36 views

Uploaded by Engr. Abdullah

Fluid Friction Factor calculation

- Design of Circular Liquid or Gas Pipes
- Mechanical Design of Process Systems-Vol 1 (Piping & Pressure Vessels)_2 كتاب موائع وفالفات
- Mechanical Design of Process System-Vol 1 (Piping & Pressure Vessels)[1]
- (Developments in Petroleum Science 3) A.P. Szilas (Eds.)-Production and Transport of Oil and Gas-Academic Press, Elsevier (1975).pdf
- FM
- FM.6a
- Pipe Flow-Friction Factor Calculations With Excel Course
- Darcy Guairte Converted
- Air Cooled Steam Condenser-Design Method.pdf
- Coiled Tube Turbodrilling- A Proposed Technology to Optimise Drilling Deep Hard Rocks for Mineral Exploration
- SPE-36608-PA
- Zhou Dissertation
- Fluid Mechanics
- Refresher note.pdf
- Lashkar Gah Site Work
- Lab Guide - Pipes
- 9A01304 Fluid Mechanics
- FluidMechSlides
- Irrigation Design Pipe Hydraulics
- Leccture 02

You are on page 1of 8

Nilore, Islamabad

Determination

of Major &

Minor Losses

in Pipes

Submitted To:

Dr. Inaam-ul-Haq

Submitted By:

Muhammad Asim Shahzad

NE-25, Group-4

ABSTRACT

Flow in pipes, laminar or turbulent, is subject to pressure losses that result from the

viscous stresses on the wall of the pipe. These losses are dependent on the Reynolds

number of the flow and the surface roughness of the pipe wall. This phenomenon is

described in terms of the friction factor (dimensionless pressure loss per unit length of

the pipe) in Moodys diagram (Figure 6.13 in Whites Intro to Fluids book, 7th Ed.).

Losses resulting from complex flow patterns appearing at some elements of piping

systems, such as valves, expansions, contractions, elbows, etc., can be described in

similar terms by means of a concentrated loss given by a dimensionless loss factor

K.The objective of this lab session was to experimentally measure thefriction factor for

the pipes of different diameters,head loss coefficient for different fittings, discharge

coefficient for flow measuring devices, total head loss and total pressure drop of the

system, for different values of the Reynolds number (Re).The pressure drop across the

pipes, fittings and the devices was measured in terms of mmHg by manometer. Then the

above mentioned parameters were calculated from the observed data. Calculations and

corresponding graphs showed that for a given value of Re, friction factor increases with

pipe diameter. For a given diameter the friction factor decreases with increasing Re. The

head loss coefficients for most of the fittings decrease with increasing Re and further

increase in Re, the friction factor increased slightly.Plots of the minor losses confirmed

that factor K for globe valve is higher than that of the other valves. Discharge coefficient

curves showed that venturi has relatively higher value than orifice at anyRe.

INTRODUCTION

This experiment is related to find out data for friction factors of different pipes by using

mercury manometer. Selection of mercury manometer was due to large pressure

difference between components and device has not ability to measure them with water

as manometer substance. There were three objectives;

To calculate friction factor at different flow rates in three different pipes of

different diameters.

To compute numerical values of minor losses at different flow rates of different

components and plot those values against Reynolds number.

To compute discharge coefficient of pressure measuring devices and also plot

values as function of Reynolds number.

These data are very valuable in determining pipe properties and also provide insight in

understanding relation between flow rate and friction factor, flow rate and minor losses

of various components and last but not least is relation of discharge coefficient and flow

rate and an indication that which instrument is better for measuring pressure difference

at different Reynolds number.

PROCEDURE

1. First of all started pump and adjusted flow rate for our experiment with the help

of Rota meter.

2. Measurepressure difference between two specific points on pipe diameter is

inch. Distance between points is constant in each case that is 2m.

3. Reading was recorded with the help of manometer in which mercury was as

indicative fluid.

4. In the same way pressure difference was measured for second and third pipe

diameter is inch and 1inch, respectively.

5. After measuring pressures of pipes, pressure differences of individual

components were measured one by one.

6. The same procedure is repeated for almost ten times to get better result and to

minimize errors

OBSERVATION AND CALCULATIONS

A. Determination of Friction Factor

Table 1: Head loss, velocity, friction factor and Reynolds number for different pipes

It is to be remembered that hf is in meter of H2O and velocity is in meters per seconds.

