Sie sind auf Seite 1von 571

MATINDOK GAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

BANGGAI REGENCY CENTRAL SULAWESI


PERTAMINA EP
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
(EIS)
AUGUST 2008

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
i
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
_________________________________PREFACE

The significance of sustainable development is contained in Law No. 23 of 1997 regarding
Management of Environment Regulation of President Number 27 of 1999 regarding Environment
Impact Analysis. In Law No. 23 of 1997, the activity that is predicted to generate the significant
and major impact to environment is obliged to conduct the study of Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA).

Matindok Gas Development Project (PPGM) will produce the gas 100 MMSCFD (gross) which
means exceed the minimum limit of gas well drilling activity which is obliged to have EIA, that
equals to 30 MMSCFD. The Activity is predicted will give significant and major impact to
component geo-physic-chemist, biology, social and public health. According of Regulation of
State Minister of Environment No. 11 of 2006 regarding Type of Business and Activity Plan which
is obliged to be provided with Environmental Impact Assessment, hence the activity is obliged to
be provided with the study of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Compilation of EIS is
according to the Regulation of State Minister of Environment No. 08 of 2006 regarding
Compilation Guidance of Environmental Impact Assessment.

Compilation of this EIA Study is intended to get the information about significant impact which is
require to be managed and monitored. Hereinafter, this document is made as reference in
Environmental Management Plan (EMP/RPL) and Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP/RKL).

Finally, we would like to thanks all party who is assisted the fluency of the this report
compilation.


J akarta, August 2008
General Manajer PPGM



M. INDRA KUSUMA



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
ii
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
___________________TABLE OF CONTENTS

PREFACE i
TABLE OF CONTENTS ii
LIST OF TABLES vi
LIST OF FIGURES ix

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background I-1
1.2. Target and Benefits I-2
1.2.1 Target 1-2
1.2.2 Benefits 1-4
1.3. Law and Regulation I-5

CHAPTER 2. ACTIVITY PLAN
2.1. Identity of Proponent and EIS Compiler II-1
2.1.1 Project Proponent II-1
2.1.2 AMDAL Compiler II-2
2.2. General Description of Activity Plan II-4
A. The Project Area Width including the needs for area facility II-4
B. Production Capacity II-5
C. The Activity Time II-7
D. Types of Energy Source and Water Source Needed for the
Activity Plan Location
II-9
E. Socialization and Public Consultation II-11
F. Drilling Activity II-11
G. Gas Pipe Line System II-14
H. Block Station (BS) II-18
I. The LNG refinery II-24
2.3. The Activity Plan Predicted to Cause Impact
2.3.1 Upstream Activity
A. Pre Construction Phase II-47
B. Construction Phase II-52
C. Operation Phase II-64
D. Post Operation Phase II-72
2.3.2. Downstream Activity
A. Pre Construction Phase II-76
B. Construction Phase II-78
C. Operation Phase II-88
D. Post Operation Phase II-92
2.4. The Alternative to be Studied in ANDAL II-96
2.5 The Connection between activity Plan With Other Activity in Vicinity II-97


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
iii
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

CHAPTER 3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE III-1
3.1. Geo-Physical-Chemical Component III-2
3.1.1 Climate III-2
3.1.2 Ambient Air Quality and Noise III-4
3.1.2.1. Ambient Air Quality III-4
3.1.2.2. Noise III-9
3.1.3 Water Quality
3.1.3.1. Groundwater Quality III-10
3.1.3.2. Seawater Quality III-13
3.1.3.3. River Quality III-15
3.1.4 Physiographic and Goelogy III-17
3.1.5 Hydrology III-22
3.1.5.1 Water Quality III-23
A. Groundwater Quality III-23
B. Riverwater Quality III-25
3.1.5.2 Surface water Quality III-28
A. River Water Debit III-28
B. Run Off-Debite III-30
3.1.5.3 Groundwater Quality III-31
3.1.6 Hidro-Oceanography Condition III-31
3.1.6.1 Bathymetry III-31
3.1.6.2 The Ebb III-32
3.1.6.3 Wave Study III-33
3.1.6.4 Stream III-35
3.1.6.5 Floating Sediment and Coastal Sediment III-36
3.1.7 Space, Soil and Land III-37
3.1.7.1 Spatial Layout Plan III-37
3.1.7.2 Land Use III-40
3.1.8 Transportation
3.1.8.1 Traffict Curent III-51
3.1.8.2 Network Road III-53
3.1.8.3 Bridge Condition III-55
3.1.8.4 Condition Environmental around road III-55
3.1.8.5 Environmental Quality Scale for Transportation
Component
III-57
3.2 Biological Component III-59
3.2.1 Terrestrial Biota III-59
3.2.2 Terrestrial Fauna III-77
3.2.3 Water Biota III-80
3.3 Social Component III-85
3.3.1 Demography III-85
3.3.2 Social - Economic III-92
3.3.3 Social- Cultural III-109
3.4 Public Health Component III-130
3.4.1 Environmental Parameters which predicted influenced by
impact
III-131
3.4.2 Process and Potency of exposure III-131
3.4.3 Risk potency of diseases III-132

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
iv
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
3.4.4 Specific Characteristic of Resident with Risk III-135
3.4.5 Health Resources III-138
3.4.6 Condition of Environmental Sanitation III-140
3.4.7 Nutrition Status of Society III-141
3.4.8 Environment Condition III-143



CHAPTER 4. SCOPE OF STUDY
4.1 Significant Analysis Impact IV-1
4.1.1 Evaluation of Potential Impact IV-2
4.1.2 Clasification and Priority IV-23
4.2 Scope of Study Area and Study Period IV-34
4.2.1 Study Area Boundary IV-38
4.2.2 Study Period Boundary of Downstream Division IV-43

CHAPTER 5. PREDICTED SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
5.1 Predicted Significant Impact In Phase Pre-construction V-1
5.1.1 Geo-Physics-Chemical Component V-1
5.1.1.1 Ambient Air Quality V-1
5.1.1.2 Noise V-12
5.1.1.3 Soil Erosion V-21
5.1.1.4 Drainage and Irrigation System V-23
5.1.1.5 Water Surface Quality V-24
5.1.1.6 The Sea Water Quality V-28
5.1.1.7 Land Transportation V-32
5.1.2 Biology Component V-46
5.1.2.1 Vegetation V-46
5.1.2.2 Wild fauna V-49
5.1.2.3 Raw water Biota V-55
5.1.2.4 Marine biota V-59
5.1.3 Social Component V-60
5.1.3.1 Demography V-60
5.1.3.2 Land Ownership Pattern V-62
5.1.3.3 Public income V-63
5.1.3.4 Employment Opportunity V-76
5.1.3.5 Social Process V-85
5.1.3.6 Social Stratification V-96
5.1.3.7 Public Attitude and Perception V-97
5.1.4 The Public Health Component V-111
5.1.4.1 Environmental Sanitation V-111
5.1.4.2 The Level of Public Health V-114
5.2 Prediction of Significant Impact of The Downstream Division V-120
5.2.1 Geo-Physics-Chemical Component V-120
5.2.1.1 Ambient Air Quality V-120
5.2.1.2 Noise V-125
5.2.1.3 Surface Water Quality V-128
5.2.1.4 Seawater Quality V-130
5.2.1.5 Land Transportation V-133
5.2.1.6 Marine Transportation V-143

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
v
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
5.2.2 Biology Component V-144
5.2.2.1 Vegetation V-144
5.2.2.2 Wild Fauna V-146
5.2.2.3 Marine Biota V-148
5.2.3 Social Component V-152
5.2.3.1 Demography V-152
5.2.3.2 Land Ownership Pattern V-153
5.2.3.3 Public Income V-155
5.2.3.4 Business Opportunity V-162
5.2.3.5 Social Process V-166
5.2.3.6 Social Stratification V-173
5.2.3.7 Public Attitude and Perception V-174
5.2.4 Public Health Component V-183
5.2.4.1 Environmental Sanitation V-183
5.2.4.2 Public Health Level V-185

CHAPTER 6. EVALUATION OF SIGNI FICANT IMPACTS
6.1 Activity Impact at Upstream Division
6.1.1. Analysis of Significant Impact VI-8
6.1.1.1 Pre Construction Phase VI-8
6.1.1.2 Construction Phase VI-9
6.1.1.3 Operation Phase VI-11
6.1.1.4 Post Operation Phase VI-13
6.2 Activity Impact at Downstream Division VI-23
6.2.1. Study of Significant Impact VI-28
6.2.1.1 Pre-contruction Phase VI-28
6.2.1.2 Construction Phase VI-29
6.2.1.3 Operational Phase VI-29
6.2.1.4 Post Operational Phase VI-30
6.2.2 Study and Basic Instruction of Environmental Management VI-35
6.3 Recommendation of Environmental Elegibility Assesment for Matindok
Gas Development Project
VI-42
6.3.1 Environmental Elegibility Assesment for Matindok Gas
Development Project
VI-42
6.3.1.1 Upstream division VI-42
6.3.1.2 Downstream division VI-43
6.3.2 Environmental Elegibility Assesment evaluated from Alternative
Study Result
VI-44

6.3.2.1 Alternative for Gas pipeline Installation VI-44
6.3.2.2 Alternative for Location of LNG Refinery and Special Port VI-47


BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDICES

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
vi
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


____________________________LIST OF TABLES


Table
1.1 The Law and Regulation as a Principe for AMDAL PPGM Study at Banggai
Regency, Central Sulawesi
I-5
2.1 EIS Study Team II-3
2.2 The Composition of Gas Production from the Gas Wells in Matindok
Block (In % mol)
II-6
2.3 The Period of Development Activity of Matindok Gas II-7
2.4 Plan for Well Development at Matindok Block II-13
2.5 Requirement of Specification and Total Number of Labour For Drilling
Development Well (per Well)
II-49
2.6 Requirement of Specification of and Total Number of Labor for Development of
BS and GPF
II-50
2.7 Requirement of Specification and Total Number of Labour for Development of
Gas Transmission
II-51
2.8 Requirement of Specification and Total Number of Labour Operational in One
Unit of GPF/BS
II-65
2.9 Specification Requirement and Total Number of Labours for gas Transmission,
Sulphur and Condensate Transportation Activities
II-66
2.10 Summary of Connection of Upstream Activity Components That Potentially
Cause The Impacts
II-74
2.11 Requirement of Specification and Total Number of Labour fotr LNG Refinery
construction, specific jetty and its Facilities
III-77
2.12 Equipment of LNG Refinery Construction, Specific J etty and its Sipported
Facilities
III-79
2.13 Gas Emission of LNG Refinery III-90
2.14 Summary of Connection of Downstream Activity Component That Potentially
Cause The Impact
III-94
3.1. Monthly and Annual Average Rainfall at the Study Area III-3
3.2. Ambient Air Quality and Noise Sampling Location III-4
3.3. Conversion of APSI into Environmental Quality Scale III-5
3.4. Ambient Air Quality around the Study Area III-6
3.5. Environmental Baseline Condition Of Ambient Air Quality Around The Proposed
Activity
III-7
3.6. The Summary Result of Ambient Air Quality Data III-7
3.7. The Measurement Result of Noise Level III-9
3.8. Laboratory Analysis Result of Well Water Quality III-11
3.9. Summary of Ground Water Environmental Quality Scale III-12
3.10. Sampling Location Of Sea Water Quality III-13
3.11. Sea Water Quality Laboratory Analysis Result III-14
3.12. Summary of Sea Water Environmental Quality Scale III-15
3.13. River Water Sampling Location III-16
3.14. Surface Water/ River Water Quality Analysis Result (According to PP No. 82 of
2001 Class II)
III-16

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
vii
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
3.15. Sample Locations to Observe the Groundwater Quality III-23
3.16. Analysis Result of Residents Well Water Quality III-24
3.17. Environment Recapitulation Scale Quality of the Villages Well Water III-25
3.18. The Samples Location for the Quality of River Water III-25
3.19. Analysis Result of the Well Water Quality III-26
3.20. Recapitulation of Environment Scale Quality of Well Water III-27
3.21. Average Debit Daily in Batui River, Banggai Regency III-28
3.22. Run-off Coefficient III-29
3.23. Calculation of The Soil Erodability Value (K) III-49
3.24. Level of Soil Lose (Erosion) at the research Area III-49
3.25. The Volume of Vehicle Traffic at Luwuk in Kintom-Batui Road III-50
3.26. Volume of Vehicle Traffic at Toili in Kintom Batui Road III-51
3.27. Road Performance of Kintom-Batui III-57
3.28. Type of Vegetation in LNG- Padang Area III-59
3.29. Type of Vegetation at Santoa River Area III-60
3.30. Type Vegetation at Uso Area III-61
3.31. Type of Vegetation at Kinikini Area III-63
3.32. Type of Vegetation around Area of Donggi Development Well III-64
3.33. Type of Vegetation around the Drilling Gas Area of Sukamaju III-65
3.34. Type of Vegetation at Block Station of Minahaki I III-67
3.35. Type of Vegetation at well of Minahaki I III-68
3.36. Type of Vegetation at well of Donggi III-69
3.37. Type of Vegetation at TrunkLine in Conservated Forest III-70
3.38. Type of Vegetation at Trunk Line area around the public Forest Unit 12 of
Tirtasari village
III-71
3.39. Type of Vegetation at Trunk Line which pass Toili River III-72
3.40. Type of Vegetation at Trunk Line which pass Argakencana village Batui District III-73
3.41. Type of Vegetation at Area of Trunk Line which pass Rice Field III-75
3.42. Type of Fauna at Study Area III-77
3.43. Density and Index of Plankton Variety in Raw Water Territorial around the
Activity Area
III-79
3.44. Density and Variety of Benthos in Some River around the Activity Area III-80
3.45. Density and Index Diversity of Plankton in Sea Territorial Water around the
Activity Area
III-81
3.46. Density and Index Diversity of Benthos in Sea Territorial Water around the
Activity Area
III-82
3.47. Types of Fish Captured by the Fisherman in Banggai Regency III-82
3.48. Condition of coral reef in the 10 Meter Depth in Batui Village III-83
3.49. Condition of coral reef in the 3 Meter Depth in Batui Village III-83
3.50. Percentage of Covered Biota Compiler Ecosystem Coral Reef (%) at Batui Coast III-83
3.51. Distribution of Resident according to Wide, Sum up and Density in
Regional Sub district of Study
III-84
3.52. Total of Resident of According Gender and Sex Ratio in Regional district of Study III-85
3.53. Number of Population according to Age Group and Dependency Ratio at Study
Area
III-85
3.54. Population with Age more than 5 years according To Education Level Per District
at Study Area of 2004
III-86
3.55. The Number of Respondent Education in Study Area III-87
3.56. Resident Composition of According to Profession in The Districts of 2005 III-87
3.57. The Main Profession of Respondent in Study Region III-88

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
viii
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
3.58. Illustration of Population Mobility in Study area of 2005 III-89
3.59. Reason of Respondent to Move to Study Region III-89
3.60. The number of J ob Seeker According to Education Level and Gender of 2003 -
2005 in Banggai Regency
III-90
3.61. The Number of J ob Seeker, Area and Request According to Gender of 2003 -
2005 in Banggai Regency
III-90
3.62. Distribution of respondent income every month III-92
3.63. Distribution of respondent cost every month III-93
3.64. Distribution of Respondent Side J ob III-94
3.65. Respondent owner of Housing III-95
3.66. Percentage of Conditions of house respondent III-96
3.67. Respondent owner of farming III-96
3.68. Respondent Kind Of Saving III-97
3.69. Respondent Owner of Luxurious Object III-98
3.70. Regional Gross Domestic Product (RGDP) By Standard Price (Rp 000.000) In
Study Area Year 2003-2004
III-99
3.71. Total Industry and Employee in Banggai in 2005 III-100
3.72. Total Industry in Banggai Based On Type of Industry III-101
3.73. Total Trading Legal Permitting Based On Company Status in Banggai III-102
3.74. Total and kind of trading facilities in study area in 2004 III-102
3.75. Total and Kind of Finance Facilities in Study Area in 2004 III-103
3.76. Land using in study area III-104
3.77. Production of Food crop in study area in 2005 III-105
3.78. Production of some vegetables in Study area in 2005 III-105
3.79. Production of some fruits in Study area in 2005 III-106
3.80. Production of some crop plantation in Study area in 2005 III-106
3.81. Production of cattle in Study area in 2005 III-107
3.82. Respondent opinion about kind of tradition activity and custom in Study area III-108
3.83. Respondent opinion about keeping tradition activity III-109
3.84. Respondent opinion about religion activity in Study area III-109
3.85. Respondent opinion about mutual assistance in Study area III-110
3.86. Respondent opinion about common activity in Study area III-111
3.87. Respondent Opinion about Frequency of Conflict and Kind Of
Problem Solving
III-111
3.88. Respondent Opinion about the Causes of Outsider Incoming in Study Area III-112
3.89. Respondent opinion about clausal of outsider so they can be accept III-113
3.90. Respondent opinion about powering figure in local environment III-114
3.91. Respondent opinion about Total and kind of Social organization in
Study area
III-114
3.92. Respondent opinion about project plan III-116
3.93. Respondent Opinion about benefit of project activity III-117
3.94. Respondent expectation about public and social facilities that be build because of
project activity
III-118
3.95. Respondent opinion about loss that cause of project activity III-119
3.96. Respondent Opinion about Public Worries Caused By
Gas Development Activity
III-119
3.97. Respondent Suggestion about Land Dragging III-120
3.98. Respondent opinion about money used plan III-121
3.99. Respondent Suggestion for Fire Caused By Project III-122

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
ix
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
3.100. Respondent suggestion for noise and dust caused by project III-123
3.101. Respondent Suggestion For Uncontrolled Poisoning Gas Caused By The Project III-123
3.102. Respondent suggestion for traffic disturbing that caused by project III-124
3.103. Respondent suggestion for water quality problem caused by project III-124
3.104. Respondent Suggestion for decreasing of public health
caused by the project
III-125
3.105. Respondent Suggestion about incoming of outsiders problems caused by the
project
III-126
3.106. Respondent Suggestion about problem of security and safety caused by project III-126
3.107. Respondent Suggestion About Problem Of Installing
Pipe Of Distribution Gas
III-127
3.108. Respondent Suggestion about labour releasing when project over III-128
3.109. Top ten of diseases in Kintom District of 2006 III-130
3.110. Percentage of ten diseases in Batui for 2006 III-130
3.111. Percentage of ten biggest case in Toili of 2006 III-131
3.112. Percentage Of Ten Biggest Case In Study Area In 2006 III-131
3.113. Types of Disease in Study Area during the Last Month III-133
3.114. Percentage of Smoker and Number of Sipped Cigarette per Day III-133
3.115. Percentage of Waste Management of Respondent III-134
3.116. Percentage of Respondent who Bring Their Babies to Posyandu/Hospital III-135
3.117. Percentage of Respondent of Weighted Result And Nutrition Status Of Children
Under 5 Five Years-Old at Study Area
III-135
3.118. Percentage of Medication which is Conducted by Respondent III-136
3.119. Health Facility per District at Banggai Regency of 2004 III-136
3.120. Health Resources per District at Banggai Regency of 2005 III-137
3.121. Percentage of Drinking Water Source which is Used by Respondent III-138
3.122. Percentage of Respondent Habit in Defecating (BAB) III-139
3.123. Percentage of Average Nutrition Status of Respondent (Babies) III-139
3.124. Food Type Consumed Daily By Respondent and Their Family III-140
3.125. Reason of Respondent to Have Daily Consume Pattern III-140
3.126. Average Distance of Septitank with Familys well III-141
3.127. Contiguity of Respondents Residence/Work Place with Source of Pollutant III-142
3.128. Respondent Opinion about Existence of Disease Vector in Their Residence III-142
3.129. Level of Respondent Ability in Using Health Service and Its Reason III-143

4.1 Summary of Hypothetic Impact Types Of Matindok Gas Development Project Plan
at Upstream Division
IV-32
4.2 Summary of Hypothetic Impact Types Of Matindok Gas Development Project Plan
at Downstream Division
IV-33
4.2 Name of Village which Become the Social Boundary of Matindok Gas Developmen
Project at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi
IV-36
4.3 Name of Villages which Become Administrative Boundary of Matindok Gas
Development Project at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi
IV-37
4.5 Study Period Boundary Matindok Gas Development Project Activity of Upstream
Division at Banggai, Central Sulawesi
IV-39
4.6 Study Period Boundary of Downstream Division at Baggai Regency, Central
Sulawesi
IV-43
5.1 ISPU Conversion to Environmental Quality Scale V-2
5.2 Environmental Quality Scale of Noise V-12

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
x
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
5.3 The Condition of J oint Street during the Mobility and Demobility of Equipments V-33
5.4 Estimation of J oint Street Condition V-36
5.5 Ossifying Level Index in Each Location V-36
5.6 The Performance of J oint Street of Kintom-Batui-Toili-Toili Barat V-40
5.7
The Performance of Kintom-Batui J oint Street during the Equipments Demobility
V-44
5.8 Matrix of Significant Impact Matindok Gas Development Project Plan Upnstream
Division at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi
V-117
5.9 Road Capacity during Mobility and Demobility of Equipments V-134
5.10 Equivalent Line of Activity Plan at Each location V-136
5.11 Road Hardening Index at Each Location V-136
5.12 The Performance of Kintom-Batui Road During Equipment Demobility V-140
5.13 Matrix of Significant Impact Matindok Gas Development Project Plan
Downstream Division at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi
V-187
6.1 Recapitulation Degree of Magnitude and Significant Impact Level VI-3
6.2 Type of Significant Impact Which Get The Priority To be Managed Upstream
Division
VI-15
6.3 The Summary of Study and Basic Instruction of Environmental Management
Matindok Gas Development Project, Upstream Division
VI-18
6.4 Recapitulation of Degree of Magnitude and Impact Significant Level Matindok
Gas Development Project at Downstream Division Banggai Regency, Central
Sulawesi
VI-24
6.5 Type of Significant Impacts Which Get The Priority To be Managed Downstream
division
VI-33
6.6 The Summary of Study and Basic Instruction of Environmental Management
Matindok Gas Development Project, Downstream division
VI-36
6.7 The Study of Environmental Elegibility to The Alternatives of Gas Pipeline
Installation
VI-45
6.8 The Summary of Elegibility to the Alternatives of Gas Pipeline Installation VI-46
6.9 The Study of Environmental Elegibilty to The Alternatives of LNG Refinery and
Special Port Area
VI-48



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
xi
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
__________________________LIST OF FIGURES


Figure
2.1. The Block Diagram of the Development Plan - Phase 1 II-8
2.2. The Scheme of Development Plan - Phase 2 II-8
2.3. The Flowchart of Block Development of Matindok 2026 II-8
2.4. The Location of PPGM Activity Plan II-10
2.5. The Regional Stratigraphy of Banggai Sula Bassin, In The Eastern-arms of
Sulawesi
II-12
2.6. The Location of Block Station Donggi and Flowline II-14
2.7. The Location of Matindok Block Station and Flowline II-15
2.8. The Location of Maleoraja Block Station and Flowline II-15
2.9. The Location of Sukamaju Block Station and Flowline II-16
2.10. The Location of Minahaki Block Station and Flowline II-16
2.11. Flowline Diagram II-17
2.12. The Flowchart of Block Station/Gathering Station. Explanation: HP (High
Pressure), MP (Medium Pressure), LP (Low Pressure), KO (Knock Out), AGRU
(Acid Gas Removal Unit)
II-19
2.13. The Works Scheme of Dehydration Plant II-20
2.14. The Flowchart of Acid Gas Removal II-21
2.15. PFD Acid Removal and Sulfur Recovery Unit (Claus Process) II-24
2.16. LNG J etty Location of Trestles and Causeways II-33
2.17. LNG J etty Profile/Trestle II-33
2.18. LNG J etty Layout II-34
2.19. The Design of Cast Anchor Placed of LNG Tanker II-38
2.20. Dock Height of LNG Tanker in Dock Facility II-38
2.21. Site Plan of LNG J etty II-39
2.22. The Design of Concrete Work at Dock Ship of LNG Tanker II-39
2.23. The 3D Design of Ship Dock of LNG Tanker II-40
2.24. Typical Highway Crossing Design II-62
2.25. Typical River Crossing Pipe Design Under the River Bed II-63
2.26. Underwater Pipe Construction II-65
2.27. MAP of Other Activities around Project Area Plan II-85
3.1. Geological Map of Batui Region III-18
3.2. Seismic Map of Sulawesi from year 1900 III-22
3.3. Bathymetry Map of Study Region and Location of Port Plan III-32


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
xii
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

3.4. Depiction of the Ebb Water Level in Kanali Foreland III-33
3.5. Maximum Wind Rose in Study Region III-34
3.6. Maximum Wind Rose in Study Region III-35
3.7. Rose of Ebb Current III-36
3.8. The Regional Space Structure Plan in Banggai III-38
3.9. The Pattern of Moderate Scenario of Space Exploitation III-39
3.10. Opening Farm by Forest Combustion In Maleoraja III-44
3.11. Latosol soil in Matindok III-45
3.12. Lateritic Soil with the Colors of 10 R 4/6 in Minahaki Area III-46
3.13. High Erosion Level of Grumusol Soil in Sukamaju Area III-47
3.14. Rendzina Soil in Batui with the Limestone Rock III-47
3.15. Fluctuation of Current traffic in Road of Kintom-Batui to Luwuk. III-52
3.16. Fluctuation of Current traffic in Road of Kintom-Batui to Toili III-53

4.1. Scheme of Scope Activity Process of Matindok Gas Development Project of Upstream
Division at Banggai Regency Central Sulawesi
IV-27
4.2 Scheme of Scope Activity Process of Matindok Gas Development Project of Downstream
Division at Banggai Regency Central Sulawesi
IV-28
4.3 Flowchart of Hypothetic Impact of Upstream Division Matindok Gas Development Project
At Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi
IV-30
4.4 Flowchart of Hypothetic Impact of Downstream Division Matindok Gas Development
Project At Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi
IV-31
4.2. MAP of AMDAL Study Area Boundary IV-46
6.1. Flow Chart of Big Impact and Significant Evaluation VI-11


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

I-1
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
















Chapter-1
I ntroduction



1.1. BACKGROUND

has planned a gasfield, whichis Province;this is the complying withLawofregarding Upstream Oil
and Gasthe Implementing Body () of Oil and GasLawofregardinga company thatPERTAMINA
handlesiesUpstream Oil and Natural GasPERTAMINAis basedonD
PPGM is an important project for oil industry and natural gas in Indonesia and will play
important roles in maintaining and strengthening Indonesia position as the biggest exporter of
LNG in the world. The development of PPGM will improve contribution of oil and natural gas
sector in rendering foreign-exchange to the country and partly for substitution of domestic oil
fuel. LNG Arun in Nangroe Aceh Darussalam Province is experiencing of production degradation.
Therefore, this LNG Project will strengthen the production of marketable LNG in Indonesia and

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

I-2
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
will become the fourth export center of LNG in Indonesia. PPGM is expected to operate in year
2012.

The development of Matindok Gas Project is an activity of developing complete facilities, starting
from producing natural gas from both explorated and developed wells plan coming from 5
natural gas fields, including: gas field of Donggi, Matindok, Maleoraja, Sukamaju, and Minahaki.
Later, the gas is channeled through pipe to LNG refinery, then the gas is transported to through
harbor using LNG oil tanker.

The gas production capacity of Matindok Block is 100 MMSCFD (gross), with condensate
content of 850 bopd, and produced water is 2500 bwpd. The predicted gas producing time
is 20 years based on the level of existing gas reserve and result of economic study of field
development. The produced gas contains CO
2
2,5%, totalizing Sulphur 3.000 ppm and there
is possibility of containing the other element.

1.2. TARGET AND BENEFITS
1.2.1. TARGET

The target of this Project is to produce natural gas, channeling gas to LNG refinery, processing
gas to become Liquid Natural Gas (LNG), and also transporting LNG and liquid hydrocarbon
(condensate) to the market. In order to reach that target, hence PPGM plan to conduct activity
of Gas Well development, Block Station (BS) construction or Gas Processing Facility (GPF),
installation of Gasworks Pipe and development of LNG Manufacture Facility, including particular
harbor. The particular harbor is planned to be constructed at two alternative locations, they are
in area of Batui District and Kintom District, Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi Province. The
activity plan of Matindok Gas Field Development Program is as follows:

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

I-3
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

1. The drilling of 21 wells which consist of 17 development wells and 4 work over wells, are
specified as follows:

No. Field Type of Drilling Activity Area
1. Donggi
4 work over wells
4 development wells
Toili Barat District
2. Minahaki 4 development wells Toili District
3. Sukamaju 2 development well Batui District
4. Matindok 4 development wells Batui District
5. Maleoraja 3 development wells Batui District

2. The development plan of Block Station (BS) at Donggi, , Sukamaju, Matindok while gas
from Matindok, Maleoraja and Minahaki will be flowed through manifolding station (MS)
3. The development of Gas Processing Facility (GPF) at two locations; they are at Donggi and
Matindok;which located at the same areawith Block station.
4. The development of Donggi-Senoro LNG (DNSLNG) Refinery and its support facilities, such
as office and dock, at two alternative locations; they are at Uso, Batui district or Padang,
Kintom district.
5. Piping:
a. Piping of flow line pipe with diameter of 4 s/d 6" at land along 35 km from the wells to
BS in each fields;
b. Piping of gathering line pipe with diameter of 16 and 18 along 40 km from BS to GPF,
then continued to the joint facility of J OB Pertamina-Medco Tomori Sulawesi at Senoro
through 5 (five) J unction which will pass several villages at district of Toili Barat, Toili
and Batui.
c. Piping of trunk line of gas channeling pipe with diameter of 32" at land along 23 km
from J oint Facility of J OB Pertamina-Medco Tomori Sulawesi at Senoro to LNG refinery,
at Uso village, Batui district or Padang village, Kintom, which will pass several villages at
district of Batui and Kintom

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

I-4
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
6. Transporting the condensate by condensate mobile tank from Block Station of Donggi,
Sukamaju, Matindok to condensate reservoir tank of J OB Pertamina-Medco Tomori Sulawesi
at Bajo.
7. The land acquisition for activity of piping plan, construction of BS, GPF, LNG refinery and
land piping; its total area is about 595 ha.

1.2.2 BENEFITS

The development of Matindok Gas Project (PPGM) is very useful to the local, regional, and
national interest, in economic, technology and social aspects. The benefit of PPGM is presented
as follows:
1. Providing stock of Gas, Liquid Natural Gas (LNG), liquid hydrocarbon (condensate) and
sulphur
2. Increasing the Income of Banggai Regency (local level), Central Sulawesi Province
(regional level) and national level through royalty and tax of sales revenue of LNG,
condensate and sulphur
3. Giving employment and business opportunity to local society, national and regional
4. Increasing ability of Nation in mastering, handling of gas producing technology

On the other hand, the development of Matindok Gas Project is also presumed to generate
negative impacts to certain environmental component. Therefore, PT Pertamina EP PPGM has
an intention to conduct an Environmental Impact Analysis (AMDAL) before conducting the
construction. This complies with the company commitment to participate in environmental
protection in its each activity. The EIA (AMDAL) is conducted based on the Law No. 23 of 1997
regarding Environmental Management, the Government Regulation No. 27 of 1999 regarding
Environmental Impact Analysis (AMDAL), and also the Regulation of State Minister of
Environment No. 11 of 2006 regarding Type of Business Plan and/or Activity which is obliged to
Provide Environment Impact Analysis (AMDAL). The result of AMDAL study is in the form of
information about various activity components that are predicted to generate significant and
major impact, which have the character of negative and positive, assessment of environmental
eligibility of the activity plan.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

I-5
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
1.3. REGULATION

The Project will identify and examine the role of regulations; they are presented in Table 1.1.

Table 1.1. The Law and Regulation as a Principe for AMDAL PPGM Study
at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi


A.
Law of Republic of
Indonesia
regarding I ts Relation to The Project Plan
1. Law No. 5 of 1960 Subject of Agrarian Matters Related to levying of farm
2.
Law No. 5 of 1990 Conservation of Living
Resources and Their Ecosystem
Related to existence of various living ecosystems
and existence of Bangkiriang Wild Life around the
Activity plan
3. Law No. 14 of 1992 Traffic and Road
Transportation
Usage of Province road and public road for the
Activity of project
4. Law No. 21 of 1992 Sea Transport Related to the plan of LNG transportation with
boat
5. Law No. 23 of 1992 Health Related to healthcare of society and worker
around Activity plan
6. Law No. 24 of 1992 Spatial Layout Related to conformity of activity plan location with
Area Plan
7.
Law No. 1 of 1995 Limited Liability Related to legal status of proponents institution
8. Law No. 23 of 1997 Environmental Management

Related to the significance of AMDAL Study

9. Law No. 41 of 1999 Forestry

Related to existence of farm used for project
which is lead by Department of Forestry and
Plantation.
10. Law No. 22 of 2001 Natural Gas and Oil Related to operational of natural gas and oil
11. Law No. 65 of 2001 Regional Tax

Related to obligation of project proponent to pay
regional tax
12. Law No. 13 of 2003 Labour Force Related to procedure and regulation of
recruitment, also rights and obligation of project
proponent to their labour
13. Law No. 19 of 2003 Public Enterprise

Related to status of project proponent as Public
Enterprise
14
Law No. 7 of 2004 Water Resources Related to project proponents link to use river for
the activity of gas drilling.
15. Law No. 16 of 2004 Fisheries

Related to project proponents link to use seawater
as gas port
16. Law No. 32 of 2004 Local Government

Related to relation of project proponent with local
government authority as autonomous area
17. Law No. 33 of 2004 Financial Balance between
Central Government and Local
Government
Related to obligation regulation of project
proponent to pay for the tax for Central
Government and Local Government
18. Law No. 51 of 2004 Sea Water Quality Standard Related to the plan of Special Port Development


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

I-6
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


B. Government Regulation
(PP) of Republic of
Indonesia
regarding I ts Relation to The Project Plan
1. PP No. 19 of 1973 Regulation and Supervision of
Working Safety in Mining Area
Related to regulation and supervision
procedures for working safety in mining area
2. PP No. 11 of 1979 Work Safety of Gas Related to labor safety
3. PP No. 35 of 1991 Rivers

Related to existence of many river crosscut by
installation of pipeline and the use of river
water in the project activity
4. PP No. 41 of 1993 Road Transportation

Related to regulation and supervision of land
transportation which is used in the project
5. PP No. 43 of 1993 Facilities and Road Traffic

Related to regulation and supervision of
facilities and land transportation traffic which
is used in project
6. PP No. 47 of 1997 National Territorial Spatial
layout Plan
Conformity of location of project plan with
territorial spatial layout plan

7. PP No. 62 of 1998 Transfer of some of
Governmental Affairs in
Forestry sector to Regional
Government
Related to the possibility of transfer of some
of governmental affairs in forestry sector to
regional government which is related to
activity plan
8. PP No. 7 of 1999 Management of Palntation and
Wild Animal
The Activity Area is related to the Bangkiriang
Wildlife Conservation Area

9. PP. No. 18 of 1999 jo PP
No. 85 of 1999
Management of Hazardous and
Toxic Waste Materials (B3)
Related to regulation and supervision of B3
waste product of activity plan

10. PP No. 19 of 1999 Control Marine Contamination
and/or Damage
Regulation and control of marine
contamination and/or damage which related
to coastal activity

11. PP No. 27 of 1999 Analysis on Environmental
Impact

Related to significance of AMDAL study

12. PP No. 41 of 1999 Air Pollution Control

Related to regulation and control of air
pollution possibly generated by activity plan
13. PP No. 82 of 1999 Aquatic Transportation Regulation and supervision of boat traffic
which is used in activity plan
14. PP No. 25 of 2000 Government and Province
Authority as An Autonom
Region
The quthority of Local Government and
Province as an autonom region related to the
realization and operationalization of PPGM at
Matindok

15. PP No. 81 of 2000 Navigation Related to special special dock operational

16. PP No. 150 of 2000 Land Damage Control of
Biomass Production

Related to regulation and land damage control
of biomass production caused by the project

17. PP No. 69 of 2001 Harbour Affairs Related to the regulation and supervision
Special Port

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

I-7
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
18. PP No. 74 of 2001 Management of Hazardous and
Toxic Materials (B3)

Related to regulation, handling and
supervision of B3 waste product caused by
plan activity
19. PP No. 82 of 2001 Management of Water Quality
and Water Pollution Control

Related to regulation and management of
water quality and water pollution control by
activity plan, especially at operational phase
20. 21. PP No. 34 Tahun
2002
22. Tata Hutan dan
Penyu-sunan Rencana
Pengelo-laan, Pemanfaatan
dan Penggunaan Kawasan
Hutan
23. Pengaturan yang terkait dengan
adanya penggunaan sebagian kawasan
hutan untuk kegiatan migas
24. PP No. 42 of 2002 Implementing Body of
Upstream Gas and Oil Activity

Related to rights and obligations
Implementing Body of Upstream Gas and Oil
activity in controlling Oil and Gas Activity by
the proponent
25. PP No. 20 of 2006 Irrigation

Regulation and supervision of drilling which
will contaminate society irrigation.
26. PP No. 6 of 2007 Forest Arrange Plan and
Compilation of Management
Plan, Exploiting and Usage of
Forest Area
Regulation which related to usage of some
forest area for the oil and gas activity

C. Presidential Decrees
(Keppres)
regarding I ts Relation to The Project Plan
1. Kepres No. 46 of 1986 Ratification of Convention for
the Prevention of Pollution
from Ships (Marpol 1973 /
1978 Annex I & II)
Related to preventive efforts and control over
marine pollution caused by ships traffic
activities

2. 3. Kepres No. 32
Tahun 1990
4. Badan Pengendali
Dampak Lingkungan
5. Terkait dengan keberadaan institusi
Badan Pengendali Dampak Lingkungan
untuk pembinaan kegiatan pengelolaan
lingkungan oleh pemrakarsa
6. Kepres No. 32 of 1990 Management of Protected Area Related to management of protected area
affected by activity plan
7. Kepres No. 43 of 1991 Energy Conservation

Related to energy conservation efforts
executed by proponent in project operational
8. Perpres No. 65 of 2006 Land Acquisition for Project
Development for Public
Regulation and observation of land acquisition
to the proponent related to the public need


D. Ministerial Decree regarding Its Relation to The Project Plan
1. Regulation of Minister of
Health No.
416/Menkes/Per/IX/1990
Water quality monitoring
Requirement
As reference in monitoring quality of water
2. Regulation of Minister of
Transportation No. KM 7 of
2005
Assist Medium Navigation
Service (SBNP)

Related special to dock operational development

3. Regulation of State
Minister of Environmental
Affairs No. 08 of 2006
Guidance for Compilation of
Environmental Impact
Analysis
This Guidance is used as reference in compilation
AMDAL document

4. Regulation of State
Minister of Environmental
Type Business Plan and/or
Activity which is Obliged to
According to this Regulation, activity plan of PPGM is
included in activity plan which is obliged to provide

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

I-8
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Affairs No. 11 of 2006 Provide Environmental
Impact Analysis
AMDAL document

5. Regulation of Minister of
Energy and Natural
Resources No. 045 of 2006
Management of Drilling Mud,
Mud Waste and of Drill
Powder in activity of Gas and
Oil Drilling
As reference in management of drilling mud, mud
waste and drill powder which is produced in this
activity.

6. Regulation of Minister of
Enviromental Affairs No.4
of 2007
Quality standard of water
waste for oil, gas and
geothermal activity
Giudance for waste Water Management caused by
the activity.
7. Regulation of Minister of
Forestry No. 14/Men. Hut-
11/2006 jo No.64/Ministry
of Foresty-II/2007
Change of Regulation of
Minister of Forestry No.
P.14/MENHUT-II/2006
regarding Guidance for
Lending-Using of Forest Area
Related to location of activity plan with forest area
for the proponent

E. Ministerial Decree Regarding Its Relation to The Project Plan
4. Decree of Minister of
Transportation No.
215/N.506/PHB-87
Waste Container Facility in
Ship
Related to the obligation of the proponent in
providing container facility from Ship

5. Decree of State Minister of
Environmental Affairs No.
02/MEN KLH/i/1988
Guidance for Determining
environmental Quality
Standard
Related to Limit of Environmental Standard Quality
for various environmental parameter referred by the
proponent

6. Decree of Minister of
Transportation No. KM 86
Year 1990
Prevention of Oil
Contamination from Ships

Related to regulation efforts, prevention and
supervision of the oil contamination from ships

7. Decree of Minister of
Energy and Mineral
Resources No.
06P/0746/M.PE/ 1991
Inspection of Work Safety for
the Installation, Equipments,
and Technic

Obligation to conduct an inspection of work safety
for the installation, equipments and technical
routinely

8. Decree of State Minister of
Environmental Affairs No.
Kep-35/MENLH/ 10/1993
Threshold of Gas Emission
from Motor Vehicles
Existence of gas emission standard for motor vehicle
used by the proponent

9. Decree of Minister of Public
Works No. 63/PRT/1993
River Body Boundary, River
Allotment, River Monitoring
Area, and ex-River area
Related to regulation andsupervision of using river
body used by proponent

0. Decree of Minister of
Transportation No. KM
67/1993
Procedures of Technical
Inspection and Land
worthiness of Motor Vehicles
on the street
Related to inspection of Land worthiness of Motor
Vehicles used by the proponent

1. Decree of Minister of
Transportation No. KM
69/1993
Management of Goods
Transportation on the street
Guidance which must be followed by the proponent
in managing goods transportation on the street
1.
2. Decree of Minister of
Energy and Mineral
Resources No.
103.K/008/MEM/ 1994
Supervision of the
Implementation of
Environmental Management
Plan and Environmental
Monitoring Plan in The
Mining and Energy Sector
RKL and of RPL later will be implemented and
reported orderly by the proponent, because the
report and implementation will be evaluated by
institution development of oil and gas activity

3. Decree of State Minister of
Environmental Affairs LH
No. 13/MENLH/ 1995
Emission Standard from
Stationary Resources
Emission Standard from Stationary Resources will be
referred in every non-car operation appliance of
releasing emission

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

I-9
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
2.
4. 3. SK Men.Hut No.
41/Kpts/II/ 1996
4. Perubahan Pasal 16
SK Men.Hut No. 41/Kpts/II/
1996 Pedoman Pinjam Pakai
Kawasan Hutan
5. Pedoman Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan ini
akan dijadikan landasan kerja bagi pemrakarsa yang
akan menggunakan kawasan hutan untuk dipakai
untuk kegiatan migas
5. Decree of State Minister of
Environmental Affairs No.
Kep-48/MENLH/ 11/1996
Noise Level Standard Noise Level Standard will be referred in every
operation appliance releasing noise

6. Decree of State Minister of
Environmental Affairs No.
Kep-49/ MENLH/ 11/1996
Vibration Level Quality
Standard
The Vibration level quality standard will be referred
in each operation appliance or activity that causes
vibration.

7. Decree of State Minister of
Environmental Affairs No.
Kep-50/ MENLH/ 11/1996
Odor Level The Odor level standard will be referred in each
operation appliance or activity that causes odor

8. Decree of Minister of
Energy and Mineral
Resources No. 300.K/38/
M/ PE/ 1997
Pipeline Safety of Oil and Gas As a reference to the proponent in pipeline
installation

9. Decree of Minister of
Energy and Mineral
Resources No. 1457 K/
38/MEM/2000
Technical Guidelines on
Environmental Management
in The Mines and Energy
Field
This Guidance will become important consideration
in compilation of AMDAL Document

10. Decree of State Minister of
Environmental Affairs No. 4
of 2001
Standard & Guidance of
Coral Reef Damage
Determination
Coral Reefs represent one of the environmental
component which get the impact from activity plan
11. Decree of Minister of
Health No. 876/Men.
Kes/SK/VII/2001
Guidance for Analysis of
Environmental Health Impact
Guidance to study the health aspect of society in
AMDAL
12. Regulation of Minister of
Health No. 416 of 1990
Requirement for Water
Quality
Related to requirement for water quality supervision
for domestic needs.
13. Regulation of Minister of
Forestry No. 19/Men. Hut-
11/2004
Collaboration of Management
of Wildlife Area and
Conservation of Nature
Related to location of activity plan with preserved
area

14. Decree of Minister of
Transportation No. KM 53
of 2002
Harbor Planning

Related to special dock operational

15. Decree of Minister of
Transportation No. KM 55
of 2002
Management of Particular
Harbor

Related to special dock operational

16. Decree of Minister of
Transportation No. KM 63
Of 2002
Organization of Harbor
Office(KANPEL)
Administration
Related to dock special operational

17. Decree of State Minister of
Environmental Affairs No.
112 of 2003
Standard of Domestic Water
Waste Quality

Related to regulation of Domestic Water Waste
Quality from IPAL of activity plan

18. Decree of State Minister of
Environmental Affairs No.
128 of 2003
Procedure and Biological
Technical Conditions of Oil
Contaminated Land
Management


This Guidance will be used by the proponent in
handling possibility of land contaminated by the
activity


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

I-10
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
19. Decree of State Minister of
Environmental Affairs No.
129 Of 2003
Emission Standard Quality of
Oil and Gas Activity
The guidance is a reference in controlling emission
from operational activity
20. Decree of State Minister of
Environmental Affairs No.
51 of 2004
Standard of Sea Water
Quality
Guidance in management of sea water quality
21. Decree of State Minister
of Environmental Affairs
No. 45 of 2005
Guidance for Compilation
of RKL and of RPL Report

Guidance in compilation of RKL and RPL report

F. Decrees/ Directives of
Chairman of BPN,
BAPEDAL, and Others
regarding Its Relation to The Project Plan
1. Technical Guidance No.
Pol. J uklak 29/VII/1991
Supervision, Control and
Security of I norganic
Blasting-Materials of ABRI
Blasting-materials possibly will be used especially in
construction.

2. Decree of Chairman of BPN
No. 2 of 1993
Procedure to Get Permit of
Location and Land Rights for
the Company
Procedure which must be followed by the proponent
in obtaining permit of location and land rights for
company
3. Decree of Chairman of BPN
No. 22 Year 1993
Guidance for Regulation of
Chairman of BPN No. 2 of
1993

This guidance is a clarification of procedure which
must be followed by the proponent in obtaining
permit of location and land rights for company
4. Decree of Chairman of
Bapedal No. 56/ BAPEDAL/
1994
Guidance Concerning
Significant Impact Measuring
This Guidance will be referred to determine
significant impact in AMDAL study
5. Decree of Chairman of
Bapedal No. 01/
BAPEDAL/09/1995
Procedure and Technical
Requirement of Storage and
Collecting The Hazardous
and Toxic Waste Materials
B3
It is a reference for the proponent in temporary
storage and collecting the B3 waste

6. Decree of Chairman of
Bapedal No. 02/
BAPEDAL/09/1995
Document on B3 Waste It is a reference in report of storage and handling of
B3 waste

7. Decree of Chairman
Bapedal No. 03/
BAPEDAL/09/1995
Technical Requirements of
Management of B3 Waste
Only as consideration that Technical Requirements
of Management of B3 Waste very weightily, then the
B3 waste processing will be handled to the third
party that is competent
8. Decree of Chairman of
Bapedal No. 04/
BAPEDAL/09/1995
Procedure on Requirements
for Collection of Processing
Revenues, Requirement for
Former Processing Sites for B3
Waste.
Only as consideration that Technical Requirements
of Management of B3 Waste very weightily, then the
B3 waste processing will be handled to the third
party that is competent
9. Decree of Chairman of
Bapedal No. 05/
BAPEDAL/09/1995
Symbol and Labels for B3
Waste

As a reference for symbol and labels for B3 Waste

10. Decree of Chairman of
Bapedal No.
255/BAPEDAL/01/1995
Procedures & Requirement
for Storage and Collecting
Ex- Lubricating Oil
As a guidance in management of ex- lubricating oil

11. Decree of Chairman of
Bapedal No. 205 Tahun
1996
Method of Air Emission
Monitoring

This guidance and method will be followed by
proponent in conducting air emission monitoring as
an effect of activity plan and decanted in document
of RPL



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

I-11
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

12. Decree of Chairman of
BAPEDAL No. 08 Year 2000
Public Participation and
Information Openness in The
Analysis on Environmental
Impact Process
As a reference in activity of public consultation and
socialization

13. Decree of Land
Transportation Dir.Gen.No
SK 726/As.307/DRJ D/2004
Technical guidelines of
Weight Tool on the street
Related to mobile station and demobilization activity
of weight tool and materials
14. Regulation of Local
Government of Central
Sulawesi No. 2 of 2004
Spatial Layout Plan of Central
Sulawesi Province
A guidance for determining the relationship
between Project Plan Area and Regional Spatial
Layout Plan
15. Decree of land
transportation Gen No SK
725/AJ /302/DRJ D/2004
Transportation of B3
Materials
As a reference in transportation of B3 materials

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
I-12
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM









EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
I-13
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
16.
D. Keputusan Menteri Tentang Keterkaitan Dengan Rencana
Kegiatan
6. Kep. MNLH No. Kep-299/MEN
LH/11/1996
17. Pedoman Teknis
Kajian Aspek Sosial
Dalam Penyusunan
AMDAL
Pedoman ini diacu untuk kajian AMDAL Aspek
Sosial
7. SK Men.Hut No. 641/Kpts/II/
1997
18. Perubahan Pasal
8 dan 18 SK Menhut
No. 41/ Kpts/II/1996
Pedoman Pinjam Pakai
Kawasan Hutan
Pedoman Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan yang baru
ini akan dijadikan landasan kerja bagi pemrakarsa
yang akan menggunakan kawasan hutan untuk
dipakai untuk kegiatan migas
8. Kep. MPE No. 300.K/38/M/PE/
1997
19. Keselamatan
Kerja Pipa Penyalur
Minyak dan Gas Bumi
Pedoman ini akan dijadikan acuan bagi
pemrakarsa dalam pemasangan pipa
9. Kep. MESDM No. 1457 K/38/
MEM/2000
20. Pedoman
Teknis Pengelo-laan
Lingkungan di
Bidang
Pertambangan dan
Energi
Pedoman ini akan menjadi pertimbangan penting
dalam penyusunan Dokumen AMDAL
0. Kep.Men.Neg. LH No. 4 Tahun
2001
21. Kriteria Baku &
Pedoman Penentuan
Kerusakan Terumbu
Karang
Terumbu karang merupakan salah satu
komponen lingkungan hidup yang terkena
dampak kegiatan
1. Kep.Men Kesehatan No. 907/
MENKES/SK/VII/2002
22. Syarat-syarat dan
Pengawasan Kualitas
Air Minum
Terkait dengan syarat-syarat pengawasan kualitas
air untuk minum bagi kesehatan pekerja dan
masyarakat
2. Kep. MNLH No. 112 tahun 2003 23. Baku Mutu Air
Limbah Domestik
Terkait dengan pengaturan mutu air limbah
domestik yang keluar dari IPAL rencana kegiatan
3. Kep. MNLH No. 128 tahun 2003 24. Tatacara dan
Persyaratan Teknis
Pengelolaan Tanah
Terkontaminasi oleh
Minyak Bumi Secara
Biologis
Pedoman ini akan digunakan oleh pemrakarsa
dalam penanganan tanah yang kemungknan
terkontaminasi oleh kegiatan
4. Kep. MNLH No. 129 tahun 2003 25. Baku Mutu Emisi
Usaha dan atau
Kegiatan Minyak dan
Gas Bumi
Pedoman ini akan dijadikan acuan dalam upaya
pengendalian emisi dari kegiatan operasional
5. Per. Men. Negara Lingkungan
Hidup No. 08 tahun 2006
26. Pedoman
Penyusunan Analisis
Mengenai Dam-pak
Lingkungan Hidup.
Pedoman ini digunakan acuan dalam penyusunan
dok. AMDAL
6. Per.Men. Negara Lingkungan
Hidup No. 11 tahun 2006
27. J enis Rencana
Usaha dan/atau
Kegiatan yang Wajib
Dilengkapi dengan
Analisis Mengenai
Dampak Lingkungan
Hidup
Berdasarkan Peraturan ini rencana kegiatan PPGM
termasuk dalam rencana kegiatan yang wajib
dilengkapi dengan Dokumen AMDAL
7. Per.Men. ESDM No. 045 tahun
2006
28. Pengelolaan
Lumpur Bor, Limbah
Sebagai acuan dalam pengelolaan lumpur bor,
limbah lumpur dan serbuk bor yang dihasilkan

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
I-14
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Lumpur dan Serbuk Bor
pada kegiatan
Pengeboran Minyak dan
Gas Bumi
kegiatan ini

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
I-15
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
29.
30.
.
31. Keputusan/ Peratura
n Kepala BPN, Bapedal
dan lainnya
32. Tentang
33. Keterkaitan Dengan Rencana
Kegiatan
34. 35. Petunjuk Pelaksanaan
No. Pol. J uklak 29/VII/1991
36. Pengawasan,
Pengen-dalian dan
Pengamanan Bahan
Peledak Non
Organik ABRI
37. Bahan peledak kemungkinan akan
digunakan terutama dalam
pelaksanaan konstruksi.
38. 39. Peraturan Kepala BPN
No. 2 Tahun 1993
40. Tatacara
Memperoleh Izin Lokasi
dan Hak-Hak Atas
Tanah Untuk
Perusahaan
41. Prosedur yang harus diikuti pemrakarsa
dalam memperoleh izin lokasi dan hak-hak atas
tanah untuk perusahaan
42. 43. Keputusan Kepala BPN
No. 22 Tahun 1993
44. Petunjuk
Peraturan Kepala BPN
No. 2 Tahun 1993
45. Petunjuk ini merupakan penjelasan dari
tatacara yang harus diikuti pemrakarsa dalam
memperoleh izin lokasi dan hak-hak atas tanah
untuk perusahaan
46. 47. Kep.Ka. Bapedal No.
56/BAPEDAL/ 1994
48. Pedoman
Mengenai Ukuran
Dampak Penting
49. Pedoman ini akan diacu untuk
menentukan dampak penting dalam studi
AMDAL
50. 51. Kep.Ka. Bapedal No.
01/BAPEDAL/09/1995
52. Tatacara dan
Persyaratan Teknis
Penyimpanan dan
Pengumpulan Limbah
Bahan Berbahaya dan
Beracun B3
53. Akan diacu oleh pemrakarsa dalam
penyimpanan sementara dan pengumpulan
limbah B3
54. 55. Kep.Ka. Bapedal No.
02/BAPEDAL/09/1995
56. Dokumen Limbah
B3
57. Akan diacu dalam sistem pelaporan
penyimpanan dan penanganan Limbah B3
58. 59. Kep.Ka. Bapedal
No. 03/BAPEDAL/09/1995
60. Persyaratan
Teknis Pengolahan
Limbah B3
61. Hanya sebagai pertimbangan
bahwa persyaratan teknis pengolahan
limbah B3 sangat berat, sehingga
kemungkinan pengolahan limbah B3
oleh pemrakarsa akan diserahkan pihak
ketiga yang berkompeten.
62. 63. Kep.Ka. Bapedal
No. 04/BAPEDAL/09/1995
64. Tatacara
Persyaratan Penimbunan
Hasil Pengolahan,
Persyaratan Lokasi Bekas
Pengolahan dan Lokasi
Bekas Penimbunan
Limbah B3
65. Hanya sebagai pertimbangan
bahwa persyaratan teknis pengolahan
limbah B3 sangat berat, sehingga
kemungkinan pengolahan limbah B3
oleh pemrakarsa akan diserahkan pihak
ketiga yang berkompeten


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

II-1
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM












Chapter-2
Activity Plan


2.1. I DENTI TY OF PROJ ECT PROPONENT AND EI S COMPI LER
2.1.1 Project Proponent
A. Name and Address of I nstitution
Name of the Company : PT. PERTAMI NA EP - Matindok Gas Development Project
Office Address : Pertamina Office, 9
th
Floor
J l. Merdeka Timur No. 1A. J akarta, 10110, Indonesia
P.O. Box 1012 J kt.
Telp./ Fax. : (021) 3816570/ (021) 3521992
B. Name and Address of Officer In Charge
Name : M. Indra Kusuma
Position : General Manager of Gas Matindok Development Project
Office Address : Pertamina Office, 9
th
Floor
J l. Merdeka Timur No. 1A. J akarta, 10110, Indonesia
P.O. Box 1012 J kt.
Telp./ Fax. : (021) 3816570/ (021) 3521992


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

II-2
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
2.1.2 EIS Compiler
A. Name and Address of Institution
Name : Research Center for Environmental Studies of Universitas Gadjah Mada
Address : J l. Lingkungan Budaya, Sekip Utara Yogyakarta 55281
E-mail : pplhugm@indosat.net.id
Telp. : (0274) 565722, 6492410
Fax. : (0274) 565722

B. Officer In Charge
Name : Dr. Eko Sugiharto
Position : Head of Research Center for Environmental Studies
of Universitas Gadjah Mada
Address J l. Lingkungan Budaya, Sekip Utara Yogyakarta 55281
E-mail : pplhugm@indosat.net.id
Telp. : (062-274) 565-722, 6492410
Fax. : (062-274) 565-722

C. EIS Study Team
The EIS Study Team consists of several sections, they are: Team Leader, Coordinator of
Physic-Chemistry section, Coordinator of Biology section, Coordinator of Social-Economic-
Culture section, and Coordinator of Public Health section, along with its own team member
and some guest speaker. The formation of EIS Study team is presented in Table 2.1.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

II-3
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 2.1. EIS Study Team
Position Name Expertise
EI S
Certificate
Resource Person Ir. Subaryono, MA, PhD.
Environment and GIS
(S3, 15 years)

Team Leader
Drs. Bambang Agus Suripto, M.Sc.
Environment
(S2, 10 years)

A, B
Coordinator of
Physic-Chemistry
section
Drs. Suprapto Dibyosaputro, M.Sc.
Geomorphology
(S2, 10 years)
A, B
Team Member
Dr. rer. nat. Nurul Hidayat Aprilita, M.Si.
Chemistry
(S3, 5 years)
A
Ir. Sinar Yudha Oil Expert -
Ir. Wahyu Widodo, M.T. Transportation A, B
Coordinator of
Biology section
Drs. Bambang Agus Suripto, M.Sc.
Environment
(S2, 10 years)
A, B
Assistant Utiyati, S.Si. Biology A, B
Coordinator of Social-
Economic-Culture
section
Drs. Dahlan H. Hasan, M.Si.
Social-Economic-Culture
(S2, 10 years)
A, B
Team Member Supriadi, SH., M.Hum.
Social-Economic-Culture
(S2)
A, B
Assistant Ir. Christina Lilies Sutarminingsih
Social-Economic-Culture
A, B
Coordinator of Public
Health Section
Prof. Dr. Sugeng Yuwono Mardihusodo
Public Health
(Professor)

Assistant P. Sutrisno, S.Sos. Public Health A, B


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

II-4
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

Supporting Team
No Name Expertise
EIS
Certificate
1 Drs. Rustam, M.Si. Physic A, B
2 Drs. Irwan Said, MS. Chemistry A
4 Rita Tri Nuraini Technician of Water and Air
Chemistry
A
5 Dr. Ir. Abdul Hamid Noor Agriculture A, B
6 Drs. Miswan, M.Pd. Terrestrial and Aquatic Biology A, B
7 Drs. M. Sufri, M.Si. Social-Economic A
8 Drs. Muis Amin Social-Culture A
9 Ahsan Nur Hadi, S.Si. GIS/Mapping A, B
10 Suhartanto Typist -


2.2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY PLAN
The general description of Matondok Gas Development activity plan is presented as follows.

A. The Project Area Width including The Needs for Area Facilities
No Facilities unit Area Width
1. Manifold Station (MS) 2 locations, @ 6 Ha 12 Ha
2. Block Station (BS) 3 locations, @ 15 Ha 45 Ha
3. pipe line of flow line 5 locations, 8 m width, 35 km
length
14 Ha
4. Pipe line of trunk line from 2 BS/GPF
LNG Plant
20 m width, 60 km length 120 Ha
5. LNG Refinery 1 unit 200 Ha
6. The construction of new road and the
development of the existing road for
drilling the development wells
6-8 m width, 15 km length 60 Ha
7 Harbor and its facilities such as J etty
construction (100 m)
200 m width, 500 m length 10 Ha
The total width of area needs 461 Ha

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

II-5
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
The area needed for construction of manifold station facilities in the 2 locations is 2 x 6 ha
(total = 12 ha); as for the BS construction is in 3 locations (45 ha each); theflowline in 5
locations need 8 m width x 35 km length of flowline (14 ha); The LNG Refinery area is 200
ha; and the gas piping system needs 20 m width x 60 km length of pipe (120 ha). This
location needs to be prepared before drilling the development wells, by the road
construction directed to the location (construction of the new road and development of the
existing road) with the cumulative length from all wells is 15 km with 6 8 m width (
60 ha). Besides, the construction of harbor and its facilities (J etty) will require area of 10
Ha. Therefore, the area needed for the project is 461 Ha. The area which is used belongs
to the society or others. The acquisition of area will be done according to the existing
regulation.

B. Production Capacity
PT. PERTAMINA EP plans the Matindok Gas Development Project which is started with the
wells drilling activity for production facilities in Matindok Block, the Block Station (BS)
construction, gas processing facilities (GPF) and construction of gas pipe transmission
(flowline and trunk line), also LNG Refinery construction along the harbor as a
transportation line for LNG or Sulphur which is produced outside the Banggai Regency.

The gas production capacity in Matindok Block is 100 MMSCFD (gross), with the
condensate content of 850 bopd and produced water 2500 bwpd, and estimated gas
production period is 20 years, based on the amount of the gas reserve and the
economical analysis. The produced gas contains CO
2
2,5%, Total Sulphur 3.000 ppm
and other possible elements.

The facilities of gas production, which will be constructed, are Gas Wells, Flowline,
Gathering Line, Block Station and Gas Processing Facility (GPF). The transmission pipe from
GPF into the LNG Refinery is planned to have 34 size for 25 km of length with the
major part is situated at 500 m far from off shore, parallel with the highway.
The element content existed in the gas production can be seen completely in Table 2.2.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project

II-6
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 2.2. The Composition of Gas Production from the Gas Wells in Matindok Block (In % mol)
DONGGI 1 DONGGI 1 DONGGI 1 DONGGI 2 DONGGI 3
SUKA-
MAJ U-1
MALEO
RAJ A-1
MI NA
HAKI -1
MATI N
DOK
MENTA
WA-1
KP. BALI
A
KP. BALI
A
DST-3 DST-4 DST-5 DST-1 DST-2 DST-3 DST-1 DST-2
Hydrogen Sulphide H
2
S 0.1000 0.41 0.60 0.35 0.40 0.10 0.12 0.37 0.41 0.20 0.28 0.4000 0.00 1.00 1.2 0.1200 0.5013 0.1290
Alkyl Merkaptan RSH 0.0005 0.0021 0.0018 0.0005 0.0019 0.0010 0.2241 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Carbonyl Sulphide COS 0.0002 0.0008 0.0007 0.0002 0.0008 0.0004 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Nitrogen N
2
1.1300 1.1300 1.0700 0.8900 1.3400 2.9800 2.2400 0.8700 1.7400 1.2291 1.2824
Carbon Dioxyde CO
2
2.4600 2.4600 2.4400 1.7700 3.1800 0.3100 3.0300 1.8000 2.1400 2.4635 2.3374
Methane CH
4
92.2800 92.2800 92.1200 93.0200 91.2600 86.0350 81.1200 88.2400 91.7500 92.6297 92.8049
Ethane C
2
H
6
1.5100 1.5100 1.5300 1.4400 1.6300 4.8450 5.4400 4.1500 1.6900 1.4717 1.4726
Propane C
3
H
8
1.1700 1.1700 1.1800 1.1900 1.2600 2.1300 4.0800 1.9800 1.4300 1.1780 1.1685
Iso-Butane i-C
4
H
10
0.3300 0.3300 0.3400 0.3600 0.3400 0.6200 0.9200 0.4400 0.3500 0.3119 0.3112
Normal-Butane n-C
4
H
10
0.3400 0.3400 0.3400 0.3600 0.3400 0.9500 1.1300 0.6500 0.4000 0.3205 0.2997
Iso-Pentane i-C
5
H
12
0.1900 0.1900 0.2000 0.2000 0.1700 0.3900 0.5500 0.3600 0.1500 0.1592 0.1475
Normal-Pentane n-C
5
H
12
0.1200 0.1200 0.1200 0.1200 0.1000 0.2800 0.4000 0.2800 0.0900 0.0898 0.0804
Hexane C
6
H
14
0.1000 0.1000 0.1200 0.0500 0.0600 0.2900 0.3500 0.6400 0.0600 0.0848 0.0636
Heptane plus C
7
H
16
0.3700 0.3700 0.4700 0.5700 0.2600 1.0900 0.7400 0.5300 0.0800 0.0618 0.0318
Mercury Hg 8.2420E-08 8.2420E-08 8.2420E-08 8.2420E-08 8.2420E-08 8.2420E-08 1.1260E-08 8.2420E-08 5.5553E-09
4.736100%
7E-09
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

ANDAL Proyek Pengembangan Gas Matindok
II-7
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
C. The Activity Time
The development activities are divided into several phase, there are pre-construction,
construction, operation, and post operation (Table 2.3).

Table 2.3. The Period of Development Activity of Matindok Gas
Year No. Activity
Phase

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ...............2035
1. Pre-construction ****************
2. Construction ************
3. Operation
a.Drilling
b.Gas Production
Operation
************


****************

4. Post Operation *****

At the initial phase, The LNG refinery will produce maximum amount of LNG up to 2 million
metrics ton per year with natural gas supplied between 300 up to 350 million standard cubic
feet per day (MMSCFD) which comes from Matindok block (100 MMSCFD) and from Senoro
block (200 MMSCFD). Besides, it will also produce condensate up to 1.500-barrel oil per day
at maximum.

The construction project includes the Gas Processing Facilities construction on the land, Gas
pipe network for gas distribution to the LNG refinery location, LNG storage tank, the
particular harbor for LNG transportation and the support facilities of refinery. The Gas
material will be supplied from 6 locations of gas sources with the addition of wells up to 25
production wells for 20 years operation period. The construction activity is scheduled to start
by the end of the year 2007. This activity plan will be done in phases, and production
facilities plan will be resumed in Figure 2.1, Figure 2.2, and Figure 2.3.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-8
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM



Figure 2.1. The Block Diagram of the Development Plan - Phase 1



Figure 2.2. The Scheme of Development Plan - Phase 2



Figure 2.3. The Flowchart of Block Development of Matindok 2026
34x265

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-9
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
D. Types of Energy Source and Water Source Needed for the Activity Plan Location.
The types of main energy to support the operation of production facilities are:
1. Gas Fuel which is needed to operate different kinds of facilities including Gas Dryer, Gas
Threating Unit, and Gas liquefied into LNG Compressor Activator and Electricity Generator
activator. Gas fuel will be taken from the production result itself.
2. Generator unit with oil fuel which is prepared for the emergency in each BS, LNG refinery
and Seashore/Harbor. The oil fuel comes from Pertamina refinery.
3. The electricity, which is generated from gas fuel generator, is used for lighting and
electricity motor activator.

The amount of water needed for the drilling is quite big, around 420 m
3
per well, hydro test
pipe channel around 20.000 m
3
, and for every BS unit operation is around 25 m
3
/day. The
water needed for the construction will be taken from the river or the closest water pool.

The water needed for an operational LNG refinery is around 75 m
3
/day which will be taken
from the deep groundwater.

The location of PPGM activity plan is presented in Figure 2.4.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-10
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM














Figure 2.4. The Location of PPGM Activity Plan

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-11
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
E. Socialization and Public Consultation
1) Socialization
The announcement of activity plan is already done through newspapers, posters, local
private radio and banner.
2) Public Consultation
In order to arrange the Term of Reference (KA-ANDAL), the public consultation has
already been held in two places, on Tuesday, May 23
rd
, 2006 in Batui District and May
24
th,
, 2006 in Toili district, between PT Pertamina-EP and the society of Banggai
Regency. Those meeting were presented by PT Pertamina-EP delegation, the deputy of
Ministry of KLH, The Dirjen Migas, Local Government of Banggai Regency, EIS Study
Team from PSLH UGM-PPLH UNTAD, also the communities of Batui, Toili and Toili Barat
districts in Banggai Regency.

Based on the observation and evaluation of information including suggestion, opinion,
and society response, local government, and the other relevant institution which
connected with the development activity plan, there are several suggestions which need
to be consider:
Land acquisition and plants compensation
Local Labour
Society Act program
The existence of offshore coral reef
The existence Bangkiriang Wild Life Conservation

All suggestions, recommendations, and ideas will be taken into consideration in the
project design and, will be put in to the EIS document, if there is no contradiction.

F. Drilling Activity
1. The well Drilling
Geologically, Matindok Block area and its surrounding are located in Banggai basin, in
the southern side of the eastern arms of Sulawesi Island. Banggai basin is the main part
of offshore depression along the coast in the southeastern of the eastsea of Sulawesi,
which is not in a symmetrical shape with N60E of slope along the coastline. This basin
is classified in the transform refted basin, which is an active margin basin or collision
related basin. The regional stratigraphic of Banggai basin can be seen in Figure 2.5.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-12
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
This area has potential hydrocarbon and has been proved on producing hydrocarbon in
carbonate rock formation of Tomori and Minahaki formation.

Until February 2006, the 12 drilling wells in Matindok block are already done, with 9
wells are successful in finding gas in five structures (Donggi, Matindok, Maleoraja,
Sukamaju and Minahaki) and 3 dry wells. The well drilling is still possibly operated in
this Matindok block. This is because based on Geological and Geophysical analyses,
there are several prospects of potential hydrocarbon content.


Figure 2.5. The Regional Stratigraphy of Banggai Sula Bassin,
In The Eastern-arms of Sulawesi

2. The Drilling of the Development Wells
The results of several well drilling exploration which was already done in this Matindok
block show that there are five structures having gas content, those structures are

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-13
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
onshore. The gas reserve (already taken) which has the certification from the six
structures is approximately reach 696 BSCF gas (P1).

Based on Geological, Geophysical, and Reservoir (GGR) analyze from those six
structures, the project is planned to drill 18 development wells (Table 2.4), with the
possibility of dry well. The types of well drilling activity include well development (18
wells), work over (6 wells), stimulation, well caring, dan well closing.

Table 2.4. Plan for Well Development at Matindok Block
No. FIELDS WELL TYPE OF ACTIVITY
1 Donggi Donggi-1
Donggi-2
Donggi-3
KPB-1
DNG-A
DNG-B
DNG-C
DNG-D
Work Over
Work Over
Work Over
Work Over
Development well
Development well
Development well
Development well
2 Minahaki Minahaki-1
MHK-A
MHK-B
MHK-C
Development well
Development well
Development well
Development well
3 Sukamaju Sukamaju-1
SJ U-A
Work Over
Development well
4 Matindok Matindok-1
MTD-A
MTD-B
MTD-C
MTD-D
MTD-E
MTD-F
Development well
Development well
Development well
Development well
Development well
Development well
Development well
5 Maleoraja Maleo Raja-1
MLR-A
MLR-B
Work Over
Development well
Development well

The drilling equipment and its capacity are in conformity with the drilling target.
Besides, it still use another support equipment operation such as air compressor,
cement mixer and pump, cement storage tanks, electric wire logging unit, mud pump,
mud logging equipment, desender and desilter, truck and trailers, water pump, blow out
preventer, etc.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-14
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
3. The Production Wells
Once the drilling process is completed, it is continued with well completion along with
arranged program, such as assembling of production string, wellhead and Christmas
tree.

G. Gas Pipe System
1. Pipe Line
The results of gas production from each well run through the production pipe (flowline) with
the suitable diameter into Block Station (BS) and Gas Processing Facility (GPF). The area
width, which will be used for this production, is around 8 meter with the cumulative length
35 km for 18 wells. The Layout from each location of Block Station and flowline are
resumed as seen on Figure 2.6 2.10.




Figure 2.6. The Location of Block Station Donggi and Flowline

Flowline Jarak
(m)
DNG - 1 to BS DONGGI 1,208
DNG - 2 to BS DONGGI 2,132
DNG - 3 to BS DONGGI 4,569
DNG - 5 to BS DONGGI 2,518
DNG - AA to BS DONGGI 1,268
DNG - BB to BS DONGGI 1,637
DNG - CC to BS DONGGI 2,087

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-15
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


Figure 2.7. The Location of Matindok Block Station and Flowline



Figure 2.8. The Location of Maleoraja Block Station and Flowline
Flowline Jarak
(m)
MLR - 1 to BS MALEORAJ A 100
MLR - AA to BS MALEORAJ A 1,435
MLR - AA to BS MALEORAJ A 676
Flowline Jarak
(m)
MTD - 1S to BS MATINDOK 1,208
MTD - AA to BS MATINDOK 2,132
MTD - BB to BS MATINDOK 4,569
MTD - CC to BS MATINDOK 2,518
MTD - DD to BS MATINDOK 1,268
MTD - EE to BS MATINDOK 1,637
MTD - FF to BS MATINDOK 2,087

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-16
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


Figure 2.9. The Location of Sukamaju Block Station and Flowline







Figure 2.10. The Location of Minahaki Block Station and Flowline


Flowline Jarak
(m)
MHK - AA to BS MINAHAKI 100
MHK - 1S to BS MINAHAKI 886
MHK - BB to BS MINAHAKI 912
MHK - CC to BS MINAHAKI 1,827
Fl owline Jarak
(m)
SJ U - 1 to BS SUKAMAJ U 100
SJ U - 1 to BS SUKAMAJ U 500

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-17
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Those flowline designs are based on ASME/ANSI B.31.8. and GPSA Hand Book.
















Figure 2.11. Flowline Diagram


The MS gas runs through the suitable pipes 14, 16, 18, 20 to the processing gas
facilities. Gas from BS Donggi-Minahaki and BS Matindok-Maleoraja runs to the LNG Plant.
Meanwhile gas from BS Sukamaju processed and directly transported to the IPP Banggai.
The gas processed in BS at Donggi and Matindok which have standard gas content will be
sold to the LNG refinery at Batui or Kintom. The gas delivery from GPF Donggi is done
across the pipe, which has 16 diameter with the pipe length is 40 km up to the next
J unction, then it is channeled through pipe with 34 diameter to the LNG Plant. The gas
delivery from BS Matindok is done across the pipe with 16 diameter (3 km length) up to the
junction, and then it is channeled through the same 34 diameter pipe to the LNG Plant. In
order to get 773 psi of gas pressure on the 34 diameter pipe, there will be compressors
placed in BS Donggi and Matindok.

2. The Pipe Design
The pipe design and pipe setting will refer to several national standards (for example,
regulation of Department of Mining and Energy regarding Oil and Natural Gas Refinery No.
01/P/M/Pertamb/1980 and The Regulation of General Director of Oil and Gas: Standard of
Well
RBT-A
Well
RBT-B
Well
KTB-1
Well
KTB-2
Well
Next
SDV-1
SDV-2
SDV-3
SDV-4
SDV-5
H
P

M
a
n
i
f
o
l
d
M
P

M
a
n
i
f
o
l
d
T
e
s
t

M
a
n
i
f
o
l
d
WELL
MHK
WELL
MTD
WELL
MLR
WELL
DNG

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-18
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Oil and Gas Mining (SPM, 1992) 50.54.0-50.54.1) and International Standard (such as API 5
SL Specification for Line Pipe, API 1104 Welding of Pipeline and Related facilities, ASME
B31.8 Gas Distribution and Transportation Piping System). Technically, the pipe design
can be used for minimum 30 years. The pipe connection will be done by specific certified
personnel.

3. Pipe Corrosion Protection
The outside gas pipe corrosion protection is done by the cathodes protection system (anode
carbon) which is expected to be able to control all kinds of outside pipe corrosion
underground in order to protect the pipe from outside corrosion. Besides, this pipe is
completed with outside pipe coating which is also functioned as protection from outside
corrosion. The internal corrosion protection is done by periodic injection corrosion inhibitor
into the gas pipe.
To facilitate the measurement of potential and flow in the pipe, a test box is set up in every
1 km.

H. Block Station (BS)
The gas from the production wells is flown in to 5 gathering stations/Block Stations placed in
each fields (Donggi, Matindok, Minahaki, Sukamaju and Maleoraja). Inside the BS, there are
separation unit, the dehydration unit, compression unit, receiving tank, utility unit, waste
flaring system and IPAL. The following are the operation units, which are used for the gas
processing in BS. The entire Block Stations in the Matindok block consist of Gathering
System and the system separation of natural gas that consist of separator, condensate, and
dehydration unit. The dehydration unit is needed to reduce the water content in the natural
gas to reach the specification gas pipeline, which are 7 lb/MMSCF at maximum.

1. Separation Unit
The Hydrocarbon from the production wells contains condensate, water, and gas, where
the major production is gas. The first step to separates condensate, water, and gas is
using gas separator. Inside the equipment, condensate and water are separated from
the gas. The condensate and water will flow from the bottom part of the separator while
the gas will flow from the upper part. The separation process inside those equipments is
a physical process without chemical material addition.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-19
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

The condensate and water are separated based on the principle of non-dissolve and the
differences of mass density. The condensate is received in the storage tank, the water
will be continuously processed with the wastewater treatment.

If the gas pressure from the well decreased because the reservoir pressure naturally
descends, it will need the compressor assembling in the Gathering Station/Block Station
to keep the stability of gas pressure that comes in to the CO
2
/ H
2
S Removal System or
into the gas consumer.

The condensate is kept in the storage tank to be delivered to the LNG refinery in Batui
by road tank. Figure 2.12 shows the system of the gathering station/ block
station.







2. Dehydration Plant
Once the gas comes out from the separation unit, it will be channeled to the
Dehydration Unit. The function of Dehydration plant is drying the gas to complete the
process of water reduction. The process includes water absorption process by using the
chemical material triethyleneglycol (TEG) which can be re-used after being physically
Figure 2.12. The Flowchart of Block Station/ Gathering Station.
explanation: HP (high pressure), MP (medium pressure), LP (low pressure),
KO (knock out), AGRU (acid gas removal unit)

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-20
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
cleaned from the water (close cycle). The results of those processes are the qualified
gas for the consumer. Figure 2.13 presents the schema of dehydration plant.


Figure 2.13. The Works Scheme of Dehydration Plant

3. The Receiving Tank
The receiving tank is used for receiving the condensate that comes from the separator,
before it is transported to Batui. The number of receiving tanks being used are 2 tanks
with the capacity of each is 1300 m
3
. The condensate will be transported from Block
Station to the LNG refinery in Batui by road tank.

4. The Compressor
The compressor will be used to keep pressure out from Block station, so it is maintained
at 900 psig. This compressor is set up in the block station and it is done after the
pressure from the well gas is less than 900 psig. The number of compressors being
placed in the Block Station are 3 units per location in average. This is because generally
the gas pressure that comes out from the wells will be naturally going down during the
production process, so it needs more new compressor in the Gathering Station/block
station.

Sales Gas
AGRU
Glycol
Contactor
Glycol/ Condensate
Skimmer
Glycol
Stripping
Column
Reboiler
Glycol
Filter

V-1
Glycol Cooler
Cold
Glycol
Exchanger
Hot
glycol
Exchanger
Glycol Surge
Drum
Glycol
Make-up
Pump
Glycol
Injection
Pump
V-2 ToFlare

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-21
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
5. The Water processing unit
The Water processing unit or Unit of Effluent Treatment or the installation of
wastewater processing (IPAL) is used for processing the liquid waste that comes from
the separator and others.

6. CO
2
/

H
2
S Removal (AGRU)
Before entering the LNG Refinery, the CO
2
and H
2
S content will be reduced by an
absorption process using MDEA (Methyl DiethanolAmine) condensation inside the Acid
Gas Removal Unit (AGRU). The main function of the unit is to absorb CO
2
and H
2
S
content inside the absorber and release them to the stripper tower or column, to obtain
the sweet gas with low CO
2
and H
2
S content. Figure 2.14 shows the flowchart of Acid
Gas Removal Unit. The gas from 5 Block Station is flown across the pipe to the Acid Gas
Removal Unit which is placed in GPF in Kayowa or in the LNG refinery.

















Acid Gas Removal Unit (AGRU)


The main function of AGRU is dump the carbon dioxide dumping. The carbon dioxide
dumping is required to prevent freezing and clogging problems in the lower temperature
that is used inside the liquefaction unit. The concentration of carbon dioxide
concentration inside the gas stream will be reduced to 50 parts per million volumes
(ppmv) with the amine-based solution absorption. This activity is closed-loop and
DHP
GATHERING
STATION
Amine
Contactor
Amine Flash
Tank
Lean-Rich
Amine
Exchanger
Still
Stripping
Column
Reboiler
Amine
booster
Pump
Lean
Amine
Cooler
Amine
Filter
Amine
Circulation
Pump
SRU
Condenser Outlet
Gas Scrubber
Inlet
Gas Scrubber
ACID GAS REMOVAL UNI T
Figure 2.14. The Flowchart of Acid Gas Removal

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-22
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
regenerative so that the absorbed carbon dioxide will be lifted from the carbon dioxide-
rich solution. The lifted carbon dioxide will be released to the air, and the amine solution
that is free from carbon dioxide will be returned to the absorption phase.

The amine-based solution which is used by all AGRUs is also able to remove the entire
sulphur mixed that is already reduced but probably is still resided in it (ex: sulfide
hydrogen, mercaptan, and others). Nevertheless, the compositional analysis indicates
that the sulphur which is left inside the feed of natural gas is only just a little amount or
none.

7. Sulphur Recovery Unit (SRU)
The purpose of sulphur recovery is to comply with environmental regulation concerning
threshold values as stipulated in the State Minister Decree of Environmental Affairs
No.129 of 2003. There are several processes available to produce the sulphur from
hydrogen sulfide. Some processes have been designed to produce sulphur and some
others are developed with the main purpose is to remove the H
2
S content from the
natural gas. The sulphur production is only a result of the continuous process that needs
to be done.
Considering that there are still 2 possibilities of sulphur content in natural gas produced
from the gas wells in Matindok block, two Processing Technologies have been
considered for the sulphur recovery;

a. Claus Processing
Claus Processing is chosen when the sulphur content inside the natural gas reaches
more than 5000 ppm. From many of the existing technologies, the Claus processing
is the most popular and applied in the entire world. The Claus processing is using
the oxidation Principle with the oxygen or air in the temperature around 1200
o
C
through the chain reaction as follows:
H
2
S + O
2
SO
2
+ H
2
O
H
2
S + SO
2
S + H
2
O
The Clauss Processing can produce sulphur from the gas bait that contains 15% -
100% H
2
S. There are several flowcharts from the Claus processing, the main
difference is its place in the arrangement.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-23
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The acid gas is stoikiometrically combined with air to burns 1/3 of the total amount
of H
2
S to be SO
2
and the entire hydrocarbon to be CO
2
. H
2
S combustion is occurred
in the burner and reaction chamber. The high temperature mass stream, as a result
from the combustion process is flown to the waste heat boiler, where the heat will
be released from the gas. Then the gas is flown to the reactor to generate reaction
to change SO
2
to sulphur. The result of the reaction will be freezed in the first
condenser and the produced liquid sulphur is separated. Gas that comes out from
the first condenser will be heated and baited to the second reactor. In this reactor,
the same reaction occurs as in the first reactor. The product of the second reactor is
being freezed inside the second condenser and the liquid sulphur will be separated.

b. Shell Paques Processing
The content of sulphur inside the natural gas is below 5000 ppm, and then it will
choose the technology from Shell Paques. The Shell Paques Processing is biological
process for the removal of H
2
S from the gas bait matched with the sulphur capacity
production of 0.5 30 ton/day. The solution that being used to absorb H
2
S is soda
solution, which contains the sulphur bacteria. The absorption of H
2
S happens in the
absorber column and the solution that came out from the absorber will be
regenerationed in the aerator tank where hydrogen sulphide biologically converted
to became sulphur element by the sulphur bacteria. The H
2
S concentration could be
reached under 5 ppmv by this process. The operation pressure of Shell Paques
processing is 0.1 90 barg.

c. Tail Gas Treating
In the Tail Gas Treating Unit, the H
2
S compound, which is not converted inside the
sulphur recovery unit, is converted as sulphur compound, so that the results of gas
dumping complies with the environmental standard.

The removed acid gas and sulphur recovery to reach the gas pipeline specification is
shown by Figure 2.15.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-24
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


Figure 2.15. PFD Acid Removal and Sulfur Recovery Unit (Claus Process)


I. The LNG refinery

The processed gas in GPF in Donggi and GPF in Matindok, which its content complies with
the gas standard will be delivered to the LNG refinery. The gas delivery from GPF Donggi is
conducted by joint Facilities of J OB Pertamina-Medco Tomori Sulawesi in Senoro to the LNG
refinery in Batui or Kintom. Meanwhile, the gas delivery from GPF Matindok is done through
junction in the pipeline Senoro - LNG refinery in Batui or Kintom.
The LNG refinery will consist of processing, receiving, utility, waste processing, harbor units,
and necessary infrastructure.

1. Processing Unit
The Processing unit consists of Gas Receiving Facilities, Gas Purifying Facilities, and
Gas Liquefaction Facilities
a. Gas Receiving Facilities
The design capacity from these facilities is planned to be 300 MMSCFD at minimum
that consist of knock out drum, separator and slug catcher. From those facilities, the
gas will be directed to the Gas Purifying Facilities (Acid Gas Removal Unit/AGRU)
passing the compression unit. The condensate, which is accumulated from this unit,
will be directed to the condensate stabilizer unit from Natural Gas Liquefaction
Facilities.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-25
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
b. Gas Purifying Facilities
The LNG refinery will consist of two generally parts: gas purifying and gas
liquefying. The Gas Purifying will be placed below and gas liquefying in the next
part. Each of the two similar purifying trains includes AGRU, Dehydration Unit and
Mercury Removal Unit (MRU). The Purifying gas needs to avoid the corrosive and
freezing problem inside the Unit Liquefaction.

Dehydration Unit
The target of this unit is for dehydrating the saturated-gas water from AGRU to
avoid the freezing and clogging problem (hydrate formation) in the very cool
temperature, which are used for the freezing unit. The water rate inside the natural
gas will be reduced until less than 1 ppmv.

The drying process will be done in two steps. The water will be removed by cooling
the kasren natural gas (sweet) until it reaches 23C and separation of soluble liquid.
After the removal of water piles process, the level of water residue (already less
than 1 ppmv) will be removed with the absorption in the molecule filter. The
molecule filter absorption is an activity, which involving the periodic filter
regeneration after the filter is full of water. This regeneration is organized by
passing the heat up gas flow (kasren natural gas from AGRU), passing through the
bottom part to release water. Then, the water-laden regenerant gas will be cooled
so that its liquefying will bring back the water content. After the water separation,
water-laden regenerant gas will be delivered to the gas fuel system. The water will
be directed to the Effluent Treatment unit.

The Mercury Removal Unit (MRU)
MRU removes a small quantity of mercury that is possibly still in the produced
natural gas. The mercury content must be removed until its value reaches below the
allowed standard, to prevent the damage of main equipment of gas liquefaction
unit, which is mostly made from aluminum. MRU is set up as a prevention measures
because mercury could react with aluminum in the Liquefaction unit, and it will
cause the heat exchanger malfunction. There will be a chemical absorption as a
result of mercury discharge in the bottom of non-generative catalyst to be
reprocessed.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-26
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
c. Natural Gas Liquefaction Facilities
The main purpose of these facilities is to liquefy the natural gas to be LNG product.
Before that, the heavy content of hydrocarbon needs to be separated to avoid the
freezing problem in the gas liquefaction pipes. Those facilities include cooling
unit/Liquefaction, fractionation unit and stabilization unit, with the facilities capacity
of 2 million mtpa.

Cooling Unit/ Liquefaction unit
This liquefaction is done in two steps. The first step is initial cooling of natural gas
until its temperature reaches less than minus 17C to 34C. After the first cooling,
the natural gas will be cooled until it reaches the coolest temperature, which is
minus 164C, to improve liquefaction process. Then, the produced LNG will be flown
to the LNG storage.

The main generator for the cooler compressor is planned to use gas turbine. The
selection of the types of gas turbine, the number of required gas turbine and also
the entire electricity power will depend on the selected cooling process.

Fractination Unit
This unit will separate heavier components, which come from the natural gas, in to
three types: methane and ethane; propane gas and liquid butane (LPG) and
condensate. This separation will be done in the deethanizer column that will release
methane gas and ethane, Depropanizer column that produce propane (refrigerant
grade propane), and debutanizer unit which will separate the residue component
into one kind of butane component and pentane, and the heavier component, The
gained methane gas will be delivered to the fuel system from the installation where
ethane gas and propane could be used as cooler material. Butane gas and all the
light fraction will be flown back inside the LNG product. Pentana gas and the
heavier fraction (condensate) will be continued to the stabilizer unit.

Stabilizer Unit
This unit will remove every lightened residue component that possibly exist inside
the condensate stream. The removal of this component is needed to keep the water

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-27
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
vapour pressure of the condensate before it is stored. The light Hydrocarbon from
this unit will be flown in to the fuel gas system.

d. Compressor
The compressor which will be used to increase the pressure from 450 psig to 750
psig is placed in the area of LNG refinery. The number of compressor placed in LNG
refinery area is 3 units with the capacity 150 MMSCFD/unit. The suction pressure is
450 psig, while the discharge pressure is 750 psig.

2. Gas Storage Facilities
Gas Storage Facilities contains systems as follows:
LNG storage and load capacity
Condensate storage and load capacity
Refrigerant storage system
Wet and dry flyer system
Fire prevention system
Waste processing and removal system

Those facilities will be explained as follows:

LNG Storage and Load Capacity
The LNG product from the cooling unit/liquefaction will be kept in the atmospheric
pressure in the LNG storage tank and periodically lifted in the LNG load tanker. The
shipload system will be planned to move out 125.000 m in less than 12 hours. The LNG
storage system will consist of 2 tanks with capacity less than 80.000 m each.

Condensate Storage and Load Capacity
The condensate product from stabilizer unit will be kept in the condensate tank and
periodically loaded in the condensate ship to be exported through the condensate port.
The condensate lifting ship system will tentatively be planned to load the ship with
capacity between 1.000 - 5.000 DWT. The condensate tank has the capacity less than
20.000 m.




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-28
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Refrigerant Storage
The propane gas has the function as cooler material and will be kept in the bullet
pressure cooler material storage. The size of bullet will be determined along the built
up of development period.

Wet and Dry Flare System
This system will be used to remove the hydrocarbon gas from LNG refinery processing
train and offsite facilities during normal operation, in condition when there is damage
equipment or in the emergency condition, then it will be removed and directly burned to
the air. The system of gas releasing and removal (Flare) will be designed in three
combustion stacks, they are Dry flare for the processing train of LNG refinery, Wet flare
for Acid Gas Removal Unit and offsite facilities, and Marine Flare for the tanker ship to
load the LNG to the ship.

Fire Prevention System
This system consists of three basic components, there are (1) monitoring device and
alarm, (2) prerequirement of passive fire prevention and, (3) equipment and active fire
extinguisher. The LNG refinery will be equipped with the monitoring device that works
continuously to warn the plant personnel about the fire and to correctly indicate the
location and its condition. The passive fire preventing system that refers to the design
specification, which is combined to the installation plan, will be used consistently by
considering economic limitation.
The passive fire prevention includes:
Making insulation of vessel skirts and column/structure of rack pipe with fire
resistance
Protection spot for the flanges or others component with higher leak level
Spacing equipment and spill containment according to international standard (such
as NFPA 59A)

The equipment and active fire extinguishing are the items that will be used actively to
monitor/extinguish the real fire condition/danger. The equipment and active fire
extinguisher include the items as follows:

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-29
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The water distribution system for air-pressure fire extinguisher for the entire area
including its reserve from the pump, fire hydrant, fire monitor, slang roll/rack and
the pipe distribution system:
The CO
2
overflowing system for the entire turbine gas room, diesel engine, and the
non personnel security space ;
The overflowing system of non-halon fire suppressant for all monitoring room with
personnel inside;
The spon system with the higher expansion spon to reduce steam for the locked
LNG spilled out and the lower expansion used for the heavy hydrocarbon spilled
out;
Fire car;
The dry powder extinguisher is available on the package unit and the wheeled and
portable units that been placed in the entire installation of portable fire
extinguishing.

Effluent Treatment Unit or Waste Processing Facilities (IPAL)
The Effluent Treatment system will be organized to collect and process contaminated
waste current which comes from the LNG refinery. Liquid waste effluentsfrom the
facilities will consist of processing oiled wastewater, non-accommodated rain water, and
floor water cleaner that potentially contaminated, clean waste, and if possible the salt
water neutralizer.
To reduce the quantity of surface water flooded area which will be processed, the
contaminated area will be monitored (the sensitive area of oil leakage), to prevent run
on and run off, and channeled to the waste processing installation. The non-
accommodate rainwater from the green line and installation area, which are not
contaminated, will be directly removed to the sea.

3. Utility Needs Facilities
The entire utilities, which are needed to support the installation activity, will be available
according to the needs. The LNG refinery will be supported by utility system sets, which
consist of:
Electricity power plant system
Fuel System
Low pressure steam system
Water installation and equipment system
Nitrogen System

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-30
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Water supply system

Electric Power Plant System (Normal and Emergency)

The need for electrical power will be met without acquiring from any external sources.
The power plant for the normal operation will be fulfilled by gas turbine generator. The
fuel for the turbine generator is part of the natural gas produced and purified. The
demand of electric power for the LNG Refinery is estimated about 58 megawatt, it will
be self-produced or using gas equals to 10 MMCFD.
In a case of an electrical power failure, emergency diesel generator will be prepared as
a substitute to assure the functional continuity of instrument and control, and to provide
the emergency lighting during shutdown period. Electric system will be equipped with
automatic start and evacuation (automatic transfer), therefore, the loss of electrical
power will immediately turn on the generator and transfer the important load to the
emergency electric power system.

Fuel System

System of gas fuel will be developed to distribute fuel to run turbine at cooler
compressor, electrical power plant turbine, and some other mechanical activators in LNG
Refinery. The main source of gas fuel is gas current, which is taken from natural gas
supply, gas extract from storage tank of LNG, and gas methane from demetanizer.

Diesel fuel will function as fuel source for the delayed ship and other ships, pump the
emergency fire extinguisher, emergency water-fire extinguisher pump, air compression
back up, and emergency electrical power plant. Diesel Fuel will guarantee the
availability of supply to run fire extinguisher pump for a long time. Diesel fuel will be
kept in one or more storage tank.

The Low Pressure Condense System
One unit of boiler, which is designed to provide low-pressure vapors requirement, will
be function as heat media for reboiled in gas treating unit.

Air Manufacture and Equipments System
The air needed for Refinery and equipments will be supplied by air compressors run by
electromotor which provide air for the instrumentation equipments requirement and

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-31
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
other needs such as Refinery maintenance. Back up air compressor is run by diesel
engine which operate to enable the periodic shut down from each compressor.

Nitrogen Producing System

Nitrogen is required as component from mixture cooler substance, for the cleaning of
equipments and pipe before it is opened, for the treatment, and for the application of
certain gas layer. Nitrogen will be obtained from refinery air system by air dissociation
refinery and then it is liquefied to be stored as liquid nitrogen. The construction design
of the nitrogen depository unit and evaporation will be developed to provide sufficient
amount of nitrogen to serve an LNG train for 10 hours, also to fulfill other Refinery
requirement.

Water Supply System
Water that will be provided for the refinery potentially has various characteristics as it
comes from different sources, including:
Freshwater System
Drilling Water System
Water Treatment System
High-Purity Water System
Boiler Feed Water System
Drinking Water System - ( Potable / drinking Water)

The freshwater will function as water source, after adequate processing, for the service,
high purification and heating, also as drinking water supply. The source of fresh water
has not been determined yet, and will be one of alternative study in Environmental
Impact Statement (ANDAL). The alternatives for fresh water source which are still under
consideration include ground water, surface water, or purified seawater.

Water for the drilling will be supplied to the drilling unit to prepare fresh water mud.
The water also will be used at Drill Bridge as cleaner water.

Water for services will be used for the bearing cooler, compressor and turbine, to equip
the fire extinguisher system, and for the general use of refinery, such as floor cleaner,
equipment cleaner, and pressure test. Demineralized water is needed for water

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-32
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
distribution at AGRU and for the preparation of solution for acid gas dumper. The water
will be produced by ion exchange demineralization.
Drinking water will be supplied not only for drinking need, but also for other daily needs
such as bath, wash up, douche, toilet, food preparation and other purposes. Drinking
water will be processed according to Health Regulation and Water Quality Standard.

4. Specific Port Facilities (LNG Port)
a. General Description
Project of LNG Donggi Senoro requires the specific jetty facility for the
transportation needs and project supply. The Specific jetty represents the jetty
utilized and managed for the operation of LNG Refinery and LNG Gas production
facilities of Donggi Senoro and not for public needs. Specific jetty activity is
conducted in small scale and just for the project need and will not be used for other
commercial or sea shipbuilding. Different from the other ordinary seaport, this
seaport activity only consists of bridge (trestles) and dock area. LNG Donggi Senoro
jetty consisted of load seaport of LNG Bridge (trestles) and causeways (Figure
2.16). LNG Donggi Senoro jetty is located in Uso village of Batui district, Banggai
Regency, Central Sulawesi Province. The determination of two alternative locations
for LNG jetty is based on the following consideration:
Depth of the sea is sufficient for LNG tanker (13 m under the lowest ebb surface)
The distance from the jetty to coast is the closest, so the bridge construction is
cheap.
Based on the study, sedimentation that happened around the dock is quite low so
it does not need the pool jetty dredging during operation.
The distance from the jetty to coast is the closest, so LNG pipe installation and
utilities is cheaper.

The LNG jetty is far away from the other facilities, so it is safe for the other
activities if there is a tanker leakage.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-33
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


Figure 2.16. LNG J etty Location of Trestles and Causeways




Figure 2.17. LNG J etty Profile/ Trestle


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-34
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


Figure 2.18. LNG J etty Layout


Now, there is one public jetty in Luwuk, capital city of Banggai regency. Generally,
ship traffic in this jetty consists of mercantile ship and passenger ship of Tilong
Kabila direction of East Indonesia owned by PELNI. The public jetty is about 50 km
from Project jetty of LNG Donggi Senoro, so it will not disturb the ship traffic from
Luwuk jetty.

There is no pre-investment which is needed to accommodate the requirement of
jetty extension facility of Project of LNG Donggi Senoro, but the plan have to
consider the possibility to add maximum two trains of LNG without influencing the
operation activity for the production of LNG and LNG export that pass the jetty. At
operation phase, area at radius of 620 meter at all side of LNG jetty will be Closed

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-35
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Area for other ship traffic utility for the safety reason (safety exclusion zone).
Figure 2.16 shows closed area for the safety of LNG jetty and combo dock. Width
of closed area is calculated according to the gas spreading study result of LNG and
condensate, which is possibly leaked during filling activity to the tanker. Beside of
closed area, area of territorial water with diameter 750 m in front of LNG jetty is
also needed for tanker maneuver basin.

b. Pre-Construction
Local people and commercial operator fisher have consulted the project. Included in
the consultation is the identification of communication and agreement about
problem solution process or the occasion that will be happen. The project has
started by communication process with the public jetty offices. The process is done
to get the construction and operation permission, the initiator will give information
all about the activities that have a relation with Donggi Senoro jetty to public jetty
developer. The activity from LNG Donggi Senoro will comply with the regulations of
jetty from Transportation Department

Pre-construction activities include studies, schedule preparation, permission, labors
mobility, and project equipments. The project region and extraordinary jetty will be
held around of coast of jetty location.

The details of Pre-Construction will be given if EPC contractor was selected and
labor and equipment mobility has been started. Constructions and Operational
region from extraordinary jetty will be placed near of jetty facilities.
The Laws and Regulations for construction and Operational the specific jetty are
mentionned in the 1st Chapter.
Specific jetty construction is a part of LNG Refinery construction. The labor
recruitment will be done together with refinery labor recruitment. In the general,
labor qualification is divided into 2 (two) community, they are skilled labor and
supported labor. The skilled labors are manager, surveyor, designer, heavy
equipment operator, and welder. The supported labors are driver, operator
assistant, laborer, surveyor assistant, and the security. Almost of supported labors
comes from local people in Banggai.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-36
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Equipment and material mobility are come from sea transportation with ship or
tongkang. The contactor will build jetty and pioneer lay down around of LNG jetty
for equipment and material mobility, including the requirement of LNG Pre-
Construction activity.

c. Construction
1) Marine Facilities
There are three facilities to support LNG refinery operational. They are:
Pioneer Dock. Construction activity needs a specific pioneer dock. The pioneer
dock has function as an entry for LNG refinery construction and its facilities as
load container, such as bulldozer, excavator, loader, back hoe, dump truck,
etc. The load container of concrete work, sand, gravel, pipe, cable, etc, and
also the load containers of primary needs such as food, drink, fuel, etc. The
pioneer dock has size of 7 m x 20 m, minimum of draft height is 3.5 m, that
will support maximum capacity of 45 tons or 15 tons/m
2
. EPC contractor will
determine the location. Lay down pioneer will be built near the construction
equipment storage, sand, gravel, cement, stone water tank, and diesel engine
and office room also.
Beside, it will be considered to rent the pioneer dock from PT Sentral Banggai,
Sulawesi about 2 km from LNG refinery location. This jetty is regularly used as
heavy equipment mobility, rig digger, etc.

