Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CEOs NOTE
We are once again pleased to share with you the findings of our sixth iProperty.com
Asia Property Market Sentiment Survey Report. This survey reveals sentiments for
the second half of 2014 while comparing the sentiments on the property market in
the first half of the year.
Conducted for a month, 5th June 2014 - 8th July 2014, across our market-leading
network of property portals, the survey gathered close to 13,000 respondents.
Cautious optimism seems to be the phrase that describes the Asian property market
in 2014. Despite economic upheavals, especially due to the tapering US economy,
capital flows have been somewhat steady in the Asian markets.
In all countries surveyed, affordability continues to remain a major concern. All these
countries have introduced multiple new measures to cool the property market
and/or are looking into providing more affordable housing to the low- and middleincome group via various schemes.
We wish to thank all the survey respondents for sharing their valuable input on the
property market. Without the involvement of these many individuals, this report
would not have been possible.
Should you have any comments and feedback pertaining to this report, please drop
is an email at my.info@iproperty.com
Sincerely,
Georg Chmiel
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
The iProperty Group
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In the sixth iProperty.com Asia Property Market Sentiment Report for H2 of 2014,
survey respondents in Malaysia (iProperty.com.my), Indonesia (Rumah123.com and
rumahdanproperti.com), Hong Kong (GoHome.com.hk) and Singapore
(iProperty.com.sg) revealed their intentions, preferences and motivations in
acquiring property.
METHODOLOGY,
AND CAVEATS
ASSUMPTIONS
This is the sixth iProperty.com Asia Property Market Sentiment Survey Report
conducted by the iProperty Group. Held twice yearly, the survey aims to provide the
general public, property investors, buyers, sellers and owners, including local and
expatriates with insights into the property market purely from a consumer
perspective.
In Malaysia, a total of 5,295 people responded to the online survey.
In Indonesia, a total of 2,590 people responded to the online survey.
In Hong Kong, the survey gathered a total of 1,940 respondents. The survey was
designed and conducted in both English and Chinese on www.GoHome.com.hk.
In Singapore, a total of 2,805 people responded to the online survey.
The analysis of data from each survey question only considered data from questions
that were not skipped.
RESULTS ANALYSIS
Overview
Malaysia and Singapore have seen a slowdown in property sales, while Indonesia has
seen a surge in local demand rather than the capital inflows that spurred record
home prices in neighboring Singapore and Hong Kong.
Majority of respondents are male, and most are married. Most respondents in
Malaysia and Singapore are Executives/Managers, while most respondents in
Indonesia are Clerks/Administrators.
Most respondents have lived in their current place for less than 5 years and majority
have 4 or more living under the same roof. The main motivation of purchasing
property are the desire to own their own home, to attain rental income and for longterm investment.
In all countries surveyed, concerns about affordability remain. A considerable
percentage of respondents:
Have trouble finding property that they can afford, and have insufficient
funds for a downpayment
Are looking to purchase property locally within the next year
Picked Location, Price and Size as the three key factors to focus on when
purchasing property
For overseas property, most respondents would only consider purchasing 2 years
from now. Australia is consistently the second choice for property investment in all
countries surveyed. Respondents in Singapore and Malaysia prefer to purchase
Private condominiums / serviced apartment, while Indonesia prefers to purchase
Landed property overseas. Similar to the previous survey, those who find overseas
property attractive are looking to purchase for investment and/or migratory
purposes.
Asias outlook
While mature markets like China, Japan and India have experienced certain highs
and lows, several new markets like Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia have
emerged. According to Knight Frank Wealth Report 2014, global investment in
commercial property is expected to increase by 11% in 2014 and 2015 to USD$593
billion and USD$657 billion (RM2.1 trillion) respectively.
In Asia-Pacific, transaction volume rose nine percent to USD$119 billion (RM388
billion) in 2013, up from the one percent increase posted in 2012. In Asia-Pacific,
transaction volume rose 9% to USD$119 billion in 2013, up from the 1% increase
posted in 2012. Head of Research for Asia-Pacific at Knight Frank, noted that the
Asian economic slowdown has been more evident in the occupier markets.
In a Cushman & Wakefield publication, Asia Pacific 2014 2015 Forecasts: Regaining
Momentum, moderate growth forecasts for Asia Pacific in 2014-2015 remain intact.
Regional gross domestic product (GDP) growth is projected to remain solid at 5.4%5.5% this year and rebound to 5.5%-5.8% in 2015.
Inflation is also expected to remain benign across much of the region, except in India
and Indonesia, where monetary policy will remain tight to fend off inflationary
pressures.
The Southeast Asian economies of Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Vietnam are
expected to grow more than 5% this year. Malaysias robust domestic demand will
remain crucial to maintaining its forward momentum, though sentiment is likely to
weaken following the implementation of the goods and services tax (GST) in 2015.
Indonesia will continue its underperformance as high interest rates and fuel prices
weigh on the economy. In Singapore, stable consumption, along with a pick-up in
exports, should allow the city-state to expand slightly above its projected long-term
trend rate (3.5%- 4%).
MALAYSIA:
SLOWER
MARKET
AMIDST ADJUSTMENT TO COOLING
MEASURES. A STRONGER SECOND
HALF IS EXPECTED, BUT THE LATEST
HIKE IN OPR IS EXPECTED TO LEND
A SLIGHT EFFECT.
The growth in the Malaysian House Price Index (MHPI) declined to 9.6% in the fourth
quarter of 2013, compared with 12.2% a year earlier, according to Bank Negara
Malaysia. This was the first time since the third quarter of 2011 that the MHPI was
below 10%, and the improvements were recorded across most states and most types
of dwelling.
Sales and new launches slowed in the last quarter of 2013, possibly due to the
various measures imposed to cool down the housing sector since 2010. Bank Negara
also said that it is possibly due to the wait-and-see attitude of some developers and
buyers following the prohibition on developer interest-bearing schemes in
November 2013, further increases in real property gains tax in January this year,
higher minimum purchase price for houses by foreigners, and uncertainties
regarding the potential impact of the goods and services tax.
Bank Negara said that although the MHPI had expanded annually by between 10%
and 12% since 2011, outpacing income and rental growth, the rate of growth in
house prices remained significantly below those observed in some neighbouring
economies.
Malaysias relatively young population and labour force, increasing urbanisation, and
general inclination to own a house, are factors that are expected to sustain strong
demand for affordable residential properties in major urban centres, likely
outstripping supply over the near and medium-term.
Bank Negara said the earlier government measures had also resulted in reduced
credit-fuelled speculative purchases of residential properties where the annual
growth in the number of borrowers with three or more outstanding housing loans
has declined substantially to about 4%, from a peak of 15.8% prior to the
implementation of the measures, to account for only 3% of housing loan borrowers.
10
11
12
DEMOGRAPHICS:
MARRIED
COUPLES
WITH
INCREASED
BUDGET FOR BOTH LONG-TERM
PROPERTY
INVESTMENT
AND
OWN-HOME PURCHASE
There are more male respondents in this survey compared to the last survey, up
from 57% to 61%. As with the previous few surveys, the survey is male-skewed.
Gender
100%
90%
61%
80%
70%
39%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Male
13
Female
In comparison with the previous survey, there is a huge increase in the percentage of
married respondents (from 41% to 54%), and this increase is directly from a drop in
respondents who are single (from 57% to 45%).
Marital Status
100%
90%
80%
70%
54%
45%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
1%
10%
0%
Married
Single
Other
Most respondents are probably living with their spouse, their young children and/or
parents, as 55% of respondents have 4 or more people living in their household.
No of People in a Household
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
25%
30%
20%
19%
20%
7%
10%
0%
One
14
Two
Three
Four
More than
Four
As for the age groups, the numbers are similar to the previous survey. Respondents
are largely from 20 to 40 years old, and majority of respondents are Malaysian
citizens.
Age Group
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
39%
37%
40%
30%
14%
20%
10%
9%
1%
0%
Below 20
20 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 and above
Residence Status
Non-resident in the country
1%
6%
Permanent Resident
91%
Citizen
0%
15
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Unemployed
Homemaker
Retired
Student
1%
2%
3%
3%
Civil Servant
Clerical / Administrative
4%
5%
8%
8%
Self Employed
Professional / Technical
Executive / Managerial
25%
40%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Despite the upward percentage jump in married respondents, the household income
remains relatively unchanged. Majority of respondents (52%) fall into the
MYR90,000 and below group, while more than a quarter (27%) are from mid- to
upper middle-income group of MYR90,001 to MYR180,000. There is a slight increase
of those earning more than MYR300,000 (from approximately 3.4% to 5%).
Annual Household Income
7%
2%
MYR300,001 - MYR500,000
3%
27%
MYR180,001 - MYR300,000
43%
MYR30,001 - MYR90,000
9%
Below MYR30,000
0%
16
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Back in March 2013, the 2012 Household Income Survey conducted by the Statistics
Department announced that the Malaysian households monthly income rose from
MYR4,025 in 2009 to MYR5,000 in 2012. Its a 7.2% increase in total. It was even
announced that all states in Malaysia recorded better average monthly household
incomes with Kuala Lumpur leading with the highest growth of 14.9% from
MYR5,488 to MYR8,586. However, with the prices of everyday items rising, the
significance of this means very little as our spending power remains weak.
