Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Sample
http://www.sample.com
Accessibility Inspection: sample.com 2
Nathan Olmstead
Table of Contents
Table of Contents.................................................................................................................2
Executive Summary.............................................................................................................3
Terminology & Conventions Used......................................................................................4
Priority Levels......................................................................................................................5
Accessibility Guidelines .....................................................................................................6
Simplicity and Clarity .....................................................................................................6
Supporting Visual and Non-Visual Navigation...............................................................8
Proper Text Markup and Phrasing ..................................................................................9
Proper Structural Markup .............................................................................................10
Providing Content and Context......................................................................................11
Device Independence.....................................................................................................12
Graceful Degradation.....................................................................................................13
Allow User Control........................................................................................................14
Respecting the User.......................................................................................................15
Accessibility Inspection: sample.com 3
Executive Summary
An accessibility inspection was conducted on the sample.com website as a
whole. The inspection focused on identifying any and all issues relating to site
accessibility as well as noting the strengths and current practices the site should
continue.
• Not utilizing the “alt” attribute for content images. When this attribute
is omitted, users with screen readers have no way to obtain the
information the image is conveying. This is also true when a user’s
browser does not load an image correctly.
• Very large page size. The extensive use of imagery on this site has made
for a much larger than average page size. This is a major issue for any
users that do not have a fast internet connection. Most users have a very
short tolerance for slow page load time. All images need to be optimized
for the web, allowing pages to have the smallest size possible.
While these issues are among the most important accessibility concerns for the
sample.com website, a number of additional issues are further detailed in the
inspection with recommended solutions.
Accessibility Inspection: sample.com 4
Color Contrast Ratio: Is the color of the text or foreground over the color of the
background. Insufficient ratios are difficult for users read with good and poor
visibility.
Inverted L: A common website layout where the Global and Local navigation
form the shape of an inverted letter “L”.
Link label: The label in this case is the word or words that are linked. These
words can be in graphical form (such as the graphical buttons at the top of the
jimmyjohns.com interface) or HTML text that is linked.
Priority Levels
The issues identified in this evaluation are grouped into three levels of priority:
High priority: These issues are likely to impact a large number of users
significantly. They should be resolved as quickly as resources allow.
Medium priority: Issues at this priority level are also likely to affect a large
number of users but generally are less disruptive to the user experience, relative
to the high priority issues. If resources are available to address these issues,
they should be addressed.
Low priority: Low priority issues typically impact a small subset of the overall
user base, although they may impact a larger group. Regardless of the number
of users affected, these issues carry only a minor negative impact. Low priority
issues are generally easy to resolve. There is less time pressure to fix low priority
issues, compared to medium priority issues and especially high priority issues.
Accessibility Inspection: sample.com 6
Accessibility Guidelines
The layout of the website should be easy to understand and follow without
extraneous or distracting elements. Important elements of the website should be
clearly labeled as well as the main focus.
Practices to Continue
• Concise product imagery. The images are large enough for the majority
of visual users to see and the images are within close proximity of the
product title and description increasing association between the two.
Suggested Changes
High Priority:
• Change color to dark blue on page headings. The color contrast ratio
for the orange font over the white background is 3.17: 1. The minimum
ratio for users with poor visibility is 4.5: 1. Source: Juicy Studios
(http://juicystudio.com/services/luminositycontrastratio.php).
• The lack of white space could be very distracting for users with
mental disabilities such as attention deficit disorder. Adding another
layer of navigation is sometimes necessary to keep users focused and not
overwhelmed by the amount of information available on one page.
Medium Priority:
• Make all links consistent in color and styling. On the site map majority
of the links are blue and underlined while others are orange and
underlined. This confuses the user in thinking that there is something
different about links based on their color. In this case, all links are simply
leading users to product pages or categories within the site with no
consistency in link coloring.
• The orange links over the white background have poor contrast that
would be difficult to read for visually impaired users. Not only will
visually impaired users be affected, but also users viewing the page with
older or low contrast monitors.
Accessibility Inspection: sample.com 8
Navigation should be clear and efficient for users with visual disabilities as well
as for users with out visual disabilities. The design and opportunistic within page
links are essential for accessibility.
Practices to Continue
Suggested Changes
High Priority:
• Deactivate current page link. Having an active current page link can
cause users to become frustrated while clicking the link expecting to see
new content appear, but not realizing what page they're currently on.
