Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • 2014-09-13 Human Right Alert (NGO) : Appendix To UPR Submission - United States - 22nd Session - "Large-Scale Fraud in IT Systems of The US Courts - Unannounced Regime Change?"

    Hochgeladen von

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    321 Ansichten165 Seiten
    Executive Summary Wide segments of the people of the United States today hold that the US government has undergone a transformation over the past couple of decades, and the US Constitution is no longer in force and effect. Instant submission documents that the US Constitution was indeed voided or suspended, and that the implementation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems in the US courts was a key event in this regard, which enables widespread judicial corruption and disregard of the law of the United States and the US Constitution. At the same time, such IT systems provide unique evidence of systemic judicial corruption, fraud on the courts, and abuse of Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights. Allegations: 1. The IT systems of the US courts enable the routine conduct of simulated (sham/fake) litigation and the publication of simulated judicial records; 2. Under such circumstances, the rule of law and the US Constitution are effectively voided, access to the courts is effectively denied; 3, Such conditions should be considered unannounced regime change; 4. Such conditions amount to violation of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite; 5. Corruption of the US courts and the legal profession is a central cause of the current socio-economic crisis in the United States and beyond. Evidence: IT system analysis documents: a) IT Systems were developed and implemented with no lawful authority; b) Identity of the servers of the US courts is unverified; c) No valid electronic signatures were implemented; d) Invalid, fraudulent authentication and service instruments and procedures were implemented (NEF/NDA); e) A “double books” system was implemented; f) Invalid authorities and permissions were implemented; g) The systems affect discrimination in access to the courts; h) Appearance of attorneys, who are not authorized as Counsel of Record, is enabled; i) Universal failure to docket summonses - a critical failure in integrity; j) Adulteration and deletion of court records; k) Inexplicable, unreasonable differences among the IT systems of the various courts. Case studies document the employment of such systems in the conduct of simulated litigation affecting abuse of the rights of Liberty and property, as well as other Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights. Today, such corruption is particularly noted in cases, originating in corruption of judges and other government officers, and in fraud by the banking industry on individuals, on shareholders, on taxpayers, and on an entire nation (Argentina). Conclusions: 1. Through the implementation and operation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems, the US courts today routinely conduct simulated litigation, unlawfully deprive the liberty and property of individuals, and place the banks above the law. Such conduct amounts to Organized State-corporate Crime. 2. Such conduct amounts to serious violation of fundamental Human Rights of the people of the United States. 3. Such conduct is also central to the current socio-economic crisis, failing banking regulation, and the “Foreclosure Crisis”, which resulted in vast increase in poverty and homelessness. 4. The validity of any legal and judicial records, originating in the United States, and the validity of any litigation in the US courts should be considered dubious. 5. The international community should reassess the nature of the current regime in the United States, particularly relative to serious violations of the Human Rights of the people of the US . 6. Efforts to address conditions, which have been established in the US, and to restore the force and effect of the US Constitution and US law, are likely be protracted and meet stark resistance by powerful US security, legal, and financial interest groups. Recommendations: Emerging from current conditions would require a fundamental and comprehensive corrective process in the US at a time, when the political

    Originaltitel

    2014-09-13 Human Right Alert (NGO): Appendix to UPR Submission - United States - 22nd session - "Large-scale fraud in IT systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?"

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Verfügbare Formate

    PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    Executive Summary Wide segments of the people of the United States today hold that the US government has undergone a transformation over the past couple of decades, and the US Constitution is no longer in force and effect. Instant submission documents that the US Constitution was indeed voided or suspended, and that the implementation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems in the US courts was a key event in this regard, which enables widespread judicial corruption and disregard of the law of the United States and the US Constitution. At the same time, such IT systems provide unique evidence of systemic judicial corruption, fraud on the courts, and abuse of Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights. Allegations: 1. The IT systems of the US courts enable the routine conduct of simulated (sham/fake) litigation and the publication of simulated judicial records; 2. Under such circumstances, the rule of law and the US Constitution are effectively voided, access to the courts is effectively denied; 3, Such conditions should be considered unannounced regime change; 4. Such conditions amount to violation of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite; 5. Corruption of the US courts and the legal profession is a central cause of the current socio-economic crisis in the United States and beyond. Evidence: IT system analysis documents: a) IT Systems were developed and implemented with no lawful authority; b) Identity of the servers of the US courts is unverified; c) No valid electronic signatures were implemented; d) Invalid, fraudulent authentication and service instruments and procedures were implemented (NEF/NDA); e) A “double books” system was implemented; f) Invalid authorities and permissions were implemented; g) The systems affect discrimination in access to the courts; h) Appearance of attorneys, who are not authorized as Counsel of Record, is enabled; i) Universal failure to docket summonses - a critical failure in integrity; j) Adulteration and deletion of court records; k) Inexplicable, unreasonable differences among the IT systems of the various courts. Case studies document the employment of such systems in the conduct of simulated litigation affecting abuse of the rights of Liberty and property, as well as other Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights. Today, such corruption is particularly noted in cases, originating in corruption of judges and other government officers, and in fraud by the banking industry on individuals, on shareholders, on taxpayers, and on an entire nation (Argentina). Conclusions: 1. Through the implementation and operation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems, the US courts today routinely conduct simulated litigation, unlawfully deprive the liberty and property of individuals, and place the banks above the law. Such conduct amounts to Organized State-corporate Crime. 2. Such conduct amounts to serious violation of fundamental Human Rights of the people of the United States. 3. Such conduct is also central to the current socio-economic crisis, failing banking regulation, and the “Foreclosure Crisis”, which resulted in vast increase in poverty and homelessness. 4. The validity of any legal and judicial records, originating in the United States, and the validity of any litigation in the US courts should be considered dubious. 5. The international community should reassess the nature of the current regime in the United States, particularly relative to serious violations of the Human Rights of the people of the US . 6. Efforts to address conditions, which have been established in the US, and to restore the force and effect of the US Constitution and US law, are likely be protracted and meet stark resistance by powerful US security, legal, and financial interest groups. Recommendations: Emerging from current conditions would require a fundamental and comprehensive corrective process in the US at a time, when the political

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    321 Ansichten165 Seiten

    2014-09-13 Human Right Alert (NGO) : Appendix To UPR Submission - United States - 22nd Session - "Large-Scale Fraud in IT Systems of The US Courts - Unannounced Regime Change?"

    Hochgeladen von

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    Executive Summary Wide segments of the people of the United States today hold that the US government has undergone a transformation over the past couple of decades, and the US Constitution is no longer in force and effect. Instant submission documents that the US Constitution was indeed voided or suspended, and that the implementation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems in the US courts was a key event in this regard, which enables widespread judicial corruption and disregard of the law of the United States and the US Constitution. At the same time, such IT systems provide unique evidence of systemic judicial corruption, fraud on the courts, and abuse of Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights. Allegations: 1. The IT systems of the US courts enable the routine conduct of simulated (sham/fake) litigation and the publication of simulated judicial records; 2. Under such circumstances, the rule of law and the US Constitution are effectively voided, access to the courts is effectively denied; 3, Such conditions should be considered unannounced regime change; 4. Such conditions amount to violation of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite; 5. Corruption of the US courts and the legal profession is a central cause of the current socio-economic crisis in the United States and beyond. Evidence: IT system analysis documents: a) IT Systems were developed and implemented with no lawful authority; b) Identity of the servers of the US courts is unverified; c) No valid electronic signatures were implemented; d) Invalid, fraudulent authentication and service instruments and procedures were implemented (NEF/NDA); e) A “double books” system was implemented; f) Invalid authorities and permissions were implemented; g) The systems affect discrimination in access to the courts; h) Appearance of attorneys, who are not authorized as Counsel of Record, is enabled; i) Universal failure to docket summonses - a critical failure in integrity; j) Adulteration and deletion of court records; k) Inexplicable, unreasonable differences among the IT systems of the various courts. Case studies document the employment of such systems in the conduct of simulated litigation affecting abuse of the rights of Liberty and property, as well as other Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights. Today, such corruption is particularly noted in cases, originating in corruption of judges and other government officers, and in fraud by the banking industry on individuals, on shareholders, on taxpayers, and on an entire nation (Argentina). Conclusions: 1. Through the implementation and operation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems, the US courts today routinely conduct simulated litigation, unlawfully deprive the liberty and property of individuals, and place the banks above the law. Such conduct amounts to Organized State-corporate Crime. 2. Such conduct amounts to serious violation of fundamental Human Rights of the people of the United States. 3. Such conduct is also central to the current socio-economic crisis, failing banking regulation, and the “Foreclosure Crisis”, which resulted in vast increase in poverty and homelessness. 4. The validity of any legal and judicial records, originating in the United States, and the validity of any litigation in the US courts should be considered dubious. 5. The international community should reassess the nature of the current regime in the United States, particularly relative to serious violations of the Human Rights of the people of the US . 6. Efforts to address conditions, which have been established in the US, and to restore the force and effect of the US Constitution and US law, are likely be protracted and meet stark resistance by powerful US security, legal, and financial interest groups. Recommendations: Emerging from current conditions would require a fundamental and comprehensive corrective process in the US at a time, when the political

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 165

    Human Rights Alert (NGO)