0.0000

0.0100

0.0200

0.0300

0.0400

0.0500

0.0600

0.0700

0.0800

0.0900

0.1000

0 20000 40000 60000

F

r

i

c

t

i

o

n

F

a

c

t

o

r

Reynolds Number

Friction Factor VS Reynolds Number

0.5

inche

s

Flow

Rate

Pipe Diameter

0.5'' 0.75'' 1.0''

m

3

/sec hf Velocity (m/sec) f Re hf Velocity f Re hf Velocity f Re

0.000139 0.1004 1.094 0.0104 14727 0.0628 0.487 0.0493 9844 0.0377 0.274 0.0933 7392

0.000278 0.38905 2.187 0.0101 29453 0.1757 0.975 0.0345 19687 0.0879 0.549 0.0544 14785

0.000361 0.6526 2.843 0.0100 38289 0.2385 1.267 0.0277 25593 0.1130 0.714 0.0414 19220

0.000417 0.86595 3.281 0.0100 44180 0.3012 1.462 0.0263 29531 0.1381 0.823 0.0380 22177

0.000472 1.09185 3.718 0.0098 50070 0.2259 1.657 0.0154 33468 0.1632 0.933 0.0350 25134

0.000528 1.3805 4.156 0.0099 55961 0.4267 1.852 0.0232 37405 0.2008 1.043 0.0345 28091

0.000583 1.64405 4.593 0.0097 61851 0.4769 2.047 0.0213 41343 0.2259 1.153 0.0317 31048

0.000639 1.99545 5.031 0.0098 67742 0.56475 2.242 0.0210 45280 0.2761 1.263 0.0431 34005

B. Determination of Head Loss Coefficient for Different Pipe Fittings

It is to be remembered that hf is in meter of H2O and velocity is in meters per seconds.

Flow Rate

Velocity

Reynolds

Number

Pipe Fittings on 1'' diameter Pipe

90

Elbow

Gradual

Increase

Gradual

Decrease

Gate

valve

Globe

Valve

Ball

Valve

Sudden

Expansion

Sudden

Contraction

m

3

/sec m/sec Re hf hf hf hf hf hf hf hf

0.000139 0.274 7392 0.0377 0 0.0251 0.0126 0.1506 0.0377 0 0

0.000278 0.549 14785 0.0251 0 0.0126 0.0126 0.3514 0.0753 0 0.01255

0.000361 0.714 19220 0.0377 0 0.0377 0.0251 0.4769 0.0628 0 0.03765

0.000417 0.823 22177 0.0628 0 0.0502 0.0377 0.5773 0.0628 0 0.03765

0.000472 0.933 25134 0.0502 0 0.0628 0.0377 0.69025 0.0753 0 0.03765

0.000528 1.043 28091 0.0628 0 0.0628 0.0502 0.8785 0.1130 0 0.06275

0.000583 1.153 31048 0.0879 0 0.0753 0.0502 0.99145 0.1255 0 0.06275

0.000639 1.263 34005 0.0879 0 0.0879 0.0628 1.1295 0.1381 0 0.0753

Table 2: Head Loss due to Friction for different Pipe fittings

Flow Rate Velocity

Reynolds

Number

Pipe Fittings on 1'' diameter Pipe

90

Elbow

Gradual

Increase

Gradual

Decrease

Gate

valve

Globe

Valve

Ball

Valve

Sudden

Expansion

Sudden

Contraction

m

3

/sec m/sec Re K K K K K K K K

0.000139 0.274 7392 9.7946 0 6.5297 3.2649 39.1784 9.7946 0 0.0000

0.000278 0.549 14785 1.6324 0 0.8162 0.8162 22.8541 4.8973 0 0.8162

0.000361 0.714 19220 1.4489 0 1.4489 0.9659 18.3528 2.41484 0 1.4489

0.000417 0.823 22177 1.8138 0 1.4511 1.0883 16.6871 1.81381 0 1.0883

0.000472 0.933 25134 1.1297 0 1.4121 0.8473 15.5335 1.69456 0 0.8473

0.000528 1.043 28091 1.1305 0 1.1305 0.9044 15.8269 2.03489 0 1.1305

0.000583 1.153 31048 1.2956 0 1.1105 0.7403 14.6216 1.85083 0 0.9254

0.000639 1.263 34005 1.0801 0 1.0801 0.7715 13.8865 1.69723 0 0.9258

Table 3: Head Loss Coefficient for different pipe fittings

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000

H

e

a

d

l

o

s

s

c

o

e

f

f

i

c

i

e

n

t

REynolds Number

K vs Reynolds Number

Elbow

Gradual Increase

Gradual Decrease

Gate Valve

Globe Valve

Ball Valve

Sudden Expansion

Sudden Contraction

C. Determination of Discharge Coefficient for Flow Measuring Devices

Actual

Flow Rate

Reynolds

Number

Orifice (D0 = 0.0147m) Nozzle (Dn= 0.0131m) Venturi (Dv = 0.0119m)