• Visually separate active page link from other navigation. The most
simple approach would be to change the color of the current page link
thus eliminating any confusion
• Provide a "skip to main content" for blind users to skip past the
navigation and jump directly to the content. Screen readers will read
through all of the navigation for every new page that is displayed. This can
be frustrating for users that have no link to skip ahead to the page content,
which is what they ultimately are looking for.
Low Priority:
• Visually separate visited links. Letting users know what pages they
have already visited on the site is beneficial especially on a website of this
volume. Using the CSS pseudo selector a:visited is preferred approach to
accomplish this.
Accessibility Inspection: sample.com 9
A lot of what makes content accessible is how things are worded as well the
XHTML markup applied to the structure of the content. Descriptive links, short
sentences, and concise wording improve legibility and meaning.
Practices to Continue
• Providing <title> tags for graphic text. This is important for users that
either cannot see the image because of disabilities and for users that the
image just simply didn’t load for. Without the title information, these users
will have no idea what information the image is trying to convey.
Suggested Changes
High Priority:
• Implement the use of the "alt" attribute for images. If an image does
not load, the user will not have any means of determining what information
the image was supposed to convey. The "alt" attribute is especially
necessary on navigation links utilizing imagery.
Medium Priority:
Practices to Continue
• Use of appropriate titles and metadata for each page. Every page
should contain useful information unique to that page. This not only helps
users but also can help with search engine optimization.
Suggested Changes
High Priority:
• Proper markup when using tables. Tabular data used for product
overviews should implement the “scope” attribute as well as table
headings and table body. Without using “scope” and table headings, users
with adaptive technology may easily get lost when searching through
tabular data.
Practices to Continue
• Providing a title for images with graphical text. Most screen readers
can still effectively read content displayed with an image if there is a title
included.
Suggested Changes
High Priority:
Medium Priority:
Device Independence
Requiring users to have a given input device such as a mouse ignores the fact
that not all users will be able to use or even possess all input devices.
Practices to Continue
• Navigation menus and links are all accessible by both mouse and
tabbing with the keyboard. Not all users have the option or are even
capable of using both a mouse and a keyboard.
Suggested Changes
High Priority:
• No use of the attribute "tab index". This is important so that users can
access links quickly and in an organized manner. When this attribute is
neglected the user is forced to tab through every link in order of source
code, which is usually not the desired order.
• Users without a mouse are forced to tab through the extensive list of
navigation before they can reach page content. A simple skip to
content link could solve this issue. It can be especially frustrating for users
attempting to complete the checkout process.
Accessibility Inspection: sample.com 13
Graceful Degradation
The user experience must be maintained even when certain technologies are not
used or upgraded on every users browsing device. Adaptive technologies should
still function properly.
Practices to Continue
• When JavaScript is turned off the CSS drop down menus maintain
usability of the navigation. Many users either by knowingly or
unknowingly have JavaScript disabled in their browsers.
Suggested Changes
High Priority:
Control over the interface is essential for disabled users; any aspects out of their
control could be detrimental to their experience.
Practices to Continue
Suggested Changes
High Priority:
Medium Priority:
• Provide a custom 404 error page with a link back to the homepage.
Let the user know they are trying to access a page that isn’t on your
website and guide them back. Default error pages are confusing to users
with cognitive issues.
Low Priority:
Many practices convey to users a sense of disrespect; those users will the
website and not return. Color contrast and timed processes are the most
common ways to disrespect users with disabilities.
Practices to Continue
Suggested Changes
High Priority:
• The total page load size for the current index page is 1504764 bytes.
An index page of this size would take a user with a 56k connection
approximately 325 seconds for a complete page load. Largely contributing
to the page size is the 104 images and 18 scripts that load. This far
exceeds the average attention span of web users, and more specifically,
even exceeds the time that users with slow connections can tolerate.
Optimizing images is a must for e-commerce sites since slow load times
can be the difference between a sale or not.
Medium Priority:
• The CSS drop down menus for local navigation is twitchy and
unforgiving for users with poor motor skills. A JavaScript timer should
be implemented thus delaying the menus closing time when “moused off”
to better support this group of users.
• Expanded image view does not show current image displayed. Since
the image viewer is created via JavaScript, a simple highlight on current
item could help prevent any confusion and random clicking through
thumbnails a user might incur.