0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
31 Ansichten10 Seiten
Wassily Kandinsky's work is grounded on a variety oI reIerences, discourses and Iorms oI knowledge, says anabela mendes. This article aims to compare a Iew instances oI Kandinskys pictorial art (sketches and paintings Irom 1907 to 1912), prose poems (1912), and compositions Ior the stage (1908-1909, 1914) all produced during the Munich and Murnau
Wassily Kandinsky's work is grounded on a variety oI reIerences, discourses and Iorms oI knowledge, says anabela mendes. This article aims to compare a Iew instances oI Kandinskys pictorial art (sketches and paintings Irom 1907 to 1912), prose poems (1912), and compositions Ior the stage (1908-1909, 1914) all produced during the Munich and Murnau
Wassily Kandinsky's work is grounded on a variety oI reIerences, discourses and Iorms oI knowledge, says anabela mendes. This article aims to compare a Iew instances oI Kandinskys pictorial art (sketches and paintings Irom 1907 to 1912), prose poems (1912), and compositions Ior the stage (1908-1909, 1914) all produced during the Munich and Murnau
Research on the work oI Wassily Kandinsky (1866-1944) allows us to realise that his gradually consolidated tendency to claim Ior an art that represents the 'spiritual, together with his Iormal option Ior a growingly abstract type oI painting, is grounded on a Iormative experience that combines a variety oI reIerences, discourses and Iorms oI knowledge. This is tantamount to acknowledging that Kandinsky`s work as a painter is duly balanced and complemented by his theoretical reIlections on art. This article aims to compare a Iew instances oI Kandinsky`s pictorial art (sketches and paintings Irom 1907 to 1912), prose poems (1912), and compositions Ior the stage (1908-1909, 1914) all produced during the Munich and Murnau period. His artistic development was then especially stimulating, inIormed as it was by a project oI reIlection on the perIormative arts characterised by versatility and by a sharp awareness oI the dialogue between painting and the other arts.
It has been said countless times that it is impossible to deIine the aim oI a work oI art by way oI words. And despite a certain superIiciality with which this aIIirmation is oIten made, it is generally correct and will remain so even in an age oI specialised training and knowledge oI language and its properties. This aIIirmation I take leave now oI all objective criteria oI evaluation is correct precisely because the artist himselI never succeeds in apprehending or recognising Iully his own goals. And to conclude: the best words possible miserably Iail when Iaced with what is kept in an embryonic state. (.) I do not wish to paint music. I do not wish to paint various states oI soul. I do not wish to paint either with colour or without colour. I do not wish to alter, decry or demolish a single aspect oI what constitutes harmony in the masterpieces oI the past. I do not wish to reveal to the Iuture its true paths. 1
1.
In January 1914 the Cologne Art Circle (Kreis Ir Kunst Kln), a privately run organisation with no rigidly set cultural agenda (and modelled on turn-oI-the-century Parisian Salons), chose to present a solo exhibition oI the artist Kandinsky in the fover oI the Deutsches Theater in Cologne. The promoters oI this initiative requested the painter`s presence at the opening in order to speak about himselI and his work. The Iirst artist to be invited by the Circle was in Iact already a key Iigure in Germany`s most avant-garde artistic milieus. Furthermore, he, along with Franz Marc, had previously appeared as co-author oI an almanac entitled Der Blaue Reiter (The Blue Rider) in 1912, which would see a second edition as early as 1914. In this work, a trans-disciplinary and trans-historical conception oI
1 From Wassily Kandinsky`s Cologne Lecture, 1914. This text, Iirst published in 1957, can be Iound in its complete Iorm in Wassily Kandinsky, Mein Werdegang (My Future Path), in Kandinskv Die Gesammelten Schriften, vol. 1, ed. by Hans K. Roethel and Jelena Hahl-Koch (Bern: Bentelli, 1980), p.58. 346 Anabela Mendes