hL Q0 Cd hL Qn Cd hL Qv Cd

m

3

/sec Re m H2O m

3

/sec

m H2O m

3

/sec

m H2O m

3

/sec

0.000139 7392 0.2761 0.000395 0.3520 0.339 0.000347 1.1366 0.314 0.000276 26816331

0.000278 14785 0.5271 0.000545 0.5095 0.690 0.000496 1.1004 0.728 0.00042 35211568

0.000361 19220 0.9287 0.000724 0.4990 1.004 0.000598 1.2111 0.879 0.000461 41667140

0.000417 22177 1.1295 0.000798 0.5221 1.142 0.000637 1.2523 1.242 0.000549 40427140

0.000472 25134 1.34285 0.000870 0.5426 1.268 0.000671 1.2961 1.468 0.000596 42145902

0.000528 28091 1.66915 0.000970 0.5440 1.644 0.000765 1.2688 1.807 0.000662 42459191

0.000583 31048 1.9327 0.001044 0.5587 1.895 0.000821 1.2716 2.108 0.000715 43447422

0.000639 34005 2.29665 0.001138 0.5614 2.209 0.000886 1.2840 2.472 0.000774 43943443

Table 4: Discharge Coefficient for Orifice plate, Nozzel, VEnturi

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000

C

d

Re

Cd Vs NRe

Orifice

Nozzle

Venturi

Discussion

With the available instrument we performed this experiment and results are shown in the form of

curves. Curves of this experiment are not exactly matching with those that are available in literature,

inasmuch as no smooth trend is obtained like in literature. Mismatch is due to following reasons

Instrument is too old and possibility is that there are silting in pipe

Environmental condition because of effect of temperature on density of water

Human error because in observing data from manometer and hastening in recording

readings

However results somehow matches and gives understanding between quantities in which plots are

drawn.

Conclusion

From calculations and graphical representation of the data, it can be calculated that

For a given value of Re, friction factor increases with pipe diameter

For a given diameter the friction factor decreases with increasing Re

The head loss coefficients for most of the fittings decrease with increasing Re.

Plots of the minor losses confirmed that factor K for globe valve is higher than that of the other

valves

Discharge coefficient increases with increasing Reynolds number.

Discharge coefficient curves showed that venturi has relatively higher value than orifice at any

Re.

References

1. F. M. White, Fluid Mechanics, 5TH Edition, McGraw HILL Company, INC, USA, 2005

2. Laboratory Manual

- Design of Circular Liquid or Gas PipesUploaded bysereuty
- Mechanical Design of Process Systems-Vol 1 (Piping & Pressure Vessels)_2 كتاب موائع وفالفاتUploaded byHussein Ali
- Mechanical Design of Process System-Vol 1 (Piping & Pressure Vessels)[1]Uploaded bydiaccessltd_17172961
- (Developments in Petroleum Science 3) A.P. Szilas (Eds.)-Production and Transport of Oil and Gas-Academic Press, Elsevier (1975).pdfUploaded byanellbmc
- FMUploaded bynavneetkpatil8409
- FM.6aUploaded byRehan Umer
- Pipe Flow-Friction Factor Calculations With Excel CourseUploaded byMohamed Zahran
- Darcy Guairte ConvertedUploaded byMelany Grissel Aguilar
- Air Cooled Steam Condenser-Design Method.pdfUploaded byLTE002
- Coiled Tube Turbodrilling- A Proposed Technology to Optimise Drilling Deep Hard Rocks for Mineral ExplorationUploaded byIonut Patras
- SPE-36608-PAUploaded byGabriela BM
- Zhou DissertationUploaded byk_jairaj
- Fluid MechanicsUploaded byEngr Muhammad Asif Javaid
- Refresher note.pdfUploaded bymerlindeberg
- Lashkar Gah Site WorkUploaded byoctatheweel
- Lab Guide - PipesUploaded byBonifacio R. Saut
- 9A01304 Fluid MechanicsUploaded bysivabharathamurthy
- FluidMechSlidesUploaded byDennys Virhuez
- Irrigation Design Pipe HydraulicsUploaded byhadush gebre
- Leccture 02Uploaded byMuhammad Ishaq Wazir
- Calculo de Dimension Cajon OverUploaded byJonathan Romero Alfaro
- 2 - Minor Losses in Pipes - Balsiger Bastos BehmUploaded byCarlos Tomey
- H4 Pipe Friction Group.xlsxUploaded byYash PersÌe
- ZAP EXP 9Uploaded byJohn Michael Menoza Zapanta
- Stage-1Uploaded byNaveen Nagisetti
- gas flowUploaded byRakesh Ranjan
- 2 4Uploaded byMANOJ M
- E4 Lab Sheet Minor Losses in PipeUploaded byHoong
- Chap 03.pdfUploaded bydada jamdar
- 10.1016@S0167-56480871019-0.pdfUploaded byjuanjo_1505