Most of respondents (79%) are from Selangor and Kuala Lumpur. The most
affordable house in the Sime Darby-UM study is in Melawati and the household
income required to own a property in Melawati is MYR9,360. This means that even
the most affordable property is already beyond the reach of the majority in Kuala
Lumpur, Putrajaya and even Selangor. The property listed in Nilai requires a
household income of MYR9,430 which is almost twice the mean household income
of Negri Sembilan and even exceeds the mean household income of Kuala Lumpur.
Hence, it can be concluded that some properties in the selected areas are beyond
the reach of the majority in Kuala Lumpur, Putrajaya and Selangor.
Currently Residing in
Labuan
Terengganu
Pahang
Perlis
Kelantan
Negeri Sembilan
1%
Malacca
1%
Kedah
1%
Putrajaya
1%
Sarawak
2%
Sabah
2%
Perak
2%
Johor
5%
Penang
6%
31%
Kuala Lumpur
48%
Selangor
0%
17
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Slightly more than half the respondents (53%) are interested in buying property,
while 21% are first-time homebuyers. That amounts to a whopping 74% who are
looking at property purchase either for own stay or investment.
Consider Themselves
1%
Expatriate
Looking to Rent our a Property
3%
3%
3%
5%
11%
21%
53%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Almost half (drop from 56% from previous survey to 49%) of respondents have
stayed in their current premises for 5 years or less, while almost a quarter (23%)
have been in the same abode for 6 to 10 years.
49%
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
23%
25%
20%
15%
15%
9%
10%
3%
5%
0%
0 - 5 years
18
6 - 10 years
11 - 20 years
More than 20
years
All my life
95% of respondents currently own residential property, and they are mainly living in
terrace houses (48%) or condominiums/apartments (28%). This might mean that
married respondents would prefer to live in houses with their families.
Residential properties are the most transacted type of properties in the Klang Valley,
making up 75% in the last three years, and condominiums received the highest
demand from homebuyers. This trend is similar in Selangor.
Properties Owned
Land
9%
Car Park
9%
10%
Shop/Commercial Buildings
95%
Residential Property
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Currently Residing In
Factory / industrial property
0%
Hotel / resort
0%
Retail Space
0%
SOHO
0%
1%
Shop Office
5%
Bungalow
8%
Semi-detached House
10%
Flat/Walk-up Apartment
28%
48%
Terrace House
0%
19
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Television / radio
Attend porperty seminars /
exhibitions
21%
29%
32%
49%
53%
Newspapers / magazines
93%
iProperty.com
0%
20
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
A large percentage (57%) are interested in purchasing new properties, while 34% are
on the fence. The top three sources of information for new properties are:
1. Online property websites and search engines
2. Directly from developers
3. Property exhibitions
According to an industry body, Malaysian Internet Exchange (MyIX), Malaysias
Internet usage rose 51% in 2013. Internet traffic consumption today showed the
biggest annual percentage increase ever in more than a decade. Plus, in early 2014,
On Device Research published a report on Mobile Malaysia: ahead of the pack,
which showed that 47% of Malaysians own more than 1 mobile phone. These
figures, plus respondents sentiment, confirm a known fact digital media is here to
stay (and is growing rapidly!).
Interest in New Property
No
4%
5%
34%
Maybe
57%
Yes
0%
21
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Apart from detailed information about the property, which is still the most
important information property purchasers require, the type of information
respondents seek has changed quite a bit.
This survey
Detailed information about
the property
Property price comparisons
Neighbourhood information
Compare features
Compare features
Read reviews
Last survey
Detailed information
property
High quality photos
about
the
Information Required
85%
66%
Hi-quality photos
48%
41%
Neighbourhood information
40%
40%
Interactive maps
32%
32%
A home-buyers checklist
26%
26%
23%
20%
19%
18%
Currency convertor
6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
22
The main percentages remain relatively unchanged from the previous survey. A
quarter of respondents (25%) are looking into property purchase in the next 6
months.
There does not seem to be an increased urgency despite the uncertainty of whether
buyers will have to bear any rise in costs for new houses from the implementation of
the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on 1st April 2015.
CIMB Research said the impact of the measures introduced during the governments
Budget 2014, is going to be negative in the short-term, but should be positive over
the longer-term as it will help remove froth from some segments in the market.
Some measures introduced in Budget 2014 include Real Property Gains Tax (RPGT)
to 30% for gains on properties disposed of within the holding period of up to three
years. For disposals within the holding period of up to four and five years, the rates
are decreased to 20% and 15% respectively. The government also introduced a new
minimum price for property that can be purchased by foreigners, from MYR500,000
to MYR1 million.
When to Purchase
6%
13%
26%
30%
25%
23
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Most respondents still feel that property prices are too high (up from 57% in the
previous survey to 67%), while the other two co-related reasons are trouble finding
properties that they can afford, and insufficient funds for a down payment.
Affordability seems to be a constant and growing concern. Plus, with the lack of
wage increase and assistance for the middle-income group, these might be the
reasons that a higher percentage of respondents compared to the last survey, are
motivated to purchase property as a long-term investment and for rental income.
The desire to accumulate asset surpassed respondents desire to own a home of their
own (which was the main motivation in the last survey).
1
2
3
4
5
H2 2014
For long-term investment
H1 2014
Desire to own a home on my own
6%
16%
17%
18%
21%
24%
36%
36%
67%
24
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Motivation to purchase
2%
6%
6%
8%
10%
Retirement
11%
12%
13%
24%
Affordability of Homes
25%
26%
27%
40%
44%
45%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
The top five considerations when purchasing property remain unchanged from the
previous round Location, Price, Size, Security and Facilities.
Factors of Consideration
2.89
Recommendations
3.54
4.83
Financing eligibility/process
5.65
Status of property
5.88
6.15
Facilities
Potential rental yield
6.56
6.63
7.55
Size
7.90
Security
Price
10.17
Location
10.24
0.00
25
2.00
4.00
6.00
26
1%
3%
4%
6%
9%
10%
12%
15%
16%
18%
19%
19%
25%
40%
69%
70%
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Consistent with previous surveys result, the top three preferred locations to
purchase property is Klang Valley, Selangor, and Putrajaya. Penang and Johor is at a
distant fourth and fifth position respectively.
Preferred Location
0%
Perlis
Terengganu
1%
Kelantan
1%
Pahang
2%
Kedah
2%
Sarawak
3%
Sabah
3%
7%
Malacca
Negeri Sembilan
8%
Perak
8%
15%
Johor
22%
Penang
25%
Putrajaya
78%
Kuala Lumpur
82%
Selangor
0%
27
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
There is a big dip (from 68% in the previous survey to 54%) for those with a budget
of less than half a million Ringgit. On the other hand, these respondents have
increased their budget to the MYR500,001 to MYR800,000 range.
This sentiment is in tandem with the rise in average prices in properties. By property
type, nationally, during the year to Q3 2013:
The average price of terraced houses rose by 7.8% y-o-y to MYR238,337
The average price of detached houses increased 15.1% y-o-y to MYR458,858
The average price of semi-detached houses rose by 14.7% to MYR421,622
The high-rise price index soared 13.7%, to an average price of MYR248,567
Budget to Purchase
1%
5%
8%
33%
MYR500,001 - MYR800,000
53%
Below MYR500,000
0%
28
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
23%
Yes
33%
Undecided
45%
No
0%
29
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
94%
No
6%
Yes
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Vietnam
3%
India
Indonesia
5%
Thailand
5%
Philippines
5%
Hong Kong
8%
China
8%
10%
New Zealand
13%
16%
28%
Australia
43%
Singapore
0%
30
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
The properties were mainly purchased via developer (45%) and local agent (42%)
from country of origin.
How They Purchased
13%
42%
45%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
The top three preferred overseas property location has remained consistent
throughout four surveys Australia, Singapore, and the United Kingdom. These
investment locations are chosen probably because Malaysians are familiar with
them, perhaps having studied or worked there. According to HSBC, Australia appeals
to Malaysian investors for its proximity, quality education and lifestyle.
Where they want to Purchase
0%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
3%
3%
3%
5%
Macau
India
Philippines
Hong Kong
Japan
Vietnam
China
Indonesia
United States
Thailand
New Zealand
United Kingdom
Singapore
Australia
9%
12%
20%
39%
0%
31
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
4%
Hotel / Resort
Shop Office
6%
Retail space
6%
SOHO
14%
Bungalow
14%
16%
Semi-detached house
26%
Flat/walk-up apartment
31%
Terrace house
67%
0%
The main budget for overseas properties are Below MYR500,000 and MYR500,001
to MYR800,000.
Budget
2%
13%
22%
31%
MYR500,001 - MYR800,000
32%
Below MYR500,000
0%
32
5%
40% of respondents are only looking into overseas property investment two years
from now, while 35% do not have any plans of purchasing.
When to purchase
40%
No plan
15%
10%
20%
30%
40%
The main reason for entertaining the idea of overseas property investment is the
same as local properties good investment. Migration is the second reason that
respondents find overseas properties attractive.
Why They Want to Purchase
The country has housing policies that
encourage foreign ownership
The economic slowdown in that country
has brought prices down
Favourable exchange rate
The potential yield is high
For my children to study aboard
For vacation / residential purpose
Expect to migrate or retire to that
country in the future
It is a good investment
2%
4%
5%
9%
10%
12%
19%
39%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
33
Consistent with answers for information search for local properties, respondents
look to online sources, followed by newspapers / magazines.
