Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

Probably Structure of the Invisible (Underground) Government (UG)

It seems that UG has all the power in the U.S. and is formed by three immense powers:
the National Rifle Association (NRA), the Mass Media and the Market. The
representative without power in the UG is the Government ("elected by poll!") and the
juridical "power".
The National Rifle Association is the main executive and armed arm; The Mass
Media (4th. Power) is the head of campaign and propaganda; The Market (bonds,
energy industry, pharmaceutical, the insurance companies, the banks,
telecommunications, subsidies, taxes, aid to other countries and others) is the
legislative, composed by lobbyists on/over congressmen; The public Government
"chosen by poll!" and the juridical power, as representative without real power in the
UG.
The subdued American people to the benevolence of the unscrupulous UG are
entertained with sublimation that make the Mass Media to the democracy, promoting
"the most powerful strength by voting!" to representatives, who does not have that
power, neither Party elected, nor the Presidency nor the Chambers.

It is good to know that we Americans are the people most benefited in the world with
this system that it is the best one that works (with exception of the medical services that
are only fully legislated for animals). Perhaps all of that is because the military and the
economical power of the United States.
It is also good to know that in this analysis the worst are not taken into account: neither
the dictatorships nor the tyrannies that correspond to slavery, feudalism and
communism; comment only on capitalism, which emerged spontaneously as a social
system, with its democracy that might be called democratic dictatorship, because to an
electoral systems around the world, where politicians do not scale by their vocation of
service, but rather by their ambition of profit.

Many people believe that the fate of the world in which we live are determined by
powerful groups like the G7, G20, the Bilderberg or the Illuminati. These beliefs
customize which determine our destinies. But that doesn't seem to be the reality,
because when a group of men are working at this level, they rely on science, and they
would not commit so many stupid things as bringing the United States into the war in
Viet Nam, Iraq, Afghanistan; subsidies that prevent the competitiveness, driving force of
capitalism, as subside of four billion dollars to the oil industry. Those groups have little
power. In any case each group gathers to know how much more they can be squeezed
people without running risk.

The Government here and in the world is more complex and impersonal. All the
politicians, secretaries (ministers), high-ranking militaries, high-ranking CIA and FBI
members and others are highly committed to the UG, or because they have shares in its
companies or their political campaigns were financed by the UG. The UG is very
benevolent with them economically, but also it is very harsh to the rebel dissidents,
because they can be destroyed publicly, just doing to appear in the Mass Means their
weaknesses and ficklenesses. The rebels publicly well known are at higher risk,
because they could suffer accidents or being attacked by aggressive fans, which are
controlled in the world by the repressive forces, to avoid surprise attacks. Sometimes
controllers organized them as it might have happened in the cases of pacifists Robert
Kennedy and John Lennon. But if he still have more political support and power and he
is opposed to "necessary wars!" (or "flowery wars" so called by Aztec Indians) as the
case of the President JFK, who was opposed to the invasion of Cuba and the useless
and costly war in Viet Nam, so the risk is greater and more direct.

Barak Obama has been at risk for his work, trying to get the country out of those wars in
the Middle East or saying that "the real boss is the Bond Market". But perhaps these
are other times; there are variants to spend the Treasury of the Nation (taxpayer
money) in the domestic industry. Something strange happened, according to the Mass
Media, the majority of the weapons that have terrorists of ISIS in their hands are
American, they are neither Russian nor Chinese, with which they have been able to
expand traveling freely along in the desert places, without any air attack. Now is already
late, of course at a higher cost, by buying very expensive drones and bombs, and
perhaps sending troops there, with the meaning more benefit to Arms Industry. The
question is: who advised the President to delay these attacks?

An example how it works [the Commander in Chief, the NRA, would be do as follows,
only more complex and subtle that is sketched here]: the arms industry managers
predict that within two years it will produce a low earnings in the industry (just a low,
profits will be enormous), then begin activities.
NRA officials say to the right chosen military general that the United States should carry
its Western Culture to someone needy. The General says the more suitable, which
more crimes committed and which may have weapons of mass extermination is Iraq.
Then the task is charged to a military general strategist and expert of the area for a war
plan. He develops his plan and says: the problem is that the 1998 Iraq Commission,
which investigated on the ground, assures Iraqis have not mass extermination weapons
neither the means to manufacture them in the medium-term. The NRA officials resort to
tell the FBI and the CIA about the problem and that possibly they will find more than one
source that says that those weapons exist there.
Meanwhile the Mass Media advance in the information of how the Government of Iraq
becomes increasingly dangerous.
George W. Bushs administration pushes on the UNO to send a new Commission for
Inspection in Iraq. After much stretch and shrink Iraq let the new Commission come in.
Every day it imposes a new requirement to exasperate the arrogant dictator Hussein,
whom his psychology is well known to take him where GS want to.
Two years have already passed; Bush is advised to begin with his more than one
ultimatum. Well, the rest is known. But arms industry blooms again, the profit is restored
and much more.

It seems that the GS is looking for a political bewildered campaign very active, when
Hilary Clinton said that she was repented of having voted on in Congress in favor of the
war against Iraq. She who is Democrat voted in favor of the war and nothing less than
the war! Has she shares in the NRA? NRA paid her debt contracted in her presidential
campaign? Bill Clinton, thanks his advisers, fulfilled his part when he was President,
spending much of the public purse bombarding Yugoslavia. Once the rebellious married
couple, now they understand better the meaning of life? Or they are subdued by their
own interests? Or perhaps, they do not want to sacrifice needlessly themselves beating
their heads against the wall.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen