Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Contents –
1. Brand
2. History of Brand
3. Why Branding
4. Brand Overview
5. Dilemma of Branding
6. Aspects of Brand
7. Evolution of Brand
1
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
25. References
2
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
Brand –
The word brand has originated from the old norse word brandr, which means “to burn” as
brands were and still are the means by which owners of livestock mark their animals to
identify them. The word brand creates an image which itself gives an impression that
what brand is all about. Brand is something which is in the mind of consumer and other
and services of the seller or group of sellers and differentiate them from those of
name, logo, or symbol for new product, he or she has created a brand. (Keller,
2003)
The brand has different definitions as one definition can be very limiting to its meaning.
The brand definitions are even categorized under six headings by some experts. (Randall
G., 1998):
• Visual
• Perceptual
• Positioning
3
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
• Added value
• Image
• Personality (Hankinson and Cowking, 1993) – some examples of the same are
History of Brand –
Brands were originally meant to commercially communicate, craftsman and farmers used
to mark their product before selling them in the market so that people could identify the
source of the product. Tobacco and patent medicine companies along with some other
businesses started first mass-market brands in the early 19th century with the help of
uniform packing and advertising campaigns. National brands started developing in USA
and Europe towards the end of 19th century. Advertising started on the large scale along
with the increase in the literacy rate. The immigrants in the USA helped large open
markets which lead to mass merchandising. Brands like American Express, Coca-Cola,
Heinz and Kodak were already established in the 1890s however all the big brands
suffered because of the Great Depression in the 1930s. This was the time when brand
Why Branding –
An obvious question comes to the mind is that why do we need a brand. As mentioned
earlier that brand remains in the mind of the consumer and that is difficult to control and
4
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
all the individuals have different relationships with the brands then why do we need to
create an image or positioning in the minds of these individuals. While the consensus is
that every organization needs to develop strong brands as an essential part of their
business strategy, the precise means for bringing this about are fraught with both
conceptual ambiguities, many of these are noted by Balmer (2001) and practical
difficulties. The branding literature seems to suggest that developing strong brands is a
organization. The brands are very potent and sometimes more powerful than the product
or the service itself which they represent. Brand “strength” certainly impresses. Coca-
Cola brand is an example; the brand has more value than the entire organization which
owns it. According to the Business Week list of the top brands, the Coke brand is worth a
Brand Overview –
• According to David Ogilvy (Macrae et al, 1996), ‘Brands are a part of the fabric
ever got fired for buying IBM’, this saying takes a whole new meaning to the
word brand and its power. IBM dominated the world market of IT solutions like
no other company in any other field. IBM till late nineties was having 60% of the
sales and 80% of world profits with the support of the strong brand value.
(Randall G.,1998).
5
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
• According to Thomas Gad brands strike cords, however striking the right cord is
very difficult and most of the time a costly. (Gad T., 2001) The brands have so
much of value in today’s world that John Stuart who was chairman of the Quaker
oats ltd said that ‘if this business were to be split up, I would be glad to take the
brands, trademarks and goodwill and you could have all the bricks and mortar and
• According to Joel Desgrippes, Branding is not only about ubiquity, visibility, and
functions; it is about bonding emotionally with people in their daily life. Only
when a product or a service kindles an emotional dialogue with the consumer, can
this product or service qualify to be a brand. (Gobe M., 2001) This definition
surrounds the emotional side of the brand value. The brand has to have some kind
of emotional bonding with the consumer then only it can work as a brand and
Dilemma of branding –
In the branding process, the brand's strength is built on a definite logic for each brand. In
this sense, branding appears to have rules, but the branding literature provides elusive
advice to managers. Anecdotal discussions of strong and powerful brands dominate the
marketing literature, and this is where the problems arise, different strong brands suggest
different courses of action, different brand management principles. While Coke had
6
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
problems changing its formula, there have been innumerable cases of new and improved
Aspects of Brand –
general form, a brand concept can be either symbolic or functional, and thus
could be positioned as a “symbolic” brand to tap the needs of those who wish to
7
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
Evolution of Brand –
The branding is evolving with the times. The time is the most important factor for today’s
generation. People around the globe are having less and less time for them and spending
more and more time to make themselves successful or sometimes just to earn enough.