Specific J etty of LNG (Figure 2.19 and 2.23)
The operational phase needs a specific jetty for LNG export transportation.
Generally, size of LNG jetty is 17 m x 23.5 m, with 10 m height of sea level
(LAT-Lowest Astronomical Tide). The jetty is supported by stainless steel and
metal concrete. Digging does not need specific jetty operational. The specific
jetty will be to -13 m length of LAT. LNG Trestle consists of concrete structure.
ROW construction will be minimized with ROW width of 40 m.
The specific jetty facilities are:
Loading platform
Loading arm
Gang-way and tower
J ib crane

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-37
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Electrical quick lock
Fire safety
Fender
Sign board for landing
Laser equipment for speed measure closure to jetty area.
Portable monitoring unit
Anemometer
Rise and fall of tide measurement
Climate radar
Ship container monitoring system
Spotless of aquatic spoiling
Sea water dock and pump
Fire monitoring station

LNG jetty is completed with 4 (four) breasting dolphins and 6 (six) mooring
dolphins for dock and tether of tanker and it will be completed with two loading
arms. The one is used for LNG liquid transfer and the other for LNG gas.
Dolphin structure is designed to be capable in supporting horizontal and vertical
forces when the tank gets a dock in jetty.

In construction phase, causeway will be buried with solid material in shallow
marine surface in LNG jetty. A causeway is designed to minimize the disturbing
of abrasion in coast.

Except of three facilities mentioned above, to support the LNG train refiner, the
platform will be built to take seawater for firewater. The platform of pump and
seawater taking are located at trestle in a area with depth of -10 m LAT. This
platform has size of 20 m x 20 m and will pump seawater to LNG jetty and uses
for desalination unit requirement at LNG refinery.

2) Offshore Construction Activity
The Figure 2.19 is a design of berth tanker of LNG. Mooring and breasting
dolphins are related to the LNG jetty.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-38
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM






























Figure 2.19 The Design of Cast Anchor Placed of LNG Tanker
Figure 2.20 Dock Height of LNG Tanker in Dock Facility

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-39
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM






























Figure 2.21 Site Plan of LNG J etty
Figure 2.22 The Design of Concrete Work at Dock Ship of LNG Tanker

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-40
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
















Area and construction permission will be acquired from Transportation
Department. The activity schedule of offshore construction will support the LNG
refinery development necessity. The construction programs includes:
Construction of specific pioneer dock;
Construction of LNG jetty, trestle, mooring and berthing dolphin;
Construction and placement of trestle structure/specific port of LNG; and
Construction of water taking placement for fire extinguishing and desalination.

The Construction activity of specific port is a part of refinery construction and
constructed in 40 months. Equipments that will be used for specific port
construction are pile hammer, crane barge, and bucket dredger (clamp shell).
Erosion potential and accretion in the nearest area from port will be calculated
in the port design.


Figure 2.23 The 3D Design of Ship Dock of LNG Tanker

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-41
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
LNG Trestle
Dredging
Dredging of temporary channel building trough mudness coast to coast line may
be needed for load activity in specific pioneer dock. PERTAMINA and partner will
consult the ADPEL to determine the remaining material of dredging activity. The
material from dredging activity of pioneer dock is estimated to be 10,000 m
3
.
Dredging activity will be done with clamp shell with capacity of 5 m
3
. Detail
design and building technique of port, trestle, and road crossing, including the
dredging method, designed by EPC. PERTAMINA and they will guarantee that
chosen methods will make a minimize impact to environment.

d. Port Operation Phase
1) Load Containing LNG Product
The LNG product that will be loaded from specific port will be connected to the
coast facility with trestle way along of 100 m. LNG ship has size of 85,000 to
137,000 m
3
that can dock in this port to load the LNG product. It is estimated
that there will be 30 LNG ships per year per train. These ships do not maximize
their fuel as long as they were in Uso Port. Load of LNG product will be done
with pump LNG from production tank to tank through loading arm. Load speed
of LNG is 5,000 m
3
/hour, so the tank load will require 24 hours. The others
ships is prohibited to get close in radius of 620 m around of LNG Specific Port.

2) Tongkang Traffic for Construction Phase
Material moved from buried area to LNG refinery area will be done with
tongkang. Every tongkang can load buried material about 5,000 m
3
with
traveling frequency of 150 to 200 per travel. The ship frequency that is needed
to load the material and equipment of construction depends on construction a
method that was applied with EPC Contractor, so it is not estimated yet. The
others supplies for LNG refinery construction, specific port, jetty, and piping
construction will be loaded to project location with tongkang or ship.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-42
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

3) Design and Offshore Safety
The facility design is considering:
a) Guide man
All of ship that come and go to Specific Port of Donggi Senoro Project will
be guided by certified guide man. The guide man is selected by PERTAMINA
PKK in coordination with Head of Harbor (Sea Transportation Department).
b) Navigation Tools
The placement of navigation tool will help all ship, including LNG tanker
(carrier) arrival and departure from harbor. This tool will be placed in the
sea to make ship safer without disturbing itself and the permanent structure
in that area. It can also prevent disturbance to the environment.
Navigation tool will be placed to state structure and float to give a shallow
water sign, such as sand route to west-north from terminal and give
navigation to arrival and departure of ships. The detail location and
navigation tool is shown in Figure 3.61, but the final decision of navigation
placement will be stated by EPC Contractor.
Voyage navigation that will be used consists of 2 tools; they are fixed light
and floating. The criterion of navigation system is estimated by Indonesia
Navigation Standard and IALA Marine Voyage System.
Adding instrument that will be used as a navigation tool, including an
electronic detection system, such as docking display board, laser rate of
approach docking sensor, vessel load monitoring system and Tsunami Early
Warning System.

c) Anchorage Area
Two regions of anchorage area are determined for ships that use sea
facilities at Donggi Senoro project. One region is especially for LNG tanker
and ones for the other ship.

d) Safety Buffer Zone in the Around of Tanker Ship
The main purpose of exclusion zone is to prevent the accident between LNG
tanker and the other ship because there are some container ship, passenger
ship, and fishery ship in Tolo Strait that will have conflict with tanker ship of

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-43
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
LNG. So this zone will shift the small ship or fishery ship or passenger ship
to the other route. An exclusion zone width is 2.4 km (1.3 nmi) and 0.8 m
(0.5 nmi) to ships stern and the other side that will be determine. Exclusive
zone is complying with the regulation of LNG canal industry. Although this
operational will disturb a fishery operational and coast traffic in a specific
range time, but this operational will minimize impacts for protecting LNG
ship tanker and its route will not disturb the safety of other ship.

e) The Close Area for Safety Purpose around the Specific Port
There is criterion to prevent ship from entering the region near from the
Specific Port. This is can viewed from two sides, they are firstly guarantee
that there is no ship will arrive to specific port region or ship as source of
fire when it has an accidental of gas or condensate release, second purpose
is to guarantee that terminal security is not for the one thing that can be
compromise.
The closed area for specific port safety is determine based on risk analyze
that estimated from maximum spolling of LNG from ship at specific port.

The closed area for safety purpose was in radius of 620 meter from Specific
Port. Beside that, the turning basin of LNG tanker will require diameter of
750 meter from LNG port.

At this distance, security aspect of Specific Port of LNG from LNG tanker
was estimated by international standard of LNG industry.

Safety signs and two kinds of port navigation (fixed and floating lights) will
equip closed area for safety in the marine are around the port. Monitoring
area will be coordinated with Head of Sea Transportation.

f) Tugboat
Tugboats will accompany LNG and condensate tanker to and from
direction station to tether location, and will ready for the ship to guarantee
the safety of closed area. The purpose of tugboats is helping an LNG and
condensate tanker from and to the tether location. If there is a tethered

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-44
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
ship, tugboats will help the ship in an emergency and fire from condensate
spilling. LNG tanker needs three tugboats for ship maneuver and get tether
at port. Beside that, some help will be given by Mooring Master through join
program with Sea Transportation Department. Donggi Senoro project, and
must be planned to supply for tugboats (three tugboats will be used, and
one as a spare ship)

4) Ballast Water
Ballast water is water that carried by drain tanker to preserve a ship stability.
Blast water tank in LNG tanker is separated from LNG load tank and it minimizes
the hydrocarbon content. Refers to MARPOL regulation, bilge water will be
placed to separate compartment of production tank. This can prevent a
contamination of oil/lubricant in ballast water. Ship will be completed with pre-
separation of ballast water. Ballast water separation or filter system must
produce effluent with oil residue not more than 15 ppm. Ballast water of LNG
tanker will be treated before discharged to the sea in specific port or from the
location where ship get upload. Ballast water exchange will be done in seashore
far away from bay (in seashore after departure from foreign port and 50 nmi
from Tolo Bay). The ballast water exchange must be recorded for verification at
specific record of Donggi Senoro LNG. Personnel of LNG Donggi Senoro project
will responsible for all marine activity and will always follow up the research
development about ballast water management, and if there is a new system of
ballast water management economically, the Donggi Senoro will consider to
apply that system in special project for Donggi Senoro. Exchange and discharge
of ballast water from condensate tanker will have the same treatment with LNG
tanker. Ballast water of LNG tanker does not need a pre-treatment in waste
water treatment, because it is not contaminated sea water, so it can be
discharged to the sea directly. The same principle will be applied to Arun and
Badak LNG refinery

LNG Donggi Senoro project want to use all tanker and ship and follow the
regulation from Non-Indigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevetion and Control Act of
1990 (USA), dan IMOs/MARPOLs voluntary ballast water management
guidelines (Guidelines for the Control and Management of Ships Ballast Water
to Minimize the Transfer of Harmful Aquatic Organisms and Pathogens,

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-45
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Resolution A.868[20] 1998) that suitable with Indonesia operational condition,
especially at Berau/Bintuni Bay. The guideline said that every ship carrying the
ballast water must be completed with ballast water management planning to
minimize and exchange aquatic organism and pathogen. This case will be
further explorated in Environmental Management Planning. Besides, sanitation
water waste is considered to sanitation water waste quality based on Kep
52/MENLH/1995.
Until know, it is not really know how LNG marine aspect will do, but almost can
be sure that it is not a part from LNG Donggi Senoro project. LNG consumer
showed that they will participate in transportation, in this case PERTAMINA
assumed that LNG ship loader will responsible for their ballast water
management and will make a program of ballast water exchange at seashore.

5) Ship Waste Container Facility
The water that is contaminated with oil or oily residue must be thrown away
from the ship. This waste will be put to vacuum truck with capacity of 5,000
liter. Vacuum truck will carry the waste to the water treatment unit in LNG
refinery, and the treatment water will be discharged to the produced water
location.

Recovered oil and residue from ships that have operated in combo dock will
handled with vacuum truck. The choice of discharge process is outside the
location or mix with condensate.

6) Construction and Operational Waste
The waste will be collected together with the other waste that comes from LNG
refinery, because the operational can be separated between constructions and
operational of LNG refinery and specific port. More than that, the waste that will
be produced from LNG refinery is a largest portion, so the waste from other
activity will be managed in waste treatment in LNG refinery.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-46
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

7) Safety and Health Environment
LNG, condensate, diesel oil is an easily burned material. So, there must be an
estimation of fire safety in specific port design. Detection facility and fire
extinguishing was prepared in taker or dock to handle of fire accident promptly.

e. Post-Operational
Specific port will get a decommissioning in the closing phase of LNG refinery.
Specific port will have a part of decommissioning process and project closing for the
others facilities will be scheduled five years before LNG refinery schedule.

5. Refinery Infrastructure
In-Plant Infrastructure
The Facility of In-plant Infrastructure is not part of the main processing system, offsite
or utility. In-plant infrastructure facility consists of the building, barracks and fence. The
Refinery is expected to include, but not limited to the following areas:
Monitoring Room
Maintenance Workshop
Warehouse
Laboratory
Rest room / sholat (praying room)
Post of Fire-extinguisher and emergency situation

Public Infrastructure
Public Infrastructure covers all facilities that are needed to support the personnel
required to operate and maintain GPF and LNG Refinery. Public infrastructure is facility
which is located outside the project area. Public infrastructure will include but not
limited to the facilities mentioned below:
Refinery Administration Building
Medication Facility
Canteen
Religious Facility
Recreation Facility / athletic activity
Water and electricity equipment
Facility for collecting and processing wet and dry waste

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-47
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Security activity
Public Communications
Otorita Banda Activity
Tax and immigration
Training facility

2.3. THE ACTIVI TY PLAN PREDICTED TO CAUSE IMPACTS

Matindok Gas Development Project consists of two separated activities; Upstream Activity
and Downstream Activity. Upstream activity includes exploration activities and gas
exploitation; these activities are limited only at gas transmission pipe assembling activity, while
the downstream activities includes the construction and the operational of LNG Refinery, specific
jetty and its supporting facilities. Every phase of Upstream Activity and Downstream
Activity for Matindok Gas Development Project activity plan will be described as follows:

2.3.1 Upstream Activity

A. Pre-Construction Phase
The activity plan components at pre-construction phase which potentially generate the
impact include Land and Plants Acquisition and Labour Recruitment.
1. Land and Plants Acquisition
At the location for the development wells, pipe installation and production unit, there
will be land and plants acquisition. The land to be acquired is about 295 Ha, which is
divided into: 68 Ha for 17 location of drilling wells, 33 Ha for MS&BS/GPF, 14 Ha
for flow line pipe route, 120 Ha for truck line pipe route and 60 Ha for the
construction or the development of new road. The land to be acquired should not be
settlement areas. The land acquisition process and compensation of plants will be
executed by Panitia Sembilan. This land acquisition will be either buying/selling
according to the agreement. These activites give potency to change the society mindset
about activity plan.

In case of land acquisition activity,it is assumed to create impacts about the change of
society land ownership which will be followed by the change of land function and
change of livelihood society. The land owned by communities and company, will be

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-48
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
acquired through selling process, while land owned by Department of Forestry will
through renting.

The increasing of public income will make a positive perception, but if the land
acquisition does not consider the owner request, it will make a social conflict, that finally
will make a negative public perception to the plan activity.

2. Labour Recruitment
The labour for construction works has to be Indonesian, and there is only limited
exception number of experts, which is not available in Indonesia. The recruitment of
labour will be conducted according to the valid law and regulation. Local people who
meet the qualification for the certain of work will be recruited. There is possibility to
take labours from outside of project area, if the labour needed cannot be fulfilled by
local resident. During construction phase, there will be camps operational and
development to provide settlement, food, water, medical treatment, and other
important needs for the worker.

Labours for development wells drilling is 118 workers, with various skill. Those various
labours will be classified into skill labours are about 108 workers and non-skill labours
are about 10 workers. Total number, eligibilities and required specification of labour
needed for drilling of development wells is presented in Table 2.5. Requirement of
specification and total labour of Block Station development is presented in Figure 2.23.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-49
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 2.5. Required Specification and Total Number of Labours
For Drilling Development Wells

No Specification/ Position
Certificate that
must be owned
Total
(person)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Company Man
K2LL
Rig Superintendent
Wallsite Supevisor
Wireline Service Company
Cementing Service Company
Mud Logging Service Company
Well testing Service Company
Mud Engineering Service Company
Casing Crew Service Company
Administration Rig
General Service Company
Camp Service
Catering Service
Security Service
Tool Pusher
Driller
Floorman
Derrickman (Drill Tower Operator)
Crane Operator
Store Keeper
Roustabout
Medical
Chief Mechanic
Mechanic Staf
Welder
Electrician
AP-3

AP-3
AP-3











AP-3
J B-3
OBL
OMB
SLO
-
OLB

-

Min. G-5
2
2
2
2
5
6
6
4
3
3
2
2
8
8
6
3
3
12
33
3
3
12
2
2
10
2
2
Total 118


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-50
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 2.6. Required Specification and Total Number of Labours
for Block Station Development (per BS)
Specification Number Total
BS Development
1. Non-Skill Labours
a. Security
b. Office boy
c. Housemaid
d. Digging worker
e. Assistant of worker for civil work
f. Worker for civil work
g. Water Pipe Welder
h. Driver for passenger vehicle



4
2
2
20
20
15
5
5



Sum 73
2. Skill Labours
a. Engineer project
b. Drafter
c. Foremen
d. Hard equipments operator
e. Rotation engine operator
f. Mechanic
g. Driver for hard equipments

10
4
6
5
5
5
4


Sum 39
Total 112


The development of gas transmission will require skilled and non-skilled labours. The
number of labours required for the project is 156 people with the specification as
presented in Table 2.7.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-51
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 2.7. Requirement of Specification and Total Number of Labour
For Development of Gas Transmission
Specification Number Total
Pipe Line Development
1. Non-Skill Labours
a. Digging worker
b. Pipe worker
c. Office boy
d. Driver for light vehicle



20
20
4
10



Sum 54
2. Skill Labours
a. Hard equipments operator
b. Certified Welder
c. Foreman
d. Engineer
e. Surveyor
f. Driver for hard equipments

10
32
6
10
4
10







Sum 72
Total 156


The pipe fabrication and other construction equipment which are conducted outside
activity location also indirectly need labours, both skilled and non-skilled.

The labour for construction works has to be Indonesian and there is only limited
exception number of experts, which is not available in Indonesia. Local people who
meet the qualification for the certain work will be recruited.

Due to the high needed of labours which are involved in these construction activities,
the amount of local labours does not enough to fulfill specific positions needed;
especially for the qualified and certified labours. So that, this reality will potentially
create social jealousy especially for local people who are not recruited as project

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-52
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
labours, besides will potentially create positive perception about this project activitiy
when being reqruited as labours.


B. Construction Phase
The upstream construction of Matindok gas Development Project is classified into 3 related
activities which are described as follows;
1) Construction for well drilling preparation
2) BS and GPF construction
3) Installation of gas transmission pipes.

During the construction activity, a program will be conducted to control the removal of
construction waste according to the Regulation of Indonesian Environment. The proponent
will develop a plan to guide the monitoring program, based on procedure of waste
management of Pertamina EP contractor. This is to assure the implementation of the
regulation. The activity component of construction phase and specific waste also its
predicted impacts will be explained as follows:

1. Mobility and Demobility of Equipments, Material and Labours
Transportation activity of equipment and material, and also labours for the field
development will use the sea and land transport service to the location of piping plan
and gas production facility. The mobility and demobility activities of hard equipments
and materials which will be transported by huge vehicles will potentially create a noisy
environment, dust, traffic jam and influence the society activities. Besides, if the
tonnage vehicle or material vehicle cross the public roads and its capacity exceed the
road class, it will create road damages and increase the risk of accident.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-53
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
2. Opening and Land Clearing
The activity of land clearing and preparation include:
a) Cutting and removing trees and shrubs from project location, which is the width of
area are matched with the land necessity.
b) Cutting and filling will be conducted to prepare the location of project wells, piping
and production facility. The filling material will not be imported, but will be taken
from local material as a result of cut and fill operation in the rolling area of the ROW
pipe location.
c) For the ROW that crosses natural drainage and rivers, channels will be built at
natural drainage/river with 2 meter width.

The activity of opening and land clearing will be conducted these wastes as follow:
a) Opening land flattening and hardening for facilities (such as base camp, street,
and lay down area) will be conducted, at least as the footprint area, which is
needed to support the work safety. There is anticipation for not taking material from
outside of the project area. The exceed number of cutting material will be placed in
allocated offsite area.
b) Sanitation Waste - Sanitation Waste coming from camp worker will be managed in
the location.
c) Garbage - Solid Waste that comes from worker camp will be piled up in the location.
d) Gas Emission from Diesel Engine - Electric power for worker camp will be supplied
by a diesel generator. The engine will be equipped with emission standard controller
and will use the low sulphur diesel fuel to minimize sulphur dioxide emission.
e) Exhausting Emission of equipment and motorized vehicle - Operation of construction
equipments and personnel vehicle will generate the exhaust emission in a small
number.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-54
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The activity of opening and land clearing will make negative impacts, such as:
a) Opening, flattening and land hardening opening the entrance way and wells
development, BS/GPF, pipe installation and facilities (base camp, road, laydown
area) will be held by cutting and flattening the footprint to support a safety work.
This activity will make a recoveryless of land by vegetation so can change a micro
climate, make a faster water runoff, make a higher risk, dust, noise that comes from
the engines.
b) The existence of labours in the camps for a long time wil affects the environment
sanitation and solid waste. Besides, the throwing gas from diesel engine in the
camp will decrease the local air quality.
c) Sanitation waste Sanitation waste which comes out from the labour camp will be
processed according to the domestic waste processing.
d) Line cleaning for the pipe which cut the irigation channel and small river has
potention to disturb water flow.

The positive impact from the activity is a business opportunity if the local society has
intention to open the bussiness, such as food stall, raw material distributor for the food
stall, goods, etc in order to fulfill the labour needs.

3. Construction Activity of Block Station (BS) and GPF Gas Production Facilities
Construction activity of BS and GPF gas production facilities will be conducted in 3
locations; Sukamaju, Donggi and Matindok. Generally, the construction activity includes;
a) Foundation structure development and its facilities for production and drilling
preparation needs.
b) Building and equipment installation
c) Piping System Activity
d) Electrical and instrument activity

The construction of Support facilities on Gas Production in land generate waste, such
as:
a) Pigging and Hydrotest
Pigging is cleaning activity of waste or garbage inside of pipe which is probably left
during pipe installation. Pigging is done by cleaner equipment (polyurethane pig)
which is put inside pipe and pushed by air compressor so this pig reaches into the

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-55
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
end of pipe. The pigging facilities include pig launcher and pig receiver which are
put to the front and the back of pipe point. Pigging is done twice, first in pipe
installation especially for every pipe obstruction and the second one after
hydrostatic test.
Hydrostatic test is done after all pipe installation activities are completely installed
and to execute this test needs 20.000 m
3
amount of water. This test is divided into
several segments; at Donggi area uses water from Karya River which is located
about 300 m from Block Station and has water debit 2.25 m
3
/second, Matindok area
uses water from Kayoa River which is located 50 m from block Station and has the
water debit about 4.25 m
3
/second, Sukamaju area uses river water which is located
about 300 m from Block Station and has water debit 0.025 m
3
/second, these
activities are purposed to know the properness level of pipe (leaking possibility and
the pressure endurance).
Water from river is flowed by using pump to the tank (Water Pond) then water is
flowed by using centrifugal pump until full capacity and no air inside, then it is
pressured until the required pressure is reached. This pressing process uses
Displacement Pump (Plunger Pump) as pressor which its pressure is 1.5 times form
work pressure. This pressure will be held for a specific time and monitoring will be
done by using the manometer and reading the recorded pressure which is displayed
on pressure recorder equipment and direct monitoring will be carried out along the
tested line.
The water medium for hydrostatic test pipe is not completed with chemical
materials. Once the hydrostatic test is completed, water can be flowed directly to
the body of water slowly in order to prevent the increasing of water debit and flow
current significantly.

b) Diesel Engine Emission The Electric power for worker camp is generated with
diesel engine. The engine will be equipped with the emission standard controller
and will use low sulphur fuel to minimize the emission of sulphur dioxide.
c) Equipments Cleaning Prior to commissioning, equipment will be cleaned internally.
Wastewater from the cleaning activity will be handled the same as hydro test water.
d) Discharged Vapour from generator/vessel ventilation - Operation of electrical
generator and small number of vessel ventilation during commissioning will be
released into the air.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-56
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
e) Grit (sand blasting material) - Small number of grit from operation of sand blasting
will be released to the environment.
f) Spilled fuel material or paint The spills from activity location will be kept and
collected for final disposal.
g) Dredging - the waste from dredging result of soil will be piled in to some location
and it can be re-used.
h) Debris from Stone disposal - Stone Debris is piled up in some designated location.
i) Sanitation Waste - water from sanitation waste will be collected and processed until
it complies with standard before it is disposed to the river.

The gas production facilities which include BS construction are predicted to cause the
environment impact such as:
a) The gas thrown from the diesel engine and electricity generator also vehicle project
will decrease the local air quality.
b) The mobility of project vehicle and engines used for the construction activity will
cause noise and increasing the level of dust.
c) Water-based drilling mud and unpoisoned drilling mud for the development wells,
cutting during the drilling, ex-hydrotest water, equipment cleaning before
comisioning which are flowed in to the river will decrease the local river quality, and
because it flows in to the sea, it will decrease the quality of seawater and affect the
sea biota.
d) Accidental spills of kind of material from the fuel will decrease river water quality.
e) A huge water needed for the hydrotest which taken from the river will decrease the
river discharge.
f) A labours domestic waste potentially decreases the quality of environment
sanitation.

The responsibility of construction and commissioning of BS and GPF facilities will be
conducted to the main contractor of PT PERTAMINA EP.

The project execution will be based on material supply as much as available in
Indonesia, and the project execution will reqruit the local labours. Most of sources
needed such as equipments, materials, services and contractor worker are available in
Indonesia, while fuel supplier, lubricants and other construction materials are not

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-57
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
available around the project location. Sand, agregat, and wood plate are probably
available in Banggai district or its surroundings.
BS and GPF construction and other related facilities construction activities give the
positive impact such as:
a) A business opportunity if the local society has intention to open the bussiness, such
as food stall, raw material distributor for the food stall, goods, etc in order to fulfill
the labour needs.
b) Society positive perception due to electricity installation along with its equipments,
the society can get benefit from these streets illumination although it is limited on
project location.


4. Piping Installation for Gas Distribution
Piping Installation for gas distribution (trunkline) from Donggi Block Station to LNG Plant
will be designed three alternative ways as follows:
a) Alternative-1, the piping installation from BS Donggi crosses SM Bakiriang which
contiguous to province street, pipe positioning will be digged into 2 m depth then
pilled. Piping installation technic is generally similar with normal treatment, which
are;
Minimum using of hard equipments
Temporary digging pipe hole, by using pre-tech method. Once the piping
installment is completed, pipe is planted and the digging hole is immediately
pilled.
Not working at the night time
There is no specific inspection road for pipe but using the province street which
has been available.

b) Alternative-2, the piping installation which crosses SM Bakiriang is done by
horizontal or Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) system. Pipe is located inside the
land by drilling horizontally before entering SM Bakiriang. Due to the land used of
SM Bakiriang is about 3 km, so that every 1 km distance, there is land using for
drilling and connecting activity. About 2 Ha width areas is needed to drilling
activity area at the next segment and pipe connection.

c) Alternative-3, the piping installation form BS DOnggi will be done through the
bottom of SM Bakiriang sea about 4 km length. Based on difficulties level,

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-58
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
installation technic and maintenance cost analysis, the third alternative way is
relatively the most expensive.
The alternative-2 and alternative-3 are proposed to prevent the damages at Bakiriang
field as wildlife reserve, although there are illegal people who have been known and
cleared away the forest at SM Bakiriang at present.

a. Land Lines
First Altrernative
On the land lines, most of the pipes will be installed with the closest distance 200 m
from the province road in to the 2 m depth. The land pipelines will cut several
highways and rivers. Those pipes consist of:
Eight (8) large rivers, with 5 8.5 m depth and 80 102 m width. The installation
method used is Pull laying with concrete weight
Twelve (12) small rivers, with 1.5 3 m depth and 20 80 m width. The
installation method used is open cut system.
One (1) location of large swamp with 0.5 1.5 m depth dan 300 m width. The
installation method used is pull laying with concrete weight.
Two (2) locations of small swamp with 0.4 1.5 m depth dan 100 m width. The
installation method used is Pull laying with concrete weight.

Figure 2.33 describes the pipe installation technic which cuts the highways.










Figure 2.33. Typical Highway Crossing Design

2 MTR TOP CASING
BOP CASING
VENT
VENT
ROADAREA

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-59
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Principally, the technics of pipe instalation that cross the higway and river will be
the same. The pipe planted 2 meter down from the surface around the highway
(general common level) and coated by the isolator and pipe casing. If those pipe
line cross the river channel, the pipe will be planted across the river and it is
installed 2 meter minimal in the river bed.














Figure 2.34. Typical River Crossing Pipe Design
Under the River Bed
The pipe transmission design is adhered to the code and standard of the
government regulation, including gas composition, class location, corrosive factor
and strength higher-level factor. Therefore, the pipe is expected to be highly
reliable. The pipe also protected by cathode and wrapped by the external blanket
(external coating) to protect the pipe from external corrosion.

After the activity of land clearing and land maturation has been finished, then the
activity of gas pipe installation is conducted as follows:
1) Land digging to plant the pipe,
2) Pipe welding at pipe location,
3) Radiography test,
4) Pipe placement,
2 m 2 m
pipeline
2 m

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-60
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
5) Pipe installation,
6) Hydrotest,
7) Cleaning/draining in the pipe (pigging).

The Instalation Activity of Gas Distribution Pipe potentially caused impact as follows.
a) Spreading, decreasing, and planting pipe will disturb the social activity of the
local people around the highway in doing their daily activity until the pipe
planted in to the certain places. Besides, this activity will cause noise and dust.
b) The pipe installations which cut the highways will be potential disrupt the
smooth traffic flow and the traffic safety.
c) After the pipe installed, the hydrotest will be done by the water from the
nearest water sources. The former hydrotest water will be dumped through the
river suitable with valid regulation, but still potentially has an impact to the river
water quality.

Second Alternative
Alternative-2, piping installation which crosses SM Bakiriang is done by horizontal or
Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) system. As previously description, pipe is
located inside the land by drilling horizontally before entering SM Bakiriang. Due to
the land used of SM Bakiriang is about 3 km, so that every 1 km distance, there is
land using for drilling and connecting activity. About 2 Ha width areas is needed
to drilling activity area at the next segment and pipe connection.

b. Sea Line
The gas pipe installation from BS Donggi for this third altenative will be done trough
the bottom of SM Bakiriang sea about 4 km length. Based on difficulties level,
installation technic and maintenance cost analysis, the third alternative way is
relatively the most expensive.

The fabrication facility is located in land and the material is transported to site using
boat. Resources for construction will mostly be available at boat and supporting
ship, and only a few logistics and material will be required from team at land. It is
estimated that only few resource needed from land, such as fuel and other goods
including temporary camp facilities. However, installation and construction of
pipeline in the coast will need a small team that is based in land.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-61
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Construction activities related to the offshore pipe development are divided into the
fabrication and installation of pipeline in the coast. The construction will be divided
into following phases:
1). Fabrication in Land - Parts of structural pipe are fabricated, assembled and
tested as a complete functional unit in workshop fabrication in land.
2). Transportation to Location - Pipe that has been pre-assembled will be
transported from fabrication site to offshore of SM Bangkiriang using special
boat.
3). Offshore Installation - this marine construction phase involves the foundation
and pipe installation.

After setting up the foundation pillar, then all pipe components and equipment will be
joined and prepared for commissioning. There will be a ship for underwater work if it is
needed.
Pipe designed for the distribution pipe will be fabricated, corrosion coated and
concrete coated at fabrication site and then they will be transported to the location
to be constructed. There are areas at sea beds which are consisted of sand wave
and possibly will require dredging at some part. The distribution pipe will be directly
placed at seabed refers to the Ministre Decree of Energy and Mining
No.300.K/38/M.PE/1997 date April 28, 1997 regarding on Work Safety of Oil and
Natural Gas Pipe Distributor. Platform risers may have been pre-installed at the
distribution pipe, depending on the detailed engineering and assessment of the
environmental condition. Figure 2.35 shows technic of the gas pipe installation at
under water.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-62
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM










Figure 2.35. Underwater Pipe Construction


The offshore distribution pipe is channeled to in land facility through a part referred
as shore approach of distribution pipe. This place usually represents as the
transition between distribution pipe under the sea in coastline and that in land.
Shoreline approach of distribution pipe will be developed using the conventional
open-ditch method. Ditch will be made from mud plain of near coast to a location in
land. Distribution pipe will be installed in the ditch and re-buried using the local soil
or amethyst rock. According to Indonesian regulation, the distribution pipe in shore
must be placed in the ditch and buried until 2 m of depth and 12 m of water depth.
Shore approach construction methods of medium distribution pipe are being studied
in order to get the alternative solutions.

Pre-commissioning of distribution pipe. Pre-commisioning or hydrostatic test
will not use corrosion inhibitor, but use freshwater. Distribution pipe will be cleaned
and measured before the water is discharged. This will be conducted using air,
compressor and pig trains along with dewatering, drying and purging process.

There are several efforts which have been done to pipe ROW for security and safety
purpose:
The organizing of warning signals to the area of ROW
Regularly checking (pipe checker)
2 m
2 m
2 m

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-63
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Regularly ROW maintenance

The pipe line will be compiled with Emergency Shutdown Valve (ESDV) or Local
Block Control Valve (LBCV) to anticipate if the pipe leaking is occurred, either at
land area or sea area. Amount of the released fluids or gas when the pipe leaking
is occurred about 45 MMSCF.

Activities related to the Development of Installation of Pipe line & Shore Approach
potentially generate the following waste:
a) Hydro test water Prior to Pre-Commissioning of facility and distribution pipe,
the fresh water will be used for pressure-container hydro test and distribution
pipe. After several times of hydro test, the water which is 20,000 m
3
will be
discharged into the sea.
b) Gas Emission of Diesel Engine - A diesel generator which supplies the electric
power for worker camp. Those engines will be equipped with a standard
emission controller and will use the low sulphur fuel to minimize the emission of
sulphur dioxide.
c) Equipment Cleaning - before commissioning, equipment will be cleaned
internally. Wastewater will be handled similar the hydro test water.
d) Gas Emission of generator/vessel ventilation The operation of the electric
power generator and small number of vessel ventilation during commissioning
will produce emission gas that will be released into the air and will be observed
periodically.
e) Grit (sand blasting material) - Small number of grit from operation of sand
blasting will be released to environment.
f) Spilling - There will be distributor construction activity which possibly result in
small spill out from barge.

The construction of pipe installation for alternative-3 at coastal area of Bankiriang
Wild life Conservation area will generate several negative impacts, such as:
a) The emmision gas from diesel machine and electricity generator will decrease
local air quality.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-64
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
b) Several spilled material, dredging and debris will cause coral reef damage (if it
is exist).
c) Unpurposed spilling of material, fuel will decrease water quality and give impact
to the sea biota.
d) Coral Reef damage.
e) Sea damage especially the damage of lay eggs locations of Maleo bird.
f) The high level of land necessity will potentially cause nervouseness and
uneasiness to the local society regarding on the compensation of land
acquisition.

The positive impact from the activity is a business opportunity if the local society
has intention to open the bussiness, such as food stall, raw material distributor for
the food stall, goods, etc in order to fulfill the labour needs.


5. Dismissing Labour
By the end of gas production operation and LNG Refinery, labour will be dismissed in
phases until the end of job contract in each unit. The dismissing process is according to
the regulation of labour force. The dismissing labour activity will cause negative impact
such as decreasing public employment and public income, decreasing the local
economic value, negative perception of society, and increasing the number of
unemployment.


C. Operational Phase
1. Labour Recruitment
There are large numbers of labours recruited for gas production and operational of LNG
Refinery, some of them are skilled labour that fit the company requirement, and the
others are non-skilled labours. The labour recruitment is according to the valid
regulation.

a. Labour recruitment for GPF/BS

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-65
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Number of personel needed for operational of GPF of initial phase depends on
chosen processing option. Table 2.25 shows estimated number and specification of
labours for the operational of each GPF unit, approximately 26 people.

Table 2.8. Requirement of Specification and Total Number of Labours
Operational in One Unit of GPF/ BS
No Specification Sum up Total
1.





2.
Un-skill personel
a. Office-Boy
b. Cleaning services
c. Driver for passenger vehicle
d. Security

Skill Personel
a. Production Operator
b. Production Foreman

4
4
2
4
sum

8
4
sum





14



12
Total 26


b. Labour recruitment for gas transmission, sulphur and condensate transportation
activities.

The number of labours required for the gas transmission, sulphur and condensate
transportation project is about 28 people (Table 2.9).




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-66
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 2.9. Specification Requirement and Total Number of Labours for
gas Transmission, Sulphur and Condensate Transportation
Activities
No Specification Sum Up Total
1.



2.
Un-skill Labour
a. Office-Boy
b Driver of light vehicle

Skill Labour
a. Pipe checker
b. Operator of hard equipments
c. Foreman
b. Driver of heavy vehicle

2
6
Sum

14
2
2
2
Sum



8





20
Total 28


The labour recruitment will have negative impacts to social anxiety for local labour
that can not be involved in employee recruitment and social stratification. This
condition will potentially generate negative perception from society, but in the other
side, there will be a positive impact to project plan for them who could be involved
as an employee and opening a change for small business in livestock supply.

2. The Development Wells Drilling
The development wells at Donggi, Minahaki, Matindok, Sukamaju and Maleoraja will be
drilled by using land-rig which has suitable capacity with the depth needed. The drilling
equipments are provided by blow out preventer, Standard Operational Procedure (SOP)
and emergency respon plan. Once the hard equipments are completely used, they will
be mobilized and demobilized by heavy vehicle. The operational of development wells
drilling will have impact as follows;
a) The drilling mud all wells will be drilled by water-based mud with un-poisonous
properties. The reservoir drilling will be done by using low-toxicity, synthetic oil-
based or water-based mud.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-67
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
b) Cuttings the produced cuttings during the drilling process is about 3000 3800
bbl and it will be managed refers to the valid regulation.
c) Gas Emission of Diesel Engine - A diesel generator which supplies the electric power
for worker camp. Those engines will be equipped with a standard emission
controller and will use the low sulphur fuel to minimize the emission of sulphur
dioxide.
d) Dredging - the waste from dredging result of soil will be piled in to some location
and it can be re-used.
e) Debris from Stone disposal - Stone Debris is piled up in some designated location.
f) Sanitation Waste - water from sanitation waste will be collected and processed until
it complies with standard before it is disposed to the river.

The drilling activity of development wells that are located at Donggi, Minahaki,
Matindok, Sukamaju and Maleoraja structure may generate these following impacts:
a) The throwing gas from diesel engine and electric power station will decrease the
local air quality and also dangerous for people.
b) Water-based drilling mud and unpoisoned drilling mud for the development wells,
cutting during the drilling, ex-hydrotest water, equipment cleaning before
comisioning which are flowed in to the river will decrease the local river quality, and
because it flows in to the sea, it will decrease the quality of seawater and affect the
sea biota,as well.
c) Accidental spills of kind of material from the fuel will decrease river water quality
and affect the sea biota.

The positive impact from the activity is a business opportunity if the local society has
intention to open the bussiness, such as food stall, raw material distributor for the food
stall, goods, etc in order to fulfill the labour needs.

3. Operational Production on Gas Production Facilities
The produced gas from entire gas wells will be flowed to gas production named Block
Station, after entering Header Manifold, gas will be flowed to separator. From BS, gas
which has been separated in the initial step then flowed to CO
2
and H
2
S removal plant
or AGRU (Acid Gas Removal Unit) and SRU (Sulphur Recovery Unit) to decrease the

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-68
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
concentration of CO
2
and H
2
S inside the produced gas, then gas will be dried on TEG
dehydration Unit (DHU) and its humidity is monitored by using DEW Point Control. Gas
which already complies with gas standard sale is measured with metering facility and
channeled through pipeline to the LNG refinery. Sulphur as a product of natural gas
separation in the form of cake/biosulphur could be used as fertilizer or landfill, while the
condensate is directly channeled to the tank, then it is transferred to Condensate
Collecting Tank of J OB Pertamina-Medco Tomori Sulawesi at Bajo, using road tank. Flare
is designed to handle 2 processes; first, to control and release the high-pressured light
gas at blow down condition; secondly, to release and fade away Gas emission with low
CO
2
particle.

The operational of Gas Production Facilities will produce waste, such as:
1) Waste containing Gas
a) Gas Emission from main equipment activator.
The main equipments, such as compressor, generator set and pumps, use gas
fuel engine. Gas emission from the combustion will be released into the air.
b) Gas emission from engine activator Electrical power back up uses diesel
generator. This engine is only used when the main gas turbine generator does
not work. Its gas emission will be released into the air.
c) Heat Stack gas of Regenerator glycol Regenerated glycol used in the drying
unit uses water vaporization which will be absorbed in the gas-flare heater. The
gas will be released through heater stack into the air.
d) Flare stack emission The flare stack is designed to handle 2 processes; first,
to control and release high-pressured light gas in an emergency situation;
secondly, to release and fade away the Gas emission which contain acid gas
with low CO
2
content. The emission can significantly increase during abnormal
operation, but the period is short.

2) Liquid Waste
a) Produced water Processing facility covers separation of produced water. The
produced water will be handled separately at wastewater processing installation
(IPAL), until it reaches wastewater standard quality before it is discharged.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-69
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
b) Liquid domestic waste waste from latrine will be processed in the septic tank,
while waste from the bathroom and kitchen will be directly discharged into the
river.
c) Waste from Surface Drain Rainwater which falls down at BS and GPF area will
be used as cleaner for the floor and/or production facilities that not contain
pollutant. Then the water will be channeled through drainage channel to the
river. Meanwhile, water for drying that contains pollutant will be channeled to
IPAL.

3) Solid Waste
a) Solid domestic waste The flammable organic solid waste is collected in the
temporary disposal site (TPS), and then it is dumped in the final disposal site
(TPA), to be burned. While non-flammable solid garbage, which is not
endangering the health, such as glass, plastic, and fiber, is separated to be
handled later.
b) Solid Industrial Waste - Chemicals coming from substance used in the processes
or waste produced by the process, such as used filters, cutting of waste
baskets, iron, strand of metal, lamp, accumulator, used chemicals plastic drum,
used oil, are collected and accommodated at locations which have been
specifically prepared, and later will be handled by third party who already have
license to manage hazardous waste.

This activity will cause negative impacts, such as society anxiety of the decreasing
of public facility in some activity location of pipe plantation. The other impact is the
disturbance of public safety from the gas pipe leakage which endangers the society
in vicinity.

The production operation of BS/GPF will generate waste which potentially affects
the environment, such as:
a) The waste that contain gas from emission of turbin generator, machine
activator, and flare stack will decrease local air quality.
b) The liquid waste from used formation water after processed to move away the
free oil contain will be thrown away to the river which can generate the
decreasing of surface water quality.
c) The on-well-handled solid waste of contractor employees from inside of BS/GPF
location will contaminate the environment.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-70
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

4. Gas Channeling through Pipe Line to LNG Plant
Gas transmission from BS/GPF pipe will be done by 2 alternative ways as follows:
First Alternative
Gas pipe construction from BS to LNG Plant will be directed by Pertamina (PPGM). Pipe
16 from BS Donggi will be connected with pipe 16 from BS Matindok at junction which
is located at Nonong village, then gas will be transmitted to LNG Plant by using pipe
18.

Second Alternative
Pipe from BS to LNG Plant will be compiled with the developed pipe from MEDCO
Tomori then pipe 16 from BS Donggi will be connected together at MEDCO junction
which is located at Sinorang village. Gas transmission will used pipe 32 to LNG Plant
and pipe 16 from BS Matindok will be compiled with pipe 32 (trunkline) MEDCO at
junction, Nonong village. The approximately of transmitted gas is about 300 MMFSCFD.
Inside of pipe inlet, there is custody to record or monitor the amount of transmitted gas.

The pipeline is designed to prevent the pipe and environment from disaster and
contamination, and avoid passing the settlement area. The pipe is equipped with a
wrapped layer (coating) to prevent corrosion and planted in land, in order to prevent
leakage and protect the pipe from damage. Stream and gas pressure is monitored
continuously to prevent any indication of pipe leakage. If there is any leakage symptom,
operator will immediately execute the SOP which has been determined according to
specific conditions that occur, especially for operational security action and insulation
system.

For the cleaning and safety of other technical operation, it needs pig launcher and
receiver at the gas channel, and equipped with venting.


5. Channeling Condensate using Land Transportation
Condensate that comes from Block Station separator is accomodated in tank before
transported to Sulphur and Condensate Accommodation Tank of the J OB Pertamina-
Medco Tomori Sulawesi in Bajo, Sinorang. Number of tank used is 2 (two), which are

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-71
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
operated interchanged. The oil/condensate from Block Station to Bajo will be
transported by road tank.

The activity of land transportation of condensate from gas production facility uses the
road tank to the condensate receiving tank location of J OB Pertamina-Medco Tomori
Sulawesi at Bajo. This activity will potentially disrupt the smooth traffic flow such as;
slowing down the speed of vehicle on the narrow road and will generate road damage
because of the heavy load vehicle. There will also increase the traffic accident.

6. Maintenance of Production Facility
Production facility maintenance activities are conducted periodically, depending on their
equipment type, for example maintenance of compressor, generator, pump, condensate
pile up tank, production well, pipe and street. These maintenance activities aim to the
dirt sweeping, repair and/or replacement.

Treatment of pile tank will be conducted once every 10 years, and will yield the sludge.
Management of sludge will be done according to Governmental Regulation No. 85 year
1999 regarding on the regulation alteration of Governmental Regulation No.18 year
1999 about Hazardous and Toxic Waste Management.
Chemicals used in activity of equipments maintenance and water process, among other
things is gas corrosion inhibitor, gas dehydrator, reverses demulsifier, portable water
disinfectant (calcium hypochloride), potable water coagulant, potable water neutralizer
(caustic soda) and cleaner.
To mitigate the Environmental Impact caused by pipe leakage, a plan for emergency
(emergency response plan) has been developed. With the procedure, if there is any
leakage/contamination, it can be overcome promptly.
Chemicals used in activity of equipments maintenance and facility of gas processing
include: gas of corrosion inhibitor, gas dehydrator, reverses demulsifier, potable water
disinfectant (calcium hypochloride), potable water coagulant, potable water neutralizer
(caustic soda) and cleaner when, if it is washed away, will then flow to the river/sea and
decrease the water quality around project location.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-72
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

D. Post Operational Phase
1. Wells Covering
The covering of operational wells is done by cement plug and bridge plug which are
constructed regarding on the regulation and pressure test. Covering wells activities
include these several scope works; opened hole zone isolation, opened hole isolation,
clogging or isolation of perforation interval, casing stubble/linear clogging, casing 9
clogging, clog test, cutting and lifting of non-cement casing 9, cutting casing about 5 m
under land surface then mud line suspension is lifted, and cement plug construction on
surface (cover). The report of wells covering is presented to BPMIGAS and Directorate
General of Oil and Gas (Ditjen MIGAS).

2. Termination of Gas Production
Termination of operation for gas production and gas distribution are done by cleaning of
transmission pipe from gas residue which is using flaring method before the termination
of gas production.

Meanwhile, termination of BS/GPF operation is done refers to the procedure, to
guarantee the high level of safety and to prevent the accidental blow out, accidental
condensate spill, fire and accidental work. The elements which are able to generate
those emergency conditions will be identified and analyzed as the suitable emergency
respon plan in implementing the valid standard and code.

Reports of wells covering, pipe line, BS/GPF and other facilities will be presented to
Directorate General of Oil and Gas (Ditjen MIGAS).

3. Demobility of Equipments
By the end of gas production, operation and LNG Refinery (estimated at least 20 years),
equipment, network pipeline and facilities that are not utilized will be unloaded and
carried over to a designated place. The pipe demolition is purposed to termination of
pipe operation in transmitting gas, there is possibility of pipe corrosion and cause
landslide which being dangerous for people, animals, and other environment
components. The handlings to ex-location facilities that have been unloaded include
cleaning and rehabilitation of the opened area. These will be conducted according to the

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-73
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
standard regulation. The report of this abandoned location is submitted to Director
General of Oil and Gas.

The equipment demobility is predicted to increase traffic density and road or bridge
damage because there will be a lot of heavy load-material vehicles, besides it will
potentially cause traffic accident.

4. Reforestation
Ex-pipe location area and other facilities that has been demolited then will be buried,
leveled and cleaned. Revegetation is done to those locations by planting local
vegetations which easy to grow based on the valid regulation. Revegetation activity
which is using varies vegetations can cover the ex-location and increase the variety of
flora and fauna at those locations.


5. Dismissing Labour
By the end of gas production operation, labour will be dismissed in phases until the end
of job contract in each unit. The dismissing process is according to the regulation of
labour force. The dismissing labour activity will cause negative impact such as decreasing
public employment and public income, decreasing the local economic value, negative
perception of society, and increasing the number of unemployment.


The summary of study regarding the connection between activity components that potentially
cause the impacts is presented as follows.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-74
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 2.10. Summary of Connection of Upstream Activity Components
That Potentially Cause the I mpacts
No
Activity Component that
cause the impacts
Location Type of Potential I mpact
A. Preconstruction Phase
1. Land and Plants Acquisition

Area for development wells,
gas production facility, gas pipe
line, and LNG refinery.
Change of land use, change of land
ownership, social process, change of
attitude and perception of society
2. Labour reruitment

at district of Toili Barat, Toili,
Batui and Banggai Regency
Increasing public income, social process,
change of attitude and perception of
society, business opportunity
B. Construction Phase
1. Mobility and Demobility of
Equipments, Material and
Labour
Highway to and from the
loading port to the gas
production facility area and gas
pipeline
Noise, vibration, increasing dust, affect the
land transportation: increasing traffic
density, road damage, traffic accident,
change of attitude and perception of society
2. Land Clearing Area for development wells,
gas production facility and gas
pipe line.
Change of micro climate, change of
landscape, increasing surface runoff,
erosion, noise, dust, soil denaturation,
decreasing the quality of environment
sanitation, disturbing water flow pattern of
irrigation and river cut by the pipeline,
disturbing the road (by pipeline),
decreasing vegetation coverage, flora and
fauna, change of shallow ground water
quality, change of attitude and perception
of society, increasing business opportunity.
3. Construction Activity of gas
production facilities (BS GPF)

Around the development well,
BS-GPF at 2 locations (Donggi
and Matindok) and 1 location at
Sukamaju.
Decreasing air quality, increasing noise,
decreasing surface water quality,
decreasing river water debit around the
hydrotest location, decreasing freshwater
biota, decreasing environmental sanitation
quality, increasing public income, change of
attitude and perception of society,
increasing business opportunity.
4.a Gas Channeling through
Land Pipe Line Activity
(Alternative-1 and 2)

Around gas pipeline through land
line: MS di Minahaki BS/GPF
Donggi; BS/GPF Donggi LNG
Plant; BS/GPF Matindok pipe 28
at junction to LNG Plant
Affect the society transportation, noise, dust,
decreasing air quality, decreasing surface water
quality, decreasing freshwater biota, increasing
erotion, decreasing river water debit around
the hydrotest location, disturbing water flow
pattern or irrigation and drainage, decreasing
environmental sanitation quality, change of
attitude and perception of society,
increasing business opportunity.
4.b Offshore Pipeline
Construction Location
Around the coast of SM Bakiriang Decreasing local air quality, decreasing sea
water quality, decreasing sea biota,
decreasing coast as the nest of Maleo bird,
coral reef damage, change of attitude and
perception of society, increasing business
opportunity
5. Dismissing Labour Wells area, BS-GPF, gas pipe
installation
Decreasing jobvacancies, increasing business
opportunity, decreasing society income and
negative perception and attitude from society

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-75
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 2.10. Continued
No
Activity Component That
Cause I mpact
Location Type of Potential I mpact
C. Operational Phase
1. Labour Recruitment

Especially at toil Barat district, Toli,
batui, Kintom and generally at
Banggai Regency
Increasing of society income, increasing level of
local economy, disturbing of social process,
change of attitude and perception, increasing
the business oppurtunity
2. Drilling Activity of
Development Wells
Around of the development wells
at Donggi, Minahaki, Matindok,
Sukamaju and Maleoraja
Decreasing quality of local air, decreasing
surface water quality, decreasing the freshwater
biota, change of attitude and perception,
increasing the business opportunity.
3 Operational Gas Production of
BS-GPF

Around 2 locations BS-GPF at
Donggi and Mationdok
Change of micro climate, decreasing surface
water quality, decreasing vegetation and wild
animal community, decreasing the air quality,
nois, decreasing society health, society income,
increasing the business opportunity, disturbing
the social process, social stratification, change
of attitude and society perception.
4. Gas Channeling through Pipe Around of pipe line change of attitude and society perception
5. Sulphur and Condensate
Loading through Land
Transportation
Along the BS-GPF Matindok
Highway and Donggi highway to
receiver tank at Bajo
Affecting the land transportation; smooth
traffic flow, traffic safety, road and bridge
damage.
6. Facilities Production
Maintenance
Around of devwlopment wells, 2
BS-GPF of Donggi and Matindok
and BS of Sukamaju
Decreasing of surface water quality, change of
attitude, and society perception
D. Post Operational Phase
1. Wells Covering Development wells location
2. Termination of operation for
Gas Production

Around of BS-GPF of Donggi and
Matindok
Decreasing the noisy atmosphere, increasing the
air quality, increasing the surface water quality,
decreasing the traffic jam, change of attitude
and perception
3. Unloading and Demobility of
Equipments
Around of BS-GPF and highway
which is crossed by equipments
transportation
Disturbing the land transportation; traffic safety
and smooth traffic flow, increasing the road
and bridge damage risk, change of attitude
and society perception
4. Reforestation Ex-well location, BS-GPF and pipe
line
Increasing of land covering by vegetation,
increasing the wild animal population
5. Dismissing Labour Especially for Toili Barat, Toili,
Batui, Kintom district and Banggai
regency
Increasing of unemployment, decreasing of
society income, decreasing the business
properties, change of attitude and society
perception.




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-76
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
2.3.2 Downstream Activity

A. Pre-construction Phase
Activity plan components on downstream pre-construction activity which potentially cause
impacts are land acquisition, planting and labour recruitment.
1. Land and Plant Acquisition
Plant and Land acquisition will be done on location of LNG Refinery construction and
specific jetty along with its facilities. The land to be acquired should not be settlement
areas. The width area to be acquired for LNG Refinery, specific jetty and its facilities
purpose is about 300 Ha. The land acquisition process and compensation of plants
will be executed by Ninth Committee. These activites potentially generate society
perception about the activity plan.

This land acquisition will be buying/selling, renting, or other method according to the
agreement. This activity potentially changes of the land use, changes of society
livelihood, and changes of land ownership. Besides, land acquisition can increase the
local society income, especially for the land owner. Increasing of society income could
generate positive perception to the land owner, on the other hand if land acquisition
activity does not match with society expectation will potentially generate social conflict
thus it will create the society negative perception to the activity plan.

2. Labour Recruitment
The labour for construction works has to be Indonesian, and there is only limited
exception number of experts, which is not available in Indonesia. The recruitment of
labour will be conducted according to the valid law and regulation. Local people who
meet the qualification for the certain of work will be mainly recruited. There is possibility
to take labours from outside of project area, if the labour needed cannot be fulfilled by
local resident. During construction phase, there will be camps operational and
development to provide settlement, food, water, medical treatment, and other
important needs for the worker.

Labours for LNG Refinery construction and specific jetty and other facilities are 3000
workers, with various skills; 1015 as skill labours and other 1950 as non-skill
labours. Requirement of specification and total labour of LNG Refinery construction,
specific jetty and its facilities are presented as follows.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-77
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 2.11 Requirement of Specification and Total Number of Labour
For LNG Refinery construction, Specific jetty and I ts Facilities
Specification Sum Up Total

1. Nonskill Labour
a. Security
b. Office boy
c. Housemaid
d. Digging worker
e. Assistant worker of civil work
f. Worker of civil work
g. water Pipe Welder
h. Driver of passenger vehicle

2. Skill labour
a. Engineer project
b. Drafter
c. Foremen
d. Operator of heavy equipment
e. Operator of rotarory equipment
f. Mechanic
g. Driver of heavy vehicle



110
50
50
540
540
400
130
130
Sum

270
110
170
130
130
130
110
Sum










1950








1015
Total 3000


It is predicted that there will be 3000 more personnel in location at the peak time of
the LNG construction phase. The number will be increased gradually, and then will be
decreased along with the work termination. The proponent realizes that the labour force
needs to be managed tightly, like in the following presentation:
a) The comprehensive guidance for health, environmental protection and safety
b) The comprehensive guidance for public relations
c) Location orientation at the time of arrival

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-78
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
d) The camp prosperity, determining minimum accepted standard
e) Pre-job health check, screening to drugs abuse, alcohol, and other test
f) Recreation camp facility
g) Provision of adequate medical support facility, and plan for emergency situation
h) Working hours in location and on leave regulation
i) Local Transportation
j) Religious service facility
k) Waste management of camp and construction
l) Security and protection of local community
m) The relationship with local community

The above-mentioned issues will be explained in detail in the scope work document of
the Pertamina EP, to be adhered by the sub-contractor. The proponent also will ensure
that all lower level sub-contractors and skilled labours are aware and adhere to the
regulation and procedure. Qualified and experienced contractor of camp management
will be appointed by Pertamina EP to execute the above activities according to standard
specified by the Owner.

Considering the number of labour needed for the LNG Refinery, specific jetty and its
facilities construction activities, there is possibility to recruit labour from outside of
project area with certain qualification and certification. Therefore, based on the fact,
potential impact is a social anxiety for local labour that can not be involved in employee
recruitment and social stratification, but in the other side, there will be a positive impact
to project plan for them who could be involved as an employee and opening a change
for small business in livestock supply.

B. Construction Phase
During the construction activity, a program will be conducted to control the removal of
construction waste according to the Regulation of Indonesian Environment. The proponent
will develop a plan to guide the monitoring program to assure the implementation of those
rules and regulations. The activity component of constrruction phase and specific waste also
its predicted impacts will be explained as follows:


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-79
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
1. Mobility and Demobility of Equipments, Materials and Labours
Transportation activity of equipments and materials, and also labours for the LNG
Refinery construction and specific jetty facilities will use the sea and land transport
service to the location of LNG refinery construction activity.
The volume of transported equipments and material is very large. The typical of the
main construction equipment of LNG Refinery, specific jetty and its related facilities are
presented in Table 2.29. The arrangement for mobility and demobility of equipments,
peak quantity, total duration in the location, and source of construction equipments is
depending on the correct construction strategy from the main contractor, and also from
the schedule and availability of equipment.

Table 2.12. Equipments of LNG Refinery Construction, Specific jetty and its
Supported Facilities
Description Amount Number
Ambulance 2
Backhoe/loaders 2
Bus 100
Air compressor, 100 600 cfm 16
Derek, 15 ton downwards 10
Derek, 22 ton until 40 ton 15
Derek, 50 ton 10
Derek, 110 ton 6
Derek, 225 ton 3
Derek, 1200 ton 1
Tower Crane 1
Forklift 10
Generator, 220 kW downwards 4
Generator, 360 Kw 6
Generator, 1.0MVA 8
Lamp, Refinery and tower 6
Prime movers 10
Fuel Tanker 2
Water Tanker 2
Tractor / truck 10
Trailer 30
Truck 30
Welding Engine, diesel 80
Welding Engine, electrics 65

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-80
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Activity of mobility and heavy equipments demobility and materials are conducted by
heavy vehicle and exceed of road class that will make a noise, vibration, and dust to the
environment that might disturb the traffic activities and society safety. Beside that, if
there is an overload tonage and material, it might be a road or bridge break, and disturb
the society activities.

2. Opening and Land Clearing
The activity of opening and land clearing include:
a) Cutting and removing trees and shrubs from project location and the width area of
cutting activity is adjusted with the project needs.
b) Leveling and pilling up activities in the LNG Refinery, specific jetty and its supported
facilities.

The activity of opening and land clearing will be conducted various wastes as follow:
1) Opening land flattening and hardening for facilities, such as base camp, street,
and lay down area will be conducted, at least as the footprint area, which is needed
to support the work safety. There is anticipation for not taking material from outside
of the project area. The exceed number of cutting material will be placed in
allocated offsite area.
2) Dredging - Dredging is possibly needed for construction of LNG Refinery port. If it is
needed, dredging materials will be piled in the coast around the project location and
can be re-used.
3) Sanitation Waste - Sanitation Waste coming from camp worker will be managed in
the location.
4) Garbage - Solid Waste that comes from worker camp will be piled up in temporary
site then it will be further managed.
5) Gas Emission from Diesel Engine - Electric power for worker camp will be supplied
by a diesel generator. The engine will be equipped with emission standard controller
and will use the low sulphur diesel fuel to minimize sulphur dioxide emission.
6) Exhausting Emission of equipment and motorized vehicle - Operation of construction
equipments and personnel vehicle will generate the exhaust emission in a small
number.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-81
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
7) Land opening, flattening and hardening - opening, flattening and hardening for Main
LNG Refinery and related facilities will be conducted by:
a) Cutting and taking the minimum footprint to sustain the work. There are
approximately 1.600.000 m of material that have to be cut to provide the
location for LNG Refinery, where majority of related crosscut material is for the
preparation of LNG piling tank.
b) Land piling and hardening the low land surface is required to get the flat area to
building various facilities. Soil which is result of cutting is used for the soil piling,
so the environmental impact from soil material can be minimized.

The activity of opening and land clearing will make negative impacts, such as:
a) Opening, flattening and land hardening opening the entrance way of piping
installation, LNG refinery, and facilities (base camp, road, laydown area) will be held
by cutting and flattening the footprint to support a safety work. This activity will
make a recoveryless of land by vegetation so can change a micro climate, make a
faster water runoff, make a higher risk, dust, noise that comes from the engines.
b) Dredging Dredging is needed for the specific jetty construction in to the LNG
refinery. This activity cause erosion and sea water mud for a while.
c) The existence of labours in the camps for a long time wil affect the environment
sanitation and solid waste. Besides, the throwing gas from diesel engine in the
camp will decrease the local air quality.
d) Sanitation waste Sanitation waste which comes out from the labour camp will be
processed according to the domestic waste processing.
e) Line cleaning for the pipe which cut the irigation channel and small river has
potency to disturb water flow.
f) Cleaning and ripping land which cuts the road has potency to disturb the local
traffic.

The positive impact from the activity is a business opportunity if the local society has
intention to open the bussiness, such as food stall, raw material distributor for the food
stall, goods, etc in order to fulfill the labour needs.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-82
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
3. Specific jetty and LNG Refinery Construction
The construction activities of LNG Refinery, specific jetty and its supported facilities
include these activities as follows:
a. Construction camp development
b. Lay down Area and Temporary Access Road development
c. Civil construction (land work, street, dismissal channel, foundation and building)
Activities
d. Structural Steel Installation
e. LNG Tank Installation
f. Fabrication and pipe installation
g. Equipments installation
h. J unction box, conduit and electric cable / instrument installation
i. CPP Building Construction
j. Refinery Construction
k. Mechanical test-drives equipments systems / pipe
l. Related facility for LNG refinery, such as specific jetty facility Construction
m. Pre-Commissioning Activity

The site construction activities will be divided into specified-purpose coverage, such as
Marine, LNG trains, Utilities, Offsite, LNG tank, etc. Typically, subcontracts will include:
a) Civil work (land work, street, dismissal channel, foundation and concrete work, and
also specific jetty)
b) Installation of steel construction
c) Installation and test-drive of pipe
d) Equipments installation
e) Electrics and mechanics instrumentation
f) Isolation


To minimalize the work at the site location and to optimize the budget and schedule,
there will be extensive use of pre-fabrication, pre-assemble and pipe modulisation,
equipments and building. For this purpose, there will be workshop either near or far
from the location. Typically, this matter will include this following:

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-83
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
a) Construction of the structural steel
b) Fabrication of pipe spool
c) Pre-isolation of Pipe and equipments
d) Sand-blasting and painting
e) Use of skid mounted Unit (equipments, pipe, electrics, etc)
f) Pre-fabrication and installation of pipe rack
g) Modular building

The responsibility for construction and commissioning facility of LNG Refinery and
specific jetty facility (marine facility) will be assigned to the main contractor of EPC.

Project implementation will be relied on material that available in Indonesia as many as
possible and work execution by using local labours. Most of resources needed such as
equipments, materials, services and contractor labours are available in Indonesia.
However, there is a high possibility that they are not available around the project site.
These include fuel, lubricant, and certain construction materials. Other materials such as
sand, aggregate, and wood board is possibly available at sources of Banggai Regency
and in vicinity.

The activity construction of LNG refinery and its related facilities potentially cause the
positive impact as follows:
a) Positive impact to the society if they have intention to the bussiness opening such
as food stall, raw material distributor for the food stall, open the store, etc to fulfill
the labour needs.
b) Society positive perception due to electricity installation along with its equipments,
the society can get benefit from these streets illumination although it is limited on
specific jetty and LNG Refinery project location.

LNG refinery and related facilities construction will cause waste as follows:
1) Sanitation waste Sanitation waste which comes from the construction camp will be
processed in the local packaging refinery processor before it is dumped.
2) Trash - Solid waste which comes from the pioneer camp will be dumped in the trash
burrying or burning places in the location.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-84
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
3) The gas from diesel engine Electricity power for the camp will be distributed from
Diesel generator. Those machines will be completed by standard emision controller
and will use lower sulphur fuel to minimize sulphur dioxide emission.
4) The gas from engine and vehicle The operation of construction equipment and
personal vehicle only caused less emission.
5) Surplus Construction Surplus material construction such as isolation material, paint
material, ex-cutting steel, will be received, classified, and dumped outside the
location.
6) The rainwater overflows Rainwater flow for the cleaning places will be flown as
surface water or across natural or imitated tunnel through the river. The
contaminated water will be flown to the receiving bassin. That water will be tested
before it is channeled to the final dumping. If the contaminated water is able to
directly dumped, it will be released to the river. If it is not suitable for directly
dumped so that it will be processed before it is dumped.
7) General spills The places that use to store the fuel or paint will be given a
boundary to prevent the in/out water flow, and all the diesel engines will be
completed by drip trays. The spills from the storage and drip pans will be dumped
using a dry absorbent or poured through the sump to be dumped in the next days.
8) An accidental spill of fuel material or paint material The spills will be collected for
the final dumps.
9) Debris from the rocks dumping The rock debris will be buried in some ground
burried places in the deep shore.
10) Sanitation waste Sanitation waste water will be collected and processed according
to the regulation standard before it is dumped to the sea.
11) Misc. A different kind of of material such as sea-fastening, grating pannel, steel
roap, etc will be falling down in to the sea accidentally.
12) Traffic jam and safety traffic for people who cross the highway to locate nearby the
LNG Refinery and harbour location

In these works, a temporary canal dredging on the mud-land to the coast might be
necessary for the possibility of equipment removal until the permanent dock cargo
construction and/or the possibility of LNG pipeway trestle was built. The buried solid
road is used in the shallow water (0 2 m to the level water) in the dock cargo or LNG
trestle. Those roads will be placed and designed for not disturbing natural coastal

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-85
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
process. In the deep down water an open trestles will be used. LNG J etty, J etty head,
tied-up place, and berthing-dolphins has to be specified constructed.

Briefly, construction program for LNG Refinery and specific jetty include work scope as
follows:
1. Water depth is about 20 meter (CD-20, on detil design) can be reached at 50 m
100 m range.
2. Tides range from 100 120 cm and will be installed by semidiurnal type (twice of
tide and twice of ebb a day)
3. Visual wave study shows heigt of wave, the value of H is relatively small from 0.1 to
o.5 m.
4. Based on data study of wind (source: Bubung airport, Luwuk) was known that the
average speed of wind was recorded as 3 6 knot/day and the dominant blown
comes from the western side, while the maximum speed was reached at 3 27 knot
with dominant blown comes from southern side. By using SMB method, it can be
known the maximum height of wave which was recorded as 1.5 m, and happened
on April to Agustus when the eastern wind occurred.
5. Current Survey for the period of 25 hours (in the 20 meter depth) and current
studyof surfzone (using float tracking method) between Uling cape and Kanali cape
showed the small value of recorded current which lays from 0.1 to 0.9 m/second.
6. Drift sediment survey and seashore survey showed that the planned location for
jetty will have sedimentation potency in small scale, exception for the river estuary.
For Uso area, Kanali cape and Uling cape, the seashore sediment is classified as
granula sand.











EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-86
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM























figure 2.36. Dominant Direction of Wave and Longshore Drift Potency Around of
Refinery location and Specific J etty


Based on marine facilities layout which will be constructed such as LNG Loading J etty
(no.1) and MOF, Material Off Loading (no.2) as shown in figure above, known that
trestle will be located/built in -7.5 m depth to -15m depth. Structure type of pile (Steel
pipe pile D = 1100) with 16 m to 18 m distance for LNG Loading J etty (no.1) and D =
800 with 4.5 m to 5 m distance for MOF (no.2) (show figure). Based on these facts and
the previously data, could be presented things as follows;
1. J etty buildings (either no. 1 or no. 2) are located at deep territorial waters and
connected to land/seashore indirectly, this is because of space area for potential
longshore drift movement, it means that the sediment transportation came from
seashore process at breaking zone area (if available) has possibility to move to
upstream (west) and downstream (east) area. Although the existence of jetty pile
will affect the current rezime (disturbing the transport process of longshore drift
1
2
1
2
LNG Loading J etty
MOF
Dominant Wave
Direction (From South)
Potential Longshore Drift

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-87
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
sediment), but this disturbing process will not significantly disturb the transportation
process of sediment in the short time. So, there was little possibility for erotion
happened at one side and also sedimentation happened in the other side.
2. Based on previously hydro-oceanography data, the upright sediment contribution to
seashore side (offshore-onshore sediment) will not have the possibility to be
happened, considering on 100 m distance from seashore, the sea will have -50 m
depth, including deep sea so the wave movement does not affect bottom of the sea
movement.
3. Based on 2 points previously, it has the conclusions that layout and design of
marine facilities construction at Padang-Uso is safe enough for its surrounding
environment especially for erotion and abration threat.

Shortly, the specific jetty construction program in the LNG complex includes work scope
as follows:
a) Mobiity of marine contractor construction in the location.
b) Building the construction base and working area along the coast.
c) Building the dock cargo bridge and tied-up places.
d) LNG J etty construction, J etty head, tied-up place and berthing dolphins.
e) Building and placing the jetty head superstructure
f) Changing marine construction base for the marine operation.

4. Dismissing Labour
By the end of LNG Refinery construction and specific jetty facilities, a lot of labours will
be dismissed in phases until the end of job contract in each unit. The dismissing process
is according to the regulation of labour force. The dismissing labour activity will cause
negative impact such as decreasing the society livelihood and public income, decreasing
the local economic value, negative perception of society, and increasing the number of
unemployment.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-88
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
C. Operational Phase
1. Labour Recruitment
There are large numbers of labours recruited for operational of LNG Refinery and
specific jetty, some of them are high qualified skilled labour to very high qualified skilled
labour and the others are non skilled labour. The labour recruitment is according to the
valid regulation.

Meanwhile, the needed labours for operating an initial train activity and the related land
facilities are estimated about 300 personel which is classified as skilled labours such as
refinery operator 35 workers, security 45 workers and nonskilled labour such as
cleaning service 200 workers.

The numbers of needed personil for operation phase is smaller than construction phase.
Considering the number of labour needed for the LNG Refinery and specific jetty
operation activities, there is possibility that local people can not fulfill completely all the
positions offered due to these activities need labour with certain specification,
qualification and certification. The labour recruitment is according to the valid
regulation.

Therefore, based on those facts, potential impact is a social anxiety for local labour that
can not be involved in employee recruitment and social stratification, but in the other
side, there will be a positive impact to project plan for them who could be involved as
an employee and opening local economy movement due to business opportunity
increasing.

2. The Operational of LNG Refinery, Specific J etty and Its Supporting Facilities
The operational of LNG refinery consisted of one train which has production capacity up
to 2 billion metric ton LNG per annum, needs gas approximately 335 MMSCFD which
is supplied from Matindok and Senoro at the beginning.

LNG Refinery operational and its supporting facilities could generate wastes such as
waste containing gas, liquid waste and solid waste. Brief description about the produced
waste as follows;



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-89
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
1) Waste containing Gas
a) Gas Emission from main equipment activator - The main equipment, such as
compressor, generator set and pumps, use gas fuel engine. Gas emission from
the combustion will be released into the opened air.
b) Gas emission from diesel activator Water pump-reserve fire extinguisher and
emergency electrical power plant will be activated by diesel engine. The
emergency diesel activator will be used if motor or turbine activator for main
gas is ruined (example: when the electricity power is off). Delayed-ship, other
ships, car, bus, truck, crane and other maintenance equipments will be
activated by diesel engine, too. Those machines will be completed by standard
emision controller and will use lower sulphur fuel to minimize sulphur dioxide
emission. The produced waste from that diesel activator will be released into
the opened air.
c) Chimney gas from hot oil heater Hot Oil has function as heat medium source
in refinery process unit. Chimney Gas from the heater will be released into the
air.
d) Flare Stack Emission flare stack is designed to handle two processes;
regulating and releasing the high pressure gas either in normal condition or
emergency state and releasing and blurring the released gas which has acid gas
particle content inside such as CO
2
. This emission can increase significantly
during un-normal operation but only happened in the short time.

The estimated emission containing gas from LNG Refinery operation is presented on
Table 2.30. This estimated emission shoul be considered in initial phase, depend
on verification and facility design renovation. The level of emission will increase
proposionally along with the increasing of number of train in the future.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-90
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 2.13. Gas Emission of LNG Refinery
Estimated Emission
(metric ton per annum)
Source
SO (as
SO
x
)
NO (as
NO
x
)
CO
Total Sulphur
(as H
2
S)
Gas Waste of MRU -- -- 3.23 x 4 40
Turbine Gas Activator for
Cooling Compressor
50 600 0.83 x 4 --
Turbine Gas Activator for
Electric Power Plant
20 600 0.30 x 4 --


2) Liquid Waste
a) The direct contact wastewater is water that comes from operation or equipment
where water has direct contact with processing liquid (formation water,
processing water). Direct contact wastewater will be channeled to IPAL to be
processed until it complies with the current quality standard before it is
discharged to the river.
b) Wet Chemical Waste acid waste and wet alkane from system utility will be
channeled through a separate compiler system to neutralization pool for the pH
adjustment before it is distributed to Effluent Treatment Unit, and to be
discharged.
c) Waste of surface draining from processing unit area and depository (rainwater,
water wash, etc) - waste of surface draining from processing unit area and
depository which is potentially contaminated will be collected and channeled to
Effluent Treatment Unit before it is discharged away. Draining waste from clean
area with no pollutant will be directly channeled a discharged to the river.
d) Liquid Domestic Waste - Waste from toilet will be processed in septic tank.
While waste from bathroom and kitchen will be channeled to the river.

3) Solid Waste
a) Solid Industrial Waste used molecule filter, carbon filter and ion resin
substitution, and the other solid waste will be temporary collected before it is
being further handled. Mercury contaminated active carbon from MRU will be
collected and dumped to the Hazardous waste facility which is already approved
or returned to the catalyst fabrication to be re-processed. Chemicals coming
from substance used for processes or waste from processes, such as used

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-91
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
filters, cutting of waste baskets, iron, strand of metal, lamp, accumulator, used
chemicals plastic drum, used oil, are collected and temporary accommodated at
location which has been prepared, and later will be handled by third party who
already has license of hazardous waste management.
b) Solid domestic waste The flammable organic solid waste is collected in the
temporary disposal site (TPS), and then collected to the final disposal site (TPA)
to be burned. While non flammable solid garbage which is not endanger the
health, such as glass, plastic, and fiber is separated to be handled later by
recycling those kinds of waste.

3. Maintenance of Production Facility
Production facility maintenance activities are conducted, its time is periodically,
depending on their equipment type, for example maintenance of process unit (gas
receiver facility, gas purification facility, liquefaction facility of natural gas), offsite
facility and utility needed which includes electric poer plant system, fuel distribution, air
pressure system of refinery and equipment, nitrogen system, water suppliying system
and fire prevention system. The maintenance activity time is periodically and aims to the
dirt sweeping, repair and/or replacement.

The management of hazardous produced waste from maintenance of production facility
will be handled based on Governmental Regulation No. 85 Year 1999 regarding on the
regulation alteration of Governmental Regulation No.18 year 1999 about Hazardous and
Toxic Waste Management. Chemicals used in activity of equipments maintenance and
facility of gas processing include: gas of corrosion inhibitor, gas dehydrator, reverses
demulsifier, potable water disinfectant (calcium hypochloride), potable water coagulant,
potable water neutralizer (caustic soda) and cleaner which, if it is washed away, will
flow to the river/sea and decrease the water quality around project location. The
analysis of environmental impact due to production facility leaking, has been arranged
an emergency response plan which could analysis the leaking or polluting process so
those conditions could be handled immediately.





EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-92
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
D. Post Operational Phase
1. Termination of LNG Refinery Operation
Once the gas production from BS/GPF is completely terminated, the next termination is
LNG Refinery operation. The termination of operation for LNG Refinery will be executed
refers to the procedure to ensure the high safety such as flare stack condition, fire and
work accident. The elements which are able to generate those emergency conditions
will be identified and analyzed the suitable emergency respon plan in implementing the
valid standard and code. Reports of LNG Refinery termination and other facilities will be
presented to Directorate General of Oil and Gas (Ditjen MIGAS).

2. Unloading and Demobility of Refinery Equipments and Specific J etty
By the end of LNG Refinery operation (estimated at least 20 year), equipments and
facilities that has been constructed will be unloaded and carried over to a designated
place. The handlings to ex-location LNG Refinery and other facilities that have been
unloaded include flatting, cleaning and rehabilitation of the open area. These will be
conducted according to the standard regulation. Reports of LNG refinery termination will
be presented to Directorate General of Oil and Gas. These activities will potentially
create a noisy environment and decrease the quality of air. Demobility of equipments
will potentially generate traffic jam, increase the risk of accident, besides, if the tonnage
vehicle or material vehicle cross the public roads and its capacity exceed the road class,
it will create road and bridge damages.

3. Reforestation
Ex-LNG refinery location area and other facilities that has been demolited then will be
buried, leveled and cleaned. Revegetation is done to those locations by planting local
vegetations which easy to grow based on the valid regulation. Revegetation activity
which is using varies vegetations could cover the ex-location and increase the variety of
flora and fauna at those locations.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-93
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
4. Dismissing Labour
By the end of operation for LNG Refinery and other facilities, labour will be dismissed in
phases until the end of job contract in each unit. The dismissing process is according to
the regulation of labour force. The dismissing labour activity will cause negative impact
such as decreasing public employment and public income, decreasing the local
economic value, negative perception of society regarding on increasing the number of
unemployment.


The summary of study regarding the connection between activity components that potentially
cause the impacts was presented as follows.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-94
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Tabel 2.14. Summary of Connection of Downstream Activity Components
That Potentially Cause the I mpacts
No
Activity Component that
cause Impact
Location Type of Potential I mpact
A. Pre-construction Phase
a. Land and Plant Acquisition

LNG Refinery location, specific jetty
and its supporting facilities.
Change of land ownership, disturbing social
process, change of land usage, attitude change
and society perception
2. Labour recruitment

Especially for Batui, Kintom district
and Banggai regency generally
Increasing the society income, social process,
change of attitude and perception, increasing
the business oppurtunity
B. Construction Phase
1. Mobility and Demobility of
Equipments, Materials, and
Labours
The highway from loading-
unloading dock to LNG Refinery
and specific jetty location
Nois, vibration, dust, affecting the land
transportation; smooth traffic flow and traffic
safety, road damage, increasing the risk of
traffic accident, change of attitude and society
perception
2. Land Opening and Clearing Around of location of LNG refinery,
specific jetty, and its supporting
facilities development





Change of micro climate, increasing the flow
debit of surface water, increasing erotion, nois,
dust, decreasing the environmental sanitation,
decreasing the covered land by vegetation,
decreasing the flora and fauna, change of
attitude, increasing business opportunity,
decreasing sea water quality, decreasing sea
water biota community
3. LNG Refinery Complex and
Specific J etty Construction

LNG Refinery, Specific J etty and its
supporting facilities;
Alternative-1: Uso village and Batui
Alternative-2: Padang village,
Kintom
Decreasing air quality, dust, nois, increasing
erotion, increasing the society income, social
stratification, increasing the business
opportunity, decreasing seawater quality,
decreasing environmental sanitation quality and
society health
4. Dismissing Labour

Especially at Batui, Kintom district
and Banggai regency
Increasing unemployment, decreasing society
income, decreasing business opportunity,
change of attitude and society perception.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-95
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Tabel 2.14. Continued
No
Activity Component That
Cause I mpact
Location Type of Potential I mpact
C. Operation Phase
1. Labour Recruitment

Especially at Batui, Kintom district
and Banggai regency
Increasing society income, social process
disturbance, change of attitude and perception,
increasing business opportunity
2. Operational of LNG Refinery,
Specific J etty and its support
facilities

Around of LNG Refinery, Specific
J etty, and its supporting facilities
location.
Change of climate micro, decreasing surface
water quality, decreasing air quality, nois,
disturbing shipping safety, decreasing
environmental sanitation, society income,
increasing business opportunity, disturbing
society health, social process, social
stratification, change of attitude and society
perception, decreasing seawater quality,
decreasing sea biota
3. Maintenance of production
facility
LNG refinery, specific jetty and its
supporting facility location.
Decreasing surface water quality, decreasing
seawater quality, decreasing freshwater biota
and sea biota, increasing society income
D. Operation Phase
1. Termination of Operation for
LNG Refinery
Location of LNG Refiner, Specific
J etty and its supporting facilities
Decreasing noisy atmosphere, increasing air
quality, increasing surface water quality,
increasing seawater quality, decreasing shipping
accident risk, change of attitude and society
perception
2. Unloading and Demobility of
Equipments (LNG refinery and
specific jetty)
Location of LNG Refinery specific
jetty and its supporting facilities
Disturbance on land transportation, smooth and
safety road traffic and increasing road damage
risk, changes of society latitude and perception,
decreasing environment sanitation quality.
3. Revegetasi Location site of LNG Refinery,
specific jetty and around of Batui
Increasing the land covering by vegetation,
increasing the wild animal population
3. Dismissing Labour Especially for Batui, kintom district
and Banggai regency
Decreasing unemployment, decreasing society
income, decreasing business opportunity,
change of attitude and society perception




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-96
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
2.4. THE ALTERNATIVES TO BE STUDIED IN EIS

A. Alternative Line of Trunkline from BS-GPF Donggi to LNG Plant
The pipe trunkline installation from BS-GPF Donggi to LNG Plant is conducted through 3
alternatives:
o Alternative line-1, the installation of trunkline pipe from BS-GPF Donggi through SM
Bangkiriang parallel with the province road, the pipe is planted in 2 meter bellow the
surface, and then re-pilled. The pipe installation technic generally is the same as normal
treatment, with these following regulations;
Minimizing the use of heavy equipments
The digging hole must be re-pilled right after the pipe installation finished
Not working at the night time
There is no specific inspection road for pipe line but using the province street which
has been available.
a. Alternative line-2, the pipe installation through SM Bakiriang will be planted by
horizontal drilling or Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD). Pipe is planted under ground
by horizontally drilling before entering the SM Bangkiriang area. The length of area in
SM Bangkiriang that is used for pipe installation is 3 km, hence there will be connection
and drilling every 1 km, using 2 ha for the next segment drilling and pipe
connection area
o Alternative line-3, trunkline installation from BS-GPF Donggi will be done by crossing SM
Bakiriang seashore about 4 km length. Based on installation technical difficulties and
installation cost, the alternative line-3 is relatively the most expensive. On this
alternative line, type of coastal ecosystem is mangrove ecosystem and in this costal
area is used by Maleo bird for laying eggs. Besides, there is coral reef around of
alternative line-3 location.


These efforts are purposed to minimize the impacts around of Bakiriang SM. Besides it is
done to anticipate of Minister Decree of Forestry Department No. 641/Kpts/ II/1997 about the
decree alteration Article 8 and 18 Ministry of Forestry Decree No. 41/ Kpts/II/1996 regarding on
Procedure of Renting and Using Forest Area which describe if there is no anything reason are going to
be permitted to use SM Bakiriang as project location, although the other fact showed there are illegal
people who have been known and cleared away the forest at SM Bakiriang at present.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-97
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
To assure the participation in developing of Indonesia, especially increase the foreign
exchange from Mining and Energy sector, PT. PERTAMINA EP keeps serious in handling and
executing these projects, especially for gas pipe installation (trunkline) by choosing the
other alternative lines; alternative line-2 and alternative line-3 as described briefly above,
with aims to prevent disturbance, minimize the negative impacts for SM Bakiriang
environment.


B. Alternative of LNG Plant Location and Specific J etty
Recently, PPGM still studies the 2 alternatives location for LNG Plant and Specific J etty; They
are at Uso village (Batui district) and Padang village (Kintom district). So, in this AMDAL
study will concern to those locations as the alternative study.


2.5. THE CONNECTION BETWEEN ACTIVITY PLAN WITH OTHER ACTIVITY IN
VICINITY

The activity Area plan is administratively included in four districts; they are Toili Barat, Toili and
Batui and Kintom. In the following are the main society activities in exploiting land. Land use at
around activity plan, which potentially caused the impact to the activity plan or on contrary,
Matindok Gas Development Plan, is potentially cause impact to other existing activities, which is
presented as follows.

a. Mining
Oil and Gas Exploration
J OB Pertamina-Medco E&P Tomori Sulawesi in Senoro and in vicinity, has done oil and gas
exploration activities, and conducted several wells drilling. Because its location is closed,
they have similar activities and its management is done by Pertamina, hence the
proponent would coordinates and did mutual cooperation between J OB Pertamina-Medco
E&P Tomori Sulawesi and Pertamina-PPGM in doing oil and gas activities in the region.
These activities were potentially decreasing the air quality, nois, decreasing the quality of
water surface, decreasing of the flora and fauna variety, on the other hand these activities
generate the positive impacts in increasing the society income through certain activities
that could be used by local people. These two activities will generate the bigger
cumulative impacts to the surrounding environment.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-98
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Nikel Exploration
Other mining activity around of PPGM location activity is Nikel Mining which has been held
since 2 years ago and until this time it is in exploration phase. There are 10 locations of
nikel mining, they are; Batui Village (Batui district), Cendanapura village, Tirtakencana,
Kamiwangi, Piondo, Lolu and Karyamakmur (Toili district), Pasirlamba village,
Gunungkramat, Lembahkramat which are located at Toili Barat. From those locations,
Batui village, Tirtakencana and Kamiwangi are nikel mining locations which are not
classified as scope of study. The width area which is opened for every location around
6000 ha and the average concentration of nikel is 1.5 %. These activities potentially
generate negative impact to erotion decreasing, sedimentation, decreasing surface water
quality and decreasing the variety of flora-fauna. While the positive impacts are increasing
employment, increasing business opportunity, increasing society income which together
with PPGM is expected could increase significantly the social prosperity

b. Plantation
The plantation area, which is incured by activity plan of Gas Matindok Field, is including
transmission pipe network like palm oil plantation managed by processing unit of PT Kirana
Luwuk. In the effort of land use for the pipe, it is needed a trilateral consultation between
plantation manager Government of Banggai Regency Pertamina-PPGM. This plantation
activity has given impact to change of the existence of forest area. Other impacts are
decreasing the variety of flora and fauna, increasing erotion, although this activity is
increasing the society income, too. Due to Matindok Gas Development Project, if there is not
good management around of plantation area, the environmental area quality will be
decreased.

c. Agriculture
Agriculture activities around of Matindok Gas Development Project, especially for
development wells locations are intensive rice field area which 3 times a year is expected to
produce. This area is rice barn area for Banggai regency with the level of income and
prosperity are classified as good enough. However, there are negative impacts from these
agriculture activities, such as; increasing of agrochemical usage; fertilizer and pesticide
which are giving bad impacts to the society and environmental condition. So, it needs to
create the awareness activity in minimizing the use of agrochemical material.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-99
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

The gas pipe line installation which cuts irrigation system either technic or non technic way
at Toili Barat district, Toili and Batui potentially generate the negative impacts such as the
change of attitude and society perception about Pertamina-PPGM.

d. Shrimp Embankment
There is intensive shrimp embankment around of Batui district, this activity play role in
contributing of decreasing the water quality and the quality of land surround due to shrimp
feed and the various of simulates growth material to simulate the shrimp growth intensively.
From Matindok Gas Development project which potentially decrease the water quality, it is
worried that impact could affect the shrimp embankment activities, considering of shrimp
health condition is very sensitive to the change of environment. So, it needs good
management in order to assure these gas development activities has minimum impact to
environment and its vicinity.

e. Bakiriang Wild Life Conservation
The pipeline will pass the area of Bangkiriang Wild Life Conservation (SMB). Even though
the condition at Conservation area is laboured by resident for the cultivation and plantation
of palm oil, but by de jure, its area still a conservation area, then Pertamina-PPGM needs to
coordinate about the land use of SMB area with the Minister of Forestry and Plantation.

The small scale activities of Matindok Gas Development Project will generate negative
impact to the decreasing of flora and fauna variety inside of Bakiriang SM.

Other activity around of activity plan location is presented in Figure 2.37

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
II-100
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Figure 2.37. MAP of other activity around of the project location



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-1
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM





Chapter-3
ENVI RONMENTAL PROFI LE



According to the result of corellation analysis between activity component which potentially
generate impact and kinds of potential impact, thus here are the environmental component which
relevant to be analyzed in Environmental Impact Assessment studies.
a) Geo-Physical-Chemical component which covering climate and ambient air quality, noise,
odor, and vibration; physiography and geology; hidrology and water quality; hydro-
oceanography; space, land and soil, and transportation.
b) Biological component which covering terrestrial biota and water biota.
c) Sosial component which covering Demography, social-economy, and social-culture.
d) Public health component which covering environmental sanitation and level of Public health.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-2
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
3.1 GEO-PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL COMPONENT
3.1.1 Climate

According to Schmidt and Fergusons climate classification, the Banggai areas climate is B type,
with average ratio of dry months and average ratio of wet months (Q) is 5, or the area is a wet
region. The rainfall data which are gained from meteorological station Bubung Luwuk Airport
illustrate that the rainy season was taking place during March to J uly with rainfall range between
115 mm on May and 169 mm on J uly. The dry season was taking place during August until
February, with rainfall range between 41 mm on October and 85 mm on December. The annual
average rainfall at the study area is 1856,6 mm/year, as shown in Table 3.1.

The monthly average ambient temperature range is 25.9
o
C on J uly until 28.3
o
C on November.
The lowest ambient temperature is 28.9
o
C on J uly and the highest one is 30.0
o
C on March.
Ambient temperature range is 22.9
o
C on J uly up to 24.5
o
C on February.

The study area is coastal area, thus the air humidity tend to be high. Monthly average humidity
range are 73% on October (dry season) until 81% on J uny and J uly (rainy season).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-3
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM





Table 3.1. Monthly and Annual Average Rainfall at the Study Area
Year J an Feb Mar Apr May J un J ul Augt Sep Oct Nov Des Total
1995 42.3 67.2 58.9 145.9 253.8 631.1 746.5 927.5 22.1 36.8 96.7 105.1 3134.0
1996 37.5 58.5 23.2 11.9 303.9 390.3 389.0 443.4 110.4 49.4 65.8 41.3 1924.7
1997 102.0 35.4 50.1 93.3 93.0 265.0 239.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 877.7
1998 0.0 0.0 27.3 69.5 103.0 340.2 173.3 0.0 85.6 33.7 60.3 26.4 919.3
1999 93.6 36.1 72.2 148.5 233.6 344.5 344.0 212.0 247.0 95.0 75.7 48.4 1950.5
2000 0.0 94.3 56.6 41.3 176.4 555.7 495.8 626.0 277.1 108.3 8.0 0.0 2439.6
2001 26.3 27.0 82.0 87.3 253.0 292.9 622.1 122.7 110.7 32.2 51.3 120.2 1827.7
2002 67.6 40.6 57.8 97.6 199.4 776.3 358.1 109.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 95.1 1809.5
2003 61.7 42.0 0.0 233.3 114.7 269.6 523.1 239.0 56.8 3.2 31.5 100.6 1675.6
2004 18.9 83.4 27.5 81.6 195.3 667.5 638.1 16.1 178.3 0.0 67.2 33.6 2007.5
Annual average 1856.6

(Source data: Meteorologi Station Bubung Luwuk Airport)

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-4
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
3.1.2 Ambient Air Quality and Noise
3.1.2.1 Ambient Air Quality

In order to understand the ambient air quality at the study area, it needs to carry out several
research about concentration of SO
2
, CO, NO
2
, Ozone (O
3
), dust TSP, PM
10
,

and noise at the
study area, thus the probability of impact from proposed activity could be known and predicted.

Field Measurement for ambient air quality and noise was performed at 12 locations (sampling
point) and the results are shown by table below.

Table 3.2. Ambient Air Quality and Noise Sampling Location
Coordinate
No. Location
Location
Code 51M UTM
1. LNG Refinery Padang A 0459960 9868722
2. LNG Refinery Uso B 0452733 9860862
3. Gas Processing Facilities (GPF) Kayowa C 0445952 9851386
4. Block Station (BS) Minahaki D 0424922 9839366
5. Block Station Sukamaju E 0430699 9849204
6. Block Station Donggi F 0418158 9829792
7. Block Station Maleoraja G 0441848 9854068
8 Block Station Matindok H 0441232 9854564
9 Pipe band BS Donggi BS Matindok J 0435108 9846652
10 Pipe band at unit XII Tirtasari village K 0423358 9836670
11 Pipe band at unit II Arga Kencoulda
village
L 0430323 9844042
12 Pipe band at Kintoms rice field M 0446188 9856122
Source: Primary Data, 2007

The analysis results of ambient air quality; environmental baseline condition around the
proposed project are shown in Table 3.4 and Table 3.7. The data shows that all ambient air
quality and noise parameter around the study area has value below the environmental quality
standard.
Analyzed parameter, sampling methods, and analyisis methods was performed according to
Government Regulation (PP) of Republic of Indonesia No. 41 of 1999 regarding Air Pollution
Management and Decree of State Minister of Environmental Affairs No. 48 of 1996 regarding
Noise Quality Standard. Data processing of laboratory analysis result, performed by relate to
Decree of Chairman of BAPEDAL No. Kep-107/KABAPEDAL/11/1997 about Technical Guidance of
Calculation, Reporting, and Air Pollution Standard Index (APSI).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-5
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
The APSI calculation results are converted into environmental quality scale which illustrate
environmental baseline condition. Conversion of APSI into environmental quality scale is shown
in Table 3.3. The Environmental Quality Scale (EQS) are used to predict the magnitude of
impact to the environment from the proposed activity.

Table 3.3. Conversion of APSI into Environmental Quality Scale
APSI Category
Environmental
Quality Scale
Category
1 50 Good 5 Very good
51 100 Moderate 4 Good
101 199 Unhealthy 3 Bad
200 299 Very Unhealthy 2 Very Bad
> 300 Dangerous 1 Poor


The ambient air quality at each sampling location with the value of environmental baseline
quality scale are shown in Table 3.5.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-6
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


Table 3.4. Ambient Air Quality around the Study Area
Location Code
Parameter Unit
A B C D E F G H J K L M
Quality
Standard
Government
Regulation
(PP) of
Republic of
Indonesia
No.41 of 1999

Sulfur Dioxide (SO
2
)

g/m
3

(24 hour)
nd nd nd nd nd 0,31 nd 0,14 - - - - 365

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

ppm
(1 hour)
0 0 0 0 0 0-1 0 0 - - - - 20

Nitrogen Oxide (NO
x
)

g/m
3

(24 hour)
2.42 1.93 0.65 0.32 2.01 3.86 3.23 2.74 - - - - 150
PM
10


g/m
3

(24 hour)

1.32 3.53 1.03 2.03 2.33 4.21 1.42 2.01 3.46 5.73 3.67 3.03 150
TSP (Dust) g/m
3
38.4 65.92 32.64 32.00 13.08 33.92 20.80 21.76 26.56 70.16 33.28 28.16 230
Note :
Source: Primary Data, 2007
nd = not detected

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-7
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.5. Environmental Baseline Condition Of Ambient Air Quality Around The
Proposed Activity

No Location EQS Note
1 LNG Refinery Padang 5
2 LNG Refinery Uso 5
3 Gas Processing Facilities (GPF) Kayowa 5
4 Block Station (BS) Minahaki 5
5 Block Station Sukamaju 5
6 Block Station Donggi 5
7 Block Station Maleoraja 5
8 Block Station Matindok 5
9 Pipe band BS Donggi BS Matindok 5
10 Pipe band at unit XII Tirtasari village 4
11 Pipe band at unit II Arga Kencoulda village 5
12 Pipe band at Kintoms rice field 5
Ambient air quality
level are not
influent to human
health, animals and
plants


The summary of ambient air quality analysis results which illustrate the initial environmental
profile (EQS) at the study area are shown in Table 3.6.

Table 3.6. The Summary Result of Ambient Air Quality Data
No Location Parameter
Analysis
Result
Quality
Standard
EQS
Sulfur Dioxide (SO
2
) nd 220 g/m
3
5
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 0 20 ppm 5
Nitrogen Oxide, NO
x
2.42 92.5 g/m
3
5
TSP (Dust) 38.4 260 g/m
3
5
1 LNG Refinery Padang
PM
10
1.32 150 g/m
3
5
Sulfur Dioxide (SO
2
) nd 220 g/m
3
5
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 0 20 ppm 5
Nitrogen Oxide, NO
x
1.93 92.5 g/m
3
5
TSP (Dust) 65.92 260 g/m
3
5
2 LNG Refinery Uso
PM
10
3.53 150 g/m
3
5
Sulfur Dioxide (SO
2
) nd 220 g/m
3
5
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 0 20 ppm 5
Nitrogen Oxide, NO
x
0.65 92.5 g/m
3
5
TSP (Dust) 32.64 260 g/m
3
5
3 GPF Kayowa
PM
10
1.03 150 g/m
3
5
Sulfur Dioxide (SO
2
) nd 220 g/m
3
5
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 0 20 ppm 5
Nitrogen Oxide, NO
x
0.32 92.5 g/m
3
5
TSP (Dust) 32.00 260 g/m
3
5
4 BS Minahaki
PM
10
2.03 150 g/m
3
5


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-8
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.6. Continued
No Location Parameter
Analysis
Result
Quality
Standard
EQS
Sulfur Dioxide (SO
2
) nd 220 g/m
3
5
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 0 20 ppm 5
Nitrogen Oxide, NO
x
2.01 92.5 g/m
3
5
TSP (Dust) 13.08 260 g/m
3
5
5 BS Sukamaju
PM
10
2.33 150 g/m
3
5
Sulfur Dioxide (SO
2
) 0.31 220 g/m
3
5
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 0.1 20 ppm 5
Nitrogen Oxide, NO
x
3.86 92.5 g/m
3
5
TSP (Dust) 33.92 260 g/m
3
5
6 BS Donggi
PM
10
4.21 150 g/m
3
5
Sulfur Dioxide (SO
2
) nd 220 g/m
3
5
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 0 20 ppm 5
Nitrogen Oxide, NO
x
3.23 92.5 g/m
3
5
TSP (Dust) 20.8 260 g/m
3
5
7 BS Maleoraja
PM
10
1.42 150 g/m
3
5
Sulfur Dioxide (SO
2
) 0.14 220 g/m
3
5
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 0
20 ppm 5
Nitrogen Oxide, NO
x
2.74 92.5 g/m
3
5
TSP (Dust) 21.76 260 g/m
3
5
8 BS Matindok
PM
10
2.01 150 g/m
3
5
Sulfur Dioxide (SO
2
) - 220 g/m
3
-
Carbon Monoxide (CO) - 20 ppm -
Nitrogen Oxide, NO
x
- 92.5 g/m
3
-
TSP (Dust) 26.56 260 g/m
3
5
9
Pipe line BS Donggi
BS Matindok
PM
10

3.46
150 g/m
3
5
Sulfur Dioxide (SO
2
) - 220 g/m
3
-
Carbon Monoxide (CO) - 20 ppm -
Nitrogen Oxide, NO
x
- 92.5 g/m
3
-
TSP (Dust) 70.16 260 g/m
3
4
10
Pipe line at unit XII
Tirtasari village
PM
10
5.73 150 g/m
3
5
Sulfur Dioxide (SO
2
) - 220 g/m
3
-
Carbon Monoxide (CO) - 20 ppm -
Nitrogen Oxide, NO
x
- 92.5 g/m
3
-
TSP (Dust) 33.28 260 g/m
3
5
11
Pipe line at unit II Arga
Kencoulda village
PM
10
3.67 150 g/m
3
5
Sulfur Dioxide (SO
2
) - 220 g/m
3
-
Carbon Monoxide (CO) - 20 ppm -
Nitrogen Oxide, NO
x
- 92.5 g/m
3
-
TSP (Dust) 28.16 260 g/m
3
5
12
Pipe line at Kintoms
rice field
PM
10
3.03 150 g/m
3
5
Source : Primary Data Analysis, 2007




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-9
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
3.1.2.2 Noise

Noise is descibed as unwanted sound, produced by some activities at certain level and time
which could generate disturbance to human health and environmental comfort. Noise level at
some location ilustrates sound energy level which expressed as decibell unit or abbreviate with
notation dB(A).

Sampling locations of noise level are similar with ambient air sampling locations. The
measurement methods of noise level was conducted by Sound Level Meter device, calculation,
and evaluation of noise level, based on Decree of State Minister of Environmental Affairs No.
Kep-48/MENLH/11/1996 regarding Noise quality standard. The measurement results of noise
level are shown in Table 3.7.

