0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
27 Ansichten10 Seiten
This document describes a methodology for analyzing and visualizing the research output of academic institutions using classification codes from the Chemical Abstracts database. It applies this methodology to compare the chemistry research from the cities of Marseille and Montpellier in France between 1982-1986. The results are presented as 3D graphs of the main research poles and 2D networks showing relationships between poles based on shared classification codes. Examples analyze changes in Marseille's poles from 1978 to 1985 and compare poles between the two cities using different frequency thresholds.
This document describes a methodology for analyzing and visualizing the research output of academic institutions using classification codes from the Chemical Abstracts database. It applies this methodology to compare the chemistry research from the cities of Marseille and Montpellier in France between 1982-1986. The results are presented as 3D graphs of the main research poles and 2D networks showing relationships between poles based on shared classification codes. Examples analyze changes in Marseille's poles from 1978 to 1985 and compare poles between the two cities using different frequency thresholds.
This document describes a methodology for analyzing and visualizing the research output of academic institutions using classification codes from the Chemical Abstracts database. It applies this methodology to compare the chemistry research from the cities of Marseille and Montpellier in France between 1982-1986. The results are presented as 3D graphs of the main research poles and 2D networks showing relationships between poles based on shared classification codes. Examples analyze changes in Marseille's poles from 1978 to 1985 and compare poles between the two cities using different frequency thresholds.
INFOGRAPHIC ANALYTICAL TOOLS FOR DECISION MAKERS ANALYSIS OF THE RESEARCH PRODUCTION IN SCIENCES. APPLICATION TO CHEMISTRY, COMPARISON BETWEEN MARSEILLE AND MONTPELLIER (FRANCE) H. DOU, P. HASSANALY, L. QUONIAM Centre de Recherche Retrospective de Marseille UA126 CNRS, Universite Aix-Marsezlle I11 - 1339 7 Marseille Cedex 13 (France) (Received September 14, 1988) Most of the scientific and technical databases contain codes. These codes divide the area of the database field in subfields. These divisions can be used t o map automatically the research network of a subject, and to provide its main research poles. The present paper explains the methodology, and applies it to Chemical Abstracts, and to the analysis of the research production of various academic institutions. The method is general and can be used with other databases such as Inspec, WPI-WPIL, etc. . . Introduction During the process of decision in sciences, the production of a scientific commun- ity, of an institution, is often analyzed in various ways. But, when the volume of this production is too important (e.g. several hundreds of papers) it is very difficult t o obtain a fast and realistic view of all the results. We developped in our laboratory various softwares t o analyze the scientific litera- ture from downloaded references coming from different databases. An infographic analysis dealing with the chemical production of two important university communi- ties in France will be presented in this paper. Methodology When an expert group, or a peer review, is concerned with several thousands of items (e.g. the scientific production of a large group, or of several institutions loc- ated in the same town, . . .) their fealings follow very often an irrational point of view, where rumors, self-knowledge, polical interest, lobbies, play a large part.' Scientometrics 17 (1989) Elsevier, Amstenlam-Oxford-New York- Tokyo Akaddmiai Kiadd, Budapest H. DOU et al.: TOOLS FOR DECISION MAKERS This attitude is very general, because it is almost impossible to have a synthetic view of all the subjects, and to be able, in a minimum amount of time to make a global, reliable, and unquestionable comparisons. This is the reason we prompt us to develop a method which will fill this gap. Interested in chemistry and physics, we choose the Chemical Abstracts database as a source of informations for the purpose of this paper. This database indexes all the scientific publications, patents, reports, . . . and references are available online, they contain several fields such as authors, titles, indexterms, codes, etc. The following example shows two references dealing with the oxidation of coal, obtained from the host ORBIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES.2 AN - CA05-87508(10) TI - Electrochemical synthesis of humic acid and other partially oxidized carbon- aceous materials AU - Vaughan, Ronald J. SO - U.S. 4592814, 12 pp. Cont.