Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
(x, 0) is excited at the entrance of the multimode waveguide at position x = x
1
of the access
waveguide 1. This eld will be decomposed into the modal eld distribution of all modes [4]:
1
(x, 0) =
m1
=0
c
1
(x)dx/
__
2
(x)dx
_
. And
(x) =
_
_
Ae
x
+Be
x
, x 0
Dcos[
(x W
MMI
/2)] +E sin[
(x W
MMI
/2)], 0 x W
MMI
Ge
(xWMMI)
+He
(xWMMIi)
, x W
MMI
(1)
where B = E = G = 0 for even modes ( even) and A = D = H = 0 for odd modes ( odd).
The remaining constants in (1) can be determined through boundary conditions. The propagation
parameters are
=
_
k
2
0
(n
2
1
N
2
),
=
_
k
2
0
(N
2
n
2
2
). The eective refractive index for mode
is N
, the wavenumber k
0
= 2/
0
, and
0
is the optical wavelength.
The eld prole
1
(x, z = L) within the MMI at position z = L then can be calculated as a
superposition of all guided modes:
1
(x, z = L) =
m1
=0
c
1
(x)e
j
L
. The propagation constants
= k
0
N
1 b = + 2 tan(
_
b
1b
), where V =
kW
mmi
_
n
2
1
n
2
2
, and b =
N
2
n
2
2
n
2
1
n
2
2
.
At the end of the MMI section, optical power is transferred to the output waveguide. Each
mode of the MMI region will contribute to the mode elds in the output waveguides b
1
, and b
2
.
These can be written as b
1
= c
10
10
(x), and b
2
= c
20
20
(x), where
10
(x),
20
(x) are the eld
proles of the fundamental mode within the output waveguides. The coecients c
10
and c
20
can
be calculated from the overlap integrals
c
10
=
_
1
(x)
10
(x)dx
_
2
10
(x)dx
, and c
20
=
_
1
(x)
20
(x)dx
_
2
20
(x)dx
(2)
The signal at output port 2 will travel through the ring waveguides and is then fed back to input
port 2. This gives a
2
= exp(j)b
2
, where = exp(
0
(2R +L
MMI
)) is the transmission loss
inside the resonators, and
0
(dB/cm) is the loss coecient in the core of the optical waveguides.
=
0
L is the phase accumulated over the ring waveguides with propagation constants
0
, where
0
= 2n
eff
/
0
, and n
eff
is the eective refractive index of the ring waveguide core.
Similarly, the eld evolution within the MMI and the waveguide from the input port 2 can be
calculated as before. Therefore, the total eld within the MMI region at the position z is given by
(x, z = L) =
1
(x, z = L) +
2
(x, z = L) =
m1
=0
c
1
(x)e
j
L
+
m1
=0
c
(x)e
j
L
(3)
756 PIERS Proceedings, Cambridge, USA, July 26, 2008
where c
1
is the eld excitation coecient from the input waveguide 2 to the MMI region.
The eld at the output ports now can be calculated and the powers in output ports 1 and 2 are
given by
P
1
=
+
_
(x, z = L)
10
(x)dx
2
+
_
(x, z = L)
(x, z = L)dx
+
_
10
(x)
20
(x)dx
,
and P
2
=
+
_
(x, z = L)
20
(x)dx
2
+
_
(x, z = L)
(x, z = L)dx
+
_
20
(x)
20
(x)dx
(4)
By using wavelength as the variable parameter in (4) the spectral transmission of the device can
be determined.
3. SIMULATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this paper, resonators using 3 dB 2 2 couplers are considered. Two types of MMI couplers
can be used, namely those based on the restricted interference (RI) and those based on general
interference (GI). Both ridge and silicon nano-waveguides are considered in this section. For the
ridge structure, the thickness of the top silicon layer of the SOI wafer is 5 m, and the etch depth
of the ridge waveguide is 2 m. The refractive index of the silicon is 3.45 and the refractive index
of the SiO
2
is 1.45 at the wavelength of
0
= 1550 nm. Using the EIM method, the equivalent
refractive indices in 2D is n
1
= 3.4767 for the core region and n
2
= 3.4713 for the cladding region.
In our simulations, the width of the MMI was chosen to be 24 m, and the width of the access
waveguides are 4 m.
(a) (b)
Figure 2: (a) Beat length of the 2 2 MMI coupler (b) Equivalent eective index refractive in the 2D
dimension.