art is deIended, a conception which Kandinsky supported enthusiastically and to which he would devote himselI thoroughly in his artistic practice, theorising and teaching Ior many years to come. The extraordinary success that Kandinsky knew as a writer during this period is Iurther seen in his Iirst theoretical work, ber das Geistige in der Kunst, insbesondere in der Malerei (On the Spiritual in Art), published in 1912. 2 In Iact, this publication would be the object oI two new editions later that same year. Also in 1912 the Munich-based editor F. Bruckmann would publish an impressive album oI thirty-eight prose poems, twelve colour and Iorty-three black and white wood-carvings, all by Kandinsky, entitled Klnge (Sounds), and dedicated by this multi-Iaceted artist (painter, wood-carver and poet) to his parents. 3
Despite his having Ielt honoured by the Cologne Art Circles invitation, Kandinsky declined to appear publicly at the inauguration oI the exhibit oI his work on 30 January 1914. Instead, he sent an explanatory outline oI his paintings as well as a typescript entitled Mein Werdegang (My Development) to the event organisers, Mr. Kames and Mr. Livingstone Hahn, which the artist wished to be presented publicly in his name. According to the exhibit promoters, the account oI the evening`s event sent to Kandinsky on the day Iollowing the inauguration reported that the public`s response to his artwork had been unexpectedly enthusiastic although the painter`s high prices had driven away potential purchasers oI his work. The public`s general response to the reading oI several oI the poems comprising the Sounds album was, however, less than Iavourable while the response by the more specialised critics was divided between extreme praise and vitriolic disdain. 4
The typescript prepared by Kandinsky expressly Ior the exhibit had in Iact not been read to the public and has been subsequently lost. Mr. Livingstone Hahn had decided to disregard altogether Kandinsky`s text, providing instead a brieI historical account oI realist and spiritual painting in general, believing such an account to be more to the public`s taste. Mr. Kames would later seek in vain the painter`s permission to publish the Cologne Lecture. The original document would not be printed until 1957, 5 and is today considered to
2 Although the Iirst edition oI On the Spiritual in Art, dedicated to the theoretician and painter`s aunt and Iirst teacher, Elizabeth TichejeII, is dated 1912, this work was in Iact Iirst published by R. Piper & Co. oI Munich in December 1911. OI interest is the editor`s introduction to the republished volume. Max Bill (ed.), Wassily Kandinsky, ber das Geistige in der Kunst (Bern: Bentelli, n/d), p.7. Subsequent reIerences to this work will be designated by the abbreviation GK. 3 The poetic work entitled Sounds was not published again according to its original conception. For Iurther discussion on this matter, see Hans Konrad Roethel`s Kandinskv. Das graphische Werk (Kln: DuMont Schauberg, 1970), pp.445-447. See also Anabela Mendes, Jolumetrie, Klangbild und Farbe im poetischen Werk Klnge von Wassilv Kandinskv. Paper given at the 2 nd International Congress oI the APEG, School oI Letters, University oI Oporto, 2001, p.1. (in press) 4 Kandinsky was inIormed in writing by the directors oI the exhibit oI the impact caused by the event in two letters dated 31 January 1913 and 5 February 1914. Roethel/Hahl-Koch, pp.173-174. 5 The 22-page manuscript can be Iound in archives located in Munich. The Iirst page is, however, missing Irom this manuscript. The surviving text was published Ior the Iirst time in: Johannes Eichner, Kandinskv und Gabriele Mnter.Jon Ursprngen moderner Kunst (Mnchen: Bruckmann, 1957), pp.106-109, 124-125. See also Roethel and Hahl-Koch, p.172. Pulsating Jisions Idioms Incarnate 347
provide Iundamental insights into the artist`s development Irom representational to abstract painting. This summary recounting oI cultural and artistic misadventures during Kandinsky`s career would not be oI great signiIicance were it not Ior the Iact that such occurrences lead us to reIlect upon the possible motivations which subsequently led the artist to produce an ongoing and systematic theoretical and aesthetic account oI his work.
2.