Where They Source for Information
Refer to family members and friends
Talk to real estate professional /
property agents
Attend exhibitions that feature
overseas property projects
Newspapers / Magazines
Other web portals
iProperty.com
23%
25%
31%
34%
54%
61%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
34
36%
Errant developers
Stringent home financing and high
interest rates
46%
53%
83%
35
20%
40%
60%
80% 100%
7.29
10
The affordability index has been trending down since 2009 after the hikes in the BLR
(to 6.6%, from 5.6% over 2009-2011) and higher property prices (+12.5% CAGR vs
income growth of +6% between 2010 and 2013). This would impact investment
decisions for new purchases and could eventually lead to a decline in property sales.
Maybank IB Research also pointed out that household debt had reached a high of
86.8% of nominal GDP at the end of 2013, and could possibly climb to 88% by the
end of this year. It also said that it remained neutral on the property sector, and
that key risks included further tightening measures and interest rate hikes.
On 10th July 2014, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) raised the overnight policy rate
(OPR) by 25 basis points to 3.25%, the first time since May 2011 with economists
expecting the rate hike to address the potential rise in financial imbalances. BNM
said going forward, the overall growth momentum was expected to be sustained
while inflation has been relatively stable.
CIMB Research said loan growth may slow down in an environment with a higher
interest rate but the impact would not be big as the magnitude of the rate hike is
expected to be small (less than one percentage point) at 25bps to 50bps in 2014 to
2015.
36
Respondents are loyal to their favourite investment hotspots in and out of Selangor.
The three main areas that respondents think will be the next investment hotspots in
Selangor are Petaling Jaya, Ara Damansara, and Puchong.
Outside Selangor, the top three areas remain the same as the last survey, with a new
state appearing in the third spot to tie with Melaka:
1. Iskandar Malaysia, Johor
2. Georgetown, Penang
3. Melaka, Melaka & Nilai, Negeri Sembilan
Hot Spots in Selangor
Rawang
Gombak
Klang
Rawang
Putrajaya
Bangsar
Seri Kembangan
Sungai Buloh
Shah Alam
Bukit Jalil
Cyberjaya
Kajang
Puchong
Ara Damansara
Petaling Jaya
0%
6%
10%
12%
16%
18%
18%
22%
23%
24%
24%
26%
29%
32%
41%
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
5%
Kuantan, Pahang
5%
11%
21%
Ipoh, Perak
24%
28%
Nusajaya, Johor
29%
29%
Melaka
29%
58%
Georgetown, Penang
60%
37
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
47% of respondents opined that transactions will remain more or less the same,
while slightly more compared to the previous survey, from 35% to 37%, provided
positive sentiment.
Will property Transactions Pick Up in the Next 6 Months?
Not Sure
Yes, Definitely
16%
37%
47%
38
Most respondents are not interested as they deem that properties in Iskandar
Malaysia are either too expensive (27%), or they are just not looking for properties in
Johor Bahru (37%). This might be due to the lack of knowledge of properties in Johor
Bahru and respondents might also be more comfortable purchasing properties in
Kuala Lumpur or Petaling Jaya.
Iskandar Malaysia has always been the influencing factor in Johor property. Iskandar
Malaysia has five flagship zones, two of which are now inundated with upcoming
property developments and catalytic government plans to develop the regional
socio-economic hub.
Iskandar Malaysia property projects have been largely marketed to attract
Singaporeans, hence many Malaysians might be less familiar with the masterplans
for each zones.
Kuwait Finance House Research (KFHR) said for the first-half of 2014, cooling
measures will dampen speculation but Iskandar is a long-term play, with the
foundation and infrastructure for Phase 1 (2006-2010) already laid down and with
raised cumulative committed investments reaching MYR131.6 billion. The report also
said that the whole of the Iskandar project is expected to be completed in 2025, and
by then it is set to prosper and live up to its vision to be a preferred location to
invest, live, work and play.
Interest in Purchasing Property In Iskandar Malaysia
33%
27%
20%
20%
39
74% of respondents feel foreign property buyers have led to the escalation of
property prices.
Under Budget 2014, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak doubled the
minimum property price for foreigners from MYR500,000 to MYR1 million.
Specifically, the MYR1 million price threshold took effect on 1 March 2014 for all
federal administered territories Labuan, Putrajaya and Kuala Lumpur. Johor
followed in May and the Johor government also eyed an additional two percent tariff
for overseas buyers across all property segments. Penang is the only Malaysian state,
where foreigners are subject to a MYR1 million minimum price on the mainland and
MYR2 million if it is a landed property on the island. Penang is also considering a
three percent levy on foreign property buyers, according to its Chief Minister Lim
Guan Eng.
According to CBRE Malaysia, in spite of the curbs, Malaysian properties are still
cheaper than those in Singapore. A 1,000 sq ft condo in the city-state sells for
USD800,000 (MYR2.61 million) to USD960,000 (MYR3.14 million), while a similarsized flat in Kuala Lumpur goes for about USD374,000 (MYR1.22 million).
According to real estate consultancy Knight Frank, luxury residences in Malaysia sell
for between USD2,300 and USD5,600 per square meter, much lower than
USD27,600 to USD33,700 in Singapore and USD43,700 to USD53,500 in Hong Kong,
Average rental yields are also more attractive in Malaysia at 4% to 6%, compared to
3% in Singapore and 2.5% in Hong Kong.
Mortgage terms are also better for non-residents in Malaysia, with buyers able to
borrow 70%of a property's value. That's more generous than the 40% to 60% in
Singapore, and 30% to 50%in Hong Kong.
Are Foreign Buyers Driving up Property Prices
11%
No
14%
Uncertain
74%
Yes
0%
40
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
43% of respondents surveyed feel that the measures are Average, while 20% feel
that they are Fair.
Views on Budget 2014
2%
Excellent
8%
Undecided
11%
Good
18%
Bad
20%
Fair
43%
Average
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
As for Budget 2014s impact on the industry, majority are split between Too early to
tell (33%) and No (36%).
Effectiveness of Budget 2014 on the Property Market
11%
Yes
21%
Unsure
33%
35%
No
0%
41
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Analyst from RHB Research believes that Malaysias property sector will recover in
the second half of 2014 driven by a stronger 2014 gross domestic product (GDP)
growth outlook and the implementation of the goods and services tax (GST) in April
2015. However, with the fresh hike in interest rates due to the OPR increase by Bank
Negara Malaysia, there might be a slight hinge in recovery.
The implementation of the GST from 1 April 2015 is expected to spur demand for
big-ticket items, such as white goods and properties, as consumers rush to make
purchases to avoid paying the tax.
Having said that, 41% of respondents replied that GST will not stop them from
investing. This coincides with the fact that there is no increase in respondents who
are looking to purchase property in the next year.
25%
I Don't Know
34%
Yes
41%
No
0%
42
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Almost half (45%) of respondents feel that loan applicants should be offered loans
on a case-by-case basis. This might be due to the respondents psychographics as
53% of respondents are interested in purchasing property, and might also be
stemmed from the affordability factor where they might fear denial of loans.
Is Bank Negaras Loan-to-value ratio on net income as opposed to gross income
fair?
No, people should be able to purchase
any property they desire
17%
38%
45%
0%
26% of respondents surveyed think that the penalty is fitting. However, 40% of
respondents feel that a bigger penalty should be implemented.
Changes to National Housing Development to fine developers RM 500,000
and jail time for up to three years for abandoned projects fair?
6%
26%
Yes, it is fitting
28%
40%
43
20%
40%
The top five schemes that respondents would like delivered in Budget 2015 are:
1. Better control on house prices
2. Better public transportation
3. More low cost & affordable housing in strategic locations
4. Reduction in income taxes
5. Reduce interest rates on housing loans
8%
9%
Better healthcare
Remove the Stamp Duty
10%
11%
13%
Abolish Tolls
Stricter regulations on foreign
12%
14%
16%
25%
27%
39%
40%
62%
44
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
The three more important considerations for PR1MA affordable homes are still the
same as the last survey:
Location
Public Transport
Amenities
The 1Malaysia Peoples Housing (PR1MA) project has received 500,000 applications
since registration was opened last year. In March 2014, Minister in the Prime
Ministers Department Datuk Seri Shahidan Kassim said the online applications were
for 80,000 houses. The 80,000 houses approved under this first phase are in the
analysis and planning stages. He also said that the government would also have a
meeting with PR1MA Malaysia Corporation to discuss the second phase involving an
additional 80,000 houses for this year. These units form part of the 500,000 to be
rolled out by the company by 2018. Property consultants have said that Perbadanan
PR1MA Malaysia should develop them in or near city centres where the demand is.
To date, PRIMA homes are in Nusantara Prima, Johor Baru and Alam Damai, Cheras.
As at August last year, out of the 20,519 units that were approved by Perbadanan
PR1MAs board of directors, 31.7% are in city centres, including 4,636 units in Kuala
Lumpur and 1,877 units in Kuching, Sarawak.
In May 2014, MRT Corp Chief Executive Officer Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid said that
the progress on the highly anticipated MRT project is slightly ahead of schedule, with
more than half of its tunnelling works completed.
With the two key considerations in the early stages of development, time will tell if
measures taken will address the issue of affordability.