    Joseph Zernik, PhD


    PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv, Israel
    joseph.zernikhra!n"o.or"
    2014-09-13 Human Right Alert (NGO): Appendix t !"R #u$mi%%in - !nited #tate% - 22nd %e%%in
    &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    -xe'uti.e #ummar+
    #i$e se"%en&s o' &he people o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es &o$a* hol$ &ha& &he () "overn%en& has +n$er"one a &rans'or%a&ion
    over &he pas& ,o+ple o' $e,a$es, an$ &he () -ons&i&+&ion is no lon"er in 'or,e an$ e''e,&. Ins&an& s+.%ission $o,+%en&s
    &ha& &he () -ons&i&+&ion /as in$ee$ voi$e$ or s+spen$e$, an$ &ha& &he i%ple%en&a&ion o' invali$, 'ra+$+len& IT s*s&e%s in
    &he () ,o+r&s /as a ke* even& in &his re"ar$, /hi,h ena.les /i$esprea$ j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion an$ $isre"ar$ o' &he la/ o' &he
    (ni&e$ )&a&es an$ &he () -ons&i&+&ion. A& &he sa%e &i%e, s+,h IT s*s&e%s provi$e +ni0+e evi$en,e o' s*s&e%i, j+$i,ial
    ,orr+p&ion, 'ra+$ on &he ,o+r&s, an$ a.+se o' -ivil, -ons&i&+&ional, an$ 1+%an 2i"h&s.
    Allegatin%: 3. The IT s*s&e%s o' &he () ,o+r&s ena.le &he ro+&ine ,on$+,& o' si%+la&e$ 4sha%5'ake6 li&i"a&ion an$ &he
    p+.li,a&ion o' si%+la&e$ j+$i,ial re,or$s7 8. (n$er s+,h ,ir,+%s&an,es, &he r+le o' la/ an$ &he () -ons&i&+&ion are
    e''e,&ivel* voi$e$, a,,ess &o &he ,o+r&s is e''e,&ivel* $enie$7 3, )+,h ,on$i&ions sho+l$ .e ,onsi$ere$ +nanno+n,e$
    re"i%e ,han"e7 4. )+,h ,on$i&ions a%o+n& &o viola&ion o' an* ar&i,le o' &he Universal Declaration of Human Rights, /here
    in&e"ri&* o' &he ,o+r&s an$ &he j+s&i,e s*s&e% is a prere0+isi&e7 9. -orr+p&ion o' &he () ,o+r&s an$ &he le"al pro'ession is a
    ,en&ral ,a+se o' &he ,+rren& so,io!e,ono%i, ,risis in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es an$ .e*on$.
    -.iden'e: IT s*s&e% anal*sis $o,+%en&s: a6 IT )*s&e%s /ere $evelope$ an$ i%ple%en&e$ /i&h no la/'+l a+&hori&*7 .6
    I$en&i&* o' &he servers o' &he () ,o+r&s is +nveri'ie$7 ,6 ;o vali$ ele,&roni, si"na&+res /ere i%ple%en&e$7 $6 Invali$,
    'ra+$+len& a+&hen&i,a&ion an$ servi,e ins&r+%en&s an$ pro,e$+res /ere i%ple%en&e$ 4;<=5;DA67 e6 A >$o+.le .ooks?
    s*s&e% /as i%ple%en&e$7 '6 Invali$ a+&hori&ies an$ per%issions /ere i%ple%en&e$7 "6 The s*s&e%s a''e,& $is,ri%ina&ion
    in a,,ess &o &he ,o+r&s7 h6 Appearan,e o' a&&orne*s, /ho are no& a+&horize$ as -o+nsel o' 2e,or$, is ena.le$7 i6 (niversal
    'ail+re &o $o,ke& s+%%onses ! a ,ri&i,al 'ail+re in in&e"ri&*7 j6 A$+l&era&ion an$ $ele&ion o' ,o+r& re,or$s7 k6 Inexpli,a.le,
    +nreasona.le $i''eren,es a%on" &he IT s*s&e%s o' &he vario+s ,o+r&s.
    -ase s&+$ies $o,+%en& &he e%plo*%en& o' s+,h s*s&e%s in &he ,on$+,& o' si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion a''e,&in" a.+se o' &he
    ri"h&s o' @i.er&* an$ proper&*, as /ell as o&her -ivil, -ons&i&+&ional, an$ 1+%an 2i"h&s. To$a*, s+,h ,orr+p&ion is
    par&i,+larl* no&e$ in ,ases, ori"ina&in" in ,orr+p&ion o' j+$"es an$ o&her "overn%en& o''i,ers, an$ in 'ra+$ .* &he .ankin"
    in$+s&r* on in$ivi$+als, on sharehol$ers, on &axpa*ers, an$ on an en&ire na&ion 4Ar"en&ina6.
    /n'lu%in%: 3. Thro+"h &he i%ple%en&a&ion an$ opera&ion o' invali$, 'ra+$+len& IT s*s&e%s, &he () ,o+r&s &o$a*
    ro+&inel* ,on$+,& si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion, +nla/'+ll* $eprive &he li.er&* an$ proper&* o' in$ivi$+als, an$ pla,e &he .anks a.ove
    &he la/. )+,h ,on$+,& a%o+n&s &o Or"anize$ )&a&e!,orpora&e -ri%e. 8. )+,h ,on$+,& a%o+n&s &o serio+s viola&ion o'
    '+n$a%en&al 1+%an 2i"h&s o' &he people o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es. 3. )+,h ,on$+,& is also ,en&ral &o &he ,+rren& so,io!
    e,ono%i, ,risis, 'ailin" .ankin" re"+la&ion, an$ &he >=ore,los+re -risis?, /hi,h res+l&e$ in vas& in,rease in pover&* an$
    ho%elessness. 4. The vali$i&* o' an* le"al an$ j+$i,ial re,or$s, ori"ina&in" in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, an$ &he vali$i&* o' an*
    li&i"a&ion in &he () ,o+r&s sho+l$ .e ,onsi$ere$ $+.io+s. 9. The in&erna&ional ,o%%+ni&* sho+l$ reassess &he na&+re o'
    &he ,+rren& re"i%e in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, par&i,+larl* rela&ive &o serio+s viola&ions o' &he 1+%an 2i"h&s o' &he people o' &he
    () . A. <''or&s &o a$$ress ,on$i&ions, /hi,h have .een es&a.lishe$ in &he (), an$ &o res&ore &he 'or,e an$ e''e,& o' &he ()
    -ons&i&+&ion an$ () la/, are likel* .e pro&ra,&e$ an$ %ee& s&ark resis&an,e .* po/er'+l () se,+ri&*, le"al, an$ 'inan,ial
    in&eres& "ro+ps.
    Re'mmendatin%: <%er"in" 'ro% ,+rren& ,on$i&ions /o+l$ re0+ire a '+n$a%en&al an$ ,o%prehensive ,orre,&ive
    pro,ess in &he () a& a &i%e, /hen &he poli&i,al pro,ess i&sel' is +n$er%ine$ .* ,orr+p&ion o' &he () ,o+r&s: 3. The lar"e!
    s,ale 'ra+$ in &he () ,o+r&s, /hi,h in 'a,& i%pli,a&es ea,h an$ ever* () si&&in" j+$"e, /o+l$ likel* re0+ire an approa,h
    s+,h as a Tr+&h an$ 2e,on,ilia&ion -o%%ission, or a )e,on$ -ons&i&+&ional -onven&ion. 8. D+e &o &he ,en&ral role o' &he
    A$%inis&ra&ive O''i,e o' &he () -o+r&s in i%ple%en&in" &he 'ra+$+len& IT s*s&e%s o' &he () ,o+r&s, &he O''i,e sho+l$ .e
    res&r+,&+re$ or ,lose$. 3. Beas+res, si%ilar &o &hose &aken a ,en&+r* a"o, +n$er si%ilar ,ir,+%s&an,es &hro+"h ena,&%en&
    o' &he Salary Act 43C3C6, /hi,h pla,e$ &he ,lerks o' &he () ,o+r&s +n$er &he $ire,& a+&hori&* o' &he A&&orne* Deneral,
    sho+l$ .e ,onsi$ere$. 4. () le"al an$ ,o%p+&in" exper&s sho+l$ .e e%plo*e$ in an ini&ia&ive &o res&ore &he in&e"ri&* o' &he
    IT s*s&e%s o' &he () ,o+r&s +n$er a,,o+n&a.ili&* &o &he () -on"ress, /i&h &he "oal o' %akin" s+,h s*s&e% as &ransparen&
    as possi.le &o &he p+.li, a& lar"e. 9. In na&ions, /here &he separa&ion o' .ran,hes is es&a.lishe$ .* la/, &he ,o+r&s %+s&
    no& .e per%i&&e$ &o $evelop an$ i%ple%en& &heir o/n IT s*s&e%s. A. 1+%an 2i"h&s an$ in&erne& a,&ivis&s %+s& keep a
    /a&,h'+l e*e on &he vali$i&* an$ in&e"ri&* o' IT s*s&e%s o' &he ,o+r&s an$ prisons.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    1/165 TOC:2
    Digitally
    signed by
    Joseph
    Zernik, PhD
    Date:
    2014.09.13
    22:24:03
    +03'00'
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    2/165 TOC:2
    Table of Contents
    Page Section
    1 Executive Summar
    3 A! Human Rights Alert (NGO)
    4 "! Allegations
    5 #! S$ecific allegations
    6 %! Simulate& recor&s' simulate& litigation ( organi)e& state(cor$orate crime
    6 a) Definition
    7 b) Judges are not covered by immunity in simulated litigation
    7 c) Simulated litigation - raceteering! organi"ed state-cor#orate crime!
    and trans-national organi"ed crime
    $ d) %utomated &'nde( of Judicial )orru#tion&
    $ C! Evi&ence
    $ #! *T sstem analsis
    * a) Systems develo#ed! im#lemented +it, no la+ful aut,ority
    11 b) Servers of unverified identity
    1- c) 'nvalid im#lementation of electronic signatures
    17 d) 'nvalid im#lementation of aut,entication and service #rocedures
    3- e) .stablis,ing of /double boos0 systems
    33 f) 'nvalid im#lementation of aut,orities and #ermissions
    33 g) Discrimination in access to t,e courts
    34 ,) %##earance of attorneys! unaut,ori"ed as )ounsel of 1ecord
    34 i) 2niversal failure to docet summonses3
    3$ 4) %dulterated and missing of court records
    3* ) P%).1 and )56.)7 - inter-court survey
    41 l) '8 systems of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt
    43 -! Case stu&ies
    43 a) Fine v Sheriff of LA County 92SD) )%! 2S)% *t,! and S):82S)
    4* b) Sieverding et al v. United States Government 92SD) D))
    53 c) Netsphere Inc et al v Baron et al 92SD) 8;<D)
    57 d) Borroer !ianne "ill 92S =anru#tcy )ourt! P%.D)
    5* e) Borroer #illiam $arsley 92S =anru#tcy )ourt! 8;.D)
    6> f) %erni& v Connor et al 92SDS )%)D)
    64 g) %erni& v 'elson et al 92SD) D))
    66 ,) S(C v Ban& of America Corporation 92SD) <?SD)
    76 i) 'cGarry v Geriatric Facilities of Cape Code) Inc et al 92SD) 5%)
    7$ 4) 'aid of the 'ist Corporation et al v #indsor 92SD) @%<D)
    7* ) N'L Capital v *epu+lic of Argentina 92SD) <?SD)
    $3 l) Leis et al v Gleason et al 92SD) ):)
    $6 m) Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al 92SD) )%)D)
    $7 n) Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al 92S)%*)
    $$ o) Citi,ens United v Federal (lection Commission 92SD) D))
    *3 #) Citi,ens United v Federal (lection Commission 9S:)82S)
    *7 +! National authorities' civil societ organi)ations' ex$erts' me&ia
    *7 #! Office of Attorne General' ,S +e$artment of -ustice' ."*
    *$ %! "an/ing Regulators
    ** 0! ,S Congress
    ** 1! The 2u&iciar
    0ith nl+ 12 ( the 3rld4% ppulatin5 the !6#6 ha% 212 ( the 3rld4% pri%n ppulatin 7 that
    ma8e% u% the 3rld4% large%t 9ailer6
    A-@( E
    i
    F
    666 a %+%tem in 3hi'h nl+ the little peple ha.e t $e+ the la35 3hile the ri'h5 and $an8er%
    e%pe'iall+5 'an 'heat and de(raud 3ithut 'n%e:uen'e%6
    Pa+l Gr+"%an, <,ono%i,s ;o.el prize /inner E
    ii
    F
    ) thin8 it;% di((i'ult t (ind a (raud ( thi% %i<e n the !# 'urt %+%tem in !# hi%tr+6 ) 'an;t thin8 (
    ne 3here +u ha.e literall+ ten% ( thu%and% ( (raudulent d'ument% (iled in ten% ( thu%and% (
    'a%e%6
    2a*%on$ Bres,ia, a visi&in" pro'essor a& Hale @a/ ),hool E
    iii
    F
    *he !# =ha% n (un'tining dem'ra'+>
    =or%er () Presi$en& Ji%%* -ar&er E
    iv
    F
    A! Human Rights Alert (NGO)
    ?igure 16 1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    3/165 TOC:2
    Table of Contents (continue&)
    Page Section
    1>> 3! The legal $rofession
    1>1 4! Ex$erts
    1>1 5! Civil societ organi)ations
    1>1 6! 7e&ia
    1>- E! Com$liance 8ith relevant ,S la8
    1>- #! Habeas Cor$us
    1>4 %! .irst Amen&ment ( the right to file $a$ers in court
    1>$ 0! .irst Amen&ment ( the right to access court recor&s
    1>$ 1!Rules Enabling Act
    1>* 3! .e&eral Rules of Civil 9roce&ure (&uties of the cler/
    11> 4! Authentication an& certification of 2u&icial recor&s' :egal 9rocess
    111 5! Electronic Signatures
    11- .! Com$liance 8ith relevant treaties an& conventions
    11- #! "asel Accor&s ( international ban/ing regulation
    113 %! Hague A$ostille Convention (#;4x)
    114 0! ,N Convention against Transnational Organi)e& Crime
    114 G! Retaliation against anti(2u&icial corru$tion activists
    114 #! General
    115 %! Retaliation against +r <erni/' author of instant submission
    116 a) 'n t,e 2S! ->1>
    137 b) 'n 'srael! ->13
    13* H! Historical $ers$ective ( Robber "aron Revival Era!
    14> *! Conclusions
    141 -! Recommen&ations
    141 =! References
    8,e ->1> Auman 1ig,ts %lert 9&A1%&) submission for t,e 2P1 of t,e 2nited States focused on
    conditions in Bos %ngeles )ounty! )alifornia3 8,e submission #rovided documentation of large-
    scale false im#risonment and real estate and financial institution fraud by State of )alifornia 4udges
    in collusion +it, attorneys and financial institutions! under #atronage of local! state! and federal la+
    enforcement aut,orities3
    8,e submission +as incor#orated by reference into t,e Auman 1ig,ts )ouncil 9&A1)&)
    Professional Staff 1e#ort +it, a note referring to /corru#tion of t,e courts and t,e legal #rofession
    and discrimination by la+ enforcement in )alifornia03C
    v
    D
    8,e submission +as in #art based on documentation of large-scale fraud in '8 systems of t,e
    Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Bos %ngeles 9Sustain)! and in t,e '8 systems of t,e Bos
    %ngeles )ounty S,eriffEs De#artment 9'nmate 'nformation )enter)3 C
    vi
    !
    vii
    D
    8,e ->13 A1% submission for t,e 2P1 of t,e State of 'srael focused on analysis of t,e '8 systems
    of t,e Su#reme )ourt! t,e district courts! and t,e detaineesE courts in 'srael3 8,e submission
    #rovided documentation of large-scale fraud in suc, systems! +,ic, started in ->>-3 8,e
    submission +as incor#orated by reference into t,e A1) Professional Staff 1e#ort +it, a note
    referring to /lac of integrity in t,e electronic record systems of t,e Su#reme )ourt! t,e district
    courts and t,e detaineesE courts in 'srael30 C
    viii
    D
    Jose#, Ferni! P,D! t,e aut,or of instant submission! ,as s#eciali"ed over t,e #ast decade in
    analy"ing t,e '8 systems of courts! #risons! and bans3 Ais re#orts on t,ese sub4ects +ere #eer-
    revie+ed! #ublis,ed and #resented in international com#uter science 9data mining) and criminology
    conferences3 C
    i(
    D
    % te(tboo on &5ac,ine Bearning& found Dr FerniEs a##lication of data-mining to Auman 1ig,ts
    researc, among &<otable uses&! and summari"ed it as follo+sG C
    (
    D
    Da&a %inin" o' "overn%en& re,or$s ! par&i,+larl* re,or$s o' &he j+s&i,e s*s&e% 4i.e., ,o+r&s, prisons6 !
    ena.les &he $is,over* o' s*s&e%i, h+%an ri"h&s viola&ions in ,onne,&ion &o "enera&ion an$
    p+.li,a&ion o' invali$ or 'ra+$+len& le"al re,or$s .* vario+s "overn%en& a"en,ies. E
    xi
    ,
    xii
    F
    't is liely t,at t,e A1% submission for t,e ->1> 2P1 of t,e 2nited States! and even more so t,e
    A1% submission for t,e ->13 2P1 of t,e State of 'srael! are t,e first-ever Auman 1ig,ts re#orts
    t,at are focused on analysis and data mining of '8 systems3
    H,ereas t,e ->1> A1% submission focused on t,e )alifornia courts and #risons and t,eir '8
    systems! t,e ->14 submission focuses on t,e 2S federal courts and t,eir res#ective '8 systems3
    "! Allegations
    ?igure 26 -over o' Ti%e %a"azine 'or () In$epen$en,e Da*, J+l* 4, 8033 ! shre$$e$ () -ons&i&+&ion
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    4/165 TOC:2
    Hide segments of t,e #eo#le of t,e 2nited States! from mainstream media! t,roug, rig,t- and left-
    +ing #olitical activists! to Aarvard la+ #rofessors C
    (iii
    !
    (iv
    D today ,old t,at t,e 2S government ,as
    undergone a transformation over t,e #ast cou#le of decades! +,ic, entailed t,e voiding or
    sus#ension of t,e 2S )onstitution3
    Suc, notion is furt,er su##orted by t,e statements of none ot,er t,an former 2S President Jimmy
    )arter! t,at t,e 2S /,as no functioning democracy0! C
    (v
    D and a call by none ot,er t,an t,e ),air of
    t,e Senate Judiciary )ommittee for t,e institution of a 8rut, and 1econciliation )ommission on t,e
    2S De#artment of Justice3 C
    (vi
    D Suc, commissions are ty#ically instituted in nations t,at emerge
    from under tyrannical regimes333
    'n t,e e(treme! suc, notion gives rise to various dissident grou#s! including! but not limited to
    &Sovereign Peo#le&!C
    (vii
    D &7reemen&!C
    (viii
    D and t,e armed &Hell 1egulated 5ilitias&3 C
    (i(
    D 8,e latterEs
    recent standoff +it, armed federal forces around t,e <evada =undy ranc, +as an un#recedented
    incident in 2S ,istory3 C
    ((
    D
    'f true! t,e voiding or sus#ension of t,e )onstitution by t,e 2S government s,ould be vie+ed as an
    unannounced regime c,ange in t,e 2nited States3
    'nstant submission #rovides am#le evidence t,at t,e 2S )onstitution +as indeed voided or
    sus#ended3
    =ot, e(#erts and t,e #ublic at large also reali"e t,at +ides#read corru#tion of t,e 2S 4udiciary in
    #articular! and t,e 2S 4ustice system in general! is central to suc, conditions3 C
    ((i
    !
    ((ii
    !
    ((iii
    D 5oreover!
    bot, e(#erts and t,e #ublic at large reali"e t,at corru#tion of t,e 2S courts and t,e 2S 4ustice
    system is directly tied to t,e current socio-economic crisis in t,e 2nited States! its failing baning
    regulation! t,e ongoing foreclosure fraud e#idemic! and t,e +idening ga#s bet+een t,e ric, and t,e
    #oor! cou#led +it, d+indling of t,e traditional middle-class3 C
    ((iv
    !
    ((v
    !
    ((vi
    D
    'nstant submission documents t,at +ides#read corru#tion of t,e 2S 4udiciary! 2S De#artment of
    Justice! and t,e 2S legal #rofession is indeed central to suc, conditions! and t,at t,e
    im#lementation of invalid fraudulent '8 systems in t,e 2S courts! +,ic, started a decade or t+o
    ago +as a ey event in establis,ing current conditions - undermining t,e rule of la+ and enabling
    +ides#read 4udicial corru#tion3 Hit, it! t,e same '8 systems #rovide a uniIue +ay to document t,e
    corru#tion of t,e 2S 4ustice system today3
    ?igure 36 PA-<2 is &he p+.li, a,,ess s*s&e% o' &he () $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ () ,o+r&s o' appeals, an$
    -B5<-= is &he respe,&ive ,ase %ana"e%en& an$ ele,&roni, 'ilin" s*s&e%.
    8,e fraud in,erent in t,e '8 systems of t,e 2S courts is not t,e ty#ical s#oradic corru#tion! +,ic,
    can be found in any 4ustice system at any time to some degree or anot,er3 't is corru#tion! +,ic,
    +as centrally im#lemented! and +,ic, eac, and every sitting 2S 4udge must be a+are of! as +ell as
    any intelligent and ca#able attorney! +,o a##ears before t,e 2S courts3
    #! S$ecific allegations
    13 8,e '8 systems of t,e 2S courts enable t,e routine conduct of abusive simulated 9s,am6fae)
    litigation and t,e #ublication of abusive simulated 4udicial records 9see section )-)3
    -3 2nder suc, circumstances! t,e rule of la+ and t,e 2S )onstitution are effectively sus#ended3
    :t,er+ise stated! access to civil courts 9as o##osed to military tribunals)! o#erating under t,e
    la+ of t,e 2nited States! is effectively denied3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    5/165 TOC:2
    33 Suc, transformation of t,e 2S 4ustice system s,ould be considered an unannounced regime
    c,ange3 )urrent conditions are ty#ical of a nation under martial la+3
    43 Suc, conditions s,ould be deemed in violation of any article of t,e Universal !eclaration of
    "uman *ights! +,ere integrity of t,e courts and t,e 4ustice system is a #rereIuisite3
    53 )orru#tion of t,e 2S courts and t,e legal #rofession is a central cause of t,e current socio-
    economic crisis in t,e 2nited States and beyond3
    %! Simulate& recor&s' simulate& litigation ( organi)e& state(cor$orate crime
    8,e main claim of instant submission is t,at t,roug, t,e im#lementation and em#loyment of
    invalid '8 systems in t,e 2S courts! t,e 2S courts today issue and #ublis, 4udicial and clerical
    records t,at are invalid and void on t,eir faces3 8,roug, t,e em#loyment of suc, invalid '8
    systems and void records issued in t,em! t,e 2S courts routinely and deliberately conduct s,am
    litigation and issue abusive orders and 4udgments in #atent violation of t,e 2S )onstitution and 2S
    la+3 1egardless of t,e invalidity of suc, orders and 4udgments! t,e courts induce or e(tort
    com#liance +it, t,em to unla+fully de#rive #ersons of Biberty! #ro#erty and ot,er )ivil!
    )onstitutional! and Auman 1ig,ts3
    a) Definitions: "Simulated Litigation", "Simulated Court Record", "Fraud upon the court"
    8,e 8e(as Penal )ode J 3-34$! #ertaining to &Simulating Begal Process& saysG
    Texas Penal -o$e ! )e,&ion 38.4I. )i%+la&in" @e"al Pro,ess
    J 38.4I. )IB(@ATI;D @<DA@ P2O-<)).
    4a6 A person ,o%%i&s an o''ense i' &he person re,klessl* ,a+ses &o .e $elivere$ &o ano&her an*
    $o,+%en& &ha& si%+la&es a s+%%ons, ,o%plain&, j+$"%en&, or o&her ,o+r& pro,ess /i&h &he in&en& &o:
    436 in$+,e pa*%en& o' a ,lai% 'ro% ano&her person7 or
    486 ,a+se ano&her &o:
    4A6 s+.%i& &o &he p+&a&ive a+&hori&* o' &he $o,+%en&7 or
    4B6 &ake an* a,&ion or re'rain 'ro% &akin" an* a,&ion in response &o &he $o,+%en&, in
    ,o%plian,e /i&h &he $o,+%en&, or on &he .asis o' &he $o,+%en&.
    4.6 Proo' &ha& &he $o,+%en& /as %aile$ &o an* person /i&h &he in&en& &ha& i& .e 'or/ar$e$ &o &he
    in&en$e$ re,ipien& is a s+''i,ien& sho/in" &ha& &he $o,+%en& /as $elivere$.
    4,6 I& is no& a $e'ense &o prose,+&ion +n$er &his se,&ion &ha& &he si%+la&in" $o,+%en&
    436 s&a&es &ha& i& is no& le"al pro,ess7 or
    486 p+rpor&s &o have .een iss+e$ or a+&horize$ .* a person or en&i&* /ho $i$ no& have la/'+l
    a+&hori&* &o iss+e or a+&horize &he $o,+%en&.
    4$6 I' i& is sho/n on &he &rial o' an o''ense +n$er &his se,&ion &ha& &he si%+la&in" $o,+%en& /as 'ile$
    /i&h, presen&e$ &o, or $elivere$ &o a ,lerk o' a ,o+r& or an e%plo*ee o' a ,lerk o' a ,o+r& ,rea&e$ or
    es&a.lishe$ +n$er &he ,ons&i&+&ion or la/s o' &his s&a&e, &here is a re.+&&a.le pres+%p&ion &ha& &he
    $o,+%en& /as $elivere$ /i&h &he in&en& $es,ri.e$ .* )+.se,&ion 4a6.
    4e6 <x,ep& as provi$e$ .* )+.se,&ion 4'6, an o''ense +n$er &his se,&ion is a -lass A %is$e%eanor.
    4'6 I' i& is sho/n on &he &rial o' an o''ense +n$er &his se,&ion &ha& &he $e'en$an& has previo+sl* .een
    ,onvi,&e$ o' a viola&ion o' &his se,&ion, &he o''ense is a s&a&e jail 'elon*.
    A$$e$ .* A,&s 3CC7, 79&h @e"., ,h. 3IC, J 3, e''. Ba* 83, 3CC7.
    8,e 8e(as la+! cited above! is useful in outlining t,e ty#ical conduct t,at is em#loyed by 4udges and
    court #ersonnel in conducting simulated! abusive litigationG
    'ssue 4udicial and6or clerical records t,at are invalid! void on t,eir faces3
    Sign! send! docet and6or #ublis, suc, 4udicial and6or clerical records by unaut,ori"ed #ersons3
    Serve false records t,at induce t,eir receiver to believe t,at t,ey are valid and effectual
    summonses! com#laints! orders! or 4udgments3
    @enerate! send! and6or #ublis, false aut,entication records for suc, 4udicial and6or clerical
    records3
    Sign! send! and6or #ublis, 4udicial and6or clerical records of vague and ambiguous language!
    +,ic, t,e court may deem #atently invalid! but t,e receiver is induced to believe are valid3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    6/165 TOC:2
    'nduce and6or e(tort submission to t,e false aut,ority of suc, abusive records3
    8,e evidence! detailed belo+! demonstrates t,e in,erent invalidity of t,e '8 systems of t,e 2S
    courts! and t,e case studies demonstrate t,eir abusive effects3
    'n terms of 2S la+! t,e conduct of court officers! including 4udges! clers! and attorneys relative to
    simulated litigation! as defined in t,e 8e(as Penal )ode J3-34$! s,ould be deemed &7raud u#on t,e
    )ourt&3
    'n Bulloch v. United States! 763 73-d 1115! 11-1 91>t, )ir3 1*$5)! t,e )ourt statesG
    =ra+$ +pon &he ,o+r& is 'ra+$ /hi,h is $ire,&e$ &o &he j+$i,ial %a,hiner* i&sel' an$ is no& 'ra+$
    .e&/een &he par&ies or 'ra+$+len& $o,+%en&s, 'alse s&a&e%en&s or perj+r*. ... I& is /here &he ,o+r& or a
    %e%.er is ,orr+p&e$ or in'l+en,e$ or in'l+en,e is a&&e%p&e$ or /here &he j+$"e has no& per'or%e$
    his j+$i,ial '+n,&ion !!! &h+s /here &he i%par&ial '+n,&ions o' &he ,o+r& have .een $ire,&l* ,orr+p&e$.
    8,e main claim of instant submission is t,at 2S 4udges! from t,e 2S district courts! t,roug, t,e 2S
    courts of a##eals! to t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt! today routinely engage in 7raud u#on t,e )ourt3
    .ven if some 4udges do not #ersonally engage in suc, conduct! it is im#ossible t,at a #erson! +,o is
    a &+ell-Iualified& 2S 4udge! and +,ose daily routine is governed by o#erating P%).1 and
    )56.)7! is not a+are of t,e fraud in,erent in t,e design and o#eration of t,e systems3 8,erefore!
    even suc, 4udges s,ould be deemed engaging in 5is#rision of 7elonies 91$ 2S) J4)3
    Suc, massive =reac, of t,e :at,s of :ffice and criminality from t,e benc, by t,e 2S 4udiciary as a
    class s,ould be deemed voiding of t,e 2S )onstitution! and t,erefore an unannounced regime
    c,ange in t,e 2nited States3
    b) Judges are not covered b immunit in simulated litigation
    8,e conduct associated +it, simulated litigation is e(tra-4udicial activity! sinceG
    Suc, 4udges do not act under t,eir 4udicial aut,ority3 See for e(am#le! invalid %ssignment and
    1eferral :rders in %erni& v Connor et al 9sections )-f! @-a) and N'L Capital v -he *epu+lic of
    Argentia 9section )-)! and
    Suc, 4udges issue records t,at are not aut,ori"ed by 2S la+3
    8,erefore! suc, conduct is not covered by any 4udicial immunity3
    7or additional detailed discussion of immunity! or lac t,ereof in relations,i# to t,e conduct of
    simulated litigation! see 7irst %mended )om#laint in %erni& v Connor et al3 C
    ((vii
    D
    c) Simulated litigation should be deemed rac!eteering, or state"corporate organi#ed crime
    8,e #ractice of simulated litigation s,ould also be deemed raceteering #er t,e 2S *ac&eteer
    Influenced and Corrupt .rgani,ations Act 92S) J1*61)! namely! a cons#iracy to conduct an
    enter#rise t,roug, a #attern of raceteering activity3
    8,e notion of 4udges and courts acting as a raceteering enter#rises is not ne+ at all3 'n t,e most
    recent e(am#le! former Pennsylvania Judge )iavarella +as #rosecuted and convicted on
    raceteering c,arges in t,e +ae of t,e &Kids for )as,& corru#tion scandal in PennsylvaniaG C
    ((viii
    D
    KBr. -iavarella a.+se$ his posi&ion o' &r+s& an$ in'li,&e$ a $eep an$ las&in" /o+n$ on &he ,o%%+ni&*
    he vo/e$ &o servi,e,K (.). A&&orne* Pe&er )%i&h sai$ 'ollo/in" &he sen&en,in".
    KThe s,he%e involve$ a ,orr+p& a"ree%en& /i&h &he opera&ors o' &he 'or!pro'i& j+venile 'a,ili&ies,K
    )%i&h sai$. KI& /as a /holesale arran"e%en& in /hi,h &he j+$"es ,on,eale$ &heir in&eres& an$ &here.*
    $i$ "rea& $a%a"e &o &he p+.li,.K
    The (.). A&&orne*Ls o''i,e ,alle$ &he ,ase &he Klar"es& an$ %os& s+s&aine$ poli&i,al ,orr+p&ion in0+ir*K
    in &he area.
    -iavarella /as ,onvi,&e$ in =e.r+ar* o' 38 ,har"es, in,l+$in" ra,ke&eerin" ,onspira,* an$ %one*
    la+n$erin".
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    7/165 TOC:2
    H,ereas t,e conviction of former 4udge )iavarella +as related to t,e #rison industry! instant
    submission claims t,at t,e most common 4udicial enter#rises in t,e 2S today are related to t,e
    baning industry3
    Hit, it! t,e notion t,at a 2S 4udge +ould find +ides#read raceteering in t,e 2S courts is
    obviously unliely3
    Ao+ever! t,e range of t,e criminal entr#rises of t,e 2S courts and 2S 4ustice system e(ceed t,e
    territorial 2SG
    'n decriminali"ing torture and t,e de#rivation of Biberty in t,e @uantanamo =ay detention center
    and in a net+or of &blac ,ole& #risons +orld-+ideL C
    ((i(
    D
    'n facilitating t,e unla+ful de#rivation of #ro#erty outside t,e 2S! as detailed for e(am#le! in t,e
    case of N'L Capital v *epu+lic of Argentina 9section )-)! and
    'n decriminali"ing t,e involvement of 2S agencies in trans-national drug and firearms
    trafficing! C
    (((
    !
    (((i
    D and decriminali"ing t,e involvement of 2S bans in trans-national money
    laundering for drug cartels3 C
    (((ii
    !
    (((iii
    !
    (((iv
    D
    8,erefore! suc, conduct s,ould also be revie+ed under t,e terms of t,e United Nations Convention
    against -ransnational .rgani,ed Crime 9->>>)3 C
    (((v
    D
    )onditions! +,ere a nationEs 4ustice system engages in suc, cons#iracy is also referred to in
    criminology as &State :rgani"ed )rime&! or &State-cor#orate :rgani"ed )rime&3
    d) $utomated "%nde& of Judicial Corruption"
    'n,erent to t,e +or! #resented in instant submission! is t,e notion t,at t,e '8 systems of t,e 2S
    courts also #rovide a uniIue database! +,ic, records t,e conduct of t,e 2S courts and 2S 4ustice
    system3 8,roug, t,e use of routine data mining tec,niIues! suc, database is amenable to t,e
    #roduction of an automated &'nde( of Judicial )orru#tion& across t,e 2S and going bac about t+o
    decades3 C
    (((vi
    D
    Suc, &'nde( of Judicial )orru#tion& could #rovide detailed analysis of 4udicial corru#tion in t,e 2S
    courts by #arameters! suc, as - 4udge! court! year! cause of action! #arties! la+-firms! etc3
    C! Evi&ence
    1ecord ee#ing and information #rocessing under #a#er administration of t,e courts ,ave evolved
    over centuries! and formed t,e core of due #rocess and fair ,earings3 % ey argument of instant
    submission is t,at t,e unc,eced transition to electronic administration of t,e courts affected a sea
    c,ange in suc, court #rocedures and #ermitted un#recedented corru#tion of t,e 2S courts3
    8,e 2S government ,as com#leted a decade-long #ro4ect of transition to digital administration of
    t,e 2S courts at a cost t,at is estimated at several billion 2S dollars3 )ourts of nations around t,e
    +orld are going t,roug, a similar #rocess! and 2nited <ations re#orts on strengt,ening 4udicial
    integrity #romote t,e #rocess3 :bviously! '8 systems could en,ance t,e reliability and trans#arency
    of t,e courts3
    8,e evidence #resented belo+ includes analysis of t,e design and o#eration of '8 systems of t,e 2S
    courts! as +ell as data mining of records from numerous courts cases3 C
    (((vii
    !
    (((viii
    D Suc, analysis
    documents fundamental fla+s in system validity! integrity! and o#eration! +ides#read corru#tion of
    t,e courts and abuse of t,e #eo#le3
    #! *T sstem analsis
    'nstant submission revie+s t,e follo+ing 2S courts and t,e res#ective '8 systemsG
    2S district courts - P%).1 and )56.)7
    2S courts of a##eals - P%).1 and )56.)7
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    8/165 TOC:2
    2S Su#reme )ourt - name unno+n
    8,e t+o systems! +,ic, +ere im#lemented in t,e 2S district courts and courts of a##eals areG
    P%).1 M for Public %ccess to )ourt .lectronic 1ecords! and
    )56.)7 M for )ase 5anagement and .lectronic )ourt 7iling3
    %nalysis of t,e design and o#eration of '8 systems of t,e 2S courts and data mining of records
    from numerous courts cases! documents fundamental fla+s in system s#ecification! validity!
    integrity! and o#eration3
    a) 'he sstems (ere developed and implemented (ith no la(ful authorit
    8,e ne+ '8 systems re#resent a sea-c,ange in court #rocedures! but bot, t,e courts and t,e 2S
    )ongress failed to establis, t,e ne+ electronic court #rocedures by la+3
    Procedures of t,e 2S courts under #a#er administration evolved from t,e .nglis, common la+! and
    +ere establis,ed in t,e US Code of Civil $rocedures) US Code of Criminal $rocedure and
    #ublis,ed Local *ules!+,ic, t,e courts +ere aut,ori"ed to ado#t! sub4ect to #rior #ublication of
    suc, rules for #ublic comment and c,allenge3
    8,e transition to digital administration of t,e 2S courts inevitably entailed a sea- c,ange in court
    #rocedures! +,ic, ,ad to be establis,ed by la+ or by t,e #ublication of ne+ Local *ules3
    1evie+ of t,e Local *ules of court of t,e various 2S courts and 2S courts of a##eals! C
    (((i(
    !
    (l
    D
    universally revealed no direct reference to P%).1! )56.)7! or ne+ digital #rocedures #ertaining
    to valid signatures and aut,entication! notice and service! and #ublic access to court records3
    'n some cases! reference! albeit vague and ambiguous! +as found in General .rders of t,e courts3
    8,e courts +ere not aut,ori"ed to establis, court #rocedures in General .rders3
    Ao+ever! in t,e vast ma4ority of t,e courts! +,ic, +ere e(amined! reference to t,e ne+ '8 systems
    +as found neit,er in t,e Local *ules! nor in t,e General .rders3 C
    (li
    D
    5ost often! t,e ne+ #rocedures +ere vaguely described in Users 'anuals. C
    (lii
    D Suc, #ublications
    could by no means be considered valid and effectual legal records3
    Implementation of $AC(* and C'/(CF in the US !istrict Court) Central !istrict of
    California
    /urt Rule% (
    /urt
    General Order% !%er% @anual
    !# Ai%tri't /urt
    /entral /ali(rnia
    ;one Deneral Or$er 0I!
    08
    De&aile$ Des,rip&ion o' ele,&roni, 'ilin"
    pra,&i,es in an >+no''i,ial? %an+al
    !# /urt ( Appeal%5
    9th /ir'uit
    ;one ;one De&aile$ Des,rip&ion o' ele,&roni, 'ilin"
    pra,&i,es in %an+al.
    ?igure 46 Ta.le )+%%ar* o' in'or%a&ion so+r,es per&ainin" &o ele,&roni, 'ilin" 'or &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o'
    -ali'ornia an$ &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i&
    Detailed evidence for t,e lac of aut,ority of P%).1 and )56.)7! as im#lemented in t,e 2S
    District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! is #resented in corres#ondence +it, t,e :ffice of t,e
    )ler 9section @-a! belo+)3
    General .rder >$->-
    2#on inIuiry! t,e office of t,e cler! 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! claimed t,at
    t,e ne+ rules +ere establis,ed in General .rder >$->-3 C
    (liii
    D
    8,e order s,ould be deemed in violation of t,e *ules (na+ling Act 9section .4)! since it amounts to
    an unaut,ori"ed sea-c,ange in t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    9/165 TOC:2
    'n t,is conte(t! it s,ould be noted t,at t,e General .rder >$->- +as #ublis,ed +it, no name of its
    aut,or and no signature of a 4udge and no aut,entication by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3 'n contrast!
    most ot,er @eneral :rders of t,e same )ourt are signed by t,e Presiding Judge of t,e )ourt3 C
    (liv
    D
    8,e lac of aut,ority and invalidity of t,e im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e 2S
    District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! and a reIuest to void General .rder >$->- +ere raised
    in Dr FerniEs 5otion to 'ntervene in Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al in t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals! *t, )ircuit3 9see section )-n)3 8,e #leading claimed t,at t,e General .rder >$->- of t,e
    2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia amounted to !eprivation of *ights Under the
    Color of La 94- 2S) J1*$3)! since for e(am#le! it unla+fully establis,ed discrimination bet+een
    attorneys and pro0se filers in access to t,e court and it de#rived t,e #ublic at large of t,e 7irst
    %mendment rig,t to access court records! to ins#ect and to co#y3 C
    (lv
    D
    &2nofficial& %nderson 5anual
    8,e ot,er ma4or source for information regarding t,e im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7 in
    t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! and t,eir mode of o#eration is t,e &2nofficial&
    %nderson 5anual3 C
    (lvi
    D Suc, #ublication can by no means be deemed a valid legal record3
    8,e 5anual is also deficient at best! if not deliberately misleading3 7or e(am#leG
    1egarding t,e critical issue of &.lectronic Document Stam#& 9#ur#ortedly a valid re#lacement for
    t,e ,and signature of t,e cler) in t,e <.7 9<otice of .lectronic 7iling - t,e #ur#orted
    aut,entication instrument)! t,e &2nofficial& %nderson 5anual says onlyG 9#13)
    The ;<= in,l+$es a >$o,+%en& n+%.er? an$ a link. Be s+re &o no&e &ha& $o,+%en&
    n+%.er, as *o+ /ill nee$ i& i' *o+ nee$ &o e!%ail a propose$ or$er &o &he -o+r&. The ;<= also
    in,l+$es an ><le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%p? /hi,h is a s&rin" o' le&&ers an$ n+%.ers /hi,h -o+r& s&a''
    ,an +se &o veri'* &he a+&hen&i,i&* o' &he ;<=. The ;<= also ,on&ains &he pa&h an$ 'ile na%e o' &he
    $o,+%en& *o+ +ploa$e$ an$ an* a&&a,h%en&s.
    8,e manual fails to mention t,e significance of t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#&! relative to
    validity of t,e <.7! according to t,e 2S courts3
    8,e manual also im#lies t,at t,at stam# Nerification 2tility is not accessible to )56.)7 users in
    t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia 9see section )1d)3
    %t t,e same time! instant submission documents t,at t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of
    )alifornia! routinely conducts simulated litigation! +,ere none of t,e <.7s of 4udicial records bears
    t,e reIuired .lectronic Document Stam#3 )ombined! suc, omissions in t,e 5anual must raise
    concerns regarding t,e intention and integrity of its aut,ors 9see also sections )1d! @-a)3
    1egarding filing t,e summonses as e(ecuted! t,e &2nofficial& %nderson 5anual saysG 9#1$)
    Ori"inal )+%%ons: re&+rne$5no& re&+rne$
    Nte: *here i% alm%t ne.er a rea%n t return the #ummn%5 % dn4t d it unle%% +u
    (eel+u mu%t6
    ThereMs a spe,ial vi$eo &rainin" %o$+le on &he -o+r&Ms /e.!si&e a.o+& ho/ &o re&+rn&he ori"inal
    )+%%ons, so i' *o+ $e,i$e *o+ nee$ &o re&+rn a )+%%ons, .e s+re &o /a&,h &ha& vi$eo.
    )ombined +it, t,e custom of t,e 2S district courts of not doceting t,e summonses! in a##arent
    violation of t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure! 9see section )1i)! and6or issue deliberately
    invalid summonses 9see sections )-,! @-a) t,is note must raise concerns regarding intention and
    integrity of its aut,ors3
    Implementation of $AC(* and C'/(CF in the US Court of Appeals) 1th Circuit
    8,e lac of aut,ority and invalidity in im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7 is discussed in
    greater detail in t+o #a#ers! in t,e form of 1eIuest for .(#ert :#inions3 C
    (lvii
    D
    Suffice is to say t,at ,ere too! t,e main source of information regarding t,e systems is a 2sers
    5anual and a video3 C
    (lviii
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    10/165 TOC:2
    Specification) !evelopment 'anagement) 2alidation of I- systems of the courts
    'n general! it is claimed t,at t,ere is no +ay t,at t,e '8 systems of t,e courts could be deemed of
    integrity and validity! absent full documentation and certification of la+ful s#ecification!
    develo#ment management! and validation by #ersons of adeIuate aut,ority3 C
    (li(
    D
    <o evidence of suc, Iuintessential measures ,ave ever been discovered! relative to t,e
    develo#ment and im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e 2S district and a##eals courts! or
    t,e '8 systems of t,e Su#reme )ourt3
    7urt,ermore! t,e '8 systems of t,e courts are in fact translation of t,e la+ into o#erable
    #rogramming code! +,ic, is inaccessible to t,e #ublic3 8,erefore! t,e aut,ority for s#ecification!
    develo#ment management and validation of suc, systems must reside outside of t,e 4udicial branc,!
    most liely under t,e legislative branc,3 'n contrast! t,e develo#ment and im#lementation of
    P%).1 and )56.)7 and t,e systems of t,e Su#reme )ourt +ere carried out by t,e %dministrative
    :ffice of t,e 2S )ourts! under t,e 4udicial branc,3 C
    l
    D
    'nstant submission o#ines t,at conduct of t,e %dministrative :ffice of t,e 2S )ourts in t,is regard
    +as and is an un#recedented s,ell-game fraud on t,e #eo#le of t,e 2nited States3
    7inally! it is claimed t,at #ursuant to t,e fundamental #rinci#le of Publicity of t,e Ba+! '8 systems
    must be as trans#arent to t,e #ublic as #ossible3 Bie+ise! t,e records! #ertaining to t,e
    aut,oritative s#ecification! develo#ment! and validation s,ould be #ublicly accessible3
    'n contrast! t,e P%).1 and )56.)7 #latforms! +it, t,eir variable im#lementations among 2S
    district and a##eals courts t,roug,out t,e 2nited States! and lie+ise t,e '8 systems of t,e Su#reme
    )ourt! are &blac bo(es& from t,e #ublicEs #ers#ective3 1egardless of intensive efforts to infer rules
    t,roug, data mining! it is im#ossible to deci#,er t,e rules embedded in suc, systems! and any
    reason for t,e variations among t,em in t,e various 2S courts3
    <evert,eless! t,e common t,eme is clearG .ac, and every 2S court im#lemented and o#erates its
    local '8 systems 9using t,e same P%).1 and )56.)7 #latforms) in a manner t,at +ould enable it
    to generate and #ublis, online 4udicial and clerical records! as +ell as case docets! +,ic, are not
    deemed valid and effectual! #ursuant to t,e 2S la+! or by t,e res#ective court! but +ould a##ear as
    valid and effectual records to t,e #ublic at large3
    b) Servers of unverified identit
    ?igure 16 )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! +n,er&i'ie$ server i$en&i&*. The -hro%e .ro/ser %essa"es
    in$i,a&e: a6 I$en&i&* o' &his si&e is +nveri'ie$. .6 -onne,&ion &o &his si&e is no& en,r*p&e$.
    (2@: h&&p:55///.s+pre%e,o+r&."ov5
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    11/165 TOC:2
    ?igure B6 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia ! +n,er&i'ie$ server i$en&i&*. The -hro%e .ro/ser
    %essa"es in$i,a&e: a6 I$en&i&* o' &his si&e is +nveri'ie$. .6 -onne,&ion &o &his si&e is no& en,r*p&e$.
    (2@: h&&p:55///.,a,$.+s,o+r&s."ov5
    Public access to 2S district and a##eals court records is effectively #ermitted only t,roug, P%).13
    Ao+ever! t,e identity of t,e servers! from +,ic, t,e records are dis#layed and do+nloaded is
    unverified3
    % ty#ical bro+ser /#age info0 statement for P%).1 isG
    #e.si&e I$en&i&*
    #e.si&e: h&&p:55///.pa,er."ov5
    O/nership: This /e.si&e $oes no& s+ppl* o/nership in'or%a&ion.
    Neri'ie$ .*: ;o& spe,i'ie$
    Te,hni,al De&ails
    -onne,&ion ;o& <n,r*p&e$.
    8,e im#lementation of servers of unidentified and unverified identity for 2S court records! in itself!
    s,ould be deemed a fatal fla+ in system integrity and validity3
    c) %nvalid implementation of electronic signatures
    8oday! all records of t,e 2S district and a##eals courts are electronic records3 Ao+ever! t,ere is no
    valid im#lementation of visible electronic signatures on any suc, records3
    1evie+ of t,e records in t,e cases #resented belo+! s,o+s a variety of forms of signatures on
    electronic recordsG
    Scanned images of ,and signatures
    6s6
    8y#ed <ame! e3g3! Jo,n Doe
    <o signature at all3
    adf
    <one of t,ese can be deemed valid electronic signatures3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    12/165 TOC:2
    ?igure C6 Wright v Bank of America 430!,v!037836, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, ;or&hern Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, Dk&
    O30!3 ! -er&i'i,a&e o' )ervi,e. The re,or$ is +nsi"ne$ an$ &here'ore invali$.
    2nder #a#er administration of t,e courts! t,e /.ntered0 stam#! inscribed on records by t,e )ler of
    t,e )ourt +it, a +et! ,and signatures obviously +as a visible #art of t,e #ublic #a#er records3 %nd
    lie+ise! t,e )ertificates of Service! +,ic, +ere ,and-signed by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt +ere #art of
    t,e #a#er #ublic records3
    2nder electronic administration of t,e courts! as im#lemented in P%).1 and )56.)7! t,at is no
    longer t,e case3
    :f note! t,e )alifornia 1egulations 9California Code of *egulations! 8itle -! Div 7! ),a#ter 1>)
    #rescribe t,at any digital signatures t,at re#laced /+et0 signatures 9,and signatures using in)!
    +,ic, +ere #art of #ublic records! must remain #ublic records in t,eir digital form3
    8o t,e degree t,at t,e 2S District )ourt! <ort,ern District of )alifornia 9relative to 7igure 7)! and
    ot,er 2S district courts and t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! conducted t,eir business in t,e
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    13/165 TOC:2
    cases! outlined belo+! in t,e State of )alifornia! t,eir conduct s,ould be deemed in violation of
    State la+3
    Similar regulations! #ertaining to electronic signatures! +ere #romulgated in most of t,e several
    states3
    'n contrast! t,e 2S (0sign Act s,ould be considered inadeIuate! and it ,as never been adeIuately
    #romulgated or enforced3
    =eyond t,e courts! t,e baning industry is also noted for its failure to im#lement valid! #ublicly
    visible electronic signatures3 9for e(am#le! t,e invalid signatures on t,e &1ecreated Better& in case
    of Borroer !ianne "ill! section )-d)3 Bie+ise! &1obo-signatures& are one of t,e ty#ical features
    of baning fraud in todayEs &7oreclosure 7raud .#idemic&3 C
    li
    D
    8,e failure to #romulgate! im#lement! and enforce under federal la+ electronic signatures in
    baning and in t,e courts s,ould be deemed ey factor in t,e current socio-economic crisis in t,e
    2S3
    8,e dubious nature of unsigned 4udicial records of t,e 2S courts ,as not gone unnoticed3 7or
    e(am#le! in various re#orts! related to t,e nomination ,earings of no+ Su#reme )ourt Justice
    Sotomayor! #ertaining to ,er conduct as a )ircuit Judge of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! -nd )ircuit!
    t,e <e+ ?or 8imes distinguis,es bet+een &signed& and &unsigned& decisions3 C
    lii
    D 't remains
    unclear! +,at validity t,e <e+ ?or 8imes legal analysts attribute to &unsigned& decisions! or t,e
    #ractice of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! -nd )ircuit! of issuing t+o ty#es of orders and 4udgments -
    signed! and unsigned3
    8,e <e+ ?or 8imes! lie+ise! distinguis,es bet+een signed and unsigned decisions of t,e 2S
    Su#reme )ourt3 C
    liii
    D
    =eyond unsigned decisions! are anonymous decisions! +,ose aut,or remain unno+n3 Hii#edia!
    +,ic, s,ould be deemed a government organ! e(#lains t,e #ractice as follo+sG C
    liv
    D
    The opinion o' &he -o+r& is +s+all* si"ne$ .* &he a+&hor7 o,,asionall*, &he )+pre%e -o+r& %a*
    iss+e an +nsi"ne$ opinion per curiam.
    8,e #ractice is a##arently gro+ing in freIuency in recent years in bot, t,e courts of a##eals and t,e
    Su#reme )ourt! and is seen as Iuestionable by bot, media and by legal sc,olars3 :f interest! t,e
    issue +as again raised relative to one of t,e most im#ortant and controversial cases of recent
    decades - Citi,ens United v Federal (lections Committee 9section )-m!n)3
    'n ->1-! t,e <e+ ?or 8imes +rote in t,is matterG C
    lv
    D
    ;ine &i%es so 'ar &his *ear, &he ,o+r& has iss+e$ an +nsi"ne$ opinion r+lin" on &he %eri&s o' a
    $isp+&e /i&ho+& '+ll .rie'in" or oral ar"+%en&. )+,h r+lin"s have .een &he s+.je,& o' ,ri&i,is% 'ro%
    pra,&i&ioners an$ &he le"al a,a$e%*. These ,ri&i,s sa* i& is a %is&ake &o resolve ,ases /i&ho+&
    a$e0+a&e in'or%a&ion an$ $eli.era&ion. I& is also pro.le%a&i,, &he* a$$, &o $o so anon*%o+sl*.
    't s,ould be noted! t,at in all cases! revie+ed by t,is +riter 9and none +as e(#licitly stated per
    curiam)! decisions of t,e courts of a##eals and t,e Su#reme )ourt +ere served unsigned and
    unaut,enticated3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    14/165 TOC:2
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    15/165 TOC:2
    ?igure D6 J+ne 89, 800I, +nsi"ne$, +na+&hen&i,a&e$ $e,ision $en*in" &he pe&i&ion Zernik v US District
    Court, Central District of California 40I!787346, in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i&, as $o,ke&e$ in &he
    ori"ina&in" ,ase in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia ! Zernik v Connor et al 4see se,&ion
    -8'6. The $e,ision /as like/ise serve$ .* &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i&, on &he pe&i&ioner +nsi"ne$
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    16/165 TOC:2
    an$ +na+&hen&i,a&e$. The pe&i&ion, KTo -o%pel =e$eral D+e Pro,ess 2i"h&sK, aske$ &he () -o+r& o'
    Appeals, C&h -ir,+i&, &o or$er &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, &o iss+e vali$ s+%%onses, in
    a ,ase /here &he Dis&ri,& -o+r& re'+se$ &o $o so 4se,&ions -3i, -3', D8a6.
    I& sho+l$ .e no&e$ &ha& &he s&a%p o' &he -lerk () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i&, s&a&es onl* K=ile$K 4an$ no&
    K<n&ere$K6, as is &he ro+&ine in &ha& -o+r&. Boreover, &he s&a%p is no& si"ne$. @ike/ise, &he s&a%p o' &he
    Dep+&* -lerk o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, /hi,h is si"ne$, onl* s&a&es K2e,eive$K, an$ no& K=ile$K, or K<n&ere$K.
    =or ,o%parison, see papers, /hi,h /ere $enie$ 'ilin" in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, in
    Zernik v Connor et al. 4se,&ion -8', <86. )+,h papers /ere s&a%pe$ K2e,eive$ B+& ;o& =ile$K.
    'n revie+ing some of t,e decisions of t,is ty#e! one cannot esca#e t,e conclusion t,at at times! t,e
    #ractice of issuing unsigned decisions is em#loyed! +,en t,e 4udges or 4ustices rule in a manner
    t,at ,as no basis in t,e la+ of t,e 2nited States3
    7or e(am#le! in %erni& v US !istrict Court) Central !istrict of California 9>$-7-714)) t,e 2S )ourt
    of %##eals! *t, )ircuit summarily denied an .mergency Petition for )om#elling 7ederal Due
    Process 1ig,ts3 8,e Petition ased t,e )ircuit )ourt to order t,e 2S District )ourt to issue valid
    summonses in %erni& v Connor et al 9-G>$-cv->155>) 9section )-f)3 C
    lvi
    D
    8,e decision of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals +as received unsigned! uncertified! unaut,enticated 9+it,
    no <D% - t,e aut,entication instrument in t,e 2S courts of a##eals) 9section )1d)3
    Is it li&ely that the failure to implement valid electronic signatures in $AC(* and C'/(CF is a
    human error3
    8,e notion t,at a national #ro4ect for transforming t,e administration of t,e courts from #a#er to
    electronic records failed to im#lement valid! #ublicly visible electronic signatures cannot be
    reasonably deemed an oversig,t! or a ,uman error3
    't s,ould also be noted t,at t,e courts of t,e State of 'srael! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis, common
    la+ as +ell! im#lemented over t,e #ast decade '8 systems! similar to t,ose in t,e 2S! +it, no
    #ublicly visible electronic signatures3 C
    lvii
    D
    d) %nvalid implementation of authentication and service procedures C
    lviii
    D
    <otice of .lectronic 7iling 9<.7) in t,e 2S district courts! and <otice of Docet %ctivity 9<D%) in
    t,e 2S courts of a##eals are t,e aut,entication instruments! establis,ed by t,e %dministrative
    :ffice of t,e 2S )ourts in P%).1 O )56.)73
    N(F in the US district courts
    8,e <.7 #ur#ortedly #rovides t,e aut,entication of t,e service of an electronically-filed #leading
    or ot,er filing by #arties! or of electronic filing and service of orders and 4udgments of t,e courts
    u#on )56.)7 #artici#ating attorneys in t,e case3 8,e <.7 re#laced t,e traditional! #a#er
    )ertificate of Service! or Proof of Service! as +ell as t,e <otice of .ntry of Judgment3 8,erefore!
    t,e <.7 is of critical significance relative to t,e validity! force and effect of 4udicial minutes! orders
    and 4udgments3
    8,e <.7 bears an &.lectronic Document Stam#&! an automatically generated! digitally encry#ted!
    al#,anumeric &c,ecsum& string! +,ic, #ur#ortedly substituted t,e +et signatures of t,e )ler of
    t,e )ourt in t,e traditional )ertificate of Service3
    %s discussed and documented belo+! t,e <.7 is an invalid aut,entication and service instrument as
    to form3
    5oreover! as documented in instant submission! t,e manner of its im#lementation in )56.)7
    o#ened t,e +ay for large-scale fraud! t,roug, t,e issuance of invalid <.7s! missing t,e &.lectronic
    Document Stam#&! or t,e issuance of no <.7 at all! in order to generate simulated court records3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    17/165 TOC:2
    N(Fs e4plained in figures
    7igures *-15! belo+! #rovide instructive images and te(t! demonstrating t,e manner of abuse!
    in,erent in t,e #ractices of t,e 2S district courts! relative to t,e <.7s3
    ?igure 96 Invali$ &ra$i&ional, paper -er&i'i,a&e o' )ervi,e .* &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& in Wright v Bank of
    America 430!,v!037836, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, ;or&hern Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia. The re,or$ in,l+$e$ a ,er&i'i,a&ion
    s&a&e%en&, >I ,er&i'*P?, as /ell as &he na%e an$ a+&hori&* o' &he in$ivi$+al exe,+&in" &he ,er&i'i,a&ion.
    1o/ever, &he $o,+%en& sho/n here is %issin" &he han$ si"na&+re o' &he Dep+&* -lerk.
    The ,er&i'i,a&ion re,or$s /ere an essen&ial par& o' &he p+.li, re,or$s in &he paper ,o+r& 'iles. In ,on&ras&,
    &o$a* &he ;<=s are hi$$en 'ro% &he p+.li, an even 'ro% pro se par&ies in &heir o/n li&i"a&ion. 4se,&ion D8a6
    The -er&i'i,a&e o' )ervi,e sho/n here is +nsi"ne$, an$ &here'ore is invali$.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    18/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 106 ;<= in,l+$in" an K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK ! an en,r*p&e$ alphan+%eri, K,he,ks+%K s&rin"
    4in re$ re,&an"les6, Dk& O8, -o%plain& in erry v remier !ortgage "un#ing $nc et al 48:04!,v!4396, ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r&, <as&ern Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    19/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 116 Nali$ ;<=, .earin" a ,o%ple&e K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK, Dk& O3, Pe&i&ion, in Richar# "ine v
    Sheriff of %os Angeles County 48:0C!,v!03C346, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia 4se,&ion -3a6
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    20/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 126 Invali$ ;<=, %issin" &he K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK, Dk& O9C, !an#ate of the US Court of
    Appeals, &th Circuit, re' Certificate of Appeala(ility, in Richar# "ine v Sheriff of %os Angeles County 48:0C!
    ,iv!03C346, as $o,ke&e$ in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia 4see also se,&ion -3a6.
    ;+%ero+s, si%ilar, invali$ ;<=s, %issin" &he K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK /ere $is,overe$ in o&her ()
    $is&ri,& ,o+r&s.
    The $e&aile$ $o,+%en&a&ion o' &he ,ases, rela&e$ &o &he 1a.eas -orp+s a,&ions o' 2i,har$ =ine in &he ()
    ,o+r&s provi$e +ni0+e $e%ons&ra&ion o' &he a.+se inheren& in &he $esi"n an$ opera&ion o' PA-<2 an$
    -B5<-=:
    3. A si%+la&e$ 1a.eas -orp+s revie/ /as ,on$+,&e$ in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia,
    /here j+$i,ial re,or$s /ere 'ile$ /i&h ;<=s %issin" &he K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK. In s+,h invali$,
    si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion, Ba"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle an$ J+$"e John #arner iss+e$ a.+sive j+$i,ial re,or$s, /hi,h
    $i$ no& ,o%pl* /i&h &he () -ons&i&+&ion an$ &he () la/ an$ +nla/'+ll* $eprive$ &he @i.er&* o' 2i,har$ =ine.
    8. #hen =ine 'ile$ his a,&ions in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i&, &aken 'ro% s+,h si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion
    re,or$s in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, &he () -o+r& o' Appeals respon$e$ .* ,on$+,&in" a si%+la&e$ revie/ as
    /ell, an$ .* iss+in" si%+la&e$ or$ers an$ %an$a&es, ,oll+$in" in a.+se o' ri"h&s.
    3. #hen &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r& re,eive$ s+,h si%+la&e$ %an$a&es 'ro% &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, &he ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r& $o,ke&e$ &he% as invali$, si%+la&e$ j+$i,ial re,or$s as /ell.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    21/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 136 Invali$ ;<=, Dk& O33A, Or$er, in Huminski v Rutlan# olice Dept et al 43:CC!,v!003A06 in &he ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Ner%on&, a -ivil 2i"h&s %a&&er. E
    lix
    F The ;<= is invali$, sin,e i& in,l+$es no K<le,&roni,
    Do,+%en& )&a%pK. I& also in,l+$es no link &o a re,or$, an$ no %ailin" or e%ailin" lis&.
    The ;<= sho/n here per&ains &o a K&ex& onl* or$erK ! &ex& &ha& is en&ere$ in &he PA-<2 $o,ke& /i&h no
    a&&a,he$ $o,+%en&. )+,h or$ers or %in+&es ,anno& possi.l* .e a+&hen&i,a&e$ &hro+"h an K<le,&roni,
    Do,+%en& )&a%pK, a ,he,ks+% s&rin" ! sin,e &here is no $o,+%en& &o ,al,+la&e &he ,he,ks+% s&rin" on. The
    si%+la&e$ $e,ision here is no& o' hi"h si"ni'i,an,e in &he 1+%inski ,ase. I& is provi$e$ here &o sho/ &he la,k
    o' vali$i&* o' s+,h K&ex& onl* or$ers5%in+&esK, /hi,h are ,o%%on in o&her ,ases o+&line$ in ins&an&
    s+.%ission, e."., S)C v BAC 4se,&ion -3h6 an$ !ai# of the !ist v Win#sor 4se,&ion -3j6, /here a,,ess &o
    &he ;<=s /as $enie$. )ee 'i"+re .elo/ 'or a K&ex& onl* -lerkLs -er&i'i,a&eK in !ai# of the !ist v Win#sor.
    ?igure 146 Invali$ PA-<2 $o,ke& no&a&ion, Dk& Onone, -er&i'i,a&e o' Bailin" .* &he -lerk o' &he -o+r&, in
    !ai# of the !ist v Win#sor, in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, ;or&hern Dis&ri,& o' Deor"ia 4se,&ion -3j6. The PA-<2
    $o,ke& no&a&ion /as assi"ne$ no $o,ke& n+%.er, an$ no link &o a re,or$ /as provi$e$. There ,o+l$ no& .e a
    re,or$s linke$ &o &his $o,ke& &ex&, an$ &here'ore, &he no K,he,ks+% s&rin"K ,o+l$ .e ,al,+la&e$, an$ no vali$
    ;<= ,o+l$ .e iss+e$ on &his $o,ke& &ex&. There'ore, &he K-lerkLs -er&i'i,a&e o' Bailin"K in re'eren,e ,o+l$ no&
    possi.l* .e $ee%e$ en&ere$, even i' &he servi,e o' Dk& O3AC, O$er /as in 'a,& exe,+&e$.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    22/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 116 Invali$ KTex& onl*K $o,ke& en&r*, Dk& Onone, Do,+%en& $ele&ion an$ re!$o,ke&in" in $n R)'
    Ronal# *ottschalk 48:33!%,!008I46 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia. The &ex& re!a''ir%s
    &ha& &he Jan+ar* 33, 8038 Or$er o' Dis.ar%en&5)+spension 4$isposi&ive or$er, akin &o j+$"%en& in s+,h ,ase6
    /as iss+e$ /i&h no ;<=, an$ &here'ore /as +na+&hen&i,a&e$, an$ o' no 'or,e an$ e''e,&.
    1o/ever, i& sho+l$ .e no&e$ &ha& &his no&e is a KTex& onl*K $o,ke& en&r* .* a person o' +nkno/n na%e an$
    a+&hori&*, /hi,h is +nsi"ne$ an$ +na+&hen&i,a&e$.
    2onal$ Do&&s,halk /as a @os An"eles A&&orne*, /ho like 2i,har$ =ine pro&es&e$ j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion. @ike
    2i,har$ =ine he /as 'alsel* arres&e$ in 800C 4al.ei& 'or a 'e/ /eeks onl*6, an$ like 2i,har$ =ine he also /as
    'alsel* hospi&alize$. 1o/ever, /hereas 2i,har$ =ine /as kep& in soli&ar* ,on'ine%en& 'or 3I %on&hs in &he
    hospi&al se,&ion o' &he jail, Do&&s,halk /as kep& in an o+&si$e ps*,hia&ri, /ar$. 1e repor&e$ &ha& he /as
    'or,e$ &o &ake ps*,hia&ri, %e$i,a&ions, /hile .ein" $enie$ ,ri&i,al $ia.e&es %e$i,a&ion.
    Thro+"h ,o%%+ni,a&ion /i&h &he a+&hor o' ins&an& s+.%ission, Do&&s,halk /as e$+,a&e$ re"ar$in" &he
    si"ni'i,an,e o' &he ;<= an$ i&s K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK. There'ore, /hen he re,eive$ &he $isposi&ive
    or$er in &his ,ase /i&h an invali$ ;<=, he 'ile$ a re0+es& &o $ele&e i& 'ro% &he $o,ke&. -hie' J+$"e A+$re*
    -ollins apparen&l* ,onsen&e$. E
    lx
    F
    The ,on$+,& o' -hie' J+$"e A+$re* -ollins here s&an$s in ,on&ras& /i&h &he re'+sal o' -hie' J+$"e A+$re*
    -ollins an$ -lerk o' &he -o+r& Terr* ;a'isi &o &ake an* ,orre,&ive a,&ions, /hen &he* /ere no&i'ie$ o' &he
    $is,over* o' &he invali$ ;<=s in "ine v Sheriff an$ Zernik v Connor et al 4see se,&ion D8a6. The reason %a*
    .e &ha& here, onl* one or$er ha$ &o .e re!$o,ke&e$. In &he &/o 'or%er ,ases, &he en&ire $o,ke& /o+l$ have &o
    .e $ele&e$.
    I& is ins&r+,&ive &ha& .o&h =ine an$ Do&&s,halk, senior, experien,e$ a&&orne*s, /ho /ere a+&horize$ -B5<-=
    par&i,ipan&s an$ passe$ &he %an$a&or* ins&r+,&ion, /ere en&irel* +na/are o' &he si"ni'i,an,e o' &he ;<= an$
    &he K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK 'or vali$i&*, 'or,e an$ e''e,& o' j+$i,ial re,or$s.
    Sources of information re5 N(F
    'n,erent to t,e invalidity of t,e <.7! t,ere is no single source t,at clearly defines t,e <.7 as an
    aut,entication instrument3 8,e information belo+ is #rimarily derived from t,e General .rder >$-
    >- in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! and various 2sers 5anual of t,e district
    and a##eals courts3 %s discussed above 9section )1a) suc, sources ,ave no aut,ority! relative to
    suc, fundamental c,anges in t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure3
    &2nofficial& %nderson 5anual 91ev >7! ->>$) for electronic filing of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia
    8,e &2nofficial& %nderson 5anual 91ev >7! ->>$) for electronic filing in t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia! #rovides t,e follo+ing vague and ambiguous e(#lanationG 9# 13)
    C
    l(i
    D
    &6 *he Nti'e ( -le'trni' ?iling
    The s*s&e% /ill presen& *o+ /i&h a ;o&i,e o' <le,&roni, =ilin" 4>;<=?6 s,reen an$ /ill also e!%ail *o+ a
    ,op* o' &he ;<=. The ;o&i,e o' <le,&roni, =ilin" 4>;<=?6 is *o+r proo' &ha& &he $o,+%en& has .een <!
    =ile$. Ho+ sho+l$ prin& &he s,reen &o a pie,e o' paper or a PD= 4or .o&h6 .e'ore pro,ee$in", .e,a+se
    *o+ /ill nee$ &o a&&a,h &he ;<= as &he las& pa"e o' &he ,o+r&es* ,op* &ha& *o+ s+.%i& &o &he -o+r&. The
    ;<= in,l+$es a >$o,+%en& n+%.er? an$ a link. Be s+re &o no&e &ha& $o,+%en& n+%.er, as *o+ /ill
    nee$ i& i' *o+ nee$ &o e!%ail a propose$ or$er &o &he -o+r&. The ;<= also in,l+$es an ><le,&roni,
    Do,+%en& )&a%p? /hi,h is a s&rin" o' le&&ers an$ n+%.ers /hi,h -o+r& s&a'' ,an +se &o veri'* &he
    a+&hen&i,i&* o' &he ;<=. The ;<= also ,on&ains &he pa&h an$ 'ile na%e o' &he $o,+%en& *o+ +ploa$e$
    an$ an* a&&a,h%en&s.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    23/165 TOC:2
    't s,ould be noted t,at t,e &2nofficial& %nderson 5anual! +,ic, includes #lenty of figures! fails
    to s,o+ an image of a valid <.7! including t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#&3 8,at! in a court
    t,at routinely issued simulated minutes! orders! and 4udgments +it, no &.lectronic Document
    Stam#&3
    %dministrative Policies and Procedures for .lectronic 7iling of t,e 2S District )ourt for t,e
    Hestern District of 8e(as
    % more s#ecific descri#tion of t,e <.7 as t,e aut,entication instrument in )56.)7 a##ears in
    t,e 2S District )ourt for t,e Hestern District of 8e(as %dministrative Policies and Procedures
    for .lectronic 7iling3 C
    l(ii
    D 8,e te(t in t,is document! regardless of its ambiguous aut,ority!
    clearly states t,at t,e <.7 constitutes &filing& and &entr&! and &Notice of Entr of -u&gment&
    #ursuant to t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure.
    4pa"e 96
    #e'tin 2: Ae(initin% and Related Re:uirement%:
    h. ;o&i,e o' <le,&roni, =ilin" 4>;<=?6 is an ele,&roni, no&i,e a+&o%a&i,all* "enera&e$ .* &he <le,&roni,
    =ilin" )*s&e% a& &he &i%e a $o,+%en& is $o,ke&e$. The ;<= in,l+$es &he &i%e o' 'ilin" an$ $o,ke&in",
    &he na%e o' &he par&* an$ =ilin" (ser 'ilin" &he $o,+%en&, &he &*pe o' $o,+%en&, &he &ex& o' &he $o,ke&
    en&r*, &he na%e o' &he par&* an$ =ilin" (ser re,eivin" &he no&i,e. I' a $o,+%en& is a&&a,he$ &o &he
    $o,ke& en&r*, &he ;<= /illz ,on&ain a 1*perlink &o &he 'ile$ $o,+%en& allo/in" re,ipien&s &o re&rieve &he
    $o,+%en&.
    4pa"e 336
    #e'tin C: /n%e:uen'e% ( -le'trni' ?iling
    a. <le,&roni, &rans%ission o' a $o,+%en& &hro+"h &he <le,&roni, =ilin" )*s&e% ,ons&i&+&es &he 'ilin" o'
    &he $o,+%en& p+rs+an& &o 2+le 94e6, =<D<2A@ 2(@<) O= -INI@ P2O-<D(2<, an$ 2+le 4C,
    =<D<2A@ 2(@<) O= -2IBI;A@ P2O-<D(2<.
    .. The &rans%ission o' a ;<= ,ons&i&+&es en&r* on &he $o,ke& p+rs+an& &o 2+les 9I an$ 7C, =<D<2A@
    2(@<) O= -INI@ P2O-<D(2<, an$ 2+les 4C an$ 99, =<D<2A@ 2(@<) O= -2IBI;A@
    P2O-<D(2<.
    #e'tin 1B: Nti'e ( /urt Order% and Eudgment%
    a. I%%e$ia&el* +pon en&r* o' an or$er or j+$"%en&, &he -lerk /ill &rans%i& a ;<= &o =ilin" (sers.
    Trans%ission o' &he ;<= ,ons&i&+&es &he no&i,e re0+ire$ .* 2+le 774$6, =<D<2A@ 2(@<) O= -INI@
    P2O-<D(2<, an$ 2+le 4C4,6, =<D<2A@ 2(@<) O= -2IBI;A@ P2O-<D(2<. The -lerk /ill sen$
    paper ,opies o' or$ers an$ j+$"%en&s &o non!=ilin" (sers.
    Ao+ever! it s,ould be noted t,at t,e te(t from t,e 2S District )ourt! Hestern District of 8e(as!
    entirely fails to mention t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#&! +,ic, #ur#ortedly re#laced t,e
    signature of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! and +,ic, #ur#ortedly e(ecutes t,e <.7 as an aut,entication
    and certification record3
    General .rder >$->- of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia
    8,e General .rder >$->- of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia #rovides
    additional information! #ertaining to t,e significance of t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#& in t,e
    #rocess of entryG C
    l(iii
    D 9#age 17)
    )F6 -le'trni' ?iling6
    ...
    O6 /erti(i'atin ( -le'trni' A'ument%6 P+rs+an& &o =e$eral 2+les o' -ivil Pro,e$+re 444a6436 an$
    444,6, &he %e&ho$ o' ele,&roni, ,er&i'i,a&ion $es,ri.e$ herein is $ee%e$ proo' o' an o''i,ial ,o+r& re,or$
    %ain&aine$ .* &he -lerk o' -o+r&. The ;<= ,on&ains &he $a&e o' ele,&roni, $is&ri.+&ion an$ i$en&i'i,a&ion
    o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es Dis&ri,& -o+r& 'or &he -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia as &he sen$er. An en,r*p&e$
    veri'i,a&ion ,o$e appears in &he ele,&roni, $o,+%en& s&a%p se,&ion o' &he ;<=. The ele,&roni,
    $o,+%en& s&a%p shall .e +se$ 'or &he p+rpose o' ,on'ir%in" &he a+&hen&i,i&* o' &he &rans%ission an$
    asso,ia&e$ $o,+%en&4s6 /i&h &he -lerk o' -o+r&, as ne,essar*. #hen a $o,+%en& has .een
    ele,&roni,all* 'ile$ in&o -B5<-=, &he o''i,ial re,or$ is &he ele,&roni, re,or$in" o' &he $o,+%en& kep& in
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    24/165 TOC:2
    &he ,+s&o$* o' &he -lerk o' -o+r&. The ;<= provi$es ,er&i'i,a&ion &ha& &he asso,ia&e$ $o,+%en&4s6 is a
    &r+e an$ ,orre,& ,op* o' &he ori"inal 'ile$ /i&h &he ,o+r&.
    't s,ould be noted t,at t,e language used ,ere is vague and ambiguous! if not #atently false3 't