The brands have to provide something to someone and not everything to everyone. It is
time of mass customization. The people spend more n services than products. Two polls
conducted by the founder of America Research Group found that Americans are spending
more of their gift allowances on presents that enhance family life and personal well
being. (Gobe M, 2001) The time to provide services that enhance the quality of people’s
In the contemporary context, there are three essentials to manage a successful brand –
• Brands have life cycle – The brands have to be relevant to survive in the long run,
as brands have life cycle and they have to protect their value to make it great.
• Real brands are about meaning and truth – As earlier said that brands need to have
emotional connection with the consumers however at the same time they need to
8
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
As per Mary Goodyear (1996), market development can be explained in terms of band of
consumerization which shows the degree of dialogue between marketers and consumers.
Brands are best understood in terms of a particular logical structure that directs consumer
perceptions. Brands are names that are associated with experiences; brands can be
Brand Positioning –
Positioning a brand through a clear and consistent image-building campaign has been a
cornerstone of brand marketing practice. Marketers spend millions of dollars each year to
create and support brand images. Their efforts seem to have paid off, as evidenced by the
enduring, well-defined, and strong images of some of the world’s popular brands (e.g.
Hilton, British Airways, and Marriot). In line with this evidence, theorists and
9
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
practitioners (Gardner and Levy, 1955; Park et al., 1986; Ries and Trout, 1986) have
The main parts of the branding for the service industry are following. (Lecture Note 1)
• Intangibility – The service is of intangible nature which can not be seen or felt.
• Variability – Service quality depends on the person who provides it and when,
• Inseparability – The service is part of the service provider, it can not separated
from same.
In the hospitality industry, the intangible factures such as relaxation, education and
entertainment must be emphasized. The process involved for the same is following.
(Lecture Note 1)
• Pre-consumption
10
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
• Post Consumption
The hospitality brands have to take a decision that at which level they would want their
brand to be positioned. Organizations like Ritz Carlton build brands at all three levels.
The Branding for the Hospitality industry is based on following points: (Lecture Note 1)
• The hospitality industry is more supply-centric than other industries of the service
sector.
• Branding for the hospitality required high degree of involvement and risk.
The hospitality industry has different types of brand and one has to take care of same
while talking about the brand image. The types of hospitality brands are following.
(Lecture Note 1)
11
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
Brand Image –
framework for strategically managing the image over the long term (Park et al., 1986).
Brand managers have had very little direction for setting up such a conceptual
Park et al. (1986). BCM proposes that every brand image should be based on a brand
Brand Equity –
Marketers always had this idea that brand names have and add value to a product or a
service; however it was considered part of the actual asset value of a company in 1980s
As per to one expert brand equity is the difference between the value of the brand to the
consumer and the value of the product without that branding (Josh McQueen, 1991)
According to Aaker brand equity is ‘a set of assets and liabilities linked to a brand, its
name and symbol that add value or subtract the value provided by a product or service to
a firm and/or to that firm’s customers.’ (Aaker, 1991) As per Aaker these assets and
12
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
• Brand Loyalty
• Name Awareness
• Perceived quality
Following factors are important for the success of any brand. According to Morgan and
• The Brand should be credible. The consumer’s trust in a brand is important for the
brand’s success.
• The Brand should be deliverable, if it can not be deliver the promised service or
• The Brand should differ from the other services or product. It should have a
• Another important factor is the resonance of the Brand with the consumer.
There are certain challenges for the development of Brand and the same are following. It
important for the managers to be aware of these challenges, and make their way through
13
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
• Savvy Customers – The customers are well informed today and needs to be given
due attention.
• Brand Proliferation
• Media Fragmentation
• Increased Competition
• Increased Costs
• Greater Accountability
enhance their self-image or their social image. Park et al. further argued that
brands should be positioned to appeal to either one of these types of needs, but
14
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
perceptual space inside the target's head. The argument went that to create
brand equity, brands needed to be defined by own able ideas (a unique selling
could easily copy. Positionings were often based as much on what perceptual
service actually did. Over the years, identical cold medicines squared off to
• Park et al. (1986) further argued that brands should be positioned to appeal to
either one of these types of needs, but not both, for a number of reasons. A
brand concept that is both functional and symbolic poses problems for
consumers because they cannot clearly relate the brand to either their
• As per Park, Jaworski and Mclnnis (1986) there are three types of brands
have been discussed as brands in the service industry are gradually changing
from function brands to symbolic brands. The demand for association with the
experience and feeling of the service is becoming more essential than ever.
