Exam 2 will be the same format as exam 1, except the essay will not be as heavily weighted as it was in exam 1. Still need to know all theories and the six-steps to solving ethical dilemmas, but the questions wont be as in-depth as they were on test 1. Ethical Theories
1. Divine Command Theory a. The resolution of dilemmas is based upon religious beliefs; resolved according to tenants of faith. b. Decisions in ethical dilemmas are made on the basis of guidance from a divine being. (Ten Commandments) c. In some countries Divine Command Theory influences the law. In some Muslim countries, adultery is punishable by death. d. What you learn in church. Higher power that will tell you what to do. e. WWJD What would your own church say???? f. We, as a society DONT follow Divine Command Theory g. Natural Law i. There are certain rights and conduct controlled by God, and no matter what a society or government does, those rights and law remain supreme. ii. Example: The Declaration of Independence iii. As a society we DO follow Natural Law iv. There are some rights that cant be taken away. v. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. 2. Ethical Egoism Theory a. Defines right or acceptable behavior in terms of its consequences for the individual. b. Egoists believe they should make decisions that maximize their own self- interest, which is defined differently by each person. c. Ethical decisions are made to improve your own self-interests. d. Money isnt the only benefit; power could be as well. e. Ayn Rand The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged i. The world would be better if we did not feel so guilty about the choices we make in ethical dilemmas and just acknowledged that it is all self interest. ii. Order in society would be maintained by laws that protect us from harming each other. f. Thomas Hobbes i. Philosopher who believed that ethical egoism was the central factor in human decision-making. ii. His main concern was the problem of social and political order: how human beings can live together in peace and avoid the danger and fear of civil conflict. iii. There would be chaos if we did not have laws in place to control the drive of self-interest. iv. Need great power in government (authoritarian) to control egoism v. HOBBES was also worried that the laws, which RAND thought was going to be enough, wouldnt be enough. Government needs more power. g. Adam Smith i. Economist and philosopher ii. Believed that people are self-interested iii. But that self-interest would not result in the selfish chaos feared by Rand and Hobbes iv. Smith believed that humans are rational and that there was some force of long-term self-interest that keeps businesses running ethically (The Moral Sentiments of Markets). v. Enlightened Egoists 1. Take a long-range perspective and allow for the wellbeing of others, although always with their own self-interest in mind. 2. Humans are rational 3. Long-term thinking 3. The Utilitarian Theory a. John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham b. Defines right or acceptable behavior as that which provides the greatest good to the greatest number of people (greatest happiness principle). c. A utilitarian will make decisions that result in the greatest utility the greatest benefit for all those affected by the decision. d. Cost/benefit analysis comparing all the alternatives and choosing the one that results in the greatest benefit to the most people. e. Balancing effort in which we minimize the harms that result from a decision even as we maximize the benefits. f. Do the most good g. Must conduct a cost-benefit analysis h. Must look at all of the options i. Must look at everyone being impacted by the decision (ripple effect). 4. The Categorical Imperative a. Immanual Kant i. German philosopher ii. Kantian ethics b. Individuals should evaluate their actions in light of the consequences that would follow if everyone in society acted the same way. i. Are you comfortable living with the standards you established? c. Does not allow any resolution in which human beings are used as a mans by which others obtain benefits. d. Do not use others in a way that gives a one-sided benefit. e. Do it for the right reasons (not self-interest, but with good will and pureness of heart). f. No wiggle room g. It must be best for all, done out of the goodness of heart h. Come up with a universal rule i. Everyone should and must follow the rule i. Ex. Cant tell a lie, everyone cant tell a lie. 5. The Contractarians and Justice a. John Locke and John Rawls b. The theory of Justice c. Social Contract d. Veil of ignorance i. What rules would you impose if you had no idea whether you would be a prince or a pauper? e. LOCKE and RAWLS contended that in a dilemma, if people imagine there are no existing rules, but that they dont know how they will be affected by the outcome of the decision, people will choose the most equitable and fair resolution. f. We all live in the same society 6. Rights Theory a. Two Elements i. Everyone has a set of rights ii. The government is obligated to protect those rights b. Individuals have certain absolute rights i. Freedom of conscience ii. Freedom of consent iii. Freedom of privacy iv. Freedom of speech v. Due Process 7. Moral Relativists a. Definitions of ethical behavior are derived subjectively from the experience of individuals and groups. b. Relativists use themselves and those around them, or they look at the particular circumstances to determine what is right or wrong, acceptable or unacceptable, ethical or unethical i. Time and place ethics c. As people evolve, or members of a group change, or the situation changes, the relative right or wrong thing to do will change as well. i. There are no absolute rules d. Some say moral relativists isnt a good theory e. Use our past history and look at the circumstance and make a decision f. Right now, yes it is ethical change things around a bid, then no it isnt ethical. 