    refers to & #roof of an official court record maintained by t,e )ler of )ourt&! instead of
    referring to &7iling&! &.ntry&! and &<otice of .ntry of Judgment&3 't refers to t,e <.7 as
    &certification t,at t,e associated document9s) is a true and correct co#y of t,e original filed +it,
    t,e court&3
    )56.)7 2ser @uide of t,e 2S District )ourt! <ort,ern District of 'llinois
    8,e 2ser @uide of t,e 2S District )ourt! <ort,ern District of 'llinois! #rovides additional
    critical information regarding t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#&G 't describes t,e &Document
    Nerification 2tility& and its use3 8,roug, t,e descri#tion in t,is @uide! it becomes evident t,at
    t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#& is not a #ersonal electronic signature! but a &c,ecsum& string!
    +,ic, s,o+s t,e eIuivalency of t+o records! #rovided t,at one ,as access to t,e &Document
    Nerification 2tility& 3
    Ao+ever! t,e language of t,e &2nofficial %nderson 5anual& and t,e General .rder >$->-
    suggests t,at t,e 2tility is <:8 accessible to )56.)7 users in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia3 Surely it is inaccessible to t,e #ublic at large3
    ?igure 1B6 Do,+%en& Neri'i,a&ion (&ili&* as $es,ri.e$ in &he -B5<-= (ser D+i$e o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&,
    ;or&hern Dis&ri,& o' Illinois.E
    lxiv
    F Des,rip&ion o' &he +&ili&* /as no& 'o+n$ in an* o' &he o&her $is&ri,& ,o+r&sL
    (sers Ban+al /hi,h /ere inspe,&e$. The (&ili&* ena.les a+&horize$ person &o $e&er%ine, i' a ,o+r& re,or$
    /as a$+l&era&e$. The p+.li, an$ pro+se par&ies are $enie$ a,,ess &o &he (&ili&*, an$ are also $enie$ a,,ess
    &o &he <le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%p, /hi,h is +se$ in &he (&ili&*.
    %lt,oug, t,e information above is derived from dis#arate 2S courts! it can be assumed to be
    universally a##licable! since t,e basic #latforms of P%).1 and )56.)7 are universally
    im#lemented in all 2S courts3
    Invalidity of the N(F as an authentication instrument as to form
    8,e 2S district and a##eals courts today #ur#ort t,at t,e <.7 9or <D% in t,e 2S courts of a##eals)
    constitute t,e aut,entication and certification instrument of court records3 Ao+ever! t,e <.7 is
    invalid as an aut,entication instrument on its faceG
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    25/165 TOC:2
    8,e o#ening statement on t,e <.7 saysG
    This is an a+&o%a&i, e!%ail %essa"e "enera&e$ .* &he -B5<-= s*s&e%.
    % true! valid aut,entication record s,ould be sent by an aut,ori"ed #erson in t,e :ffice of t,e
    )ler3
    8,e <.7 fails to state t,e name and aut,ority of an individual! issuing t,e <.7 as a De#uty
    )ler of t,e )ourt3
    8,e <.7 fails to include t,e certification statement &'! t,e undersigned! ,ereby certify333&
    8,e <.7 bears no valid signature! eit,er gra#,ic or digital3 'nstead! it includes a mac,ine
    generated encry#ted &c,ecsum& string3
    8,e <.7 is not sent and delivered as a an accom#anying record to t,e actual minutes! orders! or
    4udgments! +,ic, it #ur#orts to aut,enticate3 8,e relations,i# bet+een t,e <.7 9or <D%) and
    t,e res#ective court record is only t,roug, t,e ,y#erlin! #rovided in t,e <.73 Ay#erlins are
    insecure and invalid a##lication for t,is #ur#ose! as clearly documented in t,e <D% of S,elley
    belo+3 'n fact! many courts #ro,ibit t,e use of ,y#erlins in any court filings3
    8,e <.7 fails to conform +it, t,e la+ of t,e 2nited States! relative to t,e issuance of orders and
    4udgments under t,e signatures and seal of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3 Detailed discussion of t,e
    relevant la+s is #rovided in section .5!6! belo+3
    8,e <.7s! are concealed from #ublic access! and even from pro se #arties in t,eir o+n litigation
    9see section @1a)3 8,erefore! t,e #ublic at large and pro se #arties in #articular are unable to
    distinguis, valid and effectual records from void! not voidable records! +,ile bot, valid and void
    records are #ublis,ed by t,e courts in t,e P%).1 docets3
    -he N(F is central to undermining the integrity of US court records
    8,e sources! co#ied above! #ur#ort t,at today t,e <.7 is t,e definitive record! +,ic, aut,enticates
    t,e entry of minutes! orders! and 4udgments of t,e 2S courts3
    8,e listing of suc, minutes! orders! and 4udgments in t,e P%).1 docets! in itself! is not
    necessarily indicative of entry of suc, 4udicial records as valid and effectual records of t,e 2S
    district courts3
    Due to t,e failure to establis, t,e <.7 in a valid and aut,oritative manner! o##ortunities +ere
    created for deceiving t,e #ublic and #arties in litigation! relative to t,e validity and effect of 2S
    courts litigation records3
    %s s,o+n in instant submission in numerous cases! t,e <.7 is ey to mani#ulations t,at result in
    t,e #resentation of invalid records as valid and effectual records of t,e 2S courtsG
    'ssuance of <.7s by unaut,ori"ed #ersonnel3
    'ssuance of <.7s! +,ic, are missing t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#&! and t,erefore are
    deemed invalid by t,e 2S courts t,emselves3
    'ssuance of <.7s! +,ic, bear truncated! invalid &.lectronic Document Stam#&3
    1ecording of &te(t only orders& or minutes in t,e docet! #ur#orting t,e entry of records! +it, no
    corres#onding record and no #ossible issuance of a valid <.73
    (fforts to access N(Fs
    .(am#les ,ave been recorded in various 2S courts of minutes! orders! and 4udgments! +,ic, +ere
    #ublis,ed in t,e P%).1 docets! but +ere not aut,enticated as entered t,roug, t,e issuance of a
    valid <.7 bearing an &.lectronic Document Stam#& 9see above figures! and also Fine v Sheriff 0
    section 3-a! %erni& v Connor - section )-f! and corres#ondence +it, t,e )ler of t,e )ourt
    regarding t,e validity of docets and records in t,e latter t+o cases in section @-a)3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    26/165 TOC:2
    Per,a#s t,e best evidence for t,e fraudulent nature of t,e t,e <.7s bot, in t,e manner of t,eir
    im#lementation and t,e manner of t,eir use! comes from Dr FerniEs corres#ondence +it, )ler of
    t,e 2S )ourt 8erry <afisi in t,is matter 9section @-a)3 8,e corres#ondence #ertained to t,e denial
    of access to <.7 records and refusal of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi to ans+er on validity
    and integrity of t,e docet and records in t,e cases of Fine v Sheriff 9section )3a) and %erni& v
    Connor et al 9section )3f) in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3 Aars, retaliation
    against Dr Ferni follo+ed ,is re#eat attem#ts to access t,e <.7 records of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia! and documenting t,e fraud in t,e records of t,e latter t+o court files3
    N!As in the US courts of appeals
    8,e fallacy in im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e courts of a##eals in general! and t,e
    <D%s in #articular! is described in furt,er details in t+o #a#ers in t,e form of 1eIuests for .(#ert
    :#inion3 C
    l(v
    D
    'nformation regarding t,e #ractices of t,e 2S courts of a##eals! regarding t,e issuance of <D%
    9<otice of Docet %ctivity) in lieu of aut,entication by t,e cler of t,e court! +as derived from
    revie+ of Local *ules! General .rders! and Users 'anuals! C
    l(vi
    D as +ell as revie+ of t,e actual
    #ractices in numerous cases3
    8,e general #ractices! invalidity! and fallacy of t,e <D% as an aut,entication instrument in t,e 2S
    courts of a##eals are similar to t,e c,aracteristics of t,e <.7 in t,e 2S district courts3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    27/165 TOC:2
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    28/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 1C6 Invali$ ;DA 4;o&i,e o' Do,ke& A,&ivi&*6. The ;DA ,orrespon$s &o Ban$a&e in Richar# "ine v
    Sheriff of %os Angeles County et al 40C!9A0736 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i&. The ;DAs /ere
    $is,overe$ a'&er repea& 0+es&s &o &he -o+r&s. The ;DA, per&ainin" &o &he Ban$a&e Or$er, $en*in" &he
    <%er"en,* Pe&i&ion 'ro% 1a.eas -orp+s in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia.
    =ine, &he 70!*ear ol$, 'or%er () prose,+&or, /as an an&i!j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion a,&ivis&. =ine expose$ an$
    re.+ke$ &he &akin" .* -ali'ornia j+$"es o' Kno& per%i&&e$ pa*%en&sK 4,alle$ .* %e$ia K.ri.esK6. =ollo/in" his
    expos+re &he -ali'ornia Dovernor si"ne$ K2e&roa,&ive I%%+ni&iesK 4,alle$ .* %e$ia Kpar$onsK6 'or all s+,h
    j+$"es. T/o /eeks la&er, =ine /as arres&e$ an$ i%prisone$ .* )heri'' @ee Ba,a o' @os An"eles -o+n&*
    +n$er .ookin" re,or$s, /hi,h lis&e$ =ine as arres&e$ on lo,a&ion an$ .* a+&hori&* o' &he non!exis&in"
    KB+ni,ipal -o+r& o' )an Pe$roK 4se,&ion -3a6.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    29/165 TOC:2
    The ;DA /as no& serve$ /i&h &he Ban$a&e on =ine, &hen i%prisone$. The Ban$a&e /as serve$ on =ine
    +nsi"ne$, +n,er&i'ie$, an$ +na+&hen&i,a&e$. The ;DA /as $is,overe$ la&er, as par& o' e''or&s .* &his a+&hor,
    a& si"ni'i,an& personal risk 4see also se,&ion Da,.6 , &o re&rieve &he re,or$s o' &he vario+s =ine ,o+r&s ,ases.
    E
    lxvii
    F
    The ;DA sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ 'alse on i&s 'a,e: I& 'ails &o .ear a $o,ke& n+%.er, 'or &he re,or$ i& p+rpor&s &o
    a+&hen&i,a&e, ins&ea$ i& onl* lis&s KDo,+%en&4s6K, i& also sho/s onl* a &r+n,a&e$ K<le,&roni, Do,+%en&
    )&a%pK. The ;DA, like i&s ,o+n&erpar& in &he () $is&ri,& ,o+r&s, &he ;<=, sho+l$ .e invali$ as &o 'or%: I& 'ails
    &o in,l+$e a ,er&i'i,a&ion s&a&e%en&, an$ i& 'ails &o s&a&e &he na%e an$ a+&hori&* o' &he person, /ho iss+e$ &he
    ;DA. The ;DA sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ par&i,+larl* invali$ as a ,er&i'i,a&e o' servi,e, sin,e i& s&a&e in &he '+&+re,
    passive voi,e, K;o&i,e /ill .e ele,&roni,all* %aile$ &oK, an$ &hen expli,i&l* s&a&es &ha& pro+se par&ies /ill ;OT
    re,eive a ,op* o' &he ;DA, K-ase par&i,ipan&s lis&e$ .elo/ /ill no& re,eive &his ele,&roni, no&i,eK.
    The 'a,& &ha& &he respe,&ive re,or$, &he Ban$a&e Or$er, /as never $ee%e$ a vali$ j+$i,ial re,or$ .* &he ()
    ,o+r&s &he%selves ,an .e also reasone$ 'ro% &he 'a,& &ha& &he Ban$a&e Or$er /as $o,ke&e$ in &he ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, /i&h an invali$ ;<= 4see =i"+re C, a.ove6.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    30/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 1D6 Invali$ ;DA 'or Dk& O 7, Or$er Den*in" )&a*, in Shelley v ,uality %oan Service Corp. The or$er
    linke$ &o &he @)D /as no& an or$er in &he )hell* appeal, .+& in an +nrela&e$ prisonerLs pe&i&ion: William
    !ea#or v - Alvi#re., et al 40C!3A90I6 4Dk& O9 in &ha& ,ase6. #hen )helle* aske$ &he () -o+r& o' Appeals,
    C&h -ir,+i&, &o ,orre,& &he invali$ ;DA, his re0+es& /as no& a$$resse$.
    One sho+l$ no&i,e Appellan& )helle*Ls ,lai%s in his Appeal Brie', re"ar$in" $en*in" o' a,,ess &o &he ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r& in his ,ase.
    The ,on$+,& o' &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i&, ,an .e $ee%e$ as %ore o' &he sa%e.
    The ,ase $e%ons&ra&es &he invali$i&* o' servi,e &hro+"h &he ;DA 4an$ like/ise, &he ;<= in &he $is&ri,&
    ,o+r&s6, /here &he j+$i,ial re,or$s are no& serve$ a& all, onl* a link is provi$e$. The pra,&i,e o' provi$in" links
    ins&ea$ o' re,or$s is inse,+re, an$ sho+l$ .e prohi.i&e$ in ,o+r& pro,ess. E
    lxviii
    F
    'n t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! it a##ears t,at t,e common #ractice! relative to t,e issuance
    of simulated 4udicial records! involves t,e use of a truncated! invalid &.lectronic Document Stam#&!
    instead of t,e entire omission of t,e &.lectronic Document Stam#& from simulated 4udicial records
    in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3
    %n entirely different ty#e of invalid #ractice of <D% issuance +as found in t,e case of 1ic,ard
    S,elley3 'n Shelley v 6uality Loan Services 9>*-56133)! S,elley attem#ted to #rotect ,is rig,ts
    against a financial institution! again in alleged real estate fraud3
    8,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit denied t,e 1eIuest for a Stay in t,e %##eal in t,is case in an
    unsigned order! and t,roug, t,e service of a false and misleading <D%3
    8,e case +as uniIue! since S,elley! a pro0se filer! +as #ermitted access to electronic filing t,roug,
    )56.)73 8,erefore! ,e received by electronic mail t,e <D%s in ,is case3 Ao+ever! t,e :ctober
    --! ->>* :rder denying ,is a##eal +as received +it, an <D%! including a lin to an order in an
    unrelated ,abeas cor#us #etition3
    8,e case may a##ear as sim#ly ,uman error3 Ao+ever! it a##arently +as not suc,! since t,e 2S
    )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit refused to correct t,e error even after S,elley #ointed it out to t,e
    )ourt3
    8,e case demonstrates t,e invalidity of service t,roug, t,e <D% 9and lie+ise! t,e <.7 in t,e
    district courts)! +,ere t,e 4udicial records are not served at all! only a lin is #rovided3 8,e #ractice
    of #roviding lins instead of records is insecure! and s,ould be #ro,ibited in court #rocess3
    Fraud or human error3
    's it #ossible t,at t,e defective design of t,e <.7s and <D%s! as to form! and t,e invalid o#eration
    of <.7s and <D%s! documented in instant submission are 4ust t,e outcome of ,uman errorP
    't is e(tremely unlie to be t,e case for t,e follo+ing reasonsG
    8,e large-scale fraud! today #racticed by t,e 2S district and a##eals courts! relative to t,e
    issuance of simulated 4udicial records! is not original at all3 't is a common fraud3 8,e :ffice of
    t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! and t,e )ler of t,e )ourt as custodian of court records +ere instituted
    s#ecifically to #revent t,is ty#e of fraud ,undreds of years ago3 S#ecific court #rocedures! all of
    +,ic, are ,inged on t,e aut,ority of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt ,ave develo#ed in t,e courts!
    originating from t,e .nglis, common la+ to #revent t,is ty#e of fraud! including but not limited
    toG a) %ut,entication of all 4udicial records by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! b) %ffi(ing t,e Seal of t,e
    )ourt! +,ic, is maintained under t,e custody of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! on all court orders and
    4udgments! c) S#ecial #rocedures for t,e commencing and dis#ositive records of litigation - t,e
    issuance of summonses by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt and t,e e(ecution of t,eir service! and t,e
    <otice of .ntry of Judgment3 8,e systems! no+ em#loyed in t,e 2S courts undermined all
    t,ese #rocedures! +,ic, are ey to Due Process! in a coordinated fas,ion3
    't is unt,inable t,at after ,undreds of years of tradition! relative to t,e forms! #ertaining to
    certification of service by t,e cler of t,e court! t,e use of signatures and t,e Seal of t,e )ourt
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    31/165 TOC:2
    +er all lost on senior 4udicial officers! +,o must ,ave been involved in designing of P%).1 and
    )56.)73
    8,e concealment of t,e <.7s from #ublic access and from pro se litigants is entirely im#robable
    as an &error&3 5oreover! t,e certified 4udgments +ere al+ays filed as #art of commencing
    records in an a##eal3 8o t,e degree t,at t,e <.7s are ,eld as aut,entication and certification
    instruments! t,ey s,ould ,ave been filed toget,er +it, t,e 4udgment record in an a##eal3
    Ao+ever! revie+ of t,ousands of a##eal records in P%).1! failed to s,o+ a single case! +,ere
    t,e <.7 +as filed toget,er +it, t,e 4udgment in an a##eal3 5oreover! in cases! suc, as t,e
    a##eal of Fine v Sheriff and Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al 9sections )-a!n! belo+)! t,e 2S
    )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! conducted a##eals from 4udgments t,at +ere never aut,enticated
    or certified t,roug, an <.73 %nd +,en t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! +as reliably
    informed of t,at fact! it failed to dismiss t,e a##eal and remand t,e case to t,e 2S District
    )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3 'n fact! after revie+ of t,ousands of a##eals records in t,e
    various 2S courts of a##eals! not a single remand order for lac of certification +as ever
    discovered in P%).13
    8,e entirely ine(#licable discrimination in access to t,e courts! t,roug, t,e denial of access to
    )56.)7 to pro0se filers! cannot #ossibly be deemed a matter of ,uman error! and combined
    +it, t,e common failure to serve t,e <.7s and <D%s! even as #a#er records on pro0se filers! is
    essential for enabling t,e fraud in t,is matter3 5oreover! even +,en a pro0se filer reali"e t,e
    fraud! and attem#ts to gain access to t,e <.7s! +,ic, ,ad not been served on t,em! access is
    denied! as documented in %erni& v Connor and 'aid of the 'ist v #indsor 9sections )-f!4)3
    8,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! refused to t,e fraud and abuse of rig,ts in t,e
    im#lementation of General .rder >$->- and t,e <.7 in t,e 'otion to Intervene in t,e a##eal in
    Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit 9see section )3n)3
    Bie+ise! t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt refused to revie+ t,e same issue in t,e 'otion to Intervene in
    Fine v Sheriff in t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt3 9see section )3a)3
    't s,ould also be noted t,at in t,e transition to electronic records! t,e Su#erior )ourt of
    )alifornia! )ounty of Bos %ngeles! undermined t,e integrity of litigation in a very similar
    manner3 7or e(am#le! t,e )alifornia )ode reIuires t,at t,e )ler of t,e )ourt maintain docets
    91egisters of %ctions) and =oos of Judgments! +,ic, are #ublicly accessible! and serve a
    <otice of .ntry of Judgment on #arties in litigation3 Ao+ever! today t,e Su#erior )ourt of
    )alifornia! )ounty of Bos %ngeles! denies access to t,e 1egisters of %ctions! ,as no defined
    =oo of Judgment! eit,er on #a#er or electronic! and serves no <otices of .ntry of Judgment3
    C
    l(i(
    D
    't s,ould also be noted t,at t,e courts of t,e State of 'srael! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis,
    common la+ as +ell! im#lemented over t,e #ast decade '8 systems! similar to t,ose in t,e 2S!
    +it, invalid aut,entication records! and engage in t,e #ractice of simulated litigation3 9see also
    section @) C
    l((
    !
    l((i
    D
    e) )stablishing of *double boo!s+ sstems
    2nder #a#er administration of t,e courts! it +ould ,ave been an administratively frustrating tas to
    maintain double boos for court files3 <ot so under electronic administration of t,e courts3
    8,roug, P%).1 and )56.)7! t,e 2S courts effectively establis,ed a double court file systemG
    8,e #ublic and pro0se filers see one set of records! +,ic, do not #ermit t,em to distinguis, bet+een
    valid and void court records3 %ut,ori"ed attorneys! 4udges! and court #ersonnel see a different set
    of court records for t,e same court files3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    32/165 TOC:2
    5oreover! as an inse#arable #art of suc, conditions! t,e courts deny access to records to t,e #ublic
    and to pro0se filers3 %nd as s,o+n in t,e case of Fine v Sheriff and %erni& v Connor et al 9sections
    )-a! )-f! @-a)! any attem#t to access court records! #ursuant to +ell establis,ed )onstitutional and
    Due Process rig,ts! meets ,ars, retaliation3
    Suc, conditions ,ave set bac t,e integrity of t,e 2S courts to a medieval level3
    f) %nvalid implementation of authorities and permissions
    ?igure 196 T/o en&ries 'ro% &he online PA-<2 Do,ke& o' S)C v BAC 43:0C!,v!0AI8C6 in &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork. The Jan+ar* 38, 8030 en&r* in,l+$es a Do,ke& ;+%.er an$ a link &o an
    a,&+al re,or$. The Jan+ar* 3C, 8030 en&r* has no Do,ke& ;+%.er $esi"na&e$, an$ no link &o an* re,or$.
    There'ore, no ,o+r& re,or$ exis&s 'or &he la&&er en&r*. Boreover, "iven &he $esi"n o' &he ;<=s 4;o&i,es o'
    <le,&roni, =ilin"6, s+,h K$o,ke& &ex& onl*K %in+&es ,o+l$nM& possi.l* .e a+&hen&i,a&e$. There'ore, &he Jan+ar*
    3C, 8030 &elephone hearin" an$ i&s %in+&es sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ si%+la&e$ ,o+r& hearin" an$ si%+la&e$
    %in+&es, like %an* o&hers o' &he sa%e kin$ in &he sa%e li&i"a&ion. (; repor&s ,onsi$er %issin" ,o+r& re,or$s
    a ,ar$inal si"n o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion. The en&r* o' &he Jan+ar* 3C, 8030 si%+la&e$ %in+&es /as .* K%roK, like
    %os& o&her en&ries o' &he si%+la&e$ re,or$s in &his ,ase. The a+&hori&* o' K%roK is +nkno/n, .+& &he O''i,e o'
    &he -lerk o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork ,on'ir%e$ &ha& $o,ke& en&ries are &o$a*
    %a$e .* persons, /ho are no& a+&horize$ Dep+&* -lerks. The ini&ials K%roK ,anno& possi.l* .e $ee%e$ a
    vali$ ele,&roni, si"na&+re.
    .ntries are made in 2S district court docets by unidentified #ersons of unidentified aut,ority! +it,
    no valid signatures3 Ao+ever! in res#onse to inIuiry t,e office of t,e cler of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or clarified t,at suc, entries are not made by aut,ori"ed De#uty )lers3
    Bie+ise! in t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of )alifornia! numerous invalid entries +ere
    made in t,e docets of Fine v Sheriff and in %erni& v Connor by 5s Donna 8,omas! an
    unaut,ori"ed #erson! as #art of simulated litigation #ractices 9see section @-a)3
    'n addition! t,e system enables attorneys to file records and directly enter t,em in t,e 2S court
    docets! in violation of t,e letter and t,e s#irit of t,e 7udiciary Act 917$*) and t,e Federal *ules of
    Civil $rocedure3
    g) Discrimination in access to the courts
    Practically in all 2S courts! +,ic, +ere e(amined! only attorneys are #ermitted access to )56.)73
    %s a result! a #arty! +,o is re#resented by an attorney! is #ermitted to electronically file records and
    enter t,em into t,e P%).1 docet +it, no oversig,t and accountability by t,e :ffice of t,e )ler3
    'n contrast! an unre#resented #arty is reIuired to file and serve only on #a#er! incurring substantial
    additional time and money e(#enditure3
    Similarly! t,e courts electronically serve 4udicial records and any ot,er notices on attorneys! +,ile
    unre#resented #arties are served and noticed only on #a#er3 Suc, #ractices o#en t,e +ay to
    numerous met,ods of abuse3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    33/165 TOC:2
    Suc, discrimination in access to t,e courts s,ould be deemed in violation of t,e fundamentals of
    7air 8rial3
    1egarding universal denial of pro se filersE access to )56.)7! see for e(am#le t,e general :rder
    >$->- of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District >1 )alifornia3 C
    l((ii
    D
    <x,l+sions =ro% <le,&roni, =ilin"
    B Pro )e @i&i"an&s
    Do,+%en&s 'ile$ .* pro se li&i"an&s /ill ,on&in+e &o .e 'ile$ an$ serve$ in &he &ra$i&ional %anner an$
    /ill .e s,anne$ .* &he -lerkLs O''i,e in&o &he -B5<-= s*s&e%.
    't s,ould also be noted t,at t,e courts of t,e State of 'srael! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis, common
    la+ as +ell! im#lemented over t,e #ast decade '8 systems! similar to t,ose in t,e 2S! +,ic,
    discriminate against pro se filers3 9see also section @-b) C
    l((iii
    D
    h) $ppearance of attornes, (ho are not authori#ed as Counsel of Record
    %s documented in t,e 5emorandum :#inion of 2S Judge Jeff =o,m in t,e Case of Borroer
    $arsley 9section )-e)! a##earance of attorneys! +,o are not certified as )ounsel of 1ecord! and
    +it, &no communications +it, clients clause&! ,as become a routine fraud met,od of )ountry+ide
    7inancial )or#oration in courts across t,e 2nited States3 C
    l((iv
    D
    .ven in a ,ig, visibility case! suc, as S(C v Ban& of America Corporation! attorneys a##eared +it,
    no certificates of )ounsel of 1ecord 9section )3,)3
    Bie+ise! in Fine v Sheriff attorney 5c)ormic a##eared on be,alf of )alifornia Judge David
    ?affe and t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia +it, no aut,ority at all3 C
    l((v
    D
    %nd in %erni& v Connor et al! =rian )ave! BBP! a##eared on be,alf of )ountry+ide and later =an
    of %merica +it, no aut,ority as )ounsel of 1ecord 9section )-f! @-a)3
    8,ere is no doubt t,at '8 systems of t,e 2S courts could be designed and im#lemented in a manner
    t,at +ould force an attorney to to file t,e )ertificate of Po+ers of %ttorney #rior to filing any ot,er
    record3 8,at is not t,e case3
    5oreover! t,e manner in +,ic, attorneys are reIuired to file suc, certificates +as left vague and
    ambiguous! often defined in obscure and different +ays in t,e Local *ules or General .rders of t,e
    individual courts3 7or e(am#le! in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! t,e only
    #lace! +,ere suc, issue is defined! is in t,e Certificate of Interested $arties) sti#ulated in General
    .rder **->7 C
    l((vi
    D
    h) ,niversal failure to doc!et summonses, and the routine issuance of invalid summonses
    8,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure! 1ule 4 saysG
    2(@< 4. )(BBO;)
    4a6 -O;T<;T)7 AB<;DB<;T).
    436 Contents/ A s+%%ons %+s&:
    4A6 na%e &he ,o+r& an$ &he par&ies7
    4B6 .e $ire,&e$ &o &he $e'en$an&7
    4-6 s&a&e &he na%e an$ a$$ress o' &he plain&i''Ls a&&orne* orQi' +nrepresen&e$Qo' &he
    plain&i''7
    4D6 s&a&e &he &i%e /i&hin /hi,h &he $e'en$an& %+s& appear an$ $e'en$7
    4<6 no&i'* &he $e'en$an& &ha& a 'ail+re &o appear an$ $e'en$ /ill res+l& in a $e'a+l& j+$"%en&
    a"ains& &he $e'en$an& 'or &he relie' $e%an$e$ in &he ,o%plain&7
    4=6 .e si"ne$ .* &he ,lerk7 an$
    4D6 .ear &he ,o+r&Ls seal.
    486 Amen#ments/ The ,o+r& %a* per%i& a s+%%ons &o .e a%en$e$.
    4.6 I))(A;-<. On or a'&er 'ilin" &he ,o%plain&, &he plain&i'' %a* presen& a s+%%ons &o &he ,lerk 'or
    si"na&+re an$ seal. I' &he s+%%ons is properl* ,o%ple&e$, &he ,lerk %+s& si"n, seal, an$ iss+e i& &o
    &he plain&i'' 'or servi,e on &he $e'en$an&. A s+%%onsQor a ,op* o' a s+%%ons &ha& is a$$resse$ &o
    %+l&iple $e'en$an&sQ%+s& .e iss+e$ 'or ea,h $e'en$an& &o .e serve$.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    34/165 TOC:2
    4,6 )<2NI-<.
    436 $n *eneral/ A s+%%ons %+s& .e serve$ /i&h a ,op* o' &he ,o%plain&. The plain&i'' is
    responsi.le 'or havin" &he s+%%ons an$ ,o%plain& serve$ /i&hin &he &i%e allo/e$ .* 2+le
    44%6 an$ %+s& '+rnish &he ne,essar* ,opies &o &he person /ho %akes servi,e.
    't s,ould be noticed t,at in sections 9a)91) and 9c)91)! &must& is used3
    'n s,ortG 'f summonses are not #ro#erly com#leted and6or not #ro#erly served! and no reIuest is
    made for +aiver or amendment! t,e validity of t,e entire litigation is undermined3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    35/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 206 Invali$ s+%%ons in S)C v Bank of America Corporation in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern
    Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork. The s+%%ons is +nsi"ne$, an$ 'ails &o .ear &he seal o' &he ,o+r&, an$ &here'ore invali$.
    As is &he ,ase in o&her ,o+r&s &ha& ori"ina&e in &he <n"lish ,o%%on la/, &he s+%%ons es&a.lishes &he
    j+ris$i,&ion o' &he ,o+r& in a "iven %a&&er. There'ore, &he invali$ s+%%ons ren$ers &he en&ire li&i"a&ion invali$
    an$ /i&ho+& an* j+ris$i,&ion. )i%ilar, invali$ s+%%onses /ere $is,overe$ in o&her ,ases an$ o&her ,o+r&s.
    Boreover, &he () ,o+r&s ro+&inel* 'ail &o $o,ke& &he s+%%onses, in $isre"ar$ o' &he () -ivil -o+r&
    Pro,e$+res. There'ore, &he p+.li, a& lar"e ,anno& $is&in"+ish .e&/een vali$ an$ e''e,&+al li&i"a&ion an$
    si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion. =+r&her%ore, &he ,lerk o' &he () -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork $enie$ a,,ess &o
    &he s+%%ons, in $isre"ar$ o' &he =irs& A%en$%en& ri"h& &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s. The re,or$, sho/n here,
    /as o.&aine$ &hro+"h =ree$o% o' In'or%a&ion A,& re0+es& on &he )<-. E
    lxxvii
    F
    %s is t,e case in ot,er courts! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis, common la+! t,e summonses are
    critical documents for establis,ing t,e validity of t,e litigation3 8,roug, t,e issuance of t,e
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    36/165 TOC:2
    summonses and t,eir la+ful e(ecution 9service)! t,e court establis,es its 4urisdiction in a given
    matter on s#ecific #arties3 %bsent t,e issuance and e(ecution of valid summonses t,e integrity and
    validity of litigation is undermined3
    Ao+ever! under P%).1 and )56.)7! t,e 2S courts today universally fail to docet summonses!
    in disregard of t,e 2S )ivil )ourt Procedures3 8,erefore! t,e validity of t,e summonses! even
    +,en valid summonses +ere issued and e(ecuted! remains dubious3
    %s is t,e case in ot,er courts! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis, common la+! -$ 2S) 16*1 reIuiresG
    All /ri&s an$ pro,ess iss+in" 'ro% a ,o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es shall .e +n$er &he seal o' &he ,o+r&
    an$ si"ne$ .* &he ,lerk &hereo'.
    %s s,o+n in multi#le cases in instant submission! t,e 2S courts routinely issue clearly invalid
    summonses! e3g3! unsigned! or missing t,e Seal of t,e )ourt3 Ao+ever! as a result of denial of
    #ublic access to t,e summonses! t,e #ublic cannot discern suc, facts3
    Fraud or human error3
    's it #ossible t,at t,e defective summonses! s,o+n in t,e cases in instant submission! and t,e failure
    to docet t,em 4ust t,e outcome of ,uman errorP
    't is e(tremely unliely to be t,e case for t,e follo+ing reasonsG
    8,e general #attern is t,e same as seen in t,e case of t,e <.7sG 8,e 2S courts generate on a
    regular basis records! +,ic, undermine t,at validity of t,e entire litigation! but unla+fully deny
    #ublic access to t,e same records3
    8,e s#ecific #rocedures! #ertaining to t,e issuance! e(ecution! and doceting of t,e summonses
    ,ave evolved in t,e courts! originated in t,e .nglis, common la+! s#ecifically to #revent t,e
    fraud on t,e court t,roug, t,e conduct of simulated litigation3
    %ccordingly! t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure) enacted by t,e 2S )ongress are e(#licit
    regarding t,e duty of t,e cler to docet t,e summonses 9section .4)3 Ao+ever t,e failure to
    docet t,e summonses is almost universal in t,e 2S courts today! and suc, failure is essential for
    concealing t,e common fraud! in,erent in t,e issuance of invalid summonses3
    %s s,o+n above! section )1a! t,e &2nofficial& %nderson 5anual e(#licitly recommends t,at
    attorneys not file co#ies of t,e summonses +it, t,e #roof of e(ecution of t,e summonses and
    com#laint3
    'n cases! suc, as S(C v Ban& of America Corporation 9section )3,)! Plaintiff +as a 2S agency!
    and senior attorneys +ere involved in t,e litigation3 8,e record! +,ic, as #roduced in res#onse
    to t,e 7reedom of 'nformation reIuest! s,o+s t,at t,e summonses ,ad never been filed +it, t,e
    cler of t,e court! and multi#le ot,er features of t,e same litigation indicate t,at bot, #arties and
    t,e 4udge +ere determined from start to finis, to #erform simulated litigation in t,at case3
    %s documented most clearly in %erni& v Connor et al in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of
    )alifornia! even +,en a pro0se filer detected t,e invalidity of t,e summonses! issued by t,e
    cler! t,e cler refused to issue valid summonses 9sections )-f! @-a)3 5oreover! in t,at case!
    t,e pro0se filer tried to gain access to t,e 2S District )ourt! by #etitioning t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals! *t, )ircuit in %erni& v US !istrict Central !istrict of California. =ut t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals! *t, )ircuit #atroni"ed t,e corru#t conduct of t,e 2S District )ourt! in a manner t,at
    cannot ,ave any foundation in t,e 2S la+ 9see section )1c)3
    Per,a#s t,e best evidence for t,e fraudulent nature of conduct of t,e 2S district courts! relative
    to t,e issuance of invalid summonses and t,e universal failure to docet summonses comes from
    Dr FerniEs corres#ondence +it, )ler of t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi in t,is matter 9section @-a)3 8,e
    corres#ondence #ertained in #art to t,e refusal of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    37/165 TOC:2
    )alifornia! to issue valid summonses in %erni& v Connor et al 9see section )3f)! and refusal of
    )ler of t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi to ans+er on validity and integrity of t,e docet and records in
    t,is case3 Aars, retaliation against Dr Ferni follo+ed ,is re#eat attem#ts to access t,e records
    and document t,eir fallacy3
    't s,ould also be noted t,at t,e courts of t,e State of 'srael! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis,
    common la+ as +ell! im#lemented over t,e #ast decade '8 systems! similar to t,ose in t,e 2S!
    +it, no valid summonses3 9section @-a) C
    l((viii
    D
    i) $dulterated and missing of court records
    'n various cases! ey records are deleted from t,e P%).1 docets of t,e 2S district courts or t,e
    2S courts of a##eals +it, no legal foundation! in disregard of t,e Federal Civil Court $rocedures3
    C
    l((i(
    !
    l(((
    D 2nited <ations re#orts on &Strengt,ening Judicial 'ntegrity %gainst )orru#tion& note
    missing court records as a cardinal sign of 4udicial corru#tion3 C
    l(((i
    !
    l(((ii
    D
    'n ot,er cases! t,e evidence indicates t,at records +ere adulterated! e3g3! t,e Petition for a Hrit of
    Aabeas )or#us of 1ic,ard 7ine in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia 9see section
    @-a)! and decision in t,e Aabeas )or#us #etition of @uantanamo =ay detainee 2t,man %bdul
    1a,im 5o,ammed 2t,man in t,e 2S District )ourt! Has,ington D)! as +idely re#orted by media3
    C
    l(((iii
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    38/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 216 The re,or$ &ha& /as provi$e$ .* =e$eral <le,&ions -o%%i&&ee, in response &o a =ree$o% o'
    In'or%a&ion re0+es& on &he J+$"%en& in Citi.ens Unite# v "e#eral )lection Commission 4see se,&ions -8o,p6
    ,o%.ine$ /i&h i&s a+&hen&i,a&ion .* &he -lerk o' &he () )+pre%e -o+r&. ;o re,or$ o' &he J+$"%en& /as
    $is,overe$ in &he online p+.li, a,,ess s*s&e% o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&. (ni&e$ ;a&ions repor&s on
    )&ren"&henin" J+$i,ial In&e"ri&* lis& %issin" ,o+r& re,or$s as a ,ar$inal si"n o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion.
    -) .$C)R and C/0)CF " inter"court surve
    P%).1 +as im#lemented +it, various modifications in t,e various 2S courts and courts of
    a##eals! and enables t,e denial of #ublic access to critical court records9Summonses! #a#ers filed
    by #arties! Judgment 'nde(! )alendars of t,e )ourts! Docet %ctivity 1e#ort! )or#orate Parent
    1e#orts! etc) in an arbitrary and ca#ricious fas,ion in t,e various courts! in a##arent violation of
    7irst %mendment and Due Process rig,ts3
    Calendars C
    l(((iv
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    39/165 TOC:2
    8,e calendars of t,e courts are one of t,e fundamental &=oos of )ourts&! +,ic, are maintained
    under t,e aut,ority of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! and t,eir maintenance is an essential #art of t,e
    )lerEs duties in courts originating in t,e .nglis, common la+3
    8,e calendars are critical in ensuring t,e integrity of t,e courts M to #revent t,e conduct of
    simulated ,earings and simulated litigation by 4udges 9see section %)=)3
    Ao+ever! a survey of -- of t,e *5 2S district courts! s,o+ed t,at only 14 of t,e -- district court
    #rovided any #ublic access to calendars of t,e courts3 Some of t,e district courts! +,ere access to
    t,e calendars +as entirely denied +ere t,e )entral District of )alifornia 9)alifornia .astern!
    <ort,ern! and Sout,ern Districts #ermitted limited access)! Dela+are! and @eorgia 5iddle and
    <ort,ern Districts3
    .ven in courts! +,ere #ublic access to calendars +as #rovided! suc, access +as limited! and t,e
    calendars laced in validity3 8,e 2S District )ourt! District of )olumbia! +as found uniIue in t,e
    e(tent of access #ermitted to its )alendars3
    %dditional data regarding t,e )alendars of t,e )ourts in P%).1 and )56.)7 in various 2S
    district courts is summari"ed in t+o tables3 C
    l(((v
    !
    l(((vi
    D
    7udgment Inde4
    8,e Judgment =oo! lie t,e )alendar of t,e )ourt! is considered one of t,e fundamental =oos of
    )ourt! +,ic, establis, t,e integrity of t,e courts! and its maintenance is #art of t,e duties of t,e
    )ler of t,e )ourt3 2nder P%).1 and )56.)7! t,e Judgment =oo +as re#laced by Judgment
    'nde(3
    8,e Judgment 'nde( in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! for e(am#le! is
    instrumental for documenting t,e invalid conduct of t,e 2S District )ourt and t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals! relative to t,e t+o o##osite Judgments! +,ic, a##ear in t,e P%).1 docet of Bog )abin
    1e#ublicans v 2S% et al3 8,e first Judgment is listed as entered in t,e Judgment 'nde(! t,e second
    is not3 9see sections )-m!n)
    Ao+ever! #ublic access to t,e Judgment 'nde( is not #ermitted in all 2S district courts3 7or
    e(am#le! #ublic access to t,e Judgment 'nde( is denied in most 2S distinct courts in @eorgia3
    8,erefore! t,e #ublic is denied t,e rig,t to ascertain! +,ic, 4udgments +ere indeed entered as valid
    and effectual records of t,e 2S courts3
    *elated -ransactions *eport
    8,e 1elated 8ransactions 1e#ort #rovides an im#ortant tool for monitoring t,e integrity of
    encoding of various #a#ers by t,e staff of t,e :ffice of t,e )ler 9com#laint! motion! res#onse!
    4udgment! etc)! and t,e relations,i# among t,e records in a given docet3
    't is t,roug, t,e 1elated 8ransactions 1e#ort t,at t,e ty#ical &.vents& and &Status& met,od of
    electronic case management is a##lied to t,e records in t,e P%).1 docet3 8,erefore! an &.vent&
    is o#ened! for e(am#le! +,en a &5otion& is filed and entered! and t,e &.vent& is closed! +,en and
    &:rder&! related to t,e same &5otion& is filed and entered! @ranting! Denying! etc! t,at given
    &5otion&3
    8,e 1elated 8ransactions 1e#ort is critical for assessing t,e integrity of a P%).1 docet3
    8,e %dministrative :ffice of t,e 2S )ourts failed to #ublis, a dictionary of t,e terms and rules for
    correct encoding of 8ransactions by t,e offices of t,e clers in P%).1 and )56.)73 Ao+ever!
    rules could be inferred t,roug, data mining and acIuaintance +it, ot,er case management systems
    of ot,er courts3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    40/165 TOC:2
    7or e(am#le! a common form of dece#tion in t,e P%).1 docets is encoding a &5otion& as
    &5isc&! and not relating any &:rder& to it3 2nder suc, encoding! no &.vent& and no &Status& is
    o#ened3
    Narious courts deny access to t,is im#ortant tool3 %s s,o+n in t,e corres#ondence +it, )ler of
    t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi 9section @-a)! suc, access is denied in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District
    of )alifornia! even to a #arty in ,is o+n litigation3
    !) %' sstem of the ,S Supreme Court
    8,e electronic #ublic access and case management systems 9name unno+n) of t,e 2S Su#reme
    )ourt undermine t,e foundation of t,e 1ule of Ba+ C
    l(((vii
    !
    l(((viii
    !
    l(((i(
    !
    (c
    !
    (ci
    !
    (cii
    DG
    8,e systems enable t,e #ublication of docets! 4ournals! decisions! and 4udgments by 2S
    Su#reme )ourt #ersonnel of unno+n aut,ority3
    Suc, records are of vague and ambiguous validity3
    Public access is denied to valid! signed and aut,enticated court records3
    8,e Su#reme )ourt routinely serves unsigned! unaut,enticated decisions on #arties before t,e
    )ourt3
    8,e data! found in t,e Journals! Docets! and Decisions in in,erently inconsistent and
    contradictory3 C
    x,iii
    ,
    x,iv
    ,
    x,v
    ,
    x,vi
    ,
    x,vii
    , D
    't s,ould also be noted t,at it remains unclear! +,et,er t,e Su#reme )ourt of t,e 2nited States
    ,olds its electronic records of any validity at all3 5ost liely not3 Ao+ever! t,e mere fact t,at suc,
    central issue remains ambiguous! demonstrates t,e invalidity of t,e system3
    8,e #re#onderance of t,e evidence suggests t,at t,e Su#reme )ourt maintains #a#er court files!
    +,ic, it ,olds t,e valid and effectual records of t,e )ourt3 Ao+ever! attem#ts to gain access to t,e
    #a#er files! for e(am#le in t,e case of t,e Aabeas )or#us of 1ic,ard 7ine 9see section )-a)! failed
    to discover valid 4udicial records eit,er3 C
    (cviii
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    41/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 226 (nsi"ne$, +n,er&i'ie$ De,ision re,or$ o' &he () )+pre%e -o+r& in &he 1a.eas -orp+s Pe&i&ion
    "ine v Sheriff 40C!38906, as $is,overe$ +pon inspe,&ion in &he paper 'iles o' &he () )+pre%e -o+r&. The
    )+pre%e -o+r& serves on par&ies +nsi"ne$, +na+&hen&i,a&e$ $e,ision re,or$s. I& sho+l$ also .e no&e$ &ha&
    &he ,er&i'i,a&ion s&a&e%en& is invali$, sa*in" KA &r+e ,op*K, ins&ea$ o' KTr+e -op* o' &he Ori"inalK. ;o vali$
    $e,ision re,or$s /ere 'o+n$ +pon inspe,&ion o' &he paper )+pre%e -o+r& 'iles in &he ,ases rela&e$ &o &he
    1a.eas -orp+s pe&i&ions o' 2i,har$ =ine. E
    x,ix
    F
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    42/165 TOC:2
    't s,ould also be noted t,at t,e courts of t,e State of 'srael! +,ic, originate in t,e .nglis, common
    la+ as +ell! im#lemented over t,e #ast decade '8 systems! similar to t,ose in t,e 2S! and t,e '8
    system of t,e 'sraeli Su#reme )ourt is #articularly noted for its invalidity3 9see also section @) C
    c
    D
    Hit, it! t,e Presiding Justice of t,e 'sraeli Su#reme )ourt refuses to clarify +,et,er t,e Su#reme
    )ourt ,olds its electronic records of any validity3 C
    ci
    D
    %! Case stu&ies
    Data mining! +,ic, formed t,e basis for t,e current re#ort +as conducted t,roug, #ublic access to
    P%).1! as #ermitted by la+! in over -> 2S district courts! 2S banru#tcy courts! and 2S courts of
    a##eals3
    Aere! some individual case studies are #resented! to demonstrate t,e fraud in,erent in t,e design
    and o#eration of t,e '8 systems of t,e 2S courts! and t,eir em#loyment for t,e de#rivation of )ivil!
    )onstitutional! and Auman 1ig,ts3
    1evie+ of t,e records of t,e individual cases! belo+! demonstrates t,e corru#ting im#act of t,e
    invalid! fraudulent '8 systems of t,e 2S courts today3 8,e cases demonstrate t,at t,e 2S courts at
    all levels ,ave ado#ted t,e #ractice of conducting simulated litigation and t,e #ublication of
    simulated court record on a routine basis3 C
    cii
    D
    8,e #ractices of simulated litigation and issuance of simulated court records are #robably as old as
    t,e courts t,emselves3 :ver centuries! record ee#ing of t,e courts! t,e core of Due Process! and
    t,e :ffice of t,e )ler evolved to #revent suc, #ractices3 8,e evidence #rovided in instant
    submission! relative to t,e 2S courts! in t,e A1% ->1> submission on t,e 2nited states! relative to
    t,e )alifornia courts! and in t,e A1% ->13 submission on t,e State of 'srael demonstrates t,at t,e
    im#lementation of invalid! fraudulent '8 systems in t,e state and 2S courts ,ad an un#recedented
    corru#ting effect on t,e courts3
    <eedless to say! com#uter tec,nology could ,ave ,ad t,e o##osite effect! if correctly im#lemented3
    Bie+ise! 2< re#orts on &Strengt,ening Judicial 'ntegrity& encourage t,e im#lementation of '8
    systems in t,e courts! to en,ance 4udicial integrity3 C
    ciii
    D
    a) Habeas Cor$us in the ,nite& States ( the case of Richar& *saac .ine >
    civ
    ?
    ?igure 236 =ro% le'&: =or%er () prose,+&or, an&i!j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion a,&ivis& 2i,har$ =ine in an in&ervie/
    'ro% @os An"eles prison in 800C. () Ba"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle an$ () J+$"e John #al&er, in &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia. The evi$en,e in$i,a&es &ha& &he ha.eas ,orp+s pe&i&ion /as s+.je,&e$ &o
    perversion o' j+s&i,e &hro+"h &he ,on$+,& o' pro&ra,&e$ si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion. The () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h
    -ir,+i&, an$ &he () )+pre%e -o+r& a,&e$ in &he sa%e %anner. 2i,har$ =ine re%aine$ i%prisone$ +n$er
    soli&ar* ,on'ine%en& 'or 3I %on&hs, /i&h no le"al re,or$s as &he 'o+n$a&ion 'or his i%prison%en&. @ike/ise,
    his release /as ,on$+,&e$ /i&h no vali$ le"al re,or$ as i&s 'o+n$a&ion.
    8,e case of 1ic,ard 'saac 7ine is of uniIue significance! since it #rovided detailed documentation
    of t,e unla+ful de#rivation of t,e liberty of an anti-4udicial corru#tion activist3 8,e case is
    described in furt,er detail in an academic #a#er! #ublis,ed sub4ect to anonymous #eer-revie+3 C
    cv
    D
    8,e uniIuely detailed documentation of t,e case #rovides evidence of t,e unla+ful de#rivation of
    liberty t,roug, coordinated o#eration of fraudulent electronic record systems inG
    8,e )alifornia Su#erior )ourt! )ounty of Bos %ngelesL
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    43/165 TOC:2
    S,eriffEs De#artment of t,e )ounty of Bos %ngelesL
    2S District )ourt! )entral District of )aliforniaL
    2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! and
    2S Su#reme )ourt3
    Arrest and imprisonment of *ichard Fine
    ?igure 246 2i,har$ =ineLs p+rpor&e$ Bookin" 2e,or$, as provi$e$ .* &he @os An"eles )heri''Ls Depar&%en&
    in response on in0+ir* .* @os An"eles -o+n&* )+pervisor An&onovii,h. The 'alse an$ $eli.era&el*
    %islea$in" re,or$ lis&s =ine as arres&e$ on lo,a&ion an$ .* a+&hori&* o' &he non!exis&en& )an Pe$ro B+ni,ipal
    -o+r&. The )heri''Ls Depar&%en& re'+se$ &o ,orre,& &he Bookin" 2e,or$, even a'&er i& /as repea&e$l* no&i,e$
    o' i&s 'alla,*. I& sho+l$ .e no&e$ &ha& s+,h ele,&roni, .ookin" re,or$ is +nsi"ne$ an$ +n,er&i'ie$, an$ &he
    na%e o'i&s a+&hor is +nkno/n. E
    ,vi
    F
    7ormer 2S #rosecutor 1ic,ard '3 7ine e(#osed and rebued t,e taing by Bos %ngeles 4udges of
    /not #ermitted0 #ayments! +,ic, +ere labeled by media /bribes03
    'n t,e aftermat,! a bill +as #assed and signed into la+ by t,en )alifornia @overnor %rnold
    Sc,+ar"enegger on 7ebruary ->! ->>*! #roviding /retroactive immunity0! called by media
    &#ardons& to all 4udges involved3
    8+o +ees later! on 5arc, 4! ->>*! 1ic,ard 7ine +as arrested by t,e Harrant Detail of Bos
    %ngeles )ounty S,eriffEs De#artment in t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Bos %ngeles!
    in do+nto+n Bos %ngeles! at t,e end of a dramatic off t,e calendar #roceeding #resided by Judge
    David ?affe! re#resented as &Sentencing& - in t,e #resence of media3
    1ic,ard 7ine +as attem#ting to disIualify Judge ?affe3 8,e basis for t,e affidavits of
    disIualification for a cause +as Judge David ?affeEs acce#ting of suc, &not #ermitted& #ayments
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    44/165 TOC:2
    from a #arty to t,e litigation t,en at bar M 'arina !el *ey "ome .ners8 Association v County of
    Los Angeles 9=S1>*4->)3
    8,e entire #roceeding later failed to a##ear in t,e #ublicly available litigation c,ronology!
    #ublis,ed online by t,e court3 Bie+ise! t,e court record t,at +as t,e 5arc, 4! ->>* Judgment and
    :rder of )ontem#t! including +,at +as re#resented as &Sentencing&! +,ic, +as +idely re#orted by
    media! +as later discovered to be invalid on its face3 8,e record +as also lacing valid
    aut,entication3
    8,roug,out t,e Aabeas )or#us #etitions of 1ic,ard 7ine! and to t,is date! t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior
    )ourt denies access to t,e 1egister of %ctions 9)alifornia civil docet M t,e official record of t,e
    litigation) in t,e case of 'arina !el *ey "ome .ners8 Association v County of Los Angeles in
    obvious violation of 7irst %mendment )ivil 1ig,ts3
    8,erefore! t,ere is no +ay to tell +,et,er t,e 5arc, 4! ->>* #roceeding +as at all truly listed as a
    court #roceeding by t,e court itself3 8,e 5arc, 4! ->>* 5inutes 9#rotocol)! remained unsigned! and
    never mentioned any sentencing ,earing at all3
    1ic,ard 7ine +as later ,eld in t,e 5enEs )entral Jail facility in Bos %ngeles - #art of t,e
    8+in 8o+ers Jail com#le(! under unusual! #ossibly un#recedented conditions3 Ae +as ,eld under
    continuous solitary confinement! in a ,os#ital room in t,e 4ail! albeit - no disease or disability +ere
    ever claimed by 4ail aut,orities3
    1ic,ard 7ine +as ,eld all along +it, no valid +arrant and no valid booing records at all3 8,e
    information #rovided by t,e S,eriffEs De#artment of Bos %ngeles )ounty in t,is matter on its
    electronic record system - t,e 'nmate 'nformation )enter - +as false and deliberately misleading3
    8,e arrest and booing +ere listed as if t,ey ,ad taen #lace on location and by aut,ority of t,e
    5unici#al )ourt of San Pedro3 Ao+ever! no munici#al courts ,ad e(isted in Bos %ngeles for
    almost a decade at t,at time3
    'n t,e first fe+ mont,s of ,is 4ailing! 7ine +as denied access to #en and #a#er! and suc, conditions
    undermined ,is ability to file ,is Aabeas )or#us and related #etitions3 Jail aut,orities also e(#licitly
    attem#ted in t,e initial #eriod to de#rive ,im of t,e rig,t to re#resent ,imself! and to coerce ,im to
    acce#t re#resentation by counsel! +,ic, 7ine declined3
    :n June 7! ->>*! t,e Bos %ngeles 8imes #ublis,ed re#ort 9considered unfavorable) by female
    Journalist Nictoria Kim! +,o #ur#ortedly managed to enter t,e 5enEs Jail! intervie+ 7ine! and
    emerge out of t,e 4ail unnoticed! at a time t,at t,e S,eriffEs De#artment and t,e court banned
    intervie+s +it, 7ine3
    US !istrict Court) Central !istrict of California 0 $etition for a #rit of "a+eas Corpus
    7ineEs #etition for a +rit of Aabeas )or#us! Fine v Sheriff of the County of Los Angeles 9-G>*-cv-
    >1*14) +as dictated by #,one to a friend! and +as filed on be,alf of 1ic,ard 7ine at t,e 2S )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia 9Bos %ngeles)! but +it,out ,is ,and signature! and +it,out revie+ by
    ,im of t,e filed document3
    Per,a#s t,e best evidence for t,e fraudulent nature of t,e entire court file and records in t,is case
    comes from Dr FerniEs corres#ondence +it, )ler of t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi and ),ief Judge
    %udrey )ollins of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia in t,is matter 9see section
    @-a)3 8,e corres#ondence #ertained to t,e denial of access to records and refusal of t,e )ler of t,e
    )ourt 8erry <afisi to ans+er on validity and integrity of t,e docet and records in t,is case3 8,e
    corres#ondence also #resented detailed evidence t,at t,e commencing record in t,is case +as
    adulterated after being filed! and t,at t,e litigation ,ad no valid aut,entication records 9<.7s)! and
    +as in fact simulated litigation from start to finis,3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    45/165 TOC:2
    Aars, retaliation against Dr Ferni follo+ed ,is re#eat attem#ts to access t,e records and document
    t,eir fallacy3
    1ic,ard 7ine later claimed t,at ey documents +ere missing from t,e P%).1 docet3 C
    cvii
    D
    <eedless to say! in,erent to t,e case +as t,e fact t,at 1ic,ard 7ine +as im#risoned! and ,ad no
    access to P%).1 and )56.)7! to ins#ect t,e registration of t,e court records in ,is case3
    8,e case +as unusual in t,at t,e S,eriff! named as 1es#ondent! refused to res#ond3
    7ollo+ing t,e refusal of t,e S,eriff to res#ond! 7ine demanded ,is immediate release3
    5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle! denied ,is demand3
    .ventually! res#onse +as filed by t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt and Judge David ?affe! +,o +as
    not named res#ondent in t,e case333
    Ao+ever! suc, res#onse +as filed by attorney Kevin 5c)ormic! +,o failed to file t,e reIuired
    )ertification of )ounsel of 1ecord for Judge David ?affe! and t,erefore aut,ori"ed to file and
    a##ear in t,e case on t,eir be,alf3 C
    cviii
    D %s detailed above 9see section )1,)! a##earance of
    unaut,ori"ed attorneys! +it, &no communications +it, client clause&! are a common form of
    corru#tion in t,e 2S courts today3 'n fact! %ttorney 5c)ormic never filed any affidavit or any
    ot,er record signed by ,is #ur#orted client! Judge David ?affe! and lie+ise! never filed any #a#er
    originating in t,e Su#erior )ourt3
    %ccess to t,e )alifornia docet 91egister of %ctions) of t,e underlying Su#erior )ourt case +as
    never filed in t,e case! and access to t,e docet +as and is denied3
    7urt,er investigation #rovided evidence t,at %ttorney 5c)ormic +as in fact never aut,ori"ed as
    )ounsel of 1ecord by Judge David ?affe and t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt3 C
    ci(
    D
    8,e June 1-! ->>* 1e#ort O 1ecommendations issued by 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle concluded by
    recommending Denial +it, Pre4udice of t,e Aabeas )or#us Petition3 8,e -5 #age revie+! carefully
    referenced! +as distinguis,ed as a Aabeas )or#us revie+ by t,e fact t,at it failed to ever e(#licitly
    state t,e ca#tion of t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt case t,at +as under revie+! or ever mention t,e
    +ord &+arrant&3
    % June -*! ->>* Judgment issued by Judge Jo,n Halter! +,o #resided in t,e case after a number
    of recusals! ado#ted t,e 1e#ort and 1ecommendations3
    Ao+ever! bot, of t,ese court #a#ers! lie all #a#ers issued by t,e 2S3 District )ourt in t,is case
    laced aut,entication! reIuired to mae court #a#ers valid and effectual! and +ere t,erefore invalid
    court records 9see sections )1d! .1! @-a)3
    1egardless of t,e fact t,at all 4udicial record in t,is case s,ould be deemed void! not voidable! one
    s,ould #articularly note t,at in ,er June 1-! ->>* 1e#ort and 1ecommendation 2S 5agistrate )arla
    Hoe,rle saysG C
    c(
    D
    ))6 #*ANAARA O? R-F)-0
    2evie/ o' &he Pe&i&ion in &his ,ase is "overne$ .* provisions o' &he An&i&erroris% an$ <''e,&ive Dea&h
    Penal&* A,& o' 3CCA 4>A<DPA?6 6 (n$er A<DPA, a 'e$eral ,o+r& %a* no& "ran& ha.eas relie' on a ,lai%
    a$j+$i,a&e$ on i&s %eri&s in s&a&e ,o+r& +nless &he a$j+$i,a&ion>res+l&e$ in a $e,ision &ha& /as ,on&rar*
    &o, or involve$ an +nreasona.le appli,a&ion o', ,learl* es&a.lishe$ =e$eral la/, as $e&er%ine$ .* &he
    )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es,? or >res+l&e$ in a $e,ision &ha& /as .ase$ on an +nreasona.le
    $e&er%ina&ion o' &he 'a,&s in li"h& o' &he evi$en,e presen&e$ in &he )&a&e ,o+r& pro,ee$in".? 8I (.).-. J
    88944$6.
    <eedless to say! t,e im#risonment of 1ic,ard 7ine +it, no la+ful records conforming +it, t,e
    fundamental reIuirements of t,e la+! +as unreasonable a##lication of clearly establis,ed 7ederal
    la+3 =ut t,e records of Fine v Sheriff in t,e 2S District )ourt! as a +,ole! and t,e reasoning in t,e
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    46/165 TOC:2
    1e#ort and 1ecommendation in #articular! demonstrate t,at t,e #rivilege of Aabeas )or#us +as
    and is in fact sus#ended in t,e 2S today! under t,e rubric of %ntiterrorism3
    US Court of Appeals) 1th Circuit5 (mergency $etition
    %n .mergency Petition filed on 7ineEs be,alf at t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals for t,e *t, )ircuit - Fine v
    Sheriff 9>*-716*-) after t,e S,eriff refused to ans+er on t,e Aabeas )or#us and 5agistrate
    Hoe,rle refused to order ,is immediate release3
    8,e .mergency Petition +as denied in t,e June 3>! ->>* :rder denying t,e #etition! bearing t,e
    names of ),ief Judge %le( Ko"insi and )ircuit Judges 1ic,ard Pae" and 1ic,ard 8allman3
    Ao+ever! t,e Decision record +as unsigned! unentered! and laced aut,entication as +ell 9see
    section )1d)3
    H,ile t,e Petition +as before t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! t,is aut,or of instant
    submission! Dr Ferni! filed +it, t,e )ourt an .( Parte %##lication for Beave to 7ile! to inform it
    of t,e false records of t,e Aabeas )or#us #etition in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of
    )alifornia3 C
    c(i
    D
    8,e %##lication +as denied3
    Ao+ever! since t,e aut,or +as t,en listed as a #arty on t,e Petition! t,e aut,or +as served t,e June
    3>! ->>* :rder by ),ief Judge %le( Ko"insi! Judges Pae" and 8allman3 8,e :rder 9Dt Q4) +as
    served unsigned! +it, no <D% 9<otice of Docet %crtivity! see section )1d) at all3 C
    c(ii
    D
    5uc, later! t,e <D%s of t,e Petition +ere discovered t,roug, ins#ection in t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals3 C
    c(iii
    D 8,e <D%s included only truncated &.lectronic Document Stam#& 9see section )1d)!
    and t,erefore s,ould be deemed void3
    't s,ould be noted t,at t,e <D% for t,e June 3>! ->>* :rder says! &<otice +ill be mailed to", listing
    both Joseph Zernik and Richard Fine on the mailing list. This author never received the NDA with
    the copy o the unsigned !rder" and likewise" was inormed by Richard Fine that he had never
    received any N#F or NDA in his cases.
    8,e invalidity of t,e records of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! in t,e #etitions and a##eal of
    1ic,ard 7ine is described in furt,er details in t+o #a#ers in t,e form of reIuest for e(#ert o#inion3
    C
    c(iv
    D
    Supreme Court of the United States
    .ventually! 7ine filed #etitions and a##lications to t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt3 Ao+ever! t,e #attern of
    #retense revie+ and invalid court records and #rocedures #ersisted even in t,e ,ig,est court of t,e
    land3 See section )1l for furt,er details regarding t,e records of 1ic,ard 7ine in t,e Su#reme
    )ourt3
    % 5otion to 'ntervene +as also filed by t,e aut,or of instant submission in t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt!
    including detailed revie+ of t,e false electronic records! #ertaining to t,e im#risonment of 1ic,ard
    7ine in t,e Bos %ngeles S,eriffEs De#artment and t,e courts! including t,e Su#erior )ourt of
    )alifornia! t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t,
    )ircuit! and t,e Su#reme )ourt itself3 C
    c(v
    D
    Ao+ever! t,e #a#ers! +,ic, +ere duly filed! +ere never doceted and never revie+ed by t,e 2S
    Su#reme )ourt3 'nstead! t,ey +ere /returned0 by mail by &)ourt )ounsel& Danny =icell +it, no
    aut,ority at all! in a##arent violation of bot, 2S and international la+! +it, no revie+ at all3
    5oreover! +,ile t,e online docets of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt indicated t,at t,e cases of 1ic,ard
    7ine +ere revie+ed and denied! attem#ts to access t,e records of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt! to ins#ect
    and to co#y t,e records! found no valid 4udicial records to su##ort t,e notations in t,e online
    docets 9see also section )1l)3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    47/165 TOC:2
    Inspection of paper court files of the US Supreme Court
    1ecords! +,ic, +ere retrieved from t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt file in t,e 1ic,ard 7ine v Berory =aca!
    S,eriff of Bos %ngeles )ounty 9>*-%$-7) M a##lication for stay of e(ecution of ongoing solitary
    confinement - failed to discover any valid court records su##orting t,e #ur#orted denial of t,e
    %##lication in t,e Su#reme )ourt )onference eit,er on %#ril -3! ->1>! as sc,eduled! or on %#ril
    -6! ->1>! as noted in t,e online Su#reme )ourt docet3 >
    cxvi
    ?
    Su#reme )ourt records also failed to s,o+ any record of service and notice to t,e #arties of t,e
    #ur#orted denial3 'nformation obtained from t,e im#risoned former 2S #rosecutor 1ic,ard 7ine!
    lie+ise! indicated t,at ,e ,ad never received any notice at all of t,e #ur#orted denial3
    8,e %##lication +as first submitted to %ssociate Justice %nt,ony Kennedy3 8,e online docet noted
    denial by Justice Kennedy on 5arc, 1-! ->1>! and 1ic,ard 7ine received a notice to t,at effect as
    +ell3 Ao+ever! t,e notice +as by )ounsel Danny =icell! +,o +as not aut,ori"ed as a De#uty
    )ler3 5oreover! t,e notice +as unsigned! and t,e co#y in )ourt file +as never stam#ed /7'B.D03
    7urt,ermore! t,ere +as no valid record of denial by Justice Kennedy to form t,e legal foundation
    for suc, notice3 >
    cxvii
    ?
    7ormer 2S #rosecutor t,en re-submitted t,e %##lication to %ssociate Justice 1ut, @insburg! +,o in
    turn referred it to 2S Su#reme )ourt conference! sc,eduled for %#ril -3! ->1>3
    Prior to t,e %#ril -3! ->1>! 5r Danny =icell! again M +it, no aut,ority at all! eliminated from t,e
    court file records filed in t,e case! +,ic, included evidence! including! but not limited details of ,is
    5arc, 1-! ->1> invalid notice of denial by Justice Kennedy3 5r =icellRs conduct relative to t,e
    5arc, 1-! ->1> notice and t,e conseIuent elimination of records from t,e )ourt file +ere sub4ect
    of a com#laint filed +it, 2S %ttorney :ffice! Has,ington D)3 C
    c(viii
    D
    :n %#ril -3! ->1>! outcome of t,e conference remained unno+n3 Ao+ever! an %#ril -6! ->1> note
    in t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt online docet! C
    c(i(
    D indicated denial of t,e %##lication3 8,e records!
    +,ic, +ere obtained on July -6! ->1> from t,e )ourt file! s,o+ed no legal foundation at all for t,e
    %#ril -6! ->1> denial note in t,e online docet3
    8,erefore! it is alleged t,at t,e case documented t,e re#eated #ublication of false and deliberately
    misleading notes in t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt online docet - relative to a #ur#orted 5arc, 1-! ->1>
    denial! and later M relative to a #ur#orted %#ril -36%#ril -6! ->1> denial! t,e issuing of false notices
    by 2S Su#reme )ourt staff relative to t,e #ur#orted 5arc, 1-! ->1> denial by Justice Kennedy! and
    failure of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt Justices to dis#ose of matters before t,em3
    *elease of *ichard Fine
    :n Se#tember 17! ->1>! 1ic,ard 7ine +as released by t,e S,eriff3 %gain! t,e release too #lace
    +it, no valid order ever entered by t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt3 'nstead! Se#tember 17! ->1>
    5inutes +ere issued under ca#tion of 'arina v LA County 9=S1>*4->)! +,ere issuance of an order
    +as described! but no evidence of a signed order +as ever found3 8,e 5inutes also failed to s#ell
    out t,at an order +as ever signed by Judge ?affe to affect t,e release of 1ic,ard 7ine on t,at date3
    8,e Se#tember 17! ->1> 5inutes o#ening sentence statesG
    =or reasons kno/n onl* &o hi%sel', =ine is a&&e%p&in" &o o.&ain his releaseP
    7urt,er! t,e Se#tember 17! ->1> 5inutes 4ustify t,e abru#t release as follo+sG
    I& is .e,o%in" in,reasin"l* ,lear &ha& =ineMs ,on$+,& is irra&ionalP 1is ,on$+,& is .izarre, an$ &ha&
    'a,& alone %+s& .e ,onsi$ere$ .* &his ,o+r&...
    8,e Se#tember 17! ->1> 5inutes also failed to a##ear among t,e list of court records in t,e case!
    +,ic, +ere #ublis,ed online by t,e )ourt3 Bie+ise! t,e )ase Summary failed to state t,at any
    :rder +as signed by Judge ?affe on Se#tember 17! ->1>! or entered by t,e )ourt on t,at date3 :f
    note! a day earlier! Judge David ?affe #osted minutes! +,ic, denied 1ic,ard 7ineRs reIuest for
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    48/165 TOC:2
    release3 H,at caused t,e c,ange of mind overnig,t and t,e abru#t release of 7ine on Se#tember
    17!->1>! remained unno+n3
    8,e )alifornia )ode of 1egulations! 8itle 15G )rime Prevention and )orrections! J3-733
    %cce#tance and Surrender of )ustody! statesG
    #ar$ens an$ s+perin&en$en&s %+s& no& a,,ep& or s+rren$er ,+s&o$* o' an* prisoner +n$er an*
    ,ir,+%s&an,es, ex,ep& .* vali$ ,o+r& or$er or o&her $+e pro,ess o' la/.
    Significance of the case of *ichard Fine
    )ombined! t,e arrest! im#risonment! and release of 1ic,ard 7ine #resent an e(am#le of arbitrary
    and ca#ricious de#rivation of liberty t,roug, collusion of t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt and t,e
    Bos %ngeles S,eriffRs De#artment3
