Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
d
3
r
1
2m
|(ih+ qA)(r))|
2
+ a(T)|(r)|
2
+
b(T)
2
|(r)|
4
+
B
2
2
0
+
0
H
2
2
B H
. (1)
Expanding this expression(and dropping function arguments), we have,
g
GL
=
d
3
r
1
2m
[(ih+ qA)
(ih+ qA)] + a
+
b
2
(
)
2
2
+
( A)
2
2
0
+
0
H
2
2
( A) H
. (2)
Expanding the rst term yields,
g
GL
=
d
3
r
1
2m
3
=1
[ h
2
+ ihqA
) + q
2
A
2
]
+ a
+
b
2
(
)
2
2
+
( A)
2
2
0
+
0
H
2
2
( A) H
(3)
Using r = (x
1
, x
2
, x
3
), the Euler-Lagrange equation for a variation with respect to
is,
g
GL
=
g
GL
(
g
GL
(
x
)
) (4)
Carring out this variation yields,
g
GL
=
1
2m
(ihqA
+ q
2
A
2
) + a + b||
2
1
2m
(h
2
x
ihqA
). (5)
This is equivalent to,
g
GL
=
1
2m
(ih+ qA)
2
+ a + b||
2
(6)
which is the GL equation in an applied eld, as required. Another useful form is found by using the London gauge
where A = 0 to nd,
g
GL
=
1
2m
(h
2
x
2
+ 2ihqA
+ q
2
A
2
) + a + b||
2
= 0 (7)
Assigned Problem 2. By doing a variation with respect to the vector potential A of the Ginzburg-Landau free
energy (Eq. (64)) of the notes, derive the expression for the current (66).
Solution
The Euler-Lagrange equation for a variation with respect to one component A
i
of the vector potential is,
g
GL
A
i
=
g
GL
A
i
(
g
GL
(
Ai
x
)
) (8)
We then have,
g
GL
A
i
= i
hq
2m
(
x
i
x
i
) +
q
2
m
A
i
1
2
0
(
( A)
2
(
Ai
x
)
) (9)
The term B H does not contribute as it is linear in the derivatives of A and hence is zero after the application of
the second term in the Euler-Lagrange equation. The expansion of ( A)
2
is,
( A) ( A) = (
A
3
x
2
A
2
x
3
)
2
+ (
A
1
x
3
A
3
x
1
)
2
+ (
A
2
x
1
A
1
x
2
)
2
(10)
3
Using this expression to evaluate the last term in the case A
i
= A
1
, yields
(
( A)
2
(
A1
x
)
) = 2(
2
A
2
x
1
x
2
+
2
A
1
x
2
2
+
2
A
1
x
2
3
2
A
3
x
1
x
3
) (11)
Similar expressions hold for A
2
and A
3
. Now note that ( A) = ( A)
2
A. The rst element of this
expression is,
(( A)
2
A)
1
=
2
A
1
x
2
1
+
2
A
2
x
1
x
2
+
2
A
3
x
1
x
3
2
A
1
x
2
1
2
A
1
x
2
2
2
A
1
x
2
3
We thus nd the identity,
( A)
2
A
= 2 ( A) = 2[( A)
2
A] (12)
We also have,
( A) = B =
0
J (13)
Substituting these results into the equation above yields the simple result,
1
2
0
(
( A)
2
(
Ai
x
)
) = j
s
Using this in equation (9) for we nd,
j
s
= i
hq
2m
(
)
q
2
m
A
i
(14)
as required.
Assigned Problem 3. Show that minimizing the Helmholtz free energy within London theory,
f
1
=
1
2
0
0
(B
2
+
2
2
0
J
2
)2rdr (15)
gives the London equation.
Solution
We apply the Euler-Lagrange equations to,
f
London
=
1
2
0
dV [
2
( B)
2
+ B
2
]. (16)
Using the Euler-Lagrange equation with the identities
( B)
2
B
= 2 ( B) = 2[( B)
2
B] (17)
and using B = 0, yields the London equation
2
2
B = B.
Assigned Problem 4. Using London theory, nd the Helmholtz free energy per unit length of a vortex in a
superconductor in an external eld H.
Solution. The energy(per unit length) of an isolated vortex is given by,
1
=
0
(
B
2
2
0
+
1
2
s
v
2
s
)2rdr (18)
4
The rst term is the eld energy and the second is the kinetic energy of the superconducting electrons (see Eq. (4)).
The supercurrent is related to the velocity by,
J = n
b
qv
s
(19)
and using Maxwells equation, we then write,
1
=
1
2
0
0
(B
2
+
2
2
0
J
2
)2rdr (20)
which explicitly shows the contributions of the eld and the current. In the large / limit, this is dominated by the
regime r , so we nd an approximate value of the vortex energy by using,
1
1
2
0
(
0
2
2
)
2
2
[r(Ln(
r
))
2
+ r(
r
)
2
]dr
=
2
0
4
0
1
/
[x(Ln(x))
2
+
1
x
]dx
=
2
0
4
0
2
[
x
2
2
(
1
2
Ln(x) + Ln(x)
2
) + Ln(x)]|
1
2
0
4
0
2
[Ln(
)] (21)
Notice that the energy cost of forming the vortex is dominated by the kinetic energy of the superconducting electrons
(the logarithmic term). The energy cost due to the magnetic eld is relatively small.