For the silicon nano-waveguide structures, the height of the silicon guiding layer is h = 220 nm.
By using a 3D-EME mode solver, the 3D problem can be converted into a 2D problem, thereby
enabling the equivalent eective refractive index N
eff
of the core to be determined. Fig. 2(a) shows
the beat length and Fig. 2(b) the eective index for the 2D model of a 3 dB MMI coupler based on
the RI theory.
After having converted the structure into a 2D problem, the methods for analyzing and designing
the device in 2D for both ridge waveguide based structures and silicon nano-waveguide based
structures are similar. Therefore this paper now will concentrate on the design of the devices using
the ridge structure.
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Cambridge, USA, July 26, 2008 757
(a) (b)
Figure 3: (a) Output powers of the 2 2 MMI coupler (b) Optimal lengths for GI and RI MMI couplers.
Figure 3(a) shows the calculated output power at the bar and cross ports of a 3dB RI theory
based MMI coupler for dierent MMI lengths. The access waveguides are assumed to be of width
of 4 m. The results show that the optimum length for best power balance is approximately
L
2 (m). Fig. 3(b) illustrates the dierence between the optimized length of a 3 dB MMI
coupler based on the GI approach and those based on the RI theory. It is obvious that the length
of the MMI coupler based on RI is much shorter than the one based on RI theory. Therefore, to
reduce the size of the device and for ease of integration into more complex structures, the RI theory
based MMI couplers are preferred.
The width of the access waveguides have a signicant eect on the excess loss of the MMI coupler
as shown in Fig. 4(a). As we see, the optimal width of the access waveguide is approximately 6.5 m
to achieve the best performance. However, to prevent the excitation of the higher order modes in
the access waveguide, and to obtain low loss in the waveguide, the access waveguides must be
appropriately tapered, preferably adiabatically.
(a) (b)
Figure 4: (a) Output powers at dierent waveguide widths (b) Propagation constants vs. waveguide width.
Using the adiabaticity criteria described in [5], the local taper length scale must be much larger
than the coupling length between the fundamental mode and the dominant coupling mode, i.e., the
local taper angle must satisfy (z) W(z)((z) kn
2
)/(4), where (z) is the local propagation
constant at the position z with a waveguide width W(z). The local propagation constant at dierent
widths of the waveguide is plotted in Fig. 4(b). The resultant low-loss, adiabatically tapered access
waveguide proles are shown in Fig. 5.
The spectral transmission characteristics of the device calculated using the MPA approach are
plotted in Fig. 6, along with comparable results obtained by using the transfer matrix method
(TMM) and the FDTD [6]. The ring radius used in this design is 250 m. The results show that
there is good agreement between our MPA method with the TMM and FDTD methods. However,
by using the semi-analytical MPA approach, the device design parameters can be optimized more
easily and quickly while still maintaining adequate accuracy for the initial design of resonators [7].
758 PIERS Proceedings, Cambridge, USA, July 26, 2008
Figure 5: Adiabatic taper access waveguides.
Figure 6: Transmission characteristics using three
methods: FDTD, TMM and MPA.
4. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, the MMI couplers based microring resonators using SOI waveguides has been analyzed
and a design procedure outlined. Simulation results have been compared with well-known numerical
techniques. The modal propagation method described in this paper has the advantage of rapid
calculation thereby allowing device parameters to be optimized easily.
REFERENCES
1. Latunde-Dada, K. A. and F. P. Payne, Theory and design of adiabatically tapered multimode
interference couplers, J. Lightwave Technol., Vol. 25, 834839, 2007.
2. Photon Design, Fimmwave: http://www.photond.com/
3. Yariv, A., Universal relations for coupling of optical power between microresonators and
dielectric waveguides, Electron. Lett., Vol. 36, 32, 2000.
4. Le, T. T. and L. W. Cahill, Accurate modeling and analysis of multimode interference struc-
tures by fourier technique, Proceedings of 10th Conference on CPT 2007, Vol. 10 G-21, 105
106, Tokyo, Japan, 2007.
5. Love, J., Application of a low loss criterion to optical waveguides and devices, IEE Proceed-
ings J., Vol. 136, 225228, 1989.
6. Qiu, M., Eective index method in heterostructure slab waveguide based two-dimensional
photonic crystals, Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 81, No. 7, 11631165, 2002.
7. Cahill, L. W. and T. T. Le, Photonic signal processing using MMI coupler-based microring
resonators, Proceedings of LEOS 2007, 395396, USA, Oct. 2125, 2007.