Despite his surprising and unexpected success as published author in the years between 1911 and 1914, Kandinsky Ielt he was sorely misunderstood and considered himselI to be both proIoundly isolated and a beacon Ior enemies. In a letter dated 22 December 1911 addressed to Franz Marc (an artist with whom he would have innumerable diIIerences oI opinion), Kandinsky expresses his discouragement caused by the critics` reaction to The Blue Riders most recent exhibit: 'II you could only imagine how diIIicult it is Ior me at times to endure the hate that continually beIalls me. 6 Years later, while reminiscing about his experiences in the artistic milieu in general, Kandinsky would reiterate his belieI that he had conIronted the concept oI abstraction in art as well as the underlying spiritual transIormation it entails in a solitude oI the most absolute sort. 7
It is saIe to inIer that his path as artist and theorist was in part stimulated by the disparaging and less-than-perceptive reactions published by the specialised critics; reactions which, in turn, led to his exclusion Irom institutional legitimacy during the period preceding the First World War. 8 Moreover, iI the artistic activities by the group Iorming The Blue Rider were oI the meteoric kind, albeit possessed oI an undeniable incandescence, 9
Kandinsky`s own artistic evolution towards abstractionism represents unquestionably a painstaking and highly demanding apprenticeship during which reIlection and experimentation daily intermingled. Besides being a Iorm oI legitimate response to the chorus oI his denigrators, the artist`s theoretical and essay writings express his strong convictions concerning the ontological basis oI art. The reciprocity between theory and practice, between logical thinking and intuition-based thought processes, between reason and Ieeling was, according to Kandinsky, intrinsic to the very genesis oI the work oI art and to its essentially cosmic character.
6 Klaus Lankheit (ed.), Wassilv Kandinskv/Fran: Marc. Briefwechsel. Mit Briefen von und an Gabriele Mnter und Maria Marc (Mnchen, Zrich: R.Piper, 1983), p.84. 7 See Kandinsky`s letters to Thiemann (17.12.1934) and to Hilla Rebay (16.12.1936) in: Reinhard Zimmermann, Die Kunsttheorie von Kandinskv, vol. 1 (Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag, 2002), pp.66-67. 8 For Iurther discussion oI this matter, see Luzius Eggenschwyler, Der wissenschaftliche Prophet. Untersuchungen :u Kandinskvs Kunsttheorie unter besonderer Bercksichtigung seiner :weiten theoretischen Hauptschrift 'Punkt und Linie zu Flche (Zrich: unpublished B.A. dissertation, 1991), p.42. 9 The socially non-engage, provocative and radical way in which the two exhibits were organised by The Blue Rider group in Munich in January 1909 and September 1910 should not be Iorgotten. These exhibits were connected to the Neue Knstlervereinigung Mnchen NKVM (New Association oI Artists) and represent a major break with the predominant academicism oI that period. 348 Anabela Mendes
In the aIorementioned Cologne Lecture, which, as has been stated, the public present at his inaugural exhibit oI 1914 did not hear, the Iollowing thoughts would have been heard:
The essence oI soul is oI divine and spiritual origin. In the human being soul is enveloped by Ilesh, by Ilesh made oI soul and subject to a myriad oI external inIluences and coloured by them. Thus, works oI art can also be subject to such 'dispositions and coloured by them as well. It is by this colouration that we recognise the immutable reverberation oI the immutable diapason. The universal Iorce oI this reverberation, which emanates in resplendent Iashion throughout the artist`s output, legitimates both the artist and his work. 10
From Kandinsky`s neo-platonic perspective, the work oI art exists Iirst in abstracto beIore becoming material object. Such a perspective makes the utterly plausible claim that any sequence oI events that brings the particular work oI art to actual concrete reality is valid, regardless oI whether its emergence into concrete Iorm is oI a rationally cognitive or a more intuitive nature. The creator oI a work oI art is, according to Kandinsky, indebted to a supreme creative spirit and thereIore dependent on 'Spirit (der Geist) alone, i.e., on an abstract quality, 'the spiritual (das Geistige). This is what characterises the artistic experience in general and maniIests itselI by way oI an 'inner vibration (innerer Klang). It is to the creator oI art and to him/her alone to decide in what way s/he will make use (or not) oI the cognitive and intuitive Iaculties at his/her disposal provided that s/he is able to distinguish what is Ialse in each one oI these Iaculties, i.e., all that is inadequate or prejudicial in regard to his/her artistic intention at any given moment. 11
3.
