Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
t
0.675
e2.5
t
) + 20
Where t is the time (minutes).
EFFECT OF HIGH TEMPERATURE ON CONCRETE
At elevated temperatures due to thermal gradients, significant thermal stresses are
induced into concrete. These stresses may reduce the capacity of concrete. Experimental
results at steady state cannot be used to predict the behaviour during transient conditions.
Concrete is a heterogeneous material with variation in material types. The thermal
properties of concrete and the dimensions of concrete structural elements lead to the
development of high temperature gradients, which may or may not influence the ultimate
load bearing capacity, and it is necessary in many cases to carry out a stress analysis in
more or less detail. A realistic model of concrete in compression is also more complicated
due to the influence of the stress history on its behaviour, which must be taken into
account.
When an ordinary not-fireproof concrete is heated, free water evaporates, and above
approximately 150C, chemically bound water is released from the hydrated calcium
silicate. This process has a local peak at 270C. The dehydration of the matrix and the
thermal expansion of the aggregate give rise to internal stresses, and from 300C micro-
cracks will pierce through the material .The compressive and the tensile strength, the
thermal conductivity and the modulus of elasticity are reduced and an unloaded specimen
will be subject to an irreversible expansion. Concrete heated to less than 300C can
recover after a fire by absorbing moisture from the air, but when the micro-cracks are
- 2 -
formed the strength loss is permanent, concrete heated at more than 3008C should be
removed when repair work is done.
2.1 Concrete Compressive Strength:
A number of models exist in the literature that estimates the compressive strength of
concrete at elevated temperature, f
cT
. These models are based on the experimental results
of compressive strength tests done on concrete specimens heated to pre-specified
temperatures.
If the concrete is loaded in compression, the compressive stresses in the matrix should
first be unloaded before tensile stresses can be established and micro cracks formed when
the aggregates expand .Since because of compressive load the micro-cracking is reduced
and the drop of the compressive strength in a hot condition and after a fire is also
reduced. The concrete can be up to 25% stronger than an unloaded fire-exposed concrete
if compressive stresses of 25 to 30% of the original strength are applied.
Model proposed by Compressive strength at elevated temperatures
Hertz (2005)
Where : T
1
= 15,000, T
2
= 800, T
8
= 570, and T
64
= 100,000.
where T is the temperature in degrees Celsius and f'c is the concrete
compressive strength at ambient temperature.
Kodur et.al (2004)
[ ( )]
[ ]
}
- 3 -
Lie et al. (1986)
( )
( )
Euro code (2004)
( )
( )
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
N
o
r
m
a
l
i
z
e
d
s
t
r
e
n
g
t
h
Temperature
Comparison of Compressive Strength predicted by various models
Lie
Lie an Lin
ASCE
Lie and Irwin
Eurocode
Li and Purkiss
Hertz (Siliceous)
Aslani and Bastami
- 4 -
Fire-induced strains:
The total concrete strain at elevated temperatures (
tot
) is composed of three terms:
instantaneous stress related strain (
fT
), unrestrained thermal strain (
th
), and transient
creep strain (
tr
). The value of
fT
at the peak stress (
oT
) defines the stress-strain
relationship during the heating stage and can be predicted using the model proposed
by Terro [ ]. For a load level (
L
) greater than 0.2, the effect of elevated temperatures
on
oT
can be neglected.
Transient Strain:
This transient strain is essentially due to thermally induced incompatibilities between the
aggregate and the cementmortar matrix. It should be noted that these transient strains are
only exhibited on the first heating cycle, but not the first cooling cycle. Any subsequent
heating and cooling cycle does not exhibit such strains. It should also be noted that these
transient strains can only be determined from measurements of the total strain, free
thermal strain and elastic strains. These transient strains were first identified by
Anderberg and Thelandersson (1976).
These strain components can be highlighted by comparing two experiments (see Figure
1). In the first one, called steady-state test, the concrete specimen is first heated uniformly
to a predefined temperature and then loaded while the temperature is kept constant. The
strain that appears at the end of the heating process is only composed of free thermal
strain, whereas the strain at the end of the experiment is the sum of free thermal strain and
instantaneous stress-related strain.