    8,e case reflects +ides#read corru#tion of t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Bos
    %ngeles! t,e largest county court in t,e 2nited States! and cover-u# of t,e same by t,e 2S courts3
    1e#ort regarding corru#tion of t,e Su#erior )ourt! including! but not limited to! t,e im#risonment
    of 1ic,ard 7ine! +as incor#orated by reference into t,e ->1> 2P1 92niversal Periodic 1evie+)
    Staff 1e#ort of t,e Auman 1ig,ts )ouncil of t,e 2nited <ations! +it, a note regarding /corru#tion
    of t,e courts and t,e legal #rofession and discrimination by la+ enforcement in )alifornia03
    )overage of t,e case +as mostly left to off mainstream media3 Barge cor#orate media outlet re#orts
    +ere incom#lete and at times #artial or #lainly false3
    :ne of t,e central recommendations of t,e ->1> 2P1 re#ort on t,e 2nited States #ertained to
    restoration of t,e rig,t for Aabeas )or#us! +it, reference to detentions in @uantanamo =ay3
    %s documented in t,e case of 1ic,ard 7ine! t,e rig,t of Aabeas )or#us +as effectively denied also
    on a 2S citi"en! former 2S #rosecutor! in t,e territorial 2nited States! t,roug, effective denial of
    access to ,onest courts3
    Per,a#s t,e most im#ortant insig,t gained from t,e case of 1ic,ard 7ine #ertains to t,e ey role of
    false and deliberately misleading electronic record systems in t,e courts and #risons in t,e 2nited
    States in t,e abuse of Auman 1ig,ts3
    Due to t,e unusual set of c,aracters! t,e number of court cases filed by 1ic,ard 7ine! and t,e
    meticulous documentation! t,e case as a +,ole #rovides un#aralleled study of t,e 4ustice
    system!Auman 1ig,ts! and civil society conditions in t,e 2nited States at t,e onset of t,e -1st
    century3
    b) Sieverding et al v1 ,nited States Dept of Justice " ,SDC DC
    ?igure 216 The ,ase o' Siever#ing v US Dept of -ustice ori"ina&e$ in &he 'alse i%prison%en& o' Ga*
    )iever$in" .* &he () Barshals )ervi,e, &hro+"h &he e%plo*%en& o' 'alse ele,&roni, /arran& an$ .ookin"
    re,or$s /i&h 'ake viola&ion ,o$es. )i%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion in &his %a&&er /as ,on$+,&e$ .* J+$"e John D Ba&es in
    &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-.
    Sieverding et al v. United States Government 91G>*-cv->>56-) in t,e 2S District )ourt! District of
    )olumbia! originated in t,e false im#risonment of Kay Sieverding by t,e 2S 5ars,als Service! t,e
    creation of false and deliberately misleading records! #ertaining to ,er arrest and im#risonment by
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    49/165 TOC:2
    7=' and ot,er federal agencies! and denial of access to t,e records of t,e im#risonment! as detailed
    in t,e )om#laint3 C
    c((
    D
    1evie+ of t,e docet and ot,er court file records in t,e case s,o+sG C
    c((i
    D
    i3 Docet as a H,oleG
    8,e Docet failed to include any of t,e %ttestation6%ut,entication records by t,e cler 9<.7s M
    <otices of .lectronic 7iling)3 8,erefore! it is im#ossible to ascertain t,e validity of t,e records3
    2#on information and belief! Plaintiff Kay Sieverding +as never served <.7s in t,e case! and
    ,as never gained access to t,e <.7s3 8,e <.7s are not accessible in P%).13 8,erefore! t,ere
    is no +ay to ascertain! based on t,e #ublicly accessible P%).1 records! +,et,er any of t,e
    4udicial records in t,is docet are deemed valid and effectual records! or only simulated records3
    1elated 8ransactions 1e#ortG 8,e 5arc, 15! ->1> :rder @ranting 5otion to Dismiss 9Dt Q>57)
    +as not doceted as related to t,e )om#laint 9Dt Q>>1)! and t,e )om#laint +as not doceted as
    SterminatedR3
    Judgment 'nde(G 7ailed to record t,e dis#ositive order in t,e case - 5arc, 15! ->1> :rder
    @ranting 5otion to Dismiss 9Dt Q>57)
    ?igure 2B6 J+$"%en& In$ex o' Siever#ing v US Dept of -ustice ! 'ail+re &o en&er &he $isposi&ive or$er in &his
    ,ase ! Bar,h 39, 8030 Or$er Dran&in" Bo&ion &o Dis%iss 4Dk& O0976.
    ii3 S#ecific docet entries
    +/t @AA#G 5arc, -5! ->>* )ivil )over S,eet M not signed by )ler3
    +/t @noneG 5arc, -5! ->>* Summons
    Summons +as not doceted! in a##arent violation of t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure) as is
    t,e case #ractically in all 2S district courts today 9see also section )1i)
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    50/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 2C6 Do,ke& o' Siever#ing v US Dept of -ustice ! Dk& Onone ! 'ail+re &o $o,ke& &he s+%%ons. The
    $o,ke& &ex& 'or s+%%ons has no $o,ke& n+%.er an$ no link &o an* re,or$. The pra,&i,e, ,alle$ KTex& onl*K
    or$ers or %in+&es is a ,o%%on /a* o' perver&in" li&i"a&ion in &he () ,o+r&s 4see also se,&ion -3$ an$ -8j6
    +/t @noneG <o %ssignment :rder for Judge Judge Jo,n D3 =ates a##ears in t,e docet3
    8,erefore! Judge =ates s,ould be deemed to ,ave #resided in t,is case +it, no aut,ority at
    all3
    +/t @AA6(1G June 1! ->>* DefendantEs 5otion to Dismiss! includes unsigned Declaration by
    De#uty 2S 5ars,al Ste#,en D Hallisc,3 8,e declaration failed to #rovide as evidence t,e arrest
    and booing records of Kay Sieverding3 'nstead! t,e declaration only statedG
    C. 2elevan& an$ ne,essar* re,or$s re"ar$in" Bs. )iever$in" /ere prepare$ an$ %ain&aine$ in &he
    ()B) #arran& In'or%a&ion ;e&/ork 4#I;6 an$ Prisoner Pop+la&ion Bana"e%en&5Prisoner Tra,kin"
    )*s&e%s 4PT)6 o' re,or$s.
    +/t @noneG Simulated June 11! ->>* &5inute :rder&! recording a non-e(isting June 11! ->>*
    Judge =ates &:rder&! #ur#ortedly signed t,at date3
    8,e docet entry ,as no docet number and no lin to any record3 8,erefore! t,e &5inute :rder&
    could not #ossibly be aut,enticated! and s,ould be deemed a simulated record3 5oreover! suc,
    &5inute :rder& #ur#orts to record t,e signing on t,e same date of a Judge =ates &:rder&! but no
    record of t,e &:rder& e(ists in t,e docet and related electronic records3
    ?igure 2D6 Do,ke& o' Siever#ing v US Dept of -ustice ! Dk& Onone ! $o,ke& &ex&, si%+la&in" J+ne 33, 800C
    KBin+&e Or$erK, an$ re,or$in" &he si"nin" o' &he sa%e $a&e o' a non!exis&in" J+ne 33, 800C J+$"e Ba&es
    KOr$erK.
    +/t @noneG Simulated 5arc, 17! ->1> Judge =ates &Beave to 7ile Denied& orderG 8,e docet
    entry ,as no docet number and no record is lined to it3 8,e e(cluded record is liely to record
    fraud by 2S agencies in t,is case3 Suc, orders stand in violation of t,e Auman 1ig,t for 7air
    8rial3
    ?igure 296 Do,ke& o' Siever#ing v US Dept of -ustice ! $o,ke& &ex&, si%+la&in" Bar,h 37, 8030 J+$"e Ba&es
    K@eave &o =ile Denie$K or$er3 One o' several, si%ilar K@eave &o =ile Denie$K 'alse en&ries in &he $o,ke& o' &his
    ,ase 4see also se,&ion 3,36
    +/t @A35G 8,e dis#ositive record in t,is litigation! 5arc, 15! ->1> Judge =ates :rder
    dismissing t,e case! s,o+s no valid signature of t,e 4udge! no seal of t,e court! no attestation by
    t,e cler of t,e court3 P%).1 and )56.)7 - t,e '8 systems of t,e 2S courts s,o+ no valid
    electronic signature3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    51/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 306 Siever#ing v US Dept of -ustice ! Dk& O97 ! Bar,h 39, 8030 J+$"e Ba&es Or$er $is%issin" &he
    ,ase, &he $isposi&ive j+$i,ial re,or$ in &his ,ase, sho/s no vali$ si"na&+re o' &he j+$"e, no seal o' &he ,o+r&,
    an$ no a&&es&a&ion .* &he ,lerk o' &he ,o+r&. PA-<2 an$ -B5<-=, IT s*s&e%s o' &he () ,o+r&s in,l+$e no
    vali$, visi.le ele,&roni, si"na&+res. 4see also se,&ion 3,36
    +/t @A56G 8,e :ctober 1*! ->1> :rder of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! D)! denying t,e a##eal in
    Sieverding v US !ept of 7ustice 91>-1*4*)! as doceted in t,e 2S District )ourt file of
    Sieverding v 2S De#t of Justice! s,o+s no signatures of t,e circuit 4udges! no seal of t,e )ourt
    of %##eals! no attestation by t,e cler of t,e )ourt of %##eals3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    52/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 316 Siever#ing v US Dept of -ustice ! Dk& O7I ! O,&o.er 3C, 8030 Ker CuriamK Or$er o' &he ()
    -o+r& o' Appeals, D-, $en*in" &he appeal in Siever#ing v US Dept of -ustice, as $o,ke&e$ in &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, D-. The $isposi&ive j+$i,ial re,or$ 'ro% &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, D-, sho/s no na%e o' an* j+$"e,
    no vali$ si"na&+re o' &he ,ir,+i& j+$"es, no seal o' &he -o+r& o' Appeals, an$ no a&&es&a&ion .* &he ,lerk o' &he
    -o+r& o' Appeals. The pra,&i,e o' iss+in" s+,h Per -+ria% $e,isions, /here &he j+$"es re%ain anon*%o+s,
    has "ro/n in 're0+en,* in re,en& *ears, an$ $ra/s ,ri&i,is% .* %e$ia an$ le"al s,holar. PA-<2 an$
    -B5<-=, as i%ple%en&e$ in &he () ,o+r&s o' appeals, like &heir ,o+n&erpar&s in &he () $is&ri,& ,o+r&s, in,l+$e
    no vali$, visi.le ele,&roni, si"na&+res. 4see also se,&ion 3,36
    :verall! t,e case of Sieverding v US !epartment of 7ustice #rovides detailed evidence of t,e ease
    +it, +,ic, liberty can today be unla+fully de#rived in t,e 2nited States! t,roug, t,e use of an
    invalid net+or of federal +arrant and booing records of federal agencies3 't also #rovides
    detailed evidence of t,e ease +it, +,ic, any attem#t of t,e abused #erson to find remedy in t,e 2S
    courts against suc, #ractices can be deflected t,roug, t,e #ractice of simulated litigation and t,e
    issuance and recording of simulated 4udicial records in P%).1 and )56.)7 - t,e '8 systems of t,e
    2S district courts and 2S courts of a##eals3
    c) 2etsphere %nc et al v1 3aron et al
    ?igure 326 J+$"e 2o*al =er"+son, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, ;or&hern Dis&ri,& o' Texas..
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    53/165 TOC:2
    Netsphere Inc et al v. Baron et al 93G>*-cv->>*$$) in t,e 2S District )ourt! <ort,ern District of
    8e(as! originated in a contract dis#ute3 8,e litigation commenced +it, t,e issuance of fraudulent!
    invalid summons! and Judge 1oyal 7erguson #resided in t,e case starting 5ay ->>* +it, no
    %ssignment :rder and no aut,ority at all3
    Judge 7erguson #ur#orted to establis, in <ovember ->1> an /.( Parte 1eceiver over t,e Person
    and Pro#erty0 of Defendant Jeffrey =aron +it, no foundation in t,e la+3
    Suc, &1eceivers,i#& is in fact ain to slavery3 %nd receivers,i# establis,ed t,roug, an e( #arte
    motion is considered in violation on Due Process rig,ts on its face3
    1egardless of multi#le filings +it, t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! 5t, )ircuit! )ircuit Judges #ermitted
    suc, corru#tion to stand3 Suc, conduct s,ould be deemed e(tra-4udicial conduct! +,ic, is not
    #rotected by any 4udicial immunity3
    1evie+ of t,e records in t,is case s,o+sG C
    c((ii
    D
    +/t @AA1 - 7raudulent summonses +ere issued by t,e :ffice of t,e )ler Karen 5itc,ell M +it,
    no seal of t,e court! as reIuired by 2S la+3 8,e summons +as not doceted as issued! as
    reIuired by la+! but only under t,e #ur#orted certificate of e(ecution3 C
    c((iii
    D
    +/t @AA3 - Judge 1oyal 7erguson a##ears in t,e case +it, no %ssignment :rder at al3 C
    c((iv
    D
    8,e #ur#orted 1eceiver! %ttorney Peter Nogel! +as a##ointed in <ovember ->1> t,roug, an e(
    #arte /.mergency motion for %##ointment of 1eceiver over Jeffrey =aron0 C
    c((v
    D
    +/t @A5 8,e fraudulent :rder %##ointing 1eceiver fails to state any section of t,e 2S code as
    t,e legal foundation for t,e a##ointment of a receiver in t,is case3
    8,e fraudulent :rder %##ointing 1eceiver #ur#orted to give ,im aut,ority over t,e Person and
    %ssets of Defendant Jeff =aron3 8,e notion itself is ain to slavery! +it, no basis in t,e 2S la+3
    <umerous /5otions0! /5inutes0! /:rders0! and /)lerRs <otices of Delivery0 in t,is case +ere
    noted /entered0 in t,e docet of t,is case +it, no docet numbers! and6or +it, no ,y#erlins to
    any electronic records3 Suc, docet notes are o#ined as fraud on t,e court3
    Searc, of t,e )alendar of t,e )ourt for January 1! 1*7> to 5arc, 11! ->1-! s,o+ed /<o
    Sc,edule 7ound03 8,erefore! one must conclude t,at ,earings in t,is case +ere conducted &off
    t,e calendar&3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    54/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 336 0etsphere $nc et al v/ Baron et al 43:0C!,v!00CII6 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, ;or&hern Dis&ri,& o'
    Texas: Invali$ s+%%ons, %issin" &he )eal o' &he -o+r&.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    55/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 346 0etsphere $nc et al v/ Baron et al 43:0C!,v!00CII6 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, ;or&hern Dis&ri,& o'
    Texas: =alse $o,ke& no&es /i&h no $o,ke& n+%.ers an$5or /i&h no h*perlinks &o re,or$s.
    =y ->1-! t,e case neared its fourt, year! +it, no end in site3 8,e )ivil )over S,eet notes t,e
    original Demand of T75!>>>3 Ao+ever! by no+! Judge 1oyal 7erguson and ot,ers! ,ave sei"ed t,e
    multimillion dollars cor#orations controlled by t,e Defendant! +it, no legal foundation at all! +,ile
    intimidating ,im under t,e t,reat of force! unla+ful! but credible3
    8,e case as a +,ole s,ould be deemed simulated litigation! e(tortion and raceteering by Judge
    1oyal 7erguson! )ler of t,e )ourt Karen 5itc,ell! %ttorney Peter Nogel and ot,ers involved in t,e
    case3 )onduct of Judge 1oyal 7erguson in t,is case s,ould be deemed e(tra-4udicial activity! and
    t,erefore! +it, no 4udicial immunity at all3
    2#on revie+ of t,e records! a reasonable #erson +ould conclude t,at t,e criminal sc,eme in t,is
    case +as coordinated by t,e Plaintiffs Judge 1oyal 7erguson! )ler of t,e )ourt Karen 5itc,ell!
    %ttorney Peter Nogel! and ot,ers in advance of filing t,e com#laint3
    Netsphere Inc) et al v 7effrey Baron 9:;0::<;= in the US Court of Appeals) >th Circuit C
    c((vi
    D
    <umerous filings +it, t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! 5t, )ircuit! did not #ut an end to t,e alleged
    raceteering in t,e 2S District )ourt in 8e(as3
    %##eal from t,e .( Parte :rder %##ointing 1eceiver +as filed on December 3! ->1>! and
    continues to t,is date3 8,e docet of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals notes numerous ot,er related filings3
    C
    c((vii
    D
    8,e 2S )ourt of %##eals ,as no 4urisdiction over simulated orders and 4udgments of t,e 2S
    District )ourt3 8,erefore! all suc, cases in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! are o#ined as fraud on t,e
    court as +ell3
    1egarding District Judge 1oyal 7urgeson! +,o #retends to a##ear as Presiding Judge in t,e case!
    #a#ers filed in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals by t,e Defendant Iuote t,e from official transcri#tsG C
    c((viii
    D
    T1< -O(2T: Ho+ realize &ha& or$er is an or$er o' &he -o+r&. )o an* 'ail+re &o ,o%pl* /i&h &ha& or$er
    is ,on&e%p&, p+nisha.le .* lo&s o' $ollars, p+nisha.le .* possi.le jail, $ea&h.
    T1< -O(2T: The* $o an$ I have j+ris$i,&ion, &oo. )o ILll &ell *o+ /ha&.... Ho+ /an& &o ,hallen"e &he
    ,o+r& or$er, I have &he %arshals .ehin$ %e. I ,an ,o%e &o *o+r ho+se, pi,k *o+ +p, p+& *o+ in jail. I
    ,an seize *o+r proper&*, $o an*&hin" I nee$ &o $o &o en'or,e %* or$ers. IL% &ellin" *o+ $onL& s,re/
    /i&h %e. Ho+ are a 'ool, a 'ool, a 'ool, a 'ool &o s,re/ /i&h a 'e$eral j+$"e, an$ i' *o+ $onL&
    +n$ers&an$ &ha&, I ,an %ake *o+ +n$ers&an$ i&. I have &he 'or,e o' &he ;av*, Ar%*, Barines an$ ;av*
    .ehin$ %e.
    1egarding %ttorney Peter Nogel! +,o #retends to a##ear as 1eceiver bot, in t,e District )ourt and
    in t,e )ourt of %##eals! #a#ers filed in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals by t,e Defendant noteG C
    c((i(
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    56/165 TOC:2
    >A&&orne* Pe&er No"el is a ,ollea"+e o' &he $is&ri,& j+$"e an$ &he &/o .lo" &o"e&her on Garl Ba*erMs
    .lo" si&e.?
    >Pe&er No"el, a& &his %in+&e, is %ar,hin" 'or/ar$, .illin" $ail* in a .illin" 'renz*, a& a ra&e o' al%os&
    R30,000.00 per $a*.?
    >Pe&er No"el an$ his la/ 'ir% /ere a$verse &o Je'' BaronS li&erall* spe,ialis&s in s+in" hi% 4an$
    On$ova6. The* apparen&l* $evelope$ &his spe,ial&* in viola&ion o' &heir e&hi,al $+&ies S a'&er a,0+irin"
    a&&orne*!,lien& ,on'i$en&ial %a&erial Je'' Baron $is,lose$ &o Pe&er No"el in 8003.?
    1egardless! t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals continues to #atroni"e t,e conduct of t,e 2S District )ourt in
    t,is caseG
    :n December $! ->1>! )ircuit Judges Patric Aigginbot,am! Jerry . Smit,! and )at,arina
    Aaynes! denied =aronRs initial 5otion for Stay #ending %##eal! in an unsigned order! +,ic,
    bears no stam# of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3
    :n December ->! ->1>! )ircuit Judges Aigginbot,am and Jerry . Smit, denied a re#eat 5otion
    to Stay! again in an unsigned order! +,ic, bears no stam# of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! accom#anied
    by a misled /5emorandum to )ounsel0 by )ler of t,e )ourt Byle H )ayce3
    d) Case of 3orro(er Dianne 4ill
    ?igure 316 The ,ases o' Borro1er Dianne Hill, Borro1er William arsley, an$ Zernik v Connor et al
    $o,+%en& &he ,en&ral role o' 'ra+$ an$ ,orr+p&ion in &he () ,o+r&s in %a&&ers per&ainin" &o 'inan,ial
    ins&i&+&ions in &he er+p&ion o' &he on"oin" 'inan,ial ,risis. The ,ollapse o' -o+n&r*/i$e =inan,ial -orpora&ion
    on Jan+ar* I, 800I, /as ,a+se$ .* &he p+.li,a&ion in &he ;e/ Hork Ti%es o' &he 'ra+$ perpe&ra&e$ .*
    -o+n&r*/i$e in &he li&i"a&ion o' &he ,ase o' Borro1er Dianne Hill. The li&i"a&ion pra,&i,es o' -o+n&r*/i$eLs
    @e"al Depar&%en&, &hen le$ .* )an$or )a%+els, -o+n&r*/i$eLs -hie' @e"al O''i,er 4la&er Asso,ia&e Deneral
    -o+nsel o' Bank o' A%eri,a6 /ere also re.+ke$ in &he ,ase o' Borro/er William arsley/ 2e"ar$less, none
    o' &he senior -o+n&r*/i$e exe,+&ives 'a,e$ an* ,onse0+en,es. #i&h i&, i& /as %a$e ,lear &ha& .anks are
    &o$a* a.ove &he la/ in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, an$ &ha& &here is no reason &o .elieve &ha& hones& an$ e''e,&ive
    Bankin" 2e"+la&ion /o+l$ .e res&ore$ an*&i%e soon.
    8,e #ublication on January $! ->>$ by Pulit"er-#ri"e +inner! <e+ ?or 8imes senior business
    columnist @retc,en 5orgenson of fraud by )ountry+ide in t,e case of Borroer !ianne "ill! 9>1-
    --574) in t,e 2S =anru#tcy )ourt! .astern District of Pennsylvania! +as a ey event in t,e
    ongoing financial crisis3 8,e re#ort detailed t,e filing by )ountry+ide of &recreated letters& as
    evidenceG C
    c(((
    D
    The -o+n&r*/i$e =inan,ial -orpora&ion 'a.ri,a&e$ $o,+%en&s rela&e$ &o &he .ankr+p&,* ,ase o' a
    Penns*lvania ho%eo/ner, ,o+r& re,or$s sho/, raisin" ne/ 0+es&ions a.o+& &he .+siness pra,&i,es o'
    &he "ian& %or&"a"e len$er a& &he ,en&er o' &he s+.pri%e %ess.
    't s,ould be noted t,atG
    8,e t,ree letters in Iuestion +ere filed by outside attorneys for )ountry+ide! most liely not
    aut,ori"ed as )ounsel of 1ecord in t,e case 9see sections )1,3 )-e)3
    8,e letters bear no form of valid signature3
    8,e letters come +it, no aut,entication at all! and t,e #erson! +,o is listed +riter on t,e faces of
    t,e letters! is yet anot,er outside counsel3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    57/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 3B6 One o' &hree K2e,rea&e$ @e&&ersK, 'ile$ .* -o+n&r*/i$e in &he ,ase o' Borro1er Dianne Hill. The
    le&&ers .ear no vali$ si"na&+re an$ ,a%e /i&h no vali$ a+&hen&i,a&ion. Their ori"in is no& in -o+n&r*/i$e ei!
    &her, .+& 'ro% an o+&si$e ,o+nsel. The p+.li,a&ion o' &he 'ilin" o' &he K2e,rea&e$ @e&&ersK in &he ;e/ Hork
    Ti%es ,a+se$ &he ,ollapse o' -o+n&r*/i$e, an$ /as one o' &he ke* even&s in &he 'inan,ial ,risis.
    Hit,in ,ours! t,e )ountry+ide stoc colla#sed and t,reatened to tae t,e entire stoc maret +it,
    it3 8rading ,ad to be sto##ed3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    58/165 TOC:2
    % fe+ days later! under #ressure by senior officers of t,e 2S government! =an of %merica
    )or#oration agreed to &merge& +it, )ountry+ide! under terms t,at could not #ossibly reflect a
    reasonable business decision3
    1egardless! none of t,ose involved in t,is blatant fraud in t,e 2S court faced any conseIuences3
    e) Case of 5illiam .arsle
    ?igure 3C6 The ,ases o' Borro1er Dianne Hill, Borro1er William arsley, an$ Zernik v Connor et al
    $o,+%en& &he ,en&ral role o' 'ra+$ an$ ,orr+p&ion in &he () ,o+r&s in %a&&ers per&ainin" &o 'inan,ial
    ins&i&+&ions in &he er+p&ion o' &he on"oin" 'inan,ial ,risis. The ,ollapse o' -o+n&r*/i$e =inan,ial -orpora&ion
    on Jan+ar* I, 800I, /as ,a+se$ .* &he p+.li,a&ion in &he ;e/ Hork Ti%es o' &he 'ra+$ perpe&ra&e$ .*
    -o+n&r*/i$e in &he li&i"a&ion o' &he ,ase o' Borro1er Dianne Hill. The li&i"a&ion pra,&i,es o' -o+n&r*/i$eLs
    @e"al Depar&%en&, &hen le$ .* )an$or )a%+els, -o+n&r*/i$eLs -hie' @e"al O''i,er 4la&er Asso,ia&e Deneral
    -o+nsel o' Bank o' A%eri,a6 /ere also re.+ke$ in &he ,ase o' Borro/er William rasley. 2e"ar$less, none
    o' &he senior -o+n&r*/i$e exe,+&ives 'a,e$ an* ,onse0+en,es. #i&h i&, i& /as %a$e ,lear &ha& .anks are
    &o$a* a.ove &he la/ in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, an$ &ha& &here is no reason &o .elieve &ha& hones& an$ e''e,&ive
    Bankin" 2e"+la&ion /o+l$ .e res&ore$ an*&i%e soon.
    :n 5arc, 5! ->>$! 2S Judge Jeff =o,m entered a 5emorandum :#inion in t,e case of Borroer
    #illiam $arsley 9>5-*>374) in t,e 2S =anru#tcy )ourt! Sout,ern District of 8e(as3 C
    c(((i
    D 8,e
    5emorandum :#inion +as based on evidence in t,e same case! as +ell as a year-long study by t,e
    2S 8rustee :ffice of )ountry+ideEs litigation #ractices in t,e 2S courts t,roug,out t,e 2nited
    States3
    8,e 5emorandum :#inion detailed various fraudulent #ractices of )ountry+ide! its Begal
    De#artment and its outside attorneys in t,e 2S courts! first and foremost among t,em - t,e
    a##earance of outside attorneys on be,alf of )ountry+ide! +,o +ere not aut,ori"ed as )ounsel of
    1ecord! +it, &no communications +it, client clause&3
    <o suc, a##earances of unaut,ori"ed counsel s,ould ,ave been #ossible! ,ad t,e docets of t,e 2S
    courts been managed by aut,ori"ed clers #ursuant to 2S la+3 =ut under P%).1 and )56.)7!
    attorneys can a##ear and file #a#ers on be,alf of #arties +it, no #rior revie+ by t,e cler of t,e
    court3
    1egardless of t,e enormous fraud on t,e courts by )ountry+ide and its attorneys! +,ic, +as
    documented in t,e case of Borroer $arsley! none of t,e #er#etrators suffered any conseIuences!
    and none of t,e victims +as #rovided +it, any remedies3
    8,e case is of #articular significance! since it +as +idely re#orted by 2S media3 8,e #ublication
    too #lace during t,e #eriod of due diligence by =an of %merica )or#oration! relative to t,e
    &merger& +it, )ountry+ide 7inancial )or#oration3 Hit, it! it became clear t,at =an of %merica
    )or#oration +as fully a+are of t,e substantial criminal liabilities involved in suc, &merger&3
    8,erefore! one must conclude t,at in t,e conte(t of suc, &merger&! affected under #ressure by t,e
    most senior 2S officers! =an of %merica )or#oration reac,ed some agreement on immunities
    from criminal #rosecution! relative to various ty#es of financial institution fraud3 Hit, it! =an of
    %merica )or#oration +as #laced above t,e la+ - status t,at is evident to t,is date in t,e numerous
    &settlements& +it, t,e 2S government of financial institution fraud of un#recedented sco#e on its
    customers! stoc,older and t,e 2S ta( #ayer3 C
    c(((ii
    D 8,e fraud victims in suc, cases +ere never
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    59/165 TOC:2
    com#ensated and +ere never #rovided by any remedy3 Suc, &settlements& +ere described by media
    as &bribes& to t,e 2S government3
    :ne must not conclude t,at t,e #ractices! recorded in t,e )ase of =orro+er Parsley! +ere
    terminated after t,eir #ublication3 :n t,e contrary! t,e 7raud on t,e )ourt t,roug, a##earances of
    unaut,ori"ed counsel! +,ic, +as ty#ical of )ountry+ide! became a routine feature of t,e conduct
    of =an of %merica! after its merger +it, )ountry+ide3 C
    c(((iii
    D
    f) 6erni! v Connor et al 7,SDS C$CD)
    ?igure 3D6 The ,ases o' Borro1er Dianne Hill, Borro1er William arsley, an$ Zernik v Connor et al
    $o,+%en& &he ,en&ral role o' 'ra+$ an$ ,orr+p&ion in &he () ,o+r&s in %a&&ers per&ainin" &o 'inan,ial
    ins&i&+&ions in &he er+p&ion o' &he on"oin" 'inan,ial ,risis. The ,ollapse o' -o+n&r*/i$e =inan,ial -orpora&ion
    on Jan+ar* I, 800I, /as ,a+se$ .* &he p+.li,a&ion in &he ;e/ Hork Ti%es o' &he 'ra+$ perpe&ra&e$ .*
    -o+n&r*/i$e in &he li&i"a&ion o' &he ,ase o' Borro1er Dianne Hill. The li&i"a&ion pra,&i,es o' -o+n&r*/i$eLs
    @e"al Depar&%en&, &hen le$ .* )an$or )a%+els, -o+n&r*/i$eLs -hie' @e"al O''i,er 4la&er Asso,ia&e Deneral
    -o+nsel o' Bank o' A%eri,a6 /ere also re.+ke$ in &he ,ase o' Borro/er William rasley. 2e"ar$less, none
    o' &he senior -o+n&r*/i$e exe,+&ives 'a,e$ an* ,onse0+en,es. #i&h i&, i& /as %a$e ,lear &ha& .anks are
    &o$a* a.ove &he la/ in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, an$ &ha& &here is no reason &o .elieve &ha& hones& an$ e''e,&ive
    Bankin" 2e"+la&ion /o+l$ .e res&ore$ an*&i%e soon.
    'n %erni& v Connor et al 9-G>$-cv->155>) in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia!
    Ferni filed a com#laint under t,e cause of action of De#rivation of 1ig,ts under t,e )olor of Ba+
    against a grou# of 4udges! clers! and )ountry+ide officers! regarding t,eir conduct in t,e
    underlying case Samaan v %erni& 9S)>$74>>) in t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Bos
    %ngeles3 7rom ->>5 to ->1>! Judge JacIueline )onnor! )ler of t,e )ourt Jo,n % )lare! and
    ot,ers at t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Bos %ngeles! sub4ected Dr Jose#, Ferni to
    real-estate litigation at t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Bos %ngeles! +,ere ,e +as
    named t,e Defendant3 8,e case culminated in t,e taing of Dr FerniRs ,ome for #rivate use! under
    t,e t,reat of force by %ttorney David Pasterna! former President of t,e Bos %ngeles =ar!
    #ur#orting to act on be,alf and by aut,ority of t,e )alifornia Su#erior )ourt3
    1egarding conduct of Pasterna! acting in collusion +it, t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt! James
    Hedic! one of t,e best no+n fraud e(#erts in t,e 2S! and a ,ig,ly decorated 7=' veteran! o#ined
    /U fraud being committedU0 and /333investigation s,ould be immediately institutedU0 C
    c(((iv
    D
    Samaan v %erni& documented #ractices t,at s,ould be deemed raceteering by )alifornia 4udges
    and clers in collusion +it, financial institutions3 Simulated litigation +as conducted +it, no valid
    4udicial records at all3 8,e conduct is best detailed in t,e %mended )om#laint in %erni& v Connor
    et al in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3 C
    c(((v
    D
    8,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia refused to #rovide .Iual Protection under t,e
    Ba+! and engaged in t,e very same conduct - simulated litigation3
    Per,a#s t,e best evidence for t,e fraudulent nature of t,e entire court file and records in %erni& v
    Connor et al in t,e 2S District )ourt case comes from Dr FerniEs corres#ondence +it, )ler of
    t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi in t,is matter 9see section @-a)3 8,e corres#ondence #ertained to t,e denial
    of access to records and refusal of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi to ans+er on validity and
    integrity of t,e docet and records in t,is case3 Aars, retaliation against Dr Ferni follo+ed ,is
    re#eat attem#ts to access t,e records and document t,eir fallacy3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    60/165 TOC:2
    8,e case of %erni& v Connor et al ,olds #articular significance for t+o reasonsG
    't #roduced voluminous records of t,e direct involvement of senior )ountry+ide and =an of
    %merica senior e(ecutives in t,e fraud in t,e courtsG %ngelo 5o"ilo! Sandor Samuels! =rian
    5oyni,an3 C
    c(((vi
    D
    't s,eds lig,t on a matter t,at +as sub4ect of intense national interest and investigations! +,ic,
    #ur#orted to lead to no conclusion - t,e ouster on December 1>! ->>$ of =an of %merica
    @eneral )ounsel 8imot,y 5ayo#oulos in t,e midst of t,e &merger& negotiations of 5errill
    Bync, and =an of %merica3
    'n Samaan v %erni& in t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia =ryan )ave BBP! one of t,e largest la+-
    firms in t,e 2S engaged in ,arassment! intimidation and retaliation against Ferni! #ur#orting to
    a##ear on be,alf of )ountry+id3 Bie+ise! t,e =ryan )ave BBP #ur#orted to a##ear on be,alf of
    =an of %merica in %erni& v Connor in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3
    Ao+ever! and Ferni! +,o +as a+are of t,e case of Borroer $arsley) reali"ed t,at =ryan )ave
    BBP +as unaut,ori"ed to a##ear on be,alf of eit,er cor#oration! and often communicated directly
    +it, t,e Begal De#artment of )ountry+ide and t,e office of @eneral )ounsel of =an of %merica3
    8,roug, suc, communications it became a##arent t,at )ountry+ide ),ief Begal :fficer Sandor
    Samuels +as directly involved in t,e unaut,ori"ed and unla+ful conduct of =ryan )ave BBP3
    Ao+ever! follo+ing t,e colla#se of )ountry+ide on January $! ->>$! and t,e &merger& of
    )ountry+ide +it, =an of %merica on July 1! ->>$! +,en Sandor Samuels became accountable to
    5r 8imot,y 5ayo#oulos! =ryan )ave sto##ed its ,arassment! intimidation! and retaliation3
    Ao+ever! on December 1>! ->>$! 5r 8imot,y 5ayo#oulos +as summarily dismissed as @eneral
    )ounsel of =an of %merica and +as escorted out of t,e =of% ,eadIuarters by security in t,e midst
    of negotiation of t,e =of% &merger& +it, 5errill Bync,3 =rian 5oyni,an! +it, little or no
    e(#erience in t,e #ractice of t,e la+ +as immediately a##ointed as ,is successor3
    8,e matter +as later sub4ect of #robes by t,e 2S )ongress! by <e+ ?or %ttorney @eneral %ndre+
    )uomo! and by t,e 2S District )ourt in <e+ ?or3 %ll of t,ese #robes seemed to lead no+,ere3
    'n contrast! t,e evidence from Samaan v %erni& and %erni& v Connor et al s,o+s t,at +it,in -4
    ,ours after 5ayo#oulosEs dismissal and 5oyni,anEs a##ointment in December ->>$! =rian )ave
    BBP resumed its unla+ful conduct3
    8,erefore! one can conclude t,at t,e abru#t dismissal of 5ayo#oulos and ,is re#lacement by
    5oyni,an +as related to t,e refusal of 5ayo#oulos to #ermit certain unla+ful conduct in =an of
    %merica! favored by #ersons suc, as Sandor Samuels! t,en %ssociate @eneral )ounsel of =an of
    %merica3 Bie+ise! one can conclude t,at =rian 5oyni,an +as rece#tive and conducive to suc,
    unla+ful conduct3
    %lso of note is t,e fact t,at regardless of t,e detailed evidence of criminality by senior baning
    e(ecutives! and regardless of )ongressional 'nIuiry by Senator Diane 7einstein! all baning
    regulators refused to address com#laints in t,is matter3 C
    c(((vii
    D
    Bie+ise! 2S De#t of Justice and 7=' refused to investigate t,e matter3 C
    c(((viii
    D
    %bove all! t,e case documents in t,e greatest detail t,e collusion of 2S 4udges in t,e a##arent
    criminality of financial institutions in t,e center of t,e financial crisis 9see section @-a)3
    N(Fs in %erni& v Connor et al
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    61/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 396 Zernik v Connor et: ;<= o' Dk& OC: ;o&i,e o' 2eassi"n%en& &o () J+$"e Nir"inia Phillips. The
    ;<= in,l+$es no K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK, an$ &here'ore, &he respe,&ive re,or$ ! ;o&i,e o'
    2eassi"n%en& ! is invali$, an$ J+$"e Nir"inia Phillips /as a,&in" /i&h no a+&hori&* a& all.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    62/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 406 Zernik v Connor et: ;<= o' Dk& O307: J+$"%en& .* J+$"e Nir"inia Phillips. The ;<= in,l+$es no
    K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK, an$ &here'ore, &he respe,&ive re,or$ ! J+$"%en& is voi$, no& voi$a.le.
    8,e <.7s of t,e litigation in %erni& v Connor et al +ere discovered at a muc, later time! on
    December -*! ->>*! after mont,s t,at access to records +as denied3
    8,e <.7s #rovided t,e definitive evidence of litigation in t,e 2S District )ourt! +,ic, +as
    conducted as a simulated litigation from start to finis, 9see also section @-a)G
    i3 <one of t,e reIuested <.7s contained a com#lete &.lectronic Document Stam#&3
    ii3 :f t,e -4 <.7s! +,ic, +ere discovered! $ +ere found to include truncated &.lectronic
    Document Stam#&3
    iii3 <.7s for t,e follo+ing critical records included no &.lectronic Document Stam#& at allG
    - 'ssuance of Summonses!
    - %ssignments and 1eassignments to Judges
    - %ssignments and 1eassignments to 5agistrates
    - %ll 5inutes +,ic, +ere e(amined3
    - :rder Denying DisIualification for a )ause
    - <otice and 1e#ort and 1ecommendation by 5agistrate3
    - :rder %do#ting 1e#ort and 1ecommendation by Judge
    - Judgment by Judge3
    :f interest! t,e com#laint in %erni& v Connor et al) under t,e cause of action of De#rivation of
    1ig,ts under t,e )olor of Ba+ originated from e(actly t,e same conduct in t,e Su#erior )ourt of
    )alifornia! )ounty of Bos %ngeles3 8,e conduct is detailed in t,e 7irst %mended )om#laint in
    %erni& v Connor et al3 C
    c(((i(
    D
    'n t,e )alifornia court! Sustain! t,e '8 system of t,e Su#erior )ourt +as em#loyed for t,e e(act
    same #ur#ose as P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3 'n
    t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! 4udges a##eared +it, no valid assignment orders eit,er! and issued
    minutes! orders! and 4udgments! +,ic, +ere invalid in various +ays! from lac of aut,entication! to
    running ,earings off t,e calendar of t,e court3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    63/165 TOC:2
    't is believed t,at t,e conduct of simulated litigation is t,e most common #attern of 4udicial
    corru#tion in t,e 2S and beyond3
    g) 6erni! v /elson et al C
    c(l
    D
    ?igure 416 =ro% le'& &o ri"h&: Genne&h Belson 4&hen Dire,&or o' () A&&orne*s O''i,e, () Depar&%en& o'
    J+s&i,e6, Genne&h Gaiser 4=BI Assis&an& Dire,&or, -ri%inal Inves&i"a&ions6, () J+$"e 2i,har$ @eon, ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D-. Belson an$ Gaiser /ere na%e$ a%on" De'en$an&s in Zernik v !elson et al, pe&i&ion &o
    -o%pel () O''i,er &o Per'or% 1is D+&ies. The pe&i&ion $o,+%en&e$ &he ,en&ral role o' Belson an$ Gaiser in
    a,,or$in" 'inan,ial ins&i&+&ions i%%+ni&* a"ains& ,ri%inali&* +n$er &he on"oin" 'inan,ial ,risis. () J+$"e
    2i,har$ @eon o.s&r+,&e$ j+s&i,e &hro+"h &he perversion o' li&i"a&ion in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r& 4see also se,&ion
    AB-6.
    'n %erni& v 'elson et al 91G>*-cv->>$>5) in t,e 2S )ourt! District of )olumbia!
    pro se Plaintiff filed a Petition for a #rit of 'andamus to Compel US .fficer to $erform "is
    !uties! -$ 2S) J13613 8,e #etition #ertained to refusal of 7=' and 2S De#artment of Justice to
    #rotect t,e rig,ts of 1> million residents of Bos %ngeles )ounty! )alifornia! in vie+ of indis#utable
    evidence of raceteering by 4udges of t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt3 C
    c(li
    D
    8,e case is of #articular interest! since it #rovides direct evidence of t,e tig,t lins bet+een
    corru#tion of t,e 4udiciary! corru#tion of financial institutions 9)ountry+ide and =an of %merica
    in t,is case)! and #atroni"ing of t,e same by 7=' and 2S De#artment of Justice3 )orru#tion of t,e
    2S 4ustice system is a central cause of t,e current financial crisis! +,ic, is often overlooed3C
    c(lii
    D
    8,e #etition #ertained to allegations of long-term! +ides#read corru#tion of t,e 4udiciary in Bos
    %ngeles )ounty! )alifornia! and refusal of 7=' and 2S De#artment of Justice to #rotect t,e Auman!
    )onstitutional! and )ivil 1ig,ts of residents of t,at region of t,e 2S%3 C
    c(liii
    D
    8,e evidence of raceteering by Judges of t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt is indis#utableG
    1etroactive immunities 9/#ardons0) +ere signed for all 4udges and commissioners of t,e
    Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Bos %ngeles )ounty! )alifornia! +,o ,ad taen /not
    #ermitted0#ayments 9/bribes0)3 C
    c(liv
    D
    2nited <ations Auman 1ig,ts )ouncil 9A1)) issued an official Staff 1e#ort referring to
    /corru#tion of t,e courts and t,e legal #rofession and discrimination by la+ enforcement in
    )alifornia03 C
    c(lv
    D 8,e re#ort +as based on evidence submitted to t,e A1) of large-scale false
    im#risonments and financial6real estate fraud by 4udges of t,e )ourt3
    Barge-scale fraud +as o#ined in Sustain! t,e case management system of t,e Bos %ngeles
    Su#erior )ourt! +,ic, enables t,e conduct of simulated litigation of cases in violation of t,e la+3
    8,e o#inion +as su##orted by o#inion of international com#uter science sc,olar3 C
    c(lvi
    D
    7raud +as o#ined in t,e case management system of t,e Bos %ngeles S,eriffRs De#artment!
    +,ic, enables large-scale false im#risonments! +it, no legal foundation3 8,e o#inion +as
    revie+ed and #ublis,ed in an international com#uter science 4ournal +it, an .ditorial =oard
    listing sc,olars from si( .uro#ean nations and )anada3 C
    c(lvii
    D
    7inancial institutions are t,e beneficiaries! and 7=' and 2S De#artment of Justice are t,e #atronsG
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    64/165 TOC:2
    8,e t+o 2S officers of t,e 2S De#artment of Justice! +,o +ere named first among 1es#ondents
    +ereG
    Director of 2S %ttorneys :ffice Kennet, 5elson! and
    %ssistant Director of 7=' for )riminal 'nvestigations Kennet, Kaiser3
    :t,er named among 1es#ondents includedG
    S.) officers and
    =an of %merica )or#oration e(ecutives3
    Key #art of t,e evidence #ertained to fraud by =an of %merica and )ountry+ide in t,e courts in
    Bos %ngeles )ounty! )alifornia! and beyond! even #rior to t,e current financial crisis3 C
    c(lviii
    D
    =rief ),ronology of Ferni v 5elson et alG C
    c(li(
    D
    8,e case +as assigned to 2S Judge 1')A%1D B.:<! +,o engaged in fraud t,roug, t,e conduct
    of simulated litigation in collusion +it, t,e )ler of t,e )ourt <ancy 5ayer-H,ittington in
    disregard of 7irst %mendment and Due Process rig,tsG
    Com$laint (+/t @A#) C
    cl
    D M ty#ically t,e com#laint is a s,ort document3 Aere t,e com#laint is
    voluminous! since it included substantial #art of t,e evidence3 =ased on PetitionerRs #rior
    e(#erience in t,e 2S courts! it +as liely t,at furt,er evidence +ould be e(cluded from t,e
    docet3 7iling t,e evidence +it, t,e )om#laint ensured its entry into t,e #ublic record3
    Summonses (+/t @none) M +ere not doceted! in a##arent violation of t,e
    7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure! setting t,e litigation as Simulated Bitigation from t,e start3
    7otion for C7BEC. 9ass8or& (+/t @A%) C
    cli
    D M filed toget,er +it, t,e com#laint3 Denial of
    access to electronic filing by pro se #laintiffs enables t,e abuse of rig,ts3 %ccess to t,e electronic
    aut,entication records 9<.7s) in t,is case is denied to t,is date3
    Statement of +isCualification of -u&ge :eon (+/t @A0) C
    clii
    D and 5otion to )om#el 7=' and
    2S De#artment of Justice to #rovide t,e t,en im#risoned 1ic,ard 7ine #en and #a#er 9Dt Q4)
    C
    cliii
    D M t,e t+o records +ere included in t,e docet only after #rotests #ertaining to dis,onest
    conduct of t,e court3 9see! belo+)3
    7ormer 2S Prosecutor 1ic,ard 7ine +as at t,at time ,eld in solitary confinement +it, no valid
    legal #a#ers for ,is arrest and im#risonment3 Ae +as denied access to #en and #a#er! in effort to
    #revent ,im from filing ,is ,abeas cor#us #etition3 7ine ,ad e(#osed and rebued t,e taing by
    Bos %ngeles 4udges of /not #ermitted0 #ayments 9/bribes0)! +,ic, reIuired t,e signing of
    /retroactive immunities09/#ardons0) for all suc, 4udges3 C
    cliv
    D
    Evi&ence of Corru$tion of the Courts in Cases *nvolving Countr8i&e an& "an/ of
    America (+/t @none) C
    clv
    D M eig,t 9$) records +ere duly filed on 5ay -1! ->>*3 Judge Beon ,eld
    t,e#a#ers in c,ambers and refused to #ermit t,eir doceting3
    ReCuest for Revie8 of Con&uct of the Cler/ (+/t @3) C
    clvi
    D and 1eIuest for statement on t,e
    record by Judge Beon and )ler 5ayer-H,ittington 9Dt Q6) C
    clvii
    D D +ere filed in #rotest of
    denial of rig,t to file #a#ers in court3
    7emoran&um O$inion an& Or&er b -u&ge Richar& :eon (+/t @5'6) C
    clviii
    !
    cli(
    D
    D +ere mailed +it, no aut,entication 9<.7 M notice of electronic filing) and t,erefore cannot be
    deemed valid court records 9see belo+)3
    E:eave to .ile +enie&F (+/t @none) M later! Petitioner received by mail t,e face #ages of ,is
    eig,t #a#ers! +,ic, +ere never doceted! +it, ,and inscri#tions /Beave to file denied! 1JB03
    C
    cl(
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    65/165 TOC:2
    ReCuest for Authentication Recor&s (NE.s) (+/t @ ;) C
    cl(i
    D D Judge Beon never ruled on t,e
    reIuest! and access to t,e aut,entication records ,as been denied to t,is date3
    't s,ould be noted t,at Judge Beon and )ler 5ayer-H,ittington engaged in t,e same conduct in a
    case #ertaining to Judge :linda .vans! 2S )ourt! <ort,ern District of @eorgia3 'n #indsor v (vans
    et al 91G1>-cv->>1*7) in t,e 2S )ourt! District of )olumbia! pro se Plaintiff Hilliam Hindsor filed
    com#laint under cause of actions of
    !eprivation of *ights under the Color of La! 4- 2S)J1*$3! #ertaining to conduct of 2S Judge
    :linda .vans of t,e 2S District )ourt! <ort,ern District of @eorgia3 C
    cl(ii
    D 8,e case is of #articular
    interest! since it #rovides evidence of cover u# of 4udicial corru#tion! not only by Judge 1ic,ard
    Beon in t,e 2S District )ourt in Has,ington D)! but also by t,e 2S courts of a##eals and t,e 2S
    Su#reme )ourt3 C
    cl(iii
    D 8,e evidence s,o+s t,at in obstructing 4ustice! Judge Beon and )ler 5ayer-
    H,ittington engaged in t,e e(act same conduct in #indsor v (vans et al C
    cl(iv
    D and in %erni& v
    'elson et al D denial of t,e rig,t to file #a#ers in t,e court3
    'nvalid '8 systems of t,e 2S courts 9P%).1 and )56.)7) are germane to suc, conduct in t,e 2S
    courts3 8,e P%).1 docet and ot,er re#orts in %erni& v 'elson et al #rovide additional evidence
    of t,e conduct of Simulated BitigationG C
    cl(v
    D
    <o event is listed in t,e )alendar of t,e )ourt!
    <o Judgment is listed in t,e Judgment 'nde( of t,e )ourt!
    8,e Petition is not listed as /terminated0 in t,e 1elated 8ransaction 1e#ort! alt,oug, t,e case is
    listed as closed3
    8,e cases of %erni& v 'elson et al and #indsor v (vans et al s,o+ t,at 2S 4udges are not ready!
    +illing! able to address corru#tion of t,e state and 2S 4udges3
    8,e case of %erni& v 'elson et al! #indsor v (vans et al and ot,er similar cases in t,e 2S district
    courts! 2S courts of a##eals! and Su#reme )ourt of t,e 2nited States document t,at t,e 2S courts
    ,ave effectively establis,ed a #olicy! #ro,ibiting t,e filing of #a#ers! +,ic, document 4udicial
    corru#tion3 C
    cl(vi
    D
    h) Securities and )&change Commission v 3an! of $merica Corporation >
    clxvii
    '
    clxviii
    ?
    ?igure 426 =ro% le'& &o ri"h&: @lo*$ Blank'ein, ,hie' exe,+&ive o' Dol$%an )a,hs7 Ja%ie Di%on, ,hie'
    exe,+&ive o' JP Bor"an -hase7 John Ba,k, ,hair%an o' Bor"an )&anle*7 an$ Brian Bo*nihan, ,hie'
    exe,+&ive o' Bank o' A%eri,a, s/orn in .e'ore &he =inan,ial -risis In0+ir* -o%%ission, Jan+ar* 33, 8030,
    an$ () J+$"e Je$ 2ako'', )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork. The evi$en,e in$i,a&es &ha& J+$"e 2ako'', )<-
    an$ Bank o' A%eri,a ,oll+$e$ in &he ,on$+,& o' si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion in a lan$%ark ,ase +n$er &he ,+rren&
    'inan,ial ,risis.
    Al&ho+"h =BI Dire,&or 2o.er& B+eller III repea&e$l* &es&i'ie$ .e'ore &he )ena&e &ha& i& /as inves&i"a&in"
    ,ri%inali&* +n$erl*in" &he s+.!pri%e ,risis, E
    ,lxix
    ,
    ,lxx
    F no prose,+&ion o' &op 'i"+re ever res+l&e$ 'ro% s+,h
    inves&i"a&ions. In ,on&ras&, inves&i"a&ion o' ;e/ Hork )&a&e A&&orne* Deneral An$re/ -+o%o +n,overe$
    .la&an& ,ri%inali&* o' &op 'i"+res in Bank o' A%eri,a in ,oll+sion /i&h &op () o''i,ers ! -hair%an o' &he
    =e$eral 2eserve Ben Bernanke, Treas+r* )e,re&ar* 1enr* Pa+lson. E
    ,lxxi
    F The )ena&e )+.,o%%i&&ee on
    Inves&i"a&ions repor& on &he 'inan,ial ,risis, like/ise, $o,+%en&e$ vas& ,ri%inali&* in 'inan,ial ins&i&+&ions.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    66/165 TOC:2
    E
    ,lxxii
    ,
    ,lxxiii
    F 2e"ar$less, no &op 'i"+re in len$in" ins&i&+&ions has .een ,ri%inall* prose,+&e$. E
    ,lxxiv
    F <ven&+all*, in
    8033 A&&orne* Deneral <ri, 1ol$er ,onsen&e$ .e'ore &he )ena&e J+$i,iar* -o%%i&&ee &ha& &here /as
    ,ri%inali&* +n$erl*in" &he ,risis, .+& in &es&i%on* &ha& /as la&er re'erre$ &o as K&oo .i" &o 'ail, &o .i" &o jailK,
    ,lai%e$ &ha& prose,+&in" .ankin" exe,+&ives /as no& possi.le. E
    ,lxxv
    ,
    ,lxxvi
    F As $o,+%en&e$ here in &he li&i"a&ion
    o' Securities an# )2change Commission v Bank of America Corporation 4an$ in o&her ,ases o+&line$ in
    linke$ re'eren,es6 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork, li&i"a&ion o' .ankin"!rela&e$ %a&&ers
    /as +n$er%ine$ &hro+"h ,oll+sion in 'ra+$ on &he ,o+r& .* j+$"e, ,lerk, an$ ,o+nsel 'or .o&h par&ies, /hile
    %e$ia 'aile$ &o a$e0+a&el* repor& on /ha& &ranspire$ in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r& in ;e/ Hork.
    S(C v BAC 91G>*-cv->6$-*)! and t,e related case of S(C v BAC 91G1>-cv M>>-15) in t,e 2S
    District )ourt! Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or! +ere summed as follo+s in t,e 7air 7und
    %dministrator +ebsiteG
    The (ni&e$ )&a&es )e,+ri&ies an$ <x,han"e -o%%ission 4>)<-?6 'ile$ en'or,e%en& a,&ions a"ains&
    Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion 4>BA-?6 alle"in" &ha& BA- viola&e$ &he 'e$eral prox* re"+la&ions in &he
    %er"er .e&/een BA- an$ Berrill @*n,h T -o., In,. 4>Berrill?6 &ha& ,lose$ on Jan+ar* 3, 800C. As par&
    o' a se&&le%en& o' &hose a,&ions approve$ .* &he 1onora.le Je$ ). 2ako'' o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es Dis&ri,&
    -o+r& 'or &he )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork on =e.r+ar* 88, 8030, BA- pai$ approxi%a&el* R390
    %illion in&o a =air =+n$ &ha& /ill .e $is&ri.+&e$ &o inves&ors inj+re$ .* &he alle"e$ %is,on$+,&.
    =ollo/in" BA-Ms %er"er /i&h Berrill, &he )<- 'ile$ &/o a,&ions, )<- v . Bank o' A%eri,a -orp., 0C!,v
    !AI8C 4J)26 4>Bon+ses A,&ion?6 an$ )<- v . Bank o' A%eri,a -orp., 30!,v !083 9 4J)26 4>U4 @osses
    A,&ion?6 4,olle,&ivel* , &he >A,&ions?6. In &he Bon+ses A,&ion, ini&iall* 'ile$ on A+"+s& 3, 800C, &he )<-
    ,har"e$ BA- /i&h viola&in" )e,&ion 344a6 o' &he )e,+ri&ies <x,han"e A,& o' 3C34 4><x,han"e A,&?6 an$
    2+les 34a!3 an$ 34a!C &here+n$er .ase$ on BA-Ms 'ail+re &o $is,lose, in prox* %a&erials soli,i&in"
    sharehol$er vo&es 'or approval o' &he %er"er, i&s a+&horiza&ion 'or Berrill &o pa* *ear!en$ .on+ses o'
    +p &o R9.I .illion &o i&s e%plo*ees prior &o &he ,losin" o' &he %er"er.
    In &he U4 @osses A,&ion, 'ile$ on Jan+ar* 38, 8030, &he )<- ,har"e$ BA- /i&h viola&in" )e,&ion 3 44a6
    o' &he <x,han"e A,& an$ 2+le 3 4a!C &here+n$er .ase$ on BA-Ms 'ail+re &o $is,lose, prior &o &he
    De,e%.er 9, 800I sharehol$er %ee&in" &o approve &he %er"er, ex&raor$inar* losses &ha& Berrill
    s+s&aine$ in O,&o.er an$ ;ov e%.er 800I.
    3n "e(ruary 44, 4565, the Unite# States District Court for the Southern District of 0e1 7ork 8the
    9Court:; entere# a "inal Consent -u#gment, pursuant to 1hich BAC 1as re<uire# to pay a civil penalty
    of =6 >5,555,555 an# #isgorgement of =6/
    8,e case is of #articular interest! since it +as +idely re#orted by 2S national and international
    media! +,ic, tried to #ortray it as an e(am#le of effective baning regulation in t,e 2nited States3
    Ao+ever! t,e outcome of t,e litigation! and researc, of t,e P%).1 and )56.)7 records of t,e
    case s,o+ t,at 2S Judge Jed 1aoff! S.)! and =an of %merica )or#oration colluded in t,e
    conduct of simulated litigation from t,e start3
    8,e litigation in S(C v BAC is #robably one of t,e most remarable cases of simulated court
    #rocess and fraud on t,e #ublic by t,e 2S courts3 'n its notoriety! t,e case is #er,a#s only e(ceeded
    by N'L Capital v *epu+lic of Argentina in t,e same District )ourt 9see section )-) and Citi,ens
    United v F(C in t,e 2S District )ourt D) and t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt 9see sections )-o!#)3
    Information regarding $AC(* and C'/(CF in the US !istrict Court) Southern !istrict of Ne
    ?or&
    8,e #latforms of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or! are
    t,e same as #reviously described in ot,er 2S district courts3 C
    cl((vii
    D
    %s is t,e case in all 2S district and a##eals courts! t,e electronic aut,entication records 9<.7s M
    <otices of .lectronic 7ilings) are e(cluded from #ublic access in P%).1 also in t,e 2S District
    )ourt! Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or3 8,e <.7s are today accessible only t,roug, )56.)7! only
    by court #ersonnel and by attorneys! +,o are aut,ori"ed by t,e courts in #articular cases3
    8,e Local *ules of t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or! as do+nloaded from t,e
    )ourtRs +ebsite! +ere revie+ed! #articularly relative to t,e follo+ing mattersG C
    cl((viii
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    67/165 TOC:2
    :#erations of P%).1 and )56.)7 and court #rocedures in,erent in t,emL )ertification of court
    records under electronic filingL
    'ssuance! doceting! and e(ecution of t,e service of summons and com#laintL
    )ertification of attorneys as %ttorneys of 1ecord u#on a##earance! and
    Definition of valid digital signatures under electronic filing3
    %s +as t,e case in all ot,er 2S courts! +,ic, +ere e(amined! t,e Local *ules of t,e 2S District
    )ourt! Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or! failed to #rovide clear and unambiguous details of electronic
    filing and electronic court #rocedures in general! and in #articular relative to t,e matters listed
    above3
    7urt,er information regarding t,e design and o#erations of P%).1 and )56.)7 +as found in t,e
    (lectronic Case Filing *ules @ Instructions and t,e C' / (CF Attorney Civil !ictionary of t,e 2S
    District )ourt! Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or3 C
    cl((i(
    D Ao+ever! suc, sources are not valid legal
    sources for establis,ing t,e validity of court records3
    2sersR manuals! albeit not valid court records! #rovided additional information regarding t,e design
    and o#eration of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e various 2S district courts!+,ic, +ere ins#ected3 C15D
    Ao+ever! no #ublic access +as found online to t,e 2sersR 5anual of t,e 2S District
    )ourt!Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    68/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 436 )+%%ons as iss+e$ .* &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& an$ as exe,+&e$ in S)C v Bank of America
    Corporation 43:0C!,v!0AI8C6 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork. The s+%%ons is
    +nsi"ne$, an$ 'ails &o sho/ &he seal o' &he ,o+r&. The s+%%ons /as also never $o,ke&e$, in $isre"ar$ o' ()
    la/, an$ &he () ,o+r& $enie$ a,,ess &o i&. I& /as even&+all* o.&aine$ &hro+"h a =ree$o% o' In'or%a&ion
    re0+es& 'ro% )<-. The ,on$+,& o' li&i"a&ion /i&h no vali$ s+%%ons, no vali$ %in+&es, an$ /here &he ,o+r&
    $enies a,,ess &o &he a+&hen&i,a&ion re,or$s 4;<=s !! ;o&i,es o' <le,&roni, =ilin"6, as /ell as &he o+&,o%e o'
    &he li&i"a&ion, poin& o+& &o &he ,on$+,& o' sha%5si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion 'ro% &he s&ar&, &hro+"h ,oll+sion o' &he
    j+$"e, &he ,lerk, an$ a&&orne*s 'or .o&h )<- an$ Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion. In 'a,&, 'ro% &he s&ar& !! a
    sho/ &rial.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    69/165 TOC:2
    Information regarding $AC(* and C'/(CF in the US !istrict Court) Southern !istrict of Ne
    ?or&
    8,e #latforms of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or! are
    t,e same as #reviously described in ot,er 2S district courts3 CD 8,e electronic aut,entication records
    9<.7s M <otices of .lectronic 7ilings) are e(cluded from #ublic access in P%).13 8,e <.7s are
    today accessible only t,roug, )56.)7! only by t,e courts and by attorneys! +,o are aut,ori"ed by
    t,e courts in #articular cases3
    8,e Local *ules of t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or! as do+nloaded from t,e
    )ourtRs +ebsite! +ere revie+ed! #articularly relative to t,e follo+ing mattersG C13D
    :#erations of P%).1 and )56.)7 and court #rocedures in,erent in t,emL
    )ertification of court records under electronic filingL
    'ssuance! doceting! e(ecution of service of summons and com#laintL
    )ertification of attorneys as %ttorneys of 1ecord u#on a##earance! and
    Definition of valid digital signatures under electronic filing3
    %s +as t,e case in ot,er 2S courts! +,ic, +ere revie+ed! t,e Local *ules of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or failed to #rovide clear and unambiguous details of electronic filing
    and electronic court records #rocedures in general! and in #articular relative to t,e matters listed
    above3
    7urt,er information regarding t,e design and o#erations of P%).1 and )56.)7 +as found in t,e
    (lectronic Case Filing *ules @ Instructions and t,e C' / (CF Attorney Civil !ictionary of t,e 2S
    District )ourt! Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or3 C14D Ao+ever! suc, sources are not valid official
    sources for establis,ing t,e validity of court records3
    2sersR manuals! albeit not valid court records! #rovided additional information regarding t,e design
    and o#eration of P%).1 and )56.)7 in ot,er 2S district courts! +,ic, +ere ins#ected3 C15D
    Ao+ever! no access +as found online to t,e 2sersR 5anual of t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern
    District of <e+ ?or3
    % total of 1* #roceedings +ere listed in t,e P%).1 docet 9see t,e full P%).1 docet and lined
    records under t,e :nline %##endi()3 7or t+o of t,e #roceedings! no docet entry +as created 9see
    belo+)3 8,ese t+o #roceedings s,ould be deemed Soff t,e recordR3 7or t,e remaining 17
    #roceedings invalid docet entries +ere created - no minutes records at all +ere lined to t,e docet
    listings! no Docet <umbers +ere designated! and no information regarding content of t,e
    #roceedings +as #rovided in t,e doceting te(t3 5oreover! based on t,e design of t,e <.7s 9see
    belo+)! it is im#ossible t,at suc, docet entries +ere aut,enticated! and t,erefore! +ere effectively
    invalid docet entries! +it, no corres#onding valid court records3
    ?igure 446 T/o en&ries 'ro% &he online PA-<2 Do,ke& o' )<- v BA- 43:0C!,v!0AI8C6 in &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork. The Jan+ar* 38, 8030 en&r* in,l+$es a Do,ke& ;+%.er an$ a link &o
    an a,&+al re,or$. The Jan+ar* 3C, 8030 en&r* has no Do,ke& ;+%.er $esi"na&e$, an$ no link &o an* re,or$.
    There'ore, no ,o+r& re,or$ exis&s 'or &he la&&er en&r*. Boreover, "iven &he $esi"n o' &he ;<=s 4;o&i,es o'
    <le,&roni, =ilin"6, even ha$ &he respe,&ive re,or$ exis&e$ so%e/here, i& ,o+l$nM& possi.l* have .een
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    70/165 TOC:2
    a+&hen&i,a&e$, an$ &here'ore, /o+l$ have .een an invali$ ,o+r& re,or$. There'ore, &he %+l&iple en&ries in &he
    $o,ke& o' &his ,ase, /here no Do,ke& ;+%.er an$ links are provi$e$, sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ 'alse an$
    $eli.era&el* %islea$in" $o,ke& no&a&ions.
    :f suc, 17 minutes +it, no records! 16 +ere SenteredR by an individual identified as SmroR3 8,e
    full name and aut,ority of t,e #erson remain unno+n3 'n contrast! out of a total of -4 docet
    listings of orders and t,e 4udgment! +,ere docet number +as designated! +,ere a record +as
    lined! and +,ere informative doceting te(t +as #rovided! not a single item +as entered by SmroR3
    8,e Doceting De#artment of t,e )ourt confirmed t,at doceting in t,e case +as not #erformed by
    De#uty )lers! but refused to disclose t,e names of t,e individuals involved3 C1$D
    .ntry of transactions in t,e P%).1 docets by unaut,ori"ed court #ersonnel! +,o +ere not bound
    by :at, of :ffice! +as documented in ot,er 2S district courts as +ell3 =eyond undermining t,e
    integrity of t,e docets! suc, #ractices demonstrate t,e lac of security and validity of P%).1 and
    )56.)7 as a +,ole3
    :verall! no+,ere in t,e P%).1 docet is t,e aut,ority of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt invoed! neit,er is
    t,e name! nor t,e aut,ority of any individual as De#uty )ler to be found3
    Court records in S(C v Ban& of America Corporation C
    cl(((
    D
    August 0' %AA; ( Civil Cover Sheet (+/t @none) - alt,oug, records of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or! state t,at a )ivil )over S,eet is reIuired +,en filing a com#laint!
    no )ivil )over S,eet +as found in t,e docet of t,e case at ,and3 'n contrast! )ivil )over S,eets
    are routinely found doceted in P%).1 +it, t,e com#laints in ot,er cases3 %s furt,er noted in t,e
    1ules of )ourt! t,e )ivil )over S,eet must be #art of Service of Process! toget,er +it, t,e
    summons and com#laint3 8,e failure to file and docet a )ivil )over S,eet is of #articular
    significance! since it is one of t,e only records! +,ere a ,and signature of a De#uty )ler of t,e
    )ourt! identified by name and aut,ority! is reIuired3
    August 0' %AA; D Summons issue& (+/t @none) 0 t,e P%).1 docet states t,at on %ugust 3!
    ->>*! summons +as issued as to =%)3 Ao+ever! absent a Docet <umber! t,e te(t cannot
    #ossibly be deemed a valid docet entry3 %dditionally! no lin +as #rovided in t,e P%).1 docet
    to t,e summons record itself3 8,erefore! no electronic aut,entication could ,ave been issued
    t,roug, an <.7 under suc, circumstances on t,e summons3
    8,e summonses of t,e courts are #ublic records by la+3 8,erefore! access to t,e summons as
    issued +as re#eatedly reIuested from t,e office of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3 %ccess +as denied3
    .ventually! a co#y of t,e summons! as issued by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! +as obtained t,roug,
    7reedom of 'nformation %ct 97:'%) res#onse from S.)3 8,e summons as issued by t,e )ler +as
    discovered to be unsigned3 8,erefore! t,e summons +as in fact invalid3 C1*D
    8,e invalidity of t,e summons undermines t,e validity of t,e litigation as a +,ole3 Ao+ever! t,e
    invalidity of t,e summons in t,is case could not be discerned in P%).1! t,e #ublic access system3
    Service of 9rocess (+/t @none) - no+,ere in t,e docet of t,e case is t,ere any indication t,at
    service of t,e summons +as in fact e(ecuted! alternatively! t,at service +as +aived3 'n 7:'%
    res#onse! t,e unsigned summons record +as #rovided as t,e record of bot, t,e summons as issued
    and t,e summons as e(ecuted3 9.igure 1) <eedless to say! e(ecution of service of unsigned!
    invalid summons is invalid e(ecution3 5oreover! no record of t,e e(ecution of service +as
    #rovided3
    August 0' %AA; ( 7otion for entr of Settlement Agreement (+/t @none) ( alt,oug, media
    re#orted from t,e onset of t,e litigation t,at a #ro#osed Settlement %greement for T33 millions +as
    filed on %ugust 3! ->>*! alt,oug, several docet records later referred to t,e #ending Settlement
    %greement! and alt,oug, on Se#tember -4! ->>*! :rder +as entered in t,e docet! #ur#ortedly
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    71/165 TOC:2
    re4ecting t,e t,en #ending before t,e )ourt #ro#osed Settlement %greement! no 5otion for entry of
    t,e #ro#osed Settlement %greement and no #ro#osed Settlement %greement +ere found in t,e
    docet3
    8,e failure to file a 5otion for .ntry of t,e Settlement %greement! and conseIuent conduct of
    motion +it, no foundation records su##ort t,e o#inion t,at t,e litigation as a +,ole +as conducted
    as an invalid litigation3
    August #A' %AA; D Goff the recor&H $rocee&ing (+/t @none) ( t,ere is no docet listing at all for
    t,e %ugust 1>! ->>* #roceeding3 Ao+ever! evidence of its conduct is #rovided in t,e P%).1
    docet entries Q15!16! and 173
    8,e conduct of Soff t,e recordR court #roceeding also su##orts t,e o#inion t,at t,e litigation as a
    +,ole +as conducted as an invalid litigation3
    August %3' %AA; ( Or&er $ertaining to revie8 of $ro$ose& Settlement Agreement (+/t @#0) 0
    t,e %ugust -5! ->>* :rder statesG
    This -o+r& has &he o.li"a&ion, /i&hin ,are'+ll* pres,ri.e$ li%i&s, &o $e&er%ine /he&her &he propose$
    -onsen& J+$"%en& se&&lin" &his ,ase is 'air, reasona.le, a$e0+a&e, an$ in &he p+.li, in&eres&.
    8,e ruling on a matter t,at +as never #ending before t,e )ourt su##orts t,e o#inion of conduct of
    an invalid litigation3
    .ebruar %%' %A#A' .inal Consent -u&gment (+/t @;5) ( on 7ebruary --! ->1>! t,e 7inal )onsent
    Judgment +as filed by Judge Jed 1aoff3
    8,e doceting te(t of t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment statesG
    =I;A@ -O;)<;T J(DDB<;T A) TO D<=<;DA;T BA;G O= AB<2I-A -O2PO2ATIO; O 30,08C7
    in 'avor o' )e,+ri&ies an$ <x,han"e -o%%ission a"ains& Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion in &he a%o+n&
    o' R 390,000,003.00. 4)i"ne$ .* J+$"e Je$ ). 2ako'' on 8584580306 4A&&a,h%en&s: O 3 ;o&i,e o' 2i"h&
    &o Appeal6 4$&6 4<n&ere$: 08584580306 Esi, SjzF
    %ccess +as re#eatedly reIuested to t,e <.7 of t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment! absent +,ic,! t,e
    record cannot be deemed a valid court record3 %ccess continues to be denied3
    Freedom of Information Act 9F.IA= and Fair Fund Administrator *esponses
    +,ile t,e )ler of t,e )ourt refused to #rovide access to t,e missing court records in t,is case!
    +,ic, are #ublic records by la+! limited! but significant access +as gained to records from ot,er
    sources3
    8,e 7:'% res#onse yielded a co#y of a record t,at +as described as /summons! as issued by cler0
    and /summons! as e(ecuted03 Ao+ever! t,e record #roduced in t,e 7:'% res#onse is an unsigned
    summons +it, no seal of t,e )ourt3 8,erefore! it could not #ossibly be deemed a valid summons3
    8,e 7air 7und %dministrator #rovided a co#y of one <.7 only3 8,e same office refused to #rovide
    t,e <.7s of ot,er records! most notably t,e <.7 of t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment 9Dt Q*7)3 <o
    e(#lanation at all +as #rovided by t,e 7air 7und %dministrator for t,e refusal to #rovide co#ies of
    t,e additional <.7s3
    Circumstances Surrounding the Litigation of S(C v BAC
    8,e <e+ ?or 8imes re#orted t,e ne+s regarding t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment in t,is case as
    follo+sG
    In a r+lin" &ha& 'ree$ Bank o' A%eri,a 'ro% so%e le"al pro.le%s, a 'e$eral j+$"e /ro&e on Bon$a* &ha&
    he ha$ rel+,&an&l* approve$ a R390 %illion se&&le%en& /i&h &he )e,+ri&ies an$ <x,han"e
    -o%%issionP >This ,o+r&, /hile shakin" i&s hea$, "ran&s &he ).<.-.Ms %o&ion an$ approves &he
    propose$ ,onsen& j+$"%en&,? &he j+$"e /ro&e.
    'nde#endent investigation of events surrounding t,e =%)-5errill Bync, merger by State of <e+
    ?or %ttorney @eneral %ndre+ )uomo +as summed u# in ,is %#ril -3! ->>* letter to t,e 2S
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    72/165 TOC:2
    )ongress3 %nalystsR re#orted follo+ing release of t,e letter and its attac,ments under ,eadlines
    suc, as SBet t,e )riminal 'ndictments =eginG Paulson! =ernane! Be+isR! S=igger 8,an
    HatergatePR! and S)uomo 2nveils Paulson! =ernane! Be+is )ons#iracyR3 Ao+ever! in contrast
    +it, suc, analystsR o#inions! none of t,e #er#etrators suffered any material conseIuences so far3
    Judge Jed 1aoff! +,o #resided in t,e case! is considered one of t,e most e(#erienced and notable
    among 2S 4udges in matters #ertaining to securities! +,ite-collar crime! and raceteering3
    1egarding Judge Jed 1aoffRs conduct in t,e case at ,and! t,e #all Street 7ournal La Blog saidG