Table 3.7. The Measurement Result of Noise Level
No Location
Noise Level
dB(A)
Env.
Quality
Standard
EQS Location Note
1 LNG Refinery Padang 60.1 70 4 Near the sea shore
2 LNG Refinery Uso 64.3 70 4 Near the shoreline, near the
settlement
3 GPF Kayowa 46.6 70 5 Forest
4 BS Minahaki 49.6 70 5 Farm area
5 BS Sukamaju 38.7 70 5 Forest
6 BS Donggi 50.6 70 4 Rice Field
7 BS Maleoraja 48.3 70 5 Forest
8 BS Matindok 38.6 70 5 Forest
9 Pipe band BS Donggi
BS Matindok
51.3 70 5 200 m from the main road
10 Pipe band at unit XII
Tirtasari village
39.1 70 5 Community forest
11 Pipe band at unit II
Arga Kencoulda village
54.0 70 5 Near the main road, settlement
12 Pipe band at Kintoms
rice field
40.3 70 5 Rice Field
Source: Primary Data, 2007


From the measurement results which are shown by table above, it could be seen that the noise
level at all of the sampling locations are not exceed the noise level boundary quality standard
and generally the condition is very good and good or have environmental quality scale = 5 and
4.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-10
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
3.1.3 Water Quality

The observed water quality are sea water quality, river water quality, and ground water quality
around the study area. Sea water quality data was taken from 6 sampling points (location), river
water quality data was taken from 6 sampling points (location), and ground water quality data
was taken from 3 sampling points (locations) around the proposed project. The analyzed
parameter covers :
Parameter which directly measured at the field (in situ measurement), i.e. pH, temperature,
DO.
Parameter which measured at laboratory i.e. COD, BOD, hardness, chloride, Nitrate, nitrite,
sulphide, ammonia, and metals

The water analysis result, sea water quality, river water quality, and ground water quality are
presented below.

3.1.3.1 Ground Water Quality

In oder to know ground water quality consumed by resident around the proposed project, thus
ground water quality measurement was carried out. The number of sampling point are 3
points/locations (ASP-1, ASP-2 dan ASP-3). The sampling location and measurement result
presented inTable 3.8.

Ground water quality measurement and calculation methods refer to Decree of Minister of
Health No. 416/Men.Kes/Per/IX/1990 about requirement for water quality.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-11
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.8. Laboratory Analysis Result of Well Water Quality
Location
No. Parameter Unit Quality Standard
*)
ASP-1 ASP-2 ASP-3
1 Odor - In odorous In odorous In odorous In odorous
2 Taste - No taste No taste No taste No taste
3 Temperature C Air temperature
3
o
C
27.5 28 27.5
4 pH mg/L 6.5-9.0 8.75 8.58 8.56
5 Colour TCU scale 50 5 7.5 5.0
6 Turbidity NTU scale 25 0.139 0.238 0.217
7 Iron (Fe) mg/L 1.0 0.009 0.002 0.002
8 Hardness(CaCO
3
) mg/L 500 256.10 214.73 226.55
9 Flouride(F
-
) mg/L 1.5 0.348 0.409 0.409
10 Chloride (Cl
-
) mg/L 600 15.74 23.61 31.48
11 Mangan (Mn) mg/L 0.5 0.182 0.001 0.002
12 Nitrate/NO
3
-
(as N) mg/L 10 0.144 0.280 0.234
13 Nitrit/NO
2
-
(as N) mg/L 1.0 0.007 0.023 0.006
14 Sulphate mg/L 400 5.745 9.38 30.422
15 Organic Matter
(KMnO
4
)
mg/L 10 4.79 7.03 6.12

Note:
ASP-1 Mr. Sutrisnos well water, Unit II Arga Kencoulda village (pipe band)
ASP-2 Mr. Rahmats well water, Uso (LNG)
ASP-3 Head of villages well water, Padang (LNG)
*) Permenkes No. 416/MENKES/PER/IX/1990


Resident at several research location use the well water as clean water (consumable water) to
cook. From the analysis result, refers to the Decree of Minister of Health No. 416 of 1990, there
are no parameter exceed the quality standard.

The analysis result of ground water quality is converted to the environmental quality scale
(EQS), and presented in Table 3.9.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-12
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.9. Summary of Ground Water Environmental Quality Scale
Sample
Code
Location Parameter
Analysis
Result
Env.
Quality
Standard
Env.
Quality
Scale
Odor In odorous In odorous 5
Taste No taste No taste 5
pH 8.75 6.5-9.0 4
Turbidity 0.139 ppm 25 ppm 5
Chlorida (Cl
-
) 15.74 ppm 600 ppm 5
Nitrate/NO
3
-
(as N) 0.144 ppm 10 ppm 5
Nitrite/NO
2
-
(as N) 0.007 ppm 1.0 ppm 5
ASP-1
Mr. Sutrisnos well water,
Unit II Arga Kencoulda
village (pipe band)
Sulphate 5.745 ppm 400 ppm 5
Odor In odorous In odorous 5
Taste No taste No taste 5
pH 8.58 6.5-9.0 4
Turbidity 0.238 ppm 25 ppm 5
Chlorida (Cl
-
) 23.61 ppm 600 ppm 5
Nitrate/NO
3
-
(as N) 0.280 ppm 10 ppm 5
Nitrite/NO
2
-
(as N) 0.023 ppm 1.0 ppm 4
ASP-2
Mr. Rahmats well water,
Uso (LNG)
Sulphate 9.38 ppm 400 ppm 5
Odor In odorous In odorous 5
Taste No taste No taste 5
pH 8.56 6.5-9.0 4
Turbidity 0.217 ppm 25 ppm 5
Chlorida (Cl
-
) 31.48 ppm 600 ppm 5
Nitrate/NO
3
-
(as N) 0.234 ppm 10 ppm 5
Nitrite/NO
2
-
(as N) 0.006 ppm 1,0 ppm 5
ASP-3
Head of villages well
water, Padang (LNG)
Sulphate 30.422 ppm 400 ppm 5
Source: Analysis Result of Primary Data, 2007




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-13
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
3.1.3.2 Sea Water Quality

In order to understand the sea water quality around the study area, than the measurement of
sea water quality was performed. Measurement methods, calculation and evaluation of sea
water quality are based on Decree of State Minister of Environmental Affairs No. 51 of 2004
about sea water quality standard for jetty territorial. The field measurement location for sea
water quality was performed at 6 locations (points) as shown in Table 3.10. The result of sea
water quality analysis are presented in Table 3.11.

Table 3.10. Sampling Location Of Sea Water Quality
Coordinate
No Location Code
51M UTM
Note

1

Padang J etty 1

AL-1

0459678

9868600

The right side of proposed
Padang J etty

2 Padang J etty 2 AL-2 0459660 9868722 Proposed Padang J etty

3 Padang J etty 3 AL-3 0459640 9869056
The left side of proposed Padang
J etty

4 Uso J etty 1 AL-4 0452750 9860741
The right side of proposed Uso
J etty

5 Uso J etty 2 AL-5 0452733 9860862 Proposed Uso J etty

6 Uso J etty 3 AL-6 0452711 9861195
The left side of proposed Padang
J etty



From the analysis result, it could be seen that at all sampling locations, the concentration of
sulphide, cadmium, copper and lead exceed the maximum level of sea water quality standard,
except for sulphide at Uso-2 J etty and copper at Uso-1 J etty location. To get the environmental
quality scale, the analysis results are converted to Guidance of enviranmental quality scale
(Couldter dan Hill 1979). Condition of sea water quality are presented in Table 3.12. Then, the
sea water quality analysis results are converted into environmental quality scale as shown by
table below.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-14
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.11. Sea Water Quality Laboratory Analysis Result
Location
No. Parameter Unit
Quality
Standard
AL- 1 AL-2 AL-3 AL-4 AL-5 AL-6
PHYSI CAL :
1 Total Suspended Solid mg/l 80 12.9 9.7 10.9 7.0 13.5 12.6
2 Temperature
o
C Natural 29.5 30.0 29.5 29.5 29.5 29.0
3 Odor
-
In odorous
In
odorous
In
odorous
In
odorous
In
odorous
In
odorous
In
odorous
4 Garbage
-
Zero Zero Zero Zero Zero Zero Zero
5 Oil layer
-
Zero Zero Zero Zero Zero Zero Zero
CHEMI CAL
1 pH - 6.5-8.5 7.7 7.5 7.6 7.0 7.3 7.4
2 Salinity Natural 34.5 34.2 34.6 30.2 28.9 29.9
3 DO mg/l 5.4 5.2 5.0 5.1 5.3 5.5
4 NH
3
mg/l 0.3 nd nd nd nd nd nd
5 H
2
S mg/l 0.03 0.084 0.328 0.247 0.198 0.019 0.166
6 Detergent mg/l 1 0.98 0.88 0.73 0.78 0.29 0.88
7 Fat Oil mg/l 5 5.00 4.00 2.40 2.40 2.30 2.60
Suspended Metals
8 Cd mg/l 0.01 0.115 0.119 0.101 0.097 0.103 0.099
9 Cu mg/l 0.05 0.071 0.067 0.075 0.049 0.054 0.062
10 Pb mg/l 0.05 0.424 0.517 0.517 0.363 0.363 0.301
11 Zn mg/l 0.1 0.016 0.036 0.069 0.052 0.031 0.040
12 Hg mg/l 0.003 nd nd nd nd nd nd

BM = Sea Water Quality Standard (Decree of State Minister of Environmental Affairs. N0. 51
Year 2004 appendix III for Marine Biota)
Source : Primary Data, 2007
Nd = not detected











EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-15
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.12. Summary of Sea Water Environmental Quality Scale
Sample
Code
Location
Parameter Which
Exceed the
Environmental Quality
Scale
Environmental
Quality
Standard
EQS
AL-1

Padang J etty 1
Cadmium = 0.115
Copper = 0.071
Lead = 0.424
Sulphide = 0.084
0.01 ppm
0.05 ppm
0.05 ppm
0.03 ppm
4
4
4
4
AL-2 Padang J etty 2
Cadmium = 0.119
Copper = 0.067
Lead = 0.517
Sulphide = 0.328
0.01 ppm
0.05 ppm
0.05 ppm
0.03 ppm
4
4
4
4
AL-3 Padang J etty 3
Cadmium = 0.101
Copper = 0.075
Lead = 0.517
Sulphide = 0.247
0.01 ppm
0.05 ppm
0.05 ppm
0.03 ppm
4
4
4
4
AL-4 Uso J etty 1
Cadmium = 0.097
Lead = 0.363
Sulphide = 0.198
0.01 ppm
0.05 ppm
0.03 ppm
4
4
4
AL-5 Uso J etty 2
Cadmium = 0.103
Copper = 0.054
Lead = 0.363
0.01 ppm
0.05 ppm
0.05 ppm
4
4
4
AL-5 Uso J etty 3
Cadmium = 0.099
Copper = 0.062
Lead = 0.301
Sulphide = 0.166
0.01 ppm
0.05 ppm
0.05 ppm
0.03 ppm
4
4
4
4
Source: Primary Data, 2007


3.1.3.3 River Water Quality

In order to know the surface water quality (river water) at the study area, thus surface
water quality measurement was performed. Measurement methods, calculation and
evaluation of sea water quality are based on Indonesian Government Regulation (PP) of
Republic of Indonesia No. 82 of 2001 regarding water quality management and water
pollution management, and Decree of State Minister of Environmental Affairs No. 37 of 2003
regarding Analysis methods of surface water analysis and surface water sampling methods.

Surface water sampling of this study was carried out at the nearest rivers which have
probability to be impacted by activities at BS, GPF, LNG Refinery, and pipe band. The
sampling location of river water are presented in Table 3.13.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-16
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.13. River Water Sampling Location
Coordinate
No Location
51M UTM
Code Note
1 Santoa River 0459028 9867862 AS-1 Padang Tangkiang (LNG)
2 Kayowa River 0446081 9851570 AS-2 Near GPF
3 Singkoyo River 0424354 9039188 AS-3 Near BS Minahaki
4 Tumpu 0430819 9849442 AS-4 Near BS Sukamaju
5 Singkoyo Branch River
(upperside)
AS-5 Near Dekat BS Maleoraja
6 Toili River 0429083 9844590 AS-6 Pipe band

The study results were compared to class I water quality criteria, PP No. 82 of 2001, as
presented in Table 3.14. Then, in order to get environmental quality scale, those table 3.14
converted into environmental quality scale guidance Couldter dan Hill (1979). Analogue to air
quality measurement, the measurement just carried out based on parameter which didnt show
compliance to the environmental quality standard.

Table 3.14. Surface Water/ River Water Quality Analysis Result
(According to PP No. 82 of 2001 Class I I)
Location
No. Parameter
Quality
Standard AS-1 AS-2 AS-3 AS-4 AS-5 AS-6
1 pH 6-9 7 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.7 7.0
2 Temperature Deviation 3 27.5 28.5 28.0 27.5 27.5 28.0
3 DO 4 mg/L 6.1 6.9 6.1 6.4 6.0 6.6
4 BOD 3 mg/L 0.2 0.4 0.1 1.3 1.1 0.6
5 COD 25 mg/L 1.1 2.5 0.5 8.1 5.0 2.2
6 Total phospate 0.2 mg/L nd nd nd nd nd nd
7 NO
3
10 mg/L 1.64 2.12 1.30 1.01 4.61 1.84
8 Nitrit (NO
2
) 0.06 mg/L nd nd nd nd nd nd
9 NH
3
- nd nd nd nd nd nd
10 Cobalt (Co) 0.2 mg/L 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.05
11 Barium (Ba) - nd 1.60 nd nd 1.20 nd
12 Boron (Bo) 1 mg/L < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1
13 Cadmium (Cd) 0.01 mg/L Nd 0.011 0.008 0.003 0.010 0.001
14 Chrome (VI) 0.05 mg/L nd nd nd nd nd nd
15 Copper (Cu) 0.02 mg/L 0.006 0.011 0.008 0.003 0.010 0.001
16 Iron (Fe) - 0.01 nd 0.42 0.37 0.06 0.25
17 Lead (Pb) 0.03 mg/L nd nd nd nd 0.024 nd
18 Mangan (Mn) - 0.027 0.031 0.047 0.127 0.039 0.015
19 Zinc (Zn) 0.05 mg/L 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02
20 Chlorida (Cl) 600 mg/L 21 81 26 41 25 23
21 Fluoride (F) 1.5 mg/L 0.09 0.11 0.10 0.17 0.08 0.05
22 Sulphate (SO
4
) - 11 41 nd 18.4 nd nd
23 Oil and Fat 1000 2.60 1.70 2.60 2.20 2.50 2.40
Source : Primary Data, 2007

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-17
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
From Table 3.14 it could be seen that all studied rivers show compliance to environmental
quality standard, i.e. surface water quality class II as Government Regulation (PP) of Republic of
Indonesia No.82 of 2001. Those six studied rivers have Environmental Quality Scale (EQS)
= 5.

3.1.4 Fisiography and Geology
In General, geomorphology of the researched area is coastal area with the coastal area width
around 100 m to 1 km. On the west side, there are hills area that stretches along the coastline
with the height around 50 to 450 m, and the slope range from 5 - 40. The river flow system in
the area is parallel, and all banks to Pereng Strait. There are two river flow characteristics,
perennial and intermittent. The process of decaying accompanied with corrosion in this area is
quite intense. The thickness of the soil is moderate, around 3 4 meters.

Statigraphy of the Luwuk area to Batui area consists of Bongka Formation, Kintom Formation,
Terumbu Koral Kuarter Unit, and Akuvium Unit. The Bongka formations are conglomerate,
sandstone, lanau, lapel and limestone. This formation stretch from northern to southern area
and concentrate in the western area, with the width covers around 40% of the researched area,
with the age of Late Miosen to Pliosen. In the researched area, this Bangka Formation is
revealed in western of Kintom and Mendono.

The Kintom formation is also called Batui Formation, consists of sandy napal and sandstone.
This formation stretches on the north side of Batui town, with the width of the spread 20% of
the researched area. The rocks that form this formation are mostly limestone of napal sliding
coral and part sandstone. According to the contained fossil found in Matindok-1 Well,
Globigerinoides extremus, the age of Kintom Formation is Late Miosen to Beginning Pliosen,
while the environment sediment is outer neritic to upper bathyal. This formation is along the
western side of Bongka Formation.

The Coral Reef quarter formation consists of limestone cliff and a little napal, aged quarter
(Holocene), and stretch in most of the researched area along the coastline.

This alluvium unit is found on area near the riverbank of Batui to Luwuk. It consists of loose
stones in clay size to mid size rocks, and there are riverbed sediment found in Batui river basin.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-18
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
The height of the river bottom is around 10 30 meters, it indicates that the lifting process of
the area is still going on. This unit is only found around the riverbanks such as in Kuala Batui
Riverbank in Batui.
















Figure 3.1. Geological Map of Batui Region


The geological structure of the researched area is quite complex. This is because this area is a
corrosion zone between micro continents Banggai-Sula, between sesar transform of Sula-
Sorong. Structures of Sulawesi Selatan area are dominated by upward sesar and sliding sesar,
this is Colossi area characteristics. Upward sesar is in northeast southwest direction. Sliding
sesar is generally in southwest-southeast direction with various length.

1. The Geological Condition of the Pipe Line
In general, the pipeline plan is located in coast where the height is not much different with
the sea level, but there are a couple parts that are located near the hills. The rocks unit in
this area is consisted of sandstone unit, conglomerate unit, limestone-conglomerate
carbonate unit and clay sand. Geological structure found in this pipeline consisted of minor
faults that are generally directing northwest southeast and north south.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-19
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

In Batui area (Kilometer 57), the pipeline plan will go through beach where the upper part is
decayed soil with the thickness of 0.5 meter, then on the lower part is limestone
conglomerate with 1.5 meter thickness, and then sandstone with 1.5 meter thickness.
Limestone conglomerate is in color of brownish-white, pebble size-rocks, arranged by metric
and fragments with dominant matrix, with sand sized form consisted of carbonate material;
carbonate fragments 1-20 cm, consisted of coral (5-20 cm) and fragments of stone and
metamorphic (2 mm 1 cm). Sandstone is brownish-white in color and non carbonate
nature.

The pipeline in Kesambang area will go through limestone conglomerate area with the
thickness of 5,80 meters in kilometer 53 with paleosoil, brownish-white color, sand-rocks
size, arranged by matrix and fragments with dominant matrix, sand sized material consisted
of carbonate material 1 20 cm and coral (5 -20 cm) and stone fragments and
metamorphic (2mm 1 cm). At the upper layer, fragments are more dominant and turn into
paleosoil. To the north direction, there is more trace fossil that is found. Paleosoil is blacked-
brown in color, with the size of clays granule, 30 cm of thick.

In km 50, the pipeline will go through limestone breach with the color of decayed bright
gray, bright color of brownish-white, sand size granule, grain supported, hardly cemented,
gone through long certification with 8m thickness. On the upper 1 meter, it suffers the
highest solubility.

On the west side of Batui Road Kintom, around 700 m from Tug to Luwuk direction, the
pipeline plan is going through limestone breach on a cliff with 12-15 m width. On the lower
part (around 3m) and upper part (9m), consists of white limestone, granule size 2 mm 8
cm, dominant fragments of forebear, gastropode, pelecypod, and coral pieces (rudstone).
They are formed by limestone with the width 3 m, white color, size of 2mm 20 cm and
arranged by complete coral body in round shape (frame stone).
The complex regional geological condition of Batui and the surrounding often cause
earthquakes. To minimize the damage caused by the earthquakes, the pipeline building will
be done with an elastic structure so that it could accommodate the vibration from the
earthquakes. The pipeline position plan will also consider the faults on the territory.
Lithology distribution and geological structure of the researched area is presented in
Appendix 5.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-20
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


2. Geological Conditions on Rig Location Plan
a. Rig Location Plan in Uso territory
Located in west side of the Batui-Luwuk road (0464548; 9874633). The Morphology is
almost the same with the condition in Solan Village. It is alluvial coastal land with the
width around 750 m. This coastal alluvial consists of alluvial and koluvial sediments that
came from the hills on the west side. The material that form this area is generally
consisted of clay-sand with blacked-brown color, clay-sand granule size, with fragments
of rocks came from deformed frozen stone and metamorphic, and does not contain
limestone. To the beach direction, the sediments turn into coral with the composition of
the stones of andesite, quartz, serpentinite and gabro.

Topography is flat, and Groundwater could be found very shallow around 3.5 meters
from the soil level. According to the observation of the inhabitants wells, on the depth
of around 2.6 m, there are conglomerate ply, with the size of granule from pebble to
coral. The height of the location is between 1 15 meters from the sea level.

This geology and lithology that are in the form of pebbles, are generally having support
power value between 200-400 kg and m2. This area is good for the LNG building
location. With the condition and the data, it could be predicted how much construction
burden such could be accepted by the stones. It is necessary to consider the
construction system for this area, for example by using fingerprinting foundation or boat
foundation. This is necessary to anticipate compaction because in the long run, it could
cause serious damage that could affect the structures function. This plan site for LNG
includes tsunami disaster area so that it is necessary to make preventive anticipation.
Because of the flat and low elevation of the land, land fill could be done to make the
elevation higher, so that the risk of getting flooded from the river or sea could be
reduced. Sea water and tsunami barrier building need to be built considering that the
location is near the beach and the frequent earthquake in the area.

b. Rig Location Plan in Padang Village
This planned rig location is about 200 meter to the west from milestone km 47 following
the river stream (0456009; 986249). It is in the river bed of conglomerate sediment

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-21
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
sandstone that is not compacted. Conglomerate is grayish white in color, normal
gradation structure, cutting through sandstone-conglomerate layer in beneath, in the
size of 2 mm 10 cm granule, rounded, sealed, arranged from quartz, frozen stone and
carbonate. Sandstone is brown, sand size is middle rough, rounded, non carbonate. In
the river body, there is some rock sized sediment.

Beside of that, about 400 meter from the tugu km 47 to the north, there are
morphology contact of flat land with hills (0456369; 9862435). On the flat area, it is
consisted of brownish-black sand sediment in sand size, arranged by stone fragments
and metamorphic. On the beach, the sediment turns into rock sediment. The width of
the land is about 80 meters, the more to the south, the width of the land is less than 80
meter. Hills with height 5 15 meters and slope of 20 30 are arranged by clay-sand
with fragments of 2 20 inch. Stones are packed stone, grained stone, dan rudstone or
framed stone that has gone through intensive solution. In some places, there are
limestone conglomerate with light brown color, degradation structure is normal but not
dominant, sand fragments of 2 -4 cm.

Around the tugu border of Kintom-Batui (0458817;9863580), on the west side of Batui-
Luwuk road, there are cleavage of limestone in white color, arranged by basic standard
mass in sand size and fragments by nodular formed coral. Limestone has gone through
intensive carsification. Strike/dip N 68 E/9 , there are also tough with directions 80
/195 and 80 /46.

Space distribution of geological formation in the researched area is presented on the
geological map, in Appendix 5.

3. Earthquake and Tsunami
The geological condition in the researched area is a collusion between micro continent
Banggai-Sula, where the fragment from North Australia Irian J aya, and Ophiolite Belt from
the eastern Sulawesi. Collusion is occupying the movement to the west from Banggai-Sula
micro continent along the sesar transform Sula-Sorong. The structure of southern Sulawesi
is dominated by upward sesar and sliding sesar, while this is the characteristic of collusion
area. The upward sesar is in northeast-southwest direction. Sliding sesar is generally in
northwest-southeast direction and various length.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-22
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
















Figure 3.2 Seismic Map of Sulawesi from year 1900

According to the data, the researched area is a frequent tectonic earthquake area. This
could be seen in the Figure 2.22 that shows seismic map with the magnitude scale 5 and
happen since the year 1900. The figure shows how many epicentrum of earthquake in the
researched area, around the Banggai Island. The depth of earthquake epicentrum mainly
between 0-33 km, are included as shallow earthquake, and also on the depth of 70 150
km.
Another data according the seismic map of Indonesia that was made in the year 1992
shows that the southeast of Batui (Teluk Tolo) is predicted as upward sesar. This upward
sesar is predicted to cause tsunami when it is active. However, seeing that the location is in
the south side of the rig plan location, then, when the tsunami happen, the waves that
reach the rig will not be great. This is due to the fact that tsunami wave is always in line
with the earthquake direction. The possible center of earthquake that might happen (that is
the sesar area) is located in the south part of the rig plan location and range from Batui is
about 30 50 km. Because of that, the location selection should consider the possibility of
tsunami wave.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-23
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

The overall conditions that will affect or might be an obstruction in the building planning in 3
alternative locations are danger that comes from many directions.
3.1.5 Hydrology

On the researched area, there are some big rivers that flow all year. They are (from
southwest to northeast) Toili river, Sinorang river, Kayowa river/Matindok, Bakung river,
Batui river, Omolu river, Tangkiang river, and Kintom river. The rivers flow from northwest
to the bank at southeast. Beside of the great rivers, there are also some small rivers that
flow directly to the ocean, for example Bangkiriang river. The drainage system and irrigation
system of fields in District of Batui and Toli is well arranged, even the irrigation channels are
built according to technical rules.

On the hills and mountains between District of Batui, Toili and Toili Barat, we found
sufficient underground water with low depth (shallow groundwater). The form of water
source is on the farming fields that are very wide with in land technical irrigation.

3.1.5.1 Water Quality
A. Groundwater quality
The figure of Groundwater quality could be observed based on secondary data of the
residents well water quality measurement. The samples are taken around the Maleo Raja
Well Drilling Exploration, Matindok, Donggi, and Anoa Besar. The locations are on 5
locations.

Table 3.15 Sample Locations to Observe the Groundwater Quality
No. Sample Code Village/ Location
1. BTI Well water of resident of Batui IV village
2. SPA Well water of resident of SPA Ondo Ondolu village
3. SDS Well water of resident of Sindang Sari village
4. KMW-1 Well water of resident of Kamiwangi 1 village
5. KMW-2 Well water of resident of Kamiwangi 2 village


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-24
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Results of the measurement are presented in Table 3.16. The methods and standards
of the measurements are based on Regulation of Minister of Health of RI No.416 of
1990 regarding drinking water.


Table 3.16. Analysis Result of Residents Well Water Quality
No. Parameter BTI SPA SDS KMW-1 KMW-2
Standar
d
unit
1
BOD
5
1.75 2.39 2.34 4.26 3.28 - mg/L
2
Dissolve Solid, TDS
94 109 98 140 90 1000 mg/L
3
COD
6.80 6.29 7.12 12.56 10.57 - mg/L
4
Temperature
30/26 28/26 32/26 31/28 31/28 3 -
5
Ammoniac
<0.001 0.011 0.01 0.006 0.002 0.5 mg/L
6
Quick Silver, Hg
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 mg/L
7
Arsenic, As
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.05 mg/L
8
Iron, Fe
0.022 0.022 0.012 0.032 0.014 0.3 mg/L
9
Fluoride, F
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 1.5 mg/L
10
Cadmium, Cd
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.005 mg/L
11
Hexavalent Chromium,
Cr
6+

<0,001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.05 mg/L
12
Mangan, Mn
0.028 <0.001 <0.001 0.022 0.022 0.1 mg/L
13
Nitrate (NO
3
-N)
<0.001 <0.001 0.005 <0.001 <0.001 10 mg/L
14
Nitrite (NO
2
-N)
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 1 mg/L
15
pH
7.10 7.29 7.38 7.62 7.02 6.5-8.5 -
16
Zinc, Zn
0.012 <0.001 <0.001 0.013 <0.013 5 mg/L
17
Cyanide, CN
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.05 mg/L
18
Hydrogen Sulfide, H
2
S
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.05 mg/L
19
Cobber, Cu
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 1 mg/L
20
Lead, Pb
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.05 mg/L
21
Phenol
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - mg/L
22
Blue Compound of
metilen, MBAS
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - mg/L
23
Organic (KMnO
4
)
4.69 2.99 7.12 6.72 2.45 10 mg/L
24
Oil and Fat
- - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - mg/L


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-25
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
The analysis result of the residents well water are compared to the drinking water
standards, and to get Environment Quality Scale, converted with the Environment Quality
Scale (Couldter and Hill, 1979), and it is presented as follows.



Table 3.17 Environment Recapitulation Scale Quality of the Villages Well Water
Sample
Code
Location
Parameter over
the BML
BML SKL
BTI Well Water of Batui IV 4 degrees 3 degrees 4
SPA Well Water of SPA Ondo Ondolu - - 5
SDS Well Water of Sindang Sari 6 degrees 3 degrees 4
KMW-1 Well Water of Kamiwangi 1 - - 5
KMW-2 Well Water of Kamiwangi 2 - - 5



B. River Water Quality
To know the quality of river water at the research location, the measurement to the water
quality around location of drilling exploration of King Mateos Well (MLR), Matindok (MTD),
Donggi (DNG), and Anoa Besar (ANB) are done. To measurement, calculation and
evaluation the of quality of river water are conducted based on the Government Regulation
no. 20 of 1999 regarding the Water Pollution Control and the State Minister of
Environmental Affaires No. 42 of 1996 regarding the standard quality of liquid waste of the
Oil & Gas Activity and Geothermal.

The research result of water quality analysis is then compared to the Well Water Quality
Criteria according to the Decree of Governor of KDH I of Central Sulawesi No.
188.44/1443/Ro.BKLH march 14
th
, 1990. It takes six 6 sampling locations.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-26
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

Table 3.18 The Samples Location for the Quality of River Water
No. Sample Code Villages / location
1. SKH-1 River Kayowa Upstream River
2. SKH-2 Kayowa Downstream River
3. SBH-1 Boiton Upstream River
4. SBH-2 Boiton Downstream River
5. SSS Sindang Sari River
6. SDG Dongin River

The result could be seen in Table 3.19. To get the environment Quality Scale, it was
converted based on Couldter and Hill (1979), Environment Quality Scale and the complete
result could be seen in Table 3.20. Analog with the air quality calculation, it is based on the
unfulfilled parameter scale of the quality environment.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-27
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


Table 3.19. Analysis Result of the Well Water Quality
No. Parameter
SKH
-1
SKH
-2
SBH
-1
SBH
-2
SSS SDG
Quality
Standard

unit
1 BOD
5
2.04 2.80 6 mg/L
2 Dissolve Solid, TDS 106 106 1500 mg/L
3 COD 8.20 9.00 50 mg/L
4 Temperature 30/27 30/28 - -
5 Ammoniac 0.038 0.042 0.5 mg/L
6 Quick Silver, Hg <0.001 <0.001 0.001 mg/L
7 Arsenic, As <0.001 <0.001 0.05 mg/L
8 Iron, Fe 0.254 0.269 5 mg/L
9 Fluoride, F 0.029 0.031 1.5 mg/L
10 Cadmium, Cd <0.001 <0.001 0.01 mg/L
11
Hexavalent Chromium,
Cr
6+

<0.001 <0.001 0.05 mg/L
12 Mangan, Mn 0.018 0.024 0.5 mg/L
13 Nitrate (NO
3
-N) 0.45 0.51 10 mg/L
14 Nitrite (NO
2
-N) 0.008 0.011 1 mg/L
15 pH 7.15 7.31 5-9 -
16 Zinc, Zn 0.032 0.048 5 mg/L
17 Cyanide, CN <0.001 <0.001 0.05 mg/L
18 Hydrogen Sulfide, H
2
S 0.014 0.022 - mg/L
19 Cobber, Cu <0.001 <0.001 1 mg/L
20 Lead, Pb <0.001 <0.001 0.05 mg/L
21 Phenol <0.001 <0.001 0.002 mg/L
22
Blue Compound of metilen,
MBAS
0.014 0.018 0.5 mg/L
23 Organic (KMnO
4
) 6.77 6.88 - mg/L
24 Oil and Fat - mg/L




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-28
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


Table 3.20. Recapitulation of Environment Scale Quality of Well Water
Sample Code Location
Parameter over
the BML
BML SKL
SKH-1 Kayowa Upstream River - - 5
SKH-2 Kayowa Downstream River - - 5
SBH-1 Boiton Upstream River - - 5
SBH-2 Boiton Downstream River - - 5
SSS Sindang Sari River - - 5
SDG Dongin River - - 5

From the measurement of Table 3.19 and recapitulation of environment scale quality at
Table 3.20, it could be seen that all locations are under the standard environment quality
(BML) of water well quality. Therefore, all of the environment quality for each location = 5
or very good.

3.1.5.2 Surface Water Quantity
a. River Water Debit
The requirement of clean water for development project is quite big, so it needs data of
surface water debit availability, in this case, the river debit in the research area. From
existing secondary data (BAPPEDA of Banggai Regency, 2006), some big rivers with the
momentary debit data reside in the research region, they are Singkoyo River (64 m
3
/ sec),
Mansahang River (41 m
3
/ sec), Toili River (40 m
3
/ sec), Batui River (85,2 m
3
/ sec),
Sinorang River (24 m
3
/sec), Mendono River (60 m
3
/ sec), Tangkiang River (60 m
3
/ sec).
The debit of all rivers is estimated to be 1,895.78 x 106m
3
/ year. From all rivers, it is Batui
River that periodically monitored. The data comes from secondary data of measurement of
river surface height and also calculation conducted by Department of Public Work, General
Directorate of Water Resource, Palu Regency, 1995-2004. The width of Batui drainage basin
is about 240 km
2
. The determination of river debit stream level is relied on result of rating
curve calculation Q = 50,978(H-0.010)
2,750
. It is obtained from the calculation of water
surface height and river debit start from data of year 1990 up to 2004. Table 3.21 shows
the calculation result of river debit of Batui, measured from Kampung Sambang, 57 km from

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-29
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
town of Luwuk to Toili. Location of Automatic Water Surface Height Calculation Station is in
the coordinate of 01
o
14'29''S, 122
o
31'00''BT.

Table 3.21. Average Debit Daily in Batui River, Banggai Regency
Flow Debit (m
3
/ Second)
Month
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
J anuary 25.30 36.60 10.00 5.17 5.23 5.05 14.80 7.46 16.82 41.67
February 31.40 33.30 11.10 2.32 6.20 7.75 6.27 5.33 14.77 26.83
March 29.84 25.20 18.00 3.72 10.45 9.16 9.15 18.24 17.82 27.79
April 40.57 36.40 24.70 11.30 14.70 15.40 14.70 13.64 20.30 55.71
May 51.30 54.60 15.10 25.60 30.30 16.60 15.50 24.64 21.17 58.43
J une 47.55 86.70 28.80 33.50 42.80 69.50 14.20 44.67 57.00 73.82
J uly 50.23 64.70 78.80 26.70 10.90 59.50 11.09 19.34 62.67 192.91
August 30.33 87.20 7.72 61.20 17.60 17.40 10.56 3.35 66.00 26.65
September 25.99 30.60 3.76 15.40 7.32 7.57 7.54 1.56 41.60 77.31
October 20.50 36.30 2.62 9.77 10.50 9.78 5.12 0.15 23.27 9.19
November 48.30 22.80 2.38 6.40 15.98 13.10 8.77 1.38 40.22 9.27
December 30.27 17.70 12.50 6.64 19.30 15.76 5.13 2.33 42.22 23.23
Total 431.58 532.1 215.48 207.72 191.28 246.57 122.83 142.09 423.86 622.81
Average Daily 35.97 44.34 17.96 17.31 15.94 20.55 10.24 11.84 35.32 51.90
Source: Department of Public Work, General Directorate of Water Resource, Palu Regency, year 1995-2004


Thereby, The Environmental Quality could be categorized as very good. Amount of water
required for the activity of Hydrostatic test is estimated to be 20,000 m
3
, while the river debit of
Batui River per day is 94,093 m
3
/ day. Therefore, the hydrostatic test could use 20.000 m
3
of
water and only for one test, hence there will be no influence to the degradation of river debit.
Moreover, the hydrostatic test could be conducted in rain season, where in that moment the
condition river debit is quite stable. Therefore, the environmental quality of river water quantity
is very good (scale 5).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-30
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

b. Run-off Debit
Calculation of the run-off debit is using the rational formula (empiric):

Q = 0.028C.I .A

Where:
Q = Debit of the surface water run-off
C = Coefficient of surface Stream
I = Rain Intensity (mm / hour)
A = Area width / DAS area (Ha)

The empiric formula needs the data of land use in the research area which could determine
the number of run-off coeficient. Table 3.22 shows the land use in the research area, run-
off coeficient of the each land use, and its average coeficient.

Table 3.22. Run-off Coeficient
No
Land
Use
Width (Ha)
(A)
C. C*A C rt tang
1 Bushes 1908.21 0.21 400.7241
2 Settlement 1871 0.4 748.4
3 Forest 17,094.65 0.1 1709.465
4 Plantation 4,385.02 0.29 1271.6558 0.189501
5 Rice Field 8,895.36 0.18 1601.1648
6 Wet rice field 1,373.57 0.22 302.1854
7 Dry field 7,196.87 0.29 2087.0923
8 Suakat forest 271.5 0.1 27.15
Total 42996.18 8147.8374


Acoording to the value of each run-off coeficient derived from its land use and width, the
run-off coeficient is 0,189501.
Average run-off coeficient (C) = 0.18951
Research area width (A) = 42,996.18 Ha.
Rain intensity + 1856.6 mm/year or (I) = 2.1488 mm/hour
Run-off Debit Q = 0.0028 C.I.A
= 0.0028 * 0.189501 * 42996.18
= 22.8134 m
3
/ sec
The area for well drilling is 12 (wells) *10.000 m
2
= 120,000 m
2
( = 12 Ha).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-31
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Coefficient of surface Stream (C) = 0.64
Area width (A) = 12. Ha.
Rain Intensity + 1856,6 mm/year or (I) = 2.1488 mm/hour

Debit of the surface water run-off Q = 0.0028 C.I.A
= 0.0028 * 0.64 * 2.1488
= 0.0722 m
3
/sec


3.1.5.3 Groundwater Quality
The existence of Groundwater in an area is influenced by rainfall and characteristic of geological
formation. The research area consists of some rock formation; they are old volcouldic rock,
limestone and napal sediment. The formation has the ability to augment the Recent volcouldic
Groundwater that comes from rain that happened with different speed. According to secondary
data of Groundwater potency from Bappeda of Banggai Regency (2006), annual Groundwater
potency is equal to 387 X 106 m
3
/ year or 1.035 X 106 m
3
/ day. The Groundwater debit is very
big in this area. According to the quantity of Groundwater reserve (debit), hence if it is used for
well drilling (420 m
3
/ well), BS operational (25 m
3
/ day), and LNG refinery (75 m
3
/ day), its
influence to the degradation of groundwater debit is quite small. Therefore, the environmental
quality of ground water quality is very good (scale 5).

3.1.6 Hydro-Oceanography Condition
3.1.6.1 Bathymetry

The deep of water supply near the location plan is 20 meters; it is reachable between 50m to
100 from the coastline. At 100 meter, distance from the coastline is relatively steep with the
depth almost 100 meters. There are many coral in some coast, either died or alive. In area of
Batui Foreland, there are many coral in some places but not at all over the coastline.

Generally, the topography of coastline all over the study location is slope. The coastal location
height has range from 1 to 5 meters above the sea surface. To road is between 200-500 meters
from coastline, except in 2 Forelands, they are Kanali Foreland and Ulin Foreland, the distance is
500 - 1000 meters.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-32
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM



Figure 3.3. Bathymetry Map of Study Region and Location of Port Plan


3.1.6.2 The Ebb

The Ebb in the coastal territorial water of refinery and dock location usually has the same phase
and height. The difference of the ebb is between 100 120 centimeters. The typical ebb at the
location is mixed semi-diurnal by twice installs and twice withdraws per day.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-33
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
10:30 17:30 0:30 7:30 14:30 21:30 4:30 11:30
Waktu (jam)
T
i
n
g
g
i

m
u
k
a

a
i
r

(
m
m
)
manual tide g

Figure 3.4. Depiction of the Ebb Water Level in Kanali Foreland


3.1.6.3 Wave Study

Generally, the wave condition in study location is relatively small and very calm. The wave could
be seen among 0.1 m to 0.5 m, and it is happened around the evening.

Based on the wind data from Bubung Airport, the mean wind speed is among 3-6 knot/s.
Dominant wind direction as stipulated in wind rose is from south, followed by eastward and then
south-east direction. The daily maximum wind speed is among 3 to 27 knot/s dominant from
South. Based on the records from 2000-2004, the Station Meteorology of Bubung Airport, the
wind rose is presented as follows in Figure 3.5.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-34
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM















Figure 3.5. Maximum Wind Rose in Study Region


From the wind and fetch data of each direction, the height and wave period could be measured
by using SMB pattern, which have been mentioned above. The wave data could be seen in
graphic of wave rose, at Figure 3.6.

Based on the records, the maximum wave is among 1.5 m, it is happened at the East Monsoon
and South East Monsoon (from April to August). Based on OCDI, 1991, the critical wave height
for cargo is 0.5 m. In order to get the calmness of basin for medium ship and large ship, the
wave break building is needed.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-35
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


Figure 3.6. Maximum Wind Rose in Study Region


3.1.6.4 Stream

The stream data in Surf Zone is taken from coastal territorial water of Batui Foreland, float
tracking is used to measure the stream. Measurement at 2 dots is conducted for the stream
forecast in the offshore zone, each at the different depth (0,2d; 0.6d; 0,8d) with interval every
an hour for 25 hours. Location of the ebb is almost the same with location in the surf zone, only
at the -20 meters of depth. At that depth, the waves have not yet broken. Generally, the wave
at the location is relatively small, among 0.1 until 0,9 m/sec. The wave record is depicted in the
form of stream rose, in Figure 3.7.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-36
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

Figure 3.7. The Stream Ebb Rose


3.1.6.5 Floating Sediment and Coastal Sediment

Floating sediment condition in the study location is very clear, it means that there is no
sediment contain on it. From the indication, it could be said that the sedimentation process is
very small at that location, except in the river estuary.

At the coastal sediments, there is smoother sand that contains clay on it. It is estimated that the
sediment is the deposit of the river. The harsh sand could be met near the Batui Foreland.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-37
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
3.1.7 Space, Land, and Soil
3.1.7.1 Spatial Layout Plan

The Province Spatial Layout of Central Sulawesi of 2000-2004 (Perda No 2 of 2004) state that
the area use is either for preservation area or cultivated area. The mining area is delinisated in
the area that have mine content.

Based on its potention, the mine area plan, especially the A category in Central Sulawesi
Province is:
a. Oil and Gas, in Batui district, Banggai regency; Petasia district, Morowali regency and
Banggai Kepulauan regency.
b. Nickel in Kolondale, Petasia district, Bungku Barat, Bungku Tengah; and Bungku Selatan in
Morowali regency;
c. Coal, in Poso regency, Buol, Donggala and Banggai Kepulauan
d. Galena in Lewara Hulu river, Gawalise mountain Marawola district Donggala regency.

According to the existing RTRWP, the study area is in the Batui district which is planned as the
oil and gas mining area, thus the plan complies with the RTRWP.

Based on The Regional Spatial Layout Plan (RTRW) of Banggai 2003-2013 (Bappeda Kab.
Banggai, 2003), it shows that regional plan activity at Toili Barat, Toili, and Batui and Kintom, is
included in the Region of South Development (Figure 3.8). Regional Space Structure Plan of
PPGM activity development for each districts will be different; Toili will be the Center of Local
Activity (KPKL), Batui will be the Center of Sub Regional Activity (KPKSW), and Kintom will be
developed to become The Center of Special Activity (KPKK).

According to the Moderate Scenario, space exploitation for each project location will be treated
differently (Figure 3.9). Toili Barat, as the Matindok Gas Development area, will become the
settlement, company location, food crop, covert area, etc. Matindok gas development area in
Toili will be exploited to become company location, food crop, settlement area, and for the
others reserves. While in Matindok gas development area in Batui will be exploited to become
Preserved forest (Suaka Margasatwa Bangkiriang), covert area, transmigration, settlement area,
food crop, industrial location and plantation.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-38
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
























Figure 3.8. The Regional Space Structure Plan in Banggai


















EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-39
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

















Figure 3.9. The Pattern of Moderate Scenario of Space Exploitation















EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-40
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
3.1.7.2 Land Use
A. Settlement
The closest settlement that has direct relation with the location of activity plan, are:
a) Production Wells and GPF located in district of Toili Barat, district of Toili and district
Batui, that cover most village in that region.
b) Installation of GPF gas ring to J unction of Senoro, channeled to a consumer and LNG
refinery and transportation of condensate from BS to Bajo through way of all villages in
district of Toili Barat, Toili, Batui.
c) Development of the LNG refinery is located in Uso (district of Batui) or around Padang
(Kintom district).
Resident around activity plan, generally resides around connective provincial street of Luwuk
- Baturube.

B. Agriculture / Cultivated Area
Agriculture/plantation activity labored by society is the plantation of seasonal crop such as
rice, palawija, fruits crop (coconut, mango, banana, guava, jackfruit, rambutan), and
industrial crop (oil palm tree, chocolate crop and coconut).

At farm, which is far from settlement, the general plant pattern is started with cutting and
burning activity, but not nomaden, and the farm is usually used for planting rice two times a
year, then maize crop, chocolate crop and coconut. If chocolate crop or coconut crop are no
longer productive, then it will be rejuvenated again. Beside chocolate and coconut, which is
quite dominant, palm also starts to be labored by part of society who has adequate financial
capability.
From the description and Map of Land Use at Study Area (see the Appendix 5), The land use
at study area consists of: bushes 1,908.21 Ha, beting karang 291.54 Ha, settlement
1,871.29 Ha, forest 17,094.65, plantation 4,385.02, rice field, 8,895.36, wet rice field
1,373.57 Ha, non irrigated farm 7,196.87 Ha and Preserved forest 271.50 Ha.
1. Soil
Soil represents result of processes influenced by climate and organism of soil, which lay
in certain topography position during certain time. Soil substance is different from the
rock that is generally still fresh and hard. The soil substance came from the decay of
rock which possibly reside in near or far from area of soil substance, if the soil
substance represents the sediment material, which come far from its origin area. The

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-41
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
soil forming process is always earlier than the rock forming process that exist under the
soil. Time of soil forming started since soil substance formed or precipitated, where the
substance represents sediment material.

Climate influence the soil forming process through rainfall and temperature, and they
influence the soil humidity. Climate influence the chemical reactions in soil. The
intensive chemical reaction happens in hot temperature condition with sufficient
humidity. In the hot and dry condition, there is no chemical reaction. There is only soil
physical processes which is in the rock crushing form. Thereby, at area which have
different climate will also have the different soil characteristic. Climate variation in
research area globally is not too high, but the in the local scale, relief influence to the
temperature, and it could be felt.

Soil organism influences the process of soil forming through micro and macro organism
that exists in and on the soil surface. The main role of macro organism is its activity,
which could remove the soil material from one coat to other coat. Beside that, organic
pickings could generate the soil growth, especially the availability of organic substance
in soil. Microorganism activity in soil also releases certain substances, which could
influence the chemical reaction. Availability of cavity in soil as a result of animal activity
enlarges the capacities of surface water infiltration.

Soil substances determines the soil fertility required by crop. But, at ancient soil, the soil
substance influence shall no longer be real because most of all crop nutrients have been
cleaned and lose through the surface and go out through the ground water stream. Soil
substance influences the nature of physical, chemical, biological, and soil morphology in
study region. The substance, which contains a lot of Ca element, will tend to form the
soil, which has settled structure and consistent ossify in a dry state. The substance,
which contains a lot of iron, will be rose colored if in a good condition drainage and
have granular structure.
Relief involves in the process of soil forming because its big influence on existing water
on the farm surface that infiltrate into the soil profile. In the harsh relief area, some of
existing water in farm surface will become the surface stream. On the contrary, the area
with refine or flat relief, the percentage of water that soak into the soil profile will
become big as long as the ground water surface do not too close with the soil surface.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-42
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Percolation water will form soil horizon as effect of certain elements transport existence
and material that easily dissolve from the upper soil surface to the lower soil surface.
The surface limpasan in the other hand could be viewed as the new material carrier
from other place or eliminate the existing material on the soil surface. If surface
limpasan is more dominant, the process of soil forming will always be disturbed so that
the soil will always in a new state.

Soil set exist in PPGM area is classified based on system of Soepraptohardjo (1961). The
group of existing soil is group Alluvial, Regosol, Litosol, Latosol, Grumusol, and Lateritik.
Each group consists of more detailed soil set. Each soil set with its disseminating, usage,
fertility level and its danger is elaborated furthermore according to the field survey
result and the laboratory analyze. In the soil fertility analysis, the parameter are texture,
pH, organic substance, Nitrogen (total and available), available Phosphor, Convert
Cation capacity, Base Saturation, Base Element (K, Na, Mg, Ca), and Soil Permeability.

Alluvial soil is spread around the alluvial plain. In the new alluvial plain, its soil coat still
shows the existence of its ex- precipitation process with the different period. Alluvial soil
around the PPGM area is grey hidromorf and grumusol type. At old alluvial plain, alluvial
soil has developped so at some place, it turns into the soil Grumusol. There are twoarea
of sampling, at Kini-kini and Minakarya. These area is included into alluvial plain soilform
which in seventh month of the year is suffused by water. The level of permeability is
rather late (0.88 cm/hour), causing the process of water at the pond requires one week.

The lower alluvial plains have groundwater surface that near the surface. The superficial
groundwater cause the water saturated soil, so that all existing metal or base in a soil is
reducted (low valence). In a such state, the soil becomes the grey chromatic. The soil is
usually acid so that some metal element in soil could be poisonous for crop. Soil pH is
varied, from rather acid to neutral. The clay texture have the high cation convert
capacities. The base saturation level from the two sampling area (61.05 % and 72.25%)
indicates that this area hes fertile soil and suitable for rice field area.

Regosol soil, the same with alluvial soil, represents the underdeveloped soil. Generally,
soil Regosol comes from new precipitated substance or caused by intensive
geomorphology processes so there is no soil forming process. Regosol around the area
of PPGM expands in non productive coastal rapid by area which is relative narrow.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-43
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Generally, Regosol in unproductive coastal area. Regosol soil is not exploited as
agriculture area in this area because of its low fertility level and narrow width.

The litosol represents the thin soil by solum < 50 cm and have direct contact with the
hard rock mains, that exist below. Litosol is possibly formed at hard rock base, so that
produces the limited soil substance. However, Litosol is also formed by other soil that
experiencing the next erodibility. Litosol soil lays in hilly area of denudation in the Kayoa
(pipe line). According to the laboratory analysis, this hilly area has the soil that tends to
be acid (pH H
2
O 5.42), while at valey area have the pH that reach 5.96 (rather acid).
Thereby, level of soil acidity becomes the constrictor factor in soil fertility level of this
area. At some part of valley area in Kayoa were utilized as agriculture field of rice farm
that often have the pond. This pond is resulted from the closed water limpasan from the
top of hill by dam of water channel. This condition disturbs crop growth, and the rice
tends to be thin and yellow. The potency of Soil Litosol is finite and suggested to be
used as the non-agriculture area or let it be natural area if there is no adequate funds to
manage this area.

Latosol represents the soil expanded under the wet climate and make deep soil profile.
Latosol formed at the volcouldic substance, which lay in the conducive relief condition
with good drainage. The Latosol is formed by percolation water that bring smooth
material from the upper soil surface to the lower soil surface. The soil is formed by good
internal drainage, hence Latosol is distinguished by the same red soil colors from the
top to the under with the medium smooth soil structure under the surface. Latosol have
the rather low acidity (5.5 - 6.0) as a consequence of wet climate influenced that
dissolves some of basa content that exist in soil substance. Latosol could be found in
area of Maleoraja and Matindok, together with the sandstone and conglomerate rock.
Latosol represents the potential soil for agriculture, but also have big erosion potency as
a consequence of its position at hilly area and mountain. The infiltration of Latosol is
good to control the flood, also could guarantee the availability of wellspring for year.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-44
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM



Figure 3.10. Opening Farm by Forest Combustion In Maleoraja

Variation of Latosol soil in area of Matindok and Maleoraja is brownish yellow Latosol.
Abrownish yellow Latosol tends to be pale represents the soil that have been moldered
to which its soil growth will form the Oksisols soil type. Although this soil have
experienced the leaching process, the base saturation could still be kept. Result of
laboratory analysis indicates that the saturation of base soil is more than 35%. Organic
Substance content is also relatively high in hilly bevel area (3.49%). At valley area
between the hills, the organic substance content have increase its percentage as a
consequence of sediment material accumulation from hillside and this area have been
developped as plantation area with adequate fertility level. The valley plantation area
has sufficient water. This valley area also has association with the flood plain of Kayoa
River. So there is a possibility of flood repeated period in this area. So, it could be
concluded that the Maleoraja and Matindok area is fertile. Nevertheless, conservation
aspects have to be in consideration remember that the area have level inclination which
later will cause erosion and soilslide. In this area, there are some farm opening by forest
combustion. This condition will degrade the farm quality, furthermore, if there is no soil
conservation system, it will generate the farm degradation.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-45
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

Figure 3.11. Latosol Soil in Matindok

The soil lateritic lays in hilly area of Minahaki and Dongin. This soil type is formed in
area with high rainfall and high temperature. High temperature is generated by process
of geology period intrusive. The high temperature will speed up the process of organic
mineral substance which could make balance to the hummidification process, so it could
generate CO
2
and H
2
O. This substances will speed up the rock decomposes, as well as
Al and Fe by dissolving basa ion of K, Ca, Na, and Mg. This Soil is formed by rock in the
form of limestone and conglomerate from Bongka Formation with the forming age of
Mieosen-Pliestosen period. The rock age indicates that the soil in area is old with the
intensive decay level. Soil colors is very homogeneous, that is 10 R 4/6. The soil
thickness is more than 1.5 meter. According to the result of soil laboratory in Dongin
and Minahaki, it soil has very low base saturation (less than 35%). The texture is dusty
clay, this soil remains to have rather fast permeability class. This condition is generated
by strong soil structure in the form of granuler formed by Fe and Al. This soil type is
very sensitive to erosion and soilslide. Thereby, the fertility of soil in this area is very
low.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-46
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


Figure 3.12. Lateritic Soil with the Colors of 10 R 4/ 6 in Minahaki Area

Grumusol represent the clay soil having high wrinkling energy as a consequence of clay
smectite type existence. This clay type is specifically formed under tropic climate. The
grumusol expands from any substance which could generate the high clay value (>
35%) and under base atmosphere where the major element is Ca in its cation transfer.
The availibility of Ca element in this jerapan area comes from mineral of substance
compiler predominated by Ca-Plagioklas and/or get the augmentation from
condensation of Ca of rock that exist in vicinity. Grumusol represent the soil with
potential adequate for the development of agriculture if there is sufficient water volume.
At dry condition, the Grumusol will experience the barst with more than 1 cm width and
more than 50 cm depth. At some place, the depth could reach 10 cm and more than 1
m. This barst often generate the unfavourable effect at technique building, such as
house, road, and even bridge. The disseminating of Grumusol in study area is in hilly
area of Sukamaju. The rock that exist in this area is napal stone and slit with the high
Ca value. The condition generate the soil reaction in base atmosphere. The low organic
substance (0.6%) is generated by intensive erosion process (Figuree 3.13). Level of
base saturation is 89.45%.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-47
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM








Figure 3.13. High Erosion Level of Grumusol Soil in Sukamaju Area


The other Grumusol soil that is formed in calcify hilly area of Batui is Rendzina soil. This
soil represents the soil which still new (its growth is horizon A and C). The soil is
greyish-black, with granular structure in the upper surface. This soil always contain
CaCo
3
, so its pH tends to be base (the pH in this area is the highest around PPGM area,
it is 7.2). This soil less suitable for agriculture farm due to of its low fertility and thin
soil.








Figure 3.14. Rendzina Soil in Batui with the Limestone Rock




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-48
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
2. Soil Erosion
Level of soil erosion is calculated by the formula of soil loss according to Wischmeir and
Smith (1978) or known as USLE, presented as follows:

A = R.K.LS.C.P
Note :
A : the value of missing soil (ton/ha/year)
R : rain erosivity factor
K : index of erodability soil factor
L : index of bevel length factor
S : index of bevel inclination factor
C : index of vegetation coverage factor
P : index of farm management factor

Level of rain erosivity is calculated by:
R (= EI
30
) = 2.21 P
1.36

Note : R = monthly average rain erosovity (ton/ha)
P = monthly average rainfall (cm)

Thereby:
The monthly average rainfall is calculated as follows:
annual average of P = 1,856.6 mm/year
monthly average of P = 1.656 / 12
= 154.7167 mm/month
= 15.47167 cm/hour

R (= EI
30
) = 2.21 x P
1.36

= 2.21 x (15.47167)
1.36

= 276,477.35 ton/ha





EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-49
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
The soil erodability is calculated by considering the soil characteristic:
2.713 M
1.14
(10)
-4
(12-a) + 3.25 (b-2) + 2.5 (c-2)
K = ---------------------------------------------------------------
100

Note :
For example, at the Minahaki area, the soil texture of research area is dusty clay, hence
the M value = 6,330
Organic substance percentage ( C-Organic) = 1.72%
A value = 1.72% x 1.724
= 2.96528 = 0.0296528

The good soil structure is lump, hence the (b) value = 3
The average soil permeability of research area is late, hence the (c) value = 2
By including the value of M, a, b and c into equation, the K value is:

2.713 M
1,14
(10
)-4
(12-a) + 3.25 (b-2) + 2.5 (c-2)
K = ---------------------------------------------------------------
100

2.713 x 6330
1.14
(10)
-4
(12-0.0296528) + 3.25 (3-2) + 2,5 (2-2)
K = --------------------------------------------------------------------------
100
K = 0,24

The bevel length is 100 m and number of bevel is various among 60%,
hence LS = 35,22.
The coverage crop is in the form of bush, hence C = 0,30
The farm management system have P value = 1,00
According to the data, the level of missing soil as an effect of erosion at initial profile is:
A = R.K.LS.C.P
= 276,477.35 x 0.24 x 35.22 x 0.30 x 1.00
= 3,872.18 ton/ha/year

The erosion value at initial profile for the soil in Minahaki region which is used as bush
area is classified into average category in the environmental quality scale (scale 3).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-50
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
In the same calculation for region of Maleoraja and Sukamaju, hence the value of each
erosion determinant factor and the value of erosion is presented in Table 3.23 and
Table of 3.24.


Table 3.23. Calculation of The Soil Erodability Value (K)
No Area
%
Dirt
% very
smooth
sand
%
Clay
% organic
substance
Structure
class
Permeability
Class
Soil
erodability
(K)
1 Minahaki 46.07 2.03 42.81 1.72 3.00 2.00 0.24
2 Maleoraja 31.67 7.60 36.77 3.49 4.00 3.00 0.21
3 Sukamaju 87.81 3.18 6.32 0.60 3.00 4.00 0.98
Source: Primary Data 2007


Table 3.24. Level of Soil Lose (Erosion) at the research Area
No Area
Rain
Erosivity
(R)
Soil
Erodibility
(K)
Bevel
length
(m)
Bevel
Inclinasi
(%)
I ndex
LS
Cover
Vegetation
Index
C
Index
P
Erosion
(ton/ ha/
year)
Quality Scala
Enviromental
1 Minahaki 276,477.35 0.24 100.00 60.00 35.22 Bush 0.30 1.00 3,872.18 3
2 Maleoraja 276,477.35 0.21 100.00 60.00 35.22 Forest 0.0010 1.00 11.47 5
3 Sukamaju 276,477.35 0.98 100.00 35.00 16.56 Farm 0.40 1.00 10,074. 17 2
Source: Primary Data 2007

According to the erosion condition, the erosion level in the area for dry field such as in
Sukamaju is very high (10,074.17 ton/ha/year) with the bad environmental quality scale
(scale 2), The bush area in Minahaki with erosion value about 3,872.18 ton/ha/ year
have average environmental quality scale (scale 3), and at the forest area as in region
of Maleorejo have the small erosion level about 11,47 ton/ha/year, with the
environmental quality scale is very good (scale 5). Considering the environmental
management as a consequence of Matindok Gas development activity, hence the
proponent must know that the area for gas fields is in the area with low erosivity.
Therefore, it needs to be well managed in order not to increase the level of erosivity.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-51
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
3.1.8 Transportation

To estimate the impact magnitude for transportation component, hence the data needed for the
analysis is the condition of traffic current, condition of street network, condition of road
hardening, environmental condition around the road that have a relationship with level of road
consumer safety, is elaborated as follows.

3.1.8.1 Traffic Current

Transportation component to be studied is current traffic at joint streets and branch affected by
existence of activity of Matindok Gas Development Project. The condition that needs to be
analyzed is the daily road condition in the study area. The type of vehicle is presented as
follows:
LV (Light Vehicle) : private passenger car, mini bus, pick up
HV (Heavy Vehicle) : big bus, big truck
MHV (Medium Heavy Vehicle) : medium bus, medium truck
MC (Motor Cycle) : motorcycle


Table 3.25. The Volume of of Vehicle Traffic at Luwuk in Kintom-Batui Road

Vehicle Type
HV MHV LV
Time
BB TB BS TS AU MP
SM
Total
06.00-07.00 0 0 0 1 3 0 21 25
07.00-08.00 0 0 0 1 12 1 44 58
08.00-09.00 0 0 1 1 28 0 55 85
09.00-10.00 0 1 1 2 23 2 46 75
10.00-11.00 0 0 0 1 10 1 23 35
11.00-12.00 0 0 0 4 4 0 11 19
12.00-13.00 0 1 1 2 2 0 15 21
13.00-14.00 0 0 0 1 3 2 12 18
14.00-15.00 0 0 0 2 4 1 24 31
15.00-16.00 0 1 0 0 2 2 23 28
16.00-17.00 0 0 1 1 1 1 22 26
17.00-18.00 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 7
Source: Measurement in field, Agustus 2007
Note: BB: Big Bus; BS: Medium Bus; TB: Big Truck; S: Medium Truck;
AU: Public Transport; MP: Private Vehicle; SM:Motorcycle


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-52
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Fluktuasi Arus Lalulintas Arah ke Luwuk
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
6
.
0
0
-
0
7
.
0
0
0
7
.
0
0
-
0
8
.
0
0
0
8
.
0
0
-
0
9
.
0
0
0
9
.
0
0
-
1
0
.
0
0
1
0
.
0
0
-
1
1
.
0
0
1
1
.
0
0
-
1
2
.
0
0
1
2
.
0
0
-
1
3
.
0
0
1
3
.
0
0
-
1
4
.
0
0
1
4
.
0
0
-
1
5
.
0
0
1
5
.
0
0
-
1
6
.
0
0
1
6
.
0
0
-
1
7
.
0
0
1
7
.
0
0
-
1
8
.
0
0
Waktu
V
o
l
u
m
e

(
K
e
n
d
/
J
a
m
)
J enis Kendaraan
HV
J enis Kendaraan
HV
J enis Kendaraan
MHV
J enis Kendaraan
MHV
J enis Kendaraan
LV
J enis Kendaraan
LV
J enis Kendaraan
MC

Figure 3.15. Fluctuation of Current traffic in Road of Kintom-Batui to Luwuk.


Table 3.26. Volume of Vehicle Traffic at Toili in Kintom Batui Road

Vehicle Type
HV MHV LV Time
BB TB BS TS AU MP MC
Total
06.00-07.00 0 0 0 0 3 1 21 25
07.00-08.00 0 0 0 3 5 6 24 38
08.00-09.00 0 0 0 1 3 0 22 26
09.00-10.00 0 0 0 3 6 5 27 41
10.00-11.00 0 1 1 2 5 3 24 36
11.00-12.00 0 0 0 3 6 1 19 29
12.00-13.00 0 0 0 1 3 3 17 24
13.00-14.00 0 0 0 2 4 0 20 26
14.00-15.00 0 1 1 3 2 1 25 33
15.00-16.00 0 0 0 1 3 2 15 21
16.00-17.00 0 0 0 1 1 1 12 15
17.00-18.00 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 7
Source: Measurement in field, Agustus 2007
Note: BB: Big Bus; BS: Medium Bus; TB: Big Truck; S: Medium Truck;
AU: Public Transport; MP: Private Vehicle; SM:Motorcycle



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-53
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Fluktuasi Arus Lalulintas Arah ke Toili
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
6
.
0
0
-
0
7
.
0
0
0
7
.
0
0
-
0
8
.
0
0
0
8
.
0
0
-
0
9
.
0
0
0
9
.
0
0
-
1
0
.
0
0
1
0
.
0
0
-
1
1
.
0
0
1
1
.
0
0
-
1
2
.
0
0
1
2
.
0
0
-
1
3
.
0
0
1
3
.
0
0
-
1
4
.
0
0
1
4
.
0
0
-
1
5
.
0
0
1
5
.
0
0
-
1
6
.
0
0
1
6
.
0
0
-
1
7
.
0
0
1
7
.
0
0
-
1
8
.
0
0
Waktu
V
o
l
u
m
e

(
K
e
n
d
/
J
a
m
)
J enis Kendaraan
HV
J enis Kendaraan
HV
J enis Kendaraan
MHV
J enis Kendaraan
MHV
J enis Kendaraan
LV
J enis Kendaraan
LV
J enis Kendaraan
MC

Figure 3.16. Fluctuation of Current traffic in Road of Kintom-Batui to Toili

3.1.8.2 Network Road
Network road to be observed covers entire road network which is later estimated for the
transportation route of material at construction phase. From field observation result, the data of
geometry and road hardening condition could be obtained, and presented as follows:
Geometry of road:
Geometry of road in is presented as follows:
(1) Inter Luwuk- Kintom : - road hardening width : 7.0 meter
- road shoulder width : 1.0 meter (Left/Right)
(2) Inter Kintom- Batui : - road hardening width : 4.5 meter
- road shoulder width : 0.5 meter (Left/Right)
(3) Inter Batui-Toili : - road hardening width : 4.5 meter
- road shoulder width : 0,5 meter (Left/Right)
(4) Inter Toili- Dongi : - road hardening width : 3.7 meter
- road shoulder width : 0.5 meter (Left/Right)

Road Hardening Condition
The condition of road hardening which is later is estimated as material transportation at
construction phase should be as follows:

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-54
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


The road of Kintom-Batui has good
hardening level which is still 4.5 meter
width. The hardening type Makadam
penetrate layer with aus Latasir layer.



The road near the coast is affected by
sea abration. It could be seen at the
road that connects Toili Toili Barat
(Position: 51 M 0420780;
UTM:98229041)



The road connected Batui-Toili-Toili
Barat, have shown the damage ( hole).
This damage is caused by the existence
of water pond at low area.





EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-55
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
3.1.8.3 Bridge Condition

Bridge condition connected Luwuk and Toili Barat is generally in an adequate condition. Bridge
construction used two types, steel and concrete gelagar, with the the following condition:


The small bridge condition with the
traffic bandwith of 3.20 meter with the
steel construction, gristle to the
accident at night. The strength of
bridge construction is for the class II
road (Maximum MST is 8 ton).

The bridge condition that have damage
at its abutment building as an effect of
river current.


3.1.8.4 Condition Environmental around road
The Environment factor to be studied has a relationship with the level of road user safety, they
are the pedestrian and the other disturbance (such as livestock animal), that resides in the
traffic line and also parking activity in the road body (on street parking). According to the
observation in the road which later will be the road for material mobility, it was shown as
follows:
At certain places, such as area of settlement and area of district downtown (Kintom, Batui
and Toili), there was a lot of pedestrian, especially at the school day time.
In settlement area outside the urban area, there was a lot of livestock animal in the streets.
On street parking activity, especially at commerce area in district downtown.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-56
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


the number of school student in the
road at the school time, will cause
accident. This condition was seen in
area of district downtown.


At intercity road, a lot of livestock
animal at the road, so it will generate
traffic accident.


On the street parking activity, especially
at commerce area in downtown, will
reduce the road width, so it could
generate accident.






EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-57
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
3.1.8.5 Environmental Quality Scale for Transportation Component
Environmental Quality scale at transportation component covers the parameter of traffic fluency,
road user safety and damage of bridge and road. To determine the environmental quality scale
for each the parameter, hence it requires the study of road capacities, road performance, and
traffic encumbering.
1) Parameter of traffic fluency
Road Capacities
The road capacity is calculated by the guidance of Indonesian Road Capacities Manual
(MKJ I) of 1977:

C = Co x FCw x FCsp x FCsf

with:
C : real capacities (smp/hour)
Co : basic capacities (smp/hour)
FCW : road wide adjustment factor
FCSP : curretnt direction adjustment factor
FCSF : side resistance adjustment factor

The result of road capacities calculation of Kintom-Batui with road hardening width is
4,5 meter, and road shoulder width (right/left) is 0,5 meter, shall be as follows:
Co = 2900 smp/hour
FCw = 0.690 ; FCsp = 0.912 ; FCsf = 0.930
C = 2900 x 0.690 x 0.912 x 0.930
= 1814 smp/hour

Road Performance
The road performance is measured by the value of saturation degree (DS = degree of
saturation), that is a comparison between volume (Q) with the capacities (C) of the
roas. The DS value is used to determine the environmental quality scale of traffic
fluency parameter.
DS = Q/C
= 108/1814
= 0.06 (scale 5/ very fluent.)


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-58
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Performance of road for each rush hous condition (morning, day and evening) is
presented at the following table:

Table 3.27. Road Performance of Kintom-Batui
RLA
Rush Hour Q
(smp/ h
C
(smp/ h)
DS
(Q/ C)
Scale
Morning 108 2,620 0.060 5
Day 96 2,620 0.036 5
Evening 54 2,620 0.020 5
Source: field data processing with MKJ I 1997

Thereby, the environmental quality scale for the traffic fluency parameter is very
good/very fluent (Scale 5).


2) Road User Safety Parameter
The value of road user safety is very influenced by various factor, that is human being factor
(driver and pedestrian), road factor, vehicle factor and environmental factor (traffic and
activity around the road), while the level of accident victim depends on vehicle acceleration.

From the data result in field, total number of accident occurence is seldom, It means that
there is 1 occurence per year (result of interview with the local resident). To identify the
area of accident gristle with the perception area of 1 km, is hence it use the following
formula:
J KR
i
x 10
6

TKR
i
= ---------------
KL
i
x 365

From the data of current traffic and number the street accident occurence of Kintom - Batui,
the result is as follows:
1 x 10
6

TKR
i
= --------------- = 3.3 (Scale 3/ medium)
829 x 365

Thereby, the environmental quality scale for the road user safety parameter in Kintom -
Batui road could be classified as average (scale 3).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-59
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

3) Road and Bridge Damage Parameter
The level of road and bridge damage is very influenced by level of traffic encumbering. The
bridge class is following the road class, hence the traffic carrying capacity is one of the
consideration, especially the traffic for steel pipe mobility. Bridge condition in general is still
good (relatively new), so it was categorized to have good environmental quality scale
(Scale 4).

The existing road network is highly varied at each road. Condition of each road will be as
follows:
Good category, is the road from Luwuk-Kintom-Batui (scale 4)
Medium category (start to show the damage): internode of Batui-Toili-Toili Barat (scale
2).
Thereby, it was concluded that the environmental quality scale for the parameter of bridge
and road damage is average (scale 3).

3.2. BIOLOGICAL COMPONENT
3.2.1 Terrestrial Biota

The flora observation is conducted in study region at 14 area; they are at LNG Field, Santoa
River, Uso, Kinikini, well development area of Bumiharjo, well of Sukamaju, Block Station of
Singkoyo River, Minahaki well, Donggi well, Trunk line of conservated forest area, trunk line of
public plantation area, trunk line around Toili river, trunk line around Argakencoulda, and trunk
line of rice field area. The type of observed flora includes trees, bushes and herbs.

1. Vegetation in LNG-Padang Area (coastal and farm area)
LNG area is located around the coast and farm area of the resident. According to the
observation of vegetation in 10 plots, at this area there were 47 type of terrestrial flora that
consists of 24 trees, 15 bushes and 7 herbs (Table 3.28). Some existing flora type
represents the coastal cultivated crop such as Terminalia catapa. The cultivated corp is
generally planted at farm, such as Anacardium occidentale, Lannea Sp and Cocos nucifera
that have INP of 27.483; 26.163; and 20.961. The other type that have high density in the
area is Theobroma cacao with the density 11.739%, Adenanthera Sp. 10.870%. Bush type
which is found for example Eupatorium inulifolium, Lantana chamara and Sida rhombifolia,
while the dominant herbs found are Digitaria sp., Eulophia spectabilis, Ipomoea Pes-Caprae.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-60
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.28. Type of Vegetation in LNG- Padang Area
No. Spesies Common Name F FR (%) D
DR
(%)
I NP I D
Tree
1 Adenanthera sp. Segawe 4 7.018 25 10.870 17.887 0.105
2 Anacardium occidentale J ambu mete 6 10.526 39 16.957 27.483 0.131
3 Annona muricata Sirsak 2 3.509 3 1.304 4.813 0.025
4 Ardisia sp. - 1 1.754 1 0.435 2.189 0.010
5 Artocarpus communis Sukun 1 1.754 2 0.870 2.624 0.018
6 Couldarium edule Kenari 1 1.754 1 0.435 2.189 0.010
7 Ceiba pentandra Randu 1 1.754 2 0.870 2.624 0.018
8 Citrus aurantifolia J eruk nipis 3 5.263 6 2.609 7.872 0.041
9 Cocos nucifera Kelapa 6 10.526 24 10.435 20.961 0.102
10 Garcinia mangostana Manggis 1 1.754 1 0.435 2.189 0.010
11 Glyricidea sepium Gamal 4 7.018 13 5.652 12.670 0.071
12 Lannea sp Kayu kuda 5 8.772 40 17.391 26.163 0.132
13 Lansium domesticum Duku 1 1.754 1 0.435 2.189 0.010
14 Leea sp. Girang 1 1.754 1 0.435 2.189 0.010
15 Macaranga sp. Mahang 4 7.018 14 6.087 13.105 0.074
16 Mangifera indica Mangga 1 1.754 1 0.435 2.189 0.010
17 Mangifera odorata Mangga 2 3.509 2 0.870 4.378 0.018
18 Metroxylon sago Sagu 2 3.509 6 2.609 6.117 0.041
19 Nauclea orientalis Gempol 1 1.754 1 0.435 2.189 0.010
20 Psidium guajava J ambu biji 2 3.509 3 1.304 4.813 0.025
21 Terminalia catapa Ketapang 3 5.263 11 4.783 10.046 0.063
22 Theobroma cacao Coklat 3 5.263 27 11.739 17.002 0.109
23 Thespesia populnea Waru laut 1 1.754 1 0.435 2.189 0.010
24 Vitex trifolia laban 1 1.754 5 2.174 3.928 0.036
57 100 230 100 200 1.091
Bushes
1 Crotalaria sp. Orok-orok 5 8.929 35 10.542 19.471 0.103
2 Desmodium sp. Gegarertan 3 5.357 34 10.241 15.598 0.101
3 Desmodium triflorum Sisik betok 5 8.929 51 15.361 24.290 0.125
4 Dioscorea hispida Gadung 1 1.786 1 0.301 2.087 0.008
5 Eupatorium inulifolium Kirinyu 8 14.286 65 19.578 33.864 0.139
6 Ficus septica Awar-awar 3 5.357 10 3.012 8.369 0.046
7 Flemingia sp. Apah-apah 4 7.143 18 5.422 12.565 0.069
8 Hyptis brevipes J ukut 3 5.357 12 3.614 8.972 0.052
9 Lantana chamara Tembelekan 6 10.714 45 13.554 24.269 0.118
10 Mimosa pudica Putri malu 2 3.571 12 3.614 7.186 0.052
11 Securinega sp. Mangsian 1 1.786 3 0.904 2.689 0.018
12 Sida retusa Sidaguri 5 8.929 22 6.627 15.555 0.078
13 Sida rhombifolia Sidaguri 6 10.714 17 5.120 15.835 0.066
14 Stachytarpeta indica J arong 2 3.571 4 1.205 4.776 0.023
15 Urena lobata Pulut 2 3.571 3 0.904 4.475 0.018
56 100 332 100 200 1.016
Herb
1 Amorphophalus variabilis Bunga bangke 3 10.714 6 2.586 13.300 0.041
2 Anastrophus compresus Rumput pait 8 28.571 108 46.552 75.123 0.155
3 Digitaria sp. J elamparan 7 25.000 64 27.586 52.586 0.154
4 Eulophia spectabilis Anggrek 3 10.714 9 3.879 14.594 0.055
5 Geodorum densiflorum Anggrek 4 14.286 12 5.172 19.458 0.067
6 Ipomoea pes-caprae Daun barah 2 7.143 12 5.172 12.315 0.067
7 Isachne Rumput 1 3.571 21 9.052 12.623 0.094
28 100 232 100 200 0.632
Source: Primary Data 2007

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-61
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


2. Vegetation at Santoa of river Area (Padang Tangkiang)
Sampling area around of Santoa River at field area of Tangkiang resides in around the
settlement area. This area is near bythe LNG - Padang so that the existing ecosystem type is
also much the same. According to the observation of vegetation in 10 plots, at this area
there are 23 types of terrestrial flora that consists of 12 trees, 8 bushes and 3 herbs (Table
3.28). Some existing flora type represents the coastal cultivate crop type such as Terminalia
catapa. The crop that is generally in planted in the farms is Cocos nucifera having INP
equals to 50. Others type that have high density in the area is J atropha curcas with the
density equals to 36.765%. Bush type that is found for example Eupatorium inulifolium,
Stachytarpeta indica, Desmodium triflorum, while dominant herb is Colocasia sp and Musa
paradisiacal.

Table 3.29. Type of Vegetation at Santoa River Area

No Spesies Common
Name
F FR (%) D DR (%) I NP I D
Tree
1 Alstonia scholaris Pulai 1 2.941 2 1.471 4.412 0.027
2 Annona muricata Sirsat 1 2.941 4 2.941 5.882 0.045
3 Cocos nucifera Kelapa 7 20.588 40 29.412 50.000 0.156
4 Ficus septica Awar-awar 4 11.765 10 7.353 19.118 0.083
5 Ficus sp. Beringin 3 8.824 4 2.941 11.765 0.045
6 Garcinia mangostana Manggis 1 2.941 1 0.735 3.676 0.016
7 J atropha curcas J arak 5 14.706 50 36.765 51.471 0.160
8 Lannea sp. Kayu kuda 7 20.588 16 11.765 32.353 0.109
9 Leucaena glauca Lamtoro 1 2.941 1 0.735 3.676 0.016
10 Macaranga sp. Mahang 1 2.941 2 1.471 4.412 0.027
11 Muntingia calabura Murbei 1 2.941 1 0.735 3.676 0.016
12 Terminalia catapa Ketapang 2 5.882 5 3.676 9.559 0.053
34 100 136 100 200 0.753
Bush
1 Calotropis gigantea Biduri 3 8.824 8 3.478 12.302 0.051
2 Crotalaria sp. Orok-orok 4 11.765 16 6.957 18.721 0.081
3 Desmodium triflorum Sisik betok 4 11.765 80 34.783 46.547 0.160
4 Eupatorium inulifolium Kirinyu 9 26.471 66 28.696 55.166 0.156
5 Flemingia sp. Lapa-lapa 2 5.882 7 3.043 8.926 0.046
6 Hyptis brevipes J ukut 6 17.647 18 7.826 25.473 0.087
7 Lantana chamara Tembelak 4 11.765 28 12.174 23.939 0.111
8 Stachytarpeta indica J arong 5 14.706 15 6.522 21.228 0.077
34 100 230 100 200 0.717
Herb
1 Colocasia sp. Keladi 3 42.857 7 30.435 73.292 0.157
2 Ipomoea pes-caprae Daun barah 1 14.286 9 39.130 53.416 0.000
3 Musa paradisiaca Pisang 3 42.857 7 30.435 73.292 0.157
7 100 23 100 200 0.314
Source: Primary Data 2007


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-62
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


3. Vegetation at Uso Area (Beach Garden)
Sampling area of flora at Uso represents the lowsoil around the coast. Land use in this area
represents the area of settlement and lawn farm. The general existing of vegetation
represents the plantation crop such as Cocos nucifera with the density of 14,035%.
Meanwhile vegetation that exist in coastal edge generally represents the mangrove crop,
that is coastal typical of Avicenia sp crop and also Terminalia catapa and Vitex trifolia with
the density of each is 1.754% and 23.684%. Index of type variety of tree equals to 1.032.
Meanwhile, the bush type such as Eupatorium inulifolium (INP 36.281), Crotalaria Sp (INP
33.688) Sida rhombifolia (INP 30.914), while dominant herb type is Ipomoea pescaprae,
representing one of type which is generally at coastal ecosystem.

Table 3.30. Type Vegetation at Uso Area
No Species Common Name F FR(%) D DR(%) INP ID
Tree
1 Avicenia sp. Api-api 1 3.030 1 0.877 3.907 0.018
2 Bambusa arundinacea Bambu 1 3.030 2 1.754 4.785 0.031
3 Cassia siamea J ohar 1 3.030 4 3.509 6.539 0.051
4 Cerbera manghas Bintoro 3 9.091 12 10.526 19.617 0.103
5 Cocos nucifera Kelapa 5 15.152 16 14.035 29.187 0.120
6 Glyricidea sepium Gamal 3 9.091 13 11.404 20.494 0.108
7 J atropha curcas J arak 2 6.061 10 8.772 14.833 0.093
8 Lannea sp. Kayu kuda 3 9.091 9 7.895 16.986 0.087
9 Macaranga Mahang 2 6.061 3 2.632 8.692 0.042
10 Metroxylon sago Sagu 1 3.030 3 2.632 5.662 0.042
11 Papilionaceae Bunga kupu-kupu 1 3.030 2 1.754 4.785 0.031
12 Plumeria acuminata Kamboja 1 3.030 2 1.754 4.785 0.031
13 Pterocarpus indicus Angsana 1 3.030 2 1.754 4.785 0.031
14 Terminalia catapa Ketapang 1 3.030 2 1.754 4.785 0.031
15 Thespesia populnea Waru laut 3 9.091 6 5.263 14.354 0.067
16 Vitex trifolia Laban 4 12.121 27 23.684 35.805 0.148
33 100 114 100 200 1.032

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-63
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.30. continued
No Spesies Common Name F FR(%) D DR(%) INP ID
Bush
1 Acalypha indica Akalipka 4 8.511 22 8.148 16.659 0.089
2 Acrostichum speciosum Paku 1 2.128 1 0.370 2,498 0.009
3 Cassia alata Ketepeng 1 2.128 3 1.111 3.239 0.022
4 Crotalaria sp. Orok-orok 8 17.021 45 16.667 33.688 0.130
5 Eupatorium inulifolium Kirinyu 8 17.021 52 19.259 36.281 0.138
6 Hyptis brevipes J ukut 4 8.511 12 4.444 12.955 0.060
7 Lantana chamara Tembelekan 3 6.383 22 8.148 14.531 0.089
8 Manihot utilisima Ubi kayu 1 2.128 33 12.222 14.350 0.000
9 Pandanus tectorius Pandan 4 8.511 4 1.481 9.992 0.027
10 Sida rhombifolia Sidaguri 6 12.766 49 18.148 30.914 0.135
11 Stachytarpeta indica J arong 7 14.894 27 10.000 24.894 0.100
47 100 270 100 200 0.797
Herb
1 Wedelia triloba Sruni 3 25 26 24.299 49.299 0.149
2 Ipomoea aquatica Kangkung 1 8.333 6 5.607 13.941 0.070
3 Ipomoea pes-caprae Kangkungan 3 25 34 31.776 56.776 0.158
4 Panicum sp. Rumput 3 25 26 24.299 49.299 0.149
5 Pragmites sp. Parumpung 2 16.667 15 14.019 30.685 0.120
12 100 107 100 200 0,647
Source: Primary Data 2007


4. Vegetation at Kinikini
Kinikini resides around the estuary of Kayoa River and ecosystem type in this area
represents the swamp ecosystem. Composition of flora at swamp habitat consists of some
mangrove type, screw pine, nipah, and bushes. According to the observation of vegetation
in 10 plots, at this area there are 24 types of terrestrial flora that consists of 11 trees, 6
bushes and 7 herbs (Table 3.31).

At riverbank, the existing type of vegetation generally is mangrove crop, that is Rhizophora
sp and Avicenia sp by INP of each type is 17.842 and 29.823. The coconut crops also
dominant in this region, its density equals to 40% by INP 54815. The herb bushes that
could be found in the swamp ecosystem such as Pandanus tectorius, Sida rhombifolia,
Ipomoea pes-caprae and Spinifex litoreus.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-64
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.31. Type of Vegetation at Kinikini Area
No Spesies Common Name F FR (%) D DR (%) INP ID
Tree
1 Avicenia sp. Api-api 5 18.519 13 11.304 29.823 0.107
2 Buchanania arborescens - 2 7.407 2 1.739 9.147 0.031
3 Casuarina equsetifolia Cemara laut 3 11.111 13 11.304 22.415 0.107
4 Cocos nucifera Kelapa 4 14.815 46 40.000 54.815 0.159
5 Glyricidea sepium Gamal 2 7.407 10 8.696 16.103 0.092
6 Lumnitzera rasemosa Taruntum 1 3.704 1 0.870 4.573 0.018
7 Nipa fruticoulds Nipah 2 7.407 7 6.087 13.494 0.074
8 Rhizophora sp. Bakau 2 7.407 12 10.435 17.842 0.102
9 Thespesia populnea Waru laut 3 11.111 5 4.348 15.459 0.059
10 Xylocarpus granatum Miri 2 7.407 5 4.348 11.755 0.059
11 Zizyphus mauritima Widara 1 3.704 1 0.870 4.573 0.018
27 100 115 100 200 0.827
Bush
1 Acrostichum aureum Paku 3 25 23 26.136 51.136 0.152
2 Couldavalia maritima Koro 1 8.333 1 1.136 9.470 0.022
3 Eupatorium inulifolium Kirinyu 1 8.333 14 15.909 24.242 0.127
4 Hyptis brevipes J ukut 3 25 25 28.409 53.409 0.155
5 Pandanus tectorius Pandan 2 16.667 6 6.818 23.485 0.080
6 Sida rhombifolia Sidaguri 2 16.667 19 21.591 38.258 0.144
12 100 88 100 200 0.680
Herb
1 Cassytha filiformis Sangir langit 2 10.526 28 12.613 23.139 0.113
2 Frimbistylis sp. Bulu mata 2 10.526 15 6.757 17.283 0.079
3 Ipomoea pes-caprae Kangkungan 5 26.316 40 18.018 44.334 0.134
4 Panicum sp. Rumput 3 15.789 50 22.523 38.312 0.146
5 Pragmites sp. Parumpung 2 10.526 52 23.423 33.950 0.148
6 Saccharum spontaneum Glagah 2 10.526 17 7.658 18.184 0.085
7 Spinifex litoreus Rumput angin 3 15.789 20 9.009 24.798 0.094
19 100 222 100 200 0.800
Source: Primary Data 2007


5. Vegetation at Well Development of Donggi Area
Area of Donggi development well represents the rice field area, with the main crop type is
paddy (Oryza sativa). Generally, the paddy is planted twice in a year and the alternative
crop is palawija. At this area, there is only one tree, which grows in rice field, that is guava
(Psidium guajava). Some type of herb bush which is dominated the area of rice field for
example Hyptis brevipes, Mimosa pudica, Cleome aspera, Desmodium Sp. Panicum Sp. and
Cyperus spas wich is presented in Table 3.32.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-65
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.32. Type of Vegetation around Area of Donggi Development Well
No Spesies Common Name F FR(%) D DR(%) INP ID
Bush
1 Achyranthes sp. J arong 1 6.250 3 1.852 8.102 0.032
2 Ageratum conyzoides Wedusan 2 12.500 6 3.704 16.204 0.053
3 Cleome aspera - 1 6.250 23 14.198 20.448 0.000
4 Desmodium sp. Sisik betok 1 6.250 24 14.815 21.065 0.000
5 Euphorbia hirta Patian 1 6.250 8 4.938 11.188 0.000
6 Hyptis brevipes J ukut 2 12.500 26 16.049 28.549 0.128
7 Ludwigia ascendens Krangkong 1 6.250 4 2.469 8.719 0.040
8 Mimosa invisa Pis kucing 1 6.250 5 3.086 9.336 0.000
9 Mimosa pudica Putri malu 2 12.500 25 15.432 27.932 0.125
10 Physalis angulata Ceplukan 1 6.250 2 1.235 7.485 0.000
11 Sida rhombifolia Sidaguri 1 6.250 2 1.235 7.485 0.024
12 Stachytarpeta indica J arong 1 6.250 15 9.259 15.509 0.096
13 Synedrella nodiflora Babadotan 1 6.250 19 11.728 17.978 0.000
16 100 162 100 200 0.497
Herb
1 Commelina sp. Glegor 4 12.500 17 3.761 16.261 0.054
2 Cyperus sp. Teki 6 18.750 28 6.195 24.945 0.075
3 Eleusin indica Suket tulangan 2 6.250 23 5.088 11.338 0.066
4 Ipomoea aquatica Kangkung 2 6.250 11 2.434 8.684 0.039
5 Marsilea crenata Semanggi 3 9.375 42 9.292 18.667 0.096
6 Oryza sativa Padi 8 25.000 200 44.248 69.248 0.157
7 Panicum sp. Rumput 6 18.750 125 27.655 46.405 0.154
8 Peperomia sp. Sirih 1 3.125 6 1.327 4.452 0.000
32 100 452 100 200 0.640
Source: Primary Data 2007


6. Vegetation at Sukamaju Well Area

The result of flora observation in area of Sukamaju well, there are 61 flora types that
consists of 31 trees, 20 bushes and 11 herbs. Area of the drilling well in Sukamaju resides in
around the SM Bangkiriang. At this area, the variety index of tree is 1.327. The dominant
type is Lansium domesticum, Macaranga Sp, Parkia speciosa, Pometia Sp with the frequency
equals to 5.607%. Meanwhile, for the bush type is Eupatorium inulifolium with the
frequency equals to 12.903%, density equals to 46.859% and INP equals to 59.762. Type of
herb with the highest density value is Paspalum sp with the frequency and density of each is
20.833% and 60.390%. Result of flora observation with the sampling plot in area of
Sukamaju well is presented at the following table.





EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-66
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.33. Type of Vegetation around the Drilling Gas Area of Sukamaju
No Spesies Common Name F
FR
(%)
D
DR
(%)
I NP I D
Tree
1 Adenanthera sp. Segawe 5 4.673 3 1.282 5.955 0.024
2 Anacardium occidentale J ambu monyet 2 1.869 4 1.709 3.579 0.030
3 Areca cathecu Pinang 4 3.38 9 3.846 7.584 0.054
4 Anthocephalus sp. Kamama 2 1.869 16 6.838 8.707 0.080
5 Arenga pinnata Aren 3 2.804 3 1.282 4.086 0.024
6 Artocarpus altilis Kluwih 3 2.804 2 0.855 3.658 0.018
7 Artocarpus elastica Terap 3 2.804 2 0.855 3.658 0.018
8 Bauhinia acuminate Tayuman 4 3.738 17 7.265 11.003 0.083
9 Caryota mitis Genduru 5 4.673 12 5.128 9.801 0.066
10 Cassia timorensis Casia 2 1.869 7 2.991 4.861 0.046
11 Cocos nucifera Kelapa 5 4.673 6 2.564 7.237 0.041
12 Durio zibethinus Durian 3 2.804 3 1.282 4.086 0.024
13 Dysoxylum sp. - 3 2.804 3 1.282 4.086 0.024
14 Garcinia sp. Mundu 2 1.869 2 0.855 2.724 0.018
15 Glyricidea sepium Gamal 5 4.673 18 7.692 12.365 0.086
16 Hopea sp. Miranti 3 2.804 3 1.282 4.086 0.024
17 Lansium domesticum Duku 6 5.607 7 2.991 8.599 0.046
18 Laportea sp. - 1 0.935 1 0.427 1.362 0.010
19 Leucaena glauca Lamtoro 3 2.804 4 1.709 4.513 0.030
20 Livistona rotundifolia - 5 4.673 8 3.419 8.092 0.050
21 Macaranga sp. Mahang 6 5.607 15 6.410 12.018 0.076
22 Muntingia calabura Murbei 1 0.935 6 2.564 3.499 0.000
23 Nauclea orientalis Gempol 3 2.804 5 2.137 4.940 0.036
24 Pandanus tectorius Pandan 1 0.935 5 2.137 3.071 0.036
25 Parkia speciosa Petai 6 5.607 8 3.419 9.026 0.050
26 Pithecelobium jiringa Asam 2 1.869 2 0.855 2.724 0.018
27 Pometia sp. Matoa 6 5.607 10 4.274 9.881 0.059
28 Talauma sp. Ganda 5 4.673 19 8.120 12.793 0.089
29 Tectona grandis J ati 2 1.869 4 1.709 3.579 0.030
30 Theobroma cacao Coklat 2 1.869 23 9.829 11.698 0.099
31 Toona sp. Suren 2 1.869 3 1.282 3.151 0.024
105 100 230 100 200 1.327
Bush
1 Ageratum conyzoides Wedusan 5 8.065 40 10,471 18.536 0.103
2 Alpinia malaccensis. Lengkuas hutan 2 3.226 4 1,047 4.273 0.021
3 Bauhinia sp. Kupu-kupu 4 6.452 15 3,927 10.378 0.055
4 Bidens pilosus - 3 4.839 8 2,094 6.933 0.035
5 Calamus ornatus - 4 6.452 8 2,094 8.546 0.035
6 Costus speciosus Pancing 2 3.226 4 1,047 4.273 0.021
7 Dioscorea aculeata Gadung 3 4.839 3 0,785 5.624 0.017
8 Emilia sonchifolia Dalgiu 1 1.613 3 0,785 2.398 0.017
9 Erigeron sumatrensis - 4 6.452 15 3,927 10.378 0.055
10 Eupatorium inulifolium Kirinyu 8 12.903 179 46,859 59.762 0.154

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-67
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.33. continued
No Species Common Name F
FR
(%)
D
DR
(%)
I NP I D
11 Ficus septica Awar-awar 3 4.839 6 1.571 6.409 0.028
12 Gigantochloa apus Ambu apus 3 4.839 3 0.785 5.624 0.017
13 Lantana chamara Tembelekan 3 4.839 6 1.571 6.409 0.028
14 Maranta arundinacea Maranta 3 4.839 24 6.283 11.121 0.076
15 Passiflora sp. Rambusa 2 3.226 4 1.047 4.273 0.021
16 Piper aduncum Sasuruhan 4 6.452 35 9.162 15.614 0.095
17 Selaginela caudata Paku lumut 2 3.226 8 2.094 5.320 0.035
18 Solanum torvum Terongan 2 3.226 3 0.785 4.011 0.017
19 Urena lobata Pulut 3 4.839 6 1.571 6.409 0.028
20 Zea mays J agung 1 1.613 8 2.094 3.707 0.035
62 100 382 100 200 0.892
Herba
1 Amorphophalus variabilis Bunga bangke 4 8.333 4 0.866 9.199 0.018
2 Colocasia esculenta Keladi 3 6.250 4 0.866 7.116 0.018
3 Cyperus sp. Teki 5 10.417 11 2.381 12.798 0.039
4 Homalomena sp. - 3 6.250 3 0.649 6.899 0.014
5 Imperata cylindrica Alang-alang 2 4.167 19 4.113 8.279 0.057
6 Isachne sp. Rumput 6 12.500 28 6.061 18.561 0.074
7 Musa acuminata Pisang 2 4.167 10 2.165 6.331 0.036
8 Musa paradisiaca Pisang 6 12.500 18 3.896 16.396 0.055
9 Panicum hirtelum Rumput 3 6.250 79 17.100 23.350 0.131
10 Paspalum sp. Paitan 10 20.833 279 60.390 81.223 0.132
11 Schysmatoglotis sp. - 4 8.333 7 1.515 9.848 0.028
48 100 462 100 200 0.601
Source: Primary Data 2007


7. Vegetation at Manifold Station Minahaki Area
Area of Manifold Station in Minahaki is located in Singkoyo River. According to observation
of vegetation in 10 plots, at the area there are 11 trees, 8 bushes and 3 herbs with various
INP. Type of Glyrycidia sepium has the the highest INP that equals to 79.263, as Theobroma
cacao is 28.175 and Nauclea orientalis have the INP of 20.386. The highest density crop is
Glyrycidia sepium, equals to 55,263% and Theobroma cacao is 20.175%, while the other
type have density value under 10%. Some type of land coverage vegetation for example
Clitoria ternatea, Eupatorium inulifolium, Hyptis brevipes, Digitaria fucescens, Imperata
cillyndrica as it is presented infollowing table.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-68
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.34. Type of Vegetation at Block Station of Minahaki I
No Species Common Name F
FR
(%)
D
DR
(%)
I NP I D
Tree
1 Acacia auriculiformis Acasia 1 4 2 1.754 5.754 0.031
2 Artocarpus integra Nangka 1 4 1 0.877 4.877 0.018
3 Ceiba pentandra Randu 1 4 3 2.632 6.632 0.042
4 Cocos nucifera coconut 3 12 7 6.140 18.140 0.074
5 Glyrycidia sepium Gamal 6 24 63 55.263 79.263 0.142
6 Lannea sp. Kayu kuda 1 4 1 0.877 4.877 0.018
7 Leucaena glauca Lamtoro 3 12 5 4.386 16.386 0.060
8 Nauclea orientalis Gempol 4 16 5 4.386 20.386 0.060
9 Talauma sp. Ganda 1 4 1 0.877 4.877 0.018
10 Terminalia catapa Ketapang 2 8 3 2.632 10.632 0.042
11 Theobroma cacao Coklat 2 8 23 20.175 28.175 0.140
25 100 114 100 200 0.644
Bush
1 Clitoria ternatea Telang 3 10.000 54 26.601 36.601 0.153
2 Crotalaria sp. Orok-orok 2 6.667 5 2.463 9.130 0.040
3 Eupatorium inulifolium Kirinyu 7 23.333 75 36.946 60.279 0.160
4 Hyptis brevipes J ukut 6 20.000 27 13.300 33.300 0.117
5 Pasiflora foetida Rambusa 1 3.333 2 0.985 4.319 0.020
6 Ruellia tuberosa Ceplikan 4 13.333 11 5.419 18.752 0.069
7 Sida retusa Sidaguri 5 16.667 16 7.882 24.548 0.087
8 Sida rhombifolia Sidaguri 2 6.667 13 6.404 13.071 0.076
30 100 203 100 200 0.721
Herb
1 Digitaria fucescens J elamparan 10 50 163 55.254 105.254 0.142
2 Imperata cillyndrica Alang-alang 9 45 128 43.390 88.390 0.157
3 Musa paradisiaca Pisang 1 5 4 1.356 6.356 0.025
20 100 295 100 200 0.325
Source: Primary Data 2007


8. Vegetation at well of Minahaki I
The area of Minahaki Well I is near by the Block station of Minahaki with the distance is
about 1,204 meter. At this area, the existing type of vegetation is not too far different from
the type that exist in block station. The tree that have the highest INP is Psidium guajava
(32.432). While for bush type is Eupatorium inulifolium (63.793), and herba type that have
highest INP is Imperata cyllindrica (102.381).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-69
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.35. Type of Vegetation at well of Minahaki I
No Species Common Name F
FR
(%)
D
DR
(%)
I NP I D
Tree
1 Alstonia scholaris Pulai 4 10.811 7 9.459 20.270 0.097
2 Anacardium occidentale J ambu mete 3 8.108 6 8.108 16.216 0.088
3 Arenga pinata Aren 3 8.108 6 8.108 16.216 0.088
4 Artocarpus elastica Terap 2 5.405 2 2.703 8.108 0.042
5 Casuarina equsetifolia Cemara laut 1 2.703 1 1.351 4.054 0.025
6 Ceiba pentandra Randu 2 5.405 6 8.108 13.514 0.088
7 Cordia sp. Kordia 3 8.108 4 5.405 13.514 0.068
8 Dysoxylum sp. Kedoya 3 8.108 5 6.757 14.865 0.079
9 Lansium domesticum Duku 1 2.703 1 1.351 4.054 0.025
10 Macaranga sp. Mahang 3 8.108 9 12.162 20.270 0.111
11 Nauclea orientalis Gempol 4 10.811 5 6.757 17.568 0.079
12 Peronema couldescens Sungkai 1 2.703 1 1.351 4.054 0.025
13 Psidium guajava J ambu biji 5 13.514 14 18.919 32.432 0.137
14 Talauma sp. Ganda 2 5.405 7 9.459 14.865 0.097
37 100 74 100 200 1.052
Bush
1 Eupatorium inulifolium Kirinyu 6 30 49 33.793 63.793 0.159
2 Lantana chamara Tembelekan 3 15 22 15.172 30.172 0.208
3 Gleichenia sp. Paku 4 20 39 26.897 46.897 0.323
4 Acrosticum sp. Paku rawa 1 5 21 14.483 19.483 0.134
5 Clitoria ternatea Telang 3 15 9 6.207 21.207 0.146
6 Erigeron sumatrensis - 3 15 5 3.448 18.448 0.127
20 100 145 100 200 1.099
Herb
1 Digitaria sanguinalis J elamparan 5 35.714 27 21.951 57.666 0.145
2 Imperata cyllindrica Alang-alang 5 35.714 82 66.667 102.381 0.117
3 Poa annua Rumput 4 28.571 14 11.382 39.954 0.107
14 100 123 100 200 0.369
Source: Primary Data 2007


9. Vegetation at Well of Donggi
Area of Well Donggi represents the rice field area, with the main crop type is paddy (Oryza
sativa). Generally, paddy is planted twice in a year and alternated by the palawija crop.
Result of observation shows that there are 5 trees, 12 bushes and 10 highest herb type. The
density for the bush type of Mimosa pudica equals to 40.264%, and then followed by the
type of Ruellia tuberose (21.782%), while the highest density for the herb is Panicum
hirtelum (36.775%), then Eleusin indica equals to 21.523%.