- 5 -
In the second experiment, called transient test, the specimen is first loaded up to a given
load and then heated while the load is kept constant. The strains at the end of the latter
and the former experiment are different even though the final stress and temperature
states are the same. The difference in final strain is denoted as the transient creep strain.
tr
is induced during the first heating cycle of loaded concrete and is considered the
largest component of the total strain. Due to the nature of experimental tests,
tr
accounts
for both the transient and creep components [1,18]. Its value can be estimated using
Terros model [16]:
where V
a
is the volume of aggregates,
0.3
is the transient creep strain for initial axial
stress of 0.3f'
c
, and is given by
- 6 -
Concrete compressive stressstrain relationship:
The model proposed by Youssef and Moftah [1] is adopted by most researchers. The
model includes simplified representation of transient creep strains. The relationship
between the compressive stress, f
cT
, and the corresponding compressive strain,
cT
, is
given by
Youssef and Moftah (2007)
[ (
) (
[ (
)]
where Z is the slope of the descending branch of the concrete stressstrain relationship
and is given by
Steel at Elevated Temperatures
Concrete is widely used material for construction, throughout the world, but it being
relatively very weak in tension with respect to its compressive strength it has to be
reinforced. Of all the materials, steel by its inherent properties is the most apt metal for
reinforcing concrete. Thus making the composite made up of concrete and steel a
regular choice for construction.
Since the strength and behaviour of reinforced concrete depends upon steel, it is
essential to get a good understanding of the behaviour of steel. The existing literature
on the behaviour of reinforcing steel at elevated temperatures is pretty much limited,
compared to that of available on structural steel.
- 7 -
Reinforcing steel tensile stressstrain relationship:
Lies model [5] is used to predict the reduced yield strength of reinforcing bars f
yT
(Eq. (9))and
the stressstrain (f
sT
-
sT
) relationship (Eq.(10)).The effect of creep of steel bars is found to
have a minor effect on the behaviour of RC sections during fire exposure [4]
- 0 -
3
HEAT TRANSFER
Objective:- Explain the heat transfer Process and shows
temperature profile across the depth of section.
- 0 -
Uncoupled Heat Transfer Analysis
Uncoupled heat transfer analysis i.e. the temperature propagation is independent of the
strains in the elements.
4.1 Thermal properties
The temperature dependent thermal properties of concrete and reinforcing steel are
crucial for estimating the fire response of RC structure.
These properties include:
a) Thermal conductivity;
b) Specific heat.
Thermal properties dictate the heat transfer distribution across the section. More over the
distribution is very sensitive to many physical factors like aggregate type, moisture
content, rate of heating and more. In case of analytical studies the temperature
distribution is quite sensitive to mesh-density
Analysis Steps of RC Beams under Fire Loading:
It can be concluded that thermal analysis of a reinforced concrete section can be divided
In to three main steps;
1. The heat transfer model is applied and the heat gradient through the cross section is
predicted. The average temperatures for each layer are then obtained.
2. The equivalent uniform thermal strain
). At point B, the stiffness of the section increases due to the elimination of the residual
tensile stresses affecting the middle part of the concrete section. The compressive load at
which the total strain is equal to zero is corresponding to point C. The axial capacity of the
column is defined by point D.
12
13
Momentcurvature diagrams:
Momentcurvature curves represent the flexural behaviour of RC section under specified
axial load level (=f
c
/f'
c
). Fig. 11b shows the effect of axial load level on the studied section
prior and after 1h standard ASTM-E119 fire exposure. At elevated temperatures, affects the
results in a similar manner to that observed at ambient temperature. Lowering from 1.0
(concentric load) to 0.4(balance point) results in higher ductility accompanied with increase
in the flexural capacity. Further reduction in the value of decreases the flexural capacity and
increases the ductility.
14
15
Validation:
The proposed results has been validated for RC columns by comparing predictions from the
model with measured data from fire tests.
Load capacity validation:
The described sectional analysis methodology is applied to the column studied in the
previous sections [12] and the axial loadaxial strain relationships are constructed at different
fire durations. The peak points of these curves represent the axial capacity of the studied
column during fire exposure. Fig. 12 shows good matching between the predictions of the
proposed model, the experimental work, and the analytical work by Lie et al. [8].
16
Axial deformations:
The column studied in the previous sections was fire tested while having an axial load of 800
and 1067 kN. The prescribed sectional analysis method is applied on the column cross-
section and axial loadaxial strain diagrams are constructed at specified fire durations. At any
time during fire exposure, the axial deformation of the column is calculated by multiplying
the axial strain corresponding to the applied axial load by the length of the column exposed to
the fire. Figs. 13a and b show the axial deformation (u*)time curves for the two columns.
The initial expansion is due to the expansion of the concrete and steel materials. The
subsequent gradual contraction happens when the material strength decreases significantly
and the load effect becomes more pronounced. The predicted values have acceptable
matching when compared with the experimental results by Lie et al. [12] and FEM analytical
studies [4].