The years between 1908 and 1914 were particularly Iertile ones Ior Kandinsky, who during this period produced poetry, paintings, wood-carvings, aesthetic theory, a new conception oI theatre and short musical compositions as well as devoted himselI to gardening, bicycling and long nature walks. In Iine health despite persistent bouts oI hypochondria, Kandinsky grew both artistically and intellectually during this
10 Roethel and Hahl-Koch, p.51. 11 Roethel and Hahl-Koch, p.58. Kandinskv and Mnter going on a life fournev, 15 Mav 1904, Dsseldorf (Gabriele Mnter and Johannes Eichner Foundation, Munich) Pulsating Jisions Idioms Incarnate 349
period in the loving company oI Gabriele Mnter, his companion and Iellow painter oI more than a decade. The artist`s Munich and Murnau phase is considered to be one oI his most productive and artistically most eclectic periods. During these ten years his activities in the area oI design, painting and wood-carving succeed in placing the representational and the progressively more abstract on Iriendly terms. 12 The artistic consequences oI this development can be observed, Ior example, in the painter`s preIerence Ior experimentation with the eIIects oI brush strokes oI colour as the predominant organisational principle oI the pictorial space rather than the use oI the objects depicted or their speciIic location on the canvas as the latter`s organisational Iocus. In the Cologne Lecture Kandinsky also addresses this issue:
I Ielt simultaneously an incomprehensible agitation and the impulse to paint a picture. And the thought that this picture could be a beautiIul landscape, or an interesting pictorial scene, or the representation oI a human Iigure did not at all satisIy me. Since I loved colour the most, I began to conceive vaguely oI a colour composition in which the representational element would be seen through the Iilter oI the colours themselves. 13
Kandinsky is driven by a veritable furor divinus although this furor diIIers markedly Irom Plato`s understanding oI poetic inspiration, i.e., the latter`s belieI in the transcendent nature oI divine inspiration maniIesting itselI in the artist as a totally untutored giIt. 14 On the contrary, Ior Kandinsky artistic creativity signiIies a careIul process oI distilling several languages (i.e., pictorial, graphic, poetic and scenic, the latter considered both in its instrumental and vocal aspects). Moreover, his desire to produce trans-disciplinary works both oI an aesthetic and ethical nature is inseparable Irom his ongoing philosophical speculations. Kandinsky considers his multi-artistic and multi-modal experimentation to be reIlective Iirst oI a purely exterior principle which states that the Iusion oI the arts should grow out oI 'a work in space that involves a process oI construction. 15 His stage compositions exempliIy this principle in the sense that in them can be Iound music, song, spoken word, dance, light and colour. This Iirst principle is quite naturally and organically applied to the process oI creation Ior the stage although it can easily be extended to include the creation oI poetic texts and pictorial imagery as well. A second principle addresses, according to Kandinsky, the artist`s inner experiences; it depends directly upon the abstract categories deIined by the artist as 'inner vibration and 'spirituality. The conIluence oI the exterior and inner principles suggests the existence oI a synthetic principle bridging external and
12 See also: Gisela Kleine, Gabriele Mnter und Wassilv Kandinskv Biographie eines Paares (FrankIurt am Main, Leipzig: Insel Verlag, 1994), pp.319-452; Armin Zweite, Die Linie zum inneren Klang beIreien Kandinskys Kunsterneuung vor dem Horizont der Zeit`, in Kandinskv. Kleine Freude. Aquarelle und Zeichnungen |Catalog oI the DsseldorI/Stuttgart Exhibit|, ed. by Vivian Endicott Barnett and Armin Zweite (Mnchen: Prestel-Verlag, 1992), pp.9-32. 13 Roethel and Hahl-Koch, p.54. 14 Plato, Apology`, in The Trial and Death of Socrates, trans. by F.J. Church (London: Macmillan, 1928), pp.43-4 (22 b-c). 15 See Kandinsky`s letter to Grohmann, dated 5.10.1924 in Zimmermann, p.346. 350 Anabela Mendes
inner reality, nature and art. This synthesis gives rise to an aesthetic principle Iounded on the simultaneous stimulation oI all oI the 'receptor`s senses, the experience oI which also includes the integration oI synaesthetic processes. Once the external and inner principles are correctly identiIied, the Iundamental idea underlying Kandinsky`s aesthetic theory can be elucidated, which states in essence that by way oI works based on the aIorementioned Iusion oI the arts a modus operandi oI sensorial stimulation leading to the human being`s spiritual liberation can ultimately be divined.