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-70
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.36. Type of Vegetation at well of Donggi
No Spesies Common Name F
FR
(%)
D
DR
(%)
I NP I D
Tree
1 Anacardium occidentale J ambu mete 1 20 1 20 40 0.140
2 Calophyllum inophyllum Nyamplung 1 20 1 20 40 0.140
3 Nauclea orientalis Gempol 1 20 1 20 40 0.140
4 Terminalia catapa Ketapang 1 20 1 20 40 0.140
5 Thespesia populnea Waru laut 1 20 1 20 40 0.140
5 100 5 100 200 0.699
Bush
1 Acalypha indica Akalipka 3 8.824 6 1.980 10.804 0.034
2 Acrosticum sp. Paku rawa 1 2.941 6 1.980 4.921 0.034
3 Ageratum conyzoides Wedusan 2 5.882 6 1.980 7.863 0.034
4 Bidens pilosus - 2 5.882 2 0.660 6.542 0.014
5 Crotalaria sp. Orok-orok 3 8.824 20 6.601 15.424 0.078
6 Desmodium trifolium Sisik betok 3 8.824 34 11.221 20.045 0.107
7 Ficus septica Awar-awar 2 5.882 2 0.660 6.542 0.014
8 Hedyotis sp. Bunga karang 4 11.765 18 5.941 17.705 0.073
9 Ludwigia ascendens Kecicak 1 2.941 12 3.960 6.902 0.056
10 Mimosa pudica Putri malu 5 14.706 122 40.264 54.970 0.159
11 Ruellia tuberose Ceplikan 5 14.706 66 21.782 36.488 0.144
12 Stachytarpeta indica J arong 3 8.824 9 2.970 11.794 0.045
34 100 303 100 200 0.791
Herb
1 Commelina sp. Glegor 4 16 31 10.265 26.265 0.101
2 Cyperus sp. Teki 2 8 6 1.987 9.987 0.034
3 Eleusin indica Suket tulangan 4 16 65 21.523 37.523 0.144
4 Fimbritylis sp. Bulu mata 2 8 17 5.629 13.629 0.070
5 Ipomoea sp. Kangkung 1 4 9 2.980 6.980 0.045
6 Nymphaea sp. Teratai 1 4 4 1.325 5.325 0.025
7 Panicum hirtelum Rumput 4 16 111 36.755 52.755 0.160
8 Panicum muticum Rumputan 2 8 10 3.311 11.311 0.049
9 Paspalum sp.. Paitan 4 16 35 11.589 27.589 0.108
10 Typha sp. Teki 1 4 14 4.636 8.636 0.062
25 100 302 100 200 0.799
Source: Primary Data 2007


10. Type Vegetation at Trunk Line in Conservated Forest
According to the observation result, there are 11 trees of around area of Trunk Line, with a
few type having the same frequency and density. Most type that is often met is Lansium
domesticum, Nauclea orientalis, and Arenga pinnata with the frequency of 12.903% and
density of 10.204%. Diversity index for the tree in this area is 1.023. The forest is
predominated by bush and herb. From the plotting conducted to bush and herba, there are
about 16 bush types and 10 herb types. Type often found with high density is for example
Eupatorium inulifolium (35.393%) and Piper aduncum (12.640%), while other type is under
10%. The dominant herb type is Panicum hirtelum and Paspalum sp. Some flora type that
exist in area of Trunk Line around the conservated forest is presented at the following table.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-71
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

Table 3.37. Type of Vegetation at TrunkLine in Conservated Forest
No Species Common Name F FR(%) D DR(%) INP ID
Tree
1 Anthocephalus sp. Kamama 2 6.452 5 10.204 16.656 0.101
2 Artocarpus elastica Terap 3 9.677 3 6.122 15.800 0.074
3 Cassia timorensis Kasia 2 6.452 3 6.122 12.574 0.074
4 Lansium domesticum Duku 4 12.903 5 10.204 23.107 0.101
5 Livistona rotundifolia Palem 3 9.677 5 10.204 19.882 0.101
6 Nauclea orientalis Gempol 4 12.903 6 12.245 25.148 0.112
7 Oncosperma sp. Palem 1 3.226 3 6.122 9.348 0.074
8 Pometia sp. Matoa 3 9.677 3 6.122 15.800 0.074
9 Talauma sp. Ganda 3 9.677 4 8.163 17.841 0.089
10 Arenga pinnata Aren 4 12.903 7 14.286 27.189 0.121
11 Caryota mitis Genduru 2 6.452 5 10.204 16.656 0.101
31 100 49 100 200 1.023
Bush
1 Ageratum conyzoides Wedusan 6 8 28 7.865 15.865 0.087
2 Alpinia malaccensis. Lengkuas hutan 4 5.333 15 4.213 9.547 0.058
3 Bauhinia sp. Kupu-kupu 6 8 12 3.371 11.371 0.050
4 Bidens pilosus - 4 5.333 11 3.090 8.423 0.047
5 Calamus ornatus Rotan 4 5.333 5 1.404 6.738 0.026
6 Costus speciosus Pacing 4 5.333 7 1.966 7.300 0.034
7 Dioscorea aculeata Gadung 2 2.667 3 0.843 3.509 0.017
8 Emilia sonchifolia Dalgiu 5 6.667 8 2.247 8.914 0.037
9 Erigeron sumatrensis - 4 5.333 5 1.404 6.738 0.026
10 Eupatorium inulifolium Kirinyu 9 12 126 35.393 47.393 0.160
11 Gigantochloa apus Bambu apus 1 1.333 2 0.562 1.895 0.013
12 Lantana chamara Tembelekan 6 8 24 6.742 14.742 0.079
13 Maranta arundinacea Maranta 5 6.667 18 5.056 11.723 0.066
14 Piper aduncum Suruhan 6 8 45 12.640 20.640 0.114
15 Selaginela caudata Paku lumut 4 5.333 30 8.427 13.760 0.091
16 Urena lobata Pulut 5 6.667 17 4.775 11.442 0.063
75 100 356 100 200 0.965
Herb
1 Amorphophalus variabilis Bunga bangkai 2 4.348 3 0.852 5.200 0.018
2 Colocasia esculenta Keladi 3 6.522 4 1.136 7.658 0.022
3 Cyperus sp. Teki 7 15.217 26 7.386 22.604 0.084
4 Homalomena sp. - 3 6.522 4 1.136 7.658 0.022
5 Imperata cylindrica Alang-alang 6 13.043 50 14.205 27.248 0.120
6 Isachne sp. Rumput 4 8.696 24 6.818 15.514 0.080
7 Musa acuminata Pisang 2 4.348 9 2.557 6.905 0.041
8 Panicum hirtelum Rumput 8 17.391 121 34.375 51.766 0.159
9 Paspalum sp. Paitan 8 17.391 108 30.682 48.073 0.157
10 Schysmatoglotis sp. - 3 6.522 3 0.852 7.374 0.018
46 100 352 100 200 0.721
Source: Primary Data 2007




11. Vegetation in the Trunk Line of the Public Garden around the Forest
The plan of gas channeling pipe will pass public forest of 12 area in Tirtasari village.
According to the observation result by plotting, around the area there are 13 trees, mostly is
cultivated crop. Some type planted by society for example Anacardium ocidentale, Arenga
Pinnata, Artocarpus integra, Mangifera indica. However, dominant type planted at public

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-72
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
forest is Tectona grandis with the density equals to 77.866%. Meanwhile, there are 17 types
of bush and 2 types of herb, presented at the following table.

Table 3.38. Type of Vegetation at Trunk Line area around the public Forest Unit 12
of Tirtasari village

No Spesies Common Name F FR(%) D DR(%) INP ID
Tree
1 Anacardium ocidentale J ambu mete 4 12.5 16 6.324 18.824 0.076
2 Arenga pinnata Aren 2 6.25 2 0.791 7.041 0.017
3 Artocarpus elastica Terap 2 6.25 2 0.791 7.041 0.017
4 Artocarpus integra Nangka 2 6.25 9 3.557 9.807 0.052
5 Ceiba pentandra Randu 1 3.125 1 0.395 3.520 0.009
6 Hibiscus sp. Waru 1 3.125 1 0.395 3.520 0.009
7 Lannea sp. Kayu kuda 2 6.25 3 1.186 7.436 0.023
8 Macaranga sp. Mahang 4 12.5 10 3.953 16.453 0.055
9 Mangifera indica Mangga 2 6.25 5 1.976 8.226 0.034
10 Nauclea orientalis Gempol 2 6.25 2 0.791 7.041 0.017
11 Psidium guajava J ambu biji 3 9.375 3 1.186 10.561 0.023
12 Syzygium aqueum J ambu air 2 6.25 2 0.791 7.041 0.017
13 Tectona grandis J ati 5 15.625 197 77.866 93.491 0.085
32 100 253 100 200 0.432
Bush
1 Adiantum sp. Paku tanah 4 7.843 8 4.167 12.010 0.058
2 Ageratum conyzoides Wedusan 3 5.882 12 6.250 12.132 0.075
3 Allamanda cathartica Alamanda 1 1.961 18 9.375 11.336 0.096
4 Alpinia galangal Lengkuas 1 1.961 4 2.083 4.044 0.035
5 Amaranthus spinosus Bayam 5 9.804 12 6.250 16.054 0.075
6 Annanas commosus Nanas 3 5.882 6 3.125 9.007 0.047
7 Bidens pilosus - 2 3.922 3 1.563 5.484 0.028
8 Borreria sp. Boreria 2 3.922 4 2.083 6.005 0.035
9 Eupatorium inulifolium Kirinyu 8 15.686 70 36.458 52.145 0.160
10 Ficus septica Awar-awar 2 3.922 3 1.563 5.484 0.028
11 Heliotropium decipens Ekor anjing 3 5.882 6 3.125 9.007 0.047
12 Hyptis brevipes J ukut 4 7.843 12 6.250 14.093 0.075
13 Lantana chamara Tembelekan 5 9.804 17 8.854 18.658 0.093
14 Melastoma affine Senggani 3 5.882 6 3.125 9.007 0.047
15 Pasiflora foetida Rambusa 1 1.961 1 0.521 2.482 0.012
16 Phyllanthus niruri Meniran 3 5.882 6 3.125 9.007 0.047
17 Ruellia tuberose Ceplikan 1 1.961 4 2.083 4.044 0.035
51 100 192 100 200 0.959
Herb
1 Eleusin indica Suket tulangan 4 33.333 14 9.929 43.262 0.100
2 Imperata cyllindrica Alang-alang 8 66.667 127 90.071 156.738 0.041
12 100 141 100 200 0.141
Source: Primary Data 2007


12. Vegetation at Trunk Line which pass Toili River

The condition of Toili River vegetation is predominated by type of Bambusa arundinacea by
INP 45.593. The other tree is which is often met is Glyricidea sepium, with the density of
17.708%, while Cocos nucifera, Macaranga Sp, and Nauclea orientalis have the density
11.458% (Table 3.39). According to observation of vegetation in 10 plots, at this area, there

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-73
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
are 22 type of terrestrial flora that consists of 11 trees, 7 bushes and 3 herbs. The type of
coverage vegetation is Eupatorium inulifolium and Panicum hirtelum.

Table 3.39. Type of Vegetation at Trunk Line which pass Toili River
No Spesies Common Name F FR(%) D DR(%) INP ID
Tree
1 Arenga pinnata Aren 2 5.128 2 2.083 7.212 0.035
2 Bambusa arundinacea Bambu 6 15.385 29 30.208 45.593 0.157
3 Casuarinas sumatrana Cemara 2 5.128 3 3.125 8.253 0.047
4 Cocos nucifera Kelapa 5 12.821 11 11.458 24.279 0.108
5 Ficus sp. Ficus 1 2.564 1 1.042 3.606 0.021
6 Glyricidea sepium Gamal 6 15.385 17 17.708 33.093 0.133
7 Hibiscus tiliaceus Waru 5 12.821 7 7.292 20.112 0.083
8 Macaranga sp. Mahang 5 12.821 11 11.458 24.279 0.108
9 Muntingia calabura Murbei 2 5.128 3 3.125 8.253 0.047
10 Nauclea orientalis Gempol 4 10.256 11 11.458 21.715 0.108
11 Shorea macrophylla Meranti 1 2.564 1 1.042 3.606 0.021
39 100 96 100 200 0.867
Bush
1 Saccharum spontaneum Glagah 5 12.195 41 16.335 28.530 0.129
2 Eupatorium inulifolium Kirinyu 9 21.951 59 23.506 45.457 0.148
3 Sida acuta Sidaguri 5 12.195 25 9.960 22.155 0.100
4 Demodium triflorum Sisik betok 7 17.073 72 28.685 45.758 0.156
5 Stachytarpeta indica J arong 4 9.756 22 8.765 18.521 0.093
6 Lantana chamara Tembelekan 6 14.634 21 8.367 23.001 0.090
7 Hyptis brevipes J ukut 5 12.195 11 4.382 16.578 0.060
41 100 251 100 200 0.774
Herb
1 Anastrophus compresus Rumput 5 31.25 57 29.534 60.784 0.156
2 Imperata cyllindrica Alang-alang 5 31.25 60 31.088 62.338 0.158
3 Panicum hirtelum Rumput 6 7.5 76 39.378 76.878 0.159
16 100 193 100 200 0.474
Source: Primary Data 2007



13. Vegetation at Trunk Line that pass Countryside Area
According to the observation of vegetation in 10 plots, around area of Trunk Line in
Argakencoulda village, Batui district, there are 37 type of terrestrial flora that consists of 20
trees, 14 bushes and 3 herbs. Land use around this Trunk Line is for housing and lawn, so
the type of vegetation predominating in this area is cultivated crop, for example Artocarpus
communis, Artocarpus integra, Cocos nucifera, Mangifera indica, Theobroma cacao, it is
presented at Table 3.40. Crop of Glyricidea sepium have the highest density, that equals to
29,907% and is generally plant as fence of farm constrictor. Type of bush and herb,
represents the type which is generally found at lawn ecosystem, for example Tridax

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-74
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
procumbens, Desmodium Sp, Eleusine indica, Cynodon dactylon, as it ispresented at the
following table.

Table 3.40. Type of Vegetation at Trunk Line which pass Argakencoulda village
Batui District

No Spesies Common Name F
FR
(%)
D
DR
(%)
I NP I D
Tree
1 Artocarpus communis Sukun 2 3.448 2 1.869 5.317 0.032
2 Artocarpus integra Nangka 2 3.448 2 1.869 5.317 0.032
3 Averrhoa carambola Belimbing 1 1.724 1 0.935 2.659 0.019
4 Cassia sp Casia 3 5.172 4 3.738 8.911 0.053
5 Ceiba pentandra Randu 3 5.172 4 3.738 8.911 0.053
6 Citrus aurantifolia J eruk 4 6.897 6 5.607 12.504 0.070
7 Cocos nucifera Kelapa 6 10.345 6 5.607 15.952 0.070
8 Glyricidea sepium Gamal 5 8.621 32 29.907 38.527 0.157
9 Lannea sp. Kayu kuda 3 5.172 6 5.607 10.780 0.070
10 Lansium domesticum Duku 3 5.172 3 2.804 7.976 0.044
11 Leucaena leucocephala Lamtoro 4 6.897 4 3.738 10.635 0.053
12 Mangifera indica Mangga 6 10.345 10 9.346 19.691 0.096
13 Moringa pterygosperma Kelor 1 1.724 2 1.869 3.593 0.032
14 Muntingia calabura Murbei 2 3.448 3 2.804 6.252 0.044
15 Mussaenda sp. Nusa indah 1 1.724 2 1.869 3.593 0.032
16 Nerium oleander Nerium 4 6.897 8 7.477 14.373 0.084
17 Sesbania grandiflora Turi 4 6.897 5 4.673 11.569 0.062
18 Spondias cytherea Kedondong 2 3.448 2 1.869 5.317 0.032
19 Theobroma cacao Coklat 1 1.724 4 3.738 5.462 0.053
20 Crysophylum cainito Knitu 1 1.724 1 0.935 2.659 0.019
58 100 107 100 200 1.110

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-75
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.40. continued
No Spesies Common Name F
FR
(%)
D
DR
(%)
I NP I D
Bush
1 Gardenia augusta Kaca piring 2 3.846 2 0.493 4.339 0.011
2 Euphorbia hirta Patikan 9 17.308 71 17.488 34.795 0.132
3 Tridax procumbens Srunen 10 19.231 148 36.453 55.684 0.160
4 Sida retusa Sidaguri 5 9.615 27 6.650 16.266 0.078
5 Borreria sp. Boreria 5 9.615 12 2.956 12.571 0.045
6 Desmodium sp. Sisik betok 7 13.462 104 25.616 39.077 0.152
7 Hibiscus rosa-sinensis Sepatu 2 3.846 7 1.724 5.570 0.030
8 Manihot utilisima Ubi kayu 1 1.923 4 0.985 2.908 0.020
9 Bougenvilia spectabilis Bugenvil 1 1.923 3 0.739 2.662 0.016
10 Ixora coccinea Soka 1 1.923 2 0.493 2.416 0.011
11 Eupatorium riparium Kirinyu 4 7.692 16 3.941 11.633 0.055
12 Catharanthus roseus Tapak dara 3 5.769 7 1.724 7.493 0.030
13 Allamanda cathartica Alamanda 1 1.923 1 0.246 2.169 0.006
14 Clerodendrum thomsonae Nona makan sirih 1 1.923 2 0.493 2.416 0.011
52 100 406 100 200 0.759
Herb
1 Eleusine indica Suket tulangan 6 46.154 28 70 116.154 0.108
2 Cynodon dactylon Teki 4 30.769 8 20 50.769 0.140
3 Fimbritylis sp. Bulu mata 3 23.077 4 10 33.077 0.100
13 100 40 100 200 0.348
Source: Primary Data 2007

14. Vegetation at Area of Trunk Line which pass the Rice field
The main crop in this area is Oryza sativa. Other type having the highest density is Lannea
sp with the density of 67.857%, while the other tree have the average density 3.571%. The
type of herb bush that grows represent the type of herb bushes at the rice field ecosystems,
that is Imperata cillyndrica.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-76
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 3.41.Type of Vegetation at Area of Trunk Line which pass Rice Field
No Spesies Common Name F
FR
(%)
D
DR
(%)
I NP I D
Pohon

1 Artocarpus elasticus Terap 1 10 1 3.571 13.571 0.052
2 Couldanga arborea Kenanga 1 10 1 3.571 13.571 0.052
3 Lannea sp. Kayu kuda 2 20 19 67.857 87.857 0.114
4 Livistona rotundifolia Palem 1 10 1 3.571 13.571 0.052
5 Morinda citrifolia Mengkudu 1 10 1 3.571 13.571 0.052
6 Nauclea orientalis Gempol 1 10 1 3.571 13.571 0.052
7 Paraserianthes sp. Sengon 1 10 1 3.571 13.571 0.052
8 Terminalia catapa Ketapang 1 10 2 7.143 17.143 0.082
9 Cynamomun sp. Kayu manis 1 10 1 3.571 13.571 0.052
10 100 28 100 200 0.558
Bush
1 Schizostchyum sp. - 1 7.143 35 26.515 33.658 0.153
2 Heliotropium indicum Bandotan 1 7.143 2 1.515 8.658 0.028
3 Ruellia tuberosa Ceplikan 2 14.286 5 3.788 18.074 0.054
4 J ussiaea sp. Pangeor sila 3 21.429 7 5.303 26.732 0.068
5 Hedyotis sp. Bunga karang 2 14.286 10 7.576 21.861 0.085
6 Lantana chamara Tembelekan 2 14.286 19 14.394 28.680 0.121
7 Euatorium inulifolium Kirinyu 2 14.286 51 38.636 52.922 0.160
8 Borreria sp. Boreria 1 7.143 3 2.273 9.416 0.037
14 100 132 100 200 0.705
Herba
1 Imperata cillyndrica Alang-alang 3 15.789 177 49.441 65.231 0.151
2 Cyperus sp. Teki 4 21.053 26 7.263 28.315 0.083
3 Saccharum spontaneum Glagah 1 5.263 10 2.793 8.056 0.043
4 Ludwigia ascendens Krangkong 1 5.263 2 0.559 5.822 0.013
5 Ipomoea aquatica Kangkung 1 5.263 4 1.117 6.380 0.022
6 Isachne globosa Rumput 4 21.053 14 3.911 24.963 0.055
7 Oryza sativa Terap 5 26.316 125 34.916 61.232 0.160
19 100 358 100 200 0.526
Source: Primary Data 2007

In general, flora condition in studied region is categorized to have the environmental quality
scale of scale 4.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project III-77
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
3.2.2 Terrestrial Fauna
Fauna observation covers the domestic animal, bird, mammal, and reptile. The observation area
covers area about of activity area that area of LNG Field, Santoa River, Uso, Kinikini, well
development area of Bumiharjo, well of Sukamaju, Block Station of Singkoyo River, Minahaki
well, Donggi well, Trunk line of conservated forest area, trunk line of public plantation area,
trunk line around Toili river, trunk line around Argakencoulda, and trunk line of rice field area.
The observation is conducted directly using the assertive appliance of binoculars and indirectly,
that is by conducting interview with the resident around activity plan area. Some bird type that
is found around the activity area is presented in Table 3.42.



ANDAL Proyek Pengembangan Gas Matindok
III-78
PT. PERTAMINA EP-PPGM
Table 3.42. Type of Fauna at Studied Area
Location
No Spesies Common Name
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Aves
1 Acridotheres cinereus Kerak - - - - - + - - - + + - - -
2 Alcedo atthis Raja udang erasia - - - - - + - - - + - - - -
3 Alcedo coerulescens Raja udang biru - - + + - - + + - - - - - -
4 Alcedo meninting Raja udang - - - - - - - - - - + + + +
5 Amaurornis phoenicuru Kareo padi - - - - - - + + - - - - - -
6 Anas gibberifrons Itik - - - - - - - - + - - - - +
7 Anhinga melanogaster Pecuk ular - - - - - - - - + - - - - -
8 Ardea sumatrana Couldgak laut - - - + - - - - - - - - - -
9 Ardea purpurea Couldgak merah - - - - - - - - + - - - - +
10 Ardeola speciosa Blekok sawah - - - - - - - - + - - - - -
11 Anthreptes malacensis Burung madu - - - - - + - - - + - - - -
12 Bubulcus ibis Blekok - - - - + + + + - - + - +
13 Centropus celebensis Bubut + - - - - + + + - + + - - +
14 Clamator coromandus Bubut kembang - - - - - + - - - + - - - -
15 Collocalia esculenta Walet sapi - - - + + + + + + + + + + -
16 Corvus macrorhynchos Gagak - + + + - + + + - + - - - +
17 Dicaeum celebicum Cabe + + + + + + + + + + + + + -
18 Dicrurus montanus Srigunting + + + + - + + + - + + - - -
19 Ducula forsteni Pergam - - - - - + - - - + - - - -
20 Egretta garzetta Kuntul besar - - - + - - - - - - - - - -
21 Haliastur indus Elang bondol - - - + - - + + - - - - - -
22 Halcyon pileata Cekakak cina - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
23 Lonchura moluca Bondol taruk + + + - - - + + - - - - + +
24 Locustella certhiola - - - - - - - - - - - + + - -
25 Leptoptilos javanicus Kecici belalang - - - - - - - - + - - - - -
26 Macrocephalon maleo Maleo - - - - - + - - - - - - - -
27 Passer montanus Burung gereja - - - - - - - - + - - + + -
28 Penelopides exarhatus - - - - - - + - - - + - - - -
20 Pycnonotus aurigaster Kutilang - - - - - + + + - + + - + -
30 Ptilinopus melanospila Walik kembang - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
31 Pycnonotus goiavier Merbah cerucuk + + + + - - - - - - - - - -
32 Rallina fasciata Tikusan ceruling - - + - - - - + - - - - -
33 Rhipidura teysmanni Kipasan + + + + - + - - - + - - - -

ANDAL Proyek Pengembangan Gas Matindok
III-79
PT. PERTAMINA EP-PPGM
34 Scissirostrum dubium - - - - - - + - - - + - - - -
35 Spilornis rufipectus Elang - - - - - + - - - + - - - -
36 Streptopelia chinensis Tekukur - - - + + + + + - - + + + +
37 Tanygnathus lucionensis Betet kelapa paruh besar - - - - - + - - - - - - - +
38 Tanygnathus megalorynchos Betet kelapa filipina - - - - - + - - - - - - - -
39 Tanygnathus sumatranus Betet - - - - - + - - - + - - - -
40 Tringa totamus Trinil + - + + - - + + - - - + - +
41 Zosterops consobrinorum Kacamata + + + + - + + + - + - - - -
42 Zosterops chloris Kacamata laut - - - + - - - - - - - - - -
8 7 9 15 4 21 14 14 10 17 8 8 7 12
Reptil
1 Ahaetulla prasina Ular daun - - - - - + - - - + - + - +
2 Boiga dendrophila Ular - - - - - + - - + + - + - +
3 Crocodillus porosus Buaya - - - + - - - - - - - - - -
4 Eutropis sp Kadal + + + + - + - - - + - + + -
5 Python sp Ular piton - - - + - + - - - + - - - +
Mammalia
1 Macaca nigra Kera - - - + - + - - - + - - - -
2 Macrogalida musschenbroeckii Musang - - - - - + - - - + - - - -
3 Prosciurillus murinus Bajing - - - - - - - - - - - + - +
4 Rubrisciurus sp. Bajing - - - + - + - - - + - - - -
5 Sus celebensis Babi hutan - - - + - + - - - + - - - -
6 Tarsius pelengensis Tarsius - - - - - + - - - - - - - -
Source: Primary Data 2007

Note : + : present : absent
1. LNG Padang 8. Minahaki I Well
2. Santoa River 9. Donggi I Well
3. Uso 10. Trunk Line (reserve forest)
4. Kinikini (Kayoa river Estuary) 11. Trunk Line public forest
5. Development Well of Bumiharjo 12. Trunk Line Toili river
6. Sukamaju Wells - SM Bangkiriang 13 Trunk Line Argakencoulda
7. Block Station Minahaki I 14. Trunk Line Rice field

ANDAL Proyek Pengembangan Gas Matindok
III-80
PT. PERTAMINA EP-PPGM
In general, fauna condition in activity area is categorized to have the environmental quality scale
of scale 4

3.2.3 Water Biota
A. Biota Freshwater
Biota Freshwater observation covers the plankton, benthos residing in Sangkoyo River,
Estuary of Kayoa River, watercourse of Kayoa, Toili River, River of Santoa and watercourse
of Tompu in activity area. Condition of Biota freshwater will explained as follows:
1. Plankton
Observation to plankton variety is conducted at 12 areas in territorial water around
activity area and its result is presented in Table 3.43.

Table 3.43. Density and Index of Plankton Variety in Raw Water Territorial around
the Activity Area

Parameter
Area
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Density Fitoplankton 280 126 5 26 84 34 28 23 18 24 4269 1623
Density Zooplankton 12 10 7 25 14 5 6 4 7 7 33 25
Density Totally Plankton 293 138 13 53 99 41 35 29 26 33 4303 1650
Ind.Div. Fitoplankton 0.448 0.783 0.699 1.026 0.673 0.802 0.985 0.992 0.929 0.824 0.115 1.143
Ind.Div. Zooplankton 0.007 0.737 0.501 0.836 0.727 0.413 0.678 0.452 0.759 0.555 0.851 0.916
Ind.Div. Total Plakton 0.532 0.894 0.876 1.234 0.858 0.918 1.133 1.094 1.139 0.995 0.180 0.189
Source: Analyse the Primary Data, 2007

Note :
1. River of Singkoyo/Minahaki I
2. River of Singkoyo/Minahaki II
3. River estuary of Kayoa I
4. River estuary of Kayoa II
5. Watercourse of Kayoa I
6. Watercourse of Kayoa I
7. River of Toili I
8. River of Toili II
9. River of Santoa Padang I
10. River of Santoa Padang II
11. Watercourse of Tompu I
12. Watercourse of Tompu II

According to the index of plankton diversity in territorial water around the activity plan
area indicates that this territorial water is medium polluted (scale 2) Lee At all, 1978.

2. Benthos
Abundance and variety of benthos at river around activity area could be seen in Table
3.44.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-81
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 3.44. Density and Variety of Benthos in Some River around the Activity Area
Location
No. Class Family Spesies
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 Turbellaria Planariidae Planaria 2 0 3 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 3 0
2 Insecta Hydrobiosidae Atopsyche sp. 2 1 4 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 3 1
3 Insecta Nymphula Bellura sp 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 1
4 Insecta Chironomidae Chironomus sp 2 0 0 3 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 1
5 Insecta Hydropsychidae Hydropsyche sp 0 2 3 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 4 0
6 Insecta Philoptomidae Dolophilodes 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
7 Insecta Stratiomyidae Eulalia sp 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 3 0 2
8 Insecta Tricopter Halesus 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
9 Insecta Campyridae Photinus sp 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 4
10 Insecta Chironomidae Tendipes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 2 0
11 Gastropoda Haliotidae Haliotis 4 1 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 2
12 Gastropoda Naticidae Natica Stellata 2 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3
13 Gastropoda Neritidae Nerita 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 Gastropoda Turritellidae Turritella terebra 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 3 0 1
15 Gastropoda Buccinidae Colubraria tortuosa 1 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 0
16 Gastropoda Cerithiidae Rhinoclavis asper 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 2 2 0
17 Gastropoda Potamididae Telescopium 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2
Totally Individual 16 13 21 17 8 9 10 9 16 18 19 19
Diversity 9 9 10 10 7 8 8 8 10 10 9 10
Density Benthos per m
2
265 216 348 282 133 149 166 149 265 299 315 315
Source: Primary Data 2007

Note :
1. River of Singkoyo/Minahaki I
2. River of Singkoyo/Minahaki II
3. River estuary of Kayoa I
4. River estuary of Kayoa II
5. Watercourse of Kayoa I
6. Watercourse of Kayoa II
(51M 0424354;UTM 9039188)

(51M 0446081;UTM 9851570)
7. River of Toili I
8. River of Toili II
9. River of Santoa Padang I
10. River of Santoa Padang II
11. Watercourse of Tompu I
12. Watercourse of Tompu II
(51M 0429083;UTM 9844590)

(51M 0459028;UTM 9867862)

(51M 0430819;UTM 9849442)

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-82
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
According to the condition of benthos, environmental quality around territorial water of
activity area could be categorized as medium polluted (scale 2).

B. Marrine Biota
1. Plankton

Table 4.45. Density and Index Diversity of Plankton in Sea Territorial Water around
the Activity Area
Location
Parameter
1 2 3 4
Density Fitoplankton 11 20 87 53
Density Zooplankton 17 37 88 22
Density Total Plankton 29 59 176 77
Ind.Div. Fitoplankton 0.823 0.904 1.220 1.074
Ind.Div. Zooplankton 0.850 0.332 0.736 0.834
Ind.Div. Total Plakton 1.130 0.814 1.278 1.266
Sumber: Analisis Primary Data, 2007
Note:
1. Coastal of Uso (51M 0452733 ; UTM 9860862)
2. Coastal of Uso
3. Coastal of Padang (51M 0459660 ; UTM 9868772)
4. Coastal of Padang

According to the condition of plankton, environmental quality around territorial water of
activity area could be categorized as medium polluted (scale 2).

2. Benthos
Result of laboratory observation from sedimentation sample taken from some coastal
area around activity area (Table 3.46) shows the average density for benthos per m
2
to
each area is about 245 individual.
According to the condition of benthos, environmental quality around territorial water of
activity area could be categorized as medium polluted (scale 2).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-83
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 3.46. Density and Index Diversity of Benthos in Sea Territorial Water
around the Activity Area
Location
No.
Class Family Spesies 1 2 3 4
1 Turbellaria Planariidae Planaria 0 0 0 3
2 Insecta Hydrobiosidae Atopsyche sp 0 0 1 2
3 Insecta Stratiomyidae Eulalia sp 0 0 4 0
4 Insecta Tricoptera Halesus 0 0 0 1
5 Insecta Hydropsychidae Hydropsyche sp 0 0 1 4
6 Insecta Nymphula Bellura sp 0 0 3 1
7 Insecta Campyridae Photinus sp 0 0 2 0
8 Insecta Chironomidae Tenpides 0 0 2 0
9 Gastropoda Naticidae Natica stellata 1 1 0 0
10 Gastropoda Buccinidae Colubraria tortuosa 0 2 3 1
11 Gastropoda Haliotidae Haliotis 1 0 1 0
12 Gastropoda Neritidae Nerita 1 0 1 0
13 Gastropoda Cerithiidae Rhinoclavis asper 2 3 3 1
14 Gastropoda Potamididae Telescopium 3 2 0 3
15 Gastropoda Turritellidae Turritella terebra 0 3 2 1
Totally individual 8 11 23 17
Diversity 5 5 11 9
Density spesies per m
2
133 182 381 282
Source: Primary Data 2007
Note:
1. Coastal of Uso (51M 0452733 ; UTM 9860862)
2. Coastal of Uso
3. Coastal of Padang (51M 0459660 ; UTM 9868772)
4. Coastal of Padang
3. Fish
The type of fish captured is presented at the following table.
Table 3.47. Types of Fish Captured by the Fisherman in Banggai Regency
No Common Name Species
1 Bandeng Chanos chanos
2 Bobara
3 Beronang Siganus javus
4 Cakalang Thryssa hamiltosus
5 Deho
6 Ekor Kuning Neopomacentrus azysron
7 Katamba
8 Kakap Mereh Lucouldus sang
9 Kerapu Epinephelus lanceolatus
10 Layang Decapterus russelli
11 Layur Tricheoris sp
12 Lolosi
13 Roa
14 Sardin
15 Selisi
16 Teri Stolephorus sp
17 Tenggiri Stolephorus sp
18 Tuna
Source: Primary Data 2007 and Secondary Data, 2005


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-84
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

According to the variety and fishery product around the activity plan area, hence in
general, environmental quality in the region is categorized to be good (scale 3).

4. Coral Reef
Table 3.48. Condition of coral reef in the 10 Meter Depth in Batui Village
No Genus Percentage Covered
1 Turbinaria 1
2 Pocilopora 2.7
3 Porites, Pleurogyra, Geniopora 4.2
4 Leptiseris 2
Total 9.9
Source : Secondary Data 2005

Table 3.49. Condition of coral reef in the 3 Meter Depth in Batui Village
No Genus Percentage Covered
1 Tubastrea 2.4
2 Porites, Geniopora 1
Total 3.4
Source: Secondary Data 2007

Table 3.50. Percentage of Covered Biota Compiler Ecosystem.
Coral Reef (%) at Batui Coast
Area
No.
The Growth of Coral Rock
Compose
BT-1 BT-2 BT-3
1 Coral massive 4 5 3
2 Acropora encrusting 1 1 1
3 Acropora sub massive 4 3 5
4 Soft coral dan sponge 1 1 1
Total 10 10 10
Source: Primary Data 2007
Note:
BT-1: Batui 1 (51M 0457588, UTM 9862628)
BT-2: Batui 2 (51M 0457275, UTM 9862537)
BT-3: Batui 3 (51M 0456044, UTM 9862100)


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-85
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
According to the number (percentage) of covered coral reef and the type of soral reef
found around the activity area, hence environmental quality around the area is
categorized into bad (scale 2).

3.3 SOCIAL COMPONENT
3.3.1 Demography
a. Population Density
Administratively, the Development of Matindok Gas Project is located in Banggai Regency.
The region that will get impacts from this activity is consist of 4 (two) districts, they are
Kintom, Batui, Toili and Toili Barat. Population distribution according to width, quantity, and
density in each district is presented in the Table 3.51.

Table 3.51. Distribution of Resident according to Wide, Sum up and Density in
Regional Sub district of Study

District/
Regency
Width (km
2
)
Sum up
People
Density
(people/ km
2
)
1. Kintom 518.72 12,471 24
2. Batui 1,390.33 24,811 18
3. Toili 982.96 44,588 45
4. Toili Barat 994.66 19,603 20
Banggai Regency 9,670.65 296,488 31
Sumber: Kabupaten Banggai Dalam Angka 2005

According to the environmental quality scale, density condition in study region is included in
criterion very good or has scale 5.

b. Resident Composition according to gender and sex ratio
The number of resident according to gender and sex ratio is presented in the following
table:

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-86
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.52. Total of Resident According Gender and Sex Ratio in Regional district
of Study

total district/
Regency
RT
Amount
/ RT Male Female
Resident Sex Ratio
1. Kintom 3,587 3 6,241 6,230 12,471 100
2. Batui 5,729 4 12,885 11,926 24,811 108
3. Toili 11,103 4 22,980 21,608 44,588 106
4. Toili Barat 4,734 4 10,260 9,343 19,603 110
Kab. Banggai 72,252 4 151,927 144,561 296,488 105
Sumber: Kabupaten Banggai Dalam Angka 2005


According to the environmental quality, the resident composition in this area is very good
or have the scale 5 ( L.W. Couldter & L.G. Hill, 1981).

c. Resident Composition According to age
The resident composition according to age group is presented at the following table:

Table 3.53. Number of Population according to Age Group and
Dependency Ratio at Study Area

0 14 Year of age 15 64 Year of age 65+ Year of age
No
District/
Regency Sum Up % Sum Up %
Sum
Up
%
Dependency
ratio
1 Kintom 3,478 27.89 8,311 66.64 682 5.47 50.06
2 Batui 7,065 28.47 17,149 69.12 597 2.41 44.68
3 Toili 13,397 30.05 29,340 65.80 1,851 4.15 51.98
4 Toili Barat 7,427 37.89 8,635 55.95 1,208 6.16 78.73
Banggai 93,994 31.70 192,738 65.01 9,756 3.29 53.82
Source: Analysis form Banggai Regency in Number 2005

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-87
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Considering that the resident amount of young age is less than 40% to totalizing resident,
hence resident condition according to productive age (work age) in study region is included
in scale 5, that is very good.

d. Resident Composition According to education
Resident composition in regional district of study according to education level is presented
at the following table.

Table 3.54. Population with Age more than 5 years according To Education Level Per
District at Study Area of 2004

Kintom Batui Toili Toili Barat
Mount Education
Sum up % Sum up % Sum up % Sum up %
Amount
1. No/Not Yet Educated
168 1.34 49 0.24 2,401 6.08 55 0.32 2.00
2. No/Not Yet Graduated from
Elementary School
2,246 17.95 4,751 23.27 10,866 27.53 4,777 27.54 24.88
3. Graduated from Elementary
School
5,582 44.62 9,588 46.96 18,146 45.98 7,978 45.99 45.89
4. Graduated from J unior School 2,494 19.93 2,703 13.24 4,695 11.90 2,063 11.89 14.85
5. Graduated from Senior School 1,522 12.17 1,931 9.46 2,745 6.96 1,206 6.95 8.91
6. Graduated from Academic 254 2.03 237 1.16 351 0.89 154 0.89 1.36
7. Bachelor 245 1.96 157 0.77 262 0.66 115 0.66 1.01
J umlah 12,511 100.00 20,416 100.00 39,466 100.00 17,348 100.00 100.00
Source: Analysis form Banggai Regency in Number 2005

Meanwhile, number of the respondent education in study region is presented in the
following table.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-88
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 3.55. The Number of Responden Education in Study Area
No Mount Education Frequency Percentage
1
No/ Not Yet Educated
1 0.42
2 No/Not Yet Graduated from
Elementary School
18 7.50
3 Graduated from Elementary School 82 34.17
4 Graduated from J unior School 50 20.82
5 Graduated from Senior School 69 28.75
6 Graduated from Academic 6 2.50
7 Bachelor 13 5.42
8 Master (S2) 1 0.42
Totally 240 100.00
Source: Primary Data, 2007

According to the environmental quality (L.W. Couldter & L.G. Hill, 1981), the circumstance is
included in good criterion (scale 4).

e. Resident Composition according to Profession
Composition of residents profession is completely presented as follows.

Tables 3.56. Resident Composition of According to Profession in The Districts
of 2005

Kintom Batui Toili Toili Barat
Profession
total % total % total % total %
Avera
ge
1. Agriculture 3,502 64.98 11,003 94.74 21,355 90.22 9,042 92.05 85.41
2. Mining / dig 11 0.20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.25
3. Industrial crafting 639 11.86 105 0.90 415 1.75 203 2.07 4.15
4. Electrics, gas and
irrigate
0 0 6 0.05 10 0.04 1 0.01 0.03
5. Construction 359 6.66 98 0.84 292 1.23 158 1.61 2.59
6. Commerce 223 4.14 293 2.52 1,076 4.55 248 2.52 3.43
7. Transportation of 104 1.93 109 0.94 190 0.80 46 0.47 1.04
8. Service 142 2.63 0 0 309 1.31 125 1.27 1.30
9. Officer 224 4.16 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.04
10. ABRI / police 34 0.63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.04
11. Private sector 151 2.80 0 0 24 0.01 0 0 0.71
TOTAL 5,389 100 11,614 100 23,761 100 9,823 100 100
Source: Kecamatan dalam Angka tahun 2005

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-89
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Meanwhile, the main profession of respondent in study region is presented at the following
table.

Tables 3.57 The Main Profession of Respondent in Study Region

No Living Sum up Persentage
1 Civil Public Servant (PNS) 13 5.41
2 Private sector Officer 6 2.50
3 Entrepreneur 40 16.67
4 Merchant 3 1.25
5 Farmer 131 54.58
6 Farm worker 4 1.67
7 Fisherman 5 2.08
8 Fisherman Labors 1 0.42
9 Factory Labors / building 6 2.50
10 Countryside Officer 13 5.42
11 Teacher 6 2.50
12 Other 12 5.00
Totaly 240 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

In general, the profession of respondent in study region still be relevant with the natural
resource or their primary living, meanwhile the resident that is involved in the industrial or
secondary area is still finite.

f. Resident mobility
Population mobility from one village to another village happens among the society for any
reason, for example pressure from origin region, attraction of other region, and other
private reasons. However, this also happened because of non-economic factor. Population
mobility has impacts to the economic growth in both regions. It has a strong relation with
problems in fields of work and the availability of worker.




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-90
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 3.58. Illustration of Population Mobility in Study area of 2005.
Mutation of Inhabitant
District
Total
I nhabitant of
mid year
Natalitas Mortalitas in out
Change
Kintom 12,471 153 36 56 12 161
Batui 24,511 345 71 109 63 320
Toili 44,588 683 295 123 38 473
Toili Barat 19,603 526 224 31 79 254
Source: Analyze from Kecamatan Dalam Angka 2005

Table 3.59. Reason of Respondent to Move to Study Region
No Reason of Removing Sum up Percentage
1 Searching work 45 31.91
2 Duty / On duty 3 2.13
3 Marrying 9 6.39
4 Searching better residence 3 2.13
5 Opening effort 2 1.42
6 Reason of family 18 12.76
7 Trade the 2 1.42
8 Transmigration 41 29.08
9 Improving level live 18 12.76
Totaly 141 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

g. Labor force
Labor force is a 15 years old resident who actively executes the economic activity. The
resident who do not have any job (unemployment) and still go to school couldnot be
included in this category.
According to Kecamatan Banggai dalam Angka 2005, the resident of 15 years-old is 192,738
people or about 65.01% from total of resident and the number of labor force is 182,982
people. Meanwhile the productive age in 4 regional district of study is 63,435 people or
about 62.51% with the amount of labor force is 50.587 people. Thereby, the Labor Force
Participation Level or TPAK in region of Banggai Regency is 94.94%, while in 4 regional
districts of study is 79.75%. TPAK in regional district level is equal, and it shows that there
are resident which have age less than 15 year or young age resident who have been
involved into a world work so that TPAK in the region is high. This fact represents one of the
last effort of young group age to assist the economic condition of its family.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-91
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
h. Opportunity work

Tables 3.60. The number of J ob Seeker According to Education Level and Gender of
2003 - 2005 in Banggai Regency

2003 2004 2005
Education
Male Female Tot Male Female Tot Male Female Tot
No/ Not Yet Educated
21 13 34 42 24 66 15 3 18
No/Not Yet Graduated
from Elementary School
132 61 193 281 138 419 133 65 198
Graduated from
Elementary School
890 894 1,784 1,842 1,637 3,479 1,353 1,131 2,484
Graduated from J unior
School
139 233 372 181 344 525 161 258 419
Graduated from Senior
School
109 112 221 371 367 738 360 307 667
Source: Kabupaten Banggai Dalam Angka 2005

The number of job seeker and its area in Banggai Regency is presented as follows:

Table 3.61. The Number of J ob Seeker, Area and Request According to Gender
of 2003 - 2005 in Banggai Regency

2003 2004 2005
Uraian
Male Female Tot Male Female Tot Male Female Tot
J ob Searcher 1,291 1,313 2,604 2,717 2,510 5,227 2,029 1,764 3,793
nstalation 218 113 331 164 155 319 165 232 397
Demand 218 113 331 164 155 319 165 232 397
Source: Kabupaten Banggai Dalam Angka 2005


Besd on the data, hence work opportunity in the studied region is categorized into bad
condition or have the scale 2.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-92
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
3.3.2 Social Economic
a. Public Income
One of parameters of wealthy and prosperity is a total of public income. Lower and higher
of somebody earnings could be seen from type of jobs or his works. From the public income
could be estimated the level of prosperity of the region, which could influence non-economic
component. Level of non-economic prosperity component could be seen from building
condition, owner of appliances, level of education and others.
Picture concering monthly domestic earnings could be distinguished to become two groups
of production source, that is formal group and informal group (farmer and others). To
calculate the earnings of formal group for a year is easier because earnings obtained
routinely to each month. However, approach of domestic earnings for informal group such
as farmer, angler, service, merchant and others is more difficult. This matter because the
earnings each month for informal group is erratic and has the character of seasonally.
Sometimes they are succeed, sometimes their experience are failure. They are influenced
by various factors, as if existence of attack of disease pest, price of crop result is fall, and
others. The resident of research area generally is all farmers and or other entrepreneur shy
at to reckon among production obtained with the expenditure expense process and fulfill
other life requirement.
Pursuant to data of respondent structure according to main effort known is that most
respondent work in agriculture area, covering farmer and farm worker as much 56.25%,
angler and second angler labor, 50%. Type of other effort, which is dominant is as
entrepreneur (16.67%), government of countryside (5.42%), and government worker 5.
41% and others as much as 5%. Seen from their earnings level, there is average
respondent earnings for a month is Rp. 1.383.204,00 with the lowest level of earnings equal
to Rp. 150,000.00 and highest is Rp. 5,000,000. 00. Modus of value of earnings equal to Rp.
600.000,00 for a family for a month. Mount the most dominant respondent earnings is up till
Rp. 500,000.00 by Percentage equal to 45.83%.







EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-93
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 3.62. Distribution of respondent income every month
Estimation of income (Rp) Frequency Percentage
1 Up to 500,000.00 110 45.83
2 501,000.00 1,000,000.00 66 27.50
3 1,001,000.00 1,500,000.00 28 11.67
4 1,501,000.00 2,000,000.00 13 5.42
5 2,001,000.00 2,500,000.00 8 3.33
6 2,501,000.00 3,000,000.00 7 2.92
7 More than 3,000,000.00 8 3.33
T o t a l 100 100.00
Source: Primary Data, 2007

Mean of respondent earnings for a month is Rp. 1,383,204.00. If each family of respondent
have four people as family member, so they have earnings for a person for a month about
Rp. 345,801.00 and earnings of its day is about Rp. 11,526.70. If poorness treshold is 1
dollar America for a day per people which its exchange rate equal to Rp. 9,600.00 hence it
means that every society member in study area is inclusive of a little above impecunious
category. Pursuant to permanent of environmental quality, mount of the respondent
production in Study area have bad category (scale 2) so that less could fulfill the
requirement live the family in an optimal level.
For testing validity of respondent answer about their earnings, the data of level of
expenditure is used. Mean of respondent expenditure for a month is Rp. 761,497.00 with
the expenditure modus of equal up to Rp. 500,000.00. Most dominant expenditure level is
among Rp. 251,000.00 - Rp. 500,000.00 by Percentage equal to 32.08%, followed by the
expenditure by suggestion is Rp. 501,000.00 - Rp. 750,000.00 as much 19.17% and
expenditure till Rp. 250,000.00 as much 18.33%.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-94
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 3.63. Distribution of respondent cost every month
Estimation of income (Rp) Frequency Percentage
1 Up to 250,000.00 44 18.33
2 251,000.00 500,000.00 77 32.08
3 501,000.00 750,000.00 46 19.17
4 751,000.00 1,000,000.00 38 15.83
5 1,001,000.00 1,500,000.00 18 7.50
6 1,501,000.00 2,000,000.00 10 4.17
7 2,001,000.00 2,500,000.00 2 0.83
8 More than 2,500,000.00 5 2.09
T o t a l 240 100.00
Source: Primary Data, 2007

Seen from composition between income and the expenditure, it could be said the relative
amount mean of respondent earnings compared to its expenditure level is still higher. That
is mentioned for example shown with the existence of respondent which have income up
to Rp. 500,000.00 as much 45.83% but amount the expenditure till Rp. 500,000.00 was
conducted by about 50.41% respondent. This condition is also happened to respondent
which have income above Rp. 1,000,000.00 as much 26.67% but amount the above
expenditure of Rp. 1,000,000.00 only conducted by 14.59% respondent. Thereby could be
generated that respondent could balance their earnings level and their family expenditure
or able to manage their finance condition better or not to have extravagant attitude. For
respondent who have income about Rp. 500,000.00 practically almost everything is used for
the accomplishment of consume the foodstuff daily.

b. Double Income Pattern
There are about 59.17% respondent that have more than one effort to fulfill their daily
need. Distribution of the side job could be seen from the following table.







EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-95
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 3.64. Distribution of Respondent Side J ob

No. Kind of Side J obs Frequency Percentage
1. Farmer 58 40.84
2. Daily farmer 11 7.75
3. Fisherman 7 4.93
4. Labor 11 7.75
5. Teacher 2 1.41
6. Trader 14 9.86
7. Entrepreneur 14 9.86
8. Contract employee 2 1.41
9. Employee 3 2.11
10. Bike drivers 6 4.22
11. Others 14 9.86
Total 142 100.00
Source: Primary Data, 2007

Type of side job elaborated a lot by respondent is not different enough from their main job,
especially for respondent at agriculture area. They could be farmer and farm worker. All
laboring respondent outside of agriculture area like Government worker, entrepreneur and
teacher generally elaborates this activity. Besides, to add their income, this activity is
confessed as way to express their hobby, having the character of entertainment and
continue their parent effort. Respondent opening stand or shop at home, generally conducts
side job as merchant.

c. Ownership of Luxurious Object by Respondent
1) House and yard
Luxurious object that owned by respondent in study area consist of house, yard or farm,
cattle, saving, appliances and vehicles. Respondent which generally owns House and or
farm collected a half of their income from their parent omission. Cattle, saving,
furniture, appliances and motor vehicle is almost owned by the respondent by collected
their saving or rest of from their earnings after they fulfill their daily life need.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-96
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 3.65. Respondent owner of Housing

No Width Of House (m
2
) Frequency Percentage
1 Up to 36 60 25.00
2 37 70 100 41.67
3 71 100 44 18.33
4 101 150 18 7.50
5 151 200 10 4.17
6 More than 200 8 3.33
Total 240 100.00
Source: Primary Data, 2007

Based on the interview result of respondent known that respondent house have wide
among 14 - 600 m2 by biggest percentage about (41.67%) is 37 - 70 m2. Most of
respondent (90. 83%) in study area have yard. The width of yard is range from 50 to
5,000 m2 by biggest percentage (30.83%) is between 251 - 500 m2 , then followed by
l 1,001 2,500 m2 by Percentage equal to 24.17% and between 501 - 750 m2 as much
14.58%. Looking from here seen that ownership of respondent housing is relative wide
enough.
Status of ownership of homestead of respondent generally is their own property (SHM)
with percentage equal to 50.42%, rent / contract (5%), right of property (3.33%),
heritage or family right (1.25%) and not have certificate as much 40%. Meanwhile
condition of respondent building condition presented at Table 3.65.
Respondent building house in coulddidate of activity location and its surroundings have
wood or board wall ( 50.83%), there are about 36.67% have permanent wall and which
is semi wall as much 12.50%. Seen from its floor, generally in the form of tiling or from
cement by percentage equal to 65.83%, then with tegel floor ( 17.51%) and still in the
form of ground as much 12.08%. Roof of respondent house are dominated from zinc (
70%), from pen tile 12.50% and from rumbai or coconut leaf by Percentage 12.08%
and concrete as much 12.50%. Based on the condition could be concluded that
respondent house included to medium category (scale 3).




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-97
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.66. Percentage of Conditions of house respondent.
No House conditions Frequency Percentage
Wall
a. woods 122 50.83
b. semi permanent 30 12.50
c. Permanent 88 36.67
1
Total 240 100.00
House floor
a. Ground 29 12.08
b. cement 158 65.83
c. Tegel 42 17.51
d. Ceramics 5 2.08
e. Woods 6 2.50
2
Total 240 100.00
House roof
a. Pen tile 30 12.50
b. Asbestos 11 4.58
c. Zinc 168 70.00
d. Coconut leaves 29 12.08
e. Concretes 2 0.84
3
Total 240 100.00
Source: Primary Data, 2007


2) Farm and dry farm (field)
Farm that owned by respondent is about 39, 17% and dry farm which is owned by
respondent about 73, 75%. They have broadly range from zero, 08 - 40 Ha. Picture in
more detailed is presented in following Table.Table 3.67. Respondent owner of
farming
farm (m
2
) Dry farm (m
2
)
No
Width of farming area
(m
2
)
Frek. % Frek. %
1 Up to 1000 4 4.25 8 4.53
2 1,001 2,500 8 8.51 9 5.09
3 2,501 5,000 23 24.47 19 10.73
4 5,001 10,000 29 30.85 52 29.38
5 10,001 25,000 18 19.16 39 22.03
6 25,001 50,000 5 5.32 39 22.03
7 50,001 75,000 1 1.06 5 2.83
8 75,001 100,000 1 1.06 3 1.69
9 More than 100,000 5 5.32 3 1.69
Total 94 100.00 177 100.00

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-98
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Source: Primary Data, 2007
Width of farm and dry farm, which is generally dominant owned by the respondent, has
5,001 10,000 m2. There are about 12. 76% respondent which is included in small
farmer criterion because their wide of farm only about 2,500 m2 or less. With tight
ensured of agriculture effort, which they will not reach the optimal result and this matter
has an effect on manifestly, to economic condition of their family

3) Saving
Based on result of respondent interview, known that there are about 26.67%
respondents who have own family saving.

Table 3.68. Respondent Kind Of Saving
No Kind of saving Frequency Percentage
1 Banking 52 81.25
2 Save at home 7 10.94
3 Insurance 2 3.12
4 Arisan 3 4.69
Total 64 100.00
Source: Primary Data, 2007

Respondent express that they save their money generally in bank. A Part of other
respondent uses the insurance service as saving form. Another way is by arisan,
because here respondent claimed to cast aside some of their earnings routinely.

4) Others luxurious object
Ownership of other worth object such as radio / tape, TV, motor vehicle and others in
more detailed presented at Table 3.69.
Type of object worth which are dominant owned by respondent are television (TV), then
followed by the ownership of cattle and VCD. Types of cattle, which are generally
owned by respondent, are cow, goat, pig, poultry especially chicken, and duck.
According to respondent, cattle represent alternative used to overcome the problem of
finance or another need incidentally. TV, VCD and radio / tape represent the facilities of
entertainment therefore ownership of other worth object generally more functioning as
tools that supporting lifestyle which they elaborate during the time.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-99
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.69. Respondent Owner of Luxurious Object
No Luxurious Object Frequency Percentage
1 TV 88 26.43
2 VCD 48 14.41
3 Radio/tape 35 10.51
4 Refrigerator 2 0.60
5 Bicycle 42 12.61
6 Motorcycle 44 13.21
7 Car 6 1.80
8 Truck 2 0.60
9 Colt 3 0.90
10 Fishing ship 2 0.60
11 Compressor 2 0.60
12 Rice clipper. 2 0.60
13 Worker appliance. 1 0.30
14 Cattle 56 16.83
Total 333 100.00
Source: Primary Data, 2007

d. Regional Gross Domestic Product (RGDP)
The essence of national development as a whole is development of human being as intact
as reached development in social, economic and culture, and national defenses area. Object
of development instructed to economic activity by totally and then agricultural sector and
industrial sector well balanced instruct to fundamental requirement of society. Local
government has the power to manage their own nature resources. The problems to manage
their natural resources are they lack of optimal human resources.
Seen from growth of ninth sector presented that Banggai Regency still have the character
of agrarian. Table in the following is presenting Total RGDP and contribution of every sector
in Banggai Regency.






EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-100
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.70. Regional Gross Domestic Product (RGDP) By Standard Price
(Rp 000.000) In Study Area Year 2003-2004
2003
2004
Sector
Total % Total %
1. Agriculture 775,978 56.55 860,680 56.99
2. Mining 16,624 1.21 18,483 1.22
3. manufacture industry 103,048 7.51 114,840 7.60
4. Water and Electricity 7,997 0.58 8,955 0.59
5. Construction 96,807 7.05 106,118 7.03
6. Trading, Hotel and restaurant 121,615 8.86 133,283 8.83
7. Telecommunication and Transportation 71,723 5.23 77,729 5.15
8. Finance, rental and service company 41,671 3.04 44,245 2.93
9. Other services 136,731 9.97 145,821 9.66
Total 1,372,194 100.00 1,510,154 100.00
Source: Kabupaten Banggai Dalam Angka 2005

It means that agricultural sector predominate in form of GDRP of Banggai in 2003 and
2004. Second biggest contribution given by service sector, but in the year 2004 experiencing
degradation of equal to 0.31% compared to 2003. Commerce sector including trading,
hotel and restaurant give the biggest share third by Percentage equal to 8.83%, natural of
degradation is about 0.03% compared to 2003. Sector with smallest contribution is Electrics
and Water which in the year 2004 experiencing of improvement about 0.01%.
Seen by their growth rate, Sector of Water and Electrics take possession of the main
position with the growth rate equal to 9.03%, followed by the agricultural sector that equal
to 7.81% and Mining which have 7.70%. Sector with the growth rate which relative
minimum is Finance, Rental And Company Service equal to 5.06%, later Service sector that
equal to 5.46% and also the Transportation of and Communications of equal to 5.94%.
Required to be done by an effort supported by all part so that this sector could experience
better growth again. From ninth sector, only natural Agriculture that has degradation of
growth rate equal to 0.34% compared to during range of 2003.
With the value of GDRP equal to Rp. 1,372,194 million in the year 2004 and Total of
resident in the middle of year as much 289,979 people, hence assess the GDRP for a person
a year is Rp. 5,207,804. 00. If poorness boundary is equivalent with the earnings of equal to
Rp. 9,600.00 a day or equal to Rp. 3,504,000.00 a year, hence GDRP perkapita in Banggai
as general is 1.49 bigger than poorness boundary mean to reside in for poorness sill. Among

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-101
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
4 sub district of study areas, sub district Toili have the best family prosperity level with total
family which have the included in secure and prosperous category about 64.23%, then
followed by Toili Barat ( 57.80%), Batui ( 48.14%) and lowest is Kintom with total secure
and prosperous family about 30.53%.

e. Economic Facilities
1) Industry
There are industry activities in Banggai during range of time 2005 as much 13 unit
generally predominated by industry of wood and wooden goods. Type and amount of
the industry presented at following table.

Table 3.71. Total Industry and Employee In
Banggai in 2005
No Kind of industry
Total
Unit
Employee
1 Food, beverage and tobacco industry 1 6
2 Garment, textile and leather industry 1 1
3 Woods and wood appliances industry 6 13
4 Paper, paper appliances, printing and publishing industry 1 1
5 Fertilizer, Chemical & Goods from Rubber - -
6 Cement & the non metal dig goods - 5
7 Transport Appliance, Machine & Its Equipments 1 1
8 Other Manufacture industry 1 31
9 Personal services industry 2 3
T o t a l 13 56
Source: Kabupaten Banggai Dalam Angka 2005

Based from Total labor shown that slimmest of society citizen which could be got mixed
up with industrial area. This matter is happened not only because quality of human
resources factor which relative still be limited also because type of industry expanding
in this region still very finite so that its society citizen even also finally a lot plunged in
traditional sector like agriculture. In other side total company according to type of
company enlisted in Banggai during year 2005 increase to 5.54% compared to year
2004.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-102
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.72. Total Industry in Banggai Based On Type of Industry
No Type of company 2004 2005
1 Corporate Company (PT) 151 158
2 Comanditer Company (CV) 754 800
3 Private Company (PO) 1,614 1,703
4 Coperation 81 83
5 Other type of company - -
Total 2,600 2,744
Source: Kabupaten Banggai Dalam Angka 2005

Most dominate of company is private company (PO) with Percentage of 62.06%.The
condition represents that much people effort to fulfill their daily need by being
entrepreneur or owing private business. Considering that in 2005 amount of private
company increasing, is mean that society prefer to entrepreneurship is increasing and
there are market compartment of various product strived by the people.

2) Trading
During 2005 volume of inter island trade in Banggai increased compared to year 2004.
Most commercially commodity for example are copra as much 21,681 ton, palm oil as
much 13,650 ton, and coulde equal to 2,177 ton.
Realize main trading other in Banggai is tired cement 46,235 ton, followed by the oil of
equal to 8,531 ton and fertilize as much 3,446 ton. Meanwhile realize the most
uppermost exporting is congregation prawn as much 1,130,000 ton, copra 20,806,542
ton and dry sea algae as much 250,310 ton.
Amount of trading company got Trading legal Letter from Industry and trading
department of Banggai presented at following table.





EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-103
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.73. Total Trading Legal Permitting Based On Company Status in Banggai
No Company Status 2004 2005
1 Big Trading 40 41
2 Middle Trading 403 415
3 Little Trading 1,786 1,916
Total 2,229 2,372
Source: Kabupaten Banggai Dalam Angka 2005

Total of trading company during 2005 increased about 6. 42% compared to year 2004.
This condition depicted that commerce activity tend to progressively level from year to
year. Trading company is predominated generally by retail trade (80.78%), then middle
commerce (17.49%) and least is wholesale by percentage equal to 1.73%.
Stand represents the most popular commerce facility in 4-sub district of study area. In
Kintom public market, stand is not met so that people go on shop at their surrounding
or shop through merchant circle.

Table 3.74. Total and kind of trading facilities in study area in 2004
No Trading Facilities Kintom Batui Toili West Toili
1 General Market - 4 6 1
2 Shop - 9 30 2
3 Little shop 23 15 - -
4 Stand 129 220 295 222
5 Food and beverage station 2 6 52 22
J u m l a h 154 254 383 247
Source: Kecamatan Kintom, Batui, Toili dan Toili Barat Dalam Angka 2005

In general Sub district Toili have the most commerce facility about 36.90% from total
commerce facility in study area. This matter depicted that sub district Toili has most
potential commerce activity which indirectly also depicted the better economics
condition than other sub district.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-104
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

3) Finance Facilities
Finance facility in Study area consist of coperation and bank which in detail presented at
following table.

Table 3.75. Total and Kind of Finance Facilities in Study Area in 2004
No Finance Facilities Kintom Batui Toili
Toili
Barat
1 Village Unit Coperation (KUD) 1 2 4 5
2 Government Worker Coperation
(KPN)
- - 3 1
3 Other coperation - 3 1 -
4 Village Banking - - - -
5 Government Banking - - 3 -
6 Public Credit Banking - - 1 -
T o t a l 1 5 12 6
Source : Kecamatan Kintom, Batui, Toili dan Toili Barat Dalam Angka 2005
The dominate type of coperation in study area is Coperation of Countryside ( KUD). Sub
district Toili have most total finance facility relatively, compared to other sub district.
This condition indicated that money circulation also quite a lot happened in region as
intensive effect of various activity which followed to develop the regional economics.

f. Economic of natural resources
1) Land using
Potential natural resource which effort by people in study area at present is agriculture,
which is, covered agriculture of foodstuff crop, plantation crop, ranch, forestry and
fishery. Natural resources , which are, form as gas, oil, and other; are not yet used by
people. The operator tried to labor of gas and oil is PT. Medco E&P and Pertamina EP.
Most of land using in Study area are for agriculture, then building, dry farm/field, forest
and other. More complete detail about land using could be seen at following table.




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-105
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


Table 3.76. Land using in study area
No Land using
Kintom
(Ha)
Batui
(Ha)
Toili
(Ha)
Toili Barat
(Ha)
1 Irrigation farm - 1,108 6,042.75 3,714
2 Rainy farm - 2,850 406.30 407
3 Dry farm 2,338 - - -
4 Plantation 3,837 5,137 3,452.65 2,476.60
5 dam 0.50 251 45 -
6 Land fishery - 251 70 57
7 Savanna 10 - - -
8 Plantation company 6,033 5,230 3,695.30 1,465.55
9 Yield/ construction 232 1,702 2,229.80 1,236.38
10 woods 4,760 - 69 -
11 Not using 34,491 120,170 82,285.20 3,011.50
12 others 170.50 2,334 - 87,098
Total amount 51,872 139,033 98,296 99,466
Source : Kecamatan Kintom, Batui, Toili dan Toili Barat Dalam Angka 2005

Land using in study area is dominated to plantation for the width of 16,423.85 Ha or
about 4.23% from total wide of existing land. second is used to non irrigated dry field
or public plantation about 3.83% and third is to rice field that is about 3.74% consisted
of the rice field about 2.80% and rainy rice field about 0.94%.

2) Agriculture production
Food crop
Potential commodity that produced in study area is rice, corn, cassava, and sweet
potatoes. Toili represent the potential region yield for food commodity compared to
three other sub districts. Production of rice from Toili is 56.77% from total
production of rice in Study area. More complete description about production of
food crop is presented at following table.






EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-106
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.77. Production of Food crop in study area in 2005
No Kind of
cultivates
Kintom
(Ton)
Batui
(Ton)
Toili
(Ton)
Toili Barat
(Ton)
Total
1 Rice - 12,717 40,555 18,165 120,263
2 Dry rice 94 1.099 30 - 5,067
3 Corn 292 198 122 51 7,573
4 Cassava - 160 116 138 5,824
5 Sweet potatoes - 57 100 131 3,849
6 Bean - 21 378 4 1,064
7 peanuts 24 19 39 1 2,333
Source : Kecamatan Kintom, Batui, Toili dan Toili Barat Dalam Angka 2005

Based on table, contribution of study area to reserve of rice field during 2005 is
equal to 59.40%. Toili representing agriculture region which have development
program of transmigration contribute about 33.72% from total production of rice in
Banggai. Meanwhile contribution of study area to Production of dry farm rice is
equal to 24.14% in regency level, for the corn is equal to 8.75%, cassava 7.11%,
sweet potatoes 7.48%, bean is about 37.88% and peanut is equal to 3.56 %
respectively.
Vegetables
In general, production of vegetable during 2005 is increasing compared to 2004.
Most dominant vegetable from study area is kangkung with production about
60,48% to total production kangkung in regency stock.

Table 3.78.Production of some vegetables in Study area in 2005
No Kind of
vegetables
Kintom
(Ton)
Batui
(Ton)
Toili
(Ton)
Toili Barat
(Ton)
Total
1 Kangkung - 24,50 6,50 6,50 62
2 Petsai - 7,20 19,20 19,20 170
3 Chili 3,20 16,40 1 - 530
4 Tomatoes 4,24 18,60 0,6 - 602
5 Nourishing bean 2,14 14,40 2,40 2,40 175
6 eggplant 3,04 7,70 0,90 - 200
7 Spinach 2,45 6,3 1,7 1,7 107
Source : Kecamatan Kintom, Batui, Toili dan Toili Barat Dalam Angka 2005


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-107
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Other vegetable commodity which is uppermost enough is petsai by Production
about 26,82% to total production of regency, meanwhile for the chili and tomato
have 3,89% for each, and for the string bean is equal to 12.19%.

Fruits
Type of fruits, which is produced in study area, is banana, mango, papaya, fruit
trees and durian. Detail of amount shown following table.

Table 3.79. Production of some fruits in Study area in2005

No Kind of fruits Kintom
(Ton)
Batui
(Ton)
Toili
(Ton)
Toili Barat
(Ton)
Total
1 Banana 36.30 29.10 316.52 316.52 9,016
2 Mango 24.38 13 11.30 11.13 3,798
3 Papaya 23.40 16.80 14.38 14.13 1,356
4 Fruit Tree 6.51 46.0 121.67 121.67 490
5 Durio 1.52 4.70 0.80 0.80 1,575
Source : Kecamatan Kintom, Batui, Toili dan Toili Barat Dalam Angka 2005

Production of banana from study area give the contribution equal to 7.75% to total
production of banana in regency meanwhile for the mango is 1.57%, papaya is
5.07%, fruit trees 60.38% and durio equal to 0.50% respectively .
Crop plantation
Production of various type of plantation commodity during 2005 increased about
15-26% compared to 2004. Type of crop plantation which is predominate in study
area are coconut, cacao, coffee, clove, almond, and walnut as shown at following
table

Table 3.80. Production of some crop plantation in Study area in 2005
No Kind of crop
plantation

Kintom
(Ton)
Batui
(Ton)
Toili
(Ton)
Toili Barat
(Ton)

Total
1 Coconut 1,22940 484 45.95 20 22,872.40
2 cacao 128.95 457.60 294.85 16.30 7,109.90
3 Almond 17.77 17.37 3.80 49.05 950.60
4 walnut 30.81 2.80 - - 717,80
5 Clove - 0.37 1.60 5.90 1,212.20
6 Coffee - 9.86 10.50 - 287.60
Source : Kecamatan Kintom, Batui, Toili dan Toili Barat Dalam Angka 2005

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-108
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Contribution of coconut production from Study area to total production in regency
is 7.78%, for the cacao of 12.63%, almond 9.26%, walnut 4.68, clove 0.65% and
coffee equal to 7.08% respectively.
Cattle
Cattle that labored by people in study area consisted of big cattle especially cow,
small cattle like goat and pig and poultry covering local chicken and duck. In general,
Production of various cattle increased in 2005 relatively except for the pig of which
decreased about 1.06% and duck decreased about 3.67%.


Table 3.81. Production of cattle in Study area in 2005
No Kind of cattle
Kintom
(Ekor)
Batui
(Ekor)
Toili
(Ekor)
Toili Barat
(Ekor)
Total
1 Cow 2,120 1,757 4,283 4,332 37,970
2 Goat 1,352 599 925 516 31,403
3 Pig 940 256 1,503 3,666 26,892
4 Local Chicken 6,207 15,262 35,750 40,852 300,137
5 Duck 412 1,151 18,858 5,543 87,023
Source : Kecamatan Kintom, Batui, Toili dan Toili Barat Dalam Angka 2005

Contribution of cattle production in study area to total cow production in regency is
32.90%, for the goat is 10.80%, pig is 23.67%, local chicken 32.67% and for the
duck is equal to 29.84% respectively.
Fishery
Type of fishery, which is developed in study area, includes sea fishery, land fishery,
dam, territorial water and prawn. During range of time 2005 no one of type of
fishery expanding in region of sub district Kintom. In sub district Batui expanding is
the effort prawn fishpond by production as much 500 ton and in region of Toili
expanding is land fishery. Sub district of Toili Barat represents the fastest growth of
fishery. Type of fishery expanding is sea fishery, land fishery and territorial water
fishery each by production about 108 ton, 0.53 ton and 0.45 ton.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-109
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

3.3.3 Social Cultural
a. Value and Cultural Norm
In society life, there are many concepts in nature mind from most society people, which are
derived from important and valuable in life. Individual has owned value system and culture
norm since limiting in their mentality. This condition is happened also in society around
location of Matindok gas project development in Banggai which its resident have
background of various culture as effect of outsider coming in this region. There are three
original tribe in Banggai. They are Saluan, Banggai and Balantak. Outsider tribe that exist in
this region for example are Bajo that represent eldest outsider fisherman society from
Kendari, J ava, Sunda, Bali And Flores that are represented transmigrant and also other
outsider who look for the work opportunity such as Bugis, Padang, Gorontalo, Manado,
Muna and others. Various activities of custom and society, which live in study area,
presented at following Table

Table 3.82. Respondent opinion about kind of tradition activity and custom in
Study area
No Tradition Activity Frequency Percentage
1 Marriage celebration 16 2.24
2 Birth celebration 226 31.56
3 Funeral tradition 232 32.40
4 Village cleaning 221 30.87
5 Rainy celebration 2 0.28
6 Harvest Tradition 15 2.09
7 Transmigration birthday 2 0.28
8 Tumpe 2 0.28
Total 716 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Custom activity which is often held by society especially sliver with the cycle of human life
such as wedding ceremony, celebration of birth and death commemoration by Percentage
equal to 66.20%. Other custom activity celebrated area countryside cleanness, which
relevant with the farm activity and tumpe custom representing Monarchic event culture
heritage of Banggai Archipelago. Activity of custom usually done in countryside hall (
34.05%), mosque ( 20.77%), house ( 16.27%), and also mausoleum and pure of each of

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-110
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
6.42%. Picture about continuation of custom activity by society presented at following
Table.
Table 3. 83. Respondent opinion about keeping tradition activity
No Tradition keeping Frequency Percentage
1. Keeping tradition 211 87.92
2. Rarely 26 10.83
3. Sometimes done 3 1.25
Total 240 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

About 87.92% respondent express that several of custom activity is still done by society as
effort to preserve. A Part of other respondent express that various custom activity start
seldom be done or just sometime done. Some related reason with the mentioned is that
economic level of society relative limited ( 88.46%), existence of religious activity or
celebration ( 7.69%), and because other reason about 3.85%.

Table 3.84. Respondent opinion about religion activity in Study area
No Religion Activity Frequency Percentage
1 Syawalan 189 41.45
2 Celebration of birth of prophet 201 44.08
3 Isra Miraj 39 8.55
4 Moslem discussion 12 2.63
5 Utsawa Darmagita 3 0.66
6 Nyepi 3 0.66
7 Christmas celebration 5 1.09
8 Moonlight celebration 4 0.88
Total 456 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Moslem religious activity which is most and often celebrated by respondent is Maulud of
Prophet and Syawalan, for Christian / catholic religion is Christmas festival and for the
things believe in the Hindu is Nyepi, Utsawa Darmagita ( Holy Book reading), Full Moon And

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-111
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Tilem. Celebration of red-letter day of religion is usually carried out for participation and
cooperation of all society.

One of culture value, which still seen is value of mutual assistance and tolerance concept
attitude. Result of data collecting indicated that the mutual assistance in repairing house (
20.24%), job devote to environmental hygiene (14.84%), assisting each other in executing
celebration (30.88%) and arisan ( 20.39%) and cooperate for keeping environment
(siskamling) is 12.89% still need to remain to be defended. For local society, mutual
assistance in life goes into society and important tolerance attitude to overcome the internal
issue and pressure in everyday life.

Table 3.85. Respondent opinion about mutual assistance in Study area
No Mutual Assistance Activity Frequency Percentage
1 Cleaning the village 99 14.84
2 House repairing 135 20.24
3 Celebration of something good 206 30.88
4 Arisan 136 20.39
5 Keeping the village 86 12.89
6 Others 5 0.76
Total 667 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Considering that various custom activity such as religious and other social culture is still
executed and supported by society in general, So condition of early hue environment as
parameter assess and norm of culture society in study area own the pertained
environmental quality scale of goodness ( scale 4).

b. Social problems
In Society life, there is desire for interaction in order to fulfilling its life requirement. Relation
has the character of the dynamic arranged in the form of action, which is pursuant to
values, and social norm, which is believed in the society. Existence of from the interaction

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-112
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
could be in the form of the cooperation if action done according to value and norm which
they believed. Social interaction existed in the form of cooperation among other things is
mutual assistance. Type of ordinary activity done by respondent together with other society
member shall be as follows.

Table 3.86. Respondent opinion about common activity in Study area
No Kind of common activity Frequency Percentage
1 Increasing religion knowledge 205 32.13
2 Keeping the village 35 5.49
3 Arisan 146 22.88
4 Information sharing 102 15.99
5 Public organization activity 150 23.51
Total 638 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Activity which is most done by respondent is improve the religion knowledge ( 32.13%) by
following pengajian, religious discourse and understanding of holy book. Other activity ,
which is uppermost enough, is public organization activity, arisan and sharing information or
news. According to respondent, condition of togetherness of society at present as usual (
50.42%), other express that it growth to good progressive ( 38.75%), more bad ( 5.83%),
and respondent who express abstain is about 5%.

Beside society activity in so many everyday activity, also happened conflicting daily life,
though respondent express that existence of conflict is minimum relatively . They said that
just about 22.92% conflict that happened in their life. About 77.08% other respondent
express that in their area not or unprecedented of conflict.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-113
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.87. Respondent Opinion about Frequency of Conflict and Kind Of
Problem Solving

No Frequency of conflict and kind of problem
solving
Frequency %
1. Frequency of conflict:
a. often
b. sometimes
c. rarely
d. never happen

7
12
36
185
2.92
5.00
15.00
77.08
Total 240 100.00
2. Problem solving of conflict:
a. By tradition
b. By law
c. By discussing of themselves
d. By public sharing


1
16
2
1

5.00
80.00
10.00
5.00
Total 20 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

According to respondent opinion, event of conflict generally related with the young fellow
problem / adolescent (41.66%), family problem (25%), land problem (16.67%), and dispute
between the village or tribe of each by percentage equal to 8.33%. However, the various
existing conflicts generally could be finished better.

Nature of society in study area also tend to open marked with society acceptance friendly
(85.33%) to newcomer. This matter is related to various activity of around location, which
has implication to existence of outsider come from outside area. Society ( 70.83%) having
a notion that a lot of outsiders in their area. Outsider comes from various tribes such as
Bugis, Gorontalo, Toraja, Ternate, Buton, J ava, Sunda, Madura, Bali, Flores and Sumbawa.
Some reason of all outsiders to move in study area and its surroundings is presented at
following Table.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-114
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.88. Respondent Opinion about the Causes of Outsider Incoming in
Study Area
No Cause of incoming Frequency Percentage
1 Looking for a job 131 74.86
2 Farm/ follow transmigration program 3 1.71
3 Follow the parents 5 2.86
4 Improve status of life 3 1.71
5 J ob task 5 2.86
6 Married 28 16.00
Total 175 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Nature of society in study area also tend to open marked with society acceptance friendly (
85.33%) to newcomer. This matter is related to various activity of around location, which
has implication to existence of outsider came from outside area. Society ( 70.83%) having a
notion that a lot of outsiders in their area. Outsider comes from various tribes such as
Bugis, Gorontalo, Toraja, Ternate, Buton, J ava, Sunda, Madura, Bali, Flores and Sumbawa.
Some reason of all outsiders to move in study area and its surroundings is presented at
following Table.
Table 3.89. Respondent opinion about clausal of outsider so they could be accept
No Clausal of outsider Frequency %
1 Could work together with local people 229 39.62
2 Follow social activity 119 20.59
3 Give physical help for local development 3 0.52
4 Respect custom and tradition 139 24.05
5 Be organization inspiring 88 15.22
Total 578 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Three things that are most expected by society for the outsider are that they could be mixed
and worked along with local society ( 39.62%), respected custom and tradition and will
follow the social activity. The all the things expected would be able to remain to take care of
the environmental and comfortness together. That condition on inferential mentioned that

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-115
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
condition of early hue environment in relevant study area with the social process owned the
environmental quality scale of good ( 4).
c. Social stratification
Social stratification represents resident (society) differentiation in certain strata. They
existence of high coat and lower coat, relied by economic aspect, education, occupation,
and power. Each coat of social strata owned their life style which different each other. Social
stratification in study area could be seen by society opinion which assuming regional
administration manager / leader of countryside represent one who have the highest strata in
residence and prominent religion have strata below his. Complete strata could be seen from
following table.
Table 3.90. Respondent opinion about powering figure in local environment

No Powering Figure Frequency %
1. Area administration manager 206 27.61
2. Religion Leader 200 26.81
3. Educated People 96 12.87
4. Tradition Leader 148 19.84
5 People who could work with local people well 5 0.67
6 People who respect custom and tradition 2 0.27
5. Rich man 89 11.93
Total 746 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2006
Leader of tradition or knob and people who have best prosperity not automatically become
the figure, which could be followed or assumed to have an effect on society group, but
someone, which will work along, and care to society is importance of figure in society.
Condition of early hue environment related to social stratification before there is incoming
project in good category ( 4 )
d. Social organization/ Public organization
Existence of social organization or social institution represented way to fulfill live
requirement the society or to reach target by together and earn to know the dynamics or
society activity around study area. Social institutions usually formed by meeting which are
have democration sign. For example, group of young fellow, housewife, all farmers and all
breeders with Total and type of Social organization in study area is presented at following
Table .

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-116
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 3.91. Respondent opinion about Total and kind of Social organization in
Study area
No Kind of Social organization Frequency Persent.
Young talent
a. organization activity 201 53.03
b. Sport activity 33 8.71
c. Religion 140 36.94
d. Social Politic 5 1.32
1
Total 379 100.00
Education
a. Elementary and Primary School 196 66.44
b. J unior High School 22 7.46
c. Senior High School 15 5.08
d. Learning Group 29 9.83
e. Religion group 33 11.19
2
Total 295 100.00
Agriculture
a. Farmer and fisherman group 9 3.63
b. Cattlemen group 47 18.94
c. Farmer group 175 70.56
d. Dry farmer group 8 3.23
e. Other farmer group 9 3.64
3
Total 248 100.00
4 Family group
a. Association of Ta family 12 28.57
b. Balinese-J avanese Family 11 26.19
c. Family association 6 14.29
d. Balinese family association 5 11.91
e. other family association 8 19.04
Total 42 100.00
5 Economic
a. Credit and saving coperation 16 31.37
b. J oint venture coperation 15 29.42
c. Village unit cooperation 10 19.61
d. Small and middle company group 5 9.80
e. Rice saving place 5 9.80
Total 51 100.00
6 Health
a. Public health center 22 7.64
b. supporting unit of public health center 47 16.33
c. maternity health center 172 59.72
d. Village health center 45 15.62
e. paramedic practice 2 0.69
Total 288 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-117
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Social organization which is exist in study area go forward enough and their dynamic shown
by existence of various institution like education institute, economic institute, institute for the
young fellow, institute of health, institute of agriculture and institute of consanguinity.
Among society institutes, what most recognized by respondent are institute of young fellow
by Percentage 29.09%, then institute of education 22,64% and institute of health 22.10%
and also institute of agriculture equal to 19.03%. This matter indicates that society institute
has enough activity and takes their role to society.

e. Public perception and attitude
Attitude and public perception represented form of respond to individual or group of people
in giving meaning and assess to something. Referring to plan of Matindok Project
Development of Gas, public has various attitude and perception. Most people have known
the plan of Matindok Project Development of Gas ( 79.17%) with source information from
local government office ( 65.44%) in countryside level, sub district and regency. A complete
data of respondent response about existence of project presented at following Table.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-118
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.92. Respondent opinion about project plan
No
Knowledge and respondent attitude about
project plan
Frequency %
1. Knowledge about project plan:
a. Have knowledge about project plan
b. Not have knowledge about project plan

190
50

79.17
20.83
Total 240 100
2. Information sources about project plan:
a. Village administration office
b. Sub-district administration office
c. District administration office
d. Project employee
e. Non government organization
f. Friend and neighbors

66
16
7
10
2
35

48.53
11.76
5.15
7.35
1.47
25.74
Total 136 100.00
3. Respondent attitude about project plan:
a. Agree
b. Disagree
c. Neutral
d. Abstain

188
12
26
14

78.33
5.00
10.83
5.84
Total 240 100.00
Source : Primary Data 2007

Most public agree with the project plan (78.33%) but they have a lot expectation and
suggestion. Only about 5% respondent, which expressly disagreement to the project plan,
and 16.67% other respondent express that they just follow government discretion of and do
not have opinion to that project. Condition of hue environment for attitude and public
perception in study area pertained by good category ( scale of 4).
Public positive perception to related activity plan with the existence of some advantage or
benefit, which could be derived from existence of project activity shown at following Table.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-119
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.93. Respondent Opinion about benefit of project activity

No Kind of project benefit Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Increasing of work opportunity
Increasing of effort opportunity
Increasing of public income
Development of area project
Increasing public and social facilities
Increasing Trading and marketing volume
Increasing public enable ness from project
45
20
84
7
12
12
9
23.81
10.58
44.44
3.70
6.35
6.35
4.77
Total 189 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Biggest advantages from project activity and will be able to be felt by society is the
increasing of society earnings (44.44%), then existence of work opportunity (23.81%) and
increasing of effort (business) opportunity (10.58%). beside that there are also about
6.35% respondent express their expectation for developmental of public and social facility
for society.
Table 3.94. Respondent expectation about public and social facilities that be
built because of project activity
No Kind of public and social facilities Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Transportation Facilities
Education Facilities
Health Facilities
Sport/Art Facilities
Trading Facilities
Religion Facilities
Recreation and entertainment Facilities
43
88
40
4
5
30
2
20.28
41.51
18.87
1.89
2.36
14.15
0.94
Total 212 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-120
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Three kind of facilities which are have very expected to be developed are facilities in line of
education facilities specially for middle education (SMP And SMA), then transportation
facility which still relative limited in some part of study area at present and health
facilities which still have long distance or far from some of society.
Besides public positive perception to development of gas project, society also own the
negative perception to project related by possibility of some loss which could be happened
by activity of this project. Some of loss presented at the following Table.
Table 3.95. Respondent opinion about loss that cause of project activity
No Kind of loss Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Increasing of change in land using
Decreasing of farming production
Increasing density and traffic
Increasing public disturbing
Decreasing environmental quality
Decreasing public health
Changing of youth attitude
Possibility of disaster (such as Lapindo case)
63
29
12
6
40
5
22
20
31.98
14.72
6.09
3.05
20.30
2.54
11.17
10.15
Total 197 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

According to respondent opinion, the loss from this activity is increasing of switchover of
change of land using for agriculture farm (31.98%) which have direct effect to degradation
of agriculture production (14.72%). Other loss that is predicted is degradation of
environment quality, behavioral change of young fellow or society and possibility of disaster
like Lapindo case, fire or pipe leakage. Besides them, there are also possibilities of worries,
which arise, due to various project activities around respondents residence.

Biggest worries of respondent is possibility of broker existence in moment of farm Liberation
(15.35%), [then followed by existence of poison gas (14.56%), fire or fire blast (14.40%),
degradation of quality and amount irrigate (6.96%) and employee releasing and decreasing
of society earnings as effect when project over (6.02%).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-121
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


Table 3.96. Respondent Opinion about Public Worries Caused By
Gas Development Activity
No Kind of public worries Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.

Land dragging
Broker of land dragging
Fire
Noise and dust
Uncontrolled of Poisoning gas
Traffic disturbing
Decreasing of water quality
Decreasing of health environmental quality
Incoming of outsiders
Disturbing of safety
Risk of fire when piping
Pipe falling
Land using caused of piping
Employee releasing when project over
52
97
91
65
92
45
44
29
18
15
17
17
12
38
8.23
15.35
14.40
10.28
14.56
7.12
6.96
4.59
2.85
2.37
2.69
2.69
1.89
6.02
Total 632 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Worries which emerged when project took place produce amount suggestion and solution,
society condition before the project will change. Public also have various type of perception
to the change which will happened. Suggestion and solution which represented by
respondent made the respondent caring to activity plan so that various change with
negative effect negativity could be depressed as minimum as possible.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-122
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.97. Respondent Suggestion about Land Dragging
No Suggestion Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Socialization of land dragging plan to public
Land dragging process based on legal procedural
Price is communicated to land owner
Plan included to estimate
Transparent
No broker in land dragging process
8
4
121
4
25
3
4.85
2.42
73.33
242
15.15
1.83
Total 165 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

To prevent involving of broker in course of farm liberation, respondent have a notion that
before process of farm liberation shall be done, its started by Socialization to society (
13.25%), farm purchasing done directly to farm owner ( 80.79%) and require to be done a
deliberation transparently among farm owner, project sponsorship and government
especially to reach the price agreement ( 5.96%). Beside existence of various worries to
plan of farm liberation, a lot of respondent have own plan to shell their of farm replacement
if only their farm is bought for the project. Some plan of money used from farm liberation
presented at following Table.

Table 3.98. Respondent opinion about money used plan
No Money used plan Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Buy complement land
Saving
As capital of business
To go to mekkah for praying
For study planning of their child
173
75
87
32
4
46.63
20.22
23.45
8.62
1.08
Total 165 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Most respondent have plan to use their money of result of farm Liberation, about 46.63%
respondent having a notion that their money will be used to buy the substitution farm with

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-123
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
the fertility level more or less equal to farm freed for the project. About 23.45% other
respondent express to open the effort and expressing will be saved as much 20.22%. This
condition more or less giving picture that society have had the awareness of importance
farm to work or business as their production source, so that money of sales revenue of farm
is not used for consumptive buying.
Suggestion or respondent solution to possibility of fire or fire blast which possible emerge
especially by majoring prevention effort ( 29.46%) and if in the reality the undesirable
occurrence happened hence strive the preventing effort precisely and quickly have to
immediately done ( 28.68%). Suggestion or respondent solution in more detailed presented
at following Table.

Table 3.99. Respondent Suggestion for Fire Caused By Project
No Suggestion Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Socialization of plant activity to public
Have Standard operational procedural (SOP)
Use modern equipment
Have early warning system
Have high quality of human resources
Preventing is the main procedure
Have area that keep the pipe
Monitoring of production facilities regularly
Have quick solution to fire
8
4
10
6
8
38
12
6
37
6.20
3.10
7.75
4.65
6.20
29.46
9.31
4.65
28.68
Total 129 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007


From various suggestion or solution raised by respondent, it was shown that socialization
plan of project activity to society is of vital importance to be done so that society know
about various work type in project with the possibilities of existence of risk in order to they
make provision against all the things.

For minimization existence of noise, vibration and dirt which produced by project,
respondent suggest the existence of arrangement and controlling to entire/all project

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-124
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
activity ( 25.92%), arrangement of vehicles which used to mobilize equipments and
materials ( 24.07%). They also suggested activity location should be from resident and all
workers provided with the appliance of noise silencer especially at the time of activity
generating noise.

Table 3.100. Respondent suggestion for noise and dust caused by project

No Suggestion Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Location of project far from town
Use the right equipment
Manage of activity as well as possible
Manage of project transportation mobilization
Using noise keeping equipment
Controlling and monitoring every activity
Have quick and effective procedure to solve the risk
18
6
17
26
24
11
6
16.67
5.56
15.73
24.07
22.22
10.19
5.56
Total 108 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007


For problem of existing poison gas possibly happen, respondent have a notion that most off
all human resources who is concerned in this activity have high quality ( 32.35%), public
safety have to become the especial priority ( 14.71%) and strive the solve quickly and
precisely have to immediately done ( 13.72%) and also compensation to society who is
incurred by impact.

In order to minimalize the problem of traffic, respondent have a notion that road planned to
be used for the project of should be widened before project started ( 19.80%) or make the
alternative route ( 17.82%) and also install the fringe of traffic especially for road related
with the project activity ( 17.82%).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-125
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.101. Respondent Suggestion For Uncontrolled Poisoning Gas
Caused By The Project
No Suggestion Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Location of project far from settlement
Use modern equipment
Have high quality of human resources
Have systematic and planning activity
Have early warning system
Priority of public safety
Monitoring and controlling activity regularly
Have quick and efective to save the risk
Compensation for people
8
4
33
7
8
15
7
14
6
7.84
3.92
32.35
6.86
7.84
14.71
6.86
13.72
5.90
Total 102 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Table 3.102. Respondent suggestion for traffic disturbing that caused by project
No Suggestion Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Enlarge road that use by project
Have alternative route
Have installation of traffic fringe
Managing of project transportation mobilization
There are police in the route
There are public partisipation in traffic management
There are legal activity for distruber
20
18
18
8
8
16
13
19.80
17.82
17.82
7.92
7.92
15.84
12.88
Total 101 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Other importance suggestion or solution which important in this case is entangling society in
arrangement traffic( 15.84%) specially at some activity causing annoying of daily condition
traffic. By entangling society in so many project activity it is expected that society also have
sense of belonging of project so that they have the intention to support the project as good
as possible.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-126
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 3.103. Respondent suggestion for water quality problem caused by project
No Suggestion Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Not destroy water resources
Have detection system
Give piping of water for public
Not polluted water source and environment
Monitoring activity regularly
Using water as efficient as possible
54
5
8
8
10
5
60.00
5.56
8.89
8.89
11.10
5.56
Total 90 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

In order to keep amount of and water quality remain to be awaked better, project executor
expected not to destroy the water resources directy. Despitefully also require to do
controlling and or monitoring to project activity especially around water resources. Used of
irrigate on is expected also to be as efficient as possible so that water resources earn
remain to be made available at the future.

Table 3.104. Respondent Suggestion for decreasing of public health
caused by the project
No Suggestion Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Socialization of project activity to public
Help health checking activity
Adding of health facilities and paramedic
Health checking activity reqularly
Monitoring project activity regularly
10
40
16
10
6

12.19
48.78
19.51
12.19
7.33

Total 82 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

About 34.17% respondent pass an opinion to overcome the problem of descending
environmental health quality, that is especially through following involving of part
administrator in assisting execution of activity of health counselling ( 48.78%) and add or
develop health facilities with its medical resources ( 19.51%). Others for society incured by

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-127
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
direct impact of project activity shall be given facility of health checking and or free
medication done periodically. This represent one form of compensation or responsibility of
social company to society which directly injured or have trouble of health as effect of project
activity.

Though in general society accepted the attendance of outsider that predicted toincrease
when project started, there are about 42.08% respondent suggest some criterion to
outsider like presented at following Table.

Table 3.105. Respondent Suggestion about incoming of outiders problems
caused by the project
No Suggestion Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Outsiders must have complete ID
Outsiders must have report to local administrator
Outsiders will be share with local people
Outisiders must respect custom and tradition
Outsiders may follow social activity

6
58
15
9
13

5.94
57.43
14.85
8.91
12.87

Total 101 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Most of respondent suggested that outsiders shall oblige to report before to local
functionary, then they will be mixed and follow the activity with local society and also
respected local custom and tradition. Its expectation, reconciliation and togetherness will
always awaked better so that entire society could arrange the life better.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-128
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.106. Respondent Suggestion about problem of security and safety
caused by project
No Suggestion Frequency %
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Adding of security facillities
Increasing of public security system (siskamling)
Entangling of security personnal
Monitoring of pipe route regularly
Keeping pipe area
Pipe planted deeper
17
27
6
9
12
8
21.52
34.18
7.59
11.39
15.19
10.13
Total 70 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

If only during project activity take place there are existence of trouble of security and
safety, about 32.92% respondent have a notion that mentioned require to be overcome by
improving security entangling society, adding security facilities and take care of the areal
pipe which relatively gristle to theft. Meanwhile respondent suggestion to various related
problems with the pipe problem would be as follows.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-129
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.107. Respondent Suggestion About Problem Of Installing
Pipe Of Distribution Gas
No Suggestion
Frequen
cy
%

1.

Fire caused by pipe installing:
a. Socialization of plan activity to public
b. Location of pipe installation far from settlement
c. Employee use mask


21
17
42


26.25
21.25
52.50

Total 80 100

2.

Slipping of pipe when pipe move down:
a. Socialization of plan activity to public
b. Location of activity far fro settle
c. Installing fringe and warning system
d. Use professional employee



22
12
22
16



30.56
16.67
30.56
22.21
Total 72 100.00

3.




Decreasing of it facillity`after piping:
a. There are alternative route for public mobility
b. Location of pipe far from settle
c. There are fringe and warning equipment



74
15
11



74.00
15.00
11.00

Total 100 100.00
Source : Primary Data 2007

Generally respondent expressed that location of piping should far from resident so that it
prevented them from danger caused by piping. Beside that to avoid stuck caused by project
mobility, they suggested to wide the road, so that having alternative road and attached
fringe along the road which traffic happened.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-130
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Though some of society could be joined with project, undeniable that dread or care also
they feel when facing to end of project activity. By ending of project they loss occupation
which are done during the project for certain. Some suggestion given by respondent to the
problem would be as follows:

Table 3.108. Respondent Suggestion about labour releasing when project over
No Suggestion Frequency %
1.
2.
3.

Give competent allowance of retirement
Looking for complement job
There are transparant contract

80
28
11

67.23
23.53
9.24

Total 119 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

About 49.58% respondent gave the suggestion to get allowance of retirement to all labour
which conducted in project or gave them a substitution occupation. In order to keep the
legal aspect, employment should read the contract before signed it so they know about
their right and more ready for the employee release.

3.4 PUBLIC HEALTH COMPONENT

Every effort and or development activity executed by government also private sector generally
will give the negative and also positive good impact to environment. One of them is health
aspect of human being who exist surround the project activity either direct and also indirectly.
Activity which could generate various health problem for example effect of decreasing of
environmental sanitation, air quality and noise, decreasing mount of the environmental quality
sanitasi, quality of air and noise, decreasing of clean water availibility could affect to incidence
of various type of disease so that bother human being health.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-131
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

3.4.1 Environmental Parameters which predicted influenced by impact
Various environmental parameter of public health predicted will be incured by impact from
activity of project developmental for example: environmental sanitation. Decreasing of
environmental quality will impact to development of vector diseases so they effect the public
health level.

Land digging for the installation of pipe needed heavy equipments, operational of well of
production and operational PPGM enabled degradation. of environmental quality. Incidence of
various disease also because of existence of disease vector from hole of ex- pipe digging which
could accomodate the water, so that as a place for mosquitoes which could be contagious of
disease to human being. Other effect of project which could bother the health of human being
were dirt disseminating ( air), poison gas, noise. Thereby parameters were expected to get the
circumstantial attention at development of project activity.
Environment parameter estimated to be incured by impact of existence of development project
plan are:
1. Environmental sanitation
Environment sanitation intended here is reflection of condition of health environment in
physical, either in project tread and also environmental around project which is mirrored by
adding of health facilities, garbage management, level of the environmental accuration and
hygiene.
2. Publichealth disturbing
Health disturbing is the existence of trouble which caused change of disease pattern for both
project employee worker and resident around project.

3.4.2 Process dan Potency of exposure

Direct exposure could be happened in various construction activity and operation activity such
as increasing of dirt rate, noise, and degradation of sanitation quality . Direct exposure could hit
the 1) employees or worker in some location especially in drilling of gas 2) resident around
drilling location.

While indirect exposure is an exposure that happened as consequence of existence of gas
drilling area, for example number of street accident as effect of traffic decreasing, public health

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-132
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
disturbing as effect of descend the environmental condition and existing disease pattern change
in society. Potency of this exposure is relative big, considering occurence of resident in large
number and its process happened in long time. Those added by limited level of society
knowledge, so that society had not yet prevented the change well.

3.4.3 Risk potency of diseases
Potency of impact level or the happening of disease in a painfulness number by some disease
type in 4 subdistrict of study area presented at following Table.

Table 3.109. Top ten of diseases in Kintom District of 2006
No Kind of diseases Total Patient Percentage
1 Cold 854 24.91
2 ARI 798 23.28
3 Gastritis 583 17.01
4 Diarrhoea 355 10.36
5 Hypertention 243 7.09
6 Malaria 240 7.00
7 Dermatitis 167 4.87
8 V. Laceratum 82 2.39
9 Campak 73 2.13
10 Hypotention 32 0.93
T o t a l 3.427 100.00
Source: SP2TP, of 2006
Table 3.110. Percentage of ten disesases in Batui for 2006
No Kind of diseases Total Patient Percentage
1 ARI 582 35.82
2 Comend Cold 437 26.89
3 Gastritis 253 15.57
4 Diarrhoea 115 7.08
5 Hypertention 82 5.05
6 Scabies 44 2.71
7 Malaria 37 2.28
8 Bronhitis 30 1.85
9 Pneomonia 23 1.42
10 TBC 22 1.35
T o t a l 1.625 100.00
Source: SP2TP, of 2005

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-133
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 3.111. Percentage of ten bigest case in Toili of 2006
No Kind of diseases Total Patient Percentage
1. ARI 3,654 28.86
2. Malaria 1,385 10.94
3. Intestine infection 1,035 8.18
4. Muscle system infection 925 7.31
5. Mouth cavity diseases 856 6.76
6. accident 844 6.67
7. Skinny diseases 774 6.11
8. Diarrhoea 675 5.33
9. Influenza 635 5.02
10. Gastritis 416 3.29
T o t a l 12,660 100.00
Source: SP2TP, of 2006

Table 3.112. Percentage Of Ten Bigest Case In Study Area
In 2006
No Kind of diseases Total Patient Percentage
1. ARI 5,034 33.97
2. Malaria 1,662 11.22
3. Comend Cold 1,291 8.71
4. Gastritis 1,252 8.45
5. Diarrhoea 1,145 7.73
6. Intestine infection 1,035 6.98
7. Muscle system infection 925 6.24
8. Mouth cavity diseases 856 5.78
9. accident 844 5.70
10. Skinny diseases 774 5.22
T o t a l 14,818 100.00
Source: SP2TP, of 2006

From above mentioned table seen that disease type which is a lot of suffered by resident in
subdistrict of study area were ISPA, malaria, Comend Cold, gastritis, and diarrhoea. ISPA
represented top position as being a lot of suffered by a society. This matter is possibily
existence of dirt and various polution gas because of location of countryside of Study area very
nearby with traffic transportation road. In gas mining, internal issue of health of human being is

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-134
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
phosphorus gas ( F). In normal situation, phosphorus element are in brain, nerve, and muscle.
Phosphorus consisted of the forfor yellow / turn white and smell like ozone, and soluble in CS2
( sulfide carbon), oil and ether. While phosphorus coming from mine which was not controlled
could generate the air contamination to plant and water which could endanger the health by
passing direct contact at husk, inhabation with exhalation air, and ingesti on with food or
beverage. Condition of environment sanitation which relative bad also take important role in
disease spreading digestively like diarrhoea, dengue infection by passing mosquito bite,
dysentery, stomach infection like maag.