Highway Adjacent
3.45
4.01
Amenities
4.24
Public Transport
4.44
Location
0
45
More than half (55%) of respondents think that Goods and Services Tax (GST) will
affect their purchase decision, as they (85%) believe that it will increase property
prices.
With the imposition of GST next year, the cost of local residential properties is
estimated to increase by 3 to 4%. Whether the increased cost will be transferred to
house buyers depends on demand for the property concerned. For highly-demanded
residential properties, the increased cost is expected to be borne by house buyers.
For those in the less demanded areas, extra cost due to GST would likely be
absorbed by the developers.
Goods and services will be categorised under three groups standard rated where
6% GST will be imposed; zero rated and exempt rated.
Will GST affect Their Decision to Purchase Property
19%
Unsure
26%
No
55%
Yes
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
3%
10%
85%
0%
46
20%
40%
60%
80% 100%
47
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/FINANCIALSECTOR/Resources/Session2_NugrohoTriUtomo.pdf
48
DEMOGRAPHICS:
MARRIED
INDIVIDUALS
WITH
SLIGHTLY
MORE BUDGET LOOK FORWARD
TO OWNING THEIR OWN HOUSE,
PREFERABLY IN JAKARTA
The breakdown of gender and marital status is the same as Malaysia majority are
males (from 64% in the previous survey) to 69%. The number of male respondents
has increased steadily since the past two surveys.
Gender
31%
Female
69%
Male
0%
49
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Similar to the previous survey, most respondents (43%) fall into the 31 - 40 age
bracket.
The National Population and Family Planning Board (BKKBN) estimate the nations
young age population will likely peak between 2025 and 2035, when the productive
age population outnumbers the elderly and children. Around 60% of Indonesias
population of about 250 million population is in the working age of 15 to 64 years
old. Such a youthful population is attracting companies abroad to tap into
Indonesias potential labor pool.
By comparison, in developed countries such as Japan, birth rates are not keeping up
with an aging population that would ensure strong economic growth for the future.
Age Group
5%
Above 50
20%
41 - 50
43%
31 - 40
31%
20 - 30
1%
Below 20
0%
50
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Majority of respondents (72%) are married and almost all respondents (99%) are
citizens of Indonesia.
Marital Status
72%
Married
26%
Single
2%
Other
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Residency Status
0.5%
0.5%
99%
Indonesian Citizen
0%
51
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
The percentages are similar to the previous survey. The respondents are mainly from
Capital City District of Jakarta (37%), while 20% of respondents are from West Java,
and 12% of respondents are from East Java.
Where They Are From
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
3%
7%
9%
12%
19%
Sumatera Selatan
Nusa Tenggara Barat
Kepulauan Riau
Kalimantan Timur
Kalimantan Selatan
Kalimantan Barat
Aceh
Yogyakarta
Sumatera Utara
Sulawesi Selatan
Bali
Jawa Tengah
Banten
Jawa Timur
Jawa Barat
DKI Jakarta
37%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Most of the respondents are Clerks/Administrators (up from 36% in the last survey
to 39%), while 17% are entrepreneurs. Those who are Executives/Managers
comprised 12% of respondents.
Profession
0%
1%
1%
3%
4%
5%
8%
9%
12%
17%
Unemployed
Retired
CEO / Senior Management
Student
Homemaker
Sales
Professional / Technical
Civil Servant
Executive / Managerial
Self Employed
Clerical / Administrative
40%
0%
52
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
A large percentage (60%) fall into the Below IDR100 million annual household
income, and 21% belong to the IDR101 million and IDR200 million group.
According to government data, of 114 million workers in Indonesia last year, 86.5%
were unskilled, while only 8% were trained and 3.8% skilled, and the remaining
lightly skilled.
If Indonesia does not upgrade its human resources and provide skilled workers as
well as adequate job opportunities, many of its youth will face unemployment.
Annual Household Income
9%
1%
1%
1%
2%
5%
20%
60%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
6%
6%
7%
8%
33%
37%
0%
53
10%
20%
30%
40%
44% of respondents do not own any property, which corroborates with the fact that
there are more first-time homeowners in this survey. There is also a slight drop
(from 40% to 36%) of those who own a property.
Those who own a property are living in houses (88%).
No of Properties owned
3%
More than 4
1%
4%
11%
36%
44%
None
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Currently Living in
2%
3%
Rented Apartment
38%
Rental Property
56%
Parents/Family Home
0%
54
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
More than half (52%) of respondents have been living at their current place for 5
years or less, while 61% of respondents have 4 or more people living under the same
roof.
Years lived in current premises
3%
All my life
10%
14%
11 - 20 years
21%
6 - 10 years
52%
0 - 5 years
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
No of people in a household
34%
4
21%
3
12%
2
6%
1
0%
55
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Respondents who do not own any property are either currently living with their
parents or in their family home (56%), which co-relates to the larger number of
people living under one household. 38% of respondents surveyed are renters.
These demographics are similar to the previous survey.
Owns No property, Living in
Boarding / Home Office
2%
Renting an Apartment
3%
38%
56%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Television / Radio
13%
37%
38%
40%
Property Exhibitions
54%
Other websites
87%
Rumah123.com
0%
56
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
52% of respondents are interested in new developments, while 37% are ambivalent
about it. They would seek information online, at property exhibitions, newspapers
and directly from developers. It is interesting to note that they would reach
developers directly only after scouring three other sources of information.
Interest in New Developments
More interested in second hand
property
5%
No
5%
37%
Maybe
52%
Yes
0%
10%
20% 30%
40%
50%
60%
3%
14%
31%
34%
Print Ads
35%
Property Exhibitions
Online Search Engines
53%
66%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
57
34% are looking to purchase property in the next year, while 29% would purchase at
least two years from now.
When to Purchase
29%
12%
5%
Motivation to Purchase
Desire for a smaller home
1%
Job-related relocation or move
4%
For short- term investment capital
7%
Desire to be closer to
10%
Purchase home for family member
10%
For rental income
11%
Desire to be closes to
13%
Retirement
16%
Change in family situation
16%
Desire for vacation
18%
Desire for a larger home
23%
Affordability of homes
25%
Desire for a home in a better area
34%
For long-term investment
47%
Desire to own a home on my own
68%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
58
The top two reasons across three countries (Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia) are
the same for these two questions.
Most respondents either do not have enough to place a down payment, or property
prices are too high.
Location, Price and Size are the three factors that respondents look into when
considering to purchase a property.
Reasons for Not Purchasing
Concerned that the value of the home will decline
after buying it
Having too much debt from college and student
loans
4%
5%
7%
9%
11%
25%
44%
45%
55%
0%
Factors of Consideration
2.1
Recommendations
Eligibility for housing schemes/programs
Financing eligibility/process
Developers track record and reputation
Potential capital Appreciation
Potential rental yield
Status of property (freehold/leasehold)
Facilities
Security
Size
Price
Location
3.8
4.0
5.0
5.2
5.7
6.1
7.3
8.5
8.7
10.7
10.8
0.0
59
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
Hotels
Office / Retail
Warehouse
Flat/walk-up apartment
Villa
18%
24%
24%
25%
Student Housing
Land
Private condominiums/serviced apartments
Kiosk/Shop
91%
Houses
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
52% of respondents would consider Jakarta, while 34% would pick Bogor. The
growth in the economy, the buying power of the middle class, increase in traffic
issues and rise in fuel prices, have been major drivers for people to be located closer
to the areas of the workplace and within the more central Jakarta areas
In the Indonesian capital of Jakarta, not even the notorious traffic congestion can
slow the voracious demand for property. Roughly 10 million people live within the
urban core of this vast city while a further 28 million populate the suburbs.
With affluent cash-buyers and local businesses driving the housing market at a rapid
pace, anyone with a hope of climbing on the property ladder has to move fast to
secure value.
Where They Want to Purchase
19%
Depok
20%
Bekasi
24%
Tengerang
33%
Bogor
52%
Jakarta
0%
60
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
The top five information that respondents seek to help in the decision-making
process are:
1. Detailed information, including facilities
2. Price comparison
3. Quality photos
4. Facilities in area
5. Analysis of KPR (Kredit Pemilikan Rumah)
Information They Want to See
Currency Conversion
5%
Property videos
11%
A Home-buyers check-list
12%
20%
22%
22%
Compare Features
23%
Interactive maps
24%
29%
35%
37%
39%
42%
56%
64%
80%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
61
In this survey, respondents have increased their budget. There are more
respondents with a budget between IDR201 million and IDR300 million (from 22% to
25%), and those with a budget between IDR300 million and IDR500 million (from
18% to 22%). Those with budget surpassing IDR3 billion also increased from 1% to
2%.
Budget
2%
1%
5%
13%
22%
25%
31%
62
5%
97%
No
3%
Yes
0%
63
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Vietnam
Phillipines
Hong Kong
China
Thailand
New Zealand
The UK
USA
Malaysia
Australia
Singapore
7%
7%
7%
9%
16%
20%
20%
29%
58%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
30%
36%
62%
64
60% of respondents are not looking to purchase properties overseas. For those who
are considering overseas property, they would only be interested at least 2 years
from now.
Considering to Purchase Property Overseas
10%
Yes
30%
Unsure
60%
No
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2%
3%
65
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
There is a slight drop in preference for Singapore, while the interest in Australia has
seen a steady increase.