8. Virtue Ethics a. An acquired (learned/practiced) set of virtues is used to make decisions b. Aristotle and Plato taught that solving ethical dilemmas require training, and that ethics can be learned. c. A person who has developed the character trait of honesty will be disposed to tell the truth because it is considered (to that person, based on his social development) the right and comfortable thing to do. d. Virtue ethics means doing what a person with good moral character would do e. Oldest theory. 9. Peter Drucker a. Primum non nocere b. above all, do no harm. c. Encourages decisions that do not harm others 10. Laura Nash, Harvard Divinity School a. 12 questions to be asked in evaluating an ethical dilemma 11. Dr. Norman Vincent Peale and Kenneth Blanchard a. Is it legal? i. Threshold question b. Is it balanced? i. Step back and view the problem from other perspectives c. How does it make me feel? i. Self-examination of comfort level ii. Your resolution 12. Warren Buffet Front page of the Newspaper a. Do you want it on the front page of the newspaper b. Contemplating any business act, an employee should ask himself whether he would be willing to see it immediately described by an informed and critical reporter on the front page of his local paper, there to be read by his spouse, children, and friends. 13. The Wall Street Journal Model a. Am I in compliance with the law? i. Threshold question b. What contribution does this choice of action make to the company, the shareholders, the community, and others? What are the short- and long-term consequences of this decision. Six-steps for Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas
1. Make sure you have a grasp of all of the facts available. Be sure you are familiar with all the facts. a. List the facts 2. List any information you would like to have, but dont, and what assumptions you would have to make, if any, in resolving the dilemma. a. What would you like to know, and the assumptions made 3. Take each person involved in the dilemma and list the concerns they might have. Be sure to consider the impact on those not specifically mentioned in the case. a. List EVERYBODY involved within the case. b. Take major players and move outward. Ripple effect. 4. Develop a list of resolutions for the problem. Apply the various models for reaching resolution. If a breach has already occurred, consider that possible remedies and develop systemic changes so such breaches do not occur in the future. 5. Evaluate the resolutions for costs, legalities, and impact. Try to determine how each of the parties will react to and will be affected by each of the resolutions you have proposed. 6. Make a recommendation on the actions that should be taken.
Lecture 9 Diversity & Shit.
Workplace Diversity 1. Workplaces are more diverse today than they have ever been How Does Workplace Diversity Impact a Company? Coca-Cola Examples 2. Improves understanding of local markets 3. Makes us (the company) a better employer and business partner 4. It helps us (company) compete more effectively 5. Makes us (company) better neighbors in the community 6. Ultimately, it builds value for the shareholders Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 1. Forbids discrimination in employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 2. Forbids discrimination in hiring, firing and general conditions of employment 3. Applies to private employers with 15 or more employees, to state and local governments, and the federal government. 4. Protected Classes (5 of them) 1. Race 2. Color 3. Religion 4. Sex 5. National Origin Examples of Discrimination Covered under Title VII 5. Harassing a person because of their friends, relatives, or associates race, skin, color, religion, gender, national origin, age, or disability. 6. Treating people in similar jobs differently 7. Making assumptions about the abilities of persons based on stereotypes, physical characteristics or age. 8. Retaliating against a person because a complaint was filed. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) 9. EEOC is the federal agency charged with enforcing federal laws forbidding discrimination in employment. 10. EEOC investigates discrimination claims; attempts to resolve disputes via mediation and conciliation; and, if necessary, engages in litigation. 11. Approximately 80,000 complaints and filed annually with the EEOC. 12. Normally, a private citizen alleging discrimination in employment cannot immediately file a lawsuit against the employer. 13. Must first file claim with state or local Fair Employment Practices Agencies (FEPAs) if applicable. 14. Then, may file claim with the EEOC 15. Litigation After investigating, the EEOC may file a civil suit or issue a right-to-sue letter to the grievant 16. Grievant must exhaust all administrative remedies before initiating a lawsuit in a court system 17. Many disputes are resolved in arbitration 18. When litigated, plaintiffs prevail in only about 30% of employment discrimination suits. Remedies 19. Remedies under Title VII are intended to make the victim whole 20. May include job reinstatement, back pay, hiring, promotion, reinstatement compensatory damages, and punitive damages in some instances. 21. Some damages are capped 1. Not in cases involving intentional racial discrimination 22. Additionally, the EEOC often negotiates consent decrees that may require new procedures to correct wrongful practices. Two Legal Theories to Sue Under 23. Disparate Treatment 1. Exists where an employer intentionally treats some people less favorably than others because of their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. 24. Disparate Impact 1. Exists where an employer uses legitimate employment standards that, despite their apparent neutrality, work a heavier burden on a protected class than on other employees. 