There are of infection disease of intestine also required to be taken heed to remember its
tendency caused by consuming the indisposed food or less pay attention to the way of healthy
life. Then sequence to 7 and 8 is disease at system of muscle and mouth cavity, later followed
by accident and skin disease. Thereby require various good effort of promotif and also preventif
so that the disease growth could be depressed as minimum as possible.

The data above also supported by statement from some respondent who expressed existence
of disease type suffered by a long range of time at 1 the last year. From 240 respondent as
much 47 respondent, as much 13 people ( 5.4%) have suffered from the ISPA, 11 people (
4.6%) suffering from in ( kidney, heart, lung, liver dll), 9 people ( 3.8%) suffering from husk
and 8 people ( 3.3%) suffering THT, while other injured clan like diabetes, couldcer and others

According to result interview with resident in study area as much 125 people ( 52.1%)
expressing have suffered from malaria. Resident have suffered from Dengue slimmest research
region that is noted by 3 people ( 1.3%). During confining time 10 Total the last year of patient
of malarian every year mean 1-3 people. But malaria patient at most at 2006 they were 10
malaria patient. Therefore programs of mosquito eradication of like Eradication of Mosquito
(PSN) require to be non-stoped executed periodically to prevent progressively the disease
spreading.

There are 69 respondent expressing that in last 1 month suffer the pain. Disease type suffered
by respondent presented at following Table.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-135
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 3.113. Types of Disease in Study Area during the Last Month
No Type of Disease Number Percentage
1. Digestive Pain 39 56.52
2. Asphyxia 14 20.28
3. Acute Respiratory Infection 9 13.04
4. Rheumatism 5 7.24
5. Mal Calcium 1 1.44
6. Low blood Pressure 1 1.44
TOTAL 69 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2006

The table showed that disease that mostly attack people at study area is Digestive Pain. The
other disease is asphyxia. These types of diasease showed realation with the lifestyle at study
area, which was not healthy and higienic.

There are 16% of resident suffer from pain within a week. According to the Environmental
Quality Standard, the Health status of resident at study area is average or classified into scale
3.

3.4.4 Specific Characteristic of Resident with Risk

There are some specific characteristic of resident, which was able to cause disease, such as the
existence of smoker, waste management of society and resident participation in activity of
posyandu and way of medication.

Table 3.114. Percentage of Smoker and Number of
Sipped Cigarette per Day
No
The number of Smoker and
Amount of Cigarette per
Day
Number Percentage
1 Smoker 147 61.25
Amount of cigarette per day
a. sometimes 13 8.84
b. 1 2 cigarettes 5 3.40
c. 3 5 cigarettes 15 10.20
d. 6 9 cigarettes 13 8.84
2
e. more than 9 cigarettes 101 68.70
source : Primary Data, 2007


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-136
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The statistic above indicated that most of respondent (60%) in study area is smoker. There are
101 respondents (68.70%) that sipp more than 9 cigarettes a day. The other smoker (15
respondents) consume 3-5 cigarettes/day, 13 respondents smoke 6-9 cigarettes/day. The other
respondents state that they smoke sometimes and only sipp 1-2 cigarette per day. This habit
represents risk factor, which couldnot be disregarded with health, especially related to asphyxia,
asthma, bronchitis and other exhalation channel infection, lung and heart.

Waste management, especially household waste used by respondent generally are as follows;
burned, entered to hole and piled up with soil, and recycled into a fertilizer; there is also some
respondents that throwing away the waste to environment, such as to the river or sea. Waste
management of respondent in detail could be seen at the following table.


Table 3.115. Percentage of Waste Management of Respondent
No Waste Management Frequency Percentage
1. Burned 198 82.5
2. Entered to hole and piled up with soil 15 6.4
3. Thrown away to the river 9 3.8
4. Burned dan Entered to hole/piled up with soil 4 1.7
5. Thrown away to the sea 2 0.8
6. recycled into fertilizer 1 0.4
7. Gathered and Burned 1 0.4
8. Other 5 2.1
TOTAL 240 100.00
source : Primary Data, 2007
From total 240 respondents at study area, there are 198 people (82.5%) who do the waste
management by burn their waste, 6,4% of respondents enter the waste into a hole then piled
up with soil, 9 people (3.8%) throw their waste into a river, and the others manage their waste
by piled up with soil, recycle into fertilizer, and throw it into the sea. Throwing the waste into
the environment did not support the god condition of sanitation. An effort was neede in order to
make a good quality of environment at study area.
The description of society participation in Posyandu as one of health service was shown at the
following table.






EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-137
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 3.116. Percentage of Respondent who Bring Their Babies to
Posyandu/ Hospital
No Weigh Out Their Babies Number Percentage
1 Yes 105 74.46
2 No 36 25.54
Total Total 100.00
source : Primary Data, 2007

The table shows that more than 70% of respondent have never weighed out their babies to
Posyandu. This fact indicates that there are only few numbers of respondents who will
participate in Posyandu as form of health service. Altough the location of posyandu is far from
their residence, they still weighed their babies to the posyandu because they realize the
importance of familys health. The reason why respondent do not weighted their babies to the
posyandu is because the location is far from their residence, their babies are healthy or they are
busy helping their husbands in earn money for living. According to the situation, it could be
concluded that the characteristic of respondent at study area is good in health awareness of
their family, especially for the children under 5 years-old. Among 93 respondents who have
children under 5 years-old, there are 52.68% of respondents have an ideal weight, 45.16% of
respondents have sufficient nutrition, and 2.15% of respondents have a child with mal-nutrition.
The data of weigthed result and nutrition status of children under 5 five years-old was shown at
the following table.

Table 3.117. Percentage of Respondent of Weigthed Result And Nutrition Status Of
Children Under 5 Five Years-Old at Study Area

No Weigthed Result And Nutrition Status number percentage
1 above the red line (ideal body weight) 49 52.68
2 normal condition (sufficient nutrition) 42 45.16
3 below the red line (mal-nutrition) 2 2.15
TOTAL 93 100.00
source : Primary Data, 2007

Some ways medication, which was conducted by respondent when they are suffering from pain
or as an effort to keep the good health, could be seen in the following table.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-138
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 3.118. Percentage of Medication which is Conducted by Respondent
No Way of Medication Number Percentage
1 Puskesmas/Hospital/Doctor 165 68.8
2 Doctor/Paramedic, Nurse 51 21.3
3 Cured by themselves 5 2.1
4 Alternative medication/paramedic/mantri 3 1.2
5 Alternative medication /shince/accupunture 1 0.4
6 others 15 6.3
Total 240 100.00
source : Primary Data, 2007

The table indicates that most of resident (more than 60%) choose existing health facility as way
of medication, that is Puskesmas/Hospital/Doctor, around 21.3% of respondent go to medical
officer and paramedics, and the others take free drugs and traditional medicine (jamu),
alternative medication/shince/accupunture. Considering that there are more than 60% of
residents that using doctor and other paramedic service to overcoming pain, hence the quality
of environmental is classified into very good with scale 5.


3.4.5 Health Resources
There was only 1 Public Hospital at Luwuk and Birth Clinic Irenne that also at Luwuk district.
The puskesmas and auxiliary puskesmas are located at several districts, such as Toili (2), Toili
Barat (1), Batui (2), and Kintom (1). Condition of health resources in Mlonggo Districts was
elaborated at the following table.

Table 3.119. Health Facility per District at Banggai Regency of 2004
District Hospital Puskesmas
Auxiliary
Puskesmas
Polindes Drugstore
1. Kintom - 1 9 11 1
2. Batui - 2 8 - 3
3. Toili - 2 11 1 2
4. Toili Barat - 1 4 - 2
Total - 6 32 12 8
Source: Kecamatan Dalam Angka Tahun 2005

Distribution of health facilities at Banggai Regency were 18 facilities spread out in 13 districts,
aeach distric already have its own health facility, that is puskesmas. The number of doctor is
just a few, there are only 1 doctor each at Kintom and Toili Barat, 4 doctors at Kintom and also
Toili. The number of doctor available is quite small for the region, therefore some doctors were

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-139
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
appointed from the hospital at Banggai Regency, especially for the specialists. The number of
docter at Banggai regency was 25, 4 sepcialists and 4 denstists. Its distribution was not equally
for each region. The number of health resource was presented as follows:

Table 3.120. Health Resources per District at Banggai Regency of 2005
Health Resources
District
Doctor Nurse Paramedic
Sanitation
of SPPH
Trained
Paramedic
Untrained
Paramedic
1. Kintom 1 14 15 1 9 21
2. Batui 4 5 9 2 30 23
3. Toili 5 45 23 - 32 30
4. Toili Barat 1 14 17 - - 39
Total 11 78 64 3 71 112
Source: Kecamatan Dalam Angka Tahun 2005

The health resource consists of paramedic, number of health facilities, and respondent capability
in reaching the health cost.

There were 6 Puskesmas, 32 auxiliary Puskesmas, and other health facilities such as polindes
and drugstore. The number of Docter and dentist is 11 people, but during the survey period,
they were not exist yet. The paramedic consists of Paramedic (78), and nurse (64). The number
of health resource at Regency level is 28 people, so the paramedic in the study area is 39.28%
from the total amount, distributed in 4 districts of study area, 17.60% of nurse and Paramedic
are in Banggai Regency. The percentage of Puskesmas in study area was 21.42% from the toal
amount at Banggai Regency.

The comparison of health facility and paramedic, also paramedic and total population at 4
districts were Puskesmas and auxiliary Puskesmas 1:2,622, docter 1:9,060, bidan 1:5,566 and
nurse 1:1,557. It means, each Puskesmas and Puskesmas Pembantu have to serve more than
2,622, each docter must serve 9,060 people, and each nurse serve around 1,557 people.
According to criterion of environment quality, the condition of health facilities in Mlonggo District
generally is average (scale 3).




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-140
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
3.4.6 Condition of Environmental Sanitation

Number of sanitation facility in neighborhood and the local society behavior shows condition of
sanitation. Sanitation facility is a facility to fulfill the needs of MCK, such as well, public WC and
public bathroom.

Most of resident in study area have owned a well to profide amount of water required for
drinking, washing clothes and other household equipments, therefore the environmental
sanitation condition is good. The GPF location is far from the settlement, it is a forest area.

The environmental sanitation condition in study area is good, eventhough it is not supported by
the sampling analysis of well water that contain E. coli and total Coliform.

In general, the resident still use digged well, drilled well, water spring, water from PDAM, and
the clean river water. The resident around coast area usually use the water source aound their
area, while the resident outside coastal area use digged well or water spring as their water
source.

The description of drinking source water, which is used daily by respondent, is presented at
following table.

Table 3.121. Percentage of Drinking Water Source which is Used by Respondent
No Source of Drinking Water Number Percentage
1 Digged Wells 207 86.30
2 Digged Wells, PDAM (Water Supply Company) 19 8.00
3 Digged Wells, PDAM (Water Supply Company) 6 2.60
4 Rain water, river 4 1.70
5 Pipe of village 3 1.30
6 Other 6 2.50
Total 240 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

The table showed that there are variations of drinking water source usage in study area. The
resident from outside coastal area (86.30%) use digged well and drilled well as their drinking
water source, and the coastal resident bouhgt water from PDAM.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-141
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The various locations, which are usually used by respondent to defecate (BAB), are presented at
the following table.

Table 3.122. Percentage of Respondent Habit in Defecating (BAB)
No Location of Defecate Frequency
Percentage
1 Family Latrine 179 74.6
2 Public Latrine 13 5.40
3 Latrine of the neighbour 4 1.70
4 River 20 8.30
5 Natural Latrine 19 7.90
6 others 5 2.10
Total 240 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

The resident at study area in general has their own latrine. There are 279 people who already
have their own latrine (74.60%), 13 (5.40%) respondent using public latrine. There are 39
respondents (16.2%) defecates in the river or natural latrine. According to the data, the
environmental sanitation condition could be classified into good condition (scale 4). Therefore,
various efforts to improve the quality of environment in study area and in vicinity are needed.

3.4.7. Nutrition Status of Society
Nutrition status of society in this case is the existence of sufficiency level of nutrition or protein
energy of babies that is could be measured through body weight of babies. Nutrition status of
respondent (babies) which is observed from KMS (health card) is presented at following table.

Table 3.123. Percentage of Average Nutrition Status of Respondent (Babies)
No Nutrition Status of Babies Frequency Percentage
1 Above red line (ideal body weight) 49 52.68
2 Normal (sufficient nutrition) 42 45.16
3 Under red line (mal nutrition) 2 2.15
Total 93 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Generally, nutrition status of respondent is normal and good, there is no mal nutrition baby. This
condition indicates that knowledge and awareness of rural society about nutrition for babies
have increased to be compared to condition of 1-2 years ago. Babies health represent one of

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-142
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
significouldt indicator of healthy society, hence The Local Public Health Service continue to
conduct Good Nutrition program through the existing Puskesmas, such as increasing counseling
for all resident about consumption of nutrition, and also increasing Program of additional food
(PMT) for the babies.
The daily need of food materials of respondent could be accomplished from their own
garden/rice field, local market, further market, circle merchant or from restaurant which exist
around their residence. Meanwhile, food type consumed daily by respondent and their family is
presented at following table.

Table 3.124. Food Type Consumed Daily By Respondent and Their Family
No Food Type Frequency Percentage
1 Rice and Vegetables 38 15.8
2 Rice and lauk 11 4.6
3 Rice, Vegetables and meat/protein 150 62.5
4 Rice, Vegetables, meat/protein and fruit 34 14.2
5 Rice, Vegetables, meat/protein, fruit and milk 2 0.8
6 others 5 2.1
Total 240 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

Daily consume Pattern of respondent generally (62.5%) is rice, vegetable and with
meat/protein, such as tahu/soybean cake, briny fish and tempe/fermented soybean cake).
Around 0.8% of respondent have consumed food with complete nutrition, 15.8% of other
respondent have simple consume pattern, and 14.2% consume rice, meat/protein and fruit.

Table 3.125. Reason of Respondent to Have Daily Consume Pattern
No Type of reason Frequency Percentage
1 the Type food which most taken a fancy to it 42 17.5
2 the Type food easiest to got 127 52.9
3 Expensive price of daily needs 24 10.0
4
he Type food which most taken a fancy to it and the Type
food easiest to got
23 9.6
5 Expensive price of daily needs, the Type food easiest to got 3 1.3
6
he Type food which most taken a fancy to it, the Type food
easiest to got, Expensive price of daily needs
11 4.6
6 Nutrition needs 3 1.3
7 Other reasons 7 2.9
Total 100 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-143
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Only 0,8% of respondent expressed that their daily consume pattern was an effort to keep in
good health, this kind of reason was given by respondent which have consumed food with
complete nutrition. The common answer, which is given by respondent, was the consumed food
type is the easiest to be got and they took a fancy to it. Other respondent expressed that their
limited consume pattern is caused by expensive price of daily food and based on their daily
habit. This situation shows that level of society prosperity in study area is still low, as
consequence, their food consumption is limited to the accomplishment of carbohydrate.
Accomplishment of animal protein for daily consumption is far from their reach.

3.4.8 Environment Condition

There are some environment condition which was predicted to have effect to disease spreading
process, such as the condition of respondent residence building, average distance for septic tank
(javanese = jumbleng) and well, contiguity of respondent residence with source of pollutant,
and existence of disease vector around the residence.

Condition residence building of respondent is generally classified in average quality (scale 3)
because more than 50% of respondents house have wall, 32% have tile as its floor, and 88 %
its roof is in the form of pantile.

The more complete description of familys septitank (jumbleng), seen from its distance with well
(representing the source of water for respondent) is presented at the following table.

Table 3.126. Average Distance of Septitank with Familys well
No Distance of Septitank Well Number Percentage
1 Less than 7 m 10 5.74
2 7,1 10 m 37 21.26
3 More than 10 m 127 72.98
Total 174 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

There are around 72.50% of respondent which its MCK equipped with septic tank. About
27.50% of others do not have septic tank, and it means they also do not have MCK especially
for defecating (BAB) so that they usually defecate in sea, river, house yard or garden. 5.74% of

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-144
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
respondent have septic tank less than 7 m, 21.26% is 7-10 m apart from well, and around
72.98% have septic tank with more than 10 m apart from well.
According to health aspect, the distance standard for septitank to well is more than 10 m. This
condition of respondent, based on standard of Environmental Quality Assessment is included in
scale 3 (average).
The description about contiguity of respondents residence with source of pollutant, such as dirt,
noise, traffic, smoke and existence of industry/factory, is presented in Table 3.127.

Table 3.127. Contiguity of Respondents Residence/ Work Place
with Source of Pollutant
No Source of Pollutant Frequency Percentage
1 Dust 120 50.00
2 Noise 96 40.00
3 Traffic 130 54.20
4 Smoke 31 12.90
5 Factory/industry of Furniture 30 12.5
Source : Primary Data, 2007
The table indicates that the primary source of pollutant is traffic, dust and noise. This condition
is happened because respondents residence is generally close to the road. It is concerned that
the increase traffic and activity will influence public health.

Disease vectors around respondents residence are fly, mouse, mosquito and cockroach.
Respondent opinion about existence of the vectors in their residence is presented at following
table.

Table 3.128. Respondent Opinion about Existence of Disease Vector
in Their Residence
No Type of Disease Vector Frequency Percentage
1 Fly 129 53.8
2 Mouse 136 56.7
3 Cockroach 122 50.8
4 Mosquito 198 82.5
Source : Primary Data, 2007

The table shows that mosquito and fly are dominant disease vector (82.5%) in study area, the
others are mouse (56.7%), Cockroach (53.7%) and flies (50%). The existence of various
vectors represented bad environmental sanitation condition in study area. The data of 2006

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-145
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
showed that there was a lot of residents that suffer from malaria and DBD. Amount number of
mosquito as disease vector is predicted to increase if there was a lot of pond in construction
area; therefore, the development plan later has to anticipate the increasing number of ponds
that could improve mosquito population.

Level of society ability in using health service represents one of factor that gives influence level
of public health. If the ability of using health service increase progressively, there will be a good
quality of health service for population.

The table indicates that most of respondent (92.94%) could reach health service which exist in
vicinity. On the contrary, only small number of respondent (7.50%) express their disability. 117
respondents said that they could reach health service generally because the expense is cheap
(54.41%). 13 respondents said that the health cost is quite expensive and its location is too far.


Table 3.129. Level of Respondent Ability in Using Health Service and Its Reason
No Level of Ability and Reason Frequency Percentage
1 Able 222 92.50
2 Unable 11 7.50
Total 233 100.00
Able, the reason is:
a. Cheap Cost 11 5.11
b. The location is near 56 26.04
c. Officer always there 4 1.86
d. good and Friendly officer 1 0.46
e. Get health Insurance 6 2.79
f. Cheap cost, near, good and Friendly officer &
always stand by
117 54.41
g. Near location, good and Friendly officer &
always stand by
12 5.58
h. Health Needs 1 0.46
i. The location is near and Cheap cost 7 3.25
3

Total 215 100.00
Unable, the reason is:
a. Expensive Cost 2 15.38
b. The location is far 4 30.76
c. Officer seldom there 2 15.38
4
d. Expensive Cost and The location is far 5 38,.6
Total 13 100.00
Source : Primary Data, 2007

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
III-146
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

From various descriptions mentioned above, it could be concluded that condition of public health
was influenced by condition of population, environment nearby, resident behavior that is related
to healthy and hygienic life style (PHBS), and level service of health of which could be used by
resident. According to environmental quality assessment, the condition of population around
study area is average (3); condition of the environment quality evaluated from health aspect is
average (3); quality of healthy and hygienic life style of resident is average (3); and level health
service of which could be reached by resident in study area is average (3). It could be
concluded that in general level of public health in study area is average (scale 3). The health
condition and healthy lifestyle (K3) of project employee was later predicted in average level or
have scale 3.



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-1
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM



Chapter-4
sCOPE of STUDY




4.1. ANALYSIS of SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

The basic analysis of significant impacts in this EIS document is equal to the scope of hypothetic
environmental impact and hypothetic significant impact priority in the TOR-EIS document. The
significant Impacts to be analyzed in this EIS study are significant hypothetic impacts with the
following scope process chronology. The scope result from many potential environmental
impacts that possibly arise due to the Matindok Gas Development plan are conducted through
discussion between compiler document, literature survey, field survey, result of public
consultation that are performed in the compilation of EIS document, and using professional
judgment.

In the TOR-EIS, the scope result of potential impacts, hypothetic significant impact and priority
of hypothetic significant impact are still become one scope in the Matindok Gas Development
Project activity plan. In this TOR-EIS, the scope of potential impact, the hypothetic and the
priority of hypothetic significant impact are separated between the Matindok Gas Development
Project of Upstream division and the Matindok Gas Development Project of Downstream division.
Besides that, there are some impact sort arise in addition and some irrelevant impact as

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-2
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
hypothetic significant impact disappear in the end with certain judgment, as explained in sub
chapter 4.1.1.

4.1.1 Evaluation of Potential I mpact

As have explained in Chapter 2 about the obligation of Upstream Division and Downstream
Divison, the impact of several activities that are included as responsibility of Upstream Division
and Downstream Division also have separated.

The following will be explained about the scope process of significant impact sorts that is
researched from both activity.

A. Evaluation the scope result of potential impacts which is estimated to become
hypothetic significant impact in Upstream Division
The main activity in Upstream Division is gas development activities such as well drilling, BS
and GPF facilities construction, gas pipeline installation, production operational at GPF and
gas pipeline, and they are potential activities that create significant impact. However, as an
implementation to those constructions, there are other activities that linked to complete the
main activity construction that also create significant impact. The support activities within
gas development project in Upstream Division will be explained for each level as follows.

1. Pre Construction Phase
a. Land acquisition and plantation
b. Labour Recruitment
2. Construction Phase
a. mobility and demobility of equipments
b. Land clearing and maturation
c. BS and GPF construction
d. Gas pipeline installation
e. Dismissing Labour
3. Operational Phase
a. Labour Recruitment
b. Drilling the development well

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-3
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
c. Production operations at GPF
d. Gas pipeline
e. Channeling condensate and sulphur through land transportation
f. maintenance of production facility
4. Post Operational
a. terminating well
b. stop the gas production operations
c. equipment destruction and demobility
d. revegetation
e. Dismissing Labour

The next analysis explains how to evaluate potential impacts to development hypothetic
significant impact of Upstream Division of Matindok Gas Development Project. Hypothetic
significant impact is acquired by evaluating the potential impacts to the impact possibility
which is relevant or irrelevant as hypothetic impact. For irrelevant potential impacts, they
are erased then from the first list of potential impact scope result.
1. Micro Climate Change
Micro Climate change (light and air temperature) is assumed to have small intensity
from fire fuse due to the small amount of gas burned, therefore heat and light spreading
are relatively short and will not disturb the local resident. Micro Climate change caused
by land clearing for location of gas well development is relatively small compared to
surrounding lands that is still covered by vegetation. Therefore, micro climate change,
hypothetically, will not become a significant impact.

2. Decrease of Ambient Air Quality
Dust and gas emerge at construction phase activities will be produced by equipments,
such as genset, is relatively small, therefore hypothetically, it will not become a
significant impact. However at the operational phase the amount of gas and dust
produced from machines and gas emission from fire fuse for gas production operations
in BS and GPF are significant enough to hypothetically become a significant negative
impact. On the contrary, at the post operational phase, the air quality will be the same
as the surrounding area.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-4
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

3. Noise
Noise (that is ) produced at activities of the construction phase released by equipments,
such as genset, is relatively small and population surrounding the area is still seldom;
therefore, hypothetically, noise will not become a significant impact. However, at the
operational phase, noise produced by machines, especially compressor machine, in BS
and GPF is significant enough, therefore hypothetically it will become a significant
negative impact. On the contrary, at the post operational phase, the noise level will be
the same as the surrounding area.

4. Change of Soil Properties
The physical and chemical properties of soil will suffer change caused by vast land
clearing activities. However, it is a small area if compared to the surrounding areas that
are still covered by vegetation. Besides that, the open land will soon be managed or will
go through rapid natural succession, therefore the soil properties will not significantly
cause impacts. Therefore, hypothetically, change of soil properties will not be a
significant impact.

5. Soil Erosion
Big erosions will occur especially on land clearing and land maturation at gas well
location, BS, GPF and at gas pipe installation location (total along approximately 95 km),
mainly on rugged locations and sensitive erotion land conditions. Erosion result is big
enough (significant) mainly to another gas well location, BF and GPF, especially at
alternative-1 and alternative-2 pipe installation, while alternative-3 of pipe installation do
not have erosion impact because it is installed on in-shore sea ground. Soil material of
erosion product will flow to land owned by members of the local community in the
southern side (downstream) towards the coastline, causing disturbance to local
residents. Therefore, the impact of soil erosion hypothetically will become a significant
impact.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-5
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

6. Disturbance of Drainage and Irrigation System
Irrigation and drainage system, hypothetically, will be a significant impact, because
water flows in the rice fields will be cut, while at the candidate location of the project,
there are many technical and semi-technical irrigation networks to water the rice fields.

7. Change of Surface Water Quantity (river water)
Flow of surface water will possibly increase caused by land clearing and land
maturation, however the increase is relatively small because the opened area width is
relatively small if compared to the surrounding area that is still covered by small
vegetation. Therefore, hypothetically the impact on change of surface water quantity
particularly on surface flow debit increase will not be a significant one.
In this activity, quantity of river water debit will possibly decrease caused by its surface
water use (river water debit) for hydrostatic test on the pipeline that will streaming gas.
The necessity of surface water for hydrostatic test is quite enough, which approximately
20.000 m
3
. Trunk line pipes to be tested are pipes (trunk line) from Block Station (BS)
from Donggi to J unction I about 33 km long that will join with pipes from J OB, and
pipe from Matindok Block Station II to junction about 3 km long that will also join with
J OB pipes. However, noticing the average rivers debit in the reaserach area has reach
25 m
3
/second, so there is a big possibility that it will not influenced significantly to
hydrostatic test even if it needs a great amount of water, nonetheles if compared to
water availability at the nearest river, especially in rainfall seson, it has meager influence
to river water debit decrease; in addition the hydrostatic test implementation only do
once and in short periode. Therefore, change of river water debit quantity will not be a
significant hypothetic impact.

8. Decrease of Surface Water Quality
The decrease of surface water quality will occur in the construction phase and
production of liquid wastes from production operations. The water quality decrease will
affect other components such as downstream waters used by the local residents, and
also raw water biota. Hypothetically, the impact of the surface water quality will be a
significant negative impact. On the contrary, after production operations, the surface
water quality will be similar with the condition of the upstream waters of the same river.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-6
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
9. Decrease of Sea water Quality
The decrease of seawater quality will occur in temporary, especially in the construction
phase of offshore pipe installation. The decrease of seawater quality will affect other
components for example if the local residents catch fish in the same area and the
decrease will also affect marine biota. Hypothetically, kind of the seawater quality
impact will be a significant negative impact. On the contrary, after production operation
ends, the seawater quality will be similar to the surrounding sea areas.

10. Decrease of Shallow Ground Water Quality
The quantity of shallow ground water will potentially decrease because of the
inexistence of land covering vegetation and land exfoliation and higher-level surface
stream causing disturbance in water absorption. This is caused by land clearing activities
and land preparation for drilling wells, construction of gas production, and pipelines.
However, the opened surface width is relatively small compared to the land covered
with vegetation. Therefore, the impact is not significant so that it will not be hypothetic
significant impact.

11. Decrease of Groundwater Quantity
Based on the secondary data of the groundwater potential from the Bappeda of Banggai
Regency (2006), the annual groundwater potential is 387 x 10
6
m
3
/year or 1,035 x
10
6
/day. Considering that the groundwater debit/quantity reserve, the amount of water
needed for well drilling (420 m
3
/well), consisting 17 wells, and the water used in BS
operational (25 m
3
/day), so it have small impact towards the decrease of groundwater
quantity. Furthermore if water for drilling well use river water, the decrease of
groundwater quantity not occur significantly so that the decrease of groundwater
quantity will not be a hypothetic significant impact.

12. Disturbance of Land Transportation
Disturbance of land transportation is consist of 3 (three) disturbance types i.e. traffic
fluency disturbance, traffic safety, and road and bridge damages. The road accessibility
will increase with the opening of (ROW) pipeline in land clearing and land maturation
activities. The opened ROW line at the construction phase will be able to be used by the
local community in the operational and post-operational phase, even though it is
actually prohibited because ROW is the road for company inspection to examine
company facilities; however it is sometimes used by the local residents. This increase in

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-7
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
accessibility will make it easier for local residents to head to the farm areas or local
economic centers, therefore, road accessibility on the land clearing and land maturation
activities will hypothetically be a significant positive impact. On the contrary, the road
accessibility on Luwuk-Baturube pivot road will decrease with the mobility and
demobility of equipments/materials/lworkers, the construction of production facilities.
Because this road is relatively narrow and the only road in the activity region used for
mobility of local residents and source of community economc activity, the impact will
hypothetically be a significant negative impact. In the operational phase, the transport
of condensate by tank trucks towards Bajo will decrease the road accessibility. While the
road accessibility surrounding the production facilities (BS) will increase caused by the
construction of a new road and increase in cappacity by proponent, but on the contrary,
accessibility on the public roads around the location of production facilities will decrease
caused by the mobility of vehicles for production operations. Besides the decreasing of
road accessibility, the risk of road and bridge damages and traffic accidents will
increase. Therefore, hypothetically the road accesibility will be a positive impact and at
the same time be a significant negative impact in the operational phase.

13. Disturbance of Vegetation
The land covered by vegetation will decrease due to land clearing and maturation. Land
clearing is conducted in well locations, gas production facilities, 295 ha pipelines. Most
of the vegetated area that will be cleared are crop areas (rice fields and garden) and
bushes. The forest area to be cleared is relatively small, but the road access built for
pipe installation (ROW) in SM Bangkiriang especially in the pipeline installation of
alternative-1 and alternative-2, are parallel to the provincial road and potential to illegal
logging, causing risk of damage on the forest vegetation around the project area.
Hypothetically, this impact on vegetation will be a significant impact in the construction
phase. But the pipeline installation of alternative-3 in sea ground near Bakiriang Beach
have no impact to vegetation because there is no beach vegetation cleared for this
installation.

The covering of land by vegetation will increase after the revegetation program
conducted or after the demolition of production facilities in the post-operational phase.
It will provide space and time for succession process starting by the growth of pioneer
plants. In the revegetation program, the cleared land will be planted with local plant

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-8
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
species that can grow fast. Based on the circumtances, the impact toward density
decrease and vegetation variety is included in characteristic of hypothetic significant
impact.

14. Disturbance on Wild Animals
Wild animals especially which are living in SM Bangkiriang will be disturbed by noise,
vibration and the presence of workers in the activities of mobility and demobility of
equipment/material/workers and the activity of land clearing and maturation. The land
clearing for pipeline installation of alternative-1 and 2 is parallel with the already
provincial road in SM Bangkiriang and for development well in Sukamaju border with SM
Bangkiriang forest will also decrease quality and width of the wildlife habitat. In the
operational phase, the wild animals will experience in disturbance risk. ROW plan of
alternative -1 and 2 pipeline installation that parallel to the provincial road potentially to
enter SM Bangkiriang easier and the opened ROW will also widen the opened land. The
impact on wild animals is a derivative impact from vegetated land clearing for its
habitat. Most vegetated areas will be opened are crop areas (rice fields and garden) and
bushes, however the drilling well location is in fact located in the forest. Hypothetically,
the impact on wild animals will be a hypothetic significant impact. Likewise, the pipeline
installation of alternative-3 crosses the Bakiriang Beach, though this activity not open
the coastal area but could disturb the Maleo bird that lay eggs on sand beach. These
activity, hypothetically, have significant impact towards wild animals.

15. Disturbance on Raw water Biota
The impact on raw water biota is a derivative impact from the decrease of water quality
due to activities of construction and production operations. The change in water quality,
such as the increase of TSS (total suspension solid), dirt, and oil film will affect the
water biota especially plankton and benthos, then affect the life of fish, which is possibly
the economic source of the local community. Hypothetically, the impact on freshwater
biota will be a negative significant impact.

16. Disturbance on Marine Biota
The marine biota, especially plankton, benthos and coral reef will suffer a decrease. The
plan activity of alternative-3 pipeline installation near the sea ground of SM Bangkiriang
will have a potential to damage the coral reef. Besides that, the marine biota will be
disturbed due to the decreasing water quality caused by dirt and dredging of the pipe

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-9
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
installation activity in shallow seawater of Bangkiriang Beach. Thereby, the activity will
be a negative significant impact to marine biota.

17. Increase of Variety and Density Vegetation
In the post operational phase, the ex-area of production facilities location will be
cleaned and got restoration (recovery back to initial condition) or revegetation. Thereby
the opened land will be covered with various vegetation that increase the variety and
density of vegetation on ex-area project and surround. Hypothetically the impact to
vegetation will be significant.

18. Increase of Variety and Abundance of Wild Animals
The increasing of land width that previously covered by vegetation, in the revegetation
activity when the wild animals habitat disjointed at construction and production facility
operations become more connect and establish wide habitat. It will impact the
increasing of variety and abundance of wild animals. Thus, hypothetically the
revegetation activity will be a significant impact to wild animals.

19. Change of Demography
The local demography will be affected by workers that comes from outside the region
for construction and operational activities. However due to the relatively small amount
of workers from outside the region and the relatively short period of construction
activity and the fact that most outside workers will not permanently stay in the region,
hypothetically the impact on demography in the construction phase will not be a
significant impact. On the contrary, in the operational phase, the amount of workers
from outside the region is relatively large, so hypothetically it will be a significant impact
to demography.

20. Change of Land Ownership Pattern
The change in land ownership will permanently happen after the land acquisition
process ends. This change of ownership hypothetically will be a significant hypothetic
impact because the community around the research area such as farmer, for all the
time, intensely depend to land which become their income. Therefore the land
acquisition process if perfomed without fair discussion (musyawarah) and not following

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-10
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
the rules will potentially create conflict. Based on the circumstances, the change of land
ownership pattern will be a negative significant impact.

21. Increase of Public Income
Public income, especially the workers recruited for construction will increase; incomes of
residents providing service for fullfiling needs of project or workers will also increase.
The impact of this increase of public income will increase local economic movement and
for other people that were formerly unemployed, will also get business opportunities
that will eventually increase the public income. Hypothetically, the increase in public
income in the construction phase will be a significant impact, include in pipeline
installation especially for alternative-1 and 2. In the operational phase, the public
income, especially of workers recruited for production operations will increase; the
income of other people that provides service to fullfill needs of project or workers will
also increase. This impact on the increase of public income will raise local economic
movements and to other people that were formerly unemployed, will also get business
opportunities and eventually increase the public income. Hypothetically, the increase of
public income in the operational phase will be a significant impact.

22. Increase in Business Opportunity
Business opportunities especially for local residents will increase and provide a new
source of income due to the emerging consumers, including construction workers and
the need of goods and services for the needs of the production facility construction.
Because it involves many people and considering the large number of unemployment,
this impact on business opportunity in the construction phase will be a significant
positive impact. The business opportunity will increase in the operational phase.
Business opportunities such as the growth of diners/restaurants, and transportation
service, and the need of goods service, and other services to fulfill the large amount of
production employees in a long period of time and to fulfil the needs of maintenance in
production operations, will grow and develop. Therefore, this impact hypothetically will
be a significant positive impact.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-11
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

23. Decrease in Business Opportunity
The discontinuance of gas production operations at GPF will dismiss the business
opportunity of employees or other workers who get involved directly or indirectly in
project. This condition will impact to businees opportunity that all the time serve the
need of goods and services of workers and project. Hypothetically the discontinuance of
gas production operations will be a significant impact to business opportunity.

24. Disturbance of Social Process
The dissociative social process will arise if an agreement is not reached on the value of
land compensation and vegetation in the land and plantation acquisition process (pre-
construction phase). Even though an agreement has been made on the land
compensastion, but if there is a missunderstanding in the payment process it will also
potentially cause dissociative process. The dissociative social process will arise also in
the occurence of traffic disturbance, road damage and accidents in mobility and
demobility activities of equipment/material/workers. Dissociation will arise due to other
construction activities that involves many workers causing risk of social friction,
including the gas pipeline installation activity especially for alternative-1 and 2. In the
operational phase, the production process that produces liquid, solid and gas waste and
the possibility of unaccomodated desire of the local residents for being employees, will
cause dissociation. In fact, the period of production operations is quite long and involves
a vast area width. Therefore, dissociative social processes hypothetically will be a
significant negative impact.

25. Social Stratification
Production operations at GPF will involve the workers from outside region with high
education and special skill or competence. Likewise, the operational of PPGM which
relatively in long periode, it is preconcerted that the research study will be a developed
area that invite the interest of many newcomer to enter that area. Also preconcerted
that the standard income of newcomer will be higher than the local residents especially
for them who work in agriculture with lower income. This condition emerge stratification
or new social classes in the research area, furthermore if the newcommer reluctant to
build relationship with the local residents and show different life style/pattern with
them. This fact, finally, will disturb the social process in public and show the negative
public perception and attitude, and it will be the negative significant impact.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-12
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM



26. Change of Public Attitude and Perception
Public perception about the company will be positive if the compensation for land and
plantation aqcuisition process are satisfying, vice versa. There is a large amount of local
residents whose land has been acquired and the right of diversion is permanent. Public
perception about the company will be positive if the recruitment process (in the pre-
construction phase) for construction labors involves local workforce proportionally, and
vice versa. Public perception will be negative if in the construction process there are
many environmental impacts such as noise, dust, cutting of irrigation systems, roads,
and the decrease of road accessibility, that are likely to disturb public comfort and
security. Considering the relatively large amount of people affected by the impact, due
to the location of project is in a dense populated area (even though not in settlements)
or land owned by locals, consisting of more than 75 km long region, 125 ha width, and
considering period of construction (more than a year), hypothetically, the impact of
public attitude and perception will be a negative significant impact. Positive perception
will arise if the recruitment process for production operations proportionally involves
local residents. But on the contrary, the negative impacts will arise due to the possibility
if the residents feeling was disturbed by the liquid, solid, and gas waste produced by the
production process, and the land and sea traffic around the project location. Because of
the relatively large amount of people affected by this impact, due to the project location
being in a dense populated area and considering the long period of impact more than
20 years, hypothetically, the impact of public attitude and perception will be a negative
significant impact.

27. Disturbance of Environmental Sanitation
The environmental sanitation will deteriorate if the construction workers throw away the
solid and domestic wastes in any place. Although the company will possibly provide
portable sanitation facilities (MCK) and the contractor supervises sanitation problems
well, but because of the relatively large amount of workers that work in certain areas,
especially in pipe installation activity through alternative-1 line parallel with the already
provincial road, and alternative-2 using HDD method pass through SM Bangkiriang, it

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-13
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
will change the environmental sanitation, so the environmental sanitation in construction
phase will be a hypothetic significant impact. Meanwhile the line through the sea which
is the alternatif-3 have no impact towards environmental sanitation. In the operational
phase, environmental sanitation deteriorates if the company disposes solid wastes by
not following the existing regulations or disposing not in the intended places. The long
period of activity and the large volume of solid waste can trigger the growth of disease
vector population such as rats and cockroaches and have possibility to spread to the
local settlements. The decrease of environmental sanitation quality is estimated to be
occured the locations along the pipes parallel with Bangkiriang provincial road
(alternative-1) and pipes that using Horisontal Directional Drilling (alternative-2), if the
location of solid waste discharge is near the local settlements, so hypothetically,
environmental sanitation will be a negative significant impact. While on alternative-3 line
give no significant impact to environmental sanitation because it is relatively far from
the local settlements.

28. Decrease of Public Health
The decrease of public health is a derivative impact of the decrease of air, water and
gas quality representing primary impacts. In the construction phase, intensity of those
primary impacts are relatively small, therefore hypothetically the impact on public health
will not be a significant impact. In the operational phase, the public health, especially
the employees/workers will be disturbed due to the existence of many entertain
facilities. Considering that the operational phase is in a long period of time (about 20
years), it possibly makes the prostitution practices that cause kind of diseases like
sexual infection disease (PMS). Therefore it needs various effort of
prevention/responsibility that involve many actor so that these kind of diseases will not
spread to larger area.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-14
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

B. Evaluation of the scope result of potential impacts assumed will be a hypothetic
significant impact of downstream division
The main activity will be built at Downstream Division are LNG Refinery Construction and
Special Port. But in the plan implementation, there are other support activities related to the
construction which potentially assumed to be a significant impact.
Those activities split up into phases i.e.:
1. Pre Consruction Phase
a. Land and plantation acquisition
b. Labour Recruitment
2. Construction Phase
a. mobility and demobility of equipments
b. Land clearing and maturation
c. Construction of LNG refinery complex and Special Port
d. Dismissing Labour
3. Operational Phase
a. Labour recruitment
b. Operational of LNG refinery, Special Port, and support facilities
c. Maintenance of production facilities
4. Post Operational Phase
a. Terminating LNG refinery operation
b. Equipment destruction and demobility (refinery and Special Port)
c. Revegetation
d. Dismissing Labour

The next analysis explain the decision of hypothetic significant impacts in order to do the
construction of LNG Refinery Complex and Special Port. Hypothetic significant impact is
acquired by evaluating the potential impacts to the impact possibility which is relevant or
irrelevant as hypothetic impact. For irrelevant potential impacts will be erased then from the
first list of potential impact scope result.

1. Micro Climate Change
Micro Climate change caused by land clearing is relatively small compared to
surrounding lands which are still covered by vegetation. Meanwhile location around the

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-15
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
LNG refinery will relatively have higher temperature caused by operations of LNG
production, but because it is located near the coast with strong winds, this change will
not be significant. Therefore, microclimate change, hypothetically, will not become a
significant impact.

2. Derease of Ambient Air Quality
Dust and gas emerging at construction phase activities produced by equipments, such
as genset, is relatively small, therefore hypothetically, it will not become a significant
impact. However at the operational phase the amount of gas and dust produced from
machines and gas emission from fire fuse for operation in LNG refinery are significant to
hypothetically become a negative significant impact. On the contrary, at the post
operational phase, the air quality will be the same as the surrounding area.

3. Noise
Noise produced at activities of the construction phase is released by equipments, such
as genset, and it is relatively small in the construction of LNG Refinery and Special Port,
and population surrounding the area is still seldom; therefore, hypothetically, noise will
not become a significant impact. However, at the operational phase, noise produced by
machines in LNG refinery is significant; therefore hypothetically it will become a
negative significant impact. On the contrary, at the post operational phase, the noise
level will be the same as the surrounding area.
4. Change of Soil Properties
The complex of LNG Refinery and Special Port are built on the coastal area even in Uso
and Padang, where on both location the soil not develop yet and still a raw material.
The physical and chemical properties of soil will suffer from change caused by vast land
clearing activities (300 Ha). However, it is a small area if compared to the
surrounding areas that are still covered by vegetation. Besides, the open land will soon
be managed or will have rapid natural succession, thus the soil properties will not
significantly cause impacts. Therefore, hypothetically, change of soil properties wiil not
be a significant impact.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-16
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

5. Soil Erosion
The site plan of LNG refinery and Special Port constructions will be built on aluvial shore
plain using sand as its main source and has plain topography. The effect of land clearing
from close vegetation is the spatter erosion that will be occured in the rainy season
when the soil particel get off from its soil aggregate. Therefore, the vanished soil caused
by erotion is zero nearby (very tiny) and will not spread to the public land because of
the plain topography. Consequently, the impact of soil erosion hypothetically will
become a negative significant impact.

6. Decrease of Riverwater Debit
The construction activity of LNG Refinery Plant and Special Port and LNG operasional
will need water, surface water and also soil water. The water requirements for LNG
operasional is about 75 m
3
/day and it will use the soil water. The river/surface water is
only used for construction of Refinery buildings, Special Port, and its support facility
which the total are lesser compared to the availability of Batui river debit, that is about
94.043 m
3
/ day. Yet, other rivers have massive reserve debit. So, compared to the
water supply on the nearest river, in addition, at rainy season, it has small impact to
decrease of river water debit. Therefore, change of river water debit will not be a
hypothetic significant impact.

7. Decrease of surface water Quality
The decrease of surface water quality will occur in the construction phase and
production of liquid wastes from production operations at LNG Refinery. The decrease
will affect other components such as downstream waters used by the local residents,
and also raw water biota. Hypothetically, the impact of the surface water quality will be
a negative significant impact. On the contrary, after production operations, the surface
water quality will be the same with the condition of the upstream waters of the same
river.

8. Decrease of Sea water Quality
The decrease of seawater quality will occur in the construction phase of Special Port and
LNG refinery and also LNG production operations. The decrease of seawater quality will
affect other components, for example the local residents that catch fish in the same

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-17
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
area. The decrease will also affect marine biota. Hypothetically, the impact of seawater
quality will be a negative significant impact. On the contrary, after production operations
ends, the seawater quality will be the same as the surrounding sea areas. However, the
seawater quality will decrease if there is damage or malfunctioning of the wastewater
treatment installation (IPAL) in gas and LNG production facilities during operation.

9. Decrease of Shallow ground Water Quality
The quantity of shallow ground water will potentially decrease because of the
inexistence of land vegetation and land exfoliating and higher-level surface stream that
cause disturbance in water absorption. This is caused by land clearing activities and land
preparation for LNG Refinery and Special Port. However, the opened surface width is
relatively small compared to the land covered with vegetation. Besides, the locations
which nearby the sea will make the possibility in decreasing shallow ground water
quality that are tiny and not significant; therefore it will not be a hypothetic significant
impact.

10. Decrease of Groundwater Quantity
As it is explained before, the necessity of water for operations of LNG Refinery and
other support facilities are 75m
3
/day. Based on the secondary data of the groundwater
potential from the Bappeda of Banggai Regency (2006), the annual groundwater
potential is 387 x 10
6
m
3
/year or 1,035 x 10
6
/day. It has not significant impact to
decrease the groundwater quantity, thus it will not be hypothetic significant impact.

11. Disturbance of Land Tranportation
The road accessibility on Luwuk-Baturube pivot road will decrease with the mobility and
demobility of equipments/materials/lworkers and the construction of LNG refinery and
Special Port area. The road is relatively narrow and the only road in the activity region is
used for mobility of local residents and source of community economy, therefore the
impact will hypothetically be a negative significant impact. In the operational phase, the
transport of condensate by tank trucks towards Bajo will decrease the road accessibility.
While the accessibility on the roads surrounding the LNG refinery facilities will increase
caused by the construction of a new road and increase in cappacity done by proponent,
but on the contrary, accessibility on the public roads around the location of the
production facilities will decrease, it is caused by the mobility of vehicles for production

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-18
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
operations. Besides the decreasing road accessibility, the risk of road damage and traffic
accidents will increase. Therefore, hypothetically the road accesibility will be a positive
significant and at the same time, negative significant impact in the operational phase.

12. Disturbance of Sea Transportation
The accessibility of sea transportation around the Special Port construction in the LNG
refinery area will be disturbed, but the activity occurs for a short period and it makes
the not significant disturbance level. The sea around the location is fisherman traffict
and a place for fishing, however the fishermen activities are not too busy and the sailing
frequency is low. Therefore, hypothetically this impact will not be a significant. The
accessibility of the sea transportation around the LNG refinery will decrease due to the
mobility of LNG transporting ships at the Special Port in LNG refinery area for sale. The
sea transportation around the Special Port will be used by locals boat traffic and as a
fishing location. Although the sailing frequency is low and relatively quiet, but
considering the activity will lasts in the long period of time and predicted that the sailing
activity will develop from others activity, therefore hypothetically, it will be a negative
significant impact.

13. Disturbance of Vegetation
The land covered by vegetation will decrease due to land clearing and maturation. The
variety and vegetation density in this area will get decrease. This land clearing occurs in
the production facilities location of 300 ha which majority of vegetated area that will
be cleared are crop areas (field) and bushes. Hypothetically, this vegetation impact will
be a significant impact in the construction phase.
The land covering by vegetation will increase after doing revegetation program in the
post operational phase. In the revegetation program, the cleared lands will be planted
with local plant species that could grow fast.

14. Disturbance of Wild Animals
The land clearing and land maturation activities in construction phase cause the
dissapear wild animals. The live of animals arround the activities location get disturbed.
So, hypothetically the impact to wild animals will be a significant impact.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-19
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

15. Disturbance of marine biota
The marine biota, especially plankton, benthos and coral reef will suffer from a
decrease. The marine biota will be disturbed due to the decreasing water quality
caused by dirt and dredging in the construction of LNG Plant and Special Port in Uso
(alternative-1) and Padang (alternative-2)
The marine biota will also be disturbed in the operational activities in LNG Refinery,
Special Port, and other facilities in Uso (alternative-1) and Padang (alternative-2). The
impact on marine biota is a derivative impact from the decrease of seawater quality. If
IPAL suffers functional failure in BS and LNG Plant, there is a risk of decreasing
seawater quality, such as increase of TSS, dirty, and oil film that will affect marine biota.

16. Increase of Variety and Density Vegetation
In the post operational, the ex-area of production facilities location will be cleaned and
got restoration (recovery back to first condition) or revegetation. Thereby the opened
lands will be covered with various vegetation that increase variety and density of
vegetation on ex-area project and vicinity. Hypothetically the impact to vegetation will
be significant.

17. Increase of Variety and Abundance Wild Animals
The increasing of land width that previously covered by vegetation, in the revegetation
activity when the wild animals habitat disjointed at construction and production facility
operations becomes more connect and establish wide habitat. It will impact the
increasing of variety and abundance of wild animals. Thus, hypothetically the
revegetation activity will be a significant impact to wild animals.

18. Change of Demography
The local demography will be affected by worker that comes from outside the region for
construction activities. However due to the relatively small amount of workers from
outside the region and the relatively short period of construction activity and the fact
that most outside workers will not permanently stay in the region, hypothetically the
impact on demography in the construction phase will not be a significant impact.
Meanwhile, in the operational phase, the need of workers dominated by worker with
specific skill that is sured comes from the outside of the region. Therefore it will have

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-20
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
effect to the changing of resident density in the research area. Hypothetically,
demography impact in the operational phase will be a significant impact.

19. Change of Land Ownership Pattern
The change in land ownership will permanently happen after the land and plantation
acquisition process ends. This change of ownership hypothetically will be a significant
hypothetic impact because the community around the research area who means for
livelihood as farmer, for all the time, intensely depend on land which become their
income. Therefore the land acquisition process if perfomed without good discussion
(musyawarah) and not following the rules will potentially make conflict. Based on the
circumstances, the change of land ownership pattern will be a negative significant
impact.

20. Increase of Public Income
Public income, especially the workers that are recruited for construction will increase;
income of residents that provide service to fulfill needs of project or workers will also
increase. The impact of the increase of public income will increase the local economic
growth and for other people that were formerly unemployed, will also get business
opportunities that will eventually increase the public income. Hypothetically, the
increase in public income in the construction phase will be a significant impact. In the
operational phase, the public income, especially the workers recruited for production
operations will increase; the income of other people that provide services to fulfil needs
of project or workers will also increase. This impact on the increase of public income will
raise local economic and to other people that were formerly unemployed, will also get
business opportunities and eventually increase the public income. Hypothetically, the
increase of public income in the operational phase will be a significant impact.

21. Increase in Business Opportunity
Business opportunities, especially for local residents, will increase and provide a new
source of income, due to the emerging consumers, including construction workers and
the need of goods and services for the importance of the production facility
construction. It involves many people and considering the large number of
unemployment, thus this impact on business opportunity in the construction phase
hypothetically will be a significant positive impact. The business opportunity will increase
in the operational phase. Business opportunities such as the growth of
diners/restaurants, and transportational service, and the need of goods service, and

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-21
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
other services to fulfil the large amount of production employees in a long period of
time and to fulfil other support needs, and to maintain the production operations, so it
will grow and develop. Therefore, this impact hypothetically will be a significant positive
impact.


22. Decrease in Business Opportunity
The discontinuance of operations in LNG Refinery and Special Port will also dismiss the
employees activity who get involved within. This condition will also affect business
opportunity of resident that all the time serve the need of goods and services of workers
and project. Hypothetically the discontinuance of LNG refinery and Special Port
operations will be a significant impact to business opportunity

23. Disturbance of Social Process
The dissociative social process will arise if an agreement is not reached on the value of
land compensation and vegetation in the land and plantation acquisition process (pre-
construction phase). Even though an agreement has been made on the land
compensastion, but if there is a missunderstanding in the payment process it will also
potentially cause dissociative process. The dissociative social process will arise in the
occurence of traffic disturbance, road damage and accidents in mobility and demobility
activities of equipment/material/workers. Dissociation will arise due to other
construction activities that involves many workers that cause risk of social friction. In
the operational phase, the production process that produces liquid, solid and gas wastes
and the possibility of unaccomodated desire of the local residents for being employees,
will cause dissociation. In fact, the period of production operations is quite long and
involves a vast area width. Therefore, dissociative social processes hypothetically will be
a significant negative impact.

24. Social Level
The workers from outside region generally have higher education, skill, and income than
the local residents. This condition emerge stratification or new social classes in the
research area which the local residents, for all the time, working in agriculture field with
lower income. This fact will trigger the lokal residents jealousy if the newcomer neglect
to have relationship with the local residents and absolutely have different strata with
them. Hypothetically, the stratification will be a significant negative impact, especially in
operational phase.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-22
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

25. Change of Public Attitude and Perception
Public perception about the company will be positive if the compensation of land and
plantation aqcuisition process are satisfying, vice versa. There is a large amount of local
residents whose land has been acquired and the right of diversion is permanent. Public
perception about the company will be positive if the recruitment process (in the pre-
construction phase) for construction labors involves local workforce proportionally, and
vice versa. Public perception will be negative if in the construction process there are
many environmental impacts such as noise, dust, cutting of irrigation systems, roads,
and decrease of road accessibility, that are likely to disturb public comfort and security.
Considering the relatively large amount of people affected by the impact, due to the
location of project being in a dense populated area (eventhough not touch the
settlements) or land owned by locals, consisting of 300 ha area width, period of
whole construction time about 3 years, so hypothetically the impact of public attitude
and perception will be a significant negative impact. Positive perception will arise if the
recruitment process for production operations proportionally involves the local residents.
But on the contrary, the negative impacts will arise due to the possibility if the residents
feeling disturbed by the liquid, solid, and gas wastes produced by the production
process, and by the land and sea traffic around the project location. Because of the
relatively large amount of people affected by this impact, due to the project location
being in a dense populated area and considering the long period of impact more than
20 years, hypothetically, the impact of public attitude and perception will be a significant
negative impact.

26. Disturbance of Environmental Sanitation
The environmental sanitation will deteriorate if the construction workers throw away the
solid and domestic liquid wastes in any place. Although the company will possibly
provide portable sanitation facilities (MCK) and the contractor well supervises sanitation
problems, but because of the relatively large amount of workers that work in certain
areas, so the environmental sanitation in construction phase will be a significant
hypothetic impact. In the operational phase, environmental sanitation deteriorates if the
company disposes solid wastes by not following the existing regulations or disposing not
in the intended places. Due to the long period of activity and the large volume of solid
waste, kind of organic and non-organic solid wastes compound that can trigger the

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-23
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
growth of disease vector population such as rats and cockroaches, and have possibility
to spread to the local settlements, so hypothetically, environmental sanitation will be a
significant negative impact. In the operational phase, especially at production facilities
demolition and equipment demobility, hypothetically will decrease the environmental
sanitation condition due to the long period of time and the vast area in this activity.

27. Decrease of Public Health
The impact on public helath, in the operational phase, mainly from LNG Refinery
construction and Special Port activities, hypothetically will be a significant impact. The
reason was because in the construction activity, the project needs 3000 workers in
quite long periode of time (3-4 years). Considering around the activity location plan
have been holding the entertainment activities, especially in the evening, it is estimated
that there will be prositution practice. Hypothetically, it will decrease the standard of
public health, not only during the construction but also in the operation. Various disease
that may be rise/spread to workers (employees) or residents who live around the
project, especially, is related to sexual infection disease (PMS). Therefore, it needs
various effort of prevention that involve many actors so that these kind of diseases will
not spread to larger area. Thereby, hypothetically it will be a significant impact.

4.1.2 Classification and Priority

Classification and priority of hypothetic impact are based on the significant hypothetic impacts in
each level.

Priority of Significant Hypothetic I mpact of Upstream Division :
a. Pre-construction
1. Change of Land Ownership Pattern
2. Disturbance of Social Level
3. Change of Public Attitude and Perception

b. Construction
1. Change of ambient air quality (dust and gas)
2. Existence of noise
3. Existence of land erosion
4. Disturbance of drainage and irrigation system

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-24
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
5. Disturbance of Land Transportation Fluency
6. Disturbance of traffic safety
7. Damage of road and bridge
8. Decrease of Surface Water Quality
9. Decrease of Sea Water Quality
10. Disturbance of Flora
11. Disturbance of Fauna
12. Disturbance of Raw Water Biota
13. Disturbance of Marine biota
14. Increase of public income
15. Increase of Business Opportunity
16. Disturbance of Social Process
17. Change of public attitude and perception
18. Decrease of environmental sanitation

c. Operational :
1. Degradation of ambient air quality (dust and gas)
2. Increase of Noise
3. Decrease of surface water quality
4. Decrease of sea water quality
5. Disturbance of traffic safety
6. Damage of Road and Bridges
7. Disturbance of Raw Water Biota
8. Change of Demography
9. Increase of Public Income
10. Increase of Business Opportunity
11. Disturbance of Social Process
12. Social Stratification
13. Change of public attitude and perception
14. Decrease of environmental sanitation
15. Decrease of Public Health

d. Post Operational :
1. Increase of ambient air quality
2. Decrease of Noise
3. Increase of Surface Water Quality

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-25
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
4. Increase of Sea Water Quality
5. Disturbance of traffic safety
6. Damage of Road and Bridge
7. Increase of Variety and Density of Vegetation
8. Increase of Variety and Abundance of Fauna
9. Decrease of Public Income
10. Decrease of Business Opportunity
11. Change of Public Attitude and Perception

Priority of Significant Hypothetic Impact Downstream Division:
a. Pre construction :
1. Change of Land Ownership Pattern
2. Disturbance of Social Level
3. Change of Public Attitude and Perception

b. Construction :
1. Decrease of ambient air quality (dust and gas)
2. Existence of Noise
3. Disturbance of Land Transportation Fluency
4. Disturbance of traffic safety
5. Damage of Road and Bridge
6. Decrease of Surface water Quality
7. Decrease of Sea Water Quality
8. Disturbance of Flora
9. Disturbance Of Fauna
10. Disturbance of Marine Biota
11. Increase of Public Income
12. Availability of Business Opportunity
13. Disturbance of Social Process
14. Change of Public Attitude and Perception
15. Decrease of Environmental Sanitation Quality
16. Decrease of Public Health Standard

c. Operational :
1. Decrease of ambient air quality (dust and gas)
2. Incease of Noise
3. Decrease of Sea Water Quality

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-26
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
4. Disturbance of Marine Transportation Safety
5. Disturbance of Marine Biota
6. Change of Demography
7. Increase of Public Health
8. Availability Of Business Opportunity
9. Disturbance of Social Process
10. Social Stratification
11. Change of Public Attitude and Perception
12. Decrease of Public Health Standard

d. Post Operational :
1. Increase of ambient air quality
2. Decrease of Noise
3. Increase of Surface Water Quality
4. Increase of Sea Water Quality
5. Disturbance of traffic safety
6. Damage of Road and Bridge
7. Increase of Variety and Density of Vegetation
8. Increase of Variety and Abundance of Fauna
9. Decrease of Public Income
10. Lost of Business Opportunity
11. Change of Public Attitude and Perception
12. Decrease of Environmental Sanitation Quality

The numbering process of priority and significant hypothetic impacts are related each other.
Eventhough the hypothetic impact is already found, it does not mean another significant
hypothetic impact is not being researched. The hypothetic significant impact are the tops of
environmental problem due to one plan activity implementation, so in order to defend the
environmental grade, the problems should be well overcome.

Figure 4.1. shows the evaluation result within the scope process of hypothetic significant
impacts and priority hypothetic significant impact of Matindok Gas Development Project activity
plan of Upstream Division, while Figure 4.2. shows the hypothetic significant impacts and
priority hypothetic significant impact of Matindok Gas Development Project activity plan of
Downstream Division.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-27
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
In order to find out the certain impacts which are direct (primary) impact or indirect (secondary,
tertiary, and so on) impacts, so those hypothetic impacts related to Matindok Gas Development
Project activity plan of Upstream Division are presented in Figure 4.3, while Downstream
Division is presented in Figure 4.4.

Based on inter-impact relation analysis by initiator and experts in brain storming, then the result
is the significant hypothetic impact from Matindok Gas Development Project of Upstream
Division activity implementation plan at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi that can be resumed
at Table 4.1, while the Downstream Division is in Table 4.2.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-28
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


















Figure 4.1. Scheme of Scope Activity Process of Matindok Gas Development Project of
Upstream Division at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi

PRI ORITY OF SIGNI FI CANT HYPOTHETI C I MPACT
Preconstruction :
1. Change of Land Ownership Pattern
2. Disturbance of Social Process
3. Change of Public Attitude and Perception
Construction :
1. Change of Ambient air Quality (dust and gas)
2. Existence of Noise
3. Existence of Soil Erosion
4. Disturbance of drainage and irrigation system
5. Disturbance of Land Transportation
6. Disturbance of Traffic Safety
7. Damage of Road and Damage
8. Decrease of Surface Water Quality
9. Decrease of Sea Water Quality
10. Disturbance of vegetation
11. Disturbance of Wild Animals
12. Disturbance of Raw Water Biota
13. Disturbance of Marine Biota
14. Increase of Public Health
15. Availabity of Business Opportunity
16. Disturbance of Social Process
17. Change of Public Attitude and Perception
18. Decrease of Environmental Sanitation Quality
Operation :
1. Decrease of Ambient air Quality (dust and gas)
2. Increase of Noise
3. Decrease of Surface Water Quality
4. Decrease of Sea Water Quality
5. Disturbance of Land Transportation
6. Damage of Road and Damage
7. Disturbance of Raw Water Biota
8. Change of Demography
9. Increase of Public Health
10. Availabity of Business Opportunity
11. Disturbance of Social Process
12. Social Stratification
13. Change of Public Attitude and Perception
14. Decrease of Environmental Sanitation Quality
15. Decrease of Public Health Standard
Post Operation :
1. Increase of Ambient air Quality
2. Decrease of Noise
3. Increase of Surface Water Quality
4. Increase of Sea Water Quality
5. Traffic Safety
6. Damage of Road and Bridge
7. Increase of Variety and Density of Vegetation
8. Increase of Variety and Abundance of Wild Animals
9. Decrease of Public Income
10. Decrease of Business Opportunity
11. Change of Public Attitude and Perception


Description of
Activity Plan

Preconstruction
Construction
Operational
Post Operational
Description of I nitial
Environmental Profile

Geo-Physics-Chemistry
Component
Biological Component
Social Economic
Culture Component
Public Health

POTENTI AL I MPACT

A. Geo-Physics-Chemistry
Change of Micro Climate
Decrease of ambient air quality (dust and gas)
Existence of Noise
Change of Soil Characteristic
Existence of Soil Erosion
Disturbance of drainage and irrigation system
Decrease of River Water Debit
Decrease of Surface Water Quality
Decrease of Sea water Quality
Decrease of Soil Water Quantity
Decrease of Land Transportation
Decrease of Traffic Safety
Damage of Road and Bridge

B. Biological Component
Disturbance of Vegetation
Disturbance of Wild Animals
Disturbance of Raw Water Biota
Disturbance of Marine Biota
Incease of Variety and Density of Vegetation
Increase of Variety and Abundance of Wild
Animals

C. Social Economic Culture Component
Change of Demography
Change of Land Ownership Pattern
Increase of Public Income
Availibility of Business Opportunity
Disturbance of Social Process
Change of Public Attitude and Perception

D. Public Health Component
Decrease of Environmental Sanitation Quality
Decrease of Public Health Standard



HYPOTHETI C SI GNI FI CANT I MPACT

A. Geo-Physics-Chemistry
Decrease of ambient air quality (dust and gas)
Existence of Noise
Existence of Soil Erosion
Decrease of Surface Water Quality
Disturbance of drainage and irrigation system
Decrease of Sea Water Quality
Disturbance of Land Tranportation
Disturbance of Traffic Safety
Damage of Road and Bridge

B. Biological Component
Disturbance of Vegetation
Disturbance of Wild Animals
Disturbance of Fresh Water Biota
Disturbance of Marine Biota
Incease of Variety and Density of Vegetation
Increase of Variety and Abundance of Wild
Animals

C. Social Economic Culture Component
Change of Demography
Change of Land Ownership Pattern
Increase of Public Health
Availability of Business Opportunity
Social Stratification
Disturbance of Social Process
Change of Public Attitude and Perception

D. Public Health Component
Decrease of Environmental Sanitation Quality
Decrease of Public Health Standard

CLASSIFICATION
AND PRIORITY
EVALUATION OF
POTENTIAL IMPACT
IDENTIFICATION OF
POTENTIAL IMPACT

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
IV-29
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


















Figure 4.2. Scheme of Scope Activity Process of Matindok Gas Development
Project of Downstream Division at Banggai Regency, Central
S l i
PRIORITY OF SIGNIFICANT HYPOTHETIC
I MPACT
Preconstruction :
1. Change of Land Ownership Pattern
2. Disturbance of Social Process
3. Change of Public Attitude and Perception
Construction :
1. Decrease of ambient air quality (dust and gas)
2. Existence of Noise
3. Disturbance of Land Transportation
4. Disturbance of Traffic Safety
5. Damage of Road and Bridge
6. Decrease of Surface Water Quality
7. Decrease of Sea Water Quality
8. Disturbance of Vegetation
9. Disturbance of wild Animals
10. Disturbance of Marine Biota
11. Availability of Business Opportunity
12. Increase of Public Income
13. Disturbance of Social Process
14. Change of Public Attitude and Perception
15. Decrease of Environmental Sanitation Quality
16. Decrease of Public Health Standard
Operation :
1. Decrease of ambient air quality (dust and gas))
2. Increase of Noise
3. Decrease of Sea water Quality
4. Disturbance of Marine Transportation Safety
5. Disturbance of Marine Biota
6 Change of Demography
7. Increase of Public Income
8. Availability of Business Opportunity
9. Disturbance of Social Process
10. Social Stratification
11. Change of Public Attitude and Perception
12. Decrease of Public Health Standard
Post Operation :
1. Increase of ambient air quality
2. Decrease of Noise
3. Increase of Surface Water Quality
4. Increase of Sea Water Quality
5. Disturbance of Traffic Safety
6. Damage of Road and Bridge
7. Increase of Variety and Density of Vegetation
8. Increase of Variety and Abundance of Wild
Animals
9. Decrease of Public Income
10. Decrease of Business Opportunity
11. Change of Public Attitude and Perception
12. Decrease of Environmental Sanitation

DESCRIPTION of
ACTIVITY PLAN

Preconstruction
Construction
Operational
Post Operational
Description of I nitial
Environmental Profile

Geo-Physics-Chemistry
Component
Biological Component
Social Economic
Culture Component
Public Health
Component

POTENTI AL I MPACT

A. Geo-Physics-Chemistry
Change of Micro Climate
Decrease of ambient air quality (dust and gas)
Existence of Noise
Change of Soil Characteristic
Existence of Soil Erosion
Decrease of River Water Debit
Decrease of Surface Water Quality
Decrease of Sea water Quality
Decrease of Soil Water Quantity
Decrease of Land Transportation
Decrease of Traffic Safety
Damage of Road and Bridge
Disturbance of Marine Transportation Safety

B. Biological Component
Disturbance of Vegetaion
Disturbance of Wild Animals
Disturbance of Marine Biota
Increase of Variety and Density of Vegetation
Increase of Variety and Abundance of Wild
Animals

C. Social Economic Culture Component
Change of Demography
Change of Land Ownership Pattern
Increase of Public Income
Availability of Business Opportunity
Disturbance of Social Process
Social Stratification
Change of Public Attitude and Perception

D. Public Health Component
Decrease of Environmental Sanitation Quality
Decrease of Public Health Standard


HYPOTHETI C SI GNI FI CANT I MPACT

A. Geo-Physics-Chemistry
Change of ambient air quality (dust and gas)
Existence of Noise
Decrease of Surface Water Quality
Decrease of Sea Water Quality
Disturbance of Land Transportation
Disturbance of Traffic Safety
Damage of Road and Damage
Disturbance of Marine Transportation Safety

B. Biological Component
Disturbance of Vegetation
Disturbance of Wild Animals
Disturbance of Marine Biota
Increase of Variety and Density of Vegetation
Increase of Variety and Abundance of Wild
Animals

C. Social Economic Culture Component
Change of Demography
Change of Land Ownership Pattern
Increase of Public Income
Availability of Business Opportunity
Disturbance of Social Process
Social Stratification
Change of Public Attitude and Perception

D. Public Health Component
Decrease of Environmental Sanitation Quality
Decrease of Public Health Standard

CLASSIFICATION AND
PRIORITY
EVALUATION OF
POTENTIAL IMPACT
IDENTIFICATION OF
POTENTIAL IMPACT
Figure 4.3. Flowchart of Hypothetic Impact of Matindok Gas Develompent Project, Upstream Activity
P
r
i
m
a
r
y

I
m
p
a
c
t

S
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
y

I
m
p
a
c
t
T
e
r
t
i
a
r
y

I
m
p
a
c
t
Q
u
a
r
t
e
n
a
r
y

I
m
p
a
c
t
Land and Plants
Acquisition
Labour
Recruitment
Mobility and Demobility
of Equipment
LandClearing and
Maturity
Labour Recruitment
Drilling of
Development Wells
Production
Operational at GPF
Condensate and
Sulphur
Transportation
Production Facility
Maintenance
Wells Closing
Pre
Construction
Construction Operational
MATINDOK GAS DEVELOPMENT
ACTIVITY PLAN
Land Ownership
Pattern
Social Process
Public Income
Soil
Erosion
Vegetation Wild Fauna
RawWater
Biota
Drainage and
Irrigation System
Surface
Water Quality
Road and Bridge
Damage
Traffic Safety
Environmental
Sanitation
Sea Water
Quality
Marine Biota
Public Attitude and
Perception
Public Health Level
Business
Opportunity
Gas Pipeline
Installation
Revegetation Dismissing Labour
Cleaning and Equipment
Demobility
Termination of Gas
Operational and
Production
Air Quality &
Noise
Dismissing Labour
Gas Channeling
through Pipes
Demography
Social
Stratification
Construction of BS
and GPF
Post
Operational
EIS Matindok Gas Development Project IV-30
Figure 4.4. Flowchart of Hypothetic Impact of Matindok Gas Development Project, Downstream Activity
Land and Plants
Acquisition
Labour
Recruitment
Land Clearing and
Maturation
Dismissing Labour
Production Facility
Maintenance
Termination of LNG
RefineryOperational
Revegetation
Pre-Construction Construction Operational Post Operational
ACTIVITY PLAN OF MATINDOK
GAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Land Ownership
Pattern
Revegetat
ion
Wild Fauna
Environmental
Sanitation
Sea Water Quality
Marine Biota
Public Attitude and
Perception
P
r
i
m
a
r
y

I
m
p
a
c
t
S
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
y

I
m
p
a
c
t
T
e
r
t
i
a
r
y

I
m
p
a
c
t
Q
u
a
r
t
e
n
a
r
y

I
m
p
a
c
t
Public Health Level
Employment &
Business
Opportunity
Demography
Marine
Transportation
Safety
Operational of LNG Refinery, Port, adn Its
Support Facilities
Traffic
Fluency
Air Quality and
Noise
Public Income
Mobility and
Demobility of
Equipment
Construction of LNG
Refinery and Port
Labour Recruitment
Cleaning and
Equipments
Demobility
Dismissing Labour
Surface Water
Quality
Social Process Traffic Safety
Road and Bridge
Damage
EIS Matindok Gas Development Project IV - 31

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
32
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Tabel 4.1. Summary of Hypothetic Impact Types of Matindok Gas Development
Project Plan at Upstream Division

Activity Plan Component
Pre-
Const.
Construction Operation Post Operation
4
No Environment Component
1 2 1 2 3 Alt
1
Alt
2
Alt
3
5 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5
Geo-Physics-Chemistry
1 Ambient air Quality + +
2 Noise + +
3 Soil Erosion
4 Drainage & irrigation system
5 Surface Water Quality
6 Sea Water Quality
7 Land Transportation / +
BI OLOGI CAL
1 Vegetation +
2 Wild Animal +
3 Fresh Water Biota
4 Marine Biota
SOCI AL-ECONOMI C-
CULTURE

1 Demography
2 Land Ownership Pattern
3 Public Income + + + + + + +
4 Business Opportunity + + + + + + + +
5 Social Process
6 Stratification
7 Public Attitude & Perception

PUBLI C HEALTH
1 Environment sanitation
2
Standard of Public Health




= negative impact
+ = positive impact
A. Preconstruction Phase
1. Land and plantation acquisition
2. Labour Recruitment
C. Operation Phase
1. Labour Recruitment
2. Drilling development well
3. Production operation in GPF
4. Channeling the gas through pipeline
5. Channeling condensate & sulphur through land transportation
6. Maintenance of Production facilities
D. Post Operation Phase
1. Terminating well
2. Terminating gas production operation
3. Demolition and demobility equipment
4. Revegetation
5. Dismissing Labour
B. Construction Phase
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments
2. land clearing and maturation
3. Construction in BS and GPF
4. Gas Pipeline Installation
Alternatif -1, parallel to Luwuk Morowali road
Alternatif -2, use / as Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD)
Alternatif -3, construted on sea ground near to beach
5. Dismissing Labour
Note:
Information :

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
33
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Tabel 4.2. Summary of Hypothetic Impact Types of Matindok Gas Development
Project Plan of Downstream Division

Activity Plan Component
Pre-
Const.
Construction Operation Post Operation
3
No Environment Component
1 2 1 2
Alt-1 Alt-2
4 1 2 3 1 2 3 4
GEO-PHYSI CS-CHEMI STRY
1 Ambient air Quality
2 Noise
3 Surface Water Quality
4 Sea Water Quality
5 Land Transportation
6 Marine Transport. Safety
BI OLOGI CAL
1 Vegetation +
2 Wild Animal +
3 Marine Biota
SOCI AL-ECONOMI C-
CULTURE

1 Demography
2 Land Ownership Pattern
3 Public Income + + + +
4 Business Opportunity + + +
5 Social Process
6 Stratification
7 Public Attitude and Perception






PUBLI C HEALTH
1 Environment Sanitation
2. Standard of Public Health


A. Preconstruction Phase
1. Land and plantation acquisition
2. Labour Recruitment
C. Operation Phase
1. Labour Recruitment
2. Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port, and its support
facilities
3. Maintenance of Production facility
D. Post Operation Phase
1. Terminating of LNG Refinery operation
2. Demolition and demobility equipment (refinery and Special Port)
3. Revegetation
4. Dismissing Labour

B. Construction Phase
1. Mobility and demobility equipment
2. Land Clearing and maturation
3. Construction of LNG Refinery Complex and
Special Port
Alternatif -1, Uso Village, Batui District
Alternatif -2, Padang Village, Kintom District
4. Dismissing Labour

Note :
= negative impact
+ = positive impact
I nformation:

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
34
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
4.2. SCOPE OF STUDY AREA AND STUDY PERIOD
4.2.1 Study Area Boundary
A. Project Boundary
Project area boundary is a location where there will be activity plan for pre-construction,
construction, operational and post operational activities. Determination of project boundary is
based on Matindok gas development plan at several fields (Donggi, Minahaki, Sukamaju,
Matindok and Maleo Raja); pipe installation and LNG Refinery contruction include Special Port
facilities. Project area needed for construction of station manifold facility at three locations is
approximately 3 x each of location 1 ha (3 ha); for BS construction at three locations with 30
ha width; flowline pipeline at those five locations needs area with 8 m wide x 35 km
flowline length (28 ha); LNG Refinery Area, Special Port, and support facility of 300 ha
(with location alternative at Uso or Padang); and gas piping system width of 20 m x 60 km
pipe length (120 ha). This location needs to be prepared before drilling development well,
which is with the construction of entry road location (new road construction and increasing
the existing road) with cumulative length of 15 km and 6 8 m wide (about 120 ha). So,
the width of area needed for project is about 595 ha. The area is used to be resident land or
others. Implementation of area creation will be done as the existing rules.

B. Ecological Boundary
Ecological study boundary covers gas field locations, pipeline (sea and land) and facilities of
LNG refinery also other areas which are estimated to be area of impact spread. Those areas
are wet land, in the form of rice field, plantation area, jungle, raw water and sea water
current, also public settlement. The dust is disseminated as far as 200 m of left and right side
of pipe and other activity locations. Impact spread through water current is estimated will not
run to more than 1 km up to the downstream from water channel, including river that been
crosscut by the pipeline of liquid waste channel from production facilities of gas and LNG;
and the impact through marine territorial will not go more than 2 km from Special Port facility
of LNG Refinery.

Noise and gas emission comes from production process of gas and LNG from gas production
facilities at Donggi and Matindok also LNG at Batui of Kintom are predicted will not more than
dust and water current spreading. Whereas the impact to wild animal at SM Bangkiriang will
not exceed 3 km from left and right side of pipeline which pass the conservation area. For
sea ecological boundary, generally using current speed in 1 hour, so the distance of
ecological boundary to the sea from land is 3600 x 0,9 = 3140 m ( 3,5 km).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
35
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

C. Social Boundary
Social boundary is space around activity plan representing place of several activities of social
interaction with certain value and norm which is already established (social structure),
according to society group dynamics, and it is predicted to be affected by the project of
Matindok Gas Development. J ustification of social boundary is the existence of society
interaction with activity of farm acquisition for the area of MS BS, GPF, pipe and LNG
Refinery; pipeline installation, construction of BS and LNG Refinery, also mobility and
demobility of equipments / materials / workers. The villages which become social boundary is
presented in Table 4.3.

D. Administration Boundary
Administration boundary is the village area where the project activity take place, as
presented in Table 4.4.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
36
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 4.3. Name of Village which Become the Social Boundary of Matindok Gas
Development Project at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi

District Village
J ustification of Social Boundary
No Name No Name Pipeline Well
Block
Station
MS
LNG
Refinery
Mobility and
demobility of
equipments, materials,
and labors
1. Kintom
1
2
3
Padang
Tangkiang
Kalolos
V
V
v

V*


V
V
v
4 Uso V V** V
5 Honbola V
6 Lamo V V
7 Balantang V V
8 Bugis V V
9 Batui V V
10 Tolando V V
11 Sisipan V V
12 Ondo-ondolu I V V
13 Nonong V V
14 Kayowa V V
15 Masing V V
16 Batui IV V V
17 Batui 21 V V
18 Sukamaju I V V V V
19 Bonebalantak V V
2. Batui
20 Sinorang V V V V
21 Mulyoharjo V V
22 Argo Kencana V V V
23 Minahaki V V v V
24 Rusa Kencana V V V V
25 Agro Estate V V
26 Singkoyo V V
27 Tolisu V V
3. Toili
28 Bukit J aya V V
29 Uwelolu V V
30 Pandan Wangi V V V
31 Dongin V V V
32 Kamiwangi V V V
33 Sendang Sari V V V
34 Bukit Makarti V V
35 Bukit Harapan V V
36 Makapa V V V V
37 Karya Makmur V V V
4.

Toili Barat











note *: Location of LNG -alternative 1
**: Location of LNG -alternative 2



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
37
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 4.4. Name of Villages which Become Administrative Boundary of Matindok Gas
Development Project at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi

District Village
No. Name No Name
1. Kintom 1
2
3
Padang
Tangkiang
Kalalos
4 Uso
5 Honbola
6 Lamo
7 Balantang
8 Bugis
9 Batui
10 Tolando
11 Sisipan
12 Ondo-ondolu I
13 Nonong
14 Kayowa
15 Masing
16 Batui IV
17 Batui 21
18 Sukamaju I
19 Bonebalantak
2. Batui
20 Sinorang
21 Mulyoharjo
22 Argo Kencana
23 Minahaki
24 Rusa Kencana
25 Agro Estate
26 Singkoyo
27 Tolisu
3. Toili
28 Bukit J aya
29 Uwelolu
30 Pandan Wangi
31 Dongin
32 Kamiwangi
33 Sendang Sari
34 Bukit Makarti
35 Bukit Harapan
36 Makapa
4.

Toili Barat
37 Karya Makmur

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
38
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
4.2.2. Study Period Boundary
4.2.2.1 Study Period Boundary of Upstream Division

Study period boundary is different for every types of impact. Some impact will exist for unlimited
time shortly after activity of impact cause occurs. Most of impact types emerge in pre-
construction phase, but the impact could hold on until construction phase or from construction
phase until operational, for example the impact of social-economic-and culture aspect. Most of
impact in geo-physics-chemistry aspect occurs during the activity, and the impact will stop shortly
after the source of impact stopped. Some kind of impact occur forever if there is no effort to
overcome the problem, for example the impact of road damage. But, there is type of impact that
has permanent relative characteristic, for example change of demography. The following is study
period boundary of Matindok Gas Development Project of Upstream Division at Banggai Regency,
Central Sulawesi.

Table 4.5. Study Period Boundary
Matindok Gas Development Project Activity of Upstream Division
at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi

ACTI VI TY PHASE
TYPES OF HYPOTHETI C
I MPACT
I MPACT SOURCE STUDY PERI OD BOUNDARY
PRE
CONSTRUCTI ON
SOCI AL
Change of Land Ownership
Pattern
1. Land and plantation Acquisition During preconstruction phase
Public Income 1. Local Employee Recruitment Until construction phase
1. Land and plantation Acquisition
Social Process
2. Local employee recruitment
Could occur until operational
phase
1.Land and plantation Acquisition



Public Attitude and Perception
2. Local employee recruitment
Until construction phase


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
39
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 4.5. Continue
ACTI VI TY PHASE
TYPES OF HYPOTHETI C
I MPACT
I MPACT SOURCE STUDY PERI OD BOUNDARY
CONSTRUCTI ON GEO-PHYSI CS-CHEMI STRY
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments,
materials, and workers
A moment
2. Land clearing and maturation During the project
3. Construction of production facilities BS & GPF During the project
4. Activity of Alt-1 gas pipeline installation During the project
5. Activity of Alt-2 gas pipeline installation During the project
Ambient air Quality

6. Activity of Alt-3 gas pipeline installation During the project
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments,
materials, and workers
A moment
1. Land clearing and maturation During the project
2. Construction of production facilities BS & GPF During the project
3. Activity of Alt-1 gas pipeline installation During the project
4. Activity of Alt-2 gas pipeline installation During the project
Noise
5. Activity of Alt-3 gas pipeline installation During the project
Soil Erosion 1. Land clearing and maturation During the project














Disturbance of drainage and
irrigation system
1. Activity of pipeline installation During the project
1. Land clearing and maturation During the project
Surface Water Quality
2. Construction of production facilities BS & GPF During the project
1. Construction of production facilities BS & GPF During the project
Sea Water Quality
2. Activity of Alt-2 gas pipeline installation During the project
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments,
materials, and workers
During the project
Land Transportation
(disturbance of traffic fluency)
2. Activity of pipeline installation During the project
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments,
materials, and workers
During the project
Land Transportation
(disturbance of traffic safety)
2. Gas pipeline installation During the project
Road Damage
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments,
materials, and workers
Until the damage road get
repaired
BI OLOGI CAL
Decrease of Abundance and
variety of Vegetation
1. Land clearing and maturation Until operational phase
1. Land clearing and maturation Until operational phase
2. Construction of gas production facilities Until operational phase
3. Gas pipeline installation (Alt. 1) Until operational phase
4. Gas pipeline installation (Alt. 2) Until operational phase
Disturbance of Wild Animal
5. Gas pipeline installation (Alt. 3) Until operational phase
1. Construction of Block Station (BS) During the project
Decrease of Variety and
Abundance of raw Water Biota
2. Gas pipeline Installation During the project

Decrease of Variety and
Abundance of Sea Water Biota
1. Gas pipeline installation (Alt. 3) During the project



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
40
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

Table 4.5. continue
ACTI VITY
PHASE
TYPES OF HYPOTHETI C I MPACT I MPACT SOURCE
STUDY PERI OD
BOUNDARY
SOCI AL
1. Land clearing and maturation
2. Construction activity at BS and GPF
3. Activity of Alt-1 gas pipeline installation
4. Activity of Alt-2 gas pipeline installation
Increase of Public Income
5. Activity of Alt-3 gas pipeline installation


During construction activity
1. Land clearing and maturation
2. Construction activity at BS and GPF
3. Activity of Alt-1 gas pipeline installation
4. Activity of Alt-2 gas pipeline installation
CONSTRUCTI ON
Business Opportunity


5. Activity of Alt-3 gas pipeline installation
During construction activity
1. Construction activity at BS and GPF
2. Activity of Alt-1 gas pipeline installation
3. Activity of Alt-2 gas pipeline installation
Disturbance of Social Process
4. Activity of Alt-3 gas pipeline installation
During construction activity
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments, materials,
and workers
2. Construction of BS and GPF
3. Activity of Alt-1 gas pipeline installation
4. Activity of Alt-2 gas pipeline installation
5. Activity of Alt-3 gas pipeline installation
Change of Puiblic Attitude and
Perception



6. Dismissing Labour



During construction activity
PUBLIC HEALTH

1. Construction of gas production facilities BS & GPF
Decrease of Environment Sanitation 2. Alt.1 & 2 gas pipeline installation
3. Alt. 3 gas pipeline installation
During construction activity
OPERATI ONAL GEO-PHYSI CS- CHEMI STRY
1. Drilling development well During Operational activity
Ambient air Quality (dust and gas)
2. Production facility operation (BS and GPF) During Operational activity
Noise 1. Production facility operation (BS dan GPF) During Operational activity
1. Drilling Development well During Operational activity
Decrease of Surface Water Quality
2. Production Operational at GPF During Operational activity
1. Construction of gas production facility at BS and
GPF
During Operational activity
Decrease of Sea Water Quality
2. Drilling development well During Operational activity
Disturbance of Traffic Safety
1. Channeling condensate & sulphur through land
transportation
During Operational activity
Damage of Road and Bridge
1. Channeling condensate & sulphur through land
transportation
During Operational activity
BI OLOGI CAL
1. Drilling development well During drilling activity

Decrease of Variety and Abundance
Raw Water Biota
2. Activity of production facility operation (BS & GPF) During operational activity


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
41
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

Table 4.5. Continue
ACTI VI TY PHASE
TYPES OF HYPOTHETI C
I MPACT
I MPACT SOURCE STUDY PERI OD BAUNDARY
OPERATI ONAL SOCI AL
Change of Demography 1. Employee Recruitment holding until post operational
1. Employee Recruitment During the project
2. Drilling development well During the project

Increase of Public Health
3. Gas production operation at GPF During the project
1. Drilling development well During the project
Availability of Business
Opportunity
2. Activity of gas production facility operation
(GPF)
During the project
1. Employee Recruitment Disturbance of Social Process

2. Gas production operation at GPF
holding until post operational
Stratification 1. Production operation at GPF holding until post operational
1. Employee recruitment
2. Drilling development well
3. Activity of gas production operation at GPF

Change of Public Attitude and
Perception

4. Channeling condensate & sulphur through pipe
During operational activity
PUBLI C HEALTH
Disturbance of Environment
sanitation
1. Operational of gas production facilitis at GPF During the operational project
Standard of Public Health 1. Drilling Development well During the operational project

1. Activity of BS dan GPF gas production
operation
During the operational project
GEO-PHYSI CS-CHEMI STRY
Increase of ambient air quality
1. Terminating of production operation (BS and
GPF)
Decrease of noise level
1. Terminating of production operation (BS and
GPF)
Increrase of Sea Water Quality
1. Terminating of production operation (BS and
GPF)
Shortly after Terminating the
production operation (BS dan
GPF)
Disturbance of Traffic Safety 1. Demolition and demobility of equipments During the project
Damage of Road 1. Demolition and demobility of equipments
Until the damage road get
repair
BI OLOGI CAL
Increase of Variety and Density
of Vegetation
1. Revegetation After revegetation activity
Increase of Variety and
Abundance of Wild Animal
1. Revegetation After revegetation activity
SOCI AL
POST
OPERATI ONAL





Decrease of Public Health 1. Dismissing Labour
Shortly after Dismissing Labour
Activity
Lose of Business Opportunity 1. Terminating gas production operation at GPF Shortly after the project
1. Demolition and demobility equipment After the Project is held

Change of Public Attitude and
Perception
2. Dismissing Labour After the Project is held

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
42
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
4.2.2.2 Study Period Boundary of Downstream Division

Study period boundary differs for every types of impact. Some impact will exist for unlimited time
shortly after activity of impact cause occurs. Most of impact types emerge in pre-construction
phase but the impact could holding on until construction phase or from construction phase until
operational, for example the impact of social-economic-and culture aspect. Most of impact in
geo-physics-chemistry aspect occurs during the activity, and the impact will stop shortly after the
source of impact stopped. Some kind of impact occurs forever if there is no effort to overcome
the problem, for example the impact of road damage. But, there is type of impact that has
permanent relative characteristic after get occurred, for example change of demography. The
following is study period boundary of Matindok Gas Development Project of Downstream Division
at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi.

Tabel 4.6. Study Periode Boundary
Matindok Gas Development Project Activity of Downstream Division
at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi

ACTI VITY PHASE
TYPES OF HYPOTHETIC
I MPACT
IMPACT SOURCE
STUDY PERIOD
BOUNDARY
Change of Land Ownership
Pattern
1. Land and plantation Acquisition During preconstruction phase
Social Process 1. Land and plantation Acquisition
Could holding on until
construction phase
PRE
CONSTRUCTI ON


Public Attitude & Perception 1. Land and plantation Acquisition
Could holding on until
construction phase

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
43
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 4.6. Continued
ACTI VITY PHASE
TYPES OF HYPOTHETIC
I MPACT
IMPACT SOURCE
STUDY PERI OD
BOUNDARY
CONSTRUCTI ON GEO-PHYSI CS-CHEMI STRY
Ambient air Quality 1. Construction of BS & GPF production facilities During the project
Noise 1. Construction of BS & GPF production facilities During the project
Soil Erosion 1. Land clearing and maturation During construction phase
Disturbance of drainage &
irrigation system
1. Gas pipeline installation During the project
Surface water Quality 1. Construction of BS & GPF production facilities During the project
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments, materials,
and workers
During the project
Land transportation
(disturbance of smoothness
traffic)
2. Gas pipeline installation During the project
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments, materials,
and workers
During the project
Land transportation
(disturbance of safety traffic)
2. Gas pipeline installation During the project
Road Damage
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments, materials,
and workers
Until the damage road get
repair
BI OLOGI CAL
Decrease of Abundance and
Variety Vegetation
1. Land clearing and maturation Until the land scaping activity
1. Land clearing and maturation During the project
2. Gas pipeline installation (Alt. 1) During the project
3. Gas pipeline installation (Alt. 2) During the project
Disturbance of Wild animal
4. Gas pipeline installation (Alt. 3) During the project
1. Construction of Block Station (BS) During the project
Disturbance of raw water biota
2. Gas pipeline installation During the project

Disturbance of Marine Biota
(plankton, benthos, coral reef,
fish)
1. Gas pipeline installation (Alt. 3) During the project
SOCI AL During the project
Increase of public income 1. Construction of BS & GPF production facilities During the project
1. Construction of BS & GPF production facilities
2. Activity of Alt-1 Gas pipeline installation
3. Activity of Alt-2 Gas pipeline installation
4. Activity of Alt-3 Gas pipeline installation

Disturbance of Social Process

Can holding on until
operational phase
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments, materials,
and workers
During the project
Change of Public Attitude &
Perception
2. Construction of BS & GPF production facilities During the project
Decrease of Environment
sanitation
1. Construction of BS & GPF production facilities During the project

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
44
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Table 4.6. Continue
ACTI VITY PHASE
TYPES OF HYPOTHETIC
I MPACT
IMPACT SOURCE
STUDY PERI OD
BOUNDARY
OPERATI ONAL GEO-PHYSI CS-CHEMI STRY


Ambient air quality
(dust and gas)
1. production facility operation (BS dan GPF) During operational phase
Disturbance of safetry traffic
1. Channeling condensate & sulphur through land
transportation
During the project
Damage of Road and Bridge
1. Channeling condensate & sulphur through land
transportation
Until the damage road get
repair
BI OLOGI CAL
1. Drilling development well During the project

Disturbance of fresh water biota

2. Construction of BS & GPF production facilities
During the operational
activity
SOCI AL
1. Drilling development well
During the operational
activity Availability of Business
Opportunity
2. Production operation at GPF
During the operational
activity
1. Employee Recruitment
Can holding on until the post
operation
Disturbance of Social Process
2. Production operation at GPF
Can holding on until the post
operation
Social Stratification 1. Production operation at GPF
Can holding on until the post
operation
1. Employee Recruitment
During the operational
activity

Change of Public Attitude &
Perception
2. Production operation at GPF
During the operational
activity
PUBLI C HEALTH

Standard of Public Health 1. Construction of BS & GPF production facilities
Can holding on until the post
operation
POST
OPERATI ONAL
GEO-PHYSI CS-CHEMI STRY

Disturbance of safetry traffic 1. Demolition and demobility of equipments During the project
Road damage 1. Demolition and demobility of equipments
Until the damage road get
repair
BI OLOGI CAL
Increase of Abundance and
Variety of Vegetation
1. Revegetation After revegetation
Increase of Abundance and
Variety of Wild Animal
1. Revegetation After revegetation

SOCI AL


Change of Public Attitude &
Perception
1. Dismissing Labour After the project is held


Result of project area boundary, ecological boundary, social boundary and administrative
boundary represents study area boundary, is presented in Figure 4.5.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
45
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

Figure 4.5. MAP of AMDAL Study Area Boundary


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-1
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


Chapter-5
PREDI CTI ON OF SI GNI FI CANT
I MPACT



5.1. PREDICTION OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OF THE UPSTREAM DIVISION
5.1.1 Geo-Physics-Chemical Component
5.1.1.1 Ambient Air Quality
A. Construction Phase
1. The Mobility and Demobility Equipments
The prediction of impact that caused by mobility was average negative (-2). This
statistic came to initial environmental air quality (RLA) = 4 and to the mobility and
demobility of hard equipment and material, the quality of environmental air quality
= 2. The statistic of air quality = 2, it was based on:
The mobility of equipment and material includes the equipment and materials
shipment. The hard equipment that will be used for the main and supporting
buildings construction such as backhoe, tractor, truck, trailer, bus, etc.
The ambient air quality will decrease because the increasing of several air
parameters contains such as SO
2
, CO, NO
2
, hydrocarbon (came to the operational
of hard equipments emission) and also the increasing of the dust content that
was caused by the vehicle to the highway and the open area. These activities will
be temporary continued by the average mobility frequency, so this impact could
be classified as average negative impact (-2). This statistic based on Index of Air
Pollution Standard (ISPU) of Kep.Ka. BAPEDAL No. 107 of 1997, that was between
200 299, and it means that one of this ambient air quality parameter was
included in the index of 200 299, thus environmental quality of air = 2 (bad).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-2
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 5.1. I SPU Conversion to Environmental Quality Scale
ISPU Category
Environmental
Quality Scale
Category
< 50 Good 5 Very Good
51 100 Average 4 Good
101 199 Unhealthy 3 Average
200 299 Very Unhealthy 2 Bad
>300 Dangerous 1 Very Bad

Degree of significant impact of air quality was described as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The equipment and material mobility will have a negative impact for human,
especially for the people along the mobility line. The people settlement was
located along the mobility line, so it was estimated that there will be a quite
high number of the society who was affected by the impact of this activities. So
this criterion was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The activities of equipment and material shipment, also the labour
transportation for the fields development will be used marine and land
transportation to the location of pipeline activities, gas production and LNG
facilities. The hard equipment and materials mobility and demobility was lifted
by the hard vehicle with the area affected by the impact was quite wide. So this
criterion was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The number of vehicles that came and out, also vehicle and hard equipments
mobility was quite high, but it was temporary. So this criterion was not-
significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by the impact was the
people around the mobility line, the terrestrial and marine flora and fauna. So
this criterion was significant (S).


e) The cumulative nature of the impact

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-3
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The impact will not cumulative because the air quality parameter has not
experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications. So this criterion was not-
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will be turned after the activities have finished, the condition will be
back as it was before. So this criterion was not-significant (NS).

2. The Land Clearing and Maturity
The number of impact that caused by the land maturity activities was estimated as
small negative (-1). This statistic came to initial environmental air quality (RLA) = 4
and during the land maturity activities, the air environmental quality was estimated
= 3. The statistic of the air environmental quality was based on:
The activities of land maturity include the buried activity with the hard stones and
soil in the several locations that are needed to be buried as the building
foundation. The buried equipments are backhoe, tractor, truck, bulldozer, dump
truck, etc. This was potentially increasing dust content.
The ambient air quality will decrease because the increasing of PM
10
contains
(because of the dust contain an addition to the air caused by the buried activities).
This was a temporary activities and the impact has localized in the project
location, so the air quality was classified in the average condition.
Standard Index of Polluted Air to this activity was based on the calculation, that
was 101 199, it means that the environmental condition was average (Scale
3). (Based on ISPU calculation to Kep.Ka. BAPEDAL No. 107 of 1997).

Therefore, air quality condition that was good at initial condition (scale 4) with ISPU
51-100, will decrease into the average (scale 3) with ISPU 101-199.
The degree of the significant environmental affect the certain factors that of the will
be described as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The land clearing and maturity decreases air quality especially because of the
increasing of the dust and PM
10
, because the dust will be taken by the air
around the location. The number of people that was affected by the impact is
small, it was just the people around the location because they had been
localized, so the impact was not-significant (NS)
b) The extent of the impact

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-4
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The area affected by an impact was quite wide but the location had been
localized. It was not-significant (NS)
c) The duration of the impact
The duration of the impact was temporary and the intensity was relatively small.
So it was not-significant (NS)
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by the impact was the
terrestrial flora and fauna in the project area, and it was quite wide. So it was
significant (S)
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non cumulative, because the air quality which spreading will not
experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications, so it was not-significant
(NS)
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the land maturity activities have finished; the air
quality will be back as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)

3. The construction of BS and GPF
This activity includes the construction of structure foundation and production
facilities equipment, drilling preparation, building construction and equipments
installation. The estimated numbers of the impact of air quality that was caused by
BS and GPF construction are average negative (-2). This statistic of was the
difference between the good initial air quality (scale 4), and the condition of the air
quality around the activity, that was scale 2. It will be described as follows:
The width of BS construction activity (3 locations) was quite wide, which was 45
Ha.
The estimated ambient air quality will be declined because of the increasing of the
contains such as: PM
10
(because the dust contain in the ambient air has been
added), SO
2
, CO, NO
2
, hydrocarbon (because of the several hard vehicle emission)
Prediction of ISPU for activity was around 200 299, which means the
environmental condition was bad (scale 2)
Thus, condition of air quality, which was good to the beginning (scale 4) with ISPU
51-100, will be decline into bad (scale 2) with ISPU 200-299.
There are several the degrees of significant environmental impact.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-5
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
a) The number of people affected
The activity construction of BS and GPF did not affect many people. So it of the
impact was not-significant (NS)
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of impact spreading was not-significant (NS) because the
construction of 3 BS was located in the wide area, around 45 Ha, but it has been
localized.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of the BS and GPF will be felt by people and other creature to the
beginning of the construction until the operational activity. So it was not-
significant (NS)
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental that affected by the impact are marine biota. Thus, the
environmental component was significant (S)
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was no cumulative, because the air quality spreading will not
experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications, so it was not-significant
(NS)
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the construction of LNG refinery activities have
finished; the air quality will be back as it was before. So it was not-significant
(NS)

4. The activity of the Gas Pipeline Installation parallel with SM Bangkiriang
The activity of the pipe installation was predicted to decline the air quality. The
impact to this activity was small negative (-1). This statistic came to the difference
of initial profile that was 4, with the air condition during the activity. The judgment
was based on:
The ambient air quality will decrease because of the increasing of the several
contents, especially PM
10
(the addition of the dust content in the air because of
the drilling process and soil reclaiming around the drills), also the increasing of
SO
2
, CO, NO
2
, and hydrocarbon contents because of the emission of hard vehicle
used during the drilling activity and pipe installation.
Standard Index of Air Pollution during the activities was based on calculation of
101199, it means the environmental quality scale = 3 (average).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-6
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Thus, the condition of initial environmental profile that was good (scale 4) with ISPU
51-100, will be declined into average (scale 3) with ISPU 101-199.
These are the levels of degree of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
Staging, declining, and planting pipe will caused the disorder of the people
activity around the SM Bangkiriang, in a large number. So the impact criterion
was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of impact spreading was significant (S), because the area
width that was crossed by the pipeline was 8 m with the cumulative length
around 35 km.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact has temporary duration and the intensity was quite small. So this
criterion was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by the impact was flora
and fauna along the installation line of the gas distribution pipe. So the impact
criterion was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was not cumulative, because the air quality spreading will not
experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications, so it was not-significant
(NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activities have finished; the air quality will be back
as it was before. So this criterion was not-significant (NS).