-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 496, 799, abandoned., 86.06.03 PAT APP = 653664, 84.09.21, PAT PRTY = 496799 (IN US), 83.05.23, PCL 204178 PCL (IPC) C25B-003102A OS - Chevron Research Co., USA DT - P (Patent) CC - SEC72-7; SEC5; SEC19; SEC49 AN - CA05-85796(10) TI - Mechanism of potassium-catalyzed carbonlcarbon dioxide reaction AU - Sams, D. A.; Shadman, Farhang SO - AIChE J. (AICEAC), V 32 (7), p. 1 132-7, 1986, ISSN 000 1 1541 OS - Univ. Arizona, Dep. Chem. Eng., Tucson (AZ), USA, 85721 DT - J (Journal) CC - SEC67-2 In this references, the CC field (category code field), is very interesting, since in Chemical Abstracts the papers indexed are allocated in sections. There are 80 sec- tions to cover all the chemistry. For the period of time analyzed the division re- mains ~ o n s t a n t . ~ f ~ This field may contain one section or several sections. The first, primary section deals with the main part of the work, and the others, secondary or cross reference sections deal with side applications of the subject. These fields (e.g. the CC) may be automatically analyzed, and will lead to: - the main poles of research, using primary sections, - the network of these poles with the other part of chemistry, using the secondary sections. The list of the 80 Chemical Abstracts sections are indicated in the Appendix. I H. DOU et a].: TOOLS FOR DECISION MAKERS The presentations of the results are made in 3D for the main research poles, and in 2D for the research network of these poles. Because the network can be rather complicated in some cases, a zoom function allows to isolate the network of one pole if nece~sary.' 1~ Results 8 The references have been selected using the query: 1 MARSEILLE/CI with limitations by date, and the same for MONTPELLIER. The production of these two Centres are indicated in Table 1. 9 Table 1 Comparison of the scientific productions of Marseille and Montpellier between 1982 and 1986 Amount of references Years Marseille Montpellier The research poles: For the clarity of the presentation, we will present only the comparison between year 1985 for Marseille and Montpellier. To illustrate the differences occurring with time, the year 1978 will be also used for Marseille. The Figures 1 and 2 represent the research poles of Marseille, (years 1978 and 1985) and the Figs 3 and 4 the research poles for Montpellier using two thresholds. In the graphs, the sections are presented always at the same place, on a chess board where section 1 is at the upper left, and section 80 at the lower right. The frequency of the items (e.g. references with the same primary section) is the number of publications appearing in the time interval. This is the height of the cylinders. It is possible t o use a frequency filter, and t o consider various thresholds. Figures 3 and 4 show for the town of Montpellier the same analysis with a threshold above 0.5% and 2.5% of the overall number of references analyzed. This threshold can be Scientometrics 17 (1 989) 63 H. DOU et al.: TOOLS FOR DECISION MAKERS Pole principal 22 22 physical organic chemistry 2 46 C 01 u e 0 LL 23 0 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 Sections Fig. 1. Research poles at Marseille, year 1978, using a threshol'd of 5 Pole principal 66 66 surface chemistry and colloids Sections Fig. 2. Research poles at Marseille, year 1985, using a threshold of 5 determined in various ways, for instance in per cent of the main research pole, etc . . . but in our opinion, working in per cent of the total production seems to be the best. This give a good indication of the scattering of the subjects, and of the per- ception of these later by outside observers. 64 Scientornetrics I7 (1989) H. DOU et al.: TOOLS FOR DECISION MAKERS Pole principal 2 2 mammalian hormones Sections Fig. 3. Research poles at Montpellier, year 1985, using a threshold of 2 Pole principal 2 2 mammal~an hormones Sec t ~ons Fig. 4. Research poles in Montpellier, year 1985, using a threshold of 15 The research network: The network, when all the sections are considered, is too complicated to give valuable informations. It can only be used to spot the main knots of the system and to have an overview of the multidisciplinarity of the researchs. The use of the zoom function is more accurate. Once a significant section is identified by its number, Scientometrics 17 (1 989) 65 H. DOU et al.: TOOLS FOR DECISION MAKERS 2 4 Fig. 5. Zoom of pole 1 (Marseille, 1982, Fig. 6. Zoom of pole 1 (Marseille 1985, pharmacology) pharmacology) Fig. 7 . Zoom of pole (Marseille 1985, Fig. 8. Zoom of pole 1 (Montpellier 1985, Mammalian hormones) pharmacology) either from the preceding graph or as a main research pole, it is possible to see the network in which this pole is inserted. We analyzed automatically all the references which have in the CC field two or more sections, and the program generate all the bounds between sections. In the zoom function, when a pole is considered, only references with this pole present as primary section are analyzed. 66 Scientometrics 17 (1 989) H. DOU et al.: TOOLS FOR DECISION MAKERS Results are presented in Figs 5 to 9 where Figs 5 to 7 represent the zoom of poles 1 (pharmacology) and 2 (mammalian hormones) for Marseille for years 1982 1985, and Figs 8 and 9 the zooms of poles 1 @harmacology) and 2 (mammalian hormones) for Montpellier, for year 1985. 14 Fig. 9. Zoom of pole 2 (Montpellier 1985; mammalian hormones) In the software there is also a frequency filter which allows t o select the research poles above a certain threshold. In this paper, the threshold of 2 has been used, this means that only primary sections (with one or more secondary sections present) ap- pearing at least twice are considered t o built the network. 7 Discussion The comparisons between the research poles is a mean to follow the trends in research in Marseille and Montpellier. If the changes are small in short time intervals (1, 3 years), they can be very drastic for a longer period. The examples of year 1978 and 1985 for Marseille are very significant. The analysis suggests the following ques- tions: - Why -a very strong pole such as Physical Organic Chemistry, disappeared between 1978 and 1985? is this due to the lack of equipment, labour force, incentive,. . .? - Why poles 1 and 2 have had during the same period such a fast growth? - What will be the consequences of this growth on the other parts of chemistry? (When the networks are concerned, we can see that the number of bounds for pole Scientornetrics 1 7 (1 989) 67 H. DOU et al.: TOOLS FOR DECISION MAKERS 1 and 2 in Marseille are lower than for Montpellier. This can be explained because a strong tradition in these 2 disciplines (pharmacology and mammalien hormones) exists in Montpellier. The fundamental question is t o know if and when pole 1 and 2 in Marseille will have a better integration in the scientific network of chemistry. Analysis of years 1986 and 1987 begins t o provide an answer, since the density of the network in- creases. Analysis of all the research poles, as well as comparisons can be made if necessary The goal of this paper is not to present all the possible applications of this method, but t o reinforce the role of softwares which will help decision makers, committees, councils, t o analyze in term of network, expertise, . . . the output of databases providing meaningful codes. In this frame, various analysis have been performed in - our laboratory using databases such as WPI-WPIL (Derwent codes, Patents), Biosis (Biocodes), Predicast (Economy), Inspec (Physic). Appendix List of Chemical Abstracts sections 1. pharmacology 2 mammalian hormones 3 biochemical genetics 4 toxicology 5 agrochemical bioregulators 6 gelleral biochemistry 7 enzymes 8 radiation biochemistry 9 biochemical methods 10 microbial biochemistry 11 plant bioch'emistry 12 nonmammalian biochemistry 13 mammalian biochemistry 14 mammalian pathological biochemistry 15 irnmunochemistry 16 fermentation and bioindustrial chemistry 17 food and feed chemistry 18 animal nutrition 19 fertilizers, soils, and plant nutrition Scientornetrics 17 (1989) H. DOU et al.: TOOLS FOR DECISION MAKERS 20 history, education, and documentation 21 general organic chemistry 22 physical organic chemistry 23 aliphatic compounds 24 alicyclic compounds 25 benzene, its derivatives, and condensed benzoid compounds 26 biomolecules and their synthetic analogs 27 heterocyclic compounds (one hetero atom) 28 heterocyclic compounds (more than one hetero atom) 29 organometallic and organometalloidal compounds 30 terpenes and terpenoids 31 alkaloids 32 steroids 33 carbohydrates 34 amino acids, peptides, and proteins 35 chemistry of synthetic high polymers 36 physical properties of synthetic high polymers 37 plastics manufacture and processing 38 plastics fabrications and uses 39 synthetic elastomers and natural rubber 4 0 textiles 41 dyes, organic pigments, fluorescent brighteners, and photographic sensitizers 42 coating, inks, and related products 43 cellulose, lignin, paper, and other wood products 44 industrial carbohydrates 45 industrial organic chemicals, leather, fats, and waxes 46 surface-active agents and detergents 47 apparatus and plant equipment 48 unit operations and processes 49 industrial inorganic chemicals 50 propellants and explosives 5 1 fossil fuels, derivatives, and related products 52 electrochemical, radiational, and thermal energy technology 53 mineralogical and geological chemistry 54 extractive metallurgy 55 ferrous metals and alloys 56 nonferrous metals and alloys 57 ceramics 58 cement, concrete, and related building materials Scientometrics 17 (1 989) H. DOU et al.: TOOLS FOR DECISION MAKERS 59 air pollution and industrial hygiene 60 waste treatment and disposal 6 1 water 62 essential oils and cosmetics 63 pharmaceuticals 64 pharmaceutical analysis 65 general physical chemistry 66 surface chemistry and colloids *. 67 catalysis, reaction kinetics, and inorganic reaction mechanisms 68 phase equilibriums, chemical equilibriums and solutions 1 69 thermodynamics, thermochemistry, and thermal properties 70 nuclear phenomena i 7 1 nuclear technology 8 I 72 electrochemistry 73 optical, electron, and mass spectroscopy and other related properties ! 1 74 radiation chemistry, photochemistry, and photographic and other reprographii ! processes 75 crystallography and liquid crystals 76 electric phenomena 77 magnetic phenomena 78 inorganic chemicals and reactions 79 inorganic analytical chemistry 80 organic analytical chemistry References 1. British-French seminar: The indicators for science and technology policy. December 1986, London. 2. Orbit Information Technologies, Achiles House, Park Royal, Western av 30UA, London, England. We like to thank very much the Orbit Information Technologies for its help in providing our laboratory with online chemical informations datas. 3. Subject Coverage and Arrangement of Abstracts by Sections in Chemical Abstracts, Editor American Chemical Society; 1982. 4. K. SHINICHIRO, Changes in sections of Chemical Abstracts, Shikoku Kokenkai Ho, 33 (1982) 2-6. 5. H. DOU, P. HASSANALY, . MESSIANE, Le traitemets des codes par micro-ordinateurs, Symposium on "Les systemes d'information elaboree", Ile Rousse, September 1987, France. 6. H. DOU, P. HASSANALY, Mapping the Scientific network of patent and non-patent documents from chemical abstracts for a fast scientometric analysis, World Patent information, 2 (1988, 1 Juin). Scientometrics I7 ( I 989)
(IFAC Symposia Series) International Federation of Automatic Control, C. McGreavy-Dynamics and Control of Chemical Reactors and Distillation Columns. Selected Papers from the IFAC Symposium, Bournemou.pdf