2. No intent to discriminate must be proven Discrimination Based on National Origin 25. Number of complaints based on national origin have increased with the change in Americas demographics. 26. Events of September 11 th exacerbated the problem 27. Typically, the charges allege disparate treatment based on language and/or appearance 28. EEOC Guidelines say that employers cannot impose a blanket ban on employees speaking their native language, but an English only rule at certain times is permissible if justified by business necessity, such as safety, and if adequately explained to the employees. Sex Discrimination and the Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ) 29. Both disparate treatment or disparate impact support a sex discrimination claim. 30. An employer can prevail by establishing a BFOQ defense 1. By showing there was bona fide occupational qualification needed for a particular position. BFOQ Defense Race can never be argued for BFOQ 1. Proof of a nexus between the classification and job performance, and 1. Will the classification affect job performance? 2. Necessity of the classification for successful performance, and mere customer preference or, in general, higher costs will not justify an otherwise discriminatory employment practice. 3. That the job performance affected by the classification is the essence of the employers business operation 1. Must go to the essence of the job (e.g. a woman to fill a womans modeling role because being female goes to the essence of the job). 2. Does not include duties that are tangential to the essence. 4. NOTE Discrimination is lawful where sex, religion, or national origin is a BFOQ reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that business. On-the-job Fetal Injuries 1. Johnson Controls, Inc. is a battery manufacturer 2. Primary ingredient in the process of manufacturing batteries is lead 3. Lead is a serious health risk to fetuses carried by women exposed to lead 4. Policy: Women who are pregnant or who are capable of bearing children will not be placed into jobs involving lead exposure. 1. Johnson believed this was BFOQ 5. U.S. Supreme Court found that this policy was discriminatory and a violation of Title VII Hunter Tylo: Pregnancy is not a BFOQ 1. Actress Hunter Tylo was hired to portray a bikini-wearing husband stealing character on Melrose Place. 2. She was fired before filming because she didnt disclose the fact that she was pregnant 1. Spelling Entertainment believed this was a BFOQ 2. Tylo filed an action claiming discrimination 3. Tylo was awarded $4 million by a jury for emotional distress and $894,601 for economic loss. 4. Under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, employers cannot hire, fire, or demote on the basis of pregnancy. Equal Pay 1. The Equal Pay Act of 1963 forbids discrimination on the basis of sex. In general, women must receive the same rate for equal work on jobs requiring equal skill, effort and responsibility and performed under similar working conditions. 2. Unequal wage is lawful if paid pursuant to: 1. A seniority system 2. A merit system, 3. A system that measures earnings by quantity or quality of production, or 4. A differential based on any factor other than sex. 3. Lowering the pay of the favored sex to create equal pay violates the Act. Religious Discrimination 1. Title VII forbids discrimination on the basis of religion 2. Religious faith must be sincere and meaningful, not merely a sham to achieve advantages 3. Employers must take reasonable steps to prevent and remedy religious harassment. But a employer need only bear a de minimus cost to accommodate religious differences, more than that is considered an undue hardship for employers. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA) 1. ADA forbids discrimination in employment, public accommodations, public services, transportation and telecommunications against the disabled. Small businesses with fewer than 15 employees are exempted from the employment portions of the ADA. ADA 2. A disabled person: 1. Has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. 2. Has a record of such an impairment, or 3. Is regarded as having such an impairment. 3. An employer may not discriminate against a qualified person with a disability. A qualified person is one who can perform the essential functions of the job. The Act requires employers to make reasonable accommodations for disabled employees and applicants. 4. Reasonable accommodations might include structural changes, job reassignment, job restructuring, or new equipment. Disabilities 1. Blindness, hearing loss, mental retardation, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, disfiguring scars, alcoholism, drug abuse, AIDS, and sometimes severe obesity 2. Specifically EXCLUDED are homosexuality, bisexuality, exhibitionism, gambling, kleptomania, pyromania. Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) 1. Age discrimination under the ADEA is established under disparate treatment analysis (intentional discrimination), but to date the federal courts are split on the question of applying disparate impact reasoning. 2. An ADEA plaintiff must show that he or she is 40 or older, qualified for the position, and not hired or was terminated or demoted while a younger person received more favorable treatment. 3. The employer may defend by showing that the termination was based on a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason or that age is a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) that is, that only employees of a certain age can safely and/or efficiently complete the work in question. Sexual Orientation 1. Neither federal law nor the law of most states offers protections against discrimination on the basis of the employees sexual orientation.