    2ako''Ms ,+rren&l* provin" hi%sel' &o .e, i' no&hin" else, +na'rai$ &o sin"le!han$e$l* &ake on so%e
    heav*/ei"h& ins&i&+&ions an$ &heir la/*ers.
    <umerous attorneys a##eared in t,e case! bot, for Plaintiff S.)! a government entity! and for
    Defendant =%)3 :ver -> <otices of %##earance a##ear in t,e P%).1 docet of t,e case3
    'n a Se#tember --! ->>* re#ort! t,e Has,ington Post Iuotes official statement by S.)G
    KE#Fe /ill vi"oro+sl* p+rs+e o+r ,har"es a"ains& Bank o' A%eri,a an$ &ake s&eps &o prove o+r ,ase
    in ,o+r&,K &he )<- sai$ in a s&a&e%en&. K#e /ill +se &he a$$i&ional $is,over* availa.le in &he li&i"a&ion
    &o '+r&her p+rs+e &he 'a,&s an$ $e&er%ine /he&her &o seek &he ,o+r&Ls per%ission &o .rin" a$$i&ional
    ,har"es in &his ,ase.K
    't is alleged t,at it is #ractically im#ossible t,at t,e #rominent attorneys! +,o a##eared in t,e case
    for bot, S.) and =%) attorneys +ere una+are of t,e invalid nature of t,e litigation3
    8,e litigation of t,e case +as e(tensively covered by ma4or 2S media outlets! and also by
    international media3 % total of ten 91>) re#orts of t,e litigation +ere found in t,e <e+ ?or 8imes!
    eig,t 9$) re#orts in t,e Has,ington Post! and do"ens of re#orts in t,e Hall Street Journal3 Bie+ise!
    fourteen 914) re#orts +ere found on t,e matter in t,e 8imes of Bondon3 Ao+ever! t,ere is no
    reason to assume t,at any media! +,ic, re#orted on t,e litigation ever gained access to records in
    t,e case beyond t,ose accessible in t,e P%).1 docet! as described above3 8,ere is also no
    evidence of efforts by media to gain access to t,e missing critical court records! +,ere #ublic
    access +as denied3 't is difficult to believe t,at e(#erienced legal re#orters of ma4or media outlets
    never noticed t,e fatal defects in t,e records and conduct of t,e litigation3
    .verall Conduct of the Litigation
    8,e conduct of t,e 2S District )ourt in t,is matter s,ould be revie+ed in t,e conte(t of t,e conduct
    of civil litigation as sti#ulated in t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure! and as outlined in t,e Civil
    Litigation 'anagement 'anual) Second (dition 9->1>) by t,e Judicial )onference of t,e 2nited
    States3 2#on suc, revie+! a reasonable #erson +ould most liely conclude t,at t,e litigation as a
    +,ole +as ever deemed by t,e 2S )ourt itself as valid litigation! conducted #ursuant to t,e la+ of
    t,e 2nited States3
    8,e outcome of t,e litigation s,ould also be vie+ed from t,e fundamental fairness #ers#ectiveG
    'ndividuals! +,o +ere baning e(ecutives! unla+fully too bonuses in t,e sum of T53$ billions
    from s,are,olders3 8,e outcome of t,e litigation +as t,at com#ensation in t,e sum of T15>
    millions +as #aid by t,e s,are,olders to t,emselves! no funds +ere returned by any e(ecutives +,o
    received t,e unla+ful bonuses! and no individual +as ,eld accountable for t,e unla+ful conduct3
    8,e %ugust -5! ->>* :rder 9Dt Q13) statesG
    This -o+r& has &he o.li"a&ion, /i&hin ,are'+ll* pres,ri.e$ li%i&s, &o $e&er%ine /he&her &he propose$
    -onsen& J+$"%en& se&&lin" &his ,ase is 'air, reasona.le, a$e0+a&e,an$ in &he p+.li, in&eres&.
    8,e ruling on a matter t,at +as never #ending before t,e )ourt su##orts t,e o#inion of conduct of
    an invalid litigation3
    :n 7ebruary --! ->1>! t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment 9DtQ*7) +as filed by Judge Jed 1aoff3 8,e
    doceting te(t of t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment statesG
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    73/165 TOC:2
    =I;A@ -O;)<;T J(DDB<;T A) TO D<=<;DA;T BA;G O= AB<2I-A -O2PO2ATIO; O
    30,08C7 in 'avor o' )e,+ri&ies an$ <x,han"e -o%%ission a"ains& Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion in
    &he a%o+n& o' R390,000,003.00. 4)i"ne$ .* J+$"e Je$ ). 2ako'' on 8584580306 4A&&a,h%en&s: O 3
    ;o&i,e o' 2i"h& &o Appeal64$&6 4<n&ere$: 08584580306 Esi, SjzF
    %ccess +as re#eatedly reIuested to t,e <.7 of t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment! absent +,ic,! t,e
    record cannot be deemed a valid court record3 %ccess continues to be denied3
    H,ile t,e )ler of t,e )ourt refused to #rovide access to t,e missing court records in t,is case!
    +,ic, are #ublic records by la+! limited! but significant access +as gained to records from ot,er
    sources3 8,e 7:'% res#onse yielded a co#y of a record t,at +as described as /summons! as issued
    by cler0 and /summons! as e(ecuted03 Ao+ever! t,e record #roduced in t,e 7:'% res#onse is an
    unsigned summons +it, no seal of t,e )ourt3 8,erefore! it could not #ossibly be deemed a valid
    summons3
    8,e <e+ ?or 8imes re#orted t,e ne+s regarding t,e 7inal )onsent Judgment in t,is case as
    follo+sG
    In a r+lin" &ha& 'ree$ Bank o' A%eri,a 'ro% so%e le"al pro.le%s, a 'e$eral j+$"e /ro&e on Bon$a*
    &ha& he ha$ rel+,&an&l* approve$ a R390 %illion se&&le%en& /i&h &he )e,+ri&ies an$ <x,han"e
    -o%%issionP >This ,o+r&, /hile shakin" i&s hea$, "ran&s &he ).<.-.Ms %o&ion an$ approves &he
    propose$ ,onsen& j+$"%en&,? &he j+$"e /ro&e.
    'nde#endent investigation of events surrounding t,e =%)-5errill Bync, merger by State of <e+
    ?or %ttorney @eneral %ndre+ )uomo +as summed u# in ,is %#ril -3! ->>* letter to t,e 2S
    )ongress3 %nalystsR re#orted follo+ing release of t,e letter and its attac,ments under ,eadlines suc,
    as SBet t,e )riminal 'ndictments =eginG Paulson! =ernane! Be+isR! S=igger 8,an HatergatePR! and
    S)uomo 2nveils Paulson! =ernane! Be+is )ons#iracyR3 Ao+ever! in contrast +it, suc, analystsR
    o#inions! none of t,e #er#etrators suffered any material conseIuences so far3
    Judge Jed 1aoff! +,o #resided in t,e case! is considered one of t,e most e(#erienced and notable
    among 2S 4udges in matters #ertaining to securities! +,ite-collar crime! and raceteering3
    1egarding Judge Jed 1aoffRs conduct in t,e case at ,and! t,e Hall Street Journal Ba+ =log saidG
    2ako''Ms ,+rren&l* provin" hi%sel' &o .e, i' no&hin" else, +na'rai$ &o sin"le!han$e$l* &ake on so%e
    heav* /ei"h& ins&i&+&ions an$ &heir la/*ers.
    <umerous attorneys a##eared in t,e case! bot, for Plaintiff S.)! a government entity! and for
    Defendant =%)3 :ver -> <otices of %##earance a##ear in t,e P%).1 docet of t,e case3
    'n a Se#tember --! ->>* re#ort! t,e Has,ington Post Iuotes official statement by S.)G
    KE#Fe /ill vi"oro+sl* p+rs+e o+r ,har"es a"ains& Bank o' A%eri,a an$ &ake s&eps &o prove o+r ,ase
    in ,o+r&,K&he )<- sai$ in a s&a&e%en&. K#e /ill +se &he a$$i&ional $is,over* availa.le in &he li&i"a&ion
    &o '+r&her p+rs+e &he 'a,&s an$ $e&er%ine /he&her &o seek &he ,o+r&Ms per%ission &o .rin" a$$i&ional
    ,har"es in &his ,ase.K
    Court *ecords in Litigation of S(C v BAC
    8,e #rimary source of records +as t,roug, #ublic access to P%).1 records3 %dditionally! efforts
    +ere made to obtain missing records! +,ere access in P%).1 +as not available! t,roug, reIuests!
    +,ic, +ere for+arded to t,e office of t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! attorneys for S.) and =%) in t,e
    case! office of t,e ),air of S.)! office of =%) President! 7reedom of 'nformation %ct 97:'%)
    office of S.)! and t,e office of 7air 7und %dministrator3
    $u+lic Access to (lectronic Court *ecords
    %s +as t,e case in all ot,er 2S district courts! +,ic, +ere ins#ected! #ublic access to t,e
    aut,entication records 9<.7s) of t,e )ourt in P%).1 is denied3 C16D 7urt,ermore! at t,e 2S
    District )ourt! Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or! #ublic access to t,e )alendars of t,e )ourts is
    unreasonably limited3 %ccess is #ermitted only to t,e current seven days +indo+! and access to t,e
    Docet %ctivity 1e#ort is denied 9see belo+)3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    74/165 TOC:2
    %lt,oug, never stated in t,e *ules of Court of t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of <e+
    ?or! t,e evidence s,o+s t,at! as is t,e case in ot,er 2S courts! t,e <.7s +ere in fact deemed t,e
    aut,entication by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3 <o ot,er forms of aut,entication records! #ertaining to
    4udicial records 9minutes! orders! 4udgment) +ere found in t,e P%).1 docet3 8,e <.7 of t,e 2S
    District )ourt! Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or! as to form! +as identical to t,e <.7! as discovered in
    ot,er 2S courts3 8,e <.7 form! in and of itself! s,ould be considered invalid as a certificate3 't
    includes no certification statement! /' certifyU0! it never invoes t,e aut,ority of t,e )ler of t,e
    )ourt! it never names t,e #erson! +,o issued it! and it includes neit,er a gra#,ic ,and-signature! nor
    a valid digital signature of an aut,ori"ed individual! affi(ed as a symbol of intent to tae
    res#onsibility3 'nstead! it only includes a mac,ine generated! encry#ted c,ecsum string3
    %lt,oug, t,e Federal *ules of Civil $rocedure #rescribe t,e doceting of t,e summons as issued by
    t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! and t,e minutes of t,e #roceedings! t,ese records +ere missing from
    P%).1 docet of t,e case at ,and3
    $u+lic Access to *ecords from .ther Sources
    1eIuests for co#ies of t,e missing litigation records! +,ic, +ere for+arded to t,e office of t,e
    )ler of t,e )ourt! to attorneys for #arties in t,e case! to t,e office of S.) ),air! and to t,e office
    of President of =%)! +ere all denied3
    .ventually! only one <.7 +as obtained from t,e office of t,e 7air 7und %dministrator3 %ccess to
    t,e ot,er <.7s +as denied by t,e same office +it, no e(#lanation at all3
    8,e summons! as issued by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt! +as eventually obtained in res#onse to a
    7reedom of 'nformation %ct 97:'%) reIuest3 Ao+ever! t,e same office failed to #roduce t,e
    missing records of t,e <.7s in t,is case3
    $AC(* and C'/(CF) I- Systems of the US Courts
    8,e case of S.) v =an of %merica documents t,e critical effect of P%).1 and )56.)7! t,e
    information systems of t,e 2S courts relative to integrity of 2S court records and integrity of t,e
    2S courts! or lac t,ereof3
    )onditions t,at today #revail in t,e 2S courts stand in star contrast +it, t,e la+s enacted by 2S
    )ongress! Presidential Directives! 1egulations! and a##lications! +,ic, ,ave been #resumably
    im#lemented for aut,entication and validation of e-government in t,e 2nited States3 C-4! -5D
    Deficiencies in t,e design and o#eration of P%).1 and )56.)7 +ere #reviously noted in re#orts!
    +,ic, +ere #ublis,ed in a com#uter science and in a legal 4ournals3 C-6! -7D 8,e re#ort in t,e
    National La 7ournal documented t,e a##arent falsification of records in anot,er landmar case M
    t,e ,abeas cor#us #etition of a @uantanamo detainee in t,e 2S District )ourt in Has,ington D)3
    Suc, conduct s,ould ,ave been #revented! or s,ould ,ave triggered alerts in any valid court
    information system3
    'issing Court *ecords A Cardinal Sign of 7udicial Corruption.
    2nited <ations re#orts on /Strengt,ening Judicial 'ntegrity0 advocate t,e im#lementation of
    com#uteri"ed information systems in t,e courts! as a tool for en,ancement of trans#arency and
    integrity of t,e courts3
    Ao+ever! t,e same 2nited <ations re#orts list missing court records as a cardinal sign of 4udicial
    corru#tion3 'n t,e case of P%).1 and )56.)7! t,e im#lementation of invalid information systems
    in t,e courts! enables t,e conduct of litigation! +,ere critical records are #ermanently missing! as
    demonstrated in t,e current re#ort3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    75/165 TOC:2
    Ban&ing *egulation
    )onduct of t,e S.)! =%)! and t,e 2S District )ourt in S(C v BAC! as documented in t,e current
    re#ort! stands contrary to ongoing efforts by t,e 2S )ongress! and re#eated statements by t,e 2S
    @overnment regarding efforts to restore t,e integrity of =aning 1egulation in t,e 2nited States!
    and en,ance t,e accountability of directors! e(ecutives! accountants! and attorneys! acting on be,alf
    of cor#orations3 'n t,e +ae of t,e .nron scandal! t,e 2S )ongress #assed t,e Sar+anes0.4ley
    Act 9->>-)3 'n t,e current financial crisis! t,e 2S )ongress #assed t,e Fraud (nforcement and
    *ecovery Act 9->>*)3 S.) and ot,er =aning 1egulators routinely a##ear before t,e 2S )ongress
    and #rovide testimonies! +,ic, claim t,at integrity of =aning 1egulation in t,e 2nited State ,as
    been restored3
    8,e 2S @overnment +as also #ressured by t,e international community! +,ic, +as seriously
    ,armed by t,e ongoing financial crisis! to tae corrective measures! consistent +it, t,e 2S
    @overnmentRs duties and obligations in international treaties and accords3
    'n t,at conte(t! t,e litigation of S(C v BAC in t,e 2S )ourt! Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or!
    revie+ed in t,e current re#ort! +as re#orted as t,e ,allmar of enforcement of =aning 1egulation
    in t,e ongoing financial crisis3
    'n contrast! revie+ of t,e case at ,and documents litigation of S(C v BAC as merely a #retense3 't
    also documents t,e tig,t lin bet+een integrity in t,e 2S courts! or lac t,ereof! and t,e failure of
    2S =aning 1egulation3 8,e case as a +,ole can be vie+ed as a /s,o+ trial0! intended to falsely
    re#resent t,e #erce#tion of effective =aning 1egulation and enforcement of t,e la+3
    i) /c8arr v 8eriatric Facilities of Cape Code, %nc et al
    ?igure 416 Ja,kson @e/is, one o' &he lar"es& la.or la/ 'ir%s in &he (), en"a"e$ in ,on$+,& o' &he 'ra+$
    a"ains& a $isa.le$ n+rse in &he ,o+r& o' () J+$"e Deor"e A OLTool in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r& in !c*arry v
    *eriatric "acility of Cape Co#e, $nc et al/
    'n 'cGarry v Geriatric Facilities of Cape Code) Inc et al 91G1>-cv-11343) in t,e 2S District )ourt!
    5assac,usetts! Baura 5c@arry! a disabled nurse! filed com#laint #ursuant to t,e Americans ith
    !isa+ilities Act! 4- 2S) J1-1$9-)! claiming discrimination based on disability! related to t,e
    refusal of Defendants to intervie+ ,er for an o#en #osition of full-time %ssistant Director of
    <ursing3 C
    cl(((i
    D
    Conduct of Simulated Litigation
    8,e evidence! detailed belo+! documents t,at Plaintiff Baura 5c@arry! a disabled %merican! +,o
    attem#ted to #rotect ,er rig,ts under t,e la+ of t,e 2nited States! +as denied access to an ,onest
    court3 'nstead! t,roug, collusion of 4udges! court #ersonnel! and attorneys for t,e Defendants! s,e
    +as sub4ected to simulated litigationG
    8,e records include simulated minutes! orders! and electronic aut,entication records 9<.7s M
    <otices of .lectronic 7iling)3
    Judge :R8ool a##eared in t,e case +it, no valid %ssignment :rder 9no docet number)3 :f note!
    Judge :R8ool #resided in cases #ertaining to corru#tion of t,e =oston 4ustice system! and entered
    ,ars, sentences on t,ose convicted3 Judge :R8ool is also advertised as an e(#ert on electronic
    court tec,nology3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    76/165 TOC:2
    5agistrate Soroin a##eared in t,e case +it, no valid 1eferral :rder 9no docet number)3
    Pro Se Plaintiff 5c@arry in #art reali"ed t,at t,e litigation +as simulated! and a##roac,ed ),ief
    Judge 5ar B Holf in t,is regard 9see letter! +it, litigation records! CiD)3 8,ere is no evidence of
    corrective actions by t,e ),ief Judge3 :f note! ),ief Judge Holf served as De#uty 2S %ttorney
    and +as c,ief of t,e Public )orru#tion 2nit from 1*$1 to 1*$53
    %ut,ority of t,e attorneys for Defendants 9Jacson Be+is BBP! a large national la+ firm!
    s#eciali"ing in labor6em#loyment la+) as %ttorneys of 1ecord! is yet to be establis,ed3 5ost
    liely t,ey falsely a##eared +it, no aut,ority at allG <o record a##ears in t,e docet! +,ere t,ey
    signed as %ttorneys of 1ecordL t,ey never filed any declaration by any of t,e Defendants! and
    t,e %ns+er 9Dt Q-1) is not verified3 CivD Suc, conduct is ty#ical of outside attorneys! a##earing
    +it, no aut,ority as counsel of record! and +it, &no communication +it, client clause& - a fraud
    met,od detailed in )ase of =orro+er Hilliam Parsley 9see section acs)3
    :f #articular concern is t,e disa##earance from t,e P%).1 docet! +it, no evidence of due
    #rocess! of t,e record of PlaintiffEs 5otion for )ontem#t 9Dt Q$5)! +,ic, +as duly filed and
    doceted 9see t,e 5otion and t,e <.7 +it, litigation records)3
    Due aut,ority of court #ersonnel! +,o issued summons and /entered0 minutes and orders! as
    De#uty )lers! remains to be establis,ed3
    I- systems ere employed for the conduct of simulated litigation
    '8 systems of t,e 2S )ourtsG P%).1 and )56.)7 +ere em#loyed in t,is case for t,e conduct of
    simulated litigation3 8,e #ractice in common in t,e 2S courts! often to benefit financial
    institutions! cor#orations and government officials! and to de#rive individuals of t,eir la+ful rig,ts3
    8,e #ractice involves t,e issuance of electronic records! +,ic, are not deemed valid and effectual
    records by t,e courts t,emselves! but +,ic, t,e victims are led to believe are valid court records3
    8,e P%).1 docet in t,is case includes numerous records t,at are unaut,enticated! and are deemed
    by t,e 2S courts t,emselves as void3 8,e #ublic! and most often pro se litigants as +ell! cannot
    distinguis, bet+een valid and void court records!since #ublic access to t,e <.7s - t,e clerRs
    electronic aut,entication records3
    8,e case at ,and is uniIue! since Pro Se Plaintiff Baura 5c@arry +as #ermitted access to )56.)7!
    and t,erefore! most of t,e <.7s of 4udicial and clerical record in t,is case are included among t,e
    records! lined belo+3
    8,erefore! t,e case #rovides uniIue documentation ,o+ t,e '8 systems of t,e 2S courts! P%).1
    and )56.)7! are em#loyed for a large-scale fraud! +,ic, undermines t,e integrity of t,e 2S courts
    and t,e Auman 1ig,ts of t,e Peo#le of t,e 2nited States3
    8,e conduct of simulated litigation! t,roug, t,e collusion of large la+ firms! 4udges! and court
    #ersonnel s,ould be deemed organi"ed state crime3
    7udges and Court
    8,e 2S District )ourt! 5assac,usetts! is t,e oldest 2S District )ourt in t,e 2nited States! as
    #roudly stated on t,e )ourtRs +eb site3
    ),ief Judge 5ar B Holf 9 is a graduate of ?ale )ollege and Aarvard Ba+ Sc,ool3 Ae +as
    a##ointed a De#uty 23S3 %ttorney and +as c,ief of t,e Public )orru#tion 2nit from 1*$1 to
    1*$53 Holf +as a lecturer at Aarvard Ba+ Sc,ool from 1*$* to 1**>! and a lecturer at =oston
    )ollege Ba+ Sc,ool in 1**-3
    2S Judge @eorge % :R8ool - t,e case is listed as /assigned0 to 2S Judge @eorge % :R8ool! a
    graduate of =oston )ollege and Aarvard Ba+ Sc,ool3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    77/165 TOC:2
    2S 5agistrate Beo 8 Soroin - t,e case is listed as /referred0 to 2S 5agistrate Beo 8 Soroin! a
    ?ale )ollege and )olumbia Ba+ Sc,ool graduate3
    8,e names of numerous individuals! members of t,e )ourtRs staff a##ear in t,e court records in
    t,e case3 8,eir e(act aut,orities remain to be determined3
    %ttorneys for Defendants Partner @uy P3 8ully and %ssociate =rian ),ilds! from t,e =oston
    office of t,e la+ firm of Jacson Be+is BBP! a##eared in t,e case and filed #a#ers on be,alf of
    Defendants3
    Jacson Be+is BBP 9 is a large national la+ firm! +it, over 65> attorneys in 46 offices
    nation+ide! s#eciali"ing in labor and em#loyment la+3 8,e =oston office 5anaging Partner
    %ndre+ Picett is a graduate of Princeton )ollege and )ornell Ba+ Sc,ool3
    :verall t,e cast of c,aracters in t,is case a##ears as an 'vy Beague racet3
    -) /aid of the /ist Corporation et al v 5illiam 5indsor
    ?igure 4B6 #illia% #in$sor, 'or%erl* a s+,,ess'+l .+siness person, () J+$"e Orin$a <vans, () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, ;or&hern Dis&ri,& o' Deor"ia.
    'aid of the 'ist Corporation et al v #illiam #indsor 91G>6-cv->>714) originated in a business
    dis#ute3 'n t,e course of t,e litigation! Hilliam Hindsor! formerly a successful businessman! +as
    stri##ed of most of ,is assets! in +,at is o#ined as simulated litigation3 <umerous attem#ts to gain
    access to 4ustice in t,e courts of a##eals and t,e Su#reme )ourt all failed3 5oreover! once Hilliam
    Hindsor became an anti-4udicial corru#tion activist! it a##ears t,at ,e +as targeted for retaliation by
    t,e various courts3
    General Notes
    )ase Summary and Docet as a +,oleG C
    cl(((ii
    D
    a3 <o name and aut,ority is listed as to t,e individuals +,o entered notations and records in t,e
    Docet3
    b3 %ll %ttestation records 9<.7s - <otices of .lectronic 7iling) by t,e )ler of t,e 2S District
    )ourt +ere e(cluded from t,e Docet3
    Public %ccess to t,e Judgment 'nde( of t,e )ourt is denied3 8,e 2S District )ourt! <ort,ern
    District of @eorgia! differs in t,is matter from most 2S District )ourts! +,ic, +ere e(amined3 't
    is liely t,at u#on investigation! it +ould be discovered t,at t,e <ort,ern District of @eorgia
    routinely engages in raceteering relative to false #retense of entry of 4udgments in litigation of
    cases in t,e )ourt
    Pending Statuses 1e#ort s,o+sG &<o statuses #ending! <o statuses terminated3&
    1elated 8ransactions 1e#ort s,o+s t,e )om#laint not terminated! even after t,e case is listed in
    an unnumbered docet entry as &terminated&3
    Hindsor +as never served any <.7s of 4udicial records in ,is case! and ,is reIuest to ins#ect
    and to co#y t,e <.7s +as denied3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    78/165 TOC:2
    Specific !oc&et *ecords5
    +/t @none ( <o %ssignment :rder for Judge J :+en 7orrester a##ears in t,e Docet
    +/t @AA6 - 5arc, -*! ->>6 1ecusal of Judge :+en and 1eassignment of Judge .vansG
    a3 <o 1eassignment :rder for Judge :rinda D .vans a##ears in t,e docet3
    b3 8,e doceting te(t states reassignment! but t,e record itself includes not,ing to t,at effect3
    +/t @none ( 8,e Hrit of .(ecution +as never doceted! and no docet number +as designated3
    8,erefore! no <.7 could #ossibly be issued on suc, docet notation 9after Dct Q753)
    0450C58030 #2IT o' <xe,+&ion iss+e$ in &he a%o+n& o' R3C8,377.I7 a"ains& #illia% B. #in$sor.
    Ori"inal %aile$ &o -arl An$erson via ,er&i'ie$ %ail. 4ank6 4<n&ere$: 0450C580306
    +/t @none - %ll certificates by t,e De#uty )lers! consistently! +ere not doceted! and no docet
    numbers +ere designated to t,em3 8,erefore! no <.7s could #ossibly be issued on t,e certificates3
    'n ot,er +ords - none of t,e records! notated as certified! +as in fact certified3 :ver 3> suc,
    records a##ear in t,e docet3
    +/t @none - %ll certificates! +,ic, +ere filed by Defendant Hindsor! +ere lie+ise not doceted!
    and no docet numbers +ere assigned to t,em3 'n ot,er +ords! none of t,e records! noted as
    certified! +as in fact certified3 % total of 6 suc, records a##ear in t,e docet3
    Conclusions
    7or all t,e reasons listed above! t,e P%).1 records and t,e docet of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    <ort,ern District of @eorgia in 'aid of the 'ist v #indsor as a +,ole cannot be deemed valid
    court records3
    % P%).1 docet +as meticulously constructed! including ,undreds of #a#ers! to misleadingly
    a##ear as a valid docet of t,e 2S District )ourt3
    Defendant Hindsor +as t,erefore ased to obtain co#ies of t,e <.7s of ey docet records and a
    co#y of t Judgment 'nde(! in order to conclusively establis, +,et,er t,e docet in t,is case in
    fact is 7raud on t,e )ourt3
    Suc, conduct in t,e 2S District )ourt +as #atroni"ed by t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! 11t, )ircuit
    and t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt in related cases3 C
    cl(((iii
    D
    !) 2/L Capital v Republic of $rgentina
    ?igure 4C6 )&ree& s,ene 'ro% &he Ar"en&inian e,ono%i, ,ollapse o' 8003, () J+$"e Tho%as Driesa.
    N'L Capital v *epu+lic of Argentina 91G>$-cv->6*7$) in t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern District of
    <e+ ?or! originates in t,e default of t,e 1e#ublic of %rgentina on sovereign debt3 8,e state of
    affairs! resulting from Judge @riesa! +as described as follo+sG
    The ,o+n&$o/n s&ar&e$ on J+ne 3A&h, /hen &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es anno+n,e$ &ha& i&
    /o+l$ no& "e& involve$ in Ar"en&inaMs .a&&le /i&h ;B@ -api&al, a he$"e '+n$ &ha& pi,ke$ +p ,heap $e.&
    a'&er Ar"en&inaMs 8003 $e'a+l& an$ has sin,e li&i"a&e$ 'or pa*%en& o' '+ll prin,ipal pl+s in&eres&. The
    $e,ision le'& in&a,& a r+lin" .* Tho%as Driesa, a ;e/ Hork $is&ri,&!,o+r& j+$"e, /hi,h .anne$ Ar"en&ina
    'ro% pa*in" &he ,re$i&ors /ho in 8009 an$ 8030 s/appe$ C3V o' $e'a+l&e$ $e.& 'or per'or%in"
    se,+ri&ies, i' &he ,o+n&r* $i$ no& also pa* ;B@ /ha& i& /an&s. E
    ,lxxxiv
    F
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    79/165 TOC:2
    % ne+ default of %rgentina is #oised to cause unem#loyment! ,ards,i#! and even ,unger for
    millions in %rgentina3 C
    cl(((v
    !
    cl(((vi
    D
    8,e 4urisdiction of t,e 2S )ourt in suc, matter is not at all clear! and %rgentina referred to t,e 2S
    4udge in t,is case as &im#erialist&3 C
    cl(((vii
    D 'ts attem#t to litigate t,e case in t,e 'nternational )ourt of
    Justice +as bloced by t,e 2nited States3
    %nd yet! even in a case of suc, #ro#ortions and suc, im#lications! t,ere is no +ay to ascertain t,at
    valid litigation +as conducted by t,e 2S District )ourt! rat,er t,an simulated litigation3
    1evie+ of t,e records in t,is case s,o+sG C
    cl(((viii
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    80/165 TOC:2
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    81/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 4D6 a) Do,ke& o' 0!% Capital v Repu(lic of Argentina USDC 07SD ! s+%%ons as iss+e$ .* &he
    ,lerk /as no& $o,ke&e$ /i&h &he -o%plain& 4Dk& O36, nei&her /as i& $o,ke&e$ /i&h &he A''i$avi& o' )ervi,e 4Dk&
    O46. $) ;o&i,e o' -ase Assi"n%en& &o J+$"e Driesa 4Dk& O96 is +nsi"ne$. As in all PA-<2 ,ases, p+.li,
    a,,ess &o &he ;<=s ! a+&hen&i,a&ion re,or$s ! is $enie$. The ,ase, /hi,h %a* ,a+se &he ,ollapse o' &he
    Ar"en&inian e,ono%*, is likel* &o 'ra+$ o' %e$ieval s&*le an$ propor&ions.
    +/t @none - <o summons +as doceted! eit,er as issued by t,e cler3
    +/t @AA# - Com$laint - +as doceted +it, no )ivil )over S,eet! reIuired by Civil Litigation
    'anual of t,e 7ederal Judicial )ouncil for o#ening a court file by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3 C
    cl(((i(
    D
    +/t @AA1 - Affi&avit of Service of Com$laint - +as doceted +it, no co#y of t,e Summons eit,er3
    't remains unclear from t,e %ffidavit! in +,at +ay t,e service of #rocess com#lied +it, $% &.'.
    (ode ) *+,%" which says-
    (a) )ervi,e in &he ,o+r&s o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es an$ o' &he )&a&es shall .e %a$e +pon a 'orei"n s&a&e or
    poli&i,al s+.$ivision o' a 'orei"n s&a&e:
    (1) .* $eliver* o' a ,op* o' &he s+%%ons an$ ,o%plain& in a,,or$an,e /i&h an* spe,ial arran"e%en&
    'or servi,e .e&/een &he plain&i'' an$ &he 'orei"n s&a&e or poli&i,al s+.$ivision7 or
    (2) i' no spe,ial arran"e%en& exis&s, .* $eliver* o' a ,op* o' &he s+%%ons an$ ,o%plain& in
    a,,or$an,e /i&h an appli,a.le in&erna&ional ,onven&ion on servi,e o' j+$i,ial $o,+%en&s7 or
    (3) i' servi,e ,anno& .e %a$e +n$er para"raphs 436 or 486, .* sen$in" a ,op* o' &he s+%%ons an$
    ,o%plain& an$ a no&i,e o' s+i&, &o"e&her /i&h a &ransla&ion o' ea,h in&o &he o''i,ial lan"+a"e o' &he
    'orei"n s&a&e, .* an* 'or% o' %ail re0+irin" a si"ne$ re,eip&, &o .e a$$resse$ an$ $ispa&,he$ .* &he
    ,lerk o' &he ,o+r& &o &he hea$ o' &he %inis&r* o' 'orei"n a''airs o' &he 'orei"n s&a&e ,on,erne$, or
    (4) i' servi,e ,anno& .e %a$e /i&hin 30 $a*s +n$er para"raph 436, .* sen$in" &/o ,opies o' &he
    s+%%ons an$ ,o%plain& an$ a no&i,e o' s+i&, &o"e&her /i&h a &ransla&ion o' ea,h in&o &he o''i,ial
    lan"+a"e o' &he 'orei"n s&a&e, .* an* 'or% o' %ail re0+irin" a si"ne$ re,eip&, &o .e a$$resse$ an$
    $ispa&,he$ .* &he ,lerk o' &he ,o+r& &o &he )e,re&ar* o' )&a&e in #ashin"&on, Dis&ri,& o' -ol+%.ia, &o
    &he a&&en&ion o' &he Dire,&or o' )pe,ial -ons+lar )ervi,esQan$ &he )e,re&ar* shall &rans%i& one ,op*
    o' &he papers &hro+"h $iplo%a&i, ,hannels &o &he 'orei"n s&a&e an$ shall sen$ &o &he ,lerk o' &he ,o+r&
    a ,er&i'ie$ ,op* o' &he $iplo%a&i, no&e in$i,a&in" /hen &he papers /ere &rans%i&&e$.
    As +se$ in &his s+.se,&ion, a >no&i,e o' s+i&? shall %ean a no&i,e a$$resse$ &o a 'orei"n s&a&e an$ in a
    'or% pres,ri.e$ .* &he )e,re&ar* o' )&a&e .* re"+la&ion.
    +/t @AA3 - Notice of Assignment to -u&ge Thomas Griesa - bears no valid signature of t,e )ler
    of t,e )ourt3 8,erefore! Judge @riesa +as #residing +it, no aut,ority at all3
    +/t @%1A' 141' 3#5' 300 - Or&ers an& -u&gment! issued by Judge @riesa bear no Seal of t,e
    )ourt or attestation by t,e )ler of t,e )ourt3
    +/t @141 - 7otion an& Or&er on 7otion by &<on-#arty& )itigrou# ,ave no foundation in 2S la+3
    <o 5otion to 'ntervene or 1eIuest for Beave to 7ile +ere filed by )itigrou#3
    @iven t,e +ides#read fraud in t,e 2S courts in cases related to baning 9see section .-3! T-3)! t,e
    case s,ould be deemed of dubious validity at best3 8,e case s,ould also be ,eld sus#ect! since
    already in ,is boo &@lobali"ation and 'ts Discontent&! none ot,er t,an 2S-based <obel #ri"e
    +inner Jose#, Stieglit" raised t,e sus#icion t,at t,e colla#se of t,e %rgentinian economy +as t,e
    ,andi+or of Stanley 7isc,er 9today <o - at t,e 7ederal 1eserve)! in ,is ca#acity as a senior officer
    of t,e 'nternational 5onetary 7und 9'57)! at t,e service of 2S agencies3 C
    c(c
    D
    <otice! o#ining fraud on t,e 1e#ublic of %rgentina in N'L Capital v -he *epu+lic of Argentiina
    +as given to t,e government of t,e 1e#ublic of %rgentina by t,e aut,or of instant submission! +it,
    co#ies to t,e governments of t,e @erman 7ederal 1e#ublic! t,e Peo#leEs 1e#ublic of ),ina! t,e
    1ussian 7ederation! and t,e 2nited States3 C
    c(ci
    D
    8,e <otice in #art saysG
    Joseph Zernik, PhD, herein opines &ha& 'ra+$ is .ein" ,o%%i&&e$ on &he people an$ &he 2ep+.li, o'
    Ar"en&ina .* &he () "overn%en& an$ i&s a"en,ies, &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/
    Hork, &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, 8n$ -ir,+i&, an$ &he () )+pre%e -o+r& in &he li&i"a&ion o' 0!%
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    82/165 TOC:2
    Capital v ?he Repu(lic of Argentina 43:0I!,v!0AC7I6 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o'
    ;e/ Hork.
    8,e notice also offers t,e government of t,e 1e#ublic of %rgentina additional ste#s to furrt,er
    document t,e fraudG
    0hat 'uld the Repu$li' ( Argentina d next,
    The 2ep+.li, o' Ar"en&ina ,o+l$ $ire,&l* 4no& &hro+"h &he la/!'ir% o' -lear* e& al6 a$$ress -lerk o'
    &he -o+r& 2+.* Graji,k o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork, an$ $e%an$:
    13 An a''i$avi& s&a&in" &ha& &he PA-<2 $o,ke& in 0!% Capital v Repu(lic of Argentina is a vali$ an$
    e''e,&+al $o,ke& o' &he -o+r&, /hi,h /as ,ons&r+,&e$ +n$er &he a+&hori&* o' &he -lerk o' &he
    -o+r& an$ in ,o%plian,e /i&h &he la/ o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es7
    -3 A ,op* o' &he )+%%ons, ,er&i'ie$ KTr+e -op* o' &he Ori"inalK .* &he -lerk o' &he -o+r&, an$
    33 -opies o' &he ;o&i,e o' Assi"n%en& an$ all Or$ers, J+$"%en&s an$ Ban$a&es, /hi,h appear in
    &he PA-<2 $o,ke&, &o"e&her /i&h &he respe,&ive ;<=s, ,er&i'ie$ KTr+e -op* o' &he Ori"inalK .*
    &he -lerk o' &he -o+r&.
    Base$ on experien,e /i&h several ,lerks o' &he () ,o+r&s, in,l+$in" -lerk 2+.* Graji,k, i& is
    +nlikel* &ha& s+,h $e%an$s .* &he 2ep+.li, o' Ar"en&ina /o+l$ .e hones&l* a$$resse$.
    =ail+re &o a$$ress s+,h $e%an$s sho+l$ .e ,onsi$ere$ a$$i&ional evi$en,e o' &he 'ra+$ .ein"
    ,o%%i&&e$ in &his ,ase.
    In ,ase an* o' &he a.ove re'eren,e$ re,or$s are o.&aine$ 'ro% -lerk 2+.* Graji,k, &he* are likel*
    &o provi$e a$$i&ional evi$en,e o' &he 'ra+$ in ,on$+,& o' &he ,ase.
    A$$i&ionall*, in ,ase an* s+,h re,or$s are o.&aine$ 'ro% -lerk 2+.* Graji,k, &he* sho+l$ .e '+r&her
    'or/ar$e$ &o &he O''i,e o' A+&hen&i,a&ions, () Depar&%en& o' )&a&e, /i&h a re0+es& 'or Apos&ille
    -er&i'i,a&es, p+rs+an& &o &he Hague Apostille Convention 43CA36.
    I& is +nlikel* &ha& &he () Depar&%en& o' )&a&e /o+l$ provi$e s+,h Apos&ille -er&i'i,a&es 'or &he a.ove
    re'eren,e$ re,or$s. I' i& $oes, i& /o+l$ provi$e a$$i&ional evi$en,e o' ,ri%inali&* .* &he ()
    "overn%en&.
    l) Le(is et al v 8leason et al
    ?igure 496 () J+$"e -hris&ine B. Ar"+ello, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Dis&ri,& o' -oloar$o
    'n Leis et al v. Gleason et al 91G1>-cv->1$5>) in t,e 2S District )ourt! )olorado! @erald Be+is
    and %lison 5aynard! in #ro se! filed com#laint #ursuant to
    !eprivation of *ights under the Color of La 4- 2S) J1*$3 in t,e 2S District )ourt! )olorado!
    against Jo,n @leason! )ounsel at t,e )olorado Su#reme )ourt :ffice of %ttorney 1egulation and
    ot,ers! including! but not limited to! Justices of t,e )olorado Su#reme )ourt Hilliam Bucero! 5ary
    5ullarey! @regory J3 Aobbs! Jr3 ! and 5ic,ael =ender3 8,e matter arose from disci#linary actions
    taen against 5aynard and ,er former client Be+is! alleged by t,e Plaintiffs as de#rivation of rig,ts
    and retaliation for e(#osing corru#tion in t,e State of )olorado courts3
    8,e 2S District )ourt docet lists 2S Judge ),ristine 53 %rguello as Presiding Judge in t,e case3
    %ccording to t,e Denver Post! Judge %rguello +as set in ->>* for a 2S Su#reme )ourt Justice
    #osition3 Ci(D
    2S 5agistrate 5ic,ael J3 Hatanabe is listed as #residing by reference in t,e case3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    83/165 TOC:2
    Public access to t,e <.7s 9<otices of .lectronic 7iling) is denied in P%).1 9t,e )ourtRs electronic
    #ublic access system)3 8,e <.7s today are deemed by t,e 2S courts as t,e re#lacement of
    certificates by t,e )ler3
    8,erefore! t,e e(amination belo+ is limited to t,e records! +,ic, are accessible in P%).13 C
    c(cii
    D
    -he $AC(* !oc&et *eport and !oc&et *ecords
    +/t @A# ( )om#laintG 8,e docet te(t notesG /Summons 'ssued03 Ao+ever! t,e summonses as
    issued by t,e )ler +ere not doceted! in alleged violation of t,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure!
    +,ic, reIuire doceting of t,e summonses3
    8,e summonses are not listed even as an attac,ment3 8,erefore! t,ere could not #ossibly be a valid
    <.7 for t,e summonses as issued by cler3 8,erefore! t,e summonses as issued by t,e )ler s,ould
    be deemed invalid3
    +/t @A0 - Better 1eassigning )aseG 8,e Better fails to include valid and effectual language suc, as
    /:rder0 or /<otice03 'nstead! it is /advised0 t,at t,e case is reassigned3 5oreover! t,e Better
    s#ecifically refers to t,e <otice of .lectronic 7iling 9<.7) as integral #art of t,e Better3 Ao+ever!
    #ublic access to t,e <.7 is denied3 'n ot,er cases in t,e 2S district courts! %ssignment :rders +ere
    issued +it, invalid <.7s3 8,erefore! t,ere is no +ay to establis, +,et,er t,ere is valid
    reassignment in t,e cas for Judge %rguello3 C(D 8,e Better s,ould be deemed vague and ambiguous
    at best3
    +/t @A1 - :rder 1eferring )ase to 5agistrate Judge Kat,leen 53 8afoyaG %s noted in t,e docet! no
    record is lined to t,e doceting te(t /8.;8 :<B? .<81? - <: D:)25.<8 %88%)A.D03 %t
    t,e same time! t,e docet te(t refers to an /:1D.10 /=y Judge ),ristine 53 %rguello03 Since t,e
    docet itself states t,at no record +as doceted! it could not #ossibly be certified by Judge %rguello3
    8,erefore! it s,ould be deemed invalid docet notation3
    +/t @A4 - Better 1eassigning )ase to 5agistrate Judge 5ic,ael J3 HatanabeG See Dt Q>3! above3
    +/t @#A - 5otion for .(tension of 8ime to file returns of serviceG 8,e 5otion is listed in t,e
    docet3 Ao+ever! it is missing from t,e 1elated 8ransactions 1e#ort3
    +/t @#% - Summons 1eturned .(ecuted as to Nictor =oogG 8,e e(ecuted summons +as doceted!
    and t,erefore t,e summons as issued can be e(aminedG 8,e summons as issued by )ler include an
    invalid legal signature bo(G <o name of an individual De#uty )ler a##ears under t,e signature
    line3 't s,ould also be noted t,at filing of t,e summons as e(ecuted bears t,e /7'B.D0 stam#! dated
    /Se#tember -3! ->1>03 Ao+ever! t,e name and t,e ,and signature of an individual De#uty )ler
    are missing from t,e stam#3 't s,ould be furt,er noted t,at t,e 1elated 8ransactions 1e#ort failed to
    list t,e issuance of summons! not even as te(t related to t,e )om#laint 9Dt Q>1)3 8,e Summonses!
    as e(ecuted 9Dt Q11-3-) are not listed as related to any transaction! and service of t,e summonses
    is not listed as /terminated03
    +/t @#; ( 5emorandum regarding 1> 5otion for .(tension of 8imeG 8,ere is no record lined to
    t,e notation /8.;8 :<B? .<81? - <: D:)25.<8 %88%)A.D03 8,erefore! t,ere is no
    certification of t,e 5emorandum by Judge %rguello3 't s,ould also be noted t,at Dt Q1*! lie t,at
    5otion 9Dt Q1>) itself! ,as no designated /bo(0 in t,e 1elated 8ransactions 1e#ort3 8,erefore! no
    transaction +as o#ened! and no transaction +as terminated3
    +/t @06 - 5inutesG <o name of a De#uty )ler a##ears in t,e 5inutes3 8,erefore! t,e record
    cannot be deemed a valid record of 5inutes of t,e 2S District )ourt3 8,e 5inutes #ur#ort to rule
    on t,e 5otion 9Dt Q1>)3 Ao+ever! t,e 5otion +as never listed as an o#en transaction in t,e
    1elated 8ransactions 1e#ort3
    +/t @10 - 5emorandum regarding 4- 5otionG See Dt Q1*! above3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    84/165 TOC:2
    +/t @16 - 5emorandum regarding 47 5otionG Ditto3
    +/t @1; - :rder granting 47 State DefendantsE 5otion for .nlargement of 8ime3 7alse doceting
    te(t3 8,e lined record is titled 5inutes! and s,ould be deemed invalid court record! see Dt Q3$!
    above3
    +/t @33 - 5emorandum regarding 54 5otionG See Dt Q1*! above3
    +/t @4% - )ertificate of Service by 5ail by )lerG %bsent a valid <.7! t,e docet notation cannot
    be deemed a valid court record3
    +/t @41 - 5emorandum 1egarding 63 5otionG See Dt Q1*! above3
    +/t @45 - 5inute :rder granting 63 State DefendantsE 5otion to Stay DiscoveryG See Dt Q3$!
    above3
    +/t @5# - 5emorandum 1egarding 7> 5otionG See Dt Q1*! above3
    +/t @56 - :rder granting in #art and denying in #art 76 5otionG Ditto3
    +/t @6; - 5emorandum 1egarding $$ 5otionG Ditto3
    +/t @;# - 5inutesG See Dt Q3$! above3
    +/t @;0 - 5emorandum 1egarding *4 5otionG See Dt Q1*! above3
    +/t @#A% - 5emorandum 1egarding 1>> 5otionG Ditto3
    +/t @#A1 - 5inute :rder 1egarding 5otion for .ntry :f DefaultG See Dt Q3$! above3
    *elated $AC(* *ecords
    1elated 8ransactions 1e#ortG %s noted in a)! above! t,e 1elated 8ransactions 1e#ort includes
    invalid or missing entries for multi#le records3
    Pending Statuses 1e#ortG 8,e 1e#ort statesG
    There Are ;o Pen$in" )&a&+s 2e,or$s =or This -ase.
    ;o s&a&+ses have .een &er%ina&e$ 'or &his ,ase.
    Conclusions
    8,e records! +,ic, +ere e(amined in Leis et al v. Gleason et al 91G1>-cv->1$5>)! are incom#lete3
    Public access is denied in t,e P%).1 docets to t,e <.7s 9<otices of .lectronic 7iling)! +,ic, are
    deemed today by t,e 2S district courts t,e electronic certificates of aut,entication6attestation by t,e
    )ler3
    'n case t,e Plaintiffs ,ave in t,eir #ossession co#ies of t,e <.7s! it is recommended t,at t,ey
    #rovide co#ies of t,e <.7s #ertaining to t,e records! docet numbers of +,ic, are listed above3 'n
    case Plaintiff ,ad no access to )56.)7 so far! and got no electronic notices! it is ,ig,ly
    recommended t,at t,ey mae efforts and #ress to gain access to t,e <.7s! follo+ing ste#s! +,ic,
    are outlined in t,e lin belo+3 C(iD
    1egardless of t,e missing <.7s! sufficient evidence is found in t,e docet and related records of
    Leis et al v. Gleason et al 91G1>-cv->1$5>) as detailed in ii3! above! of notations! stating t,e entry
    of records by individuals! +,ose names and aut,ority are not s#elled out in t,e P%).1 docet!
    #ertaining to 4udicial and clerical records! +,ic, are #atently invalid court records3
    8,erefore! t,e Docet 1e#ort of Leis et al v. Gleason et al 91G1>-cv->1$5>) is false
    and deliberately misleading! meticulously constructed to convey t,e #erce#tion of valid litigation!
    +,ere in fact t,e evidence indicates t,at t,e litigation +as and is deliberately invalid from its
    commencement3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    85/165 TOC:2
    m) Log Cabin Republicans v ,S$ et al
    ?igure 106 $n %og Ca(in Repu(licans v USA et al, J+$"e Nir"inia Phillips, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,&
    o' -ali'ornia, ,on$+,&e$ 'or %an* %on&hs 'ra+$ on &he ,o+r& in a %a&&er &ha& o,,+pie$ &he () Presi$en&, &he
    () -on"ress, &he () Ar%e$ =or,es, an$ &he () p+.li,, an$ /hi,h /as &he ,en&er o' %e$ia a&&en&ion.
    Log Ca+in *epu+licans v United States of America et al 9-G>4-cv->$4-5) in t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia c,allenged President )lintonEs &DonEt %s DonEt 8ell& #olicy regarding
    t,e service of gay #ersons in t,e 2S armed forces3
    8,e case is uniIue! since Plaintiffs! Bog )abin 1e#ublicans retained a baning la+ firm! +,ic,
    em#loyed 7raud u#on t,e )ourt met,ods in order to secure )ivil and )onstitutional 1ig,ts in a case
    t,at attracted substantial national and international attention3
    8,e P%).1 docet and records >
    cxciii
    ? of t,e case made it evident all along t,at t,e case in t,e 2S
    District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia under Judge Nirginia P,illi#s and )ler 8erry <afisi!
    amounted to 7raud on t,e )ourtG
    2S Judges @eorge Sc,iavelli and Nirginia P,illi#s a##eared as Presiding Judges in t,e case! bot,
    +it, no %ssignment :rders3 %bsent %ssignment :rder in a s#ecific case! a 2S 4udge ,as no
    aut,ority to ad4udicate in t,e matter3
    'n ->>4 Judge Sc,iavelli issued a 4udgment in t,e case! in favor of t,e 2nited States3 8,e
    4udgment +as listed in t,e P%).1 docet as /entered0! and +as listed in t,e Judgment 'nde( of
    t,e )ourt3
    )onseIuently! t,e case +as deemed /closed0 by court staff3 Ao+ever! access to t,e certification
    of t,e ->>4 4udgment is denied3
    8,e ->>4 Judge Sc,iavelli /Judgment0 +as never overturned t,roug, an a##eal! or any ot,er
    4udicial #roceeding3
    'n ->1> Judge P,illi#s a##eared in t,e case and issued t,e o##osing 4udgment! in favor of t,e
    Bog )abin 1e#ublicans3 8,e ->1> 4udgment +as again listed in t,e docet as /entered0! but +as
    not listed in t,e Judgment 'nde( of t,e )ourt3 %ccess to t,e certification of t,e ->>4 4udgment is
    denied as +ell3
    )ler of t,e District )ourt 8erry <afisi ,ad #reviously denied access to t,ese records! in #atent
    disregard of 7irst %mendment and )ommon Ba+ rig,ts to access court records3
    7reedom of 'nformation res#onse by t,e 2S De#artment of Justice +as substandard! yet it #rovided
    t,e definitive evidence of t,e conduct of simulated litigation in t,e 2S District )ourt! Sout,ern
    District of )aliforniaGC
    c(civ
    D
    % simulated summons record! missing t,e seal of t,e court! reIuired by 2S la+3 C
    c(cv
    D
    % simulated! invalid aut,entication record 9<.7) for t,e :ctober ->1> Judgment by Judge
    Nirginia P,illi#s! missing t,e .lectronic Document Stam#! reIuired by t,e @eneral :rder >$->-
    of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3 C
    c(cvi
    D
    8,e 7:'% res#onse +as also notable in t,e record t,at it failed to #rovideG
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    86/165 TOC:2
    %ssignment :rder for Judge @eorge Sc,iavelli
    %ssignment :rder for Judge Nirginia P,illi#s
    %ut,entication records 9<.7s) for various 5inutes and :rders by eit,er Judges3
    Suc, 7raud on t,e 2S )ourts from coast to coast ,as been ty#ically reserved for cases! +,ere t,e
    civil rig,ts of individuals are abused to benefit bans! large cor#orations! and corru#t government
    officials3 %##arently! Bog )abin 1e#ublicans got +ealt,y and influential enoug, to #urc,ase 7raud
    on t,e )ourt t,roug, t,e services of a large baning la+ firm - )ase O H,ite! BBP3 8,e case of
    Bog )abin 1e#ublicans is t,e first to document 7raud on t,e )ourt for t,e #rotection of civil
    rig,ts333
    Judge Nirginia P,illi#s is one of a series of )alifornia and 2S 4udges! +,o refused to ans+er on
    reIuests to disclose financial benefits to t,em! if any! by =an :f %merica! +,ile continuing to
    engage in 7raud on t,e )ourt in cases involving =an :f %merica3 >
    cxcvii
    ?
    7raud on t,e )ourts is ty#ically reserved for cases! +,ere t,e civil rig,ts of individuals are abused
    to benefit bans! large cor#orations! and corru#t government officials3 8,e case of Bog )abin
    1e#ublicans is t,e first to document t,e same for t,e #rotection of civil rig,ts3
    n) Log Cabin Republicans in the ,S Court of $ppeals, :th Circuit
    ?igure 116 %og Ca(in Repu(licans v USA et al, a lan$%ark ,ase o' na&ional si"ni'i,an,e, /as s+.je,&e$ &o
    si%+la&e$ appeal pro,e$+res in &he C&h -ir,+i& -o+r& o' Appeals +n$er J+$"es #illia% -an.*, Jr, <$/ar$
    @eav*, Ar&h+r @ Alar,on, Diar%+i$ = OL),annlain, Barr* D )ilver%an,
    =ot, #arties to t,e litigation of Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia a##ealed t,e Judge Nirginia P,illi#s void! simulated Judgment3 8,e a##eal in
    t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! is of #articular interest! since bot, #arties and t,e )ourt of
    %##eals continued t,e simulated a##eal #rocess! even after being reliably informed of t,e invalidity
    of t,e Judgment! from +,ic, t,e a##eal +as taen3 C
    c(cviii
    D
    8,e 2S )ourt of %##eals ,olds 4urisdiction to conduct a##eals only from valid and effectual!
    certified 4udgments! not from void ones3 Since t,e records of case in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia +ere #atently invalid! t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! ,ad no
    4urisdiction in t,e a##eal in Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al.
    %ccordingly! notice +as served on counsel for bot, #arties in t,e a##eal - Bog )abin 1e#ublicans
    and t,e 2S3 C
    c(ci(
    D 8,e notice #rovided a co#y of reIuest for investigation! and if a##ro#riate M
    im#eac,ment #roceedings - against )ler of t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi! #ertaining to matters including!
    but not limited to Log Ca+in *epu+licans v United States of America et al 9-G>4-cv->$4-5) - alleged
    as #retense litigation and 7raud on t,e )ourts3
    8,e notice stated t,at t,e evidence in t,e matter s,o+ed t,at bot, 4udgments #ublis,ed in t,e case!
    one in favor of t,e 2nited States - dismissing t,e #etition for in4unction! and t,e ot,er in favor of
    t,e Bog )abin 1e#ublicans - granting a #ermanent in4unction! +ere issued by 4udges acting +it, no
    due %ssignment :rders! and +it, no aut,ority at all3
    5oreover! t,e notice stated t,at t,e litigation records! as a +,ole! s,o+ed litigation t,at ,ad been
    conducted in a manner t,at +as ine(#licable relative to #rovisions of t,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil
    Procedure and t,e )ivil Bitigation 5anagement 5anual! #ublis,ed by t,e Judicial )onference of
    t,e 2nited States3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    87/165 TOC:2
    8,e #arties continued t,e litigation of t,e a##eal nevert,eless3
    8,e records in t,e a##eal could not #ossibly be deemed valid legal records of t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals! *t, )ircuit! eit,erG
    % docet +as o#ened for t,e a##eal by t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals )ler 5olly ) D+yer from an
    uncertified 4udgment3 8,e )ler of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals s,ould ,ave refused to o#en a
    docet from an uncertified 4udgment of t,e 2S District )ourt3
    8,e #ur#orted orders by t,e )ircuit Judges in t,e %##eal are all unsigned records3
    8,e )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit denied a reIuest for certification of t,e docet of t,e %##eal3
    H,ile t,e a##eal +as #ur#ortedly before t,e *t, )ircuit )ourt! Dr Ferni filed a motion to
    intervene! #roviding detailed evidence of t,e 7raud on t,e )ourt in t,e litigation of t,e case3
    1egardless! t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals continued t,e litigation of t,e simulated a##eal from t,e
    simulated District )ourt 4udgment! +,ic, +as concluded in a #ublis,ed simulated o#inion3 >
    cc
    ?
    %dditional records! related to t,e a##eal of Bog )abin 1e#ublicans v 2S% et al are #rovided3 C
    cci
    D
    o) Citi#ens ,nited v Federal )lection Commission in the ,S District Court, DC
    ?igure 126 () -hie' J+$"e 2o*,e -. @a%.er&h, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-. In &he li&i"a&ion o' a
    lan$%ark ,ase .* a -hie' J+$"e &here is an invali$ .e"innin", an invali$ en$, an$ an o'' &he re,or$M
    pro,ee$in" in .e&/een.
    Citi,ens United v Federal (lection Commission 97.)) 9>$-->5) is no doubt one of t,e landmar
    decisions of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt3 /CDDecision ,olding t,at cor#orations and unions can s#end
    unlimited amounts of money in election cam#aignsU a stunning e(am#le of 4udicial activismU0
    C
    ccii
    D Ao+ever! a valid and effectual co#y of t,e 7ebruary --! ->1> Judgment of t,e 2S Su#reme
    )ourt in t,e case M a ,istoric document M is yet to be discoveredU C
    cciii
    !
    cciv
    D
    1evie+ of t,e litigation records of Citi,ens United v F(C 91G>7-cv---4>) in t,e 2S District )ourt!
    Has,ington D)! +,ere t,e case originated! demonstrates simulated - an invalid beginning! an
    invalid end! and an Soff t,e recordR #roceeding in bet+een3C
    ccv
    D
    *evie of court records C
    ccvi
    D
    8,e case as a +,ole s,o+s invalid docet records! including! but not limited toG
    V Summons as issued
    V Summons as e(ecuted
    V 5inutes
    V 2S Su#reme )ourt Judgment3
    V Judgment 'nde(
    8,erefore! t,e case as a +,ole is o#ined as Simulated Bitigation3
    See also records and comments on validity! or lac t,ereof! of records of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt in
    t,e corres#onding case M Citi,ens United v Federal (lections Commission 9>$-->5)! section )-#3
    Comments
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    88/165 TOC:2
    ,S +istrict Court 9ACER +oc/et
    8,e P%).1 docet as a +,ole is o#ined as an invalid docetG
    a3 %s #reviously s,o+n in ot,er cases! t,e P%).1 docets of t,e 2S District )ourt! in
    t,emselves! are no guarantee of valid litigation3 C
    ccvii
    D
    b3 't s,ould be noted t,at t,e aut,ority of t,e )ler of t,e 2S District )ourt <ancy 5ayer-
    H,ittington! is never invoed in t,e P%).1 docet per se3
    c! 8,e only record! +,ere t,e aut,ority of )ler of t,e )ourt is invoed in t,is case! is t,e
    Summons 9Dt Q15)! see belo+! and t,at record is o#ined as an invalid Summons! since it fails to
    s,o+ t,e Seal of t,e )ourt3
    +ecember #0' %AA5 Summons as issue&
    <o valid record of t,e Summons as issued e(istsG
    a3 8,e Summons as issued ,as no Docet <umber designated! and no lin to a record3
    8,erefore! no <.7 could #ossibly be issued! and t,e Summons as issued is not aut,enticated and no
    deemed entered by t,e )ourt3
    b3 8,e Summons as issued +as not doceted! in a##arent violation of t,e Federal *ules of Civil
    $rocedure3
    +ec #5' %AA5 Summons as execute&' (+/t @#3)
    8,e record! +,ic, a##ears in t,e P%).1 docet as Summons! as e(ecuted on 7ederal .lection
    )ommission! is an invalid Summons recordG
    a3 8,e record of t,e Summons as e(ecuted on 7ederal .lection )ommission 9Dt Q15) is an invalid
    record! since it fails to s,o+ t,e Seal of )ourt! as reIuired by 2S la+3
    b3 7:'% reIuest +as filed +it, t,e 7ederal .lection )ommission for t,e record! in order to e(clude
    t,e #ossibility t,at t,e Seal of t,e )ourt +as missing as a result of #,otoco#ying or scanning3 C
    ccviii
    D
    c3 Since t,e Summons record is t,e only record in t,e docet t,at could #ossibly be deemed as t,e
    record of %ssignment of t,e case to Judge Bambert! t,ere is no valid %ssignment to a 4udge! eit,er3
    -anuar #A' %AA6 7inutes of 9rocee&ing before Three -u&ge 9anel
    <o valid record e(ists for t,e January 1>! ->>$ 5inutesG
    a3 8,e January 1>! ->>$ 5inutes of Proceeding before 8,ree Judge Panel M t,e only 5inutes of
    #roceeding! listed in t,e docet - +as not doceted! in a##arent violation of t,e Federal *ules of
    Civil $rocedure3
    b3 8,e January 1>! ->>$ 5inutes of Proceeding before 8,ree Judge Panel ,as no Docet <umber
    designated! and no lin to a record3 8,erefore! no 5inutes record could #ossibly be issued! and t,e
    5inutes record! if one e(ists! is not aut,enticated and no deemed entered by t,e )ourt3 C
    cci(
    D
    .eb %1' %A#A ,S Su$reme Court -u&gment' as it a$$ears in the ,S +istrict Court +oc/et (+/t
    @50) C
    cc(
    D
    8,e record! +,ic, a##ears in t,e P%).1 docet as 7eb -4! ->1> 2S Su#reme )ourt Judgment! is
    an invalid Judgment recordG
    a3 't is a record dated January -1! ->1>! +,ereas t,e online docet of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt noted
    t,e issuance of a Judgment on 7ebruary --! ->1>3
    b3 't is an unsigned record! +,ic, bears a stam# certifying t,at it is a /true co#y0 of an
    unsigned original record3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    89/165 TOC:2
    c3 8,e stam# itself is signed! but not dated3 5oreover! t,e name and aut,ority of t,e #erson +,o
    signed t,e stam# 9)ynt,ia 1a##) +ere not #rinted belo+ t,e signature line3 8,erefore! t,e signature
    on t,e stam#! certifying /true co#y0 is invalid as +ell3
    d3 <o aut,entication by t,e )ler of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt +as filed +it, t,e Judgment record3
    C
    cc(i
    D
    +oc/et notation of the .eb %1' %A#A ,S Su$reme Court -u&gment' as it a$$ears in the ,S
    +istrict Court +oc/et (+/t @50)
    8,e P%).1 docet notation of t,e 7eb -4! ->1> 2S Su#reme )ourt Judgment! is an invalid
    notationG
    a3 8,e docet notation states t,at t,e record +as filed by Plaintiff )iti"ens 2nited! but no face #age
    or notice by )iti"ens 2nited +as filed +it, t,e record3
    b3 8,e filer /"nm+0 is not counsel for )iti"ens 2nited! but a court em#loyee! +,ose name and
    aut,ority remain unno+n! as is made clear by t,e Docet %ctivity 1e#ort
    c3 8,e Judgment is not /as to 67 <otice of %##eal0
    NE. of the .eb %1' %A#A ,S Su$reme Court -u&gment' as it a$$ears in the ,S +istrict Court
    +oc/et (+/t @50)
    8,e <.7 of t,e 7eb -4! ->1> 2S Su#reme )ourt Judgment is an invalid aut,entication recordG
    a3 %s noted above! t,e docet notation states t,at t,e record +as filed by Plaintiff )iti"ens 2nited!
    but t,e <.7 +as issued by a court em#loyee /"nm+0! +,ose identity and aut,ority as De#uty )ler
    remains unno+n3
    b3 <o /7iler <ame0 is listed in t,e <.7
    c3 <o /:riginal filename0 is listed in t,e <.7
    Relate& Transactions Re$ort
    8,e 1elated 8ransaction 1e#ort s,o+s litigation! +,ere t,e com#laint +as never terminated! or
    dis#osedG
    a3 8,e com#laint +as never listed as 8erminated! albeit! Summary Judgment +as #ur#ortedly
    entered by t,e 2S District )ourt! and an additional Judgment +as #ur#ortedly entered by t,e 2S
    Su#reme )ourt! after a##eal3
    8,e Judgment 'nde( s,o+s litigation! +,ere t,e com#laint +as never terminated! or dis#osedG
    a3 <o Judgment is listed as entered in t,e Judgment 'nde(
    Conclusion
    =ased on revie+ of t,e attac,ed P%).1 and )56.)7 records of t,e 2S District )ourt! Has,ington
    D)! t,e case of Citi,ens United v Federal (lection Commission 91G>7-cv---4>) s,ould be deemed
    simulated Bitigation3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    90/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 136 Invali$ PA-<2 )+%%ons o' -i&izens (ni&e$ v =<- in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D-. The re,or$ 'ails &o
    sho/ &he )eal o' &he -o+r&.
    Summons as e(ecuted M 8,e record of t,e Summons as e(ecuted on 7ederal .lection )ommission
    9Dt Q15) is an invalid record! since it fails to s,o+ t,e Seal of )ourt! as reIuired by 2S la+3 %
    re#eat 7:'% reIuest +as filed! in order to e(clude t,e #ossibility t,at t,e Seal of t,e )ourt +as
    missing as a result of #,otoco#ying or scanning3
    ?igure 146 Invali$ PA-<2 $o,ke& no&a&ion o' Bin+&es o' &he Jan+ar* 30, 800I pro,ee$in" in Citi.ens Unite#
    v ")C. ;o $o,ke& n+%.er /as $esi"na&e$, an$ no re,or$ o' &he Bin+&es /as linke$ &o &he $o,ke& no&a&ion.
    5inutes M <o valid record at all e(ists for t,e January 1>! ->>$ #roceeding! t,e only #roceeding
    listed in t,e record of t,e case3 'nvalid notation +as created in t,e docet! +it, no record lined to
    it at all3 .ffectively! it +as an Soff t,e recordR #roceeding of t,e court3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    91/165 TOC:2
    035305800I Bin+&e <n&r* Pro,ee$in"s hel$ .e'ore a Three J+$"e Panel o' -ir,+i& J+$"e A 2a*%on$
    2an$olph an$ (ni&e$ )&a&es Dis&ri,& J+$"es 2o*,e -. @a%.er&h an$ 2i,har$ #. 2o.er&s : Preli%inar*
    Inj+n,&ion hel$ on 35305800I. 4-o+r& 2epor&er #en$* 2i,ar$.6 4rje6 4<n&ere$: 035305800I6
    ?igure 116 Invali$, si%+la&e$ re,or$ o' &he =e.r+ar* 88, 8030 J+$"%en& in Citi.ens Unite# v "e#eral
    )lection Commission in &he () )+pre%e -o+r&, as i& appears in &he PA-<2 $o,ke& o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&.
    The re,or$ is no& a KJ+$"%en&K a& all, .+& a no&i,e re"ar$in" a&&orne*s 'ees.
    2S Su#reme )ourt Judgment M 8,e Judgment record! as it a##ears in t,e docet of t,e 2S District
    )ourt! is unsigned! and fails to include aut,entication by t,e )ler of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt3
    ?igure 1B6 The Citi.ens Unite# v ")C en&r* in &he J+$"%en& In$ex o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D-.
    J+$"%en& In$ex S ;o J+$"%en& a& all is lis&e$ in &he -o+r&Ms J+$"%en& In$ex 'or &he ,ase, an$ &he ,o%plain&
    is lis&e$ as never &er%ina&e$ in &he 2ela&e$ Transa,&ions 2epor&.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    92/165 TOC:2
    J+$"%en& In$ex 2epor&
    (.). Dis&ri,& -o+r& S S Dis&ri,& o' -ol+%.ia
    2epor& Perio$: 0350358009 S 0958358033
    )orr* S no $a&a 'or &he ,hosen sele,&ion ,ri&eria
    J+$"%en& In$ex 2epor& )ele,&ion -ri&eria
    -ase n+%.er 3:07!,v!8840
    p) Citi#ens ,nited v Federal )lection Commission in the ,S Supreme Court
    ?igure 1C6 -i&izens (ni&e$ is ar"+a.l* &he %os& si"ni'i,an& $e,ision o' &he )+pre%e -o+r& in re,en&
    $e,a$es. The )+pre%e -o+r&Ls =e.r+ar* 88, 8030 J+$"%en& re,or$s in &his ,ase is %issin". (; repor&
    ,onsi$er %issin" ,o+r& re,or$s a ,ar$inal si"n o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion.
    Citi,ens United v Federal (lection Commission 9F(C= 9>$-->5) is no doubt one of t,e landmar
    decisions of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt in recent decades! if not in its entire ,istory3 't transformed t,e
    2S #olitical #rocess by e(#anding t,e notion of &cor#orate #erson,ood& by according cor#orations
    t,e 7ree S#eec, rig,ts and t,e rig,t to &s#end unlimited amounts of money in election cam#aignsU
    a stunning e(am#le of 4udicial activismU0 C
    cc(ii
    D 't +as also described as a license to corru#t
    government3
    8,e 2S Su#reme )ourt docet notes t,at on 7ebruary --! ->1> 4udgment +as &issued& 9but not
    &entered&)3
    ?igure 1D6 <x,erp&s 'ro% &he online $o,ke& o' &he () )+pre%e -o+r& in Citi.ens Unite# v "e#eral )lection
    Commission
    Ao+ever! t,e record of t,e 7ebruary --! ->1> Judgment in t,e case - a ,istoric document - is yet to
    be discovered333 <o suc, record +as discovered among t,e electronic records of t,e 2S Su#reme
    )ourt3 C
    cc(iii
    D
    't s,ould be noted t,at 2< 2nited <ations 'nternational )rime Prevention )enter re#orts on
    &Strengt,ening Judicial 'ntegrity& list missing court records as a cardinal sign of 4udicial corru#tion3
    C
    cc(iv
    !
    cc(v
    D
    8,e online records of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt C
    cc(vi
    D also s,o+ t,at t,e Journal for January -1! ->1>!
    t,e date of t,e missing 4udgment record! is also missing t,e ty#ical introductory remar! found in
    many 9but not all) dates of seating of t,e Su#reme )ourt! regarding certification and entry of orders
    and decisions3
    7or e(am#le! on January -5! ->1>! t,e immediate ne(t seating of t,e )ourt! t,e Journal saysG
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    93/165 TOC:2
    The -hie' J+s&i,e sai$:
    K#e have iss+e$ or$ers &o$a*, &he* have .een $+l* en&ere$ an$ ,er&i'ie$, an$ 'ile$ /i&h &he -lerk.K
    E+n$erline a$$e$ !jzF
    8,erefore! concern must be furt,er raised t,at t,e missing 4udgment in t,is case +as never entered
    and certified as a valid 4udgment of t,e Su#reme )ourt3
    7ollo+ing t,e failure to discover t,e 4udgment record among t,e electronic records of t,e Su#reme
    )ourt! 7reedom of 'nformation reIuests +ere filed on t,e 7ederal .lection )ommission! on t,e
    )ivil Division of t,e 2S De#artment of Justice and on t,e 2S Solicitor @eneral! reIuesting from
    eac, a co#y of t,e 7ebruary --! ->1> Judgment and its aut,entication records! as served on t,em by
    t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt3
    :n 5ay *! ->11 7reedom of 'nformation %ct 97:'%) res#onse +as received from Defendant 7.)3
    C
    cc(vii
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    94/165 TOC:2
    ?igure 196 The re,or$ &ha& /as provi$e$ .* =<- as &he =e.r+ar* 88, 8030 J+$"%en& in Citi.ens Unite# v
    "e#eral )lection Commission ,o%.ine$ /i&h i&s a+&hen&i,a&ion .* &he -lerk o' &he () )+pre%e -o+r&. The
    re,or$ is no& a KJ+$"%en&K a& all, .+& a no&i,e 'ro% &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& re"ar$in" a&&orne*s 'ees.
    8,e 4udgment record! +,ic, +as #rovided by 7.) in its 7:'% res#onse cannot #ossibly be deemed
    a valid court recordG
    8,e record is dated January -1! ->1>! +,ereas t,e online docet noted t,e issuance of a
    Judgment on 7ebruary --! ->1>3
    8,e record is not signed by any 4ustice of t,e Su#reme )ourt! and it bears a stam# certifying t,at
    it is a /% true co#y0! but not &8rue )o#y of t,e :riginal&! t,e valid certification statement3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    95/165 TOC:2
    8,e stam# on t,e record is signed! but not dated3 5oreover! t,e name and aut,ority of t,e
    #erson +,o signed t,e stam# 9)ynt,ia 1a##) +ere not #rinted belo+ t,e signature line3
    8,erefore! t,e signature on t,e stam#! certifying /% true co#y0 is of dubious validity at best3
    )ontrary to +,at +as stated in t,e 7:'% res#onse letter! t,e record! +,ic, +as #rovided! did not
    include true and valid attestation6aut,entication by t,e )ler of t,e Su#reme )ourt of t,e 2nited
    States3
    August 0' %AA; ( Civil Cover Sheet (+/t @none) - alt,oug, records of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    Sout,ern District of <e+ ?or! state t,at a )ivil )over S,eet is reIuired +,en filing a com#laint!
    no )ivil )over S,eet +as found in t,e docet of t,e case at ,and3 'n contrast! )ivil )over S,eets
    are routinely found doceted in P%).1 +it, t,e com#laints in ot,er cases3 %s furt,er noted in t,e
    1ules of )ourt! t,e )ivil )over S,eet must be #art of Service of Process! toget,er +it, t,e
    summons and com#laint3
    8,e failure to file and docet a )ivil )over S,eet is of #articular significance! since it is one of t,e
    only records! +,ere a ,and signature of a De#uty )ler of t,e )ourt! identified by name and
    aut,ority! is reIuired3 %28A.<8')%8':< - %n attestation made by a #ro#er officer! by +,ic, ,e
    certifies t,at a record is in due form of la+! and t,at t,e #erson +,o certifies it is t,e officer
    a##ointed by la+ to do soU =y aut,entication is also understood +,atever act is done eit,er by t,e
    #arty or some ot,er #erson +it, a vie+ of causing an instrument to be no+n and identified3
    8,e record! is not a record +,ic, +as served on 7.) by t,e Su#reme )ourt! but a record t,at
    +as #rinted out from t,e P%).1 docet of t,e 2S )ourt! District of )olumbia3 as documented
    in t,e record ,eader3 Ao+ever! to t,e degree t,at t,e record! +,ic, +as #rovided! +as a record
    filed and entered in t,e 2S )ourt! District of )olumbia! it +as missing t,e <.7 9<otice of