5. The activity of the installation of gas distribution pipe parallel with SM
Bakiriang (Horizontal Directional Drilling)
The number of impact that was caused by the activity of the installation of gas
distribution pipe parallel with SM Bakiriang Horizontal Directional Drilling was
estimated to be small negative (-1). This statistic came to initial environmental air
quality (RLA) that was good (scale 4), and during the installation of the gas
distribution pipe, the quality of environmental air became average (scale 3). The
statistic of the environmental air quality was based on the increasing of the dust
content caused by staging, declining, and installation pipe activities. The emission of
the Diesel machine and electric power generator affects the declining of local air

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-7
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
quality. Standard index of air pollution during this activity was based on calculation
of 100 199 (based ISPU calculation, Kep. Ka.BAPEDAL No. 107 of 1997). Thus, the
condition of environmental quality which was good (scale 4) at initial condition, with
ISPU 51-100, will be declined into average (scale 3) with ISPU 101-199.
These are significant degrees of environmental impact:
a) The number of people affected
Staging, declining, and installation pipe will cause the disorder of the people
activity around the SM Bakiriang, in a small number. So the impact criteria were
not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of impact spreading was significant (S), because the area
width that was crossed by the pipeline was 8 m with the cumulative length
around 35 km
c) The duration of the impact
The impact has temporary duration and the intensity was quite small. So it was
not-significant (NS)
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by the impact was flora
and fauna along the installation line of the gas distribution pipe. So the impact
criteria was significant (S)
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was not cumulative, because the air quality spreading will not
experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications, so it was not-significant
(NS)
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activities have finished; the air quality will be back
as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)

6. The activity of gas distribution pipe installation parallel with the SM
Bangkiriang coast
The impacts number of gas distribution pipe installation activity parallel with the SM
Bakiriang coast was estimated to be small negative (-1). This statistic came to
initial environmental air quality (RLA) that was good (scale 4) and during the
installation of the gas distribution pipe, the quality of environmental air quality
became average (scale 3). The statistic of the environmental air quality was based
on the increasing of the dust degree caused by staging, declining, and installation

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-8
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
pipe activities. The emission of the Diesel machine and electric power generator
affects the declining of local air quality. Standard index of air pollution during this
activity based on calculation of 100 199 (based ISPU calculation, Kep. Ka.BAPEDAL
No. 107 of 1997). Thus, the condition of environmental quality which was good
(scale 4) at initial condition with ISPU 51-100, will decrease into average (scale 3)
with ISPU 101-199.

These are the degrees of significant environmental impact:
a) The number of people affected
Staging, declining, and installation pipe will cause the disorder of the people
activity around the SM Bangkiriang, in a small number. So the impact criteria
was not-significant (NS)
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of impact spreading was significant (S), because the area
width that was crossed by the pipeline was 8 m with the cumulative length
around 35 km
c) The duration of the impact
The impact has temporary duration and the intensity was quite small. So it was
not-significant (NS)
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by the impact was flora
and fauna along the installation line of the gas distribution pipe. So the impact
criteria was significant (S)
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was not cumulative, because the air quality spreading will not
experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications, so it was not-significant
(NS)
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activities have finished; the air quality will be back
as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-9
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


B. Operational Phase
1. The drilling of development wells
The impacts number of air quality was caused by main and support generator
operational that was estimated to be small negative (-2). This statistic was the
difference between the initial environmental air quality (scale 4) and the air quality
during the activity (2). The quality of ambient air was estimated to decline because
the increasing of: SO
2
, CO and NO
2
content. During the activity, it was estimated
that ISPU was around 200-299. It means that the condition of environmental air
quality was bad (scale 2). Thus, condition of environmental air quality that was good
at the beginning (scale 4) with ISPU 51-100, will be declined in to bad condition with
ISPU 200-299 (according to Table 5.1)
These are the degrees of significant environmental impact:
a) The number of people affected
The impact to this activity did not affected people in large number, because the
location of the wells was in the forest that far away to the settlement. So it was
not-significant (NS)
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was not-significant (NS), since the
drilling location take place in the localized area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this activity will be felt during the drilling operational period, so it
was significant (S)
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by the impact was the
animal around the drilling location. Thus, the impact was not-significant (NS)
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was not cumulative, because the air quality spreading will not
experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications, so it was not-significant
(NS)
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activities have been finished; the air quality will be
back as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-10
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

2. The Operational of Gas Production Facility (BS and GPF)
The number of impact that was caused by the operational production activity was
estimated to be average negative (-2). This statistic came to initial environmental air
quality (RLA) that was good (scale 4) and during the production operational in GPF,
the quality of the environmental air quality becames bad (scale 2). This statistic
based on:
The waste containing gas to the emission of turbine generator, machine generator
and flare stack will be reduced the air quality around the area.
The emission will be increasing significantly during abnormal operational, for a
short time.
Standard Index of air pollution during the activity was estimated to be 200 299,
it means the quality scale was bad (2).
Thus, the initial environmental quality which was good (scale 4) with ISPU 51-100,
will decrease into bad (scale 2) with ISPU 200-299 (Table 5.1). Based on the
remodeling result with the stack height of 20 m, the maximum concentration of the
emission distribution takes place in the distance of 1665 m with SO
2
concentration =
0.00929 gr/m
3
, NO
x
= 2.66gr/m
3
, and CO = 0.3755 gr/m
3
. To the remodeling
result, the condition of that concentration was under the quality standard (As it was
presented on Attachment 15). The grade of environmental impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
During the production operational phase in GPF, there was waste that contains
gas to the waste emission of the turbine generator, machine generator, and
flare stack, and it will decrease air quality around the area and affected the
people, whether the labour or the people around the GPF. So it was
significant (S)
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of impact spreading was significant (S) because the impact
could spread to the quite wide area with radius 2 km.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this activity will be felt during the drilling operational process, so
that it was significant (S)
d) The number of other environmental component affected

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-11
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The other environmental that are affected by the impact are the flora and fauna
around the drilling location. Thus, the impact was not-significant (NS)
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was not cumulative, because the air quality spreading will not
experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications, so it was not-significant
(NS)
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activities have been finished; the air quality will be
back as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)

C. Post Operational Phase
1. Termination of Gas Production Operational
During the post operational phase, the operational activity had been stopped; it will
give the positive impact for the air quality. The impact will be changed, to the bad
quantity (scale 2) to the average (scale 3) with ISPU 101-199 (Table 5.1), so the
quantity impact becames small positive (+1).

This following statement describes the significant impact degree of the
environmental air quality caused by termination of gas production operation.

a) The number of people affected
The termination of gas operational production only affects the people who work
in the project, so the criteria was not-significant (NS)
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of impact spreading was not-significant (NS) because this
activity takes place in the quite wide area that had been localized.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this operational will be felt forever and the air quality will get
better. So this criterion was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was flora and fauna
around the location which was quite wide. So the impact was significant (S)
e) The cumulative nature of the impact

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-12
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The impact was not cumulative, because the air quality spreading will not
experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications, so it was not-significant
(NS).

f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activities have been finished; the air quality will be
back as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)

5.1.1.2 Noise
A. Construction Phase
1. The Mobility and Demobility of Equipments
Noisy was the unwanted sound or sound that happened in the incorrect place and
time (Couldter and Will, 1979). There are three noise types, which are (1)
temporary, (2) frequent in many places and (3) perpetual in many places.
Environmental quality scale of noise by Couldter and Will, 1979 was described as
follows

Table 5.2. Environmental Quality Scale of Noise
Noise dB(A)
Environmental Quality Scale
(1) (2) (3)
Very good (5) < 60 < 55 < 52
Good (4) 60 70 55 63 52 59
Average (3) 70 80 63 71 59 64
Bad (2) 80 90 71 82 64 77
Very bad (1) > 90 > 82 > 77
note: (1) Temporary
(2) Frequent in many places
(3) Perpetual in many place

Hard equipment and material mobility activities and material includes equipment
traffic on project location, building materials transportation, etc, and hard vehicle
traffic activity potentially increased noise around the project region and vicinity. This
impact happens in a while, so the quantity of impact on noise caused by hard
equipment mobility and demobility was estimated as small negative (-1 ) .
This statistic was resulted to the reduction scale of the initial environmental quality
that was good (scale 4) to the environmental quality scale during the activity, which

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-13
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
was average (scale 3); along with the noise in several places, the scale 3 was based
on:
This activity includes equipment mobility to project location and building materials
transportation. This noise was estimated to be 90 dB(A), but the settlement was in
25 meter to the highway, so the noise will be 67 dB(A). The number was in the
third environmental quality (the calculation was in the appendix 12). Thus, the
increasing of noise that was before 55 db(A), that was in good condition (scale 4),
will decrease in to average (scale 3) with the increasing of noise to be 67 dB(A).
(Table 5.2)
The degree of significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The mobility has an affect increasing noise, i.e around 80 100 dB(A) in the
mobility line. According to Owen (1995), dump truck noise was 100 dB(A).
According to the noise source line calculation, the degree will decrease
logarithmically. So this criterion was Not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area which was affected by an impact quite wide, including the village that
crossed by this mobility activity. So this criterion was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The vehicle activity around the location was quite much but it was just
temporary. So this criterion was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by an impact beside
human is also the terrestrial animal. So this criterion was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not accumulate because there was no factor that causes
biomagnifications. So this impact category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activities have been finished; the condition will
change to its initial one. So it was not-significant (NS)

2. The Land Clearing and Maturity
These activities include drilling, reclaiming, and area flatting for the BS location and
pipe line. The BS location was located 25 m to the settlement, so it will not be too
affected by noise. The impact of these activities will affect the area that was located

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-14
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
in 60 km and 20 m length or 120 ha width that will cross the settlement with the
distance of 25 m. This environmental condition was estimated to be decreased to
the good condition (scale 4) into average (scale 3), so the impact quantity was small
negative (-1). This statistic was based on the noise estimation around 85 db(A) and
the impact to the near settlement around 62 dB(A), which was classified in scale 3
(average) (the calculation result was attached). Thus, the initial profile of noise
which was 55 dB(A), and it was in the good condition (scale 4), will decrease into
average (scale 3) with the increasing of noise around 62 dB(A) (Table 5.2).
The degree of significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
This activity will cause the increasing of noise around the activity location. The
location will cross several settlement areas, so the impact was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area which was affected by the impact was only along the trunk line. So
this criterion was not-significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The increasing of noise that was caused by this activity was small and
temporary. So this criterion was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by an impact beside
human was also the terrestrial fauna around the location. So this criterion was
not-significant (NS).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulative because the noise degree will not affect
peoples nerve (the noise degree in the land maturity area was around 50 60
dB(A) but it was not continued. It will be accumulated if > 85 dB(A) was
continuously takes place during 8 hours). So it will not experience
bioaccumulation or biomagnifications. The criterion was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activities have finished; the noise degree will be
back as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-15
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

3. The Activity of BS and GPF construction
This construction will be temporary; it was estimated to increase noise around the
project location and in vicinity. The noise degree was estimated around 61 dB(A). So
the initial profile of noise was 55 dB(A) that was in the good condition (scale 4), and
it will decrease into average (scale 3) with the increasing of noise 61 dB(A).
The degree of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that was affected by the impact in this activity was quite
a lot, consists of the construction labour , the closest residence, and those who
are opening the business opportunity and works in the informal sector. So the
impact criterion was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was significant (S), because this
activity was located in the quite wide area
c) The duration of the impact
The noise impact to this activity will be felt by people and other creature to the
beginning of the construction until the operational phase. So this criterion was
significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by the impact are flora
and fauna also biota in the construction area of GPF and BS. So this criterion
was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was not cumulative because the noise will not experience
bioaccumulation or biomagnifications. So this criterion was not-significant
(NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activities have been finished; the noise degree will
be back as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)

4. The Activity of Gas Distribution Pipe Installation Parallel to SM
Bangkiriang by Normal Drilling

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-16
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
This activity potentially increases the noise around the project location as an effect
of staging, declining, and planting pipe activities. This impact will be last temporary,
so the quantity of the impact was estimated to be small negative (-1). This
statistic was based on the reduction of initial environmental quality (RLA) scale that
was in the good condition (scale 4), to the estimation of environmental quality scale
during the gas distribution pipe installation activity in a moment that will be around
70 dB(A). The number was classified in the third scale of environmental quality. The
calculation result was attached. Thus, the noise that was 55 dB(A) at initial
condition, which was in the good condition (scale 4), will decrease into average
condition (scale 3) and the increasing of noise was 70 dB(A).
The degree of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
This activity will disturb the activity of people around SM Bakiriang in large
number. So this criterion was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of impact spreading was significant (S), because it was quite
wide, that was around 60 km.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact will be temporary and its intensity was quite small. So this criterion
was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was the flora and fauna
along the installation line. So this criterion was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulated because the air quality parameter spreading
will not experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications. So this criterion was
not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activities have been finished; the noise degree will
be back as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-17
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

5. The Activity of Gas Distribution Pipe Installation Parallel to SM Bakiriang
by Horizontal Direct Drilling
This activity was potentially increase noise around the project location as an effect
of staging, declining, and pipe planting activities. The impact was temporary, so the
impact quantity to this activity was estimated to be small negative (-1). This
statistic was based on the reduction of initial environmental quality (RLA) scale that
was in the good condition (scale 4) into the estimated environmental quality scale
during the gas distribution pipe installation. The increasing of noise was estimated
around 70 dB(A), the number was in the scale 3 of the environmental quality. Thus,
the initial noise scale was 55 dB(A), it meant in the good condition, and it will
decrease into average condition (scale 3), with increasing of noise around 70 dB(A).
The calculation result was attached.
The degree of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
This activity will disturb the people activity around SM Bakiriang in a small
number. So this criterion was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was not-significant (NS). The pipes
installation uses Horizontal Direct Drilling, so the width was small.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact will be temporary and its intensity was quite small. So it was not-
significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was the flora and fauna
along the installation line. So this criterion was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulated because the air quality parameter spreading
will not experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications. So this criterion was
not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activities have been finished; the noise degree will
be back as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-18
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
6. The Activity of Gas Distribution Pipe Installation Parallel to SM Bakiriang
This activity was potentially increase the noise around the project location as an
effect of staging, declining, and pipe planting activities. This impact will last
temporary, so the quantity of the impact was estimated to be small negative (-1).
This statistic was based on the reduction of initial environmental quality (RLA) scale
that was in the good condition (scale 4) and the estimation of environmental quality
scale during the gas distribution pipe installation activity that will be around 70
dB(A). The number was included in the third scale of environmental quality. The
calculation result was attached. Thus, the initial noise that was around 55 dB(A), it
meant in the good condition (scale 4), will decrease into average condition (scale 3)
and the increasing of noise becames 70 dB(A). The calculation result was attached.
The degree of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
This activity will disturb the fisherman activity around SM Bakiriang in a small
number. So this criterion was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The width was significant (S), because it was quite wide, that was around 137
Ha.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact will be temporary and its intensity was quite small. So this criterion
was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was the flora and fauna
along the installation line, especially coral reefs. So it was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulated because the air quality parameter spreading
will not experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications. So this criterion was
not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activities have finished; the noise degree will be
back as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-19
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


B. Operational Phase
1. Operational Production in GPF
This operation uses the main equipment, such as compressor, genset, and the
pumps with gas material, it was potentially increase noise level around production
area, and this impact last during the operational phase, so the quantity of impact as
an effect of this operational activity in GPF was estimated to be small negative (-
1). This statistic was based on the reduction of initial environmental quality (RLA)
scale that was in the good condition (scale 4) and the estimation of environmental
quality scale during the gas distribution pipe installation activity that will be around
65,04 dB(A). The number was included in the third scale of environmental quality.
The calculation result was attached. Thus, the initial level of noise that was 55
dB(A), that was in the good condition (scale 4), will decrease into average condition
(scale 3) and the increasing of noise becames 65.04 dB(A). The calculation result
was attached.
The degree of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The noise in this operational phase only affects the GPF worker. So this criterion
was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width was not-significant (NS), because the operational activity
takes place in the localized area.
c) The duration of the impact
The activity impact will be felt during the operational phase. So this criterion
was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was the flora and fauna
around the operational location. So this criterion was not-significant (NS).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulated because the air quality parameter which
spreads will not experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications. So this
criterion was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-20
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The impact will turn after the activities have been finished; the noise degree will
be back as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)


C. Post Operational Phase
1. Termination of The Gas Production Operation
Termination of the gas production operation will have positive affect to the noise.
The impact was estimated to change to its initial environmental quality scale of
average (scale 3) to good scale (scale 4), so the impact quantity was average
positive (+1). This statistic cames to the condition during the operation which were
65.04 dB(A), that was average condition (scale 3), then it was changed to the initial
condition of 55 dB(A), that was good condition (scale 4).
The degree of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
This activity has a positive impact on the settlement area. So this criterion was
not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The width was significant (S), because this activity takes place in the quite
wide area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact will be felt forever and the condition will get much better. So this
criterion was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was flora and fauna
around the operational location which was quite wide. So this criterion was
significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulated because the air quality parameter spreading
will not experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications. So this criterion was
not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activities have been finished; the noise degree will
be back as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-21
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
5.1.1.3 Soil Erosion
A. Construction Phase
1. Land Clearing and Maturity
This activity has an affect in the increasing of surface erosion. It will be happened
because the vegetation which was covering the land was gone and the land was
peeled by the area opening and preparation for the wells drilling, gas production and
liquid gas facilities construction and also for the pipeline installation. Then, in the
location will have erosion risks. The erosion degree was influenced by several
factors, such as soil and rain sensitivity. The raindrops affect and release the soil
aggregate so that it will increase the surface stream and erosion process. This
condition will last continuously as long as the land opened surface will be closed
with the buildings or vegetation. The calculation result of initial profile to each area
with the different land cover has been explained in chapter III. The erosion level in
the land used for the agriculture in Sukamaju was very high (10,074.17 ton/ha/year)
with the bad environmental quality scale (scale 2). The bushes area in Minahaki has
the erosion level around 3,872. 18 ton/ha/year) with the average environmental
quality scale (scale 3) and in the forestry land such as in Maleorejo has a small level
of erosion around 11.47 ton/ha/year, with the average environmental quality scale
(scale 3). The environmental management as an effect of the Matindok gas
development was needed so that there will be more attention by the proponent as
the gas field was located around the lowest erosion area, so it must be managed
promptly so that the increasing of erosion will not be happened in the other two
areas. There was land clearing and maturity activity so the C factor (crop) will be
totally changed into the open land without bare land with score C of 0.9. Thus, the
number of erosion was estimated to be around 9 times wider than that in the forest
area or three times higher than that in bushes area, so the environmental quality
becames bad (scale 1). Therefore the quantity of impact was average negative
(-2).

The degree of the erosion as an effect of the land clearing as to the project, local
and regional impact, that was based on 6 determined criteria of the degree of the
significant impact was presented as follows :
a) The number of people affected

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-22
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The number of people affected by erosion was quite many, considering that the
drilling plan for each location needs land around 100 x 100 m
2
. The number of
proprietor and the worker was around 5-10 people per location. Most of lands
are the hilly land to wavy topography covered with forest, bushes, and
agriculture crop. In the drilling location, the soil will be flatted and compressed,
so the erosion was only happened in the drilling location area plan with 17 ha
width (17 development wells). The wells location in the reality was far to the
residence area, and many people will be affected by the erosion. According to
the situation, the degree of the impact was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact to this activity was significant (S), because it was happened in 100
x 100 m
2
per wells. The number of development wells was 18 wells in 5 gas
fields, they are Donggi, Maleo Raja, Matindok, Minahaki and Sukamaju. The
drilling activity will be in the operational area of the gas field, which are around
18 ha. Thus, cumulatively the area width was quite wide and included in the
significant (S) category.
c) The duration of the impact
Based on the land compressed in the drilling location plan as a standard of the
drilling equipments installation, the erosion will less intensive and probably will
be stopped. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The land will not be agriculture area in the long period, because of the erosion.
There will be a lot of other environmental component that was affected because
of soil erosion, such as hydrology, biology component (vegetation and soil relic
essence), soil fertility, and society social economics, so the impact magnitude
was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact of this activity to the soil erosion was not cumulative. So the impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact to this activity could be fixed to prevent the continued erosion or the
land will be back as it was before. So the impact magnitude was not-
significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-23
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


5.1.1.4 Drainage and Irrigation System
A. Construction Phase
1. The Installation of Gas Distribution Pipe
There are more than 7 high rivers go to Peleng strait in Banggai Regency that soon
will be cut by the installation of transmission line to Donggi to Kintom. Those rivers
have water source in the mountain range that was located in the east side of
Banggai Regency and flows in the general parallel pattern and each river has
dendrite pattern. The regulation to the mountain range was rather soft and explicit
to the sideway into flat. In the downstream area, most of the river water was used
for irrigation water in the area of Toili Hilir, Batui Hilir, and Luwuk. The rivers and its
rate are quite high, such as Singkoyo river (64 m
3
/seconds), Mantahang river (41
m
3
/seconds), Toili river (40 m
3
/seconds), and Batui river (85.2 m
3
/seconds),
Simorang river (24 m
3
/seconds), Mendono river (60 m
3
/seconds) and Tangkiang
river (60 m
3
/seconds), and wet rice field irrigation around 8,895.36 Ha (source:
BAPPEDA of Banggai Regency, 2006). The recent condition of the river stream or
the irrigation was quite good, so to the irrigation function aspect, it was in the good
condition (scale 4). The irrigation and drainage function was temporary reduced so
the quantity will also reduce caused by non-fluency flowing rate. It was caused by
the pipe installation and it was estimated around 10-15 m
3
/seconds, hence the
environmental quality scale becames bad (scale 2). The impact magnitude was
average with scale 2 (negative 2).
The degree of the drainage and irrigation system disturbance caused by that activity
which includes the impact of the project, local, and regional was based on 6 criteria
that are presented as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The people that are affected are the farmer that use water (P3A) in the lowland,
alluvial land, and coast land in Banggai Regency to irrigate their wet land, so the
number of people who are affected was many. This was included in the
significant (S) category.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-24
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

b) The extent of the impact
The area that was affected by the disturbance of drainage and irrigation system
was almost entire wet rice land in the lowland alluvial and coastland in Banggai
Regency. The impact included in the significant (P) category.
c) The duration of the impact
The disturbance caused by pipe installation activity will not last in a long period
and with intensity once during Matindok gas development project. So the impact
includes in the not-significant (NS) category.
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The number of others environmental component that was affected by this
activity are a lot such as the traffic (traffic jam, accident). There will be was
muddle (hydrology), the society perception etc. The impact of this activity
includes in significant (S) category.
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
This activity only temporary and will not be cumulative. Thus, this activity
includes in the not-significant (NS) category.
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The affect the drainage and irrigation disturbance soon will be changed normally
as it was before when the activity completed. This impact includes in the not-
significant (NS) category.



5.1.1.5 Water Surface Quality
A. Construction Phase
1. The Activity of BS and Gas Production Facility (GPF) Construction
Activity of BS and GPF construction which will takes place temporary, was predicted
to reduce river water quality as a result of involuntary overland flow of material, fuel
and hydro test waste water, equipments sweeping before commissioning that are
discharged into river. This will reduce river water quality around activity area.
Impact forecast at surface water quality when activity of BS and GPF construction =
- 2. This number came to initial surface water environmental quality (RLA) = 4 and
at the time of activity of BS and GPF construction, surface water quality = 2. This

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-25
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
number came to improvement of turbidity value and oil at the time of activity. Level
of turbidity value was around 45-90 NTU, and it means the condition of surface
water area was bad (scale 2). Therefore, the condition that was initially good (scale
4) will experience degradation, becames bad (scale 2).

The degree of significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
During this activity, the number of people affected was relatively much, that
was the people around the river flows. The impact criterion was significant
(S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact was significant (S), because the rivers will pass
several villages.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact was temporary, so it was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental components affected
The number of other environmental component was affected are the river flora
and fauna. This impact criterion was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulated because it will not experience
bioaccumulations or biomagnifications. So this criterion was not-significant
(NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn once the activity was completed; the water surface quality
will change to be as it was before. The impact criterion was not-significant
(NS).

B. Operational Phase
1. The Development Wells Drilling
Material sand blasting (grit) and cuttings are cleaned and thrown to river during
drilling; ex-hydro test water, equipments sweeping before commissioning which was
discharged into river will reduce river water quality (surface water). Impact forecast
at surface water quality when this activity was done = - 2. This number cames to
level of initial environment profile (RLA) = 4, and at the time of saturated activity of
development well, the RLA was = 2. This number cames to one of parameter
causing degradation of surface water quality, which was turbidity at the time of test

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-26
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
hydro test. Degradation value of Turbidity becames 45-90 NTU, and it means the
condition of surface water quality was bad (scale 2). Therefore, condition of
environmental quality which was initially good (scale 4) will reduce to became bad
(scale 2).
The degree of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
Material sand blasting (grit) and cuttings are cleaned and thrown to river during
drilling; ex-hydro test water, equipments sweeping before commissioning which
was discharged into river potentially will reduce river water quality and affects
people who are using the river. Therefore, the impact criterion was significant
(S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width was significant (S), because the river stream will flow to
downstream.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact will be felt during the drilling operation. This criterion was not-
significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected is the water biota around
drilling location. This criterion was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulated because the water quality parameter will not
experience bioaccumulations or biomagnifications. So this criterion was not-
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn once the activities have been finished; the water quality will
be back as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)

2. The Activity of Operational Production in GPF
Liquid waste to ex-formation water after being processed will be separated to its oil
and then discharged into river, and it potentially will reduce surface water quality.
Impact forecast at surface water quality when activity was done was average
negative (- 2) with free oil content and fat around 11-15 ppm. This number cames
to good level of initial environment profile (RLA) (scale 4) with oil content and fat
around 1-5 ppm, and at the time of activity of production operation of in GPF, the
environmental condition was predicted to became bad (scale 2).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-27
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

The degree of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
At operational phase, production in GPF resulted liquid waste to ex-formation
water after proceed to separate its free oil and then discharged into river that
potentially will reduce surface water quality and affects resident who use the
river. Therefore, its impact criterion was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width was significant (S), because the rivers will flow in to
downstream.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this activity will be felt during the production operation. So this
criterion was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was water biota in the
river around the GPF location. Therefore, this impact includes in the significant
(S) category.
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulated because the water quality parameter will not
experience bioaccumulations or biomagnifications. So this criterion was not-
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn once the activities have been finished; the water quality will
be back as it was before. So it was not-significant (NS)

C. Post Operational Phase
1. The Termination of Gas Production Operation
At post operational phase, activity of operation has been terminated and it will give
positive affect surface water/river quality. The impact forecast was estimated to
have impact magnitude that was initially average (scale 3), where oil content and fat
at surface water was 6-10 ppm will change and change to good ( scale 4)
condition with oil rate and fat around 1-5 ppm, so it was a small positive impact
magnitude (+ 1).
The degree of the significant impact was as follows:

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-28
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

a) The number of people affected
This activity was only affected the people who work in the gas operational area.
Therefore the impact includes in the not-significant category (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading includes in the not-significant (NS)
category because this activity takes place in the localized area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact will be felt forever and water surface quality will get better.
Therefore this criterion was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was flora and fauna
around the operational area. Therefore this criterion was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulated because the water quality parameter will not
experience bioaccumulations or biomagnifications. So this criterion was not-
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn once the activity was completed, water surface quality will
change as it was before. Therefore this criterion was not-significant (NS).

5.1.1.6 The Sea Water Quality
A. Construction Phase
1. The Activity of BS and GPF construction
Impact magnitude forecast that was happened at sea water quality as a result of
activity of construction BS and GPF was small negative (-1). This number was a
difference between good initial sea-water environmental quality (scale 4) with scale
quality when activity takes place where the condition decline to became average
(scale 3). The consideration was based on scale 3 elaborated as follows: cuttings
during drilling, water ex-hydro test, equipments sweeping before commissioning that
was discharged into river will possibly reduce river water quality around activity
location, and because this river water having estuary on the sea, hence it will cause
degradation of sea water quality and affects life of marine biota.
The degree of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-29
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Drilling mud which water-based and non-toxic for depth of well top expansion,
cuttings during drilling, water ex-hydro test, equipments sweeping of before
commissioning that was discharged into river will possibly reduce river water
quality around activity location and because this river water having estuary on
the sea, hence it will cause degradation of sea water quality, so that many
people affected. Therefore the impact criterion was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width was not significant (NS), the sea-water was quite effective
pollutant diluents.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact was temporary during the construction. Therefore this criterion was
not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was marine biota around
the construction area. Therefore this criterion was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulated because the water quality parameter
spreading will not experience bioaccumulations or biomagnifications. So this
criterion was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn once the activity was completed, water surface quality will
change to be as it was before. Therefore this criterion was not-significant
(NS).

2. The Installation of Gas Pipe Transmission through the Sea (alternative-3)
At the time of installation activity of gas pipe line through sea, it was predicted that
there will be degradation of sea water quality as a result of turbidity improvement.
Installation activity of gas pipe line was through the sea (alternative-3), so the
construction activity, such as sea base digging for pipe installation, will generate
degradation of sea water quality especially because of turbidity improvement.
Impact forecast of the activity degradation of sea water quality was average
negative (-2). This number cames to good condition of initial environment profile
(scale 4) and it will experience degradation to became bad condition (scale 2)
resulted to improvement of turbidity to became around 45-90 NTU ( environmental
quality scale = 2).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-30
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

The degree of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
Staging, declining, and pipe planting will disturb the people activity in the coast
line which generally works as fisherman. Therefore the criterion was
significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact area width was significant (S), because the turbidity as an effect
of this activity was quite wide.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact was temporary and the intensity was quite small. This criterion was
not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was marine biota along
the water area installed by the pipes. Therefore this criterion was significant
(S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulated because the water quality parameter
spreading will not experience bioaccumulations or biomagnifications. So this
criterion was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activity was completed, seawater quality will
change to be as it was before. Therefore this criterion was not-significant
(NS).

B. Operational Phase
1. The Development Well Drilling
Impact forecast of sea water quality when drilling activity of this development wells
was done was small negative (1). This number cames to good RLA (scale 4) and at
the time of saturated activity of development well, that was estimated to decline to
became average (scale 3). Considering that the area scale = 3, when all wells have
been finalized, hence water-based mud will be thrown to sea/river. There are 2000
to 2500 bbl water-based mud was estimated to be thrown to each well, or total
about 7500 bbl.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-31
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

The degree of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
Drilling mud which water-based and non-toxic after being checked will be
thrown to sea, but it does not affect the people in high number. Therefore the
impact criterion was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact was not-significant (NS), because the drilling activity takes place
in the localized area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this activity will be felt during the drilling operation. This criterion
was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was water biota around
the drilling location. Therefore this criterion was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulated because the seawater quality parameter
spreading will not experience bioaccumulations or biomagnifications. Therefore
this criterion was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activity was completed; seawater quality will
change to be as it was before. Therefore this criterion was not-significant
(NS).

C. Post Operational Phase
1. The Termination of the Gas Production Operational
At post operational phase, it will have positive affect seawater quality. To impact
forecast, the impact magnitude that was average (scale 3), will change to initial
condition, that was good (scale 4), so there will be average positive impact
magnitude (+1).
The degree of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
This activity will only affect the people who work in the area. Therefore the
criterion was not-significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-32
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact was not-significant (NS), because the activity
was located in the localized area.
c) The duration of the impact
This impact will be felt forever and the seawater quality will change as it was
before. Therefore this criterion was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was water biota around
the location. Therefore this criterion was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact will not be cumulated because the seawater quality parameter
spreading will not experience bioaccumulations or biomagnifications. Therefore
this criterion was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the activity was completed, seawater quality will
change as it was before. Therefore this criterion was not-significant (NS).

5.1.1.7 Land Transportation
A. Construction Phase
1. The Mobility and Demobility of the Equipments, Material, and Labour.
(1) The Traffic Fluency
The current traffic during construction phase was resulted to traffic of material
transportation (vehicle of steel pipe conveyor) and it will create postponed
traffic, especially in joint streets connecting Kintom-Batui-Toili. Estimated that
the vehicle that passes the road was maximum 10 vehicle/hour or 100
vehicle/day, hence joint streets performance was as follows.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-33
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


Table 5.3. The Condition of J oint Street during the Mobility and Demobility of
Equipments

RLA During the construction
Busy
Hours
V
(smp/ h)
C
(smp/ h)
DS
(V/ C)
Scale V
(smp/ h)
C
(smp/ h)
DS
(V/ C)
Scale
Kintom-Batui Line
morning 108 2,620 0.060 5
128 2,406 0.048 5
afternoon 96 2,620 0.036 5
116 2,552 0.044 5
evening 54 2,620 0.020 5
74 2,574 0.028 5
Batui-Toili Line
morning 92 2,620 0.035 5 112 2.406 0.047 5
afternoon 76 2,620 0.029 5 96 2.552 0.038 5
evening 44 2,620 0.016 5 64 2574 0.025 5
Toili-Toili Barat Line
morning 74 2,620 0.0282 5 94 2,406 0.039 5
afternoon 52 2,620 0.0198 5 74 2,552 0.029 5
evening 36 2,620 0.0137 5 56 2,574 0.022 5

Source: Data Field Processing with MKJ I, Year 2007


Based on the calculation result with MKJ I method, it was predicted that there
are traffic addition to the material carrier vehicle that will not change the
environmental quality scale on the traffic fluency parameter. Therefore, the
impact quantity was zero (zero impact quantity).

(2) The Traffic Safety
According to condition of initial profile of area for safety parameter of street
consumer, it could be informed that it was accident gristles (scale 3 or Traffic
Gristle Level (TKRI) = 3.3)). Thus, the existence of traffic vehicle of material
conveyor and equipments of construction was estimated to increase the number
of accident cases to 2 times during construction phase per year.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-34
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
gristle) 1/very (scale 5.9
365 x 929
6
10 x 2
i
TKR = =
Therefore, the initial environmental quality scale 3 (quite sensitive to accident),
will change to scale 1 (very sensitive to accident), therefore the impact quantity
became 2 (negative 2).
This condition was caused by the factors as follows:
The minimum width of hardness for the traffic only less than 5,5 meter
A lot of cattle around the street side
The number of pedestrian that walks in the road
The vehicle speed in the straight road was 60-70 km/hours
Existence of road structure as result of parking in road body (city/commercial
area)
The structure width in the road bridge

The attention for safety of road user needs to be paid, especially when hard
vehicle of conveyor passes settlement area and urban. Vehicle maneuver could
endanger other road user, pedestrian in road body and also Existence of
livestock animal. The degree of significant impact could be elaborated as
follows:
a) The number of people affected
The people affected by this activity were the province road user to Luwuk to
Toili Barat. The initial profile includes the condition in the category of
accident gristle, so it could increase the number of the accident level, hence
the impact was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area affected by this activity was entire road that was used for material
transportation route, so the impact was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
During this activity, there will be disturbance felt by the society, so this
criterion was significant (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-35
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

d) The number of other environmental component affected
The mobility will affect the other component, such as the anxiety, especially
for road user (the uncomfortable disturbance and accident gristle), so the
impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
This activity only affects temporary, so it was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact was temporary when the material vehicle crossed the area
around the road. This impact was not-significant (NS).

(3) The Roads and Bridges Damages
Condition of roads and bridges for now was generally good. However, at certain
places, it was gristle on sliding and road body stability. The roads and bridges
damage was generally resulted by the Existence of natural factor (inundation) in
rainy season.

The type of the road damages in the study area was as follows:
The wavy roads caused by the supporting force of the soil base or road
drainage channel that was not well functioned, also the material vehicle
traffic, such as the high CPO truck.
The erosion of the body road caused by the wave
The abutment collapsed caused by the river erosion.

Existence of traffic of material conveyor/construction substance with MST > 8
ton will speed up the damage level of roads and bridges.
The condition was based on environmental quality scale determination for the
parameter of roads damage to difference of ITP (Ossifying Level Index) before
and after activity. The determination of ITP for each location of joint streets was
based on the following assumption.
Soil base CBR = 5 %
Rainfall 900 mm/year
Slope slightly: < 6%

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-36
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The material conveyor using Dump Truck (DT) during the activity.
The damages will happen if: ITP
1
< ITP
2

The Estimation of J oint Street Condition will be presented in the following table.

Table 5.4 Estimation of J oint Street Condition

The initial profile condition
The condition during material vehicle
mobility
J oint Street
BB BS TB TS MP DT LEP BB BS TB TS MP DT LEA
Kintom-Batui 0 0 0 9 14 0 2.70 0 0 50 11 18 50 60.90
Batui-Toili 0 0 0 18 46 0 5.40 0 0 50 23 59 50 64.35
Toili-Toili Barat 0 0 0 16 52 0 4.83 0 0 50 20 66 50 63.62

Table 5.5 Ossifying Level Index in Each Location
J oint Street I TP1 LEP LEA LET LER I TP2 Description
Kintom-Batui 5.45 2.70 60.90 31.80 15.90 5.80 ITP1 < ITP2
Batui-Toili 5.30 5.40 64.35 34.88 17.44 5.50 ITP1 < ITP3
Toili-Toili Barat 5.30 4.83 63.62 34.22 17.11 5.60 ITP1 < ITP4

Note:
LV : Light Vehicle
ST : Small Truck
MT : Medium Truck
HT : Heavy Truck
HB : Heavy Bus
LEP : Initial Equivalent Line
LET : Middle Equivalent Line
LEA : Last Equivalent Line
LER : Planned Equivalent Line
LHR : Average Daily Traffic
ITP1: Road Hardening Index before Activity
ITP2: Road Hardening Index after Activity

Thus, the road damage quality scale which was scale 3 (average) at initial condition,
will decrease to the scale 1 (very bad), so the impact quantity became -2 (negative 2).
Route of material transportation will pass environmental road which only represent
the ground road; concreted by stone (Macadamized), so that it will experience the damage.
This was caused by road ossifying that unable to support the high vehicle burden (MST > 10
Ton). Pursuant to significance level impact caused by activity of equipments mobility, could
be elaborated as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The people affected by impact are road users which by coincidence pass
joint streets which were used for route of equipments mobility. Road

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-37
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
damage will cause the uncomfortable for other road user; so the impact was
Significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
Area to be incurred by an impact was located in the Kintom region, the
bridge damage will make worse the transportation line in those joint, so the
impact was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
This mobility was happened during the construction activity, thus the impact
was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The mobility will affect the other component, such as the anxiety, especially
for road user (the uncomfortable disturbance and accident gristle), so the
impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The road/bridge damage will get worst/accumulative if there was no
immediate reparation. This criterion was significant (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact t
The road/bridge damage will not change to the initial condition, so the
impact was significant (S).

2. The Activity of Gas Transmission Pipe Installation
(1) The Disturbance of Traffic Fluency
Fluency disturbance was caused by the Existence of crosscut pipe installation on
joint streets. Even though the existing traffic based on the result of initial profile
perception showed that the condition was very good, but if the pipe installation
cut the particular line, it will disturb traffic fluency (traffic postponed if it was not
well-arranged, especially for traffic at each direction). The existing traffic fluency
was very fluent, that was shown by the calculation result of DS (Degree Of
Saturation) < 0.20 (or scale 5) for all joint streets in study area. But with the
Existence of pipe installation, there was only one line that has been used (half
road), the DS at one direction = 1.0. The average of the both direction was:

DS = (0.035 + 1.0)/ 2 = 0.502 (scale 3/ average)


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-38
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Therefore the environmental quality scale of traffic fluency parameter which to
the beginning was scale 5 (very good), will decrease to scale 3 (average), so the
impact was -2 (negative 2).

Installation of gas transmission pipe which cut joint streets will disturb the traffic
fluency. Based on level of significant impact, it could be elaborated as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The people affected are road users that pass the pipe line installation.
Considering that the traffic condition was not dense and there are still
another alternative lines that was not covering the road, so that the impact
was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area affected by this activity was entire road which passed the joint
street, so this impact was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The disturbance caused by this activity only temporary, so this impact was
not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The installation activity will affect the other component, such as the anxiety,
especially for road user (the uncomfortable disturbance and accident
gristle), so the impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact of traffic fluency only happens for a moment. Therefore the
impact was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact of traffic fluency parameter was temporary and if there was any
traffic line regulation, the traffic will change to normal condition. Therefore
the impact was not-significant (NS).

(2) The Disturbance of Traffic Safety
The pipe installation that crosscut joint streets potentially will affect traffic
safety. The digging activity causes hole in the body road. The hole will endanger
the driver and also pedestrian at night, so that need of light facilities in activity
location was very important. The Existence of pipe installation activity in joint

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-39
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
streets will raise the number of accident 3 times, so that condition criterion level
of consumer safety was presented as follows:
gristle) 1/very (scale 9.9
365 x 829
6
10 x 3
i
TKR = =

Therefore, environmental quality scale parameter of traffic safety which to the
beginning was 3 (average) will decrease to 1 (very bad), so that its quantity
impact was - 2 (negative 2).
Accident gristle could be happened by the time of execution of pipe installation,
it was caused by digging and body road conglomeration. Thus, the impact
significance will be elaborated as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The people affected are the road user who passing the road. The impact will
be very bad, if it was not well organized. This impact was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The number of area that was affected by this activity could be vast, because
the road user could be to another area. This impact was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The disturbance was only during the installation in that area. This impact
was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The activity will affect the other component, such as the anxiety, especially
for road user (the uncomfortable disturbance and accident gristle), so the
impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact of traffic safety parameter only happened for a moment.
Therefore the impact was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact could be turned if it was well-organized. This impact was not-
significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-40
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


B. Operational Phase
1. The Transmission of Condensate and Sulphur by the land transportation
(1) The Disturbance of Traffic Fluency
The current traffic during operation phase resulted to traffic of condensate
transportation will cause the traffic postponed, especially in joint streets of
Kintom-Batui-Toili. The estimation of traffic transportation was maximum 20
vehicle/hours or 200 vehicle/day, hence performance of joint streets should be
as follows:


Table 5.6. The Performance of J oint Street of Kintom-Batui-Toili-Toili
Barat

RLA During the transmission activity
Busy Hours
DS
1

V
(smp/ h)
C
(smp/ h)
DS
2

(V/ C)
DS
Difference
Kintom-Batui Line
morning 0.060 148 2,406 0.14 0.080
afternoon 0.036 136 2,552 0.12 0.840
evening 0.020 84 2,574 0.07 0.050
Batui-Toili Line
morning 0.035 132 2,406 0.055 0.020
afternoon 0.029 116 2,552 0.045 0.016
evening 0.016 84 2,574 0.033 0.017
Toili-Toili Barat Line
morning 0.0282 114 2,406 0.047 0.0118
afternoon 0.0198 92 2,552 0.036 0.0162
evening 0.0137 76 2,574 0.030 0.0163
Source: Data field Processing in MKJ I, Year 2007

Based on the calculation result with MKJ I method, it was predicted that the
traffic addition to the condensate carrier vehicle has a small change to the
environmental quality scale on the traffic fluency parameter. Therefore, the
impact quantity was zero (zero impact quantity).
(2) The Disturbance of the traffic safety
With the Existence of condensate transportation that passed the land road,
there will be the increasing numbers of vehicle to 1029 vehicle/day and it will
increase the number of accident if it was not well-managed, to be 3 (three)

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-41
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
accident/year. It represented the accumulation to various activity during
construction phase.
gristle) 1/very (scale 7.9
365 x 1029
6
10 x 3
i
TKR = =

Based on the calculation result, environmental quality scale for the parameter of
road user safety after Existence of the condensate transportation, will decrease
parameter to the beginning of scale 3 (rather gristle) to scale 1 (very gristle).
Thus, its quantity impact was -2 (negative 2).

This was caused by the following factor:
The traffic growth will came larger as the others industrial activity mixed with
the traffic line in the same road.
The increasing activity around the road suitable with the area development
and works activity.
The growth of people who have activity and stayed in around the road which
was passed by the condensate transportation, so it was conflicts gristle with
the pedestrian.

The level of the impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
People who will be affected by the Existence of vehicle maneuver of
condensate are road user who passes the transportation road. Condition of
initial profile was in accident gristle category, so the Existence of hard
vehicle will increase level of accident. Therefore the impact was significant
(S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area affected by this activity was entire roads along 30 km. So the
impact was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The disturbance was coming to the Existence of condensate transportation
during construction phase. Hence, the impact was significant (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-42
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

d) The number of other environmental component affected
The activity will affect the other component, such as the anxiety, especially
for road user (the uncomfortable disturbance and accident gristle), so the
impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
This activity only affected in a moment; therefore the impact was not-
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact was only temporary, when the vehicle passed the area around
the road. Therefore the impact was not-significant (NS).

(3) The Road and Bridge Damage
The condition of the existing road and bridge was generally good, but at certain
places, it was gristle to landslide and road body stability. Damage of road and
bridge was generally resulted to the Existence of nature factor (floods) in rain
season. Transportation of condensate through land road will pass bridge and
sub-province road and also province (class IIIa and IIIb) with maximum
strength of 8 ton. It was predicted that the old bridge and road will experience
damage that was caused by road concreting that unable to support high vehicle
burden (MST > 10 tons). The road was surge (scale 1/very bad). It was based
on the reality on field that in general road body is very labile as a result of very
high ground water.
Therefore, the quality scale of road damage level that initially was scale 3
(average) will reduce into scale 1 (very bad), so that the impact magnitude
becames -2 (negative 2).
The level of the impact significance will be described as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The people affected are the road user that passes the conveyor route. The
road damage cause uncomfortable for the road user, so this impact was
significant (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-43
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

b) The extent of the impact
The area affected was Kintom and Batui, so if there was road or bridge
damage, it will disturb the transportation line, so the impact was
significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
This activity happened during the operational phase, so the impact was
significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The activity will affect the other component, such as the anxiety, especially
for road user (the uncomfortable disturbance and accident gristle), so the
impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
If the road/bridge damage was not immediately repaired, it was getting
worse; therefore the impact was significant (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The road/bridge damage will not change to its at the initial condition, so the
impact was significant (S).

C. Post Operational Phase
1. Cleaning and Demobility of Equipments
(1) Disturbance of Traffic Fluency
Process of equipments demobility at post operational phase was conducted step
by step, so that the activity will not cause the high traffic current. This was
shown to quantification result of saturation degree that represented comparison
between traffic volume and the joint streets capacity, as it presented as follows:

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-44
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table5.7. The Performance of Kintom-Batui J oint Street during the
Equipments Demobility

RLA During the Equipments Demobility
Busy
Hours DS
1

V
(smp/ h)
C
(smp/ h)
DS
2

(V/ C)
DS
difference
Kintom-Batui Line
Morning 0.060 313 2,406 0.13 0.070
afternoon 0.036 281 2,552 0.11 0.840
evening 0.020 169 2,574 0.06 0.040
Batui-Toili Line
morning 0.035 297 2,406 0.123 0.098
afternoon 0.029 261 2,552 0.102 0.0712
Evening 0.016 159 2,574 0.062 0.046
Toili-Toili Barat Line
morning 0.0282 289 2,406 0.120 0.0918
afternoon 0.0198 237 2,552 0.093 0.0722
evening 0.0137 151 2,574 0.059 0.0413
Source: Data field processing with MKJ I, year 2007

Based on the calculation result with MKJ I method, it was predicted that the
traffic addition to the equipments demobility has a small change to the
environmental quality scale on the traffic fluency parameter. Therefore, the
impact quantity was zero (zero impact quantity).

(2) The Disturbance of traffic safety
Condition of safety level in J oint Street was relied on number of accident and
average daily traffic volume. The number of accident in study area was
estimated to be 2 times per year in average and number of the LHR (Average
Daily Traffic) equals to 691 vehicle/day. Hence, the criterion of road user safety
level was as follows:
gristle) 1/very (scale 7.9
365 x 691
6
10 x 2
i
TKR = =

Therefore, the initial environmental scale parameter was scale 3 (rather
gristle,) and it will became scale 1 (very gristle), so the impact magnitude
became -2 (negative 2).




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-45
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The level of impact significance was described as follows:
a) The number of people affected
People that incurred by impact to Existence of vehicle maneuver was
province road user start to Luwuk to Toili Barat. The initial profile condition
was included in the category rather gristle, so it was concerned that the
Existence of the hard vehicle would increase the level of accident, so that
the impact was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
Area incurred by impact of the equipments demobility was entire road as
transportation route, so that the impact was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The disturbance that was caused by this activity happened in short time, so
the impact was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The activity would affect the other component, such as the anxiety,
especially for road user (the uncomfortable disturbance and accident
gristle), so the impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The transportation caused by the demobility only affected in a moment, so
the impact was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact to this activity was temporary, when the conveyor vehicle
passed the area around the road. The impact was not-significant (NS).

(3) The Road and Bridge Damage
Equipments demobility would arise the traffic of hard vehicle that transporting
construction equipments, since most heavy tinder payload of vehicle conveyor
was MST > 10 ton. The vehicle traffic for construction equipments with MST >
10 ton will cause the road surging. Therefore, the quality scale of road damage
which to the beginning was scale 3 (average) will decrease to scale 1 (very
bad), so that the impact magnitude becames -2 (negative 2).

Equipments demobility would get through the main joint street and bridge with
the various conditions. If the vehicle with MST > 10 ton passed the road, it will

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-46
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
cause the damage of road and bridge. The level of the impact significance
caused by the equipment demobility was elaborated as follows.
a) The number of people affected
The people affected are road user that passed the joint street which was
used for the demobility route. The road damage was uncomfortable for
another road user; therefore the impact was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area affected was around Kintom. If there was the road damage, it
would cut the transportation line in that road, so the impact was
significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
This activity happened only in a short time, so the impact was not-
significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The activity would affect the other component, such as the anxiety,
especially for road user (the uncomfortable disturbance and accident
gristle), so the impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
If the road/bridge damage was not immediately repaired, it was getting
worse; therefore the impact was significant (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The road/bridge damage will not change to the initial condition, so the
impact was significant (S).

5.1.2 Biology Component
5.1.2.1 Vegetation
A. Construction Phase
1. The Land Clearing and Maturity
Land covered by vegetation will be decline because of opening and land maturation
activity. This land clearing took place in the well location, gas production facility, and
pipe line for the width of more than 130 ha. Most of the vegetation area that will be
opened represents the growth area (rice field and plantation) and entangle, but the
well location was near the forest. In the forest area, tree abundance was 230

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-47
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
tree/ha (scale 4), and at plantation area, tree abundance about 106 tree/ha,
whereas at rice field area, there was no trees around. So the impact estimation of
vegetation around the rice field, plantation and forest area was counted through
formula of N= k.l. (N: mising tree community; k : tree loss/ha ; l: farm width (ha)
for the development project). The Existence of land clearing will cause tree
reduction (0 tree x 30 + (230 tree x 40 + (106 tree x = 19,700 tree of total area for
PPGM activity). Compared to the abundance entire trees in the study area, the
number of trees which were opened in forest was relatively small, but road access
for the pipe installation (ROW) in SM Bakiriang, especially the pipe installation of
alternative-1 that was parallel with Existence province road, was potential to the
illegal logging activity, so the forest vegetation around the activity location will
experience the damage (scale 1). Hypothetically, the impact of this vegetation was
significant in the construction phase and the impact magnitude was high negative (-
3).

The degradation of terrestrial flora variety in the forest was caused by the loss of
grove. Groves which later grows in open area was not various. When area forest
was opened (by ID 1.327) and made for plantation area, the condition also will be
declined to 0.61.

The level of significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The land maturation, existing plant in project tread will be cleaned. There are no
people that were affected to this activity because the land was owned by the
proponent and no one has exploited this land previously. So the impact was
not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area affected was only small, that was around the activity location. This
criterion was not-significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity was small but the impact was last for a long period, Thus, this
impact criterion was not-significant (NS).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-48
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

d) The number of other environmental component affected
Component affected by the impact was the loss of fauna habitat in the area.
The loss of fauna habitat in the activity location will influence the upline
consumer. Therefore, it will cause the ecosystem instability in that habitat, so
the impact criterion was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was cumulative; it will affect each other, so the impact criterion was
significant (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after this activity has been completed, and there will be a
tree planting. So this criterion was significant (S).

B. Post Operational Phase
1. Revegetation
The type of activity that was predicted to affect the terrestrial flora in this phase was
revegetation activity. By the end of production period, the area of ex-facility location
will be cleaned and the land opened was brought back to the initial condition
according to the regulation. The revegetation activity will cause the growth of
coppice so the land will be covered by vegetation. This activity will generate positive
average impact (+2) for the terrestrial flora. The environmental quality scale during
the post operational production will increase to scale 1 (condition as an effect of
land clearing that decrease amount of tree = 19,700) to scale 3 (approaching the
initial condition).

The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people affected was quite a lot, because the society around
could use the vegetation for the various needs, such as for the food of their
cattle. The land revegetation with the reboisation will change the local climate
so it will be felt by the society around the project area. The impact was
significant (S).



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-49
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
b) The extent of the impact
The positive impact spreads only in the revegetation area, so the impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The positive impact intensity was quite high and in the long time, so the impact
was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Positive impact of revegetation activity will generate the other positive impact,
for example the daily temperature will decrease so it will improve the potential
quality of habitat that supported the life of many fauna types. Therefore, the
impact magnitude was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The positive impact was cumulative, so the criterion was significant (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn if the vegetation covered area will be reopened, so the
impact was not-significant (NS).

5.1.2.2 Wild fauna
A. Construction Phase
1. The Land Clearing and Maturity
Wild fauna, especially which live in SM Bakiriang, will be disturbed by noise,
vibration and attendance of the worker in all of the activity. Land clearing for the
installation of pipe line alternative-1 that was parallel to province road in SM
Bakiriang and for the construction BS and development wells in Sukamaju which has
border with the forest of SM Bakiriang, will decline the quality and the area width of
fauna habitat. Habitat of Maleo bird will decrease, because certain plantation that
becames food for Maleo will decrease. So, the bird often met nowadays near the
well of Sukamaju-1, after the Existence of development well drilling in Sukamaju-2
and gas production facility development (BS), will move into the forest of SM
Bakiriang. Wild fauna in SM Bakiriang also experience of the trouble when ROW plan
of the installation of pipeline alternative-1 that parallel to the province road was
used by all hunter to enter the forest, and opened ROW means the wide land
clearing area. The impact for the wild fauna represented the impact to land clearing.
So, the construction phase activity will cause the degradation of wild fauna variety.
The variety of animal type in activity area was good (scale 4), with the existing
variety type = 30, and there are 4 types protected fauna. Activity of land

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-50
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
preparation was predicted to cause the decreasing of variety and abundance of
fauna as an effect of the loss of land covered by vegetation (including food supply,
place take a rest, food hunt and other place). A half member of population which
live in activity area will decrease because there was no time to move (its mobility
ability was low and the land execution for area preparation goes quickly). In the
other part, especially the fauna with high mobility, for example certain bird group,
still able to move to another place around the area. In this new place, the new
population will create the new population balance. The land clearing and maturity
activity will cause fauna migration in the project area so the abundance and wild
fauna variety in activity location and in vicinity will decrease into 26 fauna types and
there was no protected animal type (scale 2) and the impact was average negative
(-2).
The level of significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
Number of people affected by the Existence of fauna migration as an effect of
the noise and also loss of habitat to clearing activity was relatively small. The
existing of fauna has not been exploited by resident, therefore impact category
was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was higher than activity plan width
because the fauna has migration to the others habitats outside the original
habitat. The impact was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity and the impact duration are quite long, so the impact criterion was
significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The fauna migration to other habitat causes the loss for pollinating agent of
flora around activity location (for example: bird, insect) and it will influence
other component at upline level, so the impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was cumulative. The impact category was significant (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn, so the impact criterion was not-significant (NS).



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-51
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
2. BS and GPF Facility Construction
The activity of block station and gas production facility construction will increase
noise, dirt and gas emission in vicinity area. Noise was one of main intruder type for
fauna, such as bird, mammalians, and reptile. Bird was very sensitive to noise, so
during the activity, the fauna will move to avoid source of noise and look for new
place. There are 30 fauna types in activity area and among of them, there were 4
protected fauna type (scale 4). However, if the noise has gone, fauna will soon
change to their original habitat, so that impact magnitude was small (-1).

The level of significant impact as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that was affected by fauna migration because of noise to
main building and supporting construction activity was very small. Fauna has not
been exploited yet by resident; therefore the impact category was not-
significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was higher than activity plan width
because the fauna has migrated to the others habitats outside the original
habitat. The impact was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity of the impact was small, so the other components (density and
fauna diversity) are relatively high. The impact duration takes place only in a
moment. The fauna will migrate during the activity that causes noise. The
impact criterion was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The fauna migration to other habitat will cause the loss of pollinating agent for
flora around the activity location (for example: bird, insect) and it will influence
other component at the upline level, so the impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was not cumulative, because the intensity was relatively small and
temporary. The impact category was not-significant (NS).



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-52
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn after the noise disappeared, the fauna will change to their
original habitat. The impact criterion was not-significant (NS).

3. The Installation of Gas Transmission Pipe
Installation activity of pipe in general will not reduce natural vegetation community
as fauna habitat. But considering that at certain segment, the installation of pipe line
will pass SM Bangkiriang, which was animal conservation area, hence the study of
pipe line installation that passed SM Bakiriang gives 3 alternatives.
The Installation activity of pipe line alternative-1 (installation in normal drilling) and
alternative-2 (HDD), empirically will not reduce the vegetation community
significantly, and installation of pipe in the coastline will influence migration line of
Maleo bird that used to lay eggs in the coast. Eventhough there are still some
animal types that are protected by SM Bakiriang, for example babirusa and
Rangkong bird, hence its Existence around location project needs an attention.
Some sensitive and shy animal types will avoid the activity of project, while the
tolerant types will stay around the project. To installation activity of pipe line
alternative-1 and alternative-2, the impact for wild fauna was average negative (-2)
and it was only happened during pipe installation activity.

The level of the significant impact was presented below:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people affected to fauna migration caused by installation activity
of pipe line alternative-1 and alternative-2 does not exist directly. Fauna has not
been exploited by resident; therefore impact category was not-significant
(NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of impact spreading was higher than activity plan width because
the fauna has migrated to the other habitats. The impact was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity of the impact was small. The duration impact took place only a
moment, and the fauna will migrate during the activity that causes noise. The
impact criterion was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-53
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The fauna migration to other habitat will cause the loss of pollinating agent for
flora around the activity location (for example: bird, insect) and it will influence
other component at the upline level, so the impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was cumulative, so that the category was significant (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn, so the criterion was not-significant (NS).

Meanwhile the installation of pipe line alternative-3 will cross the SM Bangkiriang
coast line and sea. In SM Bakiriang, there are several types of protected wild fauna;
one of them was Maleo bird. This bird type will migrate to coast area to lay eggs.
With Existence of installation activity of pipe line alternative-3 which passed coastal
line and sea, hence it will give a real high affect to this animal (-3). Condition of wild
fauna that was initially has scale environmental quality of 4, will decrease to scale 1
(loosing the protected animal to the location activity).

The level of the impact significance as follows:
a) The number of people affected
There are no people affected by this activity. The existing fauna has not been
exploited by the resident. The impact category was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was higher than activity width plan
because the fauna has migrated to the others habitats. The impact was
significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity and the impact are in long period, so the category was
significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The extinction of the protected animal (Maleo bird) will affect the number of
other component, so the criterion was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was cumulative, because the intensity was high and permanent. The
impact category was significant (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-54
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will not turn, so that the criterion was significant (S).

B. Post Operational Phase
1. Revegetation
The activity that will affect animal at post operational phase was revegetation. The
ex-location which has been unloaded and cleaned will be revegetated and it will
increase the variety and animal abundance. At the initial condition there were 26
fauna types (scale 2). The revegetation activity will bring back the condition, as it
was estimated there will be 30 types and the change of some protected fauna types
(scale 4). This was because this activity will make the area more green, covered by
vegetation. Thus, the revegetation indirectly will give positive average (+2) affect
the fauna.
The level of the impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
This activity will increase the animal diversity so that in the end it has advantage
for the society around the area. So, the impact category was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width was not wide, so the impact category was not-significant
(NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The positive impacts intensity was quite high for a long time, therefore the
impact category was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Positive impact of the revegetation activity will generate the other positive
impact. The process will progressively improve the ecosystem stability in that
region, and it will give the other positive impact such as decreasing of pest
population and improving the regional esthetics value. So, the impact category
was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The positive impact was cumulative, so the impact category was significant
(S).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-55
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn if the area covered by vegetation will be re-cleared, so the
impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).

5.1.2.3 Raw water Biota
A. Construction Phase
1. Block Station (BS) Construction
The activity of Block Station (BS) construction will affect the raw water biota. This
activity will conduct hydrostatic test. Before pre-commissioning, it will be used a raw
water for the hydro test. After several times of hydro test, the water which was
20,000 meter cubic will be discharged into a river that will flows to the sea.
Dismissal waste water of hydrostatic test will decrease the quality of river water and
in the end will disturb river biota. The index of variety which at the initial profile
equals to 1.23 (scale 3) will decline to scale 2 with the variety index = 1. The impact
that affects plankton and benthos was the negative small (- 1 ).

The level of the impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The Existence of the waste water of hydro test in the river will decrease the
abundance and variety of plankton as the main producer and also benthos. It
will influence the abundance of and fish variety, so that will directly affect the
people that usually look for fish in the waters around the activity area. Therefore
the impact category was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact spreading was relatively wide, so the impact category was
significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high but it happens only temporary, therefore
the impact was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Fish are the consumer of the producer (plankton, benthos) in water ecosystem
and will be consumed by organism in its upline level. Therefore, the affect other

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-56
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
environmental component activity was quite a lot, so the impact was
significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative because it was only happened temporary, so
the impact category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact that arises was turned over, because it happens in a moment, so the
impact category was not-significant (NS).

2. The Installation of Gas Transmission Pipe
The pipe installation activity will affect the raw water biota. This activity will conduct
hydrostatic test. Before pre-commissioning, it will use raw water for the hydro test.
After several times of hydro test, water which was 20.000 meter cubic will be
discharged into the river or sea. Beside that, pipe installation activity will crosscut
the river also and generate the turbidity. The waste water to hydrostatic and
turbidity will affect the river quality and in the end it will disturb the river biota. The
index of variety which at initial profile equals to 1.23 (scale 3), then will decrease to
scale 2 with the variety index = 1. Impact that will affect plankton and benthos
represents the negative small impact (-1).
The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The Existence of the waste water of hydro test in the river will decrease the
abundance and variety of plankton as the main producer and also benthos. It
will influence the abundance and fish variety, so that will directly affect the
people that usually look for fish in the waters around the activity area. Therefore
the impact category was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact spreading was relatively wide, so the impact category was
significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high but it happens only temporary, therefore
the impact was not-significant (NS).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-57
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Fish are the consumer of the producer (plankton, benthos) in water ecosystem
and will be consumed by organism in its upline level. Therefore, the affect other
to environmental component activity was quite a lot, so the impact was
significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative because it only happens temporary, so the
impact category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact that arises was turned over, because it happens in a moment, so the
impact category was not-significant (NS).

B. Operational Phase
1. Development Wells Drilling
Water-based Mud that was used for the well drilling must be checked before it was
discharged to river and sea. If there was elements exceeding the quality standard, it
will be processed, also the liquid waste to this drilling activity. If the process was not
perfect, this activity will directly affect the river/raw water biota. The initial variety
index that equals to 1,23 (scale 3) will decrease to the scale 2, with the variety
index = 1. The impact represents the negative small impact (-1)
The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The liquid waste to the drilling activity that was discharged to the river will
decrease the abundance and variety of plankton as the main producer and also
benthos. It will influence the abundance and fish variety, so that will directly
affect the people that usually look for fish in the waters around the activity area.
Therefore the impact category was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact spreading was relatively wide, so the impact category was
significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was small but it happens in along time, therefore the
impact was significant (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-58
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Fish are the consumer of the producer (plankton, benthos) in water ecosystem
and will be consumed by organism in its upline level. Therefore, the affect to
other environmental component activity was quite a lot, so the impact was
significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative because it only happens temporary, so the
impact category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact that arises was turned over, because it happens in a moment, so the
impact category was not-significant (NS).

2. The Operational of Gas Production Facility (BS and GPF)
The impact for raw water biota came to the decreasing of water quality as an affect
of the operational activity of gas and liquid gas. The quality changes, such as
increasing TSS (total suspended solid), turbidity, and oil film that will affect the
water biota especially plankton and benthos, and later on it will affect the fish which
possibly became the society economic sources. The liquid waste before it was
discharged to the river will be processed so that the quality will fulfill the standard.
However, the water quality which was discharged will still be worst to be compared
with initial condition. The decreasing of surface water quality will give the affect to
river biota. The condition of plankton population and benthos in the river around the
activity location which has initial variety index equals to 1.23 (scale 3) will decrease
to scale 2 with the variety index = 1. The affect the raw water biota that was
generated to the gas production facility operational activity was small negative (-1).
The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The liquid waste to the drilling activity that was discharged to the river will
decrease the abundance and variety of plankton as the main producer and also
benthos. It will influence the abundance and fish variety, so that will directly
affect the people that usually look for fish in the waters around the activity area.
Therefore the impact category was significant (S).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-59
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
b) The extent of the impact
The impact spreading was relatively wide, so the impact category was
significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was small but it happens in along time, therefore the
impact was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Fish are the consumer of the producer (plankton, benthos) in water ecosystem
and will be consumed by organism in its upline level. Therefore, affect other
environmental component activity was quite a lot, so the impact was
significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative because it was only happens temporary, so the
impact category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact that arises was turned over, because it happens in a moment, so the
impact category was not-significant (NS).

5.1.2.4 Marine biota
A. Construction Phase
1. Pipe Installation
The Pipe installation of alternative-3 line through the sea will cause the turbidity and
decrease the percentage of coral reef coverage. The damage was relatively small,
less than 5% (scale 1). But the Existence of coral reef was very significance for
other sea biota, such as fish with high economics value. Therefore, the turbidity
resulted by this activity will affect plankton and benthos so it will decrease
abundance and variety of plankton and benthos, to scale 3 with the variety index =
1.13 1.28 to < 1 (scale 2), so its impact was small (-1).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-60
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

The level of significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The small disturbance of marine biota includes the declining of percentage coral
life coverage, will affect directly to the society that look for fish around the
activity area. Thus, the impact was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact spreading was not wide, so the impact category was not-
significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was small but it happens in along time, therefore the
impact was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Coral reef was a fish habitat and the other water organism (benthos) which
becames one of the food chain. So, the impact of this activity was quite high.
Thus, it was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was cumulative, so it was significant (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will not turn because it causes the damage of coral reef as habitat
for marine biota. With the damage of coral reef, the fish abundance in some
place was decreasing, or furthermore, it was extinct. The impact was
significant (S).

5.1.3 Social component
5.1.3.1 Demography
A. Operational Phase
1. The labour Recruitment
The Labour recruitment in operational phase includes: for each drilling of
development well = 118 people, operational 2 BS-GPF = 52 people, and for the
condensate and sulphur transportation = 28 people. To the total labour
requirement, 23.23% represents unskilled labour which could be filled by local
resident, and 76.77% represents the skilled labour was fulfilled by people to outside

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-61
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
of area. This condition will cause the increasing of density in the study area and will
increase continuously with the various activities of this gas development operational
phase. The density in the study area recently was 27 people/km
2
which was
included in very good (scale 5) category. The arrival of labour to outside of area will
not affect to the existing density. It was estimated that maximum density increase
around 31 people/km2 or its impact magnitude was small negative (-1). Therefore,
the levels of density will decline to good or scale 4.

The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
To 198 people who will be involved at operational phase, there are 152 skilled
labour and generally will be filled by the people to outside of area. This number
will not have a major effect on demography condition. This criterion was
included in not-significant category (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The new resident was generally concentrated in some location near the
operational location. The area width of impact spreading was not-significant
(NS).
c) The duration of the impact
Although the labour will work during the operational activity, but considering
that labour was not many, hence the impact intensity was relatively small.
Therefore this criterion was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was employment
opportunity and the public income. The impact magnitude was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact of this activity to the demography composition was not cumulative.
The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact characteristic of demography composition could be turn when the
works period was completed and will not be extended. The impact magnitude
was not-significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-62
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

5.1.3.2 Land Ownership Pattern
A. Pre-construction Phase
1. Land and Plant Acquisition
The width of land acquisition for the various facilities in the upstream division was
295 Ha, including: the location of 17 development wells with the width of 68 Ha,
Manifold Station (MS) with the width of 3 Ha, Block Station (BS) and GPF with the
width of 30 Ha, pipe line "flow line" = 14 Ha, pipe line "trunk line" = 120 Ha, and
new road construction or development of the existing road = 60 Ha. The land was
generally rice field farm and dry field or plantation. The total width of rice field farm,
farm/huma, dry field/plantation in the study area was 48,193.15 Ha; with the detail
width: rice field = 14,528.05 Ha, farm/huma 2,338 Ha, dry field/plantation
14,903.25 Ha, and plantation 16,423.85 Ha. The average ownership of rice field by
society was 2.501 - 25.000 m
2
, and ownership of farm was 5,001 50,000 Ha. If
the average ownership of rice field by the resident was 1 Ha, and for the
agriculture/plantation was 3 Ha, hence it was estimated that the rice field width that
exist in study area was owned by 14,528 people and for the agriculture/plantation
was 5,747 people. Meanwhile, respondent who own rice field are 39.17% or about
0.65% to total land owner; and respondent who has agriculture/plantation was
73.75% or about 3.08% to total land owner. If the width of the land for the
upstream division activity was 295 Ha, and if it was assumed that the other 25%
represents the rice field land, and 75% was the plantation area, hence there will be
74 people who have rice field or 0.51% to total rice field owner, and 74 people was
the plantation owner or 1.28% to total of plantation owner who will experience the
change of land ownership. According to the percentage, the number of resident that
will loose their land was very small, but considering that the land represents their
main source living, hence although the percentage of resident who will loose their
land only 1.79%, its impact was categorized as small negative (-2). Therefore,
pattern of land ownership in the study area which at the initial condition was 3, then
it will decrease to very bad or scale 1.
The level of the significant impact of land and plant acquisition to the land
ownership pattern was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The land and plant acquisition activity for the location of development well, MS,
BS-GPF, pipe line, and improvement or road making will affect land ownership
pattern around the project area. Land that was required for the activity was 295

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-63
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Ha. If the average land ownership of each rice field and plantation around
project area were 1 Ha and 3 Ha of each farmer, hence there were about 74
people of rice field farmer or about 0.51% to total rice field owner, and 74
people of plantation farmer or about 1.28% to total land owner who will loose
their land ownership. Change of land ownership was quite small, but considering
that the land represents their main source living, hence the impact will be felt by
the society. Therefore, its impact category was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was significant (S) because it includes
3 districts in the study area.
c) The duration of the impact
The land was main source of public income, so the impact magnitude was
significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by this activity was the
change of land use and the decreasing of public income. The impact category
was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so the category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact for change of land ownership could not be reversed, or could not be
recovered. But if there was a good compensation, thus the impact was not-
significant (NS).

5.1.3.3 Public income
A. Construction Phase
1. Land Clearing and Maturity
The labour who directly involved in this activity for upstream division in particular
was unskilled labour, around 157 people was local labour. The average family
income of respondent and people who work in the agricultural area was Rp. 750,
000.00. The high income level was included in bad category or scale 2. This
activity has positive affect increase public income especially those who directly
involved in various construction activities. It was estimated that their income will
increase even higher than UMK (Regency Minimum Salary). Their income level could
reach around Rp. 1, 000, 000.00 per month. The increasing of income could be felt

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-64
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
directly by project labour (1.22% to total job seeker or 0.28% to total productive
age residents) at upstream division which covers Toili, Toili Barat and Batui.
The increasing of income indirectly will be felt by local resident that open business
to fulfill the labours needs. Assuming that each business type could serve the needs
of 15 20 people, therefore with 157 labour, there will be 10 residents who will
open business opportunity. The average income to opening business was Rp. 500,
000.00/month for each person, therefore in the study area there will be an
increasing of income directly or indirectly per month.
Unskilled Labour = 127 x Rp. 1,000,000.00 = Rp. 127,000,000.00
People that open business = 10 x Rp. 500,000.00 = Rp. 5,000,000.00 +
Rp. 132,000,000.00

If the average increasing o income of total resident in upstream division with 89,002
people, hence each resident will receive Rp. 1,483.11 per month as a benefit to
project Existence or around Rp. 7,415.56 per household with 5 people family
member. The increasing of income was actually only felt by some resident and not
significantly improve the prosperity of society in general. The impact magnitude was
small positive (+1) because the increasing of income only around Rp 7,415.56 per
family per month, so that public income level that was initially bad (2) will increase
to average or scale 3.
The level of impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people affected or those who get positive impact of this activity
was relatively small, around 1.22% to total job seeker and around 0,28% to
total productive age resident. Therefore, the impact magnitude was not-
significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact category was not-significant (NS). It was the employment
opportunity, especially for the unskilled labour , that relatively felt by the society
around the project area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was not quite high, considering that the number of labour
involved was relatively small and it happened in the short period or temporary.
Therefore, the impact category was not-significant (NS).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-65
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

d) The number of other environmental component affected
The increasing of income was relatively small, so it will not affects the quality or
prosperity of society. The impact category was not-significant (NS).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so the impact category was not-significant
(NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact of this activity was significant (S), because the level of public
income could be turned to the initial condition which was average bad. It will
happen if the project activity has completed.

2. The Construction of Block Station (BS) and Gas Production Facilities (GPF)
The number of labours involved directly in construction BS and GPF are 112 people,
including 39 skilled labour and 73 unskilled labour. The unskilled labour was
generally fulfilled by the local resident who will obtain direct benefit to project. But if
compared to total number of job seeker and the total number of productive age
resident, the percentage only around 0.57% and 0.13%.

Level of income of society that involved in this activity was higher than the standard,
it was exceeding Regency Minimum Salary standard, which has been specified by
the Government of Banggai Regency, around Rp. 750,000.00/people/month.
Assuming that the income level of unskilled labour who directly involved in this
project was Rp. 1.000.000,00/people/month and skilled labour around
Rp.3.000.000,00, hence in study region the money circulation in a month was
presented as follows:

Unskilled labour = 73 x Rp. 1,000,000.00 = Rp. 73,000,000.00
Skilled labour = 39 x Rp. 3,000,000.00 = Rp. 117,000,000.00 +
Rp. 190,000,000.00
The increasing of income will cause the improvement goods and service demand,
also economics activity in the region. But it was estimated that money circulation in

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-66
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
study region generally came to unskilled labour , while the income to skilled labour
will be spent in the outside of area.

The increasing of income will be felt by member of society who was involved in the
employment opportunity. Considering that the labour who involves in this activity
was only 112 people, the resident which will open business opportunity also only a
few. Assuming that there were around 10 people who will open business opportunity
with average income level around Rp. 500,000.00/month, hence the total income of
the society to employment opportunity was Rp. 5,000,000.00/month, hence the total
number of the public income to the employment opportunity in a month was Rp.
5,000,000.00. Therefore, in study region there will be the increasing of income Rp.
78,000,000.00 per month especially to local resident, or Rp. 876.38 per person, or
Rp. 4,381.92 per household with 5 family member. The increasing of income was
actually only be felt by some resident and will not give significant improvement to
the prosperity of society in upstream division in general. Moreover, considering that
the price of daily needs was very high. The impact magnitude was small positive
(+1) because the increasing of income was only Rp 4,381.92 per family per month,
so the initial level of public income was bad (2) or only around Rp. 500,000.00 per
month, will increase to average or scale 3.
The level of the impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people who get positive benefit or impact to this activity of
employment opportunity was 0.57% to total number of job seeker and 0.13% to
total number of productive age resident. Considering that it was only a few
labours involved in this activity (10 people), therefore the impact magnitude
was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact includes in not-significant (NS) category because it was only felt
by the society around the project area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was not high considering that the number of labour
involved was relatively small and the impact was temporary. Therefore the
impact category was not-significant (NS).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-67
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The increasing of income was relatively small and it will not affect the quality
and prosperity of society. The impact was not-significant (NS).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so its category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact of this activity was significant (S), because the level of public
income could be turned to the initial condition which has the average bad level.
It will happen if the project activity has completed.

3. The Installation of Gas Transmission Pipe through SM Bangkiriang
(1) Normal Drilling and Parallel to the Province Road (Alternative-1)
Installation activity of gas transmission pipe by normal drilling and parallel to
province road through SM Bakiriang will involves 156 people, consists of 72
skilled labour and 84unskilled labour. The increasing of income was directly felt
by the unskilled labour. If the level income to the unskilled labour was Rp.
1,000,000.00/person/months, hence the increase of income was = 84 x Rp.
1,000,000.00 = Rp. 84,000,000.00.

The increasing of income was also felt by people who get business opportunity
as an effort to fulfill the needs of construction labour. Assuming that there were
10 people around project tread who will involve in different business opportunity
with average level income around Rp. 500,000.00/month, hence the total
number of the public income to the employment opportunity per month was Rp.
5,000,000.00. Therefore, the increasing of income that was felt by the local
society was around Rp. 89,000,000.00 per month.

The increasing of income has a positive impact, but if it compared to the
number of residents in upstream area, hence the average of income increase
that could be felt by every resident was Rp 999.98/month or around Rp 4.
999.89/month for every household with 5 family member. This number was
relatively small if it was compared to the increasing of daily needs price.
Therefore, the impact magnitude was small positive (+1). Therefore, the initial

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-68
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
condition of public income level that was bad (scale 2) will increase to average
or scale 3.

The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of local resident who directly get the benefit or positive impact
of this activity was 84 people or 0.65% to the total of job seeker and around
0.15% to the total number of productive age resident. The impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was not-significant (NS) because
the impact was relatively felt by the society around the project area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was not high and it happens in the short time or
temporary. So the impact was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The increasing of income was relatively small and it will not affect the
quality and prosperity of society. The impact was not-significant (NS).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so its category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The increasing of income was relatively small. So the impact was not-
significant (NS). Once the project has completed, the decreasing of
income will not be felt by the society.

(2) Horizontal Directional Drilling (Alternative2)
Installation activity of gas transmission pipe with horizontal directional drilling
through SM Bangkiriang involves 156 people that consist of 72 skilled labour and
84unskilled labour. The increasing of income was directly felt by the unskilled
labour. If the level income to the unskilled labour was Rp.
1,000,000.00/person/months, hence the increase of income was = 84 x Rp.
1,000,000.00 = Rp. 84,000,000.00.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-69
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The increasing of income was also felt by people who get business opportunity
as an effort to fulfill the needs of construction labour. Assuming that there were
10 people around project tread who will involve in different business opportunity
with average level income around Rp. 500,000.00/month, hence the total
number of the public income to the employment opportunity per month was Rp.
5,000,000.00. Therefore, the increasing of income that was felt by the local
society was around Rp. 89,000,000.00 per month.

The increasing of income has a positive impact, but if it compared to the
number of residents in upstream area, hence the average of income increase
that could be felt by every resident was Rp 999.98/month or around Rp 4,
999.89/month for every household with 5 family member. This number was
relatively small if it was compared to the increasing of daily needs price.
Therefore, the impact magnitude was small positive (+1). Therefore, the initial
condition of public income level that was bad (scale 2) will increase to average
or scale 3.

The level of the impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The number of local resident who directly get the benefit or positive impact
of this activity was 84 people or 0.65% to the total of job seeker and around
0.15% to the total number of productive age resident. The impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was not-significant (NS) because
the impact was relatively felt by the society around the project area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity quite high and the impact will happen in a quite long
time because this activity was quite complicated. Therefore, the impact was
significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The increasing of income was relatively small and it will not affect the
quality and prosperity of society. The impact was not-significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-70
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so its category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The increasing of income was relatively small. So the impact was not-
significant (NS). Once the project has completed, the decreasing of
income will not be felt by the society.

(3) Gas Transmission Pipe Installation through the Sea (Alternative-3)
Installation activity of gas transmission pipe through the sea involves 156 people
that consist of 72 skilled labour and 84 unskilled labour. The increasing of
income was directly felt by the unskilled labour. If the level income to the
unskilled labour was Rp. 1,000,000.00/person/months, hence the increase of
income was = 84 x Rp. 1,000,000.00 = Rp. 84,000,000.00.

The increasing of income was also felt by people who get business opportunity
as an effort to fulfill the needs of construction labour. Assuming that there were
10 people around project tread who will involve in different business opportunity
with average level income around Rp. 500,000.00/month, hence the total
number of the public income to the employment opportunity per month was Rp.
5,000,000.00. Therefore, the increasing of income that was felt by the local
society was around Rp. 89,000,000.00 per month.

The increasing of income has a positive impact, but if it compared to the
number of residents in upstream area, hence the average of income increase
that could be felt by each resident was Rp 3,587.00/month or Rp 17,935.00 per
household. This number was relatively small if it was compared to the increasing
of daily needs price. This number was relatively small if it was compared to the
increasing of daily needs price. Therefore, the impact magnitude was small
positive (+1). Therefore, the initial condition of public income level that was bad
(scale 2) will increase to average or scale 3.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-71
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

The level of the impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The number of local resident who directly get the benefit or positive impact
of this activity was 84 people or 0.34%. This number was relatively small if
it was compared to the total number of resident. The impact magnitude was
not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was not-significant (NS) because
the impact was relatively felt by the society around the project area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high and the impact will happen in a quite
long time because this activity was quite complicated. Therefore, the impact
was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The increasing of income was relatively small and it will not affect the
quality and prosperity of society. The impact was not-significant (NS).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so its category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The increasing of income was relatively small. So the impact was not-
significant (NS). Once the project has completed, the decreasing of
income will not be felt by the society.

4. The Dismissing Labour
Dismissing labour will decrease public income, especially for the labour who involves
directly in the construction activity. It was also felt by people who open business
opportunity to fulfill the labours needs. Since early phase, there was an agreement
that the labour involved only temporary, that was during the construction, and
hence they already make some preparation for dismissing labour activity. The
impact was small negative (-1) because resident who feel the decline of income was
those who involve in the project, that was 0.35%, so the public income level will
change to bad (scale 2).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-72
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The level of the significant impact was presented as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The number of local resident that will experience the decline of income to this
activity was relative small, only 0.35% to the total number of resident. The
impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact was included in the significant (S) category. Although it was small
but the impact was felt by the all people around the project area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was small and it was temporary. The impact characteristic
was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by the decline of income
was the quality and prosperity of society, and furthermore will affect the public
health. Therefore, the impact characteristic was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, considering that the society will get the other
employment opportunity. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will be reversed; the local people that had lost their employment
opportunity will get the other employment opportunity soon. The impact was
not-significant (NS).

C. Operational Phase
1. The Drilling of development well
The drilling activity for each development well involves around 118 people that
consist of 108 skilled labour and 10 unskilled labour. Assuming that there will be 3
well drilling, hence there will be 324 skilled labour and 30 unskilled labour which in
general will be filled by local resident. The increase of income will be directly felt by
labour recruited by the project or 0.23% of total job seeker, or 0.005% to total
productive age resident in upstream division that covers Toili, Toili Barat and Batui.

Eventhough the average labour income level that involved in this operational activity
was higher than those in outside of this activity, but considering that local labour

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-73
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
involved in this activity limited, hence the increasing of income will not significant.
The Existence of employment opportunity also will not increase the income of local
resident. The skilled labour was generally will not stay or spend their income in the
project area. The drilling activity was quite intensive. It was estimated that there will
be around 50-100 people who will open business opportunity to fulfill the labours
needs, especially the unskilled. The impact magnitude was small positive (+1)
because the increasing of income was only felt by around 0.005% of resident that
was recruited for this project, and 0.11% of resident who have the opportunity to
open business. This activity gives positive impact so the public income level which
was initially bad (2) will increase to average or scale 3.
The level of significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of local resident that get the benefit and positive impact to this
activity was relatively small, because it needs the labour with special expertise.
Although there are another resident who get the benefit as the supplier for
labours needs, such as lodging, food stall, etc., but the number was small, it
was only 10 people. Therefore, the impact magnitude was not-significant
(NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The category was not-significant (NS) because the impact was only felt by
the resident around the project area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact happened in a quite long period, but the intensity was small. The
impact was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component affected by the increasing of income was
the quality and prosperity of society; furthermore it will affect the public health.
Therefore, the impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so its category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact category was significant (S), because the public income level will
reverse to the initial condition once the activity has completed.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-74
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
2. Production Operational in GPF
The gas production facility in BS-GPF consists of 2 units and it will involve 52 labour
that includes 24 skilled labour (46.15%) and 28 unskilled labour or 53.85%. Though
the average labour income level that involved in this operational activity was higher
than the labour who works outside this activity, but considering that local labour
involved in this activity was limited, hence the increasing of income was assumed to
be not significant. The Existence of employment opportunity also will not increase
the income of local resident. The skilled labour was generally will not stay or spend
their income in the project area. It was estimated that only several people that will
open business to fulfill the needs of unskilled labour. This activity scale was not
quite high. The increasing of income only felt by 0.05% people who were recruited
for the project and 0.009% resident who open business, so the impact magnitude
was small positive (+1). The public income level that was initially bad (2) will
increase to average or scale 3.
The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of local resident that get the benefit and positive impact to this
activity was relatively small, because it needs the labour with special expertise.
Although there are another resident who get the benefit as the supplier for
labours needs, such as lodging, food stall, etc., but the number was small, it
was only 10 people. Therefore, the impact magnitude was not-significant
(NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The category was not-significant (NS) because the impact was only felt by
the resident around the project area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact happened in a quite long period, but the intensity was small. The
impact was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component affected by the increasing of income was
the quality and prosperity of society; furthermore it will affect the public health.
Therefore, the impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so its category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-75
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The impact category was significant (S), because the public income level will
reverse to the initial condition once the activity has completed.

D. The Post Operational Phase
1. Dismissing Labour
The dismissing labour activity will affect the declining of public income. It was really
felt by the labour that directly involved in this gas development activity. The
declining of income was also felt by the labour that indirectly involved in the project
such as the local contractors. The local labour who was directly involved in the
project was 0.10%, and people who open business was 0.01%, so the impact was
categorized as small negative (-1). The public income level that was initially bad
(2) or Rp 500,000.00 per month, will became very bad (1) or less than Rp
500,000.00 per month.
The level of significant Impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that was affected by the decline of income to this activity
was quite small, they are the labours who are directly and indirectly involved in
the gas development operational, which was around 0,11% to the total
productive age. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
Although the impact was small but the width of area spreading was included in
the significant (S) category because it was not only felt by the resident around
the project area but also the resident around that initially involved in the
project.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was relatively small and it was temporary. Therefore, the
impact was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component affected by the increasing of income was
the quality and prosperity of society; furthermore it will affect the public health.
Therefore, the impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative considering that the society has the other
employment opportunity. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-76
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will reverse if someday the local resident that was loose their
employment opportunity will get another opportunity. Therefore, the impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).

5.1.3.4 Employment Opportunity
A. Construction Phase
1. Land Clearing and Maturity
This activity will use the unskilled labour and around 157 people are involved. It
means the employment opportunity could be used by local resident around the
study area. The type of business that could be opened to fulfill the labours needs,
such as food stalls, etc.

Considering that the number of labour involved in this activity was quite small, it
was only 10 people that use this opportunity to open business. Several people that
are involved in this informal activity use it as the main or side income. The people
who take the opportunity hopefully will involve the other people as a business
partner or employee. So the business opportunity could be felt by the other people.

There were only few people that open business considering that their location near
the rice field and plantation. In the settlement area, it was less than 10 people who
open the business. The employment opportunity level was bad (2) because the
number was limited and the business type was generally related with the nature.
With this activity, the existing business opportunity will increase into average (3)
with the business growth around 10 11 units that serve the construction activity,
therefore the activity impact was small positive (+1) to the employment
opportunity.
The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that opened business was relatively small, it was 10
people. The construction labour was the unskilled one that cames to around the
project area. The impact category was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was not-significant (NS), and this
employment opportunity was only felt by the resident around the project area.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-77
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was relatively small and it was temporary. Therefore the
impact was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The impact that follows this activity was the increasing of income, society
prosperity, and the increasing mobility of the daily needs equipments, etc. The
impact category was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so its category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will reverse, so the business opportunity will decrease again once
the activity has completed. The impact category was significant (S).

2. BS and GPF Construction
This activity will involve 112 people that include 39 skilled labour and 73 unskilled
labour. It meant the business opportunity could be used by local resident around the
study area. The business was to fulfill the labour needs, such as food stalls, laundry,
lodging, etc.

Considering that the number of labour involved in this activity was quite small, it
was only 10 people that use this opportunity to open business. Several people that
are involved in this informal activity use it as the main or side income. The people
who took the opportunity hopefully will involve the other people as a business
partner or employee. So the employment opportunity could be felt by the other
people.

There were only few people that open business considering that their location near
the rice field and plantation. In the settlement area, it was less than 10 people who
opened the business. The employment opportunity level was bad (2) because the
number was limited and the business type was generally related with the nature.
With this activity, the existing business opportunity will increase into average (3)
with the business growth around 4 5 units that serve the construction activity,
therefore the activity impact was small positive (+1) to the employment
opportunity.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-78
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that opened business was relatively small, it was 10
people. The construction labour was the unskilled one that cames to around the
project area. The impact category was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was not-significant (NS), and this
employment opportunity was only felt by the resident around the project area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was relatively small and it was temporary. Therefore the
impact was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The impact that follows this activity was the increasing of income, society
prosperity, and the increasing mobility of the daily needs equipments, etc. The
impact category was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so its category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will reverse, so the business opportunity will decrease again once
the activity has completed. The impact category was significant (S).

3. The Installation of Gas Transmission Pipe through SM Bakiriang
(1) Normal Drilling parallel to Province Road
This activity involves 156 people that include 72 skilled labour and 84 unskilled
labour. However, considering that number of labour who involves in this activity
was not high, and the skilled labour with higher income will prefer the city
facilities, it was estimated only 10 people who take the business opportunity and
most of them are local labours.

There were only few people that open business considering that their location
near the rice field and plantation. In the settlement area, it was less than 10
people who open the business. The employment opportunity level was bad (2)
because the number was limited and the business type was generally related

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-79
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
with the nature. With this activity, the existing employment opportunity will
increase into average (3) with the business growth around 4 5 units that serve
the construction activity, therefore the activity impact was small positive (+1)
to the employment opportunity.
The level of significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that opened business was relatively small, it was 10
people. The construction labour was the unskilled one that cames to around
the project area. The impact category was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was not-significant (NS), and this
employment opportunity was only felt by the resident around the project
area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was relatively small and it was temporary. Therefore
the impact was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The impact that followed this activity was the increasing of income, society
prosperity, and the increasing mobility of the daily needs equipments, etc.
The impact category was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so its category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will reverse, so the employment opportunity will decrease again
once the activity has completed. The impact category was significant (S).

(2) Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD)
This activity involves 156 people that include 72 skilled labour and 84 unskilled
labour. However, considering that number of labour who involves in this activity
was not high, and the skilled labour with higher income will prefer the city
facilities, it was estimated only 10 people who take the business opportunity and
most of them are local labours.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-80
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Assuming that each business type able to serve 15 20 people, so there was
around 5 6 local residents that takes the existing business opportunity. The
business opportunity of local society has bad quality (2) because the number
was small and the business type was generally related with the nature. With this
activity, the existing employment opportunity will increase into average (3) with
the different business growth that serves the construction activity, therefore the
activity impact was small positive (+1) to the employment opportunity.
The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that opened business was relatively small, it was 10
people. The construction labour was the unskilled one that cames to around
the project area. The impact category was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was not-significant (NS), and this
employment opportunity was only felt by the resident around the project
area.
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity of the impact was relatively high and it happens in a quite long
period because the pipe installation using this technique was complicated.
The impact magnitude was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The impact that follows this activity was the increasing of income, society
prosperity, and the increasing mobility of the daily needs equipments, etc.
The impact category was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so its category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will reverse so the business opportunity will decrease once the
activity has completed. The impact category was significant (S).

(3) The Installation of Gas Transmission Pipe through the Sea
This activity involves 156 people that include 72 skilled labour and 84 unskilled
labour. However, considering that number of labour who involves in this activity
was not high, and the skilled labour with higher income will prefer the city

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-81
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
facilities, it was estimated only 10 people who take the business opportunity and
most of them are local labours. Assuming that each business type able to serve
15 20 people, so there was around 5 6 local residents that takes the existing
business opportunity. The business opportunity of local society has bad quality
(2) because the number was small and the business type was generally related
with the nature. With this activity, the existing employment opportunity will
increase into average (3) with the different business growth that serves the
construction activity, therefore the activity impact was small positive (+1) to
the employment opportunity. Considering that the number of labour involved in
this activity was quite small, the people who take the opportunity hopefully will
involve the other people as a business partner or employee. So the employment
opportunity could be felt by the other people.

The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that opened business was relatively small, it was 10
people. The construction labour was the unskilled one that cames to around
the project area. The impact category was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was not-significant (NS), and this
employment opportunity was only felt by the resident around the project
area.
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity of the impact was relatively high and it happens in a quite long
period because the pipe installation using this technique was complicated.
The impact magnitude was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The impact that follows this activity was the increasing of income, society
prosperity, and the increasing mobility of the daily needs equipments, etc.
The impact category was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so its category was not-significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-82
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will reverse so the business opportunity will decrease once the
activity has completed. The impact category was significant (S).


B. Operational Phase
1. Development Well Drilling
In this drilling activity, the employment opportunity also appeared caused by the
number of labour that involved. For each development well, it will involves around
118 people as a labour, that includes 108 skilled labour and 10 unskilled labour.
There will be 3 parallel well that drilled, so the number of skilled labour involved was
324 people and 30 unskilled labour. Beside that, it was estimated that there are a lot
of other newcamers that works in those development area. This condition gives the
quite good employment opportunity for the local people.

The type of business that could be opened was business to fulfill the labour needs,
such as food stalls, laundry, lodging, etc. Considering that this activity has a very
high intensity and it will happen continuously, so it was estimated that there will be
more than 50 people use this opportunity to open business. Therefore, the impact of
this activity was average positive (+2) to the employment opportunity. The
employment opportunity that was initially bad (2) because only 10 people who open
business in each area, then will increase to good or scale 4.
The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
This activity will involve the labour with special expertise, so the number of local
labour that involves was limited. Considering that this activity works in parallel,
so there are more local labour involved. Beside that, there are many newcamers
who work in this development area. It gives a good employment opportunity for
the local people. It was estimated that more than 50 people who use this
employment opportunity. The impact category was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The width area was significant (S) because this employment opportunity will
develop the others area.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-83
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high because the total number of labour involved
in this activity was quite a lot. Besides, there will be newcamers. The impact
also happens in a long period considering that there are 17 drilling wells. The
impact magnitude was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The impact that follows this activity was the increasing of income, society
prosperity, and the increasing mobility of the daily needs equipments, etc. The
impact category was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so its category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will reverse, so the employment opportunity will decrease once the
activity has completed. The impact category was significant (S).

3. Production Operational in GPF
This activity will operate 2 unit facilities and involves 52 labour that include 28
skilled labour and 24 unskilled labour. Beside those labour, it was estimated that
there are a lot of other newcamer that works in the development area. This
condition gives quite good employment opportunity for the local people.
The type of business that could be opened was business to fulfill the labour needs,
such food stalls, laundry, lodging, etc. Considering that the operational activity time
was long, 20 years at minimum, it was estimated that this area will quite full, with
the newcamers, thus the employment opportunity will grows higher than before. It
was estimated that there will be more than 50 people who use this opportunity to
open business. Therefore the impact of this activity was average positive (+2).
The employment opportunity that was initially bad (2) will increase to good or scale
4.
The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
It was estimated that there will be more than 50 people who use this
opportunity to open the business in the study area as an affect of the labour

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-84
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
who directly and indirectly involves through the local contractor, also many
newcamers that works in this area. The impact category was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width was significant (S) because this employment opportunity was
able to develop in others area.
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity was quite high and it will last in a long period. The impact
magnitude was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The impact that follows this activity was the increasing of income, society
prosperity, and the increasing mobility of the daily needs equipments, etc. The
impact category was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so its category was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will reverse, so the employment opportunity will decrease once the
activity has completed. The impact category was significant (S).

C. Post Operational phase
1. The Termination of Gas Production Operation
The activities in the post operational phase will affect the employment opportunity
that initially used by the society. It was estimated that not all the business
opportunity automatically closed along with the production termination and
dismissing labour activity. There are several types of business that still open,
especially those that has good development. It was only around 10% of business,
especially for the food and drink business that will close. The impact to this activity
was small negative (-1), so the employment opportunity that was initially bad (2)
because in each area only around 10-25 people that open business, will turn to very
bad (1).
The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of local people that will loose the employment opportunity caused
by this activity was relatively small, it was around 10%. Several businesses that

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-85
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
have been settled will not be affected by this condition. The impact magnitude
was not-significant (NS).

b) The extent of the impact
The area width was significant (S) because this employment opportunity able
to develop in others area that use the existing employment opportunity.
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity of the impact was small and only in the certain period (temporary)
so the local people are able to get the other employment opportunity. The
impact category was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The impact that follows this activity was the increasing of income, society
prosperity, and the increasing mobility of the daily needs equipments, etc. The
impact category was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact to the decreasing of employment opportunity was non-cumulative,
considering that people will change to get their employment opportunity; The
impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The existing impact will reverse if local people who loose their employment
opportunity are able to work and run their business again. The impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).

5.1.3.5 Social Process
A. Pre Construction Phase
1. Land and Plant Acquisition
During the land and plant acquisition activity, if there was no clarity on the
execution process and the area replacement cost, it will generate various
interpretations among member of society. One group of society will have different
opinion with other group, even between societies and the proponent. If this
condition grows continuously, it will cause the disturbance of social relation. There
will be around 114 people who will experience change on land ownership and it
potentially generates anxiety or conflict in the society. It could be happened since

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-86
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
land was the main source of income for the people. There are around 40% resident
who was related to the land acquisition process, or the impact magnitude was
average negative (-2). The Social process that initially in a good condition (4),
will turn to bad or scale 2.
The level of the significant impact was as follows.
a) The number of people affected
If the land and plant acquisition for the project area was not well organized, it
will affect the social process, especially anxiety or conflict between society or
with the proponent. Estimating that there will be around 40% of people that will
experience anxiety or conflict related to the land acquisition, thus the impact
category was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was significant (S) because this
activity takes place in 3 districts of the study area.
c) The duration of the impact
The affect the social process (anxiety and social conflict) that was caused by this
activity will be happened in a long period with the quite high intensity, so the
impact magnitude was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component affected caused by the social disturbance
was social anxiety that enable to disturb the security in the society. The impact
category was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The social process disturbance was non-cumulative impact considering that
people was general have open mind. The impact category was not-significant
(NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The Social process disturbance could to be reversed because getting the
compensation for land values according to the agreement. It was estimated that
generally the ex-owner of land will look for other area for substitution. The
impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).

2. The Local Labour Recruitment
This activity potentially caused the negative affect of the social process in the
society. Recently, there are around 12.848 local resident who still jobless or looks

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-87
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
for employment opportunity. Various activities of construction give employment
opportunity for 268 people, covering 111 skilled labour and 157 unskilled labour.
The people that are not recruited for project would feel unsatisfied and jealous to
the people who were recruited, either cames to local area or outside area. Assuming
that all skilled labour for the project cames to outside area, hence the percentage of
local resident recruited for the project as unskilled labour was 1.22% to the total
jobseeker.

Meanwhile, dissatisfaction and jealousy also emerges to local resident that was
recruited for the project because the skilled labour generally cames to outside area
(41.42%) with higher income level than the local labour. This condition in the end
will generate the non-harmonic condition of social relationship, even conflict in the
society. The social relation pattern in society during the time was good (scale 4), but
it will turn into inharmonic condition. However, considering that the disturbance of
social process was relatively small, less than 20% or with impact magnitude -1, so
that social process condition in society which during the time was good (4) will turn
into average (3).

The level of the significant impact was as follows.
a) The number of people affected
The number of labour recruited for various construction activities in upstream
division was 268 people, consists of 41.42%skill labour and 58,58% unskilled
labour. This condition generates jealousy among people who are not recruited.
Dissatisfaction and jealousy also arise between the workers which have been
recruited for work, that was between local labour and newcamers labour. But
considering that proportion of recruited local labour was higher than the
newcamers labour, hence the social process disturbance was relatively small.
The impact was not-significant (NS). .
b) The extent of the impact
The impact to this activity was not wide, only concentrated in the project area.
The impact was not-significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was relatively small and it will not happen in such a long
period because in general the local society has open mind to the newcamers, so

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-88
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
the existing social process disturbance was easy to be cured. The impact
category was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component affected was social anxiety that able to
disturb the security in the society. The impact category was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact to this activity was non-cumulative because social relation in this
society was able to be improved through intensive communication among
immigrant labour and local labour, also among local recruited resident with
other non-recruited resident. Therefore the impact magnitude was not-
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact to the social process disturbance was not-significant (NS),
because it could be cured.