Lecture 10
How should a business organization treat its employees? 2. Employee Privacy 1. Employers interests in conflict with employee privacy 2. Expectation of moral behavior 3. Sexual Harassment 1. Employers responsibility to provide a safe work environment Law of Sexual Harassment 1. Sexual harassment consists of unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature which (1) become a condition of employment, or (2) become a basis for employment decisions, or (3) unreasonably interfere with work performance or create a hostile working environment 2. Two categories 1. Quid pro quo this for that 1. A sexual experience in exchange for keeping ones job 2. Hostile environment 1. Workplace rendered offensive and abusive by sexual aggression, etc. where no employment benefit is gained or lost 3. Plaintiffs (Employees) Case: Plaintiff must prove 1. Unwanted harassment, 2. Harassment based on sex and 3. Harassment that affected a term, condition or privilege of employment, sufficiently severe and pervasive as to unreasonably interfere with work performance or create a hostile abusive work environment. 4. Defendant (Employer) is liable: 1. If wrongdoer was a coworker and employer unreasonably failed to prevent or remedy the harassment where management knew or should have known about it. 2. If wrongdoer was a supervisor and employee suffered a tangible employment action (e.g., demotion) because of the harassment 3. If wrongdoer was supervisor but no tangible employment action was suffered, employer can avoid liability by proving both that it exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct the harassment promptly and that employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of those measures The Ethics of Confrontation 1. Model for Confrontation 1. Determine the facts 2. If you dont know the facts, or cant know the facts, present the issue to those involved and affected. 3. Always give the opportunity for self-remedy 4. Dont fear the fallout and hassle
Lecture 11
Elements of Strict Product Liability 5. Product defective 6. Because of defect, product unreasonably dangerous 7. Defect proximate cause or substantial factor in injury
Lecture 12
Why is it important for organizations to have ethics programs? 1. Many ethical issues within organizations are complex 1. The development of an ethics program forces those within an organization to reach a consensus on appropriate action (proactively) 2. It is nearly impossible to know every detail of the highly complex laws relevant to any particular type of business or job 1. Ethics programs sensitize employees to the potential legal and ethical issues within their work environments 3. To satisfy the publics desire for more responsibility and accountability 4. To eliminate bad apples within an organization through enforcement of the ethical standards adopted by the organization. 5. Organizations that have become bad barrels must redesign their image and culture to conform to industry and social standards of acceptable behavior. 6. In the absence of such programs, employees will make decisions based on their observations of how their coworkers and supervisors behave. 7. To ensure that all employees understand its values and comply with the policies and codes of conduct that create its ethical climate 1. Because employees come from diverse business environments, educational, and family backgrounds, it cannot be assumed that all will know how to behave appropriately when they enter a new organization or job 8. To avoid legal problems by complying with the minimum standards required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and other laws and regulations 1. Failure to comply can result in financial losses (fines and penalties) and the loss of public confidence 2. Carrot-and-stick philosophy 1. Incentive to build and enforce effective ethics programs that encourage employees to make ethical and legal decisions. Control Systems 1. Compliance Orientation 1. Creates order by requiring that employees identify with and commit to specific required conduct 2. Uses legal terms, statutes, and contracts that teach employees the rules and penalties for noncompliance 2. Values Orientation 1. Strives to develop shared values 2. There are penalties, but the focus is more on an abstract core of ideals such as respect and responsibility 3. Does not rely on coercion, but makes the companys values something seen as something to which people willingly aspire. Types of Codes of Conduct 1. Code of ethics 1. Most comprehensive 2. General statements, sometimes altruistic or inspirational, that serve as principles as the basis for rules of conduct 2. Code of Conduct 1. A written document that may contain some inspirational statements but usually specificies acceptable or unacceptable types of behavior 2. More like a regulatory set of rules and lends itself to less debate about specific actions 3. Often developed without the participation of many stakeholder groups 3. Statement of Values 1. Serves the general public and groups of stakeholders 2. Conceived by management and fully developed through input from stakeholders
Who Develops the Code of Ethics 1. President 2. Board of Directors 3. Chief Executive Officers 1. Who will be charged with enforcement of the Code? 4. Legal Counsel 1. To ensure that the Code correctly assesses key areas of risk and provides protection from potential legal problems 2. A Code of Ethics that fails to address specific high-risk activities (e.g., disposing of toxic waste) within the scope of daily operations is inadequate for maintaining standards that can prevent misconduct.
