Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BY
FEBRUARY 2012.
CERTIFICATION PAGE
PLANT-WIDE CONTROL OF THE HYDRODEALKYLATION
PROCESS USING ASPEN PROCESS SIMULATORS
BY
ADEGUNJU, ADEDAYO S.
CHE/2006/003
A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL
ENGINEERING IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
THE AWARD OF THE B.SC. HONOURS DEGREE IN CHEMICAL
ENGINEERING OF THE
OBAFEMI AWOLOWO UNIVERSITY, ILE-IFE
ADEGUNJU, ADEDAYO S.
Date
Signature of Author
Mr A. Bamimore
Date
Project supervisor
Dr E. Betiku
Date
Head of Department
Date
ADEGUNJU, A.S
CHE/2006/003
iii
DEDICATION
To HIM that has the biggest PLANT (the universe) under His CONTROL
To my parents and siblings as a proof that the future is bright because ALLAH IS IN
CONTROL
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
To Almighty Allah be the highest praises for his providential care in helping me to
accomplish the present feat despite all odds.
As must ever genuinely be the case, a hearty THANK YOU goes to my supervisor Mr
A. Bamimore an understanding and deeply concerned man who imparted to me a
great deal of academic exposure in the process of our friendly interaction that
eventually led to the production of this thesis. May Almighty God bless him in all his
life endeavours.
I wish to place on record the deep love, genuine care, hearty concern and mature
understanding untiringly offered by my parents, Mr and Mrs M.I ADEGUNJU. May
you live long to reap the fruits of your labour. (Ameen)
A man of many companions may come to ruin but there is always a friend that will
stick closer than a brother, but in my case I have friends like Seun Aluko, Ishola
Esther, Sonubi
Temitope, Oloyede
Aderonke
Idayat,
Kasim
Shamsudeen,
Animashaun Hameed, Lasisi Lukman, Sogunle Olalekan, and it goes on and on like
that. It is a wonderful adventure with you all.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page........................................................................................................i
Certification Page...........................................................................................ii
Letter of transmittal........................................................................................iii
Dedication......................................................................................................iv
Acknowledgement..........................................................................................v
Table of contents.............................................................................................vi
List of figures..................................................................................................viii
List of tables.....................................................................................................ix
Abstract............................................................................................................x
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction....................................................................................1
1.1.
1.2.
Objectives............................................................................3
1.3.
1.4.
vi
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
2. HDA Process Flow sheet..................................................................19
4.1. Aspen Plus flow-sheet for HDA process.......................................28
4.2. Aspen Plus flow-sheet for HDA process ( with bypass)................29.
4.3. Aspen Dynamics flow-sheet for CS1.............................................33
4.4. Aspen Dynamics flow-sheet for CS2.............................................34
4.5a. Closed loop response of CS1 to 10oF increase in reactor inlet
temperature............................................................................................37
4.5b. Closed loop response of CS1 to 2oF decrease in reactor inlet
temperature............................................................................................41
4.6a. Closed loop response of CS2 to 10oF increase in reactor inlet
temperature............................................................................................45
4.6b. Closed loop response of CS2 to 2oF decrease in reactor inlet
temperature...........................................................................................50
4.7a. Closed loop response of CS1 to 47 lb/h rise in recycle toluene
flowrate................................................................................................54
4.7b. Closed loop response of CS2 to 82 lb/hr rise in recycle toluene
flowrate................................................................................................58
viii
LIST OF TABLES
1. Steady state controlled variables selected by various authors.................12
4.1. Pairing of controlled and manipulated variables...................................32
A1. Data of HDA process for simulation......................................................65
A2. Column Specifications...........................................................................68
A3. Equipment data......................................................................................69
B1. Table of parameter tuning of HDA process(CS1)..................................72
B2. Table of parameter tuning of HDA process( CS2).................................75
ix
ABSTRACT
The connections between the various units of a chemical processing plant need to be
put into consideration in control design because the behaviour of a complete plant is
not only given by its individual units. Though if the units of a plant are connected in
series, it is easy to predict the behaviour of a plant from the behaviour of the
individual units, this does not imply that the units can be operated like individual
units. A plant-wide control strategy in which all the controllers in the system are well
integrated is thus proposed.
This plant-wide control strategy was applied to the HYDRODEALKYLATION
PROCESS which is a model of an industrial chemical process for the purpose of
studying and evaluating process control technology with the aid of ASPEN PROCESS
SIMULATORS. The process steady state design was modelled in ASPEN PLUS, and
subsequently exported to ASPEN DYNAMICS for control structure design. The two
control structures developed were tested for robustness and stability by using the
reactor inlet temperature and toluene recycle rate disturbances.
The results showed that the two control structures provide satisfactory disturbance
rejection in terms of overshoot, settling time and stability. The reactor inlet
temperature change and the toluene recycle rate did not have an appreciable effect on
the production rate and purity of benzene. This showed that a good control structure
with adequate tuning does well in the face of disturbances.
xi