Countries
Singapore
Australia
Malaysia
H2 2014
60%
38%
24%
H1 2014
69%
37%
24%
H2 2013
58%
26%
17%
H1 2013
56%
23%
15%
Preferred Overseas Location
1%
India
2%
Phillipines
Vietnam
3%
Macau
3%
China
6%
Thailand
6%
New Zealand
9%
Hong Kong
9%
12%
USA
14%
Japan
15%
UK
24%
Malaysia
37%
Australia
60%
Singapore
0%
66
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Respondents budget for overseas property is similar to the last survey, with more
opting for budget between IDR1 billion and IDR3 billion.
38% would spend less than IDR1 billion, while those who would spend above IDR3
billion are 27% (up from 33%). 34% (up from 28%) would spend between IDR 1
billion and IDR 3 billion.
Budget to Purchase
5%
8%
14%
34%
38%
67
10%
20%
30%
40%
The preference for local and overseas properties is rather different. Most would
prefer to purchase residential buildings overseas.
Local
House
Commercial
Land
1
2
3
Overseas
Apartment
House
Condominium
Warehouse
SOHO
Hotel
Boarding Home
Land
Retail space
Flat / walk-up apartment
Villa
Private condominium / serviced
Houses
Apartment
0%
68
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
6%
11%
16%
16%
It is a good investment
22%
40%
42%
61%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
69
16%
20%
24%
28%
60%
65%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
70
SENTIMENTS:
AFFORDABILITY
CONCERNS ARE PREVALENT, WHILE
A LARGE PERCENTAGE ARE
UNAWARE OF SOME FINANCING
SOLUTIONS
AND
HOUSING
POLICIES
Most respondents (37%) are concerned about affordability and rising property
prices. Another key concern is financial policies for homes and interest rates.
Main Concerns On Property Market
14%
19%
30%
37%
0%
71
10%
20%
30%
40%
6.9
Affordability
72
More than half (55%) of respondents disagree with the revocation of Housing
Financing Liquidity Facility (FLPP). Reportedly, starting April 2015, the government
will impose revocation of FLPP for residential homes.
Views on the Revocation of Housing Financing Liquidity Facility
22%
Unsure
23%
Agree
55%
Disagree
0%
73
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
However, another 55% agree that Bank Indonesia should maintain its LTV policy,
despite 57% saying it plays a role in their property purchase decision.
The growth of banking house mortgages (KPR) in Central Java slowed down due to
the implementation of loan to value (LTV) policy. After the implementation of LTV,
the banking house mortgages for large-house is at 0.38% (quarter-to-quarter), lower
than the growth of house mortgage in the previous period of 1.55%. The middlesegment house mortgage growth of 0.73% (quarter-to-quarter), is lower than the
growth of 2.89% in the previous period.
Should Bank Indonesia Maintain its LTV policy
19%
No
26%
Unsure
55%
Yes
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
No
25%
Unsure
57%
Yes
0%
74
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
60% of respondents surveyed opine that the elections will affect the property
market, while 75% think that the property market will benefit in a positive way after
the election.
According to Jones Lang LaSalle Indonesia, once the new president is elected,
Indonesia can have clearer business projection. Residential property remains a
popular investment vehicle for cash-rich Indonesians.
A senior associate director for research and advisory of Cushman & Wakefield
Indonesia said that prospective buyers are in a wait-and-see mode, reducing demand
in the second quarter to the lowest in the past five years. But the market is expected
to pick up again later this year after the elections.
Will the property market experience an upward trend after the 2014
presidential elections
40%
No
60%
Yes
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Will the property market benefit in a positive way after the elections
25%
No
75%
Yes
0%
75
20%
40%
60%
80%
69%
Yes
0%
76
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
However, despite this acceptance, they (87%) are also worried about surging
property prices that might take place.
Concerned About Surging Property Prices if flooded with new mega-city
developments
13%
No
87%
Yes
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
60% are not aware of the governments Public Housing Saving programme
(Tabungan Perumahan Rakyat/Tapera).
Aware of the Governments Public Housing Saving Programme
60%
No
40%
Yes
0%
77
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Regardless, 57% do not mind cutting their income by 3% each month for Tapera.
Agreeable to Income being cut by 3%each month for Public Housing Savings
13%
Unsure
30%
No
57%
Yes
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Majority of respondents feel that the increase in Sale Value of Tax Object (SVTO) will
affect the value of their property.
The governments policy to increase the SVTO of land and buildings at 140% is
expected to lead to decreased turnover for homes and property sales.
Will the Sale Value of Tax Object have an impact on the value of your
property
11%
Unsure
21%
Disagree
68%
Agree
0%
78
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
According to respondents, the three main actions that will give developers a bad
reputation are:
Developers do not build as per promotion and promises after the sale and
purchase transactions
Developers that do not take care of the legality of the correspondence land and
buildings
Developers that do not build public facilities and social facilities
Which of the following will give developers a bad reputation?
Developers are very difficult to reach even tend
to avoid if you want to ask questions or ask
Developers do not actively communicate when
there are obstacles or problems in
The developer does not provide clear
information on a regular basis on the status
Developers are not taking care of
correspondence legality of land and buildings.
Reneges developers to build public facilities
and social facilities.
Developers do not build according to the
agreement that promoted or promised after
1
1.1
1.95
2.2
3.1
3.9
1
KPR (Kredit Pemilikan Rumah) is seen as the most beneficial, followed by staggered
cash payments.
A number of banks have stated their commitment to provide financing facility
through mortgage loan (KPR) which can reach the societys need in overcoming
housing backlog.
Most beneficial schemes for those buying a property
13%
Hard Cash
34%
Gradual Cash
53%
KPR
0%
79
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
59% dont know about financing solutions for KPR developers products, but they
(78%) think that is sufficient to utilise developers KPR as a mortgage solution.
Aware about financing solutions for KPR developers
41%
Yes
59%
No
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
22%
Unsafe
78%
Safe
0%
80
20%
40%
60%
80%
7%
8%
8%
9%
29%
Family/Couple Savings
The combination of personal savings and
borrowing from banks
37%
41%
58%
Personal savings
0%
81
20%
40%
60%
53% of respondents feel that the current home interest rates are high, while 14%
deem it as very high. The current Indonesian interest rate BI (base rate) is 7.5%.
Very High
53%
High
30%
Average
2%
Low Enough
1%
Very Low
0%
82
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Most respondents (72%) are unaware of AREBI (Real Estate Brokers Association of
Indonesia).
Aware of on an organization called AREBI
72%
No
28%
Yes
0%
83
20%
40%
60%
80%
84
In the past three years alone, the government has introduced a number of cooling
measures:
Year
November
2010
October
2012
February
2013
85
Measures Introduced
Special Stamp Duty
implemented
(SSD)
was -
Reasons
To curb excessive
property speculation
and
short-term
trading activities in
the residential sector
To curb investment
and buying activities
attributed to nonlocal buyers.
Doubled the stamp duty on all property transactions worth more than HK$2
million (US$257,902).
Measure aims to
increase the cost of
the transaction if a
buyer makes a subsale before the date
when the property is
delivered.
Hong Kong's home prices have more than doubled since 2008, driven higher by a
flood of cheap money from developed markets' central banks in the wake of the
global financial crisis.
The special administrative region's property market has become the world's least
affordable, according to a Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey,
published in January. The survey found average home prices were 14.9 times gross
annual median household income, the highest level ever recorded in the survey's 10year history.
The number of new and existing homes sold in July jumped to 7,792, after remaining
below 6,000 a month for the past year, according to government data.
According to Colliers International, the increase in stamp duties and the impact of
SSD and BSD lead us to believe there is only very limited room for short-term
investors to play in the local residential market. The government is now actively
monitoring developments in the nonresidential property sectors as well.
Hypothetically, if it implements similar SSD and BSD in non-residential real estate
sectors, we would not rule out the possibility that real estate players, including some
long-term investors, will leave Hong Kong to seek real estate opportunities with
better risk-adjusted returns in other markets.
86
Gender
60%
Female
40%
Male
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
3%
Others
37%
Single
60%
Married
0%
87
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
50 or above
10%
45-49
16%
40-44
35-39
23%
30-34
23%
14%
25-29
3%
20-24
1%
19 or below
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
The results also show that there is quite an even distribution between those with 2
and 3 people in their household. 33% of respondents have more than four members
in their household.
No of People in a Household
10%
More than 4
23%
29%
29%
9%
1
0%
88
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
There was an increase the number of respondents reporting that they held whitecollar jobs (28% to 31%). Professionals continue to remain the second largest
occupation group represented.
Occupation
CEO
Student
1%
Other
1%
Unemployment
1%
Senior Executive
1%
4%
Retired
Homemaker
6%
Technician
6%
Self-employed
7%
Salesperson
7%
15%
Executive Managerial
22%
Professional
31%
White-collar
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
4%
15%
28%
30%
89
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
1%
1%
5%
Property Seller
9%
Investor
18%
Property Buyer
22%
33%
Tenant
34%
Property Owner
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Currently Staying In
Apartments under Home Ownership Scheme
(HOS)
0%
Public Housing
0%
Self-owned (mortgaged)
Self-owned
Rental
23%
36%
42%
90
1%
3%
Radio
Property Exhibitions
8%
Billboards
8%
10%
Flyers/Brochures
12%
15%
TV
31%
33%
Newspapers/magazines
81%
The top three information that respondents want to see when searching for
property related information and news is detailed property information, property
prices comparison and property photos.
Information They Want to See
0%
Others
Interactive map
16%
Agents contact
16%
23%
Property video
28%
Mortgage information
Mortgage analysis
31%
Mortgage calculator
32%
34%
36%
37%
62%
Property photos
65%
73%
91
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
The survey findings continue to reveal that Hong Kong people trade up their
properties once every five years on average. There is a slight change in the number
of respondents who have stayed in their current premises for less than five years
(53%) compared to the previous findings (57%).
All my life
10%
17%
11 20 years
18%
6 10 years
53%
0 5 years
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
83% did not sell nor purchase property in the first half of the year.
Did you sell or purchase any residential properties in first half of 2014
Purchased
5%
6%
7%
Sold
83%
0%
92
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
63% of respondents will consider shifting their capital to investment options, with
stocks, currency and securities being the top three investment choices.
Under the current uncertain property market environment, would you consider
shifting your capital to other investment options?
37%
No
63%
Yes
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Other
4%
Grave/Niche
10%
No Interest
12%
Retail/Commercial Building
17%
Car park
25%
Securities
47%
Currency
66%
Stocks
0%
93
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
OVERSEAS
PROPERTY:
JAPAN
INCREASINGLY
ATTRACTIVE;
MAINLAND CHINA AND SOUTH
EAST ASIA PROPERTIES REMAIN
POPULAR
88% of respondents currently do not own properties overseas or in China, while 12%
reported that they do.
Currently Own Property Overseas or in China
12%
Yes
88%
No
0%
94
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Interest in overseas property investment has decreased compared to H1. The survey
showed that 22% of respondents want to purchase overseas properties compared to
last survey (25%).
Considering to Invest in Property Overseas
22%
Yes
78%
No
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Like last year, the most sought-after property markets for investors are South East
Asia regions (including Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia, etc.), reaching
48%. Mainland China comes next, amounting to 35%.
It is worth noting that Japanese properties have become the new target of Hong
Kong investors. The percentage of respondents interested in them has soared to
30%, a 12 percentage point increase from the 18% in the last survey, showing that
more Hong Kong investors are searching for investment targets in Japan recently.
Where They Want to Purchase
3%
Indonesia
6%
Other
10%
Thailand
12%
Macau
16%
Malaysia
17%
U.S.
19%
Singapore
U.K.
30%
Japan
30%
32%
Australia
35%
China
0%
95
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Other
8%
Dongguan
10%
Foshan
Zhongshan
19%
Guangzhou
19%
21%
Beijing
32%
Zhuhai
35%
Shenzhen
37%
Shanghai
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
1%
0%
2%
6%
22%
50%
96
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
32% plan on purchasing property overseas in 1 to 2 years from now, while 25% plan
to do so in at least 2 years or more.
When they want to Purchase
No plan
24%
25%
32%
15%
5%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
44% of respondents indicate they would consider overseas real estate investment
due to the potential high investment return. Another 23% of respondents expressed
a desire to migrate to, or enjoy their retirement in an overseas market.
Why they want to Purchase
Other
For my children study aboard / in China cities
1%
10%
11%
11%
23%
44%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
97
3%
14%
84%
0%
98
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
The public generally holds a more conservative view towards property prices. 46% of
respondents expect property prices to remain stable in 2H 2014. 33% of respondents,
however, believe property prices will go down. The higher income group, accounting for
37% of them, by and large expects a slowdown in the property market. There is a 4%
increase (to 21%) in the proportion of respondents which believes property prices will rise, a
revival after a drastic drop in the last survey (half year ago). An increasing number of
respondents hold a positive attitude towards the property prices. Yet 40% of respondents
predict the market will shrink by between 6% and 10%.
Prediction for Hong Kong property prices in the second half of 2014?
21%
33%
46%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
63% of respondents believe that the residential flat supply in the second half of 2014
is not adequate.
Believe the residential flat supply in the second half of 2014 is adequate?
37%
Yes
63%
No
0%
99
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Compared to previous years, Hong Kong people show that they hold a more
positive attitude towards property prices. Yet there is a decline in both the number
of respondents who would consider purchasing and selling property in 2H 2014.
28% of respondents would consider purchasing property in H2 2014, a drop of3%
points compared to the 31% in the last survey. Meanwhile, 14% of respondents
would consider selling property in H2 2014, a slight decrease of 1% point compared
to the last survey.
The Hong Kong SAR Government extended DSD change flat period recently.
Have these changes led you to consider selling your properties?
14%
Yes
39%
No property
46%
No
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60% of respondents will adjust their property asking price when selling their
residential property. 67% of respondents shared that they will adjust the property
price by below 10%, while 21% will adjust the price from 11% to 20%.
Will adjust property asking price when selling residential property?
40%
No
60%
Yes
0%
100
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
The extension of the six-month waiver period has had a certain influence on
market transactions, with 23% and 24% of respondents expressing an intention to
sell or purchase properties respectively.
The Hong Kong SAR Government extended DSD change flat period for the
second-home buyers recently. In the H2 of 2014, the government should:
11%
22%
23%
45%
Make no change
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
The latest government measure to relax the double stamp duty (DSD) affects
respondents decision to buy or sell a home, indicating that this new move has had a
certain effect on the market.
The Hong Kong SAR Government extended DSD change flat period recently.
Have these changes led you to consider buying properties
64%
No
36%
Yes
0%
101
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
44%
No
56%
Yes
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Discounts and subsidies offered by developers (91%) have, for the first time,
become one of the top three factors to consider when purchasing new properties.
The other two factors include; geographical environment (97%) and location and
transportation (97%).
Factors of Consideration
70%
73%
73%
79%
82%
85%
86%
89%
91%
97%
Living environment
97%
0%
102
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1
2
3
Buying Price
US$
per
Sq.M
53,026
32,745
Hong 20,660
Monaco
53x
10,099
UK, London
48x
6,856
Hong Kong,
33x
6,198
Kong Island
4 Singapore
17,709
41x
4,276
5 Russia, Moscow
16,509
26x
6,277
http://www.globalpropertyguide.com/most-expensive-cities
103
1.90%
2.09%
3.00%
2.41%
3.80%
Cooling measures
Singapores private home prices dropped by the most in almost 5 years following
efforts that began in 2009 to curb property market speculation, with government
curbs ranging from taxes on property sales, additional levies on foreign buyers and
mortgage limits.
According to preliminary data released on 1 July 2014 by the Urban Redevelopment
Authority (URA), an index tracking private-residential prices retreated 1.1% to 209.3
points in the three months to June, following an approximate 1.3% decline in the
previous three months.
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), Singapores central bank, said that it is too
early to ease property restrictions after prices in Asias second-most expensive
housing market fell for three straight quarters. As it is still an initial stage of a price
correction, the government will probably look at the pace and period of correction
before deciding on relaxing measures. Home prices in Singapore will probably extend
declines as the government sticks with curbs.
Caution issued by the central bank
In May 2014, Singapore's central bank issued a warning to investors about the risks
posed by buying property overseas, as high house prices prompt a growing number
of Singaporeans to invest in real estate abroad.
MAS said the value of overseas properties dealt with by Singapore real estate
agencies was S$2 billion ($1.6 billion) in 2013, up from S$1.4 billion in 2012. A strong
Singapore dollar and curbs on mortgage lending at home have encouraged more
Singaporeans to buy property in United Kingdom and Australia. MAS reported a 43%
rise in the value of overseas property transactions handled by local real estate
agencies in 2013 compared with 2012.
Global Real Estate Transparency Index 2014
In a recently released Global Real Estate Transparency Index 2014, published by
consultancy firm Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL), Singapore kept its 13th place finish.
Hong Kong slipped to 14th place from 2012s 11th place, making the Singapore the
most transparent real estate market in Asia. JLL explains Hong Kongs downgrade to
lower scores caused by cooling measures initiated by the government as well as in
accounting standards and corporate government.
It is the second time that Singapore ranked higher than Hong Kong since JLL started
to publish the index in 1999. The 2014 study covers 102 markets globally.
104
Below are the JLL indexs top 20 most transparent real estate markets and their
respective scores.
1. United Kingdom 1.25
2. United States 1.34
3. Australia 1.36
4. New Zealand 1.44
5. France 1.52
6. Canada 1.52
7. The Netherlands 1.67
8. Ireland 1.62
9. Finland 1.69
10. Switzerland 1.73
11. Sweden 1.79
12. Germany 1.79
13. Singapore 1.81
14. Hong Kong 1.87
15. Belgium 1.92
16. Denmark 1.96
17. Poland 2.02
18. Spain 2.05
19. Norway 2.07
20. South Africa 2.09
105
DEMOGRAPHICS:
MARRIED
HOMEOWNERS MONITOR MARKET
AS AFFORDABILITY CONCERNS
REMAIN
There is a significant drop in the number of male respondents from the previous
survey, 63% to 49%.
Gender
51%
Female
49%
Male
48%
49%
49%
50%
50%
51%
51%
There are many more married respondents compared to the last survey, from 64%
to 71%.