4.
In his activities devoted to painting in his Munich and Murnau period Kandinsky became mainly concerned with the study oI colour and its multiple eIIects. He also explores Iorm in its inIinite possibilities, at times, however, neglecting content, and studies the changes oI perspective caused by the deliberate decentring and displacement oI elements or sections oI the pictorial composition. In many oI the paintings oI this period, objects or reIerences to objects are all but absent with the exception oI an assortment oI recurrent yet evolving motiIs made up oI towers, cupolas, boats with their oars, birds, mountains and the unmistakable medieval knight. These motiIs recall the artist`s abiding passion Ior the Russia oI his childhood and youth. In subsequent phases oI the artist`s work, he would also make use oI shamanic motiIs, reshaping artistically his ethnographic experiences in the Vologda region oI northern Russia in 1889. 16
II we observe Kandinsky`s paintings as a process oI mise-en-scene, we readily become aware oI the role played by concealment and disguise, but also oI how the heavy emphasis given to the work`s constitutive elements (i.e., colour choice, a ludic approach to Iorm, rhythms and movement) creates, by way oI the expressive devices at his disposal, a language oI absolute exceptionality operating outside the descriptive norms oI general linguistic capability. In addition, Ior Kandinsky this exceptional language is motivated by a sense oI the 'pure (Reinheit) and closely linked with a proIound artistic sensibility: it is the very echo resonating Irom the great divine and spiritual Opus. 17
It is this sense oI the 'pure underlying his pictorial theory and practice that can equally be Iound in his poetic writings, Ior instance the Klnge (Sounds) album oI 1912 as well as in his theatre project which would come to Iruition in 1928, when he staged, prepared the stage sets and designed the lighting and models Ior a production oI Modest Mussorgsky`s Pictures at an Exhibition given at the Friedrich Theatre in Dessau. Between 1906 and 1923 the painter created Iourteen compositions Ior the stage in addition to writing three essays on
16 The daily contact Kandinsky maintained with several autochthonous populations (Finno-Ugrian, Lap and Siberian) at this time led him to discover an ancient religious, Iolkloric and iconographic heritage which the painter would subsequently incorporate into some oI his paintings Irom the Munich and Murnau period up to his late Parisian period. These paintings display small, gaily coloured, organic Iigures that are known as representatives oI 'biomorphic abstraction. For Iurther discussion, see: Peg Weiss, Kandinskv and the Old Russia The Artist as Ethnographer and Shaman (New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 1995). 17 See also Bill, GK, pp.132-143. Pulsating Jisions Idioms Incarnate 351
the art oI stagecraIt, deIining the latter as the embodiment of total art, the abstract synthesis oI art itselI. II Ior Kandinsky the act oI painting was an act oI violence, acknowledged by him in an autobiographical text, 18 his stage compositions reveal an artist who approaches the blank page in an unhurried, painstaking and meticulous manner; the artist develops a rigorous process oI textual notation Ior an essentially instructive or expository score accompanied by small preparatory sketches and designs. These preparatory designs appear to be the source oI his idea Ior an almost minimalist writing Ior the theatre; they can also be considered to be the point oI departure or arrival Ior a painting or poem. In Grner Klang (Green Sound), a work written between 1908 and 1909, we discover a composition divided into two scenes, both enacted by a vast assortment oI human Iigures (women, men, children, a beggar and a cripple), whose spatial organisation and movement not only reveal a structure oI audible, pictorial and rhythmic contrasts but also require the reader`s or spectator`s participation in a momentary process oI ontological, mystical and transcendental reIlection on the cosmic dimension oI human destiny. The title oI this short composition accentuates the Iigure oI the beggar dressed in green (a serene, quiescent and discreet colour in this work), 19 who plays an ambivalent role here: is he simply a wretched beggar or rather the saviour oI humankind? The title also conveys the symbolic importance oI voice, Ior it is through song that the Iigure oI the beggar becomes an object oI inquiry, Iirst in a Iemale Iigure`s love song (in which she also appears dressed in green) then by the reedy lamentation uttered by the cripple. This brieI composition Ior the stage shares certain aIIinities with the poem 'Lied (Song) 20 Irom the Sounds album, as well as with the painting Das bunte Leben (The Coloured LiIe) oI 1907.