- FourierUploaded byazadsekhar
- l Ccompxe 2011 Sp1.11.339 Release Notes en USUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- TORQUE_Administrators_Guide.pdfUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- Roll Torque UsersguideUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- Double PipeUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- Reynold's Transport TheoremUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- CluisterUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- StanfordHPCConf Rocks PresoUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- Turbine Tech MagazineUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- 856200204 b 09Uploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- c 04111334Uploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- The only wala ate reaction.pdfUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- parityKudryavtsevUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- Resonance QfactrUploaded bypankajparashar
- RCI QuestionUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- Verification of BernoulliUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- MIL MonitorUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- Friction factor ExperimentUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- Friction Factor CalUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- DPHX Report G5Uploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- FF Lab ReportUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- Solid State RelaysUploaded byphild2na2
- DocumentUploaded byEngr. Abdullah
- Derivative IntegralsUploaded byDerek_Chandler_214
- Calculas FormulasUploaded bySaurabh Ray
- Breeder ReactorUploaded bywhyread
- Heat TransferUploaded byEngr. Abdullah

- lesson 2 pin galore soccerUploaded byapi-276156601
- Africa 1Uploaded byWilliam Anthony
- Essay 1- Tess Antrim-CashinUploaded byeaa56
- Range 1827enUploaded byLangtu Votinh
- Crane-Loads-and-Wharf-Structure-Design-Workshop-Putting-the-Two-Together.pdfUploaded byvinaysa18gmailcom
- nbme_5-4Uploaded byUsmle Usmle
- Advantage of Database ApproachUploaded byArup Kumar Boro
- TALENTSHIP_2Uploaded byChristian Mamuaja
- Msds Bleach KlorinUploaded byUswatun Treasures
- Proceeding ICEBM 2016Uploaded byYuda Chan
- 3 mca .netUploaded byAnonymous IJAAT2dqB
- Important Q for Modern HistoryUploaded byDeepak Nayan
- Technical Presentation on Engine ValvesUploaded byRockey Rahul
- AutoCard Gr.3Uploaded byPatson Opido
- Procurement Schedule - MEPUploaded byBajibabu Prodduturi
- Osteogenesis Imperfecta with pathological fracture shaft of femur: A case reportUploaded byIOSRjournal
- Energy LendingUploaded byDanbee Shin
- sabre_en_lo_4pp_v2Uploaded byUliAlejandroRodriguezCorianga
- ConceptionUploaded byjslum
- New Product Development ReportUploaded byFaseeh-Ur-Rehman
- ASU's BrochureUploaded byAbeer Elshater
- EXE Software Outsourcing BrochureUploaded byElena Oglindă
- Get the Facts: Data on Poverty in IllinoisUploaded bySocial IMPACT Research Center at Heartland Alliance for Human Needs and Human Rights
- New Letter CASI India Local ChapterUploaded byProf Sheth
- Fced Pss - 15-24 June 1Uploaded byjem monrae
- Floating FinalUploaded byTechnos_Inc
- SpellingUploaded bySmail
- Hoja TenicaUploaded byRoger Chipana Tito
- 325632866-1-LR-Mate-200id-Mechanical-Unit-Maintenance-Manual.pdfUploaded bykhaja avez
- Jussi Parikka Insect Media an Archaeology of Animals and Technology Posthumanities 2010Uploaded bycangurorojo