Functional Brand –
• Functional brands satisfy immediate and practical needs. For example, in the
15
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
functional brand since its usefulness lies primarily in its ability to transport
comes from externally generated needs. Functional brands have no links to the
personality. Product classes such as microwaves and hotels like Formula 1 are
Emotional Branding –
• The foundation for the change from branding to emotional branding is a shift
have become more of objects of desire than just being objects of functionality.
The computers have become lifestyle entertainment items rather than just
transportation and place to stay respectively, they have become your part of
personality, the airline one flies and hotel you associate with, let others know
what class of society one belongs to. The important words in the world of
brand are now ‘sensory experience’ and ‘ultra chic’ etc. (Gobe M, 2001) The
Imagination and Vision. They give direction to the brand managers to plan
16
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
• According to the Gobe Mark there is major shift in the economies from
factory based to consumer based economy. The same is explained here with
Symbolic Brand –
• Symbolic brands satisfy symbolic needs such as those for self-expression and
prestige, and their practical usage is only incidental. For example, in the
brand since its usefulness lies primarily in its ability to tell the time correctly.
The brand Movado, on the other hand, would be considered a symbolic brand
since it is used primarily for its status appeal, and its ability to tell the time is
only an incidental reason for its usage. Once a concept is selected for a brand,
17
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
Park et al. (1986) advise that it should be maintained over the brand’s life for
sake of consistency.
members of self. The symbolic brand concept is tied to the reference group or
primarily for its status appeal, and its ability to provide experience to its
customers with very modern and ultra-chic services however at a price. Once
a concept is selected for a brand, Park et al. (1986) advise that it should be
• The Brands about a decade ago were meant to satisfy the Physiological needs of
the consumers. The example of this level is budget operators in the field and
• The next level of the evolving was for the Safety Needs of the consumers. E.g.
Ikeas, Roosters
18
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
• The brands evolved to next level where social needs of the consumers were more
• Esteem needs of the consumers are important at this level. E.g. Marriot, Four
Seasons
• Self-Actualization – This is where a consumer needs the service or product for the
self actualization. The hotels like Burj-al-Arab are good examples at this level.
The brand in the today’s world connects people with the companies sublimely. For
example, JetBlue is not a typical airline, it does not just provide mean of transport to
travel from one place to another. It is an airline which sells very chic, well coordinated
experience to its customers; the fares are very inexpensive however they have very
stylish urbane planes with cushy seats and DIRECTV channels. Their brand is known for
its ‘coolness’.
longer hold. Choice proliferation and media fragmentation have made brain real estate in
consumers heads scarcer, and perceptions harder to manage. Consumers seem to have
become savvier, better informed, and less trusting of marketers, making it harder to shape
brand perceptions. Further, products and services have begun to create direct
19
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
relationships with customers, rather than being inter-mediated by retailers, which leads to
the need to brand customer interactions before, during and after the sale.
References –
3. Gad T., 2001, 4-D Branding, Cracking the corporate code of the network
economy, page 23
7. Gobe M., 2001, Emotional Branding, the new paradigm for connecting brands to
20
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
marketing: seeing through the fog, European Journal of Marketing, page 248-91.
Dennis L. Duffy, 2003, Internal and external factors which affect customer loyalty,
9. Mark J. Kay, 2006, Strong brands and corporate brands, European Journal of
Marketing
10. Gobe M., 2001, Emotional Branding, the new paradigm for connecting brands to
11. Gobe M., 2001, Emotional Branding, the new paradigm for connecting brands to
12. Gobe M., 2001, Emotional Branding, the new paradigm for connecting brands to
13. Gardner, B.B. and Levy, S.J., 1955, The product and the brand, Harvard Business
14. Park, C.W., Jaworski, B.J. and MacInnis, D.J., 1986, Strategic brand concept
21
Vivek Chaturvedi, MAHM, Sep 2007
17. McQueen J., 1991, Leveraging the power of emotion in building brand equity,
18. Park, C.W., Jaworski B.J. and Maclnnis D.J. (1986), Strategic brand concept
22