Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos by Steven H.

Strogatz
Solutions by Aminur Rahman
Chapter 2: Flows on the Line
2.1 A Geometric Way of Thinking
2.1.1. The xed points are: x

= n, n Z.
2.1.2. Points of greatest positive velocity are: x =
2n+1
2
, n Z.
2.1.3. (a) The ows acceleration is: x = cos x.
(b) Points of greatest positive acceleration are: x = 2n, n Z.
2.1.4. (a) We plug in x
0
= /4 to get
t = ln

csc x
0
+ cot x
0
csc x + cot x

x
0
=/4
= ln

1 +

2
csc x + cot x

csc x + cot x = (1 +

2)e
t
.
cot
_
x
2
_
= (1 +

2)e
t
.
x
2
= cot
1
__
1 +

2
_
e
t
_
.
x = 2 cot
1
__
1 +

2
_
e
t
_
.
= 2 tan
1
_
e
t
1 +

2
_
.
(b) The general solution is
x = 2 tan
1
_
e
t
csc x
0
+ cot x
0
_
2.1.5. (a) The simple pendulum.
(b) At x

= 0 any perturbation throws the trajectory of the pendulum out of the ball
B

(x

= 0), however at x

= the trajectory will always remain in the ball B

(x

= ).
2.2 Fixed Points and Stability
2.2.1. Unstable: x

= 4. Stable: x

= 4.
2.2.2. Unstable: x

= 1. Stable: x

= 1.
2.2.3. Unstable: x

= 0. Stable: x

= 1.
2.2.4. The xed points are x

= n, n Z. To nd the stability we take the derivative, f

(x) =
e
x
sin x + e
x
cos x. Plugging in the xed points shows that when n is even the xed
points are unstable and when n is odd the xed points are stable.
2.2.5. This system has no xed points.
2.2.6. Unstable x

=

4
+ 2n, n Z. Stable: x

4
+ 2n, n Z.
2.2.7. We cant explicitly nd the xed points, but one is encouraged to plot the function and
analyze the qualitative behavior of the system.
2.2.8. Notice that a fourth order polynomial will satisfy the conditions. We need this function to be
tangent to the x-axis at x = 1, and transverse to the x-axis at the other two xed points.
The function will be positive on x (, 1) (1, 0) (2, ) and negative on x (0, 2).
So, consider the function,
f(x) = x(x + 1)(x 2)(x +a) = 2ax (2 +a)x
2
+ (a 1)x
3
+x
4
.
Taking the derivative gives,
f

(x) = 2a 2(a +a)x + 3(a 1)x

2
+ 4x
3
.
To satisfy the tangency condition at x = 1 we set the derivative to zero at that point and
solve for a which gives, a = 1. Therefore,
f(x) = x(x + 1)
2
(x 2).
Testing the conditions we see that this does indeed satisfy them. We can also check this
graphically by plotting the function.
2.2.9. It is perhaps easier to transform this plot into the ow line plot. By analyzing the ow on
the real line we easily see that our ODE is: x = x(x 1).
2.2.10. (a) x = 0.
(b) x = sin x.
(c) Not possible because we need an unstable xed point between any two unstable ones for
smooth vector elds.
(d) x = 1.
(e) x =

100
n=1
(x n).
2.2.11. We consider the ODE

Q+
1
RC
Q =
V
0
R
, Q(0) = 0.
The integrating factor is = exp(t/RC). By method of integrating factor, we have
Q =
_

V
0
R
dt =
_
V
0
R
e
t/RC
dt = V
0
Ce
t/RC
+ const.
Qe
t/RC
= V
0
Ce
t/RC
+ const. Q = V
0
C + const.e
t/RC
Q = V
0
C
_
1 e
t/RC
_
.
2.2.12. Consider a nonlinear resistor for which I = g(V ) V = g
1
(V ). Then the voltage drop
across the system becomes
V
0
+V +
Q
C
= V
0
+g
1
(I) +
Q
C
= V
0
+g
1
(

Q) +
Q
C
= 0.
Now, we solve for

Q,
g
1
(

Q) = V
0

Q
C


Q = g(V
0

Q
C
.)
Then the xed point is the same, Q

= CV
0
, because g is zero when its argument is zero.
Also, from the graph of g we see that g(V
0
Q

/C) > 0 and g(V

0
Q
+

/C) < 0, so the xed

point is still stable. The nonlinearity doesnt result in any qualitative changes.
2.2.13. (a) Dividing through by m gives,
v = g
k
m
v
2

_
dv
g
k
m
v
2
= t +C
_
m
gk
tanh
1
_
k
gm
v
_
= t +C.
Since, v(0) = 0, C = 0, hence
v =
mg
k
tanh
_
gk
m
t
_
=
rm
k
_
e
rt
e
rt
e
rt
+e
rt
_
, r =
gk
m
.
(b) Taking the limit we get, lim
t
v =
mg
k
.
(c) The xed point of the terminal velocity equation is v

=
mg
k
, and it is stable. This
corresponds to the terminal velocity. Notice, we didnt consider the negative value for
v

since this would not be physical.