Marital Status
2%
Others
27%
Single
71%
Married
0%
106
20%
40%
60%
80%
51 and above
23%
41 - 50 years old
36%
31 - 40 years old
19%
20 - 30 years old
3%
Below 20
0%
107
10%
20%
30%
40%
The top 5 districts (in descending order) that respondents currently reside in are:
District 19 - Serangoon, Hougang, Punggol, Sengkang
District 23 - Bukit Panjang, Choa Chu Kang, Bukit Batok, Dairy Farm, Hillview
District 18 - Tampines, Pasir Ris, Simei
District 20 - Ang Mo Kio, Bishan, Braddell, Mei Hwan, Thomson
District 22 - Boon Lay, Lakeside, Jurong
There are more respondents from District 18 this time around, jumping from fifth
spot (previous survey) to the third spot.
Currently Residing In
1%
District 28
District 27
District 26
District 25
District 24
District 23
District 22
District 21
District 20
District 19
District 18
District 17
District 16
District 15
District 14
District 13
District 12
District 11
District 10
District 09
District 08
District 07
District 06
District 05
District 04
District 03
District 02
District 01
5%
1%
3%
0%
7%
5%
2%
6%
12%
7%
2%
5%
4%
4%
3%
6%
3%
3%
2%
7%
2%
5%
4%
4%
3%
6%
3%
0%
108
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
The percentages are relatively the same. Most respondents (30%) are
Executives/Managers, while 19% are Professionals and 11% are
Clerical/Administrative.
Profession
2%
2%
2%
Part - timer
Unemployed
Student
Retired
CEO / Senior Management
3%
4%
5%
6%
Civil Servant
ClericalAdministrative
Homemaker
Self Employed
6%
10%
11%
Sales
19%
Professional/ Technical
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
There are less respondents earning less than SGD$60,000 per annum in this survey
(from 35% in the previous survey to 27%). 11% of respondents preferred no say what
their annual household income was.
Annual Household Income
11%
4%
SGD$180,001 SGD$240,000
4%
SGD$140,001 SGD$180,000
5%
SGD$120,001 SGD$140,000
5%
8%
SGD$100,001 SGD$120,000
16%
SGD$80,001 SGD$100,000
21%
SGD$60,001 SGD$80,000
16%
SGD$40,001 SGD$60,000
11%
Below SGD$40,000
0%
109
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
The results remain relatively unchanged from the last survey. 31% of respondents
have 4 people in their household, while 22% have more than 4 in their homes.
No of People in a Household
22%
More than 4
31%
4
24%
3
19%
2
4%
1
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
More than a third of respondents (30%) are adopting the wait-and-see approach by
monitoring the market, while 16% are first-time homebuyers. There is a much
smaller group of real estate professionals/agents in this survey (from 15% in
previous survey to 5%).
Consider Themselves
Real Estate Agent Professional/Agent
5%
5%
12%
15%
16%
16%
0%
110
5%
10%
15%
20%
Most Singaporean respondents have been residing in their current abode for less
than five years (44%), while 24% have been living in the same place for 1120 years,
and 23% have been in the same place for 610 years.
Years Lived in Current Premises
5%
All my life
12%
27%
11 - 20 years
24%
6 - 10 years
32%
0 - 5 years
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
More than half of respondents (50%) own one property, while 21% do not currently
own a property.
No of Properties Owned
2%
More than 4
3%
5%
19%
50%
1
21%
None
0%
111
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Most respondents (80%) own a residential property, and combined with the fact that
50% of respondents own one property, it can be deduced that this group is made up
largely of property owners. In tandem with the previous three surveys, most
respondents (85%) live in residential buildings HDB Flat (60%) and Private
Condominium (25%).
Overall, respondents profile seems to be largely consistent with the previous survey.
Type of Properties Owned
2%
Other
12%
Land
16%
Shop/Commercial Building
80%
Residential Property
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Currently Living In
Factory /Industrial Property
0%
Hotel/Resort
0%
Retail Space
1%
Office Space
1%
2%
SOHO
5%
Bungalow
7%
Semi-detached house
9%
Terrace House
24%
Private Condominium
51%
HDB Flat
0%
112
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
http://www.singstat.gov.sg/statistics/visualising_data/chart/Home_Ownership_R
ate_Of_Resident_Households.html
113
4%
14%
17%
Television / radio
21%
39%
39%
48%
Newspapers / Magazines
53%
iProperty.com
25%
Yes
30%
No
38%
Maybe
0%
114
10%
20%
30%
40%
Other
16%
SMS Ads
23%
26%
TV / Radio
38%
Property Exhibitions
50%
Print Ads
Online Search Engines
52%
52%
0%
115
The more details, the better it is. After all, property is a big-ticket item that requires
plenty of research and consideration prior to purchase. The main information that
respondents seek are:
1. Price comparisons
2. Detailed information (facilities)
3. Reviews on property/location
4. Price growth comparison and Display of average asking prices
Information Looked for Online
1%
Other
10%
Currency Conversion
16%
17%
Property videos
19%
Interactive maps
23%
24%
Mortgage analysis
29%
A Home-buyers check-list
31%
32%
36%
Compare Features
39%
Hi-quality Photos
41%
44%
48%
58%
64%
116
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
27%
28%
5%
3%
5%
6%
6%
7%
7%
9%
10%
21%
26%
0%
117
5%
1
2
3
4
5
Last survey
A long-term investment
For rental income
Desire to own a home
/ Affordability of homes
Desire to own a larger home
6%
7%
8%
9%
9%
11%
14%
Retirement
Desire for vacation home/investment
15%
16%
17%
20%
Affordability of homes
23%
29%
34%
118
15%
The three main types of property that respondents prefer are Private
Condominiums/Serviced Apartments, HDB flats, and Terraced Houses. It would
seem that many Singaporeans aspire to own a condo. Today, the price of an average
flat is between SGD$1 million to SGD$1.5 million, effectively pricing out many
middle-class and younger workers. According to the Global Property Guide,
Singapore is the 4th most expensive place in the world to buy an apartment, after
Monaco, London, and Hong Kong.
The districts that are more popular with respondents are:
District 19 - Serangoon, Hougang, Punggol, Sengkang
District 20 - Ang Mo Kio, Bishan, Braddell, Mei Hwan, Thomson
District 03 - Alexandra, Queenstown, Tiong Bahru
District 05 Clementi, Dover, Pasir Panjang, West Coast
District 11 - Novena, Newton, Thomson, Watten Estate, Meyer, Tanjong Rhu
Respondents seek properties that are not necessarily within the district that they live
in. Out of the top 5 in the list, only 2 districts are the same as where they live.
Types of Properties Interested In
Other, please specify
1%
Student Housing
3%
Hotels
3%
Not considering
4%
Retirement Homes
4%
Industrial
6%
Retail
7%
Office
7%
Bungalow
Detached House
11%
16%
Semi-detached house
21%
Flat/walk-up apartment
21%
HDB
Terraced House
Private condominiums/serviced apartments
23%
25%
57%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
119
Where to Purchase
District 28 - Seletar, Yio Chu Kang
District 27 - Sembawang, Yishun
District 26 - Springleaf, Upper
District 25 - Kranji, Woodgrove,
District 24 - Lim Chu Kang
District 23 - Bukit Panjang, Choa Chu
District 22 - Boon Lay, Lakeside,
District 21 - Upper Bukit Timah, Ulu
District 20 - Ang Mo Kio, Bishan,
District 19 - Serangoon, Hougang,
District 18 - Tampines, Pasir Ris, Simei
District 17 - Changi, Flora, Loyang
District 16 - Bayshore, Bedok, Siglap,
District 15 - Amber Rd, Joo Chiat,
District 14 - Geylang, Eunos, Sims,
District 13 - Macpherson, Braddell
District 12 - Balestier, Serangoon,
District 11 - Novena, Newton,
District 10 - Ardmore, Bukit Timah,
District 09 - Cairnhill, Orchard Rd,
District 08 - Little India
District 07 - Golden Mile, Middle Rd
District 06 - Beach Rd, High Street
District 05 - Clementi, Dover, Pasir
District 04 - Habourfront, Mount
District 03 - Alexandra, Queenstown,
District 02 - Anson Rd, Tanjong Pagar
District 01 - Cecil, Marina, People's
0%
120
5%
8%
7%
9%
3%
12%
12%
9%
19%
19%
12%
7%
14%
15%
12%
9%
14%
16%
13%
10%
5%
7%
8%
16%
14%
18%
9%
7%
5%
10%
15%
20%
18% would spend less than SGD$500,000, while 12% would spend SGD$1 million to
SGD$1.5 million, and 18% would spend SGD$600,001 to SGD$700,000.
In early July, Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Tharman
Shanmugaratnam, who is also chairman of the central bank, said that a further
correction in the Singapore property market would not be unexpected. Residential
prices have risen 40% since 30 September 2009 to their peak in September last year.
The managing director of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said that debt
levels among highly-leveraged households remain high. The MAS has narrowed its
2014 inflation forecast to between 1.5% and 2%, from 1.5% to 2.5% as the property
curbs helped stabilise prices and rents.
Budget
3%
5%
12%
8%
SGD$800,001 to SGD$900,000
13%
SGD$700,001 to SGD$800,000
18%
SGD$600,001 to SGD$700,000
13%
SGD$500,001 to SGD$600,000
18%
121
5%
10%
15%
20%
53% of respondents surveyed are concerned about affordability and rising property
prices.
Concerns on the Property Market
1%
Other
Errant developers and poor building
quality
8%
13%
25%
53%
0%
Singapores central bank said its too early to ease property restrictions after prices
in Asias second-most expensive housing market fell for three straight quarters.
Director of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said that real estate prices
remain at elevated levels in its annual report released in July 2014. Singapore is
looking to secure the gains from stabilizing the market and restoring financial
prudence.
On an affordability scale, the rating average is 6.97 (1 being affordable and 10 being
unaffordable).
Perception on Affordability
6.97
Affordability
0
122
10
18%
Yes
82%
No
0%
123
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Vietnam
Hong Kong
China
New Zealand
Indonesia
Other
India
United States
Thailand
Australia
Phillipines
United Kingdom
Malaysia
42%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
7%
8%
32%
53%
0%
124
52% of respondents are not looking to invest in property overseas. While there is
lesser interest in Malaysia and a constant interest in Australia, Singaporeans
surveyed have also shown more interest in the United Kingdom.
Preferred
overseas
location
Malaysia
Australia
United
Kingdom
Thailand
H2 2014
H1 2014
H2 2013
H1 2013
31%
18%
12%
35%
22%
9%
39%
19%
7%
42%
15%
7%
7%
9%
9%
7%
In May 2014, the MAS said Singapore investors poured SGD$2 billion into foreign
properties last year a 43% jump on year 2012. Malaysia accounted for slightly more
than half of real estate investments abroad last year by Singapore investors,
followed by the United Kingdom and Australia, based on the central banks
estimates.
MAS said the value of overseas properties dealt with by Singapore real estate
agencies was SGD$2 billion in 2013, up from SGD$1.4 billion in 2012. A recent
research report by estate agent Knight Frank found that buyers from Singapore
accounted for 23% of all purchases of newly built central London property in 2013,
second only to British buyers who accounted for 27%.
Considering to Purchase Property Overseas
15%
Yes
34%
Undecided
52%
No
0%
125
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
India
China
Vietnam
Macau
Japan
Other
Hong Kong
New Zealand
United States
Phillippines
Indonesia
Thailand
United Kingdom
Australia
Malaysia
7%
12%
18%
31%
0%
126
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
27%
15%
9%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
43% of respondents would budget less than SGD$500,000 for overseas property.
Budget
1%
2%
7%
8%
7%
SGD$800,001 to SGD$900,000
10%
SGD$700,001 to SGD$800,000
9%
SGD$600,001 to SGD$700,000
17%
SGD$500,001 to SGD$600,000
40%
127
128
1
2
3
4
5
Singapore
Serviced Private condominiums / Serviced
apartments
HDB
Terrace house
Flat / Walk-up apartment
Semi-detached house
41%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Reasons to Purchase
2%
3%
3%
5%
9%
11%
13%
21%
33%
It is a good investment
0%
129
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
The popular search for information is always online. There is a slight difference for
overseas properties as respondents would prefer to attend exhibitions featuring
overseas properties, and talk to real estate professionals. Face-to-face
communication is seen as more important compared to newspapers when it comes
to overseas properties.
How They Search
14%
16%
Newspapers/magazines
16%
18%
iProperty.com
18%
19%
0%
130
5%
10%
15%
20%
19%
Yes
39%
Undecided
43%
No
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Other
20%
For retirement
23%
56%
For investment
0%
131
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
37% of respondents pick Johor Bahru, while 30% preferred to invest in Nusajaya.
This sentiment remains unchanged from the last survey.
Where They Want to Buy in Iskandar Malaysia
12%
21%
Medini
30%
Nusajaya
37%
Johor Bahru
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
3%
17%
54%
69%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
132
0%
Hotels
0%
Retail space
3%
3%
5%
Office
7%
Detached house
12%
Bungalow
13%
Terrace house
17%
Semi-detached house
38%
No concerns
25%
Cooling Measures
36%
38%
Infrastructure
39%
52%
66%
0%
133
20%
40%
60%
80%
SENTIMENTS: AFFORDABILITY IS
STILL A KEY WORRY, EVEN AS
RESALE PRICES OF NON-LANDED
PRIVATE HOMES DROP
More respondents (from 18% in the last survey to 21%) are unsure about whether
the average Singaporean family can afford resale HDB Flat prices, while 52% opined
that these flats are not within their reach.
According to Singapore Real Estate Exchange (SRX), resale prices of non-landed
private homes dipped 1.3 per cent month-on-month in July, with the private resale
price index hitting the lowest level since October 2012, based on a flash report
released yesterday by the Singapore Real Estate Exchange (SRX). From the recent
peak in January, prices have slipped 6.5 per cent.
Declines in prices were seen across all three regions, with the Core Central Region
(CCR), or city centre, leading the fall at 4 per cent last month.
Prices in the Rest of Central Region, or city fringes, dropped 1.1 per cent, while those
in the Outside Central Region, or suburbs, were down 0.6 per cent.
I don't know
27%
Yes
52%
No
0%
134
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
43% of respondents would like more ownership restrictions on foreigners, while 33%
would like the implementations of regulations on housing prices.
The government's cooling measures have brought the percentage of foreigners
buying up Singapore property on par with most other countries, as pointed out at
the inaugural OPPLive Asia conference at Marina Bay Sands in April 2014.
According to Global Property Guide, Singapore has experienced an influx of
expatriates in recent years. Some foreigners have preferred to buy, rather than face
escalating rentals, especially if they are going to be in Singapore for more than a
couple of years. Singapore now has the sixth-highest percentage of foreigners in the
world; about 38% of Singapores populations are foreigners. Of these, 10% are
permanent residents, and the remaining 28% expats.
Foreign buyers have contributed to Singapores strong recent house price increases.
While there was a decrease in the number of transactions across all buyer groups,
the proportion of purchases by non-Singaporeans increased q-o-q by 4.0 percentagepoints in Q1 to 29%. This was the highest proportion of private home purchases by
non-Singaporeans since the Additional Buyers Stamp Duty (ABSD) was first
introduced in December 2011.
4%
Other
22%
31%
43%
0%
135
20%
40%
60%
The sentiment is the same as the previous survey. 45% of respondents prefer the
government to manage the prices of HDB flats only.
Should the Government be responsible for managing HDB prices?
18%
I don't Know
41%
No
42%
Yes
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Slightly more than half of respondents (53%) think that new and resale private
condominiums would see a price drop in the second half of 2014. In the last survey,
more respondents chose HDB resale flats as the property to see a price drop.
Type of property that will see a price drop in H2 2014
30%
Landed Properties
0%
136
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
38% feel that their property will retain its value in H2 2014, while 38% also feel
otherwise. Overall, the sentiment is mixed, with more being unsure of the market
when it comes to their opinion on a propertys value.
Confident that their property will retain its value in H2 2014
25%
I don't know
38%
No
38%
Yes
0%
137
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
The reduction of Mortgage Servicing Ratio (MSR) has affected 51% of respondents
decision to purchase another property. This might be one of the reasons that
Singapores housing market continues to decline, despite a reasonable rate of
economic growth.
The private residential property price index dropped 1% during the year from Q1 to
Q2 2014, in contrast with the 4.1% annual rise seen year-on-year to Q2 2013. This
was based on figures released by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA). When
adjusted for inflation, house prices fell by 1.68% over the same period. On a
quarterly basis, private residential property prices fell 1.26% (-1.43% inflationadjusted) in Q1 2014.
Has the reduction of the Mortgage Servicing Ratio (MSR) from 35% to 30% by
the government in August 2013 affected your decision to upgrade or purchase
another property?
49%
No
51%
Yes
20%
138
30%
40%
50%
60%
Most respondents (65%) said that property remains unaffordable, despite lower
prices in certain regions.
According to reports by both URA and SRX, property prices in certain regions
have been lowered in H1 2014 compared to previous years. Thus, have
property prices become more affordable for you
65%
No
35%
Yes
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
3.75
Early-bird discounts
3.43
3.05
Furniture vouchers
0.00
139
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
Slightly more than half of respondents surveyed (56%) are satisfied with the
governments efforts in cooling the property market.
Last year, MAS said that lenders must consider a borrowers total debt when
granting mortgages. Under this loan framework, a borrowers loan repayments,
including mortgages, shouldnt exceed 60% of income, based on the policy
guidelines.
Declining home sales eased demand for housing loans. Mortgages increased just
7.9% in March 2014, the slowest pace since June 2007, according to central bank
data. Standard Chartered Plcs Southeast Asias head said that Singapores home
prices will probably fall further before the housing curbs introduced in the past five
years are scaled back.
Are you satisfied with the governments plans announced in Budget 2014 to
keep property market cooling measures in place for the time being?
44%
No
56%
Yes
0%
140
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Listed on the Australian Securities Exchange, the iProperty Group (ASX:IPP) owns and
operates Asias No.1 network of property websites under the iProperty.com
umbrella brand. Headquartered in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, the Company is focused
on developing and operating leading property portals with other complementary
offerings in Asian markets. It currently operates market leading property portals in
Malaysia, Hong Kong, Macau, Indonesia and Singapore, and has investments in India
and Philippines. With further expansion planned, the iProperty Group is continuously
working to capitalise on its market-leading positions and the rapidly growing online
property advertising market throughout the region. Along with 18 property websites
across the region, the Groups portfolio also includes the first comprehensive
regional commercial property website, CommercialAsia.com, as well as a regional
property exhibition business and monthly property magazines in Malaysia and
Indonesia.
* Disclaimer
Although every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this report, the publisher and author assume no
responsibility for errors or omissions nor is liable for damages resulting from the use of the information contained
herein.
141