0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
362 Ansichten4 Seiten
Von Neumann architecture is a computer architecture based on that described in 1945 by the mathematician and physicist John Von Neumann. Harvard allows two simultaneous memory fetches. Same memory holds data, instructions. Two sets of address / data buses between CPU and memory.
Von Neumann architecture is a computer architecture based on that described in 1945 by the mathematician and physicist John Von Neumann. Harvard allows two simultaneous memory fetches. Same memory holds data, instructions. Two sets of address / data buses between CPU and memory.
Von Neumann architecture is a computer architecture based on that described in 1945 by the mathematician and physicist John Von Neumann. Harvard allows two simultaneous memory fetches. Same memory holds data, instructions. Two sets of address / data buses between CPU and memory.
Separate memories for data and instructions. Two sets of address/data buses between CPU and memory Harvard allows two simultaneous memory fetches. Same memory holds data, instructions. A single set of address/data buses between CPU and memory Harvard architecture The Harvard architecture is a computer architecture with physically separate storage and signal pathways for instructions and data. The term originated from the Harvard Mark I relay- based computer, which stored instructions on punched tape (24 bits wide) and data in electro-mechanical counters. These early machines had data storage entirely contained within the central processing unit, and provided no access to the instruction storage as data. Programs needed to be loaded by an operator; the processor could not boot itself. Today, most processors implement such separate signal pathways for performance reasons but actually implement a modified Harvard architecture, so they can support tasks such as loading a program from disk storage as data and then executing it.
Von Neumann architecture also known as the Von Neumann model and Princeton architecture, is a computer architecture based on that described in 1945 by the mathematician and physicist John von Neumann and others in the First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC. This describes a design architecture for an electronic digital computer with parts consisting of a processing unit containing an arithmetic logic unit and processor registers, a control unit containing aninstruction register and program counter, a memory to store both data and instructions, external mass storage, and input and output mechanisms. The meaning has evolved to be any stored-program computer in which an instruction fetch and a data operation cannot occur at the same time because they share a common bus. This is referred to as the Von Neumann bottleneck and often limits the performance of the system. The design of a Von Neumann architecture is simpler than the more modern Harvard architecture which is also a stored-program system but has one dedicated set of address and data buses for reading data from and writing data to memory, and another set of address and data buses for fetching instructions. A stored-program digital computer is one that keeps its program instructions, as well as its data, in read-write, random-access memory (RAM). Stored-program computers were an advancement over the program-controlled computers of the 1940s, such as the Colossus and the ENIAC, which were programmed by setting switches and inserting patch leads to route data and to control signals between various functional units. In the vast majority of modern computers, the same memory is used for both data and program instructions, and the Von Neumann vs. Harvard distinction applies to the cachearchitecture, not the main memory.
CISC and RISC
MCs (Micro Controllers ) with Harvard architectureare called "RISC MCs. with von Neumann's architecture are called CISC MCs. The PIC16F84MC has a RISC architecture. Harvard architecture is a newer concept than von-Neumann's. In Harvard architecture, data bus and address bus are separate. Thus a greater flow of data is possible through the CPU, and of course, a Greater speed of work. It is also typical for Harvard architecture to have fewer instructions than von-Neumann's, and to have instructions usually executed in one cycle.
The CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computers) Approach The primary goal of CISC architecture is to complete a task in as few lines of assembly as possible. This is achieved by building processor hardware that is capable of understanding and executing a series of operations. For this particular task, a CISC processor would come prepared with a specific instruction (we'll call it "MULT"). When executed, this instruction loads the two values into separate registers, multiplies the operands in the execution unit, and then stores the product in the appropriate register. Thus, the entire task of multiplying two numbers can be completed with one instruction: MULT 2:3, 5:2 MULT is what is known as a "complex instruction." It operates directly on the computer's memory banks and does not require the programmer to explicitly call any loading or storing functions. It closely resembles a command in a higher level language. For instance, if we let "a" represent the value of 2:3 and "b" represent the value of 5:2, then this command is identical to the C statement "a = a * b." One of the primary advantages of this system is that the compiler has to do very little work to translate a high-level language statement into assembly. Because the length of the code is relatively short, very little RAM is required to store instructions. The emphasis is put on building complex instructions directly into the hardware. The RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computers) Approach RISC processors only use simple instructions that can be executed within one clock cycle. Thus, the "MULT" command described above could be divided into three separate commands: "LOAD," which moves data from the memory bank to a register, "PROD," which finds the product of two operands located within the registers, and "STORE," which moves data from a register to the memory banks. In order to perform the exact series of steps described in the CISC approach, a programmer would need to code four lines of assembly: LOAD A, 2:3 LOAD B, 5:2 PROD A, B STORE 2:3, A At first, this may seem like a much less efficient way of completing the operation. Because there are more lines of code, more RAM is needed to store the assembly level instructions. The compiler must also perform more work to convert a high-level language statement into code of this form.