B. Construction Phase
1. Construction Activity of BS and GPF
This activity will involve 112 people, consists of 39 skilled labour and 73 unskilled
labour. This condition affects the social process or social relation pattern in society
because there are a lot of local residents that are jobless and not recruited in the
project. The skilled labour that involves was quite a lot, around 34.82% of total
labour needed, and the skilled labour will be dominated by people to outside of
region. The skilled labour that has high income will have different life style with local
resident. This condition will generate jealousy and social stratification. Social relation
will change by the appearance of curiosity and there will be a social conflict. It
estimated that around 40% of residents, notably the unemployed one, who will feel
inharmonic social relation. The change on social interaction pattern was categorized
into -2. Therefore, the condition of social process which was originally good (4), will
decrease to bad or scale 2.
The level of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
Local labour that involves in this activity generally is unskilled labour and it was
only around 0.57% of total job seeker at study area. This condition causes
jealousy on society. Dissatisfaction and jealousy are also felt among the labour
that already been recruited, that was among local labour with immigrant labour.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-89
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
This condition affects social process that was experienced by around 40% of
society. Its impact magnitude was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
Social process disturbance was not only felt by society around project area but
also society at several districts in the study area. The impact was included in
the significant (S) category.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high because social process disturbance was felt
by a lot of people and the impact happens in a long period, during construction
phase. The impact magnitude includes in significant (S) category.
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by social process
disturbance was the social crisis and security disturbance. The Impact
magnitude was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
Considering that the local people have open mind to the immigrant and easy to
discuss/communicate, the impact was non-cumulative. The impact magnitude
was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact to the social process disturb was able to recovered, so the impact
category was not-significant (NS).

2. The Installation Activity of Gas Transmission Pipe through SM Bakiriang
(1) Normal Drilling Parallel to Province Road
This activity will involve 156 people that consist of 72 skilled labour and 84
unskilled labour. This condition will affect the social process or social relation
pattern in the society. It happens because there are a lot of unemployed local
people and not recruited in the project. Meanwhile, the skilled labour involved
also quite a lot, around 46.15% to total labour needed, and it was dominated by
the labour to outside area. The skilled labour that has higher level income will
have different life style to the local people. This condition causes jealously and
social stratification that generates inharmonic relationship between the labour
also the local people in general. The social relation that initially closed, then it
will change because there was a social anxiety that finally will cause the social
conflict. It was estimated that around 40% of people, especially the jobseeker,

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-90
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
who feel the inharmonic social relationship. The change of social interaction
pattern was classified into average negative (-2), so the social process condition
that was initially good (4), then will decrease into bad or scale 2.
The level of significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
Local labour that involves in this activity generally was unskilled labour and it
was only around 0.57% of total job seeker at study area. This condition
causes jealousy on society. Dissatisfaction and jealousy are also felt among
the labour that already been recruited, that was among local labour with
immigrant labour. This condition affects social process that was experienced
by around 40% of society. Its impact magnitude was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
Social process disturbance was not only felt by society around project area
but also society at several districts in the study area. The impact was
included in the significant (S) category.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high because social process disturbance was
felt by a lot of people and the impact happens in a long period, during
construction phase. The impact magnitude includes in significant (S)
category.
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by social process
disturbance was the social crisis and security disturbance. The Impact
magnitude was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
Considering that the local people having open mind to the immigrant and
easy to discuss/communicate the impact was non-cumulative. The impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact to the social process disturb was able to be recovered, so the
impact category was not-significant (NS).




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-91
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
(2) Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD)
This activity will involve 156 people that includes 72 skilled people and 84
unskilled labour. This condition will affect the social process or social relation
pattern in the society. It happens because there are a lot of unemployed local
people and not recruited in the project. Meanwhile, the skilled labour involved
also quite a lot, around 46.15% to total labour needed, and it was dominated by
the labour to outside area. The skilled labour that has high level income will
have different life style to the local people. This condition causes jealously and
social stratification that generates inharmonic relationship between the labour
and also the local people in general. The social relation that was initially closed,
then it will change because there was social anxiety that finally will cause the
social conflict. It was a estimated that around 40% of people, especially the
jobseeker, who feel the inharmonic social relationship. The change of social
interaction pattern was classified into average negative (-2), so the social
process condition that was initially good (4), then will decrease into bad or scale
2.
The level of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people that was affected
Local labour that involves in this activity generally was unskilled labour and
it was only around 0,65% of total job seeker at study area. This condition
caused jealousy on society. Dissatisfaction and jealousy were also felt
among the labour that already been recruited, that was among local labour
with immigrant labour. This condition affects social process that was
experienced by around 40% of society. Its impact magnitude was
significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
Social process disturbance was not only felt by society around project area
but also society at several districts in the study area. The impact was
included in the significant (S) category.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high because social process disturbance was
felt by a lot of people and the impact happens in a long period of time,
during construction phase. The impact magnitude includes in significant
(S) category.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-92
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected social process
disturbance was the social crisis and security disturbance. The Impact
magnitude was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
Considering that the local people having open mind to the immigrant and
easy to discuss/communicate the impact was non-cumulative. The impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact to the social process disturb was able to be recovered, so the
impact category was not-significant (NS).

(3) Through the Sea Line
This activity will involve 156 people that include 72 skilled people and 84
unskilled labour. This condition will affect the social process or social relation
pattern in the society. It happened because there are a lot of unemployed local
people and not recruited in the project. Meanwhile, the skilled labour involved
was also quite a lot, around 46.15% to total labour needed, and it was
dominated by the labour to outside area. The skilled labour that has high level
income will have different life style to the local people. This condition causes
jealously and social stratification that generates inharmonic relationship between
the labour and also the local people in general. The social relation that initially
closed, then it will change because there was a social anxiety that finally will
cause the social conflict. It was estimated that around 40% of people, especially
the jobseeker, who feel the inharmonic social relationship. The change of social
interaction pattern was classified into average negative (-2), so the social
process condition that was initially good (4), then will decrease into bad or scale
2.
The level of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people that was affected
Local labour that involves in this activity generally was unskilled labour and
it was only around 0.65% of total job seeker at study area. This condition
causes jealousy on society. Dissatisfaction and jealousy are also felt among
the labour that already been recruited, that was among local labour and

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-93
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
immigrant labour. This condition affects social process that was experienced
by around 40% of society. Its impact magnitude was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
Social process disturbance was not only felt by society around project area
but also society at several districts in the study area. The impact was
included in the significant (S) category.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high because social process disturbance was
felt by a lot of people and the impact happens in a long period, of time
during construction phase. The impact magnitude includes in significant
(S) category.
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component was affected by social process
disturbance was the social crisis and security disturbance. The Impact
magnitude was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
Considering that the local people having open mind to the immigrant and
easy to discuss/communicate the impact was non-cumulative. The impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact to the social process disturb was able to be recovered, so the
impact category was not-significant (NS).

C. Operational Phase
1. Labour acceptance
This activity will involve 198 people that include 152 skilled labour (76.77%) and 46
unskilled labour (23.23%). It was estimated that local people only fills the
employment opportunity as unskilled labour and its only reach amount 0,36% of
total jobseekers in the upstream area. This condition will affect the social process or
social relation pattern in the society. Meanwhile, the amount of skilled labour that
was involved also more than the unskilled labour, and it will be dominated by the
people to the outside area. The skilled labour that has higher level income will have
different life style to the local people. This condition caused jealously and social
stratification and it affects the inharmonic relation between the labour and the local

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-94
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
people in general. The social relation that was initially closed then will change and it
finally caused the social conflict. It was estimated that around 40% of people,
especially the jobseeker, who felt the inharmonic social relationship. This change of
social interaction pattern was categorized as negative average (-2), so the social
process condition that was initially good (4) because of the inharmonic relationship
that was felt by more than 75% people, will decrease into bad or scale 2.
The level of the significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that was recruited for the various operational activity was
198 people that generally (76.77%) unskilled labour. This condition caused
jealously to the people who are not recruited. Dissatisfaction and jealously also
felt among the labour that has been accepted, which was between the local
labour and the immigrant. This condition causes the social process disturbance
that will be felt by 40% of society. The impact magnitude was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact of this activity was wide, not only concentrated in the project area.
The impact magnitude was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high and it will last in a long period. The impact
magnitude was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component affected by social process disturbance was
the social crisis and security in society. The Impact magnitude was significant
(S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact for the social process was non-cumulative because social
relationship in the society could be recovered by intensive communication
between the immigrant labour and the local people. Therefore, the impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact to this activity was included in the not-significant category (NS)
because the social process could be recovered.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-95
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


2. The Operational Production Activity in GPF
The operational activity of the 2 gas production facilities in GPF potentially caused
negative affect of the social process in the society. This condition was as an effect of
the Existence of employment opportunity for 52 people that generally (54%)
dominated by the labour that has certain expertise. The people that in general have
no certain expertise or competence in the development gas will be jealous to the
immigrant. The social relationship pattern that was initially good (scale 4) could
change because of this inharmonic relationship that was felt by more than 75%
people, especially between immigrant and local people. Considering that the number
of labour involved was relatively small, it was estimated that the social process
disturbance will be felt by less than 20% of people, or the impact quality was small
negative (-1), so the social process condition will be changed into average (3).

The level of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The labour recruitment activity will involve 52 labour which in general having the
certain expertise that cames to outside area. This condition will generate
jealousy for local society who was not recruited in the operational phase and in
the end, it will cause the social process disturbance in society. Considering that
the labour involved was relatively small or only about 0,22%, hence social
process disturbance will also less than 20%. The impact magnitude was not-
significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact to this activity was relatively felt by society that concentrated in the
project area. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity and the duration of the impact will be felt in a long period.
However, considering that the society basically having open mind to the
immigrant, in the end they could associate with the immigrant. The impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-96
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by social process
disturbance was the social crisis and security in society. The Impact magnitude
was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact for the social process was non-cumulative because social
relationship in the society could be recovered by intensive communication
between the immigrant labour and the local people. Therefore, the impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact to this activity was included in the not-significant category (NS)
because the social process could be recovered.

5.1.3.6 Social Stratification
A. Operational Phase
1. The Operational Production Activity in GPF
This activity needs labour which includes the skilled and unskilled. Almost every
skilled labour cames to the outside area and has a higher education level, better
income, and has different lifestyle to the local people. This condition will cause the
social stratification in the study area. This condition will be even worse if the
immigrant feels that they have higher social status so they will not associate with
local society. In this operational phase, there will be around 352 skilled labour and
54 unskilled labour. There was 86,69% of skilled labour that dominate various
project activity and it will affect the social condition of the society. The existing
social stratification change could be seen to the society who initially works in the
agriculture sector with the lower income. The social classification that will be
happened includes education level, livelihood, and economics with percentage
around 60% or the impact quality was categorized as average negative (-2).
Therefore, the social stratification that initially has good quality (4) then will
decrease into bad (2).
The level of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The social stratification was felt by almost every people in the study area. The
impact magnitude was significant (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-97
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
b) The extent of the impact
The impact was wide, not only concentrated in the project tread. The impact
magnitude was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high and it will happen in a long period. The
impact magnitude was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by social process
disturbance was the social crisis and security in society. The Impact magnitude
was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact for the social process was non-cumulative because social
relationship in the society could be recovered by intensive communication
between the immigrant labour and the local people. Therefore, the impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact to this activity was included in the not-significant category (NS)
because the social process could be recovered.

5.1.3.7 Public Attitude and Perception
A. Pre construction Phase
1. Land and Plant Acquisition
Land and plant acquisition was the activity that causes public perception. Negative
perception to company or proponent will emerge if the process not conducted
through deliberation and there was no agreement in the case of replacement cost
lost. During the time, society behave normally to the activity project, but around
78,33% of society was agree with the project with some suggestions and
expectations. Therefore, the quality of initial environmental profile of public attitude
and perception was good (4). The Existence of land acquisition that was not
accompanied by the good compensation value in the end will generate various
perceptions because of the loss of agricultural activity, the decreasing of public
income, and the difficulty to get the substitution land because of the limited access
and fund. The number of people who are involved in the process was 1,38%, but
considering that the land represents the main source of income of resident and the
process involves many labours, hence there will be around 40% of resident

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-98
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
concerned about the internal impact of this activity, or the impact magnitude was
included in negative average (-2). Therefore, the environmental quality that was
initially good (4), will decrease into bad or scale 2.
The level of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The number of land needed for the project was owned by around 1,38% of total
people that own land in the study area. Considering that agriculture sector
generally was the main source of residents income, hence activity of land and
plant acquisition that was not conducted transparently will have negative affect
the public attitude and perception. Therefore its impact was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was significant (S), because the
activity was in 3 districts in the study area.
c) The duration of the impact
The negative attitude and perception of the society will happen in the long
period with quite high intensity. The impact magnitude was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by social process
disturbance was the social crisis and security in society. The Impact magnitude
was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact for the social process was non-cumulative because social
relationship in the society could be recovered by intensive communication
between the immigrant labour and the local people. Therefore, the impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Negative public perception and attitude which emerge to this activity could be
reversed because the resident will get compensation for their land. It was
estimated that the people then will look for the substitution land. The impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).

2. The Local Labour Recruitment
Labour recruitment activity potentially generates negative affect to the existing
public perception and attitude. This condition was triggered with the Existence of

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-99
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
employment opportunity for the various facilities development in upstream area that
need around 268 people consists of 111 skilled labour (41.42%) and 157 unskilled
(58.58%). The Unskilled labour will be filled by local resident and skilled labour
cames to outside area.
So, there will not be many local residents that are involved in the project. The skilled
labour with higher income level will have the different life style with the local
resident. This condition will cause the appearance of jealousy and social
stratification that will turn to be negative public attitude and perception. However,
considering that there are more local labour recruited in project, hence negative
public perception of project was also relatively small or only around 20% and it was
categorized as small negative (-1). The public attitude and perception that
previously has good quality (4) will decrease to average (3).
The level of the impact significance was as follows;
a) The number of people affected
The number of people affected by this activity was local labour and the
immigrant, there were around 268 people. Skilled labour recruited was generally
cames to outside area and unskilled labour was to local resident with
proportional number. The public negative perception and attitude to the
proponent was only shown by around 20% of society. Thus, impact criterion
was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreading was quite wide because it includes
resident to around the area or outside area of 3 districts in study area. The
impact criterion was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was relatively small and it will not persist for a long period
because in general the local society has open mind. The impact category was
not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by social process
disturbance was the social crisis and security in the society. The Impact
magnitude was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-100
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The impact was non-cumulative. The society around the project are local society
has open mind. The impact criterion was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact to the public attitude and perception will turn into positive if the
impact production works continuously done. The impact criterion was not-
significant (NS).

B. Construction Phase
1. Mobility and Demobility of Equipments, Material, and labour
This activity will generate negative public attitude and perception because the
increasing of vehicle traffic in the project location. The impact was noise, dirt, and
potency of traffic jam and accident. The negative perception and attitude also
emerge with the Existence of labour mobility that involve 268 people, meanwhile
there are still a lot of local resident that was jobless and not recruited by the project.
The total number of recruited labour was 41,42% (skilled labour) that will be filled
by the labour to outside area with higher income level. This condition will generate
jealousy, social difference and inharmonic relationship among all labour and even
with the local resident. The impact magnitude was negative average (-2) because
around 80% of resident are concerned with all of the unexpected things. Public
attitude and perception which was good to the beginning (4) will decrease to bad (2)
The level of significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people affected by this activity was quite a lot; they were the
resident along the mobility line and other local resident that was not recruited
by the project. The impact criterion was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area of the impact spreading was quite wide because it includes several
area along the mobility line that covers 3 districts in study area even in their
outside area. The impact criterion was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact to this activity was temporary, only during the mobility and
demobility activity. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-101
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by social process
disturbance was the social crisis and security in the society. The Impact
magnitude was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative; therefore the criterion was not-significant
(NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will be reversed if the process was well-organized. The impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).

2. BS and GPF Construction
This activity has negative impact for the public attitude and perception as an effect
of the decreasing of air quality, increasing of noise, decreasing of surface water
quality, disturbance of raw water biota, and social process disturbance especially
local resident jealousy to the immigrant labour. The negative perception and attitude
to project was felt by more than 23% of society, so the condition of public attitude
and perception to project which was initially good (4) will became bad (2), and its
impact magnitude was negative (-2).
The level of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people affected by this activity was quite a lot; it was more than
23% of resident around the project area. The impact includes in the significant
(S) category.
b) The extent of the impact
The area of the impact spreading was quite wide because it includes several
area along the mobility line that covers 3 districts in study area even in their
outside area. The impact criterion was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high because this activity was quite complex and
intensive with the long period. The impact magnitude was significant (S).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-102
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by social process
disturbance was the social crisis and security in the society. The Impact
magnitude was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative; therefore the criterion was not-significant
(NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will be reversed if the process was well-organized. The impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).

3. The Gas Transmission Pipe Installation through SM Bakiriang
(1) The Pipe Installation with Normal Drilling Parallel to Province Road
The pipe installation that includes land digging will raise dust and noise which
could disturb public health, the decreasing of surface water quality and
disturbance of wild fauna. In several locations of pipe installation there are
digging material and holes which could disturb traffic fluency and generate
traffic jam. The skilled labour involved was 46.15%, and they came to outside
area with higher income level. This condition will cause jealousy especially to
local labour, so it will disturb social process. Various negative impacts will
emerge to cause negative perception and attitude to project that was felt by
20% of population, or its impact magnitude was small negative (-1). The public
attitude and perception which was initially in good quality (4) will became
average (3).
The level of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people affected by this activity was relative small, which was
less than 20% to total of jobseeker. The impact was relatively felt by the
local labour who was jealous to the immigrant labour. The impact criterion
was not-significant (NS).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-103
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of this activity was concentrated around the project area.
The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact was temporary, that was during the installation activity and its
intensity was not quite high. The impact magnitude includes in the not-
significant (NS) category.
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Considering that impact was only felt by a few societies, so the possibility of
the social crisis and security was relatively small. The impact magnitude was
not-significant (NS).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative because it was felt during the construction
activity. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The public perception will be reversed in to positive if the process was well-
organized. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).

(2) The Gas Transmission Pipe Installation with Horizontal Directional
Drilling (HDD)
The pipe installation that includes land digging will raise dust and noise which
could disturb public health, the decreasing of surface water quality and
disturbance of wild fauna. In several locations of pipe installation there will
digging material and holes which could disturb traffic fluency and generate
traffic jam. The skilled labour involved was 46.15%, and they came to outside
area with higher income level. This condition will cause jealousy especially to
local labour, so it will disturb social process. Various negative impacts will
emerge cause negative perception and attitude to project that was felt by 20%
of population, or its impact magnitude was small negative (-1). The public
attitude and perception which was initially in good quality (4) will became
average (3).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-104
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

The level of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that was affected by this activity was relative small,
which was less than 20% of total of jobseeker. The impact was relatively
felt by the local labour who was jealous to the immigrant labour. The impact
criterion was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of this activity was concentrated around the project area.
The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact was temporary, during the installation activity and its intensity
was not quite high. The impact magnitude includes in the not-significant
(NS) category.
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Considering that impact was only felt by a few society, so the possibility of
the social crisis and security was relatively small. The impact magnitude was
not-significant (NS).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative because it was felt during the construction
activity. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The public perception will be reversed in to positive if the process was well-
organized. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).

(3) The Gas Transmission Pipe Installation through Sea Line
This activity includes put down the pipe in the sea ground, and it will affect the
coast damage which was also the place of Maleo bird to lay their eggs, also
coral reef damages, decreasing of sea water quality, and disturbance of marine
biota. The skilled labour involved was 46.15%, and they came to outside area
with higher income level. This condition will cause jealousy especially to local
labour, so it will disturb social process. Various negative impacts will emerge
cause negative perception and attitude to project that was felt by 20% of
population, or its impact magnitude was small negative (-1). The public

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-105
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
attitude and perception which was initially in good quality (4) will became
average (3).

The level of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that was affected by this activity was relative small,
which was less than 20% to total of jobseeker. The impact was relatively
felt by the local labour who was jealous to the immigrant labour. The impact
criterion was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of this activity was concentrated around the project area.
The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact was temporary, that was during the installation activity and its
intensity was not quite high. The impact magnitude includes in the not-
significant (NS) category.
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Considering that impact was only felt by a few societies, so the possibility of
the social crisis and security was relatively small. The impact magnitude was
not-significant (NS).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative because it was felt during the construction
activity. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The public perception will be reversed in to positive if the process was well-
organized. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).

4. The Dismissing labour
The dismissing labour activity could generate negative perception to the society. It
was estimated that there will be unemployed people to the labour that used to be
directly involved in the project or the local people that fulfill the labours needs
during the construction activity. This condition will not affect labour of the project
because there was a work agreement/ work contract. However, considering that not
all of the labour was ready to face this phase, it was estimated that around 1.22%

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-106
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
of labour will have negative perception to this project or the impact quality was
small negative (-1). The public attitude and perception that was initially good (4)
will be decrease into average (3).
The level of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The number of local people that will loose their employment opportunity caused
by the Dismissing Labour activity was not quite much, only around 268 people
or around 1.22% to total jobseeker. The impact magnitude was not-
significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of spreading was significant (S) because it was not only felt by
the people around the project area but also other people around.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was relatively small and it was temporary until the local
resident get the employment or business opportunity in the operational phase.
The impact was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was the decreasing of
income and prosperity of society, in the end will also affect the public health.
The impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact to the lost of employment opportunity was non-cumulative, it was
estimated that the people will have the other employment opportunity. The
impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turned or recovered if someday the local people that loose their
employment opportunity will have the other employment opportunity. The
impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).

C. Operational Phase
1. Labour Recruitment
The attitude and negative perception of the society will appear because this activity
needs around 198 people, meanwhile there are still many local people, especially
the jobseeker (more than 96%) that was not recruited by the project. The total
number of recruited labour was 76.77%. There will be skilled labour to outside of
area with the higher education level, competence, and income. This condition will

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-107
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
cause the appearance of jealousy and social stratification that brings to inharmonic
relationship among the labour and even with the local resident. The impact
magnitude was negative average (-2) because there are around 40% of people
worried about the unexpected things. The public attitude and perception that was
initially good (4) will decrease into bad (2).
The level of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that was affected by the negative attitude and perception
that was related to this activity was quite much, around 40% of local people.
The impact criterion was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area spread was quite wide because it includes several areas in 3 districts
in study area even in their outside area. The impact criterion was significant
(S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact to this activity last in a quite long period along with the Matindok
gas development operational. The impact magnitude includes in the significant
(S) category.
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by social process
disturbance was the social crisis and security in society. The Impact magnitude
was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so the criterion was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The affect the public attitude and perception will reverse into positive, if the
various impacts are controlled, so that the criterion was not-significant (NS).

2. The Operational Production in GPF
The labour involved in this activity was the skilled and unskilled labour, and it could
generate the negative impact to the public attitude and perception. Besides, there
will be any anxiety related to this activity, also the jealously to the society to the
immigrant labour (46.15%) who have higher education level, competence, and
income than local people. This condition will appears social stratification in the study

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-108
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
area, and it will get worst if the immigrant who has high social status does not want
to socialize and associates with local people. It causes the negative attitude and
perception to the society. The impact magnitude was negative average (-2). The
public attitude and perception that was initially good (4) will decrease into bad (2).
The level of significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
Many people ( 40%) give the negative attitude and perception related to the
social stratification in the society. The impact magnitude was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width was quite wide, not only concentrated in the project area. The
impact magnitude was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high and it happens in a long period, during the
operational phase. The impact category was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by social process
disturbance was the social crisis and security in society. The Impact magnitude
was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The negative public attitude and perception was non-cumulative if there was
any intensive communication among the local people and the immigrant labour.
The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The negative public attitude and perception was included in the not-
significant (NS) category because it could be recovered.

3. Gas Transmission through Pipe
This activity will generate negative public attitude and perception that was caused
by the pipe leakage, pipe explosion, and disturbance of public health around the
project area. Considering that there was socialization about the activity and the
possibility of impact, hopefully it was able to reduce the anxiety. There are around
14% of people who are worried about this activity or the impact magnitude was
small negative (-1). The public attitude and perception that initially has good
quality (4) will decrease into average or scale 3.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-109
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The level of the significant impact was as follows
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that have negative perception to this activity was many
(14%). However, the socialization was hopefully able to increase the society
knowledge and understanding, so it could reduce the society anxiety. The
impact criterion was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The pipe will be planted parallel to the highway location, but there are only
several settlements along the highway, so the impact spreads was not wide. The
impact criterion was not-significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high and it will happen in a long period during
the of Matindok gas development project. The impact magnitude was
significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was social process
disturbs, social crisis and orderliness disturbs in the society. The impact
magnitude was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so the criterion was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The society perception will be turn in to positive when the processing effort also
conducted. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).

D. The Post Operational Phase
1. Cleaning and Demobility of equipments
The cleaning and demobility activity related with the completed of the gas
operational production will conducted through the existing transportation line. This
activity appearing the attitude and society negative perception caused by the
increasing of dust content in the air, noise, road damages, traffic disturbs and
accident. Considering that this activity will not conducted all together and it has
small intensity, estimated its only around 8% of society citizens that have attitude
and negative perception small negative (-1). The attitude and society negative

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-110
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
perception that initially has good quality (4) because of the negative respond that
indicate by around 20% society citizens will be decline into average with the scale 3.
The level of the significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The number of local people that was affected by this activity estimated not
much which was more or less than 8% because the demobility activity was
through the transportation line which relative rarely settlement. The impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The width area of the impact spreads was not-significant (NS) because the
settlement center that was located along demobility line relatively less.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was relatively small and it was persisting in the certain
period and temporary. The impact characteristic was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by social process
disturbance was the social crisis and security in society. The Impact magnitude
was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The negative public attitude and perception was non-cumulative if there was
any intensive communication among the local people and the immigrant labour.
The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The negative public attitude and perception was included in the not-
significant (NS) category because it could be recovered.

2. Dismissing Labour
Due to the completed job contract of the project labour, there was public negative
perception. It was estimated that there will be unemployed people to the labour that
used to be directly involved in the project or the local people that fulfill the labours
needs during the construction activity. Public attitude and perception that was
initially good (4) since only around 21% of resident that worries of project negative
impact, then will decrease to bad (2) along with the increasing of percentage, that
was 74%. Thus, the impact magnitude was negative average (-2).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-111
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The level of significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The number of local people that will loose their employment opportunity caused
by the dismissing labour activity was quite much, 53% of population that
includes the labour that directly and indirectly involved in the project through
the existing contractors. The impact magnitude was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact spreads was significant (S) because the impact
was felt not only felt by the people around the project area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was relatively small and it was temporary until the local
resident get the employment or business opportunity. The impact was not-
significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected was social process and
social anxiety. The impact magnitude was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact to the lost of employment opportunity was non-cumulative, it was
estimated that the people will have the other employment opportunity. The
impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turned or recovered if someday the local people that loose their
employment opportunity will have the other employment opportunity. The
impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).

5.1.4 The Public Health Component
5.1.4.1 Environmental Sanitation
A. Construction Phase
1. BS and GPF Construction
During the construction phase, the activity potentially decreases the environmental
sanitation quality that was caused by insufficient raw water requirement, toilet
facilities, and solid waste. The environmental sanitation condition will be dirty, so
the quality of environmental sanitation was very bad (1) while the initial condition
was average (3). The impact magnitude was negative average (-2).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-112
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The level of the significant impact was as follows.
a) The number of people affected
The people affected are not only the local people but also the existing labour.
The impact magnitude was included in the significant (S) category.
b) The extent of the impact
The area of negative impact spreads was limited in the project area. The impact
magnitude was not-significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
Although this activity was happened everyday, but it was temporary, so the
impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by this activity was
demography, social economic, and public health. The impact magnitude was
significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact of this activity was non-cumulative, because it was felt by society
during the construction phase. The impact magnitude was not-significant
(NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The condition of the environmental sanitation will not change as it was before
after the development construction of gas production facilities has completed.
The impact magnitude was significant (S).

2. The Gas Transmission Pipe Installation
At initial stage of gas transmission pipe installation activity through the land via SM
Bakiriang, Normal Drilling and HDD (alternative-1 and alternative-2), there will be
preparation by making hole to plant the gas transmission pipe using hard
equipment, such as Back hoe. The pipes are transported by hard vehicle, and its
traffic could generate soil surface damage or holes on the road. The holes then will
be filled up with water that in the end could be the place for disease vectors. Also
the waste that was discharged around the location could decrease the quality of
environmental sanitation. The pipe installation with alternative-1 and 2 will decrease
the quality of environmental sanitation. The initial profile of environmental sanitation

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-113
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
was average or scale 3. The environmental sanitation condition becames very bad
(1) with the percentage of sanitation facility use was less than 25%. The impact
quantity was negative average (-2). Meanwhile, the pipe installation through the
sea does not give any affect the environmental sanitation.
The level of significant impact was as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that was affected by this activity was the local people
around the pipe line area. The condition of sanitation will decrease as an affect
of dust, smoke and the environmental condition around the settlement area that
became worse, so it will affect public health. The impact magnitude was
significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact for decreasing of environmental sanitation will spread in the wide
area along with pipe line area. The impact magnitude was significant (S)
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity was quite high because the volume and works difficulty
level was high. It happens in a quite long period, so the impact magnitude was
significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by the decreasing of
sanitation quality was social-economic and socio-cultural. The impact magnitude
was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact of the decreasing of sanitation quality was non-cumulative, so the
impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact to this activity could be reversed. The impact magnitude was not-
significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-114
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM


5.1.4.2 The level of Public Health
A. Operational Phase
1. The Drilling Activity of Development Well
This activity potentially generates impact such as gas/dust and waste that could
affect the public health quality. The labour involved in this project was dominated by
the labour to the outside area. It was predicted that there are many labour that was
separated with their family, so this condition will raise the diseased types related to
the sexual disease (PMS). It could happen since the location around project area
will provide entertainment facilities to service labour/employee and another society
during the operational phase ( 20 years).

All this time, the public health quality was in average quality (3) considering that not
all society could get good health facility and have healthy and hygienic lifestyle. It
was estimated that the condition of public health level will decrease into very bad
(1) since this activity intensity was quite high and it will happen in a long period.
The impact quantity was negative average (-2).
The level of significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The society that was affected by this activity beside the labour was the local
people around the activity location, also the other society. The impact
magnitude was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact was wide because it could spreads to other area
considering that there are open interactions in the area. The impact magnitude
was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this activity happens in a quite long period, it was 20 years,
with high intensity, so the impact magnitude was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by the decreasing of
sanitation quality was social-economic and socio-cultural. The impact magnitude
was significant (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-115
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so the impact magnitude was not-significant
(NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The decreasing of public health could be recovered or fixed with the various
efforts. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).
2. The Production Operational Activity in GPF
This activity potentially generates impact such as gas/dust and waste that could
affect the public health quality. The labour involved in this project was dominated by
the labour to the outside area. It was predicted that there are many labour that was
separated with their family, so this condition will raise the diseased types related to
the sexual disease (PMS). It could happen since the location around project area
will provide entertainment facilities to service labour/employee and another society
during the operational phase ( 20 years).

All this time, the public health quality was in average quality (3) considering that not
all society could get good health facility and have healthy and hygienic lifestyle. It
was estimated that the condition of public health level will decrease into very bad
(1) since this activity intensity was quite high and it will happen in a long period.
The impact quantity was negative average (-2).

The level of significant impact:
a) The number of people affected
The society that was affected by this activity beside the labour was the local
people around the activity location, also the other society. The impact
magnitude was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of the impact was wide because it could spreads to other area
considering that there are open interactions in the area. The impact magnitude
was significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this activity happens in a quite long period, it was 20 years,
with high intensity, so the impact magnitude was significant (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-116
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component that was affected by the decreasing of
sanitation quality was social-economic and socio-cultural. The impact magnitude
was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non-cumulative, so the impact magnitude was not-significant
(NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The decreasing of public health could be recovered or fixed with the various
efforts. The impact magnitude was not-significant (NS).

The recapitulation result of significant impact of Matindok Gas Development Project at
Upstream Division at Banggai Regency Central Sulawesi was presented on the following
table.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-117
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 5.8. Matrix of Significant Impact
Matindok Gas Development Project Plan
Upnstream Division at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi

I mpact Criterion
Activity Phase Activity Plan Environmental Parameter
1 2 3 4 5 6
Total
Number of
Significant
I mpact
(S)
A. Pre
Construction
1.Land and Plant
Acquisition
Land ownership pattern S S S S NS NS 4S
Social Process S S S S NS NS 4S
Public Attitude and Perception S S S S NS NS 4S

2. Labour Recruitment Social Process NS S NS S NS NS 2S
Public Attitude and Perception NS S NS S NS NS 2S

B. Construction 1. Mobility and Air Quality S S NS S NS NS 3S
Demobility of Noise NS S NS S NS NS 2S
Equipments Traffic Safety S S S S NS NS 4S
Road and Bridge Damage S S S S S S 6S
Public Attitude and Perception S S NS S NS NS 3S

2. Land Clearing and Air Quality NS NS NS S NS NS 1S
Maturity Noise S NS NS NS NS NS 1S
Soil erosion S S NS S NS S 4S
Vegetation NS NS S S S NS 3S
Wild Fauna NS S S S S NS 4S
Public Income NS NS NS NS NS S 1S
Employment Opportunity NS NS NS S NS S 2S

3 BS & GPF construction Air Quality NS NS S S NS NS 2S
Noise S S S S NS NS 4S
Surface Water Quality S S NS S NS NS 3S
Sea Water Quality S NS NS S NS NS 2S
Wild Fauna NS S NS S NS NS 2S
Raw water Biota S S NS S NS NS 3S
Public Income NS NS NS NS NS S 1S
Employment Opportunity NS NS NS S NS S 2S
Social Process S S S S NS NS 4S
Public Attitude and Perception S S S S NS NS 4S
Environmental Sanitation S S S NS NS NS 3S

4. Installation of Gas Air Quality (alt- 1) S S NS S NS NS 3S
Transmission Pipe (alt- 2) NS S NS S NS NS 2S
(alt- 3) NS S NS S NS NS 2S
Noise (alt- 1) S S NS S NS NS 3S
(alt- 2) NS NS NS S NS NS 1S
(alt- 3) NS S NS S NS NS 2S
Sea Water Quality (alt- 3) S S NS S NS NS 3S
The Disturbance of Irrigation and
Drainage system
S S NS S NS NS 3S
Traffic Fluency NS S NS S NS NS 2S
Traffic Safety S S NS S NS NS 3S
Wild Fauna (alt-1) NS S NS S S NS 3S
(alt-2) NS S NS S S NS 3S
(alt-3) NS S S S S S 5S

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-118
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 5.8. continued
Impact Criterion
Activity Phase Activity Plan Environmental Parameter
1 2 3 4 5 6
Total
Number of
Significant
I mpact
(S)
B. Construction 4. Installation of Gas Raw water Biota S S NS S NS NS 3S
Transmission Pipe Marine Biota S NS NS S S S 4S
Public Income (alt-1) NS NS NS NS NS NS 0
(alt-2) NS NS S NS NS NS 1S
(alt-3) NS NS S NS NSN NS 1S
Employment Opportunity (alt-1) NS NS NS S NS S 2S
(alt-2) NS NS S S NS S 3S
(alt-3) NS NS S S NS S 3S
Social Process (alt-1) S S S S NS NS 4S
(alt-2) S S S S NS NS 4S
(alt-3) S S S S NS NS 4S
Public Attitude and Perception
(alt-1)
NS NS NS NS NS NS 0
Public Attitude and Perception
(alt-2)
NS NS NS NS NS NS 0
Public Attitude and Perception
(alt-3)
NS NS NS NS NS NS 0
Environmental Sanitation (alt-1) S S S NS NS NS 3S
(alt-2) S S S NS NS NS 3S
(alt-3) NS NS NS NS NS NS 0
5. Dismissing Public Income NS S NS S NS NS 2S
Labour Public Attitude and Perception NS S NS S NS NS 2S

C. Operational 1.Labour Demography NS NS NS S NS NS 1S
Recruitment Social Process S S S S NS NS 4S
Public Attitude and Perception S S S S NS NS 4S

2. Drilling of Air Quality NS NS S NS NS NS 1S
Development Wells Surface Water Quality S S NS S NS NS 3S
Sea Water Quality NS NS NS S NS NS 1S
Raw water Biota S S S S NS NS 4S
Public Income NS NS NS S NS S 2S
Employment Opportunity S S S S NS S 5S
Social Stratification S S S S NS NS 4S
Public Attitude and Perception S S S S NS NS 4S
Level of Public Health S S S NS NS S 4S

3. Production Air Quality S S S NS NS NS 3S
Operational in GPF Noise NS NS S NS NS NS 1S
Surface Water Quality S S NS S S NS 4S
Raw water Biota S S S S NS NS 4S
Public Income NS NS NS S NS S 2S
Employment Opportunity S S S S NS S 5S
Social Process NS NS NS S NS NS 1S
Level of Public Health S NS S S S NS 4S

4. Gas pipe Public Attitude and Perception NS NS S S NS NS 2S
Transmission
5. Condensate and Traffic Safety S S S S NS NS 4S
Sulphur through Road and Bridge Damage S S S S S S 6S
Land Transportation


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-119
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 5.8. continued

Impact Criterion
Activity Phase Activity Plan Environmental Parameter
1 2 3 4 5 6
Total
Number of
Significant
I mpact
(S)

D. Post
Operational
1. Termination of Gas
Production Operational
Air Quality NS NS NS S NS NS 1S
Noise NS S NS S NS NS 2S
Surface Water Quality NS NS S S NS NS 2S
Sea Water Quality NS NS S S NS NS 2S
Employment Opportunity NS NS NS S NS NS 1S

2. Cleaning and Traffic Safety S S NS S NS NS 3S
Demobility of Road Damage S S NS S S S 5S
Equipment Public Attitude and Perception NS NS NS S NS NS 1S

3. Revegetation Vegetation S NS S S S NS 4S
Wild fauna S NS S S S NS 4S

4. Dismissing Labour Public income NS S NS S NS NS 2S
Public Attitude and Perception S S NS S NS NS 3S


Note:
Number (1), (2), and (3) indicate activity alternatives.




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-120
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
5.2 PREDICTION OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OF THE DOWNSTREAM DI VISI ON
5.2.1 Geo-Physics-Chemical Component
5.2.1.1 Ambient Air Quality
A. Construction Phase
1. Construction of LNG Refinery and Special Port at Uso
The number of impact that was caused by Construction of LNG Refinery and Special
Port at Uso was average negative (-2). This statistic cames to initial environmental
air quality (RLA) = Good (scale 4) and during the activity of Special Port
construction, the air quality was decreased into bad (scale 2), based on:
The ambient air quality will be decrease because of the increasing of several air
parameter contains such as: PM
10
(caused by the increase of dust concentrate in
the ambient air), SO
2
, CO, NO
2
, hydrocarbon (to hard equipment emission that
was used for construction of Special Port).
The Index of Air Pollution Standard (ISPU) during the activity was estimated to be
200-299, it means that air environmental = 2 (bad).
Therefore, the air quality was decreasing to good (scale 4) with ISPU 51-100, to bad
(scale 2) with ISPU 200-299 (according to Table 5.1).
Degree of The significant impact was described as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The construction of LNG Refinery and Special Port will have a negative impact
for human. The people settlement was located along the mobility line, so it was
estimated that there was a quite many society affected by the impact of this
activities. So this criterion was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact was Significant (S), because the construction of LNG
Refinery and Special Port at Uso occupied the area of 200 Ha, and mobility of
vehicle for material passes the settlement area.
c) The duration of the impact
The duration of the impact was 40 years, thus the impact criterion was
Significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The number of other environmental component affected was human and fauna,
thus the criterion was Significant (S).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-121
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact has no cumulative nature of the impact because the air quality
parameter has not experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications. So this
criterion was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact was reversible when the construction was done, the air quality will
be back as the initial condition. So this criterion was not-significant (NS).

2. Construction of LNG Refinery and Special Port at Padang
The number of impact that caused by Construction of LNG Refinery and Special Port
at Padang was average negative (-2). This statistic cames to initial environmental
air quality (RLA) = Good (scale 4) and during the activity of Special Port
construction, the air quality was decreasing into bad (scale 2), based on:
The ambient air quality will be decrease because of the increasing of several air
parameter contains such as: PM
10
(caused by the increase of dust concentrate in
the ambient air), SO
2
, CO, NO
2
, hydrocarbon (to the hard equipment emission that
was used for construction of Special Port).
The Index of Air Pollution Standard (ISPU) during the activity was estimated to be
200-299, it means that air environmental = 2 (bad).
Therefore, the air quality was decreasing to good (scale 4) with ISPU 51-100 to bad
(scale 2) with ISPU 200-299 (according to Table 5.1).
Degree of The significant impact was described as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The construction of LNG Refinery and Special Port will have a negative impact
for human. The people settlement was located along the mobility line, so it was
estimated that there was a quite many society affected by the impact of this
activities. So this criterion was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact was Significant (S), because the construction of LNG
Refinery and Special Port at Uso occupies the area of 200 Ha, and mobility of
vehicle for material passes the settlement area.
c) The duration of the impact
The duration of the impact was 40 years, thus the impact criterion was
Significant (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-122
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

d) The number of other environmental component affected
The number of other environmental component affected was human and fauna,
thus the criterion was Significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact has no cumulative nature of the impact because the air quality
parameter has not experienced bioaccumulation or biomagnifications. So this
criterion was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact was reversible when the construction was done, the air quality will
be back as the initial condition. So this criterion was not-significant (NS).

B. Operational Phase
1. Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port, and Support Facilities
The number of impact that was caused by operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port
and its support facilities at Padang was average negative (-2). This statistic cames to
initial environmental air quality (RLA) = Good (scale 4) and during the activity of
Special Port construction, the air quality was decreasing into bad (scale 2), based
on:
According to the result of modeling with stack height = 20 m, the maximum
concentrate of gas emission spreading was on 1665 m with SO
2
concentrate =
0.00929 gr/m
3
, NOx = 2.66gr/m
3
, and CO = 0.3755 gr/m
3
. Based on the
modeling result, air quality was still under the quality standard. The gas emission
modeling result was presented at Appendix 15.
Therefore, the air quality was decreasing to good (scale 4) with ISPU 51-100 to bad
(scale 2) with ISPU 200-299 (according to Table 5.1).
Significant impact level:
a) The number of people affected
The operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port and its support facilities only
affected the labour, thus the impact was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact was significant (S) because the activity takes place
in area of 300 Ha.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-123
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

c) The duration of the impact
The operational of refinery takes place in a long period and has high intensity.
Therefore the impact criterion was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The number of other environmental component affected was human and fauna,
thus the criteria was Significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact has no cumulative nature of the impact because the air quality
parameter has not experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications. So this
criterion was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact was reversible when the operational of LNG Refinery was done, the
air quality will be back to the initial condition. So this criterion was not-
significant (NS).

C. Post Operational Phase
1. Termination of LNG Refinery Operational
During the post operational phase, the operational activity has terminated and it will
give positive affect the air quality, to bad (scale 2) to the average (scale 3) with
ISPU 101-199, thus the impact magnitude was small positive (+1).
The following describes the impact significant degree of the environmental air
quality caused by termination of LNG Refinery operational.
a) The number of people affected
The operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port and its support facilities only
affected the labour, thus the impact was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact was significant (S) because the activity takes place
in area of 200 Ha.
c) The duration of the impact
The termination of LNG Refinery operational will last forever and the air quality
will be better, thus the impact criterion was not-significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-124
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

d) The number of other environmental component affected
The number of other environmental component affected was flora and fauna,
thus the criteria was Significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact has no cumulative nature of the impact because the air quality
parameter has not experience bioaccumulation or biomagnifications. So this
criterion was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact was reversible when the operational of LNG Refinery was done, the
air quality will be back as the initial condition. So this criterion was not-
significant (NS).

2. Cleaning and Demobility of Equipment (Refinery and Special Port)
The scale for initial profile of air quality was 4. The impact magnitude as a result of
cleaning and demobility of equipment (refinery and special port) was small negative
(-1). This number cames to the initial environmental profile, that was good (scale 4)
which has ISPU value 51-100, then it decreases to average (scale 3) with ISPU value
101-199. This consideration was based on:
The ambient air quality will decrease because of the increasing of several air
parameter contains such as: PM
10
(caused by the increase mobility of vehicle),
SO
2
, CO, NO
2
, hydrocarbon.
The ISPU during the activity was estimated to be 101 199. It means
environmental air quality = average (3).
Significant impact level was outlined as below:
a) The number of people affected
The number of human that was affected was high, also was the hard vehicle.
The refinery area and special port was near settlement area, thus the impact
was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area of impact dwaspersion was quite large because it passed settlement
area. The impact criteria was significant (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-125
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

c) The duration of the impact
The intensity of impact was small and its duration was short, then the impact
criteria was not-significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component affected was public attitude and
perception, thus the impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The decreasing of air quality due to the increase of PM
10
was not cumulative,
therefore the impact was not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact was reversible when activity was done, the air quality will be back to
the initial condition. So this criterion was not-significant (NS).

5.2.1.2 Noise
A. Construction Phase
1. Construction of LNG Refinery and Special Port
LNG Refinery construction activity was predicted to improve noise at project site and
its surroundings. The noise level was predicted to be 70 dB(A). According to
environmental quality scale, the noise level has the environmental quality = scale 2
(bad). The initial environment profile (scale 4) will decrease to scale 2. The impact
magnitude resulted was negative average (-2). Therefore, the initial condition, that
was scale 4 with noise level = 55 dB(A), will increase to 70 dB(A). It means the
environmental condition was bad (scale 2). The calculation result could be seen in
appendix.
Significant impact level was outlined as below:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people affected by LNG Refinery construction activity are many,
covering construction labour, resident and provider of goods and service at
around project site. Therefore this impact criterion was significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact was significant (S), because LNG Refinery
construction activity occupied vast area, about 200 Ha.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-126
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

c) The duration of the impact
Noise impact will be felt by human and other living thing to the beginning of
development until operational phase; therefore this criterion was significant
(S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other components that will be incurred by the impact are flora, fauna and biota
at the construction area of gas production facilities and LNG Refinery. Therefore
this criterion was categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
There are no cumulative impacts for this parameter, because no
bioaccumulation and biomagnifications happened to the noise impact, so this
criterion was categorized as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Characteristic of impact was reversible because noise level could be improved
after the activity was over, so this criterion was categorized as not significant
(NS).

B. Operational Phase
1. Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port, and Support Facilities
The impact magnitude resulted was negative average (-2). According to
environmental quality scale, the noise level has the environmental quality scale 2
(bad). The initial environment profile (scale 4) will descent becoming scale 2.
Therefore, the initial condition, that was scale 4 with noise level = 55 dB(A), will
increase to 64,81 dB(A.) It means the environmental condition was bad (scale 2).
Significant impact level was outlined as below:
a) The number of people affected
The operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port and its support facilities only
affected the labour, thus the impact was not-significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact was significant (S), because LNG Refinery
construction activity occupies vast area about 200 Ha.
c) The duration of the impact
The operational of refinery takes place during the operational of LNG Refinery,
Special Port and its support facility. Therefore the impact criterion was
significant (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-127
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other components that will be incurred by the impact are flora and fauna at the
construction area of gas production facilities and LNG Refinery. Therefore this
criterion was categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
There are no cumulative impacts for this parameter, because no
bioaccumulation and biomagnifications happened to the noise impact, so this
criterion was categorized as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Characteristic of impact was reversible because noise level could be improved
after the activity was over, so this criterion was categorized as not significant
(NS).

C. Post Operational Phase
1. Termination of LNG Refinery Operational
On the phase of post operation, the operation has stopped and it will give a positive
affect the noise level. To the prediction, the noise level was scale 2, with noise level
= 64-77 dB(A), will change to 3, with noise level = 63-71 dB(A), so the grade was
small positive impact (+1).
The grade of impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
On the phase of termination of gas and LNG factory operation activities, it will
only affect people who are working in there. That was why it was considered as
not significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area width of spreading was categorized as significant (S), because the
activities are held in a wide area around 300 Ha.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of the termination of gas and LNG factory operation activities will be
felt forever and the air quality will became better. That was why the impact was
categorized as not significant (NS).




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-128
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other components that were affected are flora and fauna around the LNG
factory was quite large. Therefore to the components perception, it was
categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non accumulative because the air quality parameters will not
going through bio-accumulation nor bio-magnification. Criteria was categorized
as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will reverse after the LNG operational activities ended. The noise
level will became as it was at initial condition. Therefore, it was valued as not
significant (NS).


5.2.1.3 Surface Water Quality
A. Construction Phase
1. LNG Refinery and Special Port Activity
Construction activity of gas production facilities and LNG Refinery are tentative but it
was predicted to decrease river water quality and cause spilled of several materials,
fuel, hydro test waste water, and waste water of tools cleaning before
commissioning. Impact magnitude forecasting of surface water quality during
construction of BS and GPF was negative two (-2). The number was derived to initial
environmental quality of surface water/river, that was good (scale 4), which has
turbidity level = 6-20 NTU, and during the construction of LNG Refinery and special
port, where the quality will decreases to bad (scale 2) because there was an
increase of turbidity level = 45-90 NTU.
Significant impact level was outlined as below:
a) The number of people affected
Number of human being incurred by construction activity of gas production
facilities and LNG Refinery was predicted to be quite a lot. They are construction
labour, resident around the project area, and people who are exploiting business
opportunity at informal sector. Therefore, this criterion was categorized as
significant (S).



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-129
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact was significant (S), because LNG Refinery
construction activity occupies vast areal about 200 Ha.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this parameter will be felt by human and other living thing to the
beginning of development until the operational phase; therefore this criterion
was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other component that will be incurred by the impact are flora, fauna and sea
biota around construction area of gas production facilities and LNG Refinery.
Therefore, it was categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
There are no cumulative impacts for this parameter, because no
bioaccumulation and biomagnifications happened to this impact, so this criterion
was categorized as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Characteristic of impact was reversible because surface water quality could be
improved after the activity was over, so it was categorized as not significant
(NS).

B. Post Operational Phase
1. Termination of LNG Refinery
On the post operation phase, the operational has stopped and will have a positive
affect to the quality of surface water. At the initial phase, the scale was 2, with
turbidity level 45-90 NTU, then will change to 3, with turbidity level = 20-45 NTU,
so the impact grade was small positive (+1).
The grade of impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
On the phase of termination gas and LNG factory operation, it will only affect
people who are working in there. That was why it was considered as not
significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The width of spread was categorized as significant (S), because the activities
are held in a wide area, around 200 ha.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-130
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of the termination of gas and LNG factory operation will be felt
forever and the surface water quality will became better. That was why the
impact was categorized as not significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other components affected are a large number of flora and fauna around the
LNG factory. Therefore, to the components perception, it was categorized as
significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non accumulative because the noise level parameters will not
going through bio-accumulation and bio-magnification. Criteria was categorized
as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will turn around after the LNG operational activities has ended. The
noise level will became as in the initial condition. Therefore, it was valued as
not significant (NS).

5.2.1.4 Seawater Quality
A. Construction Phase
1. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port
Impact magnitude forecasting of sea water quality for construction activity of gas
production facilities and LNG Refinery was average negative (-2). This value
represents the difference of initial water quality (scale 4), turbidity level = 6-20 NTU,
with the scale of air quality at the time when the activity takes place (scale 2). The
decrease was based on the dredging activity during construction of special port that
could decrease sea water quality. The increase was estimated to be 45-90 NTU, and
it was included into scale 2.

Significant impact level was outlined as below:
a) The number of people affected
The turbidity will disturb activity of society especially for the fishermen. Thus,
the impact criterion was significant (S).



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-131
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
b) The extent of the impact
The width of spreading area was categorized as significant (S), because the
activities are held in a wide area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact will be temporary, during the activity of LNG Refinery and Special
Port construction. That was why the impact was categorized as not significant
(NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other component that will be incurred by the impact was sea biota. Therefore,
this was categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
There are no cumulative impacts for this parameter, because no
bioaccumulation and biomagnifications that was happened to this activity, so
this criterion was categorized as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Characteristic of impact was reversible because it could be improved after the
activity was over, so this criterion was categorized as not significant (NS).

B. Operational Phase
1. Operational phase of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and Support
Facilities
Liquid waste that cames to waste containing oil, water to manufacture operational,
water to equipment cleaning, after processed at IPAL then discharged to the sea.
Meanwhile, at Special port area, there might be some oil spill to tanker ship. The
activity will decrease sea water quality, especially to parameters of oil and fat.
The estimation of impact on sea water quality during the LNG refinery operational
activity was average negative (-2). This number was base on the level of initial
environment profile = 4 with oil and fat level around 1-5 ppm, while during the
operational of LNG refinery the condition decreases into bad scale (2) because the
oil and fat level was 11-15 ppm. The number was included into bad environmental
quality scale (2).



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-132
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Impact significance level:
a) The number of people affected
Liquid waste of LNG refinery operation that was processed at IPAL and then
discharged to the sea, may cause the decreasing of sea water quality, however
it will not affect human being in high number. Thus the impact was considered
to be not significant (NS). Number of human that was affected by the impact,
especially fishermen was quite small because it spreads only at 2 km of area.
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact was not significant (NS) because it spreads only at
2 km of area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of LNG refinery operational will be perceived during the LNG refinery
operational. Thus, this criterion was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other environment component that will get impact was sea-biota. Due to the
reason, the environment component side that gets impact was significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was not cumulative because the sea water quality parameter will not
have bioaccumulation or biomagnifications. Thus this criterion was not
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will reverse after the LNG refinery operational has done, the sea
water will like former condition. Thus it was not significant (NS).

C. Post Operational Phase
1. Termination of LNG Refinery Operational
In the post operational phase, the activities has stopped and will have a positive
affect to the sea water quality. To the prediction, the impact scale of environment
quality of 2 (bad oil and fat level = 11-15 ppm) will change to 3 (average oil and
fat level = 6-10 ppm), and it was categorized as small positive (+ 1).




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-133
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Impact Significance:
a) The number of people affected
On the phase of termination of gas and LNG factory operation activities, it will
only affect people who are working in there. That was why it was considered as
not significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The width of spreading area was categorized as not significant (NS), because
the activities are done in a wide area but it could be localized.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of the termination of gas and LNG factory operational will be felt
forever and the sea water quality will became like original condition. That was
why the impact was categorized as significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other environmental components that are affected are the sea biota near the
LNG factory that was quite wide. Impact was categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact was non cumulative because the sea water quality level parameters
will not going through bio-accumulation or bio-magnification. The impact was
categorized as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact will reverse after the LNG operational activities has ended. The sea
water quality level will became like original condition. Therefore, it was valued
as not significant (NS).

5.2.1.5 Land Transportation
A. Construction Phase
1. Mobility and Demobility of Equipments, Materials, and Employees
(1) Traffic Fluency
The condition before activity takes place was fluent, based on the spot
observation and calculation of DS (degree of saturation). It was a comparation
between volume and capacity (V/C). The interval of DS was 0.0-2.0. During
construction phase, the traffic increases, especially for material vehicle, and it
could cause traffic delay at Kintom-Batui-Toili road. It was estimated that there

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-134
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
will be 10 vehicles/hour or 100 vehicles/day, thus the road capacity was
presented as follows:

Table 5.9. Road Capacity during Mobility and Demobility of
Equipments

RLA Construction Activity
Busy
Hour
V
(smp/ h)
C
(smp/ h)
DS
(V/ C)
Scale V
(smp/ h)
C
(smp/ h)
DS
(V/ C)
Scale
Kintom-Batui Road
Morning 108 2,620 0.060 5
128 2,406 0.048 5
Afternoon 96 2,620 0.036 5
116 2,552 0.044 5
Evening 54 2,620 0.020 5
74 2,574 0.028 5
Source: Field Data Calculation with MKJ I, Year 2007

To the calculation of future road performance predicted after the equipment
demobilitys, the scale of environment was constant, so the grade of impact was
zero (nol).

(2) Road User Safety
The collected data field showed that initial traffic condition was traffic with
sensitive accident (TKRi = 3.3), so Existence of hard vehicle traffic will decrease
to the initial environment quality scale 3 (moderate) to scale 1 (very bad), so
the impact magnitude resulted was -2 (negative 2). It was estimated that the
traffic accident will multiply 2 times per year during construction phase.
gristle) 1/very (scale 5.9
365 x 929
6
10 x 2
i
TKR = =

This matter according to factors as follows:
minimal width of road ossification for traffic only 4.5 meters (less than 5.5
meters),
livestock animal quantity left at the roadside,
pedestrian quantity at the road,
average speed of vehicle at straightway about 60-70 km/hour
road width structure caused by parking activity at road body (urban/business
area),
road width was getting narrow at the bridge.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-135
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Road user safety was necessary to be payed, especially at the time when there
are high sized transportation vehicle passes the settlement area and urban area.
Manouvre of hard vehicle could endanger road user and livestock animal that
caused by the road width structure at bridge. Significant impact level was
outlined as follows:
a) The number of people affected
Human being incured by the impact are road users rushing across the
province road connecting Luwuk-Toili Barat. Initial traffic condition was
traffic with sensitive accident, so it was categorized as significant (S)
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact covered the area alongside mobility of equipments,
labour and material, so it was categorized as significant (S)
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this activity was tentative but have significant intensity, so
that this criterion was significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Mobility of equipments, labour and material activity will affect the other
component, such as disturbance of comfort and traffic accident, so it was
categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
There are no cumulative impacts of this activity, so it was categorized as
not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Traffic safety disturbance was reversible impact and tentative because it
could be improved with the traffic arrangement, so it was categorized as
not significant (NS).

(3) Road and Bridge Damage
Road and bridge condition at this time was generally in good performance, but
at several places, they are sensitive with landslide. Road and bridge damage
was usually caused by nature factor Existence (e.g.: flood) at rainy season. The
construction materials transport with MST > 8 ton and repeating load will
increase road and bridge damage level.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-136
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
This matter was caused by dissability of road to support dump truck (DT) with
capacity > 8 m
3
to location of quarry to project location. The determination of
environmental quality for road and bridge damage parameter was based on the
difference value of ITP (Road Hardening Index/Indeks Tebal Perkerasan) at initial
condition with the condition after activity takes place. The assumption to determine
ITP at each road:
CBR of ground soil = 5 %
Rain intensity 900 mm/year
Flat: < 6%
There was material loading using Dump Truck (DT).
There will be a damage if: ITP
1
< ITP
2

The significant impact prediction for road damage was presented at the
following table:

Table 5.10. Equivalent Line of Activity Plan at Each location
Initial condition Conditition at Equipment mobility
Road
BB BS TB TS MP DT LEP BB BS TB TS MP DT LEA
Kintom-Batui 0 0 0 9 14 0 2.70 0 0 50 11 18 50 60.90


Table 5.11. Road Hardening Index at Each Location
Road ITP1 LEP LEA LET LER ITP2 Ket
Kintom-Batui 5.45 2.70 60.90 31.80 15.90 5.80 ITP1 < ITP2


Note:
KR : Light Vehicle
TK : Small Truck
TS : Avrage Truck
TB : High Truck
BB : High Bus
LEP: Initial Equivalent Line
LET : Middle Equivalent Line
LEA : Last Equivalent Line
LER : Planned Equivalent Line
LHR : Average Daily Traffic
ITP1: Road Hardening Index before Activity
ITP2: Road Hardening Index after Activity

Therefore, the environment quality scale of road and bridge damage level will
descend to the initial scale 3 (moderate) to scale 1 (very bad), so impact
magnitude was - 2 (negative 2).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-137
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Materials transportation route will pass the ossified road (makadam), so it was
predicted that the road will experience damage. This matter was caused by
dissability of road to support high loading vehicle (MST > 10 ton). Significant
impact level, are outlined as follows:
a) The number of people affected
Human being incured by the impact are road users rushing across the road
that was used for equipments mobility route. The road damage will
generate unpleasant feeling of the road users, so it was categorized as
significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
Area width of impacts disemination was Kintom area, so the bridge damage
will disconnecting transport route at this area. Therefore, it was categorized
as significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
Mobility of construction material was done during construction phase, so it
was categorized as significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Project vehicle mobility activity will affect the other component such as
comfort disturbance and traffic accident, so it was categorized as
significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
Road and bridge damage are cumulative impacts, so it is categorized as
significant (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Characteristic of the road and bridge damage impact are non reversible until
roadwork was done, so it is categorized as significant (S).

2. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port
(1) Traffic Fluency
Construction activity of Gas Production Facilities and LNG Refinery is at the main
road of Kintom-Batui, so the activity will affect the traffic fluency. Traffic
disturbance are caused by project activity exploiting the road. The condition
before activity takes place was fluent, based on the spot observation and
calculation of DS (DS value: 002-0,06 or at scale 5). The decrease of road

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-138
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
service level was caused by side disturbance of construction activity. The activity
will cause the decrease of road width, and that will make the road becomes one
direction road (3 meter width). It means, DS is 1 at one of road direction. The
average value for each direction is calculated as follows:
DS = (0.06 + 1.0)/ 2 = 0.503 (scale 3/ average)
Therefore the traffic fluency parameter will descent from the initial environment
quality scale 5 (very good) to be scale 3 (moderate), so the impact magnitude
resulted is -2 (negative 2).

Activity of LNG Refinery and Special Port construction will occupy Kintom area
and at province line, and it will affect traffic fluency at the area. Significant
impact level is outlined as follows:
a) The number of people affected
Human being incured by the impact are road users rushing across the
province road connecting Batui-Kintom and resident at this area, so it is
categorized as significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact of gas production facilities and LNG Refinery
construction activity covers Batui, Toili and Toili Barat, so it is categorized as
significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
Disturbance caused by production facilities development activity will happen
during construction phase, so it is categorized as significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Construction Activity of Gas Production Facilities and LNG Refinery will affect
other component such as comfort and accident, so it is categorized as
significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
There are no cumulative impacts of this activity, as traffic arrangement at
bussy hour will return to the normal traffic condition, so it is categorized as
not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Traffic jam is reversible impact because it could be improved with the traffic
arrangement, so it is categorized as not significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-139
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

(2) Disturbance of Traffic Safety
Construction Activity of Gas Production Facilities and LNG Refinery at around the
roadway could endanger road user. Road accident could be caused by several
factors, such as: existence of project worker going across the road, placement
of construction equipments at road body reducing road width structure, and lack
of lighting at night. It was predicted that vehicle frequency is 929 vehicle/day
and the accident will be doubled (2 accident per year) if the traffic was not well-
managed.
gristle) 1/very (scale 5.9
365 x 929
6
10 x 2
i
TKR = =

Therefore, environmental quality scale of traffic safety parameter will descend
from initial scale moderate (3) to scale 1 (very bad), so impact magnitude is 2
(negative 2).

Traffic accident could be happened at crowded project activity (rush hour)
especially with the existence of labour transportation that have conflict with the
current traffic. Significant impact level is outlined as follows:
a) The number of people affected
Human being incured by the impact are road users rushing across the
province road connecting Luwuk-Toili Barat. Initial traffic condition was
traffic with sensitive accident. The existence of hard vehicle traffic will
increase traffic accident level, so it is categorized as significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact will be felt by road users of Batui and vicinity, so it
is categorized as significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this activity is during the construction phase and have
significant intensity, so this criterion is significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Construction activity of Gas Production Facilities and LNG Refinery will affect
other component such as comfort disturbance and traffic accident, so it is
categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-140
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
There are no cumulative impacts of traffic safety parameter, so it is
categorized as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Traffic safety disturbance is reversible impact because it could be improved
with the traffic arrangement based on SOP, so it is categorized as not
significant (NS).

B. Post Operational Phase
1. Cleaning and Equipments Demobility
(1) Traffic Fluency
The equipment demobility process after the termination of construction and
operational phase are done in steps, so the process will not make a significant
traffic increase. In general, the future traffic growth is small, thus road condition
will be the same, that is at scale 5 (DS value: 0,06-0,13) or very good/very
fluent. The change of fluency level as a result of equipment mobility is very
small, it is between 0,040 to 0,075, as it is seen on the following table:

Table 5.12. The Performance of Kintom-Batui Road During Equipment
Demobility
RLA During equipment mobility
Busy Hour
DS
1

V
(smp/ h)
C
(smp/ h)
DS
2

(V/ C)
Differenece
value of DS
Morning 0.060 313 2,406 0.13 0.070
Afternoon 0.036 281 2,552 0.11 0.075
Evening 0.020 169 2,574 0.06 0.040
Source: Field Data Processing with MKJ I, year 2007
From the calculation of future road performance predicted after the equipment
demobilities, the scale of environment was constant at scale 5 (very good), so
that the grade of impact is zero (nol).

(2) Disturbance of Traffic Safety
It was predicted that the road that are going to be passed by the vehicles on
the demobility is still have a tendency of accident along with the growth of
traffic flow. The addition of hard vehicles to the traffic will increase the risk of
road traffic. Assuming that the traffic growth is 2% per year and traffic accident

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-141
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
increases to be 4 times per year (if it was not well-managed), thus the traffic
gristle is calculated as follows:
LHR (2007) : 828 smp/day
LHR (2027) : 1231 smp/day
gristle) 1/very (scale 8.9
365 x 1231
6
10 x 6
i
TKR = =

Therefore, the scale of environmental traffic safety parameters that was at scale
3 will become scale 1, so the impact is negative 2 (-2).

Impact Significance:
a) The number of people affected
People who are going to be affected from the maneuvers of equipment
carrier vehicles are the road users of the province road from Luwuk to Toili
Barat. The initial road condition already has a high level of traffic accident
tendency, so the tendency for accidents will increase because of the heavy
equipment carrier vehicles from the project. Impact is categorized as
significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The areas that are going to be affected by the equipment demobility is the
whole transporting route, so the impact is categorized as significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The disturbance because of the equipment demobility is only in a short
period, so the impact is categorized as not significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The equipment demobility impact is felt by other road users, in form of
comfort and the tendency of accident to happen, so the impact is
categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The transportation of vehicles will only have a temporary impact, so the
impact is considered as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact caused by the equipment demobility is only temporary when the
vehicles were passing by. Impact is categorized as not significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-142
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
(3) Road and Bridge Damage
The road and bridge condition are generally good, but in some locations, there
are tendency of landslide and road instability. The road and bridge damages are
mostly caused by nature factors (flood) in the wet season. The transportation of
construction equipment has MST > 10 ton, but the road is on III-A class with
maximum MST = 8 ton, thus it will increase the damage on road and bridge.
There will be wavy road and decrease of pier (as bridge support), especially on
the old bridge, along the road that is passed by hard vehicle.
Therefore, the scale of road quality that was scale 3 (moderate) in the
beginning, will become scale 1 (very bad), so the impact become -2 (negative
2).
Equipment demobility will pass through the main road and bridges in various
conditions. If the bridges are passed by vehicles that has MST>10 ton, road and
bridge damages could happen. According to the level of equipment demobility
impact, it could be explained as follows:

a) The number of people affected
People that are affected are road users who passed the route of the
equipment demobility. The possible road damage will also reduce the
traveling comfort, so the impact is considered as significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The affected area is in Kintom, so if the bridge damage happened, it will cut
off the transportation route on that line, thus the impact is considered as
significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
Demobility is done in a short period, so the impact is considered as not
significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The demobility activity will have impact on other components, those are the
comfort and safety disturbance, so the impact is categorized as significant
(S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The road or bridge damage will accumulate if not being fixed immediately.
Impact is categorized as significant (S).



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-143
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Road/bridge damage cannot be reversed to the initial condition if not being
repaired. Thus, the impact is significant (S).

5.2.1.6 Marine Transportation
A. Operational Phase
1. Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port and Support Facilities
(1) Disturbance of Marine Transportation Safety
The operational of Special port will generate traffif conflict, especially for
fisherman and LNG Tanker. It will decrease traffic safety. During these days,
traffic condition is quite good (not too dense), only fisherman boats on the
beach/sea. Their activity is influenced by season and wave height, hence its
environmental quality is categorized into scale 3 (average). The increase of LNG
tanker activity, that is once per 2 days, will make conflict with the fisherman
boats. The impact magnitude is estimated as follows:
Initial Profile of Environmental Quality for Marine Transportation Safety =
scale 3
At Operational Phase (operasional of Special port) = scale 1
Impact magnitude is small negative (-2)
The safety of marine transportation is very important, especially during
operational of special port/jetty. For fisherman around project area, the port
could disturb their activity.
The Impact Significance for marine transportation safety is presented as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The activity will give affect all fishermen at and around the project area.
Thus, the impact is significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact is only at limited area that is at port area;
therefore the impact is not-significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The disturbance will take place during operational of special port. Hence,
the impact is significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other component affected by the impact is social component (attitude
and perception), therefore the impact is significant (S).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-144
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
Transportation activity is temporary and only passed project area, hence the
impact is not-significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact of transportation activity is reversible, hence the impact is not-
significant (NS).

According to the description, P = 3, then operational of LNG Refinery, Special
Port and its support facilities has significant affect parameter to marine
transportation safety (water trasportation).

5.2.2 Biologi Component
5.2.2.1 Vegetation
A. Construction Phase
1. Land Clearing and Maturation
Land clearing at downstream area is done in the area of 300 ha width. A
considerable part of opened vegetation area is cultivation area (plantation area and
bushes). Tree abundance at the area is 230 tree/ha (scale 4). The land clearing
activity wil directly decrease the abundace and variety of flora in the area. Prediction
of impact magnitude is calculated by formula of N = k.l (N: abundance of tree
community that lost; k : tree lost/ha; l : area width (ha) for project development).
Therefore, there will be a reduction about 230 trees x 300 ha = 69,000 trees. Land
clearing and land maturation activity will descend the environment quality scale of
abundance and variety of flora, so impact magnitude result is big negative 3 (- 3).
Significant impact level is outlined as follows:
a) The number of people affected
There are no human being incured by the land clearing and maturation activity
impact because the land used are the proponents property, so it is categorized
as not significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
Area width of impact dissemination is limited at the activity site only. Therefore,
it is categorized as not significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this activity is not significant but will happened in long period, so
this criterion is significant (S).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-145
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other component that will be incurred by the impact are the lost of faunas
habitat at that area. This matter will impact the instability of ecosystem because
of food chain disturbance, society perception etc, so it is categorized as
significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impacts are cumulative and mutual influence impacts, so it is categorized as
significant (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Characteristic of the impact is reversible impact because it could be improved
with the revegetation activity, so it is categorized as not significant (NS).

B. Post Operational Phase
1. Revegetation
The activity that was predicted to get impact during post operational phase at
downstream division is revegetation. After the production activity was terminated,
ex-area of LNG Refinery will be revegetated. The activity will cause positive impact
(average positive / +2) to terrestrial flora. Environmental quality scale at post
operational phase increases from scale 1 (condition that is caused by elimination of
69.000 trees) to scale 3 (approaching the initial condition).
The grade of impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The number of human affected by impact is small. Revegetation will change
micro climate, thus the impact is categorized as not significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact only at revegetation area, hence the impact is not
significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity is small positive but it takes place in wide area, so it is categorized
as significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The positive impact of revegetation is the decrease of daily temperature and it
will increase habitat quality for fauna, so it is categorized as significant (S).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-146
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impacts are cumulative, so it is categorized as significant (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact is reversible if the vegetation area was re-opened, so it is
categorized as not significant (NS).

5.2.2.2 Wild Fauna
A. Construction Phase
1. Land Clearing and Maturation
There are 10 diversities at project area, but 3 of them were conservated, they are
raja udang, kipasan dan trinil bird (scale 4). Preparation of land clearing was
predicted to reduce fauna biodiversity, because it could remove land habitat for the
fauna (including food suplly, rest place, and reproduction place). A majority of
community at project area will die because they have no chance to move, because
they have a low mobility ability and the fast duration for land clearing preparation,
also for the other community, that have a high mobility, for example birds, they
could move to the other place. In the new habitat, this new community will affect a
community balance, so there will be a new balance community. fauna biodiversity
reduces (scale 2) and it has an average negative impact (-2).
The magnitude and significance of the impacts are:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people affected came from fauna migration which was minimum.
The fauna extending un-benefit for local people so the impact category is not
significant (NS).
b). The extent of the impact
Area extend of impact is larger than project planning area because there is
fauna migration to the other habitats. So, there is a significant (S) impact.
c). The duration of the impact
Intensity of impact is small but in a long period, so the impact categorize is
significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Fauna migration to the other habitat make flora around the project area will loss
its pollen agent (e.g.: birds, insects) and this could affect the upline level, so it
has a significanct impact (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-147
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
It is non cumulative impact, because it has a small and temporary intensity. The
category of impact is not significant impact (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
It has a reversibility impact, the fauna will come back to origin habitat. So, this
is categorized into not significant impact (NS).

B. Post Operational Phase
1. Revegetation
The activity that was predicted to get impact during post operational phase at
downstream division is revegetation. After the production activity is terminated, ex-
area of LNG Refinery will be revegetated. The activity will restore biodiversity. At the
initial condition, they are 10 types of fauna, and it was predicted that there will
more to come (scale 4). Revegetation makes the area used to be not covered by
plantation, then it will covered by vegetation, the fauna habitat is no longer divided
into several area. Therefore, revegetation indirectly will give average positive impact
to the fauna (+2).
The significance of the impacts are:
a) The number of people affected
Revegetation will increase fauna biodiversity, and in the end it will be very
usefull for the society, so it has a significanct impact (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area extent of positive impact is not large, thus the impact is not
significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
Intensity of impact is big and takes place in a long period, thus it has a
significanct impact (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Revegetation makes the area that used to be not covered by plantation, now it
is covered by vegetation, the fauna habitat is no longer divided into several
area. It will increase another positive impacts, such as decrease of pest
population, therefore it has a significanct impact (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-148
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impacts are cumulative, so it is categorized as significant (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact is reversible if the covered area was re-opened. So, this is
categorized into not significant impact (NS).

5.2.2.3 Marine biota
A. Construction Phase
1. Construction of LNG Refinery and Special Port at Uso (Alternative 1)
LNG Refinery and Special Port construction activity at Uso will generate turbidity that
affects the marine biota. Initially, biodiversity of plankton and benthos has scale 3
(ID = 1,13) and it was predicted will reduce to scale 1 (ID < 1). There is small
negative impact (-1). The example of calculation is presented in Appendix 15. The
fish community will have a small negative impact (-1). This case will happen for
coral coral reef community. The recovery coral coral reef percentage of 10% (scale
2) is predicted will reduce to < 5%, so there is a small negative impact (-1).
The magnitude and significance of the impacts are:
a) The number of people affected
Turbidity from activity of LNG Refinery and Special Port construction that been
discharged to the sea will affect sea water quality and decrease marine biota.
The abudance of plankton biodiversity as a major producer or benthos will be
reduced. It could be happened to the coral coral reef that will reduce recovery
coral reef percentage, and it will affect the abudance and diversity of fish. Then,
this case will affect the fisherman. So, it could be categorized to significant
impact (S).
b) The extent of the impact
Areal extend of impact is not happened in a large area. So, there is a not
significant impact (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
There is a small impact and happened in construction activity. So, it could be
categorized to not significant impact (NS).



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-149
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Coral reef is a habitat for fish and the others marine organism (benthos), it is
one of food chain. There was too much activity in the other component, so it
has a significant impact (S).

e) The cumulative nature of the impact
It is a cumulative, so the category of impact is significant impact (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
It has a reversibility impact. So, this is categorized into not significant impact
(NS).

2. Construction of LNG Refinery and Special port at Padang (Alternative 2)
LNG Refinery and Special Port construction activity at Padang will generate turbidity
that affects the marine biota. Initially, biodiversity of plankton and benthos has scale
3 (ID = 1,28) and it was predicted to reduce to scale 2 (ID < 1). There is small
negative impact (-1). The fish community will have a small negative impact (-1).
There is no coral reef at the area because base substrate of the area is sand which
is not a media for coral reef to grow.
The magnitude and significance of the impacts are:
a) The number of people affected
Turbidity from activity of LNG Refinery and special port construction that been
discharged to the sea will affect sea water quality and decrease marine biota.
The abudance of plankton biodiversity as a major producer or benthos will be
reduced, and it will affect the abudance and diversity of fish. Then, this case will
affect the fisherman. So, it could be categorized to significant impact (S).
b) The extent of the impact
Areal extend of impact is not happened in a large area. So, there is a not
significant impact (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
There is a small impact and happened in construction activity. So, it could be
categorized to not significant impact (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-150
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

d) The number of other environmental component affected
Plankton is a producer for consumer level (benthos, fish) of aquatic ecosystem.
The decrease of producer amount will affect the upline level. There is too much
activity in the other component, so it has a significant impact (S)
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
It is a cumulative, so the category of impact is significant impact (S).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
It has a reversibility impact. So, this is categorized into not significant impact
(NS).

B. Operational Phase
1. Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port and Other Facilities at Uso
(Alternative 1)
The LNG activity and other support facilities will cause some effect to the marine
biota. The liquid waste from the operational of LNG will be processed before it is
discharged to the sea, so the quality could be fit into standard. Although it will be
better, but the waste water could be classified into worse than the previous
condition. The plankton and benthos population were in scale 3 with the diversity
index of 1.13 and it was estimated to decrease into scale 2 with the diversity index
< 1. The negative impact that raise based on this LNG activity to the marine biota is
small negative (-1). The fish community will have a small negative impact (-1).
This case also happen to coral reef community, that have recovery coral reef
percentage of 10% (scale 2) and it was predicted to reduce to < 5%, so there is a
small negative impact (-1).
The magnitude and significance of the impacts are:
a) The number of people affected
Liquid waste from activity of LNG Refinery and special port construction that
been discharged to the sea will affect sea water quality and decrease marine
biota. The abudance of plankton biodiversity as a major producer or benthos will
be reduced. It could be happened to the coral reef that will reduce recovery
coral reef percentage, and it will affect the abudance and diversity of fish. Then,
this case will affect the fisherman. So, it can be categorized to significant
impact (S).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-151
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
b) The extent of the impact
It was happened at the wide area, and it is called to be significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The The duration of the impact is considered to be small, because the activities
will go on for a long period, therefore the value of the impact is significant
(S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Coral reef is a habitat for fish and the other marine organism (benthos), which is
one of food chain. There was too much activity in the other component, so it
has a significant impact (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The Impact is in the cumulative area, thats why it could be categorized not
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The Impact is not reversible, so it could be categorized as not significant
(NS).

2. Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port and Other Facilities at Padang
(Alternative-2)
The LNG activity and other support facilities will cause some effect to the marine
biota. The liquid waste from the operational of LNG will be processed before it was
discharged to the sea, so the quality could be fit into standard. Although it will be
better but the waste water could be classified into worse than the previous
condition. Initially, biodiversity of plankton and benthos has scale 3 (ID = 1.28) and
it was predicted will reduce to scale 2 (ID < 1). There is small negative impact (-
1). The fish community will have a small negative impact (-1). There is no coral
reef at the area because base substrate of the area is sand which is not a media for
coral reef to grow.
The magnitude and significance of the impacts are:
a) The number of people affected
Liquid waste from activity of LNG Refinery and special port construction that
been discharged to the sea will affect sea water quality and decrease marine
biota. The abudance of plankton biodiversity as a major producer or benthos will

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-152
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
be reduced, and it will affect the abudance and diversity of fish. Then, this case
will affect the fisherman. So, it can be categorized to significant impact (S).
b) The extent of the impact
Area extend of impact is happened in a large area. So, there is a significant
impact (S).
c) The duration of the impact
There is a small impact and happened in a long period during operational
activity. So, it could be categorized to significant impact (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Plankton is a producer for consumer level (benthos, fish) of aquatic ecosystem.
The decrease of producer will affect the upline level. There is too much activity
in the other component, so it has a significance impact (S)
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
It is a non-cumulative, so the category of impact is not significant impact
(NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
It has a reversibility impact. So, this is categorized into not significant impact
(NS).

5.2.3 Social Component
5.2.3.1 Demography
A. Operational Phase
1. Labour Recruitment
At this operational phase, especially in the labour recruitment, it was estimated that
there will be 300 labour, they are : 265 people or 88.33% that could be categorized
in the unskilled labour, that mostly filled by local community, and 35 people or
11.67% is in the skilled labour area with some skilled expert that mostly comes from
outside area. This condition could make some increasing amount of people near the
study location and it was estimated that this condition will happened for along
period of time, as the increasing amount of gas development operation. The density
in this study area is 27 person/km
2
and it could be categorized as a good criteria
(scale 5). The imigran labour will not disturb the people who live there because the
number is not too big. It was estimated that the maximum increasing amount of

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-153
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
people is 30 person/km
2
and it could be said that the impact is negative (-1). So, we
could say that the density is in scale 4.
Impact Significance Grade:
a) The number of people affected
There are 300 people involved in this operation, 35 people are skilled labour and
most of them come from outside area. By loking at the density condition, it can
be categorized as not significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The new comers usually concentrate in the location near the facility location,
This wide spreading area is not significant (NS).
c) The duration of the impact
Because of the small amount of workers worked in the location area, the
intensity of impact is quite small. It could be categorized as not significant
(NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other society components that are affected such as business opportunity and
public income. It could be categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact of this labour recruitment to the density is cumulative. Thus, it could
be categorized as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact of the activity towards the contract is no longer being continued. It
could be categorized as Not significant (NS).

5.2.3.2 Land Ownership Pattern (Alternative-1 and 2)
A. Pre-construction Phase
1. Land and Plant Acquisition
Area width for facility at Downstream Division is 300 Ha, covering LNG Refinery,
special port and their support facilities. Generally, the land is used for coconut tree
industry. Land width of rice field, farm/huma, dry field/garden and plantation that
exist in study region are about 48,193.15 Ha; with the detail wide of rice field about
14,528.05 Ha, farm/huma 2,338 Ha, dry field/garden 14,903.25 Ha and plantation
area 16.423,85 Ha. Domination or ownership of rice field by society is between
2.501 25,000 m
2
and ownership of farm and also garden between 5,001 50,000

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-154
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Ha. If the ownership of rice field by resident is 1 Ha and for the farm/garden about
3 Ha, the predicted width of rice field that exist in study region owned by society is
about 39.17% or around 0.65% from total number of rice field owner; and
respondent owning farm/garden are 73.75% or about 3.08% from total number of
farm owner. If farm width for the project is 300 Ha, hence there are about 100
people or 0.57% of resident experienced the change of farm ownership. Considering
that farming is the main job opportunity, thus the change of land ownership
(0,57%) is categorized as average negative (-2). Therefore, pattern of farm
ownership in study region which from the beginning was moderate (3) will descend
to become bad or scale 1.
Significant impact level:
a) The number of people affected
Land acquisition activity for the location of LNG Refinery, special port and their
support facilities will affect the pattern of farm ownership around the project.
Area width for facility is 300 Ha, if farm width around project area is 3 Ha per
person, hence there are about 100 farmers or about 0.57% of resident will
experience the change of farm ownership. Therefore, it is categorized to be
significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact is assumed to be significant (S) because this area
covers 2 regional districts in study area.
c) The duration of the impact
The land is the main source for job opportunity of farmers at study area.
Therefore, considering the intensity and duration of activity, the impact is
categorized into significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other component that will be incurred by the impact as consequence of land
acquisition activity are change of land use, loss of job and descend of income of
farmer and farm worker. Therefore, it is categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
Land acquisition activity have non-cumulative impact characteristic, so the
impact is categorized as not significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-155
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Change ownership of land is non reversible criteria, but then change ownership
of farm will be done with the equal compensation, so it is categorized as not
significant (NS).

5.2.3.3 Public Income
A. Construction Phase
1. Land Clearing and Maturation (alternative-1 and 2)
The amount of labour required for the construction activity at Downstream division,
especially the unskilled, was predicted to be 157 people, and most of them are local
people. The activity gives positive impact to the local public income, especially for
those who directly involved in the construction activities. It was predicted that their
revenue will be above the Regional Minimum Salary/UMK (Upah Minimum
Kabupaten). They could earn Rp. 1,000,000.00 per month. The increase will be
enjoyed by labour of the project, they are around 1.22% of total jobseeker or
0.42% of total resident at productive age at Kintom and Batui.

The income improvement is also happened to the people at project area that have a
business opportunity. Assuming that each business opportunity could serve the
needs of 15 20 people, thus with 157 labour, there will be 10 people that opening
business opportunity. If average income of people who open business opportunity is
Rp. 500.000,00/month for each person, so in a month in the project area will have a
money circulation:
Unskilled labour = 127 x Rp. 1,000,000.00 = Rp. 127,000,000.00
Skilled labour = 10 x Rp. 500.000.00 = Rp. 5,000,000.00 +
Rp. 132,000,000.00

Total resident at downstream area is 37.282 people. Hence, each resident will has
Rp. 3,541.58 or around Rp. 17,703.91 per household with 5 family member.
Therefore, the increase only enjoyed by a small part of society and it is not
significant in increasing public prosperity at downstream area. Its impact magnitude
is small positive (+1), thus the public income increases from bad category (2), or
equals to Rp 750,000.00 per month per household, to average (scale 3).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-156
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The grade of impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The amount of people that are affected by positive impact from this activity is
very small, that is about 1.22% from total jobseeker and around 0.42% of total
resident at productive age. So, it could be categorized as not significant
impact (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
Areal extend of impact is categorized into not significant impact (NS),
because the impact for employment opportunity, especially for unskilled labour
is for local people only.
c) The duration of the impact
There is a small impact magnitude and it was happened in a short period or
temporary. So, it could be categorized as not significant impact (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The increasing of income is in a small value, so it was predicted that there is no
influence for quality and prosperity to local people. Thus, there is not
significant impact (NS).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
It is a non-cumulative impact, so the category of impact is not significant
(NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Although there is a small increasing of income, it is included to not significant
impact (NS). The public income level could be reversed to initial condition, to
very bad condition, when the project has finished.

2. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port (alternative-1 dan 2)
The quantity of labour in the construction of LNG Refinery area and Special Port is
3000 people, which 1,015 are skilled labour and 1,950 are unskilled labour. The
unskilled comes from local area and they will get direct positive impact of the
project. The number of resident that get direct impact at each project area is only
about 15.18% and 7.66%.
Assuming that the unskilled labour will get monthly income Rp. 1,000,000.00/
people/month, and skilled labour will get Rp.3,000,000.00; so in a month in the
project area, there will be money circulation:

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-157
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Unskilled labour = 1,950 x Rp. 1,000,000.00 = Rp. 1,950,000,000.00
Skilled labour = 1,015 x Rp. 3,000,000.00 = Rp. 3,045,000,000.00 +
Rp. 4,995,000,000.00

There is an improvement of income that will affect the increasing of material and
service demand, and it will move an economic aspect in the related region.
However, money circulation only comes from the unskilled labour, while the skilled
labour only spends 25% of their income in the project area, and the rest will be
spent outside the area.
The income improvement is also happened to the people at project area that have a
business opportunity. Assuming that the project will need 300 labour, then there will
be 100 people who will open business. If their average income is Rp.
500,000.00/month, hence total public income that comes from business opportunity
is Rp. 50,000,000.00/month.
The money circulation at project area: from local labour Rp. 1,950,000,000.00 +
business opportunity Rp. 50,000,000.00. + outside area labour Rp. 761,250,000.00
= Rp. 2,761,250,000.00. If the number is divided with total resident, thus each
resident will have Rp. 74,063.89 or Rp. 370,319.46 per household with 5 family
member. The increase of public income is very significant, and its impact magnitude
is average positive (+2). The public income level is increase from bad (2) that is Rp
750.000,00 per household per month, to good condition (scale 4).
The grade of impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The amount of local people that could get benefit directly or positive impact of
the activity are 15,18% from total jobseeker and 7,66% from total resident at
productive age. While the people that open business opportunity is more than
100 people. So, there is significant impact (S).
b) The extent of the impact
Area extend of impact is categorized as significant (S), because the impact
could be taken by local people at the project area and in vicinity.
c) The duration of the impact
Intensity and impact duration have a high value, because it involved a big
number of labour in a long period. So, it could be categorized as significant
impact (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-158
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The increasing of income is in a small value, so it was predicted that there is no
influence for quality and prosperity to local people. Thus, there is not
significant impact (NS).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
It is a non-cumulative, so the category of impact is not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
It was included to not significant impact (NS). The public income level could
be reversed to initial condition, to very bad condition, when the project has
finished.

3. Dismissing Labour
The dismissing labour will cause the declining of public income. The decline of
income will be felt by the workers that have been working in the construction
activities. The decline of income is also felt by people that open business. However,
the working contract states that the labour is involved only at construction phase;
hence they are already prepared for the dismissing labour activity. The number of
resident that experienced direct impact from the decrease of public income is 7,66%
from total resident at productive age, and its impact magnitude is negative small
(-1), therefore level of public income will be bad (2).

The grade of impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The number of resident that experienced direct impact from the decrease of
public income is 7.66% from total resident at productive age, they are labour
that are involved directly or indirectly to the construction activity. So, there is
significant impact (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact is not significant (NS) because it was only felt by
unskilled labour and only centralized at the project area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity is low and temporary, thus the impact is not significant
(NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-159
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component affected by the impact is the decline of
public prosperity that will affect public health level. So, there is significant
impact (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact is non accumulative because the local citizens could find another
working and/or business opportunities. Impact is categorized as not
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact could turn around and be replenished, when the citizens manage to
find another business or working opportunity. Impact is categorized as not
significant (NS).

C. Operational Phase
1. Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port and Support Facilities
Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port and Support Facilities involve 300 labour,
they are 35 skilled labour (11.67%) and 265 unskilled labour or 88.33%. The
average income of this activity is higher than the labour who works outside of this
activity.
Considering that the operational period is quite long, that is 20 years, thus there will
be a lot of business opportunity for local resident by opening business that has
direct or indirect relation with the needs of the projects, especially the labour. The
area will be developed and it will draw an interest of other society to comes in and
get some opportunity. Assuming that there will be 1000 immigrant for LNG Refinery
activity and others, there will be around 100 people that open some business. If the
unskilled labour will get monthly income Rp. 2,000,000.00/people/month and skilled
labour will get Rp. 7,500,000.00/people/month also income from business
opportunity is Rp. 1.000.000,00/ people/month, so in a month in the project area
will have a money circulation:

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-160
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

unskilled labour : 265 x Rp. 2,000,000.00 = Rp. 330,000,000.00
skilled labour : 35 x Rp. 7,500,000.00 = Rp. 262,500,000.00
Local entrp. : 100 x Rp. 1,000,000.00 = Rp. 100,000,000.00 +
Rp. 692,500,000.00

Each resident will get Rp. 3,541.58 or around Rp. 17,703.91 per household with 5
family member. Considering that the operational period is quite long, the increase of
income will cause the raise of goods and services demand, and encourage the
economic condition in the area. It was predicted that the impact will be moderate
positive (+2), so the level of income that was bad (2) will become good or scale 4.

Grade of impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The amount of people that affected by direct positive impact from this activity is
265 people. It was also predicted that citizens from another nearby society will
also feel the benefit from the business opportunities as provider of goods and
services for the workers, like lodging, eateries, etc. Impact is categorized as
significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area of the impact spreading is categorized as significant (S) because the
impact will not only felt by citizens in the location but also the citizens live in
nearby locations.
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity of the activity is moderate and will go on in a relatively long
period. Therefore, the impact is significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other environmental component affected by the increase of income is the
increase of society prosperity, including health quality. Impact is categorized as
significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
Impact was predicted to be non accumulative and considered as not
significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-161
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
From the criteria, the impact of the activity could be considered as significant
(S), because the income level of the society could become bad, after the activity
ended.

D. Post Operational Phase
1. Dismissing Labour
The dismissing labour force will cause the declining of public income. The decline of
income will be felt by the workers that have been working in the gas development
activities. The decline of income will also be felt by the citizens that are indirectly
involved in the project through the local contractors. The number of local resident
that experienced the decrease of income was around 265 people or 0.47% from
total resident at productive age. The impact of this is small negative (-1), so the
level of public income that was bad (2) become very bad (1).
Grade of impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The number of local citizens that will experience the decrease of income is 265
people, consists of the workers that have been directly or indirectly involved in
the gas development operational. Impact is categorized as significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
Area extend of impact is categorized into not significant (NS), because the
impact is centralized at project area only.
c) The duration of the impact
Intensity is relatively low and the impact was predicted to be temporary. Impact
is categorized as not significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other affected components are the declining quality and prosperity of the
citizens that could finally affect the public health level. Impact is measured as
significant (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-162
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact is non cumulative because the local citizens could find another
working and/or business opportunities. Impact is categorized as not
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact could turn around and be replenished, when the citizens manage to
find another business or working opportunity. Impact is categorized as not
significant (NS).

5.2.3.4 Business Opportunity
A. Construction Phase
1. Land Clearing and Maturation (alternative-1 and 2)
In general, this activity will use the unskilled labour, and it was predicted that there
will be 157 labour. This situation is a good chance for local society to open business
around the project location. Especially, the opportunity to supply the goods and
services demand of project labour, e.g: the dailly needs, laundry, housing,
restaurant, etc.

However, there are only 10 people who will get a benefit from this opportunity. So,
each member of society could involve other person in opening business opportunity,
for example on partnership and employee, hence the opportunity will be felt by all
member of society.
The area is a plantation area, thus only few people that could open business
opportunity. The initial profile of business opportunity at the area was bad (2)
because the business is only limited and connected with what nature has, also only
few people, around 10 people, that using this condition as a business opportunity at
settlement area. This activity will increase the profile to average (3), and there will
be around 10-11 business units that will serve the needs of gas construction activity.
So, this activity has a positive impact (+1) to public business opportunity.





EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-163
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The magnitude and significance of the impacts are :
a) The number of people affected
There is only 10 people who will get a benefit from this opportunity. In general,
this activity will use the unskilled labour from around the project area. Hence,
there is a not significant impact (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact is not significant (NS) because the opportunity is
only enjoyed by local society.
c) The duration of the impact
Intensity is relatively low and the impact was predicted to be temporary. Impact
is categorized as not significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
There are some impacts of this activity, such as income and prosperity
improvement, public mobility increasing, etc. So, there is a significant impact
(S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
It is a non-cumulative, so the category of impact is not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact was reversible and it remove the business opportunity when the
project is finished. Hence, there is a significant impact (S).

2. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port (alternative-1 and 2)
This activity is predicted to involve 1,950 people, especially the unskilled. There are
many people that involved in the project, so there will be a business opportunity to
the local people. Especially, the opportunity to supply goods and service demand of
project labour, e.g: the dailly needs, laundry, housing, restaurant, etc. If each
business unit could serve 15-20 labour, there will be around 100 people that could
enjoy the opportunity. The initial profile of business opportunity at the area was
used to be bad (2) because the business is only limited and connected with what
nature has, also only few people, around 10 people, that using this condition as a
business opportunity at settlement area. This activity will increase the profile to
good condition (4). So, this activity has an average positive impact (+2) to public
business opportunity.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-164
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The magnitude and significance of the impacts are:
a) The number of people affected
There will be around 100 people that could enjoy the opportunity. This activity
will involve the unskilled labour who will need goods and services, e.g: the dailly
needs, laundry, housing, restaurant, etc. Hence, there is a significant impact
(S).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact was assumed to be significant (S) because this area
covers 2 districts in study area.
c) The duration of the impact
Intensity and impact duration have a big value, because the period is in a long
duration. So, it could be categorized to significant impact (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
There are some impacts of this activity, such as income and prosperity
improvement, public mobility increasing, etc. So, there is a significant impact
(S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
It is a non-cumulative, so the category of impact is not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact is reversible and it removes the business opportunity when the
project has finished. Hence, there is a significant impact (S).

C. Operational Phase
1. Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port and Support Facilities
During this activity, the opportunity of conducting business will arise, and the area
around the project location will be developed. The type of business that could be
established are business to fulfill various needs that are directly related to the
project, or indirect needs of the workers, especially the unskilled labour.

Considering that the activity will be take place in 20 years, thus there will be a lot of
newcomers who come for employment. Assuming that there will be 1000 people
to come, thus around 50 people will use this opportunity to open business. Only few
people that open business opportunity, so each member of society could involve the
other in opening business opportunity, for example on partnership and employee,

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-165
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
hence the opportunity will be felt by all member of society. The impact is average
positive (+2), and the business opportunity of the society that was initially bad (2)
will become moderate or scale 4.
The magnitude and significance of the impacts are:
a) The number of people affected
It was predicted that more than 50 people will take advantage of this business
opportunity. Therefore, the impact could be categorized as Significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact is categorized as Significant (S) because there are a lot of people
that interested in opening business at this area.
c) The duration of the impact
Intensity and impact duration have a high value, because the activity happened
in a long period. So, it could be categorized as significant impact (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
There will be several impacts that come, for example the increase of income and
prosperity, the increase of mobility of citizens and daily needs, etc. Therefore it
is categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact is non cumulative, so it was valued as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The existing impact could turn around so the chance to do business is decreased
when the project ended. Therefore, the impact is considered as Significant
(S).

D. Post Operational Phase
1. Termination of Gas Production Operational
Activities in the post operational will affect the business opportunities for the local
citizens. However, it was predicted that not all business that have been developed
will be closed because of the termination of the project. There are still a lot of
businesses that have been well developed, and still be opened although the
operational of gas production activities has stopped. The prediction was only around
10% of business type will be closed, that is business of food for the labour. The

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-166
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
impact is small negative (-1), so the business opportunity of the citizens that was
previously bad (2) will become very bad (1).
The magnitude and significance of the impacts are:
a) The number of people affected
The prediction was only around 10% of business type that will be closed. The
other business that was already settled will not get any influence from this
activity. Therefore the impact is considered as Not Significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area of impact spreading is categorized as not significant (NS) because
the impact is only felt by people who lived nearby and have been taking
advantage of the business opportunities.
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity is relatively low and the impact will last for certain period of time
until the local citizens found another business opportunities. Impact is
considered as not significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other components affected by the declining of business opportunity are the
decline of income, prosperity, and in the end could affect the health level.
Impact is considered as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact of the declining business opportunity is non accumulative because
the citizens could find another business or employment opportunities. Impact is
considered as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact could be replenished when the local citizens found another job or
business opportunities. Impact is considered as not significant (NS).

5.2.3.5 Social Process
A. Pre-Construction Phase
1. Land and Plants Acquisition (alternative-1 and 2)
Land acquisition activity with no clarity about its execution process and
compensation cost of farm will generate various interpretation among the citizen.
There is a possibility that one society group will have different opinion with the other
society group, also with the Proponent. If this condition was expanded, it will disturb

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-167
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
the social relation of the citizen. There will be around 70 people who would
experience change of land ownership and potentially will generate social anxiety or
conflict because the land is used to be the main source of revenue for society and
their activity used to involve other member of society. Thus, the impact will be felt
by a lot of member of society, not only for land owner. It was predicted that there
will be around 40% of society that will experience social anxiety because of land and
plants acquisition. Impact magnitude is average negative (-2). Social process in
citizen which from the beginning was good (4) will decrease to bad or scale 2.
Significant impact level is outlined as below:
a) The number of people affected
Land acquisition activity without accompanied by the clarity about its execution
process and compensation cost of farm will generate various interpretation
among the citizen. There is a possibility that one society group will have
different opinion with the other society group, also with the Proponent. It was
predicted that there will be around 40% of society that will experience social
anxiety because of this land and plants acquisition. Therefore, it is categorized
as significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact is assumed to be significant (S) because the land
acquisition activity will be felt in 2 districts of project area.
c) The duration of the impact
The impact intensity is so high and will take place in long period. Therefore, it is
categorized as significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other environmental component affected by this activity is social anxiety
that will affect public safety. Therefore, it is categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
There are no cumulative impacts for this parameter, so it is categorized as not
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Change of land ownership is non reversible, but then it will be done with the
equal compensation, so it is categorized as not significant (NS).



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-168
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
2. Local Labour Recruitment
Labour Recruitment activity is potential to generate the negative impact in society.
During the time, there are 12,848 local resident which still unemployed. This activity
gives the job vacancy to 3,000 people that covers 1,015 skilled labour or 33.83%,
and 1,950 unskilled labour or 66.17%. The citizen that is not recruited in this job
vacancy will jealous. If assumed that entire skilled labour that is accomodated in the
project come from outside area, hence local resident percentage that was accepted
in the project is about 15.18% from total of job seeker.

Meanwhile, dissatisfaction and jealousy also emerge from accepted local resident to
the all skilled labour which generally came from outside area (33.83%) with the
higher income level than local worker. This condition in the end will generate the
social conflict. Social relationship pattern in society which during the time was good
(scale 4) will change, among inacceptable society with the society which could be
accepted to work, and also among out side area worker with the local worker. It
was predicted that there will be 40% of citizen who feel the inharmonic social
relationship in society as a consequence of dissatisfaction of labour recruitment.
Impact magnitude is average negative (-2), so social process condition will turn into
bad level (2). Significant impact level is outlined as below.
a) The number of people affected
Number of the labour recruited for construction activity at downstream division
are 3000 people, that consists of skilled labour 33.83%, and unskilled labour
66.17%. This condition generate the jelaousy for inacceptable people.
Dissatisfaction and jelaousy are also happened among inacceptable society with
the society that was accepted for work, and also among out side area worker
with the local worker. This condition will generate the disturbance of social
process, so it is categorized as significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact is assumed to be significant (S) because the impact
dissemination is wide, not only limited in project area.
c) The duration of the impact
The duration of the impact will take place in long period, and the local citizen
having open mind character will start to associate with the incoming worker.
Therefore, it is categorized as not significant (NS)

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-169
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

d) The number of other environmental component affected
There are other environmental components that are affected by this activity,
such as social anxiety or conflict. Therefore, it is categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
There is no cumulative impact for this parameter. Problem in society relationship
could be improved, so it is categorized as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Problem in society relationship is reversible criteria because it could be
improved, so it is categorized as not significant (NS).