(d) The average velocity is v
avg
=
s
t
=
29300
116
= 253 ft/sec.
(e) Solving for the terminal velocity numerically gives V 265 ft/sec. Plugging this into
the terminal velocity formula gives k =
mg
V
2
= .120 kg/ft.
2.3 Population Growth
2.3.1. (a) We solve the ODE

N = rN(1 N/K) via separation of variables.
_
dN
rN(1 N/K)
= t +C
1
r
ln
N
N K
= t +C.
Plugging in the initial conditions gives, c =
1
r
ln
N
0
N
0
k
, then
1
r
ln
N
N K
= t +
1
r
ln
N
0
N
0
K

N
N K
=
N
0
N
0
K
e
rt
N =
N
0
N
0
K
e
rt
N K
N
0
N
0
K
e
rt
N =
K
N
0
N
0
K
e
rt
1
N
0
N
0
K
e
rt
=
KN
0
e
rt
N
0
K N
0
e
rt
.
(b) Let x = 1/N, then the ODE becomes
x = N
2

N =
1
N
2
N
_
1
N
K
_
=
1
N
_
1
N
K
_
= x
_
1
1
Kx
_
= x +
1
K
; x(0) = 1/N
0

_
dx
x + 1/K
= t +C ln
_
x +
1
K
_
= t +C
x +
1
K
= e
t
x = e
t
+
1
K
Plugging in the initial condition gives, =
1
N
0

1
K
, then
x =
_
1
N
0

1
K
_
e
t
+
1
K
.
2.3.2. (a) We nd the xed points, x = k
1
ax k
1
x
2
= 0 x

= 0,
k
1
a
k
1
. For stability we
dierentiate, f

(x) = k
1
a 2k
1
x, which shows the xed points are unstable and stable
respectively.
(b) Sketching.
2.3.3. (a) In the Gompertz equation, a is the growth constant (the ability of cells to grow) and
b
1
is the carrying capacity (1/b is as large as the cell can feasibly get).
(b) The xed points are N

= 0, 1/b. Dierentiating gives, f

(N) = a ln(bn) a, so the

xed points are unstable and stable respectively. Now we can sketch the vector eld.
2.3.4. We set the derivative to zero to nd the critical points, f

(N) = 2a(N b) = 0 at N = b,
which corresponds to the local maxima because f

(N) = 2a.
2.3.5. We nd the xed points,

N
N
= ra(Nb)
2
= 0 (Nb)
2
=
r
a
Nb =
r
a
N

=
r
a
+b.
N

=
r
a
+ b is stable. N

=
r
a
+ b is unstable if b >
r
a
, otherwise its unphysical, since
physically, N 0.
2.4 Linear Stability Analysis
2.4.1. The derivative is f

(x) = 1 2x, so the xed points, x

= 0, 1 are unstable and stable

respectively.
2.4.2. The derivative is f

(x) = 3x
2
6x + 2, so the xed points, x

= 0, 1, 2 are unstable, stable,

and unstable respectively.
2.4.3. The derivative is f

(x) = sec
2
x, so the xed point, x

= 0, is unstable.
2.4.4. The derivative is f

(x) = 3x
2
+ 12x, so x

= 6 is unstable, however the derivative test is

inconclusive for x

= 0. Graphically, we see that x

= 0 is half-stable.
2.4.5. The derivative is f

(x) = 2xexp(x
2
), so the derivative test is inconclusive for the unique
xed point x

= 0. Graphically, we see that it is half-stable.

2.4.6. The derivative is f

(x) = 1/x, so the unique xed point x

= 1 is unstable.
2.4.7. For a > 0, the derivative is f

(x) = a 3x
2
, so x

a is stable, and x

= 0 is unstable.
If a < 0, x

= 0 is stable, but the other two xed points vanish since they are now imaginary.
For a = 0, the dynamical system becomes x = x
3
, so the only xed point is x

= 0 and it
is stable. Note: this is a supercritical pitchfork bifurcation.
2.4.8. This is already done. See 2.3.3 b in the previous section.
2.4.9. (a) We solve the ODE via separation of variables,
x = x
3

_
x
3
dx = t +C
1

1
2
x
2
= t +C
1
2x
2
=
1
t +C
2
x
2
=
1
2t +C
3
x =
_
1
2t +C
3
0 as t
(b) Numerics.
2.5 Existence and Uniqueness
2.5.1. (a) The xed point x

= 0 is stable for any c > 0.