18 In his autobiographical work Rckblicke (Reminiscences), Kandinsky states that learning to paint implied a combat with the canvas and a subsequent victory over the latter; he thus justiIies, both literally and Iiguratively, his aggressive libidinous nature. The process oI understanding his obstinate nature in the Iace oI diIIiculties related to the control oI creative stimuli during the materialisation oI the desired work oI art would appear to be at issue here. Roethel and Hahl-Koch, p.41. 19 Bill, GK, p.94. 20 We provide below a published translation oI this poem originally entitled 'Lied:
SONG A man sits in A narrow ring, A narrow ring OI thinness. He is content. He has no ear. And doesn`t have his eyeballs. He cannot Iind What`s leIt behind OI red sounds oI the sun ball. Whatever Ialls Stands up again. And what was dumb, 352 Anabela Mendes
Toward the end oI 1908 Kandinsky wrote a new stage composition entitled Schwar: und Weiss (Black and White). The text Ior this piece is organised into Iour orchestrated scenes and reveals an ascendent progression oI dynamic moments around a small male Iigure dressed in black as well as an indistinguishable white Iorm oI disproportionately gigantic dimensions depicting the artist`s embryonic conception oI a woman. During the Iirst three scenes oI the piece, the composer builds his abstract universe by way oI these two Iigures (symbolic representations oI liIe and death, oI the positive and negative, viewed in their essential complementarities). He simultaneously Iills the space with a series oI miniature- like human Iigures, cloaked in heterogeneous colours and given to explosive movement, who contrast in size, rhythm and directionality with the heavy props which invoke the natural world, depicted here in uncommon dimensions. In the Iourth scene a change oI scenery and oI the organisation and behaviour oI the scene`s participants occurs, a change announced by a strident overture. The space is now dominated by a black knight mounted on a white horse that slowly crosses the stage diagonally. In contrast with the voluminous horse and knight couple and their ponderous traversal oI the stage, much smaller Iigures dressed in shades oI green once again appear; they Iorm a mountain oI squatting Iigures and appear to be located at the centre oI the earth. The entire scene comes alive through the successive light changes, the sounds made by the horse`s hooves and the appearance oI a bird. The composition aims to instil in the spectator a process oI inner polarisation as a result oI the interaction oI contrasting aesthetic stimuli built on the now opposed, now complementary pair oI black and white Iigures. The composition as a whole, particularly its last scene, can be objectively compared to Kandinsky`s pictorial universe and colour schemes oI the same period. Moreover, there exist several studies by the painter as well as copies made by Olga von Hartmann Ior this stage composition that likewise push the boundaries oI stage and pictorial languages. Kandinsky gave the title Jiolett (Violet) to his last stage composition. Originally entitled Jioletter Jorhang (Violet Curtain), the artist worked on it between 1908 and 1926. Although this piece heeds the same principles as the earlier ones, Jiolet possesses a much greater inner and external complexity. We discover here Ior the Iirst time a text that is unabashedly absurd, derisive and disconcerting in its humour. In Iact, some contemporaries believed it to be an example oI dada writing. 21
It sings a song. Until the man, Who has no ear, And doesn`t have his eyeballs, Will start to Iind Signs leIt behind OI red sounds oI the sun ball.