17
Lateral Deflection:
Bratina et al. [4] analyzed a 4m column subjected to a load of 930 kN at an eccentricity of
40mm and exposed to Eurocode1 standard fire [21] using FEM. The same column is
analyzed using the proposed sectional analysis methodology. The moment curvature
diagrams are constructed at different fire durations. The lateral deflection w* at each time
step was estimated using the moment-area method for the estimated curvature distribution
along the column height. Failure criteria proposed by BS476 and adopted by Kodur and
18
Dwaikat [22] are used .These criteria are setting limits for the maximum allowable deflection
and maximum rate of deflection, respectively:
where L is the span between the supports (mm) and d is the effective depth of the
beam(mm).
Conclusions:
1. The mathematical studies are capable of predicting the fire resistance of rectangular
reinforced concrete columns with an accuracy that is adequate for practical purposes.
2. Using the models, the fire resistance of square and rectangular reinforced concrete
columns can be evaluated for any value of the significant parameters, such as load,
column section size, column length, concrete strength, and percentage of reinforcing
steel and concrete cover to the steel, without the necessity of testing.
3. A review of predicted temperatures in concrete at various depths indicated that the
model predictions follow the expected trend with lower temperatures at larger depths
from fire exposed surface.
4. The temperature at various depths of concrete, as well as in rebars, increases with fire
exposure time. As expected, the predicted temperature decreases with increasing
distance from the fire exposed side.
5. The figure clearly shows that the moment capacity of the beam decreases with
increasing time of fire exposure .This is due to the deterioration in the material
strength and stiffness as a result of increased temperatures in concrete and steel. The
figure also shows that ultimate curvature (curvature at collapse) increases with time of
fire exposure. This is also due to degradation of the material strength and stiffness.
19
References
[1] Anderberg, Y., and Thelandersson [2], S., 1976, Stress and Deformation
Characteristics of Concrete at High Temperatures: 2. Experimental Investigation and
Material Behavior Model, Bulletin 54, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden, 85
pp.
[2] Bastami, M. and Aslani, F. Preloaded high-temperature constitutive models and
relationships for concrete, Scientia Iranica, 17(1), pp. 1125 (2010).
[3] BS EN 1992-1-2, 2004, Eurocode 2. Design of Concrete Structures.Part 1.2: General
RulesStructural Fire Design, Commission of European Communities, Brussels,
Belgium, 100 pp.
[4] El-Fitiany, S.F. ; Youssef, M.A., 2009 , Fire Safety Journal, V.44, pp. 691703
[5] El-Fitiany, S.F., Simplified Tool For Performance-Based Design of reinforced
concrete frames exposed to fire,
[6] Gernay, T., 2012, Effect of Transient Creep Strain Model on the Behaviour of
Concrete Columns Subjected to Heating and Cooling, Fire Technology, V.48, pp.313329.
[1] Hertz, K. D., 2005, Concrete Strength for Fire Safety Design, Magazine of Concrete
Research, V. 57, No. 8, pp. 445-453.
[2] Kodur, V. K. R.; Dwaikat, M. M. S.; and Dwaikat, M. B., 2007, A numerical model
for predicting the fire resistance of reinforced concrete beams, Cement & Concrete
Composites, V.30, pp. 431443.
[3] Kodur, V. K. R.; Wang, T. C.; and Cheng, F. P., 2004, Predicting the Fire Resistance
Behavior of High Strength Concrete Columns, Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 26,
pp. 141-153.
[4] Kodur, V. K. R.; Dwaikat, M. M. S.; and Dwaikat, M. B., 2009, Macroscopic FE
model for tracing the fire response of reinforced concrete structures, Engineering
Structures, V. 31, pp. 2368-2379
[1] Li, L., and Purkiss, J. A., 2005, Stress-Strain Constitutive Equations of Concrete
Material at Elevated Temperatures, Fire Safety Journal, V. 40, pp. 669-686.
[2] Lie, T. T., 1992, Structural Fire Protection, American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE) Practice Manual, No. 78, New York, 241 pp.
20
[3] Lie, T. T., and Lin, T. D., 1985, Fire Performance of Reinforced Concrete Columns,
STP 882, Fire Safety: Science and Engineering, ASTM International, West Conshohocken,
PA, pp. 176-205.
[4] Terro, M. J., 1998, Numerical Modeling of the Behavior of Concrete Structures in
Fire, ACI Structural Journal, V. 95, No. 2, Mar.-Apr., pp. 183-193.
[5] Youssef, M.A.; Rahman, M.,2007, Simplified seismic modelling of reinforced
concrete flexural members, Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 59, No. 9, November, pp.
639649.
[6] Youssef, M. A., and Moftah, M., 2007, General Stress-Strain Relationship for
Concrete at Elevated Temperatures, Journal of Engineering Structures, V. 29, pp. 2618-
2634.