Assigned Problem 5. Using the Gibbs free energy within London theory, demonstrate that the triangular lattice
vortex array has lower energy than the square lattice array, for a xed applied eld, H > H
c1
, which is close to H
c1
.
Solution
The energy to add the N
th
vortex to a vortex lattice is given by the energy of the added vortex plus the vortex-
vortex interactions. Within London theory, the Gibbs free energy (or chemical potential) to add the N
th
vortex to a
vortex array is given by,
g = (
1
0
H) +
j
B
0
0
K
0
(|r r
j
|/) (22)
Using H
c1
=
1
/
0
, the relation between the applied eld and the lattice spacing is found by setting g = 0, which
yields,
H H
c1
=
B
0
0
N
ij
K
0
(|r
i
r
j
|/) (23)
This xes the lattice spacing, a, of a ux array. This spacing is dierent for dierent lattice structures. Associated
with the lattice spacing there is a total number of vortices inside the superconductor. This total number of vortices,
at xed a, is larger for the triangular lattice, N
tr
than it is for the square lattice, N
tr
> N
sq
. In fact the highest
packing possible is for the triangular lattice case.
In setting up a vortex lattice, the gain in Gibbs free energy is given by,
G = N(
1
0
H) +
ij
B
0
0
2
0
K
0
(|r
i
r
j
|/) (24)
Notice that there is a factor of two in the second term(compared to Eq. (33)), which is the energy cost of vortex-vortex
repulsion, due to the fact that the energy cost in setting up the ux lattice is small for the rst vortices added to the
lattice. Using Eq. (34), this can be rewritten as,
0
G
N
= (H
c1
H) +
1
2
(H H
c1
); so that
G
N
=
1
2
0
(H
c1
H) (25)
5
This is the energy gain per vortex in setting up the lowest energy vortex lattice. Notice that if we consider only
nearest neighbor interactions, the energy per vortex is the same no matter what the vortex lattice structure. However
the number of vortices which can be added to the superconductor does depend on the structure of the nal vortex
lattice. Since the number of vortices in the case of a square lattice is smaller than the number added for the triangular
lattice, the total energy is lowest for the case of a triangular lattice. Notice that this result is general, the triangular
lattice is the true ground state because it has the highest possible vortex density.
Assigned Problem 6. Go through the calculations to show that the kinetic energy and angular momentum per
unit length of a quantum of circulation in a neutral superuid are given by equations (40) and (41) of the notes.
Solution We have,
kin
=
1
2
dm(r)v
s
(r)
2
=
1
2
s
(2rdr)
(
0
)
2
(2r)
2
=
2
0
s
4
ln(b/) (26)
and
l
kin
=
r
2
dm(r)
v
s
(r)
r
=
s
(2r
3
dr)
0
2r
=
0
s
2
(b
2
2
) (27)
Assigned Problem 7. Considering only the kinetic energy of the supercurrent and using arguments like those
of Problem 6, show that the supercurrents circulating around a ux quantum in a superconductor have energy
approximately given by Eq. (55) of the notes.
Solution Using the same procedure as for the neutral superuid, with v
s
= mj
s
/(q
s
) with current given by,
j
s
(r) = j
0
r
; j
0
=
0
2
0
3
(28)
we nd,
kin
=
1
2
dm(r)v
s
(r)
2
=
1
2
s
(2rdr)(
m
0
2q
s
3
)
2
2
r
2
=
2
0
4
0
2
ln(/) (29)
where we used,
= (
m
2
s
q
2
0
)
1/2
(30)
J
n
= en
n
E + eD
n
n
x
;
J
p
= ep
p
E eD
p
p
x
(31)
from the Boltzmann equation using the relaxation time approximation.
Solution
Same as the solution for
J
n
with a change in sign in the force and in the denition of the current.
6
Assigned Problem 9. The collision integral (Eq. (113) of the notes) is zero when,
f( p
1
)f( p
2
) = f( p
3
)f( p
4
). (32)
Show that the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution
f(t, r, v) = Ce
(v
V )
2
(33)
satises this equation, for the case of elastic scattering.
Solution
Subsituting into the equation, cancelling C factors and taking a logarithm of both sizes, then cancelling factors
gives,
(v
1
V )
2
+ (v
1
V )
2
= (v
3
V )
2
+ (v
4
V )
2
(34)
Expanding and rearranging gives,
|v
1
|
2
+|v
2
|
2
(|v
3
|
2
+|v
4
|
2
) = 2[(v
1
+v
2
) (v
3
+v
4
)]
V (35)
The left hand side is zero for elastic scattering, while the right hand side is zero by momentum conservation, hence
the Maxwell-Boltzmann form leads to zero for the collision integral in this case.