B. Construction Phase
1. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port (alternative-1 and 2)
This construction activity will involve 3000 people, which 1,950 are skilled people or
66.17% and 1,015 are unskilled people or 33.83%. This condition will affect social
process and social relation pattern. There are about 84.82% unemployment people
that not involved in the project. Meanwhile, the skilled labour is dominated by
people from outside of the area. Skilled labour with the higher income were
predicted to have a different living pattern. The society will be suspicious that tends
to generate social conflict. It was predicted that there will be around 40% of citizen,
especially the jobseeker that will feel un-harmony relationship. The social interaction
pattern have an impact magnitude of average negative (-2), so the good
condition in a initial social process (4) will decrease to bad or scale 2.
The magnitude and significance of the impacts are:
a) The number of people affected
The local people involved in this activity as unskilled labour is around 15,18% of
total jobseeker at study area. This condition was predicted to make a social
jealousy for the people that is not involved. The jealousy also happened
between local people and newcomers. It was predicted that there will be around
40% of citizen who will experience social process disturbance. It has a
significant impact (S).



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-170
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
b) The extent of the impact
Social process disturbance not only be aware by local people but could be felt by
people in the other district. The area extend of impact is categorized into
significant impact (S).
c) The number of other environmental component affected
A large number of non-local labour requirements will affect social process in the
society. It happens in a long period. This has a significant impact (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
There are other environmental components that are affected by this activity,
such as social anxiety or conflict. Therefore, it is categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
Thera are no cumulative impacts for this parameter Problem in society
relationship could be improved, so it is categorized as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Problem in society relationship is reversible criteria because it could be
improved, so it is categorized as not significant (NS).

C. Operational Phase
1. Labour Recruitment
The labour recruitment for various operational at downstream division activities will
involve 300 people, with 35 skilled people (11.67%) and 265 unskilled people or
88.33%, where most of unskilled people is from local area. It was predicted that
local people is only involved as unskilled, and it is only around 2.06% of total
jobseeker at downstream area. This condition was predicted to make a social
anxiety that will turn to a social conflict. Meanwhile, skilled workers that are involved
are more than the unskilled workers, and the skilled workers are mostly from other
region. Skilled workers with higher level of income will tend to have a different life
style with the local society and it will cause jealousy and social problems that leads
to an uncomfortable relationship between workers, and with the local citizens in
general. The society will be suspicious that tends to generate social conflict. It was
predicted that there will be around 26.95% of citizen who will feel a harmonic
relationship in a social pattern of each other. The change of social interaction

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-171
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
pattern is categorized into average negative (-2), so the social process that was
originally good (4) will become bad or scale 2. Degree of Impact Significance:
a) The number of people affected
The number of workers that are employed for various operational activities are
300 people, mostly (88.33%) unskilled workers from local area. This condition
will cause jealousy for the local citizens that are not able to be workers in the
project. The dissatisfaction will also happen between workers themselves,
between local workers and workers from another region. The condition will
cause a disturbance of social process that is quite big (around 73.05%) and felt
by the society. Impact is valued as Significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
In this activity, the impact is widespread, not only concentrated around project
location. Impact is valued as significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
Intensity is quite high, and the impact will be for a long period, so the impact is
categorized as significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
There are other environmental components that are affected by this activity,
such as social anxiety or conflict. Therefore, it is categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact of the activity toward the social process in the society could be non
cumulative because it could be repaired by an intensive communication between
workers from other regions and local workers. Therefore, the impact is
categorized not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The social process in the society could be categorized as not significant (NS)
because it could be repaired.

2. Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port, and Support Facilities
The operation of 2 trains of LNG Refinery is potential to cause a negative impact on
social process in the society. This activity will involve 300 people, which 35 are
skilled people (11.67%) and 265 unskilled people or 88.33%. The local citizens who
are not involved in this activity will become jealous to workers from other regions
because have better skilled and will fill up the available job opportunities. The

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-172
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
society will be suspicious that tends to generate social conflict. Only about 26.95%
local citizens will not feel harmony between each other during the activity phase.
The magnitude is categorized into average negative (-2), so the social process that
was originally good (4) will become bad or scale (2).
Degree of Impact Significance:
a) The number of people affected
The number of workers that are employed for various operational activities are
300 people with specific skilled and come from outside the area. This condition
will cause jealousy for the local citizens that are not able to be recruited as
workers in the project. The social process disturbance will be felt by around
40% of citizen. Therefore, it is categorized as significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
Social process disturbance not only be aware by local people but could be felt by
people in the other 2 districts. The area extend of impact is categorized into
significant impact (S).
c) The duration of the impact
the impact will be for a long time, but the local society has open mind to build
good interaction with the newcomers, thus the impact is categorized as not
significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
There are other environmental components that are affected by this activity,
such as social anxiety or conflict and public safety. Therefore, it is categorized
as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact of the activity toward the social process in the society could be non
cumulative because it could be improved by an intensive communication
between workers from other regions and local workers. Therefore, the impact is
categorized as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact on social process in the society can be categorized as not
significant (NS) because it can be repaired.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-173
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
5.2.3.6 Social Stratification
A. Operational Phase
1. Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port and Support Facilities
The operational of 2 trains of LNG Refinery is potential to cause a negative impact to
social process in the society. This activity will involve 300 people, which 35 are
skilled people (11.67%) and 265 unskilled people or 88.33%. The skilled workers
that are involved are more than the unskilled workers, and skilled workers are
mostly came from other region. Skilled workers with higher level of income will tend
to have a different life style that are different with the local citizens life style. This
condition will generate social stratification at study area. The newcomers who do not
have a good faith to interact with local society will make the situation worse than
before.
Social stratification will be happened in the society of farmer with lower income. At
least there will be strata of education, employment, and economic level with
percentage of 60% or having impact magnitude of average negative (-2). There
is no social stratification at the initial profile or good level (4), but it will decrease
into bad level (2).

Degree of Impact Significance:
a) The number of people affected
Social stratification will be felt by almost all citizens. Therefore, the impact
magnitude is significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
In this activity the impact is widespread, not only concentrated around project
location. Impact is valued as significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
Intensity is quite high, and the impact will be for a long time, so the impact is
categorized as significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
There are other environmental components that are affected by this activity,
such as jealousy of local society to the newcomers, social anxiety, also
disturbance of public safety, so the impact is categorized as significant (S).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-174
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact of the activity toward the social stratification in the society could be
non cumulative because it could be improved by an intensive communication
between workers from other regions and local workers. Therefore, the impact is
categorized as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact on social stratification in the society could be categorized as not
significant (NS) because it can be repaired.

5.2.3.7 Public Attitude and Perception
A. Pre-construction Phase
1. Land and Plants Acquisition (alternative-1 and 2)
Land acquisition represented one of activity that caused public perception. Negative
perception to the company will emerge when process of land acquisition was not
done through deliberation and there are no agreements in the case of compensation
cost. During the time, society behave regularly to project activity, but there is
78.33% of society agree with the project existence, with several advices, thus initial
profile is good (scale 4). Land acquisition with no compensation cost in the end
will generate various opinions, such as the loss of job on agricultural sector,
difficulty in get the substitution farm outside of the area because of limited access
and fund. There were 100 people that experience the change in land ownership
(0.47%). However, considering that the land is their only source of income, and
involve many other residents, thus there are around 40% of residents that have
trouble with land and plants acquisition process, and the impact magnitude is
average negative (-2). Therefore, environmental quality which from the
beginning was Good (4) will descend to bad level or scale 2.
Significant impact level is outlined as follows.
a) The number of people affected
There are 0.47% of people who experiencd the change in land ownership.
Considering that the land is their only source of income, and involve many other
residents, the process must be transparent or it will generate negative impact.
Therefore, the impact is categorized as significant (S).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-175
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
b) The extent of the impact
The activity is not only felt by local people but could be felt by people in the
other 2 districts. The area extend of impact is categorized into significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
Intensity is quite high, and the impact will be for a long period, so the impact is
categorized as significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
There are other environmental components that are affected by this activity,
such as jealousy of local society to the newcomers, social anxiety, also
disturbance of public safety, so the impact is categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact could be non cumulative because it could be improved by an
intensive communication. Therefore, the impact is categorized as not
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
Land acquisition activity will be done with the equal compensation, so it is
categorized as not significant (NS).

2. Local Labour Recruitment
Labour Recruitment activity potentially generates the negative affect on perception
and attitude in society. This condition was triggered by the existence of job vacancy
to 3000 people which 1,015 are skilled people (33.83%) and 1,950 unskilled people
or 66.17%. The unskilled people are from local area and the skilled labour is from
outside of the area.
Skilled labour with the higher income level was predicted to have the different life
style than the local resident. This condition will cause the appearance of jelaousy
and social difference that lead to inharmonic relationship among all labour and even
with the local resident. This matter will generate the negative perception and
attitude of society. The local people that are involved in this activity as unskilled
labour is around 15.18% of total jobseeker at study area. This condition will
generate social jealousy for the people that is not involved. It is predicted that there
will be around 40% of citizen, especially the jobseeker that will feel inharmonic
relationship. The social interaction pattern have an impact magnitude of average

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-176
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
negative (-2), so the good condition in initial profile (4) will decrease to bad or
scale 2.
Significant impact level is outlined as follows:
a) The number of people affected
Number of the labour recruited in labour recruitment activity is 3000 people.
The unskilled is from local area and the skilled labour is from outside of the
area. The local people that were involved in this activity as unskilled labour is
around 15,18% of total jobseeker at study area, thus inharmonic relationship
will be felt by not less than 40% of society, especially the jobseeker. Therefore,
its impact criterion is significant ( P).
b) The extent of the impact
The activity is not only felt by local people, but could be felt by people in the
other 2 districts. The area extend of impact is categorized into significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
Intensity is quite high, and the impact will be for a long period, but it could be
improved by an intensive communication. Therefore, its impact criterion is not
significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
There are other environmental components that are affected by this activity,
such as jealousy of local society to the newcomers, social anxiety, also
disturbance of public safety, so the impact is categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact could be non cumulative because it could be improved by an
intensive communication. Therefore, the impact is categorized as not
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact on public attitude and perception will return to positive when there
was a good impacts management. Therefore, this criterion is not significant
(NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-177
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

B. Construction Phase
1. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port (alternative-1 and 2)
This activity have a negative significant impact to attitude and perception of public,
such as decline of air quality, increasing noise, decrease of seawater quality,
disturbance of marine biota and social process disturbance, especially social jealousy
of local resident to the newcomers. It was estimated that more than 50% people
that will feel inharmonic relationship of each other, especially the jobseeker. The
initial social interaction pattern have a good impact magnitude (4), but it will
decrease to bad (2). Hence, the impact magnitude is average negative (-2). The
magnitude and significance of the impacts are:
a) The number of people affected
It was estimated that more than 50% people who will be affected by the
impact. This is categorized into significant impact (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The activity is not only felt by local people but could be felt by people in the
other 2 districts. The area extension of impact is categorized into significant
(S).
c) The duration of the impact
Intensity is quite high, and the impact will be for a long period, so the impact is
categorized as significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
There are other environmental components that are affected by this activity,
such as social anxiety, also disturbance of public safety, so the impact is
categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact could be non cumulative because it is only felt during construction
activity. So, it is categorized into not significant impact (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact on public attitude and perception will return to become positive if
there was a good impact management. Therefore, this criterion is not
significant (NS).




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-178
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
2. Dismissing Labour
Along with the end of working contract, the dismissing labour will bring a negative
perception in the society. It was predicted that the impacts that will arise are
unemployment of the direct or indirect ex-workers, and also people that open
business to fulfill the needs of labour. However, this activity will not have big
influence to the labour because there was already a working contract for them. The
attitude and perception of the public that was good (4) will become average (3)
when the activity took place. Thus, the impact magnitude is small negative or -1.
Grade of impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The number of local citizens who will be affected by the dismissing labour
activity is quite high, they are around 1,950 people or 15.18% of total
jobseeker. Impact is categorized as significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The extent of the impact is categorized as not significant (NS) because the
area of impact dispersion is not wide and only at around the project area. They
also hope to be recruited for operational phase.
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity is relatively low and the impact could go on in a certain period
until the local citizens can get another working opportunity at operational phase.
Impact is categorized as not significant (NS).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other components that are affected by the declining of business opportunity are
the decline of income, prosperity, and in the end could affect the public health
level. Impact is considered as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact of the declining of business opportunity is non cumulative because
the citizens could find another business or employment opportunities. Impact is
considered as not significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-179
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact could turn around and be replenished, when the citizens manage to
find another business or employment opportunity. Impact is categorized as not
significant (NS).

C. Operational Phase
1. Labour Recruitment
The negative perception and attitudes are also related to the employment that
involve 300 people, while there are still a lot of local citizens (more than 97%) that
are not recruited by the project. In the other side, from the total number of workers,
11.67% of them are skilled workers and come from other regions with higher level
of education and income. This condition will cause jealousy and relationship
problems between workers and the local citizens. The impact is average negative
(-2) because more than 40% of the citizen will worry about the arising problems.
The public attitude and perception that was initially good (4) will become bad (2).
The degree of impact significance is as follows.
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that will be affected by the negative attitude and
perception of the society is quite large, more than 80% of the local citizen.
Impact is categorized as significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area of impact spreading is quite large covering a few territories along the
mobility and demobility track that are included in 4 districts in the study area,
and even outside area. Impact is categorized as significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact from this activity will go on during the operational of the Matindok
gas development project. Impact is categorized as significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
There are other environmental components that are affected by this activity,
such as social anxiety, also disturbance of public safety, so the impact is
categorized as significant (S).


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-180
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impacts are non cumulative, so it is categorized as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact on public attitude and perception could be reversed and become
positive when the impacts are being fixed. Impact is categorized as not
significant (NS).

2. Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port and Support Facility
The activity will involve 300 people, around 35 people (11.67%) are skilled workers,
and unskilled workers are 265 people (88.33%). The skilled workers that are
involved are more than the unskilled workers, and mostly from other region. Skilled
workers with higher level of income will tend to have a different life style than the
local citizens. This condition will generate social stratification at study area. The
newcomers who do not have a good faith to interact with local society will make the
situation worse than before. This matter will generate the negative perception and
attitude of society. The impact is average negative (-2) because more than 40%
of the citizen will worry about the arising problems. The public attitude and
perception that was good (4) will become bad (2).
The degree of impact significance is as follows:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people that will have a negative perception is quite high. Impact
is categorized as significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact is not only centralized in surrounding area of the LNG, but also in
wider areas. Impact is categorized as significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
Intensity is quite high and will last during the operational phase. Impact is
categorized as significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
There are other environmental components affected by this activity, such as
social anxiety, also disturbance of public safety, so the impact is categorized as
significant (S).



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-181
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact could be non cumulative because it could be improved by an
intensive communication. Therefore, the impact is categorized as not
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact on public attitude and perception could be reversed and become
positive if the impacts were well-handled. Impact is categorized as not
significant (NS).

D. Post Operational Phase
1. Cleaning and Equipment Demobility
The cleaning and equipment demobility activity in the end of the operational phase
will be done through the existing transportation route. The activities will cause
impact in the form of negative public attitude and perception because of the
increase of dust, noise, road damages, traffic disturbance, and traffic accidents.
However, considering that the demobility activities are being done not in the same
time and in low intensity, then it was predicted that the negative impact will be
small negative (-1). Therefore, the negative perception and attitude of society that
used to be in good quality (4), because negative respond is only shown by 21% of
society, will decrease to average (scale 3). The degree of impact significance is as
follows.

a) The number of people affected
The number of people who are affected by the demobility was predicted to be
low (less than 8%) because the transportations are done through transportation
routes that are rarely populated. Impact is considered as not significant (NS).
b) The extent of the impact
The area of impact spreading is categorized as not significant (NS) because
the residential along the transportation route is relatively rare.
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity of the impact is relatively low and in a certain period or not
permanent. Impact is categorized as not significant (NS).




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-182
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
d) The number of other environmental component affected
Other environmental components that are affected by the attitude and
perception of the society are the conflict and inharmonic relationship in the
society. Impact is considered as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact on public attitude and perception is non cumulative because there
are a lot of impact treatment. Impact is categorized as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact could be reversed or cured, by doing many available impact
management. Impact is categorized as not significant (NS).

2. Dismissing Labour
Along with the ending of the working contract, the dismissing labour will bring a
negative perception in the society. It was predicted that the impacts that will arise
are unemployment, and businesses like eateries, laundry, cleaning service, etc. The
negative perception and attitude of society that used to be in good quality (4),
because negative respond is only shown by 21% of society, will decrease to bad (2)
because there is an increasing of public anxiety level that is 74%, during the
dismissing labour activity. The change is around 53% or the impact magnitude is
average negative (-2). The grade of impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The number of local citizens who will be unemployed as an impact of the
dismissing labour activity is quite high (53%). They are the workers that have
been directly or indirectly involved in the project. Impact is categorized as
significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The area of impact spreading is categorized as significant (S) because the
impact is not only felt by the local citizens but also citizens at outside the
territory.
c) The duration of the impact
The intensity is relatively low and the impact could go on in a certain period
until the local citizens could get another employment opportunity. Impact is
categorized as not significant (NS).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-183
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
d) The number of other environmental component affected
There are other environmental components that are affected by this activity,
such as social anxiety, also disturbance of public safety, so the impact is
categorized as significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact of the decreasing of business opportunity is non cumulative because
the citizens could find another business or employment opportunities. Impact is
considered as not significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
The impact cacouldn be reversed and be replenished, when the citizens manage
to find another business or employment opportunity. Impact is categorized as
not significant (NS).

5.2.4 Public Health Component
5.2.4.1 Environmental Sanitation
A. Construction Phase
1. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port (alternative-1 and 2)
The activity will involve 3000 people which 1,015 are skilled people and 1,950
unskilled people. This kind of activity will affect quality of environment sanitation on
the land or sea, as location for Refinery or Special Port area. There will be problems
of waste due to the lack of waste treatment facility, thus the waste will be spread
around the location.
The initial profile for environment sanitation was average (3) because there is
around 16.20% of resident that still defecate on the environment and in general
they have no waste treatment. The construction activity will decrease the profile to
bad (1) with percentage of environment sanitation user is less than 25%. The
percentage of sanitation quality change is 42% or its impact magnitude is average
negative (-2).

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-184
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

The grade of impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people affected is quite high, they are construction labour, local
resident, and other society. Impact is categorized as significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact is spreading into the outside of project area or other district. Based
on those condition, impact magnitude as effect of this activity is Siginificant
(S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this activity is on the long time, that is with a high intensity and at
the construction phase, so the impact magnitude is Siginificant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other component which is affected by this activity is social-economic-
culture, so the impact magnitude is Siginificant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact is non cumulative. Thus, the impact is considered as not
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
After the construction activity has done, actually it could be reversed to the
initial condition or provide the prevent activity as soon as possible. So, the
impact will be return to the first condition. Based on those condition, impact
magnitude as an effect of this activity is Not Siginificant (NS).

B. Post Operational Phase
1. Cleaning and Equipment Demobility (Refinery and Special Port)
Ex-material of refinery, special port, pipes, and other facility will leave holes that will
cause water pond. It will generate the disease vector such as mosquito. Besides,
this area will be dirty because there is a lot of debris and waste. The initial profile of
environment sanitation was average (3), and the activity will decrease the quality
into very bad (1), with percentage of environment sanitation usage is less than
25%. The change is around 42% or included into average negative (-2).
The grade of impact significance:

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-185
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
a) The number of people affected
The number of people affected is quite high, they are construction labour, local
resident, and other society. Impact is categorized as significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact is spreading into the outside of project area or other district. Based
on those condition, impact magnitude as effect of this activity is Siginificant
(S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this activity is on the long time, that is with a high intensity and at
the construction phase, so the impact magnitude is Significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other component which is affected by this activity is social-economic-
culture, so the impact magnitude is Significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact is non cumulative. Thus, the impact is considered as not
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
After the construction activity has done, actually it could be reversed to the
initial condition or provide the prevent activity as soon as possible. So, the
impact will be return to the first condition. Based on those condition, impact
magnitude as an effect of this activity is Not Siginificant (NS).

5.2.4.2 Public Health Level
A. Operational Phase
1. Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port and Support facilities
The operational of LNG and other facilities consists of some activities that could
produce gas/dust and waste that could affect public health. It was assured that the
skilled labour are mostly come from other region who is far separated from their
families. The condition will generate the growth of diseases that is related to sexual
infection disease (PMS) because there is a lot of prostitution area and their activity
will increase along with the duration of operational phase that is 20 years.

The initial profile of public health was average (3), considering that bad condition of
environment sanitation and not all of people could get service from health facility,

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-186
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
also the bad healthy and hygienic lifestyle of society. Thus, the public health profile
will decrease into very bad (1). The intensity is quite high and the duration is long,
hence more than 20% of population will suffer from new kinds of disease.
Therefore, the impact magnitude is average negative (-2).
The grade of impact significance:
a) The number of people affected
The number of people affected is quite high, they are employees, local resident,
and other society. Impact is categorized as significant (S).
b) The extent of the impact
The impact is spreading into the outside of project area. Based on those
condition, impact magnitude as effect of this activity is significant (S).
c) The duration of the impact
The impact of this activity is in the long time, it is 20 years, with high
intensity, so the impact magnitude as effect of this activity is significant (S).
d) The number of other environmental component affected
The other component affected by this activity is social-economic-culture, so the
impact magnitude as effect of this activity is significant (S).
e) The cumulative nature of the impact
The impact is non cumulative. Thus, the impact is considered as not
significant (NS).
f) The reversibility or irreversibility of the impact
After the construction activity has done, actually it could be reversed to the
initial condition or provide the prevent activity as soon as possible. So, the
impact will be return to the first condition. Based on those condition, impact
magnitude as an effect of this activity is Not Siginificant (NS).

The recapitulation result of significant impact of Matindok Gas Development Project at
Downstream Division at Banggai Regency Central Sulawesi is presented on the following
table.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-187
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 5.13. Matrix of Significant Impact
Matindok Gas Development Project Plan
Downstream Division at Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi

I mpact Criterion
Activity Phase Activity Plan Environmental Parameter
1 2 3 4 5 6
Total
Number of
Significant
I mpact
(S)
A. Pre 1. Land and Plant Land Owner Pattern (alt-1 & 2) S S S S NS NS 4S
Construction Acquisition Social Process (alt-1 & 2) S S S S NS NS 4S
Public Attitude and Perception S S S S NS NS 4S
(alt-1 & 2)


2. Labour Social Process S S NS S NS NS 3S
Recruitment Public Attitude and Perception S S NS S NS NS 3S

B. Construction 1. Mobility and Traffic Safety S S S S NS NS 4S
Demobility of Road and Bridge Damage S S S S S S 6S
Equipments Public Income NS NS NS NS NS S 1S

2. Land Clearing and Vegetation NS NS S S S NS 3S
Maturation Wild Fauna NS S S S NS NS 3S
Business Opportunity (alt-1 & 2) NS NS NS S NS S 2S

3. Construction of Air Quality 1 (Uso) S S S S NS NS 4S
LNG Refinery and Air Quality 2 (Padang) S S S S NS NS 4S
Special Port Noise (alt-1 & 2) S S S S NS NS 3S
Surface Water Quality (alt-1 & 2) S S S S NS NS 4S
Sea water Quality S S NS S NS NS 3S
Marine Biota (alt-1 & 2) S NS NS S S NS 3S
Traffic Fluency S S S S NS NS 4S
Traffic Safety NS S S S NS NS 3S
Business Opportunity (alt-1 & 2) S S S S NS S 5S
Public Income (alt-1 & 2) S S S NS NS S 4S
Social Processs (alt-1 & 2) S S S S NS NS 4S
Public Attitude and Perception (alt-
1 & 2)
S S S S NS NS 4S
Environmental Sanitation (alt-1 &
2)
S S S S NS NS 4S
4. Dismissing Public Income S S NS NS NS NS 2S
Labour Public Attitude and Perception S NS NS S NS NS 2S


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
V-188
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 5.13. continued
I mpact Criterion
Activity Phase Activity Plan Environmental Parameter
1 2 3 4 5 6
Total
Number of
Significant
I mpact
(S)
C. Operational 1. Labour Demography NS NS NS S NS NS 1S
Recruitment Social Process S S S S NS NS 4S
Public Attitude and Perception S S S S NS NS 4S

2. Operational of Air Quality NS S S S NS NS 3S
LNG Refinery, Noise NS S S S NS NS 3S
Special Port, and Sea water Quality NS NS S S NS NS 2S
Support Facilities Marine Biota (alt-1 & 2) S S S S NS NS 4S
Marine Transp. Safety S NS S S NS NS 3S
Demography NS NS NS S NS NS 1S
Business Opportunity S S S S NS S 5S
Public Income S S S S NS S 5S
Social Process S S NS S NS NS 3S
Social Stratification S S S S NS NS 4S
Public Attitude and Perception S S S S NS NS 4S
Public Health Level S S S S NS NS 4S

D. Post 1. Termination of Air Quality NS S NS S NS NS 2S
Operational LNG Refinery Noise NS S NS S NS NS 2S
Operational Surface Water Quality NS S NS S NS NS 2S
Sea water Quality NS NS S S NS NS 2S
Business Opportunity NS NS NS S NS NS 1S

2. Cleaning and Air Quality S S NS S NS NS 3S
Demobility of Traffic Safety S S NS S NS NS 3S
Equipments (Refinery Road and Bridge Damage S S NS S S S 5S
and Special Port) Public Attitude and Perception NS NS NS S NS NS 1S
Environmental Sanitation S S S NS NS NS 3S

3. Revegetation Vegetation NS NS S S S NS 3S
Wild Fauna S NS S S S NS 4S

4. Dismissing Decrease of Public Income S NS NS S NS NS 2S
Labour Public Attitude and Perception S S NS S NS NS 3S



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-1
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM














Chapter-6
THE EVALUATI ON OF SI GNI FI CANT I MPACT





Based on the Estimation of Significant Impact in Chapter V, it was explained the impacts
that could possibly occur due to the PPGM development, whether it is at the upstream or down
stream section, in the region of Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi. Each impact will be
happened in 4 activity phases, pre-construction, construction, operational and post-operational
phase, towards Geophysic-chemistry, Biology, Social and Public Health component.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-2
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
In the TOR-EIS document, it was explained ways to decide that environmental impact will be
managed or not through the evaluation of significant impacts. The decision determination will
use parameters of impact and level of impact significance in accordance with the Government
Regulation No. 79 of 1999. The criteria of decision determination are as follows:

The decision on hypothetic impact that will be managed is categorized into dikelola
(managed/PK) or tidak dikelola (not managed/TPK), based on these 3 criteria:
a) Environmental parameters having certain Environmental Quality Standard: if the level of
significance (P) 3 and the negative impact expected to arise causes change of value in
certain parameters, then the value will exceed the quality standard. It could be concluded
that the impact is included in the managed significant impact category (PK).
b) Environmental parameters with no Environmental Quality Standard: If (P) 3 and the
value of expected impact (+/-) 2, it could be concluded that the impact is included in the
managed significant impact category (PK).
c) Impacts outside the mentioned criteria are included in the not significant and not managed
impact category (TPK).

Based on the above criteria, Table 6.1 shows the recapitulation of Impact Magnitude and
Level of Impact Importance, and decision on managed or not managed impacts. The
managed environmental impacts are marked with the abbreviation PK (Penting dan
Dikelola/ Significant and Managed), while the not managed impact will be marked by TPK
(Dampak Tidak Penting dan Tidak Dikelola/ Not Significant and Not Managed).

6.1 ACTIVITY I MPACT AT UPSTREAM DIVISION

The recapitulation of Magnitude Degree and Impact Significance Level of Matindok Gas
Development Project at Upstream division was presented in Table 6.1.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-3
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.1. Recapitulation of Magnitude Degree and Impact Significant Level
Matindok Gas Development Project at Upstream division
Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi

I mpact Significance
Level Activity
Phase

Type of Hypothetic I mpact Source of Impact
Impact
Magnitude
(+/ ) P %
Decision/ Conclusion of
Evaluation Result
(PK/ TPK)
PRE
CONSTRUCTION
SOCI AL

Change of Land Ownership Pattern Land and Plants Acquisition 2 4 66.67 PK
Social Process Disturbance 1. Land and Plants Acquisition 2 4 66.67 PK
2. Recruitment of local Labour force 1 2 33.33 TPK
1. Land and Plants Acquisition 2 4 66.67 PK Change of Public Attitude and
Perception 2. Recruitment of local Labour force 1 2 33.33 TPK




CONSTRUCTION GEOPHISYC-CHEMISTRY
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments, material and
employees
2 3 50.00 PK
2. Land Clearing and maturation 1 1 16.67 TPK
3. Construction activity of Production Facility of BS and
GPF
2 2 33.33 PK
4. Gas pipeline installation (alt-1) 1 3 50.00 TPK
5. Gas pipeline installation (alt-2) 1 2 33.33 TPK
Decreasing of Ambient Air Quality
6. Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) 1 2 33.33 TPK
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments, material and
employees
1 2 33.33 TPK
2. Land Clearing and maturation 1 1 16.67 TPK
3. Construction activity of Production Facility of BS and
GPF
2 4 66.67 PK
4. Gas pipeline installation (alt-1) 1 3 50.00 TPK
5. Gas pipeline installation (alt-2) 1 1 16.67 TPK
Noise
6. Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) 1 2 33.33 TPK
Soil Erosion Land Clearing and maturation 2 4 66.67 PK















Disturbance of Drainage and
Irrigation System
Gas pipeline installation 2 3 50.00 PK

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-4
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.1. Continued
I mpact Significance
Level Activity
Phase

Type of Hypothetic I mpact Source of Impact
Impact
Magnitude
(+/ ) P %
Decision/ Conclusion of
Evaluation Result
(PK/ TPK)
Construction activity of Production Facility of BS and
GPF
2 3 50.00 PK Decreasing of Surface Water
Quality

1. Construction activity of Production Facility of BS
and GPF
1 2 33.33 TPK
Decreasing of Seawater Quality
2. Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) 2 3 50.00 PK
1. Gas pipeline installation 2 2 33.33 PK Land Transportation (Disturbance
of traffic fluency)
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments, material and
employees
2 4 66.67 PK
Land Transportation (Disturbance
of traffic safety)
2. Gas pipeline installation 3 3 50.00 PK
Road damage Mobility and demobility of equipments, material and
employees
2 6 100.00 PK
BI OLOGY
Decrease in abundance and
variety of vegetation
Land Clearing and maturation 3 3 50.00 PK
1. Land Clearing and maturation 2 4 66.67 PK
2. Construction activity of Production Facility 1 2 33.33 TPK
3. Gas pipeline installation (alt-1) 2 3 50.00 PK
4. Gas pipeline installation (alt-2) 2 3 50.00 PK
Disturbance of Wild Fauna
5. Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) 3 5 83.33 PK
1. Construction of Block Station (BS) and GPF 1 3 50.00 PK Disturbance of abundance and
variety of raw water biota 2. Gas pipeline installation 1 3 50.00 PK
CONSTRUCTION
Disturbance of abundance and
variety of sea water biota
Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) 1 4 66.67 PK

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-5
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.1. Continued
I mpact Significance
Level Activity
Phase

Type of Hypothetic I mpact Source of Impact
Impact
Magnitude
(+/ ) P %
Decision/ Conclusion of
Evaluation Result
(PK/ TPK)
SOCI AL
1. Land Clearing and maturation +1 1 16.67 TPK
2. Construction activity of BS and GPF +1 1 33.33 TPK
3. Gas pipeline installation (alt-1) +1 0 16.67 TKP
4. Gas pipeline installation (alt-2) +1 1 16.67 TKP
Increasing Public Income

5. Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) +1 1 16.67 TKP
1. Land Clearing and maturation +1 2 33.33 TPK
2. Construction activity of BS and GPF +1 2 33.33 TPK
3. Gas pipeline installation (alt-1) +1 2 33.33 TPK
4. Gas pipeline installation (alt-2) +1 3 50.00 TPK
Increasing Business Opportunity


5. Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) +1 3 50.00 TPK

1. Construction activity of BS and GPF 2 4 66.67 PK
2. Gas pipeline installation (alt-1) 2 4 66.67 PK
3. Gas pipeline installation (alt-2) 2 4 66.67 PK
Disturbance of Social Process

4. Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) 2 4 66.67 PK
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments, material and
employees
2 3 50.00 PK
2. Construction activity of BS and GPF 2 4 66.67 PK
3. Gas pipeline installation (alt-1) 1 0 00.00 TPK
4. Gas pipeline installation (alt-2) 1 0 00.00 TPK
5. Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) 0 00.00 TPK
Change of public attitude and
perception



6. Dismissing Labour 1 2 33.33 TPK
PUBLI C HEALTH
CONSTRUSTI ON
Degradation of Environmental
Sanitation
1. Construction activity of Production Facility (BS and
GPF)
2 3 50.00 PK
2. Gas pipeline installation (alt-1 and alt-2) 2 3 50.00 PK
3. Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) 1 0 00.00 TPK



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-6
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.1. Continued
I mpact Significance
Level Activity
Phase

Type of Hypothetic I mpact Source of Impact
Impact
Magnitude
(+/ ) P %
Decision/ Conclusion of
Evaluation Result
(PK/ TPK)
OPERATI ONAL GEOPHYSI C - CHEMI STRY
1. Drilling of Development Well 2 1 16.67 TKP Decreasing Ambient Air Quality
(dust and gas) 2. Production facility operation (BS and GPF) 2 3 50.00 PK
Increasing Noise 1. Production facility operation (BS and GPF) 1 1 16.67 TPK
1. Drilling of Development Well 2 3 50.00 PK Decreasing Surface water Quality
2. Production Operational in GPF 2 4 66.67 PK
1. Construction of Gas Production Facility of BS and
GPF
1 1 16.67 TPK Decreasing Sea water Quality
2. Drilling of Development Well 1 1 16.67 TPK
Disturbance of Traffic Safety Distribution of condensate through land transportation 2 4 66.67 PK
Road and Bridge damage Distribution of condensate through land transportation 2 6 100.00 PK
BI OLOGY
1. Drilling of Development Well 1 4 66.67 PK

Decreasing the abundance and
Variety of Raw water biota 2. Production facility operation (BS and GPF) 1 4 66.67 PK
SOCI AL
Change of Demography Composition Labor Recruitment 1 1 16.67 TPK
1. Labor Recruitment +1 2 33.33 TPK
2. Drilling of Development Well +1 2 33.33 TPK
Increasing Public Income

3. Gas Production Operation in GPF +1 2 33.33 TPK
1. Drilling of Development Well +2 5 83.33 PK

Business Opportunity
2. Gas Production Operation in GPF +2 5 83.33 PK
1. Labor Recruitment 2 4 66.67 PK Disturbance of Social Process
2. Gas Production Operation in GPF 2 4 66.67 PK
Stratification Social Gas Production Operation in GPF 2 4 66.67 PK
1. Labor Recruitment 2 4 66.67 PK
2. Gas Production Operation in GPF 2 4 66.67 PK
3. Channeling of gas and condensate through pipes 1 2 33.33 TPK

Change of public attitude and
perception




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-7
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.1. Continued
I mpact Significance
Level Activity
Phase

Type of Hypothetic I mpact Source of Impact
Impact
Magnitude
(+/ ) P %
Decision/ Conclusion of
Evaluation Result
(PK/ TPK)
PUBLI C HEALTH
Degradation of Environmental
Sanitation
Operational of Gas Production Facility in GPF 1 1 16.67 TPK
Public Health Level

1. Drilling of Development Well 2 4 66.67 PK

2. Gas Production Operation in BS and GPF 2 4 66.67 PK
POST
OPERATI ONAL
GEOPHYSI C CHEMI STRY

Increasing ambient air quality Stop production operation (BS and GPF) +1 1 16.67 TPK
Decrease noise level Stop production operation (BS and GPF) +2 2 33.33 TPK
Increasing sea water quality Stop production operation (BS and GPF) +1 2 33.33 TPK
Disturbance of Traffic Safety Demobility of Equipments +2 3 50.00 PK
Road Damage Demobility of Equipments 2 5 83.33 PK
BI OLOGY 2
Increasing of variety and density
of vegetation
Revegetation +2 4 66.67 PK
Increasing of variety and
abundance of animal
Revegetation +2 4 66.67 PK
SOCI AL







Decreasing of public income Dismissing labour 1 2 33.33 TPK
Decreasing of business
opportunity
Stop production operation in GPF 1 1 16.67 TPK
1. Demobility of Equipments 1 1 16.67 TPK

Change of Public Attitude and
Perception

2. Dismissing Labour 2 3 50.00 PK


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-8
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
6.1.1 Analysis of Significant Impacts

Every activity phase or plan of gas field development project activity, whether in the pre-
construction, construction, operational and post-operational phase, will cause impacts on
environmental components, neither negative nor positive. The activity plan as the source of
impact, that causes many significant impacts towards the environmental component, is as
follows:
1. Pre-construction Phase consists of land and plants acquisition;
2. Construction Phase consists of mobility and demobility of equipment, material, and
labors, land clearing and maturation, construction of BS and GPF, and gas pipeline
installation;
3. Operational Phase consists of labor recruitment, drilling of development wells, production
operation in GPF, Distribution of sulphur and condensate through land transportation;
4. Post-operational Phase consists of Demobility of Equipments, Revegetation, Dismissing
labour.

The environmental components that are affected by significant impacts are as follows:
1. Geophysic-Chemistry Component consists of ambient air quality, surface water quality,
sea water quality, soil erosion, drainage and irrigation systems, and land transportation;
2. Biology Component consists of vegetation, terrestrial fauna, and raw water biota;
3. Social Component consists of Land ownership, business opportunity, social process, social
stratification, public attitude and perception;
4. Public Health Component consists of environment sanitation and public health level.

6.1.1.1 Pre-construction Phase

The significant impact that might appear during pre-construction phase is the change of land
ownership pattern, as a result of land and plants acquisition. It also change the land use, thus
there will be a change in the recent revision of local spatial layout.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-9
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
6.1.1.2 Construction Phase

The activity of land maturation for development of drilling well, pipe line installation,
construction of BS and GPF, will have negative impact to the surface flow pattern, erosion, and
decreasing the vegetation and wild fauna.

Meanwhile the land preparation activity will disturb stream flows even though there are tunnels
that will be installed, if the size does not consider river flow capacity, it will cause significant
impacts showed by water that could not be collected by the tunnels. Besides that, the strong
water flow that could not be collected in the tunnels, will covering the tunnels and cause road
damage. The construction of roads without drainage systems will cause flood in roads. The
flood will head to the river and accelerate the erosion process in roads and more water is unable
to be collected in the tunnels. High rain intensity will increase the risk of flood and could spill
out, causing road damage and disturbance of accessibility at surrounding locations. If the land
preparation activity is conducted in the rainy season, it will increase the intensity or variety type
of erosion, becoming rill erosion and gulley erosion. Erosion occurring in new pipelines or roads
will increase sedimentation in surrounding rivers. The land preparation activity for pipe
installation in several locations will cut banks, causing the formation of slopes, increasing the
risk of landslides. However, the regions affected by the slides are relatively small and the
materials contained in the slides are soil, decayed rocks, or a mixture of both. This landslide will
mainly cause disturbance of road accessibility.

The activity of land clearing, land consolidation, road works for the construction of pipe
installation from wells to BS (in Donggi, Sukamaju and Matindok-Maleoraja field) and
construction of BS and trunk line (BS Donggi-LNG Plant) will cause negative significant impact in
the form of degradation of population and plant type. The installation of pipe will pass the
plantation area (rubber and coconut). As for the segment that passes SM Bangkiriang, pipe
installation is planned to use 3 alternatives. Plan of alternative line-1 passing SM Bangkiriang
which factual condition at the moment has been used by local residents for the garden and palm
tree, and a few others are secondary forest covered by natural trees. The SM Bangkiriang forest
is preserved area for Maleo birds, but its condition is getting worrisome due to the decrease of
tree types that could be the food source for Maleo bird, caused by the substitution of those tree
types with crop trees such as rubber, chocolate and palm tree, by private companies.
Therefore, pipeline installation alternative-1 and alternative-2 empirically will not decrease the

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-10
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
natural vegetation significantly and the underground pipe installation will not affect the
migration of Maleo bird to the beach to lay eggs, because the migration is done by flying in the
forest region in the northern side towards the beach located in the southern side. Even so, some
animal types are protected by SM Bangkiriang that we could still find, they are babirusa and
rangkong bird, and hence its existence around project location requires attention. Some
sensitive animal types are shy, making them avoid the noise such as vehicle for construction,
while tolerant types will stay around project areas. The inspection road for inspection of pipe is
often used by residents (although illegal) for roads especially in field development and
construction of BS Sukamaju locations which is near the SM Bangkiriang will trigger the resident
activity around forest or even enter in forest and hunters also use that road to enter the forest
which could accelerate the wild animal reduction in SM Bangkiriang. Meanwhile installation of
pipe of alternative-3 that is conducted through coast will influence the existence and
preservation of Maleo bird. This protected Bird type performs migration from SM Bangkiriang
towards the coast to lay eggs, causing disturbance and damage of Maleo bird habitat.
Installations of this pipeline, alternative-3, will also cause the damage of coral reef in the
territorial water.

The mobility activity of equipments and material mostly affects the environment around
development location. The mobility of material and workers from port or location of dwelling
place to work location mostly will use the provincial road and in concentrated settlement area in
Banggai Regency, in the right-left side of the road, will disturb public traffic as well as causing
decrease of air quality caused by the increase of dust concentration. Further consequences are
public negative perception towards PPGM, due to public discomfort.
On the contrary, activities in the construction phase will give the benefit for society because it
will open job/business opportunity. Therefore, there will be an increase in public income of
residents that are directly or indirectly involved with the activity. However, the high level of
unemployment and insufficient education background will cause some labour force not be
accommodated in activities of the construction phase. This will cause disappointment leading to
negative attitude and perception towards PPGM.

The activities of the construction phase will influence all environmental aspects. Some
environmental parameters have potency to exceed quality standards such as dust concentration
at pipe installation locations and production facilities. If this activity takes place in the rainy

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-11
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
season, the result will not be obtained, but on the contrary, the erosion and sedimentation level
will increase. The activity of land clearing, especially BS in Sukamaju and pipe installation
alternative line- 1 and alternative- line 2 is conducted in limited area, but if not handled well, its
impact will occur in the next phase because it will trigger public activities causing disturbance to
Maleo birds and will inhabit places deeper in to the forest. The installation of pipe alternative-
line 3 following coastline of the SM Bangkiriang will disturb the coral reefs ecosystem, and in
construction activities will disturb the beach environment as the habitat of Maleo birds If
compared to other alternatives, the pipeline through the coast will relatively have bigger
influence toward the environmental biotic.

Construction Phase will not have a significant effect on the degradation of environmental
ecological function, because areas affected are relatively minimum and widespread. The
possibility of residents having high expectations to be involved in the project will become a
problem. If expectations are not fulfilled, it will cause disappointment leading to negative
perception towards PPGM. If the impact is not handled well, it will continue to affect further
phase, which is operational phase.

6.1.1.3 Operational Phase

The activity of drilling development well will give positive impact to the business opportunity of
local society (multiplier effects). It will increase their income. But in the other hand, the drilling
will give negative impact, such as the possibility of spilled mud from the drilling that polluting
the water and it will decrease the abundance of raw water biota.

Activity of production process in BS Donggi, Sukamaju and Matindok and liquid production in
LNG Plant will cause the decrease in air quality caused by flare stack, emission exhausted from
compressor and genset, and vehicles. Types of pollutant possible to be released from the
activity are HC, CO
2
, CO, NO
X
, and SO
2
.

The pipelines that are installed will cause anxiety of society, that is the leak and the other
unexpected impact that somehow could be like that in Sidoarjo (Lapindo). This various opinion
of society will generate negative perception of society towards PPGM Project.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-12
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The production activity maintenance will produce liquid waste. Handling procedure to the
possibility of leakage improves the effort to lessen the river contamination, because leakage
causes quality degradation of the surface water. If the effort of quality control of liquid waste
fails, it will cause significant impact in the form of degradation of freshwater biota density. The
downhill water quality affects directly to plankton and benthos later on through the food chain
will affect the fish variety. Several members of the society in the study region take fish in the
project location for family consumption or to be sold. Therefore, the risk of water quality
decrease will have to be minimized.

Activity of production operation will be desired by most residents of the West Toili, Batui, and
Kintom and even in the Banggai Regency, because they expect to work or get business
opportunity. The amount of labor needed are more than 430 employees and in a long period of
operation, more than 20 years will cause the increase in public income, through company or
contractors recruitment or those taking benefit to open business because of the PPGM.

The direct impact will be suffered by resident around project having access as labour or
unskilled labour in each project activity, while indirectly through informal sector creation to be
ready for requirement of company employees. If employees earnings answer the demand,
hence other economic activity such as for the housing development that needs various material
such as sand, river stone, cement, soil and other, despitefully also will grow the job opportunity
for some of other society. The business opportunity for local society is able to improve the local
public income, and could give the prosperity for resident. However, local economic growth will
not be equal because citizen having wide farm, good education and big capital will have the
better opportunity. This could generate social stratification in the society that in the end will give
negative perception of the society.

The activity of construction phase will influence all environmental aspect. Some environmental
parameter have potency to exceed quality standard if not handled well, such as some chemical
component and water chemical in location for production operation in Donggi, Sukamaju,
Matindok. The operational activity takes place for about 20 years. This liquid waste is required to
be well-managed because it will cause the derivative impact in the form of degradation of raw
water biota and seawater biota. Other component to be concerned is society, if water is used for
the activity of resident; it has a risk to decrease public health. Meanwhile, residents have high

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-13
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
expectation to be involved in project activities at the operational phase. However if expectations
are not fulfilled, it will cause disappointment leading to negative perception towards PPGM.

6.1.1.4 Post Operational Phase

The activity of well closing and production operations will give positive impacts on air, water
vegetation, and wild animals because there is no water and air pollution. Meanwhile, the
production facilities that no longer being maintained will be the place for growing plantation,
and it will increase a green environment. This process will grow naturally, could not be
prevented or developed. On the other hand, negative impacts that could happen are the
decrease of public income, job and business opportunity. The ex-workers have to adapt with
their new household expenditure. They did not earn any income from the project activity
anymore, as a result of working contract termination. This post-operational phase will be started
when the gas and liquid gas are no longer economically produced.

The more detail description of activities and its managed significant impacts (primary,
secondary, tertiary, and quartery) is shown in the Figure 6.1.

According to the study, the type of significant impacts that need to be managed in priority is
presented in Table 6.2.


Figure 6.1. Flowchart of Relationship between Activity and Managed Significant Impact of Matindok Gas Development Project, UpstreamDivision
Land and Plants
Acquisition
Mobility and Demobility
of Equipments
Construction of BF and
GPF
Production Operationala
at GPF
Construction Operational
Land Ownership
Pattern
Soil Erosion
Vegetation Wild Fauna RawWater Biota
Air Quality &
Dust/Noise
Environmental
Sanitation
Marine Biota
Public Attitude and
Perception
P
rim
a
ry
Im
p
a
c
t
S
e
c
o
n
d
a
ry
Im
p
a
c
t
D
T
e
rtia
ry
Im
p
a
c
t
Q
u
a
rte
n
a
ry

Im
p
a
c
t
Public Health Level
Business
Opportunity
Social Stratification
Post Operational
ACTIVITY PLAN OF
MATINDOK GAS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Surface
Water
Quality
Social Process Traffic Safety Road and Bridge
Damage
Pre-construction
Land Clearing and
Maturation
Gas Pipeline Installation Labour Recruitment Development Wells
Drilling
Condensate and
Sulphur Transportation
Revegetation Cleaning and Demobility
of Equipments
Dismissing Labour
Drainage and
Irrigation System
Sea Water Quality
EIS MAtindok Gas Development Project VI-14

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-15
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.2. Type of Significant Impacts Which Get The Priority To Be Managed
Upstream division

Activity Phase Type of Hypothetic I mpact I mpact Source
Decision/ Conclusion
of Evaluation Result
(PK/ TPK)
PRE
CONSTRUCTI ON
SOCI AL

Change of Land Ownership Pattern Land and Plants Acqusition PK
Disturbance of Social Process Land and Plants Acqusition PK



Change of Attitude and Perception of
Society
Land and Plants Acqusition PK
CONSTRUCTI ON GEOPHYSI C-CHEMI STRY

Decreasing ambient Air Quality
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments,
material and employees
PK

2. Construction activity of Production
Facility of BS and GPF
PK
Increasing Noise
Construction activity of Production
Facility of BS and GPF
PK
Soil Erosion Land Clearing and maturation PK

Disturbance of Irrigation and
Drainage System
Gas pipeline installation PK
Decreasing Surface Water Quality Construction activity of Production
Facility of BS and GPF
PK
Decreasing Sea Water Quality Gas pipeline installation through sea
(alt-3)
PK
Land Transportation (Disturbance of
traffic fluency)
Gas pipeline installation PK
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments,
material and employees
PK Land Transportation (Disturbance of
traffic safety)
2. Gas pipeline installation PK
Road Damage
Mobility and demobility of equipments,
material and employees
PK
BI OLOGY
Decrease in abundance and
variety of vegetation
Land Clearing and maturation PK
1. Land Clearing and maturation PK
2. Gas pipeline installation (alt-1) PK
3. Gas pipeline installation (alt-2) PK
Disturbance of Wild Fauna
4. Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) PK
1. Construction of Block Station (BS)
and GPF
PK
Disturbance of abundance and
variety of raw water biota 2. Gas pipeline installation PK

Disturbance of abundance and
variety of sea water biota (plankton,
benthos, coral reefs, fish)
Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) PK
SOCI AL
1. Construction activity of Production
Facility of BS and GPF
PK
2. Gas pipeline installation (alt-1) PK
3. Gas pipeline installation (alt-2) PK

Disturbance of Social Process

4. Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) PK


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-16
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.2. Continued
Activity Phase Type of Hypothetic I mpact I mpact Source
Decision/ Conclusion
of Evaluation Result
(PK/ TPK)
CONSTRUCTI ON Change of public Attitude and
perception
Mobility and demobility of equipments,
material and employees
PK
PUBLI C HEALTH
Degradation of Environmental
Sanitation
1. Construction activity of Production
Facility (BS and GPF
PK
2. Gas pipeline installation (alt-1 and 2) PK
OPERATI ONAL GEOPHYSI C CHEMI STRY


Decreasing Ambient Air Quality
(dust and gas)
Production facility operation (BS and
GPF)
PK
Decreasing Surface water Quality 1. Drilling of Development Well PK
2. Production Operational in GPF PK
Disturbance of Traffic Safety
Distribution of condensate and sulphur
through land transportation
PK
Road and Bridge damage
Distribution of condensate and sulphur
through land transportation
PK
BI OLOGY
1. Drilling of Development Well PK

Decreasing the abundance and
Variety of Raw water biota
2. Production facility operation (BS and
GPF)
PK
SOCI AL
1. Drilling of Development Well PK
Business Opportunity
2. Production Operational in GPF PK
1. Labor Recruitment PK
Disturbance of Social Process
2. Production Operational in GPF PK
Stratification Social Production Operational in GPF PK
1. Labor Recruitment PK

Change of Public attitude and
perception 2. Production Operational in GPF PK
PUBLI C HEALTH
1. Drilling of Development Well PK
Decreasing Public Health Level 2. Production facility operation (BS and
GPF)
PK
POST
OPERATI ONAL
GEOPHYSI C CHEMI STRY
Disturbance of Traffic Safety Demobility of Equipments PK
Road Damage Demobility of Equipments PK
BI OLOGY
Increasing of variety and density of
vegetation
Revegetation PK
Increasing of variety and abundance
of animal
Revegetation PK

SOCI AL ECONOMI C CULTURE


Change of Public Attitude and
Perception
Dismissing labour PK



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-17
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
6.1.2 Study and Basic Instruction of Environmental Management

According to result of holistic study mentioned above, there are impact types that got priority to
be managed. Table 6.3 presents a management instruction of each impact type that get
priority to be managed at each activity phase.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-18
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.3. The Summary of Study and Basic Instruction of Environmental Management
Matindok Gas Development Project, Upstream division

Activity Phase
Activity Component
That Cause The Impact
Environment Component
incurred by The Impact
Environmental Management Instruction
Land and Plants Acquisition
Change of Land Ownership
Pattern
Socialization to the society about land and plants acquisition
Making data of land ownership that will be acquired
Coordination with the related institution
PRE-
CONSTRUCTION

Social Process
Change of Public Attitude and
Perception
Socialization to the society about land and plants acquisition
Fixing the price of land according to the agreement with the land owner and its payment
method
Coordination with the related institution
Involving Tim 9 and BPN in the land acquisition process
CONSTRUCTION Mobility and demobility of
equipments, material and
employees
Air Quality
Diesel, generator, etc, are equipped with the standard emission controller
Using water sprinkler along the road for mobility activity, especially near the resident area,
during dry season

Construction activity of
Production Facility
Air Quality
Use of Controller of standard emission for diesel engine of generator and oil fuel that have
low sulphur rate
Using dust suspresion control
Equiping worker by K3 ( ex. masker)
Noise
Development activity generating noise conducted in the daytime
Using earplug or earmuff
Surface Water Quality Conducting the hydrostatics test analysis to all discard water

Mobility and demobility of
equipments, material and
employees
Traffic fluency
Arrangement of transportation Schedule which do not at the same time with the busy hours
of morning and daytime
Counseling to transportation driver to be careful during piloting transportation in roadway,
especially around area of settlement and urban area (Kintom, Batui, Toili And Toili West)

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-19
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.3. continued

Activity Phase
Activity Component
That Cause The Impact
Environment
Component
incurred by The
Impact
Environmental Management Instruction
CONSTRUCTION Construction of Production
Facility

Activity of gas pipeline
installation that cut through the
road
Traffic Safety
Socialization to citizen living around route of transportation that there will be traffic vehicle
project using big truck/trailer.
Maximum vehicle Speed is 40 km / hour
Installation of traffic sign attached before entering project area in each distance 150 m and
50 meter, on two direction
Illuminator installation to enlighten the road in the activity area
Installation of gas pipeline that cut the public road
Illuminator installation to enlighten the road in the pipeline installation area

Road and Bridge damage
Light reparation when the road is still used for the traffic of material vehicle by given the
soil then it is compacted and covered by latasir
Making of bridge Prop to add the construction strength
Using sea transportation if the bridge could not be passed
Land Clearing and maturation Soil Erosion Planting pioneer grass (leguminous) on the pipeline area
Build a simple channel and well for surface water at the area of BS and GPF
Build a simple drainage channel for surface water and soil (as a result of erosion) around
the well location at gas well area

Vegetation
Revegetation around the activity area that do not disturbing the construction activity

Fauna
Revegetation around the activity area that do not disturbing the construction activity
Maintaining the terrestrial fauna by minimizing land clearing only at around the area for
production facility, pipeline, BS and GPF
Gas pipeline installation Drainage and Irrigation
System
Preparing the pipe extension that will be planted crossing the drainage or river path
At each pipeline crossing the river path, the installation has to be done promptly
Gas pipeline installation (alt-3) Sea water quality Placing environment supervisor to watch over the activity, especially when there is oil spill
from the equipment, and handling the situation
Limiting the area for construction activity to minimize turbidity
Construction activity of BS and
GPF
Gas pipeline installation

Raw water biota
Water from hydrotest of BS and GPF construction activity must be tested before it is
discharge into river to ascertain that the water is up to environmental quality standard
Animal
Sea water biota

The construction pipe installation is conducted at the same time with the installation of JOB
pipe
Facility for construction must not use the Bangkiriang beach for pipe construction service
Water from hydrotest of BS and GPF construction activity must be tested before it is
discharge into sea
Rehabilitating the coral reefs around the activity area

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-20
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 6.3. continued
Activity Phase
Activity Component
That Cause The Impact
Environment
Component
incurred by The
Impact
Environmental Management Instruction
CONSTRUCTION Construction activity of Gas
Production Facility (BS and GPF)
Social Process Socialization of activity plan to the society
Facilitating social and religious activities of the society
Mobility and demobility of
equipments, material and
employees
Attitude and Perception of
Society
Facilitating social activities of the society
Socialization of activity plan to the society
Construction of BS and BF
Construction of BS and BF
Gas pipeline installation
Environment Sanitation Providing the particular place to accommodate the domestic and construction waste
Providing MCK facility
Socialization
OPERATI ONAL

Production operation in GPF Ambient Air Quality Operating AGRU and SRU
Installing CEM
Equipping the worker with K3 facilities
Drilling the Development Well
Production operation in GPF
Surface Water Quality Using waste water treatment or effluent treatment for water before it is discharged into the
environment
Condensate Transportation
through Land Road
Road Safety Arrangement of transportation Schedule which do not at the same time with the busy hours of
morning and daytime
Counseling to transportation driver to be careful during piloting transportation in roadway,
especially around area of settlement and urban area (Kintom, Batui, Toili And Toili West)
The rule for condensate transportation is according to the regulation of Kep. Dirjen Hub Darat No
SK 725/AJ.302/DRJD/2004
Maximum vehicle Speed is 40 km / hour
Road and Bridge Damage Light reparation when the road is still used for the traffic of material vehicle by given the soil then
it is compacted and covered by latasir
Making of bridge Prop to add the construction strength
Drilling the Development Well
Production operation in GPF
Raw water biota Liquid waste treatment before it is discharged to the environment




EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-21
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 6.3. continued
Activity
Phase
Activity Component
That Cause The Impact
Environment
Component
incurred by The
Impact
Environmental Management Instruction
OPERATI ONAL

Drilling the Development Well
Production operation in GPF
Business Opportunity Auction for the local subcontractor to be involved in the operational activity of Matindok Gas
Development Project
Giving facility to the local society to participate in the business opportunity, for example by giving
the loan through Pertamina cooperation
Labour recruitment
Production operation in GPF
Social Process Giving transparent information about job opportunity for the local society (the qualification, the
number, and selection process)
Giving priority to the local society, especially the unskilled, according to the need for project
activity
The skilled employee will be selected according to the needs
The selection process for unskilled employee is conducted together with local legal entity (for ex.
KUD), and for the skilled employee is using regional and national recruitment institution
Production operation in GPF Social stratification Several facilities for the employees could be accessed by local society
Facilitating social, sport, and religious activities of the society
Labour recruitment
Production operation in GPF
Attitude and Perception of
Society
a. Positive impact
Increasing the participation of businessman and local society in every Matindok gas
development operational activity, for example informing the routine activity to the society
Giving facility to the local society to participate in the business opportunity, for example by
giving the loan through Pertamina cooperation
b. Negative impact
Facilitating social activities of the society
Socialization of activity plan to the society

Labour recruitment
Production operation in GPF
Public Health Impact source treatment (dust, gas emission, noise, also liquid waste treatment before it is
discharged to the environment)
Socialization of Healthy and Hygenic Lifestyle (PHBS) for the employee and society


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-22
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.3. continue
Activity
Phase
Activity Component
That Cause The Impact
Environment
Component
incurred by The
Impact
Environmental Management Instruction
POST
OPERATI ONAL
Demobility of equipment using
hard vehicle
Traffic safety Arrangement of transportation Schedule which do not at the same time with the busy hours of
morning and daytime
Counseling to transportation driver to be careful during piloting transportation in roadway,
especially around area of settlement and urban area (Kintom, Batui, Toili And Toili West)
Socialization to citizen living around route of transportation that there will be traffic vehicle
project using big truck/trailer.
Maximum vehicle Speed is 40 km / hour
Road and Bridge Damage Light reparation when the road is still used for the traffic of material vehicle by given the soil then
it is compacted and covered by latasir
Making of bridge Prop to add the construction strength
Using sea transportation if the bridge could not be passed
Revegetation Vegetation Restoration to the initial condition
Revegetation activity using local plantation according to the area width

Fauna Restoration to the initial condition
Revegetation activity using local plantation according to the area width

Dismissing Labour Attitude and Perception of
Society
Strengthening the social communication network by socialization before dismissing labour activity
Helping the society with increasing their enterpreneurship or skill



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-23
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
6.2. ACTIVITY I MPACT AT DOWNSTREAM DIVISI ON

The recapitulation of Degree of Magnitude and Impact Significant Level of Matindok Gas
Development Project at Downstream division is presented at Table 6.4.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-24
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.4. Recapitulation of Degree of Magnitude and Impact Significant Level
Matindok Gas Development Project at Downstream division
Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi
I mpact Significant Level
Activity
Phase

Type of Hypothetic I mpact Source of I mpact
Impact
Magnitude
(+/ )
P %
Decision/ Conclusion
of Evaluation Result
(PK/ TPK)
PRE
CONSTRUCTION
SOCI AL

Change of Land Ownership Pattern Land and Plants Acquisition 2 4 66.67 PK
1. Land and Plants Acquisition 2 4 66.67 PK



Social Process Disturbance
2. Recruitment of Labour force 2 3 50.00 PK
1. Land and Plants Acquisition 2 4 66.67 PK Change of Public Attitude and
Perception 2. Recruitment of Labour force 2 3 50.00 PK
CONSTRUCTION GEOPHISYC-CHEMISTRY
1. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port
at Padang
2 4 66.67 PK
Decreasing of Ambient Air Quality
2. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port
at Uso
2 66.67 PK
1. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port
at Padang
2 4 66.67 PK
Noise
2. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port
at Uso
2 4 66.67 PK
1. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port
at Padang
2 4 66.67 PK Decreasing of Surface Water
Quality
2. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port
at Uso
2 4 66.67 PK
1. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port
at Padang
2 3 50.00 PK














Decreasing of Seawater Quality
2. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port
at Uso
2 3 50.00 PK

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-25
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.4. Continued
I mpact Significant Level
Activity
Phase

Type of Hypothetic I mpact Source of I mpact
Impact
Magnitude
(+/ )
P %
Decision/ Conclusion of
Evaluation Result
(PK/ TPK)
Land Transportation (Disturbance
of traffic fluency)
Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port at
Padang and Uso
2 4 66.67 PK
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments, material and
employees
2 4 66.67 PK
Land Transportation (Disturbance
of traffic safety) 2. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port
at Padang and Uso
2 3 50.00 PK
Road and Bridge damage Mobility and demobility of equipments, material and
employees
2 6 100.00 PK
BI OLOGY
Decrease in variety and Density
of vegetation
Land Clearing and maturation 3 3 50.00 PK
Disturbance of Wild Animal Land Clearing and maturation 2 3 50.00 PK
1. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port
at Padang
1 3 50.00 PK Disturbance of abundance and
variety of sea water biota
2. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port
at Uso
1 3 50.00 PK
SOCI AL
1. Land Clearing and maturation +1 1 16.67 TPK Increasing Public Income
2. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port +2 4 66.67 PK
Decreasing Public Income Dismissing Labour 1 2 33.33 TPK
1. Land Clearing and maturation +1 2 33.33 TPK Increasing Business Opportunity
2. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port +2 5 83.33 PK
Disturbance of Social Process

Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port 2 4 66.67 PK
1. Construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port 2 4 66.67 PK
CONSTRUCTION

Negative Public Attitude and
perception 2. Dismissing Labour 1 2 33.33 TPK


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-26
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.4. Continued
I mpact Significant Level
Activity
Phase

Type of Hypothetic I mpact Source of I mpact
Impact
Magnitude
(+/ )
P %
Decision/ Conclusion of
Evaluation Result
(PK/ TPK)
PUBLI C HEALTH
1. Construction of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and
Support Facility at Padang
2 4 50.00 PK
CONSTRUSTION

Degradation of Environmental
Sanitation 2. Construction of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and
Support Facility at Uso
2 4 50.00 PK
GEOPHYSIC - CHEMISTRY
Decreasing Air Quality Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and
Support Facility
2 3 50.00 PK
Increasing Noise Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and
Support Facility
2 3 50.00 PK
Decreasing Sea water Quality Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and
Support Facility
2 3 50.00 PK
Marine Transportation
(Disturbance of Marine
Transportation Safety)
Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and
Support Facility
2 3 50.00 PK
BI OLOGY
Decreasing the abundance and
Variety of Sea water biota
Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and
Support Facility
1 4 66.67 PK
SOCI AL
Demography: Increasing Density Labour Recruitment 1 1 16.67 TPK
Increasing Business Opportunity Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and
Support Facility
+2 5 83.33 PK
Increasing Public Income Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and
Support Facility
+2 5 83.33 PK
1. Labour Recruitment 2 4 66.67 PK Disturbance of Social Process
2. Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and
Support Facility
2 3 50.00 PK
OPERATI ONAL
Stratification Social Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and
Support Facility
2 4 66.67 PK


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-27
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.4. Continued

I mpact Significant Level
Activity
Phase

Type of Hypothetic I mpact Source of I mpact
Impact
Magnitude
(+/ )
P %
Decision/ Conclusion of
Evaluation Result
(PK/ TPK)
1. Labour Recruitment 2 4 66.67 PK Negative Public attitude and
perception 2. Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port
and Support Facility
2 4 66.67 PK
PUBLI C HEALTH
OPERATI ON
Decreasing Public Health Level

Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and
Support Facility
2 4 66.67 PK
GEOPHYSI C CHEMI STRY
Increasing air quality Stop operation of LNG Refinery +1 2 33.33 TPK
Decrease noise level Stop operation of LNG Refinery +1 2 33.33 TPK
Increasing surface water quality Stop operation of LNG Refinery +1 2 33.33 TPK
Increasing sea water quality Stop operation of LNG Refinery +2 2 33.33 TPK
Disturbance of Traffic Safety Demobility of Equipments 2 3 50.00 PK
Road and Bridge Damage Demobility of Equipments 2 5 83.33 PK
BI OLOGY
Increasing of variety and density of
vegetation Peningkatan
Revegetation +1 3 50.00 PK
Increasing of variety and abundance
of animal
Revegetation +2 4 66.67 PK
SOCI AL
Decreasing of business opportunity Stop operation of LNG Refinery 1 1 16.67 TPK
Decreasing of public income Dismissing labour 1 2 33.33 TPK
Negative Public Attitude and 1. Demobility of Equipments 1 1 16.67 TPK
Perception 2. Dismissing labour 2 3 50.00 PK
PUBLI C HEALTH
POST
OPERATI ON
Degradation of Environmental
Sanitation
Demobility of Equipments 2 3 50.00 PK

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-28
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
As in Upstream division, every activity phases or plans of gas field development project activity,
whether in the pre-construction, construction, operational and post-operational phase will cause
impacts on environmental components, either negative or positive. The activity plan as the
source of impact that causes many significant impacts towards the environmental component,
are as follows:
1. Pre-construction Phase consists of land and plants acquisition, and Labour Recruitment.
2. Construction Phase consists of mobility and demobility of equipment, material, and
labors, land clearing and maturation, construction of LNG Refinery Area and Special Port;
3. Operational Phase consists of labor recruitment, Operational of LNG Refinery, Special Port,
and Support Facility.
4. Post-operational Phase consists of Demobility of Equipments (Refinery and Special Port),
Revegetation, and dismissing labour.

The environmental components affected by significant impacts are as follows:
1. Geophysic-Chemistry Component consists of ambient air quality, surface water quality,
sea water quality, land transportation that includes Disturbance of traffic fluency, traffic
safety, Road and Bridge damage, marine transportation;
2. Biology Component consists of vegetation, fauna and seawater biota;
3. Social Component consists of Land ownership, public income, business opportunity, social
process, social stratification, public attitude and perception;
4. Public Health Component consists of environmental sanitation and public health level.

The study of impact, negative or positive, from the downstream division activities is presented
as follows:

6.2.1 Study of Significant Impact
6.2.1.1 Pre-construction Phase

Activity of land and plants acquisition for LNG Refinery area, special port and its supporting
facilities will give impact to the land ownership pattern, from the inhabitant to the proponent.
Thus, there will be change in land use. The local labor recruitment process, besides giving
positive effects, including providing job and business opportunities, is also predicted to disturb
social process in the society. This matter for example is triggered by the large amount of
recruited employees from outside the region. These employees generally possess better skills,
higher income level and different lifestyle compared to the local residents. This will cause local

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-29
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
social jealousy that lead to the social relationship and eventually causes negative public attitude
and perception.

Activities in the Pre-construction Phase will have a significant impact to the environment-social-
economic, and culture, especially social and economic component. Although the duration is quite
short, if the impact is not handled well, it will continue to affect further phase, that is
construction and operational phase.

6.2.1.2 Construction Phase

Activities of mobility and demobility of equipments, materials, and employees by land
transportation is using hard and big vehicle, and its intensity is high. It will affect traffic safety
also road and bridge damage. The construction of LNG Refinery area and special port will
decrease air quality, surface and seawater quality, increase noise, and disturbing the road traffic
because there is high vehicle mobility. The bad environmental condition that comes from waste
of construction labour, material, and equipment will decrease environmental sanitation around
the project area.

The biology components that get impact from activity is land clearing and maturation for the
construction of LNG Refinery and special port, by cutting down the trees in the location. The
decreasing of tree population will disturb fauna habitat. The construction of LNG Refinery and
Special Port at the seashore (alternative-1 and 2) potentially decrease quality of seawater, and
then it will decrease variety and abundance of seawater biota.
The impact on social component is social friction between employee and non-employee (those
who are not recruited), also between local employee and employee from outside of region.
There is a social jealousy that comes from unsatisfaction of labour recruitment process, different
education level, income, also skill. In the other hand, this activity needs 3000 employees, and it
gives large opportunity, such as business opportunity for local society that in the end will
increase their income.

6.2.1.3 Operational Phase

The operational of LNG Refinery, Special port and its support facility is planned for 20 years at
minimum. This activity will generate several impacts, such as decreasing air quality, seawater
quality, increasing noise; also, it will decrease variety and abundance of seawater biota. Banggai

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-30
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
sea territorial is a quite busy area. Thus, the operational of special port could affect the safety of
marine transportation.

The operational of LNG Refinery and Special port will increase job and business opportunity at
Banggai Regency. The number of employee needed for the project is around 600 people during
20 operational years. This will increase public income of the local society, also give benefit to
the contractor as a partner of PPGM project.

The direct impact will be suffered by resident around project is the access as labour or unskilled
labour in each project activity, while indirect impact is informal sector for requirement of
company employees. If employees earnings answer the demand, hence other economic activity
such as the housing development, that needs various material such as sand, river stone,
cement, soil and other, also it will grow the job opportunity for society. It could improve public
income, and could give the prosperity for resident. However, local economic growth will not be
equal because citizen having wide farm, good education and big capital will have the better
opportunity.

Meanwhile, there will be high expectation of some local resident to get direct benefit from the
project. If their expectation is not fulfilled, it will generate negative perception towards PPGM
activity. The other negative impact is the social stratification. The local inhabitant in general is a
farmer who has low income, while the newcomer usually has higher education, skill, and income
level. The newcomer will occupy the higher level of social stratification. These negative impacts
must be handled well so there will not be any negative perception of the society.

6.2.1.4 Post Operational Phase

The activity of demobility of equipment for LNG Refinery and Special Port will cause disturbance
of traffic safety also road damage. The activity of clearing out the operational facilities will
decrease environmental sanitation.

Revegetation around the ex-refinery area, special port, and its supporting facilities will increase
the variety and abundance of vegetation and fauna; also, it will increase ambient air quality
around the area.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-31
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
On the other hand, negative impacts that could happen are the decrease of public income, job
and business opportunity. The ex-workers have to adapt with their new household expenditure.
They do not earn any income from the project activity anymore, as a result of working contract
termination. Hence, this phase, especially the dismissing labour activity, will cause negative
impact of the society.

The more detail description of activities and its managed significant impacts (primary,
secondary, tertiary, and quartery) is shown in the Figure 6.2.

According to the study, the type of significant impacts that need to be managed in priority is
presented in Table 6.5.
Figure 6.2. Flowchart of Relationship between Activity and Managed Significant Impact of Matindok Gas Development Project, DownstreamDivision
Pre-construction
ACTIVITY PLAN OF
MATINDOK GAS DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
Mobility and Demobility
of Equipments
Dismissing Labour Labour Recruitment Cleaning and Demobility of
Equipments
Revegetation Dismissing Labour
Land Ownership
Pattern
Social Process
Public Income
Vegetation Wild Fauna
Air Quality &Noise Surface Water
Quality
Road and Bridge
Damage
Traffic Safety
Environmental
Sanitation
Sea Water Quality
Marine Biota
Public Attitude and
Perception
P
rim
a
ry
Im
p
a
c
t
S
e
c
o
n
d
a
ry
Im
p
a
c
t
T
e
rtia
ry
Im
p
a
c
t
Q
u
a
rte
n
a
ry
Im
p
a
c
t
Public Health Level
Employment and
Business
Opportunity
Traffic
Fluency
Marine
Transportation Safety
Construction Operational Post Operational
Construction of LNG
Refinery and Port
Operational of LNG Refinery, Port, and Its
Support Facilities
Land Clearingand
Maturity
Land and Plants
Acquisition
Labour Recruitment
EIS Matindok Gas Development Project VI-32

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-33
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.5. Type of Significant Impacts Which Get The Priority To Be Managed
Downstream division

Activity Phase Type of Hypothetic I mpact I mpact Source
Decision/ Conclus
ion of Evaluation
Result (PK/ TPK)
PRE
CONSTRUCTI ON
SOCI AL
Change of Land Ownership Pattern Land and Plants Acquisition PK
1. Land and Plants Acquisition PK
Social Process Disturbance
2. Labour Recruitment PK
Change of Public Attitude and 1. Land and Plants Acquisition PK



Perception 2. Labour Recruitment PK
CONSTRUCTI ON GEOPHYSI C-CHEMI STRY
Decreasing of Air Quality
Construction of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and its support facility at Padang and
Uso
PK
Increasing Noise
Construction of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and its support facility at Padang and
Uso
PK

Decreasing of Surface Water
Quality
Construction of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and its support facility at Padang and
Uso
PK
Decreasing of Seawater Quality
Construction of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and its support facility
PK

Land Transportation (Disturbance
of traffic fluency)
Construction of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and its support facility at Padang and
Uso
PK

Land Transportation (Disturbance
of traffic safety)
1. Mobility and demobility of equipments,
material and employees
PK

2. Construction of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and its support facility at Padang and
Uso
PK


Road and Bridge damage
Mobility and demobility of equipments,
material and employees
PK
BI OLOGY

Decrease in variety and Density
of vegetation
Land Clearing and maturation PK
Disturbance of Wild Animal Land Clearing and maturation PK

Disturbance of abundance and
variety of sea water biota
Construction of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and its support facility at Padang and
Uso
PK
SOCI AL
Increasing Public Income
Construction of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and its support facility
PK
Increasing Business Opportunity
Construction of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and its support facility
PK

Disturbance of Social Process

Construction of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and its support facility
PK

Negative Public Attitude and
perception
Construction of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and its support facility
PK
PUBLI C HEALTH

Degradation of Environmental
Sanitation
Construction of LNG Refinery Area and
Special Port at Padang and Uso
PK

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-34
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.5. Continued
Activity Phase Type of Hypothetic I mpact I mpact Source
Decision/ Conclus
ion of Evaluation
Result (PK/ TPK)
GEOPHYSI C - CHEMI STRY
Decreasing Air Quality
Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and Support Facility
PK
Increasing Noise
Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and Support Facility
PK
Decreasing Sea water Quality
Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and Support Facility
PK
Marine Transportation (Disturbance
of Marine Transportation Safety)
Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and Support Facility
PK
BI OLOGY
OPERATI ONAL
Decreasing the abundance and
Variety of Sea water biota
Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and Support Facility
PK
SOCI AL
Increasing Business Opportunity
Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and Support Facility
PK
1. Labour Recruitment PK
Disturbance of Social Process 2. Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and Support Facility
PK
Stratification Social
Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and Support Facility
PK
1. Labour Recruitment PK
Negative Public attitude and
perception
2. Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and Support Facility
PK
PUBLI C HEALTH

Decreasing Public Health Level

Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special
Port and Support Facility
PK
GEOPHYSI C CHEMI STRY
Disturbance of Traffic Safety Demobility of Equipments PK
Road and Bridge Damage Demobility of Equipments PK
BI OLOGY
Increasing of variety and density of
vegetation Peningkatan
Revegetation PK
Increasing of variety and
abundance of animal
Revegetation PK
SOCI AL
Negative Public Attitude and
Perception
Dismissing labour PK
PUBLI C HEALTH
POST
OPERATI ONAL
Degradation of Environmental
Sanitation
Demobility of Equipments PK



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-35
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
6.2.2 Study and Basic Instruction of Environmental Management
According to result of holistic study mentioned above, there are impact types that get priority to
be managed. Table 6.6 presented a management instruction of each impact type that get
priority to be managed at each activity phase.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-36
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.6. The Summary of Study and Basic Instruction of Environmental Management
Matindok Gas Development Project, Downstream division
Activity Phase
Activity Component
That Cause The Impact
Environment
Component
incurred by The
Impact
Environmental Management Instruction
PRE-
CONSTRUCTION
Land and Plants Acquisition Change of Land Ownership
Pattern
Socialization to the society about land and plants acquisition
Making data of land ownership that will be acquired
Coordination with the related institution
Land and Plants Acquisition
Labour Recruitment
Social Process
Public Attitude and
Perception
a. Land and Plants Acquisition
Socialization to the society about land and plants acquisition
Fixing the price of land according to the agreement with the land owner and its payment
method
Coordination with the related institution
Involving Tim 9 and BPN in the land acquisition process
b. Labour Recruitment
Giving transparent information about job opportunity for the local society (the qualification,
the number, and selection process)
Giving priority to the local society, especially the unskilled, according to the needs for project
activity
The skilled employee will be selected according to the needs
The selection process for unskilled employee is conducted together with local legal entity, and
for the skilled employee is using regional/national recruitment
Air Quality Use of Controller of standard emission at diesel engine of generator and oil fuel that have low
sulphur rate
Using dust suspresion control
Equiping worker by K3
CONSTRUCTION Construction of LNG Refinery
Area and Special Port
Noise Development activity generating noise is conducted in the daytime
Using earplug or earmuff
Sea Water Quality Using oilboom or oil dispersant to prevent oil spill from the consruction equipment
Dredging carefully to minimize turbidity
Maintaining the engine chamber, dredging equipment, and the other construction equipments,
and keeping it clean from oil spill
Surface Water Quality Using waste water treatment or effluent treatment for water or IPAL effectively

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-37
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.6. continued
Activity Phase
Activity Component
That Cause The Impact
Environment
Component
incurred by The
Impact
Environmental Management Instruction
CONSTRUCTION Mobility and demobility of
equipments, and material
Construction of LNG Refinery
Area, Special Port and Its support
facility

Traffic safety Arrangement of transportation Schedule which do not at the same time with the busy hours of
morning and daytime
Counseling to transportation driver to be careful during piloting transportation in roadway,
especially around area of settlement and urban area (Kintom, Batui)
Socialization to citizen living around route of transportation of there will be traffic vehicle project
using big truck/trailer
Maximum vehicle Speed is 40 km / hour
Installation of traffic sign attached before entering project area in each distance 150 m and 50
meter, on two direction
The sign must be big enough to be seen clearly from distance of 25 meter
Giving the protector to the labour on the road (by traffic cone or rope as a boundary)
Illuminator installation to enlighten the road in the activity area
Construction of LNG Refinery Area,
Special Port and Its support facility
Traffic fluency Placing Officer to maintain the traffic before the road is transferred to the other area
Making new road that has similar qualification with the old one
Mobility and demobility of
equipments, and material
Road and Bridge damage Light reparation when the road is still used for the traffic of material vehicle by given the soil then
it is compacted and covered by latasir
Making of bridge Prop to add the construction strength
Using sea transportation if the bridge could not be passed
The reparation of road and bridge must be n coordination with Kimpraswil agency of Banggai
Regency
Land Clearing and maturation Vegetation Revegetation around the activity area that do not disturbing the construction activity
Fauna Revegetation around the activity area that do not disturbing the construction activity
Maintaining the terrestrial fauna by minimizing land clearing only at around the area of LNG
Refinery
Construction of LNG Refinery Area,
Special Port and Its support facility
Sea water biota Activating effluent treatment unit or waste water management to prevent the impact for
environment
Rehabilitation of coral reefs around the activity area

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-38
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.6. continued

Activity Phase
Activity Component
That Cause The Impact
Environment
Component
incurred by The
Impact
Environmental Management Instruction
CONSTRUCTION Business Opportunity Auction for the local subcontractor to be involved in the operational activity of Matindok Gas
Development Project
Giving facility to the local society to participate in the business opportunity
Giving entrepreneurship and/or skill training
Public Income Giving priority to the local society, especially the unskilled, according to the need for project
activity
Giving facility to the local society to participate and develop their business opportunity
Social Process Socialization of activity plan to the society
Facilitating social, religious and other activities of the society

Construction of LNG Refinery
Area and Special Port

Attitude and Perception of
Society
a. Positive impact
Increasing the participation of businessman and local society in every matindok gas
development operational activity, for example informing the routine activity to the society
Giving facility to the local society to participate in the business opportunity
b. Negative impact
Facilitating social activities of the society
Socialization of activity plan to the society
Environment sanitation Providing waste treatment for construction and domestic waste, liquid and solid waste
Providing sufficient MCK facility
Socialization of Healthy and Hygenic Lifestyle (PHBS) for the employee and society

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-39
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.6. continued

Activity
Phase
Activity Component
That Cause The Impact
Environment
Component
incurred by The
Impact
Environmental Management Instruction
OPERATI ONAL

Operational of LNG Refinery Area,
Special Port and Its support
facility
Air Quality Using effectively the facility of Acid Gas Removal Unit (AGRU), Sulfur Recovery Unit (SRU) and
MRU
Equipped the labour with K3 facilities


Noise Using special accoustic layer to prevent noise
Using earplug or earmuff
Sea water quality Liquid waste treatment before it is discharge
Using oil boom to prevent oil spill from the equipment
Marine transportation safety Placing navigation sign and marine transportation safety
Placing light/lamp at the boundary of Project area and LNG tanker
Traffic fluency Placing Officer to maintain the traffic before the road is transferred to the other area
Making new road that has similar qualification with the old one


Sea water biota Liquid waste treatment that according to regulation
Rehabilitation the coral reef around the project area


Business Opportunity Auction for the local subcontractor to be involved in the operational activity of Matindok Gas
Development Project
Giving facility to the local society to participate in the business opportunity


Public Income Giving priority to the local society, especially the unskilled, according to the need for project
activity
Giving facility to the local society to participate and develop their business opportunity

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-40
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.6. continued
Activity Phase
Activity Component
That Cause The Impact
Environment
Component
incurred by The
Impact
Environmental Management Instruction
OPERATI ONAL

Labour recruitment
Operational of LNG Refinery Area,
Special Port and Its supporting
facilities
Social Process a. Labour Recruitment
Giving transparent information about job opportunity for the local society (the qualification,
the number, and selection process)
Giving priority to the local society, especially the unskilled, according to the need for project
activity
The skilled employee will be selected according to the needed
The selection process for unskilled employee is conducted together with local legal entity,
and for the skilled employee is using regional/national recruitment
b. Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and Its support facility
Socialization of activity plan to the society
Facilitating social, religious and other activities of the society
Operational of LNG Refinery Area,
Special Port and Its supporting
facilities
Social stratification The facilities for employee (such as facility for education, health center, etc) must be accessed
also for local inhabitant
Facilitating the activity such as community gathering, or other social or religious activities.
Labour recruitment
Operational of LNG Refinery Area,
Special Port and Its supporting
facilities
Attitude and
Perception of Society
Labour recruitment
Giving transparent information about job opportunity for the local society (the qualification,
the number, and selection process)
Giving priority to the local society, especially the unskilled, according to the need for project
activity
The skilled employee will be selected according to the needs
The selection process for unskilled employee is conducted together with local legal entity,
and for the skilled employee is using regional/national recruitment
Operational of LNG Refinery Area, Special Port and Its support facility
Socialization of activity plan to the society
Facilitating social, religious and other activities of the society
Operational of LNG Refinery Area,
Special Port and Its supporting
facilities
Public Health Impact source treatment (dust, gas emission, noise, also liquid waste treatment before it is
discharged to the environment)
Socialization of Healthy and Hygenic Lifestyle (PHBS) for the employee and society

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-41
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.6. continued
Activity
Phase
Activity Component
That Cause The Impact
Environment
Component
incurred by The
Impact
Environmental Management Instruction
POST
OPERATI ONAL
Demobility of equipment Traffic safety Arrangement of transportation Schedule which do not at the same time with the busy hours of
morning and daytime
Counseling to transportation driver to be careful during piloting transportation in roadway,
especially around area of settlement and urban area (Kintom, Batui)
Socialization to citizen living around route of transportation of there will be traffic vehicle project
using big truck/trailer
Maximum vehicle Speed is 40 km / hour
Installation of traffic sign attached before entering project area in each distance 150 m and 50
meter, on two direction
The sign must be big enough to be seen clearly from distance of 25 meter
Giving the protector to the labour on the road (by traffic cone or rope as a boundary)
Illuminator installation to enlighten the road in the activity area
Road and Bridge Damage Light reparation when the road is still used for the traffic of material vehicle by given the soil then
it is compacted and covered by latasir
Making of bridge Prop to add the construction strength
Using sea transportation if the bridge could not be passed
The reparation of road and bridge must be n coordination with Kimpraswil agency of Banggai
Regency
Dismissing Labour Attitude and Perception of
Society
Streghtening the social ommunication network by socialization before dismissing labour activity
Clearing up and Demobility of
equipment
Environmental Sanitation Cleaning up the ex-clear up material
Flattening the holes in the ex-building

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-42
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
6.3. RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ELEGIBILITY ASSESSMENT FOR
MATINDOK GAS DEVELOPMENT PROJ ECT

6.3.1 Environmental Elegibility Assessment evaluated from Environmental Impact
6.3.1.1 Upstream division

Based on the result of impact evaluation performed holistically by joining impact estimation and
impact significance level for each environmental component towards activity component, it was
discovered that the project is potentially cause significant impact, negative and positive.

The positive impacts are predicted to appear during the construction, operational, and post
operational phase. The significant positive impacts are as follows: increase of business
opportunity, increase of area coverage by terrestrial flora, and increase of terrestrial fauna.
Business opportunity will open some new hope for local society, and it will generate positive
perception and attitude of society.

Meanwhile, the negative impacts are:
a. Geophysic-Chemistry Component: air quality (dust), noise, soil erosion, disturbance of
irrigation and drainage system, decrease of surface water quality, and disturbance of land
transportation.
b. Biology component: decrease of land covered by terrestrial vegetation, decrease of
terrestrial fauna, and disturbance of water biota.
c. Social component: change of land owership, disturbance of social process, social
stratification, and attitude and perception of society.
d. Public Health component: decrease of environment sanitation quality and disturbance of
public health.

However, some of the negative impact predicted to emerge could be managed through some
proposed environmental management approach. With the existence of expected environmental
management, the negative impact could be minimized, overcame and even prevented. The
positive impact could be further developed, therefore activity of development of drilling and
addition of facility, which is for the benefit of the society, could go on without disregarding
environmental quality.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-43
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Based on the statement above, the Matindok Gas Development Project is suitable with
environmental capacity and the supporting forces of the region around the drilling well location
is still appropriate, although several management effort and environmental monitoring is still
needed.

6.3.1.2 Downstream division

Based on the result of impact evaluation performed holistically by joining impact estimation and
impact significance level for each environmental component towards activity component, it is
discovered that the project is potentially cause significant impact, negative and positive.

The positive impacts are predicted to appear during the construction, operational, and post
operational phase. The significant positive impacts are as follows: increase of business
opportunity and public income, increase of area coverage by terrestrial flora, and increase of
terrestrial fauna. Business and job opportunity will open some new hope for local society to
increase their income, and it will generate positive perception and attitude of society.

Meanwhile, the negative impacts are:
a. Geophysic-Chemistry Component: air quality (dust), noise, decrease of surface and sea
water quality, and disturbance of land and marine transportation.
b. Biology component: vegetation, fauna, seawater biota.
c. Social component: change of land ownership, social stratification, disturbance of social
process, negative attitude and perception of society.
d. Public Health component: decrease of environment sanitation quality and disturbance of
public health condition.

However, some of the negative impact predicted to emerge could be managed through some
proposed environmental management approach. With the existence of expected environmental
management, the negative impact could be minimized, overcame and even prevented. The
positive impact could be further developed, therefore activity of development of drilling and
addition of facility, which is meant for the benefit of the society, could go on without
disregarding environmental quality.


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-44
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Based on the statement above, the Matindok Gas Development Project is suitable with
environmental capacity and the supporting forces of the region around the drilling well location
is still appropriate, although several management effort and environmental monitoring is still
needed.

6.3.2 Environmental Elegibility Assessment evaluated from Alternative Study Result
6.3.2.1 Alternative for Gas Pipeline Installation

The gas pipeline installation that through SM Bangkiriang is planned to be in 3 alternatives:
a) Alternative-1: parallel with regency road with normal drilling.
b) Alternative-2: parallel with regency road with Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) or
underground horizontal drilling.
c) Alternative-3: installation through shallow sea base of Bangkiriang beach.

The SM Bangkiriang, especially in location near highway to Batui, is mostly a land for local
agricultural activities, such as planting palm tree, also as secondary forest. The SM Bangkiriang
forest is preserved as habitat of Maleo birds, but its condition is getting worrisome due to the
decrease of tree types that could be the food source for Maleo bird caused by the substitution of
those tree types with crop trees such as rubber, chocolate and palm tree by private companies.

Even so, some animal types are protected by SM Bangkiriang, they are babirusa and rangkong
bird, hence its existence around project location requires attention. Some sensitive animal types
are shy, making them avoid the noise such as vehicle traffic for construction, while tolerant
types will stay around project areas.

The provincial road, as strategic road for economical activities, was already in there before the
existence of SM Bangkiriang (1998). Thus, moving the strategic road to the other area will shut
down the economic activity of local society. Therefore, the road is not included in the legal
conservation area of SM Bangkiriang. The effort of PT Pertamina EP to use the road is against
the regulation of Department of Forestry because there is area of SM Bangkiriang at both sides
of the road. Installation of gas pipeline alternative-1 and 2 will parallel with the road, and the
environmental damage could be minimized. The study of 3 alternatives for pipeline installation is
presented in Table 6.7.:


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-45
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

Table 6.7. The Study of Environmental Elegibility
to The Alternatives of Gas Pipeline Installation

Pipeline that through SM Bangkiriang Area

No.

Environmental Parameter
That Get Impact

Alternative-1
(Normal)
Alternative -2
(Horizontal
Drilling)
Alternative -3
(Sea)
1. Air Quality (1) (1) (1)
2. Noise (1) (1) (1)
3. Sea water Quality (1)
4. Vegetation (3)
5. Wild Fauna (2) (2) (3)
6. Sea water Biota (1)
7. Public Income (+1) (+1) (+1)
8. Business Opportunity (+1) (+1) (+1)
9. Social Process (2) (2) (2)
10. Attitude and Perception of Society (1) (1) (1)
11. Environment Sanitation (2) (2)

Note: /+ = negative/positive impact
The numbers show impact magnitude:
1 = small impact
2 = average impact
3 = major impact

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-46
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
The table showed that the impact is temporary, that is at pipeline installation. Alternative-3
shows that there is a decrease of seawater quality and its biota, but it is only temporary. Once
the installation is completed, the quality of seawater and biota will be just like the initial
condition.

There will be coral reefs damage along the area for pipeline installation, but it is only temporary.
The installation is pursuant to the regulation of Minister of Mining and Energy No
300.K/38/M.PE/1997 on 28 April 1997 regarding Work Safety of Gas and Oil Pipeline Installation.
Bangkiriang Beach will not be included in the area for pipeline installation. The installation
alternative-3 is using the beach area outside SM Bangkiriang, also for mobility and demobility of
equipment, material and employee.

According to the environmental study, alternative-3 has the biggest environmental impact. The
impact for geophysic-chemistry and social-economic-culture is relatively similar, but the impact
for biotic component is various. Impact to the vegetation is only happened in the alternative-1,
the biggest impact to the fauna is happened in the alternative-3 because this alternative is using
beach area that has become as location for Maleo bird to lay their eggs. Alternative-3 also will
disturb sea biota, especially coral reefs. On the other side, the public health is not significantly
affected by alternative-3 because the area is far from the settlement. Hence, it could be
concluded that alternavtive-3 has the bigger impact than the other 2 alternatives.

In order to decide which alternative to be taken, the proponent must consider not only
environmental eligibility, but also its economic, technical, also legal eligibility. Table 6.8. shows
the eligibility study.

Table 6.8. The Summary of Elegibility to the Alternatives of Gas Pipeline Installation

Pipeline that through SM Bangkiriang Area
No.

Eligibility/ Problem
Alternative-1 Alternative -2 Alternative -3
1. Environmental Problem low low high
2. Economical Problem low high Very high
3. Technical Problem low high average
4. Legal Problem high high none
5. Existing Condition Provincial road Provincial road Beach/Sea


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-47
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM

The table showed that according to the environmental, economic and technical problem,
alternative-1 is the lowest. Alternative-2 shows difficulties in the execution and its cost. But after
all, alternative-3 has the highest rank on environmental, economic, and technical problem.

There is still one aspect that needs to be considered, that is legal aspect. On the south-east area
of SM Bangkiriang to the beach, and the edge road (right and left side) is included into one
area, according to the regulation of Minister of Forestry No. 398/KPTS-II/1998 on 12 April 1998
regarding The Decision for Bangkiriang as Conservation Area. It could be legal problem for
alternative-1 and 2 of gas pipeline installation. As for the alternative-3, it could be considered as
not againts the law. Thus, there is no legal problem for alternative-3.

If there is a change on status of the provicial road that cross SM Bangkiriang by Departement of
Forestry, thus PT Pertamina EP could coordinate with the institution to manage the possibility to
use the edge road, so the alternative-1 could be executed.

6.3.2.2 Alternative for Location of LNG Refinery and Special Port

The alternative location for LNG Refinery and Special Port is in 2 locations, they are Uso village,
(Batui district) and Padang village (Kintom District). In general, the two locations have similar
environmental condition, in geophysic-chemistry, biology, social, and public health. The
environmental eligibility study for the two locations was presented as follows:


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
VI-48
PT PERTAMINA EP -PPGM
Table 6.9. The Study of Environmental Elegibility
to The Alternatives of LNG Refinery and Special Port Area

Location of LNG Refinery and Special Port
No.
Environmental Parameter That
Get Impact

Alternative-1
(Uso, Batui)
Alternative-2
(Padang, Kintom)
1. Air Quality (2) (2)
2. Noise (2) (2)
3. Seawater Quality (2) (2)
4. Marine Transportation (2) (2)
5. Vegetation (3) (3)
6. Wild Fauna (2) (2)
7. Seawater Biota (1) (1)
8. Business Opportunity (+2) (+2)
9. Public Income (+2) (+2)
10. Social Process (2) (2)
11. Social Stratification (2) (2)
12. Attitude and Perception of Society (2) (2)
13. Environment Sanitation (2) (2)
14 Level of Public Health (2) (2)

Note: /+ = negative/positive impact
The numbers show impact magnitude:
1 = small impact
2 = average impact
3 = major impact


The holistic study of significant impact at pre-construction, construction, operational, and post-
operational phase showed that the two alternative locations has no significant impact.
Therefore, the locations have similar environmental eligibility level. Beside that, the economic
and technical aspect showed that the determination of location for LNG Refinery and Special
Port is considering the aspect of strategic and accessible for the construction and operational
activities.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM




BI BLI OGRAPHY


Anonimous, 2004, Thefreedictionary.com, Farlex.Inc.
Audley-Charles, M.G., and J .S. Milsom. (1974). Comments on a paper by T.J . Fitch Plate
convergence, transcurrent faults, and internal deformation adjacent
southeast Asia and the western pacific. J ournal of Geophysical Research
79:4980-4981.
Badan Koordinasi Keluarga Berencana Nasional (BKKBN), Hasil Pentahapan Keluarga
Sejahtera Tingkat Nasional tahun 1994-2001, www.bkkbn.go.id
Badan Pusat Statistik, 1990, Sensus Penduduk Indonesia Tahun 1990, BPS, J akarta.
Badan Pusat Statistik, 2003, Data dan Informasi Kemiskinan, BPS, J akarta.
Bally, A.W. and Snelson, S. (1980). Realms of subsidence. Facts and principles of world
petroleum occurrence. Can. Soc. Petrol. Geologists Memoirs 6:9-94.
Biswas, A.K. and Geping, Q. (1987). Environmental impact assessment for developing
countries. United Nations University, Tycooly International, London, 232 pp.
Cooley, Charles Horton, 1922, Freedom Chapter 12 in Human Nature and the Social
Order (Revised Edition) Charles Scribner's Sons, New York.
Cooley, Charles Horton, 1918, Social Process,Charles Schribners Sons, New York.
http://spartan.ac.brocku.ca/Iward/Cooley/cool_ctoc.html
Davis, K., and W. E. Moore. 'Some Principles of Stratification.' American Sociological
Review 10 (1945):242-49.
Depkes, 2002, Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2001, Menuju Indonesia Sehat 2010,
Departemen Kesehatan RI, J akarta
Gellner, 1983, The integration of immigrants Social cohesion and quality of life
http://Social.coe.int/en/Index.htm
Geertz, Clifford, 1973, The Interpretation of Culture, New York : Basic.
Green, R.H. (1979). Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental
Biologists. J ohn Wiley and Sons. New York, 527 pp.

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
PT. PERTAMINA EP - PPGM
Hadi Sidarta, P, 1995 Aspek Sosial AMDAL, Sejarah Teori dan Metode, Gadjah Mada
University Press, Yogyakarta.Krejcie,R.V., D.W. Morgan, 1970, Determining
Sample Side for Research Activities, Educational and Psychological
Measurement.
Hari Purwanto, 2000 Kebudayaan dan Lingkungan Dalam Perspektif Antropologi, Pustaka
Pelajar, Yogyakarta,
Myers and Michener, et al, 2002, Lecture 04 - Social Psych Social Perception
Attribution, http:www.nd.edu.
Mantra, Ida Bagus, 2001, Kumpulan Rumus-Rumus Demografi. Fakultas Geografi
Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta
Patton, M.Q.(1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. SAGE Publications.
Newbury Park London New Delhi.
PRM Research 447, 2004, Calculating Sample Size and Margin of Error Table,
http://www.prm.nau.edu/prm447/sample_size.htm
Raosoft, Inc, 2004, Free Sample Size Calculator, http: //www .raosoft. com/ samplesize
.html
Redfield, Robert, Ralph Linton and Melville, J . Herskovits, 1936 : 38 (1): 149-152
"Memorandum for the Study of Acculturation. American Anthropologist.
Sayogyo dan Pujiwati Sajogyo, 2002. Sosiologi Pedesaan (Kumpulan Bacaan) J ilid 2.
Gadjah Mada University Press, Cit, 11 Yogyakarta
Schmidt, F.H. and Ferguson, J .H.A. (1951). Rainfall Types Based on Wet and Dry Period
Ratios for Indonesia and Western New Guinea. Verh. Djawatan Mety. Dan
Geofisik, J akarta 42
Sloan, N.A. (1993b). Effects of Oil on Marine Resources: A Worldwide Literature Review
Relevant to Indonesia. EMDI Environment Report, Halifax, Canada and
J akarta, Indonesia, 70 pp.
Soekanto, Soerjono, 1969. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar, Yayasan Penerbit Universitas
Indonesia, J akarta.
Sukamto Reksohadiprodjo, dan A Budi Purnomo, 1998. Ekonomi Sumber Daya Alam dan
Energi, BPFE, Yogyakarta
Sukamto Reksohadiprodjo, dan A Budi Purnomo, 1998. Ekonomi Lingkungan Suatu
Pengantar, BPFE, Yogyakarta
Surveyguy, 2004, Sample Size Calculator, Creative Research Systems Survey Software,
http://www.SurveyGuy_com.Sample Size Calculator.htm
Thanh Loi, Duong,1998, Assimilation versus Integration and the Vietnamese Youths
Identity Youth Involvement and Community Development tanggal 16-18
Oktober 1998, Vietnamese Canadian Federation, Ottawa.

Figure3.2. Map of Earthquake Activity in Sulawesi Island since 1900
(USGS-NIEC, 2003)
EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


F
i
g
u
r
e

2
.
2
8
.

L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n

f
o
r

S
p
e
c
i
a
l

P
o
r
t

o
f

L
N
G

a
n
d

M
O
F

a
n
d

I
t
s

B
r
i
g
d
e

(
T
r
e
s
t
l
e
s
)


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

F
i
g
u
r
e

2
.
2
9
.

P
r
o
f
i
l
e

o
f

S
p
e
c
i
a
l

P
o
r
t

o
f

L
N
G
/
T
r
e
s
t
l
e


EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

F
i
g
u
r
e

2
.
3
0
.

S
i
t
e

P
l
a
n

o
f

L
N
G

S
p
e
c
i
a
l

P
o
r
t



EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM


F
i
g
u
r
e

2
.
3
1
.

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

P
l
a
n

o
f

M
O
F



=Fault (a) Clear, (b) Predicted
(a) (b)
(a) (b)
= Up fault (a) Clear, (b) Predicted
(a) (b)
=Up Fault (a) Clear, (b) Predicted
= Landsat view
Note :
(Surono dkk., 1993)
0 3 6 9 Km
U
122
o
30 BT 122
o
45 BT
1
o

0


L
S

1
o

1
5


L
S

Figure3.1. Geology Map of Batui and vicinity (taken from
Surono dkk., 1993)
EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

Figure3.3. Map of Seismic Zone in Indonesia (SNI-1726-2002)
EIS Matindok Gas Development Project
PT PERTAMINA EP - PPGM

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen