0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
553 Ansichten3 Seiten
This afternoon, the following letter was sent to CUSA, Alexander Golovko, and C. Katie Black at CazaSaikaley in response to their Cease and Desist Letter to Mathieu Murphy-Perron, rabble.ca, et al.
Originaltitel
Letter Responding to CUSA/Golovko Cease and Desist
This afternoon, the following letter was sent to CUSA, Alexander Golovko, and C. Katie Black at CazaSaikaley in response to their Cease and Desist Letter to Mathieu Murphy-Perron, rabble.ca, et al.
This afternoon, the following letter was sent to CUSA, Alexander Golovko, and C. Katie Black at CazaSaikaley in response to their Cease and Desist Letter to Mathieu Murphy-Perron, rabble.ca, et al.
C . Katie Black CazaSaikaley srl/LLP 350 - 220 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON K1P 5Z9 Alexander G olovko C/O Student Experience Office, Carleton University alexander_golovko@carleton.ca Tory Building, Room 430 1125 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 C arleton U niversity Students Association, Inc. cusa@cusaonline.ca University Centre, Room 401 1125 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 RE: Cease and Desist Letter of September 11, 2014 to Mathieu Murphy-Perron et al. Dear All: It has come to our attention that the Cease and Desist Letter issued by Ms. Black on September 11, 2014 contains an incorrect and counterfactual interpretation of events, and we believe that this letter represents an attempt to silence fair comment criticism of the actions and legacy of various iterations of the Carleton University Students Association (CUSA) executive, collectively represented by the slate name and branding A Better Carleton (ABC). The current slate of executives represents the third iteration of this slate name and branding, having been first used by Alexander Golovko and others for the 2012-2013 academic year. Further, we object to the characterization of the published material by Mr. Murphy-Perron as absolutely false, defamatory, factually baseless[,] and designed to destroy [CazaSaikaleys] clients impeccable reputation and cause harm to their families. Through this letter, we will outline the factual errors, and draw from both published reports that confirm the events as published by Mr. Murphy-Perron and our own experiences with CUSA. While we may not necessarily agree with the opinions expressed by Mr. Murphy-Perron, we absolutely believe they represent fair comment. As you are aware, the Cease and Desist Letter makes reference to five (5) particular statements that it deems objectionable. We will address three (3) statements individually, and two (2) together below:
In 2009, Rebecca Granovsky-Larsen, then-Editor-in-Chief, and Nora Loreto, then-News Editor, of the Ryerson Free Press published an article documenting a recent Conservative Party student workshop at the University of Waterloo expose a partisan attempt to take over student unions and undermine Ontario Public Interest Research Groups (OPIRGs) on campuses across Ontario. (source: http://rabble.ca/babble/canadian-politics/conservative-party-strategy-take-over-student- unions-exposed/) Mr. Golovko, in his tenure as CUSA President, proceeded to target progressive student organizations on campus, from the funding Ontario Public Interest Research Group (OPIRG) Carleton and the Carleton Food Collective (source: http://charlatan.ca/2013/11/cusa- withholds-opirg-and-carleton-food-collective-levies/), to the resources provided by the Canadian Federation of Students (CFS) and Graduate Students Association (GSA) (source: http://www.leveller.ca/2012/10/cusa-executive-wages-war-on-the-cfs/). Mr. Murphy-Perron is entitled to his interpretation that these tactics represent the same ideological current as those reported on by Ms. Granovsky-Larsen and Ms. Loreto.
In 2012, while Mr. Golovko was CUSA President, a motion was passed CUSA Council that was successful in changing CUSAs Discrimination on Campus policy to one which would allow anti- choice materials on campus, in addition to [taking] away reserved spaces for minority groups. (sources: http://www.charlatan.ca/2013/01/cusa-changes-discrimination-policy/ and http://speakjhr.com/2013/01/carleton-student-government-amends-discrimination-policy/ and http://cusaonline.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Minutes-Dec-12-2012.pdf) While Mr. Golovko abstained, according to the meeting minutes, the majority of his fellow executives voted in favour of the policy. Mr. Golovko was also a member of a secret Facebook group designed to [collaborate] in private outside council meetings on motions, strategy, and election candidates (source: http://www.charlatan.ca/2013/04/a-better-caucus-abcs-council-strategy/), and meetings were scheduled to ensure that non-ABC-allied councillors would be unable to attend (Here, the participation in this letter of former CUSA Councillor Alex Watson is particularly relevant. Mr. Watson adds the following on this: Having been a member of CUSA council from 2012-2014,and one who was originally elected in collaboration with the ABC slate, I can personally attest to the truth of this claim surrounding the scheduling of meetings. I was a member of the aforementioned 'secret group' and there were indeed discussion that revolved around scheduling meetings at inconvenient times for our opponents. It is simply disingenuous, and knowingly malicious for someone such as Mr. Golovko to claim that this statement is defamatory.). Mr. Murphy-Perron is entitled to represent these facts in his published work.
In 2013, a Free Speech Wall was erected at Carleton University by the Carleton Students for Liberty. It contained a number of statements that students on campus found objectionable, and that they would characterize as hate speech. CUSA took no steps to respond to the concerns of these students, and instead, when the Free Speech Wall was torn down, chose to condemn an act of vandalism (sources: http://www.charlatan.ca/2013/01/cusa-condemns-arun-smith-for- vandalism/ and http://dailyxtra.com/ottawa/news/carleton-students-association-condemns-free- speech-opponent/) (Here, the participation in this letter of Arun Smith, the student who tore down the Free Speech Wall, is particularly relevant). Mr. Golovko voted in favour of the motion to condemn, according to the meeting minutes. (source: http://cusaonline.ca/wp- content/uploads/2013/05/Minutes-Jan-27.pdf) Mr. Murphy-Perron is entitled to publish the facts as they were, and to inject his own commentary and interpretation.
Mr. Murphy-Perron, through his published piece, has established a fair comment case to make these determinations. Further, it is clear that the evidence supports that he is entitled to render a such conclusion. These statements are, accordingly, in no way absolutely false, defamatory, factually baseless[,] and designed to destroy [CazaSaikaleys] clients impeccable reputation and cause harm to their families, and it is perhaps important here to note that the Mr. Golovko and the various iterations of ABC do not have an impeccable reputation by any meaningful standard.
Unless Ms. Black is a mind-reader, there is no way for her to be able to establish Mr. Murphy- Perrons purpose beyond a good faith representation of fair comment, and unless current CUSA executives are planning to seek re-election and have confided that information in Mr. Murphy- Perron, there is no way for her to be able to determine that his statements were intentionally designed to scare them. It strikes us as absurd to think that any court would allow this argument to proceed, and we are inclined to question Ms. Blacks judgment in including this. We hope that by sending this letter, which we are going to publish as an open letter, we might provide the necessary additional information to prevent student funds from being used in support of silencing fair comment criticism. We are indeed troubled by CUSAs use of student funds to cover the legal expenses of a former CUSA President, and we hope that this letter dissuades CUSA from their continued frivolous expenditure of student funds. Yours very sincerely,