Developing and Implementing a Code of Ethics 1. Consider areas of risk and state the values as well as conduct necessary to comply with laws and regulations. Values are an important buffer in preventing serious misconduct. 2. Identify values that specifically address current ethical issues. 3. Consider values that link the organization to a stakeholder orientation. Attempt to find overlaps in organizational and stakeholder values. 4. Make the Code understandable by providing examples that reflect values. 5. Communicate the Code frequently and in language that employees can understand 6. Revise the code every year with input from organizational members and stakeholders.
Ethics Training and Communication An effective ethics program must include a training program to communicate and educate employees about the companys ethical standards.
Keys to Successful Ethics Training 1. Help employees identify the ethical dimensions of a business decision. 2. Give employees a means to address ethical issues. 3. Help employees understand the ambiguity inherent in ethical situations. 4. Make employees aware that their actions define the companys ethical posture both internally and externally. 5. Provide direction for employees to find managers or others who can help them resolve ethical conflicts. 6. Eliminate the belief that unethical behavior is ever justifiable a. Stretching the ethical boundaries results in unethical behavior b. Whether discovered or not, an unethical act is just that c. An unethical act is never in the best interests of the company d. The firm is held responsible for the misconduct of its members.
Cases we need to know 1. Joe Camel 1. Originally part of a circus 2. 1913 Adopted by R.J. Reynolds tobacco company (RJR) to become the new face of Camel Cigarettes. 3. Made into a cartoon 4. Young kids loved the advertisements. Children between 3 and 6 51% of them recognized Joe as being associated with cigarettes. Kids 12 19 98% had seen an ad for Joe and 58% saw the ads as being cool! 5. American Cancer Association petitioned the Federal Trade Commission to ban the ads completely 6. RJR responded to threat by stating that Camel is able to track 98% of its sales and that they can promise that these sales are not going to young kids. 7. Survey was published, tobacco institutions began a campaign discouraging young people from smoking. 8. It was announced that Joe Camel wasnt going anywhere anytime soon. 9. RJR claimed that, just because children can identify our logo doesnt mean they will identify our product. Even though the amount of under-aged smokers who smoke Camel rose from 5% to 33%. 10. In 1992 CDC reported that Marlboro, Newport and Camel, were the preferred cigarettes for those 12 18 years of age. These are also the brands that do the most advertising. 11. 1992 Campaign called Dump the Hump began. Was established to try to ban all ads that taught children how to smoke. 12. 1993 FTC recommended a ban on Joe Camel ads. 13. 1994 James Johnston, CEO of Camel said, We do not market to children and will not. He added, We do not survey anyone under the age of 18. 14. A chart was discovered the RJR created, which showed the percentage each tobacco company had control over with 14 to 24 year olds 15. It was believed that as that age group matured, they would control the cigarette volume for the next 25 years. 16. 1997 RJR began phasing out Joe Camel and bringing in a healthy look with young men and women hanging out in bars and swimming pools. 17. Soon after came the Tobacco Settlement. The settlement forbidden outdoor advertising, the use of human images, cartoon characters, and vending-machine sales. 18. Suits were settled large amount of money were paid by the tobacco companies. 19. Joe Camel Cartoon Spokesman for Camel Cigarettes 20. David Fishel RJR Spokesman 21. James W. Johnston RJR Tobacco Division Chief/CEO 2. BP 1. BP is a holding company with 3 segments (Exploration & Production, Refining & Marketing, and Gas, Power and Renewable) 2. 2 nd largest oil company in the world 3. Until 2007, BP had been a favorite of nongovernmental organizations and environmental groups 4. Named worlds most admired company 5. 4,000 civil suits paid from a fund of 2.1 billion set aside for litigation. 6. Entered into agreement with EPA for a guilty plea to Clear Air Act violations (50 million dollar fine) 7. 