurants were
closed; on the night of these closures, CNN reported1 that Mexico City was going through a
“silent chaos” and conducted interviews with families “who have survived the swine flu”.
Nowhere did the reports mention that Mexico City suffers from world’s worst air quality and
infant mortality issues due to air pollution. Air pollution deaths in Mexico City itself are as high
as 100,000 per year. The reports coming in from Mexico was no reason to cause alarm.
According to the CDC2, Mexico had 50,000 running cases of acute respiratory illnesses from the
ever-prevalent seasonal flu and the H1N1 swine flu made up only 21% of the cases tested. For a
country with 106 million people a 5% rate of infection is no cause for panic; as of June 2009 the
CDC reported that the outbreaks in Mexico likely peaked in earlier months. As the amount of
outbreaks increased, the U.S news media confirmed that antiviral drugs will work against the
swine flu and alleviate symptoms. At the same time the amount of people visiting emergency
rooms and doctor's offices increased. Most of these patients had mild symptoms from, not
necessarily swine flu, influenza like illnesses which is a far broader category of illness. A similar
alarmist media reported3 in 2003 that the U.S will see widespread infections and deaths from an
avian flu virus, which had only affected 200 people; the reports were setting the scene for a food
and a medical health crisis. The report specifically highlighted that 70 days into an avian flu
pandemic, everyone in the US will know someone who has died and the death toll could reach
has fizzled out and a handful of cases are reported yearly. Instead of delivering the information
in a rational way the media has and is overreacting and is still covering swine flu like it is the
11 weeks after the first outbreak in Mexico City, the WHO declared swine flu a level 6
pandemic. To define the 2009 outbreak of swine flu as a pandemic the WHO changed its
definition of the word “pandemic”4. The definition change makes diseases pandemic if there are
more cases than normal, thus not requiring enormous number of deaths worldwide. To add fuel
to the swine flu frenzy, Professor Neil Ferguson at the WHO reported5 that the swine flu will
“infect 40 to 50% of United Kingdom’s population” if it truly turns pandemic. What is surprising
is that the WHO declared the virus a pandemic after the first death in United States was detected.
Previous to the swine flu the WHO has not declared any other flu outbreak a level 6 pandemic.
By this new definition the yearly bout of seasonal influenza should be declared a level 6
pandemic. The most recent influenza virus to generate mass casualties that was categorized as a
pandemic was the 1968 Hong Kong flu which killed an estimated 1 million people. The panic
was only heightened when 100 schools across the U.S. were closed due to risk of swine flu
infection which translated into 50,000 students staying home. U.S. officials from the CDC
reported6 that 40% of the U.S. population could catch the swine flu and 90,000 people could die
from the swine flu; to date the number of swine flu deaths in the U.S. stands at 4000. The CDC
and the WHO have also stopped tracking swine flu cases and have not required lab testing to
highlights that out of 13,000 patients impacted with flu like illnesses only 2% tested positive for
the swine flu and 12% tested positive for other kinds of flu. Instead of administering tests and
recording cases the WHO and the CDC resorted to spot checks, designed to identify basic
symptoms and risk factors. Not testing every patient also translates into misleading data when it
comes to tracking the actual number of deaths from the swine flu. In other words, encouraging
the public to take antiviral drugs and vaccines is the only prevention mechanism the agencies
have in mind.
The fear, panic and prevention methods highlighted by the CDC and the WHO benefits
pharmaceutical companies around the world. Increased demand for antiviral drugs Tamiflu and
Relenza proved beneficial to drug makers Roche and GlaxoSmithKline, who recorded more than
$100 million in profits due to the windfall from swine flu. Roche estimated that sales of its anti-
swine flu drug quadrupled during the pandemic and expects to rake in 2.7 billion francs in
revenue from Tamiflu. Even as the risk of the virus alleviates, swine flu vaccine makers have a
lot to gain from the pandemic. The swine flu vaccine that the drug companies have fast-tracked
will bring in billions of dollars in windfall profit; due to vaccine contracts from governments
around the world. Novartis A.G, Sanofi-aventis, GSK and CSL Limited expect8 $7 billion in
revenue from the swine flu and Novartis A.G has already generated $700 million in worldwide
swine flu vaccine sales. The drug companies manufacturing the swine flu vaccine have reported
Adjuvants allow drug makers to use less of the virus to make the vaccine; this translates into
more doses being prepared thus increasing efficiency and keeps costs low for the companies.
Even though the Food and Drug Administration has not approved the use of the adjuvants the
Department Health and Human Services has allocated $1 billion to purchase adjuvants from the
major drug makers, despite safety concerns9. The HHS has granted vaccine makers immunity
from lawsuits resulting from the swine flu vaccine and use of adjuvants may be approved as the
next logical step to dealing with the overblown pandemic. A free pass is being given to the drug
makers, during a 1976 outbreak of the swine flu, 40 million Americans were vaccinated and
thousands of claims were filed against drug companies for serious illnesses such as Guillain-
Barré syndrome10. While the media props up the swine flu story and public health agencies
recommend people take vaccines and antiviral drugs. The pharmaceutical industry stands to
The current pandemic as measured by the inaccurate metrics of the WHO and the CDC
puts the death toll at less than 10,000. Only some of these cases are confirmed swine flu deaths
and the 2009 swine flu pandemic has been rated the mildest pandemic ever11. The seasonal flu
kills half-million people a year and it has never been declared a pandemic year-after-year. New
10 New York Times; Fear of a Swine Flu Epidemic in 1976 Offers Some Lessons, and
Concerns, Today. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/09/health/09vaccine.html
11 Los Angeles Times; Swine Flu may be mildest pandemic ever, researchers say
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/booster_shots/2009/12/swine-flu-may-be-mildest-pandemic-
ever-researchers-say.html
research published in the British Medical Journal suggests that Roche AG’s Tamflu doesn’t
prove effective against flu complications due to lack of available data in adult patients12. The
relentless media coverage given to a disease that stems from the ever-prevalent influenza virus
and declaration of a pandemic for a disease that has affected less people than the regular
influenza virus has helped foster an environment of fear, uncertainty and doubt. These actions
have directly led to the raking in of billions of dollars in windfall profits by pharmaceutical
companies.