    .lectronic 7iling)! +,ic, is deemed by t,e 2S district courts as t,e aut,entication record under
    electronic filing3 C
    cc(viii
    D
    8,e 5arc, -*! ->11 res#onse on t,e 7:'% reIuest from :ffice of Solicitor @eneral! statesG
    ;ei&her o' &hese re,or$s /ere 'o+n$ in revie/ o' re,or$s %ain&aine$ .* &he O''i,e o' &he )oli,i&or
    Deneral 4O)D6.
    8,e 5arc, -4! ->11 res#onse from t,e )ivil Division of t,e 2S De#artment of Justice to 7:'%
    reIuest statesG
    The -ivil Division $oes no& %ain&ain re,or$s rela&in" &o &ha& ,ase.
    1eIuests for co#ies of t,e missing 4udgment +ere also for+arded to #arties in t,e case3 :nly one
    #arty res#onded! saying t,at t,e 7ebruary --! ->1> Judgment ,ad never been served nor noticed3
    <o #arty res#onded t,at a 7ebruary --! ->1> Judgment +as eit,er noticed or served3
    't s,ould be noted t,at t,e notion of &cor#orate #erson,ood&! +,ic, +as t,e #ur#orted legal
    foundation for t,e litigation in Citi,ens United v F(C originates in a 1$$6 Su#reme )ourt decision!
    +,ic, in itself s,ould be deemed an early e(am#le of a simulated record of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt!
    during anot,er #eriod of remarable corru#tion of t,e 2S courts3 8,e only reference in in Santa
    Clara County v. Southern $acific *ailroad) 11$ 23S3 3*4 91$$6) to &cor#orate #erson,ood& is in a
    ,eadnote added by t,e court re#orter! but not in t,e body of t,e decision itself3
    8,e 2S Su#reme )ourtRs case management system! a ey to establis,ing t,e validity! or lac
    t,ereof! of various Su#reme )ourt records! remains under a veil of secrecy! in a##arent violation of
    7irst %mendment and Due Process rig,ts3 )laims of online #ublication of false and deliberately
    misleading records by t,e office of t,e )ler of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt +ere #art of t,e #revious
    reIuest for im#eac,ment of )ler Hilliam Suter3 C
    cc(i(
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    96/165 TOC:2
    +! National authorities' civil societ organi)ations' ex$erts' me&ia
    #! Office of Attorne General' ,S +e$artment of -ustice' an& ."*
    8,e 7='Es official #olicy is reflected in t,e follo+ing #assageG C
    cc((
    D
    KThis ,ase sho+l$ $e%ons&ra&e &ha& &he =BI /ill p+rs+e all alle"a&ions o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion
    vi"oro+sl*, as p+.li, ,orr+p&ion viola&ions are a%on" &he %os& serio+s o' all ,ri%inal ,on$+,& an$ ,an
    &ear a& &he 'a.ri, o' a $e%o,ra&i, so,ie&*,K sai$ John =. Pik+s, spe,ial a"en& in ,har"e o' &he Al.an*
    $ivision, in a prepare$ s&a&e%en&.
    Ao+ever! t,e evidence s,o+s t,at in #ractice! 7=' ,ardly ever investigates com#laints of corru#tion
    of state and 2S 4udges3
    'n no case! +,ere la+ enforcement agencies +ere informed of t,e corru#tion and criminality by
    state or 2S 4udges! clers! attorneys! and6or bans! +ere any corrective measures undertaen3 C
    cc((i
    !
    cc((ii
    D
    2S De#artment of Justice 'ns#ector @eneral refused to res#ond on com#laint against senior officers
    of t,e 2S De#artment of Justice! 7=' %ssistant Director for )riminal 'nvestigations Kennet, Kaiser
    and t,en 2S %ttorneys :ffice Director Kennet, 5elson! relative to t,eir fraudulent res#onses on
    Senator Diane 7einstein! relative to refusal of t,e 2S De#artment of Justice to address mounting
    credible evidence of raceteering by )alifornia 4udges! attorneys! and baning e(ecutive3
    8,e 'ns#ector @eneral #ersisted in ,is refusal to tae action! even after inIuiry by )alifornia
    Senator Diane 7einstein3 C
    cc((iii
    D
    1eno+ned Aarvard Ba+ Professor Barry 8raub! +,o in t,e early years of t,e :bama administration
    assumed a s#ecial #osition in t,e 2S De#t of Justice! namely - Senior )ounsel! %ccess to Justice -
    refused to ans+er on a reIuest to restore 1ic,ard 7ineRs access to 4ustice and a reIuest to establis,
    by la+ t,e validation of case management and online #ublic access systems of t,e courts! +,ic,
    +ould affect substantial im#act on restoration of access to 4ustice and t,e 1ule of Ba+ in t,e 2nited
    States3 C
    cc((iv
    D
    )om#laints! filed +it, t,e 2S %ttorneyEs :ffices against clers! attorneys! and court staff! relative
    to t,eir conduct in t,e 2S courts! +ere never addressed3 C
    cc((v
    !
    cc((vi
    D
    'n t,e )entral District of )alifornia! +,ere #ublic corru#tion is ram#ant! t,e 2S %ttorney :ffice
    ,ad #reviously closed t,e Public )orru#tion and )ivil 1ig,ts 2nit3 Ao+ever! on June 1-! ->1>!
    ne+s +as #ublis,ed t,at t,e Public )orru#tion and )ivil 1ig,ts 2nit ,ad been re-establis,ed by t,e
    ne+ly a##ointed %ndreE =irotte! Jr - 2S %ttorney! )entral District of )alifornia3 8,e ne+s re#ort
    cited a memo by t,e 2S %ttorney stating t,at &,e ,o#ed to ,ave t,e unit o#erational by July 13&
    7ollo+ing t,e ne+s! a series of com#laints on #ublic corru#tion and de#rivation of rig,ts +ere filed
    +it, t,e 2S %ttorneyEs :ffice! )entral District of )alifornia3 'n no case +as recei#t of t,e
    com#laint acno+ledged! and in no case +as t,ere any indication t,at any action +as taen on t,e
    com#laints3 C
    cc((vii
    D
    8,e reIuest for im#eac,ment of t,e 2S %ttorney for t,e )entral District of )alifornia %ndre
    =irotte! Jr! #rovides a list 9+it, lins to t,e original records) of com#laints! filed +it, ,is office!
    regarding corru#tion of t,e )alifornia courts! +,ic, ,e failed to address! or even acno+ledge
    recei#t of3 8,e failure of 2S %ttorney :ffices to res#ond or initiate action in any suc, cases!
    documents t,at corru#tion of t,e courts! t,e legal #rofession! and financial institutions is today
    under #atronage of t,e 2S De#artment of Justice3 C
    cc((viii
    D
    1eIuest! filed +it, t,e 2S %ttorney @eneral! to address t,e large-scale fraud in P%).1 and
    )56.)7! +as never addressed3 C
    cc((i(
    D
    8,e cases! detailed above! of Borroer !ianne "ill! Borroer #illiam $arsley! and %erni& v
    Connor! S(C v BAC! document t,at 2S aut,orities +ere and are fully a+are of t,e tig,t lin
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    97/165 TOC:2
    bet+een corru#tion of t,e courts! t,e failure of baning regulation and t,e onset of t,e ongoing
    financial crisis in t,e 2S and beyond3 %nd yet! as often noted by 2S media and e(#erts! including
    .conomics <obel #ri"e +inner Paul Krugman! Pulit"er Pri"e-+inner! senior business columnist
    @retc,en 5orgenson! acclaimed investigative 4ournalist 5att 8aibbi and many ot,ers! none of
    cul#rits among senior baning e(ecutives +as ever ,eld accountable3 C
    cc(((
    !
    cc(((i
    !
    cc(((ii
    D
    %s a result! today bans in t,e 2S are #laced above t,e la+! &too big to 4ail&! and are #ermitted to
    engage in un#recedented fraud and abuse of consumers! s,are,olders! and t,e ta( #ayer3
    'n a +idely re#orted testimony before t,e 2S Senate! 2S %ttorney @eneral .ric Aolder in fact
    acno+ledged suc, #olicy 3 C
    cc(((iii
    D
    I a% ,on,erne$ &ha& &he size o' so%e o' &hese ins&i&+&ions .e,o%es so lar"e &ha& i& $oes .e,o%e
    $i''i,+l& 'or +s &o prose,+&e &he% /hen /e are hi& /i&h in$i,a&ions &ha& i' *o+ $o prose,+&e, i' *o+ $o
    .rin" a ,ri%inal ,har"e, i& /ill have a ne"a&ive i%pa,& on &he na&ional e,ono%*, perhaps even &he
    /orl$ e,ono%*.
    1egardless of later attem#ts by .ric Aolder to retract suc, testimony in later media a##earances! t,e
    evidence s,o+s t,at in fact suc, #olicy! +,ic, ,e advocated even #rior to becoming %ttorney
    @eneral! remains in effect3 C
    cc(((iv
    D
    'nstead! t,e 2S De#artment of Justice ,as re#eatedly entered &settlements& +it, large financial
    institutions! relative to +ides#read fraud in o#erations! +,ere suc, financial institutions #ay a fine
    to t,e 2S federal government! but no remedy is accorded to t,e actual victims of t,e fraud3 8,e
    latest settlement in t,is manner +as for T1635 billions +it, =an of %merica )or#oration3 C
    cc(((v
    D
    'n re#orting t,e latest &settlement&! 1euters re#ortsG
    The ne"o&ia&ions have .een $riven .* an inves&i"a&ion in&o se,+ri&ies sol$ .* Berrill @*n,h, /hi,h &he
    .ank a"ree$ &o a,0+ire in 800I a& &he hei"h& o' &he 'inan,ial ,risis, people 'a%iliar /i&h &he %a&&er
    have sai$.
    Ao+ever! one must recall t,at t,e merger of =an of %merica and 5errill Bync, +as com#elled on
    =an of %merica by senior 2S officers! t,roug, +,at +as described by analysts as a &criminal
    cons#iracy&! involving among ot,ers t,en 7ederal 1eserve =en =ernane3 C
    cc(((vi
    D 't must be
    assumed t,at as #art of suc, &merger&! +,ic, defied any business sense! =an of %merica
    e(ecutives +ere #romised some ind of immunity for criminality in 5errill Bync,3 :ne must
    assume t,at same! relative to t,e earlier &merger& of =an of %merica and )ountry+ide 7inancial
    )or#oration3
    )onditions in t,e 2S today in t,is regard are similar to conditions t,at #revailed in t,e 2S over a
    century ago! during t,e &1obber =aron Period& 9see section %=))3 C
    cc(((vii
    D
    8,e failure of t,e 2S government to address corru#tion of t,e courts! baning regulation and t,e
    bans mae it unliely t,at t,e t,e 2S +ill soon see recovery from t,e current socio-economic
    crisis3
    2nder suc, conditions! t,e 2S and ot,er nations are more liely to face a #rolonged economic
    De#ression3
    %! "an/ing Regulation
    <o baning regulation agency in t,e 2nited States today duly #erforms its duties in revie+ing
    com#laints of fraud by financial institutions against t,e #eo#le of t,e 2nited States3
    S.) ),air! 5ary Sc,a#iro! for e(am#le! refused to res#ond on a reIuest to #erform ,er duties!
    relative to com#laints of fraud by senior officers of =an of %merica )or#oration and )ounty+ide
    7inancial )or#oration3 C
    cc(((viii
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    98/165 TOC:2
    8,e )om#troller of )urrency! :ffice of 8,rift Su#ervision! :ffice of 8rade )ommission +ere no
    different in t,is regard3 8,ey all refuse to #erform t,eir duties! even after inIuiries by t,e 2S
    )ongress3 C
    cc(((i(
    D
    8,erefore! t,roug, suc, unla+ful conduct of senior 2S officers! baning e(ecutives +ere #lace
    above t,e la+3
    0! ,S Congress
    1eIuest! filed +it, t,e Senate Judiciary )ommittee and to t,e 2S Aouse of 1e#resentatives to
    initiate revie+ of evidence of large-scale fraud in t,e '8 systems of t,e us courts! +as ignored3
    C
    cc(l
    !
    cc(li
    D
    Bie+ise! reIuest! filed +it, Senator Bea,y! ),air of t,e Senate Judiciary )ommittee to initiate
    revie+ of evidence of large-scale fraud in t,e '8 systems of t,e us courts! +as never addressed3
    C
    cc(lii
    D 8,e case is note+ort,y! since t,e same Senator Bea,y did not ,esitate to call for t,e
    institution of a 8rut, and 1econciliation )ommission! relative to t,e corru#tion of t,e 2S
    De#artment of Justice3 C
    cc(liii
    D Suc, call by Senator Bea,y! a senior and res#ected senator is
    #er#le(ing3 Hit, it! Senator Bea,yEs un#recedented statement documents t,at t,e 2S )ongress is
    fully a+are of t,e corru#tion of t,e 2S 4ustice system today3 :n t,e ot,er ,and! 8rut, and
    1econciliation )ommissions are ty#ically instituted in nations! +,o emerged from under tyrannical
    regimes3 8,erefore! Senator Bea,yEs call s,ould be considered an admission of t,e tyrannical
    nature of t,e 2S regime today! +,ere t,e 2S 4ustice system is ,olding #o+ers t,at are outside its
    aut,ority3 Ao+ever! since t,ere +as no c,ange in t,e 2S #olitical system #rior to t,e time of
    Senator Bea,yEs call! it is unclear ,o+ ,e #erceived suc, 8rut, and 1econciliation )ommission
    could o#erate under t,e current 2S regime3
    1eIuests for 'm#eac,ments! documenting corru#tion of 2S t,e 2S courts! including Judge Jed
    1aoff! +,o +as and is central to t,e failure of 2S baning regulation! t,roug, fraud in litigation of
    financial institutions +ere never addressed3 C
    cc(liv
    !
    cc(lv
    !
    cc(lvi
    !
    cc(lvii
    !
    cc(lviii
    !
    cc(li(
    !
    ccl
    D
    'n fact! regardless of am#le evidence of ram#ant corru#tion of t,e 2S 4udges! im#eac,ment by t,e
    2S )ongress of 4udges! t,roug,out t,e ,istory of t,e 2nited States! is e(tremely rare3 't s,ould be
    seen as failure of t,e 2S )ongress to #erform its duties3
    5alaise of t,e 2S )ongress s,ould be deemed in,erent to current conditions in t,e 2nited States3
    1! The 2u&iciar
    'n no case! +,ere a court +as noticed of t,e simulated nature of t,e #roceedings and t,e records! u#
    to t,e Su#reme )ourt of t,e 2nited States! did a court cease suc, conduct! or correct its false
    electronic #ublic records3
    7or e(am#leG
    'n Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! 9see )-c)!
    5otion to 'ntervene +as filed! documenting t,at t,e a##eal! t,en before t,e )ourt! +as taen
    from a simulated 4udgment records in t,e 2S District )ourt! )enteral District of )alifornia 9see
    section )-c)3 8,e 5otion ased t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals to dismiss t,e a##eal for lac of
    4urisdiction3 C
    ccli
    D 8,e 5otion +as denied3
    'n Fine v Sheriff 9>*-716*-) in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! t,e June 3>! ->>* :rder!
    issued by ),ief Judge %le( Ko"insi toget,er +it, )ircuit Judges Pae" and 8allman on 7ineEs
    Aabeas )or#us #etition! s,ould be deemed as 7raud on t,e )ourt! and effectively #roviding t,e
    #atronage of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! to raceteering by )alifornia 4udge 9see also
    section )3a)3 C
    cclii
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    99/165 TOC:2
    Bie+ise! in Fine v Sheriff 9>*-%$-7) in t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt 9see section )3a)! 5otion to
    'ntervene +as filed! +,ic, documented t,e systemic fraud in t,e records! related to t,e false
    im#risonment of former 2S #rosecutor 1ic,ard 7ine in t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! in t,e
    Bos %ngeles S,eriffEs De#artment! in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! in t,e
    t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! and in t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt itself3 C
    ccliii
    D 8,e #a#ers +ere
    unla+fully &returned& by )ourt )ounsel Danny =icell! acting +it, no aut,ority at all3 C
    ccliv
    D
    'n "umins&i v Corsones 91G**-cv->>16>) at t,e 2S District )ourt! Nermont! t,e )ourt ignored
    Dr FerniEs .( Parte %##lication for Beave to 7ile and 1eIuest not to serve s,am court orders on
    Pro Se Plaintiff Auminsi C
    cclv
    D
    8,e most com#re,ensive communications in t,is regard +ere conducted +it, t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia! and t,e outcome +as ,ars, retaliation against t,e aut,or of instant
    submission3 Dr Ferni #resented to t,e ),ief Judge and )ler of t,e )ourt of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia! credible evidence of t,e #ractice of simulated litigation in a number
    of cases in t,at )ourt! #ertaining to de#rivation of Biberty! )ivil )onstitutional and Auman 1ig,ts!
    and fraud by financial institutions 9see section @-a)3 <o corrective actions +ere ever taen3
    8,e 7ederal :ffice of %dministration of t,e )ourts refused to res#ond on t,is matter3 C
    cclvi
    D
    5oreover! t,e evidence s,o+s t,at t,e 2S courts ,ave effectively establis,ed a #olicy of denying
    t,e rig,t to file records in court! +,ic, document state or federal 4udicial corru#tion 9see section
    $3c)3
    't s,ould be concluded t,at t,e 2S courts are not ready! +illing! able to address t,eir o+n
    corru#tion3
    3! The legal $rofession
    2nder conditions! +,ic, +ere created t,roug, t,e im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7!
    attorneys routinely a##ear as counsel! +,ile not aut,ori"ed as )ounsel of 1ecord 9see section )1,)3
    5oreover! as documented in cases involving financial institutions! t,ey at times a##ear +it, &no
    communication +it, client clause&3 C
    cclvii
    D
    Suc, a##earance by attorneys in t,e 2S courts s,ould be deemed 7raud u#on t,e )ourt3
    'n cases involving bans! #articularly under t,e current financial crisis! attorneys routinely file
    fraudulent baning records3 C
    cclviii
    D
    't is im#ossible t,at ca#able and com#etent attorneys! +,o a##ear before t,e 2S courts! fail to
    recogni"e t,e fundamental fraud in suc, systems3 %nd yet! no records +ere found of #rotest by t,e
    2S =ar %ssociation3
    :f #articular concern must be t,e e(am#les of litigation! +,ere 2S agencies +ere #arty to t,e
    litigationG
    'n t,e case of S.) v =an of %merica )or#oration 9)-b)! a 2S agency +as t,e #laintiff3 %nd
    t,e failure to issue and serve a valid summons in t,is case! demonstrates t,at from t,e start t,e
    S.) and its counsel +ere set to conduct simulated litigation in t,is landmar baning regulation
    case3
    'n t,e case of Bog )abin 1e#ublicans v 2S% et al 9)-c!d) t,e 2S +as Defendant in t,e 2S
    District )ourt! and a##ellant in t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals3 'n bot, courts! 2S counsel +illingly
    #artici#ated in simulated litigation in landmar cases3
    1eIuest! filed +it, %merican =ar %ssociation! to revie+ evidence of large-scale fraud in t,e 2S
    courts! +as never addressed3 C
    ccli(
    D
    Hides#read corru#tion of t,e legal #rofession s,ould be deemed in,erent to conditions! currently
    #revailing in t,e 2S courts3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    100/165 TOC:2
    4! Ex$erts
    1eIuest for revie+ of t,e evidence of fraud in t,e com#uteri"ed records of t,e 2S district courts
    and courts of a##eals 9$AC(* and C'/(CF) +as #reviously to Aarvard Ba+ Professor ?oc,ai
    =enler! an e(#ert on com#uters and t,e la+3 C
    ccl(
    D <o res#onse +as received3
    <o com#uter science or legal e(#ert in t,e 2ntied States +as +illing to o#ine on t,e findings of
    studies! or revie+ academic #a#ers! +,ic, documented t,e findings of instant submission3
    <o la+ dean in t,e 2nited States! +,ic, ,as been ased! agreed to o#ine on t,e evidence of fraud in
    t,e 2S courts3 7or e(am#le! 5art,a 5ino+! Aarvard Ba+ Dean! +,o lists ,er s#ecialty as Auman
    1ig,ts! +as ased to o#ine on integrity! or lac t,ereof! in '8 systems of t,e 2S district and a##eals
    courts - P%).1 and )56.)73 'n res#onse Dean 5ino+ saidG C
    ccl(i
    D
    I re"re& &ha& as $ean &his is no& so%e&hin" &ha& I ,an +n$er&ake. Bes& /ishes, Barha Bino/, Dean
    an$ Jere%iah )%i&h, Jr Pro'essor o' @a/.
    ?ale Ba+ Sc,ool faculty +ere solicited for o#inion! but none res#onded3 C
    ccl(ii
    D
    Si( 96) to# academic la+ 4ournals! +,ic, s#eciali"e in Auman 1ig,ts or com#uters and la+! refused
    to acce#t for revie+ academic #a#ers! dealing +it, t,e issues! detailed in instant submission3
    Aarvard Ba+ Sc,ool Dean 5art,a 5ino+! Professors Bani @uinier! 1andal Kennedy! and Debora,
    1amire" M members of t,e =oard of %dvisors of Aarvard )ivil 1ig,ts )ivil Biberties Ba+ 1evie+ -
    refused to res#ond on re#eat reIuest t,at t,e 4ournal acno+ledge recei#t of a #a#er! aut,ored by
    Jose#, Ferni! P,D! submitted to t,e 4ournal! titledG )ase 5anagement and :nline Public %ccess
    Systems of t,e )ourts M %n 2rgent )all of Begislative %ction3 C
    ccl(iii
    D Previous reIuests for
    acno+ledgment of recei#t by t,e 4ournal itself lie+ise remained unans+ered3 C
    ccl(iv
    D
    Bie+ise! in international conferences! +,ere 2S sc,olars +ere in administrative ey #ositions!
    suc, #a#ers +ere e(cluded! even after #assing #eer-revie+3 C
    ccl(v
    D
    'n contrast! international 4ournals and academic conferences in com#uter-science 9data mining) and
    criminology #ublis,ed and #resented t,e researc,! #ursuant to anonymous #eer-revie+3 CD
    't is liely t,at e(#erts in t,e 2S +ere un+illing to tae t,e riss! associated +it, +,istle-blo+ing
    of any ind in t,e 2nited States today 9see section %s-)3 Ao+ever! it is unliely t,at ste#s +ould
    ,ave been taen against +orld-reno+ned academicians in t,e fields of la+ and com#uters3
    8,erefore! current conditions in t,e 2S s,ould also be deemed reflection of malaise of t,e 2S
    intelligentsia3
    5! Civil societ organi)ations
    <o national )ivil Society organi"ation! +,ic, +as a##roac,ed! is ready! +illing! able to address
    corru#tion of 4udges and attorneys3 't is believed to be in #art due to t,e fact t,at in many suc,
    organi"ations attorneys are involved in #olicy decisions! and are #articularly concerned regarding
    #rofessional retaliation3
    6! 7e&ia
    2S mainstream media s,ould be considered com#licit +it, corru#tion of t,e 2S courts3
    Some of t,e cases! outlined in instant submission! +ere cases t,at generated national and
    international interest! and +ere re#eatedly covered by mainstream media! for e(am#leG Citi,ens
    United v F(C 9)3o!#)! Log Ca+in *epu+licans v USA et al 9see section )3m!n )! S(C v BAC 9see
    section )3,)! N'L v *epu+lic of Argentina 9see section )3)3 8,e invalidity of t,e docets in t,ese
    cases is so blatant! t,at t,ere is no +ay t,at e(#erienced 4ournalists! s#eciali"ing in re#orting on
    legal manner! could avoid noticing t,at fact3 %nd yet! no+,ere are suc, re#orts to be found3 Horse
    yet! in t,e case of 7ine v S,eriff 9see section )3a)! t,e Bos %ngeles 8imes re#eatedly re#orted in a
    manner t,at #ortrayed t,en falsely im#risoned 1ic,ard 7ine as some ind of a lunatic3 C
    ccl(vi
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    101/165 TOC:2
    8,ere is gro+ing evidence of su##ression of t,e #osting of evidence of 4udicial corru#tion in t,e 2S
    also on various +eb sites online3 8,is aut,orEs Scribd3com arc,ive is often mani#ulated3 &1eads&
    counts! +,ic, totaled over 134 million only recently! +ere ine(#licably reduced to only over
    1>>!>>>3 .ven on +eb sites t,at are su##osed to be &leaing sites&! suc, as Bivelea3com t,ere is
    evidence of &:nline )ontent 5anagement& to reduce t,e visibility and readers,i# of #osting on t,e
    4udiciary3
    E! Com$liance 8ith relevant ,S la8
    #! Habeas Cor$us
    ?igure B06 @e'&: #ri& o' 1a.eas -orp+s, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, <as&ern Dis&ri,& o' Penns*lvania U/S/ e2/ rel/ -ohn
    Wheeler v/ assmore Williamson 4J+l* 3C, 3I996 2i"h&: #ri& o' 1a.eas -orp+s A$ Tes&i'i,an$+%, () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, US v Rivera an# Sanche. 4Ba* 3C, 3C836. <x&ensive sear,h in &he
    PA-<2 re,or$s o' vario+s () $is&ri,& ,o+r&s 'aile$ &o $is,over a sin"le #ri& o' 1a.eas -orp+s, iss+e$ a'&er
    &he i%ple%en&a&ion o' PA-<2 an$ -B5<-=. )in,e &he #ri& o' 1a.eas -orp+s is in 'a,& &he s+%%ons in
    s+,h li&i"a&ion, all ,ases o' 1a.eas -orp+s in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es &o$a* sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ invali$, si%+la&e$
    li&i"a&ion. There'ore, &he privile"e o' 1a.eas -orp+s sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ s+spen$e$, no onl* in &he
    D+an&ana%o Ba* $e&en&ion ,en&er an$ o&her K.la,k holeK prisons, opera&e$ .* &he () "overn%en& in vario+s
    lo,a&ions aro+n$ &he /orl$, .+& also in &he &erri&orial (ni&e$ )&a&es.
    8,e 2S )onstitution! Section *G Limits on Congress! saysG
    The Privile"e o' &he #ri& o' 1a.eas -orp+s shall no& .e s+spen$e$, +nless /hen in -ases o'
    2e.ellion or Invasion &he p+.li, )a'e&* %a* re0+ire i&.
    8,e #rocedure! a##licable for Aabeas )or#us is initiated by a Petition for Hrit of Aabeas )or#us3
    8,e +rit in t,is case is a summons +it, t,e force of a court orderL it is addressed to t,e custodian 9a
    #rison official for e(am#le) and demands t,at a #risoner be taen before t,e court! and t,at t,e
    custodian #resent #roof of aut,ority! allo+ing t,e court to determine +,et,er t,e custodian ,as
    la+ful aut,ority to detain t,e #risoner3
    Bouis =randeis 92S Su#reme )ourt Justice 1*16 to 1*3*) referred to it as Et,e greatest ac,ievement
    of t,e .nglis,-s#eaing courts - establis,ing Biberty by la+E3
    Hilliam =rennan Jr 92S Su#reme )ourt Justice 1*56 to 1**>) routinely referred to it as &8,e @reat
    Hrit&! and t,e &)ornerstone of t,e 2nited States )onstitution&3
    %nd in Fay v Noia 91*63) Justice =rennan +roteG
    The .asi, prin,iple o' &he Drea& #ri& o' ha.eas ,orp+s is &ha&, in a ,ivilize$ so,ie&*, "overn%en& %+s&
    al/a*s .e a,,o+n&a.le &o &he j+$i,iar* 'or a %anLs i%prison%en&: i' &he i%prison%en& ,anno& .e
    sho/n &o ,on'or% /i&h &he '+n$a%en&al re0+ire%en&s o' la/, &he in$ivi$+al is en&i&le$ &o his
    i%%e$ia&e release.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    102/165 TOC:2
    8,e 2P1 1e#ort on t,e 2nited States 9->1>) recommended t,at t,e 2S restore t,e rig,t for Aabeas
    )or#us3 Ao+ever! t,at re#ort +as #rimarily based on conditions in t,e @uantanamo =ay detention
    center and ot,er &blac ,ole& #risons! o#erated by t,e government of t,e 2nited States in various
    locations around t,e +orld3
    'nstant submission! and in #articular t,e cases of 7ine and Sieverding! 9see sections 3-a!b)
    demonstrate t,at Aabeas )or#us +as and is in fact sus#ended also in t,e territorial 2nited States3
    =eyond t,e section! referenced above! #ertaining to t,e invalidity of t,e P%).1 and )56.)7
    records in *ichard Fine v Sheriff of Los Angeles County 9-G>*-cv->1*14) in t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia! one s,ould noteG
    i3 <o Hrit of Aabeas )or#us +as ever issued by t,e )ourt! follo+ing t,e filing of t,e Petition3
    8,erefore! t,ere +as no summons in t,is case - invalid litigation +it, no 4urisdiction by t,e
    )ourt3
    ii3 S,eriff +as rig,tly named by 7ine as 1es#ondent! since ,e +as ,olding 1ic,ard 7ine3
    iii3 S,eriff refused to res#ond! and never res#onded on t,e Aabeas )or#us #etition of 7ine3
    iv3 2S 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle decided to #ermit Judge David ?affe of t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior
    )ourt to a##ear as 1es#ondent instead3 Suc, decision! to c,ange t,e named 1es#onder in
    litigation! +as made +it, no aut,ority at all3
    v3 2S 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle +as never duly assigned to t,e case3 8,erefore! s,e ,ad no
    aut,ority to ad4udicate in t,e first #lace3 C
    ccl(vii
    D
    v3 Kevin 5c)ormic a##eared on be,alf of Judge ?affe and t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt +it,
    no aut,ority at all - ,e +as never a##ointed )ounsel of 1ecord for suc, #arties3
    vi3 <o declaration by Judge ?affe or any ot,er res#onding #arty can be found in t,e Aabeas )or#us
    #a#ers3 Kevin 5c)ormic filed res#onse #a#ers +it, declaration by counsel alone - invalid
    #leading3
    vii3 <o signature +,atsoever by Judge ?affe or any ot,er res#onding #arty can be found in t,e
    Aabeas )or#us #a#ers filed by %ttorney 5c)ormic3
    viii3 <o docet! no +arrant! and no valid 4udgment from t,e underlying case 95arina v B% )ounty)
    in t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt +ere ever filed! to s,o+ t,at t,e im#risonment &conformCedD
    +it, t,e fundamental reIuirements of la+&3
    1egardless of t,e fact t,at all 4udicial record in t,is case s,ould be deemed void! not voidable! one
    s,ould #articularly note t,at in ,er June 1-! ->>* 1e#ort and 1ecommendation 9later ado#ted by
    2S Judge Jo,n Halter in ,is Judgment! denying t,e Petition)! 2S 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle saysG
    C
    ccl(viii
    D
    ))6 #*ANAARA O? R-F)-0
    2evie/ o' &he Pe&i&ion in &his ,ase is "overne$ .* provisions o' &he An&i&erroris% an$ <''e,&ive Dea&h
    Penal&* A,& o' 3CCA 4>A<DPA?6 6 (n$er A<DPA, a 'e$eral ,o+r& %a* no& "ran& ha.eas relie' on a ,lai%
    a$j+$i,a&e$ on i&s %eri&s in s&a&e ,o+r& +nless &he a$j+$i,a&ion>res+l&e$ in a $e,ision &ha& /as ,on&rar*
    &o, or involve$ an +nreasona.le appli,a&ion o', ,learl* es&a.lishe$ =e$eral la/, as $e&er%ine$ .* &he
    )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es,? or >res+l&e$ in a $e,ision &ha& /as .ase$ on an +nreasona.le
    $e&er%ina&ion o' &he 'a,&s in li"h& o' &he evi$en,e presen&e$ in &he )&a&e ,o+r& pro,ee$in".? 8I (.).-. J
    88944$6.
    <eedless to say! t,e im#risonment of 1ic,ard 7ine +it, no la+ful records! conforming +it, t,e
    fundamental reIuirements of t,e la+! +as unreasonable a##lication of clearly establis,ed 7ederal
    la+3 =ut t,e records of Fine v Sheriff in t,e 2S District )ourt! as a +,ole! and t,e reasoning in t,e
    1e#ort and 1ecommendation in #articular! demonstrate t,at t,e #rivilege of Aabeas )or#us +as in
    fact sus#ended! under t,e rubric of %ntiterrorism333
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    103/165 TOC:2
    %! .irst Amen&ment to the ,S Constitution( the right to file $a$ers in court
    ?igure B16 () J+$"e 2i,har$ @eon, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Dis&ri,& o' -ol+%.ia, ro+&inel* $enies &he ri"h& &o 'ile
    papers &ha& provi$e evi$en,e o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion.
    ?igure B26 =ive 496 papers /i&h K@eave &o =ile Denie$, 2J@K in Win#sor v )vans et al. in &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, D-. In ,ases seekin" pro&e,&ion a"ains& j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion, &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& 'aile$ &o $o,ke&
    papers, /hi,h provi$e$ evi$en,e o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion, in $isre"ar$ o' =irs& A%en$%en& ri"h&s an$ &he $+&ies
    an$ o.li"a&ions o' &he -lerk o' &he -o+r&. Ins&ea$, s+,h papers /ere $ire,&l* 'or/ar$e$ &o J+$"e 2i,har$
    @eon, /ho han$ s,ri..le$ on &he% K@eave &o =ile Denie$K, an$ ha$ &he% re&+rne$ &o &he 'iler. #illia%
    #in$sor, a no&a.le an&i!j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion /his&le!.lo/er, re%ains &he &ar"e& o' re&alia&ion .* &he ,o+r&s &o
    &his $a&e. C
    ccl(i(
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    104/165 TOC:2
    ?igure B36 ;ine 4C6 papers /i&h K@eave &o =ile Denie$, 2J@K in Zernik v !elson et al 4see also se,&ion -8"6.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    105/165 TOC:2
    ?igure B46 One o' a series o' papers, /hi,h /ere s&a%pe$ K2e,eive$ B+& ;o& =ile$K an$ $enie$ 'ilin" +n$er
    perver&e$ KDis,repan,* ;o&i,esK in Zernik v Connor et al in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o'
    -ali'ornia. E
    ,,lxx
    F The O''i,e o' &he -lerk rea$ ea,h 'ilin", an$ $enie$ &he ri"h& &o 'ile an* paper, /hi,h provi$e$
    evi$en,e o' j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion, ei&her in &he )+perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' @os An"eles, or in &he ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r& i&sel'. =or ea,h s+,h paper, a perver&e$ KDis,repan,* ;o&i,eK /as iss+e$, p+rpor&in" &o invoke
    a Ba* 39, 800I ins&r+,&ion .* () Ba"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle &o &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk. In &his 'i"+re ! &he 'ilin"
    /as $enie$ o' Opinion @e&&er .* 'ra+$ exper& Ja%es #e$i,k, a hi"hl* $e,ora&e$ =BI ve&eran, re"ar$in" 'ra+$
    in &he )+perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' @os An"eles, in &he ,ase o' Samaan v Zernik/
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    106/165 TOC:2
    8,e 2nited States courts ,ave effectively establis,ed a #olicy e(cluding from t,e 7irst %mendment
    rig,t /to #etition t,e @overnment for a redress of grievances0 #a#ers! +,ic, documented 4udicial
    corru#tion3 5oreover! to accom#lis, suc, #olicy! t,e records s,o+ed 2S 4udges and court
    #ersonnel colluding in 7raud on t,e )ourt! and tig,t linage +as demonstrated bet+een suc,
    conduct! abuse of Auman 1ig,ts! and failing baning regulation in t,e 2nited States3
    8,erefore! in 5ay ->>* #etition +as filed at t,e 2S District )ourt! Has,ington D) - %erni& v
    'elson et al 91G>*-cv->>$>5) 9see also section )-g)! under cause of action &8o )om#el 2S :fficer
    to Perform Ais Duties&3 %mong Defendants +ere Kennet, Kaiser 9%ssistant Director of 7=' for
    )riminal 'nvestigations)! Kennet, 5elson 9t,en Director of 2S %ttorneys :ffice)! and Samuel
    =e"e 9Senior )ounsel at S.))3 )onduct of Judge 1ic,ard Beon at t,e 2S District )ourt! District
    of )olumbia! +as by t,en #redictable M t,e 2S )ourt eliminated from t,e docet - +it, no Due
    Process67air Aearing - #a#ers! +,ic, +ere duly filed! and +,ic, #rovided evidence of 4udicial
    corru#tion at t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt3
    %t t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! Judge Nirginia P,illi#s and 5agistrate
    )arla Hoe,rle ,ad #reviously engaged in ->>$-* in similar conduct in %erni& v Connor et al 9-G>$-
    cv->155>) 9see also section )-f)! +,ere ten 4udges of t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt! %ngelo
    5o"ilo and Sandor Samuels +ere named among Defendants in com#laint under cause of action of
    De#rivation of 1ig,ts under t,e )olor of Ba+3 8,e evidence #rovide in t,e case effectively
    documented raceteering at t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt3 %t t,e commencement of t,e litigation
    at 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! t,e /Pro Se )ler0 refused to issue valid
    summons #resented to ,im3 Bater! #a#ers! +,ic, #rovided evidence of 4udicial corru#tion! +ere
    dis,onestly doceted M concealed under unrelated #a#er and doceting te(t in t,e online P%).1
    docet3
    H,en t,at #ractice +as #rotested! t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia initiated t,e
    #ractice of selectively refusing to file! and selectively issuing #erverted #retense /Discre#ancy
    <otices0 on certain #a#ers +it, no Due Process67air Aearing3 8,e staff of t,e :ffice of t,e )ler
    also e(#licitly informed Plaintiff t,at 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle instructed t,em to issue suc,
    /<otices0 on any #a#ers #ertaining to allegation of 4udicial corru#tion3 7urt,ermore! 5agistrate
    )arla Hoe,rle and Judge Nirginia P,illi#s of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia
    later issued a #retense /:rder0 - #ro,ibiting Plaintiff from access to t,e 2S )ourts in t,e matter3
    8,e records of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! also documented alleged
    Judicial 5isconduct and 7raud on t,e )ourt M relative to t,e issuance and doceting of invalid
    #retense )ourt records by 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rle and Judge Nirginia P,illi#s in collusion +it,
    unaut,ori"ed court #ersonnel3
    )onduct of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia +as t,erefore sub4ect of a Petition!
    +,ic, +as duly filed in June ->>$ at t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit - %erni& v US!C0CAC
    9>$-7-714) M #ur#ortedly revie+ed by )ircuit Judges Ste#,en 1 1ein,ardt! 5ars,a S =er"on and
    5ilan D Smit,! Jr3 8,e Petition at t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! soug,t to )om#el Due
    Process 1ig,ts M issuing of valid summons and engaging in ,onest doceting at t,e 2S District
    )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3 Ao+ever! #a#ers! +,ic, #rovided evidence of t,e denial of t,e
    rig,t to file #a#ers at t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! and alleged +ides#read
    corru#tion at t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt! +ere eliminated from t,e docet of t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals! *t, )ircuit3 :nly unsigned orders +ere issued by t,e )ircuit Judges! +,ic, +ere served
    and noticed +it, no aut,entication6certification by t,e )ler of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t,
    )ircuit3
    Bater! in %#ril ->1>! similar conduct +as documented at t,e Su#reme )ourt of t,e 2nited States!
    under ca#tion of Fine v Sheriff 9>*-%$-7)3 8,e %##lication! #ur#ortedly revie+ed by t,e
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    107/165 TOC:2
    )onference of t,e Su#reme )ourt! #ertained to t,e im#risonment in solitary confinement of former
    2S #rosecutor 1ic,ard 7ine! +it, no +arrant and no entry of Judgment6)onviction or Sentencing!
    after ,e ,ad e(#osed! #ublici"ed! and rebued t,e taing of /not #ermitted0 #ayments 9/bribes0) by
    4udges of t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt! +,ic, reIuired t,e enactment of /retroactive
    immunities0 9/#ardons0) for suc, 4udges3
    Pa#ers +ere duly filed as 5otion to 'ntervene C
    ccl((i
    D in t,e Su#reme )ourt of t,e 2nited States
    under t,e ca#tion! referenced above! and +,ic, documented t,e #arallels in alleged corru#tion of
    t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! of t,e )alifornia Judicial )ouncil! of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia! and of t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! in t,e Aabeas )or#us
    Petition of 1ic,ard 7ine and t,e cases #ertaining to Dr Ferni3
    8,e #a#ers +ere eliminated from t,e docet of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt by )ourt )ounsel Danny
    =icell! +,o acted +it, no aut,ority at all3 C
    ccl((ii
    D
    0! .irst Amen&ment to the ,S Constitution( the right to access court recor&s to ins$ect an& to
    co$
    'n Ni4on v. #arner Communications) Inc. 435 23S3 5$* 91*7$)! t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt reaffirmed
    t,e common la+ rig,t to access 4udicial records to ins#ect and to co#yG
    I& is ,lear &ha& &he ,o+r&s o' &his ,o+n&r* re,o"nize a "eneral ri"h& &o inspe,& an$ ,op* p+.li, re,or$s
    an$ $o,+%en&, in,l+$in" j+$i,ial re,or$s an$ $o,+%en&s... A%eri,an $e,isions "enerall* $o no&
    ,on$i&ion en'or,e%en& o' &his ri"h& on a proprie&ar* in&eres& in &he $o,+%en& or +pon a nee$ 'or i& as
    evi$en,e in a la/s+i&. The in&eres& ne,essar* &o s+ppor& &he iss+an,e o' a /ri& ,o%pellin" a,,ess has
    .een 'o+n$, 'or exa%ple, in &he ,i&izenLs $esire &o keep a /a&,h'+l e*e on &he /orkin"s o' p+.li,
    a"en,ies... an$ in a ne/spaper p+.lisherLs in&en&ion &o p+.lish in'or%a&ion ,on,ernin" &he opera&ion o'
    "overn%en&...
    8,e Su#reme )ourt found t,is rig,t in,erent to t,e 7irst %mendment! to t,e 7ourt, and t,e Si(t,
    %mendments3
    8,e rig,t to access court records to ins#ect and to co#y is essential for maintaining #ublic
    trans#arency and integrity of t,e courts3
    1egardless! t,roug, t,e im#lementation of t,e '8 systems of t,e 2S courts! t,e #ublic is today
    denied access to court records! at times! even a #arty to records in o+n litigation 9see section )1e!g)
    7or e(am#le! re#eat efforts +ere made to access t,e records in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia in 7oseph %erni& v 7acBueline Connor et al 9-G>$-cv->155>)! *ichard I Fine v
    Sheriff of Los Angeles County 9-G>*-cv->1*14)! and US v City of Los Angeles et al 9-G>>-cv-1176*)
    9see sections @-a)3 C
    ccl((iii
    D
    Bie+ise! Hilliam Hindsor +as denied access to ,is o+n case records in t,e 2S District )ourt!
    <ort,ern District of @eorgia 9see section )-4)3
    1! Rules Enabling Act
    7rom Hii#edia &1ules .nabling %ct&G
    The 2+les <na.lin" A,& 4,h. A93, P+..@. 73S439, 4I )&a&. 30A4, ena,&e$ J+ne 3C, 3C34, 8I (.).-. J
    80786 is an A,& o' -on"ress &ha& "ave &he j+$i,ial .ran,h &he po/er &o pro%+l"a&e &he =e$eral 2+les o'
    -ivil Pro,e$+re. A%en$%en&s &o &he A,& allo/e$ 'or &he ,rea&ion o' &he =e$eral 2+les o' -ri%inal
    Pro,e$+re an$ o&her pro,e$+ral ,o+r& r+les. The ,rea&ion an$ revision o' r+les p+rs+an& &o &he 2+les
    <na.lin" A,& is +s+all* ,arrie$ o+& .* &he J+$i,ial -on'eren,e o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, &he poli,*%akin"
    .o$* o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es 'e$eral ,o+r&s.
    The ena,&%en& o' &he 2+les <na.lin" A,& on J+ne 3C, 3C34 /as a revol+&ionar* %o%en& in &he his&or*
    o' ,ivil pro,e$+re in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es. The la/ repeale$ &he ar,hai, K,on'or%i&* prin,ipleK /hi,h ha$
    "overne$ a,&ions a& la/ 4an$ onl* a,&ions a& la/6 in (.). 'e$eral ,o+r&s 'or over 340 *ears7 na%el*, &he
    r+le &ha& 'e$eral ,o+r&s sho+l$ ,on'or% &heir pro,e$+re in s+,h a,&ions &o &ha& o' &he ,o+r&s in &he s&a&e
    in /hi,h &he* /ere lo,a&e$. The ,on'or%i&* prin,iple ha$ ,a+se$ %ajor pro.le%s 'or 'e$eral ,o+r&s &ha&
    $i$ no& a,&+all* si& in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, s+,h as &he (ni&e$ )&a&es -o+r& 'or -hina.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    108/165 TOC:2
    #hile &he ,o+r&s exer,ise$ r+le%akin" po/ers "ran&e$ &o &he% +n$er &he A,& /i&ho+& -on"ressional
    in&erven&ion 'or nearl* 'or&* *ears, -on"ress re'+se$ &o allo/ &he =e$eral 2+les o' <vi$en,e &o "o in&o
    e''e,& a'&er &heir approval .* &he )+pre%e -o+r& in 3C73. The 2+les o' <vi$en,e /ere even&+all*
    passe$, /i&h s+.s&an&ial ,han"es, as le"isla&ion .* -on"ress. Be,a+se o' -on"ressLs in&erven&ion in
    3C73 an$ s+.se0+en& *ears, &he r+le%akin" po/ers "ran&e$ &o &he j+$i,iar* .* &he A,& have .een
    re$+,e$.
    't is claimed t,at t,e evidence #rovided in instant submission documents t,at t,e develo#ment!
    im#lementation! and o#eration of t,e '8 systems of t,e 2S courts in fact violates t,e *ules
    (na+ling Act 9see section )1a)
    Suc, system re#resent t,e sei"ing by t,e 2S 4udiciary of unla+ful aut,ority to adulterate t,e
    7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure and numerous ot,er la+s as +ell as )ivil and )onstitutional
    1ig,ts3
    5oreover! since t,e rules! embedded in suc, systems ,ave never been disclosed or #ublis,ed! suc,
    systems also violate t,e fundamental #rinci#le of Publicity of t,e Ba+3
    3! .e&eral Rules of Civil 9roce&ure (&uties of the cler/
    8,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure sayG
    2+le 4. )+%%ons
    4a6 -on&en&s7 A%en$%en&s.
    436 Contents/ A s+%%ons %+s&:
    ...
    4=6 .e si"ne$ .* &he ,lerk7 an$
    4D6 .ear &he ,o+r&Ms seal.
    %s documented in instant submission! t,e 2S courts today often fail to issue summonses t,at are
    signed by t,e cler and bear t,e courtEs seal3 5oreover! as s,o+n in %erni& v US !istrict Court)
    Southern !istrict of California! t,e )ler of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia
    refused to issue valid summonses 9see also section @-a)3
    %nd +,en t,e 2S )ourt of %##eals! *t, )ircuit +as #etitioned to mandate t,e 2S District )ourt to
    issue valid summonses! t,e #etition +as summarily denied3
    8,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure sayG
    2+le 9. )ervin" an$ =ilin" Plea$in"s an$ O&her Papers
    ...
    4$6 =ilin".
    436 2e0+ire$ =ilin"s7 -er&i'i,a&e o' )ervi,e. An* paper a'&er &he ,o%plain& &ha& is re0+ire$ &o .e serve$
    Q&o"e&her /i&h a ,er&i'i,a&e o' servi,eQ%+s& .e 'ile$ /i&hin a reasona.le &i%e a'&er servi,e.
    %s s,o+n in instant submission! valid )ertificates of Service are no longer filed +it, t,e cler of
    t,e courts under P%).1 and )56.)73
    8,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure sayG
    2+le 9I. <n&erin" J+$"%en&
    ...
    4.6 <n&erin" J+$"%en&.
    436 #i&ho+& &he -o+r&Ms Dire,&ion. )+.je,& &o 2+le 944.6 an$ +nless &he ,o+r& or$ers o&her/ise, &he
    ,lerk %+s&, /i&ho+& a/ai&in" &he ,o+r&Ms $ire,&ion, pro%p&l* prepare, si"n, an$ en&er &he j+$"%en&
    /hen:
    4A6 &he j+r* re&+rns a "eneral ver$i,&7
    4B6 &he ,o+r& a/ar$s onl* ,os&s or a s+% ,er&ain7 or
    4-6 &he ,o+r& $enies all relie'.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    109/165 TOC:2
    %s s,o+n in instant submission! t,e cler of t,e court no longer signs and enters t,e Judgments of
    t,e 2S courts under P%).1 and )56.)73
    8,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure sayG
    2+le 77. -on$+,&in" B+siness7 -lerkMs A+&hori&*7 ;o&i,e o' an Or$er or J+$"%en&
    4a6 #hen -o+r& Is Open. <ver* $is&ri,& ,o+r& is ,onsi$ere$ al/a*s open 'or 'ilin" an* paper, iss+in" an$
    re&+rnin" pro,ess, %akin" a %o&ion, or en&erin" an or$er.
    ...
    486 3r#ers/ )+.je,& &o &he ,o+r&Ms po/er &o s+spen$, al&er, or res,in$ &he ,lerkMs a,&ion 'or "oo$ ,a+se,
    &he ,lerk %a*:
    ...
    4$6 )ervin" ;o&i,e o' an Or$er or J+$"%en&.
    436 Service/ I%%e$ia&el* a'&er en&erin" an or$er or j+$"%en&, &he ,lerk %+s& serve no&i,e o' &he en&r*,
    as provi$e$ in 2+le 94.6, on ea,h par&* /ho is no& in $e'a+l& 'or 'ailin" &o appear. The ,lerk %+s& re,or$
    &he servi,e on &he $o,ke&.
    %s documented in instant submission! today t,e rig,t to file #a#ers is often denied! +,en #a#ers
    #rovide evidence of 4udicial corru#tion3 8,e cler of t,e court no longer send notice of an order or
    4udgment! and t,e clers fail to record t,e service in t,e docet3
    8,e 7ederal 1ules of )ivil Procedure sayG
    2+le 7C. 2e,or$s Gep& .* &he -lerk
    4a6 -ivil Do,ke&.
    436 In Deneral. The ,lerk %+s& keep a re,or$ kno/n as &he >,ivil $o,ke&? in &he 'or% an$ %anner
    pres,ri.e$ .* &he Dire,&or o' &he A$%inis&ra&ive O''i,e o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es -o+r&s /i&h &he approval o'
    &he J+$i,ial -on'eren,e o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es. The ,lerk %+s& en&er ea,h ,ivil a,&ion in &he $o,ke&.
    A,&ions %+s& .e assi"ne$ ,onse,+&ive 'ile n+%.ers, /hi,h %+s& .e no&e$ in &he $o,ke& /here &he 'irs&
    en&r* o' &he a,&ion is %a$e.
    486 I&e%s &o .e <n&ere$. The 'ollo/in" i&e%s %+s& .e %arke$ /i&h &he 'ile n+%.er an$ en&ere$
    ,hronolo"i,all* in &he $o,ke&:
    4A6 papers 'ile$ /i&h &he ,lerk7
    4B6 pro,ess iss+e$, an$ proo's o' servi,e or o&her re&+rns sho/in" exe,+&ion7 an$
    4-6 appearan,es, or$ers, ver$i,&s, an$ j+$"%en&s.
    %s documented in instant submission! t,e under P%).1 and )56.)7! t,e docets are no longer
    e#t by t,e clers of t,e courts or #ersons! aut,ori"ed by t,em3 5oreover! t,e clers often refuse to
    acce#t t,e filing and6or record in t,e docet #a#ers! +,ic, #rovide evidence of 4udicial corru#tion!
    as +ell as #rocess issued! and #roofs of service or ot,er returns s,o+ing e(ecution 9e3g3!
    summonses)3
    4! Authentication an& certification of 2u&icial recor&s' legal $rocess un&er the signature of the
    cler/ an& the Seal of the Court
    8,e 2S )onstitution! %rticle 'N! J1! declaresG
    =+ll 'ai&h an$ ,re$i& shall .e "iven in ea,h s&a&e &o &he p+.li, a,&s, re,or$s an$ j+$i,ial pro,ee$in"s o'
    ever* o&her s&a&e. An$ ,on"ress %a* .* "eneral la/s pres,ri.e &he %anner in /hi,h s+,h a,&s,
    re,or$s an$ pro,ee$in"s shall .e prove$, an$ &he e''e,& &hereo'.
    8,e %ct of 5ay -6! 17*>! statesG
    Tha& &he a,& o' &he le"isla&+res o' &he several s&a&es shall .e a+&hen&i,a&e$ .* havi" &he seal o' &heir
    respe,&ive s&a&es a''ixe$ &here&o: Tha& &he re,or$s an$ j+$i,ial pro,ee$in"s o' &he ,o+r&s o' an* s&a&e
    shall .e prove$ or a$%i&&e$, in an* o&her ,o+r& /i&hin &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, .* &he a&&es&a&ion o' &he ,lerk,
    an$ &he seal o' &he ,o+r& annexe$, i' &here .e a seal, &o"e&her /i&h a ,er&i'i,a&e o' &he j+$"e, ,hie'
    j+s&i,e or presi$in" %a"is&ra&e, as &he ,ase %a* .e, &ha& &he sai$ a&&es&a&ion is in $+e 'or%. An$ &he
    sai$ re,or$s an$ j+$i,ial pro,ee$in"s, a+&hen&i,a&e$ as a'oresai$, shall have s+,h 'ai&h an$ ,re$i&
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    110/165 TOC:2
    "iven &o &he%, in ever* ,o+r& /i&hin &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, as &he* have, .* la/ or +sa"e, in &he ,o+r&s o'
    &he s&a&e 'ro% /hen,e &he sai$ re,or$s are, or shall .e &aken.
    8,e %ct of 5arc, -7! 1$>4! statesG
    Tha&, 'ro% an$ a'&er &he passa"e o' &his a,&, all re,or$s an$ exe%pli'i,a&ions o' o''i,e .ooks, /hi,h are
    or %a* .e kep& in an* p+.li, o''i,e o' an* s&a&e, no& apper&ainin" &o a ,o+r&, shall .e prove$ or a$%i&&e$
    in an* o&her ,o+r& or o''i,e in an* o&her s&a&e, .* &he a&&es&a&ion o' &he keeper o' &he sai$ re,or$s or
    .ooks, an$ &he seal o' his o''i,e &here&o annexe$, i' &here .e a seal, &o"e&her /i&h a ,er&i'i,a&e o' &he
    presi$in" j+s&i,e o' &he ,o+r& o' &he ,o+n&* or $is&ri,&, as &he ,ase %a* .e, in /hi,h s+,h o''i,e is or
    %a* .e kep& or o' &he "overnor, &he se,re&ar* o' s&a&e, &he ,han,ellor or &he keeper o' &he "rea& seal o'
    &he s&a&e, &ha& &he sai$ a&&es&a&ion is in $+e 'or%, an$ .* &he proper o''i,er an$ &he sai$ ,er&i'i,a&e, i'
    "iven .* &he presi$in" j+s&i,e o' a ,o+r&, shall .e '+r&her a+&hen&i,a&e$ .* &he ,lerk or pro&hono&ar* o'
    &he sai$ ,o+r&, /ho shall ,er&i'*,
    +n$er his han$ an$ &he seal o' his o''i,e, &ha& &he sai$ presi$in" j+s&i,e is $+l* ,o%%issione$ an$
    0+ali'ie$7 or i' &he sai$ ,er&i'i,a&e .e "iven .* &he7 "overnor, &he se,re&ar* o' s&a&e, &he ,han,ellor or
    keeper o' &he "rea& seal, i& shall .e +n$er &he "rea& seal o' &he s&a&e in /hi,h &he sai$ ,er&i'i,a&e is %a
    $e. An$ &he sai$ pro,ee$in"s o' &he sai$ ,o+r&.
    8,e 2S la+! -$ USC C :D1: 0 Seal and teste of process) saysG
    All /ri&s an$ pro,ess iss+in" 'ro% a ,o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es shall .e +n$er &he seal o' &he ,o+r& an$
    si"ne$ .* &he ,lerk &hereo'.
    <o order of t,e 2S courts is issued today under t,e seal of t,e court and under t,e signature 9eit,er
    ,and-signature or electronic signature) of t,e cler of t,e court3
    %nd as s,o+n above! in numerous cases! also t,e summonses of t,e 2S courts are issued unsigned
    and +it, no seal of t,e court embossed on t,em3
    <eit,er is any 4udicial record aut,enticated t,roug, a )ertificate of Service bearing t,e signature of
    t,e cler of t,e court3
    5! Electronic Signatures in Global an& National Commerce Act (%AAA) an& E(Government Act
    (%AA%)
    7rom Hii#edia! E(lectronic Signatures in Glo+al and National Commerce ActEG
    The <le,&roni, )i"na&+res in Dlo.al an$ ;a&ional -o%%er,e A,& 4<)ID;, P+..@. 30AS88C, 334 )&a&.
    4A4, ena,&e$ J+ne 30, 8000, 39 (.).-. ,h. CA6 is a (ni&e$ )&a&es 'e$eral la/ passe$ .* &he (.).
    -on"ress &o 'a,ili&a&e &he +se o' ele,&roni, re,or$s an$ ele,&roni, si"na&+res in in&ers&a&e an$ 'orei"n
    ,o%%er,e .* ens+rin" &he vali$i&* an$ le"al e''e,& o' ,on&ra,&s en&ere$ in&o ele,&roni,all*...
    Al&ho+"h ever* s&a&e has a& leas& one la/ per&ainin" &o ele,&roni, si"na&+res, i& is &he 'e$eral la/ &ha&
    la*s o+& &he "+i$elines 'or in&ers&a&e ,o%%er,e. The "eneral in&en& o' &he <)ID; A,& is spelle$ o+& in
    &he ver* 'irs& se,&ion 4303.a6, &ha& a ,on&ra,& or si"na&+re >%a* no& .e $enie$ le"al e''e,&, vali$i&*, or
    en'or,ea.ili&* solel* .e,a+se i& is in ele,&roni, 'or%?. This si%ple s&a&e%en& provi$es &ha& ele,&roni,
    si"na&+res an$ re,or$s are j+s& as "oo$ as &heir paper e0+ivalen&s, an$ &here'ore s+.je,& &o &he sa%e
    le"al s,r+&in* o' a+&hen&i,i&* &ha& applies &o paper $o,+%en&s.
    8,e sti#ulations of t,e .-Sign %ct in t,emselves are inadeIuate! and to t,e degree t,at it a##lies to
    government records! suc, as records of t,e 2S courts! t,e %ct +as never #romulgated in a
    meaningful +ay3
    7rom Hii#edia! &(0Government Act 9<;;<=&G
    The <!Dovern%en& A,& o' 8008 4P+..@. 307S347, 33A )&a&. 8ICC, 44 (.).-. J 303, 1.2. 849I5). I036,
    is a (ni&e$ )&a&es s&a&+&e ena,&e$ on De,e%.er 37, 8008, /i&h an e''e,&ive $a&e 'or %os& provisions o'
    April 37, 8003. I&s s&a&e$ p+rpose is &o i%prove &he %ana"e%en& an$ pro%o&ion o' ele,&roni,
    "overn%en& servi,es an$ pro,esses .* es&a.lishin" a =e$eral -hie' In'or%a&ion O''i,er /i&hin &he
    O''i,e o' Bana"e%en& an$ B+$"e&, an$ .* es&a.lishin" a 'ra%e/ork o' %eas+res &ha& re0+ire +sin"
    In&erne&!.ase$ in'or%a&ion &e,hnolo"* &o i%prove ,i&izen a,,ess &o "overn%en& in'or%a&ion an$
    servi,es, an$ 'or o&her p+rposes.
    The s&a&+&e in,l+$es /i&hin i&:
    =I)BA 4&he =e$eral In'or%a&ion )e,+ri&* Bana"e%en& A,& o' 8008 as Ti&le III, an$
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    111/165 TOC:2
    -IP)<A 4&he -on'i$en&ial In'or%a&ion Pro&e,&ion an$ )&a&is&i,al <''i,ien,* A,&6 as Ti&le N.
    %s #art of t,e transition to electronic administration of government! t,e 2S )ongress #assed t,e .-
    @overnment %ct 9->>-) and t,e .-Sign %ct 9->>>)3 8,e 2S De#artment of Aomeland Security
    Presidential Directive-J 9->>4) furt,er establis,ed #olicies for validation and aut,entication of
    electronic systems and electronic records of t,e .(ecutive =ranc, agencies3 Standards +ere
    accordingly #romulgated and a##lications +ere im#lemented3 'n contrast! t,e records systems!
    im#lemented by t,e 2S courts! +ere not covered by suc, la+s and regulations3
    'n contrast! no suc, la+s and standards +ere a##lied to t,e electronic records of t,e 2S )ourts 9see
    also section )1c)3 't is obvious t,at all t,e 2S courts 4udicial records today are electronic records3
    1egardless! t,ey bear no valid electronic signatures3 Bie+ise! +,en suc, records are served on
    #arties as #a#er records! t,ey bear no valid ,and or electronic signatures3 %t times! t,e records bear
    scanned gra#,ic signatures of 2S 4udges3 Ao+ever! suc, signatures are neit,er valid ,and
    signatures! nor valid electronic signatures3
    8,e electronic records of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt bear no signatures at all3 %nd +,en Su#reme
    )ourt records +ere ins#ected! in t,e case of *ichard Fine v Sheriff Lee Baca! no ,and signatures
    +ere discovered in t,e #a#er file eit,er3 8,erefore! it remains unclear if any Su#reme )ourt 4udicial
    records are ever signed at all3
    .! Com$liance 8ith relevant treaties an& conventions
    2nder t,e current regime! t,e 2nited States s,ould be deemed in violation of and6or failing to fulfill
    its duties and obligations #ursuant to 'nternational Ba+ and t,e follo+ing treaties and6or
    conventionsG
    #! "asel Accor&s on "an/ing Su$ervision
    7rom Hii#edia &=asel %ccords&G
    The Basel A,,or$s re'er &o &he .ankin" s+pervision A,,or$s 4re,o%%en$a&ions on .ankin"
    re"+la&ions6QBasel I, Basel II an$ Basel IIIQiss+e$ .* &he Basel -o%%i&&ee on Bankin" )+pervision
    4B-B)6. The* are ,alle$ &he Basel A,,or$s as &he B-B) %ain&ains i&s se,re&aria& a& &he Bank 'or
    In&erna&ional )e&&le%en&s in Basel, )/i&zerlan$ an$ &he ,o%%i&&ee nor%all* %ee&s &here. The Basel
    A,,or$s is a se& o' re,o%%en$a&ions 'or re"+la&ions in &he .ankin" in$+s&r*.
    8,e 2S! a #arty to t,e =asel %ccords! C
    ccl((iv
    D s,ould be deemed failing to fulfill its duties and
    obligations #ursuant to t,e %ccordsG
    7ailing to maintain effective national =aning Su#ervision to ensure t,e conduct of 2S bans
    under &sound baning #rinci#les&3
    Decriminali"ing 5oney Baundering by 2S bans3 9see section D-)
    Decriminali"ing un#recedented fraud by 2S bans on consumers! s,are ,olders! and t,e 2S ta(
    #ayers3 9section D-)
    )olluding! t,roug, fraud in t,e 2S courts in un#recedented fraud on t,e #eo#le of t,e 2S and
    beyond! e3g3 t,e #eo#le of %rgentina3 9see sections )-d!e!f!g!,!)
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    112/165 TOC:2
    %! Hague A$ostille Treat (#;4#)
    ?igure B16 )a%ple () Apos&ille 'or%, p+rs+an& &o &he Hague Apostille ?reaty 43CA36. Diven &he lar"e!s,ale
    'ra+$ in a+&hen&i,a&ion an$ ,er&i'i,a&ion o' () ,o+r&s j+$i,ial re,or$s, $o,+%en&e$ in ins&an& s+.%ission, i& is
    re,o%%en$e$ &ha& o&her na&ions, /hi,h are par&* &o &he Trea&*, no& re,o"nize Apos&illes, iss+e$ .* () a+!
    &hori&ies.
    8,e 8reaty abolis,ed t,e reIuirement of legali"ation for foreign #ublic documents1 C
    ccl((v
    D
    8,e 2nited States entered t,e )onvention into force on 15 :ct 1*$13
    'nstant submission documents un#recedented fraud in t,e aut,entication and certification of 4udicial
    records in t,e 2S courts today3 9see section )1d)
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    113/165 TOC:2
    't recommended t,at ot,er nations! +,ic, are #arty to t,e 8reaty not recogni"e %#ostilles from t,e
    2nited States courts3
    0! ,nite& Nations Convention against Transnational Organi)e& Crime
    8,e 2nited <ations )onvention against 8ransnational :rgani"ed )rime 92<8:)) is a ->>> 2nited
    <ations-s#onsored multilateral treaty against transnational organi"ed crime3 8,e )onvention +as
    ado#ted by a resolution of t,e 2nited <ations @eneral %ssembly on 15 <ovember ->>>3 %s of
    %ugust ->14! t,e )onvention ,as been ratified by 1$> states3 't is also called t,e Palermo
    )onvention! and its t,ree #rotocols 9t,e Palermo Protocols) areG C
    ccl((vi
    D
    Protocol to Prevent! Su##ress and Punis, 8rafficing in Persons! es#ecially Homen and
    ),ildrenL
    Protocol against t,e Smuggling of 5igrants by Band! Sea and %ir! and
    Protocol against t,e 'llicit 5anufacturing and 8rafficing in 7irearms
    %ll four of t,ese instruments contain elements of t,e current international la+ on ,uman trafficing!
    arms trafficing and money laundering3 8,e 2nited <ations :ffice on Drugs and )rime 92<:D))
    acts as custodian of t,e 2<8:) and its #rotocols3
    8,e )onvention came into force on -* Se#tember ->>33 C
    ccl((vii
    D
    8,e 2 signed t,e )onvention on 13 Dec ->>> and ratified it on 3 <ov ->>53
    8,e 2S s,ould be deemed in violation of t,e )onvention on t,e follo+ing groundsG
    a3 Decriminali"ation of 8rafficing in Persons - under t,e &.(traordinary 1endition& #ractices! +,ic, are
    #ur#ortedly a##roved by t,e 2S courts3
    b3 Decriminali"ation of 5oney Baundering - as seen in t,e case of AS=) and ot,er 2S bans3 9see Section
    D-)
    c3 Decriminali"ation of 5oney Baundering - as seen in t,e case of N'L Capital v *epu+lic of Argentina 9see
    section )-)
    G! Retaliation against anti(2u&icial corru$tion activists
    #! General
    ?igure BB6 An&i!j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion a,&ivis&, .lo""er 2o"er )h+ler, a'&er .ein" .ea&en an$ 'alsel* i%prisone$
    in Ala.a%a. A-@(, -o%%i&&ee &o Pro&e,& Jo+rnalis&s, an$ la/ pro'essors a&&e%p& &o assis& )h+ler. The le"al
    re,or$s, in,l+$in" &he /arran&, p+rpor&e$l* provi$in" &he le"al 'o+n$a&ion 'or his arres& an$ i%prison%en&,
    /ere seale$ .* &he ,o+r&. The ,ase /as $es,ri.e$ as Kprior res&rain& o' =ree )pee,hK, /hi,h is
    ,ons&i&+&ionall* prohi.i&e$. I& is %os& likel* a ,ase o' 'alse arres& an$ 'alse i%prison%en&, /i&h no vali$ j+$i,ial
    re,or$s. E
    ,,lxxviii
    ,
    ,,lxxix
    ,
    ,,lxxx
    ,
    ,,lxxxi
    ,
    ,,lxxxii
    F
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    114/165 TOC:2
    ?igure BC6 An&i!j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion a,&ivis&, 'or%er () prose,+&or 2i,har$ =ine, $+rin"
    his 800C!30 'alse i%prison%en& in soli&ar* ,on'ine%en& in @os An"eles 4see also se,&ions -8a6.
    ?igure BD6 Davi$ ),hie$, an&i!j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion a,&ivis&, /as jaile$ 'or 30 $a*s 'or silen&l* o.servin" &he
    ,o+r&. E
    ,,lxxxiii
    F
    %! Retaliation against +r -ose$h <erni/ ( author of instant submission
    ?igure B96 Dr Joseph Zernik, a+&hor o' ins&an& s+.%ission, shor&l* .e'ore es,apin" @os An"eles an$ &he
    (ni&e$ )&a&es in April 8030. As a res+l& o' his e''or&s &o $is,over, ar,hive, an$ $isse%ina&e re,or$s,
    per&ainin" &o j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion, in ,onj+n,&ion /i&h &he 'irs& ever (P2 o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, he /as so+"h& .*
    () Barshals KThrea& (ni&K, an$ a&&e%p& /as %a$e &o apprehen$ hi%. A'&er es,apin" &o Israel, re&alia&ion .*
    &he () an$ Israeli "overn%en&s ,on&in+e$. In 8033, as a res+l& o' re&alia&or* a,&ions, ,oin,i$en&al /i&h &he
    p+.li,a&ion o' &he (; (P2 repor& on Israel, &o /hi,h he ,on&ri.+&e$ a s+.%ission, Dr Zernik re0+es&e$ &/i,e
    &he pro&e,&ion o' &he =e$eral Der%an "overn%en&. 4see also se,&ions -3$. -8'6
    8,e com#re,ensive studies of t,e '8 systems of various courts! +,ic, are in #art included in instant
    submission! and in #art +ere #ublis,ed in academic 4ournals! sub4ect to international anonymous
    #eer revie+! are t,e outcome of my intense interest in t,is area! as a ey to Auman 1ig,ts in our
    time3 Ao+ever! ' came to t,is area +it, no formal training in eit,er com#uter science or t,e la+3
    5y acIuaintance +it, t,e legal system and '8 systems of t,e courts +ere all t,e outcome of my
    e(#erience in t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Bos %ngeles! +,ic, started around ->>73
    'n <ovember ->>7! ' +as forced to leave ,is ,ome and my #ro#erty under t,e t,reat of force!
    unla+ful by credible! by t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Bos %ngeles3 5y #ro#erty +as
    forcibly entered by %ttorney David Pasterna! former President of t,e Bos %ngeles =ar %ssociation!
    +,o #ur#orted to tae #ossession of it on be,alf and by aut,ority of t,e Su#erior )ourt3
    1egarding conduct of Pasterna! acting in collusion +it, t,e Bos %ngeles Su#erior )ourt! James
    Hedic! one of t,e best no+n fraud e(#erts in t,e 2S! and a ,ig,ly decorated 7=' veteran! o#ined
    /U fraud being committedU0 and /333investigation s,ould be immediately institutedU0 C
    ccl(((iv
    D
    5y case #rovided detailed documentation of abuse of Auman 1ig,ts t,roug, +ides#read 4udicial
    corru#tion in t,e Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! Bos %ngeles! in collusion +it, financial institutions
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    115/165 TOC:2
    and large la+ firms3 8,e underlying case +as best summari"ed in t,e 7irst %mended )om#laint in
    %erni& v Connor et al in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia3 C
    ccl(((v
    D
    5y case also #rovided detailed documentation of t,e #atroni"ing of t,e corru#tion of )alifornia
    4udges by corru#tion in 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! and t,e 2S )ourt of
    %##eals! *t, )ircuit3 9see section )3f)3
    8,e case +as uniIue in its documentation! sinceG
    't commenced in ->>4 - +ell before t,e onset of t,e financial crisis3
    't involved no default or any debt to t,e offending ban3 'n fact! ' ,ad no business relations,i#
    +it, t,e #er#etrators! )ountry+ide and =an of %merica3 %nd yet! ' +as targeted for real-estate
    fraud by t,ese bans3
    't im#licated t,e most senior officers of )ountry+ide - %ngelo 5o"ilo and Sandor Samuels -
    and t,e most senior officers of =an of %merica - =rian 5oyni,an and @eneral 8ommy 7ran -
    in direct involvement in cor#orate corru#tion and raceteering in t,e courts3 C
    ccl(((vi
    D
    't s,o+ed t,at 7='! 2S De#artment of Justice! S.)! and all baning regulators - )om#troller of
    t,e )urrency! 8,rift Su#ervision! 7ederal 1eserve! 7ederal 8rade )ommission! #atroni"ed suc,
    corru#tion even before t,e onset of t,e financial crisis3 C
    ccl(((vii
    D
    't s,o+ed t,e ey role! in +,at s,ould be deemed raceteering in t,e courts! of some of t,e
    largest la+ firms in t,e 2nited StatesG =ryan )ave! BBP! S,e##ard 5ullin! and =uc,alter <emer3
    C
    ccl(((viii
    D
    't s,o+ed t,e serious retaliation by t,e courts on t,ose! +,o e(#ose t,eir corru#tion3
    a= 'arch <;:; 0 (scaping the US folloing the U$*0US su+mission
    'n t,e mont,s #receding t,e %#ril 1*! ->1> <@: submission deadline for t,e 1
    st
    ever 2P1 of t,e
    2nited States! ' increased my efforts to collect court records! documenting t,e corru#tion of t,e
    Su#erior )ourt of )alifornia! t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! and t,e 2S )ourt
    of %##eals! *t, )ircuit! as detailed above 9sections )1d! )-a!f)3
    Suc, efforts included +ritten communications +it, court #ersonnel! in effort to gain access to
    #ublic records! communications +it, ot,er anti-4udicial activists! for e(c,ange of information and
    records! and also included re#eat a##earances in #erson in t,e office of t,e cler of t,e various
    courts! in an effort to e(ercise t,e 7irst %mendment rig,ts of access to court records to ins#ect and
    to co#y3
    ' +as also increasingly active in disseminating t,e records and information on various online sites!
    including Bivelea3com! Scribd3com! and .(aminer3com! +,ere my +riting attracted by t,en
    ,undreds of t,ousands of reads 9and by today more t,an - millions)3
    'n communications +it, ot,er anti-4udicial corru#tion activists and ot,er individuals! +,o +ere
    abused by t,e courts! it also became a##arent! t,at all of us came to t,e conclusion t,at t,e 4udges
    +ere acting out of com#liance +it, t,e la+3 Ao+ever! ' +as t,e only one! +,o focused on
    intensive study of t,e mec,anics of t,e electronic record systems of t,e various courts! and
    documented t,e t,at t,e orders and 4udgments! issued by suc, 4udges! +ere void on t,eir faces for
    lac of valid aut,entication and certification3 ' urged t,em ot,er victims of 4udicial abuse to try to
    gain access to records! including in #articular t,e <.7s3
    :n t,e bacground of communications +it, 1ic,ard 7ine and ot,er anti-4udicial activists across t,e