2005 Texas City Refinery Explosion 2005 agreement with OSHA to fix 271 violations, but BP failed to fix any. 8. Explosion at refinery in Texas City, Texas killed 15 and injured 500. 1. Largest fine in OSHA history (87 Million USD) 9. Prudhoe Bay 1. Refinery located on 478,000 aces of land in Alaska 2. Pipes installed in 1977 and were given estimated economic life of 25 years if maintenance was done regularly. 3. March 2006 Pipeline burst and spilled 267,000 gallons of oil 4. Pipeline was severely corroded 5. November 2007 BP pled guilty to negligent discharge of oil, a misdemeanor under the Clean Water Act (20 Million USD fine). 6. July 2011 BP paid 25 Million USD civil penalty 7. November 2012 Announced that Alaska would collect 255 Million USD due to pipeline leaks and shutdown of 2006 (BPs share was $66 million) 10. Inspecting and Cleaning Pipes 1. Coupon Method 1. Sends pieces of metal (coupons) into the pipeline to run with the flow and coupons are inspected to detect corrosion. 2. Used by BP in 1495 locations 2. Smart Pig Method 1. Industry Standard, required every 5 years 2. Smart pig detection device runs along the inside of the pipeline to detect corrosion. 3. BP hadnt done smart pigging at Prudhoe Bay since 1998 and pipes hadnt been cleaned since 1992 11. Trading 1. June 2006 Commodities Futures Trading Commission filed a civil complaint against BP. (Brokers tried to manipulate price of propone by manipulating the supply). 2. August 2006 Justice Department investigates BPs energy trading and stock sales by executives 1. Alleged insider trading by BP brokers 2. Brokers indicted for trading in commodities prior to announcements about production quantity and transport systems 3. $303 million fine, $53 million of which paid investors for incurred losses. 4. September 2009 Federal Judge tosses indictments of BP traders. 12. Additional Oil Spills 1. June 5, 2008 193 barrel oil spill at Atlantis Rig in the Gulf of Mexico 2. April 20, 2010 Deepwater Horizon rig (18,000) feet in the Gulf of Mexico experienced an explosion and oil spill 1. 11 Killed 2. 200 million gallons of oil spilled 3. Largest oil spill & largest environmental disaster in history 4. BP lost 30 billion USD 5. $7 Million per day spent on containment from April July 6. House of Representatives determined that BP didnt follow standards when drilling in the well. 3. Ann Hopkins & PriceWaterhouse 1. Ann Hopkins began her career at PriceWaterhouse (PW) in 1977 2. Became the firms specialist in large-scale computer system design and operations for the federal government. 3. Became a Senior Manager with the Advisory Services division. 4. Senior managers could be submitted for partnership when a current partner submitted their name for candidacy for the nomination process. 5. Partners were told to make comments in the form of a long or short evaluation of the nominee. 6. Partners then voted either to approve, reject or put the candidate on hold until the following year. 7. There were not any restrictions on the number of partnerships granted 8. 1982 Anns name was submitted for candidacy to be considered for the 1983 class of partners. 9. Of the 88 names submitted for partnership, Ann was the only female. 10. Of the current 662 current partners only 7 were females. 11. Ann Hopkins Placed on hold 12. Anns supporters said she was a stellar performer and she was called the rainmaker 13. Ann was responsible for bringing a two year 25 Million Dollar contract. This was the largest contract ever obtained by the firm. 14. She also had the most billable hours out of any candidate. 15. Negative Comments abrasiveness, concerned with her interpersonal skills, difficult to work with.. 16. Macho, overcompensated for being a woman, needs a course in charm school, shouldnt be using foul language because she is a lady, she should walk more femininely, talk more femininely, dress more femininely, wear make-up, have her hair styled and wear jewelry. 17. Aforementioned reasons in point P were reasons that would qualify as gender stereotyping a subtype of gender discrimination. 18. EEOC did not find a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 19. Ann filed suit against PWC 20. Ann won 21. Now, the Supreme Court recognizes stereotyping as a way of establishing discrimination. 22. She was awarded the partnership Essay is performing the 6-step analysis on two of the cases she presented on. Not sure which cases will be on the exam 1. BeechNut 2. Ice T 3. Adelphia 4. Martha Stewart 5. Challenger 6. Salt Lake City Case