(Wassily Kandinsky |1912|, Sounds, trans and intro by Elizabeth R. Napier |New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1981|, p.128.) 21 Ulrika-Maria Eller-Rter, Kandinskv Bhnenkomposition und Dichtung als Reali:ation seines Svnthese- Kon:epts (Hildesheim, Zrich, New York: Georg Olms Verlag, 1990), p.94. See also Jessica Boissel (ed.), Wassilv Kandinskv ber das Theater Du Theatre O Teatpe (Kln: DuMont, 1998), p.213. Pulsating Jisions Idioms Incarnate 353
This stage composition is made up oI seven scenes, two interludes and an apotheosis. The scenes include various caricatured Iigures, some recognizable as characters Irom earlier compositions and voicing similar themes: the metaphysical dimension oI liIe, a deep inquiry into the nature oI the world, and the Iate oI the individual versus the undiIIerentiated masses. Despite their anonymous condition, these beings devoid oI psychological deIinition are nonetheless quite Iinely and incisively hewn. The middle and Iinal structures oI this composition are in our opinion oI particular interest. They Iorm together an intensely unique logic underpinned by a rigorous light design revelatory oI a truly proIessional- level lighting technique. In the Iirst oI the two interludes, occurring just beIore the third scene, the main character, so to speak, is in Iact a red dot that traverses the stage beIore widening into a large circle. Immediately aIterwards, the surIace oI the newly Iormed red circle envelops a diIIuse yellow spot that moves in a vertical upward and downward motion. This dynamic pair then interacts with a blue ellipse that Ilickers in the right-hand corner oI the stage. The interlude closes as the diIIerent colours Iade into the dominant red accompanied by the sound oI trumpets. In the Iinal interlude, which occurs just beIore the IiIth scene, the main characters are a black spot and diagonal lines that move in all directions, sometimes Irom opposite ends, while traversing a white screen in now curved, now rectilinear, now vibratory motion. The ecstatic mood generated by this scene is the result oI the rapid interplay oI these elements and their presentation in the Iorm oI a kaleidoscopic vision amidst a tremendous raucous explosion. Jiolets Iinale is both extensive and possessed oI a compositional unity giving to it a virtual autonomy vis-a-vis the rest oI the piece. Whether it is perceived as an autonomous piece or as the Iinal act oI this stage composition, however, Apotheosis is a Irenzied event oI euphoric colour, a riot oI Iree Iorms colliding and clashing together; in short, it is a tableau that inspires a truly uncommon perspective. Why does Kandinsky give the name Apotheosis to this Iinale? Why does Kandinsky wish to show his readers museum goers and potential spectators oI his compositions Ior the stage this veritable atelier in action? Let us listen to this picture-writing, ready Ior the stage, as iI the now wished to Iree itselI Irom the ever eternal, ever spiritual plane:
Wassily Kandinsky, Glass Painting with Red Spot, c.1913 (Municipal Gallery, Lenbachhaus) 354 Anabela Mendes
A series oI coloured brush strokes appear in diIIerent combinations and in diIIerent places. The red is exhausted. To the right, quite low, near the margin, a great green circle emerges suddenly Irom a single point. The entire scene begins to turn: it veers on its leIt side which then occupies an inIerior position; the higher part is now the lower part. Another quick spin Iollows. And another. And yet another and another. Each time more quickly. The entire scene spins like a wheel with ever increasing speed. The sounds oI a whip are heard. Ever louder and quicker. The colours and sounds then run oII wildly. 22
In Kandinsky the interplay oI the material and the spiritual, which underpins his concept oI the 'abstract (even when he considers it to be 'concrete), 23 emerges Iundamentally Irom his idea oI construction, his principle oI organisation oI every intervening expressive element or device, i.e., light, colour, Iorm, texture, rhythm, resonance, vibration, movement, voice, body, musicality, etc. This interplay encompasses the speciIic artistic medium which holds them together as well as the Iorces involved in their interaction. These elements, which interact either in a convergent Iashion or in a multiplicity oI heterogeneous expansions, produce now isolated, now large or discrete packets oI meaning possessed oI an autonomy oI expression. These elements or devices, however, never abandon an active sense oI totality or wholeness governed by principles which are exclusive oI the work oI art in question: the nature oI these principles is dictated by the work oI art itselI. This Iundamental idea oI the non-appropriation oI principles, which creates the speciIic viability oI each individual work, allows us to live the intentionalities and energies which together drive the idea oI composition inherent in Kandinsky`s scenic, poetic and pictorial work.
22 Wassily Kandinsky, Apotheosis` (1914), in Boissel, p.272; my translation. 23 CI. Max Bill (ed.), Konkrete Kunst (1938) and abstrakt oder konkret (1938), in Kandinskv, Essavs ber Kunst und Knstler (Bern: Benteli-Verlag, (2) 1963), pp.217-221, 223-225.