    2S! and as a result of ot,er unusual incidents! it also became obvious t,at t,e ris to my #ersonal
    security +as steadily gro+ing3
    =y t,at time! it ,as been 3 years t,at anytime ' a##eared in t,e main entrance of t,e )alifornia
    Su#erior )ourt in Bos %ngeles! an armed De#uty S,eriff +as attac,ed to me for t,e entire duration
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    116/165 TOC:2
    of my visit in t,e building 9including t,e restrooms)3 ' considered it an effort to intimidate and
    deny access to t,e court3 8,e De#uty S,eriffs t,emselves informed me t,at suc, #ractice +as
    un#recedented3 8,ey e(#lained t,at it resulted from an order issued by Judge JacIueline )onnor3
    1eIuests to access t,e record of suc, Judge JacIueline )onnor order +ere denied3
    7ollo+ing is t,e outline of my activities! relative to efforts to access court records in t,e 2S District
    )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia! +,ic, ended u# +it, clear and imminent danger to my life and
    my libertyG
    1eIuest to ins#ect <.7s in sus#ected simulated litigation cases
    'n #articular! my efforts included corres#ondence +it, t,e )ler of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia! 8errry <afisi! and 1ecords Su#ervisor Da+n =ulloc! documenting t,e denial
    of access to court records in t,e cases of Fine v Sheriff of Los Angeles County 9-G>*-cv->1*14)
    9section )3a)! %erni& v Connor et al 9-G>$-cv->155>) 9section )3f)! and US v City of LA et al (2:00-
    cv-11769)3 C
    ccl(((i(
    D
    8,e latter case +as #articularly sensitive! since it #ertained to t,e ongoing large-scale false
    im#risonment in Bos %ngeles )ounty in t,e aftermat, of t,e 1am#art corru#tion scandal 91**$-
    ->>>)! and failure of t,e 2S federal agencies to tae action! even a decade later3 't became one of
    t,e central issues in A1%Es submission for t,e ->1> 2P1 of t,e 2S3 C
    cc(c
    D
    %not,er critical issue +as my reIuest for investigation of t,e evidence for adulteration of t,e
    commencing P%).1 record 9Petition) in 7ineEs Aabeas )or#us case3 De#uty )ler S,aron 5c@ee!
    'ntae 2nit Su#ervisor! Public De#artment of t,e :ffice of t,e )ler! su##orted my claims3 S,e
    indicated t,at 5s Donna 8,omas! 5agistrate )arla Hoe,rleEs )ourtroom %ssistant 9a title +it, no
    legal aut,ority - eIuivalent of an office secretary) unla+fully ,andled t,e records and constructed
    t,e docet in 7ineEs ,abeas cor#us #etition3 8,at fact is also evident by t,e initials D8 on almost ->
    entries in t,at docet3
    8,e corres#ondence belo+ +as often also co#ied to ot,er relevant court #ersonnel and t,e staff of
    ),ief Judge %udrey )ollins 9but <:8 t,e ),ief Judge ,erself)3
    't s,ould be noted t,at eventually! +,en ' got access to t,e <.7s in %erni& v Connor et al and to
    some of t,e <.7s in Fine v Sheriff! t,ey indeed turned out to confirm my sus#icion all along - t,at
    t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia conducted simulated litigation in t,ese t+o
    cases! and many more3
    'n revie+ing t,e events outlined belo+! it s,ould also be noted t,at ),ief Judge %udrey )ollins! and
    )ler of t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi! denied my access to t,e <.7s and refused to tae corrective actions
    once ' uncovered t,e invalid <.7s3 Ao+ever! in t,e case of In *(5 Gottschal&) t,ey in fact
    reaffirmed my claims of invalidity of all clerical and 4udicial records! +,ic, +ere issued +it,
    invalid <.7s3 't +as only t,roug, communications +it, me t,at @ottsc,al! a senior! e(#erienced!
    attorney! +,o +as abused by t,e courts for #rotesting 4udicial corru#tion! got familiar +it, t,e
    #ractice of simulated #rocess t,roug, t,e issuance of invalid <.7s3 H,en ,e! an aut,ori"ed
    )56.)7 user! received t,e Judge )ollins :rder of Disbarment +it, no valid <.7! ,e c,allenged its
    validity3 %nd t,e note entered in t,e P%).1 docet of t,e case indicates t,at Judge )ollins
    consented and too corrective action3 9see figure belo+)3 Ao+ever! in t,e P%).1 docet of 'n 1.G
    1onald @ottsc,al t,ere +as only one order! so t,at t,e correction +as sim#le3 %##lying t,e same
    corrective action to Fine v Sheriff or %erni& v Connor et al +ould ,ave reIuired eliminating t,e
    entire P%).1 docets3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    117/165 TOC:2
    ?igure C06 Invali$ KTex& onl*K $o,ke& en&r*, Dk& Onone, Do,+%en& $ele&ion an$ re!$o,ke&in" in $n R)'
    Ronal# *ottschalk 48:33!%,!008I46 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia. The &ex& re!a''ir%s
    &ha& &he Jan+ar* 33, 8038 Or$er o' Dis.ar%en&5)+spension 4$isposi&ive or$er, akin &o j+$"%en& in s+,h ,ase6
    /as iss+e$ /i&h no ;<=, an$ &here'ore /as +na+&hen&i,a&e$, an$ o' no 'or,e an$ e''e,&.
    1o/ever, i& sho+l$ .e no&e$ &ha& &his no&e is a KTex& onl*K $o,ke& en&r* .* a person o' +nkno/n na%e an$
    a+&hori&*, /hi,h is +nsi"ne$ an$ +na+&hen&i,a&e$.
    2onal$ Do&&s,halk /as a @os An"eles A&&orne*, /ho like 2i,har$ =ine pro&es&e$ j+$i,ial ,orr+p&ion. @ike
    2i,har$ =ine he /as 'alsel* arres&e$ in 800C 4al.ei& 'or a 'e/ /eeks onl*6, an$ like 2i,har$ =ine he also /as
    'alsel* hospi&alize$. 1o/ever, /hereas 2i,har$ =ine /as kep& in soli&ar* ,on'ine%en& 'or 3I %on&hs in &he
    hospi&al se,&ion o' &he jail, Do&&s,halk /as kep& in an o+&si$e ps*,hia&ri, /ar$. 1e repor&e$ &ha& he /as
    'or,e$ &o &ake ps*,hia&ri, %e$i,a&ions, /hile .ein" $enie$ ,ri&i,al $ia.e&es %e$i,a&ion.
    Thro+"h ,o%%+ni,a&ion /i&h &he a+&hor o' ins&an& s+.%ission, Do&&s,halk /as e$+,a&e$ re"ar$in" &he
    si"ni'i,an,e o' &he ;<= an$ i&s K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK. There'ore, /hen he re,eive$ &he $isposi&ive
    or$er in &his ,ase /i&h an invali$ ;<=, he 'ile$ a re0+es& &o $ele&e i& 'ro% &he $o,ke&. -hie' J+$"e A+$re*
    -ollins apparen&l* ,onsen&e$. E
    ,,x,i
    F
    The ,on$+,& o' -hie' J+$"e A+$re* -ollins here s&an$s in ,on&ras& /i&h &he re'+sal o' -hie' J+$"e A+$re*
    -ollins an$ -lerk o' &he -o+r& Terr* ;a'isi &o &ake an* ,orre,&ive a,&ions, /hen &he* /ere no&i'ie$ o' &he
    $is,over* o' &he invali$ ;<=s in "ine v Sheriff an$ Zernik v Connor et al 4see se,&ion D8a6. The reason %a*
    .e &ha& here, onl* one or$er ha$ &o .e re!$o,ke&e$. In &he &/o 'or%er ,ases, &he en&ire $o,ke& /o+l$ have &o
    .e $ele&e$.
    I& is ins&r+,&ive &ha& .o&h =ine an$ Do&&s,halk, senior, experien,e$ a&&orne*s, /ho /ere a+&horize$ -B5<-=
    par&i,ipan&s an$ passe$ &he %an$a&or* ins&r+,&ion, /ere en&irel* +na/are o' &he si"ni'i,an,e o' &he ;<= an$
    &he K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK 'or vali$i&*, 'or,e an$ e''e,& o' j+$i,ial re,or$s.
    -ul 0#' %AA; - %ttem#t to access court records in Fine v Sheriff of LA County and %erni& v
    Connor et al t,roug, a visit in #erson in t,e :ffice of t,e )ler of t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia +as denied! in a##arent violation of 7irst %mendment and Due Process
    rig,ts3
    August #' %AA; ( )om#laint and reIuest for investigation +ere emailed to 8erry <afisi! )ler of
    t,e 2S District )ourt! in reG 8am#ering +it, court records in t,e :ffice of t,e )ler3 C
    cc(cii
    D 8,e
    email again reIuested to ins#ect and to co#y t,e <.7s in Fine v Sheriff of LA County and %erni&
    v Connor et al3
    8,e email also detailed evidence for adulteration in t,e commencing record of 7ineEs Aabeas
    )or#us #etition3 7or e(am#le! t,e #etition +as doceted as filed on 5arc, ->! ->>*! but it
    included a #ur#orted &Judgment& record by B% Su#erior )ourtEs Judge David ?affe! +,ic, +as
    dated 5arc, -4! ->>*3 :t,er evidence for adulterations in t,e commencing record +ere
    detailed3
    Terr* ;a'isi
    Dis&ri,& -o+r& <xe,+&ive an$ -lerk o' -o+r&
    4.* e%ail an$ .* priori&* ,er&i'ie$ %ail, res&ri,&e$ $eliver*6
    338 ;. )prin" )&ree&, 2oo% D!I@os An"eles, -ali'ornia C0038
    &err*Wna'isi,a,$.+s,o+r&s."ov
    Ti%e response re0+es&e$ .* #e$ A+"+s& 9, 800C, 9:00p%
    -lerk ;a'isi:
    Please a,,ep& &his le&&er as %* re0+es& 'or inves&i"a&ion in re: -on,erns re"ar$in"
    $o,ke&in",%ain&enan,e o' -o+r& re,or$s, an$ ,on$+,& o' ,leri,al s&a'' a& &he (.). Dis&ri,& -o+r&, @os
    An"eles in &he 'ollo/in" ,ases:
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    118/165 TOC:2
    36 =ine v )heri'' Depar&%en& o' @A -o+n&* 48:0C!,v!03C346, an$
    86 Zernik v -onnor e& al 48:0I!,v!039906
    The &/o ,ases are join&l* repor&e$, sin,e in .o&h ,ases, &he ke* persons involve$ in,l+$e$:
    36 Ba"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle
    86 -o+r&roo% Assis&an& Donna Tho%as
    36 Pro )e -lerk -hris )a/*er.
    =or .o&h ,ases re0+es& /as also 'ile$ 'or a,,ess &o ;<=s &o inspe,& an$ &o ,op*, an$ a$$i&ional
    ,on,erns %a* .e raise$ 'ollo/in" revie/ o' &he ;<=s.
    Ti%e is o' &he essen,e, preli%inar* response is re0+es&e$ .* #e$, A+" 9, 800C, 9:00 p%:
    a6 #he&her &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& in&en$s &o &ake an* a,&ion rela&ive &o ins&an& ,o%plain&X
    .6 I' so S /ha& is &he es&i%a&e$ &i%e 'or ,o%ple&ion o' s+,h revie/X
    ,6 I' &he ,o%plain& is revie/e$ S /o+l$ ,o%plainan& Joseph Zernik .e no&i'ie$ o' &he res+l&s o' s+,h
    revie/X
    $6 Is &here an* o&her spe,i'i, pro,e$+re a& &he -o+r& 'or 'ilin" ,o%plain&s on s+,h %a&&ersX
    e6 2e0+es& is herein 'ile$ 'or a,,ess p+rs+an& &o ;ixon v #arner -o%%+ni,a&ions, In, 43C7I6 &o
    &he Do,ke& A,&ivi&* 2epor&s an$ &o &he -alen$ar o' &he -o+r&s , rela&ive &o .o&h a,&ions, &o inspe,& an$
    &o ,op*.
    1) ?ine . #heri(( Aepartment ( &A /unt+ (2:09-'.-01914)
    Dr Zernik "o& in&eres&e$ in &he ,ase onl* /hen i& /as ,lose &o &he en$ o' &he le"al revie/ pro,ess.
    A,,or$in"l*, Dr Zernik +n,overe$ &he iss+es o' ,on,ern lis&e$ .elo/, onl* ver* re,en&l* S a'&er &he
    le"al revie/ pro,ess /as ,o%ple&e$. Diven &he ,en&ral si"ni'i,an,e o' &he re,or$ in 4a6 .elo/,
    ,on,ern is &ha& an* +n&o/ar$l* even& rela&e$ &o s+,h re,or$ ,o+l$ have res+l&e$ in perversion o'
    j+s&i,e, an$ &he on"oin" jailin" o' a person /hi,h sho+l$ have .een release$ 'ro% jailin".
    a) "urprted Eudge Aa.id Ga((e @ar'h 45 2009 Eudgment (r /ntempt H15253I appearing a%
    part ( the re'rd (A8t J15 A8t J1B)6
    )+,h j+$"%en& 'or ,on&e%p& a"ains& A&& 2i,har$ =ine is &he ,en&ral $o,+%en& in &he en&ire ,ase.
    -on,erns are raise$ re"ar$in" &he vali$i&* o' .o&h ,opies o' &he re,or$, /hi,h appear in &he $o,ke&.
    1o/ever, pri%ar* ,on,ern in &his le&&er res&s /i&h -ope O3, an$ &he possi.ili&* &ha& i& /as a$+l&era&e$
    a'&er .ein" 'ile$ as a re,or$ a& &he (.). Dis&ri,& -o+r&, @A.
    Inheren& $e'e,& is apparen& in .o&h ,opies o' &he p+rpor&e$ J+$"e Davi$ Ha''e Bar,h 4, 800C
    J+$"%en& in,l+$e$ in li&i"a&ion re,or$s in &his ,ase 4-opies O3, O8! =oo&no&es O3, O8, respe,&ivel*6.
    )+,h J+$"%en& .ears a =I@<D s&a%p o' &he @A )+perior -o+r& $a&e$ Bar,h 4, 800C. -op* O3 o' &he
    J+$"e Davi$ Ha''e Bar,h 4, 800C J+$"%en& /as la&er in,orpora&e$ as an exhi.i& in &he 1a.eas
    -orp+s Pe&i&ion o' A&& 2i,har$ =ine, .earin" a =I@<D s&a%p o' &he (.). Dis& -r&, @A, $a&e$ &hro+"h
    han$!al&era&ion Bar,h 80, 800C. -op* O8 /as 'ile$ as an exhi.i& on Ba* 3, 800C. 1o/ever, .o&h
    -op* O3 an$ -op* O8 o' &he J+$"%en& are $a&e$ Ba,h 84, 800C .* han$!/ri&in" per&ainin" &o an$
    a$ja,en& &o &he veri'i,a&ion a&&ri.+&e$ &o J+$"e Davi$ Ha''e on &he las& pa"es o' &he respe,&ive -op*
    O3 an$ -op* O8 o' &he p+rpor&e$ j+$"%en& re,or$s.
    A&& =ine repor&s &ha& &he ,op* &ha& he provi$e$ 'or s+.%ission /i&h A8t J1, ha$ no $a&e en&ere$ in i&.
    The $o,ke&in" &ex& o' A8t J1 re'ers &o ,han"es or %o$i'i,a&ions in &he re,or$s &ha& &ook pla,e on
    Bar,h 84, 800C, al.ei&, &he exa,& na&+re o' &he %o$i'i,a&ion is no& spelle$ o+&.
    On J+l* 80, 800C I raise$ s+,h ,on,erns re"ar$in" &he p+rpor&e$ Bar,h 4, 800C re,or$ /i&h Bs
    )haron B,Dee, )+pervisor o' Opera&ions in &he -lerkMs O''i,e. )he pro%ise$ %e &o look in&o &he
    %a&&er.
    On J+l* 87, 800C I $is,+sse$ &he %a&&er /i&h Bs B,Dee a"ain. A& &ha& &i%e she in'or%e$ %e &ha& she
    ,on,+rre$ /i&h %* opinion &ha& &here /as reason 'or ,on,ern in &his re"ar$, an$ she in'or%e$ %e
    &ha& she raise$ &he iss+e /i&h &he ,o+r& o' Ba"is&ra&e #oehrle.
    $) *a$le ( /ntent% ( exhi$it% that 3ere (iled 3ith "etitin t /ali(rnia /urt ( Appeal%5
    2nd Ai%tri't5 and in'rprated a% part ( re'rd (A8t J1) H4I
    The &i&les o' 4 exhi.i&s: O4,9,A,7 are %issin" in &he re,or$ &ha& is &o$a* seen in PA-<2, an$ no
    <xhi.i& ;+%.ers are sho/n. D+e &o ver* li%i&e$ ,o%%+ni,a&ions oppor&+ni&* /i&h jaile$ A&& 2i,har$
    =ine, I $i$ no& have &he oppor&+ni&* &o revie/ &he iss+e /i&h hi% prior &o &his $a&e. 1o/ever, I a%
    'or/ar$in" &o hi% a ,op* o' &his le&&er, hopin" &ha& he respon$ an$ s&a&e /ha& /as &he na&+re o' &he
    respe,&ive pa"e in &he $o,+%en& &ha& he provi$e$ 'or 'ilin" in ,o+r&.
    ') &etter dated @ar'h 205 2009 in'luded a% part ( the re'rd (A8t J1) H9F
    @e&&er $a&e$ Bar,h 80, 800C 'ro% Dep+&* -lerk -hris )a/*er &o A&& 2i,har$ =ine ,o+l$ no& possi.l*
    .e par& o' &he 'ilin" .* A&& 2i,har$ =ine, an$ i& is +n,lear /h* i& is represen&e$ as s+,h.
    d) Nti'e ( Re(eren'e t a @agi%trate Eudge (A8t J2)
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    119/165 TOC:2
    The assi"n%en& &o a j+$"e is lis&e$ per DO 07!08.-on,ern is &ha& no s+,h Deneral Or$er ,o+l$ .e
    'o+n$.
    e) Nti'e ( /leri'al -rrr in re: #tamp ?)&-A n A8t J1 (A8t J3)
    The $o,ke&in" &ex& s&a&es:
    035845800C3 ;OTI-< O= -@<2I-A@ <22O2: On &he pe&i&ion &he $a&e /as Bar,h 3C, 800C, /hi,h is
    in,orre,&. The ,orre,& $a&e is Bar,h 80, 800C. 4rn6 4<n&ere$:035845800C6
    -on,ern is re"ar$in" ,on'l+en,e o' +n+s+al even&s rela&ive &o Dk& O3 on Bar,h 84, 800C.
    () Nti'e ( /leri'al -rrr in re: A%%ignment t 9udge (A8t J4)
    The $o,ke&in" &ex& s&a&es:
    035895800C4 ;OTI-< O= -@<2I-A@ <22O2: D+e &o ,leri,al error &he -ase has .een reassi"ne$
    'ro% J+$"e Dean D. Pre"erson &o J+$"e Deor"e 1 #+ 'or all '+r&her pro,ee$in"s. The ,ase /ill no/
    re'le,& &he ini&ials o' &he &rans'eree J+$"e -N0C!03C34 D# 4-#6. 4rn6 4<n&ere$: 035875800C6
    -on,ern is &ha& in 'a,& re,+sal o' a j+$"e, or +n$oin" o' invali$ assi"n%en&, /hi,h /ere no& -leri,al
    <rrors /ere in,orre,&l* re,or$e$.
    2) Kerni8 . /nnr et al (2:0D-'.-01110)
    a) /a%e num$ering 7 unu%ual 'lu%tering 3ith unrelated 'a%e%5 3hi'h n it%(a'e appear% in
    .ilatin ( ?R/" Rule C9 (a)(1)
    )ele,& a ,ase:
    8:0I!,v!03990!NAP!-# Joseph Zernik v. Ja,0+eline -onnor e& al 4,lose$6
    8:0I!%j!03990!D(TH ()A v. Bar&inez 4,lose$6
    9:0I!,v!03990!)D@!OP 1e,&or Bar&inez v. @i&&on @oan )ervi,in" @P e& al4,lose$6
    $) Adulteratin ( "lainti((4% %ummn%5 and d'8eting ( (al%e and deli$eratel+ mi%leading
    %ummn a% part ( 'urt re'rd% in "a'er (A8tJ1)6
    On &he $a* o' 'ilin" &he ,o%plain&, Plain&i'' presen&e$ Pro )e -lerk, -hris )a/*er, /i&h vali$
    )+%%ons. Br )a/*er re'+se$ &o veri'* an$ iss+e s+,h s+%%ons, an$ insis&e$ on "enera&in" on his
    o/n, o+& o' ,o%plian,e /i&h 2+les o' -o+r&, 'alse an$ $eli.era&el* %islea$in" s+%%ons, /hi,h he
    &hen pro,ee$e$ &o $o,ke& +n$er &he ,o%plain& in A8t J1. )+,h ,on$+,& sho+l$ .e $ee%e$ +pon
    revie/ o.s&r+,&ion o' j+s&i,e, $enial o' a,,ess &o &he ,o+r& an$ &o 'air &rial.
    ') Nti'e ( Re(eren'e t !nited #tate% @agi%trate Eudge (A8t J4)
    The assi"n%en& &o a j+$"e is lis&e$ per DO 07!08.-on,ern is &ha& no s+,h Deneral Or$er ,o+l$ .e
    'o+n$.
    d) Order Returning /a%e ?r Rea%%ignment !pn Re'u%al (A8tJB5 JC5JD5 J95 J10)
    The re!assi"n%en& &o a %a"is&ra&e j+$"e is lis&e$ per DO 07!08.-on,ern is &ha& no s+,h Deneral
    Or$er ,o+l$ .e 'o+n$.
    e) &ng dela+% ) d'8eting ( "lainti((4% paper%5 and ther irregularitie%5 re%ulting in
    %u$%tantial di.ergen'e ( the re'rd% (rm rdinal %e:uen'e6
    As a res+l& o' vario+s $ela*s i%pose$ onl* on Plain&i''Ms papers, a& &i%es over a %on&h, &he $o,ke&
    sho/s re,or$s &ha& $iver"e s+.s&an&iall* 'ro% or$inal se0+en,e.
    () A'8eting ( unrelated paper% under the %ame re'rd num$er and the %ame d'8eting text
    (A'8et J125 J1B5 J1D)
    -on,ern is &ha& s+,h ,on$+,& res+l&e$ in &he ,on,eal%en& o' ,ri&i,al re,or$s.
    g) ?ailure t d'8et re'rd% 3ith "a'er header %e'urit+ $lue imprint
    A n+%.er o' re,or$s /ere $o,ke&e$ /i&h no .l+e hea$er i%prin&, a& &i%es, s+,h ina$e0+a&e $o,ke&in"
    /as ,orre,&e$ a'&er ,o%plain&s /ere 'ile$ /i&h =BI.
    h) "r(% ( #er.i'e ( #ummn% and /mplaint (A8t J43)
    =alse re,or$s /ere $o,ke&e$.
    i) "r(% ( #er.i'e ( #ummn% and /mplaint (A8t J43)
    =alse re,or$in" +n$er 2ela&e$ Transa,&ions.
    9) Eudgment (A8t J10C)
    =alse re"is&ra&ion as seen in 2ela&e$ &ransa,&ions S +nrela&e$ &o -o%plain& 4Dk&O36, /hi,h /as le'&
    +n&er%ina&e$.
    3) /n'ern% appli'a$le t $th 'a%e%
    a) All3ing (iling ( paper% $+ attrne+% 3ith n Nti'e% ( Appearan'e% $+ /un%el
    A& leas& in one ,ase S 'ilin" o' papers .* Br*an -ave, @@P 'or -o+n&r*/i$e, &he evi$en,e is ra&her
    ,on,l+sive &ha& Br*an -ave, @@P, /as never a+&horize$ &o appear as ,o+nsel o' re,or$ in ,o+r& 'or
    ei&her -o+n&r*/i$e or Bank o' A%eri,a. Ins&ea$, Br*an -ave, @@P an$ -o+n&r*/i$e an$5or Bank o'
    A%eri,a -orpora&ion en"a"e$ in /ha& %+s& .e $ee%e$ +pon revie/ repea& o' ,on$+,& &ha& /as
    re.+ke$ .* &he 1on Je'' Boh%, (.). J+$"e, Texas, an$ /hi,h -o+n&r*/i$e pro%ise$ &ha& -o+r& no&
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    120/165 TOC:2
    &o repea& 4,ase o' Borro/er Parsle*, ;o 09!C0374,Be%oran$+% Opinion 4Dk& O84I6.
    $) ?ailure t pr.ided ade:uate /rprate Ai%'l%ure% in a timel+ manner5andLr in'lu%in (
    /rprate data (rm un8n3n %ur'e%6
    The ,o+r& 'aile$ &o en'or,e &he la/ in re: -orpora&e Dis,los+res, an$ in,l+$e$ ,orpora&e $a&a 'ro%
    +nkno/n so+r,es.
    ') !%e ( manual %tamp% .er%u% ele'trni' %tamp% =?)&-A>6
    In .o&h ,ases ,er&ain re,or$s /ere s&a%pe$ >=I@<D? +sin" a %an+al s&a%ps ins&ea$ &he ele,&roni,
    s&a%ps %os& ,o%%onl* +se$ a& &he ,o+r&. -on,ern is &ha& s+,h s&a%ps on s+,h re,or$s represen&e$
    re&roa,&ive s&a%pin" o' &he re,or$s.
    d) Aelegatin ( the /ler84% authrit+ t /urtrm A%%i%tant6
    In .o&h ,ases ,er&ain ,leri,al '+n,&ions /ere ,arrie$ o+& .* Bs Donna Tho%as,/ho is +pon
    in'or%a&ion an$ .elie' -o+r&roo% Assis&an&. -on,ern is /he&her s+,h '+n,&ions are in$ee$ $ele"a&e$
    &o -o+r&roo% Assis&an&s .* &he -lerk o' &he -o+r&.
    e) "arti'ipatin ( Aeput+ /ler8%5 8n3ingl+5 in d'8eting re'rd% that ma+ nt $e authenti'
    'urt re'rd%
    -on,ern is re"ar$in" ,on$+,& o' $ep+&* ,lerks or ,o+r&roo% assis&an&s, /hi,h %a* ,ons&i&+&e
    $o,ke&in" o' re,or$s, /hi,h on &heir 'a,e /ere no& a+&hen&i, ,o+r& re,or$s, e.". S s+%%ons in Zernik
    v -onnor e& al. )+,h ,on$+,& &ha& %a* have &aken pla,e, %a* .e $ee%e$ +pon revie/ pro$+,&ion o'
    'alse an$ $eli.era&el* %islea$in" li&i"a&ion re,or$s, an$ o.s&r+,&ion o' j+s&i,e an$5or perversion o'
    j+s&i,e.
    () "arti'ipatin ( Aeput+ /ler8%5 8n3ingl+5 in /urt 'ndu't that ma+ nt $e legitimate 'urt
    pr'edure5 and that ma+ $e deemed upn re.ie3 a% a$u%i.e n it% (a'e6
    -on,ern is re"ar$in" ,on$+,& o' $ep+&* ,lerks or ,o+r&roo% assis&an&s, /hi,h %a* have involve$
    par&i,ipa&ion in ,o+r& ,on$+,& &ha& o+& o' ,o%plian,e /i&h a+&hen&i,, vali$, ,o+r& pro,e$+res, an$ %a*
    .e $ee%e$ +pon revie/ as a.+sive in na&+re, e.". S Dis,repan,* pro,e$+res in Zernik v -onnor e&
    al, /hi,h /ere never re,or$e$ .* &he ,o+r&, .+& /ere re,or$e$ .* plain&i'' as >Perver&e$ Dis,repan,*
    Pro,e$+res? (A8t J101).
    Thank *o+ 'or *o+r a&&en&ion &o &his %a&&er.
    Da&e$: A+"+s& 3, 800C
    JO)<P1 1 Z<2;IG
    WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
    B*: Joseph 1 Zernik
    3I93 =oo&hill Blv$, @N, -A C3790
    Tel: 43836 939 49I37 =ax: 4I036 CCI 0C377
    jz38349ear&hlink.ne&
    //:
    2i,har$ I. =ine
    4B* ()P) 'irs& ,lass %ail T .* e%ail &o %%6
    Prisoner A&&orne* 43I843A76
    Pro )e Pe&i&ioner
    @O) A;D<@<) -O(;TH JAI@
    T/in To/ers 490 Ba+,he& )&.
    @os An"eles, -A C0038
    WWWWWWWW
    3 J+$"e Davi$ Ha''e Bar,h 4, 800C J+$"%en& 'or -on&e%p&, -op* O3: A&& 2i,har$ =ineMs 1a.eas
    -orp+s Pe&i&ion, (.). Dis& -r&, @A 4Dk& O36 as re,en&l* seen in Pa,er:
    h&&p:55inproperinla.,o%500!00!00!+s!$is&!,&!la!'ine!v!la!,o+n&*!sheri''!$o,!03!exh!0C!03!04!j+$"%en&!
    ,on&e%p&.p$'
    8 J+$"e Davi$ Ha''e Bar,h 4, 800C J+$"%en& 'or -on&e%p&, -op* O8: A&& 2i,har$ =ineMs 1a.eas
    -orp+s Pe&i&ion, (.). Dis& -r&, @A 4Dk& O3A6 as re,en&l* seen in Pa,er:
    h&&p:55inproperinla.,o%500!00!00!+s!$is&!,&!la!'ine!v!la!,o+n&*!sheri''!$o,!3A!8Wexh!a!j+$"%en&!o'!
    ,on&e%p&!in!%arina!hoa!v!la!,o+n&*.p$'
    3 Par&* in In&eres& Dr Joseph Zernik, an$ like/ise A&& 2i,har$ =ine are *e& &o "ain a,,ess &o
    a+&hen&i,a&e$ ,opies o' an* o' &he (.). -o+r& re,or$s $is,+sse$ here
    4 TO- o' <xhi.i&s &ha& /ere par& o' a pe&i&ion 'ile$ /i&h -ali'ornia -o+r& o' Appeals, 8n$ Dis&ri,&,
    appears as p48, Dk& O3!8:
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    121/165 TOC:2
    h&&p:55inproperinla.,o%500!00!00!+s!$is&!,&!la!'ine!v!la!,o+n&*!sheri''!$o,!03!exh!0C!03!08!pe&i&ion!&o!
    ,al!,&!app!8n$!&o,!exhi.i&s.p$'
    9 @e&&er $a&e$ Bar,h 80, 800C 'ro% Dep+&* -lerk -hris )a/*er &o A&& 2i,har$ =ine.
    Se$tember #6' %AA; - %ttem#t to access court records in Fine v Sheriff of LA County and %erni&
    v Connor et al t,roug, #ersonal a##earance in t,e :ffice of t,e )ler +as denied3 C
    cc(ciii
    D
    A-/&ARA*)ON O? EO#-"H H K-RN)M
    I; 2<: )ep&e%.er 3I, 800C visi& &o &he (ni&e$ )&a&es Dis&ri,& -o+r& @os An"eles.
    I, JO)<P1 1 Z<2;IG, here.* $e,lare as 'ollo/s:This $e,lara&ion /as /ri&&en as a %e%oran$+% o'
    %* )ep&e%.er 3I, 800C visi& &o &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, @os An"eles. I have personal kno/le$"e o' &he
    'a,&s se& 'or&h herein, /hi,h I kno/ &o .e &r+e an$ ,orre,&, ex,ep& as &o &hose %a&&ers &herein s&a&e$
    as .ase$ +pon in'or%a&ion an$ .elie', an$ as &o &o &hose %a&&ers, I .elieve &he% &o .e &r+e an$
    ,orre,& as /ell. I' ,alle$ as a /i&ness, I ,o+l$ an$ /o+l$ ,o%pe&en&l* &es&i'* /i&h respe,& &here&o.
    3. B* visi& &o &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, @os An"eles, O''i,e o' &he -lerk, 2e,or$s Depar&%en& /as par& o'
    %* on"oin" e''or&s 'or a& leas& &/o an$ a hal' *ears, &o exer,ise in vario+s ,o+r&s %* ri"h&s p+rs+an&
    &o &he =irs& A%en$%en& &o &he (ni&e$ )&a&es -ons&i&+&ion an$ ;ixon v #arner -o%%+ni,a&ions, In,
    43C7I6 S &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s S &o inspe,& an$ &o ,op*.
    8. D+rin" &ha& visi& I presen&e$ &he Dep+&* -lerk o' $+&*, /ho s&a&e$ his na%e /as <$$*
    2a%irez,/i&h a /ri&&en re0+es& &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s S &o inspe,& an$ &o ,op* ! in %* ,ase S
    Zernik v Connor et al 48:0I!,v!039906 an$ in &he ,ase o' 2i,har$ =ine ! "ine v Sheriff 48:0C!,v!
    03C346.
    3. -xhi$it 1 is a &r+e an$ ,orre,& ,op* o' &he le&&er re0+es& &ha& I presen&e$ &o Br <$$* 2a%irez.
    4. Br 2a%irez i%presse$ %* ,op* o' &he le&&er /i&h &he s&a%p >2e,eive$ K.
    9. I also presen&e$ Br 2a%irez /i&h &he re0+es& &o a,,ess ,o+r& papers .* ,o%ple&in" &he paper
    'or%s &ha& /ere provi$e$ .* &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk 'or &ha& p+rpose.
    A. -xhi$it 2 is a &r+e an$ ,orre,& ,op* o' &he ,o%ple&e$ paper 'or%s &ha& I s+.%i&&e$ &o Br <$$*
    2a%irez as par& o' %* re0+es& &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s S &o inspe,& an$ &o ,op*.7. B* re0+es&s
    per&aine$ &o &/o ,ases o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, @os An"eles:
    a6 -oseph Zernik v -ac<ueline Connor et al 48:0I!,v!039906 ! /here I s+e$ so%e 30 j+$"es o'
    &he @A )+perior -o+r&, A&&orne* Davi$ Pas&ernak, -o+n&r*/i$eLs -hie' @e"al O''i,er !)an$or
    )a%+els an$ -<O An"elo Bozilo 'or /ha& /as ,lai%e$ &o a%o+n& &o ra,ke&eerin". I .elieve$
    &ha& &he () -o+r& s+.je,&e$ %e &o a sha% ,o+r& a,&ion in &he ,ase,an$ &ha& none o' &he or$ers
    an$ also &he j+$"%en& /ere hones&, vali$, an$ e''e,&+al ,o+r& papers. Ins&ea$ &he* /ere voi$,
    no& voi$a.le.
    .6 Richar# "ine v Sheriff Department of %os Angeles County 48:0C!,v!03C346 ! &he ha.eas
    ,orp+s pe&i&ion o' 2i,har$ =ine. I .elieve$ &ha& &he () -o+r& s+.je,&e$ 2i,har$ =ine &o a sha%
    ,o+r& a,&ion in &he ,ase, an$ &ha& none o' &he or$ers an$ also &he j+$"%en& /ere hones&, vali$,
    an$ e''e,&+al ,o+r& papers. Ins&ea$ S &he* /ere voi$, no& voi$a.le.
    I. In .o&h ,ases I ha$ also previo+sl* 'ile$ ,o%plain&s re"ar$in" alle"e$ a$+l&era&ion o' re,or$s 'ile$
    in ,o+r& on paper .* pro se 'ilers.
    C. D+rin" &he )ep&e%.er 3I, 800C visi&, I /as $enie$ a,,ess &o all re,or$s, /hi,h I re0+es&e$ a,,ess
    &o. A,,ess &o paper re,or$s /as $enie$ on )ep&e%.er 3I, 800C, +n$er &he ,lai% &ha& &he paper
    re,or$s ha$ alrea$* .een shre$$e$. 1o/ever, /hen I re0+es&e$ a,,ess &o &he ,o+r&
    re,or$s,$o,+%en&in" &he ,lai%e$ shre$$in", s+,h a,,ess /as $enie$.
    30. A,,ess &o no re,or$s /ha&soever /as "aine$ $+rin" &he visi& o' )ep&e%.er 3I, 800C.
    33. A&&a,he$ &o &his $e,lara&ion are:
    -xhi$it 1: )ep&e%.er 3I, 800C 2e0+es& .* Joseph Zernik &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s,
    s&a%pe$>2e,eive$? an$ ins,ri.e$ /i&h &he na%e o' <$$* 2a%irez .* &he Dep+&* -lerk o' $+&*.
    -xhi$it 2: )ep&e%.er 3I, 800C 2e0+es& .* Joseph Zernik &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s, +sin" 'or%s
    provi$e$ .* &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk.
    I $e,lare +n$er penal&* o' perj+r* +n$er &he la/s o' &he )&a&e o' -ali'ornia an$ &he (ni&e$ )&a&es &ha&
    &he 'ore"oin" is &r+e an$ ,orre,&. <xe,+&e$ &his 3r$ $a* in Jan+ar*, 8030, in @os An"eles -o+n&*,
    -ali'ornia.
    Joseph 1 Zernik
    B*
    WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
    JO)<P1 1 Z<2;IG
    PO Box 98A, @a Nerne, -ali'ornia C3790
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    122/165 TOC:2
    Tel: 43836 939!49I3 =ax:4I036 CCI!0C37
    Yjz38349ear&hlink.ne&Z
    +ecember %;' %AA; - 'n an a##earance in t,e :ffice of t,e )ler! a letter to )ler of t,e )ourt
    8erry <afisi +as filed! +,ic, again ased to ins#ect and to co#y t,e <.7s in Fine v Sheriff of LA
    County and %erni& v Connor et al.
    During t,is visit! co#ies +ere obtained ofG C
    cc(civ
    D
    - % series of invalid <.7s in %erni& v Connor et al 0 all of t,em missing t,e &.lectronic
    Document Stam#&! and
    - % single invalid <.7 9for t,e 5andate) in Fine v Sheriff 0 also missing t,e &.lectronic
    Document Stam#&3 8,e lie+ise invalid <.7 of t,e Judgment +as ins#ected! but reIuest for a
    co#y +as denied3
    8,e integrity! or lac t,ereof! of t,e <.7s in %erni& v Connor et al) discovered on December -*!
    ->1>! +as summari"ed in a table form! s,o+n belo+3 C
    cc(cv
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    123/165 TOC:2
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    124/165 TOC:2
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    125/165 TOC:2
    ?igure C16 Ta.le s+%%ar* o' ;<=s in Zernik v Connor et al, $is,overe$ on De,e%.er 8C, 800C in &he O''i,e
    o' -lerk, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia.
    ;o&e:
    i6 ;one o' &he re0+es&e$ ;<=s ,on&aine$ a ,o%ple&e K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK.
    ii. O' &he 84 re0+es&e$ ;<=s, onl* I /ere 'o+n$ &o in,l+$e &r+n,a&e$ K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK.
    iii. ;<=s 'or &he 'ollo/in" ,ri&i,al re,or$s in,l+$e$ no K<le,&roni, Do,+%en& )&a%pK a& all:
    a. Iss+an,e o' )+%%onses,
    .. Assi"n%en&s an$ 2eassi"n%en&s &o J+$"es
    ,. Assi"n%en&s an$ 2eassi"n%en&s &o Ba"is&ra&es
    $. All Bin+&es /hi,h /ere exa%ine$.
    e. Or$er Den*in" Dis0+ali'i,a&ion 'or a -a+se
    '. ;o&i,e an$ 2epor& an$ 2e,o%%en$a&ion .* Ba"is&ra&e.
    ". Or$er A$op&in" 2epor& an$ 2e,o%%en$a&ion .* J+$"e
    h. J+$"%en& .* J+$"e.
    #ummar+:
    Dis,over* o' &he ;<=s provi$e$ &he $e'ini&ive evi$en,e o' li&i"a&ion &ha& /as ,on$+,&e$ 'ro% s&ar& &o 'inish as
    invali$ ,o+r& pro,ess, /here a j+$"e an$ a %a"is&ra&e si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion /i&h no a+&hori&* a& all.
    -anuar 1' %A#A - 7ollo+ing t,e discovery on December -*! ->>*! of t,e invalidity of t,e <.7s
    in %erni& v Connor et al) reIuest for clarification +as emailed to )ler of t,e )ourt 8erry <afisiG
    C
    cc(cvi
    D
    2evie/ o' &he $o,ke& an$ &he ;<=s $e%ons&ra&e$ &ha& a n+%.er o' persons exe,+&e$ &ransa,&ions in
    &he $o,ke& o' &he a.ove re'eren,e$ ,ase. 1o/ever, none o' &he% /as i$en&i'ie$ .* na%e. Boreover,
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    126/165 TOC:2
    no/here /as an* s&a&e%en& 'o+n$ &o &he e''e,& &ha& s+,h &ransa,&ions an$ s+,h $o,ke& /ere, in 'a,&,
    exe,+&e$ .* Dep+&* -lerks an$ .* a+&hori&* o' -lerk o' &he -o+r&, Terr* ;a'isi.
    I &here'ore re0+es& &he 'ollo/in" ,lari'i,a&ions &hro+"h s&a&e%en&s on &he re,or$ .* Terr* ;a'isi, -lerk
    o' &he -o+r&:
    36 Tha& >$&? $i$5$i$ no& re'er &o Bs Donna Tho%as.
    86 Tha& Bs Donna Tho%as /as5/as no& a+&horize$ as a Dep+&* -lerk $+rin" &he perio$ ,overe$ .*
    &he $o,ke& o' Zernik v Connor et al 48:0I!,v!039906. In ,ase Bs Tho%as /as in$ee$ a+&horize$,
    please provi$e &he $a&e o' her appoin&%en& as Dep+&* -lerk.
    36 Tha& &ransa,&ions .* Bs Donna Tho%as in &he $o,ke& o' Zernik v Connor et al
    48:0I!,v!039906 /ere5/ere no& exe,+&e$ .* a+&hori&* o' Terr* ;a'isi, -lerk o' &he -o+r&.
    46 Tha& &he re'+sal on Bar,h 9!7, 800I, .* -hris )a/*er, Pro )e -lerk, &o iss+e s+%%onses
    prepare$ .* Plain&i'' in Zernik v Connor et al 48:0I!,v!039906, an$ his iss+an,e ins&ea$ o'
    s+%%onses prepare$ .* -hris )a/*er, Pro )e -lerk, hi%sel', /hi,h /ere $o,ke&e$ +n$er &he
    ,o%plain& 4Dk& O36, an$ no&a&e$ in &he +nn+%.ere$ se,on$ $o,ke& slo&, /as5/as no& .* a+&hori&* o'
    Terr* ;a'isi, -lerk o' &he -o+r&.
    96 Tha& all o&her &ransa,&ions in &his $o,ke&, /hi,h /ere exe,+&e$ .* ,o+r& personnel, /ere5/ere no&
    exe,+&e$ .* a+&hori&* o' Terr* ;a'isi, -lerk o' &he -o+r&.
    A6 Tha& &he $o,ke& o' Zernik v Connor et al 48:0I!,v!039906, as $ispla*e$ in PA-<2 /as5/as no&
    $ee%e$ .* &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& an hones&, vali$, an$ e''e,&+al $o,ke& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es
    -o+r&,p+rs+an& &o (ni&e$ )&a&es la/.
    <o res#onse +as ever received on t,is reIuest3
    -anuar 1' %A#A - 1eIuest +as emailed to )ler of t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi! for clarification 1.G %erni& v
    Connor et al 9-G>$-cv->155>)! Fine v Sheriff 9-G>*-cv->1*14)! In re5 *ichard Fine 9-G>*-mc-
    >>1-*)! and US v City of LA et al 9<5;;0cv0::FD1=5 Denial of access to records! and validity of
    im#lementation of P%).1 and )56.)7 in t,e 2S District )ourt! )entral District of )alifornia!
    #ursuant to @eneral :rder >$->-3 8,e reIuest in #art saysG C
    cc(cvii
    D
    Thanks a"ain &o Bs Da/n B+llo,k 'or her help an$ her pa&ien,e $+rin" %* visi& &o &he -lerkMs
    2e,or$s Depar&%en& on De,e%.er 8C, 800C. D+rin" &ha& visi&, I s+.%i&&e$ a /ri&&en re0+es& &o
    a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s, p+rs+an& &o ;ixon v #arner -o%%+ni,a&ions, In, 43C7I6. E3F
    The vas& %ajori&* o' %* re0+es&s &o a,,ess ,o+r& re,or$s, &o inspe,& an$ &o ,op*, /ere $enie$. I a%
    /ri&in" &o re0+es& a /ri&&en explana&ion 'or s+,h $enial o' a,,ess:
    36 B* re0+es&s &o a,,ess re,or$s 'ro% 'o+r $i''eren& paper ,o+r& 'iles 4re'eren,e$ a.ove6, even %*
    o/n ,ase, /ere $enie$. Dep+&* -lerk John ini&iall* ,lai%e$ &ha& &he paper 'ilin"s /ere $es&ro*e$
    i%%e$ia&el* +pon s,annin". #hen I s+""es&e$ &ha& i& ,o+l$ no& possi.l* .e &he ,ase, he &ra,ke$
    .a,k. ;ever&heless ! I /as $enie$ a,,ess &o an* paper ,o+r& 'ile re,or$s.
    86 B* re0+es&s &o a,,ess ele,&roni, ,o+r& 'ile re,or$s in -B5<-= ! spe,i'i,all* ! &he ;o&i,es o'
    <le,&roni, =ilin"s 4;<=s6 o' &he sa%e 'o+r ,o+r& 'iles, /ere like/ise $enie$ ! even in %* o/n ,ase
    !/i&h no explana&ion a& all.
    36 B* re0+es&s &o a,,ess re,or$s, /hi,h $o,+%en&e$ &he shre$$in" o' &he ,lai%e$!&o!.e!shre$$e$
    paper ,o+r& 'iles, /ere like/ise $enie$ ! /i&h no explana&ion a& all.
    46 B* re0+es&s &o a,,ess 4&o o.&ain ,opies6 paper prin&o+&s o' ele,&roni, ,o+r& 'ile S &he ;<=s in &he
    sa%e 'o+r ,ases, /ere like/ise $enie$, /i&h &he ex,ep&ion o' prin&o+&s o' &he ;<=s in %* o/n ,ase,
    Zernik v -onnor e& al, /hi,h I /as provi$e$ .* Bs B+llo,k, an$ 'or /hi,h I &hanke$ her.
    96 Bs B+llo,k an$ I ha$ a $e&aile$ &e,hni,al $is,+ssion in re:a6 The le"al 'o+n$a&ion, i' an*, 'or &he
    opera&ion o' -B5<-= a& &he () -o+r& 'or &he -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia7.6 The spe,i'i, '+n,&ion o'
    &he ;<=s in &ha& s*s&e%, an$ i&s le"al 'o+n$a&ion, i' an*7,6 Denial o' p+.li, a,,ess &o &he ;<=s, an$
    i&s le"al 'o+n$a&ion, i' an*.
    A6 Bs B+llo,k s&a&e$ &ha& &he 'o+n$a&ion 'or &he opera&ion o' -B5<-= a& &he -ali'ornia -en&ral Dis&ri,&
    /as in &he Deneral Or$er 0I!08. =ro% %e%or*, I &ol$ her &ha& s+,h or$er /as +n+s+al a%on" &he
    Deneral Or$ers ! sin,e i& ha$ no na%e o' a j+$"e /ho a+&hore$ i&, le& alone a si"na&+re, an$
    like/ise,ha$ no a&&es&a&ion .* a ,lerk. There'ore, I 0+es&ione$ i&s vali$i&* an$ e''e,&. Bs B+llo,k
    ,he,ke$ i& +p, apparen&l* 'o+n$ %* re,olle,&ion &o .e ,orre,&, an$ &hen &ol$ %e &ha& she /o+l$ "e&
    .a,k &o %e on &he iss+e.
    76 Bs B+llo,k like/ise s&a&e$ &ha& &he $enial o' a,,ess &o ;<=s, ex,ep& in oneLs o/n ,ase, /as
    'o+n$e$ in Deneral Or$er 0I!08. I ,hallen"e$ her 'ro% %e%or* on &ha& iss+e as /ell. I s&a&e$ 'ro%
    %e%or* &ha& ;<=s /ere %en&ione$ onl* in one or &/o para"raphs o' &he or$er, .+& no re'eren,e /as
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    127/165 TOC:2
    %a$e &o a,,ess, onl* &o &he ;<=s '+n,&ion as ,er&i'*in" ,o+r& re,or$s, an$ also as a+&hen&i,a&in"
    servi,e an$ en&r* o' par&iesL papers, an$ o' ,o+r& or$ers an$ j+$"%en&s. A"ain ! Bs B+llo,k sai$ &ha&
    she /o+l$ resear,h &he %a&&er.
    I6 Bs B+llo,k s&a&e$ &ha& &he $enial o' a,,ess &o ;<=s res+l&e$ 'ro% &he 'a,& &ha& personal
    in'or%a&ion /as in,l+$e$ in &he%. I ,hallen"e$ &ha& ans/er, sin,e &he sa%e in'or%a&ion /as also
    provi$e$ in &he Par&ies an$ A&&orne*s pa"e S /hi,h /as p+.li,l* a,,essi.le. Bs B+llo,k a"ree$ /i&h
    %e on &ha& poin&.
    C6 I also aske$ a.o+& &he r+les per&ainin" &o iss+in" or no& iss+in" o' a vali$ ;<= 'or a "iven re,or$
    'ile$ a& ,o+r&. The response /as &ha& an ;<= /as a+&o%a&i,all* iss+e$ an* &i%e a ,lerk s,anne$ or
    pos&e$ a re,or$ in&o &he PA-<2 $o,ke&. I ,hallen"e$ &ha& no&ion. I& /o+l$ have &o .e resear,he$ as
    /ell.
    306 I also raise$ &he 0+es&ion re"ar$in" &he $ispla* o' "eneral or$ers o' &he -o+r& online. I& /as
    al/a*s &he sa%e exa,& 90 "eneral or$ers &ha& /ere availa.le on $ispla* 'or p+.li, vie/in" an$
    a,,ess, 'or a& leas& &/o *ears. 1o/ever, i& /as o.vio+s &ha& in 'a,&, &he &o&al n+%.er o' "eneral
    or$ers o' &he ,o+r& /as %+,h lar"er. Bs B+llo,k /as no& ,lear on &ha& iss+e. 1o/ever, in response &o
    %* re0+es& she pro%ise$ &o provi$e %e a prin&o+& o' &he in$ex o' s&an$in" or$ers ,overin" &he perio$
    'ro% 8003!800C. )he s&a&e$ &ha& s+,h perio$ /o+l$ ,over all "eneral or$ers per&ainin" &o ele,&roni,
    'ilin" a& &he -ali'ornia -en&ral Dis&ri,&.
    336 In "eneral, al&ho+"h I /as no& an a&&orne*, no& even .* a lon" sho&, I .elieve$ &ha& &he iss+es
    $is,+sse$ a.ove ha$ &o .e 'o+n$e$ in ei&her &he =e$eral 2+les o' -ivil Pro,e$+re, or in 2+les o'
    -o+r&, .+& no& in Deneral Or$ers, le& alone >+no''i,ial %an+al? o' -B5<-=. I &here'ore also re0+es&e$
    ,lari'i,a&ion re"ar$in" &he le"al 'o+n$a&ion 'or an* o' &he spe,i'i, r+les o' &he opera&ion o' ele,&roni,
    'ilin", as pra,&i,e$ in &he -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia. Bs B+llo,k &ol$ %e &ha& I ,o+l$ expe,& a /ri&&en
    response soon a'&er &he .e"innin" o' &he ne/ *ears, an$ I a% /ri&in" &o repea& %* re0+es& 'or s+,h
    /ri&&en response on &he %a&&ers lis&e$ a.ove.
    1es#onses on t,ese Iuestions! to t,e degree t,at any +ere received! are co#ied belo+3
    -anuar #1' %A#A - 1e#eat com#laint and reIuest for res#onses by 8erry <afisi! )ler of t,e 2S District )ourt!
    )entral District of )alifornia! +ere emailed! in reG Fine v Sheriff 9-G>*-cv->1*14)3
    8,e email to )ler of t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi saysG C
    cc(cviii
    D
    I& has also .een over hal' a *ear &ha& I have .een $enie$ a,,ess &o ,o+r& re,or$s in =ine v )heri''
    48:0C!,v!03C346 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, @os An"eles, E3F /i&h no explana&ion a& all, an$ sin,e I 'ile$
    a ,o%plain& alle"in" $ishones& %anip+la&ion o' &he re,or$s in &he sa%e ,ap&ion a& &he O''i,e o' &he
    -herko' &he -o+r&. E4F
    I& has .een a ,o+ple o' %on&hs sin,e I re0+es&e$ *o+r responses on rela&e$ 0+es&ions. I a"ain /ri&e
    &o re0+es& an explana&ion 'or &he $enial o' a,,ess &o ,o+r& re,or$s a& &he (ni&e$ )&a&es -o+r&, @os
    An"eles, 'or responses on %* ,o%plain& an$ &he 0+es&ions, /hi,h *o+r o''i,e las& in$i,a&e$ /ere
    .ein" resear,he$. The %a&&er involve$ &he alle"e$ a.+ses an$ $epriva&ion o' @i.er&* o' 2i,har$
    =ine. U+es&ions a$$resse$ &o *o+r o''i,e in,l+$e$, .+& /ere no& li%i&e$ &o &he 'ollo/in":
    36 #as &he PA-<2 $o,ke& o' "ine v Sheriff 48:0C!,v!03C346 hel$ .* &he o''i,e o' &he -lerk o' &he
    -o+r& as an hones&, vali$ an$ e''e,&+al ,o+r& re,or$ o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o'
    -ali'ornia, in ,o%plian,e /i&h () la/X
    86 #ha& /as &he le"al 'o+n$a&ion 'or &he opera&ion o' PA-<2 an$ -B5<-= a& &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&,-en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'orniaX
    36 #h* /as &he Deneral Or$er 0I!08, /hi,h I /as in'or%e$ .* s&a'' o' *o+r o''i,e /as &he 'o+n$a&ion
    'or &he opera&ions o' PA-<2 an$ -B5<-= a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia
    +nsi"ne$, no& even %en&ionin" &he na%e o' i&s a+&horXE8F
    46 #h* /ere pro,e$+res 'or a+&hen&i,a&ion an$ ,er&i'i,a&ion o' ,o+r& re,or$s, /hi,h /ere $ras&i,all*
    ,han"e$ /i&h &he in&ro$+,&ion o' PA-<2 an$ -B5<-=, never p+.lishe$ as @o,al 2+les o' -o+r&,as
    re0+ire$ .* la/X
    96 #h* /as p+.li, a,,ess $enie$ &o &he paper re,or$ /hi,h /as &he 1a.eas -orp+s pe&i&ion o'
    2i,har$ =ine "ine v Sheriff 48:0C!,v!03C346 in $isre"ar$ o' =irs& A%en$%en& ri"h&sX
    A6 #h* /as p+.li, a,,ess $enie$ &o &he ;<=s 4no&i,es o' ele,&roni, 'ilin"s6 in "ine v Sheriff 48:0C!,v!
    03C346 in $isre"ar$ o' =irs& A%en$%en& ri"h&sX
    76 #h* /as no hones&, vali$ an$ e''e,&+al ;<= ever iss+e$ 'or an* o' &he %in+&es, or$ers, j+$"%en&
    in "ine v Sheriff 48:0C!,v!03C346X
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    128/165 TOC:2
    I6 #as Donna Tho%as a+&horize$ as Dep+&* -lerk a& &he &i%e &ha& she en"a"e$ in &ransa,&ions in
    &he $o,ke& o' "ine v Sheriff 48:0C!,v!03C346X
    Ho+r o''i,e las& in$i,a&e$ &ha& s+,h 0+es&ions /ere .ein" resear,he$. E3F
    In a$$i&ion, a ,o%plain& /as 'ile$ A+"+s& 3, 800C /i&h *o+r o''i,e, re"ar$in" alle"e$ $is hones&
    %anip+la&ions o' &he paper re,or$ &ha& /as &he ha.eas ,orp+s pe&i&ion o' 2i,har$ =ine in "ine v
    Sheriff 48:0C!,v!03C346. E4F
    )+,h ,on,erns /ere se,on$e$ .* &he )+pervisor o' &he In&ake (ni&, Bs )haron B,Dee. A& leas& &/o
    s&a'' %e%.ers o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, @os An"eles /ere alle"e$ as involve$ in s+,h ,on$+,&, or
    /orse:
    a6 Pro )e -lerk -hris )a/*er
    .6 -o+r&roo% Assis&an& Donna Tho%as.
    2e'+sal o' &he -lerk o' &he -o+r& &o ans/er on an* o' &hese 0+es&ions appeare$ &o a la* person as
    no&hin" %ore &han K&akin" &he =i'&hK, in a ,ase &ha& appeare$ 'or all pra,&i,al p+rposes a 'ra+$ an$
    a.+ses .* &he (ni&e$ )&a&es -o+r& on Br 2i,har$ =ine, $eli.era&el* in&en$e$ &o $eprive hi% o'
    @i.er&*.
    -anuar #4' %A#A - 1e#eat reIuest +as emailed to )ler of t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi for res#onse
    on t,e January 4! ->1> reIuest for clarifications regarding docets integrity3
    8,e email note says in #artG C
    cc(ci(
    D
    The () Dis&ri,& -o+r& /o+l$ no& ,er&i'* i&s $o,ke&s. Boreover, no s&a&e%en&s appear in &he $o,ke&s in
    &he na%e o' &he -lerk or an* -lerk Dep+&*, as s+,h. There'ore re0+es&s /ere %a$e, an$ re0+es&s
    are %a$e herein, 'or s&a&e%en&s .* &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, @A ! Terr* ;a'isi, /he&her &he $o,ke&s in
    Zernik v Connor et al 48:0I!,v!039906 an$ "ine v Sheriff 48:0C!,v!03C346 /ere hones&, vali$, an$
    e''e,&+al $o,ke&s, in ,o%plian,e /i&h () la/. Please a,,ep& &his re0+es& also as -+s&o$ian o'
    2e,or$s o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, @A, p+rs+an& &o -ali'ornia @a/, as a re0+es& 'or ,+s&o$ian o'
    re,or$s $e,lara&ion re"ar$in" &he PA-<2 $o,ke&s o' Zernik v Connor et al 48:0I!,v!039906 an$ "ine
    v Sheriff 48:0C!,v!03C346.
    <o res#onse +as ever received on t,is reIuest3
    -anuar #;' %A#A - De#uty )ler and 1ecord Su#ervisor in t,e :ffice of t,e )ler! Da+n =ulloc +rote! in
    res#onse on reIuest to clarify! +,et,er t,e docets in Fine v Sheriff of LA County and %erni& v Connor et al)
    ,onest! valid! and effectual docets! in com#liance +it, 2S la+G C
    ccc
    D
    I a% s&ill resear,hin" *o+r re0+es&. I /ill sen$ *o+ a le&&er /hen I have &he ans/er.
    <o res#onse on t,is Iuestion +as ever received3
    .ebruar #;' %A#A - Better from &)ourt )ounsel& Bydia ?urtc,u! C
    ccci
    D #ur#orted to notice t,e
    investigation into t,e allegations of adulteration of 7ineEs Aabeas )or#us commencing record3
    :f noteG
    - &)ourt )ounsel& is <:8 a court officer defined by la+! and ,as no aut,ority as suc,3
    - Past e(#erience +it, &)ourt )ounsels& of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt C
    cccii
    D and of t,e Su#erior
    )ourt of )alifornia! )ounty of Bos %ngeles s,o+s t,at suc, #ersons are often em#loyed by t,e
    courts to act +it, no aut,ority and deceive #ersons! coming before t,e courts3
    - 8,e 7ebruary 1*! ->1> letter failed to s#ecify by +,ose aut,ority t,e &)ourt )ounsel& +as
    +riting3
    - 8,e 7ebruary 1*! ->1> +as re#lete +it, errors! ty#ical of dece#tive letters3 9see for com#arison
    letters of 5r )arri"osa on be,alf of t,e Judicial )ouncil of )alifornia! +,ic, even after a long
    e(c,ange and re#eated reIuests for corrections! could not s#ell out correctly t,e name of t,e
    court file in Fine v Sheriff333 C
    ccciii
    D )
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    129/165 TOC:2
    ?igure C26 =e.r+ar* 3C, 8030 le&&er 'ro% K-o+r& -o+nselK @*$ia Har,h+k, p+rpor&in" &o ini&ia&e an$ inves&i"a!
    &ion in&o &he alle"a&ions o' 'alsi'i,a&ion o' ,o+r& re,or$s in "ine v Sheriff. <ven %* na%e /as ,han"e$ 'ro%
    Zernik &o Davis...
    7arch #1' %A#A - Better to )ler of t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi again ased for e(#lanation regarding
    evidence of adulteration of t,e commencing record in 7ineEs Aabeas )or#us #etition3 C
    ccciv
    D
    7arch #4' %A#A - 1es#onse from 8erry <afisi! )ler of t,e 2S District )ourt! e(#lainedG C
    cccv
    D
    - 8,e commencing record of 7ineEs #etition +as s,redded immediately after being scanned! and
    t,at t,ere +as no certification of t,e s,redding3
    - $ro se #arties do not receive co#ies of t,e <.7s on a routine basis! t,ey need to reIuest co#ies3
    - 8,e General .rder >$->-! +,ic, establis,es electronic filing! and +,ic, +as #ublis,ed +it, no
    name of its aut,or and no signature! +as signed by &ma4ority of t,e 4udges&3 Ao+ever! t,e co#y
    t,at +as attac,ed to t,e res#onse letter +as again missing t,e signatures3
    - 8,e res#onse failed to address t,e evidence of adulteration of 7ineEs Aabeas )or#us
    commencing record3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    130/165 TOC:2
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    131/165 TOC:2
    ?igure C36 Bar,h 3A, 8030 2esponse .* -lerk o' &he -o+r& Terr* ;a'isi, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o'
    -ali'ornia, on re0+es& 'or inves&i"a&ion, re"ar$in" invali$ ,o+r& re,or$s, a$+l&era&ion o' ,o+r& re,or$s, an$ $e!
    nial o' a,,ess &o ,o+r& re,or$s.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    132/165 TOC:2
    7arch %0' %A#A - %not,er attem#t +as made to access court records in %erni& v Connor and
    Fine v Sheriff t,roug, a visit to t,e :ffice of t,e )ler.
    %ccess +as denied3
    Ao+ever! access +as gained to General .rder 1>->1! +,ic, +as missing from t,e collection of
    @eneral :rders! #ublis,ed online by t,e )ourt3 C
    cccvi
    !
    cccvii
    D
    8,e discovery of General .rder 1>->1 #rovided ey evidence! +,ic, led to emailing t,e staff of
    t,e office of ),ief Judge %udrey )ollins! )entral District of )alifornia! &<otice to 1eliably
    'nform t,e ),ief Judge! %udrey )ollins! and a 1eIuest for 'nitiation of )orrective %ctions &3
    7arch %1' %A#A - %n email to )ler of t,e )ourt 8erry <afisi! addressed ,er 5arc, 16! ->1>
    res#onse! regarding clerEs #roceduresG C
    cccviii
    D
    Thank *o+ 'or *o+r Bar,h 3A, 8030 response, E3F /hi,h ,lari'ie$ &he ,+rren& pra,&i,es rela&ive &o
    Deneral Or$ers an$ ;<=s a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia. #hereas *o+r le&&er
    a$$resse$ so%e o' %* 0+es&ions, 'ile$ /i&h *o+r o''i,e s&ar&in" A+"+s& 800C, E8FE3FE4F i& s&ill le'& so%e
    ke* 0+es&ions +nans/ere$:
    36 In "eneral, /ha& /as &he le"al 'o+n$a&ion 'or $enial o' p+.li, a,,ess &o &he ;<=s 4;o&i,es o'
    <le,&roni, =ilin"s6, /hi,h a,,or$in" &o &he Deneral Or$er 0I!08, in,orpora&e$ as par& o' *o+r Bar,h
    3A,8030 response, &o$a* serve$ as .o&h &he a+&hen&i,a&ion an$ ,er&i'i,a&ion o' ,o+r& re,or$sX
    86 In par&i,+lar, /h* /as I $enie$ a,,ess &o &he ;<=s in &he ha.eas ,orp+s o' 2i,har$ =ine:2i,har$ I
    =ine v )heri'' o' @os An"eles -o+n&*
    48:0C!,v!03C346X
    36 #as Donna Tho%as a+&horize$ as Dep+&* -lerk /hen she exe,+&e$ &ransa,&ions in &he $o,ke& o'
    &he ha.eas ,orp+s o' 2i,har$ =ine:
    2i,har$ I =ine v )heri'' o' @os An"eles -o+n&* 48:0C!,v!03C346X
    46 #as &he $o,ke& o' 2i,har$ I =ine v )heri'' o' @os An"eles -o+n&*
    48:0C!,v!03C346 an hones&, vali$ an$ e''e,&+al $o,ke& o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o'
    -ali'ornia, in ,o%plian,e /i&h &he la/s o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&esX
    96 #ha& /as &he reason &ha& %in+&es, or$ers, an$ j+$"%en&s, /hi,h /ere lis&e$ in $o,ke&s o' &he
    -o+r& as Ken&ere$K, /ere serve$ /i&h ;<=s, /hi,h /ere %issin" &he 2)A!en,r*p&e$ $i"i&al
    si"na&+res, /hi,h /ere $e'ine$ in Deneral Or$er 0I!08 as &he "overnin" si"na&+re, servin" as
    veri'i,a&ion o' s+,h ;<=sX
    A6 #ere ,o%plain&s, alle"in" &a%perin" /i&h &he re,or$s o' &he ha.eas ,orp+s pe&i&ion o' 2i,har$
    =ine, 2i,har$ I =ine v )heri'' o' @os An"eles -o+n&* 48:0C!,v!03C346, a& &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk,
    /hi,h ha$ .een 'ile$ /i&h *o+r o''i,e, ever revie/e$ .* *o+r o''i,eX
    The 'avor o' expe$ien& responses on &he 0+es&ions a.ove /o+l$ .e "rea&l* appre,ia&e$. )+,h
    0+es&ions per&aine$ &o &he in&e"ri&* o' ,o+r& re,or$s a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o'
    -ali'ornia, in "eneral, an$ &o &he @i.er&* o' a person in &he %a&&er a& han$, in par&i,+lar.
    7arch %5' %A#A - ' sent to t,e office of ),ief Judge %udrey )ollins! 2S District )ourt! )entral
    District of )alifornia! &<otice to 1eliably 'nform t,e ),ief Judge! %udrey )ollins! and a
    1eIuest for 'nitiation of )orrective %ctions &3 =y t,at time! ' +as met,odically revie+ing court
    cases in 2S courts across t,e 2nited States! and in #articular in )alifornia3 5y em#,asis +as on
    ,abeas cor#us #etitions! on t,e one ,and! and on cases involving financial institutions! on t,e
    ot,er3 %fter one becomes familiar +it, t,e met,ods of #erverting t,e records! it becomes easy to
    conduct mec,anical searc,es! and identify cases! +,ere t,e 4udges are #erverting t,e litigation!
    +it,out even reading t,e legal content of t,e #a#ers3 8,e notice #ertained to t,e case of 7ames (
    Geener v "SBC 'ortgage Services Inc et al 9-G>*- cv->6*56)! +,ere t,e evidence suggested t,at
    Judge )ollins ,erself +as involved in t,e 7raud on t,e )ourt3 C
    ccci(
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    133/165 TOC:2
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    134/165 TOC:2
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    135/165 TOC:2
    ?igure C46 Bar,h 87, 8030 e%ail &o &he o''i,e o' A+$re* -ollins, -hie' J+$"e, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis!
    &ri,& o' -ali'ornia.
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    136/165 TOC:2
    Earl A$ril %A#A - ' received a #,one call from De#uty 2S 5ars,al Darcy Smit,! asing me to
    come for an &intervie+&3 8,e &intervie+&! lie &)ourt )ounsel& ?arc,uEs letter! +as again
    re#resented as #art of an ,onest attem#t to investigate my claims of adulteration of 7ineEs Aabeas
    )or#us #etition records3
    ' res#onded t,at ' did not give la+ enforcement &intervie+s&! and ased for a +ritten invitation3
    A$ril 5' %A#A - ' received an email note from t,e same De#uty 2S 5ars,al Darcy Smit,3
    At 02:03 "@ 4LCL20105 Aeput+ @ar%hal #mith 3rte:
    Br. Zernik,I /o+l$ ver* %+,h like &o ,on$+,& an in&ervie/ /i&h *o+ re"ar$in" *o+r e%ails &o -hie' ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r& J+$"e A+$re* -ollins, please ,on&a,& %e a& *o+r earlies& ,onvenien,e.
    Dep+&* Dar,* B )%i&h
    Dis&ri,& Threa& Inves&i"a&or
    () Barshal )ervi,e @os An"eles, -A
    833!4C4!0377
    :nly t,en it became a##arent t,at De#uty 5ars,al Darcy Smit, +as #art of t,e &District 8,reat
    2nit&3 't at least raised t,e concern t,at ' +as by t,en targeted as a &t,reat& to t,e 2S District
    )ourt3
    'n res#onse ' ased De#uty 5ars,all Smit, to e(#lain t,e legal foundation for suc, &intervie+&3
    5y concern +as t,at ' +ould never emerge from t,at &intervie+& a free man3
    De#uty 5ars,al Smit, never res#onded on my reIuest for an e(#lanation3
    A$ril %1' %A#A - ' +as out all nig,t3 H,en ' returned ,ome Sunday morning! my neig,bors
    informed me t,at on Saturday nig,t armed federal agents +ere looing for me and looed eager
    to s,oot3 8,e neig,bors urged me to turn myself in! since t,ey +ere concerned t,at if t,e federal
    agents return and start s,ooting! t,ey may be in ,armEs +ay3
    ' entered my a#artment! too #ass#orts and cas, 9+,ic, ' ,ad ready for mont,s)! +ent to t,e
    air#ort! and too a flig,t out of t,e 2nited States3 ' left t,e 2S +it, t,e clot,s on me and my
    com#uter! not,ing else3
    8,e last email communication ' received from De#uty 5ars,al Smit, stated! &7ool me once333
    etc&3
    %lt,oug, ' lost most my #ro#erty and most of my lifeEs savings! as +ell as my business in t,e
    #rocess! ' consider myself lucy! ,aving emerged live and free from t,e 2nited States3
    += <;:H 0 Further retaliation in Israel folloing the U$*0Israel su+mission
    8aing of my savings by =an AaPoalim under #atronage of State aut,orities
    'n January ->13! my remaining savings 9most ,ad been unla+fully taen in t,e 2nited States)! t,en
    de#osited in t,e largest ban in 'srael - =an AaPoalim - +ere unla+fully taen by t,e ban3 8,e
    ban claimed t,at t,e funds +ere taen in com#liance +it, 2S la+ 97%8)%)3 =ut 7%8)% +as not
    in effect at t,at time in t,e 2S! and surely not in t,e State of 'srael3 8,e taing of t,e funds included
    no #rior legal #rocedure! eit,er in t,e 2S or in 'srael3
    Suc, actions are similar to t,e unla+ful actions taen by 2S bans against %ssange and Hiileas
    in late ->1>3 C
    ccc(
    D
    =an of 'srael! 'sraelEs central ban and baning regulator! t,en ,eaded by Stanley 7isc,er 9today!
    <o - in t,e 2S 7ederal 1eserve)! refused to duly register my )onsumerEs )om#laint against =an
    AaPoalim in t,is matter! as documented in a letter from Stanley 7isc,erEs o+n office3 C
    ccc(i
    D
    8,e January -7! ->13 letter from @overnor of =an of 'srael =ureau Stanley 7isc,er in #art saysG
    2e"ar$less o' &he 'a,& &ha& i& is a () la/,&he Israeli .ankin" s*s&e%, like &he .ankin" s*s&e%s in
    %an* o&her na&ions, is "earin" i&sel' &o a,&, p+rs+an& &o &he $e%an$s o' &he () Binis&r* o' &he
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    137/165 TOC:2
    Treas+r* an$ &ax a+&hori&ies, in or$er &o avoi$ san,&ions .* s+,h .o$ies, in,l+$in" /i&hhol$in" 'ro%
    pa*%en&s, &rans'erre$ 'ro% &he () &o Israel, re"ar$less o' &he in$ivi$+al ,lien&s .
    ...
    #e +n$ers&an$ &ha& ,lari'i,a&ions in &he spiri& o' &his le&&er have alrea$* .een provi$e$ &o *o+ .* E&he
    Israeli!jzF Bank 1aPoali%, BB, on ;ove%.er 4, 8038.
    #i&h all o+r s*%pa&h* 'or &he in,onvenien,e an$ &ro+.le, ,a+se$ &o &he ,+s&o%ers .* &he =AT-A
    ins&r+,&ions, /e re"re&'+ll* ,anno& help *o+ .e*on$ provi$in" ,lari'i,a&ions, as $e&aile$ a.ove.
    Has,ington D) %ttorney James Jatras! former 2S State De#artment counsel! o#ined t,at Stanley
    7isc,erEs conduct in t,is case made no sense at all3 C
    ccc(ii
    D
    8,e Su#reme )ourt of t,e State of 'srael refused to duly register a Petition to )om#el Stanley
    7isc,er to #erform ,is baning regulation duties in com#liance +it, t,e la+ of t,e State of 'srael3
    8,e #etition +as duly registered only after it +as dismissed3 C
    ccc(iii
    !
    ccc(iv
    D 8,en ),ief )ler of t,e
    'sraeli Su#reme )ourt Sara, Bifsc,it" refused to ans+er on a reIuest to e(#lain t,e retroactive
    adulteration of court records in t,is case3
    .ventually! +,en all else ,ad failed! ' filed a 1eIuest for Protection +it, t,e 7ederal @erman
    government! t,roug, t,e 8el %viv )onsulate3 C
    ccc(v
    D
    Soon after t,at! all funds +ere returned by t,e ban3
    ->13 - 7urt,er retaliation follo+ing t,e 2P1 submission
    Bater in ->13! civil litigation +as #ur#ortedly commenced against me in t,e Aaifa 5agistrate
    )ourt3 Suc, litigation +as clearly simulated litigation and 7raud u#on t,e )ourt and an attem#t to
    intimidate and retaliateG
    8,e litigation started +it, no summonsL
    8,e com#laint listed no la+ of t,e State of 'srael as t,e basis for t,e com#laintL
    %ttorney! +,o filed t,e com#laint! failed to file certificate of )ounsel of 1ecord for t,e
    #ur#orted #laintiffsL
    )ourt orders +ere served unsigned by a 4udge! and +it, no aut,entication by t,e cler of t,e
    courtL
    8,e litigation +as to be conducted be,ind closed doors! and ' +as re#eatedly +arned in
    #ur#orted &orders& by t,e 4udge! against s,o+ing any of t,e records to any ot,er #erson! and
    %ccess to court records +as denied to t,e #ur#orted Defendant in ,is o+n case3
    ' refused to a##ear in suc, court3
    %ttem#ts to gain .Iual Protection under t,e Ba+ against suc, abuse! by #etitioning to t,e 'sraeli
    Su#reme )ourt again failed - t,e Su#reme )ourt #ur#ortedly denied t,e #etition! but refused to
    serve a signed and certified record of t,e decision3 C
    ccc(vi
    !
    ccc(vii
    D
    .ventually! ' again filed a 1eIuest for Protection +it, t,e @erman )onsul in 8el %viv! and t,e
    litigation file +as &closed&3 C
    ccc(viii
    D
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    138/165 TOC:2
    H! Historical $ers$ective ( Robber "aron Revival Era!
    ?igure C16 K-orpora&e Personhoo$K is one o' &he ,on,ep&s &ha& en,aps+la&es &he &rans'or%a&ion o' &he ()
    re"i%e, or"anize$ s&a&e!,orpora&e ,ri%e, an$ &he role o' ,o+r& ,orr+p&ion in s+,h &rans'or%a&ion 4see also
    se,&ions -8o,p6. I& also poin&s o+& &he vas& si%ilari&* .e&/een &he ,+rren& era an$ &he 2o..er Baron <ra in
    &he (), 'ollo/in" &he -ivil #ar an$ lea$in" in&o &he Drea& Depression.
    )onditions! +,ic, ,ave been establis,ed in t,e 2nited States over t,e #ast cou#le of decades
    resemble conditions! +,ic, #revailed in t,e 2nited States over a century ago! during t,e &1obber
    =aron .ra&! C
    ccc(i(
    D from t,e end of t,e )ivil Har and into t,e beginning of t,e ->t, century and t,e
    @reat De#ression3
    8,e #eriod +as c,aracteri"ed by t,e buildu# of e(treme +ealt, by a fe+! and t,e im#overis,ment
    of t,e many3 8,e ne+ 1obber =arons +ere t,e o+ners of railroad and baning cor#orations3 Babor
    of men! +omen! and c,ildren +as e(#loited in an e(treme fas,ion! and labor dis#utes +ere
    su##ressed t,roug, murderous violence3 'nde#endent farmers +ere im#overis,ed! strangled by ,ig,
    interest debt to t,e bans! leading to consolidation of farmland by t,e ric,3
    =ans and railroad cor#orations acted as unregulated trusts or mono#olies and engaged in fraud in
    financial institutions and t,e stoc marets3 %s a result! t,e 2S economy +as #lagued by a series of
    financial #anics and economic c,aos +it, millions of %mericans losing 4obs! farmers being forced
    off t,eir land! and railroads! bans! and ot,er businesses going under3
    )orru#tion of local! state! and federal government +as ram#ant3 8,e #residency! regardless of #arty
    affiliation! became subservient to t,e business magnets3
    <otably! t,e #eriod +as also c,aracteri"ed by +ides#read corru#tion of t,e courts! and corru#tion of
    t,e offices of t,e clers of t,e 2S courts +as notorious3 C
    ccc((
    D 8,e 1obber =arons +ere effectively
    #laced above t,e la+3 )onduct of t,e 2S courts +as described in t,e 2S )ongress as &a burlesIue
    and a s,am &3
    8,e Su#reme )ourt +as conducive to increasing t,e #o+er of t,e mono#olies! undermining t,eir
    regulation by eit,er federal or state governments3 =y 1$$6 t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt issued t,e
    dubious decision record in Santa Clara County v. Southern $acific *ailroad M 11$ 23S3 3*4 91$$6)!
    +,ic, led to &)or#orate Person,ood&3 8,is decision s,ould be considered an early e(am#le of a
    simulated Su#reme )ourt record3 8,e #art #ertaining to &)or#orate Person,ood& +as not #art of
    t,e decision by t,e 4ustices itself! but a ,eadnote by a court re#orter3
    &)or#orate Person,ood& and #ractices of t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt made cor#orations by far t,e
    #rimary beneficiary of t,e &Due Process& 14t, %mendment! +,ic, +as originally enacted to #rotect
    t,e rig,ts of t,e freed slaves3
    %ccording to a ,istorical study by 7ederal Judicial )enter! t,e Salary Act 91*1*)! 9Statutes at Barge
    4>! 1*1*G 11$-) +as central to reform of t,e 2S courts3 8,e %ct #laced t,e clers of t,e 2S courts
    under t,e direct aut,ority of t,e 2S %ttorney @eneral3 %not,er ey to t,e reform +as t,e
    a##ointment of Su#reme )ourt 4ustices t,at favored t,e restriction of cor#orate #o+er! suc, as
    =en4amin )ardo"o! no+n for &#iercing t,e veil of cor#orate structures&! and Bouis =randeis! +,o
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    139/165 TOC:2
    +as a #ro#onent of baning regulation! no+n for ,is boo &:t,er Peo#leEs 5oney&3 %nd yet!
    #assage of ma4or reforms as #art of 1ooseveltEs <e+ Deal +as bloced by t,e 2S Su#reme )ourt!
    until t,e Su#reme )ourt +as directly faced +it, t,e &)ourt Pacing& t,reat3
    Bater in ->t, century! t,e #rovisions of t,e Salary Act +ere reversed! and t,e clers of t,e 2S
    courts +ere again #laced under aut,ority of t,e 2S 4udiciary3
    %s documented in instant submission! corru#tion of t,e offices of t,e clers of t,e 2S courts and
    t,e resulting corru#tion of court records is again a ,allmar of t,e 2S courts today3
    'n 1*** t,e Glass0Steagall Act 91*33)! enacted in t,e +ae of t,e @reat De#ression as t,e
    cornerstone of financial institutions regulation! +as re#ealed under ,eavy lobbying by financial
    institutions3 C
    ccc((i
    D 8,e re#eal of Glass Steagall is #erceived among t,e ma4or direct causes of t,e
    current financial crisis3 C
    ccc((ii
    D
    8oday! &)or#orate Person,ood& is again central to t,e transformation of t,e 2S regime3 8,e ->1>
    )iti"ens 2nited decision of t,e Su#reme )ourt! based on &)or#orate Person,ood& and cor#orate
    7irst %mendment 7ree S#eec, rig,ts! undermined cam#aign finance regulation! and created
    un#recedented #o+er for cor#orations over #oliticians and #olitics in t,e 2nited States3 C
    ccc((iii
    D
    %s s,o+n in instant submission! t,e Citi,ens United v F(C case is mared by simulated court
    records! lie t,e Santa Clara *ailroad case of 1$$63 %nd in t,e recent "o++y Lo++y decision! a
    furt,er e(tension of Citi,ens United! cor#orations +ere granted 7irst %mendment 7reedom of
    1eligion rig,ts3
    &)or#orate Person,ood& is also t,e focus of current reform efforts in t,e 2nited States3 7or
    e(am#le! t,e ->1- :ccu#y5arines Press 1elease summari"ed t,e grou#Es goalsG
    a) 1e#ealing of t,e <D%%!
    b) :verturning of )iti"ens 2nited!
    and c) .(#osing and indicting t,e 1W3 C
    ccc((iv
    D
    :verturning )iti"ens 2nited is alos t,e single cause of t,e &5ove to %mend& grass-root movement3
    C
    ccc((v
    D
    8,e ,istory of reform of 2S cor#orate corru#tion and court corru#tion in t,e first ,alf of t,e ->t,
    century demonstrates t,e relations,i# bet+een t,e t+o! and t,e magnitude of t,e reIuired efforts3 't
    also #oints out t,at reform of t,e offices of t,e clers of t,e 2S courts is a necessary first ste#3
    *! Conclusions
    8,e findings of instant submission ,old serious im#lications relative to t,e current socio-economic
    crisis in t,e 2nited States! to baning regulation! and Auman 1ig,ts of all residents of t,e 2nited
    States3 5oreover! due to t,e dominant global economic #osition of t,e 2S! and its ongoing attem#ts
    to dominate t,e global baning and financial systems! #articularly t,roug, t,e 2S court system!
    C
    ccc((vi
    !
    ccc((vii
    D t,e findings also ,ave serious im#lication for socio-economic develo#ment +orld-
    +ide3 Bie+ise! t,e findings ,ave serious im#lications! relative to t,e #osition of t,e 2S in various
    international dis#utes and conflicts3
    13 8,roug, t,e im#lementation and o#eration of invalid! fraudulent '8 systems! t,e 2S courts today
    routinely conduct of simulated litigation! unla+fully de#rive t,e liberty and #ro#erty of
    individuals! and #lace t,e bans above t,e la+3 Suc, conduct amounts to :rgani"ed State-
    cor#orate )rime3
    -3 Suc, conduct amounts to serious violation of fundamental Auman 1ig,ts of t,e #eo#le of t,e
    2nited States3
    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    140/165 TOC:2
    33 Suc, conduct is also central to t,e current socio-economic crisis! failing baning regulation! and
    t,e /7oreclosure )risis0! +,ic, resulted in vast increase in #overty and ,omelessness in t,e
    2nited States and undermined t,e 2S middle-class3
    43 8,e validity of any legal and 4udicial records! originating in t,e 2nited States! and t,e validity
    of any litigation in t,e 2S courts s,ould be considered dubious3
    53 8,e international community s,ould reassess t,e nature of t,e current regime in t,e 2nited
    States! and any claim t,at its foreign #olicy is driven by Auman 1ig,ts interests3
    63 .fforts to address conditions! +,ic, are no+ establis,ed in t,e 2nited States! and to restore t,e
    force and effect of t,e 2S )onstitution and 2S la+! are liely be #rotracted and meet star
    resistance by #o+erful 2S security! legal! and financial interest grou#s3 8,erefore! no corrective
    #rocess is liely to be commenced! unless conditions deteriorate! accom#anied by civil unrest3
    -! Recommen&ations
    .merging from t,e current conditions +ould reIuire a fundamental corrective #rocess in t,e 2nited
    States! +,ere as a result of current conditions! t,e #olitical #rocess is underminedG
    13 8,e large-scale fraud in t,e 2S courts! +,ic, in fact im#licates eac, and every 2S sitting
    4udge! +ould liely reIuire an a##roac, similar to a 8rut, and 1econciliation )ommission!
    and6or a Second )onstitutional )onvention3
    -3 Due to t,e central role of t,e %dministrative :ffice of t,e 2S )ourts in im#lementing t,e
    fraudulent '8 systems of t,e 2S courts! t,e :ffice s,ould be restructured or closed3
    33 5easures! similar to t,ose taen under similar circumstances a century ago t,roug, t,e Salary
    Act 91*1*)! +,ic, #laced t,e clers of t,e 2S courts under t,e direct aut,ority of t,e %ttorney
    @eneral! s,ould be considered3
    43 2S legal and com#uting e(#erts s,ould be engaged in an initiative to restore t,e integrity of t,e
    '8 systems of t,e 2S courts! under accountability to t,e 2S )ongress! +it, t,e goal of maing
    suc, system as trans#arent as #ossible to t,e #ublic at large3
    53 'n nations! +,ere t,e se#aration of branc,es of government is establis,ed by la+! t,e courts
    must not be #ermitted to develo# and im#lement t,e courtsE '8 systems3
    63 Auman 1ig,ts and internet activists must ee# a +atc,ful eye on t,e validity and integrity of
    '8 systems of t,e courts and #risons
    %ugust 31! ->14
    Jose#, Ferni! P,D
    Human Rights Alert (NGO)
    Occu$T:I
    =! References