(b) We solve the ODE,
x = x
c

_
x
c
dx = t +k
x
c+1
c + 1
= t +k.
For x = 0, t = k, and for x = 1, t =
1
c+1
k, so the time it takes the ow to go from
x = 1 to x = 0 is T = 1/(c + 1).
2.5.2. Notice 1 +x
10
1 +x
2
, so we solve the inequality,
t C
_
dx
1 +x
2
= tan
1
x t C tan
1
x.
So, as x , t C /2 t /2 + C. Since this holds for any valid constant, C, t is
nite.
2.5.3. We solve the ODE,
x = rx +x
3
t C =
_
dx
x(r +x
2
)
=
_
dx
rx

_
xdx
r(r +x
2
)
=
1
r
ln x
1
2r
ln(r +x
2
) =
1
r
[ln x ln
_
r +x
2
] =
1
r
ln
x
r +x
2
0 as x
So, t = C, and hence is a constant. Note: this is a subcritical pitchfork bifurcation.
2.5.4. We solve the ODE,
x = x
1/3

_
x
1/3
dx = t +C
1

3
2
x
2/3
= t +C x
2/3
=
2
3
t +C
2
x =
_
2
3
t +C
2
_
3/2
.
Since x(0) = 0, x =
_
3
2
t
_
3/2
, but x = 0 is also a solution. So, we have the following solutions,
x =
_
0 for t < t
0
,
_
2
3
(t t
0
)

3/2
for t t
0
;
t
0
0.
Since this holds for any t
0
, there are innitely many solutions.
2.5.5. We solve the ODE,
x = |x|
p/q
t +C =
_
|x|
p/q
dx =
_
x
p/q
dx =
1
p/q + 1
x
p/q+1
.
However, x = 0 is also a solution. Notice, we need only consider x 0 because x(0) = 0 and
x 0 for any x.
(a) For p < q, we have the following solutions,
x =
_
0 for t < t
0
,
[(p/q + 1)(t t
0
)]
1/(p/q+1)
for t t
0
;
t
0
0.
Since this holds for any t
0
, there are innitely many solutions.
(b) For p > q, p/q + 1 < 0, so for x(0) = 0, the only solution is x = 0.
2.5.6. (a) By the conservation of mass, the volume is also conserved, and the equations given are
just the time derivatives of the volume.
(b) The potential energy of the system is mgh and the kinetic energy is
1
2
(m)v
2
. If all
the potential energy is converted to kinetic energy, v
2
= 2gh.
(c) From (a) and (b) we have, av = A

h and v =

2gh. Then, a

2gh = A

h

h =
a
A

2gh.
(d) We solve the ODE,

h = Ch
1/2

_
h
1/2
= Ct +C
1
2h
1/2
= Ct +C
1
h =
C
4
t
2
+C
1
t +C
2
.
Since h(0) = 0, C
2
= 0, hence h =
C
4
t
2
+ C
1
t. Here, C is known from (c), however C
1
is arbitrary, therefore there exists innitely many solutions in backward time.
2.6 Impossibility of Oscillations
2.6.1. Any second order ODE can be broken down into two rst order ODEs, and hence is a two
dimensional dynamical system.
2.6.2. Proof. Suppose the system x = f(x) has a nontrivial periodic solution x(t), i.e. x(t) = x(t+T)
for some T > 0, and x(t) = x(t +s) for all 0 < x < T. Consider
_
t+T
t
f(x)
dx
dt
dt. By the chain
rule we have,
_
t+T
t
f(x)
dx
dt
dt =
_
x(t+T)
x(t)
f(x)dx = 0
because x(t) = x(t +T). However,
_
t+T
t
f(x)
dx
dt
dt =
_
t+T
t
f(x)
2
dt > 0
because T > 0 and f is not identically zero. This forms a contradiction. Therefore, there can
be no periodic solutions to one dimensional dynamical systems.
2.7 Potentials
2.7.1. The potential is V (x) =
1
2
x
2

1
3
x
3
. The xed points are x

= 0, 1 and unstable and stable

respectively.
2.7.2. The potential is V (x) = 3x, and the system has no xed points.
2.7.3. The potential is V (x) = cos x. The xed points are x

= n, n Z. The xed points are

stable when n is odd and unstable when n is stable.
2.7.4. The potential is V (x) = 2x cos x, and the system has no xed points.
2.7.5. The potential is V (x) = cosh x. The xed point x

= 0 is stable.
2.7.6. The potential is V (x) = rx +
1
2
x
2

1
4
x
4
. This must be done graphically and/or numerically.
2.7.7. Proof. Suppose the system x = f(x) has a periodic solution x(t) such that x(t) = x(t + T)
for some T > 0 and x(t) = x(t + s) for all 0 < s < T. Consider the integral
_
t+T
t
f(x)
dx
dt
dt.
Assume there is a nontrivial potential function V (x) such that dV (x)/dx = f(x). Then
_
t+T
t
f(x)
dx
dt
dt =
_
x(t+T)
x(t)
dV
dx
dx = V (x)

x(t+T)
x(t)
= 0,
because x(t) = x(t +T), but
_
t+T
t
f(x)
dx
dt
dt =
_
t+T
t
dV
dx
dx
dt
dt =
_
t+T
t
dV
dt
dt =
_
t+T
t

_
dV
dx
_
2
dt 0.
Therefore, V 0, hence the system can not have a periodic solution.