    1+%an 2i"h& Aler& 4;DO6: (P2 )+.%ission ! (ni&e$ )&a&es 88n$ session
    Appendix: &arge-%'ale (raud in )* %+%tem% ( the !# 'urt% - !nannun'ed regime 'hange,
    141/165 TOC:2
    i
    2012, un$a&e$, KThe Prison -risisK, AC%U
    https://www.aclu.org/files/assets/massincarceration_problems.pdf
    ii
    8033!03!33 Pa+l Gr+"%an, K Ano&her Insi$e Jo.K, ;H Ti%es
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/14/opinion/14rugman.html!_r"0
    iii
    8033!38!88 ),o& Pal&ro/, K)pe,ial 2epor&: The /a&,h$o"s &ha& $i$nL& .arkK, 2e+&ers
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/22/us#foreclosures#id$%&'()*+0,-20111222
    i.
    8033!07!3C Al.er&o 2iva, Ji%%* -ar&er: () >has no '+n,&ionin" $e%o,ra,*?, Salon
    h&&p:55///.salon.,o%5803350753I5ji%%*W,ar&erW+sWhasWnoW'+n,&ionin"W$e%o,ra,*Wpar&ner5
    .
    1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6 s+.%ission &o &he (ni&e$ ;a&ions 1+%an 2i"h&s -o+n,il 'or &he (P2 o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es
    480306, as i& appears in &he (ni&e$ ;a&ions 1+%an 2i"h&s -o+n,il si&e
    1TTP:55li..oh,hr.or"512Bo$ies5(P25Do,+%en&s5sessionC5()512Aler&W(P2W()AW)0CW8030W1+%anV80ri"h&s
    V80aler&3.pp$'
    1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6 Appen$ix I &o s+.%ission 'or &he (P2 o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es .* &he (ni&e$ ;a&ions 1+%an
    2i"h&s -o+n,il
    h&&p:55li..oh,hr.or"512Bo$ies5(P25Do,+%en&s5sessionC5()512Aler&W(P2W()AW)0CW8030W1+%anV80ri"h&s
    V80aler&3.p$'
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58C9A43745
    (ni&e$ ;a&ions 1+%an 2i"h&s -o+n,il Pro'essional )&a'' 2epor&, re'errin" &o 1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& s+.%ission /i&h &he
    no&e K,orr+p&ion o' &he ,o+r&s an$ &he le"al pro'ession an$ $is,ri%ina&ion .* la/ en'or,e%en& in -ali'orniaK 4pa"e A,
    para"raph 496
    h&&p:55$a,,ess!$$s!n*.+n.or"5$o,5(;DO-5D<;5D3053AC5A95PD=5D303ACA9.p$'XOpen<le%en&
    .i
    Zernik, J: Be*on$ vo&in" %a,hines ! ,ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e%s o' &he ,o+r&s ! )+s&ain an$ &he @os An"eles )+perior
    -o+r& Par& I
    h&&p:55es.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53304777475
    Zernik, J: Be*on$ ele,&roni, vo&in" %a,hines ! 'ra+$ in ,ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e%s o' &he ,o+r&s ! )+s&ain an$ &he @os
    An"eles )+perior -o+r& ! Par& II
    h&&p:55es.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53304790C75
    Zernik, J: Be*on$ vo&in" %a,hines ! ,ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e%s o' &he ,o+r&s ! )+s&ain ! -B) o' &he @os An"eles
    )+perior -o+r& ! A.s&ra,& an$ =i"+res s
    h&&p:55es.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303A8II05
    Zernik, J: -o%p+&ers T &he -o+r&s ! )+s&ain ! -B) o' &he @os An"eles )+perior -o+r& ! 2e"is&ers o' A,&ion
    h&&p:55es.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303A84A35
    vii
    Zernik, J: Da&a Binin" as a -ivi, D+&* S Online P+.li, PrisonersM 2e"is&ra&ion )*s&e%s,
    $nternational -ournal on Social !e#ia' !onitoring, !easurement, !ining 3: I4!CA 480306
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53I38I9C35
    .iii
    1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6 s+.%ission &o &he (ni&e$ ;a&ions 1+%an 2i"h&s -o+n,il 'or &he (P2 o' &he )&a&e o' Israel
    480336, as i& appears in &he (ni&e$ ;a&ions 1+%an 2i"h&s -o+n,il si&e:
    The 1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6 s+.%ission 480336 'or &he (niversal Perio$i, 2evie/ o' israel .* &he (; 1+%an 2i"h&s
    -o+n,il, as i& appears on &he (; /e. si&e
    h&&p:55li..oh,hr.or"512Bo$ies5(P25Do,+%en&s5)ession395I@512AW(P2WI)2W)39W8038W1+%an2i"h&sAler&W<.p$'
    8033!03!03 The 1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6 s+.%ission, as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (; 1+%an 2I&"h&s -o+n,il (P2 repor&
    /i&h &he no&e K@a,k o' in&e"ri&* in &he ele,&roni, re,or$s o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&, &he $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ &he $e&ainees ,o+r&s
    in IsraelK 4pa"e 4, para"raph 896
    h&&p:55$a,,ess!$$s!n*.+n.or"5$o,5(;DO-5D<;5D3853I05385PD=5D383I038.p$'XOpen<le%en&
    8038!09!30 1+%an 2i"h& Aler&, Appen$ix I &o )+.%ission7 39&h (P2 ! )&a&e o' Israel ! KIn&e"ri&*, or la,k &hereo', o' &he
    ele,&roni, re,or$ s*s&e%s o' &he ,o+r&s o' &he )&a&e o' IsraelK
    h&&ps:55$rive."oo"le.,o%5'ile5$50BIAa8xUD.%k9,j;x$8sz[09oBk(5e$i&X+sp\sharin"
    i/
    Bio"raphi,al )ke&,h S Joseph Zernik, PhD
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54A4833335
    x
    #iki ;er$s, KBa,hine @earnin"K, *oogle (ooks
    h&&p:55.ooks."oo"le.,o.il5.ooksX
    i$\4Za*A/AAUBAJTa%p7prin&se,\'ron&,overTa%p7so+r,e\".sWa&.Ov\onepa"eTa%p70Ta%p7'\'alse
    /i
    Joseph Zernik. KDesi"n an$ Opera&ion o' &he <le,&roni, 2e,or$ )*s&e%s o' &he () -o+r&s are @inke$ &o =ailin"
    Bankin" 2e"+la&ionK Data Analytics, 8038
    h&&p:55///.&hink%in$.or"5in$ex.phpXvie/\ar&i,leTar&i,lei$\$a&aWanal*&i,sW8038W3W90WA009C
    /ii
    Joseph Zernik, KIn&e"ri&*, or @a,k Thereo', o' &he <le,&roni, 2e,or$ )*s&e%s o' &he -o+r&s o' &he )&a&e o' IsraelK, Data
    Analytics, 8038
    http://www.thinmind.org/inde/.php!.iew"article0articleid"data_analytics_2012_2_10_10013
    /iii
    8033!30!09 Tea Par&* an$ @i.erals ,onvene a& 1@) &o $is,+ss -ons&i&+&ional -onven&ion 4vi$eo6
    h&&p:55&o$a*.la/.harvar$.e$+5&ea!par&*!an$!li.erals!,onvene!a&!hls!&o!$is,+ss!,ons&i&+&ional!,onven&ion!vi$eo5
    /i.
    K@a/ren,e @essi"Ls ,all 'or s&a&e!.ase$ a,&ivis% on .ehal' o' a -ons&i&+&ional -onven&ion ,o+l$ provi$e &he +proo&e$
    %ove%en& /i&h a poli&i,al proje,& 'or /in&erK
    8033!33!37 Alesh 1o+$ek, K1as a 1arvar$ Pro'essor Bappe$ O+& &he ;ex& )&ep 'or O,,+p* #all )&ree&XK. ?he Atlantic
    h&&p:55///.&hea&lan&i,.,o%5poli&i,s5ar,hive580335335has!a!harvar$!pro'essor!%appe$!o+&!&he!nex&!s&ep!'or!o,,+p*!/all!
    s&ree&58479A35
    /.
    8033!07!3C Al.er&o 2iva, Ji%%* -ar&er: () >has no '+n,&ionin" $e%o,ra,*?, Salon
    h&&p:55///.salon.,o%5803350753I5ji%%*W,ar&erW+sWhasWnoW'+n,&ionin"W$e%o,ra,*Wpar&ner5
    /.i
    KIn a spee,h in Deor"e&o/n (niversi&*, )ena&or @eah*, -hair o' &he )ena&e J+$i,iar* -o%%i&&ee ,alle$ 'or a KTr+&h
    an$ 2e,on,ilia&ion -o%%issionK on &he () Depar&%en& o' J+s&i,e.
    800C! Trans,rip& o' )ena&or @eah* spee,h
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53I4788935
    xvii
    8033!0C!00 )overei"n -i&izens ! A Dro/in" Do%es&i, Threa& &o @a/ <n'or,e%en&, "B$
    http://www.fbi.go./stats#ser.ices/publications/law#enforcement#bulletin/september#2011/so.ereign#
    citi2ens
    /.iii
    8030! John Gerse*, The =ree%an on &he @an$ Bove%en&: Drass 2oo&s @i.er&arianis% in A,&ion, %i(ertarian Alliance
    h&&p:55///.li.er&arian.,o.+k5X0\no$e53
    xix
    #ell 2e"+la&e$ A%eri,an Bili&ias
    h&&p:55/ra%si&e.,o%5Xx"Wso+r,e\%s"W%esWne&/ork
    xx
    8034!07!30 B+n$* ran,h s&an$o'' ]invi"ora&e$M an&i!"overn%en& "ro+ps, repor& sa*s, Washington ost
    h&&p:55///./ashin"&onpos&.,o%5ne/s5pos&!na&ion5/p580345075305.+n$*!ran,h!s&an$o''!invi"ora&e$!an&i!"overn%en&!
    "ro+ps!repor&!sa*s5
    xxi
    KI &hink i&Ls $i''i,+l& &o 'in$ a 'ra+$ o' &his size on &he (.). ,o+r& s*s&e% in (.). his&or*,K sai$ 2a*%on$ Bres,ia, a visi&in"
    pro'essor a& Hale @a/ ),hool /ho has /ri&&en ar&i,les anal*zin" &he role o' ,o+r&s in &he 'inan,ial ,risis. KI ,anL& &hink o'
    one /here *o+ have li&erall* &ens o' &ho+san$s o' 'ra+$+len& $o,+%en&s 'ile$ in &ens o' &ho+san$s o' ,ases.K
    8033!38!88 ),o& Pal&ro/, K)pe,ial 2epor&: The /a&,h$o"s &ha& $i$nL& .arkK, Reuters
    h&&p:55///.re+&ers.,o%5ar&i,le580335385885+s!'ore,los+res!i$()T2<7B@0B-80333888
    xxii
    K...a s*s&e% in /hi,h onl* &he li&&le people have &o o.e* &he la/, /hile &he ri,h, an$ .ankers espe,iall*, ,an ,hea& an$
    $e'ra+$ /i&ho+& ,onse0+en,es.K
    8033!03!33 Pa+l Gr+"%an, KAno&her Insi$e Jo.K, 07?
    h&&p:55///.n*&i%es.,o%580335035345opinion534kr+"%an.h&%lXWr\0
    //iii
    KBore &han 300 la/ pro'essors have si"ne$ on &o a le&&er release$ &o$a* &ha& proposes ,on"ressional hearin"s an$
    le"isla&ion ai%e$ a& 'ashionin" K%an$a&or* an$ en'or,ea.leK e&hi,s r+les 'or )+pre%e -o+r& j+s&i,es 'or &he 'irs& &i%e. The
    e''or&, ,oor$ina&e$ .* &he li.eral Allian,e 'or J+s&i,e, /as &ri""ere$ .* Kre,en& %e$ia repor&s,K &he le&&er sai$, apparen&l*
    re'errin" &o s&ories o' %ee&in"s an$ o&her po&en&ial ,on'li,&s o' in&eres& involvin" J+s&i,es An&onin ),alia an$ -laren,e
    Tho%as a%on" o&hers.K
    8033!08!84 Blo" o' &he @e"al Ti%es
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54C9IA43A5
    xxiv
    8033!04!07 K=ore,los+re 'ra+$: The ho%eo/ner ni"h&%ares ,on&in+eK, "ortune
    h&&p:55'or&+ne.,o%580335045075'ore,los+re!'ra+$!&he!ho%eo/ner!ni"h&%ares!,on&in+e5
    //.
    8038!03!07 Dre&,hen Bor"enson, >=ro% <as& an$ #es&, =ore,los+re 1orror )&ories?, ;e/ Hork Ti%es
    h&&p:55///.n*&i%es.,o%5803850350I5.+siness5%or&"a"e!servi,in"!horror!s&ories!'air!"a%e.h&%lXpa"e/an&e$\allTWr\0
    //.i
    Zernik, J: =ra+$ an$ -orr+p&ion in () -o+r&s are Ti"h&l* @inke$ &o Bankin" =ra+$ an$ &he Dlo.al <,ono%i, -risis !
    3A
    &h
    #orl$ -ri%inolo"* -on"ress presen&a&ion480336
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5A33939A85
    //.ii
    800I!09!87 Zernik v -onnor 48:0I!,v!039906 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, Dk& O 0A8: =irs&
    A%en$e$ -o%plain&:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30)11334/
    //.iii
    8033!0I!33 Dave #arner, K=or%er j+$"e sen&en,e$ &o prison 'or Kki$s 'or ,ashK s,he%eK, Reuters
    h&&p:55///.re+&ers.,o%5ar&i,le5803350I5335+s!,ri%e!ki$s'or,ash!i$()T2<77AAGD80330I33
    //i/
    800A!30!33 K De&ainee &rea&%en& &opi, o' ,on'eren,eK, )&an'or$ ;e/s
    h&&p:55ne/s.s&an'or$.e$+5ne/s5800A5o,&o.er335h+%ani&*!30330A.h&%l
    ///
    3CC7!38!00 () Depar&%en& o' J+s&i,e, O''i,e o' Inspe,&or Deneral, De,e%.er 3CC7 )pe,ial 2epor&: -IA Dr+"
    Tra''i,kin" &o @os An"eles, -ali'ornia
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/240)1514
    ///i
    8038!0A!80 K=+ll ,overa"e: AT=Ls =as& an$ =+rio+s s,an$alK , @os An"eles Ti%es
    h&&p:55///.la&i%es.,o%5na&ion5a&'!'as&!'+rio+s!s"!s&or*"aller*.h&%l
    ///ii
    8033!07!03 -hris&ie )%*&he, K1)B- J+$"e Approves R3.CB Dr+"!Bone* @a+n$erin" A,,or$ K, Bloom(erg
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013#0)#02/hsbc#6udge#appro.es#1#4b#drug#money#laundering#
    accord.html
    ///iii
    8033!0A!80 To% Bli,k%an, KDe'i,ien,ies in 'inan,ial oversi"h& ena.le %one* la+n$erin"K, ?ransnational
    $nstitute
    h&&p:55///.&ni.or"5ar&i,le5$e'i,ien,ies!'inan,ial!oversi"h&!ena.le!%one*!la+n$erin"
    ///i.
    8033!33!87 KIn&erna&ional .anks have ai$e$ Bexi,an $r+" "an"sK, %os Angeles ?imes
    http://articles.latimes.com/2011/no./2)/world/la#fg#me/ico#money#laundering#bans#20111125
    ///.
    KOr"anize$ -ri%eK, U0 3ffice on Drug an# Crime
    h&&ps:55///.+no$,.or"5+no$,5en5or"anize$!,ri%e5in$ex.h&%l
    ///.i
    8030!0A!89, Joseph Zernik, KA+&o%a&e$ In$ex o' () J+$i,ial -orr+p&ion Propose$ .* 1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6K,
    )2aminer/ com
    h&&p:55///.exa%iner.,o%5ar&i,le5a+&o%a&e$!in$ex!o'!+s!j+$i,ial!,orr+p&ion!propose$!.*!h+%an!ri"h&s!aler&!n"o
    ///.ii
    Zernik, J: Da&a Binin" o' Online J+$i,ial 2e,or$s o' &he ;e&/orke$ () =e$eral -o+r&s, In&erna&ional Jo+rnal on
    )o,ial Be$ia: Boni&orin", Beas+re%en&, Binin", 3:AC!I3 480306
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53I38I9I95
    xxxviii
    Zernik, J: Invali$ <le,&roni, 2e,or$ )*s&e%s o' &he )&a&e an$ =e$eral () -o+r&s S <na.lers o' 1+%an 2i"h&s A.+se
    an$ &he =inan,ial -risis S -HB<2@A# 8033 paper S peer!revie/e$ an$ a,,ep&e$, &hen reje,&e$ a$%inis&ra&ivel*.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53370404035
    ///i/
    8030!03!84 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: @o,al 2+les o' -o+r&,-hap&ers 3!4
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58IIA843I5
    xl
    -O(2T 2(@<), Berkele* @a/ @i.ar*
    h&&p:55///.la/..erkele*.e$+5li.rar*5$*na%i,5"+i$e.phpXi$\78
    /li
    8030!03!84 Deneral Or$ers o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58IIA30I45
    xlii
    8030!03!84 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: -B5<-= K(no''i,ialK An$erson Ban+al
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58IIAC9335
    () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, <as&ern Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: (sers Ban+al ! <le,&roni, =ilin" -B5<-=
    h&&p:55///.,ae$.+s,o+r&s."ov5,ae$5DO-(B<;T)5-B<-=5(serBan+al.p$'
    xliii
    800I!08!07 () Dis&ri,& -o+r& -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: *eneral 3r#er 0I!08
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,587A384735
    /li.
    2010#03#24 7eneral 8rders of the $% 9istrict -ourt, -entral 9istrict of -alifornia
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58IIA30I45
    /l.
    8033!03!07 %og Ca(in Repu(licans v USA et al 430!9AA346 a& &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i& ! Bo&ion &o
    In&ervene an$ -on,o%i&an&l* =ile$ Papers as p+.lishe$ in &he online PA-<2 $o,ke&s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/41311034/
    xlvi
    8030!03!84 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: -B5<-= K(no''i,ialK An$erson Ban+al
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58IIAC9335
    /l.ii
    8030!03!87 A$$en$+% O3 &o 2e0+es& 'or Opinions 2e: -B5<-= ! ,ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e% o' &he () -o+r& o'
    Appeals C&h -ir,+i&, as revie/e$ in or$ers in =ine v )heri''
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/24323540/
    8030!04!09 A$$en$+% O8 &o 2e0+es& 'or <xper&sL Opinions 2<: -ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e% ;DAs, () -o+r& o' Appeals,
    C&h -ir,+i&
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/2432)353/
    /l.iii
    8030!03!30 ;DAs 4;o&i,es o' <le,&roni, =ilin"s6 a& () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i&: 2+les, Or$ers. (serLs D+i$e,
    Ni$eo Trans,rip&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58C3A73395
    /li/
    =. -oenen: Neri'i,a&ion an$ Nali$a&ion Iss+es in <xper& an$ Da&a.ase )*s&e%s: The <xper& )*s&e%sPerspe,&ive,
    $exa, pp.3A, C&h In&erna&ional #orkshop on Da&a.ase an$ <xper& )*s&e%s Appli,a&ions4D<[ALCI6, 3CCI
    -o$$, < =: The rela&ional %o$el 'or $a&a.ase %ana"e%en&: version 8,A-B -lassi, Books )eries,A$$ison!#esle*
    P+.lishin" -o%pan*, In,, 3CC0
    l
    &he web site of the :dministrati.e 8ffice of the $% courts pro.ides the following information:
    -B5<-= is &he 'e$eral ,o+r&sL ,ase %ana"e%en& an$ ele,&roni, ,ase 'iles s*s&e%. I& provi$es ,o+r&s enhan,e$ an$
    +p$a&e$ $o,ke& %ana"e%en&. I& allo/s ,o+r&s &o %ain&ain ,ase $o,+%en&s in ele,&roni, 'or%. An$ i& "ives ea,h ,o+r& &he
    op&ion o' per%i&&in" ,ase $o,+%en&s ! plea$in"s, %o&ions, pe&i&ions ! &o .e 'ile$ /i&h &he ,o+r& over &he In&erne&.
    -B5<-= i%ple%en&a&ion in &he .ankr+p&,* ,o+r&s has .een +n$er/a* sin,e earl* 8003. Dis&ri,& ,o+r& i%ple%en&a&ion
    .e"an in 8008. Appella&e ,o+r& i%ple%en&a&ion .e"an in la&e 8004.
    The &ransi&ion &o a ;ex& Denera&ion o' -B5<-= is /ell +n$er/a*. The re0+ire%en&s "a&herin" phase o' &he proje,&
    ,on,l+$e$ in Bar,h 8038, as "ro+ps o' j+$"es, ,ha%.ers s&a'', ,lerks, an$ ,o+r& s&a'' i$en&i'ie$ an$ priori&ize$ h+n$re$s
    o' re0+ire%en&s. The proje,& also re,eive$ inp+& 'ro% &he .ar, a,a$e%ia, "overn%en& a"en,ies, an$ o&hers &hro+"h
    in&ervie/s, 'o,+s "ro+ps, an$ s+rve*s o' approxi%a&el* 30,000 j+$i,iar* s&akehol$ers. The proje,& is in &he $esi"n an$
    $evelop%en& phase. The ini&ial s,he$+le ,alls 'or &he 'irs& ;ex& Denera&ion release &o .e availa.le &o &he ,o+r&s in 8034,
    'ollo/e$ .* '+ll &ransi&ion over several *ears. The 'irs& release /ill in,l+$e ,en&ral si"n!on '+n,&ionali&*, /hi,h /ill allo/
    +sers o' -B5<-= an$ PA-<2 &o %ain&ain one a,,o+n& a,ross all ,o+r&s an$ &o si"n in one &i%e &o a,,ess %+l&iple ,o+r&s.
    =or %ore in'or%a&ion, please ,on&a,&: Bar.ara Gi%.le, O''i,e o' J+$"es Pro"ra%s 48086 908!3IA8.
    The &ransi&ion &o a ;ex& Denera&ion o' -B5<-= is /ell +n$er/a*. The re0+ire%en&s "a&herin" phase o' &he proje,&
    ,on,l+$e$ in Bar,h 8038, as "ro+ps o' j+$"es, ,ha%.ers s&a'', ,lerks, an$ ,o+r& s&a'' i$en&i'ie$ an$ priori&ize$ h+n$re$s
    o' re0+ire%en&s. The proje,& also re,eive$ inp+& 'ro% &he .ar, a,a$e%ia, "overn%en& a"en,ies, an$ o&hers &hro+"h
    in&ervie/s, 'o,+s "ro+ps, an$ s+rve*s o' approxi%a&el* 30,000 j+$i,iar* s&akehol$ers. The proje,& is in &he $esi"n an$
    $evelop%en& phase. The ini&ial s,he$+le ,alls 'or &he 'irs& ;ex& Denera&ion release &o .e availa.le &o &he ,o+r&s in 8034,
    'ollo/e$ .* '+ll &ransi&ion over several *ears. The 'irs& release /ill in,l+$e ,en&ral si"n!on '+n,&ionali&*, /hi,h /ill allo/
    +sers o' -B5<-= an$ PA-<2 &o %ain&ain one a,,o+n& a,ross all ,o+r&s an$ &o si"n in one &i%e &o a,,ess %+l&iple ,o+r&s.
    =or %ore in'or%a&ion, please ,on&a,&: Bar.ara Gi%.le, O''i,e o' J+$"es Pro"ra%s 48086 908!3IA8.
    http://www.uscourts.go./;ederal-ourts/-,(-;/:bout-,(-;.asp/
    li
    8030!0C!88 2o.o!)i"na&+res S &he la&es& ,o%p+&er 'ra+$ in () .ankin" an$ ,o+r&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,547A773905
    lii
    800C!0A!09 A$a% @ip&a%, K;e/ ),r+&in* o' J+$"eMs Bos& -on&roversial -aseK, 07 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/01/us/politics/01ricci.html
    800C!0A!3A John ),h/ar&z KIn D+n -ase, Peers )+ppor& )o&o%a*orK, 07 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/1)/us/politics/1)6udge.html
    8034 !07!03 A$a% @ip&ak5 KBir&h -on&rol Or$er Deepens Divi$e A%on" J+s&i,esK, 07 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/0)/04/us/politics/supreme#court#order#suspends#contraception#rule#for#
    christian#college.html
    800C!07!30 K)o&o%a*orMs ;o&a.le -o+r& Opinions an$ Ar&i,lesK, 07 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/interacti.e/2004/03/21/us/0321#scotus.html
    liii
    2012#01#21 :dam +ipta, %upreme -ourt 'e6ects <udge 9rawn ,aps in &e/as 'edistricting -ase, 07 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/21/us/supreme#court#re6ects#6udge#drawn#maps#in#te/as#redistricting#
    case.html
    8038!0A!8A A$a% @ip&ak, s+pre%e!,o+r&!$e,lines!&o!revisi&!,i&izens!+ni&e$, 07 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/21/us/supreme#court#declines#to#re.isit#citi2ens#united.html
    li.
    8034!0I!8A Pro,e$+res o' &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, Wikipe#ia
    http://en.wiipedia.org/wii/=rocedures_of_the_%upreme_-ourt_of_the_$nited_%tates
    lv
    8038!0A!33 A$a% @ip&ak KB*s&er* o' -i&izens (ni&e$ )e0+el Is =or%a&, ;o& <n$in"K, 07 ?imes
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/12/us/in#citi2ens#united#ii#how#6ustices#rule#may#be#an#issue#itself.html
    l.i
    800I!0A!84 Zernik v ()D- 40I!787346 a& &he () -o+r& o' Appeals C&h -ir,+i& ! Alle"e$ =ra+$ on &he -o+r& an$
    (n$er%inin" o' Bankin" 2e"+la&ion
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53C9849435
    lvii
    8033!03!03 The 1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6 s+.%ission, as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (; 1+%an 2I&"h&s -o+n,il (P2
    repror& /i&h &he no&e K@a,k o' in&e"ri&* in &he ele,&roni, re,or$s o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&, &he $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ &he
    $e&ainees ,o+r&s in IsraelK 4pa"e 4, para"raph 896
    http://daccess#dds#ny.un.org/doc/$>98-/7(>/712/150/12/=9;/71215012.pdf!8pen(lement
    lviii
    8033!07!08 ;<= 4;o&i,e o' <le,&roni, =ilin"6 in &he () -o+r&s <le,&roni, =ilin" )*s&e% 4-B5<-=6
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,599IA84035
    li/
    8030!03!38 Huminski v/ Rutlan# olice Dept, et al 43:CC!,v!3A06, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Ner%on& ! &/o 'alse an$
    $eli.era&el* %islea$in" ;<=s serve$ on Plain&i'' 1+%inski /i&h no -o+r& )&a%ps
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/23241)42/
    lx
    8038!03!33 In 2<: 2 D 48:33!%,!008I46 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia ! %in+&es, or$ers,
    j+$"%en&s iss+e$ /i&h invali$ ;<=s are invali$ ,o+r& re,or$s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5I437A80A5
    l/i
    8030!03!84 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: -B5<-= K(no''i,ialK An$erson Ban+al. ;o O''i,ial Ban+al
    exis&e$.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58IIAC9335
    The ,orpora&e si&e:
    h&&p:55e'ile.an$ersonla/.ne&5
    l/ii
    8030!04!03 (ni&e$ )&a&es Dis&ri,& -o+r& 'or &he #es&ern Dis&ri,& o' Texas,A$%inis&ra&ive Poli,ies an$ Pro,e$+res 'or
    <le,&roni, =ilin"
    h&&p:55///.&x/$.+s,o+r&s."ov5e,'5$o,s5e'ilepro,$.p$'
    lxiii
    800I!08!07 () Dis&ri,& -o+r& -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: Deneral Or$er 0I!08
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,587A384735
    lxiv
    8033!0A!80 PA-<2 an$ -B5<-=: Do,+%en& Neri'i,a&ion (&ili&*, as $es,ri.e$ in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, ;or&hern Dis&ri,&
    o' Illinois
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59I43A9095
    l/.
    8030!03!87 A$$en$+% O3 &o 2e0+es& 'or Opinions 2e: -B5<-= ! ,ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e% o' &he () -o+r& o'
    Appeals C&h -ir,+i&, as revie/e$ in or$ers in =ine v )heri''
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/24323540/
    8030!04!09 A$$en$+% O8 &o 2e0+es& 'or <xper&sL Opinions 2<: -ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e% ;DAs, () -o+r& o' Appeals,
    C&h -ir,+i&
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/2432)353/
    lxvi
    8030!03!30 ;DAs 4;o&i,es o' <le,&roni, =ilin"s6 a& () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i&: 2+les, Or$ers. (serLs D+i$e,
    Ni$eo Trans,rip&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58C3A73395
    lxvii
    8030!03!30 De,lara&ion o' Dr Joseph Zernik in 2<: ;DAs, per&ainin" Richar# "ine v Sheriff of %os Angeles County et
    al 40C!9A0736 an$ -oseph Zernik v US District Court, Central District of California 40I!787346, in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals,
    C&h -ir,+i&, o.&aine$ in a visi& &o () -o+r& o' Appeals C&h -ir,+i&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58C483C795
    l/.iii
    8034!0I!8C 2i,har$ )helle* v U+ali&* @oan )ervi,e -orp, e& al 40C!9A3336 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i& !
    'alse an$ $eli.era&el* %islea$in" ;DA in a ,ase involvin" a 'inan,ial ins&i&+&ion
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,583I0I4C835
    l/i/
    8033!03!0I Thro+"h I%ple%en&a&ion o' -ase Bana"e%en& )*s&e%s, &he -ali'ornia an$ &he () -o+r&s 2en$ere$ &he
    J+$i,ial Pro,ess Na"+e an$ A%.i"+o+s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/41314252/
    lxx
    8033!03!03 The 1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6 s+.%ission, as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (; 1+%an 2I&"h&s -o+n,il (P2
    repror& /i&h &he no&e K@a,k o' in&e"ri&* in &he ele,&roni, re,or$s o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&, &he $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ &he
    $e&ainees ,o+r&s in IsraelK 4pa"e 4, para"raph 896
    http://daccess#dds#ny.un.org/doc/$>98-/7(>/712/150/12/=9;/71215012.pdf!8pen(lement
    lxxi
    8034!04!87 Ashkenazi^7A o&her v Binis&er o' J+s&i,e e& al in &he 1i"h -o+r& o' J+s&i,e 483005336 S Dr ZernikLs 2e0+es&
    'or -er&i'i,a&ion o' Presi$in" J+s&i,e Dr+nisLs De,ision, >Tr+e -op* o' &he Ori"inal? 4'+ll <n"lish &ransla&ion6
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5883038C3I5
    l//ii
    800I!08!07 () Dis&ri,& -o+r& -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: Deneral Or$er 0I!08
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,587A384735
    lxxiii
    8033!03!03 The 1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6 s+.%ission, as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (; 1+%an 2I&"h&s -o+n,il (P2
    repror& /i&h &he no&e K@a,k o' in&e"ri&* in &he ele,&roni, re,or$s o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&, &he $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ &he
    $e&ainees ,o+r&s in IsraelK 4pa"e 4, para"raph 896
    http://daccess#dds#ny.un.org/doc/$>98-/7(>/712/150/12/=9;/71215012.pdf!8pen(lement
    l//i.
    800I!03!09 -ase o' Borro/er #illia% Parsle* 409!C03746, Dk& O84I: J+$"e Je'' Boh%Ls Be%oran$+%
    Opinion, re.+kin" -o+n&r*/i$eLs li&i"a&ion pra,&i,es, -o+n&r*/i$eLs 'alse o+&si$e ,o+nsel s,he%e !
    appearan,es .* ,o+nsel /ho are no& -o+nsel o' 2e,or$, /i&h Kno ,o%%+ni,a&ions /i&h ,lien&sK ,la+se:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/23001411/
    l//.
    8030!03!3C =ine v )heri'' 48:0C!,v!03C346 -orrespon$en,e Br -arrizosa ! Dr Zernik re: -ase -ap&ion in &he 1a.eas
    -orp+s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58IA4094A5
    8030!03!3C. 2i,har$ =ine: Dr Zernik ! Br -arrizosaLs -orrespon$en,e on .ehal' o' &he -ali'ornia J+$i,ial -o+n,il in re:
    -ase -ap&ion in en"a"e%en& o' A&&orne* B,-or%i,k in =ine v )heri'' 48:0C!,v!03C346
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/25143322/
    lxxvi
    3CCC! () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: Deneral Or$er CC!07 ! -er&i'i,a&ion as &o In&eres&e$ Par&ies.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54430A33C5
    lxxvii
    8030!0C!0C )e,+ri&ies an$ <x,han"e -o%%ission, K=OIA 2esponse ;o 30!03CA4!=OIA, 2<: S)C v Bank of
    America Corporation 43:0C!,v!0AI8C6K
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54AA0I99C5
    lxxviii
    8033!03!03 The 1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6 s+.%ission, as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (; 1+%an 2I&"h&s -o+n,il (P2
    repror& /i&h &he no&e K@a,k o' in&e"ri&* in &he ele,&roni, re,or$s o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&, &he $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ &he
    $e&ainees ,o+r&s in IsraelK 4pa"e 4, para"raph 896
    http://daccess#dds#ny.un.org/doc/$>98-/7(>/712/150/12/=9;/71215012.pdf!8pen(lement
    lxxix
    8033!30!84 (): PA-<2 'ra+$, $iappearin" re,or$s ! T)A li&i"a&ionW In'or/ars
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,537C0C4A795
    lxxx
    8034!04!0C Tai&z v -olvin 43:33!,v!03I7I6 in &he (.). Dis&ri,& -o+r& Dis&ri,& o' Bar*lan$ S re,or$s $isappeare$ 'ro%
    PA-<2 $o,ke&_
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/211142445/
    l///i
    8003!03!00 )&ren"&henin" J+$i,ial In&e"ri&* A"ains& -orr+p&ion ! (; In&erna&ional -ri%e Preven&ion -en&er
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54I303AC75
    lxxxii
    80000!04!00 2epor& o' &he =irs& Nienna -onven&ion ! )&ren"&henin" J+$i,ial In&e"ri&*, -I-P!A, (ni&e$ ;a&ions Dr+"
    -on&rol an$ -ri%e Preven&ion -en&er 480006 4)ee p9!A6
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54I303AC75
    lxxxiii
    8033!04!89 Da'na @inzer, KIn Di&%o Opinion, T/o Nersions o' 2eali&*K, rou(lica
    http://www.propublica.org/article/in#gitmo#opinion#two#.ersions#of#reality
    l///i.
    8030!33!39 Ze%ik, J: The -lerks an$ &he -alen$ars o' &he () -o+r&s
    ///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,548AIA0435
    l///.
    8030!33!33 Ta.le 3: () Dis&ri,& -o+r&s: PA-<2 an$ -B5<-= ! P+.li, A,,ess &o -alen$ars, )+rve* o' over 80 $is&ri,&
    ,o+r&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5480737985
    l///.i
    8030!33!33 Ta.le 8: () Dis&ri,& -o+r&s PA-<2 an$ -B5<-=: P+.li, A,,ess &o -alen$ars ! )+rve* o' In$ivi$+al
    -ases in 9 Dis&ri,& -o+r&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,548300A935
    l///.ii
    8033!09!83 P2<)) 2<@<A)<: -i&izens (ni&e$ v =e$eral <le,&ion -o%%ission in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D- ! invali$
    ,o+r& re,or$s in a )i%+la&e$ @i&i"a&ion
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A0I030A5
    l///.iii
    8033!09!!84 2< -i&izens (ni&e$ v =e$eral <le,&ion -o%%ission 4=<-6 ! 2e0+es& 'or Poli,* )&a&e%en&
    .* =<-
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A3494I85
    l///i/
    8033!03!89 2e0+es& 'or I%pea,h%en& o' () )+pre%e -o+r& -lerk #illia% )+&er
    ///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54793C3I85
    /c
    8030!!07!03 -o%plain& a"ains& () )+pre%e -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell 'or Alle"e$ P+.li, -orr+p&ion
    an$ Depriva&ion o' 2i"h&s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/33))2313/
    x,i
    8033!09!30 -i&izens (ni&e$ v =e$eral <le,&ion -o%%ission ! )i%+la&e$ @i&i"a&ion in &he () )+pre%e -o+r&P
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5990A43AA5
    /cii
    8033!08!30 Press 2elease: =ra+$ Opine$ in () )+pre%e -o+r& 2e,or$s 2e,eive$ .* Pe&i&ioner #illia% #in$sor
    =ro% &he O''i,e o' -lerk )+&er
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54IA093895
    8033!03!3I Press 2elease: #in$sor v Bai$ o' &he Bis& in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es an$ Alle"e$ -orr+p&ion
    o' &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk o' &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54734AI485
    /ciii
    8030!0I!30 2<: =ine v Ba,a 40C!A38906 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! De,lara&ion o' Deor"e
    B,Der%o&& in re: April 8A, 8030 +nsi"ne$ le&&er .* +nna%e$ Dep+&* -lerk, no&i,in" $enial o' &he appli,a&ion, as
    $is,overe$ in -o+r& 'ile.
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/314)1)02/
    /ci.
    8030!0I!33 2<: =ine v Ba,a 40C!AI876, =ine v Ba,a 40C!38906, an$ =ine v Ba,a 430!A846 a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o'
    &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! O,&o.er 800C Ter% Jo+rnal ! vali$i&*, or la,k &hereo'
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53A47AC8A5
    /c.
    8030!0I!33 =ine v Ba,a 40C!38906 Pe&i&ion 'or #ri& o' -er&iorari a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es : Online
    $o,ke&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53A4I3C875
    /c.i
    8030!0I!33 =ine v Ba,a 40C!38906 a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es, online Or$er @is&s per&ainin" &o $enial
    o' &he Pe&i&ion 'or #ri& o' -er&iorari
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53A4I33475
    /c.ii
    8030!07!8I Inspe,&ion o' paper ,o+r& 'iles in =ine v Ba,a 40C!AI876 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es:
    De,lara&ion o' Deor"e B,Der%o&& in 2e: (nsi"ne$ @e&&er $a&e$ April 8A, 8030, .* )+pre%e +nna%e$ Dep+&* -lerk re:
    Denial o' &he Appli,a&ion
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5390349CC5
    /c.iii
    8030!0I!30 2<: =ine v Ba,a 40C!A38906 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! De,lara&ion o' Deor"e
    B,Der%o&& in re: April 8A, 8030 +nsi"ne$ le&&er .* +nna%e$ Dep+&* -lerk, no&i,in" $enial o' &he appli,a&ion, as
    $is,overe$ in -o+r& 'ile.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53A4737085
    /ci/
    8030!0I!30 2<: =ine v Ba,a 40C!A38906 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! De,lara&ion o' Deor"e
    B,Der%o&& in re: April 8A, 8030 +nsi"ne$ le&&er .* +nna%e$ Dep+&* -lerk, no&i,in" $enial o' &he appli,a&ion, as
    $is,overe$ in -o+r& 'ile.
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/314)1)02/
    ,
    8033!03!03 The 1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6 s+.%ission, as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (; 1+%an 2I&"h&s -o+n,il (P2
    repror& /i&h &he no&e K@a,k o' in&e"ri&* in &he ele,&roni, re,or$s o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&, &he $is&ri,& ,o+r&s an$ &he
    $e&ainees ,o+r&s in IsraelK 4pa"e 4, para"raph 896
    http://daccess#dds#ny.un.org/doc/$>98-/7(>/712/150/12/=9;/71215012.pdf!8pen(lement
    ci
    8034!07!30 @e&&er &o Presi$in" J+s&i,e Dr+nis: 2e0+es& 'or ,lari'i,a&ion in re ! perver&e$ )+pre%e -o+r& re,or$s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,583338C88A5
    cii
    The &er%s si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion an$ si%+la&e$ ,o+r& re,or$s are +se$ in ins&an& s+.%ission in &he sense provi$e$ .* &he
    Texas la/:
    Texas Penal -o$e ! )e,&ion 38.4I. )i%+la&in" @e"al Pro,ess
    J 38.4I. )IB(@ATI;D @<DA@ P2O-<)).
    4a6 A person ,o%%i&s an o''ense i' &he person re,klessl* ,a+ses &o .e $elivere$ &o
    ano&her an* $o,+%en& &ha& si%+la&es a s+%%ons, ,o%plain&, j+$"%en&, or o&her ,o+r& pro,ess /i&h &he in&en& &o:
    436 in$+,e pa*%en& o' a ,lai% 'ro% ano&her person7 or
    486 ,a+se ano&her &o:
    4A6 s+.%i& &o &he p+&a&ive a+&hori&* o' &he $o,+%en&7 or
    4B6 &ake an* a,&ion or re'rain 'ro% &akin" an* a,&ion in response &o &he $o,+%en&, in ,o%plian,e /i&h &he
    $o,+%en&, or on &he .asis o' &he $o,+%en&.
    4.6 Proo' &ha& &he $o,+%en& /as %aile$ &o an* person /i&h &he in&en& &ha& i& .e 'or/ar$e$ &o &he in&en$e$ re,ipien& is a
    s+''i,ien& sho/in" &ha& &he $o,+%en& /as $elivere$.
    4,6 I& is no& a $e'ense &o prose,+&ion +n$er &his se,&ion &ha& &he si%+la&in" $o,+%en&:
    436 s&a&es &ha& i& is no& le"al pro,ess7 or
    486 p+rpor&s &o have .een iss+e$ or a+&horize$ .* a person or en&i&* /ho $i$ no& have la/'+l a+&hori&* &o iss+e or
    a+&horize &he $o,+%en&.
    4$6 I' i& is sho/n on &he &rial o' an o''ense +n$er &his se,&ion &ha& &he si%+la&in" $o,+%en& /as 'ile$ /i&h, presen&e$ &o,
    or $elivere$ &o a ,lerk o' a ,o+r& or an e%plo*ee o' a ,lerk o' a
    ,o+r& ,rea&e$ or es&a.lishe$ +n$er &he ,ons&i&+&ion or la/s o' &his s&a&e, &here is a re.+&&a.le pres+%p&ion &ha& &he
    $o,+%en& /as $elivere$ /i&h &he in&en& $es,ri.e$ .* )+.se,&ion 4a6.
    4e6 <x,ep& as provi$e$ .* )+.se,&ion 4'6, an o''ense +n$er &his se,&ion is a -lass A %is$e%eanor.
    4'6 I' i& is sho/n on &he &rial o' an o''ense +n$er &his se,&ion &ha& &he $e'en$an& has previo+sl* .een ,onvi,&e$ o' a
    viola&ion o' &his se,&ion, &he o''ense is a s&a&e jail 'elon*.
    A$$e$ .* A,&s 3CC7, 79&h @e"., ,h. 3IC, J 3, e''. Ba* 83, 3CC7.
    ciii
    ,iv
    Zernik, J: 1a.eas -orp+s in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! &he ,ase o' 2i,har$ Isaa, =ine ! 2evie/
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58478C0I45
    c.
    8030!0I!3I Zernik, J: Da&a Binin" o' Online J+$i,ial 2e,or$s o' &he ;e&/orke$ () =e$eral -o+r&s, In&erna&ional
    Jo+rnal on )o,ial Be$ia: Boni&orin", Beas+re%en&, Binin", 3:AC!I3 480306
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53I38I9I95
    c.i
    8030!03!0I )+pervisor An&onovi,h, @os An"eles -o+n&*, repea& %ailin" o' Jan+ar* I, 8030 response 'ro% )heri'' @ee
    Ba,a in re: Arres& an$ .ookin" re,or$s o' In%a&e 2i,har$ =ine 43I843A76, in,l+$in" &he 'ra+$+len& a&&a,h%en&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5899993435
    ,vii
    8030!03!89 "ine v Sheriff 48:0C!,v!03C346 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia ! Do,ke& 2epor&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5389A798C5
    c.iii
    3CCC!00!00 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, Denral Or$er CC!07 ! -er&i'i,a&ion as &o Par&ies
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54430A33C5
    ci/
    8030!03!3C P. -arrizosa, >2<: <n"a"e%en& o' A&&orne* B,-or%i,k in "ine v Sheriff 48:0C!,v!03C346 in &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia?, @e&&er on .ehal' o' &he -ali'ornia J+$i,ial -o+n,il
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58IA499885
    ,x
    800C!0A!38 =ine v )heri'' 48:0C!,v!03C346 Dk& O8A ! 2epor& an$ 2e,o%%en$a&ion .* () Ba"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,543CC83I75
    c/i
    800C!0A!84 =ine v )heri'' o' @A 40C!73AC86 a& &he () App -& C&h: Dk& O08 ! ZernikLs <x Par&e Appli,a&ion 'or @eave &o
    =ile
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58933I9005
    c/ii
    800C!0A!30 =ine v )heri'' 40C!73AC86 a& &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i&, alle"e$ =ra+$ in +nsi"ne$
    +na+&hen&i,a&e$ or$er 4Dk& O46 iss+e$ in &he na%es o' -ir,+i& J+$"es Gozinski, Paez, an$ Tall%an $en*in" &he
    <%er"en,* Pe&i&ion o' 2i,har$ =ine
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,587A8A7II5
    c/iii
    8030!03!30 De,lara&ion o' Dr Joseph Zernik in 2<: ;DAs, per&ainin" &o 2i,har$ =ine v )heri'' o' @os An"eles -o+n&*
    e& al 40C!9A0736 an$ Joseph Zernik v () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia 40I!787346, in &he () -o+r& o'
    Appeals, C&h -ir,+i&, o.&aine$ in visi& &o () -o+r& o' Appeals C&h -ir,+i&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58C483C795
    c/i.
    8030!03!87 A$$en$+% O3 &o 2e0+es& 'or Opinions 2e: -B5<-= ! ,ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e% o' &he () -o+r& o'
    Appeals C&h -ir,+i&, as revie/e$ in or$ers in =ine v )heri''
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/24323540/
    8030!04!09 A$$en$+% O8 &o 2e0+es& 'or <xper&sL Opinions 2<: -ase %ana"e%en& s*s&e% ;DAs, () -o+r& o' Appeals,
    C&h -ir,+i&
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/2432)353/
    c/.
    2030!04!80 =ine v )heri'' 40C!AI876 =a,e pa"es o' 'ive 'ilin"s .* Dr Joseph Zernik, /i&h s&a%ps sho/in" re,eip& .*
    &he () )+pre%e -o+r& s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,530304A975
    8030!04!3I =ine v )heri'' 40C!AI876 3 A%en$e$ Bo&ion &o In&ervene s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303A39735
    8030!04!3I =ine v )heri'' 40C!AI876 8 A%en$e$ 2e0+es& 'or @enien,e .* Pro )e =iler s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303A3A3A5
    8030!04!3I =ine v )heri'' 40C!AI876 3 A%en$e$ 2e0+es& 'or -orre,&ions in () )+pre%e -o+r& 2e,or$s s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303A830C5
    8030!04!3I =ine v )heri'' 40C!AI876 4 A%en$e$ 2e0+es& 'or In,orpora&ion .* 2e'eren,e s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303A83445
    8030!04!3I =ine v )heri'' 40C!AI876 Dr ZernikLs Bo&ion &o In&ervene 9 A%en$e$ Appen$i,es s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303A3AC85
    8030!04!3I =ine v )heri'' 40C!AI876 9 A%en$e$ Appen$ix I[ .: ZernikLs De,lara&ion in re: April 3A, 8030 sear,h 'or
    re,or$s in &he -o+r&s %i,ro'il% j+$"%en&s ar,hive s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303I99795
    8030!04!88 =ine v )heri'' 40C!AI876 a& &he () )+pre%e -o+r& ! Dr ZernikLs De,lara&ion 2<: -o+r& -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell
    an$ =ilin" a& () )+pre%e -o+r&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5334304A45
    c/.i
    8030!07!8I Inspe,&ion o' paper ,o+r& 'iles in =ine v Ba,a 40C!AI876 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es:
    De,lara&ion o' Deor"e B,Der%o&& in 2e: (nsi"ne$ @e&&er $a&e$ April 8A, 8030, .* )+pre%e +nna%e$ Dep+&* -lerk re:
    Denial o' &he Appli,a&ion
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/33014344/
    c/.ii
    8030!07!89 =ine v Ba,a 40C!AI876 a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! 2e,or$s o' Denial o' &he Appli,a&ion
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/34534330/
    c/.iii
    8030!07!03 In re: =ine v )heri'' 40C!AI876: -o%plain& a"ains& () )+pre%e -o+r& -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell Alle"in"
    P+.li, -orr+p&ion an$ Depriva&ion o' 2i"h&s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/33))2313/
    c/i/
    8030!07!8I Inspe,&ion o' paper ,o+r& 'iles in =ine v Ba,a 40C!AI876 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es:
    De,lara&ion o' Deor"e B,Der%o&& in 2e: (nsi"ne$ @e&&er $a&e$ April 8A, 8030, .* )+pre%e +nna%e$ Dep+&* -lerk re:
    Denial o' &he Appli,a&ion
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/33014344/
    c//
    8030!04!07 )iever$in" e& al v. (ni&e$ )&a&es Dovern%en& 43:0C!,v!009A86 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D- S
    in re: Arres& an$ I%prison%en& .* =e$eral A"en,ies ! Alle"e$ I%pea,ha.le Bis,on$+,& .* () J+$"e John D Ba&es
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5498788935
    c//i
    8030!04!07 )iever$in" e& al v. (ni&e$ )&a&es Dovern%en& 43:0C!,v!009A86 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D- S
    in re: Arres& an$ I%prison%en& .* =e$eral A"en,ies ! Alle"e$ I%pea,ha.le Bis,on$+,& .* () J+$"e John D Ba&es
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5498788935
    ,xxii
    8038!03!33 ;e&sphere In, e& al v Baron e& al 43:0C!,v!00CII6 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, ;or&hern Dis&ri,& o' Texas:
    -o%pile$ re,or$s 4Do,ke&, -alen$ar, -o%plain&, )+%%ons, Assi"n%en& Or$er, Or$er Appoin&in" 2e,eiver , e&,6 S
    evi$en,e o' ra,ke&eerin" in &he -o+r&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5I4C47A0C5
    c//iii
    ;e&sphere In, e& al v. Baron e& al 43:0C!,v!00CII6 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, ;or&hern Dis&ri,& o' Texas: -o%pile$
    re,or$s 4Do,ke&, -alen$ar, -o%plain&, )+%%ons, Assi"n%en& Or$er, Or$er Appoin&in" 2e,eiver , e&,6 S evi$en,e o'
    ra,ke&eerin" in &he -o+r&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5I4C47A0C5
    ,xxiv
    A 'ra+$+len& no&e /as inser&e$ in &he $o,ke& +n$er Dk& O009, p+rpor&in" &o sho/ &he en&r* o' an Or$er 2eassi"nin"
    &he ,ase &o J+$"e 2OHA@ =(2D<)O. In 'a,&, &he re,or$ linke$ +n$er Dk& O009 is an A''i$avi& o' <xe,+&ion o' )ervi,e o'
    )+%%ons an$ -o%plain&.
    c//.
    8030!33!84 Dk& O383 S <%er"en,* %o&ion 'or Appoin&%en& o' 2e,eiver over Je''re* Baron
    ,xxvi
    ;e&sphere In,, e& al v Je''re* Baron 430!33806 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, 9&h -ir,+i&: -o%pile$ re,or$s 4Do,ke&,
    Bo&ions, Or$ers6
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5I4IIII005
    ,xxvii
    The () Dis&ri,& -o+r& $o,ke& lis&s as 2ela&e$ -ases in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, 9&h -ir,+i&: 30!33808, 33!30333, 33!
    308IC, 33!308C0. The $o,ke& o' ;e&sphere In,, e& al v Je''re* Baron 430!33806 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, 9&h -ir,+i&,
    lis&s n+%ero+s o&her 2ela&e$ -ases, all o' &he% s&ill ,+rren&.
    c//.iii
    8003!08!33 ;e&sphere In,, e& al v Je''re* Baron 430!33806 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, 9&h -ir,+i&: Bo&ion 'or
    2e,onsi$era&ion o' Dis&ri,& -o+r& Or$er Appoin&in" 2e,eiver Over &he Person an$ Proper&* o' Je'' Baron.
    c//i/
    8003!08!33 ;e&sphere In,, e& al v Je''re* Baron 430!33806 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, 9&h -ir,+i& Bo&ion 'or
    2e,onsi$era&ion o' Dis&ri,& -o+r& Or$er Appoin&in" 2e,eiver Over &he Person an$ Proper&* o' Je'' Baron
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5I4IIII005
    c///
    800I!03!0I -ase o' Borro/er 1ills 403!889746 ! in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r&, <as&ern Dis&ri,& o' Penns*lvania,
    Pi&&s.+r"h. -o+n&r*/i$eLs Three K2e,rea&e$ @e&&ersK an$ a Trans,rip&
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/23003444/
    c///i
    800I!03!09 -ase o' Borro/er #illia% Parsle* 409!C03746, Dk& O84I: J+$"e Je'' Boh%Ls Be%oran$+% Opinion,
    re.+kin" -o+n&r*/i$eLs li&i"a&ion pra,&i,es, -o+n&r*/i$eLs 'alse o+&si$e ,o+nsel s,he%e ! appearan,es .* ,o+nsel /ho
    are no& -o+nsel o' 2e,or$, /i&h Kno ,o%%+ni,a&ions /i&h ,lien&sK ,la+se:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/23001411/
    c///ii
    8034!0I!80 Bo'A in R3A.9 .illion $eal /i&h (.). over %or&"a"e .on$s: so+r,e, Reuters
    h&&p:55///.re+&ers.,o%5ar&i,le5803450I5805+s!.anko'a%eri,a!r%.s!se&&le%en&!i$()GB;0DG89-80340I80
    ,xxxiii
    8030!0A!3C Wright v Bank of America et al 49!30!,v!037836 a& &he () -o+r&, ;or&hern -ali'ornia: Alle"e$
    ra,ke&eerin" .* Brian Bo*nihan an$ Bank A%eri,a
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5338C393I5
    c///i.
    8007!38!37 )a%aan v Zernik 4)-0I74006 Davi$ Pas&ernak: Dran& Dee$s in re: 380 )o+&h Pe,k Drive, Beverl*
    1ills, -A C0838, opine$ as 'ra+$ .* Ja%es #e$i,k
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/24441235/
    c///.
    800I!09!87 Zernik v -onnor 48:0I!,v!039906 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, Dk& O 0A8: =irs&
    A%en$e$ -o%plain&:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30)11334/
    c///.i
    8030!09!09 -o+n&r*/i$e, Bank o' A%eri,a E;H)<7BA-F, an$ i&s Presi$en& Brian Bo*nihan -o%pila&ion o' 2e,or$s
    <vi$en,e o' 2a,ke&eerin"
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/304)3315/
    c///.ii
    8030!09!09 -hairs o' () -on"ress -o%%i&&ees o' &he J+$i,iar* an$ Bankin" Are 2e0+es&e$ &o Join )ena&or
    =eins&einLs In0+iries on -o%p&roller o' &he -+rren,*
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/304)4552/
    c///.iii
    8030!07!0A -o%plain& =ile$ /i&h () A&&orne* O''i,e @os An"eles A"ains& Bo*nihan Bank o' A%eri,a E;H)<:BA-F
    Br*an -ave @@P Alle"in" 2a,ke&eerin"
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/334)1044/
    c///i/
    800I!09!87 Zernik v -onnor 48:0I!,v!039906 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, Dk& O 0A8: =irs&
    A%en$e$ -o%plain&:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30)11334/
    c/l
    8033!09!8A Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D- ! /ill'+l %is,on$+,& .* () J+$"e
    2i,har$ @eon &o ,over +p ,orr+p&ion o' &he @os An"eles ,o+r&s .* -o+n&r*/i$e an$ Bank o' A%eri,a
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A33CCCI5
    c/li
    8033!09!33 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: Do,ke& an$ o&her PA-<2
    repor&s in )i%+la&e$ @i&i"a&ion ,on$+,&e$ .* J+$"e 2i,har$ @eon an$ -lerk ;an,* Ba*er!#hi&&in"&on
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5998334A85
    c/lii
    8033!04!83 KIn =inan,ial -risis, ;o Prose,+&ions o' Top =i"+resK ! Be,a+se o' /i$esprea$ ,orr+p&ion o' &he j+s&i,e
    s*s&e%, &he* are e''e,&ivel* i%%+neP
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/33320103/
    c/liii
    8033!03!07 )+perior -o+r& o' @os An"eles -o+n&*, -ali'ornia: #i$esprea$ P+.li, -orr+p&ion an$ 2e'+sal o' ()
    Depar&%en& o' J+s&i,e &o Take A,&ion
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54A4A0A405
    c/li.
    800C!08!34 -ali'ornia )ena&e .ill provi$in" re&roa,&ive i%%+ni&ies 4Kpar$onsK6 'or all j+$"es /ho &ook Kno& per%i&&e$K
    pa*%en&s 4K.ri.esK6.)B[8!33
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58934C0495
    ,xlv
    8030!04!3C 1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;D06 s+.%ission &o &he (ni&e$ ;a&ions 1+%an 2i"h&s -o+n,il 'or &he 8030 2evie/
    4(P26 o' 1+%an 2i"h&sin &he (ni&e$ )&a&es as in,orpora&e$ in&o &he (P2 s&a'' repor&, /i&h re'eren,e &o K,orr+p&ion o' &he
    ,o+r&s an$ &he le"al pro'essionK.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53I9AAI375
    c/l.i
    800C!04!80 Pro' <li*ah+ )ha%irLs Opinion @e&&er re: )+s&ain ! &he -ase Bana"e%en& )*s&e% o' &he )+perior -o+r& o'
    -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' @os An"eles
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54A0AC3375
    c/l.ii
    8030!0I!3I Zernik, J: Da&a Binin" as a -ivi, D+&* S Online P+.li, PrisonersM 2e"is&ra&ion )*s&e%s, In&erna&ional
    Jo+rnal on )o,ial Be$ia:Boni&orin", Beas+re%en&, Binin" 3: I4!CA 480306
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53I38I9C35
    c/l.iii
    E3F 8030!09!09 -o+n&r*/i$e, Bank o' A%eri,a E;H)<7BA-F, an$ i&s Presi$en& Brian Bo*nihan -o%pila&ion o'
    2e,or$s <vi$en,e o' 2a,ke&eerin"
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,530C793AI5
    E8F 8030!09!09 -hairs o' () -on"ress -o%%i&&ees o' &he J+$i,iar* an$ Bankin" Are 2e0+es&e$ &o Join )ena&or
    =eins&einLs In0+iries on -o%p&roller o' &he -+rren,*
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,530C7CII85
    E3F 30!07!0A -o%plain& =ile$ /i&h () A&&orne* O''i,e @os An"eles A"ains& Bo*nihan Bank o' A%eri,a E;H)<:BA-F Br*an
    -ave @@P Alle"in" 2a,ke&eerin"
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,533C730CC5
    c/li/
    8033!09!33 Zernik v !elson et al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: Do,ke& an$ o&her
    'ra+$+len& PA-<2 repor&s in )i%+la&e$ @i&i"a&ion ,on$+,&e$ .* J+$"e 2i,har$ @eon an$ -lerk ;an,* Ba*er!#hi&&in"&on
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/33231412/
    cl
    800C!09!03 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& O3!36 -o%plain&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8IA04C5
    800C!09!03 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& O3!86 -o%plain& !
    <xhi.i&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8IA40I5
    800C!09!03 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& O3!36 -o%plain& ! -ivil
    -over shee&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8IAA4C5
    cli
    800C!09!03 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-:4Dk& O86 Bo&ion 'or
    -B5<-= pass/or$
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8IAI385
    clii
    800C!09!33 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& O36 )&a&e%en& 'or
    Dis0+ali'i,a&ion o' ()J+$"e 2i,har$ @eon
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8I73395
    ,liii
    800C!09!33 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& O46 Bo&ion &o ,o%pel
    &he i%prisone$ 2i,har$ =ineLs =irs& A%en$%en& ri"h&s .* provi$in" hi% pen an$ paper
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8I7A9A5
    ,liv
    8033!04!83 1a.eas -orp+s in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es ! &he ,ase o' 2i,har$ Isaa, =ine
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58478C0I45
    cl.
    800C!0A!03 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& O96 2e0+es& 'or
    revie/ o' ,on$+,& o' &he ,lerk
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/3125)41)/
    cl.i
    800C!09!03 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-:4Dk& O86 Bo&ion 'or
    -B5<-= pass/or$
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8IAI385
    ,lvii
    800C!0A!0I Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& O0A6 2e0+es& 'or
    s&a&e%en& on &he re,or$ .* J+$"e 2i,har$ @eon an$ -lerk o' &he -o+r& per&ainin" &o re'+sal &o $o,ke& papers 'ile$ in
    ,o+r&, in,l+$in" s&a&e%en& 'or $is0+ali'i,a&ion o' J+$"e 2i,har$ @eon.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8II4335
    cl.iii
    800C!0A!30 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& O076 Be%oran$+%
    Opinion .* J+$"e 2i,har$@eon1h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8IC8775 10C!0A!30 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096
    in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& OI6 Or$er .* () J+$"e 2i,har$ @eon
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8IC4905
    ,lix
    800C!0A!30 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096: =ra+$+len& >Or$er? 4Dk& OI6 %aile$ .* J+$"e 2i,har$ @eon &o pro
    se Plain&i''
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5998304345
    ,lx
    800C!0A!8C Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096: =ra+$+len& papers %aile$ .* J+$"e 2i,har$ @eon &o pro se plain&i'',
    /i&h &he ins,rip&ions>@eave &o 'ile $enie$?.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59988C9AC5
    ,lxi
    800C!0I!33 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& OC6 <x Par&e 2e0+es&
    'or ;<=s 4ele,&roni,a+&hen&i,a&ion re,or$s6 o' or$ers serve$ .* &he ,o+r&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8ICAA35
    ,lxii
    8033!33!38 P2<)) 2<@<A)<: Bai$ o' &he Bis& -orpora&ion <& Al v Al,a&raz Be$ia, @@-, e& al 43!0C!-v!039436
    )i%+la&e$ @i&i"a&ion ! =ra+$in &he () -o+r&, ;or&hern Dis&ri,& o' Deor"ia
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59987877A5
    cl/iii
    8033!08!30 Press 2elease: =ra+$ Opine$ in () )+pre%e -o+r& 2e,or$s 2e,eive$ .* Pe&i&ioner #illia% #in$sor
    =ro% &he O''i,e o' -lerk )+&er
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54IA093895
    8033!03!3I Press 2elease: #in$sor v Bai$ o' &he Bis& in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es an$ Alle"e$ -orr+p&ion
    o' &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk o' &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54734AI485
    ,lxiv
    8033!09!8A #in$sor v <vans e& al 43:30!,v!003C76 in &he () -o+r&, Dis&ri,& o' -ol+%.ia ! #ill'+l Bis,on$+,& .* ()
    J+$"e 2i,har$ @eon &o ,over +p ,orr+p&ion o' &he () -o+r&, ;or&hern Dis&ri,& o' Deor"ia
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A30430C5
    cl/.
    800C!09!83 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& Onone6 )+ppor&in"
    2e,or$s O3 ! <vi$en,e o' ,orr+p& pra,&i,es .* -o+n&r*/i$e an$ Bank o' A%eri,a in &he () -o+r&s ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8C9C075
    800C!09!83 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& Onone6 )+ppor&in"
    2e,or$s O8 ! =ra+$ <xper& Opinion 2e: =ra+$ .* -ali'ornia J+$"es in ,oll+sion /i&h -o+n&r*/i$e, Bank o' A%eri,a in &he
    )+perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' @osAn"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8CA8005
    800C!09!83 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& Onone6 )+ppor&in"
    2e,or$s O3 ! 2e0+es&s 'or Assis&an,e .* =orei"n A%.assa$ors in re: A.+se o' 2i"h&s in &he )+perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia,
    -o+n&* o' @os An"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8CA3C95
    800C!09!83 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& Onone6 )+ppor&in"
    2e,or$s O4 ! ;o&i,e 'ile$ .* Zernik in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r& in Texas in re: =ra+$ .* -o+n&r*/i$e in &he )+perior
    -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' @os An"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8CA9I35
    800C!09!83 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& Onone6 )+ppor&in"
    2e,or$s O9 ! 2e,or$s 'ile$ .* Zernik in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r& in Texas in re: =ra+$ .* -o+n&r*/i$e in &he )+perior
    -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' @os An"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8CAI7C5
    800C!09!83 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& Onone6 )+ppor&in"
    2e,or$s OA ! A$$i&ional 2e,or$s 'ile$ .* Zernik in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r& in Texas in re: =ra+$ .* -o+n&r*/i$e in &he
    )+perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' @os An"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8C703C5
    800C!09!83 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& Onone6 )+ppor&in"
    2e,or$s O7 ! =+r&her 2e,or$s 'ile$ .* Zernik in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r& in Texas in re: =ra+$ .* -o+n&r*/i$e in &he )+!
    perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' @os An"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8C74375
    800C!09!83 Zernik v Belson e& al 43:0C!,v!00I096 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, #ashin"&on D-: 4Dk& Onone6 )+ppor&in"
    2e,or$s OI ! =+r&her <vi$en,e 'ile$ .* Zernik in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r& in Texas in re: =ra+$ .* -o+n&r*/i$e in &he
    )+perior -o+r& o' -ali'ornia, -o+n&* o' @os An"eles ! Kleave &o 'ile $enie$K
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A8C7CC45
    ,lxvi
    8030!30!80 The () -o+r&s <s&a.lishe$ a Poli,* <x,l+$in" An* Papers Per&ainin" &o J+$i,ial -orr+p&ion 'ro% &he =irs&
    A%en$%en& 2i"h& &o=ile Pe&i&ions
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53C7II3A45
    ,lxvii
    Zernik, J.: KDesi"n an$ Opera&ion o' In'or%a&ion )*s&e%s o' &he () -o+r&s are @inke$ &o =ailin" Bankin"
    2e"+la&ionK, Da&a Anal*&i,s 8038, Bar,elona, )pain
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5300A833335
    cl/.iii
    Zernik, J.: )e,+ri&ies an$ <x,han"e -o%%ission v Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion ! )i%+la&e$ @i&i"a&ion an$
    )i%+la&e$ Bankin" 2e"+la&ion in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,544AA38385
    cl/i/
    800I!0C!84 =BI Inves&i"a&es =o+r =ir%s a& 1ear& o' &he =inan,ial Bess, ?ruthout
    h&&p:55&r+&h!o+&.or"5ar,hive5,o%ponen&5k85i&e%5I0890:'.i!inves&i"a&es!'o+r!'ir%s!a&!hear&!o'!&he!'inan,ial!%ess
    ,lxx
    8038!03!39 )&a&e%en& o' 2o.er& ). B+eller, III, =BI Dire,&or, .e'ore &he (ni&e$ )&a&es )ena&e, -o%%i&&ee on
    Appropria&ions, )+.,o%%i&&ee on -o%%er,e, J+s&i,e, ),ien,e an$ 2ela&e$ A"en,ies
    h&&p:55///.appropria&ions.sena&e."ov5si&es5$e'a+l&5'iles5hearin"s5B+ellerV80Tes&i%on*V80=I;A@.p$'
    cl//i
    800C!04!83 2<: S)C v BAC 43:0C!,v!0AI8C6 )&a&e o' ;e/ Hork A&&orne* Deneral An$re/ -+o%o @e&&er &o ()
    -on"ress an$ anal*s&sL responses:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/410)4440/
    cl//ii
    8033!04!33 Dre&,hen Bor"enson, K;a%in" -+lpri&s in &he =inan,ial -risisK, 07?
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/business/14crisis.html!pagewanted"all
    cl//iii
    8033!04!33 () )ena&e )+.,o%%i&&ee on Inves&i"a&ions, K#all )&ree& an$ &he =inan,ial -risis: Ana&o%* o' a
    =inan,ial -ollapseK
    http://www.nytimes.com/interacti.e/2011/04/14/business/14crisis#doc.iewer.html
    ,lxxiv
    8033!04!34 Dre&,hen Bor"enson, KIn =inan,ial -risis, ;o Prose,+&ions o' Top =i"+resK, 07?
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/business/14prosecute.html!pagewanted"all0_r"0
    cl//.
    8033!03!0A Bark Don"lo'', K<ri, 1ol$er A$%i&s )o%e Banks Are J+s& Too Bi" To Prose,+&eK, Huffington ost
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/01/eric#holder#bans#too#big_n_2521)41.html
    cl//.i
    8033!03!0A Trans,rip& o' A&&orne* Deneral <ri, 1ol$erLs re%arks .e'ore &he )ena&e J+$i,iar* -o%%i&&ee, in /hi,h
    he $is,+sses &he i$ea &ha& so%e .anks are LToo Bi" &o JailL, American Banker
    h&&p:55///.a%eri,an.anker.,o%5iss+es537IW495&rans,rip&!a&&orne*!"eneral!eri,!hol$er!on!&oo!.i"!&o!jail!30978C9!3.h&%l
    cl//.ii
    8030!0I!3I Zernik, J: Da&a Binin" o' Online J+$i,ial 2e,or$s o' &he ;e&/orke$ () =e$eral -o+r&s, In&erna&ional
    Jo+rnal on )o,ial Be$ia: Boni&orin", Beas+re%en&, Binin", 3:AC!I3 480306
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/35325353/
    cl//.iii
    8030!33!07 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork: a6 @o,al 2+les, .6 <-= 2+les an$ Ins&r+,&ions, ,6
    A&&orne*Ls <-= Di,&ionar*
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54394CI045
    cl//i/
    8030!33!07 () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork: a6 @o,al 2+les, .6 <-= 2+les an$ Ins&r+,&ions, ,6
    A&&orne*Ls <-= Di,&ionar*
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54394CI045
    ,lxxx
    The ,o%ple&e PA-<2 $o,ke& /i&h $e&aile$ anal*sis, a$$i&ional re,or$s in li&i"a&ion o' S)C v BAC 43:0C!,v!0AI8C6,
    an$ links &o %os& o' &he re,or$s in &he re'eren,e lis& .elo/, are provi$e in &he Online Appen$ix a&:
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,544AA38385
    cl///i
    )ee li&i"a&ion re,or$s, .io"raphi,al no&es o' &he j+$"es an$ a&&orne*s involve$, ne/s repor&s, an$ rela&e$ re,or$s
    +n$er: 8033!0A!30 2<: !c*arry v *eriatric "acilities of Cape Co# $nc et al 43:30!,v!333436 ! 2a,ke&eerin" &hro+"h
    )i%+la&e$ @i&i"a&ion in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Bassa,h+se&&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59C3843AC5
    cl///ii
    -ase 2e,or$s: Bai$ O' The Bis& -orpora&ion e& al v #illia% #in$sor 43:0A!,v!007346
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/43054155/
    8033!08!33 Bai$ o' &he Bis& -orpora&ion e& al v #illia% #in$sor 43:0A!,v!007346 ! <vi$en,e o' 2a,ke&eerin" in &he ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r&, ;or&hern Dis&ri,& o' Deor"ia
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54I79C0C35
    ,lxxxiii
    8038!38!33 !ai# of the !ist Corporation et al v William Win#sor 430!3033C6 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, 33&h -ir
    -o%pile$ 2e,or$s o' Appeal s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5490I0C705
    8033!03!3I Press 2elease: Win#sor v !ai# of the !ist in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es an$ Alle"e$ -orr+p&ion
    o' &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk o' &he )+pre%e -o+r&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54734AI485
    8033!08!30 Win#sor v !ai# of the !ist Corporation 430!AC0 an$ 30!AAC06 ! =ra+$ opine$ in () )+pre%e -o+r& re,or$s,
    re,eive$ .* Br #in$sor 'ro% o''i,e o' -lerk )+&er
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54I9CA385
    8033!33!8I William ! Win#sor v !ai# of the !ist Corporation, et al 430!AAC06 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es:
    a6 )+""es&e$ re0+es& 'or a vali$ re,or$ o' $enial, ,er&i'ie$ .* J+s&i,e Tho%as, an$ .6 2e,or$s provi$e$ on Jan+ar* 8I,
    8033 .* Br #in$sor
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/4)))3)31/
    cl///i.
    8034!07!89 KAr"en&inaMs $e.& sa"a ! (nse&&lin" &i%esK, ?he )conomist
    h&&p:55///.e,ono%is&.,o%5ne/s5a%eri,as583A0IA3I!,lo,k!&i,kin"!&o/ar$!ar"en&ine!$e'a+l&!+nse&&lin"!&i%es
    ,lxxxv
    8008!08!8I KAr"en&inaLs ,ollapse. A $e,line /i&ho+& parallelK, ?he )conomist
    ///.e,ono%is&.,o%5no$e53030C33
    cl///.i
    8034!07!87 KAr"en&ina .ra,e$ 'or soverei"n $e.& $e'a+l&K, "inancial ?imes
    h&&p:55///.'&.,o%5in&l5,%s5s5058$e43,8a!397a!33e4!ae8e!00344'ea.$,0.h&%lOaxzz3BD&Aeh&s
    cl///.ii
    8034!0I!88 KAr"en&ina sla%s (.). j+$"e as Li%perialis&,L peso hal&s ro+&K, Reuters
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/22/us#argentina#debt#id$%?*>07,0@)20140522
    cl///.iii
    8034!0I!83 ;B@ -api&al v 2ep+.li, o' Ar"en&ina 43:0I!,v!0AC7I6 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/
    Hork
    h&&ps:55$rive."oo"le.,o%5'ile5$50BIAa8xUD.%k9TNZNT1Hx.(Z'U%B5e$i&X+sp\sharin"
    ,lxxxix
    8030!33!3C -ivil @i&i"a&ion Bana"e%en& Ban+al, )e,on$ <$i&ion 480306 J+$i,ial -on'eren,e o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es,
    -o%%i&&ee on -o+r& A$%inis&ra&ion an$ -ase Bana"e%en&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5434CI0I35
    c/c
    8008!0A!0A Dlo.alisa&ion an$ i&s $is,on&en&s .* Joseph )&i"li&zWThe <,ono%is&
    www.arlindo#correia.com/100402.html
    c/ci
    8034!0C!07 ;B@ -api&al v The 2ep+.li, o' Ar"en&ina 43:0I!,v!0AC7I6: 2o..in" Ar"en&ina in &he () ,o+r& in
    Banha&&an ! 'ra+$ o' %e$ieval s&*le an$ propor&ions ! opinion 'ile$ /i&h &he "overn%en& o' Ar"en&ina
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,583IC9ACII5
    c/cii
    8030!38!30 @e/is e& al v Dleason e& al 43:30!,v!03I906 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -olora$o S Opinion 2e"ar$in"
    PA-<2 Do,ke& an$ -o+r& 2e,or$s in a -ivil 2i"h&s Ba&&er
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54A0I73405
    c/ciii
    8033!08!0C Press 2elease: ]DonM& Ask, DonM& TellM &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i& Insis&s on -on$+,&in" a
    )i%+la&e$ Appeal 'ro% a )i%+la&e$ J+$"%en& o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/440)0313/
    c/ci.
    8033!08!38 2< ! 2epl* in 2e ! =OIA 2esponse on @o" -a.in 2ep+.li,ans v ()A e& al 48:04!,v!0I4896 in &he ()
    Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/54504214/
    c/c.
    () la/, 8I ()- 3AC3 re0+ires:
    All /ri&s an$ pro,ess iss+in" 'ro% a ,o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es shall .e +n$er &he seal o' &he ,o+r& an$ si"ne$ .* &he
    ,lerk &hereo'.
    c/c.i
    800I!08!00 () Dis&ri,& -o+r& -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: Deneral Or$er 0I!08, A+&horizin" -B5<-=, Di"i&al
    A+&hen&i,a&ion an$ A&&es&a&ion in ;<=s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/2)1324)1/
    ;o&e: The () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia i&sel' ,on,e$e$ &ha& j+$i,ial re,or$s, iss+e$ /i&h invali$
    a+&hen&i,a&ion re,or$s 4;<=s ! ;o&i,e o' <le,&roni, =ilin"6 are invali$ ,o+r& re,or$s, /hi,h sho+l$ .e re%ove$ 'ro% &he
    $o,ke&s:
    8038!03!0I The () -o+r&s <n"a"e in @ar"e!),ale =ra+$ on &he People
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/54333014/
    c/c.ii
    8033!04!38 P2<)) 2<@<A)<: Bri.in" o' )&a&e an$ () J+$"es .* Bank o' A%eri,a B+s& .e a )erio+s -on,ern_
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/32541302/
    ,x,viii
    8033!03!0I Press 2elease: ]DonM& Ask DonM& Tell ! %o&ion &o in&ervene Appeals &o Dis%iss &he Appeals 'ro% an
    (n,er&i'ie$ J+$"%en&, /as Pos&e$ in &he Do,ke&, is ;o/ Pen$in" .e'ore &he -o+r&!s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54A98I48I5
    J. Zernik, >Bo&ion &o In&ervene an$ -on,o%i&an&l* =ile$ Papers,? in %og Ca(in Repu(licans v USA et al 430!9AA346 in
    &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i& Dk& O3C!47, Jan+ar* 7, 80337 re&rieve$ )ep&e%.er 4, 80387 a,,essi.le a&:
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54A93A0345
    c/ci/
    8030!38!07 %og Ca(in Repu(licans v Unite# States of America et al 48:04!,v!0I4896 ! ;o&i,e &o -o+nsel in 2e
    2e0+es& 'or I%pea,h%en& Pro,ee$in"s in 2e -lerk T<22H ;A=I)I
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/44532411/
    cc
    8033!0C!8C P+.lishe$ Opinion in @o" -a.in 2ep+.li,ans v ()A e& al in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i& &he
    o+&,o%e o' si%+la&e$ li&i"a&ion
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/54))3241 /
    cci
    i 8030!38!0C @o" -a.in 2ep+.li,ans v (ni&e$ )&a&es o' A%eri,a e& al 48:04!,v!0I4896 ! 2e0+es& 'or -opies o'
    A&&es&a&ions .* &he -lerk o'&he -o+r&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,544CA33IA5
    ii 8030!38!0A @o" -a.in 2ep+.li,ans v (ni&e$ )&a&es o' A%eri,a e& al 48:04!,v!0I4896 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral
    Dis&ri,& o'-ali'ornia ! DonL& Ask DonM& Tell ! li&i"a&ion re,or$s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5447700C35
    iii 8030!38!0A @o" -a.in 2ep+.li,ans v ()A 48:04!,v!0I4896 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: DonM&
    Ask DonM& Tell S <vi$en,e o' Ano&her Pre&ense @i&i"a&ion .* J+$"e Nir"inia Phillips
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5447733045
    iv 2e,or$s o' Appeal S @o" -a.in 2ep+.li,ans v (ni&e$ )&a&es o' A%eri,a e& al
    430!9AA346
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5447700C35
    v 8030!38!0C Press 2elease: @o" -a.in 2ep+.li,ans v (ni&e$ )&a&es o' A%eri,a e& al 48:04!,v!0I4896 ]DonM& Ask DonM&
    TellL ! -lerk o' &he () -o+r& aske$ &o provi$e a&&es&a&ion re,or$s, ,er&i'* &he $o,ke&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,544C7903C5
    ccii
    8030!03!83 -i&izens (ni&e$ v =e$eral <le,&ion -o%%ission 330 ).-&. I7A 480306 a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$
    )&a&es S opinion o' Pro' -he%erinsk* an$ #ikipe$ia overvie/
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5433A40I35
    cciii
    8033!09!37 P2<)) 2<@<A)<: -i&izens (ni&e$ v =e$eral <le,&ion -o%%ission in &he () )+pre%e -o+r& S so 'ar
    onl* a si%+la&e$ J+$"%en& re,or$ has .een $is,overe$P
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,599A334035
    cci.
    8033!09!83 2<: -i&izens (ni&e$ v =e$eral <le,&ions -o%%ission, =<- =OIA ;o. 8033!4A:8n$ ZernikLs 2epl* on
    =<-Ls 8n$ =OIA 2esponse
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A04II035
    cc.
    8033!09!83 -i&izens (ni&e$ v =e$eral <le,&ion -o%%ission 43!07!,v!88406 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D-, invali$ ,o+r&
    re,or$s in a )i%+la&e$ @i&i"a&ion
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A0I030A5
    cc.i
    8033!09!83 -i&izens (ni&e$ v =e$eral <le,&ion -o%%ission 43!07!,v!88406 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, D- S invali$ ,o+r&
    re,or$s in a ,ase o' )i%+la&e$ @i&i"a&ion
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/31050101/
    cc.ii
    8033!09!83 2<: -i&izens (ni&e$ v =e$eral <le,&ions -o%%ission, =<- =OIA ;o. 8033!4A:8n$ ZernikLs 2epl* on =<Ls
    8n$ =OIA 2esponse s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59A04II035
    cc.iii
    8033!08!0C Press 2elease: ]DonM& Ask, DonM& TellM &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i&, Insis&s on -on$+,&in" a
    Pre&ense Appeal 'ro% a Pre&ense J+$"%en& o' &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54C0703395
    cci/
    Zernik, Joseph: )e,+ri&ies an$ <x,han"e -o%%ission v Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion S )i%+la&e$ @i&i"a&ion an$
    )i%+la&e$ Bankin" 2e"+la&ion in &he (ni&e$ )&a&es
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,544AA38385
    cc/
    Zernik, J: Da&a Binin" o' Online J+$i,ial 2e,or$s o' &he ;e&/orke$ () =e$eral -o+r&s, In&erna&ional Jo+rnal on )o,ial
    Be$ia: Boni&orin", Beas+re%en&, Binin", 3:AC!I3 480306
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53I38I9I95
    cc/i
    8033!04!34 P2<)) 2<@<A)<: 1arvar$ @a/ Pro'essor Ho,hai Benkler has .een aske$ &o revie/ &he evi$en,e o'
    lar"e!s,ale ,o%p+&er 'ra+$ in &he () ,o+r&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,598CC3CAI5
    ,,xii
    8030!03!83 Citi.ens Unite# v "e#eral )lection Commission 330 ).-&. I7A 480306 a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$
    )&a&es ! opinion o' Pro' -he%erinsk* an$ #ikipe$ia overvie/
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/41314053/
    ,,xiii
    8033!03!3A Citi.ens Unite# v "e#eral )lection Commission 40I!8096 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es !
    2evie/ an$ -o%pile$ Online 2e,or$s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30400545/
    cc/i.
    8003!03!00 )&ren"&henin" J+$i,ial In&e"ri&* A"ains& -orr+p&ion ! (; In&erna&ional -ri%e Preven&ion -en&er
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54I303AC75
    ,,xv
    80000!04!00 2epor& o' &he =irs& Nienna -onven&ion ! )&ren"&henin" J+$i,ial In&e"ri&*, -I-P!A, (ni&e$ ;a&ions Dr+"
    -on&rol an$ -ri%e Preven&ion -en&er 480006 4)ee p9!A6
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5903A44045
    cc/.i
    8033!03!3A Citi.ens Unite# v "e#eral )lection Commission 40I!8096 in &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es !
    2evie/ an$ -o%pile$ Online 2e,or$s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30400545/
    cc/.ii
    33!09!30 2epl* on =<- 2esponse on =<- =ree$o% o' In'or%a&ion A,& 4=OIA6 2e0+es&, ;o. 8033!4A, in re:
    =e.r+ar* 88, 8030 J+$"%en& in -i&izens (ni&e$ v =e$eral <le,&ion -o%%ission 40I!I096
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/33033215/
    ,,xviii
    2e"ar$in" &he ;<=s as a+&hen&i,a&ion re,or$s o' &he () ,o+r&s +n$er ele,&roni, 'ilin", see:
    8033!03!07 @o" -a.in 2ep+.li,ans v ()A e& al 430!9AA346 a& &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i& ! Bo&ion &o In&ervene
    an$ -on,o%i&an&l* =ile$ Papers as p+.lishe$ in &he online PA-<2 $o,ke&s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/41311034/
    cc/i/
    8033!03!89 2e0+es& 'or I%pea,h%en& o' () )+pre%e -o+r& -lerk #I@@IAB )(T<2 s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54793C3I85
    ,,xx
    800I!38!30 Dave Canfiel#, K<x!J+$"e To% )par"o in$i,&e$ .* 'e$s 'or ,orr+p&ionK, ?roy Recor#
    http://www.troyrecord.com/general#news/20051210/e/#6udge#tom#spargo#indicted#by#feds#for#corruption
    ,,xxi
    8038!03!39 Zernik, J: @os An"eles )+perior -o+r& ! /i$esprea$ ,orr+p&ion an$ re'+sal o' () "overn%en& &o &ake
    a,&ion, 3A&h #orl$ -ri%inolo"* -on"ress presen&a&ion
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5A33934AC5
    cc//ii
    8030!07!0A -o%plain& =ile$ /i&h () A&&orne* O''i,e @os An"eles A"ains& Bo*nihan Bank o' A%eri,a E;H)<:BA-F
    Br*an -ave @@P Alle"in" 2a,ke&eerin"
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/334)1044/
    cc//iii
    ;einstein inAuiry on 7lenn ;ine $%98<
    cc//i.
    8030!0I!87 2e0+es& 'or res&ora&ion o' A,,ess &o J+s&i,e 'ile$ /i&h () Depar&%en& o' J+s&i,e )enior -o+nsel
    @a+ren,e Tri.e in re: 2i,har$ =ine
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/31311113/
    ,,xxv
    8030!07!38 -o%plain& 'ile$ /i&h &he () A&&orne*Ls O''i,e, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, a"ains& () Ba"is&ra&e -arla
    #oehrle an$ O&hers a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, on P+.li, -orr+p&ion
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5343C44035
    cc//.i
    8030!07!03 In re: =ine v )heri'' 40C!AI876: -o%plain& a"ains& () )+pre%e -o+r& -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell Alle"in"
    P+.li, -orr+p&ion an$ Depriva&ion o' 2i"h&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5337783335
    cc//.ii
    8033!07!30 2e0+es& 'or i%pea,h%en& o' () A&&orne*, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, A;D2<M BI2OTT<, Jr, 'or
    &olera&in" ra,ke&eerin" .* -ali'ornia j+$"es, a&&orne*s, an$ o&hers
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59C70I7995
    ,,xxviii
    8033!07!30 2e0+es& 'or i%pea,h%en& o' () A&&orne*, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, A;D2<M BI2OTT<, Jr, 'or
    &olera&in" ra,ke&eerin" .* -ali'ornia j+$"es, a&&orne*s, an$ o&hers.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59C70I7995
    ,,xxix
    8033!07!0A >2e0+es& 'ile$ .* #in$sor an$ Zernik /i&h () A&&orne* Deneral <ri, 1ol$er 'or 2evie/ o' In&e"ri&* o'
    P+.li, A,,ess an$ -ase Bana"e%en& )*s&e%s o' &he () -o+r&s?, Human Rights Alert 80*3;
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59C4I073I5
    cc///
    8033!03!33 Pa+l Gr+"%an 2e! The Bankin" -risis ! Ano&her Insi$e Jo. ! KA s*s&e% /here &he .ankers ,an ,hea&
    an$ $e'ra+$ /i&ho+& ,onse0+en,es...K 07 ?imes
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,590793A3C5
    cc///i
    8033!04!34 Dre&,hen Bor"enson an$ @o+ise )&or*, KIn =inan,ial -risis, ;o Prose,+&ions o' Top =i"+resK, 07 ?imes
    h&&p:55///.n*&i%es.,o%580335045345.+siness534prose,+&e.h&%lXpa"e/an&e$\allTWr\0
    cc///ii
    8033!80!34 Ba&& Tai..i, KDan"s&er Bankers: Too Bi" &o JailK, Rolling Stones
    h&&p:55///.rollin"s&one.,o%5poli&i,s5ne/s5"an"s&er!.ankers!&oo!.i"!&o!jail!80330834
    cc///iii
    8033!03!0A KTrans,rip&: A&&orne* Deneral <ri, 1ol$er on LToo Bi" &o JailLK, American Banker
    h&&p:55///.a%eri,an.anker.,o%5iss+es537IW495&rans,rip&!a&&orne*!"eneral!eri,!hol$er!on!&oo!.i"!&o!jail!
    30978C9!3.h&%l
    cc///i.
    8303!04!0A Jilian Ber%an, K <ri, 1ol$erLs 3CCC Be%o 1elpe$ )e& The )&a"e =or LToo Bi" To JailLK,
    Huffington ost
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/04/eric#holder#1444#memo_n_3354450.html
    cc///.
    8034!0I!80 K Bo'A in R3A.9 .illion $eal /i&h (.). over %or&"a"e .on$s: so+r,eK, Reuters
    h&&p:55///.re+&ers.,o%5ar&i,le5803450I5805+s!.anko'a%eri,a!r%.s!se&&le%en&!i$()GB;0DG89-80340I80
    cc///.i
    800C!04!83 2<: )<- v BA- 43:0C!,v!0AI8C6 )&a&e o' ;e/ Hork A&&orne* Deneral An$re/ -+o%o @e&&er &o ()
    -on"ress an$ anal*s&sL responses:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/410)4440/
    cc///.ii
    1o/ar$ Zinn, KA PeopleLs 1is&or* o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&esK, -hap&er 33: K2o..er Barons an$ 2e.elsK
    h&&p:55///.his&or*isa/eapon.,o%5$e',on35zinn.aron33.h&%l
    cc///.iii
    E3F A+"+s& 3, 8030 2e0+es& 'or () O''i,er ! Bar* ),hapiro, )<- -hair &o Per'or% her D+&ies.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5398I3AI85
    E8F J+l* 87, 8030 )<- =OIA response O30!03CA9, re: -o%plain&s a"ains& Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion 4;H)<:BA-6 an$
    -o+n&r*/i$e =inan,ial -orpora&ion:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/332)1152/
    E3F Bar,h A, 8030 -o%plain& 'ile$ /i&h )<- -hair Bar* ),hapiro a"ains& Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion 4;H)<:BA-6 an$
    i&s Presi$en&5-<O an$ 'or%er Deneral -o+nsel X Brian Bo*nihan.
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/241334)3/
    E4FJ+ne 33, 8030 -o%plain&s 'ile$ /i&h O''i,e o' -o%p&roller o' &he -+rren,* an$ )<- -hair Bar* ),hapiro a"ains&
    -o+n&r*/i$e =inan,ial -orpora&ion, Bank o' A%eri,a -orpora&ion, an$ i&s -<O5Presi$en& Brian Bo*nihan alle"in" 'ra+$
    an$ ex&or&ion on Dr Zernik 'ra+$ on sharehol$ers, .ankin" re"+la&ors, an$ &he () &axpa*er.
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/3240)433/
    ,,xxxix
    Ba* 8I, 8030 Joseph Zernik, K-o%plain& Pen$in" Be'ore -o%p&roller o' &he -+rren,* Alle"es 2a,ke&eerin" .* Bo'A
    an$ Brian Bo*nihanK
    h&&p:55///.exa%iner.,o%5ar&i,le5,o%plain&!pen$in"!.e'ore!,o%p&roller!o'!&he!,+rren,*!alle"es!ra,ke&eerin"!.*!.o'a!an$!
    .rian!%o*nihan
    cc/l
    8033!30!34 P2<)) 2<@<A)< The )ena&e J+$i,iar* -o%%i&&ee is aske$ &o 2evie/ <vi$en,e o' @ar"e!s,ale =ra+$ in
    &he <le,&roni, 2e,or$ )*s&e%s o' &he () -o+r&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5AIA4I7375
    cc/li
    Zernik, J: <vi$en,e o' /i$esprea$ ,orr+p&ion o' &he () ,o+r&s an$ propose$ ,orre,&ive %eas+res s+.%i&&e$ &o &he
    () 1o+se o' 2epresen&a&ives
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5I94I39995
    cc/lii
    8033!30!33 2e0+es&in" )ena&or @eah*, -hair o' &he )ena&e J+$i,iar* -o%%i&&ee &o Ini&ia&e 2evie/ o' <vi$en,e o'
    @ar"e!s,ale =ra+$ in &he <le,&roni, 2e,or$ )*s&e%s o' &he () -o+r&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5AI99I9435
    cc/liii
    KIn a spee,h in Deor"e&o/n (niversi&*, )ena&or @eah*, -hair o' &he )ena&e J+$i,iar* -o%%i&&ee ,alle$ 'or a KTr+&h
    an$ 2e,on,ilia&ion -o%%issionK on &he () Depar&%en& o' J+s&i,e.
    800C! Trans,rip& o' )ena&or @eah* spee,h
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53I4788935
    cc/li.
    8033!03!30 2e0+es& 'or inves&i"a&ion5i%pea,h%en& pro,ee$in"s, in re: () J+$"e J<D 2AGO== an$ -lerk 2(BH
    G2AJI-G, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork, -on$+,& o' )e,+ri&ies an$ <x,han"e -o%%i&&ee v Bank o'
    A%eri,a -orpora&ion 43:0C!,v!0AI8C6
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54AA3A9305
    cc/l.
    8030!38!04 2<: () J+$"es J<D 2AGO==, NI2DI;IA P1I@@IP), JO1; #A@T<2, () Ba"is&ra&e -A2@A #O<12@<
    ! 2e0+es& 'or Inves&i"a&ion, I%pea,h%en& Pro,ee$in"s #here Appropria&e
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,544AAC3I85
    ,,xlvi
    8033!07!08 2e0+es& 'or I%pea,h%en&s () J+$"e Deor"e OLTool, -lerk )arah Thorn&on, Bo&h o' &he () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, Bassa,h+se&&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59C3II04I5
    cc/l.ii
    8033!0A!80 I%pea,h%en&s Inves&i"a&ion o' J+$"e John #al&er, Ba"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle, -lerk Terr* ;a'isi, an$
    o&hers in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, in re:=ine v )&a&e Bar 48:30!,v!0004I6
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59I8734375
    cc/l.iii
    8033!0A!80 I%pea,h%en&s Inves&i"a&ion o' J+$"e John #al&er, Ba"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle, -lerk Terr* ;a'isi, an$
    o&hers in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, in re:=ine v )&a&e Bar 48:30!,v!0004I6
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,59I8734375
    cc/li/
    8030!38!0I Press 2elease ! 2e0+es& 'or Inves&i"a&ion, I%pea,h%en& o' 2(BH G2AJI-G, -lerk () Dis&ri,& -o+r&,
    )o+&hern Dis&ri,& o' ;e/ Hork
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,544C30C9C5
    ccl
    8033!03!89 2e0+es& 'or I%pea,h%en& o' () )+pre%e -o+r& -lerk #I@@IAB )(T<2
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54793C3I85
    ccli
    8033!03!0I Press 2elease: ]DonM& Ask DonM& TellL in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i& ! Bo&ion &o In&ervene,
    2e0+es&in" &he () -o+r& o' Appeals &o Dis%iss &he Appeals 'ro% an (n,er&i'ie$ J+$"%en&, /as Pos&e$ in &he Do,ke&, is
    ;o/ Pen$in" .e'ore &he -o+r&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54A98I48I5
    cclii
    800C!0A!30 "ine v Sheriff 40C!73AC86 in &he () -o+r& o' Appeals, C&h -ir,+i& ! Or$er, alle"e$ as 'ra+$, iss+e$ .* Alex
    Gozinski, -hie' J+$"e, &o"e&her /i&h -ir,+i& J+$"es Paez an$ Tall%an
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/25211044/
    ccliii
    8030!04!80 Bo&ion &o In&ervene an$ rela&e$ papers in =ine v )heri'' 40C!AI876 in &he () )+pre%e -o+r&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,530304A975
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303A39735
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303A3A3A5
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303A830C5
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303A83445
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303A3AC85
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5303I99795
    ccli.
    8030!07!03 In re: =ine v )heri'' 40C!AI876: -o%plain& a"ains& () )+pre%e -o+r& -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell Alle"in"
    P+.li, -orr+p&ion an$ Depriva&ion o' 2i"h&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5337783335
    ccl.
    8030!03!34 Huminski v Corsones 43:CC!,v!003A06 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, Ner%on&: Joseph ZernikLs <x Par&e
    Appli,a&ion 'or @eave &o =ile an$ 2e0+es& no& &o serve sha% ,o+r& or$ers on Pro )e Plain&i'' 1+%inski
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58988C0945
    ccl.i
    8030!04!07 2e0+es& 2esponse5-o%%en&s on Alle"a&ions o' =ra+$ in PA-<2 T -B5<-= ! () A$%inis&ra&ive O''i,e
    o' -o+r&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58C94937I5
    ,,lvii
    800I!03!09 -ase o' Borro/er #illia% Parsle* 409!C03746, Dk& O84I: J+$"e Je'' Boh%Ls Be%oran$+% Opinion,
    re.+kin" -o+n&r*/i$eLs li&i"a&ion pra,&i,es, -o+n&r*/i$eLs 'alse o+&si$e ,o+nsel s,he%e ! appearan,es .* ,o+nsel /ho
    are no& -o+nsel o' 2e,or$, /i&h Kno ,o%%+ni,a&ions /i&h ,lien&sK ,la+se:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/23001411/
    ccl.iii
    800I!03!0I -ase o' Borro/er 1ills 403!889746 ! in &he () Bankr+p&,* -o+r&, <as&ern Dis&ri,& o' Penns*lvania,
    Pi&&s.+r"h. -o+n&r*/i$eLs Three K2e,rea&e$ @e&&ersK an$ a Trans,rip&
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/23003444/
    ccli/
    8033!30!33 P2<)) 2<@<A)<: The A%eri,an Bar Asso,ia&ion is aske$ &o revie/ evi$en,e o' lar"e!s,ale 'ra+$ in &he
    ele,&roni, re,or$ s*s&e%s o' &he () ,o+r&s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/15331413/
    ,,lx
    8033!04!34 P2<)) 2<@<A)<: 1arvar$ @a/ Pro'essor Ho,hai Benkler has .een aske$ &o revie/ &he evi$en,e o'
    lar"e!s,ale ,o%p+&er 'ra+$ in &he () ,o+r&s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/32443415/
    ,,lxi
    8030!04!89 2e0+es& an$ 2e'+sal o' Opinion @e&&er .* 1arvar$ @a/ ),hool Dean Bar&ha Bino/ in re: Alle"e$ =ra+$
    in PA-<2 an$ -B5<-=
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5304I98IA5
    ccl/ii
    30!04!89 2e0+es& 'or Opinion .* Hale @a/ ),hool =a,+l&* in re: Alle"e$ =ra+$ in PA-<2 an$ -B5<-=
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5304I93795
    ccl/iii
    8030!0C!0C 1arvar$ Dean Bino/, Boar$ o' A$visers o' 1arvar$ -ivil 2i"h&s -ivil @i.er&ies @a/ 2evie/ Aske$ 'or
    A,kno/le$"%en& o' 2e,eip& o' Paper )+.%i&&e$ &o &he Jo+rnal.
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/3)154410/
    ccl/i.
    8030!0C!0I 1arvar$, Hale @a/ Jo+rnals 2e'+se &o 2evie/ Paper Do,+%en&in" -orr+p&ion o' &he () J+s&i,e )*s&e%
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/3)0))401/
    ccl/.
    Zernik, J: Invali$ <le,&roni, 2e,or$ )*s&e%s o' &he )&a&e an$ =e$eral () -o+r&s S <na.lers o' 1+%an 2i"h&s A.+se
    an$ &he =inan,ial -risis S -HB<2@A# 8033 paper S peer!revie/e$ an$ a,,ep&e$, &hen reje,&e$ a$%inis&ra&ivel*.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53370404035
    ccl/.i
    8030!09!87 Joseph Zernik, KDe'i,ien& @os An"eles Ti%es repor&in" on &he ,ase o' 2i,har$ =ineK, )2aminer/com
    h&&p:55///.exa%iner.,o%5ar&i,le5$e'i,ien&!los!an"eles!&i%es!repor&in"!on!&he!,ase!o'!ri,har$!'ine
    ,,lxvii
    800C!04!80 =ine v )heri'' 48:0C!,v!03C346 Dk& O8 ;o&i,e o' 2e'eren,e &o Ba"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5448038475
    ,,lxviii
    800C!0A!38 =ine v )heri'' 48:0C!,v!03C346 Dk& O8A ! 2epor& an$ 2e,o%%en$a&ion .* () Ba"is&ra&e -arla #oehrle
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,543CC83I75
    ccl/i/
    8034!03!0A Joseph Zernik, KD+pli,i&o+s () j+$"es: Je$ 2ako'', 2i,har$ @eonK, 3p)#0e1s/com
    http'@@111/ope#ne1s/com@articles@A@Duplicitous+US+Bu#ges+-e#+(y+-oseph+Zernik+Banking+CrimeCBanking+
    CrisisCBanking+"rau#CCorruption+6D565E+>&A/html
    ccl//
    800C!04!0C Zernik v -onnor e& al 48:0I!,v!039906 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, Dk& O309:
    -o%pile$ 2e,or$s o' Perver&e$ Dis,repan,* ;o&i,es:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/34))351)/
    ccl//i
    8030!04!80 "ine v Baca 40C AI876 Bo&ion &o In&ervene an$ rela&e$ papers:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/3030413)/
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/301113)3/
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30111131/
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30112104/
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30112144/
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30111142/
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/301533)3/
    ccl//ii
    -o%plain& a"ains& () )+pre%e -o+r& -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell Alle"e$ P+.li, -orr+p&ion an$ Depriva&ion o' 2i"h&s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/33))2313/
    ccl//iii
    8030!03!89 De,lara&ion o' Joseph Zernik in re: Nisi& &o () Dis& -r&, @os An"eles, an$ Opinion re: In&e"ri&* o'
    Opera&ions an$ a,,ess &o re,or$s in Joseph Zernik v Ja,0+eline -onnor e& al 48:0I!,v!039906, 2i,har$ =ine v )heri'' o'
    @os An"eles -o+n&* 48:0C!,v!03C346, an$ () v-i&* o' @os An"eles e& al 48:00!,v!337AC6
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58IC383835
    ccl//i.
    8034!0I!33 KBasel -o%%i&&ee %e%.ershipK, ?he Basel Committee
    http://www.bis.org/bcbs/membership.htm
    ccl//.
    -onven&ion o' 9 O,&o.er 3CA3 A.olishin" &he 2e0+ire%en& o' @e"alisa&ion 'or =orei"n P+.li, Do,+%en&s, ?he
    Hague Conference on rivate $nternational %a1
    h&&p:55///.h,,h.ne&5in$exWen.phpXa,&\,onven&ions.&ex&T,i$\43
    ccl//.i
    (ni&e$ ;a&ions -onven&ion a"ains& Transna&ional Or"anize$ -ri%e an$ The Pro&o,ols There&o 480006
    h&&p:55///.+no$,.or"5$o,+%en&s5&rea&ies5(;TO-5P+.li,a&ions5TO-V80-onven&ion5TO-e.ook!e.p$'
    ccl//.ii
    8034!0I!30 )&a&+s o' (ni&e$ ;a&ions -onven&ion a"ains& Transna&ional Or"anize$ -ri%e, (ni&e$ ;a&ions
    https://treaties.un.org/=ages/Biew9etails.asp/!src"&'(:&@0mtdsg_no"CBDDD#120chapter"150lang"en
    ,,lxxviii
    8033!33!03 2OD<2 )1(@<2 (PDAT< Ala.a%a .lo""er /i'eLs a,,o+n& o' &he .ea&in", a.$+,&ion
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53II0I00485
    ,,lxxix
    8033!33!33 )ara 2a'sk*, K-ensorship in Ala.a%aLs )hel.* -o+n&*K, Committee to rotect -ournalists
    http://www.cp6.org/blog/2013/11/censorship#in#alabamas#shelby#county.php
    ,,lxxx
    8033!33!0A G*le #hi&%ire, KA-@( 'i"h&s &o open ,o+r& re,or$s o' jaile$ .lo""er, ar"+es ,o+r& or$er +n,ons&i&+&ionalK,
    A@.,o%
    http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2013/11/aclu_fights_to_open_court_reco.html
    ccl///i
    8034!03!3A K#ill /e le& 2o"er )h+ler 4KThe @e"al ),hna+zerK6 s+''er alone an$ 'or"o&&enXK, Dai l y Fos
    h&&p:55///.$ail*kos.,o%5s&or*5803450353A538I93IA5!#h*!is!&his!&ren$in"!on!re$$i&!.+&!a.sen&!here
    ccl///ii
    8034!03!80 An$re/ Grei", K-orr+p&ion!'i"h&in" jo+rnalis& 2o"er )h+ler s&ill jaile$ a'&er 'ive %on&hsK, rofessorsG
    Blog
    http://professorsblogg.com/2014/03/20/corruption#fighting#6ournalist#roger#shuler#still#6ailed#after#fi.e#
    months/
    ccl///iii
    2038!07!03 I%prisone$ ,o+r& /a&,her DANID )-1I<D ! The J+$i,ial 1o+se o' -ar$s an$ 1o/ I& is =allin" Do/n a&
    &he <xpense o' &he People
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5CII0I34A5
    ccl///i.
    8007!38!37 )a%aan v Zernik 4)-0I74006 Davi$ Pas&ernak: Dran& Dee$s in re: 380 )o+&h Pe,k Drive, Beverl*
    1ills, -A C0838, opine$ as 'ra+$ .* Ja%es #e$i,k
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/24441235/
    ,,lxxxv
    800I!09!87 Zernik v Connor et al 48:0I!,v!039906 Dk& O 0A8 =irs& A%en$e$ -o%plain&
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5307AA3945
    ccl///.i
    8030!09!09 -o+n&r*/i$e, Bank o' A%eri,a E;H)<7BA-F, an$ i&s Presi$en& Brian Bo*nihan -o%pila&ion o' 2e,or$s
    <vi$en,e o' 2a,ke&eerin"
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/304)3315/
    ccl///.ii
    1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6 s+.%ission &o &he (ni&e$ ;a&ions 1+%an 2i"h&s -o+n,il 'or &he (P2 o' &he (ni&e$
    )&a&es 480306, as i& appears in &he (ni&e$ ;a&ions 1+%an 2i"h&s -o+n,il si&e
    1TTP:55li..oh,hr.or"512Bo$ies5(P25Do,+%en&s5sessionC5()512Aler&W(P2W()AW)0CW8030W1+%anV80ri"h&s
    V80aler&3.pp$'
    1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6 Appen$ix I &o s+.%ission 'or &he (P2 o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es .* &he (ni&e$ ;a&ions 1+%an
    2i"h&s -o+n,il
    h&&p:55li..oh,hr.or"512Bo$ies5(P25Do,+%en&s5sessionC5()512Aler&W(P2W()AW)0CW8030W1+%anV80ri"h&s
    V80aler&3.p$'
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58C9A43745
    (ni&e$ ;a&ions 1+%an 2i"h&s -o+n,il Pro'essional )&a'' 2epor&, re'errin" &o 1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& s+.%ission /i&h &he
    no&e K,orr+p&ion o' &he ,o+r&s an$ &he le"al pro'ession an$ $is,ri%ina&ion .* la/ en'or,e%en& in -ali'orniaK 4pa"e A,
    para"raph 496
    h&&p:55$a,,ess!$$s!n*.+n.or"5$o,5(;DO-5D<;5D3053AC5A95PD=5D303ACA9.p$'XOpen<le%en&
    ccl///.iii
    8030!07!0A -o%plain& =ile$ /i&h () A&&orne* O''i,e, @os An"eles, A"ains& Brian Bo*nihan, Bank o' A%eri,a
    E;H)<:BA-F, Br*an -ave @@P, Alle"in" 2a,ke&eerin" an$ @ar"e ),ale =inan,ial Ins&i&+&ion =ra+$
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/334)1044/
    ccl///i/
    800C!38!8C Zernik v -onnor 48:0I!,v!039906, =ine v )heri'' 48:0C!,v!03C346, () v -i&* o' @A e& al 48:00!,v!
    337AC6 ! 2e0+es& an$ 2esponse in a&&e%p& &o "ain a,,ess &o ;<=s ! -B5<-= re,or$s o' () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral
    Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,584AI390I5
    cc/c
    8030!04!0I 1+%an 2i"h&s Aler& 4;DO6 s+.%ission &o &he (ni&e$ ;a&ions 1+%an 2i"h&s -o+n,il 'or &he (P2 o' &he
    (ni&e$ )&a&es, as i& appears in &he (ni&e$ ;a&ions 1+%an 2i"h&s -o+n,il si&e
    h&&p:55li..oh,hr.or"512Bo$ies5(P25Do,+%en&s5sessionC5()512Aler&W(P2W()AW)0CW8030W1+%an ri"h&s aler&3.p$'
    ,,x,i
    8038!03!33 In 2<: 2 D 48:33!%,!008I46 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia ! %in+&es, or$ers,
    j+$"%en&s iss+e$ /i&h invali$ ;<=s are invali$ ,o+r& re,or$s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5I437A80A5
    cc/cii
    800C!0I!03 =ine v )heri'' o' @A -o+n&* 48:0C!,v!03C346 an$ Zernik v -onnor e& al 48:0I!,v!039906: -o%plain& an$
    2e0+es& 'or Inves&i"a&ion, =ile$ /i&h Terr* ;a'isi, -lerk o' &he -o+r&, 2e"ar$in" Dishones& Banip+la&ion o' 2e,or$s in &he
    O''i,e o' &he -lerk
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58I3409I95
    cc/ciii
    800C!0C!3I Zernik v Connor 48:0I!,v!039906 an$ "ine v Sheriff 48:0C!,v!03C346 in () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,&
    o' -ali'ornia: De,lara&ion o' Joseph Zernik in 2e Denial o' A,,ess &o -o+r& 2e,or$s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58I3400I05
    cc/ci.
    800C!38!8C Zernik v -onnor 48:0I!,v!039906, =ine v )heri'' 48:0C!,v!03C346, () v -i&* o' @A e& al 48:00!,v!337AC6
    ! 2e0+es& &o inspe,& an$ &o ,op* ;<=s, $+rin" visi& &o &he O''i,e o' &he -lerk, an$ ,opies o.&aine$ 'ro% () Dis&ri,&
    -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/24151305/
    ,,x,v
    8030!03!03 Zernik v -onnor 48:0I!,v!039906 ! -B5<-= ! Ta.le )+%%ar* o' ;<=s in Zernik v -onnor, .ase$ on
    ,opies provi$e$ .* -lerk on De,e%.er 8C, 800C
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,584AI33C75
    cc/c.i
    8030!03!04 2e0+es&in" () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, @A -lerk Terr* ;a'isiLs s&a&e%en&s re $o,ke& o' Zernik v -onnor et al: Is i&
    hones&, vali$, an$ e''e,&+al, in ,o%plian,e /i&h () la/X
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5847784CA5
    cc/c.ii
    8030!03!04 Zernik v Connor et al 48:0I!,v!039906, "ine v Sheriff 48:0C!,v!03C346, $n re' Richar# "ine 48:0C!%,!
    0038C6, an$ US v City of %A et al 84'55+cv+66HE&;' 2e0+es& -lari'i,a&ions .* () Dis&ri,& -o+r& @A -lerk Terr* ;a'isi in re:
    Denial o' a,,ess &o re,or$s, an$ vali$i&* o' i%ple%en&a&ion o' PA-<2 an$ -B5<-= in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral
    Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia, p+rs+an& &o Deneral Or$er 0I!08.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58477A7C85
    cc/c.iii
    8030!03!34 =ine v )heri'' 48:0C!,v!03C346 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: 2epea& ,o%plain&
    an$ re0+es& 'or ,lari'i,a&ion, e%aile$ &o Terr* ;a'isi, -lerk o' &he -o+r&, in re: Denial o' a,,ess &o re,or$, an$ la,k o'
    in&e"ri&* o' re,or$s.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58I3483985
    cc/ci/
    8030!03!3C =ine v )heri'' 48:0C!,v!03C346, Zernik v -onnor e& al 48:0I!,v!039906 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral
    Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: -orrespon$en,e /i&h -lerk Terr* ;a'isi, in re: Nali$i&* o' $o,ke&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,589448C7I5
    ccc
    8030!03!3C =ine v )heri'' 48:0C!,v!03C346, Zernik v -onnor e& al 48:0I!,v!039906 in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral
    Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: -orrespon$en,e /i&h -lerk Terr* ;a'isi, in re: Nali$i&* o' $o,ke&s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,589448C7I5
    ccci
    8030!08!3C @e&&er .* K-o+r& -o+nselK @*$ia H+r&,h+k. () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& -ali'ornia, p+rpor&in" &o
    inves&i"a&e evi$en,e o' 'ra+$ in li&i"a&ion re,or$s o' 2i,har$ =ineLs ha.eas -orp+s pe&i&ion, =ine v )heri'' 48:0C!,v!03C346
    4NO*)/-: *hi% re'rd 3a% rem.ed (rm #'ri$d6'm 3ithut m+ 8n3ledge66
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5307A43035
    Ne3 !R&:
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53048I3335
    cccii
    8030!!07!03 -o%plain& a"ains& () )+pre%e -o+nsel Dann* Bi,kell 'or Alle"e$ P+.li, -orr+p&ion
    an$ Depriva&ion o' 2i"h&s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/33))2313/
    ccciii
    8030!03!3C "ine v Sheriff 48:0C!,v!03C346 -orrespon$en,e Br -arrizosa ! Dr Zernik re: -ase -ap&ion in &he 1a.eas
    -orp+s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58IA4094A5
    ccci.
    8030!03!3A =ine v )heri'' 48:0C!,v!03C346 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, @os An"eles: -lerk Terr* ;a'isiLs, 2esponse &o
    ZernikLs 2e0+es& 'or -lari'i,a&ions in 2<: ;<=s an$ -o%plain&s re: Ta%perin" /i&h -o+r& 2e,or$s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/2551141)/
    ccc.
    8030!03!3A =ine v )heri'' 48:0C!,v!03C346 a& &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, @os An"eles: -lerk Terr* ;a'isiLs, 2esponse &o
    ZernikLs 2e0+es& 'or -lari'i,a&ions in 2<: ;<=s an$ -o%plain&s re: Ta%perin" /i&h -o+r& 2e,or$s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/2551141)/
    ccc.i
    8030!03!89 ;o&i,e &o -hie' J+$"e A+$re* -ollins, an$ 2e0+es& &o Ini&ia&e -orre,&ive A,&ions in re: Zernik v -onnor,
    =ine v )heri''
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,583I0087375
    ccc.ii
    8030!03!89 De,lara&ion o' Joseph Zernik in re: Nisi& &o () Dis& -r&, @os An"eles, an$ Opinion re: In&e"ri&* o'
    Opera&ions an$ a,,ess &o re,or$s in Joseph Zernik v Ja,0+eline -onnor e& al 48:0I!,v!039906, 2i,har$ =ine v )heri'' o'
    @os An"eles -o+n&* 48:0C!,v!03C346, an$ () v -i&* o' @os An"eles e& al 48:00!,v!337AC6
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58IC383835
    ccc.iii
    8030!03!84 =ine v )heri'' in &he () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ornia: 2e0+es& 'or '+r&her ,lari'i,a&ions .*
    -lerk o' &he -o+r& Terr* ;a'isi 2<: Denial o' A,,ess, In&e"ri&* o' -o+r& 2e,or$s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,58II793745
    ccci/
    8030!03!87 ;o&i,e &o Presi$in" J+$"e A+$re* -ollins, () Dis&ri,& -o+r&, -en&ral Dis&ri,& o' -ali'ronia, 2e: Geener v
    1)B- Bor&"a"e )ervi,es In, e& al 48:0C!,v!0AC9A6, li&i"a&ion involvin" 'inan,ial ins&i&+&ions, an$ &he 'inan,ial ,risis
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/23)44))41/
    ,,,x
    8030!38!89 KBanks an$ #iki@eaksK, 07 ?imes
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,54A0784835
    ,,,xi
    8033!03!87 2esponse .* Dovernor o' Bank o' Israel )&anle* =is,her, in re: +nla/'+l seizin" o' .ank a,,o+&ns .*
    Bank 1aPoali%, BB
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5383C93I395
    ccc/ii
    8033!08!0A A&&orne* Ja%es Ja&ras opinion in re: Bank o' IsraelLs )&anle* =is,herLs Jan+ar* 87, 8033 =AT-A
    2esponse @e&&er
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,53848479C75
    ccc/iii
    8038!30!83 Joseph Zernik v )&anle* =is,her 47A905386 Pe&i&ion in &he 1i"h -o+r& o' J+s&i,e o' &he )&a&e o' Israel.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5330IAI9935
    ccc/i.
    8033!03!0I Zernik v =is,her 41-J 7A905386 ! 2e0+es& 'or &he -hie' -lerkLs ,lari'i,a&ion re"ar$in" a$+l&era&ion in
    )+pre%e -o+r& re,or$s
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,538C3038395
    ccc/.
    8033!03!83 2e0+es& 'or pro&e,&ion .* &he Der%an A%.assa$or &o Israel o' a h+%an ri"h&s5,o%p+&er s,ien,e /ri&er
    in Jer+sale%
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/121411445/
    ccc/.i
    8033!09!83 Zernik v Binis&er o' J+s&i,e e& al 48AIC5336 ! 2e0+es& &o a$$ a $o,+%en& ! J+$"e <speranza Alon !
    %as&er o' &he K%*s&i,al se,re&s o' ,o+r& pro,e$+reK, or Ko.s&r+,&ionis& /i&h i%p+ni&*KX
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5343C0C7835
    ccc/.ii
    8034!03!83 Zernik v @ivni e& al 48AIC5336 S 2epea& re0+es& 'or ,er&i'i,a&ion o' April 3I, 8038 De,ision an$ J+ne 89,
    8033 J+$"%en&, KTr+e -op* o' &he Ori"inalK 55 `bcdefghigjfgkl 8AIC533 mnoefpnqicnkerfdisktecnrjhmu 3I vifkwdi
    8033 mnoefpxfyjzwev 89 vfgefi 8033 kejpiofdspjs{n|v K.
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5803734I075
    ,,,xviii
    8033!0I!88 2e0+es& 'or pro&e,&ion .* &he Der%an -ons+l in Israel o' a Der%an ,i&izen a"ains& si%+la&e$ ,o+r&
    pro,ess
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,588380894I5
    ,,,xix
    1o/ar$ Zinn, K-hap&er 33: 2o..er Barons an$ 2e.elsK, in: PeopleLs 1is&or* o' &he (ni&e$ )&a&es.
    https://libcom.org/library/peoples#history#of#united#states#howard#2inn
    ,,,xx
    Bessin"er, I ),o&&, KOr$er in The -o+r& ! 1is&or* o' -lerks o' (ni&e$ )&a&es -o+r&sK, "e#eral -u#icial Center 480086
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/34514))4/
    ccc//i
    8034!04!3C Dan 2o.er&s, K#all )&ree& $ere"+la&ion p+she$ .* -lin&on a$visers, $o,+%en&s revealK, ?he *uar#ian,
    (G
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/14/wall#street#deregulation#clinton#ad.isers#obama
    ccc//ii
    8038!0I!87 Ja%es 2i,kar$s, K2epeal o' Dlass!)&ea"all -a+se$ &he =inan,ial -risisK,US 0e1s
    http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/economic#intelligence/2012/05/2)/repeal#of#glass#steagall#caused#
    the#financial#crisis
    ,,,xxiii
    8030!03!83 Citi.ens Unite# v "e#eral )lection Commission 330 ).-&. I7A 480306 a& &he )+pre%e -o+r& o' &he
    (ni&e$ )&a&es ! opinion o' Pro' -he%erinsk* an$ #ikipe$ia overvie/
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5433A40I35
    ,,,xxiv
    8038!07!33 O,,+p*BA2I;<) Press 2elease 4J+l* I, 80386 ! $e'inin" $o,+%en& o' &he 2o..er Baron 2evival <ra
    h&&p:55///.s,ri.$.,o%5$o,5CCI4I3IA5
    ,,,xxv
    Bove &o A%en$ /e.!pa"e
    h&&ps:55%ove&oa%en$.or"5
    ,,,xxvi
    8034!0A!30 Joseph Zernik, KA2D<;TI;A: A"ain on &he ver"e o' e,ono%i, ,ollapse ! a"ain &he vi,&i% o' ()
    &rea,her*_K, 3p)#0e1s/com
    h&&p:55///.ope$ne/s.,o%5ar&i,les5A2D<;TI;A!A"ain!on!&he!ve!.*!Joseph!Zernik!Ar"en&inaWDlo.al!Bankin"!
    -ar&elWIn&erna&ional!Bone&ar*!=+n$!!IB=WIsrael!340A30!C83.h&%l
    ,,,xxvii
    8034!04!8C Ba*er Bro/n, K() Dis&ri,& -o+r& 1ol$s Tha& a ;on!Par&* =orei"n Bank B+s& Prepare a #i&ness #i&h
    Do,+%en&s OverseasK
    h&&p:55///.%a*er.ro/n.,o%5()!Dis&ri,&!-o+r&!1ol$s!Tha&!a!;on!Par&*!=orei"n!Bank!B+s&!Prepare!a!#i&ness!#i&h!
    Do,+%en&s!Overseas!04!8C!80345

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen